Contents
1. Transcript
1.1. Session 1 (August 8, 2009)
-
Grassian
- This is Esther Grassian interviewing Mimi Dudley, Miriam Sue Dudley, on
Sunday, August 8, 2009, at Mimi's apartment in Van Nuys. It is about ten
to eleven in the morning.So Mimi, let's start with your family background and your early
childhood. When and where were you born?
-
Dudley
- I was born in Minot, North Dakota. My family--my mother [Gita Lea Feldman
Feinstein; in 1939 changed to Leah Feldman Fine] came to North Dakota
when she was eleven, from Estonia. My father [Henry "Hank" Phillips
Feinstein; in 1939 changed to Henry Hank Phillips Fine] was born in
Grand Forks North Dakota. They met in Minneapolis and returned to Minot,
where she'd been since she was eleven. She was one of seven children
[Gita Lea Feldman Fine, Norman Feldman, Rose Feldman Straus, Esther
Feldman, Zalman Feldman, Edel Feldman, Rivala Feldman], and Minot was a
very important place in our lives, although I left at fifteen months.
However, I did go visit relatives.I was born in 1924, December twenty-fifth.
-
Grassian
- Okay. When you said you left, did you mean that you--
-
Dudley
- At fifteen months, my folks established roots in Los Angeles, and the
grandparents did as well.
-
Grassian
- Okay. Were those your mother's parents [Chaim Feldman and Shayne Feldman]
or your father's parents [Nahum Labe and Jenny Phillips Feinstien]?
-
Dudley
- Yes, my mother's. No, no, no, no, no. My father's parents came with us to
Los Angeles. My mother's parents stayed in Minot and several of her
brothers and sisters stayed there, so I visited them in my teens and
later on.
-
Grassian
- How much education did your parents have?
-
Dudley
- My father went to school in Grand Forks [North Dakota] and then later in
Minneapolis, and he went through high school. That was it. My mother
went to school in Minot, and she went to secretarial school in
Minneapolis. She met somebody in Minneapolis and married and had a son.
However, I guess she came back to Minot and then my father came to visit
somebody in Minot and fell madly in love with her, and with the help of
her father persuaded her to marry. It was a wonderful, tempestuous,
exciting marriage. They were exciting people.
-
Grassian
- Did your parents work?
-
Dudley
- Oh, my mother was--yes, she did secretarial work. She was very political,
and she was with the Wobblies in Minneapolis. My father, he studied a
great deal. He studied in public libraries, and he learned what he
needed to know about vitamins, and he established the Vitamin Flour and
Milling Company in downtown Los Angeles on Alpine Street. Then from then
on he--well, they used food-pressing equipment, and he learned about
presses and went into the record business later. He owned a
record--well, he worked with Mercury Records, as did Norm [husband,
Norman Dudley] later.
-
Grassian
- Well, that's very interesting. But just a quick question. When you said
Vitamin Flour and Milling, did you mean they milled things to make
vitamins?
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes. He really learned what he was doing about food
chemistry by going to public libraries and studying. He studied in
Chicago. He made a particular trip to Chicago to study what he needed to
know. He was a very, very bright, intense kind of person.
-
Grassian
- So libraries figured largely in your family background.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- Did he talk about it a lot?
-
Dudley
- It was very, very important, yes. When I was six--we moved around a great
deal. It was in the depression. I think we moved whenever the rent was
due, but that's how I knew so many areas, why I know so many areas of
Los Angeles. The first thing that he would do is look for the public
library and from the time I was six on, I had a library card and spent a
lot of time in libraries. It's interesting, I never connected that.
-
Grassian
- That's very interesting. You mentioned that you have a brother, or a
half-brother [Fred Fine]. Did you have any other brothers or sisters?
-
Dudley
- It was a deep, dark secret in Minot, North Dakota, that Mother had been
married twice, so we didn't know that we were half-brother and sister
until after my mother's death. [laughs] So he was three years older than
I. My sister [Edelle Fine] is six years younger. My sister died at the
age of eleven. My brother lived into fairly old age.
-
Grassian
- You love to read. How did your family influence your reading interests?
-
Dudley
- Well, my father was a library user, and my mother--Mother, as I said,
there were seven of them in the family, and two of her sisters [Esther
and Rivala] lived with us almost their whole lives, well, no, until
marriage. She too, the younger sister [Edelle], she was ten years older
than I, always saw to it that I could get to libraries. It's really
through family. I didn't know any librarians personally. I probably
worshipped them and was afraid of them, but I didn't--it was not through
the influence of librarians. It was family. And my father had a lot of
books. In the family are still some of my father's bookcases. Oh, and I
had to have permission to read them. I wasn't allowed just to read
something without his permission, which, of course, led to a great deal
of sneaking of books.
-
Grassian
- So that made them more mysterious and valuable, because you weren't
permitted to read them.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, yes. And I could only use the children's section of the library
for--I finally did get permission--I think I was about ten or eleven--to
go into the adult section of the library. I don't know if that's still a
rule or not.
-
Grassian
- I don't know. Okay, so now let's talk about where you grew up. You said
that your family moved to L.A. when you were fifteen months old, so
where--
-
Dudley
- Yes. We lived in--again, what was important to my father was that we be
in a particular school district. The school district--it was 24th Street
School [in Los Angeles], very near the Clark Library, and although we
moved--this was the West Adams area. It had big, huge old houses, and in
every house in that area was a library and a butler's pantry and, oh,
three or four or five bedrooms, and I think probably during the
depression they rented for very, very little, because they wanted to
have them occupied. That was near the 24th Street School, so that was
West Adams area.Later we moved to Venice [California] and still later to the
Beverly-Robertson area, yes, and then around La Cienega, Beverly
[Boulevard] and La Cienega [Boulevard in Los Angeles], where there were
oil wells, and about then is when I left home, I think, and moved. My
first home was in Tujunga [in southern California]. I had a
four-hundred-square-foot house in Tujunga when I was in college [UCLA],
and it was quite a distance from UCLA, but it worked. Later I told Norm
that that was my favorite house, and it hurt his feelings terribly.
[laughs] It was my first house.
-
Grassian
- So you mentioned the 24th Street School. That was a public school, I'm
guessing.
-
Dudley
- Yes.
-
Grassian
- Did it have a library, and do you remember other schools you went to?
-
Dudley
- It had a book room. It had a book room where, yes, there were books
available that you could read in the daytime. You couldn't take them
home with you. But I could read during recess, and I was a very early
reader and an intense reader.
-
Grassian
- The libraries that were in the houses that you lived in, in the West
Adams area, were those stocked with books?
-
Dudley
- Oh, no, no, no. This was our own--they rented them. They were not
furnished. We brought our own furniture with us, and we brought my
father's bookcases all over with us.
-
Grassian
- Okay, so you moved your books, his books.
-
Dudley
- We moved. Oh, when I say we probably moved, yes, we probably moved four
or five times.
-
Grassian
- Within the L.A. [Los Angeles] area.
-
Dudley
- Yes. And my father loved L.A., and he knew a great deal about it too.
-
Grassian
- And so you lived in the West Adams area and the Venice area. Do you
remember the other--
-
Dudley
- Well, Beverly-La Cienega. I don't know what area that is. But during the
early years it was mostly West Adams. A wonderful principal at the 24th
Street School, and it is interesting. Well, in my present day life I
meet people who went to that school, and through life I have. I've never
quite understood that, but it was a very sought-after school with a
little system, library system.The Clark Library attracted me. It was always a few blocks from where we
lived, and I couldn't go into the Clark Library, but I could look into
it. Oh, and the grounds were available, and they still are available.
There was a telescope that [William Andrews] Clark meant to be--it's
still in the will actually--available to the public, and the kids could
climb up into the tower and use the telescope.
-
Grassian
- Did you do that?
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, yes. But mostly I'd look at the house. The house is now gone.
The library was built; now I don't remember the date. But the old house
stayed there until I would think maybe the seventies or something like
that. It was used as a storehouse for "L.A. Times" for a while. But by
the time I saw it, the grounds had been enlarged.
-
Grassian
- Wow. When you said a storehouse for the "L.A. Times", do you mean the
print copies of old newspapers?
-
Dudley
- Yes, old newspapers. I think probably in the sixties they needed to empty
the house and tear it down, but that would be interesting to check the
date of it.
-
Grassian
- I'll see if I can find that. Okay, let's talk a little bit about the
kinds of careers that you considered and what influenced you to become a
librarian when you were young.
-
Dudley
- I did my undergraduate work at UCLA and loved it. Well, I became an
English major, and that was meant for me and I for it. After I completed
my undergraduate work, I rather aimlessly started to work on a master's
in English under Hugh Dick. My term project was a bibliography. The
library had just obtained the Olive Percival Collection, which was a
collection of children's books. Olive [May Graves] Percival was a local
realtor, who was a collector. There are books written about Olive
Percival. But she had just died, and I don't know how we got the
collection, but we did.It's an historical collection of children's books and of miniatures, and
I did a descriptive bibliography of the poetry in the collection. I met
Bob [Robert] Vosper, who was the assistant university librarian at the
time. Hugh Dick introduced us, and I was a goner for bibliography. I
continued the course, and in the course of taking Hugh Dick's course I
met a guy who had come to Los Angeles to complete a degree. He was a
librarian in New York, and he needed to go see the dean at USC, because
I think it was connected with his work. She turned to me--I don't
remember, her name may have been Pulling [Hazel Adele Pulling] or
Pullman. She turned to me in the middle of the conversation and said,
"And what are you doing?" [laughs] And before I left, I decided to go to
library school there. We didn't have a library school at UCLA. We had
one at [University of California] Berkeley and one at, it wasn't Mount
St. Mary's, it was another Catholic school. I can't remember the name of
it anymore.So I entered library school totally because of that bibliography course,
and my first job was as bibliographer, which I will go into now. No?
-
Grassian
- If you would like.
-
Dudley
- All right. [laughs] I didn't like library school very much, because it
didn't focus on bibliography, which was my interest. But I did take a
reference course and whatever else was required at the time. I still
lived in Tujunga, and it was a long drive to USC, so the first thing
that I did was make arrangements to have the course completed in two
years instead of one, so that I wouldn't have to drive to USC from
Tujunga all that often. But I did stick it out. I didn't like library
school, but I certainly liked everything that I knew about bibliography
and reference. I did fall in love with reference.When I was ready to graduate from library school, I didn't have anything
particular in mind. I think I just wanted more bibliography. My friend
Fauna Finger, who was graduating at the same time I was, said, "Well,
are you starting work on Monday?" And I said, "No." And she said, "Well,
you know, Bob Vosper is expecting you. That position is being held for
you." And either I didn't understand, or it didn't--at any rate, I
phoned and he said, "Is Monday going to work for you?" I said, "Yes."
And I was what was called a bibliographic checker, which meant checking
orders to be sure--it was in acquisitions, and they were orders
initiated by Lawrence Clark Powell for the most part, but faculty and
bibliographers. So it was a small library then. I remember when we got
our millionth volume that was a very big deal. But it was large enough
so that we did need to check all orders. We weren't swamped with orders,
but there were four of us [Mimi Dudley, Charlotte Spence, Dorothy
Harmon, and Kathy].It was very interesting that Larry Powell did a lot of ordering himself,
and I did some in the people I was interested in, and after I'd been
there a couple of weeks, he came out and asked if I was going to do a
book on--it was Ivy Compton Burnett, because I was ordering her as she
appeared. And, no, I wasn't. I was just interested in that. But that he
could notice who ordered what gives you an idea of how small the library
was.
-
Grassian
- So there were four librarians doing bib checking?
-
Dudley
- Right, in acquisitions. Two of them had been there for a long time and
knew the library and knew the library system, but it took me a while to
learn. And I stayed in that position all the time, that early period at
the library. That was in--oh, I was going to look this up. It was 1949,
yes, July first, 1949, because Norah Jones started work the same day and
just recently she called me and said, "We celebrate July first, don't
we?" [laughter] So I started in 1949.
-
Grassian
- So you, in a way, accidentally started working at the UCLA Library.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- But it wasn't something that you planned, because you didn't really know
about it.
-
Dudley
- No, no, no, I didn't really. I didn't. I was very misty. I guess I didn't
know what I was doing, but I remember that it was a shocker to me that,
oh, I didn't know that I'd made a commitment. Well, and another thing is
that my career at SC [University of Southern California], when
graduation came close, the dean [Hazel Adele Pulling] told me that I
needed one more course, and I wasn't about to do that. So she arranged
that all I had to do was pay tuition for the one course, which was a
real, real shocker to me, but she took care of it. Isn't that a shocker?
They didn't do that at UCLA.
-
Grassian
- You paid tuition, but you didn't take the class.
-
Dudley
- That's right.
-
Grassian
- Interesting. So when you were working at the UCLA Library, there was just
one library, right, Powell [Library]?
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- What was the physical environment like in Powell then?
-
Dudley
- Oh, the remodeling of the Powell has all been--it's really been
rearrangement of departments. Very little changes were done for a number
of years. Any additions--a wing was added in, I think, '45. It was
L-shaped until '45, but by the time I got there, that was really all the
exterior changes. When you entered that library, the Reserve Book Room
was up the short flight of stairs to your right. Downstairs to your
right as you entered was the Music Library, the Engineering [Library] or
as much as we had of the engineering, and the Biomedical Library. The
Biomedical Library was in one room. That was--Louise Darling came very
shortly--about the same time I did, and there were other libraries there
that I'm not remembering. But it was all in one--we were a one-building
library, and it was very good, because we could watch all of the
collections develop.I believe that there was the beginning of a Music Library. That's sort of
vague. Upstairs was the library. The Reference [Department], the main
reading room, didn't change much, although at one time they did block
off one end of it for offices, but that's gone now. The West Wing, I
guess, is what it was, was blocked off, and I had an office there. All
of the--we were later bibliographers. No, later we were called
bibliographers, yes; reference librarians. There were bibliographers,
yes. Bibliographers were hired later. But Reference did take over the
space at the end of the building at the main reading room, and let's see
what else upstairs. Well, everything, everything was there.
-
Grassian
- Sort of behind the scenes?
-
Dudley
- Yes. Of course, the stacks were all contained in the building. It was
much later, I think, that there were additional stacks built. That was
after I left, really. That must have been in the--
-
Grassian
- And the staff that worked behind the scenes, catalogers, acquisitions--
-
Dudley
- Oh, all of us. They were all up there, catalog and acquisitions in
the--am I right? Was it the North Wing or the West Wing? The wing you're
in now.
-
Grassian
- I'm directionally challenged. I get mixed up.
-
Dudley
- Let me think. Yes, it was the West Wing, and it still is the West Wing,
yes, where you guys are.
-
Grassian
- Do you remember about what percentage of the librarian workforce were
men?
-
Dudley
- Administrators were all men. The librarian, the assistant librarian, the
associate librarians, they were all men. Lawrence Clark Powell was the
librarian, and Bob Vosper was assistant. Andy [Andrew Harlis] Horn and
Neal Harlow were Special Collections. Gifts and Exchanges grew, and it
was a man. Oh, yes, yes, there were a couple of reference librarians who
were men [David Herron, Richard O'Brian], but the rest were all women,
so I don't know what percentage that would be.
-
Grassian
- Well, how many just total librarians do you think there were, but not
counting administrators?
-
Dudley
- Oh, total reference librarians at that time was probably eight or ten.
Acquisitions, there were six librarians. All of us were women. Oh, the
head of acquisitions was a man; that was [John] Johnny Smith.
Cataloging, let me thing. In cataloging at that time the head of
cataloging was a man [Rudolph "Rudy" Ingelbarts], and maybe there were
twenty catalogers.
-
Grassian
- Were there dress codes for women librarians then?
-
Dudley
- Oh, yes. Oh, yes. It was just assumed that they wouldn't need any, but at
one point, women started wearing slacks, and it was decided by--well,
this was a great deal later. Oh, by that time it was the sixties. Nobody
ever, ever wore pants to work. A meeting was called, and it was decreed
that women could wear pants to work, but it was pantsuits, not pants. I
remember being told that by that they meant to dress the way Janice
Koyama dressed, and Janice Koyama was properly dressed.
-
Grassian
- How about the men? How did the men dress?
-
Dudley
- Men wore suits. Men wore suits. Yes, all of them wore suits. They
continued really to wear suits for almost all the time I was there.
-
Grassian
- Do you remember any sort of behavior that we might call sexual harassment
now?
-
Dudley
- No, I don't. I don't. There were no episodes that I experienced or that
were brought to my attention. There were marriages within the staff. I
want to think about that a little bit more. No, not that we knew about.
The men were all managers. They were all in the management class, and I
don't remember them even having much to do with us.
-
Grassian
- So the men were managers and they didn't have much to do with you. So
they made decisions on their own then?
-
Dudley
- Oh, yes. Oh, yes. Oh, yes. There were no committees. There were, I'm
sure, consultations when we started purchasing a great deal of
purchasing. Then Larry Powell went to Europe. He took the whole Library
of Congress catalog with him. But they did start hiring subject
specialists who--almost all of them had doctorates, and they all had
library degrees, but subject specialties as well. That was a while
later.
-
Grassian
- I'm not sure I know what you mean when you say he took the Library of
Congress catalog with him.
-
Dudley
- Well, the whole LC [Library of Congress] catalog. It was photographed
volumes of the card catalog. At first it was photographed collection. It
was many, many volumes, I don't remember how many, but, oh, surely into
the hundreds. You do know it. You know it. Do you think maybe it's into
the hundreds?
-
Grassian
- It could be. What year was that, that he took--do you remember
approximately?
-
Dudley
- Well, it was in the early fifties, in the early fifties.
-
Grassian
- So he took all those volumes with him for--
-
Dudley
- He took it with him, yes, for purchasing, because he went on a purchasing
expedition.
-
Grassian
- Oh, and so he could check to see if we already, or LC--
-
Dudley
- And he bought--that's right, right, right, what our holdings were, or
what the LC--that's right. And LC did tell where those books were held.
-
Grassian
- Okay, wow.
-
Dudley
- Then, of course, later they sent--well, they sent bibliographers to do
purchasing, but he was the first one who went to Europe himself and did
all that, and to establish contacts with book sellers.
-
Grassian
- So regarding the library administration, when Powell was the main
library, since the librarians didn't have much contact with the
administrators, and the administrators or the managers were mostly men
and they made decisions, I'm guessing that there wasn't anything that
you could do if there was something that you objected to.
-
Dudley
- No, no. We were all nominally free to make suggestions about book
collection, which was really my interest at that time. We were not only
free, we were encouraged to select books. But as far as management is
concerned, no, we--no.
-
Grassian
- Okay. So I actually skipped over some things I was going to ask you.
-
Dudley
- Please, please, go back, yes.
-
Grassian
- So this is fascinating. I wanted to ask a few more things way back
earlier. I wanted to ask you, going back to your field of interest, how
you got interested in librarianship when you were young. So do you
remember what you wanted to be when you were growing up? When did you
first think about being a librarian?
-
Dudley
- Not until I was a graduate in graduate library school, in graduate
English at UCLA. It wasn't anything that I had thought about or
considered. I didn't relate in that way to the librarians at the public
libraries.
-
Grassian
- Okay, so that's right. You did say that. Did you have any jobs when you
were in high school or as an undergrad?
-
Dudley
- I had one job. I worked in a soda and sandwich shop in high school, and I
think it was very good experience for being a reference librarian. Later
on, when I was helping interview and select people for the college
library, I gave special credence to people who'd had that waitressing
experience. I think public service experience is very, very important,
and to me, that's really what was most appealing for a long time at my
job at UCLA.
-
Grassian
- So now I'm going forward chronologically, as I should have done before
but I didn't.
-
Dudley
- I interrupted you, that's why.
-
Grassian
- No, no, my fault. So now talking about the major changes in your life. So
you've been married to Norman for many years. Can you tell me how you
met and when?
-
Dudley
- Fifty-eight, fifty-eight years. Yes. Well, we met in our psychoanalyst's
[Alex Blumstein] office. Our appointments were about the same time, and
we met, and then we were in group therapy together, and we learned a
great deal about each other, a great deal. Oh, after our appointments,
we would talk for long, long, long periods of time, and we started
dating, and as we were being--we went to Las Vegas when we decided to
marry. We decided one evening, and we just drove there. And as we were
being married, I looked over at Norm and realized he was much taller
than I. Next day I went to work, and somebody said, "What color are his
eyes?" And I had to phone him to ask. [laughter] Ours was very much a
sitting and talking relationship. But I've always remembered that.And Norm at the time was doing sales work, and my father really, really
wanted him in his business, which was the record business by that time,
and Norman did become the West Coast distributor for Mercury Records.
That was fun, and he enjoyed it. The headquarters for Mercury was
Chicago, so I think I skipped part of my life. I don't know how that
could have happened. But when I was fifteen, I did go to school in
Chicago for a year, and I didn't like it at all. I could hardly wait to
get back to Los Angeles. The cold of Chicago was all that I remembered,
so when Norm first started going to Chicago a lot, I didn't go along. It
took me some time to get to know it and love it again.
-
Grassian
- I'm just curious. Why did you go to school [Hyde Park High School] in
Chicago for a year?
-
Dudley
- Oh, my father was putting up a record plant there. He and my mother and
my younger sister were there for a long time before I decided that I
needed to go too, or they decided I needed to. So I shopped for a proper
winter coat in Los Angeles, and I liked it a lot. It was chic and wooly.
Got to Chicago and got off the train and a chill struck me, and it
lasted the whole year I was in Chicago. I really wasn't there for a
whole year. My mother and I went to Carson, Pirie, Scott on Monday and
bought a coat, a proper Chicago coat that weighted me down, and I felt
that way that whole year, so that was my Chicago experience up until
Norm started going there a lot, and then ALA [American Library
Association] being there was what really won me over.
-
Grassian
- Okay. So getting back to you and Norman, were you already a librarian
when you and Norman got married?
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- But you said he was in the music industry--
-
Dudley
- Right.
-
Grassian
- --or he worked for your father.
-
Dudley
- Well, he worked for my father for a while and then he became the West
Coast distributor. My father was pressing records then, and Norm learned
a lot about records and the record industry from my father. But he
really liked--it was fun. It was fun for both of us. He needed to tout
all the Mercury Records people around town and around the country, and I
did some of that traveling with him, and that was a taste of showbiz
that was fun. Norm did that for about ten years. We bought a house in
the valley, and when the boys [Noah and Seth Dudley] were born, we
bought a bigger house in the Hollywood Hills. Those were really fun
years.But we figured out at the end of ten years that we could live on savings,
in order for Norm to go to graduate school, saving and some scrimping,
and he decided he wanted to go to library school. He liked everything he
knew about it, and he liked our friends. So the boys were eleven and
twelve when he went to library school, and he loved it. He loved being
in library school, and his first job was at UCLA, went to UCLA Library
School [UCLA Graduate School of Library Science]. They hired him
immediately, and he had some interesting jobs. You want me to go into
Norman's interesting jobs?
-
Grassian
- Certainly.
-
Dudley
- Okay. [laughs] Oh, by that time, of course, I had left. We had the two
boys. I'm going to stop for a minute and talk about that. Our first son,
Noah, was born in the valley [San Fernando Valley], and when he was
seventeen months old, Seth was born. It was our goal to have five of
them, but that's really as far as we went. But the two boys--that was
Seth--grew up together in the house in Hollywood, and the boys went to
Hollywood High School. The house was very meaningful to all of us. I'm
getting lost.
-
Grassian
- Okay. Well, you were saying that Norman had some interesting jobs when he
became a librarian.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes. His first job was--the UCLA Library was just moving in to the
University Research Library, into what's now the Young Research Library,
and his first job was to figure out things about the move. He did that
with Paul Miles, and it was an extremely--there are specialists to do
that now, but at that time there weren't, and they figured it out, Paul
and Andy Horn, who later became dean of the library school. So they did
that and then Norman worked for a year as a reference librarian in the
college library, which was downstairs by that time, in the college
library.
-
Grassian
- By downstairs you mean downstairs in the Powell Library building. The
move happened, I believe, in 1965. Is that correct? About 1965, the move
from Powell to what is now YRL but then was URL, University Research
Library.
-
Dudley
- Right. And the plan of moving the books was what he worked on.
-
Grassian
- Yes, okay. So that was his first job.
-
Dudley
- That was his first job, and then he worked for a year as a reference
librarian. Then he became the Acquisitions Librarian, and that meant the
Acquisitions Department was under him. Oh, yes, and the book selectors,
that was it. It was the people who were hired by that time to do book
selection were experts in their fields, and Norm by that time was
establishing contracts with the booksellers around the world really, and
hiring people to do that. Then I think the bibliographers themselves
went to whichever country. That's right. Norman sent them to whichever
country they were responsible for.
-
Grassian
- So he was the first person who, it sounds like, sent bibliographers out
to different countries to buy books, as opposed to Vosper [this was
actually Powell], who went by himself and took the whole hundreds huge
volumes with him.
-
Dudley
- Yes, to help in selection.
-
Grassian
- How did the bibliographers figure out what we had, or did they know their
areas well enough?
-
Dudley
- Oh, they knew their areas. They were extremely well educated in their
areas, and they were librarians. I know since they have hired people
without the library degree, but at the time, they had to be both.
-
Grassian
- And they didn't have to take the hundred-volume catalog with them.
-
Dudley
- No. [laughs]
-
Grassian
- Okay. Who was Norman working under when he was an AUL [Assistant
University Librarian]? When did he become an AUL, and who was he working
under, do you remember?
-
Dudley
- I think it was Vosper. It was Vosper, yes, I'm pretty sure it was. Yes,
it was definitely Bob Vosper.
-
Grassian
- Do you remember what his impressions were of library administration and
the library?
-
Dudley
- Norman's?
-
Grassian
- Yes.
-
Dudley
- He admired Bob Vosper. He admired him, and, of course, when Norm was in
library school, Larry Powell was, and Norm and Larry and Bob really
liked each other a lot.
-
Grassian
- So Larry Powell was the university librarian when Norman was in library
school?
-
Dudley
- Yes, right, right. No, Bob Vosper was. Bob Vosper, yes. And Larry was
dean of the library school.
-
Grassian
- Okay, that's right.
-
Dudley
- So he worked with them and with Paul Miles; Page Ackerman. Page Ackerman
had been the Psychology and Education librarian, or one of them, under
Gladys Coryell at first, and then she became university librarian after
Vosper. Page was interested in aspects of management. Management was her
interest and her specialty. I'm not remembering too much about that
period, but it was different from a scholarly interest, which had been
dominant earlier.
-
Grassian
- Among the heads of the library?
-
Dudley
- Yes. After Page, it was Russell Shank, and it was during that period that
Norm retired.
-
Grassian
- What year did he retire, do you remember?
-
Dudley
- Oh, goodness. I'll have to think about it a minute.
-
Grassian
- Okay, you can tell me later. Were you aware of any controversies in the
library that Norman dealt with, problems, controversies?
-
Dudley
- Oh, yes. [laughs] Yes. Largely personnel. At that time, no one had been
fired. Nobody needed to be fired. They were very carefully selected and
usually the manager of that section was the one who hired, and standards
were very high. But there were a few times that that was necessary, and
however, I think that was when Norm was in acquisitions rather than the
bibliographers.
-
Grassian
- Well, any time in his career, if you recall any controversies or issues,
major problems that he was involved in or he dealt with.
-
Dudley
- No, I really don't. No. I'll consider that, think more about it.
-
Grassian
- Okay. Can you think of any other highlights that you remember about his
career, other than what you've already mentioned?
-
Dudley
- I'll have to think about that one.
-
Grassian
- When you think back on his career, what do you think he was most proud
of?
-
Dudley
- Oh, I think his rapport and his understanding. They really loved him. The
bibliographers all really, really liked Norm a lot. They were the prima
donnas of the library, and I think that some people felt they were
harder to get along with. Norm also worked with the faculty a lot, and
in many cases, he worked with the faculty rather than the bibliographer
in that field. I think that was what might be inherent in the position
at that time. He enjoyed it. He enjoyed them and for the most part he
enjoyed the people he worked with in the front offices, it was called at
the time. There were exceptions, as I think the library became I guess
more management-conscious is I guess what it was. Well, let's see. Page
had come from the Graduate School of Management, did she not? I think
she got her doctorate in management.
-
Grassian
- So there was a definite turn away from the administrators being scholars
and the administrators being more managers during the period that Norman
was there.
-
Dudley
- Yes, right, right.
-
Grassian
- Would you consider him to have been more of a manager or more of a
scholar?
-
Dudley
- More of a scholar.
-
Grassian
- But it sounds like he was also a--
-
Dudley
- He did a really good job of working with the bibliographers.
-
Grassian
- Of managing.
-
Dudley
- Yes.
-
Grassian
- He was sort of both.
-
Dudley
- And cataloging, yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- Okay. So he was in charge of acquisitions and cataloging and
bibliographers?
-
Dudley
- Yes, I guess that's true.
-
Grassian
- Collections, tech services. Okay. Anything else that needs--
-
Dudley
- I can't remember that, if cataloging was separate during Norm's time. I
don't know. I just remember the catalogers from the 1950s is what I'm
remembering.
-
Grassian
- Okay. So is there anything else that you want to say about Norman?
-
Dudley
- I'm going to think of a lot of things as soon as we turn the mic off. I
like to talk about Norman.
-
Grassian
- Okay. Well, we could stop here if you would like and then continue the
next time.
-
Dudley
- Good, good.
-
Grassian
- I'll try to keep it more in a chronological sequence. But this has been
great fun.
-
Dudley
- Okay. Well, I've enjoyed it.[End of interview]
1.2. Session 2 (August 22, 2009)
-
Grassian
- This is Esther Grassian. I'm interviewing Miriam Sue [Mimi] Dudley. This
is our second interview and we are at Mimi's apartment in Sherman Oaks,
not Van Nuys, California. Today is Saturday, August 22 [2009], and it is
eleven a.m. So Mimi, I listened to our first interview, and I had a
bunch of follow-up questions, so I hope you don't mind this. One was,
you mentioned that your mother [Leah Feldman Fine] was eleven she
left--she and her family came to the U.S.
-
Dudley
- Right.
-
Grassian
- Can you tell me why your mother's family left Estonia?
-
Dudley
- Mother had a younger brother three years younger, and Jewish boys were
being conscripted, and they needed to leave. My grandfather [Chaim
Feldman] came first and came to Minot and was able to send for the rest
of them. He worked--I think maybe I said this--for a hide and fur
company. Somebody from their town had gone to Minot, North Dakota and
established a fur business, and my grandfather traded furs. He went
into--it was Indian country and traded--I don't know what they traded,
but at any rate, trade with Indians, and brought furs into the hide and
fur company [Hides and Furs Company] in Minot.
-
Grassian
- When you said conscripted, was that into the Estonian--
-
Dudley
- Russian, Russian Army. Yes. Estonia was in and out of Russian and German
domains when my mother was three.
-
Grassian
- So what did he do before, in Estonia? I was just curious.
-
Dudley
- My grandfather, he was a merchant. He was a merchant, so he knew about
trading.
-
Grassian
- Okay, so he knew about trading. He came over, and he got into the trading
business with the Indians.
-
Dudley
- Yes.
-
Grassian
- What year was that?
-
Dudley
- It was 18--let's see. Mother was born in [18]98, so it was 1909, I guess.
-
Grassian
- 1909, wow. Did your mother ever talk about what her life was like in
Estonia?
-
Dudley
- Yes. Mother, from the time she was three, was in school. It was land of
the midnight sun, and she remembers being carried to school and
deposited. It was all-day school and sometimes they spoke German and
sometimes Russian, and the children needed--when the government
inspectors came, they needed to speak the right language.
-
Grassian
- Was that a Jewish day school, or a public--
-
Dudley
- No, it hadn't anything to do with being Jewish. It was a mixed community,
as I remember Mother talking about it.
-
Grassian
- So just a general school that they had.
-
Dudley
- Yes, a neighborhood school.
-
Grassian
- So she spoke Estonian, German, Russian and English, and maybe something
else.
-
Dudley
- Right, right. I don't think she spoke English there. She learned English
when she came here. They also spoke a little French. She learned a
little French in school.
-
Grassian
- Okay. So they left Estonia in 1909, and she had seven sisters and
brothers?
-
Dudley
- Well, no, at that time there were four of them [Lea Feldman, Norman
Feldman, Esther Feldman, Rose Feldman], and then the other three [Zalman
Feldman, Edel Feldman, Rivala Feldman] were born in the United States.
-
Grassian
- And so what was their life like in Minot?
-
Dudley
- Well, Minot was I think maybe twenty-five hundred people when they moved
there. Again, her father was a salesman in the hide and fur. Let's see.
He had a cart. He had a cart of some kind that he drove into--he rode
out of town and traded with Indians and homesteaders. Actually, I'm
remembering now, he had pictures of Jesus [Christ] that he [laughs]
framed, pictures that he--maybe he gave them to the farmers. Maybe that
was it. I don't know. It's a dim recollection. I remember his talking
about that.
-
Grassian
- Now, how do you spell hide and fur?
-
Dudley
- It's the hides, animal hides.
-
Grassian
- Oh, h-i-d-e, I see. Just wondering.
-
Dudley
- Hides and furs.
-
Grassian
- Okay, got it. Hides and furs, and that was the name of the company. So
you mentioned that your mother was one of seven children. What number
child was she?
-
Dudley
- She was the first.
-
Grassian
- Oh, she was the oldest.
-
Dudley
- Yes, was the oldest. That's why I think she received all that attention
at school or taken to school. She was a treasured first child in quite a
large family.
-
Grassian
- So it wasn't typical for children there to go to school at age three, or
you don't know?
-
Dudley
- I don't know. Well, her brother three years later, I don't believe he
was. I think it was very dangerous, because they were Jews. But she was,
well, I think maybe she was an extra-bright little girl.
-
Grassian
- You talked about visiting Minot and enjoying that when you were in your
teens or maybe even younger, because you had moved to L.A. [Los Angeles]
at the age of fifteen months. But you said you went back to Minot often
and you visited relatives.
-
Dudley
- Right. I just went twice, really. I went when I was fifteen, because my
folks had moved to Chicago for a couple of years, and Chicago was too
hot for me in the summer, it was deemed. So they sent me to visit the
family in Minot, and it was a wonderful summer. I really enjoyed it
thoroughly and learned about the family. The main street in Minot was
two blocks long, called Main Street. There was a family owned clothing
store, a family owned jewelry store. Of the six brothers and sisters,
one remained in Minot, and many, many cousins stayed in North Dakota.
When children reached college age, they went to Minneapolis and they
never came back, so Minot became more--well, at one time there were
twenty-five Jewish families in Minot, but since then something happened.
The Army has stations near it or something. It's gotten to be quite a
big town. Maybe Air Force, I don't know. Somebody has something big
outside of Minot.
-
Grassian
- Okay. And you said at one time, was that like in the twenties, the
thirties?
-
Dudley
- When Minot grew?
-
Grassian
- Well, twenty-five Jewish families in Minot.
-
Dudley
- Yes, that was at its peak, I believe. I think that was maybe in the
forties, that much later.
-
Grassian
- Okay. About your father [Henry "Hank" Feinstein-Fine]. Was he an only
child, or did he have brothers and sisters?
-
Dudley
- No, he had a younger sister [Adeline (T.V.) Yetive Feinstein Moss] and a
younger brother [Mortimer Mozart Feinstein]. His father [Nahum Labe], he
also was a merchant, and he was born in--they were in Grand Forks, North
Dakota and some other--well, that's where he met mother, I think. What
else can I tell you about Minot?I know that Norman [husband, Norman Dudley] and I were there for a
holiday when our children [Noah and Seth Dudley] were older, and they
had built a temple by that time, very, very small place. People came in
and sat in front of us, and I could tell by the age of the children that
they must be fourth cousins of our children, because the families did
all know each other [laughs] and were very close. Oh, my grandfather was
very instrumental, my mother's father, in uniting the town. A rabbi
would come once a year to Minot, and so boys were bar mitzvah'd. There
wasn't any education for girls.
-
Grassian
- So thinking about your father, what do you know about his childhood? What
was it like?
-
Dudley
- He ran away when he was thirteen, and my grandfather knew where he ran.
He ran with the circus. The circus came to town and when they left, Dad
went with them. My grandfather went to him and told him that the circus
owner would not continue to employ him if he didn't agree to come back
at the end of the summer, and he did. So he traveled with the circus
that one summer and came home afterwards. Let's see, what more do I know
about his childhood?My grandmother [Jenny Phillips Feinstien] was very--she had a lot of
theories and ideas about child raising and about music. Everybody in the
family needed to play an instrument. My father's younger sister played
violin. My father's younger sister is T.V. Moss, and she's quite well
known in the book business. Her name is Adeline Yetive, and she died at
102 within the last couple of years. But she worked at--I'm getting out
of sequence here. [laughs]
-
Grassian
- Well, I'm making a note so we can come back to that. But tell me how you
spell that, TV Moss? Were those initials?
-
Dudley
- When they write about her, it's T-V.
-
Grassian
- T period, V period.
-
Dudley
- Yes.
-
Grassian
- Okay, T.V. M-o-s-s?
-
Dudley
- Yes.
-
Grassian
- Okay. So your father ran away to the circus. Sounds like he was a very
independent-minded person.
-
Dudley
- Oh, he was, yes. He was an extremely strong and clever young man.
-
Grassian
- So did that personality continue throughout his life?
-
Dudley
- It did. He was a very, very strong man, quite remarkable, a wonderful
man.
-
Grassian
- Your mother, was she also very strong-willed?
-
Dudley
- Yes.
-
Grassian
- She was the first born.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, she was, and he was first born, and they had a really great
life. They enjoyed each other a lot, and they were both inventive and
clever. Life was tough for them in the thirties.
-
Grassian
- In what way?
-
Dudley
- Financially. Things were terrible, terrible. We were right in the
depression, the well-known depression. There were--do you want me to
skip to the depression? Shall we build our way up to the depression?
-
Grassian
- Yes. Because you were born in 1924--
-
Dudley
- At the end of '24.
-
Grassian
- Okay, so that would be skipping ahead five years, so hold that thought
and I'm going to write down depression so that we talk about that. Okay,
that and T.V. Moss. So there was you and there was your younger sister
[Edelle Fine], who grew up together.
-
Dudley
- Well, there was my brother [Fred Fine]. My brother was older than I.
-
Grassian
- You didn't know about him, I thought.
-
Dudley
- Well, I didn't know until--we were raised together.
-
Grassian
- You were raised together?
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- But you didn't know that he was your half brother.
-
Dudley
- No, no, until--
-
Grassian
- Well, who did you think he was, a cousin?
-
Dudley
- No, I thought he was my brother.
-
Grassian
- You thought he was your full brother.
-
Dudley
- Yes.
-
Grassian
- You didn't know that he was your half brother.
-
Dudley
- That's right, that's right, that's right. That was a deeply kept secret
by the town of Minot.
-
Grassian
- Oh, I see. Okay, I misunderstood. I thought you didn't know he existed
until you were an adult.
-
Dudley
- No, no, no, no, no. No, no, no, no.
-
Grassian
- Oh, okay. Now I understand. Okay, so he was not your father's son, but--
-
Dudley
- He was my mother's son.
-
Grassian
- He was your mother's son, but not your father's son.
-
Dudley
- Right, that's right.
-
Grassian
- You had different fathers, but your father treated him as though he was
his son, and your father knew that he was not his son.
-
Dudley
- Oh, yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- Of course.
-
Dudley
- But the town--as I said, my grandfather was influential in the town, my
mother's father, and that whole town was sworn to secrecy. It was a very
big deal. We knew people from Minot all of our lives, but it was never
until after their death that, oh, yes, people knew about that and people
kept it a secret.
-
Grassian
- How did you find out?
-
Dudley
- Oh, well, there were secrets in the atmosphere, and there were things
that I knew were--I knew there was something I wasn't supposed to ask
about. Fred must have known too. He would have had to have known.
-
Grassian
- Fred was your brother.
-
Dudley
- My brother, yes.
-
Grassian
- I mean, did he know who his father [Howard Guilford], his real father
was?
-
Dudley
- I learned after my mother's death. I talked to one of her sisters, who
said that when Mother had come home, brought the baby home--the baby was
raised in Minot those first three years, his first three years, my
mother was a big-time boss of the family, and she said that it was not
to be discussed and so nobody discussed it. [laughs] And the whole town
did not discuss it, and that he was to be raised as Hank's child.
-
Grassian
- Hank was your father.
-
Dudley
- My father, yes. So it was observed. So after their death, I learned a lot
about Fred and Fred's father.
-
Grassian
- Why did she want to keep that a secret? Was she really married?
-
Dudley
- Oh, no. I had thought, well, they weren't married. That was certainly the
conclusion that I came to. But I read in--his father was somebody who
was in the papers, the newspapers, and I learned things about him. They
were married. They were married.
-
Grassian
- They were married and they divorced.
-
Dudley
- No, they didn't divorce. He was--wait, yes. They did divorce. They
divorced, and the reason there was so much publicity about him is that
he was shot by gangsters on a drive-by shooting. He was a journalist,
and there was a book written about him. He exposed yellow journalism, so
there was quite a bit about him.
-
Grassian
- What was his name, do you remember?
-
Dudley
- I've forgotten. I've forgotten.
-
Grassian
- Well, if you remember you can--
-
Dudley
- I know that later Fred learned about it, was a Minneapolis family. He
looked the family up. But why it was such a big deal for my father for
it not to be known, I don't know. He was very young. He was a young guy.
-
Grassian
- So your father didn't want it known, but it sounded like, and your mother
too.
-
Dudley
- Well, father, and mother's family didn't want it known either.
-
Grassian
- Didn't want it known that she had ever married before.
-
Dudley
- Yes, and that Fred was anybody but Dad's son. It's strange. It's so
strange, those family mysteries.
-
Grassian
- He must have known the date, the year that your parents got married and
his birthday.
-
Dudley
- Well, everything was very concealed, I remember. My father lied about his
age. That was a deep, deep, dark secret, and I knew there was cover up
about that, but I didn't understand what or why or how much, how much
cover up. It all seems very silly now, but it was very important to
them.
-
Grassian
- At the time. Very interesting. So moving back to you, you mentioned you
were fifteen months old when your family moved to L.A., and I don't
remember you saying why they decided to move to L.A.
-
Dudley
- I think it's the reason everyone did. I think it was climate. I think
that's what drew them here. My grandmother and grandfather, my father's
mother and father, moved here, and I think it was the "golden land." I
think people from North Dakota moved here.
-
Grassian
- And your father's parents moved to L.A. with you. Did they live with you?
-
Dudley
- No, no, no. They moved here first, I think, and then Dad and Mom came.
-
Grassian
- What would you say your childhood was like? How would you describe--
-
Dudley
- My predominant memories are of the depression and worry and fear. My
mother's, let see, first her one sister, Esther, lived with them, and
two brothers came in and out. They took freight trains from Minot to
L.A., everybody seeking employment. But he lived with us and then
ultimately my mother's younger sister lived with us. It was a big
family.
-
Grassian
- Big family. And your mother did the cooking and cleaning for everybody?
-
Dudley
- Mother cooked, yes. The girls--everybody worked. Yes, everybody helped.
It was a very congenial family.
-
Grassian
- Did you spend a lot of time with your grandparents in L.A.?
-
Dudley
- My grandparents lived--we lived near USC [University of Southern
California], and my grandparents owned an apartment house, and my
earliest memories are living in a cottage down the street from the
apartment house. So I remember learning to be able to go there by
myself. My grandma would meet me at the corner, and Mother would take me
to the edge of the sidewalk, and so I have great memories of that.
-
Grassian
- And what were they like?
-
Dudley
- My grandmother and grandfather?
-
Grassian
- Yes.
-
Dudley
- Well, my grandfather, he was an entrepreneur. He had had a clothing store
in Grand Forks, and he had a soda pop factory and a glass factory. His
was in Grand Forks and in Minneapolis. And when they came to L.A., they
bought property, an apartment house, and they were absolutely wild about
me. They were great, great, loving grandparents. They fared better in
the depression. They always were okay, but just okay. My father was a
hustler, and he did a lot of different things, but mostly I think he was
like his dad, ultimately. He came out of the depression really well and
did well the rest of his life. But those were tough, tough years.
-
Grassian
- So from about, let's see. You moved here when you were fifteen months, so
that was about 1926 maybe, something like '25, '26, because you were
born in 1924--
-
Dudley
- The end of '24.
-
Grassian
- --so it must have been '26.
-
Dudley
- Yes, I was December '24.
-
Grassian
- Okay. So you lived here for a few years, and the depression hit in 1929,
and so your family was in poor financial circumstances.
-
Dudley
- Yes. We lived in many, many houses. Again, my father, very important to
him that we live within the 24th Street School District, which was near
the Clark Library. The people who owned the big houses around there were
very eager to have tenants. They probably needed to pay people to keep
those big houses up, so there was always a lot of space. But rent would
come due and we would find another big, big house.
-
Grassian
- You'd find another place to live, so you moved around from one place to
another. Yes, yes.
-
Dudley
- But stayed within that school district for four years, till fourth grade.
-
Grassian
- Where you and your sister went, and your brother went there--
-
Dudley
- My brother.
-
Grassian
- All three of you.
-
Dudley
- Yes. My sister was born. She was six years younger than I.
-
Grassian
- Oh. What was her name?
-
Dudley
- Edelle, E-d-e-l-l-e. She was named after one of my mother's brothers, who
lived in those big houses with us. He died when she was born. He died in
the same hospital that she was born in.
-
Grassian
- And then she died at the age of eleven of what? What did she die of?
-
Dudley
- She had strep throat, and it was just as penicillin was coming in. She
probably died of medication, of wrong doses, but they really didn't know
what they were doing.
-
Grassian
- That must have been a very sad time.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, yes, it was tough.
-
Grassian
- So you talked about your elementary school period and growing up in L.A.,
and the last time you talked about the Clark Library and how you used to
go and look in the house, and you weren't allowed in there. You also
talked about your father's books, and you had to ask for permission to
use his books.
-
Dudley
- [laughs] Well, no, it was, was that an okay book for me to read. It was
censorship on his part. No, no, he had books I wasn't supposed to read.
-
Grassian
- You weren't allowed to read.
-
Dudley
- And, of course, those were the books that I read most--
-
Grassian
- Those were the ones you wanted to read.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- Was there anything else--your sister died when she was eleven, you were
seventeen.
-
Dudley
- When I was seventeen.
-
Grassian
- But before that, you mentioned that your parents and your younger sister
were in Chicago for a long time before you joined them.
-
Dudley
- Yes. At one point, Dad was--well, let's see. He became very interested in
food processing, and he had a flour mill. He built a flour mill,
extremely interested in vitamins, and I don't know how or what, but he
incorporated vitamins into flour. It was the Vitamin Flour and Milling
Company, and he learned about food presses. It was presses for food he
became--I know it was something with Laura Scudder too. So he knew about
presses and ultimately produced records and pressed records. He had a
pressing plant, and he opened one in Chicago, and so they went to
Chicago. He and Mother and my sister went, but I was in school here, so
I was here for the first year they were in Chicago, and then they stayed
another year and I joined them when I was fifteen. Then from Chicago,
when summer came, I went to Minot. But I did go to school in Chicago for
a year.
-
Grassian
- Okay. But going back to your father, what did he do? When he first came
to L.A., did he then build a flour mill?
-
Dudley
- Well, ultimately he did, yes. He learned about milling and was extremely
interested in it. His flour mill was on Broadway and Alpine in downtown
L.A.
-
Grassian
- When he first came to L.A.--
-
Dudley
- When he first came to L.A., he did lots of different things. Well, I know
at one time he had something with General Foods and Laura Scudder, and
that must have been the flour milling time.
-
Grassian
- Do you remember what year that flour mill was built, or approximately?
-
Dudley
- Well, let me see. I think I was about eight, eight or nine.
-
Grassian
- So 1932, '33. So after the depression.
-
Dudley
- Well, it was still--we were in the heart of depression, and how he
financed it and did all of that, I don't know.
-
Grassian
- I was going to ask you that. I was wondering if you had to move around
from place to place because of finances, so he maybe got a loan of some
kind, was able to--
-
Dudley
- Don't know. He was pretty good. People liked him a lot. He was an
appealing man. Actually, what his role was with people, and I don't know
if it started that young or not, was he played a father role in many,
many people's lives. I heard about that from the time I was a girl,
somebody telling me, "Your father has been a father to me," and that was
predominant, I think, in his relationships.
-
Grassian
- Okay. So then he became interested in flour and built this flour mill.
-
Dudley
- And food processing.
-
Grassian
- And food processor in about 1933 or so?
-
Dudley
- It would be in the thirties.
-
Grassian
- In the early thirties. Then, let's see, if you were fifteen when you went
to Chicago, when you were fourteen they moved to Chicago. That was 1938.
-
Dudley
- That makes sense, yes.
-
Grassian
- So who did you live with while your parents were in Chicago?
-
Dudley
- My aunts, the aunts who always lived with us, my mother's younger
sisters. From the time really that they came to Los Angeles, there was
always Mother's family.
-
Grassian
- Some family, grandparents, aunts?
-
Dudley
- Well, no, not the grandparents. The North Dakota grandparents stayed
there. My mother's family stayed in North Dakota, but two of her sisters
and two of her brothers came to L.A.
-
Grassian
- Right. But your father's parents came to L.A.?
-
Dudley
- They were the ones who came to L.A. They were the first ones to come,
yes.
-
Grassian
- So you didn't live with them, you lived with your aunts?
-
Dudley
- Well, I lived with my mother and father and, oh, yes, and when Mother and
Dad were away I lived with my aunts.
-
Grassian
- And then you made the decision yourself that you were going to go to
Chicago to join them?
-
Dudley
- Well, no. By that time, they knew they were staying another year. When
they first went, they didn't know how long they would be there. But when
they reached the decision that they were going to stay, I guess Dad was
still establishing the record business, that they decided I needed to
come.
-
Grassian
- That record pressing. So the record pressing business he established in
Chicago and then came back to L.A. after a couple of years, it sounds
like--
-
Dudley
- Well, he built a processing plant in Chicago and then came back here and
built one.
-
Grassian
- Okay, so he basically built two, and based on his experience with
pressing vitamins, presses for vitamins--
-
Dudley
- Pressing flour, yes, yes, right.
-
Grassian
- --flour, then he knew enough to be able to construct these two plants. So
then you all moved back to L.A., except you spent a summer in Minot, and
then after that everybody came back to L.A.
-
Dudley
- Came back to L.A.
-
Grassian
- Okay, I've got the sequence of events then.
-
Dudley
- Right, right.
-
Grassian
- So when you came back to L.A., you were sixteen then?
-
Dudley
- I was fifteen. I think I had my fifteenth birthday in Chicago. Yes, yes,
I was fifteen when we came back here. And when we came back here, then
we lived for a while with the grandmother and grandfather, with my
father's folks, and I went to Fairfax High.
-
Grassian
- What year was that?
-
Dudley
- Well, it was my last--went to Fairfax, I guess, in '41, '42. Does all
that add up?
-
Grassian
- And that was your senior year?
-
Dudley
- Yes.
-
Grassian
- I'll have to figure that out. Okay, so you were seventeen to eighteen or
so when you were there.
-
Dudley
- Yes, sixteen, seventeen.
-
Grassian
- Sixteen, seventeen, okay. So we've got that sequence of events. But I
wanted to go back a little bit more and ask more about your mother. You
said she did secretarial work. Who did she work for? What did she do?
-
Dudley
- She did it in a law firm in Minneapolis, and she had to do with politics
and the Wobblies. That's how she met the guy--isn't it awful that I
can't remember that name of my brother's family? I don't know if there's
any record of it. At any rate, that's when she met him, and they
married, because I read in the papers that they did. Oh, and also there
was a document. There was a document.
-
Grassian
- Which paper did you read it in?
-
Dudley
- Minneapolis papers.
-
Grassian
- Minneapolis papers of around what year was that?
-
Dudley
- When I read it?
-
Grassian
- Or what year was it published in the paper that they got? It sounds like
it was a big story.
-
Dudley
- It was a big story. It was big stories, yes.
-
Grassian
- What was your mother's maiden name?
-
Dudley
- Feldman, F-e-l-d-m-a-n.
-
Grassian
- Okay. So let's see. If your brother is three years older than you, and
you were born in 1924, he was born in 1921.
-
Dudley
- So it was probably '20 and '21 and '22 that all this went on. And yellow
journalism I know is the big thing about that man, that he was exposing
it and he was a reporter, so that's what that was about.
-
Grassian
- So was your mother actually a member of the Wobblies?
-
Dudley
- Yes.
-
Grassian
- She was. What did she do?
-
Dudley
- Well, I don't know, I don't know.
-
Grassian
- She didn't talk about it.
-
Dudley
- No, because those years were hidden.
-
Grassian
- Oh, those were the secret years.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, yes. She and I never discussed it.
-
Grassian
- Did you ever find any documents or anything?
-
Dudley
- About her?
-
Grassian
- About her doing anything then?
-
Dudley
- No, no. I did about him.
-
Grassian
- What was her first name?
-
Dudley
- Leah.
-
Grassian
- Leah Feldman. You know, the Wobblies still exist. They have a website.
-
Dudley
- Is that so?
-
Grassian
- I found out they were established in 1905, so, interesting.
-
Dudley
- I pieced this together when I was at ALA [American Library Association
conference], and I can't remember if it was Minnesota or Illinois, but I
know there was someone from ALA who was just delighted, and she and
Norman [Dudley] and I had really fun in the library looking all this up.
It was really a good time.
-
Grassian
- Looking at the old newspapers?
-
Dudley
- Yes.
-
Grassian
- From Minneapolis?
-
Dudley
- Yes.
-
Grassian
- So it was the main Minneapolis newspaper or something like that.
-
Dudley
- Oh, yes, yes. Carolyn Dusenbury [University Librarian, California State
University, Chico] was the one who worked with us in the library,
looking at microfilm.
-
Grassian
- Microfilm of the newspaper, yes. So is there anything else that you want
to say about your mother, what she was like, her personality?
-
Dudley
- She and Dad were both very volatile and domineering and wonderful. They
were wonderful together. Sparks flew, and they were very, very much in
love really all of their lives. Did you meet Mother, Esther [Grassian,
interviewer]?
-
Grassian
- I don't think I did. I only saw her, I think, once or twice. She already
was suffering from Alzheimer's and she was bedridden, so, yes, sadly, I
didn't get to meet her. So going back to your father now, with the
presses. Do you know anything about how he managed to translate from the
vitamins to the record pressing?
-
Dudley
- He studied. He learned a lot. I think it was the Crerar Library [at
University of Chicago] he went to, in Chicago, the John Crerar. And he
could absorb. He just had a remarkable mind. Oh, and then he was great
with people, and there was somebody called "the Old Man" that Dad--I
don't know his name at all, but I knew about him. He was a miller, and
Dad learned a lot from him, and Dad took care of him. He was an old man.
I know he found him someplace downtown where he had that plant.
-
Grassian
- Where the vitamin milling plant--but I'm just curious. He went to
Chicago, he established the record-pressing plant and back to L.A.,
established another one, after he had the vitamin-milling plant, because
he knew about presses. Just wondering how that connection got made
between the vitamin pressing and the record pressing.
-
Dudley
- I don't know. He was in at the beginning of Mercury Records. Again, it
was friends. Well, there were really three founders of Mercury, Irv
Green and Dad and, oh, I don't remember the other one [Hank Sabis]. But
they stayed in Chicago until quite late. Those guys were there. That's
where Mercury Records was.
-
Grassian
- So he was one of the founders of Mercury Records, and his name was Hank
Dudley?
-
Dudley
- Hank Fine.
-
Grassian
- Hank Fine. Oh, that's right. Dudley is your married name.
-
Dudley
- That's right, that's right.
-
Grassian
- Hank Fine, okay. Okay, I see. So when he came back to L.A. and had the
Mercury Records pressing business, you were about sixteen, or he
established that, he built that plant and you were about sixteen or so?
-
Dudley
- Wait, my mind is wandering. Let me think. In L.A.? Are we back to L.A.?
Is that what we're talking about?
-
Grassian
- Yes, yes.
-
Dudley
- I know--gee, it was on Robertson, the record-pressing plant, oh, and
Santa Monica; Santa Monica and Robertson. Oh, there were so many parts
of that, that was making the plates and--I don't know. I'm fuzzy about
it. I didn't know much about it, really. I didn't know much, or I wasn't
very interested, I think, in that part of it. I know Dad involved other
family members in pressing plants, yes. He had one of his cousins he put
in business there.
-
Grassian
- And so he had these two pressing plants, plus the vitamin plant?
-
Dudley
- Well, no, I think he was through with the flour business by that time.
Oh, in Indiana--have I talked about Indiana?
-
Grassian
- No.
-
Dudley
- Oh, well. By that time--he went to Indiana when my boys were little. I
know the kids and I spent two summers there in Indiana. My mother really
didn't like to be in Indiana. I'll think of the city [Richmond] in a
minute. A big, big pressing plant, a huge pressing plant. He built--it
was the old Starr Piano Company [in Indiana] had buildings by the river,
and they bought those buildings and added more buildings for a very big
pressing plant. And Dad needed to be there. He couldn't come back and
forth. He really needed to be there, and Mother really didn't want to
live in Indiana at all. So they lived in a hotel, and he had a bunch of
rooms in the hotel combined, and he built a kitchen for Mother, wooing
her to--so she did spend time there.And I was interested in the farming country, because the boys were in
kindergarten and we wanted to show them farms. So we went a couple of
summers and spent time there, and Mother was fine being there as long as
we were. [laughs]
-
Grassian
- Do you remember what city that was in Indiana?
-
Dudley
- I'll think of it in a minute. Yes, it's a well-known city. And Dad could
get--at that time it was very hard to get--there weren't enough people
in that town, but people from Kentucky came. He got Kentuckians to work
there. Oh, I'll think of the name of this city. It was a farming
community, and I learned a lot about the farms and the farmhouses around
there and farming people. This is something very new to me, and the boys
were tiny and they absorbed a lot. It was really nice. I really liked
it.
-
Grassian
- They were about four and five years old? Because they're about a year and
a half apart.
-
Dudley
- Right, right, right.
-
Grassian
- So about what year was that, do you think?
-
Dudley
- Well, it was about 1960.
-
Grassian
- About 1960. And it was called--the company that he bought, was that Old
Starr Piano?
-
Dudley
- It was Old Starr Piano Company.
-
Grassian
- Old or all?
-
Dudley
- No, it was the Starr Piano Company. That company at one time made
airplane propellers for wooden planes, for wooden airplanes, and it was
wonderful going through those old buildings. I know Lawrence Clark Powel
was [UCLA University] librarian then, and I wanted very much--they had
the records of the piano company and the airplane propeller company;
they were still in that building. He made some contacts for me for
libraries, for the records.
-
Grassian
- So that was later. That was around 1960. So going back now, so you came
back to L.A. from Chicago, and is that when you went to Fairfax High for
about a year? You graduated then?
-
Dudley
- Yes.
-
Grassian
- Then you went to UCLA.
-
Dudley
- I went to UCLA immediately, yes.
-
Grassian
- How did you happen to pick UCLA?
-
Dudley
- Well, this was '42, 1942. I went to look at UCLA and Los Angeles City
College it was called then, LACC, and I decided I liked the looks of
UCLA more and really didn't know much more about it. [laughs] There were
five hundred students on campus then. No, no, no, no, no. There were
five thousand students on the campus, and it was still--it wasn't
Marines. There were five hundred of some unit of, not the Army, Coast
Guard, I don't know, on campus, and there were five buildings on campus.
There was Royce [Hall] and the library [later Powell Library] were there
and the chemistry building, well, that's what they called it,
Chemistry/Physics [building], and then the Education building [later
Moore Hall] was built behind the library.
-
Grassian
- Moore Hall?
-
Dudley
- Yes.
-
Grassian
- And the chemistry building is now called Young Hall. Is that the one that
you mean?
-
Dudley
- Yes.
-
Grassian
- Not Young Library, but Young Hall. Okay, so Powell, Royce, Moore, and
Young Hall?
-
Dudley
- Well, no. Next door to Royce Hall was the--
-
Grassian
- Haines Hall.
-
Dudley
- What's it called now?
-
Grassian
- Haines Hall. Or maybe it wasn't called that then.
-
Dudley
- No, it was the chemistry building.
-
Grassian
- That was the chemistry building?
-
Dudley
- No, wait. Yes, wait, wait, wait. Well, there were those four buildings,
then Moore Hall was behind the library. And the hills, the rest of it
was Westwood Village. I suppose it belonged to the university, but it
was just fields.
-
Grassian
- All around it, just fields.
-
Dudley
- Oh, and there was a bridge leading across to the buildings. They
carted--where Murphy Hall is now.
-
Grassian
- Administration building.
-
Dudley
- You needed to cross a bridge. It was a deep gully, a deep gully where the
Music Library, the Music building and the Art building are now. That was
all gully. I'm sure you've seen pictures of that.
-
Grassian
- I don't remember if I've seen it. I've heard that there was a bridge.
-
Dudley
- Yes, the bridge is--you still walk across the bridge.
-
Grassian
- You walk across it, but you can't see that there's a gully now. It's all
filled in and covered over. So you started at UCLA in about 1942. What
were you interested in then?
-
Dudley
- Well, as soon as I took my first English course, I knew I wanted to be an
English major. The requirements weren't very hefty as I remember it. You
needed a science course and a history course and a lot of gym. Oh, yes,
you had to have two years of gym, and that was very onerous. I really
had a hard time with that, but I did it. Oh, Royce Hall was built then
too. Is it called Royce Hall, where the student union is and everything?
Yes.
-
Grassian
- So what do you remember about that first class that made you want to be
an English major?
-
Dudley
- Well, actually, the first class was Subject A, because my records hadn't
arrived. That's right, my records hadn't arrived, and so there was--yes,
there was an administration building. I don't know how we got to it.
Well, at any rate, I remember being in the Administration building and
trying to get records, so it was Subject A and it was grammar. But my
first English course was taught by Ernest Jones. I can't remember the
name of the city where I spent so many years, but I can remember Ernest
Jones. [laughs]
-
Grassian
- Ernest Jones, okay. He taught you the first English class, and that was
the English--Subject A.
-
Dudley
- Well, it was English--no, no, no. When I first really, my first real
literature course was--and Brad Booth [Bradford Allen Booth] was--Hugh
[Gilchrist] Dick and Lily Bess Campbell, after whom Campbell Hall is
named, and isn't there a Rolfe Hall?
-
Grassian
- Yes.
-
Dudley
- It was Victorian literature. Is there a Blanchard Library? Is the English
Library [Grace M. Hunt Memorial English Reading Room] called Blanchard?
It was his [Frederic Thomas Blanchard] library, and he became the
nucleus of that English collection.
-
Grassian
- His personal collection. The English reading room I believe now has a
different name. I don't think that's the name of it, but it does have
another name.
-
Dudley
- It probably was integrated into the collection, I would think.
-
Grassian
- No, it's a separate collection.
-
Dudley
- They still have it separate?
-
Grassian
- Yes. Okay. So what else were you interested in when you were an
undergrad? What did you do?
-
Dudley
- Oh, I was just--I sat in Royce Hall a lot and drank coffee and talked. We
just talked. It was incessant talk, before and after literature classes.
That's what I did.
-
Grassian
- That's what you did. You enjoyed doing that.
-
Dudley
- Yes. Oh, it was just a whole new world to me. It was a world opening to
me and never ceased to be. We talked about what we were reading.
-
Grassian
- So you had coffee. Was there a coffeehouse in Royce Hall?
-
Dudley
- In Royce, the room that is now--well, I think maybe it's still coffee.
It's stained-glass windows. Is there now still a room? You go up the
stairs and--I'm confusing when I came back to work with that time. So
much has been done with that building and so much added and so much
changed.
-
Grassian
- Yes, it's been remodeled quite a bit. Yes, yes.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, yes. But, yes.
-
Grassian
- Yes. So you became an English major and--
-
Dudley
- And I don't think I knew anybody but English majors. That's what I did
for those years.
-
Grassian
- You hung out around Royce Hall because that's where the English classes
were taught, I suppose, and the department was there.
-
Dudley
- Yes. And, of course, there was just the one library.
-
Grassian
- Right across from Royce Hall, Powell.
-
Dudley
- Yes. Everything--of course, it wasn't the size it is now either. They
added two wings and a lot more, and they filled in the wings, and it was
a different building in many ways.
-
Grassian
- So it didn't have either wing when it was first built?
-
Dudley
- No, no, no, no.
-
Grassian
- Just one building there. It was built, I think, in 1929, so it had
already been built by the time you got there.
-
Dudley
- Yes. I think there were four buildings; no, there were five. The more I
think about it, I've added a sixth, haven't I? Because Royce was there.
Yes, I'd forgotten about that. Yes, there was a path from the library
down to Royce. There was a path that many, many, times they tried to
plant on that path, and a psychology professor said, "You mark my words.
The people will win. There will be a path from the library to Royce, and
they're not going to be able to ever, ever plant there." Of course,
later buildings were planned for it, but nothing was ever built there.
-
Grassian
- So right across from each other they planned to fill it in, but they
never did because people just kept--tried to. They just walked through.
-
Dudley
- Well, yes, and people would walk over. They'd climb over--they didn't
build a wall, but they would rope it off. But nothing they could really
ever do about that.
-
Grassian
- Do you remember--thinking back on your undergraduate years at UCLA, what
else do you remember? Do you remember anything else, or what is your
overall impression?
-
Dudley
- I was just turned on. It was as if life started then for me. I commuted,
and it took three buses to get from--by that time where were we? We were
living near Beverly [Boulevard] and La Cienega [Boulevard], and from
there I would take a bus on Beverly to Fairfax and another from Fairfax
[Avenue] to Wilshire [Boulevard] and another from Wilshire to campus. I
would get up before dark, and I'd get home in the dark. It was so
wonderful, yes.
-
Grassian
- So every day you took three buses. Was that throughout your four years?
-
Dudley
- No. No, no, no. Then there were people driving and friends driving. Yes,
I did, I had a car at the age of thirteen, but I didn't want to drive.
-
Grassian
- Thirteen? At the age of thirteen you had a car?
-
Dudley
- Yes. My father really thought I should drive, but I didn't. I didn't want
to.
-
Grassian
- Were you permitted to drive at the age of thirteen then?
-
Dudley
- I think you could get a license. I know my brother got a license early,
and I think you did it by cheating and lying and saying you had to
transport your sick mother or something. I didn't. I didn't want to
drive. I moved to Tujunga, but I think I was in graduate school by that
time.
-
Grassian
- So you lived at home the whole time you were an undergrad, and you took
buses or friends drove you, but you didn't drive yourself.
-
Dudley
- No, no, no.
-
Grassian
- You didn't live on campus--I mean, they didn't have--did they--
-
Dudley
- No, no. Oh, there was a place to live on campus. There was a women's--I
think it's still there.
-
Grassian
- Hershey Hall.
-
Dudley
- Hershey Hall, yes, yes, yes. I did know a woman who lived there, and then
people lived in private houses near campus. They rented rooms.
-
Grassian
- But you didn't do that?
-
Dudley
- No, no, no. There weren't dorms.
-
Grassian
- So you became an English major pretty early on, and you have great
memories of your undergraduate years at UCLA.
-
Dudley
- Oh, yes, yes, and the faculty. I remember so many people. I probably
remember all of the people who were in the English Department at the
time. It wasn't huge. There were only five thousand kids on campus.
-
Grassian
- About how many English majors would you say there were then?
-
Dudley
- I don't know. I don't know.
-
Grassian
- Not a lot. So you remember all the faculty, and you've mentioned Hugh
Dick.
-
Dudley
- Brad Booth, Franklin P. [Prescott] Rolfe, Lily Bess Campbell. Oh, you
know, there were two women who, they weren't adjunct professors, they
were--I don't think they had a title. They were what I suppose we would
think of as student assistants now. Margaret Carhart was one, and I
don't remember the name of the other. But Lilly Bess Campbell had a
doctorate from University of Chicago, and she didn't believe in women on
the faculty. She discouraged--finally while I was there, they did give a
master's in English to a woman, but she didn't think women should be
doing graduate work in English.
-
Grassian
- But she herself did.
-
Dudley
- She was, yes, but she was it for a very, very long time. She kept women
out of the department for many years.
-
Grassian
- Do you think she didn't want the competition?
-
Dudley
- I don't know. Now I don't know. At the time, she was loathed and feared,
very feared, and, of course, I don't know about the politics of it. I
don't know what went on. Oh, [Majl] Ewing was another one in the
department, Majl Ewing, M-a-j-l. The English Department was on the top
floor of Royce, and all the English Department could be housed in one
office with a balcony, and I think two of them shared an office. But it
was very small, and the top of Royce was a labyrinth.
-
Grassian
- So you got to wander around in the top, like in the tower parts?
-
Dudley
- Yes. You could step onto the tower. You could step from one tower to the
other.
-
Grassian
- And so this woman Campbell, who was loathed yet had--
-
Dudley
- Feared, feared.
-
Grassian
- --feared and loathed, had a building named after her.
-
Dudley
- Right, right. She taught Shakespeare, and I've always thought it was kind
of interesting that that building, this very difficult, tyrannical,
prudish woman, that that hall became, what did they call it at first,
"Rainbow Coalition"? Was that what they called it? It was for the few
black students we had, the few Chicano, I think we called them Chicano,
Asian, but very, very small departments at UCLA. Well, that was later.
That was later.
-
Grassian
- Yes, for Ethnic Studies groups.
-
Dudley
- That was many years later.
-
Grassian
- So since you were so enthusiastic about being an English major as an
undergrad, it probably was a natural progression for you to want to go
to grad school, so how did you do it in spite of this woman who tried to
block--
-
Dudley
- Well, by that time, I don't think I could. Oh, probably, yes. I had a
friend who did ultimately get a doctorate at UCLA, so Lily Bess Campbell
was probably gone by--she was definitely gone by that time. Yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- Okay, so that's how you got into grad school as a woman, grad school in
English.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes. There were many of us by that time.
-
Grassian
- Okay, so it was before--
-
Dudley
- I'm talking about early on, when I first went to UCLA.
-
Grassian
- So there were many women who became English--
-
Dudley
- Well, I'm sure, I'm sure.
-
Grassian
- --by the time you did.
-
Dudley
- It was no longer extraordinary. And the first course I took was in
bibliography from Hugh Dick. I had had Brad Booth for English 1A, 1B,
whatever they were at that time, and then I took courses from them
later. But, yes, I like thinking about that time. It's exciting just to
think about it, yes.
-
Grassian
- You really enjoyed it. It sounds like it was a great time.
-
Dudley
- Yes. I was an asthmatic, and it got more and more serious. I needed to,
or it was thought that I needed to move to Tujunga, which at the time
was a very small population, a very small town composed mostly of
churches. I think when I moved there, there were twelve churches, and
crazies lived in Tujunga. People seeking a cure moved there. The air was
supposed to be pure, and there were sanitariums, and I moved into--I got
a little house for twenty-five hundred dollars, paid twenty-five dollars
a month were my payments on the house.
-
Grassian
- You bought it for twenty-five--
-
Dudley
- Well, my father bought it, yes. Right, right.
-
Grassian
- Your father bought it for you and then you paid him back, twenty-five
dollars a month?
-
Dudley
- I don't know if I paid him back. He put the payment down and then I paid
twenty-five a month. Wait a minute. I think the house--it was five
thousand, twenty-five hundred down and twenty-five a month. That's what
it was. So it wasn't a twenty-five-hundred-dollar house, it was a
five-thousand-dollar house. It was a tiny, tiny house, and the city was
mostly boulders. It was a dirt road, a house down the street, but I
lived there for a year without coming down, and I did get stronger.
-
Grassian
- What year was that?
-
Dudley
- I'd have to figure it out. I think probably '45. I graduated from high
school in '42, and I went to UCLA, and in '45 I moved to Tujunga. Then I
went to graduate school. I think I went in '46.
-
Grassian
- Approximately. So you don't seem to have any asthmatic problems now. You
got over it.
-
Dudley
- No, no, no, no. I got over it. It might have been age. It could possibly
have been the air. I don't really think so, but, yes, and there was no
more asthma. I had a final attack in 1952, but a slight one.
-
Grassian
- And you haven't had a problem since then?
-
Dudley
- No, no.
-
Grassian
- Without medication or anything, you just simply got out of it.
-
Dudley
- Yes. It just went away.
-
Grassian
- So that was why you moved to Tujunga was because of the climate, to help
you with your asthma.
-
Dudley
- Right.
-
Grassian
- How long did you have asthma? Was it all your life up to then?
-
Dudley
- Well, from the age of about eight, and it got worse and worse,
particularly those wonderful years as an English major at UCLA. I
wheezed a lot and ultimately I really was crippled by it.
-
Grassian
- Okay. And then you spent a year just--
-
Dudley
- A year without coming down, and then all the way through graduate school
I lived in Tujunga, but I drove by that time and I did drive to campus.
-
Grassian
- So what did you do for that year you were living in Tujunga not coming to
L.A.?
-
Dudley
- I read and I met people. I met the Young Democrats, and I became as
active as I could be and made a lot of friends, just knew a lot of great
people, all of whom had asthma in the family. Nobody was up there who
wasn't sick.
-
Grassian
- And your father supported you. Did you see your parents? Did they come
visit you?
-
Dudley
- Oh, sure. Oh, sure. They came up, and people came to see me. In those
days, there weren't freeways, and it seemed to me that--is it possible
that it could have taken a couple of hours? I don't think that's
possible, but it seemed to me, and there was no question of my coming
down. I was supposed to stay there. And the doctor, my doctor came to
see me there, so life was really different.
-
Grassian
- Doctors made house calls then. Your doctor came from L.A., near West
Adams or near wherever you--
-
Dudley
- No. Let's see. The doctor was at Wilshire and La Brea.
-
Grassian
- And that's around where your parents lived, La Cienega.
-
Dudley
- Yes, not far.
-
Grassian
- Okay. So you talked about your graduate work in English. Was it about a
year that you spent being a grad student in English before you decided
to go to library school? Was it longer? About a year?
-
Dudley
- It was a year. Do you want to hear about that now? Are we up that far? I
took Hugh Dick's course in bibliography and was really, really just
enamored of it. He did some lectures at the Clark, and that was
revisiting an old world and a new world to me. And for my, I suppose, I
don't know, term paper or whatever, he introduced me to Bob Vosper, and
the library had just gotten--Bob Vosper was the acquisitions librarian
at the time, and they had just gotten a collection of children's books,
the Olive [May Graves] Percival collection, and I did a descriptive
bibliography of the poetry in the Olive Percival collection and learned
more and more about bibliography and the collection itself. She was a
real estate developer in Los Angeles, and she had died, and the
university bought this collection.Some of her books were one inch by one inch, and she had cutouts
throughout the collection. She had cutouts in all sorts of beautiful
papers and inserted them into her books, so when you picked up a book,
all these papers would fly out. [laughs]
-
Grassian
- Like confetti almost, it sounds like.
-
Dudley
- Well, yes, yes, oh, yes. I wish that I had known her. She was a tough,
hard-boiled real estate person, but she wrote these party invitations of
parties she made up in her head and sent to make-believe characters in
minute handwriting, beautiful, beautiful material, which we've had on
exhibit from time to time. And she did a lot of first editions of
children's books, a rare, rare children's book, and I loved working on
that collection. That's how I met Bob Vosper, because he--when I was
taking it the bibliography course.
-
Grassian
- So you liked working on the collection because of--I mean, what do you
like about bibliography?
-
Dudley
- Well, it was a descriptive bibliography, so I learned a lot about
bibliography. That's still a requirement, I think, for any graduate
student in English.
-
Grassian
- So by bibliography you mean cataloging?
-
Dudley
- No, no, no, no, no. The study of, well, it was physical and descriptive
bibliography, and we learned how to do a bibliography, and we learned
about the famous bibliographies. We learned about things like [Michael]
Sadleir.
-
Grassian
- Okay. So tell me what you mean when you say--let's say somebody doesn't
know what descriptive bibliography is.
-
Dudley
- It's a physical description of the book.
-
Grassian
- So you did a physical description of the book, like--
-
Dudley
- Of some of the poetry in the collection.
-
Grassian
- So this was like an index to the poetry in the collection, or?
-
Dudley
- No, no. I described the books. I described them by size, by cover, by
paper, so you really learned a lot in that class; print. Not the
contents of the book, it was the physical description of the book.
-
Grassian
- Okay, the physical description. But then what does poetry have to do with
it? That is the contents, right?
-
Dudley
- Well, because her collection was massive, and I had to select a part of
it, and I couldn't possibly in one semester do a descriptive
bibliography of all the books in the collection. So I just chose in the
collection. I went through the collection and separated the poetry.
-
Grassian
- Oh, okay. I didn't understand that. Okay. So you took the books of
poetry, some of which were one inch by one inch--
-
Dudley
- Oh, yes. That wasn't just the poetry. A lot of miniatures, but a lot of
other things too, and described them.
-
Grassian
- So walk me through that. How did you do that? Did you have a magnifying
glass? I mean, if it was tiny, you had a magnifying glass to--
-
Dudley
- Oh, well. I have a box of miniatures here I'll show you.
-
Grassian
- Maybe later, but yes.
-
Dudley
- Okay, it's over there. Well, they weren't so small that you couldn't read
them. You could read them, and the cuttings were of particular interest,
what flowed out of the books. So that was my term project. So I got to
know Bob Vosper. And there was a guy in this class, in Hugh Dick's
class, again whose name I've forgot, but he was a librarian from I think
it was New York Public [Library], but someplace in New York, and he had
come for the summer to take this course in bibliography. He needed to go
to USC [University of Southern California] to interview--he was a
librarian--interview the library school dean, and I went with him. She
talked to him, but then she talked to me about library school, and that
was the first I knew anything at all about library school or being a
librarian. I hadn't had any indoctrination or any knowledge really of
libraries or librarians. I know I admired the reference librarian, a
particular one at UCLA, and I was sort of awed by her, but I didn't know
anything about the subject. And I decided to go, that day I think I
decided to go to library school and be like Ardis Lodge, I guess.
-
Grassian
- That was the woman that you admired, Ardis Lodge?
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- I mean, as a grad student or undergrad did you get any tours of the
library or have anybody tell you anything about what the library
contained? Because you were an English major. You had to use the
library, I suppose.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes. Well, I did use the library.
-
Grassian
- But nobody told you anything about it.
-
Dudley
- No, no, no, I didn't have any--well, Hugh Dick, yes, Hugh Dick, our
library and Clark, so, yes, that's really what a bibliography course
does do. And you learn about the famous bibliographies. So then I went
to library school. I still lived in Tujunga and driving there, and I did
not like the courses. I didn't like it.
-
Grassian
- What didn't you like about it?
-
Dudley
- I didn't like the faculty very much. I didn't in all the time I was there
meet anyone who was exciting or inspiring or interesting. It seemed more
a how to than an expansion, an intellectual expansion.
-
Grassian
- So it was very practical, and you wanted something theoretical or
something to expand your horizons.
-
Dudley
- Well, I don't know what I wanted. I just wanted to go be like Ardis
Lodge, I guess. I wanted to learn all of that.
-
Grassian
- What was she like? What did you like about her?
-
Dudley
- She was a reference librarian, and she had an ability to focus, which I
hope I ultimately did too, on the person at the reference desk. I didn't
know her personally. I never really knew Ardis personally, although
there were some other tie-overs, but not at that time. She just--I
didn't know anything about reference books. I knew what you needed to
know as a student and a graduate student, but she inspired me. It was
her manner, I think.
-
Grassian
- Her manner inspired you, that she focused on the person and their need.
-
Dudley
- Yes, and she knew a great deal too. You had to know a lot in those days.
She knew reference materials.
-
Grassian
- So it sounded like you interacted with her at the reference desk, or you
observed her.
-
Dudley
- Oh, no. When I needed to know something, I knew then where to go.
-
Grassian
- You discovered her and then you knew that she was a great source of help,
and then you admired that in her, and you wanted to be like her in some
way.
-
Dudley
- I suppose so, yes, because she really was my only contact with libraries.
But the English Department courses were what was so great. Let's see.
Then library school--oh, I know. It was too far for me to drive every
day. One thing about [U]SC was that it was very easy to negotiate with
them, and they said, okay, I could take two years rather than the year
and a summer that it took, so I broke it up and it was more palatable.
The required courses as I remember them were cataloging and reference,
oh, book selection. Book selection was something. Did you know Betty
Rosenberg?
-
Grassian
- Yes.
-
Dudley
- Betty taught that.
-
Grassian
- Oh, she taught at USC before she came to UCLA?
-
Dudley
- No, no, no, no, no. That's not right. I didn't know Betty till I came to
UCLA. That's right. Later she did. Later she did.
-
Grassian
- So you didn't like your classes or the faculty at USC--
-
Dudley
- No, and I thought right up till the very end that I might not continue. I
didn't think about work or a job or anything. And then a friend I went
through school with, Fauna Finger--[Interruption][End of interview]
1.3. Session 3 (August 29, 2009)
-
Dudley
- --was quite dismissive of our Jewishness, our Judaism, because there
really wasn't very much that went on in the family, but holidays were
observed. My grandfather, my mother's [Leah Feldman Fine] father, was
interested. Oh, he performed the services for the dead in Minot [North
Dakota], for the Jewish dead. He could do that, although he was not
connected with any rabbi. I think the word was Pesach, something like
that. So actually there was very, very minor recognition, but we were
Jews and that's something we knew.
-
Grassian
- Okay. I'm not sure if the tape was recording, so let me just repeat, this
is Esther Grassian recording a third interview with Mimi Dudley at her
apartment in Sherman Oaks, on Saturday, August 29th [2009]. We were
talking about the role that religion played in Mimi's life and went over
a little bit of--this was a kind of follow up from the last interview,
where you mentioned that there were about twenty-five families in Minot.
They built a temple there. The rabbi came once a year and conducted bar
mitzvahs, but there was no Jewish education for girls. So that was in
Minot and then throughout your life, in terms of religion you were not
fully observant, but celebrated holidays?
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes. And Mother did light candles on Friday night, and we had Seders
and traditional food as much as was possible at Pesach, but we had no
formal education in Judaism. Our children [Noah and Seth Dudley], of
course, we did supply that for our kids.
-
Grassian
- And then they're still interested in Judaism and observe holidays, right?
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, yes. They are. They're very devout members of congregations.
There's an occasional little feud going on with the boys, whose rabbi is
going to officiate at our funerals, which we think is pretty funny.
-
Grassian
- Already they're feuding about that.
-
Dudley
- Yes.
-
Grassian
- Oh, well. Well, maybe they can both do it together.
-
Dudley
- They can each have his rabbi.
-
Grassian
- So that's interesting. Then there were a few points that we were going to
get back to at some point in time, so I thought I'd mention them now and
then we could talk about them maybe in chronological order, if that's
okay. So first I made a note about the depression and your family's
circumstances during the depression, and you mentioned that you had to
move frequently, and there was a lot of worry about finances. Did you
want to say anything more about that?
-
Dudley
- Yes. I guess it's coming across as a very gloomy household, and it really
wasn't. I think I was a gloomy little girl. I think I worried a lot. I
believe that's what it was, in retrospect. Yes, I worried about the
moves, and I worried about whether the lights would be on. They were
often turned off for lack of payment. My father [Hank Fine] was a real,
real hustler, and he worked very, very hard, and he had a lot of family
to take care of. There were a lot of us living there. But it was a very
caring bunch of people.
-
Grassian
- Everybody took care of each other.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- Well, the other thing we'll talk about later was T.V. Moss, but that's a
little later chronologically, maybe.
-
Dudley
- Right.
-
Grassian
- So we talked a lot about your half brother Fred [Fine] and the deep, dark
secret about your mother's first marriage and who his real father was,
and you remembered later what his real father's name was. Do you want to
say something?
-
Dudley
- Yes. His father's name was Guilford, G-u-i-l-f-o-r-d, but this is
something that didn't really come out in the lifetime of my mother.
After my mother's death, Norm [Norman Dudley] and I did some sleuthing.
We knew there was a Minneapolis connection, and we learned about it by
looking at microfilm. I think we were in Minneapolis at the time, and we
learned that he was Fred's father. We never did establish about a
marriage. I'm not sure that my mother was married to him. Yes, yes, I
think we did finally establish that, yes, he had two marriages. He was a
yellow journalist, and Guilford was killed by a mob in the thirties.
It's all extremely complicated. I don't think that it's essential. It's
interesting. It was interesting.
-
Grassian
- Okay. You mentioned your sister Edelle [Fine]. We didn't talk much about
her, though I know you said she died at the age of eleven of strep
throat--
-
Dudley
- She was eleven.
-
Grassian
- --and mishandled medications, or the wrong medication, or--
-
Dudley
- Well, she had strep throat and was taken to, I think it was Hollywood
Pres[byterian] Hospital, and it was when penicillin was first used. The
diagnosis was strep throat, and she was given penicillin, but apparently
not in the right amounts.
-
Grassian
- Then we talked quite a bit about your parents moving to Chicago with your
sister for a couple of years, you joined them after a year, and why they
moved there, etc., and the fact that he was one of the founders of
Mercury Records. We also talked about your mother, what you found out
about her meeting and marrying her first husband, Howard Guilford, and
how she didn't talk about the Wobblies at all, because it was during
those years of the deep, dark secret, so she never talked about that.
Then you talked about your parents' relationship with each other, and
you mentioned that your father went to Indiana and built another
pressing plant there near the river. Do you remember the city in
Indiana? [Richmond, Indiana]
-
Dudley
- I still don't remember the name of the city. I wish I had had that at my
fingertips, because it was a wonderful time, an interesting time. I took
our sons to that town when they were four--I guess they were three and
four the first time we went, and then we went again when they were five
and six--because the kindergarten unit for Noah was farms, and I wanted
him to see a real farm. It was a wonderful opportunity to take him. My
folks were in a hotel in Indiana, and my father arranged for the
children to have many, many trips to the farm. They were there when the
cows were brought in, arrived at the creamery just as the milk was
delivered and processed. They were exposed to a great deal of farming
lore. They learned to drive quite young because of tractors.My father, his plant was--they were on the Kentucky border, and the plant
was a wonderful opportunity for employment, I guess. Oh, the plant, did
I talk about the plant?
-
Grassian
- Yes.
-
Dudley
- Oh, I've already done all that. All right.
-
Grassian
- Yes, you did, you did, and that was very interesting too.
-
Dudley
- I guess the thing I want to add to that is that when we were driving one
day, we stopped at a farmer's--did I mention that?
-
Grassian
- No, I don't remember.
-
Dudley
- And the woman who was showing us around said, "How are things?" And the
woman said, "Oh, well, things are so much better now that the Jew has
come to town." [laughter] It provided employment. I sort of hoped the
boys didn't hear that one.
-
Grassian
- Well, at least it was a positive comment about a Jew.
-
Dudley
- Oh, yes, yes. It was a good thing the Jew had come to town.
-
Grassian
- And then after that we talked about, going chronologically, how you
picked UCLA for your undergraduate years, the fact that you wanted to be
an English major as soon as you took an English lit class your undergrad
years, and you talked about living in Tujunga for a year because of your
asthma and getting stronger and how you haven't had an attack in many
years, you're over it, and you talked about the descriptive bibliography
of children's miniatures you did for your graduate course in English
with Hugh Dick, meeting Bob [Robert] Vosper, how you were persuaded to
go to library school, and driving from Tujunga to USC [University of
Southern California] for library school, because there wasn't one at
UCLA. And you didn't especially like library school, because it wasn't
interesting to you. You talked about how you admired Ardis Lodge,
reference librarian, and wanted to be like her and know what she knew,
so that's where we got to last time.So then you did mention in your first interview how you got the job at
UCLA, that you didn't realize this, but Bob Vosper was holding a
position for you, so you went there and started working as a
bibliographic checker. What did a bibliographic checker do then?
-
Dudley
- There were four of us [Mimi Dudley, Charlotte Spence, Dorothy Harmon,
Kathy], and we checked book orders primarily to learn if we had the book
in any form. The orders came from the faculty and also from us. We
didn't have subject responsibility. We were just encouraged to order
books, current books of interest or any books. We did look at catalogs.
The collection, I don't remember what it was when I came in '49, but
between '49 and '54 I know we celebrated the acquisition of the first
millionth book, the one-millionth book. Lawrence Clark Powell, did I
mention his going to--
-
Grassian
- Yes, and taking the--
-
Dudley
- He was a very active acquisitions librarian.
-
Grassian
- You mentioned that he took the entire LC [Library of Congress] catalog
with him in multiple huge volumes.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, yes, right, right.
-
Grassian
- That was interesting.
-
Dudley
- So what the bibliographic checkers did was check the collection to avoid
duplication, and they initiated orders as well.
-
Grassian
- Okay. I think what happened later in the UCLA Library maybe elsewhere is
they separated those two functions of checking to see what we had and
ordering, selecting books, because I [Esther Grassian] was a Library
Assistant I at one time, doing bibliographic checking, just to see if
what was going to be ordered was already owned by the library. So they
did separate that function later and it probably was on a much lower
level than what you were doing.
-
Dudley
- Yes. What we needed to do was determine whether the material requested,
if we had it in any other form, if it had been published in serial form.
-
Grassian
- So it was at a much less complex level. So for how long were you a
bibliographic checker?
-
Dudley
- For five years.
-
Grassian
- Five years.
-
Dudley
- Yes, I did that from 1949 to 1954, at which time I wanted to take a
maternity leave, but was told that any time I wanted to come back I
could come back. I would be welcomed. But maybe I shouldn't take
maternity leave. Maybe I should check out, and I did. And sure enough,
ten years later when I wanted to come back, it was easy. It was great.
But I came back as a reference librarian.
-
Grassian
- So you resigned rather than just--
-
Dudley
- Yes, I didn't go on leave.
-
Grassian
- And it was all oral, all verbal kind of. There was nothing in writing
about, you can come back any time?
-
Dudley
- Oh, yes, yes, yes. We weren't a very big staff in those days, yes.
-
Grassian
- So you left for ten years, and you were home with your kids.
-
Dudley
- Yes. Norman and I married in 1952, and we had the children in '54 and
'56.
-
Grassian
- And so you retired or you resigned in '54?
-
Dudley
- [19]54.
-
Grassian
- [19]54, and then for ten years you weren't working at the UCLA Library.
Did you work anywhere else?
-
Dudley
- No, no, I stayed home. Those were interesting years in my life. I enjoyed
them. When I first came back to work--do you want to hear anything about
those ten years? Those ten years were devoted to community and to
learning things about community that I had never been interested in, but
I became very involved.
-
Grassian
- Sure. What were you involved in?
-
Dudley
- Well, I was involved first with early childhood education, because that's
where my kids were, and then in the PTA [Parent Teachers Association]
and other civic organizations. It's all kind of blurry now, but I
learned a lot during that time. But when the boys were, oh, by the time
they were in school--I didn't come back to UCLA till they were ten and
twelve, I think, but I did return to UCLA to work on a bibliography for
Brad Booth in the English Department.
-
Grassian
- So you did that while--
-
Dudley
- I did that part time.
-
Grassian
- --while the kids were in school, public school.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- What kind of bibliography was that?
-
Dudley
- Well, [Michael] Sadleir is one of UCLA's prime collections. It's a
collection of nineteenth century fiction, and it now has its own room.
It's the Brad Booth Room in Special Collections, and we had a notable
and fine collection of nineteenth century fiction. Sadleir did a
bibliography of it, and it's widely used. Brad Booth was the chair of
the English Department, and he hoped in his retirement to work on the
collection. But in the meantime, nothing had been done with it at all,
and I looked at all of the books in the collection and did a preliminary
subject index to the Sadleir books and, oh, once every couple of months
or so Brad and I would look at them together, and my handwriting was
infinitesimal. I did this on three-by-five cards, and it was wonderful.
I thoroughly enjoyed doing it, did about, oh, maybe three, four hours a
day, something like that. And ultimately Brad died, and Hugh Dick was
interested too, but my interest in it sort of faded with Brad's death.
By that time the boys were older, and I wanted to go back to the
library.
-
Grassian
- Okay. So getting more into the Sadleir collection, who was Michael
Sadleir?
-
Dudley
- Michael Sadleir was a bibliographer and a bookman, and he collected--I
want to fill this in.
-
Grassian
- So Sadleir was a collector. Did you want to say anything more about him?
-
Dudley
- Well, Brad Booth writes a very touching report on his going to Sadleir's
collection in London. He was invited to see the collection, and he came
up a flight of stairs, and in a large room was a collection of books in
mint condition--that was the primary requirement, that they needed to be
in mint condition--of nineteenth century fiction. And Booth wrote,
wired--I don't know how they communicated--as quickly as he could to Bob
Vosper, and Vosper busied himself raising funds for the collection.
Sadleir ultimately did two collections. One ended at Yale [University],
and one--Bob Vosper did get the money for the Sadleir collection, and it
was our great pride.And working with the books was a great privilege. I thoroughly,
thoroughly enjoyed it. The cards are still in the boxes, the original
boxes, in Special Collections. However, there is a plan afoot which I am
supposed to learn more about and I will, as soon as I have time, to
publish in some form the cards. The handwriting, as I say, is
infinitesimal. I think there is some problem about that, but UCLA will
in some way be making that available to the public, and that will be
fun.
-
Grassian
- Going back to acquiring the collection, so Sadleir had died then?
-
Dudley
- No, no. Sadleir was selling these collections.
-
Grassian
- Oh, he was just selling them. He didn't want them anymore, or he wanted
them at a university or something.
-
Dudley
- Yes, he wanted them to be preserved.
-
Grassian
- Okay, he wanted them to be preserved. So Vosper raised the funds to buy
the collection. Was there any opposition to it?
-
Dudley
- Well, raising the money is always a problem. It's always a problem. But
they did. Of course--I'm trying to remember what Lawrence Clark Powell's
connection with it was. Of course, ultimately I'm sure Bob Vosper needed
to go to him for the funds. I don't remember any special fundraising
festivities, but I know getting the money together was a great triumph.
-
Grassian
- So what portion of it went to Yale, as opposed to--
-
Dudley
- Well, it was two collections, two separate collections.
-
Grassian
- Oh, a duplicate?
-
Dudley
- I don't know. No, I think not. I think maybe it was--I don't know the
distinction.
-
Grassian
- Okay. But there's a Sadleir collection of some sort at Yale and a Sadleir
collection at UCLA.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, yes, right, right.
-
Grassian
- And it's a prized collection.
-
Dudley
- Yes.
-
Grassian
- So you said you spent three or four hours a day on it. Were you paid?
Were you hired for that?
-
Dudley
- Oh, yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- Oh, you were hired.
-
Dudley
- The English Department did hire me to do that. Right.
-
Grassian
- Oh, the English Department hired you, not the library.
-
Dudley
- No, Brad Booth was chair of the English Department, and he had plans to
do other things with the collection when he retired, but it just didn't
work out for him.
-
Grassian
- What kind of plans, if you know?
-
Dudley
- Let me think. Well, he had published on Sadleir and, oh, [Anthony]
Trollope. He had published on Trollope, and I think he had done
something on Robert Louis Stevenson that was pending publication. He was
a very active man with a very active mind, but he died very suddenly. He
was young when he died.
-
Grassian
- Okay. You mentioned that you wrote on slips. There weren't any computers
in those days, of course, and you didn't touch-type, so you were writing
or printing on the cards. Can you tell me how you--just go through the
process of how you did it?
-
Dudley
- Oh, well, I started--the books were arranged alphabetically--
-
Grassian
- By?
-
Dudley
- By author, which is just the casual employee could arrange them. And they
were in the corner office of the--they were stored in the corner office
of the Powell Library Building, the office that overlooks--it was on the
first floor, and the windows overlook Sunset Boulevard, the curve on
Sunset Boulevard. It had been the office of the first--oh, goodness, I'm
not going to be able to remember his name, our first provost at the time
[Ernest Carroll Moore], I think. He talked about standing at the window
looking out, waiting for [University of California] Berkeley to come
after him, to close UCLA, that UCLA was very competitive, or Berkeley
was very competitive. It was University of California's southern branch,
so that was the corner office. But it was used to store this collection.
Powell, Lawrence Clare Powell, had used it as his office.That building was at one time--it housed everything. It housed what
became the Biomedical Library. It was in one room in the basement. It
housed the Music Library. All the branch libraries were there, so that's
where the collection was housed. I got a little off there.
-
Grassian
- That's where it was. Right, right. No, that's good.
-
Dudley
- So I saw them in pristine condition. I saw them pretty much as Brad Booth
saw them the first time.
-
Grassian
- Were they in boxes, or on shelves?
-
Dudley
- No, they were shelved.
-
Grassian
- They were put on shelves--
-
Dudley
- --in the original bindings. Later on we had to have some of them boxed
and bound. So I started with A and read it. I think it was Ainsworth. I
believe it was Ainsworth, and made notes and assigned subject headings
to it, and I tried to keep the subject headings to five. I didn't want
any more than five subject headings per title.
-
Grassian
- Did you create your own control vocabulary, or did you use LC subject
headings or?
-
Dudley
- Really, for fiction there isn't any such thing. I know L.A. Public
[Library] had its own.
-
Grassian
- Did they use Sears Fiction [Sears List of Subject Headings]?
-
Dudley
- I don't remember.
-
Grassian
- I seem to vaguely remember that. But anyway, so you created your own
control vocabulary.
-
Dudley
- That's right, that's right, and with cross references.
-
Grassian
- And by the way, were these called Yellowbacks?
-
Dudley
- Oh, some of them. There is a collection, a separate collection in that
room of Yellowbacks.
-
Grassian
- Oh, so they weren't all Yellowbacks.
-
Dudley
- No, no, no, no, no. They were first editions of--Yellowbacks were often
not first editions. They were reprints. But he collected first editions
in mint condition, so he doesn't necessarily have all of any given
author. He would collect it only if it were in mint condition, but in
many cases, that was everything of an individual writer.
-
Grassian
- So it would have to be a first edition, except for the Yellowbacks, and
in mint condition for him to collect it. But he must have had some kind
of list or known who the nineteenth century authors were.
-
Dudley
- He was himself a publisher and very active in the book business. So what
is your question?
-
Grassian
- Well, I'm wondering if he worked from a list of authors, or he just knew
who all of these nineteenth--if he were a publisher, he probably had a
idea of who all these authors were.
-
Dudley
- I'm not remembering that, but I'll think about that. So that's what I did
for a few years. I read them. Oh, and the other thing that I did was I
read book reviews of all of them. So I read reviews in--UCLA had at that
time a wonderful collection of nineteenth century journals and
newspapers, so I tried to get--I looked in sources for reviews and
quoted them in the bibliography.
-
Grassian
- On each index card that you would--
-
Dudley
- On each card, yes, yes, right.
-
Grassian
- So you read each book. You'd have a card, one card for each book?
-
Dudley
- Yes.
-
Grassian
- And then you would do subject index to the fiction, and then you would
also list any book reviews that you found that you then read.
-
Dudley
- Right. I'd quote reviews, yes.
-
Grassian
- You quoted from the reviews.
-
Dudley
- Yes, I'd quote reviews.
-
Grassian
- And authority checking. Did you check for names in the UCLA catalog and
elsewhere?
-
Dudley
- Oh, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, I did. Yes, I did. Right. Right. And it was
fascinating and captivating and I loved it. I loved working on it. And,
of course, Brad Booth was very excited about it, that it was taking
shape, and he did write about it in "Nineteenth-Century Fiction," the
journal, and had great aspirations for when he retired, what we could do
with it. So that was--
-
Grassian
- So you did that three or four hours a day every day?
-
Dudley
- Yes. You know, I'm backing up on that. I'm not sure that I did that every
day. I did it--I'm sure if the boys had a meeting or something, I
probably went to it. I didn't have any particular schedule, but I know
it was mornings until the boys were out of school.
-
Grassian
- While the kids were in school. You mentioned before when you were taking
that graduate course with Hugh Dick how much you loved descriptive
cataloging.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- Did you do descriptive as well as subject for this?
-
Dudley
- Oh, yes, yes, I did, on three or four categories, maybe five categories,
I don't know. I did describe the book.
-
Grassian
- So you did the descriptive and the subject index for each book.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- Okay, so it wasn't just a subject index. So each card had--
-
Dudley
- The card had the size of the book and the publication information.
-
Grassian
- Number of pages and paper and everything that you do for descriptive. So
you expanded from just doing descriptive to doing both?
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, yes. It was a subject index to the collection.
-
Grassian
- Did you finish it?
-
Dudley
- Well, I went all the way through it, but it was my intention to revise it
and to go through it again. I had really meant to do a cursory job and
go fill in on it, but I never got to that. I went through it the one
time. Yes, and some of the books, of course, I didn't read.Oh, another thing I forgot about was that I hired, through the English
Department, readers. But it had to be people who, of course, were
connected with the university, and it had to be copies that were in the
collection. It could not be the Sadleir books themselves. So I would
speak to whomever we hired and ask pertinent questions about the novel.
I did say this was all novels, didn't I? This was all novels.
-
Grassian
- You said they were all fiction, yes.
-
Dudley
- So the English Department did pay for other readers, and they were people
that I could trust and talk with.
-
Grassian
- So you didn't read every single book.
-
Dudley
- No, I didn't, no.
-
Grassian
- About what percentage? Or wait a minute. I forgot to ask how many
books--let me stop for one second.[Interruption]
-
Dudley
- --if I have anything around here that's going to describe it more,
because I really want to. I don't have anything in my files either.
-
Grassian
- Well, you can think about it, and we can go back to it next time.
-
Dudley
- Okay, we really need to, because I have much more to say about the
Sadleir collection.
-
Grassian
- Yes, we'll certainly go back to it next time. But do you remember about
how many books were in the collection?
-
Dudley
- I can't remember.
-
Grassian
- Thousands? Or hundreds?
-
Dudley
- Oh, I don't know, Esther.
-
Grassian
- Okay. Well, you can think about it and maybe come back to it.
-
Dudley
- Oh, yes, yes. It's exciting.
-
Grassian
- About what percent would you say that you read yourself? About 50
percent, 75?
-
Dudley
- Oh, no, more than that probably. Probably 75, 80 [percent].
-
Grassian
- And then you relied on these readers to read the ones that we owned.
-
Dudley
- Yes. I can't even remember how many, just not very many. But I think I
was getting to the point with it where I wasn't sure that I'd be able to
do all the things with it that I wanted to do. But again, it had to be
in the collection, in our own collection. But we had a pretty good
collection of nineteenth century fiction in the stacks.
-
Grassian
- Right. So what would you say were some interesting or exciting
discoveries you made as a result of cataloging this collection?
-
Dudley
- I don't think of it as cataloging. I think of it as--
-
Grassian
- Or creating a subject index.
-
Dudley
- What was fun about it?
-
Grassian
- Something, anything interesting or exciting, particular--
-
Dudley
- It was a very exciting, very exciting to learn what we had and who else
and where else it existed. That was great fun too. I remember using
British Museum Catalog a lot and Bibliotheque Nationale [of France]. So
many of these were not available anyplace else.
-
Grassian
- So you were checking to see who else had copies, not even at all--
-
Dudley
- Well, very often I would look in to see if any of them had reviews, if
British Museum had anything on the book, what kind of information I
could get. And the reviewers, the people who were reviewing them, of
great interest, of course. Well, the "Athaeneum" is what I used the
most. We had a wonderful collection of the reviewing sources of the
nineteenth century. I think all the major reviewing sources we had. We
subscribed to, of course, and had been subscribing to, but we had back
files of them. So I guess there had been an early emphasis on the major
journals.
-
Grassian
- So generally, you found reviews on most of these books, right?
-
Dudley
- Yes.
-
Grassian
- They were well known enough to have been reviewed?
-
Dudley
- No, not necessarily. Oh, no. Some of them are extremely minor novels and
novelists.
-
Grassian
- Was it more the Yellowbacks that were more minor?
-
Dudley
- No, no, no.
-
Grassian
- Tell me about the Yellowbacks.
-
Dudley
- Well, I think I'm going to wait and talk about all of that together,
okay, all right.
-
Grassian
- Okay, next time. Okay, that's fine. So you did that for how long?
-
Dudley
- Well, let's see. Oh, I don't know. My guess would be maybe three, four
years.
-
Grassian
- Three or four years. Then you became a reference librarian in the college
library at UCLA and you were there for many years till you retired in
1981. How did that happen?
-
Dudley
- Yes. Well, I think it was when the boys were in junior high and while I
was working on the Sadleir that I was more and more attracted to the
library and to get back to it. I wanted a half-time position. I still
wanted to be available for the kids. Norah Jones was--I had known Norah
for a long time. We had been in library school together, and she had an
opening for a reference librarian, and it was my goal to do half time.
Once I became involved with it, I had a hard time only doing half time,
so I think just gradually it became full time for me.
-
Grassian
- But you started out half time.
-
Dudley
- Yes.
-
Grassian
- So you said you started wanting to go back to working in the library. Was
it because you were doing all this checking and you just kind of--
-
Dudley
- Brad died, and I think that was what--there really wasn't anyone who was
in the English Department who knew about it or was that enthusiastic.
Hugh Dick would have continued with it, but I really wanted to get back
to the library.
-
Grassian
- So you wanted to move sort of from this solitary, pretty solitary task of
working on the Sadleir collection, and then you moved to public service.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- Yes, that's quite different.
-
Dudley
- Right, right.
-
Grassian
- You never did that before, though. I mean, you had been a bibliographic
checker.
-
Dudley
- That's right, that's right.
-
Grassian
- So that was your first public service work. Did someone train you, or how
did you--
-
Dudley
- No.
-
Grassian
- You didn't have training.
-
Dudley
- I think that I had taken the--of course, I used a lot of reference
materials in working on the bibliography. No, there wasn't specific
training for reference. Well, of course, I knew the major
bibliographies, and I still think that's what reference is about. I
think so. It wasn't difficult at all. It was wonderful. I loved being at
the desk.
-
Grassian
- What year did you start working in college library, the undergraduate
library? It started in 1965, college library, didn't it?
-
Dudley
- Well, yes. Did it? I don't remember.
-
Grassian
- Sometime around then.
-
Dudley
- Let's see. Norm moved to URL [University Research Library]. The URL
collection moved in--
-
Grassian
- About '65.
-
Dudley
- Let's see. Did you say '65?
-
Grassian
- I think around '65.
-
Dudley
- Yes, I think '65 is right.
-
Grassian
- Oh, so he was working in--the college library existed, and he moved
there--
-
Dudley
- He was responsible for--I remember when University Research Library
opened. We went to the grand opening, and Bob Vosper was at the door
greeting people, and he said to the boys, "We never could have made this
move without your father." And Norm was fresh out of library school, and
that was just Bob Vosper's graciousness. But Norm had arranged for the
actual moving of the collection.
-
Grassian
- So but Norman worked in College Library before you did, right, for a year
or something? I thought I remembered you saying that.
-
Dudley
- Well, he worked in reference, when College Library's reference service
for a year was in the basement level, and that's when he worked there.
-
Grassian
- And he worked there and then he moved up to the--
-
Dudley
- Yes. Very, very quickly he--I have some letters on his quick move. He
went into acquisitions and then became collection development librarian.
-
Grassian
- So when you started working in College Library, Norman was already at
what is now YRL [Young Research Library], or--
-
Dudley
- I don't know.
-
Grassian
- But in any case, both of you were not working in College Library at the
same time.
-
Dudley
- No, no.
-
Grassian
- Okay. So it was in the sixties sometime, and maybe you'll remember later
or next time about what year it was that you started working in College
Library. So thinking about the sixties and the seventies, there was a
lot of political unrest at UCLA and elsewhere at that time. There were
demonstrations. There were police on campus. There was even a time when
the police chased somebody into the Research Library, broke his arm.
-
Dudley
- Oh, yes, oh, yes.
-
Grassian
- What do you remember about that?
-
Dudley
- Well, what I remember is libraries--it was a time of great unrest, as you
said, and libraries had been savaged, and people had burned drawers of
the catalog. I'm sure this is all in--
-
Grassian
- At UCLA?
-
Dudley
- No, not at UCLA, but other libraries. So people were on guard. People
were very concerned about libraries, and one of the administrators was
always there at a reference desk, at all of our reference desks, because
that would be--oh, and there had also been--what did they call the nude
races or runs through libraries?
-
Grassian
- Flashers?
-
Dudley
- That's right, flashers, and that was a really good place, because you had
really long, long corridors to run down. So there were administrators
assigned to be on hand in case there was police stuff, and at one point
the police said to lock the front doors of the College Library. We did,
and this was a campus sweep of students protesting the [Vietnam] war,
and they made a great sweep over the quad, and they went right past the
door of the library. But they did then go on to the Research Library,
and two kids came in and the police followed, and Bob Vosper went out
and told the police that they couldn't come in here, that this was safe,
and he protected the kids. So that was a moment of glory for us. But the
College Library, they just swept past us--
-
Grassian
- Went right past during that time.
-
Dudley
- --and went down the steps.
-
Grassian
- And this was during the protest period about the Vietnam War mostly.
-
Dudley
- Vietnam War, right, right.
-
Grassian
- Do you remember anything else about that time period?
-
Dudley
- No, I remember great concern, because kids around the country had been
destroying libraries, destroying them in terms of the catalog. It was
contagious and, of course, our goal was to save the library.
-
Grassian
- And it was only the card catalog.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes. They didn't get at collections, as I remember it, of libraries.
Do you remember any of that? Was that--particularly, of course,
[University of California] Berkeley was particularly active, that
campus. Oh, they were swept from one end of the campus by the police,
and that's why they didn't stop to break into Royce Hall or the library.
It was a campus sweep.
-
Grassian
- Campus sweep, yes. So--
-
Dudley
- Oh, other things too of spilling ink in catalog drawers. There was a lot
of focus on libraries throughout the country.
-
Grassian
- Trying to destroy--
-
Dudley
- University.
-
Grassian
- And so people wanted to protect them. And there was nothing online, of
course. Everything was card catalog--
-
Dudley
- And books.
-
Grassian
- Although there was the shelf list in the back office that the public
generally didn't know about, so theoretically, a card catalog could be
reconstructed from the shelf list, but nobody knew that except for
people who worked in libraries. Okay. So now about College Library. Who
were the heads of College Library when you worked there, and what were
they like? That was from approximately in the sixties sometime, which
you'll think about later, what date, till you retired in 1981.
-
Dudley
- Well, Norah Jones was the founder of the College Library. Norah had been
herself a cataloger. What else did Norah do? She had not worked in
reference. She was head of the Reserve Book Room, and when she was a
student at UCLA for her undergraduate work, she had a job in the Reserve
Book Room, and when she got out of library school, there was an opening
for Reserve, and she liked it very, very much. She liked working with
the students, and she liked organizing, and it was a really good job for
her. Then when it was a national movement, really, to establish
undergraduate libraries, and when UCLA decided to do that, the Reserve
Book Room was an integral part of an undergraduate library, and she was
appointed the College Library librarian. She did a really good job of
it, and she was a really excellent organizer.At that time there were--well, a few years later--there were a lot of
exchange services. A librarian from England wanted to come to us, and
Norah went to England and served as a librarian there, and a librarian
came to UCLA from England, but not as the head of the library. The
second person to serve in that position was Jim Davis, and he served as
the head librarian in Norah's absence. When she returned, she was given
another position. She became head of technical services at the
University Research Library, and Jim Davis carried on as head librarian
at College [Library]. There was strong feeling about Jim. He was
uncomfortable, a man who got the position by default, and he was rather
difficult and ultimately he needed to--I don't remember how many years,
maybe just a couple of years--he was transferred to--what did they do
with Jim? Oh, at first they thought he might be a bibliographer. Then,
oh, I know, Special Collections, Special Collections took him.The next one was Hiram Davis, and Hiram was from the South, and he was
the first black librarian we had, the first head librarian. He learned a
lot on that job. He didn't have a smooth time of it either, and I think
he was there for a couple of years too. I don't believe it was any more
than that. Then he got a job at one of the state colleges, and he was
replaced by another Davis. No, no, he was replaced when a young man from
one of the state colleges [Tom Fry] became head librarian, and he was
more interested in--it seemed to me his interests were not collection
development and not reference. I don't remember what his interests were
[laughs], but he too left College Library, and then I don't know,
because I left while he was still librarian.
-
Grassian
- Was that Tom Fry you're talking about?
-
Dudley
- Tom Fry, that's it, that's it. Yes. I'd forgotten his name.
-
Grassian
- So Norah was the first head of College Library, and she established it
and everything. I remember that she also established, I believe, some
satellite libraries in the dorms. Do you remember that?
-
Dudley
- Oh, right, right, she did. She did. She was an inventive woman, and she
had good ideas and always made room for new ideas. The dorms--people
would come to--by that time we had dorms, and people wanted to be able
to study in their dorms, so she established little collections in dorms.
That went on for a few years. People enjoyed that. Oh, and Norah kept
very close ties with the offices, and she knew what was going on on
campus. She maintained very good relationships for the College Library.
-
Grassian
- Outside of the library.
-
Dudley
- Outside of the College Library and with the other libraries on campus.
The libraries were expanded. At one time, we had nineteen libraries on
campus, a lot of special libraries, and at this time it seems to be
decreasing practically daily. I don't know how many are left now, but
that was the move at the time.
-
Grassian
- We're going to talk a little bit more about these different people who
headed College Library in a little more depth, but first I wondered if
you could talk about your College Library colleagues, the other
librarians and who they were and what they were like.
-
Dudley
- Oh, that's nice to be thinking about that. We at the time were hired as
reference librarians, but that meant half time on the desk and then we
had other responsibilities as well, responsibilities for the collection,
adding to the collection, reading reviews about reference books and
determining what we needed and what was appropriate for us. The policy
was our circulation was two weeks, and University Research Library was
for graduates and faculty primarily, although we could use it. Their
circulation period I don't remember. It was a month or six weeks, and
faculty, of course, took books out and could have them until they were
requested, so there was no time limit. But College, we were very strict
about it and remain so. I think that's owing to Norah, Norah's strength,
that no faculty member and nobody else can check books out of the
College Library for a longer period of time. Is it two weeks now?
-
Grassian
- Two weeks, still two weeks.
-
Dudley
- Yes, it's still two weeks. So the other obligations of the librarians--it
was collection development, and there was reserve. Of course, reserve,
someone needed to--I guess maybe it was working with the reserve
collection. I don't think we had a separate librarian for reserve at the
time. I don't remember.
-
Grassian
- I don't think so.
-
Dudley
- No, I think it was an obligation of somebody in reference.
-
Grassian
- Well, I started in '69, so as of '69 I don't remember anyone in charge of
reserves, a librarian, although you said Norah had been to begin with.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes. So what else did we do? New bookshelf, it was adding--well,
somebody was in charge of the reference collection, and that meant
paying particular attention to new reference materials, old ones that we
needed, and someone in charge of the new bookshelf. That's to be sure we
had what was currently available, was hot off the press. Our new
bookshelf was always just excellent, excellent. Hmm, what else did we
do? I'll have to think about it.
-
Grassian
- Okay. So going back to the heads of College Library. At one point, a
consultant was called in to deal with problems in College Library. Who
was involved? What do you remember about that?
-
Dudley
- Jim Davis was. He was selected by Norah, who had a very motherly attitude
toward him, and she hired him. She hired him and tutored him, but when
Norah was there to tell him what to do, everything was fine. But he was
autocratic and difficult. He was difficult to get along with. So there
was just problem after problem, and so outside people were brought in to
try to guide and direct and get us back on the track, but it just really
seemed impossible. So ultimately what happened instead was that Jim was
transferred to another department. And he had advocates, and it became
quite a political, political mess.
-
Grassian
- How did you feel at the time about the problems and the resolution?
-
Dudley
- Well, I think I was pretty hopeless about his being able to succeed in
it. I think it was a matter of his temperament. I don't think he could
rise to it. It was handed to him by his mentor, and it just didn't work.
It just couldn't work, and that was the ultimate decision of the team
that was brought in. Oh, the assistant university librarian for public
services was his immediate superior. That was Everett Moore, and Everett
[unclear] administrator. He was a fine, fine man, but I think he could
not handle it, so that's what happened there.
-
Grassian
- And Page Ackerman I think was involved.
-
Dudley
- Well, Page Ackerman was the librarian by that time.
-
Grassian
- She was the university librarian.
-
Dudley
- She was the university librarian, and she was the one who called in a
team to--
-
Grassian
- Team of consultants, okay.
-
Dudley
- Who really worked hard. It was a very good team, and they worked
individually with him, as Page had. It wasn't for lack of desire. It was
just what the conclusion had to be, I think.
-
Grassian
- Okay. Maybe we can talk a little bit about Hiram Davis next, and then I
don't know if you would want to stop there and continue next time. What
about Hiram?
-
Dudley
- All right. Well, Hiram was a very personable guy and had personal
relationships with staff [laughs] and that led to problems in itself. He
really didn't have the background for a university librarian. He didn't
have the education for it or, well, knowledge. He didn't know anything
about administration. He was a nice guy, but he just didn't have the
background necessary for it, so it did not work out. It was a series of
real failures, I think, on the part of administration to hire these
people. For one thing, College Library had a particular mission, and it
was different from University Research Library. It was to help
university students use the library. That was not the mission of the
University Research Library. Theirs was to work with faculty and
graduate students.But at College Library, our patrons were undergraduates who didn't know
how to find books, who came in scared and mystified, and it was our goal
to help these kids. That became our focus. I think we were unfocused for
a while when Norah left.
-
Grassian
- You said he had relationships with staff. Was that with students as well?
Was there some controversy or problems that you remember?
-
Dudley
- I think he certainly had some personnel problems, no question about that,
but I think it was--oh, well, I think anything else is kind of gossip
mongering.
-
Grassian
- Okay. He appointed you, I think, to a little bit higher position for a
while. You were head of public service for College Library?
-
Dudley
- Who?
-
Grassian
- You.
-
Dudley
- Who--
-
Grassian
- Hiram.
-
Dudley
- Hiram? Oh, well, Hiram needed assistance.
-
Grassian
- Needed someone who knew what they were doing.
-
Dudley
- Right, right.
-
Grassian
- Because he didn't know.
-
Dudley
- Yes. Yes. Well, didn't that happen under Jim? I don't remember. I don't
know.
-
Grassian
- I don't remember that under Jim, but sort of more your recollection.
-
Dudley
- Yes, I did. Of course, I always had a passion for the College Library and
I still do.
-
Grassian
- And a passion for its mission?
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- The mission of College Library.
-
Dudley
- Now, actually, I don't think I was doing anything in--I'm murky about
it--in education. Oh, sure I was. I was doing it even under Jim. Oh,
yes, yes, I was. I was.
-
Grassian
- Beginning around the time that I started, I believe, was around the time
the workbook was--
-
Dudley
- Was that the end of the seventies?
-
Grassian
- It was the end of the sixties.
-
Dudley
- End of the sixties.
-
Grassian
- As I recall. But did you--
-
Dudley
- Oh, well, yes, I would like to get into that. That was with Jim.
-
Grassian
- Yes, we're going to definitely get into that.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, I remember. Yes, that's right.
-
Grassian
- Right, yes.
-
Dudley
- Well, I don't think that Hiram was involved in library instruction. I
don't believe he was at all.
-
Grassian
- So did you want to talk about the workbook now? It's been about an hour.
Or do you want to wait for next time? Because that's a big topic.
-
Dudley
- Let's wait for next time and start fresh then.
-
Grassian
- Yes, yes. Okay, so we can stop for now then.
-
Dudley
- Okay, great.[End of interview]
1.4. Session 4 (September 8, 2009)
-
Grassian
- This is Esther Grassian interviewing Mimi Dudley, the fourth interview.
Today is Tuesday, September 8 [2009], and we are again at Mimi's
apartment in Sherman Oaks, and it is about 10:25 in the morning. Last
time you talked about the [Michael] Sadleir collection [of nineteenth
century fiction], your involvement in it, and I know that you have some
more you want to say about that, so we'll do that in a minute. We also
talked about your life and your career up to the point of when you
started developing the Library Skills Workbook. So we can start with the
Sadleir collection or anything else that you'd like to follow up on
first.
-
Dudley
- Yes. Well, I think what brought me back to work was the Sadleir
collection. Brad Booth was the chairman of the English Department, and
he had intended to--when he retired, he wanted to work with the Sadleir
collection. He had been instrumental in acquiring it for UCLA. He
describes in "Nineteenth Century Fiction," the periodical, his first
sight of the collection. Sadleir was a book collector and a publisher
and a bibliographer, and he worked for Constable [and Company, Ltd.]. I
think he was president of Constable at one time, and his two-volume "XIX
Century Fiction: A Bibliographical Record Based on His Own Collection,"
is a renowned masterpiece of bibliography. He was also a novelist. He
wrote "Fanny by Gaslight." He collected some over eight thousand, almost
nine thousand volumes of first editions and rare mint-condition books
from major and minor nineteenth century writers.It was the condition of the books that drew Brad Booth's eye. He
describes going up a flight of stairs and walking into the room of these
dazzling, dazzling collections. There were three collections. There was
a collection of yellow books [Yellowbacks] and a collection of the
novels. His prime requisite was that they be in mint condition and in
original wrappers, and that's how I saw them when I was hired by Brad
Booth to go in and do a bibliography of the collection. It was extremely
exciting. These books--I was handling these books for the first time
since he had acquired them, so that was a very exciting project to be
working on.My bibliography was--I tried to restrict myself to five subject headings
per novel, and most of them I didn't really need that many. But I went
into the Sadleir Room--it was a round table in that room--and read them,
and after a while we also hired students, well, they were doctoral
students in the English Department, who would read, not in the Sadleir
Room, but read the library's copies. We had many, many editions of these
novels, but it was a library copy that the people would read. Then we
would discuss them, and I could draw them out and assign subject
headings to them. I think it was three years that I did that, three very
exciting years. Then Brad Booth died and while Hugh Dick was perfectly
willing to go on with the project, because it had grown a great deal, I
by that time was ready to go back to being a librarian.
-
Grassian
- Okay. So I meant to ask you, did you ever get your master's in English?
-
Dudley
- No, not in English, no.
-
Grassian
- Library, you want to library school and got an M.L.S. [Masters of Library
Science degree]. But you had been a grad student in English, but then
you switched.
-
Dudley
- Yes. As soon as I learned about bibliography, I moved over to
librarianship, yes.
-
Grassian
- Okay. Anything else that you'd want to say about it?
-
Dudley
- Let's see. It's hard for me to break away from the Sadleir collection
once I get started on it. When the dedication ceremonies of the Sadleir
collection took place at the library, in 1953 that was, I mentioned that
part of the collection was Yellowbacks, and UCLA published a Yellowback
of two lectures that were given in honor of the dedication, one by
Frederick [B.] Adams [Jr.], who was the director of the Pierpont Morgan
Library, and the other was W.W. Robinson [actually David Anton Randall
according to the UCLA catalog record], who was the president of the
Friends of the UCLA Library. And this book itself is so handsome.
-
Grassian
- And what is it called?
-
Dudley
- It's called "Revelations of Two Celebrated Book-Snatchers, or, What
Victoria Read [listed in UCLA Library Catalog as "The Sadleir
Collection: addresses"]."
-
Grassian
- And you're holding--it has an illustration on the front of it looks like
a woman tied up in like a coffin, open coffin standing and someone tying
her in there, two pirates, looks like two pirates.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes. The yellow books were sensational and they were very often
cheap reprints of Victorian novels. They were sold in railroad stations
in England. A lot of people who had not been readers during this period
learned to read, and the books were sold in railway stations. And, of
course, those yellow books in Sadleir's collection are, again, mint
condition.
-
Grassian
- Mint condition, and they had covers on them?
-
Dudley
- Oh, very, very lurid covers.
-
Grassian
- Like this one, yes. That's funny. Now, I'm just curious. Were the books
themselves illustrated inside, or was it all text?
-
Dudley
- Oh, some, some. Oh, yes, some. They were first editions and, of course,
the most illustrious artists of the time were illustrators.
-
Grassian
- Of these Yellowbacks?
-
Dudley
- No, no, not of the Yellowbacks but of the rest of the collection.
-
Grassian
- Because at first I was--
-
Dudley
- Yes, there is quite a bit written about the illustrations of the
Yellowbacks. Actually, Suzanne [M.] Tatian and Claire Bellanti and I did
a paper, "Nineteenth Century Fiction: A Celebration of the Sadleir
Collection" that is a description, that's a physical description of the
Yellowback, well, of the entire collection.
-
Grassian
- So would you say--I'm not sure about this, because I haven't read or
looked at any Yellowbacks--would you say that in a way, they might have
been sort of the equivalent of Classics Illustrated? But they had more
text, and they were text of novels rather than just--
-
Dudley
- The Yellowbacks are you talking about?
-
Grassian
- Yes.
-
Dudley
- There's a third--I've mentioned that the collection is in three parts.
There was the mint and first editions of the most important novels of
the period, and the Yellowbacks, and the third section was series, like
the Classics [Illustrated] series.
-
Grassian
- Like Classics Illustrated? Because I was just thinking of Classics
Illustrated as being geared to maybe people who wouldn't ordinarily read
the classics, and they were mostly illustration and so on. So in that
sense--
-
Dudley
- Yes, I think that's true.
-
Grassian
- Interesting. Okay. Anything else that you want to add about it?
-
Dudley
- No, I think that covers my great career as a bibliographer, and really it
was a very, very happy time.
-
Grassian
- You loved it.
-
Dudley
- Yes, I did.
-
Grassian
- But when Brad Booth died, then it kind of like faded--although the
collection is still there.
-
Dudley
- The collection is still there, and the box--[Interruption]
-
Grassian
- We're talking about finishing up about the Sadleir collection, and you
just talked about how much you enjoyed it, and you did it for three
years, and then after Brad Booth died, then you were--but did you
finish? I forgot to ask.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- You finished it, okay.
-
Dudley
- But it was just once over lightly. It definitely--we should have gone on
with it for another good long time, because while I did look at current
reviews--we had a very good collection of journals of the period--there
is much more to be done. It should be done in greater depth; it's a
long, long project.
-
Grassian
- In terms of the reviews, it's identifying reviews and doing excerpts from
them? But also--
-
Dudley
- Yes, and assigning subject headings and looking that over. It was just a
once over lightly that I did, and it would be great to go into it in
more depth for somebody. Somebody should go into it.
-
Grassian
- So somebody could do that as a further research project, to review and
extend what you did.
-
Dudley
- Right, right.
-
Grassian
- And I believe that a library school intern has created a database which
is ready for data entry of what you did, which is still available on the
cards in Special Collections, so we'll be talking about that with them
to see what can be done.
-
Dudley
- Yes, well, that would be wonderful. My handwriting is miniscule, and I'm
sure they're not easy to read, but I think they photograph all right.
-
Grassian
- Okay. Oh, and I must have asked you about how many volumes you kept?
-
Dudley
- There are eight thousand, over eight thousand.
-
Grassian
- And you did all eight thousand?
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes. Well, no. Yes, I did all the novels.
-
Grassian
- All the novels, and that was eight thousand?
-
Dudley
- Yes, the collection was eight thousand.
-
Grassian
- Whew. Three years. Okay. So are you ready to talk about the library?
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- So the last time, we talked about who the heads of College Library were
when you were working there, and you started working--you went back to
College Library about what year, do you remember?
-
Dudley
- I went back after the Sadleir [unclear].
-
Grassian
- After the Sadleir, after you were off because of raising your kids till
they were in school.
-
Dudley
- I don't really have that date. I'll have to think about it.
-
Grassian
- Approximately.
-
Dudley
- Well, the boys were--oh, it was probably the end of the sixties.
-
Grassian
- Okay, because I [Esther Grassian] started in '69, and you were already
working in College Library, so it was before that. Whatever. So we
talked about your work in College Library a bit. First of all, when you
worked in College Library, and again, I didn't ask this, I know that you
were a reference librarian, as many of us were, that's what we were
called. What did you do besides being a reference librarian? You had
off-desk responsibilities at the time. Before the Library Skills
Workbook.
-
Dudley
- Yes. Well, it was to contact faculty and to offer library orientation.
That was what I was doing. And there was a program, a new program on
campus, an undergraduate program for basic orientation to the library.
Until that time they had--but we've always done library tours. They were
always available, and librarians would offer it to the departments they
thought would be interested, and that meant faculty contact and
lectures. Lectures was what we did. A program started called--at the
time it was called Rainbow, a Rainbow Program. It had four parts. It was
Chicano students is what we call them now; no, it's what we called it
then. Chicano, black, Asian, and I lose the fourth. I know there were
four distinct--
-
Grassian
- American Indian.
-
Dudley
- Oh, yes, that's right, American Indian. So a T.A., a teaching assistant
in the Chicano Program, came and he opened reference books and plucked
facts and gave the facts to his students, and it was a hunt for the
students of the huge reference collection that UCLA had. Well, of
course, to find that fact was difficult. The intentions were wonderful,
but the fifty or so students would come in and would look frenziedly and
feverishly for a fact, and this was not supposed to be with any
guidance. The theory was that they would be leafing through reference
books and learn a great deal.So I decided that it would be good to write questions, to first talk
about a particular reference book, about dictionaries in general and
give them that information and introduce them to a few dictionaries and
then a fact that they could look up. And that was fine. However, that
isn't of very great interest when a class of thirty students had that
question, so one kid would go do it and that would be it and pass it
around. And they really didn't learn much about the reference works
themselves. So I proposed giving them thirty--well, this man who came to
me with it was really anxious to do a library program. So I wrote thirty
questions about each tool. The one I think about a lot is something so
simple that we all need, or needed at the time daily, was a Thomas
Guide, so I could do thirty by giving each one a different street, and
in order to answer the question, they would have to pick up the Thomas
Guide and look it up, and they'd have to handle the Thomas Guide, they'd
have to know where the Thomas Guides were. It required them to come to
the library, which in itself was a feat.That was of interest to the faculty, to the English Department. English
Department was the one who first was interested in it. However, when it
came to thousands and thousands of students, it became more and more
complicated and more and more questions needed to be written. So they
were compiled in a book. However, writing the questions themselves--oh,
I know what we did. We created shelving in--we had a room to collate the
books, so people were hired and taught how to do that. So we would have
a box of thirty books which would be distributed to one class, and each
of the students in that class had different questions to answer. But it
became a very big problem to collate them, so every library that did it
needed to learn how to do that and how to write them.So libraries were very enthusiastic about it, the idea, and the book was
adapted by many, many libraries through the country, and I went to
libraries and taught people how to do it, so each library could do it
for themselves and empathize the things that they wanted. Do you think
that's a pretty good description of what I was doing, Esther? I know
that photographing each page was complicated, and we did it at the Xerox
machines in the libraries, and it would be days and days and days of
standing at the--I'm sure you helped with that.
-
Grassian
- I don't remember helping with that. Possible, but I'm thinking back. So
that's a great overview of it, and just going back to the very
beginning, those four ethnic groups. I remember that there were
librarians assigned or volunteered to work with each of them. The one
that you worked with was the Chicano group.
-
Dudley
- Oh, that's what I started with. Yes, that's right, right.
-
Grassian
- That's what you started with, and so the first workbook was called
something like the Chicano Library Skills Workbook [Chicano Library
Program]. But it didn't start out as a book. Do you remember how it
started out?
-
Dudley
- It was cards. It was on cards, and then the cards were filmed for pages
of the books.
-
Grassian
- But before it was a book, remember the envelopes? They were boxes of
envelopes with--
-
Dudley
- Boxes and boxes. Yes, I would take--on weekends when we went out of town,
we would take boxes with us, and people we were visiting or who were
visiting us had to collate. Oh, Esther, I'd forgotten about that. Yes,
yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- Yes. Remember the envelopes?
-
Dudley
- Huge boxes of envelopes, yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- Right. And as I recall the boxes, well, there were a number of different
questions, and it was in a particular sequence, search-strategy
sequence, and each question had like a set of maybe twenty or thirty
envelopes with a different question in each one related to that same
topic. Is that right? Do you remember that?
-
Dudley
- I think you're right. It's fuzzy.
-
Grassian
- You had forgotten that.
-
Dudley
- Yes, I had. And we really wore the library staff out doing it and
correcting them and returning them. And, oh, the man who started it was
just so intrigued and so delighted with it, from the Chicano Department
we called it at the time. Then it was required for all four sections.
They weren't really departments. It was four--
-
Grassian
- And so now I remember that there was a woman who was a T.A. also for the
Chicano group.
-
Dudley
- Yes, Elena [Frausto].
-
Grassian
- Elena Frausto? I think it was Elena Frausto.
-
Dudley
- Hey, good for you. Oh, you looked this all up.
-
Grassian
- Oh, no, I just remembered it. I don't know why. So it progressed into the
workbook. Now, I remember there was something about writing answers as
opposed to having multiple choice answers. Did you remember that?
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes. We do have examples of it, don't we?
-
Grassian
- Yes, I remember that.
-
Dudley
- We would introduce them to the tool, the encyclopedia, and give a
description of it, and then give them five questions. There were five
questions and they were, let us say, numbered one to five. I don't know
if it's alphabetical. And the student, in order to answer the question,
needs to go to that tool, though they could guess what tool it is, but
if they made any errors at all, they were to come and talk with us and
then we would be sure that they reviewed that, whatever the book was.
-
Grassian
- Now, when you say you told them about, say, dictionaries or
encyclopedias, you mean in writing. It wasn't like an in-person group
thing?
-
Dudley
- No, no, no.
-
Grassian
- It was like a little description in writing--
-
Dudley
- Yes, of what this tool is, what it does and then the use of it.
-
Grassian
- Right. And then there were the questions, and when you say five, there
were five answer choices? That was the multiple choice.
-
Dudley
- That's right.
-
Grassian
- Before the multiple choice version, the first way that you had people do
it, I think, I sort of recall, was they had to write their answer in. Do
you remember how that worked?
-
Dudley
- Well, I think that it was very, very slow to correct all of those. There
were, I don't know, was it thousands by that time? And as I said, we
wore everybody on the staff out. It could be illegible. So, yes, then we
did do multiple choice, but it was really not a matter of them--they had
to go look at the tool. Although it sounds like they could fake it, they
could fake it, but they couldn't fake it all the way through a book, so
if they made one mistake, they were required by their instructors, their
professors, whatever, to come to discuss it with us.
-
Grassian
- So each person would have a workbook, and the categories of questions
would be like dictionaries, encyclopedias, and each of the questions for
each of the workbooks would be different so that they wouldn't copy from
each other.
-
Dudley
- Right, right.
-
Grassian
- So they had to go and look at the object or whatever it is, and so that's
what we would call hands on and active learning today, because it was.
They were actively learning, trying out, looking and doing things on
their own, even before there were computers. There were no computers
then. So this was in the seventies through '81 when you retired, right?
-
Dudley
- Yes.
-
Grassian
- Yes, so about ten years or so, maybe more, and that's what they were
doing. As I recall, you mentioned wearing out the reference staff, so
what do you recall about how the workbook, how all that photocopying was
paid for, and people were hired to help with it; do you remember that?
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes. Of course the University Research Library, students would go to
University Research Library looking at their tools too, and that was
something of an overload for University Research Library. Some of the
questions originally involved them going to the branches. At that time
we had nineteen branches. We had a Geology [Library] and a Geography
[Library] and a Chemistry [Library] and, well, we had an English Reading
Room. So it's something that the entire library system became involved
with, to some people's distress, because we all have our own ideas about
it. At the time, chief librarians around the country were very
interested in it, and I went to speak to many, many, many universities
about it.The great fear of it was that it would do away with reference and there
wouldn't be reference librarians, and as things turned out, not only
owing to people learning--but getting people into the library has always
been a problem. Whether we're getting them into the library now is
always something that's discussed. And once we get them in, what are
they doing there? Are they learning about library resources? The
question with the development of computers is just a totally different
question. But I remember one of the plaints always was, "Well,
eventually it will be closing the reference desk." And reference
librarians have really become something more than that now, something
beyond that. But teaching library skills became a part of, I think,
every library school's curriculum.
-
Grassian
- Well, we wish it would. It's sort of a part of every academic library,
but whether it's a part of every library school's curriculum, that's
still a goal, I think, that we're trying to achieve.
-
Dudley
- Well, public libraries play a much stronger role than they used to in
helping people learn how to avail themselves of library resources.
-
Grassian
- Right, right. So what you're describing was this sort of a tension
between reference and instruction. Instruction was a new role for
librarians, and some reference librarians--
-
Dudley
- Were resentful.
-
Grassian
- --were resentful. Do you want to talk about that a little bit?
-
Dudley
- I guess what I remember about it in our case was that other libraries,
small libraries, would be bombarded with questions, and they didn't have
the staff for it. There was just a greater awareness of libraries on
campus. I think maybe in one edition we sent students to branch
libraries and asked them some very minor question, not anything that
would necessarily involve the library or the librarian. But it would
develop in students the knowledge that there are special libraries and
there are many, many libraries on campus, so that was its goal. But it
certainly changed the role of the librarians.
-
Grassian
- So the workbook was self-supporting. There was a cost to it, but it was
self-supporting, wasn't it? Did you want to talk about that? Because in
terms of people being bombarded with questions, do you remember how that
was dealt with in terms of hiring extra people, library school students?
-
Dudley
- I don't really remember, no. I don't know. But I know we needed a lot of
help. We opened a room in the library, in the Powell Library building,
for the collating and for correction. Students would bring books in for
correction, and if they did not get all of them right, then they were
required to speak with a librarian, so that took librarians' time too.
-
Grassian
- And they got a grade, didn't they?
-
Dudley
- Well, no. It's the department that sent them to do it. Our grade was A,
but if they didn't get that A from us, if they didn't do it, then it was
an F, and that was--I think it was one-third of the grade given to them
by the department if it was an English class.
-
Grassian
- Wow.
-
Dudley
- I don't remember. It was powerful. They didn't mean to fool around. They
really wanted students to do this.
-
Grassian
- And the way they--they'd do the workbook, they'd come, they would have it
corrected, and if there was something wrong, they would speak with the
librarian. Did they get a chance to redo that question?
-
Dudley
- Yes, oh, yes. Our goal was for them to be sure that each student knew
what a dictionary was and where to find them.
-
Grassian
- And to succeed. And to be successful.
-
Dudley
- Yes, and to bring them into the library, yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- Okay. And then if they corrected it, would they then get an A?
-
Dudley
- Yes, oh, yes, yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- Okay, so then they would get an A and then they would take that proof
back.
-
Dudley
- In the library portion of the class they were taking. It was largely the
English Department, but there were other departments too who required
it. Oh, yes, yes. We did special workbooks for departments, for faculty
members in particular departments. We did, I remember, a political
science one dealing with general reference materials, but also with
specific dictionaries and encyclopedias in the subject field. Yes, that
took off too, right.
-
Grassian
- And each workbook started with a tour of the physical libraries, right?
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- So how did that work?
-
Dudley
- Well, it was [laughs], it was really nice. In the Powell Library, it took
the student up the stairs and I think one or two things on the stairway
pointed out to them, and it's in first person, and it says, "And you
turn to your left and you'll see the reference desk and the reference
librarians. You'll smile at them as you go to the atlases." And many,
many students came in reading it and would smile at the reference
librarians and then go on to the topic at hand.
-
Grassian
- So they did the tour and then there were many other questions and many
other categories, right? So there were a total of, as I recall, maybe
twenty categories--
-
Dudley
- That's right.
-
Grassian
- --including--what do you remember? Besides dictionaries and
encyclopedias, and you mentioned the Thomas Guide, which is like a
street atlas--
-
Dudley
- It's a street guide.
-
Grassian
- And then do you remember a couple of other categories?
-
Dudley
- Well, "New York Times," Atlas. What I asked librarians when I traveled
with it was, which tools did they use the most? And we all agreed
throughout the country, throughout every place else I was too. There are
certain tools that we all agree are the most used.
-
Grassian
- The basic tools, basic reference, and those were the ones that you
focused on in helping people learn.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, yes. And for many--oh, and, of course, the arrangements of the
books within the library. That's difficult for students.
-
Grassian
- Finding books on the shelf.
-
Dudley
- Right. It doesn't go into great detail about what Library of Congress is
or what Dewey [Decimal System] is or whatever particular or special
library it was, but it does acquaint them with the concept.
-
Grassian
- Okay. So there were first the logistical problems to conquer of how you
were going to actually do it. It started out with envelopes in boxes on
a reference counter. I remember those envelopes.
-
Dudley
- Yes. Did you need to take some home with you over the weekend? I did a
lot of that.
-
Grassian
- It wasn't just me. I think you had your friends too outside the library
who were helping you.
-
Dudley
- Yes. Yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- Then it progressed to a workbook which people wrote their answers in, as
I recall--
-
Dudley
- I think that's right.
-
Grassian
- --and then the next iteration was a workbook with multiple choice
questions and answers that could be corrected more easily and quickly.
And then the whole logistics of collating. How did you identify the
questions and answers? Because you must have had a huge number of them.
-
Grassian
- Yes. There was a key, a code. I don't remember what we did.
-
Grassian
- Well, developing the questions and answers must have taken a lot of time
too.
-
Dudley
- Yes, it did. It did. And, of course, it had to be reviewed each year,
because you'd get new editions of the reference work. Also, things would
come up, well, with I remember adding something and taking something
away that wasn't used that much anymore.
-
Grassian
- So it had to be revised.
-
Dudley
- And, of course, in each subject field when we were doing them for a
particular department, they needed to be reviewed every year, so it was
a lot of added information that the librarians needed to cope with. And,
yes, Esther, I've really forgotten how the staff wasn't necessarily
delighted at each of these libraries. But my total remembrance is that
it became a popular program. The faculty liked it.
-
Grassian
- And it didn't take class time. Students did this outside of class as a
homework assignment.
-
Dudley
- At first I think we went into the class, oh, for ten minutes or
something, to talk about what it was and how they were to do it and
where they were to purchase the workbook. I don't know if that continued
or not. I don't know whether a librarian went into every classroom. I
don't know.
-
Grassian
- I don't think so. I don't remember that.
-
Dudley
- No. An entrance requirement at UCLA was something called Subject A, and I
think half of the students who entered the college, the university--
-
Grassian
- Had to take Subject A.
-
Dudley
- --had to take Subject A, and it was a requirement for Subject A. It
became a requirement for--individual faculty members would require it.
-
Grassian
- In addition. So it was like a required textbook. They would just go to
the bookstore, student store and buy a copy, and that would cover the
cost of the person who was hired to correct it and whatever library
school students were hired to assist at the reference desk answering--do
you remember anything about that?
-
Dudley
- No. No, I don't remember. Were they hired to do that?
-
Grassian
- Yes. As I recall, but maybe you don't recall that. And that was partly
due to the reference versus instruction issues among some of the
librarians, feeling, I believe, that this was not their real work.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes. Right, right.
-
Dudley
- It was interfering with their real work, which was reference. So it went
on for about ten years. Oh, and do you remember how you came up with the
idea of doing multiple choice questions as opposed to having people
write it in?
-
Dudley
- Oh, I think writing it in was--to decipher the writing was time
consuming--
-
Grassian
- That was tough.
-
Dudley
- --and it just seemed if we could work out a system where, yes, indeed,
they would have to have picked up that book and not be guesswork.
-
Grassian
- Right. You said that you met with people from all over the country, but
there were people from other countries too who were interested in the
workbook model, and you talked with them. They came to visit, or your
corresponded?
-
Dudley
- People came to UCLA. People got financing to come and study it for a few
days. I'm remembering people from the Scandinavian countries and
England, oh, South America too. Then libraries would ask you to come
talk about it, because not all libraries were anxious to take on this
different burden, this new burden. [laughs]
-
Grassian
- And partly would you say that was because at the time, instruction was
not really a part of the role of a reference librarian or reference
staff, reference desk? It was a new thing, I mean, although libraries
did orientations.
-
Dudley
- Yes. Librarians had--in many departments, I think, a librarian was asked
to come into the department, into the classroom and give a lecture. I
remember that from early on. But it was a brief lecture and it couldn't
really go into much depth, and the idea was to get the students into the
library. I remember thinking that if every student at the university so
much as walked through the door it would be a good thing, and I think
that's still true. I think it's probably true even more now, because
students can use computers wherever they are.
-
Grassian
- So can you talk about library administrators' attitudes about the
workbook program, how that changed over time? It was like a ten-year
period.
-
Dudley
- Yes. When that came up at a lot of meetings, some really latched onto it
and really, really liked it, and others felt as the librarians did, that
this was not--but you know, this was true, the beginning of reference
work as well. Libraries were meant to supply books, not to answer
questions at the desk. I think that in every phase of librarianship
that's true. I'm trying to think of what effect it--well, there was
dissention. There certainly was dissention about it, but a lot of
libraries in the country welcomed it. There was a period of time, I'm
sure, when it affected reference work.
-
Grassian
- It was a model that really worked well for a large university, because
you were talking about how librarians were invited into classes to talk
to classes, but it was brief and while it might have been somewhat
useful, students were generally not handling the reference tools. The
librarian was holding something up and talking about it, and I remember
doing that myself.[Interruption]
-
Grassian
- Okay. So we were just talking about how the model of a workbook was
really better suited, or maybe well suited to a large university with
many students and a limited librarian staff, because you had said
librarians went into classrooms, were invited to, and they would talk
about tools, but there were only a limited number of librarians and
many, many, many thousands of students. So this was a way to reach more
students without adding huge numbers of librarian staff, right?
-
Dudley
- Yes, although I do remember adaptations made for very small schools. I
remember somebody got an NEA [National Education Association]--yes, NEA
hired me to go to small schools.
-
Grassian
- National Education Association? Okay, and so there were small colleges
that also did workbook adaptations.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, and it was useful to them for the very same reasons. They
didn't have much staff, and they too wanted all of the students--the
library wanted all of the students on campus to know where the library
was and what tools it had and to know something about the collection.
-
Grassian
- And at the time, the physical library was where all the tools were. There
weren't any computers, so people had to come into the library.
-
Dudley
- That's right, that's right.
-
Grassian
- And in a way, just even walking in the door alleviates some of that
library anxiety, library phobia, fear, and the smiling smile at the
reference librarian who will smile back at you, of course, was
interesting. I didn't remember that. That's great. So you retired in
1981. The workbook had been going for about eleven, twelve years,
something like that, ten years. Do you have anything you wanted to say
about that, at the time, reasons for--
-
Dudley
- Well, I think that when I retired, I don't think they were using the
workbook at all. They stopped using the workbook. Am I right about that,
that they stopped?
-
Grassian
- No, not exactly.
-
Dudley
- No, they did continue with it.
-
Grassian
- A little, shortly after. And your name always appeared on the workbook as
author, correct?
-
Dudley
- Right, right, right.
-
Grassian
- And then I think there was a little controversy about removing your name
from the workbook?
-
Dudley
- Oh, yes. [laughs] Well, again, that was Jim Dudley; no, what was his
name, Jim?
-
Grassian
- Tom Fry? Or Jim Davis?
-
Dudley
- Jim Davis. Jim Davis did not want my name on the workbook. He wanted it
to appear as something that the College Library developed, and, of
course, that's not true. It's something I developed. So, yes, there was
that. And then are you saying there was something later too?
-
Grassian
- I thought also the same issue came up later, before you retired, that was
similar.
-
Dudley
- I don't--
-
Grassian
- Don't recall that?
-
Dudley
- No, no.
-
Grassian
- Okay. So in looking back at the workbook program, thinking back on it,
would you have done anything differently, either related to the program
or dealing with colleagues or administrators about it at UCLA or
elsewhere?
-
Dudley
- Well, I look back on it perhaps falsely as a very successful program
there and throughout the, well, certainly many, many, many libraries in
the United States. And, yes, about that time, people were thinking about
usages on the computer, weren't they?
-
Grassian
- Yes.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, I think that's true. So I'm really forgetting things that were
obviously big problems at the time.
-
Grassian
- Well, about '81, when you retired was about the time that computers were
really entering the public arena of libraries, at least in reference and
then later for the public. But when you said usage, you meant usage of
the workbook on a computer, or usage of computers in libraries?
-
Dudley
- No, no, a workbook on computer was what people were talking about.
-
Grassian
- Right, and there have been tutorials developed that are very similar to a
workbook, which is not in paper, but it's online, so, yes, that has
happened. Were you aware of other types of instruction going on in other
libraries, not the workbook model but other models?
-
Dudley
- Oh, well, yes, because of work in ALA [American Library Association].
Well, the very fact that we had a section in the American Library
Association, that we established a section called--it was called
bibliographic instruction.
-
Grassian
- And that is the next thing I wanted to talk about, so this is perfect. So
did you want to talk about it now, or do you want to wait for the next
time to talk about organizations?
-
Dudley
- Well, I should probably think this through, but what I'm remembering
about ALA is--oh, well, that's right. Library instruction wasn't any
more popular with ALA than it was with some reference librarians. So it
was a big job to establish at ALA. ALA did not want to have sections of
every crackpot thing that went on in libraries. But by that time, there
were quite a few libraries throughout the country that did a model of
our workbook, and we did have to knock on doors a lot to be able to get
a section. At the same time, public libraries were--well, yes,
adaptations had been made for public libraries.
-
Grassian
- Of the workbook?
-
Dudley
- Of the workbook, yes, yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- Well, maybe I'm wrong, but I thought that you had started locally, with
local, then regional, then state and national, and the national in terms
of professional organizations and involvement with instruction. So
starting with the California Clearinghouse on Library Instruction--
-
Dudley
- That's right, right, right.
-
Grassian
- Did you want to talk about that a little bit, if you remember?
-
Dudley
- Yes. I think maybe it was the California state librarians who--it was a
clearinghouse. It was for us all to get together and talk about library
instruction. Yes, that's right. So California Library Association was
certainly the first one to have, before ALA. I don't remember very much
about it. I know it was very useful and it got librarians together to
discuss mutual problems limited to instruction.
-
Grassian
- And you remember what your role was in getting that going?
-
Dudley
- No, no, I don't. Do you--
-
Grassian
- Well, you had a big role in it.
-
Dudley
- Tell me. Review it.
-
Grassian
- Well, I think that you got to talking to other librarians in instruction.
I think I remember Sue Galloway as one person. Does that ring a bell?
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, in San Diego. Yes, yes. Well, again, that was because Sue did
an adaptation for, was it UC San Diego [University of California, San
Diego]? I think that was where she was at the time. And other librarians
who had done adaptations, that's right--
-
Grassian
- Of the workbook.
-
Dudley
- --so that's how it started, yes. And it was very useful to us, because,
of course, it wasn't just the UC system. It was the Cal State
[California State University] system, and then there was always this
interest on our part in drawing public libraries in. Well, because in
the undergraduate library, students, freshmen came to us not knowing
anything about libraries, and that led us, of course, to high school
libraries, and it wasn't that the high school librarians weren't
offering it, it was a problem of numbers, how many students could they
handle and where they needed to take students to public libraries and to
college libraries. So, yes, it did draw in libraries of all persuasions,
yes.
-
Grassian
- So the California Clearinghouse on Library Instruction wasn't just for
academic libraries, it was for librarians from all kinds of libraries.
-
Dudley
- Right, right, that's what we intended it to be.
-
Grassian
- And as I recall, people were sharing materials that they created for
their users. In addition to the workbook there were many other kinds of
things, pathfinder's guides. There was a big collection and everyone was
very excited about it, because there were no computers then and no way
to share that kind of either information or materials otherwise.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes. It's so good that you remember that. Does it still meet?
-
Grassian
- It does. It has a new name. Actually, there's the Northern [California]
Clearinghouse [on Library Instruction, North], and the Southern
[California Clearinghouse on Library Instruction, South] one became a
chapter of the ACRL [ALA Association of College and Research Libraries]
California Chapter, became a committee or section of the ACRL California
Chapter, and it's now called SCIL, Southern California Instruction
Librarians. But it is academic librarians now, rather than being open to
everyone. But it does still meet.
-
Dudley
- That's real nice.
-
Grassian
- Yes, that's still going on. And the northern one still exists as its own
separate organization. So that was like a local, regional, and even
state group, because as you mentioned, it started out as part of CLA,
California Library Association. Then nationally you mentioned the
bibliographic instruction section [of ACRL], and there's also LIRT,
Library Instruction Round Table. Do you want to talk about both of those
and how you were involved in establishing them? You mentioned knocking
on doors.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes. The bibliographic instruction section later became the
instruction section, and actually it was ill-named. It had been
functioning for several years before the name was changed. Maybe we
should finish that next time and let me think more about it.
-
Grassian
- Want to do that next time? Okay, sure. So we can stop now.
-
Dudley
- Wow, the California Clearinghouse. I had forgotten that.[End of interview]
1.5. Session 5 (November 8, 2009)
-
Grassian
- Today is November 8, [2009] Sunday, and this is Esther Grassian
interviewing Mimi Dudley in her apartment in Sherman Oaks. Today we're
going to go back and, Mimi, can you talk a little bit about the
University of Arizona and the workbook, and then we'll go on to talk
about professional organizations.
-
Dudley
- Yes. Shelley Phipps came to UCLA, as many librarians did, to look at the
workbook and think about it and talk about it. I had been to the
University of Arizona, I believe it was at an ALA [American Library
Association] meeting, oh, sometime later. David Laird, who was the
librarian at University of Arizona, was a speaker, and so was the [UC]
Berkeley librarian. It was David who said--but the other librarian
concurred--that if this workbook is indeed successful, there will be no
need of reference librarians. [laughter] That was a very bold prediction
that David made.We were to talk, however, about the ALA. Is that what we should get on
to?
-
Grassian
- Okay, but I wanted to just say a couple more words or questions about the
University of Arizona. First of all, the point about reference to me
kind of illustrates the whole tension between instruction and reference
and how there was that kind of tension back then. Do you recall that?
-
Dudley
- Yes. Oh, I do. Many librarians felt that instruction was not necessary,
that people came to the reference desk and asked for help, and that
formal--actually, all that there was was a library lecture. A librarian
would be invited, perhaps, to an English A class, and would give a
one-hour lecture on library resources. As for the students--oh, they
would also take them on tours. But that was what library instruction
was, and to try to introduce them to the library at a practical basis,
to have them go into the stacks to find books, to be introduced to some
basic reference books. There just wasn't a way of doing that, and that's
really why we started to do this.
-
Grassian
- And reference librarians, some at the time, were seeing reference, as I
recall, as distinct from instruction and as our real work. Do you
remember something like that?
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes. There was resentment, and I think that many reference
librarians--well, for one thing, it was great traffic in the reading
rooms and getting access to the tools was something that was a problem.
We had to purchase more almanacs, more of the daily things you wanted
students to get to know about. So it affected the budget in a sense too.
There was a lot of concern, a lot of worry about library instruction.
-
Grassian
- So about the University of Arizona, they ended up with a required
workbook program, is that right?
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes. They did, as did many libraries. I once had a list of the
libraries who were using it, making adaptations for their own libraries
of the basic workbook. Many librarians came to be at UCLA for a couple
of days, librarians from the United States, from England. It was a very
big movement in the Scandinavian countries. Finland did a workbook, as
did Denmark. It seems to me later they asked me to come and speak at
five universities in the area, in the Netherlands. It was adapted for
use in England, at many, many universities in England. Oh, also some in
Latin American countries. I've lost--I don't remember. A list at one
time existed of libraries that asked permission. It was copyrighted by
UCLA. Therefore, many people asked for permission. Many, of course,
didn't bother with that.
-
Grassian
- And you gave permission.
-
Dudley
- Oh, yes, yes. We had standard letters of permission, yes.
-
Grassian
- I remember someone coming from China and saying, "You know, if you give
permission, it's just going to be copied all over China." And you said,
"Oh, that's okay." I remember that. [laughter]
-
Dudley
- How great, how great.
-
Grassian
- So the workbook was widely used in many places, or adapted, and in
addition to working on the workbook and responding to people asking
about adaptations and permissions to use it and so on, you were also
very active in professional organizations, both regarding what we now
call information literacy instruction, and you participated in
organizations locally, regionally, statewide, nationally, and
established them, most notably three library instruction organizations.
If you recall, the California Clearinghouse on Library Instruction, the
ACRL Bibliographic Instruction Section, now called just the instruction
section, and the American Library Association's Library Instruction
Round Table or LIRT. Can you talk about these groups, why each one was
established and your role? Maybe first the Clearinghouse in California,
then BIS and LIRT.
-
Dudley
- Yes. In California, the first libraries to take an interest in formal
library instruction other than classroom lectures, they were other UC
libraries. We formed an organization, and we met, oh, I don't know,
maybe two or three times a year, to exchange ideas about library
instruction, to learn about each other, to learn what we were doing and
what we could borrow from each other. It was a very cooperative group of
people, all eager to spread the word. Not all campuses participated, but
those who did benefited from it.At first it was a very informal kind of thing, and then we became part of
the California Library Association. It started out just very independent
of anything else. It was just librarians who wanted to do something
about getting students into the library and making them comfortable and
helping them learn something about the values of the library. So that
flourished, and I haven't been to a meeting for maybe twenty years or
so, but I understand it's still a help to librarians.
-
Grassian
- I wanted to just mention--do you recall when it started in CLA, it
started as, I believe, a subcommittee of a reference group, and the
subcommittee became so large that it dwarfed the reference group. Is
that right?
-
Dudley
- [laughs] Yes, yes, I think that's true, and I think there was concern on
the part of some librarians in reference, who felt that it infringed.
Now that you mention it, I am remembering there was some resentment. I
think there was resentment in reference sections when, oh, when the
desks were overwhelmed with students. So, yes, it was contentious. It
was contentious.The one I remember is ALA, was trying to find a niche in ALA and going
from--I did learn a lot about the mechanism of ALA. I learned where our
niche was in ALA, where we belonged, and it was very difficult. I
went--not I alone, there were others interested in this. Evan Farber I
remember from Earlham [College], Sheila Laidlaw from--oh, and somebody
also from Penn State [Pennsylvania State University]. So we pounded on
doors, and we were persistent, and finally it was voted on, and I think
it took several years to get into the doors of RTSD [Reference and
Technical Services Division]. No, that's Norm's [Norman Dudley] group.
No, I think it was. It was reference and--
-
Grassian
- Was it ACRL [Association of College and Research Libraries]?
-
Dudley
- Well, eventually it was ACRL, but it was a Reference and Technical
Services Division that we thought about, and then ultimately we did find
our place in reference where we belonged.
-
Grassian
- ACRL?
-
Dudley
- Yes, ACRL. The first meeting, I don't remember how we got word out, but
there were a lot of reference librarians who were not at UCLA but in
other libraries across the country, interested in establishing a forum
for instruction. The first meeting, attendance was overwhelming. I
remember the packed room. I guess I and others had worked on a
Constitution, and we presented it, and it was adapted overwhelmingly,
and we were accepted. A lot of politics, a lot of meeting people, and a
lot of ALA stuff went on to establish it. It was not easy.
-
Grassian
- The Bibliographic Instruction Section [of ACRL].
-
Dudley
- Yes, it was called BIS, Bibliographic Instruction Section. And, of
course, that was not an awfully good description of what we did. At the
same time--but that was really university libraries we were talking
about. However, that's really not what our intention was. Our intention
was to teach library users to make the most effective use of library
resources, all libraries, and many public librarians, many school
librarians were interested. School librarians had their own sources for
meeting and disbursing information, but public librarians did not have
much, so the Library Instruction Round Table was formed, and again there
were people who--it took us a little bit to sort that out. But a
different organization was formed, and everybody was really so happy to
have found a home.
-
Grassian
- So you said it took a long time to form these groups. Did you have to go
to ALA presidents? I mean, how far did you have to go up the chain to
get--
-
Dudley
- Well, I needed to--I keep saying I. There were, oh, two, three, four of
us who were pounding on doors. Ultimately, yes, we did need to go before
the board, but it was each section that we--we attended meetings and
learned what their--we learned a lot, what their functions were and
where we would fit best.
-
Grassian
- Okay. So there were several people involved in establishing these
organizations, and you mentioned a couple of them. Why was it so hard to
get people to go for it?
-
Dudley
- I think it was mostly because I think reference felt threatened by it. I
believe that's what was the case, and establishing anything new has its
problems. I'm thinking that faculty was not at all hard to--we had great
faculty support, I think. It became sort of almost a matter of routine
at colleges. It was libraries, it had college and university libraries.
It may have been infringing on--well, at UCLA I think it could have been
some infringing for some of the reference librarians and the University
Research Library. And there were specialized libraries. We did do
workbooks for special libraries too, and perhaps when people came in
looking for specific material, it added to the workload of reference
librarians, no question about that. And it was a different kind of
demand too.
-
Grassian
- So regarding these organizations, did you serve in any elected or
appointed positions in them? I don't remember.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes. I was on the boards of--I think I was Library Instruction Round
Table and BIS. Yes, I definitely was, yes. BIS, not RTSD, but yes, and I
did do that for a number of years and very involved in the committee
work. Then I traveled a lot to libraries who wanted specifically to do
the workbook.
-
Grassian
- And I remember very well you mentoring people like me when I was a new
librarian, introducing me and others to these organizations and
committees and so on, so you did that a lot, didn't you?
-
Dudley
- Oh, I'm glad to hear that. Yes, I think probably that was important. It
was certainly important to me too.
-
Grassian
- And currently, you may not know this, the ACRL instruction section has
over forty-three hundred members, and LIRT has over sixteen hundred
members. [Dudley laughs] They both have many committees, they offer
programs, they publish materials. What are your thoughts on their
current and future states? Do you think there will always be a need for
them?
-
Dudley
- Yes, I think that the solutions are different, but, oh, goodness yes.
It's complicated. This research business is a complicated one, and
gaining information, of course, it has changed with computers. Library
usage has certainly changed. But I think more than ever, people need
help in finding the information that they need, but the field is
certainly very, very different, as library schools are very different.
The emphasis is so different.
-
Grassian
- So you mentioned that bibliographic instruction wasn't the best
description of what we did. There's a lot of controversy over the
meaning of various phrases that people have used over the years to
describe what we do, library instruction, bibliographic instruction,
information literacy, information competency. What are your thoughts on
the use of these phrases or on these phrases?
-
Dudley
- Well, I think helping people use--it's the most effective egress to
library information. I think that's what we're aiming for, how to make
the most effective use of library resources, of information resources,
by whatever means.
-
Grassian
- Whatever you call it, that's what we're doing. That's what the aim of it
is.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- And we've been doing it for a long time now.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes.
-
Grassian
- Okay. So just on another point, a long time ago you wrote a piece in
"Research Strategies." It may have been the first issue, in "Research
Strategies," the first peer-review journal devoted to what we now call
information literacy instruction. The journal is now defunct, but it was
the first one. And your view then was that librarians don't need to
justify the need for library instruction, just as faculty don't need to
justify the need to teach Shakespeare. What are your thoughts on that
now?
-
Dudley
- Goodness, I haven't thought about that for a very, very long time.
-
Grassian
- Yes, it has been a long time.
-
Dudley
- Well, no, I don't even remember how they were called upon to
justify--what was going on?
-
Grassian
- Well, for funding and to spend time on instruction.
-
Dudley
- It just seems the natural role for librarians.
-
Grassian
- It does to many of us.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes, and is that still a matter of contention?
-
Grassian
- Well, in some ways. Again, for funding and spending time on instruction,
especially if it takes a lot of time to do some of the things that we
can now do using technology. But staff time is considered a commodity,
along with direct funding, so how you spend your time and what you're
doing, and some people are concerned about what they call ROI, return on
investment, which is a business kind of term. So if you have any
thoughts on that--
-
Dudley
- Well, my mind reverts to the prophecy that there wouldn't be any need for
reference librarians. Isn't that really what reference librarians do? I
don't know what the statistics are on the use of reference sources. I'm
sure librarians are still called upon to go to a class and make a
presentation, but I would think that that's really why there is a
reference desk and why they're staffed.
-
Grassian
- And reference has changed a lot from providing facts to teaching people
how to learn for themselves, so that part of it--
-
Dudley
- Yes, how to get access, right, right, right. Yes, well, I think it always
should have been. I think that the reference librarian always was in
that position. I think some librarians didn't use it in that way, but I
do think that is the goal, and I think it's the goal when reference
desks were first established. And that too was a matter of--reading
library literature, I remember that that was contested. What librarians
originally did was order and arrange books, and as for getting at the
content of books, that developed.
-
Grassian
- Okay. So, now, for all of your wonderful work in library instruction,
information literacy instruction, and your efforts, particularly in
establishing the ACRL then-called Bibliographic Instruction Section,
that section established an award in your honor, the Miriam Dudley
Instruction Librarian Award. What are your thoughts on that?
-
Dudley
- It still thrills me and excites me. I was present at some of the awards,
and I feel very honored and delighted that that's something that is
valued in my profession.
-
Grassian
- It's considered very prestigious and a great honor. So do you recall any
other honors or awards that you received?
-
Dudley
- Well, I think probably what was a particular delight and pleasure was
being invited to libraries to speak to staff, faculty, and librarians
about the need for library instruction. Let's see. I did something that
I dimly remember at Oxford and something at Cambridge. That was
wonderful and exciting. I guess spreading the word and helping libraries
to--many libraries really had to fight for this. I was sent by--I'll
need to ponder over this--maybe it was NEA, was sent by them to a small
college to help the librarian, actually, to help the librarian fight the
fight with the faculty and to establish a program there. But many, many
times I think it was more inspirational, to help librarians fight on for
instruction.
-
Grassian
- Did you want to say anything more about that, or shall we go on?
-
Dudley
- I want to remember the name of the foundation that sent me, but I'll that
over. Okay.
-
Grassian
- So just overall, when you think back over your career and the time since
you retired, in what ways do you see that libraries and librarianship
have changed?
-
Dudley
- Well, of course, the huge change has been in the availability of
information. It's made the job of the librarian totally different, a
totally different job. That, of course, is the profound change. I don't
really know what's going on in training of librarians. I think that
reference has certainly changed, and I really don't know. I haven't kept
up with that. I cannot speak to that.
-
Grassian
- Okay. What advice would you give someone who's just starting a career as
a librarian?
-
Dudley
- Well, a broad smile comes to my face when you say that. I do have a
couple of young friends who are just starting, who are in library
school, and I glory for them. I can't think of a better way to serve
society, a more pleasurable way. Librarians lead good lives. They're
doing something important and significant. Well, that and motherhood and
apple pie.
-
Grassian
- Well, yes.
-
Dudley
- It's all good. It's all good.
-
Grassian
- Looking at your smiling face, I know how much you love being a librarian
and you are a librarian still.
-
Dudley
- Yes, yes. I still do identify myself as a librarian.
-
Grassian
- And you still encourage people to enter this career.
-
Dudley
- Oh, yes. Oh, yes. I can't think how many years it's been since my
retirement. I guess I retired in 1980. Is that true? Maybe about thirty
years.
-
Grassian
- I think it was '81.
-
Dudley
- [19]81, almost thirty years.
-
Grassian
- Wow. It's a long time.
-
Dudley
- It is a long time.
-
Grassian
- So is there anything else that you haven't mentioned that you would like
to add?
-
Dudley
- Well, we hadn't talked about the fact that when Norman and I were
married, he worked for Mercury Records. He was the West Coast
representative for Mercury Records, and he really, really liked the life
that I led. He liked my friends. He liked the whole library picture, and
at one point in our lives we were able to work out a savings that would
permit him to go to library school. We intended--our intention was to
live at a different scale. We certainly did the two years he was in
library school. But then he went to UCLA and he liked it as much as he
thought he would. [laughs] He worked for one year in reference and then
he went into--
-
Grassian
- Administration?
-
Dudley
- --administration, yes. But that one year was sheer gravy, and he worked
as a collection development officer for about twenty years too, at UCLA.
So those were really wonderful years for both of us. I think that's the
other thing I want to say, about satisfaction of being a librarian.
-
Grassian
- Okay. Is there anything else you'd like to say about library instruction
or information literacy instruction?
-
Dudley
- Haven't I said it all? Is there anything left to be said?
-
Grassian
- Maybe not.
-
Dudley
- If there is, fill me in.
-
Grassian
- I don't know, but I just thought I'd give you the opportunity.
-
Dudley
- Well, I have very, very good strong memories and basic belief in the
value of the work I have done and others around me are doing.
-
Grassian
- That's wonderful. Well, thank you, and I think this concludes our
interviews.
-
Dudley
- Well, how very nice, and I've thoroughly enjoyed it.
-
Grassian
- Great.[End of interview]