Contents
1. Transcript
1.1. Session 1 (October 8, 2006)
-
Collings
- Good morning, Andy. Let me just ID the session here. Jane Collings
interviewing Andy Lipkis, October 8th, 2006, at his home in Venice.
-
Collings
- Good morning.
-
Lipkis
- Good morning.
-
Collings
- Why don't we just start off with talking something about
your--introducing your early life, and if you could just tell me when
and where you were born. Just begin at the beginning.
-
Lipkis
- I'm not quite sure where I was conceived, but I was born and raised in
Los Angeles and raised in a home in Baldwin Hills in southwestern L.A. I
was born on November 25th, 1954, Thanksgiving Day.
-
Collings
- Oh, my gosh.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, which gives me the proud distinction of either being something that
people can give thanks for or that I'm a turkey, and I think usually I
fall in the turkey column.
-
Collings
- Oh, come now. Well, let's hear a little bit about your family, your
parents and brothers and sisters if you have them.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, I'm the third son, the third of three. My mom was Joyce Lipkis. My
dad Dr. Leon Lipkis. Wow, I don't know what ages they were, but she was
from Kansas City, Missouri and he from Salt Lake City, Utah. They met
some time just before or after the war, but they got married after the
war. As I said, I'm the third son.
-
Lipkis
- It was a family really active in community. My mother went back to school
when I was in second grade. She went to UCLA to get a degree in the
English Department. She had the distinction or an indistinction, I
guess, I don't even know what the right word is, but she graduated with
high honors with her master's, but at that time the English Department
would not let women proceed on to the Ph.D. program if they were over
thirty-five.
-
Collings
- Oh, my goodness. Oh, my gosh.
-
Lipkis
- Yes. Would that be a lovely lawsuit now?
-
Collings
- Yes.
-
Lipkis
- So she had to leave the UC system and she became an instructor over at
Santa Monica College.
-
Collings
- Which is a great place.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, it's fantastic. My wife, Kate, is there now.
-
Lipkis
- Interesting, my mom, I guess finished high school, but her father, who
was a newspaper executive, had died and she had to support the family so
she didn't go to school, and so she went after me, the youngest, got
into school.
-
Lipkis
- And my wife went straight into advertising right after high school, which
was a lucrative and successful career, Clio-winning copywriter. We met
well into her career and she was an Australian, and we'll probably get
to that story some other time. But she's just returned to school to get
her degree. So following in my mom's footsteps.
-
Collings
- Yes, that's an interesting parallel there, isn't it?
-
Lipkis
- Yes. So my folks were, as I said, really involved in community, community
building. They formed an organization called Crenshaw Neighbors. They
built their house in the Baldwin Hills and at some point they--Crenshaw
Neighbors was a multi-cultural collaboration to bring together the white
and black community and strengthen relations. They worked to elect a
police captain to be their city councilman, and that was Tom Bradley,
who later we all worked to get elected as mayor.
-
Lipkis
- So I set that context because some of my earliest memories were walking
precincts with my mother, me in a stroller for Adlai Stevenson and then
other campaigns. I guess John F. Kennedy campaign and then as a teen,
early teen, twelve, thirteen-year-old, I worked for [Eugene] McCarthy
for president. So that's important because a whole lot of my foundation
of skill development, learning, and orientation was that.
-
Lipkis
- My parents helped form a synagogue as part of building community, and
they also had me in a cooperative nursery school, fairly progressive
nursery school. Again, I think all of those things were interesting
strands of foundation for me.
-
Lipkis
- In the for whatever it's worth department, I learned much later in life
that I was unplanned. I was kind of--I slipped through in
-
Collings
- How did you learn that?
-
Lipkis
- Well, I learned it in college, actually, that I was a--I slipped through
a new birth control device. The reason why the question came up is that
at some point in college I was examining my life to that point and I had
frequently gotten into things kind of through a side door or back door,
but then had to work much, much harder once I was in, in order to
justify being there and how the people who let me in feel okay. I'll get
to a number of youthful stories or a few of them to explain that in a
minute.
-
Lipkis
- So whether I had that sense as an infant or a baby or as my human life,
or being born on Thanksgiving Day, I don't know, but I've felt a special
obligation to work and to serve. It's also part of the cultural
background of the notion of Tikkun olam as our job is to help heal the
world.
-
Collings
- The notion of what?
-
Lipkis
- Tikkun olam, T-i-k-k-u-n o-l-a-m. It's the fundamental Jewish principle
of what we're here for, which is to heal the world, to complete the
world. That really informs my philosophy and perspective a lot, more
than I even recognized all the time.
-
Lipkis
- Anyhow, so I had probably two important events that weren't even on my
organizing list when I was growing up. Right after my mom started
school, in fact right as finals started in her first year, I got hit in
the head by a piece of wood that a friend of mine flung, one-foot square
piece of plywood, he threw up in the air to try to hit a paper airplane,
and it landed in my forehead.
-
Collings
- Oh, you're lucky it didn't hit your eye.
-
Lipkis
- Well, a little bit further I would have been dead, because it would have
hit my temple, and so it was a compound depressed skull fracture that
turned into eight hours of neurosurgery as they put me back together,
and a week in the hospital, and wearing a metal plate for six months. It
was pretty major. The surgeon they brought in for me was the same one
they flew in for Kennedy. Fortunately, the results were better with me.
I don't know exactly what all, I mean, it was a pretty--you know, it's a
powerful thing when that happens with a little kid and you have a major
threat to survival. Whether that caused me to shift priorities or what,
I don't know, but that just was there, the fact that I was having to
wear a helmet and a metal plate for a portion of a year probably also
skewed some of my focus to what I did with my energy. So there's that.
-
Lipkis
- Actually, around that time, and before that, there is one other
interesting piece, is that we had an apple tree at our house, and I
really liked it, and enjoyed it. I was very into gardening. I would grow
vegetables at our house, at both of my grandmother's houses. I was just
into planting vegetable gardens and I wanted to be a farmer.
-
Lipkis
- One year the tree flowered and fruited all year long, which was an
anomaly. Usually just flower, leaf out, make the fruit, and then go
through the season. This was different and I thought it was really
special and really important and I wanted to tell people about it. My
parents engaged me in a conversation, I think it was my mom, "so how
would you do that?" Not why would you do that, or don't be silly why
would people want to know that, but how would you do that.
-
Lipkis
- Well, that interaction became a fundamental basis of action in my life as
a problem-solver, because I think that many people, most people, when
they share something weird they get to a don't be silly or that's crazy,
or a judgment, and I recall my parents, and my dad, saying instantly
without judgment, "Well, how would you do that?" So every idea went into
how to do, and I would fantasize and think about the answer. That's
pretty critical, because it sort of created me as a problem-solving
machine. And without any resistance or stuff about how to get from idea
to reality, I would just fantasize and think and ultimately would find
myself building a bridge from fantasy to reality. So the conversation
with the apple tree became, well, how would I share that with people?
Well, I could do it in the newspaper, get it in the newspaper somehow,
and that caused me to imagine a front page picture in the neighborhood
paper with our apple tree. And the conversation proceed ed to, "Well,
how would you make that happen?"
-
Lipkis
- And it was, "Well, I could call the paper and tell them about it and
maybe they'll come and do a story."
-
Lipkis
- Well, I have a picture in my mind of the front page of the paper with the
apple tree on it. I believe I actually went all the way through the
steps of calling the newspaper. I don't remember what happened. I don't
think they came out, I don't think there was a picture, but I picture
that as, it's a memory that, I guess, to my brain is as valid as if it
happened, even though I can tell the distinction that I think it didn't.
But they encouraged me to do the process.
-
Collings
- Well, I'm really fascinated by this idea that you've decided that you
wanted to tell people about it, because it's when you have to--it's when
you tell people things that they then know and so much of the work that
you do has to do with, like, explaining things to people and informing
them and actually getting them to behave along the lines of their better
nature.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, and calling that forth. I guess that's an integration of this notion
of healing, but my propensity to be an expresser.
-
Collings
- Right, right.
-
Lipkis
- But, yet, it's interesting that you point that out, because there is some
process from thought to reality and things don't become real until other
people get to engage in them for the most part. So I counsel people who
are--sometimes I've led projects on manifesting your ideas or workshops,
and really encouraged people to write and dream and think, and in fact
it's there in the workshop workbook, our book (The Simple Act of
Planting a Tree), which is to get it down and just the process of taking
it from your head onto paper gives it form.
-
Collings
- Yes, you have a whole section on how you visualize the idea just going
in.
-
Lipkis
- Exactly, and it's extraordinarily powerful and it works, and people need
to know that skill. So, yes, that's where all that came from.
-
Collings
- Very interesting.
-
Lipkis
- I didn't take any classes in it, it's just life experience.
-
Collings
- But are there other instances that you can think of where it was
important that you felt like you needed to tell people about something?
-
Lipkis
- Oh, yes. It's foundational to almost everything we've done and where I'm
going from here. It's funny, because throughout school, I look back and
see that I had a problem with even art classes and doing art and having
ideas. Generally when I first express them to people, aside from my
parents, people didn't see it, didn't get it, they dismissed it, "Oh,
yes, so what?" "Are you crazy?" Or, "You're just a kid." Or, "What is
that?" Which always led to frustration, and irritation, and a greater
push to be understood, to seeking to be understood and valued instead of
being dismissed. So I had that kind of energy going on, but also I
learned that when I finished a project, a school art project or
something, then people went, "Oh, my God, I had no idea." So that is a
theme that occurs throughout my life of people not getting it and then
getting it (once it's complete).
-
Lipkis
- It's interesting, there's an arc of experience, certainly linked to
growing up, that goes with that, which is that frustration of not being
understood or trusted or whatever, and my response being, "Well, I'll
show you," or "I'll show them." Sometimes it's a "get back" at them,
sometimes it's a "let me better explain myself," sometimes, you know,
especially younger, filled with expletives and anger.
-
Collings
- Now, you said that you went to a progressive nursery school.
-
Lipkis
- Yes.
-
Collings
- But did you go to, like, a regular elementary?
-
Lipkis
- Regular elementary school.
-
Collings
- How did that go?
-
Lipkis
- I think it was fine. I think it would be interesting to talk to teachers,
but they'd all be dead, I think. Yes, probably. But I recall that my
parents tested me and they told me later that I came out gifted, but
they didn't put me in a gifted program. They kept me with regular kids
and I didn't know any different. It was probably that I was borderline
or something, and I'm appreciative of that, I think.
-
Lipkis
- I just remember once writing a poem for an assignment and the teacher
saying that wasn't creative and pretty well closed down my ability to
read poetry or ever appreciate it.
-
Collings
- No, I was just wondering, because my experience has been that people with
their own ideas about how to do things don't generally do that well in
regular school.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, right. For sure. And as we move into teen, I was literally blessed
with a miracle in that department. So we'll get there, and we're pretty
close to that. I'm trying to think of--there was something else
foundational. I said, the tree, the getting hit in the head.
-
Lipkis
- Oh, I guess I already had this, but my fix on infrastructure and systems,
a piece of that came up when the Baldwin Hills Dam broke. So I lived
right under it, our house was one of four, five, six on the block that
wasn't flooded and filled with mud, and thousands of homes that were
inundated. But going through that whole experience of seeing the police
and all the operations, somehow peaked my interest. It may have even
come from somewhere else, but I don't know. But I just recall that.
-
Lipkis
- Well, that comes back, there's a big through-line in infrastructure and
agencies and all of that. I'm trying to mark some of these starting
points.
-
Lipkis
- Another fundamental experience was that my first experience with memory
going to the library at schools, the first book I ever chose for myself
was about Luther Burbank. It was a kids' book and I read it, and I have
continued finding Luther Burbank surfacing throughout my life and
reading about him and feeling interesting parallels.
-
Collings
- Yes, so your family did garden?
-
Lipkis
- Well, I did, and they let me. They let me sort of take over spaces in the
garden. I think my brother once had a vegetable garden, because there's
a picture with me and he and a cousin holding a giant squash, that's
practically bigger than me.
-
Collings
- Was this, do you think, some sort of holdover from the victory gardens,
or was this a particular--
-
Lipkis
- Well, they weren't into it. They just allowed me to do it. There was this
thing called the American Greeting Seed Company ("Greeting Seed" was
another company--totally different product) and I signed up as a sales
kid.
-
Collings
- Oh, I remember that, yes.
-
Lipkis
- I bought all these vegetable seeds and nobody wanted to buy them, people
really wanted to buy flower seeds, so I didn't succeed in that path. I
have no idea how old I was, certainly preteen. I just remember this old
smelly suitcase that I loaded with the seeds. But that I did plant a
garden, grew corn, squash, all kinds of things like that.
-
Collings
- But it wasn't a larger family interest?
-
Lipkis
- No. No, we didn't--I wasn't really able to dig up the whole yard, it was
just portions of it. So, no, it was this funny--and they could never
explain where that came from.
-
Collings
- Now, what do your two brothers do?
-
Lipkis
- One's a doctor, my oldest is a gastroenterologist living in San Diego.
That's Don [Donald Lipkis]. My next one is Roger [Lipkis] and he lives
in San Fernando Valley. He's always been a business creative, so he was
sort of considered an entrepreneur and he has sort of a conglomeration
of travel agencies and he also coaches track. He had a couple Olympic
gold medalists from the Valley track club. So he lives in the Valley
with his family.
-
Collings
- Your father is a medical doctor?
-
Lipkis
- Optometric.
-
Collings
- Optometrist?
-
Lipkis
- Yes.
-
Collings
- Yes. Oh, great. That's a great area.
-
Lipkis
- I had an uncle who was a medical doctor, so that was in the family, and
another uncle who was a NASA scientist at TRW.
-
Collings
- So sort of medicine, engineering, planning, it's all there.
-
Lipkis
- All professional, yes, and certainly I assume that was the expectation
for what I was supposed to do, which that expectation gave me some real
trouble.
-
Collings
- You were to be either a doctor or go into business in some way?
-
Lipkis
- Some kind of professional, yes. Doctor, lawyer, you know, definitely go
to college, get your degree, and become whatever. It's not that my
parents ever said that, it was just that was kind of that's what
everybody around me did, and all my cousins and everybody else. So it's
like, okay, that's what I'm supposed to do.
-
Collings
- Right.
-
Lipkis
- And later when confronted with what I had to do there was no definition
for it, so it was very scary and it was like jumping off into the abyss.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, so anything about--
-
Collings
- No, that's okay. You were going to go on into sort of getting into high
school.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, in high school I--well, in my late junior high I started--I got
really involved in the McCarthy for president campaign, and then Tom
Bradley for mayor. And both failed, of course, but there was a lot of
skill development there with the ability to express and share,
especially. It's interesting that you asked that question.
-
Lipkis
- Also to your earlier question, I was rarely motivated by teachers. Some
things I enjoyed, but a lot I didn't. But I was attracted to working in
the media department of these campaigns and I learned how to write press
releases. I was really willing to write and work hard and correct and
self-correct and take feedback in those settings. I had harder time in
school In fact, also my mother was an English teacher, and I resisted
her correction for a long time, until I finally, when I melted and let
that in I learned a lot, and it was the same process. But mostly it was
being able to work with adults who I respected who weren't my parents,
and a real need to express effectively, because otherwise it wasn't
going to be heard. So that's where I got some of my greatest writing
skill. And I also learned again a lot about community organizing and
just fundamentals of taking ideas to reality and working with people.
-
- Now, how did you happen to get involved in these campaigns? Was this
through the synagogue or through school or--
-
Lipkis
- No, no. Initially, as I said, it was my mom volunteering and I would tag
along. Then my brother, Roger, was really active in politics and I would
tag along with him, go to campaign headquarters.
-
Collings
- Because it seems like you were sort of young, unless there was something
drawing you into that.
-
Lipkis
- No, it was a family portal, so transferred from my mom to being with my
cool brother who was four years older than me and tagging along, but
making my own way and being valued in my own right, even as a little kid
in the campaign. So I did youth fundraisers for McCarthy and things like
that, car washes.
-
Collings
- Oh, that's great. What junior high did you go to?
-
Lipkis
- I started at Audubon Junior High, which is in the Crenshaw area. It was a
rough time. There were very few whites left there and the anger in the
black community focused on whites was pretty strong. I would get punched
pretty much every day.
-
Collings
- Really?
-
Lipkis
- Yes, and I really wanted to go there. My parents thought it wasn't
necessarily a good idea, but--
-
Collings
- You wanted to go because it was nearby?
-
Lipkis
- It wasn't about proximity as much as my family was really active in the
Civil Rights Movement, I thought, you know, I can do this. I should, and
so I did, but it was not very comfortable. Martin Luther King was killed
just, I think, while I was there. So it was tense times. At that point
my father moved his office to Westwood, or some time a couple of years
before that, and my mom was going to UCLA. I wasn't getting to learn
much because all the time and energy was focused on discipline in the
school and so I went, okay, let's look for someplace for me to go, and I
transferred over to Emerson Junior High.
-
Collings
- Oh, my son goes there. Yes.
-
Lipkis
- They taught Russian, so I thought, "Oh, Russian would be interesting,"
and I could get a language transfer and start a language. It's just a
few blocks from where my dad's office was where he could drop me, and so
that's--and I went from there to the McCarthy headquarters and then the
eighteen-year-old vote campaign headquarters up in Westwood.
-
Collings
- Where were the headquarters?
-
Lipkis
- They were in Westwood, in the Village, in various places, buildings that
aren't there anymore. But I think McCarthy was once an old abandoned
supermarket. It was big, big. It was fun days.
-
Lipkis
- Anyhow, yes, that's all really fundamental soup. So I moved on to Uni
[University Senior High School] for high school, had one normal
semester. During that time I hooked up with a friend who, I should strip
out "hooked up," can't use that word anymore.
-
Collings
- Why's that?
-
Lipkis
- Okay, because now it means intercourse.
-
Collings
- Oh, yes, of course. Okay. That's true.
-
Lipkis
- But I connected with some people there, somebody was setting up a
recycling center and I started participating in that and I actually
helped create a bit of a media event for its opening. So back to
expressive, and again, before even the tree stuff started we opened the
recycling center, I called a reporter and got them to come out as we
were going door to door collecting glass and bottles and stuff like
that.
-
Collings
- How did you get them to come out?
-
Lipkis
- Just called them and invited them, and they said, "Oh, yes, that's a
story we'd like to cover."
-
Collings
- Where does Earth Day fit into all of this?
-
Lipkis
- It comes in another couple months. So this is in 1969. Then came Earth
Day and I went to summer camp. Now, so back up. Conditions in Los
Angeles, the environment growing up, no smog alerts, bad smog. Nobody
knew what it was doing to us, except my personal experience was on
typical days it hurt to breathe and I'd come home from school, couldn't
take a deep breath. I'd ask my mom to turn on the kettle and boil or
make steam so I could breathe some steam and get some relief. That's
what I remember.
-
Lipkis
- My brothers, they were sent to summer camp, and at some point I wanted to
do that, and they sent me, as well. Probably in the fifth grade or sixth
grade and I started going to camp every summer and loved it. So summer
camp was Camp JCA, Jewish Community Association, Jewish Centers
Association, but in the San Bernardino Mountains, a hundred miles away
from here.
-
Collings
- Yes, and for like a week or was it the whole summer?
-
Lipkis
- It was usually two to three weeks. There we could play, it didn't hurt
our lungs. I really grew to love the forest. I always chose nature
studies as my hobby hour. There was something that I liked about being
there and the connection and all of that. Also camp was a great
expression of social justice movement starting with Civil Rights and
then anti-Vietnam War, and singing the folk songs and all of that, that
was just this feeling of community, more feeling of community, and a
community of caring. Our job was to care, was to help, and all of that.
So more of seeds of who I was.
-
Lipkis
- So then I went off to the Soviet Union for a whole summer because of my
Russian classes. When I got into high school, I did one year at Emerson,
a year at Uni--or no, it was the summer between junior high and high
school where we decided to go. I'd never been on a plane before. I used
my Bar Mitzvah money and a group of us went.
-
Lipkis
- I don't remember exactly how all these pieces came together, but it was a
great trip, and I was really struck by the transit systems in Russia and
all around Europe, that everywhere I went there were these trains and
people could get around. They didn't have tons of cars and they didn't
have smog. I thought, "Whoa."
-
Collings
- Yes, yes, this is great.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, why, if they're a Communist country with, you know, how come they
get to have that and we don't? And I started questioning that whole
notion of that we're necessarily better or something, because if we are
why can't we have that stuff? So that influenced me.
-
Lipkis
- Somehow I got back, and I don't remember exactly how and why, but Ed
Edelman, who was a city councilman at the time, appointed me to a
citizen planning board.
-
Collings
- Oh, that's surprising.
-
Lipkis
- I was the youth representative, I was the youngest ever, and we were
dealing with a project that has only just come to fruition in the last
couple of months, or completion, there was a plan to run a freeway, the
Beverly Hills Freeway, from Hollywood right down Santa Monica Boulevard
to connect at the 405. So that was the plan, the freeway. The Citizens'
Committee was to evaluate that and figure out what to do, and we
recommended no freeway, and lo and behold, no freeway was built and the
widening and facilitating of Santa Monica Boulevard was this very long
envisioned process.
-
Collings
- I know. Oh, God, that's been going on forever, yes.
-
Lipkis
- Well, 1968, '69.
-
Collings
- I didn't know that. Amazing.
-
Lipkis
- That's when I was involved, and that was the subject, and that yielded,
ultimately, what was just finished now in 2006.
-
Collings
- Oh, how interesting, because I live half a block from there, and we've
been complaining, "Oh, when is this going to be done?" My God, I didn't
know it started in 1968.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, well, I think the talk of a Beverly Hills Freeway was before that,
but that's when we were brought in to cope with it. So I have that
experience. I don't know why Ed Edelman would have known me to appoint
me. I can't remember that.
-
Collings
- Maybe something, some publicity about the trip to Russia?
-
Lipkis
- No, that wasn't publicized, but--and my dad's not going to remember. I
just don't--I don't think Ed Edelman will remember, but he's a friend.
It may be because the recycling stuff and maybe a teacher recommended or
I'm not quite sure what. So I definitely stuck out as weird, and
fortunately most of the time it was appreciated, not un. It had to be
teachers. Maybe it was my campaign experience or something that
translated over, but I mean, I had that. It didn't go anywhere, I was
his citizen youth advisor for a while.
-
Collings
- But I'm sure it was a great insight for you to see how this, start to see
how this kind of thing--
-
Lipkis
- Oh, yes, city agency, policies, and part of the influence was I wasn't
impressed by policy stuff, whereas most environmental organizations are
mostly about policy. TreePeople has always been almost exclusively about
action. Forget about policy, we'll just get the job done. We're morphing
rapidly now, because there's a glass ceiling of infrastructure of bad
policies that yield the work that people do, no matter how good their
intension, no matter how much they do, other things yield their work
ineffective.
-
Collings
- Yes, but you've probably built up the head of steam, you know, through
this other focus.
-
Lipkis
- Oh, hugely. Yes, and that our word is very potent in policymaking now as
a result.
-
Lipkis
- But back to this. So I went to Russia the summer I was fourteen, back to
camp the summer I was fifteen, and it was a leadership development
group, the oldest kids in camp, called TASC, TeenAge Service Camp or
TASC. I had always revered them as leaders and seeing them, they were a
group that was selected through an application process and all kinds of
stuff to be the ones who would then become counselors in training and
junior counselors. The job was to give something back to camp, since
camp had given us all this stuff. Some time in the prior year is when
the Forest Service announced that smog was killing trees in that forest.
I learned from our camp naturalist, who had learned from the Forest
Service that that was happening, and that there were smog resistant
trees available, that would live when the other trees didn't.
-
Lipkis
- Now, so the San Bernardino Forest was predominantly Ponderosa and Jeffrey
pine, lots of other species, but the vast numbers, vast majority were
those and those trees were dying. They started to decline as smog
started to increase. It was known as the X disease, they didn't know
what was killing
-
Collings
- They had no idea that it was the smog?
-
Lipkis
- Well, somebody began to suspect it and U.C. Riverside, the Forest Service
Research Lab, ultimately got conclusive evidence when they built
charcoal-filtered air chambers around whole trees and they got better,
and starting testing difference species. They figured it out and they
learned what was happening, and that what was happening is the ozone in
the smog and another chemical called PAN, peroxyacetyl nitrate, has a
kind of corrosive, burning effect. Not unlike our own lungs were
experiencing, but the smog would be ingested or breathed in by the plant
and it would burn the stomata, those little holes were the air went in,
and when it burnt it, it destroyed the chlorophyll. So as the
chlorophyll was being destroyed, the chlorophyll makes the food, less
chlorophyll, less food, the tree is weakened and goes into a [unclear]
decline.
-
Lipkis
- Trees actually have something analogous to our blood pressure, it's call
sap pressure. In fact, what we call sap foresters and biologists call
pitch. Pitch, not black as pitch pitch, but pitch because there's so
much pressure measurable in pounds per square inch inside a tree that
when a bug drills in it's literally pitched out. So if that tree is
healthy the sap flows very quickly and kicks invaders out of the tree
and then seals the hole. Once they were weakened the blood pressure, sap
pressure, dropped to the point where they couldn't defend themselves.
-
Collings
- Now, does that have anything to do with the bark beetle infestation?
-
Lipkis
- That has everything to do with it. Air pollution is what was causing--the
air pollution damage and slow starvation is what enabled the bark beetle
infestation to get started, and that was spreading and increasing the
destruction of the forest.
-
Lipkis
- So by 1970 the foresters said that they thought they were losing about 10
percent of the forest per year due to bark beetles, not
drought-perpetuated, but smog perpetuated, and said that if it continued
that the forest, as we all knew it, would be gone by the year 2000, if
no one did anything about it.
-
Lipkis
- So here I have had this cauldron of social action and doing something
about it, a love for the forest. Earth Day happens, I've got a taste of
environmental stuff through this recycling. And I also had, again, I
think you presently spotted something that I tell at this point, but
it's actually the through-line, which is I had a growing frustration
with being told, "You're just a kid, you don't make a difference." Even
though teachers, everyone spouted the party line, which is, "You can
make a difference," the overwhelming nature of our city, our culture of
war, made most people feel like I don't make a difference. So when they
would say, "You can make a difference," they didn't really believe, and
I could hear that. As a kid I could hear it, and I think all kids are in
touch with a certain energy, their own energy, creative expression, as
they enter into the world, and encounter the forces that tell them in
some form or another that, "No, you don't get to have you r dream." And
at some point, they give it up and it gets replaced with cynicism and
pain and frustration and anger. I think most kids, most teens'
expression of anger and frustration come from that process. I was like
any other kid holding that frustration. So I'm there with that, maybe
more so because of my inability to be fully expressive in school and all
of that, but there was certainly already a questioning of authority,
this was the late sixties and the beginning of the seventies, and so the
other movements that were showing up with the Beatles and the
counterculture starting to rise, already the Vietnam War, and so on
edge, distrusting, and I learned that smog is killing the place that I
could escape to. Earth Day energy and the counselor said, "No one's
replanting the forest, and it's not going to get replanted unless
somebody does it, and you are the only ones who know, so let's do
something about it."
-
Lipkis
- So that summer, when we were planning our project, what we were going to
give back for the future of our camp, we decided to convert a place in
the camp that had been a truck parking lot and baseball field, that had
had oil sprayed over it for forty years every year to keep the dust
down, we decided to make that a meadow, a place for picnics, and plant
it with smog-resistant trees. So we spent three weeks, fourteen guys,
fourteen girls, all of us fifteen and sixteen years old, all with our
hormones starting to flow.
-
Collings
- I know, I was thinking fourteen girls and fourteen guys.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, and the girls are wearing overalls with bathing suit tops, bikini
tops, and the guys are coming into their... "Gee this is exciting
stuff."
-
Lipkis
- So the result of the twenty-eight of us swinging picks, shovels,
stripping the earth bare, shoveling truckloads full of manure in 110
degrees down in San Bernardino from a dairy, all of that, if you were to
look at it without knowing what was going on it would look like a teen
prison camp, except for the bathing suit stuff. But the work was the
same, we were breaking rocks, we were doing all this stuff, but it was
incredibly fun, incredibly meaningful, infused with purpose. We were
expressing the anger, the frustration, and taking it back, taking the
land back. I had felt kind of like a loner before that. I don't know if
loner is the right word, but I'd seen people I'd been attracted to as
leaders, I never thought of myself as one and never had that validation
yet. In that environment people, who I had respected, were respecting
me. So this was the coming out of a difficult teen tunnel, I think. So I
shot through that tunnel with this experience. It was like all of a
sudden I started to feel who I was, and I was worthy, and I could
really--we saw that we could make a difference.
-
Lipkis
- A couple things happened, just like the apple tree, just like the
recycling, we're doing this stuff, and I'm going, "You know, people need
to know about this. They need to know." So I got on the phone and called
this woman, who I had met. I guess she was the assignment editor that I
met when I did the recycling story. I must have met them through
somebody who was helping form news around the recycling. It must have
been from a recycling or glass manufacturer or something like that, that
happened back in high school. But I called that connection that I had
saved, and said, "Hey, we're up here in the mountains, we're planting
smog-resistant trees because the forest dying," and she dispatched a
crew all the way to San Bernardino. They did a story.
-
Lipkis
- Somewhere, I would hope that it could be found. It was ABC, the reporter
was Al Wyman, he might even be dead by now, I don't know. But they did
the story. So again, juice, validation.
-
Lipkis
- So that happened near the end of the project. Also the very end of the
project, the whole camp, 300 kids, assembles for us to dedicate this
park on the last day of camp. We're all holding hands, singing songs,
feeling so good. The animals are flying in and returning to the site.
-
Collings
- Oh, how marvelous.
-
Lipkis
- It's like the magic of a Disney moment, but real. We see squirrels,
chipmunks, birds, and we go, "Oh, my God, we did this healing."
-
Lipkis
- Now, we weren't literate to know that they were just eating the grass
seed that we had sprinkled, but our experience was the trees were in the
ground, smog-tolerant, thriving, the grass was there, we created this
beautiful thing. That was very potent. Always the last day of camp
everyone's going back home, everyone's crying because we created this
great community, we've got to go separate, go back to the real world.
Camp director says to us, "If you like this, don't cry, make it real in
your world back in the city." I went, "Okay, thanks a lot."
-
Lipkis
- So I return, two weeks later school starts, and I found that--so I'm
returning to eleventh grade, and I found that a group of parents over
the summer have created an alternative school at my school.
-
Collings
- At Uni.
-
Lipkis
- At Uni. They held a lottery, 150 kids were going to get to go into this
program called IPS, the Integrated Program School. They held a lottery,
I either missed the lottery, or my name was not drawn. I'm in class and
I can't return to school, because I'm filled with what I've just been
through, and that statement from Jerry Ringerman, the camp director,
"Make it real," I immediately went into problem-solving creation mode
and I went, "This is so potent, kids are in such a state"--even then
there was gang violence. It wasn't terminal at that point, people were
getting roughed up, but they weren't--guns hadn't been injected into the
scene. I went, "You know, all kids need this experience. I've got to do
something to save the forest. I want to create a camp where kids can
have this experience."
-
Lipkis
- So I began trying to figure out how I was going to get the kids in the
mountains to have the experience of--it was the planting, but it was the
bigger thing. It was connecting, connecting to their power, working as
teams, yes, helping the forest, but getting something that would give
them the strength to come back to the city and know that they could
actually make a difference here. So that became a project that I
wanted--and I called it The Project. I didn't have any other name for
it. It was really clear to me that I couldn't go to class, I had to do
this, and someone had created the perfect space for me to do, instead of
going to class, go to work, because the purpose of IPS was community
service. Yes, there was class and there was counseling, but you were
encouraged to go out and do projects.
-
Lipkis
- I was a little depressed, I guess, I don't remember the emotions. But my
Russian teacher, whose name was Asta Aristov, was friends with the
administrator of this new program. Asta Aristov was also an
environmentalist herself. She was a Russian immigrant, cared about the
environment a lot, when nobody else knew really what it was. She talked
to her friend about this kid in her class, and a lot of the kids in IPS
they were just--they got in by lottery, so they didn't have to make a
case for why they should be there or whatever, they just went to the
beach. They took their free time and went off and did whatever.
-
Lipkis
- I think, by the way, Summerhill, the Summerhill Schools, were kind of the
model of education, free education, and all that. Turns out that my
preschool was the first Summerhill School in L.A. It's now a K through
middle school school and it's called Play Mountain Place in Culver City.
-
Collings
- I've seen that ad. I've seen their publicity, yes.
-
Lipkis
- That's where I went. So back to that spirit, but anyhow several parents
yanked their kids out of the program or they dropped out.
-
Collings
- Because they weren't doing anything, yes?
-
Lipkis
- Yes, and three spaces opened and I was one of three kids dropped in. Back
to coming in the side door.
-
Collings
- Yes.
-
Lipkis
- I did not have the luxury of playing around, but I so needed that, and
immediately they were there to support me. They introduced me to a UCLA
grad student in biology, who brought me over to UCLA, taught me how to
use the bio med research library. I immediately started doing research
on smog and trees and pulled all this great stuff together and read it
and got that background.
-
Lipkis
- My brother had created, when he was in junior high and high school over
at Dorsey, somehow got involved in the Crenshaw Youth Services
Commission. Another back to community participation. So I knew, you
know, little bits about nonprofit and all that (I wanted to create a
camp where kids could plant trees and care for the environment, but
didn't know how to do it) and I talked to him and got some guidance from
him. Somehow I got a [unclear] camp and I didn't know what. I
interviewed the people at my camp and got way overwhelmed when I found
out it cost like a half million dollars to run a camp. Here I am
fifteen. My allowance may have been fifty cents or something, I have no
idea. It was just, I can't deal with that.
-
Lipkis
- But at the time I was mostly trying to find resources, make something
happen, and just use everything I knew, and I'd identified Chevron as a
target to talk to, because they were running these ads back then, not
unlike the same ads they run now. Now they're running ones that go, "Do
people care? Yes, people do." It shows how their employees are fixing
the environment. It was Standard Oil of California at the time. They had
a total fraud scheme going, but no one knew it at the time, an additive
called F3-10 that was put in the gas.
-
Collings
- Is that the one that's supposed to wash the engine?
-
Lipkis
- Back then it was supposed to wash the engine and what comes out, and they
put two cars in bags, big plastic bags, and ran them, and the normal gas
the bag was black, and the clean gas, that F3-10, it was crystal clear.
-
Collings
- Problem solved.
-
Lipkis
- Problem solved, and they're the company that cares. It was probably the
same PR people.
-
Lipkis
- So I started aiming at them, thinking about them, and the day after I got
my driver's license, when I turned sixteen, I drove down to my
appointment with the head of PR, and said, "You know, I've got this
project, you guys should support it, because of everything you say, and
I believe you. This is great."
-
Collings
- What was the project at this time, because you weren't--were you still
thinking about the camp, even though it was that expensive?
-
Lipkis
- Yes, at that point, it was, I wanted to figure out a way to get kids to
the mountains to plant trees. I didn't have a budget or anything, or
even exactly what. I was seeking a partner who would help me design it
and carry it out, or an investor. This guy, who took the meeting, very
friendly guy, said, "That's really interesting. I was just in the forest
and it looked fine to me. I didn't see any problem."
-
Lipkis
- I said, "Well, no, the trees are dying. I saw them myself."
-
Lipkis
- He said, "No, they're not."
-
Lipkis
- I went, "No, they are," and pull out my research and say, "It's all here,
the forest is dying and it's from the smog."
-
Lipkis
- He could see, you know, I'm a sixteen-year-old, naive, revolutionary at
that point, and finally, because I wasn't budging and he said, "You
know, let's say it is the smog. If it is, it's because of Kaiser Steel,"
who had that largest mill west of the Mississippi right out here at the
foot of the San Bernardino Mountains in Ontario. He said, "You need to
shut that company down. You need to organize the workers of that company
to shut it down to save the forest," and he told me how to do it.
-
Lipkis
- So he took my point of interest, grabbed that, and manipulated me through
fifteen, twenty minutes of organizing talk, getting me all fired up. He
was my friend, paid for my parking, gave me some industry reports on how
air is already better and it's no longer a problem, and sent me out. I
took the elevator six floors to the street and realized what had
happened, and I was devastated. If adults are going to be like this,
-
Collings
- Because this was really the first experience you'd had like this?
-
Lipkis
- Yes.
-
Collings
- You had been working with so many wonderful people up to now.
-
Lipkis
- Exactly, and why would--why would someone manipulate and trash and stop
this poor kid, just with innocent passion? It hurt so much and it was
like, that's it, never again. I'm not going to dream, I'm not going to
share this stuff, it's time to go play Frisbee, get stoned, and rejoin
the ranks. That was reality. I quit flat out. I didn't want to touch it.
I was angry.
-
Lipkis
- Well, it seemed like it was six months, it may have been a lot less,
maybe it was a month, maybe it was two or three, but at some point I got
some rest and the anger started converting to, "They're never going to
do that to me again, and I'll show that motherfucker." I'll show them. I
went through a process, and what did I learn, what am I going to do
different this time? Most of it was about communication, some of it was
about get more detail, and that was the beginning of me, and now I can
look back, but that was when I first began to understand that failure is
not failure, and that it is compost for success. That it is loaded with
lessons. At the time, they were so potent that they caused me to quit
and the quitting was actually important to rest, to let go, and get the
dream back.
-
Lipkis
- Well, that started a cycle of three years of trying and failing, and
trying and failing, but still learning. I would talk to foresters and
tell them I wanted to plant trees in summer camps, and they'd say, "Oh,
it can't be done, because trees got to be planted during the spring.
They won't live in the summer. I would always say, "Well, how can we
make this work?" Ultimately, I would get answers and ideas. But
sometimes the frustration, you know, then learning about the budget, was
like, "Okay, forget it. Throw that one away," and quit, and then it
would come back. By the time I was ready to graduate high school, so
that was two years, the idea had evolved to me realizing I didn't have
to open a summer camp, I could just work with all the existing ones.
And, no major costs. Use their energy, their momentum, and just offer
them a program that would serve them. So that made sense.
-
Lipkis
- During that year, Datsun, you know, Nissan, started a program called
"Test Drive a Datsun and Plant a Tree."
-
Collings
- Oh, I think I vaguely recall this, yes.
-
Lipkis
- Yes. So I went straight to them, met with them to say, "Hey, I've got a
project in the works." They were kind of interested and they met with
me, and we started planning, and I started writing proposals, you know,
get a little bit of money to go plant some of these trees. Then I was
waiting and waiting and waiting, and I think it was the summer that I
graduated high school, and I waited and tried, and abruptly the Nissan
program was shut down because they were getting flack for being a
Japanese company trying to do domestic work, and back then there was
paranoia about Japan and messing in domestic affairs, so they killed the
program, pulled the plug. Again, disappointed after being strung along
for a long time. Again, I quit. I put everything away and went off to
college. I will just go be normal. I've had these years of innovative
education, it's fun, but let's be serious.
-
Lipkis
- So one semester I worked my butt off up there. I loved the school.
-
Collings
- Which school was this?
-
Lipkis
- Sonoma State. Lived in the dormitory. Had a great time. A lot of people
from camp, a lot of people from my high school, and it was great, and
after one semester I was bored off my butt. Over the winter break, I got
the flu, and I was in bed recovering after, like, four days, and lo and
behold, there's that dream. It's just knocking saying, okay, you got to
do this. By then I'm getting really troubled by what I'm--
-
Collings
- Can you please go away? [laughs]
-
Lipkis
- Yes. Yes, it's like what is this? I must be really weird. It was
disturbing, but also creatively it just the juices were all flowing
there. Again, okay, if I'm going to learn from everything before, what
do I need to do different this time? I forget, I think it was as a
result of something that I, a class I took, it was a Mexican-American
Myth and Art, taught by a Zen master Latino, that gave me enough
principles of self-realization that I, and maybe he counseled me or
something, but at some point I realized that part of my failure cycle
was I was afraid, not of failure, but of success. I was afraid that if
this thing succeeded, just to get the kids in the mountains to plant
trees, that it would take over my life, (a); and (b) that I couldn't
hide and be part of the conspiracy of "we don't make a difference." And
to discover that and tell the truth about that was very powerful,
because the next piece of it was, "Oh, I'll just do it for a year." So I
have this internal battle going on. It's like the devil and the angel up
there, but not devil and angel, it's just some other form. So there's
the part of me that really wants to do it and the other part that says,
"No, way, it's going to destroy your life."
-
Lipkis
- So I made a commitment to myself to just do it for a year, and then I
would return to normal, return to class, and all that, and that shut up
the scared voice and I came out of that really strong. I went straight
to school. There was a new environmental studies program, I made an
appointment with the dean the first day back from winter break, told him
what I wanted to do, asked him for independent study credit. He said
he'd give it to me, so I cut back on my class load. He said, "Keep a
journal," I'd never done that before, "and go for it."
-
Lipkis
- So I bought a journal set and started writing and out flowed--I wrote for
like four or five hours, the whole plan. I had the blueprint in my mind
from all that learning, and I just spelled it out and then started. I
immediately contacted twenty summer camps in the mountains, wrote them a
letter, asked them if they would plant trees based on what was happening
in their camp, and twenty of them wrote back to say they would and they
would take a total of 20,000 trees. I found the trees in a state nursery
at the California Department of Forestry, same people I'd been calling
over the years to--I had been tracking what the source was over time.
They had the trees. I then began trying to figure out how I was going to
get the trees and make something happen and things started to go wrong.
-
Lipkis
- I wasn't succeeding raising money and I was trying. My parents were not
going to give me the money. I needed about $600.
-
Collings
- They didn't support the project or they just--
-
Lipkis
- No, they did support the project, but they had watched me try, start and
quit, and start and quit, and start and quit, and I don't know if they
said, or I just felt like I couldn't in good conscious ask them for a
whooping $600. I mean, I was living on $5 a week back in those days, and
that was a huge amount. So I had to find some other source, and just
wasn't doing it.
-
Lipkis
- Well, when I found the trees, they said, "You're going to have to buy
them."
-
Lipkis
- I said, "No problem, I will."
-
Lipkis
- Then I was checking in with them saying, "I don't have the money yet."
-
Lipkis
- They said, "Well, guess what? At a certain stage we're going to have to
destroy them, those that we have that aren't sold, because we have to
make room for next year's crop."
-
Lipkis
- I said, "Fine, what's that date?"
-
Lipkis
- They gave it to me and I tried like crazy, still wasn't raising the
money, and just before that date arrived, I checked with them and they
said, "We can't wait anymore."
-
Lipkis
- I said, "No, no, no, wait, wait, wait, wait, I'm going to get to Los
Angeles and ask people for money, because I'm not getting it up here."
-
Lipkis
- They said, "Well, we'll see."
-
Lipkis
- I flew to L.A., called them to check in as I was in between going to meet
with people, whoever somebody would point me to that might have money,
and they said, "We're sorry, we couldn't wait. Our guy's on the tractor
now."
-
Lipkis
- I was sunk. My mom is there going, "I'm so sorry, I didn't want you to
get your hopes up." I'm devastated and she's saying, "Just let it go,
give up," and I did for three minutes. Then the wheels started to turn
and the expressive shows up. I made a couple of calls, one was to my
brother, who had still been politically active. He knew a legislator. I
called my brother and he said, "Let me get a hold of this guy." He was
in session, but I said, "The state's killing these trees, you've got to
do something." I called Art Seidenbaum who was a great guy, used to be a
great columnist at the Times.
-
Lipkis
- Now, I need to back up. While at Uni one of the resources I met was a
woman named Anita Berman, who had created this organization called
Ertia, that's the opposite of inertia. She came to our school and
handpicked three or four kids who she wanted to support having Ertia.
The idea was to support us somehow on getting our projects developed.
-
Lipkis
- She, in the process of that, and nothing much came of that except I did
manifest, she introduced me to Art Seidenbaum, this reporter, who was
interested in kids and stuff. So I had a talking relationship with him,
where, at least, he knew who I was. I called him in this moment of
crisis and he went, "Sounds pretty weird, but let me see what I can do."
-
Lipkis
- He talked to his editor, who got a young reporter assigned to the story
to talk to me. I tell the reporter, he goes, "Yes, right, they're really
going to be killing the trees, but give me the number."
-
Lipkis
- So I gave him the phone numbers and he calls them and he calls me back
very agitated. He says, "They're really killing the trees. You were
right."
-
Lipkis
- So again, distrust, youth, couldn't be that bad, doesn't sound credible,
goes and confirms it, and he's pissed, and he's going, "Well, sit tight,
we're going to do something."
-
Lipkis
- A little while later he called me back and said, "You can relax, they've
stopped killing the trees. They're going to fly down here to meet with
you tomorrow."
-
Lipkis
- I went, "Whoa."
-
Lipkis
- So what apparently happened, I'll tell you the part that I'm making up.
He contacted the governor's office, because forestry was not responsive.
And this may be made up or may have in fact happened, but the
implication certainly happened. I'm not sure whether I can quote him,
but he had a conversation with the governor's office about tomorrow's
headline, "The State Murders Baby Trees," given that he was from the
Times. They saw that it made sense to--
-
Collings
- It certainly didn't cost them much to stop this.
-
Lipkis
- Well, no, he had to wake up somebody who knew. It was not in the best
interest of Governor Ronald Reagan to have that kind of a headline and
they intervened. They called the Department of Forestry and got them off
the tractor, and by then the legislator who was--what's his name? He's
now dead (Julian Dixon). I will remember at some point. Anyhow, he got
on the case and was calling, too. So there was a bit of an uproar and
that next day a forester flew in from Sacramento and from Division of
Forestry and one guy drove in from Riverside to pick him up, and they
both met me at my parents' condo.
-
Collings
- They met you at your parents' condo?
-
Lipkis
- Yes.
-
Collings
- It's just such a funny picture.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, you know, Smokey the Bear types in uniform.
-
Lipkis
- How are we doing?
-
Collings
- We're a bit over time.
-
Lipkis
- Oh.
-
Collings
- I don't know how you're doing for your time.
-
Lipkis
- Well, let me--let's try to go six more minutes.
-
Collings
- Okay. A bit over your time, not mine.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, okay. Actually, pause for a minute. [Tape recorder turned off.]
-
Collings
- Okay, now we're back on.
-
Lipkis
- So we're in my parents' living room with these two foresters, and they're
going, "Everyone loves what you're doing and we want to help. We've
figured out a way that we can help you out. We can make this a
demonstration project."
-
Lipkis
- Now, the problem was they couldn't give me the trees. You know, I was
planting them on federal government land. So I mean, here's this total
public project, but they thought they had to sell them, and they weren't
allowed to give them away, because it would be a gift of public funds.
But they realized, due to the Times' call, that there were some
loopholes, they could be sponsors.
-
Collings
- Or they could reduce the price.
-
Lipkis
- Well, they could do that. Yes, a penny apiece or whatever, or half a
penny. But they just adopted the project as a demonstration project, and
they said, "So we can give you the trees."
-
Lipkis
- "Great," I said.
-
Lipkis
- "But trees are living things and what you want to do probably isn't going
to work, so we'll give you a hundred."
-
Lipkis
- I said, "No, I wanted 20,000."
-
Lipkis
- They went, "Yes, but, you know, you don't know what you're doing, you're
a kid," blah, blah.
-
Lipkis
- I went, "Let me tell you what I know," and I laid out the plan, and they
look at me with their jaws open going, "How did you do that?"
-
Lipkis
- I said, "Your people for three years have told me what won't work, and I
asked them what would work, and I basically got a forestry education."
-
Lipkis
- They were so impressed that it was actually a viable plan that dealt with
the seasons and how they make the trees live by potting them instead of
using bare root trees, that they went, "We think you can do it."
-
Lipkis
- I said, "Well, great, 20,000 trees."
-
Lipkis
- They went, "We don't have them. We killed 12,000, but we've got 8,000
left, so you can have those."
-
Lipkis
- I went, "Wonderful, I'll take them."
-
Lipkis
- They agreed to deliver them to my house back up in Sonoma County. So I'd
moved out of the dorms into a farmhouse in the town of Cotati, right
next to Highway 101 on the Old Redwood Highway. It's this great old
farmhouse on seven acres of land and about eight of us lived there at
$50 a month. It was the good old days.
-
Collings
- Yes.
-
Lipkis
- We ran the food co-op through our house. There was a barn there. So I
mean that really supported that $5 a week food budget, because
everything we needed we got through that co-op that was right there. It
was great.
-
Lipkis
- So anyhow, several days after that meeting in L.A., a forester shows up
at my house in a pickup truck with eight boxes of a thousand trees in
each. Actually, more specifically it was two, four, six--three boxes of
two thousand trees apiece, and two boxes with a thousand apiece.
Something like that.
-
Lipkis
- Anyhow, unloads the boxes and said, "Well, you've got to get these into
refrigerators in the next couple of hours, otherwise they're going to be
dead, and you've got ten days to get them potted, otherwise they're
going to die. Good luck. Enjoy." And drives off.
-
Lipkis
- So he's going down the driveway kicking up dust and I'm looking at these
boxes going, "Hmm."
-
Collings
- And they're crying [makes crying sound.]
-
Lipkis
- Yes. Now what? I don't have a car. I didn't know that piece of the
puzzle. So I grab a housemate and enroll him in helping me, and he's got
the car, and I got on the phone and got the Sonoma State College
cafeteria to take 3,000 and the dorm where I had just moved out of,
their dining hall, kitchen, to take 3,000, a Foster's Freeze next door
to us got a thousand, and we stuffed a thousand tiny redwoods in our
fridge. We had three fridges in our house, so we could stuff it in.
-
Lipkis
- Then I got on the phone and talked to, gave a call to a developer that I
had interviewed. They were the bad guys, they were developing, you know,
building all these homes on the farmland there, but I had made this
relationship with the guy, and asked him if he would donate soil and he
said he would, he'd pay for a truckload of soil. Then I got a hold of
the local dairy who gave me surplus milk cartons. That was all very,
very cool. I mean, it wasn't simple, but I pulled it off in a day or so.
-
Lipkis
- Then started around-the-clock potting operations, getting college kids
in, and they weren't fast enough. We just weren't getting the job done.
So I called in the Boy Scouts and they worked for a couple of days and I
could see we were not going to get it done. Then I brought in the Girl
Scouts.
-
Collings
- Brought in the Girl Scouts. [laughs]
-
Lipkis
- We got it done. So ten days of potting party nearly twenty-four hours a
day, we got all the trees in their pots and pots being in milk cartons,
covering a lot of the land around the barns and stuff of that house.
Then I could breathe, the trees were saved. The problem was they were up
there and somehow I needed to get them down here, and had no money, no
nothing, but at least I had the trees and they were alive.
-
Lipkis
- So Easter break came and I grabbed a few of the trees and came to L.A. to
try to raise money, hang out with my family. When I got back the Times
reporter called to say, "Just wanted to see how it was going."
-
Lipkis
- I said, "It's great. I've got the trees, they're in the pots, snug and
happy."
-
Lipkis
- He's going, "Well, how are you going to get what you need to do?"
-
Lipkis
- I said, "Well, I've got a budget. I've figured out I need $4,000, so
that's about fifty cents per tree, and I figure I'll ask the kids of
L.A. to give fifty cents each and we'll raise the money."
-
Lipkis
- He said, "Well, I'd like to tell that story."
-
Lipkis
- So another reporter's assigned, comes out, interviews me. They take that
picture and that's at the condo, and I go away. So the interview was
like Wednesday, Thursday before Easter. Easter Sunday happens and I
drive back up north. Monday morning I receive a call from my dad and
five-thirty or six saying, "Something's happened that you should know
about."
-
Lipkis
- I said, "What?"
-
Lipkis
- He said, "Well, people are calling because you're in the paper."
-
Lipkis
- So that hit, I think it was Monday morning.
-
Collings
- This article with this wonderful picture, yes.
-
Lipkis
- Yes. The first thing they--oh, I actually heard from somebody at the
school security at five-thirty, reporters were trying to find me. Then
my dad called at six saying that they were getting calls. Some woman had
gotten in her chauffeur-driven Rolls Royce and driven to their house and
gave them a check for $500. I guess, I'm trying to break down that day,
and I should--it's all my journals. He called me and said, "Some people
want you to come down."
-
Lipkis
- I'm going, "No way. I just got back here." I'm so happy to be out of L.A.
again, which I had grown to hate and back in my farmhouse, this is
great, this is where I want to be. "No, I'm not coming down. I can't
afford to do that."
-
Lipkis
- Then he called back and said, "This woman just drove over and she's just
given you a check for five hundred, and Ralph Storey wants you for--
-
Collings
- Oh, Ralph Storey, yes.
-
Lipkis
- Yes. So the L.A. version of Good Morning, America, Good day, L.A., or
something, they want you on the show tomorrow. I'm going, "Okay, I'll
come down." I flew down, did the show. Stephanie Edwards interviewed me
and it was great. Got home to find a sack of mail.
-
Collings
- Wow.
-
Lipkis
- So that story finished. Let's go the end--
-
Collings
- Is your address in the story?
-
Lipkis
- Yes, it's at the very end. In fact, that's the important punch line. It
brings us almost to the end of this chapter, page seven, column one.
-
Lipkis
- Okay. "Lipkis still needs $4,000 for the project this summer to cover the
cost of renting a truck for two months, obtaining tools, mulching
materials, paying two hundred and fifty a month salaries."
-
Lipkis
- I haven't seen this, you know, in thirty-something years. So "two hundred
and fifth a month salaries for two full-time trained assistants. He asks
that anyone willing to help contact him at 1745 Selby."
-
Lipkis
- Then finishes with, "I've given up trying to get money from big business
and now I'm going to take it to the people. As he said, if person just
contributed fifty cents for one tree we could get it done, that's all it
costs."
-
Lipkis
- A sack of mail loaded with letters especially from kids, fifty-cent
contributions, some less. It was overwhelming. And it's fairy-tale, but
there it is, and we called both my grandmothers and aunt and assembled
the whole family and we just sat on the floor of their condo opening
these letters and reading and crying, because so many people sent money
in memory of somebody.
-
Collings
- Oh, what a lovely idea.
-
Lipkis
- Kids. It really touched a nerve and it turned out to be quite--I mean, it
was exhilarating and also a little disturbing, because the next day
there was another sack of mail. It took two weeks, but we raised--in two
weeks' time there was $10,000. It was extraordinary. A lot of people
were coming forward offering help. A forest products company called
Potlatch offered to truck the trees to L.A. American Motors, which had
given me an award for the idea of this project and for my recycling and
community planning work, the American Motors Conservation Award, they
gave it to me as I was graduating high school. They called and said,
"Did you ask? Did we turn you down?"
-
Lipkis
- I don't remember what the answer was, but "We could loan you two Jeeps
for the summer."
-
Lipkis
- So that really was the missile that launched everything. It exploded.
-
Lipkis
- This is a good place to break.
-
Collings
- Okay. All right. Okay, great. [End of interview]
1.2. Session 2 (November 13, 2006)
-
Collings
- Okay. This is Jane Collings interviewing Andy Lipkis, November 13th,
2006, at his home.
-
Collings
- We were going to pick up with the donations that had come in.
-
Lipkis
- Right. So in that period of three weeks, the response from the L.A.
Times, there was around $10,000 that came in, which was shocking and
delightful. It was all in these tiny little gifts. We needed to do
something so it didn't become a tax burden for me, and so we could spend
it, and knew that we needed to create a nonprofit organization. As I've
mentioned earlier, my brother was involved with nonprofits, and so he
had a little bit of--I think he even gave me a sample Articles of
Incorporation. I grabbed another family member, Paul Bergman, who was on
the faculty at UCLA Law School, and he grabbed two other professors, and
together they filed the papers for us and then helped form the board,
which was just he and my dad and me, I think, initially. I created a
name, The California Conservation Project, Inc., and that was to give us
a sense of standing just by name, bigger than a kid who's a freshman at
college.
-
Collings
- Right. Right. This is all still so unimaginable.
-
Lipkis
- Yes. I mean, so here I was, and so we picked that name and that gave us,
I thought, some bit of credibility. But the funny thing is, from the
start, no matter when we used it, people always just started referring
to us as "the guy with the trees," or "the tree people." But I had had
somebody design a logo at some point, and we called ourselves the CCP,
but nobody--that never stuck, it never worked.
-
Lipkis
- So ultimately, this is along much later, we actually, because they were
going to call us "tree people" we took--oh, again, a little later in
this story, but when we started writing newsletters to people, I met a
lovely guy who had someone name the newsletter, it was "The TreePeople
News." Then we actually reincorporated our name, changed our name to
California Conservation Project, TreePeople, and then later changed it
to TreePeople, California Conservation Project, and then dropped
California Conservation Project altogether. So we weren't being clever
with the name, it was what was applied to us.
-
Collings
- Do you have any idea who first came up with that name? I mean, was that
something on the news?
-
Lipkis
- What? TreePeople?
-
Collings
- Yes.
-
Lipkis
- What sticks for me is that first summer when we got going, we worked with
these twenty summer camps that I was planning on, and it was
just--everyone just said, "Here come the tree people," and "The tree
people are coming to talk to us." You know, it was little t, little p,
but it was just easier for everybody and certainly much more friendly
and more representative of the spirit of the work, for sure.
-
Collings
- Yes. Well, very much, because it's got tree, of course, and people,
because your whole organization has to do with marshalling the energies
of people.
-
Lipkis
- Of trees and people, yes.
-
Collings
- Yes.
-
Lipkis
- Literally bringing trees, you know, I say bringing trees and people
together for a healthier, safer community. But what was interesting is
that this friend who was a publisher, thinker, who had his graphic
artist people do stuff for us, he created a logo-type of TreePeople as
one word. I began to reflect on how powerful that was, that the power is
really when they come together, and that there's synergy there. So
whereas it was just by name of the newsletter, we started using it as
one word, and that's what it is in our logo and has been incorporated as
one word, because they really are inseparable. People want to find the
magic tree, the super tree, as if that's going to do the job, and it
never can by itself.
-
Collings
- What do you mean, the tree that will endure?
-
Lipkis
- Yes, the one that will feed the world. The one that will endure. The one
that will survive. The one that's perfect for whatever, and every once
in a while you see a science article or quasi-science, bad science
article, about here is the super tree for feeding Africa. It's never
that way, but our thinking is always that there is an answer out there
somehow separate from us, and the fact is trees do magical, great,
healing work, but they never can do it without people involved,
especially when it comes to cities. Someone's got to plant it, someone's
got to protect it, and to simply declare a number or a type never works.
So they're inseparable from people. The answer is as much about people
energy and intelligence and care and stuff that we're all capable of
doing, but we've forgotten, you know, we're not usually invited to do.
-
Collings
- In your book, "The Simple Act of Planting a Tree," deals largely with
people.
-
Lipkis
- That point.
-
Collings
- Yes.
-
Lipkis
- Yes. Yes, and I'm getting ready to write another one and it's even more
focused on the power that people have. I haven't worked it all out yet,
but it's really interesting, the more I look at the more, the energy,
the capacity the people have, and are, this may be heretic, especially
in certain religious circles, but it's so clear, if you look at the
earth as an ecosystem and all the animals and all the species and what
everybody does from a science perspective, every species' role is pretty
well defined. We sort of understand them to some degree, except for that
of mosquitoes. [laughs] But if you look at the human being as a
biological unit of ecosystem and you notice all the energy that is
focused to supporting the existence of a human, and tell the truth about
all its functionality, not just that it is an animal that eats and
creates pollution, but that it has all these faculties of intuition and
spirituality and creativity and a real knack at problem solving , and
also a heart that drives it, too, packed with compassion. If you say,
okay, well, what are the ecosystem functions of that, I conclude that
it's pretty clear that the role of the human on the planet is to be a
problem-solver healer, healer being one to fix the wounds, to sustain
life for others and other species, because we have the ability to do
that. We're hardwired for it. We have antennas that respond to pain,
that give us adrenaline to propel us forward and the planet feeds us all
these different energies, and yet they're not deployed for that. They've
been deployed around now mostly consumerism, your job is to consume,
which is not helpful for people's survival on the planet.
-
Lipkis
- Not only that, within the definition of pollution is the waste of energy.
So when you look at all the energies that the human has, the ecosystem
giving it, and whether those energies are utilized or wasted, and then
the conclusion is most of it is wasted, when you think of the creative
energy and spiritual and food and all this stuff, and what's the bulk of
humanity doing with that, down to the level of the individual to family
to community to city, is all that energy being deployed to making the
planet livable and healthy and safe for people and everything else and
the answer is no.
-
Collings
- Sadly.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, well, it's kind of not--I mean, what we do is complicated, but when
you look at it from this perspective it's not complicated, and if you
buy all scientific theory as correct that pollution is the waste of
energy, then you ask, well, what form is the pollution taking with all
this energy being wasted? Then it gets really compelling, because the
form that pollution is taking is boredom, frustration, greater levels of
frustration, and that turns to anger and pain, personal pain, physical
pain, the physical energy that we have not utilized turns to obesity.
Obesity turns to diabetes and all kinds of diseases that take us down,
that you don't see in populations that are consuming their calories and
using them. So that pollution challenge is pretty amazing and that pain
needs to be mitigated with drugs, of all kinds. So no wonder we have a
highly addicted society that a war on drugs has not been able to do
anything but spread.
-
Lipkis
- So from that principle and the impact it's having on people's health and
the world and we can pursue all kinds of strands, that was just one, go,
well, what could be the benefit to utilizing that energy to contribute,
and if we could give everybody a tree as a first step for them to
understand that and feel the joy and the fulfillment, if they're
planting right, to be able to use some of their energy. There's a
multi-level kind of easing of pain and connecting and of easing of
alienation and connecting people up to begin exercising that muscle of
healing in whatever form. It's not that every--well, maybe everybody
should be planting a tree as part of the air supply and water supply,
but it's only a gateway to opening, to connecting people up to a much
broader participation in community.
-
Lipkis
- So that's a more elaborate statement. That's my thesis for my next book.
-
Collings
- Okay, wonderful. Just let me ask you, when you are mobilizing volunteers,
when your organization is mobilizing volunteers, and you have a
speakers' bureau and so forth, are those the kinds of things that--
-
Lipkis
- We talk about?
-
Collings
- Yes.
-
Lipkis
- No, that's why I need to write this, because this is, you know, Andy's
philosophy, which you got a taste of in there. I speak about it a little
bit, but we talk about the good things, but I think when our speakers
speak, and I haven't done a training of speakers in a long time, so
we're about to rebuild that, I think we will infuse it. We've got to
infuse it with this stuff, but it's so desperate at the moment that I
need to go right it down so there's a source document, so people can tap
into that, and then share it, so people go, "Oh, my God, yes, look
around. What's the pollution doing to our own family and our own lives
and could we use some of that energy now to deploy?" And it changes the
dynamic from people thinking of me as some hero in sacrifice. Like,
well, we can never do that. So realizing, no, this is the most selfish
work that people could do to ease physical pain and improve health and
make life feel like it's worth living.
-
Collings
- In fact, when you began this, you were really thinking along these lines,
you were thinking about letting other kids have an experience.
-
Lipkis
- Other kids tap that power.
-
Collings
- Yes.
-
Lipkis
- So this is really, yes, if you will, a lot of trees wait twenty, thirty
years before they can produce a seed. The DNA was there all along and
it's just starting to flower in another way. So thank you for spotting
that. It's like, oh, it's not new at all, but hopefully expressing it in
a way that's more relevant to today.
-
Lipkis
- Even my bike ride this morning was to be thinking about how more
effectively to get the word out. We had been clever with our million
tree campaign, but we have not done much recently on that scale--and
that was a long time ago. That was now twenty years.
-
Collings
- Right, and you had an advertising agency involved, even.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, yes.
-
Collings
- Dale--
-
Lipkis
- Doyle, Dane, and Bernbach.
-
Collings
- Yes.
-
Lipkis
- Which is now DDB Needham [Worldwide]. Yes, and that opened it up for the
whole movement that came out of it, but we need to stand on our
shoulders. There is so much possible now with, what I say, the
hardwiring of the global brain with the Web. You know, there can be a
problem, a pain, anywhere on the planet, and the ability for that
information to actually get to somebody with an antenna, a heart that
goes, "Oh, that's my issue." It doesn't have to be right in front of
them anymore, probably there's stuff, opportunity, right nearby, but the
fact that there's so much need in the world and an ability to hook up
humans to help whatever it might happen to be.
-
Collings
- Now, are you moving toward having your own graphic arm, your own
publicity arm of the organization, or do you continue to use others?
-
Lipkis
- You know, we have a communications person, and they need to be highly
skilled, but my preference--we've done it both ways. We've made some of
our own videos. There's no way that we can pay and afford the highest
level talent that there is, and yet the same talent, energy, that I'm
talking about, it resides here in L.A., some of the most creative media
people in the world at the mouth of the pipeline, who have their own
personal issues about whether they're getting to use that energy well or
not. The times that we have invited board members and others to use
their talent for video making, have created stunning video. So we could
never--it would cost us several million dollars to deploy this level of
creative accomplished talent and writing and production. When we show
some of these videos people go, "Whoa, we just thought it was going to
be something industrial, and yet--." It was a production from--one of
our best was done by David Zucker who's an accomplished comic filmmaker
and from Airplane and Naked Gun and all those two, Marshall Herskovitz,
who was the director-producer of Thirtysomething, and all of those. They
collaborated with me and produced the mini documentary on us, not
documentary, just our own little seven-minute piece that tried to
explain what we were up to. Well, it's extraordinarily compelling and
emotional, and we need to do it again, because it's very, very old and
there's more story to tell now.
-
Lipkis
- So I think that that--yes, the answer to your question is that there are
just incredible resources out there that need to be deployed and it
would be a horrible waste for us to try to raise the money or produce
our own and not get any of the quality that we could.
-
Collings
- Given what a media-rich environment Los Angeles is, and how TreePeople
has used the media, could your organization exist, as it does today, if
you were based in another city, like Seattle, say?
-
Lipkis
- That's an interesting question. You mean, without the resources to get
our word out?
-
Collings
- Yes. Right, and without the saturation of the local news, without the--
-
Lipkis
- Well, it's interesting. I'm going to give you several responses, because
we're probably a day, one interview ahead of where we ought to be, but
we'll just do this and it'll slot in another place.
-
Collings
- Yes, that's fine. We can go back and forth.
-
Lipkis
- Because as the organization grew, many people have asked, from around the
world, they wanted to create branches of TreePeople. The model that
everyone assumes in this male-dominated global domination grow game is
that we should have set TreePeople up to be a statewide and then
national and international organization, because so many people want to
do what we do. Because I didn't go to school or business school or any
of that, I had no skill and knowledge of how to do that, I had an
intuitive sense as I had looked at other organizations from a youthful
perspective, but also, I guess, just an integrity perspective. I could
see that most of the national networks and big organizations somewhere
lost their soul of the local power, and that they became groups who were
about harvesting the money from local organizations and not leaving the
real strength behind. That, to me, violated purpose, intent, mission of
the work, and I developed another approach, which is in a sense not been
so effective from the people who judge our clout from, well, how many
countries are you in and what are your numbers. We're not the same as
the NRDC [National Resources Defense Council], that's almost the same
age as us. Totally different reason, different methodology, different
purpose, and definitely different strategies.
-
Lipkis
- The methodology informed from inexperience was let us share our pollen
and cross-pollinate. [recording off]
-
Collings
- Okay, let me turn back on. Yes, go ahead.
-
Lipkis
- So what we sensed is, I mean, as I'd seen community organizations all
around form, deploy the [Saul] Alinsky organization, various strategies,
even really good community organizing, but once the organizers left, the
organizations tended to collapse. What that would mean here is that
organizations would get started, plant trees, and the people would go
away and the trees would die. So it's like, why bother? You know,
there's all this energy spent with breaking the promise.
-
Lipkis
- What evolved instead was the notion of an organization that mimics a
native tree. So sustainability being another through-line here, a native
Southern California oak, a Coast live oak, when that acorn sprouts in
its natural setting it may send a root down nine feet before it sends up
a leaf. Why? It's because it is programmed for sustainability. It knows
that in its DNA that there will be seasons two, three, four years, where
there's no rainfall and it needs to establish the sustainable water
supply, because a leaf is a vehicle for losing water, and if there isn't
water to replace it, it dries up and dies and the plant's dead. It
happens very quickly.
-
Lipkis
- So thinking analogous to that, how do we allow native organizations with
local sense, with local DNA, local knowledge, to form in a way that's
responsive to the local resource and nutrients and style and need? So we
have helped organizations get started all over this country and a lot of
the English-speaking world by Kate [Lipkis] and I going to London, to
Ireland, Australia, Canada, even Mexico, and telling stories and sharing
strategies and then doing some training and basically training of a
leadership team, a steering committee, to give them tools and skills
that became the book, but that could allow them to find with their DNA
their roots enough to get started and identify local resources,
establish that root system. And it has been somewhat effective. We never
were funded to get out and make organizations happen all over the place.
We did get some funding to help develop training, so the skill
development was possible.
-
Lipkis
- So that's a long way of answering your question. As a native adaptive
plant in Seattle we would probably form in a slightly different way in
response to conditions.
-
Lipkis
- On the other hand, large metropolitan areas, if you're going to
effectively get to everybody, the media's got to be a part of it.
Media's actually much easier to get in other communities. You can't get
a public service announcement on the air in Los Angeles, because air
time is too valuable. You can make a great one, and we made them as good
as we could, with stars like Gregory Peck and stuff, in order to have
that pop to the top of priority list for a station, but no, it's much
easier in other markets to use the airwaves. So that's another answer to
your question.
-
Collings
- Yes, okay.
-
Lipkis
- So, should we go back to--let's pick up.
-
Collings
- Yes, why don't we go back. You've got 8,000 trees.
-
Lipkis
- We've got 8,000 trees, $10,000, the trees were in my house up north. I
mentioned that because of the publicity a trucking company offered to do
trucking, and we actually had to figure out how we were going to get
these things down. We wound up using these wire vegetable crates. I
don't even know if they make them anymore, but they were made of wood
and wire and they would neatly hold either nine trees or sixteen trees.
I'm sorry, twelve or sixteen. Four-by-four or four-by-three, standing up
in this wire cage. We could stack them four or five high. So we were
able to get all the trees into one 40-foot trailer. Those trees were
then trucked on down to L.A.
-
Lipkis
- I'm not sure if I mentioned, my summer camp, JCA [Jewish Centers
Association], offered us a home, a place to have an office in the
mountains, our nursery, food, and a base, and that was fantastic.
-
Collings
- For the summer?
-
Lipkis
- For the summer. I hired my first--my roommate was the first staff, Randy
Crosno.
-
Collings
- You actually hired him? You paid him?
-
Lipkis
- Well, yes, for the summer. I mean, I think I paid everybody two or three
hundred dollars for the summer. I'd have to look back. It wasn't a whole
lot. It was sort of matching what I thought were camp staff rates at
that point.
-
Collings
- And this money came from the donations?
-
Lipkis
- Yes, all those donations. So we formed the nonprofit and an account, put
them in, so I could start spending. But mainly we worked on more and
more donations of in-kind services that really, really stretched the
budget. So camp hosted us and fed us and gave us a phone and office
space and all that. American Motors, who had given me that conservation
award, they got in touch and said, "We want to help," and they loaned
two Jeeps, a Waggoneer and a pickup truck. I think Sears donated some
tools. So I was able to continue digging deeper. McCullough Corporation,
the people who make chainsaws, donated a chainsaw and an auger and some
power tools at some point. So the pieces all started really coming
together nicely.
-
Lipkis
- The people who I hired, actually, so one was a roommate, another two were
from that original summer camp, Camp JCA, who both were going to Sonoma
State College. Four of us were at Sonoma State. One was Susan Strict and
one was Sunny Levy, and the fifth was a high school girlfriend of mine
who was at UC Berkeley, Stacey Wolfson. So Randy Crosno, Stacey Wolfson,
Sunny Levy, and Susan Strict, and Andy. Three guys, two girls. Three
women and two men. We all moved down to L.A. into Camp JCA, set up our
base, and off we went.
-
Lipkis
- Susan had actually helped me communicate with some of the camps and
stuff. So these were a group of people who were somewhat engaged in
helping before and I brought them on. We trained ourselves, met with the
Forest Service, and had already been communicating with the camps, and
then told them, "Hey, it's happening, we'll be coming." We created our
own little environmental ed training program for the summer campers and
how we would talk to them, what we'd have them do.
-
Lipkis
- That was kind of important. TreePeople has always been a very
learning-based organization, and so given that we knew nothing, we had
to apply what we knew from very little experience that we had as
youngsters in the world. We were all coming out of our first year of
college. So we applied whatever we knew. I had a bent towards logistics
and the campaign stuff we had talked about. But we realized that we
needed to inspire the kids to plant and to take care of their trees, and
to magnify. So back to media. So that wasn't an inappropriate part of
the question. My old expressive stuff, I'm remembering, we were talking
about. We said, "You know, it's important to plant your tree, but it's
almost as important to magnify it and let people know that you did it."
-
Lipkis
- So we started talking about how real change happens, even right from the
start. Like, "Okay, we're all up here in the forest, we care, but we
really need to clean up smog. That's really the objective, to save the
forest, because hopefully we can do something, but we'd better clean up
the bigger cause, not just the problem. And we need to tell a whole lot
more people about this."
-
Lipkis
- So we evolved, I think even over the first year, and certainly it evolved
over time into some other expressions, but, and I'm not sure exactly
when this fully evolved to this Cafe USA concept, but we would talk to
kids about how does change happen in the world and where's their power.
And from the perspective that they have no power to that they actually
have power to make the change today in the forest, but that it can go
beyond.
-
Lipkis
- Let me pause for a second. [recording off]
-
Lipkis
- So where were we?
-
Collings
- You were talking about organizing the, amplifying the--
-
Lipkis
- Oh, yes, yes, telling the kids. So what evolved was this discussion about
tasting their power today with the planting, but (a) to save the forest,
we need to spread the word, and we needed to go beyond. We would have
our discussions with them would be about what's happening in the forest,
understanding a little bit about the biology and how smog is killing the
trees and all that, but also where's the smog is coming from and why,
and how do we change that, and letting them talk about the alternatives
to the lifestyle that we're living that's killing the trees. They would
get into having transit discussions and things like that. Then we'd say,
"Okay, how do we effect change?"
-
Lipkis
- I evolved this notion of Cafe USA, which was to have them think about the
way democracy works, because it's pretty important. Back to all people
using it and participating, and the answer tends to be no. Why Cafe USA
is like--our government is like a cafe, you go in and we've got to tell
the waiters and waitresses, who are all elected representatives, what
you want. Now, they've forgotten that they're the waiters and
waitresses, and they're not tending to ask you what you want, and we're
tending not to see them as that, and we're not actually telling them.
All we do is get angry. We walk in the cafe and see everyone else
getting what they want, and feel upset that we're not getting served.
Then we just blurt out some angry statement and smash a glass and we
walk out. That's the equivalent of how we deal with democracy, you know,
that rarely does anybody effectively and creatively communicate their
opinion and their desire to their representatives.
-
Lipkis
- We said, "So think about that, and think about how you're likely to be
best heard," and all that.
-
Lipkis
- So we would have them plant and commit to care for the week or two or
three or the summer that they were there in the mountains to keep those
trees alive. That was what the Forest Service and the Department of
Forestry was not used to. Their way of planting is put a tree in the
ground and leave it. So you bury your tree in the ground during the wet
season and hope that there will be enough follow-up rain that falls on
the tree. You know, that can result in a 1 or 2 or 5 or 10 percent
survival, but not usually more than that ever. Our protocol was put the
tree in a pot, so it has some ability to--we can plant in the dry season
instead of just in the wet season and have people care for the tree for
at least two years to get their roots established and it worked.
-
Lipkis
- So we would plant and sometimes, I mean, we were planting one tree could
take ten minutes to an hour and several kids swinging picks, because the
soil was very rocky, very hard. So basically you created your hole by
removing big rocks and that's a lot of work.
-
Collings
- It's a good way for kids to spend their time. [laughs]
-
Lipkis
- Well, it's a way to utilize a lot of energy.
-
Collings
- Absolutely.
-
Lipkis
- But, you know, we could never deliver humongous numbers that way, but the
numbers of trees that lived--but we would then have them as part of our
process or a follow-up they would all write letters. Or they would talk
about how they wanted to communicate creatively, so it was noticed, so
it wasn't just ignored. So some made audio tapes, some wrote plays, and
they shared it. We didn't know who to target at the time, but Reagan had
moved from governor to president, and Jerry Brown was becoming governor,
and as he came into office we know he got over 10,000 letters from kids
talking about--we said, "You can say anything you want, but it probably
doesn't hurt for you to say, you know, the forest is dying, it's because
of smog. I planted a tree today, what are you doing?" They did that in
some effect and they said whatever else they wanted to say, we didn't
usually get copies of their letters, but we know that when Jerry took
office, he was highly aware of the problem and desire to do something to
help save the forest, which I don't know how much of that is responsible
for his long-term green awareness, but he's been aware of us for a long
time.
-
Lipkis
- It's interesting that now he's just been elected--
-
Collings
- Attorney general.
-
Lipkis
- Yes. So he may pick up where Eliot Spitzer, is in New York, is leaving
office, he leaves that for--he became the governor, I think.
-
Collings
- I'm not sure.
-
Lipkis
- But he was really an aggressive attorney general.
-
Lipkis
- So we spent the summer traveling around to all these camps, planting, and
doing all this stuff, and that was great.
-
Lipkis
- Oh, the learning organization. Every time we would do an event, a speech,
a planting, always as a part of it at the end was the five of us sitting
down--first of all, listening for any feedback from people, but then
critiquing each other and critiquing our methodology, what worked, what
didn't, what are we going to do different next time. So in that rapid
evaluation and fix and truth-telling environment, we were able to learn
lessons very quickly, and get to be effective from no knowledge to a lot
of knowledge. You know, what motivated kids, what turned them off, what
kept them engaged.
-
Collings
- So what were some of the fixes that you needed to make during this
process, do you recall?
-
Lipkis
- I don't remember all the specifics, but I think we would certainly
involve minor tweaks in terms of the messaging. Where did the kids go to
sleep? Where were they interested? Certainly, our planting styles and
whether we put one or two or four kids on a team. How we train them to
be tool safe, or to include that in the training. How much time, you
know, what size group to have assembled for training, because the
further you move from one-on-one the less attention is spent, and the
more distracted they get.
-
Lipkis
- This is the phone. Excuse me one sec. [recorder off]
-
Lipkis
- That's David Zucker coming to a meeting with another Hollywood person, he
wants to show the tapes that I was just talking about, to them, because
he's trying to involve them in doing more for us.
-
Collings
- Great. Excellent.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, it's really cool. Are we rolling?
-
Collings
- Yes.
-
Lipkis
- What's neat about that, just a point of information, is that the first
thing he did, before he and Marshall Herskovitz produced the second one,
he had the company that makes their trailers take our news footage and a
little bit other interviews to make this really hot tape. So if this
company can make me look good in a movie trailer, they've got to be able
to better tell the TreePeople story.
-
Collings
- Absolutely. Yes.
-
Lipkis
- So it's just, again, an example of really high value turnaround.
-
Lipkis
- You know, one of the other lessons that we learned, that's what we were
talking about, and this happened a little bit later, probably the
beginning of the second year of planting season, we brought all of our
volunteers to work with the County Forest and Fire Warden on a project.
-
Collings
- These were the children still or these were adult volunteers?
-
Lipkis
- In this case, this was families, adults, church groups, stuff like that.
So it's a little later in our process, we were working in the Angeles
Forest, bringing groups up there from the city instead of just summer
campers. So we started getting people up into the mountains, I'd say it
was in year two or three, somewhere. We discovered a really painful
lesson and that was that the foresters were only used to working with
inmates. They had a military background and they were used to working
with inmate crews, and so the volunteers were treated like inmates and
people weren't engaged and they were there to do their work, but they
pooped out after a couple of hours. What we found was that throughout
the Forest Service they learned that people think that they're going to
volunteer for all day and that they burn out after an hour or two, and
most don't show. So they had to scale back on the size project that they
wanted done. That became just the unspoken or spoken internally only,
the quiet way of dealing with volunteers.
-
Lipkis
- Our response was very, very different. It was like, whoa, wait a minute,
these are our volunteers, these are promises we're making, this can be
really fun, it can be nurturing, it can be great, and that's not the
experience we had. Let us build the human interface onto this thing. You
foresters tell us how the trees need to be planted, where you want them
planted, and what you want planted, so use your forestry expertise and
let us bring the human interface. We problem-solved that and said, "We
need to add fun, music, celebration to this," and we would stop and have
a water fight. We would have people bring guitars and play at the
beginning and at lunch and have lunch. Our volunteer days could easily
last eight hours with people staying highly productive and get thousands
of trees planted. That wound up re-inspiring Forest Service people.
-
Lipkis
- So we evolved that and that made us, you know, people want to come back,
and made us successful.
-
Collings
- Now, was this the first time that the Forest Service had used volunteers
in their collaboration with you?
-
Lipkis
- When we were doing the first summer we were sort of managing everything,
it was just us and the camps. Forest Service knew what we were doing, we
were getting permission, but they didn't have the foresters out, they
weren't experiencing that. Then later, as we started trying to work with
them, they had a protocol for involving volunteers, but not in a very
big way. To this day, because it keeps getting forgotten, there's not a
whole lot of institutional memory in the Forest Service, because the way
you promote is to move to another forest around the country, and you can
do that every two years or less. Well, it takes a long time to learn
local lore, local knowledge, different forestry techniques because of
totally different environment. Southern California is not taught in--our
Mediterranean dry forestry is not taught in forestry schools. The local
foresters here from the county, went to Israel to learn, because of the
same climate, and we learned from them what to do. But in the same way
volunteer coordination had not come to a high art. Had it, when I first
started, I never would have had to form TreePeople.
-
Collings
- So how did you get involved with them? Did you go to them for this
project?
-
Lipkis
- Yes, it's their land and we needed their permission and we wanted to
cooperate. Now, that incident I had with the L.A. Times and stuff kind
of cauterized forever our relationship with the California Department of
Forestry, because I made them look bad.
-
Collings
- The article soliciting the donations?
-
Lipkis
- Yes.
-
Collings
- Yes, yes.
-
Lipkis
- They thought that I did them damage and they looked bad and didn't
realize we really were galvanizing a movement of support for them, but
there's always the other, the shadow side of our work is sometimes
stepping on the toes of organizations. We're pretty careful about that
now, but for twenty years or so a number of agencies were like, no, no,
no, they're too radical, long hair, or they're going to buy it, or I
don't know what. It turns out it's more of the DNA of organizations not
to accept outside input. It's like what we see with schools.
-
Collings
- I was noticing in that photograph in the Times, you know, you do have a
beard and long hair.
-
Lipkis
- Yes.
-
Collings
- Did you get to a point where you felt like you needed to have a more
corporate--
-
Lipkis
- Clean look?
-
Collings
- Yes, cleaner look.
-
Lipkis
- You know, I think I just changed with the current style and times,
frankly. My son looked at this article the other day and he went, "You
were a hippie."
-
Lipkis
- I went, "Well." He's starting to look like that. So we all were that.
That's what people looked like in those days. Not everyone, I mean, it
was definitely--the Vietnam War was starting up and there was this
division between the hippies and the clean-cuts, but clearly our act did
clean up, and your question is a really good one, and it's a complete
other important theme. As we realized, as I realized, that our function
was to stay as neutral as possible, to be seen not as--our job, if we
were going attack successfully and solve the bigger environmental
problems was to be seen as something that everybody could participate
in. That you don't have to change. You don't have to become an
environmentalist. You don't have to--that who you are today can take
action now and I wanted to strip us of as much projection and things
that would cause people to not want to participate and not want to hear
our message. So we decided not to be political, not to be left or right,
not to have all the things that everyone expected of us, because part of
this world is that everything's transmuted into politics and we lose a
lot in that. It's the dominant game. It's almost like sports, there's a
winner and a loser, and the world doesn't actually have to be structured
that way. We lose so much energy and time in the battle and leaving very
little, and usually a policy battle, leaving very little energy for
implementation. Cash, maybe, maybe not. The laws, if we haven't done the
right job of educating everybody on the moral basis of protecting the
environment, then a slight majority will always be used to turn around
and undo a lot, and then we all lose.
-
Lipkis
- So I decided to keep us much more in the neutral space. We wanted to be
an intake system, to have people discover their energy, their joy, but
also their caring without closing that down.
-
Lipkis
- So, yes, when you look at my look and all that stuff, it's like, "Whoa, I
was not very good at being very neutral," but I tried to become more and
more of a blank screen under which people could project values, or see
values that work for them that related to them. You know, we probably,
if you professionally evaluated that, that's probably mixed success, but
there is certainly a fair degree of success in that now, because we're
one of the few organizations that has the privilege of going into every
school in Southern California. If we had a political axe to grind and
all that, we wouldn't have access and authority, and we shouldn't,
because our job is to use science to help people understand their
responsibility. If we were carrying the political perspective as
anti-nuke and all that stuff, it's always tempting, but we'd be giving
up a whole lot of much more important power.
-
Lipkis
- Why did I go there? You asked a question, I think. Oh, did we change?
-
Collings
- Yes.
-
Lipkis
- So, yes, I mean, when we first got started we didn't identify as an
environmental group, because there was no such thing and people didn't
respond to that. Still, because environment gets hot, we get tempted to
say we're an environmental organization, but I hate doing that because
we are also a public health organization and we're an infrastructure
organization. It's a funny mix of challenges, because truly we're
TreePeople, and if you understand how a tree is this multidimensional
solution machine with human, from community builder to family repair, to
all the stories, all the things we can point to, with hard evidence of
what trees and people doing together, what benefits have come from that,
but if we isolate on to any one of them it gets lopsided.
-
Collings
- Yes. Well, to keep it on just we're about trees and people, that is very
neutral, isn't it?
-
Lipkis
- It is, and the problem is when people hear of the profound work we're
doing with water and infrastructure now, they're going, oh, God. I mean,
every one of them says, "You've got the wrong name," because it causes
people to so undervalue us, and being undervalued is a burden that trees
have due to lack of literacy, and our board members and others feel the
same thing about us. So it's like, "No, you're going to change the
name." But I haven't, and now there's pretty strong ground around it,
and so it would be stupid to change the name. We finally, finally, have
descriptor, which really works pretty nicely, which is, "Helping Nature
Heal Our Cities," and that's taken a while to come up with that. I had
"bringing trees and people together to heal our city," or whatever, but
it's interesting, one of--
-
Lipkis
- --we're getting off
-
Collings
- The 8,000 trees.
-
Lipkis
- Well, we've gotten actually the whole flow of development, but we're
getting into bits and pieces and it does meander here, but at some point
when Marshall Herskovitz joined our board he found, in the same spirit,
that people just didn't--he didn't get the strokes from people around
him in the industry when he said he was TreePeople. He knew that he had
great passion for us and admired the work, but they didn't get it. In
the ego-driven world, it's like, well, if you were only somehow
different then we'd be more excited about it and we'd get involved. It
was always, "Well, you need to be a national organization or an
international organization."
-
Lipkis
- So he actually drove--this patches back to that conversation earlier, he
drove a strategic options investigation into the possibilities of us
becoming a national or international organization. We actually hired
somebody from The Boston Consulting Group, who's a friend of mine, who
volunteered the analysis, and went around the country to find out what
was the need, what was the possibility. She found what I had intuited,
which is there was tremendous--this movement that we had clearly helped
found, there was a tremendous distrust of authority and centrality, and
just as I had intuited, there was a need for local power and control.
People get a tremendous amount of power when they do it themselves, when
they discover the answers, and that keeps them--that's part of what
keeps them going instead of taking command from and ideas from somewhere
else. She found that there was a reluctance to being willing to be
organized from any central place, again, validation, and concluded that
we should write a book and do training. Before her report got out of
draft form we had the contract from Jeremy [unclear] to do this. In
fact, that has helped spread that. A number of organizations have been
founded trying to do national organizing and they've mostly failed,
because there is that access to a sensibility and power that comes from
this work that you just can't violate.
-
Collings
- Right. And also you've said that, you know, you need the involvement of
community people to actually achieve this work and that that's sort of
central to what it's about.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, and it's not about writing a check and having someone else do it.
-
Collings
- Yes.
-
Lipkis
- We'll get into, and maybe our last minutes today we can map a little bit
of the next steps that we'll follow. So where the organization
developed, I'll just chart some points here as an outline.
-
Collings
- Okay.
-
Lipkis
- So we did that summer, we planted the trees, the trees came back, I
thought I had that promise I'd only do it for a year. I put everything
away.
-
Collings
- Right. I wanted to ask you what you were--probably we'll talk about this
next time, what you were thinking you were going to be doing.
-
Lipkis
- What happened, yes. Well, I put everything away and went back to school,
moved back up north, and thought I could be happy, and that didn't last.
So I came back and restarted everything here. The L.A. Times wrote a
follow-up article after the summer to tell people. I knew there were so
many thousands of people who were tracking us that we needed the Times
to, (a), get some credit for what they helped make happen, and to tell
the story. So there was a follow-up article in August or September that
said what happened. I put everything away, went back to school, and as I
said, that didn't work out. I moved back to L.A., dropped out of school
to the displeasure of my parents, and started things up again and found
trees and hired back some of the staff and some other people who I had
met that first summer. Hunter Sheldon who became Hunter Lovins, wife of
Avery Lovins, we hired her as we started that next year. Ordered trees,
got them in, and sent a newsletter to all the people who
-
Collings
- The first newsletter.
-
Lipkis
- Yes. Had given money, to tell them what we did, and ask them for more,
and they gave more, lo and behold. So I restarted the whole process, not
thinking I was going to do that. So there were city tree potting and
preparation, storage, transport. This is a great story we'll come to,
make sure you ask me about it. But I had asked, when I was trying to get
the trees down here the first time, I am big on utilizing underused
resources in the community, wasted resource. Living up north I always
passed Hamilton Air Force Base, and it had all these Army trucks sitting
on it. I thought, well, they should move the trees down for us. I
started asking them before we had found the trucking company and that
offer, I wrote the Air Force and asked them. I never got a response.
-
Lipkis
- Lo and behold, a year later, when we had potted the trees and we were
here needing to move them, I got the response. A person got my letter.
It had passed through eleven different people in different departments
and agencies, and this person said, "How can we help you? I think this
is really cool."
-
Lipkis
- I said, "Well, that was for a year ago, but we got another need coming
up," and we organized a convoy, a military convoy, to transport trees to
the forest. Great story, we'll come back to that.
-
Lipkis
- Got the trees up, did another summer of planting, and then, you know, so
we had this tradition of planting in the mountains during the summer.
-
Collings
- So you repeated this as a tradition?
-
Lipkis
- Yes, yes, because that's what our program was. Then as word would spread
there were more and more calls from schools and groups who wanted
something during the year, and we needed to prepare trees during the
year. Then we began to see that we really needed to be planting in the
city, because that's where, again, where the smog problem was, and that
we could sort of keep it going. We established an office in my parents'
house, and were in that cycle. City office, just part-time work, I had
transferred to UCLA, started going there trying to be a student while
doing some of this stuff, and we continued on the cycle of summer
planting in the mountains, increasing educational work in the city, and
the education formalized into an education program that would sometimes
support planting, but also became it's own thing. Then there was the
mountain planting and then we started doing urban planting as part of
the educational work. So that grew.
-
Lipkis
- So we can talk a little bit about that and all the aspects of urban
planting and what we learned and how our evaluating our successes and
failures on that created the Citizen Forestry Program, which really
kicks in in the eighties. And how we started our first office, first the
office at my parents' house, and that story and how that worked with
sometimes one to seven of us hanging out at their home, to getting our
first formal office outside. How having nurseries at people's homes sort
of got, we started out wearing out our welcome in people's backyards,
because we were taking over, and that created the need for a nursery and
how I found TreePeople Center, which is quite a landmark now in Los
Angeles. That story's pretty big. Then how we got it, and another
bureaucratic fight and nightmare and all the times they tried to make
sure we couldn't be there.
-
Collings
- That's a great spot.
-
Lipkis
- And what it's become. Yes, and big story, because it didn't just happen.
There was a whole battle that it took, and two mayors, and stuff.
-
Lipkis
- And programs that emerged along the way, the El Nino floods and the
disaster relief work that we did, some attempts at whole city programs
in Culver City, the Marina Freeway run, as another major expression, the
Africa Fruit Tree Airlift, our ongoing fruit tree program that's
associated with that, and the Million Tree Campaign, and the lessons
from that, of the Olympics' one. Then where we are today, another
attempt by Mayor Bradley, after the Million Tree Campaign, to start
another one, but no investment, and so it didn't happen. Now, we have
Mayor [Antonio] Villaraigosa that we can talk about.
-
Collings
- Who met with you on his first day in office.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, but also met with me, he spent four hours with me during his first
campaign getting a very deep briefing on the economics and the science
behind true community forest, and that was the basis, in large part, for
him--unfortunately, he didn't consult me back on what he should do, he
just declared, "We want to plant a million trees," on his second
campaign. Yes, and met with us on his first day and how all that goes.
-
Lipkis
- The other big, big piece of story is the riots and what impact that had
on me in taking our work deeper. So from tree planting to true urban
watershed management and much more healing the city and delivering some
of the social goods and moving back during the Olympics, going to
Australia and meeting Kate, and what that did.
-
Lipkis
- So that's a bunch of bullet points if we can sort it out of how we get to
today and where it's going from here.
-
Collings
- Absolutely. Well, it sounds like, I mean, in the early days you were
tapping into two sort of unstoppable forces or needs, which is planting
trees, who can argue with that? And working with kids and serving an
educational need. Those are two very potent areas. You're bringing them
together and it sounds like it was just a really great way to build up
the momentum for the more complex things you get into later.
-
Lipkis
- Exactly, and it's still a key part of the formula. Interestingly enough,
we're still taking playgrounds and stripping asphalt out and putting
trees on them. I mean, the same, the very first thing we did, we're
transforming schoolyards and parks. One could say that if we all we did
was set the goal of transforming every single school in L.A. to be a
watershed park, that that would enough be a goal.
-
Collings
- Oh, that would be tremendous. Yes.
-
Lipkis
- But, of course, that's just one thing of what we need to do. We can do
that and we can do so much more, but to have those be functional,
protecting health, make them much better learning centers, but also be
protecting the environment, would be huge.
-
Lipkis
- So all that is to come.
-
Collings
- Okay, great.
-
Lipkis
- So if you want to, based on what I just told you, based on the outline in
the book of the history, if you want to manage me a little bit more
tightly on time.
-
Collings
- Sure. [End of interview]
1.3. Session 3 (November 20, 2006)
-
Collings
- Okay, good morning, Andy. The date is November 20th. Jane Collings
interviewing Andy Lipkis at his home in Venice, California.
-
Lipkis
- Great. Good morning.
-
Collings
- Okay.
-
Lipkis
- So we left off at the close of the first year, I think.
-
Collings
- Right. Right.
-
Lipkis
- I put all the tools away and thought I was done, as I promised.
-
Collings
- Promised yourself.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, promised myself. Did park trees at somebody's house up in Brentwood
(Ted and Rita Williams), in a corner of their yard, we brought trees
back from the forest and left them tidy there.
-
Lipkis
- So I returned to Sonoma State, thinking, "Ah, this is great, back in the
country. I can be a student again." Got straight into it. Found a house,
started school, and found myself distracted from school and bored. I was
thinking about the work and sort of missing it. While I was still trying
not to do it, I was sort of wanting to do it. I finished one semester
and I think I had almost completely two minds going. One was, okay,
well, I'll do a semester and then come back to L.A. Then I ignored that,
and said, "No, I'm going to just keep going to school." I rented a house
and that got sold and then I was--so as the new semester was starting I
became sort of near homeless and moved into another place that just
wasn't very nice. I had a couple of disturbing experiences, which
basically said, you're avoiding what you got to do, and close down your
life in Sonoma County and move back to L.A. I did that, I just, it was
really clear that the energy was not there supporting me being there,
and it was like trying to swim upstream on a very strong current to stay
there. All I did was turn around and go, "Okay, do what I'm meant to
do," and move back here. First moved in with my folks. They weren't so
happy about that. They weren't happy about me dropping out of school
either.
-
Lipkis
- But I picked up the organization, put together a newsletter for all the
people who had sent donations, gave them a report on what we did. They
all sent money and said, "Keep going." I ordered trees, pulled together
a couple people who I had met during the summer, one of them was Hunter
Sheldon, and I think Randy, from the first summer, my old roommate, at
some point came down, and another of the original staff members. I think
they came down after summer. But during the year Hunter and I,
ultimately her brother, and some others, just picked up the work and we
started taking--we potted trees at schools and various places and began
doing some speaking and organizing the whole summer program. Summer came
and that's when the Air National Guard called--did I tell this story?
-
Collings
- Well, you said you were going to tell the story, yes. You alluded to it,
yes.
-
Lipkis
- Oh, I alluded to it. Okay. So this is great. So this year we had 10,000
trees, and they were being stored at Hunter's house and my girlfriend's
(Tracey Haase) house in Mandeville Canyon. This was just the time we
were trying to figure out how we were going to get all these trees, more
of them, to the mountains this year, and I received a call from someone
in the Air Force or Air National Guard saying, "I have this letter that
you wrote quite a while ago. Do you still need us to move your trees?"
-
Lipkis
- I went, "Well, actually, yes."
-
Lipkis
- It was a whole year later. We put together a plan and moved all the trees
into Mandeville Canyon, and one A.M. the military raided Mandeville
Canyon. We had a convoy of ten army trucks and soldiers and a bunch of
volunteers and they rumbled up the canyon and pulled up to my
girlfriend's house. That was Tracey Haase.
-
Collings
- Did she know they were coming?
-
Lipkis
- Oh, yes, yes. The neighborhood didn't, but the Haase family did. We had
told the press, as well, and they were there. It was quite a sight, all
these army trucks getting loaded up with beautiful baby trees. Off we
went, we took everything up to the mountains, set up our base camp back
at Camp JCA. Again, I put together a team, some of the same people from
the year before and some new and we had another great summer of
planting. When that finished we sort of began rolling casually
full-time, or part-time in the city.
-
Lipkis
- I enrolled in UCLA and tried to be a student there. I was working about
eighty, ninety hours a week on TreePeople, and then trying to go to
class, and loving the classes, but falling asleep constantly, not from
being bored, just tired. Whenever I wasn't talking my body said, "It's
time to rest." Anyhow, I enrolled in the geography department there with
the ecosystems focus and then found the creative problem-solving
program.
-
Lipkis
- I missed Sonoma County a lot being in L.A., and one day I saw somebody
eating a whole wheat sandwich with avocado, sprouts, and tomato, and I
thought, "You don't look like you're from here." His name was David and
he became a friend and he introduced me back into UCLA, both the food
co-op, which I'd joined there. We used to have a food co-op running out
of my house in Sonoma. So, like, that was a good way in, and then the
creative problem-solving program, which gave me flexibility to keep
working on this. TreePeople became a campus student organization.
-
Collings
- Oh, really?
-
Lipkis
- Yes. So we were able to actually rent trucks through UCLA's motor pool.
In fact, for a year or two I drew a minor salary of whatever they paid.
I think we paid money in, but--
-
Collings
- Like for a T.A. ship or something?
-
Lipkis
- Yes, but it was a student organization and they were able to give us two
positions at, like, a hundred or two hundred dollars a month or
something like that. I forget what exactly it was. But we had a key to
an ASU office in Kerckhoff Hall and it was great.
-
Lipkis
- So I was on campus for about two years really just three--I think three
or four--well, a year and a half, whatever that turns into in quarters.
I finally dropped out because I was just falling asleep and miserable
doing that. But I met a lot of good people and the UCLA system killed
off the creative problem-solving program, so I no longer had a home and
a base there. It was a great interdisciplinary program, and this is a
lot of training I got there in integration, integrated thinking or
support for that. Because it was a combination of the architecture and
urban planning school, and it was based in the basement there, but
included engineering and business. It was fantastic, because we got--I
just got the institutional validation until the institution killed it,
of the need for integration and how to think that way and how to
facilitate that, and it was great.
-
Collings
- Do you remember any of the professors who were involved with it?
-
Lipkis
- Marv Adleson was one of the leads, senior person, at Urban Planning and
Architecture. Michael Van Horn was another. A woman by the name of
Jane--she may have been in the School of Education, as well. She was
Asian. I forget her last name. Those are the people I remember.
-
Collings
- It's just interesting to--
-
Lipkis
- Yes. Well, yes, I mean, given that you're from UCLA.
-
Collings
- Right.
-
Lipkis
- I definitely have UCLA roots and links. There are people who tell the
story that I founded it there, which wasn't true, but that's all right.
Lots of people like to claim us. But I was pretty young and so they're
thinking, well, it must have been.
-
Collings
- It must have been the case, yes.
-
Lipkis
- Yes. So at that time we were storing trees in people's backyards. I was
going to school. Hunter was going to law school. I can't remember, I'll
have to do some research to figure out which staff then started working
for us in what kind of time, but I just remember we evolved slowly an
education program based on the request for more and more presentations.
-
Collings
- How did people know that you were willing to do these programs, these
presentations?
-
Lipkis
- Well, I think they didn't know, they just asked, because so many of the
people who sent contributions were teachers and their students, and when
we wrote a newsletter back, they went, "Oh, wow, they're alive, that
would be a great story to tell and get the kids involved since they all
helped." We would try to find schools or senior centers or places that
people wanted to pot trees, as a labor source. So we did major potting
operations at University High School, my old school, and a couple other
places, but for several years all the science and biology classes came
out to pot trees.
-
Lipkis
- Our headquarters was my parents' condo. After the second summer there was
starting to be some pressure between '74 and '75 to liberate a backyard
that we just totally took it over at Tracy Haase's house. So I was
thinking, "We're going have to find a nursery," and I was driving to an
event in the valley from Westwood and went over the Santa Monica
Mountains and saw what looked like a ranger station to me, and thought,
"Whoa, what's that doing in the city?" I pulled in and looked around and
some firemen were there. It turned out to be an old, old, old fire
station built in 1922, rumored to have been buildings left from William
Mulholland's construction of the L.A. water system, including the St.
Francis Dam. That was the dominant rumor, that these are portable
buildings, and you could see the bolts where they were actually bolted
together, and they said that the built the dam and then moved the stuff
there and then the dam broke. We've had Katherine Mulholland there and
she couldn't verify that one way or another in trying to figure out
whether we had historic buildings or not. We weren't able to prove it,
except we did find a gift from the Water Department to the Fire
Department of buildings there. So definitely it was through water and
Mulholland, and it was certainly in his time.
-
Lipkis
- Anyhow, the firemen showed me around and there was a nursery that had
been built in the twenties and abandoned. There were great redwoods on
the site and all kinds of unique specimen trees that had been planted by
the firemen over the years. Rumors, again, that the original fire
captain on the site was friends with the head of the arboretum and got
some great trees. The firemen referred to the whole place as "the
country club." It was about thirty-three acres and there were trails and
benches and stuff, and they all liked to hang out there. Aside from
being a nursery, they had a, they called it a fire-resistant plant
research planting that was there, and then they also had a bunch of
empty garages and sheds that had been--sheds and stables, stables for
horses and sheds for Model-T fire trucks, and it was called Mountain
Patrol One. So before there were fire stations in the hills and
helicopters they patrolled on horseback and then Model-Ts and then in
pickup trucks. Then as the city grew they built fire stations in
neighborhoods as they expanded the city.
-
Lipkis
- But the bottom line was that the firemen said, "Well, we're going to be
moving out to a new station across the street."
-
Lipkis
- I went, "Whoa, we need a nursery and here it is and its empty." I was
already in the mode of financing TreePeople from other people's waste,
other people's either underutilized resources or unutilized or discards.
That's how we really--you know, we were recycler composters in the
ecological sense, and there is so much waste in this society and in this
city and there was plenty for us to sort of live off of. So from the
underutilized military trucks for our convoy to companies giving us
their leftover vehicles or whatever.
-
Lipkis
- So I remember coming back to our office, my old bedroom, when I got back
that day and said, "I found our new nursery." I said, "It's at Coldwater
and Mulholland," and then everyone laughed and they went, "Right."
-
Lipkis
- That began a long process of trying to get access to it. So the fire
department said they were going to be turning it over to the [City of
Los Angeles Department of Recreation and] Parks Department at some
stage. They swapped thirty-three acres on the top of the hill there with
thirty-three acres of land that the Parks Department had in the
Sepulveda Basin that they'd leased to move and create a big brush fire
fighting facility down there. Then they were going to move across the
street into their dispatch station and build a fire station out of that.
-
Lipkis
- Well, that sounded great. So I went to the fire department and asked them
for permission to co-occupy while they were there, to put tools
in--there was a beautiful old, old two-room shed that they had built for
holding just fire tools. Well, our tools were the same, shovels,
basically, and hose and picks and stuff. Again, it was empty, completely
unused. I also wanted to start growing the trees up there, but we didn't
need to be there all the time, we just wanted to use the space. So I
asked the fire department and they said, "Oh, that's a big thing, you're
going to have to go through our board and get all kinds of permits."
Then they said, "But it's not ours, it's going to the Parks'."
-
Lipkis
- So we went to the Parks Department and they said, "No, it's not ours yet,
it's still fire department's."
-
Lipkis
- So we're in this big hold, not unusual. I made a presentation to the
board of the fire commissioners and they endorsed the work and said,
"Yes, we'd love to have you." That was very unusual, they don't share
their facilities with anybody, but it happened. But, as they said, they
were passing it on to Rec and Parks. I'm forgetting exactly what the
sequence was, actually, between the two commissions. Both were
difficult.
-
Lipkis
- Well, we began working with the Parks Department who said it's not
[inaudible], we said it is, we need your permission to be here. We began
working with the staff, and ultimately wrote a proposal and then got the
agenda for their board meeting and saw the staff recommendation was no.
"Here's the request and don't allow it."
-
Collings
- Based on? What was their thinking?
-
Lipkis
- Just, we don't do it. They're young. They didn't even justify it, they
just went probably no institution--I mean, who knows what. It was one of
those moments where my mom went, "Well, nice dream. Sorry." I was really
pissed off for about five minutes and then I went, "No, I've got to go
that meeting and maybe something will happen."
-
Lipkis
- I put together a bunch of photos of kids taking action and planting and
stuff like that and went before the commission. This was the first day
of a new director of the department. Our item came up and they voted and
it failed and I went, "Wait a minute, I want to speak." I'm just this
kid at that point. I mean, I was eighteen or nineteen by then, but--
-
Collings
- Did you still have the beard and all that at this point?
-
Lipkis
- Oh, yes. Yes, I never didn't.
-
Lipkis
- They said, "Okay, come up," and I said what I wanted to do, passed around
the photos, and they all looked at it and said to the director, "How
could you say no to this?" And they did something they rarely do, they
completely overrode their staff and said, "We're giving you a permit. We
want you to be able to do this." So we had that.
-
Lipkis
- I think the problem then was that I hadn't gotten permission from the
fire department yet, because they were really, for security and
everything, they just didn't share. But Rec and Parks gave us that okay,
even though their staff hadn't wanted it.
-
Lipkis
- Then there was a major fire in the Angeles National Forest. We're talking
about exactly this time of year in '74, and it was one of those big,
big, big ones, and we said, "We're ready to reforest that and we've got
trees, but we need a place to store them." We had gotten permission from
Rec and Parks, but it was still fire department land. So we pushed and
because of the fire and because of the timing we got the green light
to--basically, they issued a thirty-day permit for us to move trees on
and use them. We were there for ten years with a thirty-day permit.
-
Collings
- Continually renewing it, or just it never gave up?
-
Lipkis
- I just rode. Yes, it never came up.
-
Lipkis
- We moved our trees in November 7th, nineteen--no, that was the second
phase. Somewhere like January of '75 we moved the trees in and began the
reforestation in the Angeles. That became a during the year weekend
volunteer projects sort of thing, as well as going back up to the
mountains. So that gave us more continued work around the city, on the
edge of the city.
-
Lipkis
- We then got word that the fire department was, at some point, going to
move out of the place, and when they did that it was really important
because of vandalism, it was important that we have bodies there
immediately, the same day, because being up in the woods, and there used
to be street racers on Mulholland Drive, they just knew it'd get ripped
apart within minutes. In fact, the fire department even said that, you
know, the fire guys said, "Well, we can't wait to kick this down,
because it was so old and rotting."
-
Lipkis
- I began the process of trying to get a permit to move in and that was a
nightmare. Again, the Rec and Parks Department said, "No way, can't do
it." This time we mobilized a campaign to get letters from all the
homeowner groups and residents. I spoke to all the homeowner
associations, and they all said, "Oh, we'd be really happy to have you,"
because we basically said, "We'll build a park for you there." The Parks
Department wanted to have it be a truck service facility. So we just
organized and got all these letters written to the mayor [Tom Bradley]
and to the council and to the Rec and Parks Commission. Again, the staff
opposed it, but the community wanted it. So we got permission to occupy
the buildings the day the fire department moved out, again, stayed on a
thirty-day permit. November 7th, 1977 the fire department moved out and
moved across the street and we moved in.
-
Lipkis
- Now, in between our staff had grown to the point where we really needed
more than my bedroom as an office and a candidate for congress, Gary
Familian lost the race. He had paid for a year's rent on a storefront in
Santa Monica, and gave it to us. So we had a storefront office on Santa
Monica Boulevard and 15th Street. It was great.
-
Lipkis
- Funnily enough, a couple of months before we were offered that the
Northrop Corporation closed down its L.A. office and moved to Orange
County and gave to the United Way hundreds or thousands of desks,
everything from this huge corporate headquarters. Beautiful Steelcase
desks and stuff. So United Way put out the word to all the nonprofits in
town and said if anybody wants, and we went, we saw, and my staff
thought I was nuts. Like, "What are you going to do with that? We don't
even have an office."
-
Lipkis
- I said, "We're going to need it some day."
-
Lipkis
- So we rented these big, big trucks, got the furniture, moved it into one
of the sheds at Coldwater, and then lo and behold, we were given the
office within a month or two after that, and we were fully equipped at
no cost. We moved all this furniture down.
-
Collings
- How did Gary Familian know about you, what was the relationship there?
-
Lipkis
- Well, various people were becoming donors and actually in my process of
trying to connect up with the fire department, one of the fire
commissioners, whose name was Bruce Corwin, and so he was on the fire
commission. He met me through that and was quite supportive and he wound
up introducing me to some potential donors, one of them being Gary
Familian. I remember having dinner with them all. That was how. So we
just sort of maintained that relationship.
-
Collings
- Boy, it sounds so far like your speaking skills, your presentation
skills, your all-around social skills are an important part of this
picture.
-
Lipkis
- They are, but they're being developed all the way along. So I started as
a fairly unrefined radical kid, teenager, and as I had to have more and
more of these meetings with people, I have no idea how amusing I was to
them. They must have been quite comical, but I was fairly self-assured,
probably shouldn't have been, but certainly naively so in what we were
doing, and people were willing to take us under their wings. There were
plenty of people who wouldn't, but other people felt like, oh, I can
help. It was like that guy from the California Air National Guard, my
letter had gone through fifteen offices, people saw it, stamped "No
way," passed it on, but it didn't ever get thrown out. It finally landed
in the hands of someone who went, "Why not?" And that's the miracle of
TreePeople is it just takes people going, "How can I help? Maybe there's
something I can do." And the resources then flow and they look
miraculous, but we still have those desks.
-
Collings
- Yes, that's good furniture.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, yes. Old Steelcase.
-
Lipkis
- So we were there at that office and kept waiting for permission and the
thing kept being delayed. Actually our lease ran out in the storefront.
Then my brother was part of a mobile medical practice that had an office
a little further east, also on Santa Monica Boulevard, in West L.A. The
building he was in was kind of old and funky, and there was a huge space
that was vacant, and the owner of the building donated that to us for
like three or four months while we were waiting to get in there. That day finally came and we moved our stuff in and started--we not only
set up the office and moved in, but we moved in beds, because we had to
maintain a crew twenty-four hours a day. So we were just like a fire
crew. I got the captain's quarters, and everybody else was in the dorm.
There was a kitchen. There were three or four of us twenty-four hours a
day. We just lived there, worked there. I still maintained, paid rent on
a house in Santa Monica with David Winkleman, who I had met. I had, by
the way, moved out of the house with my parents are some point, some
months after moving down here, found a place in Venice with a bunch of
people going to UCLA.
-
Collings
- But you were still using their place as an office at that--
-
Lipkis
- Yes. Yes. Then we got to move to Santa Monica. So, yes, that was funny,
to actually not be living there, but going over.
-
Lipkis
- So, yes, still paying rent in Santa Monica, but being at TreePeople
usually six days and nights a week. It was just nice to know I could get
away somewhere.
-
Lipkis
- After a while we realized that we really--we wanted to start investing
dollars in building this thing. Not dollars, we wanted--it needed to be
better than a broken-down place and we needed to raise some money and
nobody wanted to give us money, because we only had a thirty-day permit
and we really needed a long-term lease. So we began working on that.
-
Lipkis
- Again, I contacted UCLA, Department of Architecture, to give some
designs, and another architecture school, Syark, gave some ideas, and I
tried to find someone who could build something for us. But the Rec and
Parks Department just would not give us the long-term lease. They
finally, again, just administrative battles with always a different
director, but it was always, no, we're not--they didn't want to give us
a long-term lease because it would mean they would lose control of the
site, and that would become controlled by the city council and they
didn't want to do that if it was longer than three years. Finally, we
settled on a three-year lease and that lasted for a long time,
continually renewed.
-
Lipkis
- But it was during the Bradley administration that we had to get the
long-term lease. Wendy Greuel was his parks staff member. That's how we
met her. The mayor really wanted it, and yet the department staff really
resisted. I remember one day I received a call from the head of the ARCO
Foundation, and he said, "What would happen if there was a daycare
center built at 12601 Mulholland Drive?"
-
Lipkis
- I went, "Well, that would move us out."
-
Lipkis
- He said, "Thanks, you didn't hear this call, but, by the way, I have a
check for a million dollars from ARCO to give to the Parks Department to
build this daycare center there, and it shouldn't happen."
-
Lipkis
- And I went, "Thanks."
-
Lipkis
- Then he said, "You didn't hear this from me."
-
Collings
- Boy, handy to have all these friends.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, well, we try not to ever mistreat anybody. But what happened, the
Rec and Parks Commission got involved, because the mayor said, "Make
this happen."
-
Lipkis
- Their staff didn't want to and the commission said, "You don't even have
any money to do anything with these parks. Why are you holding on this?
Here's this public-private partnership, this is what we say we're about,
just get out of the way and let them do it."
-
Lipkis
- What the chair of the commission said to the director of the department
was, "You don't have any money, so just get out of their way." So what
she did was go after a major grant, so she could say, "Now, we have the
money," instead of just partnering.
-
Lipkis
- I let somebody in the mayor's office know and they were so angry that a
million dollars that could be going to inner-city childcare was going to
Coldwater and Mulholland, and that was sort of the final straw of their
resistance, because the commission just got actively involved angrily
with their staff and said, "You will make this happen."
-
Collings
- So how did the million-dollar childcare center get shut down? That seems
like that was a pretty weighty movement.
-
Lipkis
- Well, the mayor learned about it and basically said to the director of
the department, "I'm going to feed you to the council members in
downtown."
-
Collings
- So this was the last straw, this was the defining moment?
-
Lipkis
- It was. It actually was with this incredible breakthrough where she got
into big trouble with her commission. The commission just said, "You
will let them move in and you will pass this on to the city council,"
and that resulted in us getting a twenty-five-year lease. We wanted a
hundred, but
-
Collings
- So what was your vision for the organization at this point?
-
Lipkis
- I knew that we--I should back up and say, not only did we move in when we
moved in, but in anticipation of moving in we wanted to have that be an
education center. L.A. needed an environmental ed center and it needed
our nursery and all that, but it was to be a place where the community
would come to learn, to plan, to get trained and stage stuff. So that
was the vision that we would help provide those services. So we actually
began writing environmental education grants even before we got in and
as we got, I think we got some funds granted to us once we moved in and
we hired a couple of educators to help guide that part of the
organization. But from then on we were conducting education programs in
the schools and pretty quickly we started reaching almost 30,000 kids a
year, just from a little bit of start-up money mostly. I think we would
charge a little fee or contribution to help pay for educators' time.
(Those kids would spend the better part of a day touring our facilities
and then plant a tree seed in the nursery and take another one home.)
-
Lipkis
- But the interesting thing that happened, all this is--so I got you
through to us having a long-term lease and that had to go to the city
council and they had to approve it. Anyhow, we have that. They would
only do that with the justification of us spending a bunch of money on
the site, which we wanted to do. Actually, at one point, Buckminster
Fuller had offered us this big dome that he had made that was kind of
central display for the L.A. Bicentennial, but Rec and Parks wouldn't
let us have it up there. So people give us all kinds of things. So we
didn't take it. I don't know where it wound up.
-
Lipkis
- But we moved in in November of '77 and by January or February of '78 it
started to rain and it was an El Nino-sized storm, but nobody knew what
El Nino was at the time, it was just raining and raining and people were
getting into trouble. Another friend from college, his parents lived in
Benedict Canyon, down the street, and their home was threatened with a
mudslide and he called to ask if they could borrow some tools from us
and I said, "Sure," and we took them over there and saw that it was
bigger trouble than they could handle with just a few people. So we
said, "We need to get a lot of people down here." So we rounded up a
bunch of neighbors and we brought in tools for fifty or a hundred
people. I think we had at least fifty people. Got sandbags and built the
sandbag wall and protected the house.
-
Lipkis
- Well, City Councilman Zev Yaroslovsky watched us do that, and it was
several hours of operation, and there was nobody that helped them, so we
just got the volunteers to do it. He was impressed. Well, the storm went
away and everything was fine for a week or two, and then another wave of
storms came in. In L.A. when you get three days of rainfall nonstop the
soil is saturated and things then let go and you've got landslides
everywhere. It was raining and there was a big storm predicted and some
warnings went out and things were bad. Well, we had exercised ourselves
from that last time and felt good about our ability to get volunteers
trained and supported. Zev called and said, "Can you do that on a larger
scale, because it looks pretty bad?" His district was the hills.
-
Lipkis
- We said, "Sure, we'll do it."
-
Lipkis
- Sure enough, I mean, the storm didn't stop and it got really bad and we
put our heads together, and this has been another hallmark of TreePeople
is just fast thinking, creative problem solving, how do we scale up? We
didn't know exactly what we were doing. We knew we needed to get people
up there, we knew we could train them and somehow dispatch them. Zev had
the city install these emergency phone lines called ring-down lines,
from the fire department dispatch to us and from the emergency command
center, actually, to us. So all you did was pick up the phone and it
starts ringing on the other end. So they installed those things and all
hell broke loose. We went to the media and said, "We need volunteers."
They put out the call and people would call us and we'd tell them where
to show up at our headquarters and we put them in teams and trained them
and started sending them out.
-
Collings
- And this was just for the hill area, the hills?
-
Lipkis
- Well, there's three hillside areas in L.A. that are significant. One is
the Santa Monica Mountains, two is Baldwin Hills on the south side, and
three is on the north and Sunland-Tujunga.
-
Collings
- Okay. So were you dealing with these three?
-
Lipkis
- They all showed up as problems. The councilman who is in Sunland-Tujunga
was taking care of a lot of the stuff on its own up there, but wound up
calling for, their office called for help, because we started getting
pretty good and had bodies and we were sending crews down to Baldwin
Hills.
-
Lipkis
- But, lo and behold, various things showed up that were really quite
useful. Ham radio operators, and when they realized we had something
going they offered their network, which was great. So that gave us
communications. We heard from these four-wheel drive clubs. You know,
all these guys with, whatever they're called now, well, they became the
SUVs, but the clubs had them before they were widespread. There were
still quite a few of them around, but they were big four-wheel drive
vehicles and people wanting to be macho. Urban assault vehicles. They
offered their help and we said, "Yes, we need the vehicles."
-
Lipkis
- Then carpenters sort of showed up en masse, because they weren't working,
they were all idled during the rains, and student environmentalists. So
we had these four parties that gave us essentially an army. The hams
were expert and they helped set up our office, that we had a generator
there. They pulled together the communications and several hundred ham
radio operators. They were able to put an operator in every vehicle. The
four-wheel drive clubs came in. Red Cross and Salvation Army came up and
started feeding. So we set up a whole emergency command center up there.
It was pretty impressive.
-
Lipkis
- The storm went for three days, we pulled together about 800 volunteers.
Wait a second. No, I'm forgetting. Yes, 800 volunteers or 900 volunteers
and saved about 300 homes. I'll have to check the headlines.
-
Collings
- Did you notice anything--could you categorize these volunteers in any
way? I mean, did they tend to be people of a particular political
persuasion? Libertarians, perhaps?
-
Lipkis
- The amazing thing is, it was an incredible mix. People came from all
walks of life. They were hearing on the news people are needed, and we
made sure that--they had to be eighteen and they were able-bodied. There
were a lot of guys, but women, too. It was across the spectrum. There
were definitely the wilderness people, the environmentalist, but also
jocks and, as I said, carpenters. So that was also critical, because
here we saw for a disaster everyone put their politics aside. It's
interesting that you ask the question, because it is so divisive and we
have been trained to look at our world from what tribe are we in, and it
keeps us so far apart. It's like the mission of Babel from the Bible,
when people were cooperating they could do anything, and so God got
scared, like you're too much like me, so he gave them different
languages in Babel, because they built the Tower of Babel and that will
make sure they don't cooperate. Well, our political tribes are s o
divisive and keep us using all our energy in the battle instead of in
healing.
-
Lipkis
- So in this case, it was really delightful, and that actually led to
something. But we were on the news, people watched it. Actually mostly
in the newspapers. It was pretty amazing. So that ended and we went
back, you know, sent everyone home and we went back to doing our normal
work.
-
Lipkis
- Then in 1980 the storms returned with a vengeance and we were ready. We
saw all the signs and we started calling up volunteers and organizing
ourselves and lo and behold, it hit. My staff went crazy, because we had
committed to a whole city forest program in Culver City and meant to be
doing education work and all this stuff, and we were getting more and
more sort of quasi-professional staff, and the last thing they wanted to
do was stop their work and do disaster relief. They didn't sign up for
that, and yet, I said, "You know, this is the city's priority, got to do
it."
-
Collings
- How large was your staff at this point?
-
Lipkis
- Probably between six and ten, by 1980.
-
Collings
- Full-time?
-
Lipkis
- Yes, and some were educators and some did planting work or volunteer
coordination. I just don't remember exactly how many.
-
Collings
- What did you look for in people when you were hiring the staff?
-
Lipkis
- Gung-ho generalists. We used to call ourselves--well, kind of like, we
operated like a fire crew and whoever had the most skill for a given
task was the lead for that. So we did hire some people who had
backgrounds in environmental education. Rocky Roeder, Irv Peterson were
our first Ph.D.s in environmental ed that came on our staff. But others
were just people who cared about the environment and really wanted to
work, either with the trees or whatever.
-
Lipkis
- So anyhow, when the flood hit in 1980 we were able to--we maintained the
network, or called the four-wheel drive clubs back and the ham radio
operators and put everything together and started rolling. This one went
on for ten days, so we wound up with 3,000 volunteer days and saved
about 1,200 homes. It was huge. It was really big. Every night people
were--you know, the news crews were all with us, people were watching
homes getting saved. These volunteers coming out of nowhere. It gave the
people of L.A., I've heard from so many people, several came to us who
are on our board now, came to us because of that. They said they were
ready to leave and move out, because L.A. was soulless, they thought,
and when they saw the community just come together to save itself they
were encouraged to stay. David Zucker from our board, a filmmaker, tells
that story, and others.
-
Lipkis
- So it was great. I mean, I could tell so many stories from that that are
really fun, but probably a bit of a distraction with how much more we
need to get.
-
Collings
- Maybe we could come back to those, once you get the rest of your
chronology filled in.
-
Lipkis
- Yes. It was fundamental because doing that both gave me some more
philosophical underpinnings. I saw what happened when people chose to
volunteer. People who were in the disaster crunch who did what the macho
American myth tells them to do, which is look out for number one, those
people suffered tremendous emotional, crippling emotional damage,
because they saw their house being destroyed, and didn't know what to
do. I watched many people just freak out and crumble. But I watched
other people in the exact same circumstances, their home is threatened,
instead of looking out for number one and being overwhelmed, they joined
the group, and they said, "We've got to help everybody, not just
ourselves." They were strengthened. That joining the group gave them a
shield and gave them strength and they had access to people, and they
didn't get emotionally damaged. They were strengthened. They went
through the fight together, and sometimes they may or may not have lost
their house. But that is a pivotal piece of information about--and you
see it now with new medical research coming out. People who volunteer
have higher immune systems and T-cell counts. It's an amazing thing. So
there's a whole body of work to talk about that I will be writing more
about at some point about that, but it was during the floods, that I got
that experience and perspective.
-
Lipkis
- Several other things happened that I'll just note, because they become
through-lines. That integration of multiple kinds of people from across
the spectrum, one of them was the four-wheel drive clubs. They said, "We
knew you were environmentalists and we thought that you would be
attacking us, but we found that you were wonderful people, and you
didn't attack us." It opened their minds and their hearts. They had
bumper stickers that said, you know, "Kill a Sierra Clubber," and stuff
like that. It became such a vulnerable experience for them that their
leaders came and said, "Everyone's always fighting us for the damage
we're doing, but they never accepted that they were." They said, "Could
you teach us? Maybe we are and maybe we can fix that."
-
Lipkis
- So they invited us to actually do these massive education events with
hundreds, or thousands of people, four-wheel drive enthusiasts, out in
the desert to show them how they were damaging stuff and how to behave
differently. Then they became an army for us for plantings after fires.
We pulled together over a thousand club members to move into the forest
and do a massive planting.
-
Lipkis
- So a lot of change started happening just because of that coming together
instead of fighting. Very, very important.
-
Collings
- Absolutely. This flood work sounds like one of the more transformative
events of the organization.
-
Lipkis
- It absolutely is, because people saw us not as--you know, I still that
long-haired kind of hippie, and a lot of people didn't want to embrace
us, but when they saw we weren't ideological, that we were there to
actually serve, it opened a whole lot of doors and hearts and a lot of
people saw us for the first time. They never knew of us.
-
Lipkis
- Another very big thing came from it, but the funny thing is, you talk to
people now who went through it, people who remember us, and they have
patched together a mythology around it. They think we were there
planting trees on the landslides to stop them. That's just what they
recall. Those weren't people who were involved, but people who watched
the media. I went, "No, we weren't. We used the shovels--."
-
Collings
- They would be pretty fast work.
-
Lipkis
- Well, right, you can't stop a landslide with a tree. You can prevent one,
but not when it's pouring. No, it's just what they did with their
synthesis of that, what made sense for them.
-
Lipkis
- What came from it that was so big, was after the floods, so ten days,
Johnny Carson invited me onto the show.
-
Collings
- Yes, I saw that picture.
-
Lipkis
- That's where that came from. He was just so blown away, everybody was,
that all these people just came and helped and there was so much
goodwill.
-
Lipkis
- I should say that, also mark that we, what happened in Los Angeles also
happened in New Orleans. The fire department and police department could
not get their vehicles in and could not communicate into the hills. The
communication system didn't support hillside activity in the canyons and
all that, they didn't have vehicles that could get them in. So we were
so coordinated with them, that at times we were putting hams in police
four-by-fours. The fire department was constantly turning over
dispatches to us to get in and handle the rescues. So it was big. People
watched. No one knew how bad it was with the communications break and
all that, because we filled the gap like a balloon. We built this neural
bridge network that filled the gaps. That was my unique set of
knowledge, and I'm not patting myself on the back, that's just a bit of
my nerdiness.
-
Lipkis
- So when I was in high school, I don't know if I said, I used to make
terrariums and listen to a police scanner. I listened to the police
department and the fire department while I was doing this. So I had two
aspects of my brain engaged.
-
Collings
- Oh, that's interesting. You never mentioned listening to the scanners
before.
-
Lipkis
- But I did mention that I was making the terrariums?
-
Collings
- Well, I don't know specifically that, but those types of interests, yes.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, so I'm doing this creative really focused landscape in a bottle. So
it was all this manipulation, while I'm listening to the scanner,
completely different part of the brain. Well, what's happening is, I was
learning the code and logistical thinking and learning about the
deployment of both the fire department and the police department.
-
Collings
- Why were you listening to the scanners?
-
Lipkis
- You know, it was interesting to me.
-
Collings
- How did you even get into this? It's kind of an unusual activity.
-
Lipkis
- Oh, this is funny. It is, yet there's a lot of people who do.
-
Collings
- There are.
-
Lipkis
- But I know exactly how it happened. During high school, so I was in that
Innovative Program School doing my research and all that. Well, that
wasn't all the time, there were other things going on in town. One of
them was the Cambodia and Kent State riots at UCLA. Well, we were
protesting the war. I went to the campus to join the protest and the
police were there en masse and tear gassing and all that stuff. I found
this guy who was listening to a little radio and he was listening to the
cops. I thought, "I'm hanging out with him."
-
Collings
- Good thinking.
-
Lipkis
- Yes. It's like, I want to protest, but I'm not wanting to get arrested.
-
Collings
- I don't want to get tear gassed, yes.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, and gassed. I thought, well, that's sort of me with doing the
responsible or chicken thing, I don't know what it was. But I was so
impressed with that, I went and got one of these basic radios from Radio
Shack and I just started listening. It was fascinating. I had that link
of interest from back in the floods when I was growing up and rescue
people and all that. I'd watched "Adam-12" and "Emergency" on TV, so I
had that interest, and this sort of filled that. Lo and behold, I was
getting a training in logistics and emergency command stuff, that nobody
gets unless you're in the agency, but I had an entire mind map response
system all built in my brain. I had no idea why, and wasn't even
consciously carrying it around. But when the disaster hit I knew exactly
what to do. I knew where the holes were in their operations and I knew
how to communicate with them in a way that gave them confidence to trust
us.
-
Collings
- I mean, I think there's an argument that if you hadn't been listening to
those transmissions that this disaster thing wouldn't have worked.
-
Lipkis
- I wouldn't have been able to do this. No, no, probably not, because it
was huge for them to trust us. I mean, when you think about it, L.A.
does not--big cities do not use volunteers during disasters. They just
don't. We hadn't mobilized volunteers for a major event in town since,
like, World War II. So partly because of liability issues. They'll fly
in firefighters from Canada and Australia before they'll use people for
firefighting, because it's so dangerous.
-
Collings
- Yes.
-
Lipkis
- But, yes, so yes, you can find this through-line back of very weird
activities that would wind up showing up as having produced value and
that was that.
-
Lipkis
- So, yes, I was on the "Tonight Show." That was huge. Johnny Carson wrote
this big check.
-
Collings
- Did you enjoy being on the show?
-
Lipkis
- Yes and no. I mean, it was scariest thing I'd ever done in my life. It
was fun, but being backstage behind the curtain waiting to be called
out, I thought I was going to die. I mean, my heart was beating so, so
fast and so powerfully I just remember feeling my pulse--
-
Collings
- What were you afraid of?
-
Lipkis
- Oh, I think it was just stage fright. I had no idea what was going to
happen and I was me holding this little tree and I'm standing back there
and hear the music go and the curtain open and I just stood there and
they pushed me. So I just sort of jumped onto the stage and breathlessly
got there and sat down with him and put the tree on the coffee table and
totally threw him for a loop. He has all his questions, everything sort
of laid out, and if you listen to the interview you'll see he just
sputtered through like all the questions he had prepared, "How did you
do this? You were all over the place. I was just so impressed," and
blah. I didn't know what to answer.
-
Lipkis
- Anyhow, it was a fun interview. In fact, at one point he picked up the
tree, when he ran out of everything scripted, and he went, "So this is
going to be a redwood?"
-
Lipkis
- And I went, "It's already a redwood." [laughs]
-
Lipkis
- He turned it into a very funny moment. He said, "Oh, I meant the kind I
could drive my car through."
-
Lipkis
- I went, "Well, it is, and if you look close you'll see the little hole."
-
Lipkis
- Anyhow, on a commercial break he asked how much money we had lost from
all the tools we lost, and I said, "It was $15,000," and he wrote a
check out right there, on the spot, and gave it to me. It was amazing.
So, yes, it was a real high point, except that I'd just broken up with
my girlfriend, so that was a low point.
-
Collings
- Well, I'm sure she was very impressed when she saw you on the show.
-
Lipkis
- Yes. It didn't bring her back. We're still close friends.
-
Lipkis
- But anyhow, it caused me to start thinking, my God, if we can mobilize
people for disaster in this city and do this, there's an ongoing
environmental disaster and we're not mobilizing people at that kind of
scale. We really need to think about how to do that, and like, let's get
the people of L.A. together to do something really big. Like what would
be huge? Like a million trees. So just at that time, probably before the
floods, but I was thinking about it through them, and especially
afterwards, the Club of Rome issued, or actually it wasn't the Club of
Rome, it was the Environmental Quality Commission, first one for the
president, issued the global 2000 report, "What's Going On?" It was
looking out into the future saying, "What are the trends? What's
happening?" And it was a horrible glimpse of the future, of basically
saying where everything was going. It was labeled "The Doomsday Report,"
by the media. But the conclusion interested me, it said, "Without global
cooperation and action we're doomed to their fate. Somehow we've got to
turn the corner."
-
Lipkis
- I went, well, okay, we need to demonstrate global cooperation and action.
We'd just come out of that cooperation event of the floods. L.A. had
just been named the host of the '84 Olympics. I thought, "Hmm, eyes of
the world, needs to learn cooperation, let's do something humongous that
really requires everybody. Let's plant a million trees."
-
Lipkis
- I started thinking that's what we should do. Within a week I receive a
phone call from the City Planning Department. I think the guy's name was
Jon Perica. He's going, "We have just put in an air quality management
plan that we have to plant a million trees in L.A. to achieve better air
quality and to tell the feds that we're going to do that. It's going to
cost us at least $200 million to plant and another couple hundred
million dollars to maintain them. We've just seen you with all these
volunteers and we wondered if you maybe could do something as part of
this?"
-
Collings
- Funny you should say that.
-
Lipkis
- This is amazing timing. I remember being in my parents' condo in Westwood
when the call came in. It was strange that they found me there. I don't
know where they found that number or anything, but they did. I said, "We
will do it, and we'll do it for nothing," because I was just--or a
fraction of the cost. I began at that moment to put together this
campaign to plant a million trees for the Olympics.
-
Lipkis
- So that came out of the floods, too. So it was, yes, quite the pivotal
moment.
-
Lipkis
- I should catch my breath for a moment.
-
Collings
- Yes. [recording off]
-
Collings
- Okay, we're back on.
-
Lipkis
- Two funny stories on the floods, just actually three stories, two funny.
Salvation Army was feeding us and Red Cross and basically their food ran
out and people got pretty tired, because they were working twenty-four
hours a day and bedding down. I put our volunteers on just calling
suppliers.
-
Lipkis
- Oh, I know what happened. We saved the home of somebody who had a deli.
-
Collings
- That was good thinking. [laughs]
-
Lipkis
- Well, we didn't know. After we saved their house they said, "Hey, I run
Art's Deli," or "I am Art of Art's Deli, and can we help in some way?"
-
Lipkis
- I went, "Yes, we really need food." So they showed up with some trucks
full of food or a van full or something. But the food line went from
soup kitchen run by Red Cross to a Bar Mitzvah. We had these great
spreads of deli meats and just lovely food and cheeses and salads. It
was like, whoa, this was really cool. That gave us the idea, when that
ran out we started calling all the other delis in town and they matched.
So volunteers were well fed. That was fun.
-
Lipkis
- In terms of all the odd--there were lots of odd characters. I think I
told the story that I created a uniform for us.
-
Collings
- No. No, you talked about the TreePeople name.
-
Lipkis
- The name, California Conservation Project. Well, we made a patch and it
looked like an agency patch, mountains and trees and water, California
Conservation Project, sewed them on brown Sears work shirts and all of a
sudden we looked semi-official. This actually goes back to the floods
and firefighting. So we're in the forest wearing these things at times,
or we'd put them on, because we found ourselves being good Samaritans
early, long before the floods. Somebody's in an accident or their car's
broken down, you show up in the middle of the forest, you're wearing a
uniform, they're much more likely to be willing to let you help them.
Working with agencies, we looked like agency people, except we were a
little shaggier. No one wanted to admit that they didn't know what this
agency was, and so again, it was more of that easing the interface. We
weren't doing anything fraudulent, but it allowed people to include us
more.
-
Collings
- Wearing this patch.
-
Lipkis
- Wearing the patch on a brown shirt with a little walnut name tag. So that
was quite cool.
-
Lipkis
- Our people, our staff were wearing those during the floods. We hadn't
even invented TreePeople T-shirts yet, that came a little later, and
we're who we are. Kind of soft and friendly and we believe in hugging.
Two of our larger staff guys in uniform were giving each other just a
supportive hug after one long day, and these burly four-wheel drive club
guys come in and went, "God, I've never seen two men hugging before."
Yes, it was just culture clash.
-
Collings
- Yes, I was wondering about the culture clash.
-
Lipkis
- It was there, but again, the bigger call made everything light and flow.
It worked just fine.
-
Lipkis
- The peak end of that whole thing, it was as stuff was calming down, we
received a call from someone, I don't even remember where, but this old
couple in Malibu in the mountains were stranded. A creek had cut them
off and they were up against a mountain, and they were there and people
were throwing food to them. They couldn't get out. They were okay, but
they were stuck and they needed to get to work. I was getting rather
cocky at that point. Yes, their car was by the house and they couldn't
get across this major gorge. I went, "Can we build a bridge for them?"
Or somebody asked if--you know, whatever it was. It wasn't about getting
their bodies out, it was about restoring their life. We figured we would
build a bridge. I got on the horn to various suppliers, talked to our
four-wheel drive people. I think we had some engineers from those
construction workers, so we designed it through the night, had the
materials ready in the morning. The Coast Guard was going to actually
fly a helicopter in to lift these major beams, telephone poles, into
place. It turned out that they couldn't get the helicopter in, but we
were able to figure out how to do it with our bodies.
-
Lipkis
- So everyone's moving at five a.m., we show up at sunrise with all the
materials, everything's set, and within a couple of hours we built a
bridge they were able to drive their car over and we broke a bottle of
champagne over it. So those are fun flood stories.
-
Collings
- Yes, absolutely.
-
Lipkis
- So the Million Tree Campaign, that's huge. I could attempt to do that in
ten minutes.
-
Collings
- Well, you could introduce it.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, let's see how efficiently we can go. It's well documented in our
book, "The Simple Act of Planting a Tree." There's a whole chapter
called "Taking it to the Streets."
-
Lipkis
- So you've got the grounding. The purpose was to demonstrate massive
cooperation and individual action. It was not to have TreePeople, and as
volunteers go out and plant a million trees. We had the prescription to
plant a million, but that was all we had and we knew we wanted people to
do it. So with the awareness we had generated from the floods I knew
that it needed to be a communications campaign. So I somehow--oh, one of
the volunteers in the floods who I got to know said that they knew
somebody in advertising who was the president of an agency. I went to
him (Ronnie).
-
Collings
- This was Doyle, Dane, Bernbach?
-
Lipkis
- Doyle, Dane, Bernbach. I'm forgetting the guy's name, but I'm sure we
have it documented somewhere. Set up a meeting with the president, went
to him and said, "We want to plant a million trees. We want the people
to plant a million trees and be really motivated. We need educators, and
you're the best educators there are, as far as I'm concerned, or
translators, and I'm already--." When I was a kid in the early days
telling the TreePeople story, it was really easy, I was the translator,
people could understand kid language, and I think that's why the public
responded. But the more I'd learned the less able I was to communicate
with the public, because we had too much data. So we needed the
translator broadcasters.
-
Lipkis
- So I said, "I would like to give your people a chance to sell something
they actually believe in." A highly offensive statement to an
advertising executive. He didn't get too perturbed by that, he just
said, "I doubt if anyone's going to be interested, but if they are I'll
let you know."
-
Lipkis
- Well, I got back to the office and he called and he said, "I have a whole
team for you. People really wanted to do this." He was surprised. He
said, "I've given my permission, so come on back, we'll do a briefing."
-
Lipkis
- So we laid out what we wanted to do to a creative team there. We informed
them what the issues were with smog and energy stuff, from what we
understood at that point, but it was mostly about air quality. They went
to work and called us back and presented all these ideas. They created
what has become a globally used term, but they did it for us, Urban
Releaf, r-e-l-e-a-f, and Turn Over a New Leaf Los Angeles... Help Plant
The Urban Forest. They gave us a whole creative approach of bumper
stickers and billboards and bus signs and posters. It was really very
cool.
-
Collings
- Did you find that you needed to take different messages to different
communities?
-
Lipkis
- We did not have that sensitivity yet. L.A. still thought of itself as a
white English-speaking community.
-
Collings
- One community.
-
Lipkis
- Yes. We were quite unaware.
-
Lipkis
- There were two newspapers in town even then, the L.A. Times and the
Herald Examiner. We knew that there was La Opinion, but I don't know, I
guess my lack of cultural sensitivity--
-
Collings
- Because I could imagine some communities being interested because it
would create park space for kids and others being interested because of
air quality.
-
Lipkis
- That's all absolutely true, we just didn't know it. I wasn't
sophisticated enough at all, and that starts coming in a little later.
But at that point that's just no.
-
Collings
- Yes, part of the history is that that was not there.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, not there at that point. It's become there profoundly now, highly
tailored messages to different communities and meeting their needs for
nutrition and all kinds of things.
-
Lipkis
- But they came back even with a script--well, they said, "We need a
spokesperson," and they gave me ten names. They said, "You can only work
from this list, no one else will do." One was the mayor [Tom Bradley],
one was Barbra Streisand, Gregory Peck, and more just big, big names
like that. Now, I started calling and trying to make contact with these
people. It was just me. I didn't have really a board who could help in
anyway, nobody knew anybody. Lo and behold, someone in Gregory Peck's
office said, "Maybe we can help." I mean, everybody else turned us down
flat.
-
Collings
- How did they assemble this list of names?
-
Lipkis
- This was the ad agency.
-
Collings
- But why did they choose those names?
-
Lipkis
- I think they decided they needed to be A, A, A list.
-
Collings
- Oh, but these people had not indicated any interest going in?
-
Lipkis
- No. No, it was like you are so obscure nobody knows you except from this
flood fight, we've got to take a name that's so big that it's going to
create attention and create credibility.
-
Collings
- All right.
-
Lipkis
- Gregory Peck said yes. Then they created a script based on him and gave
it to him and he said he would do it. I guess he said, "Oh, this is
interesting, send me a script." So then they created it.
-
Lipkis
- Again, here we've got no money to run this campaign and they were willing
to do the creative work, but they didn't have budget to produce the
stuff. So we had somehow begun a relationship with General Telephone. I
think one of their people joined our board. I don't remember exactly how
that relationship got built. Actually, it could have come from us
complaining about poor service and giving them feedback and then when
they did something well we actually wrote them an acknowledgement
letter, and they were so shocked that anyone would do that, that it went
up the ranks and we established contact. Anyhow, somehow they got
involved on our board and I asked General Telephone, who had an
industrial film division for training, if they would loan us their crew
to do the shoot, and they were delighted to get to work with Gregory
Peck. The producer-directors, all that, from the agency came out and
together they worked together. Some of them took over equipment, others-
-but we produced this totally professional shoot of a TV commercial,
zero dollars. The thing was cut that night and ready to go to all the TV
stations.
-
Lipkis
- Now, I've left a whole lot out, but things didn't happen that quickly. I
mean, it took a while to get to the point where we had Gregory Peck
doing this and it wasn't at the very earliest stage of the campaign,
because I had launched the campaign in '80, '81. Oh, I've actually got a
bunch of gunk or story to tell, perhaps, about the Olympics.
-
Lipkis
- But anyhow, we did the commercial shoot and Gregory Peck asked Kate, my
wife, and I back to his house afterwards. This is a burn-in memory for
her, in which we're there and he serves her tea. He asked her what she
would like, and went off to the kitchen and made it and served it for
her, and that was really cool.
-
Lipkis
- Where I was going, I'll say this part of it and then we can pick up.
-
Collings
- Okay.
-
Lipkis
- So we announced that we wanted to plant a million trees and was starting
to get word out and I started--someone introduced me--oh, I had hired a
fundraiser and he got a meeting with Peter Ueberroth, who was selected
to run the Olympics. In the earliest of days, we met with him, and boom,
Peter says, "Give me a proposal for a million dollars for a million
trees."
-
Lipkis
- I said, "Well, that's not what I wanted to do."
-
Lipkis
- And the fundraiser is just elbowing me and saying, "Shut up, just go with
it."
-
Lipkis
- Peter's conditions were, "You can't tell a soul that I asked this. It's
got to be totally secret. Come back to me with a plan."
-
Lipkis
- I went into the organization, back to TreePeople staff, and said, "A
donor has shown up, I can't tell you who it is, they want to give us a
million dollars to distribute a million trees to a million kids in L.A.
Let's figure out how to do that."
-
Lipkis
- There's a whole illustration of my lack of military approach. We staff
meeting'ed it to death for several months and gave back to him with
a--the staff didn't want to do it and I didn't say, "Forget it, just do
it," and we worked up this, you know, several million-dollar approach
that would get trees planted through an education program that was
right, by the way, instead of just distributing dead trees, but he got
pissed off. We gave him the proposal and he didn't want to deal with us
after that, because it's not what he asked for. We made it too complex.
-
Collings
- Now, why didn't your staff want to do it?
-
Lipkis
- Well, they were right, they didn't want to just give--they were right
from an integrity perspective. They didn't just want to hand out a
million trees and have them die, they thought we needed to do a better
educational program and all that.
-
Collings
- Right, do the follow-through.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, and with the trees costing at least half the money or more, I had
quickly put together a way that L.A. Unified [School District] could get
the trees to all the kids through the school system, but we just--I
didn't make decisive action. My dad was watching all this and he went
nuts, because we wasted all this time, and more than that an Olympic
opportunity.
-
Collings
- I know you have to go now, we'll talk another time.
-
Lipkis
- But we can finish this up.
-
Collings
- I did want to ask you, did you ever try to do something that didn't work,
because there seemed to be so many fortuitous turns of events, and it
can't always be that way. So I was just sort of wondering what the
pattern was with that.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, I mean, there's plenty--I keep saying, we fail all the time. There
are many failures, or little problem-solving cycles. We'll note this,
we'll come back to some of those. The whole city program in Culver City
certainly could have been stronger and there were some problems, but
there were also little amazing solutions at the end.
-
Collings
- Are we done?
-
Lipkis
- Yes.
-
Collings
- Okay. [End of interview]
1.4. Session 4 (December 5, 2006)
-
Collings
- This is Jane Collings interviewing Andy Lipkis in his home on December
5th, 2006.
-
Lipkis
- And it is.
-
Collings
- It is, yes. Okay, we were just, as we just said off tape, we were going
to continue with the chronology.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, and so where--
-
Collings
- That's what we were looking at last time.
-
Lipkis
- Thank you, that helps. What was it, we started talking about the
Olympics. How far into it did I get?
-
Collings
- Really not at all.
-
Lipkis
- Like I finished the--
-
Collings
- You were talking about getting the property up at Mulholland, and then
just within the last eight to ten minutes--
-
Lipkis
- Then we did the flood stuff?
-
Collings
- Yes. Oh, yes.
-
Lipkis
- It was after we got in there, I talked about that.
-
Collings
- Yes, definitely talked about the flood.
-
Lipkis
- Okay, and that led to the set up for the--
-
Collings
- Then like eight to ten minutes on the Olympics, just very briefly.
-
Lipkis
- Right. So I got the set up from the floods to the city asking us for--
-
Collings
- Yes. Yes.
-
Lipkis
- Okay, great.
-
Collings
- Then I think off tape we talked a little bit about how your
organizational structure needed to change, you felt, as a result of
the--
-
Lipkis
- Yes, and I could do that then. So we did about the initial conversations
with Ueberroth on tape?
-
Collings
- Yes.
-
Lipkis
- Okay. Great. So he had made an offer for a million dollars for a million
trees to a million kids. We struggled with how to do that with integrity
and came up with an answer that he didn't like and he closed the door.
-
Collings
- Yes.
-
Lipkis
- At the same time we spent a lot of time spending money as a staff and not
delivering and not--and sort of not earning our keep and consumed the
money. So I went off to--well, coincidentally I went off to Hawaii for a
workshop, a learning retreat and a break, and while resting realized
that we really needed to make changes. In fact, saw, once I got some
rest, that we really did need to do the million trees somehow, even
though the staff was somewhat reluctant. I got back and discovered that
we were pretty much out of money. We couldn't sustain everyone we had
and the drive and the dream to do this campaign just was overriding.
-
Lipkis
- So I talked to some advisors when I got back and came in and basically
said, "Look, we've got enough to pay everybody thirty days' severance,
but we don't have any money beyond that. So I've got to close it down
and just change the structure. We're going to launch into planting a
million trees because it's so important to get this message to the world
and anybody who wants to work as a volunteer is free to stay, stay on."
-
Collings
- Who were these advisors, by the way?
-
Lipkis
- One was a friend named Bill Anderson from the National Park Service. The
National Park Service had moved into L.A. in a big way to set up the
Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area. At the time I really
didn't have an active board of directors. It's a good reason for a board
of directors, to create more balance and better advice, but this was--it
was still relatively early in our development as an organization. We
didn't have good financial management, good advice, anything on that
front.
-
Lipkis
- So anyhow, about four people decided to stick around and make it work.
But within hours, the same day that I made the announcement and let
everyone know that we were about to undergo a change, the incredible
validation showed up, somebody called with 100,000 trees to donate to us
on the spot. I mean, the word wasn't out there, they just, they had
called.
-
Collings
- And who was this?
-
Lipkis
- It was a nursery somewhere out in Pomona. They had these hundred, 120,00
trees and we went, "Wow, that's a really nice way to start things."
-
Lipkis
- Four staff people, including me, decided to stay on and two were
education interns, Bruce Flynt, Chris Imhoff, or at that time Chris
Reiseck, and one was a staff member named John Earl, and I. We sat down
to figure out what we could do with no money and we just started to
roll. As we put things together and announced that we were going to do
the campaign, resources, more and more resources started to show up. To
take advantage of the 100,000 trees we thought, "Oh, that would make a
great launch." I contacted our old friends at the Air National Guard,
who provided the trucks before. We scoped out the trees and what that
was about, and figured out their sizes and stuff and we knew that we
would fifty, a convoy of fifty trucks to move them all up to our
headquarters. We thought, "That will be a great way to launch the
campaign," get the mayor up there and stuff. The Air Guard started
working on it, they wanted to help and they could only find twenty-five
trucks, military trucks, in the region and so we mobilized a two trip
convoy of twenty-five trucks.
-
Collings
- Now, when they got--maybe you don't know the answer to this question, but
when they got back to you saying that they would like to help a second
time, were you still dealing with, like, the same person? I mean, was
there some person who was interested in this?
-
Lipkis
- Yes. Now, I'd have to look in my notes to see the name of the person. It
was a person, in fact, when I--when you go back, all the years back when
I said in the second year that a person called, it's the same guy. He
was somebody in a position of authority at the 146th Tactical Airlift
Wing out in the San Fernando Valley.
-
Collings
- Who really supported this type of thing.
-
Lipkis
- Yes. He said, "There's no reason why we can't help, and I think it's a
great idea."
-
Lipkis
- I don't know if I said, but that became an annual tradition, every year
we would, I think I talked about it once, but every summer when we
needed to pot up trees, move them to the forest. Now, we did it for
probably four, five, six years.
-
Collings
- All working with this same person?
-
Lipkis
- Same person, same contact. They always got really good publicity. Their
people really enjoyed the training exercise of learning to drive in the
mountains and do convoy and all that, and they're doing good service for
the state, which is part of their mission.
-
Lipkis
- So, yes, at some point the guy retired and handed it off to someone else,
but the tradition was alive and well. So it wasn't hard. They talked to
a number of military reserve units around and they were working on the
twenty-five trucks and then realized that the fuel involved in that was
going to be a lot and they located these huge, huge trucks that were
like forty, fifty feet long. I mean, they're sort of longer than
allowed, but they're huge. They got eight of them and made those
available and we pulled together 200 volunteers and I think they started
at like five in the morning and met them out in Pomona, loaded the
trucks, brought them in, and the mayor, Mayor Bradley showed up, and a
major alert out to the media. It was great. The media showed, hundreds
of volunteers. The trucks pulled in and we unloaded them. Bradley
himself used his muscle when they couldn't get the back of the truck
open, he came over. He's a former football player. He muscled it o pen
and we unloaded them and it was a great opening. Then we were off and
running and trying to figure out what we were going to do.
-
Collings
- So you had re-contacted Peter Ueberroth then?
-
Lipkis
- No, actually I tried and he wouldn't take the calls. He wasn't interested
in anything. He closed the door and that was it. No, it was, we're going
to do it without them, and we would love official recognition and we
would love to partner and we're willing, but we're not going to let the
lack of that get in the way. We're just going to get it done and we're
going to get it done as efficiently as we can without funding, without
any grants, just declare that it's got to be done. It's interesting,
I've done that numerous times and the more mature we get as an
organization the less we do that, the less responsible it is, and yet in
the early days that's where the real magic and the power was, was to
take on something because it was right, because we needed to do it. I
think that's what the public loves, as well, and people get bored with
the predictable and the well managed and the well planned, though staff
don't like it. But there is actually something in between , which is to
take on a challenge that you're not quite sure how you're going to
solve, that still galvanizes people and challenges them to bring their
creativity in.
-
Collings
- Well, I suppose at that time there would be less riding on a non-success.
I mean, because the organization is so young.
-
Lipkis
- Right, little organization, not known. You know, we got known because we
saved a lot of people's homes and some lives and people appreciated
that, but there was no money riding on it either. So there wasn't really
a potential for scandal. Having done this from being a kid and not
having any professional training at it, actually I didn't know anything
about planning or anything, so we just shot from the hip and did it. I
think the public got it. I think they appreciated that this is something
that's calling on their participation and it's not some wired preset
program that doesn't matter whether they participate or not. It's only
going to work if they're involved. There's something about that edge
that really helps and that we need to continue to find, because
everything else in this urban life and this society we live in is so
pre-manufactured, where you don't have a summit between two countries
until the answer's already worked out.
-
Collings
- Right.
-
Lipkis
- Well, no risk--nothing ventured, nothing gained.
-
Collings
- Yes, exactly.
-
Lipkis
- And yes, the stuff goes on in the background, so that's what keeps the
risk low. But anyhow, so we launched with no money, no way of knowing
exactly how we were going to get there, but a trust that we put the word
out and we would figure it out as we went.
-
Collings
- Yes. Now, the money that you were operating with earlier, was that still
the donations that had come in?
-
Lipkis
- Yes, it was from our donors.
-
Collings
- And Johnny Carson's check, which replenished the equipment that you had
lost?
-
Lipkis
- Right.
-
Collings
- Yes. So that was the basis of your funding earlier?
-
Lipkis
- Yes, it was the same donors who wrote back when I sent out a newsletter
after the first year. They wrote back and then we started mailing to
them once a year.
-
Collings
- Yes. So that was how you were paying the staff?
-
Lipkis
- Yes, and we were, along the way we developed a newsletter called "The
TreePeople News." I'm not sure I told that story, but that's when we
first started toying with the name TreePeople. People were calling us
that us. Did I talk about that?
-
Collings
- Yes. Yes, and explained it really well.
-
Lipkis
- Yes. But it started out with the newsletter that then became our name. So
we started doing first one newsletter a year and then several, and that
became a way that people started sending money.
-
Collings
- But those donations kind of dwindled off, because it wasn't the same big
rush that there had been in the beginning, because of that--
-
Lipkis
- Yes, and we were becoming our own sort of institution, but we weren't
delivering a compelling case for why we needed to be there and what we
were doing. We were doing environmental education and we were getting
grants for some of that and people didn't perceive the urgent need.
-
Collings
- Right.
-
Lipkis
- Well, when we simplified the message and turned up the challenge and the
heat for a million trees, people were really quite galvanized by that.
It was because of our storm reputation, I was able to ride on that.
Someone, I'm forgetting. Her name was Ronnie [Korn], but I forgot how we
met. She knew, I think it may have been one of our 10k runs. Did I talk
about that?
-
Collings
- No. No, let's get to that, especially the Marina [Freeway] run.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, that's the one, and it happened before the million trees, I think,
or during it. Now, I'm--the first one was '79, '80, '81, '82. So, yes,
we had started that before. So I'll do that and I'll come back to the
campaign.
-
Collings
- Okay.
-
Lipkis
- So this follows the theme of communication opportunities. I wanted to
have a 10k run, they were really popular. It was a good way to, we
thought to raise money and engage the public in something physical. So
we organized one for the trees and for the urban forest. I think we had
a small grant from the state and part of the mission was to get the term
"urban forest" established out in the world. That was one of the
deliverables for our grant. So we were working on creative ways and so
we thought we'd have an urban forest run.
-
Lipkis
- We planned to run it from the West L.A. Federal Building up Sepulveda
into the mountains to Mulholland Drive and then back down. So it
wouldn't really get too much in the way of too many people's lives. But
Prop[osition] 13 had passed and the city council decided that police
couldn't be used to support these races. So there had been a number of
races around and it cost a lot of money to have cops close streets and
all of that. So we were in the middle of filing for permit for it and
they said, "No, we couldn't do it."
-
Lipkis
- So I started looking around for another venue, because we'd already
advertised that it was going to happen and we had a deadline.
-
Collings
- And you had a grant?
-
Lipkis
- Well, the grant wasn't to produce that, it was only to do our work, but
the deliverable was to get the message out about urban forestry.
-
Collings
- That's so fascinating that the deliverable is to get a phrase entered
into the lexicon.
-
Lipkis
- Yes. Well, we offered that. We said, it's needed, because it's an
important term, it's not out there. So I started looking around and then
found what I thought would be an ideal site, which was the Marina
Freeway, which turned out to be exactly five kilometers, with a parking
lot, and only one place where it actually crossed a street. So I
immediately got on the phone to the people at the police department who
we'd been working with, and I said, "Look at your map, look at the
intersections where the Marina cross Culver. Now, are they yours or are
they CHP's?" In other words, can we do this or not?
-
Lipkis
- They looked and said, "It's clear, no problem, it's CHP. We won't have
involvement."
-
Lipkis
- SO I then got on the horn to CalTrans and said, "We'd like to hold a 10k
run on a freeway."
-
Lipkis
- They said, "Great, we have one that we'd like to show you where you can
do it."
-
Lipkis
- Because we wanted to have people run and plant trees as the unique piece
to this. So they took me all the way out to the 118 Freeway in the Simi
Valley, that was under construction. It was almost done, but it wasn't
open. They said, "Here you go, and we've already checked the books,
there's precedent, roads closed, bridge closed in San Francisco, you can
do it, no problem. We'd love to have you here."
-
Lipkis
- I went back then and said, "Well, I want to do it, but not there. We want
to do it where people are."
-
Collings
- Yes, exactly.
-
Lipkis
- And it's sort of important that we close a freeway just to make--I
started getting very excited about the statement, the educational
statement and all of that.
-
Collings
- Well, we just talked earlier, you were thinking of it as sort of an
environmental art piece, as well.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, right. So you've got that whole set up you can graft in here. But I
couldn't talk about that, it was the purpose. And they went, "Well, no,
you can't close a freeway."
-
Lipkis
- I said, "But you said there's precedent."
-
Lipkis
- They said, "Well, yes, but--" they were in a corner.
-
Lipkis
- I said, "Okay. Let us work on this."
-
Lipkis
- They came back with their set of rules and said, "Sure, there's
precedent, and yes, all you've got to do is meet all these
requirements," and they gave me the requirements and they were sure they
were done with me.
-
Collings
- That they'll never see you again?
-
Lipkis
- Yes. The requirements included essentially legislative resolutions, which
are essentially laws passed by both the State Senate, the State
Assembly, the city of L.A., the county of L.A., the city of Culver City.
Did I do this before or no?
-
Collings
- No.
-
Lipkis
- No. Okay, so every one of those legislative bodies had to introduce a
piece of legislation supporting the run, plus we had to provide $10
million worth of insurance.
-
Collings
- Ouch.
-
Lipkis
- And have the city fire and people on hand and paramedics and pay
CalTrans' expenses.
-
Lipkis
- Let's pause for a second.
-
Collings
- Yes. [recording interrupted]
-
Collings
- All right.
-
Lipkis
- I think we had six weeks to pull all this off, and advertise and recruit
and get everyone there. Oh, boy, what a challenge. It was like, okay,
it's all over.
-
Collings
- What about the $10 million?
-
Lipkis
- Well, it's great when people define a challenge, basically you're
creating the engineering metrics for what you need to do. So they
defined the hurdle and we just had to figure out how to get over the
hurdle. So what they were sure was a fatal body block, turned out to,
once again, be a problem. Did I talk about the philosophy of the
problem? It's more like a math problem or an engineering problem,
something to be solved, as opposed to the problem being a sign that you
failed. So, yes, it's disappointing at first to have the problem, but
then I just went, "Okay, here are the problems we have to solve. How are
we possibly going to do this?"
-
Lipkis
- Well, we had made friends in some places and I started with a family
friend, who was a state senator, Hirsch Rosenthal. I called him and said
what our problem and challenge was, and he said, "No problem, I can
introduce a bill. You'll have to fly up and testify at the
Transportation Committee, but we can make that happen."
-
Lipkis
- So we got that process started. We asked the city councils and the
supervisors to introduce something, because remember we had just done
the floods, we were heroes in some people's mind, and it wasn't hard to
ask for something really simple in return, though that's not simple,
it's that its no big cost and it's no big sweat, and it's what
legislatures do.
-
Lipkis
- So we got that rolling, and then I'm scratching my head about how do we
get that insurance? We started checking around and only Lloyd's of
London would provide it, and it was going to be really, really
expensive. But a different strategy emerged when we began looking at
corporate media sponsors, which we needed to get the word out. Radio, a
rock music station called KZLA, turned out to be owned by KABC and they
carried a $90 million policy. So it was a simple administrative rider
for the day named TreePeople and the State. So we got the insurance.
Piece of cake.
-
Collings
- Now, why did they want to do that for you?
-
Lipkis
- Well, they became a sponsor and they needed to insure the event anyhow.
-
Collings
- Okay.
-
Lipkis
- So if anyone got hurt, they didn't get nailed.
-
Collings
- So their radio station printed on the T-shirt or something?
-
Lipkis
- They helped promote. Yes, we put them on the shirt. No, it was KLOS.
That's right, they were ABC. Anyhow, yes, they got--
-
Collings
- KLOS, was it?
-
Lipkis
- I think so. But, yes, we put them on the shirt, they did the promotion
and the outreach. As all this process was going on we printed posters,
we leafleted all the runs all over town, people started registering,
things were going pretty well. Then I got a call the last week before
the run from the L.A.P.D. saying, the same guy saying, "Meet me out at
the Venice station." I did and they said, "We've got a problem." They
said, "We can't close those intersections."
-
Lipkis
- I said, "Do you have any idea how big this has gotten?"
-
Lipkis
- The commander for the station says, "Come with me." He brings me into the
locker room and shows me, our poster is in their locker room with--he
said, "Half my division is running in your race. We know it, we're all
excited about it, we've paid our dues. We're running. So we've got to
figure out a way to solve this thing, but we can't have cops there."
-
Lipkis
- Just two weeks before, I mean, these are all interthreaded, but we
were--a crew of us were living up at TreePeople pretty much twenty-four
hours a day and one night a cop had been shot just a quarter mile from
us in Coldwater. So the whole street was closed and there were what
seemed like a couple hundred cops. We set up an emergency kitchen and
fed them and took care of them all night long. Didn't have to do that,
but we did, and it's just who we are.
-
Lipkis
- So the cops are saying, "Can we build a bridge or something?"
-
Lipkis
- I went, "I don't think so. It'd be a lot easier if we somehow can get
around this policy." I said, "Think about what TreePeople has done for
the city and you're telling me you can't give four cops for a couple of
hours?"
-
Lipkis
- He went, "Yes, you're right. I've got to turn around and go try to sell
this," and he personally went to the Police Commission and got them to
reverse their policy and allow us what we needed. So that came through
the Thursday before the Sunday, and we still didn't have permission yet
from--CalTrans was saying, "You know, no legislative resolution, no
nothing." So we had the insurance, we had L.A.P.D., we had everything
lined up, and it wasn't till I think it was Friday that--it still
had--it had to go through the whole Senate first and then the assembly
and we actually were waiting for the secretary of state to get the
document from the Assembly and I think it happened, like, late on Friday
we had someone there, run to the secretary of state to certify it, and
then fax it to CalTrans. They got the document and they went, "You've
done it. Okay. What do you need?" And they pulled all their people
together for an urgent meeting and figured out the logistics.
-
Lipkis
- In the meantime, we had organized, again, hundreds of volunteers, the ham
radio operators and the four-wheel drive clubs and the people that
helped in the floods.
-
Collings
- How would you communicate with these people?
-
Lipkis
- Which people?
-
Collings
- Like the four-wheel drive clubs and all that?
-
Lipkis
- Oh, well, they had their internal network and I would communicate to
their leaders and they would get all their people together.
-
Collings
- So they had kind of like a phone tree?
-
Lipkis
- Yes.
-
Collings
- Yes, okay.
-
Lipkis
- So we had raised--gotten corporate sponsor, raised seedlings, everything
was in place. So it was just the lack of CalTrans being willing to
provide the people and the crews to close the freeway down and we got it
at that eleventh hour. Lo and behold, we deployed all the volunteers and
CalTrans coned off, closed the freeway, everything was set, and 5,000
people showed up. It worked like clockwork, no problem. People parked in
the Fox Hills Mall, walked up the ramp, ran the race, came back, it was
clean. The absolute mega surprise was we had accomplished that mission
with the contract. Front page of the L.A. Times and front page of the
Herald Examiner, this incredible photo of this absolute sea of bodies.
That, with the name Urban Forest, twice on the front page of the Times,
a picture of the banner and the caption.
-
Lipkis
- So we were able to declare that part done.
-
Collings
- Yes.
-
Lipkis
- So that process, I think even created some political momentum just to
see, not only were we doing the emergency work and the planting and a
lot of people stopped and planted trees along the way.
-
Collings
- So they carried it with them along the run?
-
Lipkis
- We had them on the side where they needed the plants. All they had to do
was stop and take the time to plant. Those trees are there today. That's
the forest along the side of the Marina Freeway near the Centinela off
ramp. We did the run four more years after that. Another one of--I think
the third year was another set of front page pictures. So that was cool.
-
Collings
- So was this sort of a transformative event for the organization, would
you say, in the way that some of the others have been?
-
Lipkis
- Yes, every time--because there's two things. One is that I have a
creative idea or vision and see stuff that needs to happen and know
intuitively what it's going to do for us, but can't usually convince
people, or couldn't, to trust me. People couldn't conceive that we could
do it or what the value would be or what happens with public awareness
that goes through a collective shift. It's very different than just a
simple getting an article in the paper or something like that, when you
create an event somehow large enough that there's a collective
awareness, which is very hard to happen here. I mean, it just doesn't
happen much in this town, but you can do it, and they're important to
have happen. It's to change perception and get people enrolled. These
things mostly happen around scandals and major emergencies, not much
really affects Los Angeles. The riots did. The Olympics coming to town
did, but it wasn't lasting.
-
Lipkis
- So the internal shift was, oh, my God, we can do this. It's not a skill
set that anybody brought to, but it's one I guess I just embody. So that
emboldened us a little bit, gave us a little bit more confidence. So
that was part of the building our way towards knowing that we should do
the Million Trees and having that same consciousness that we needed to
get something to get the focus of the whole Southern California
community on doing something together positive. So that really was the
vision and that's what drove it, and I knew by then that we had lost the
ability to communicate effectively, to translate our own message into
what the public could understand.
-
Collings
- How did you know that?
-
Lipkis
- Well, in the early days when I was just a teenager telling the story
really simply, people could get it and get involved. The more science we
knew, the more facts we had, the less able we were to get it across.
-
Collings
- I mean, in the beginning you were talking about specific projects. Did
you continue talking about specific--
-
Lipkis
- No. No, we were talking about the bigger picture, fix the environment and
all that. So the specificity and simplicity of a million trees really
worked for us, I'm not sure it's working for the mayor right now, for
the mayor's campaign, because it's been done, I think. But it made
sense. People may have been skeptical then, but they were able to get
their minds around it.
-
Collings
- Sure.
-
Lipkis
- And absolutely has its limitations and problems and I didn't recommend
doing it again, because it's too simplistic, but at the time it worked.
It got a lot of people focused in.
-
Lipkis
- But back to the run and the floods. Somebody who helped in the run, and
maybe in the floods, her name is Ronnie Korn-something, knew the
president of Doyle Dane Bernbach, and she introduced me to him, set up
so he would take a meeting. Did I--it seems like I got into this.
-
Collings
- Yes, you did. You did talk about the Doyle Dane Bernbach campaign.
-
Lipkis
- Oh, great. Okay. And Gregory Peck and all that stuff?
-
Collings
- Right, right. Right.
-
Lipkis
- Okay. So we got way into that?
-
Collings
- Yes. Yes, you talked about that, but you hadn't talked about the--
-
Lipkis
- The Ueberroth thing.
-
Collings
- Yes, exactly.
-
Lipkis
- So that had happened before. I guess it's because you asked a--
-
Collings
- I think maybe you skipped ahead, yes.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, I did, and it was only because you asked about problems and
challenges and failures, so I cycled back and went, oh, yes, well--
-
Collings
- Oh, yes, there had been this, yes.
-
Lipkis
- And as you will see every time we've started something it's been usually
met by a major problem, if not failure, and most of the time I just
didn't stop, or I would stop for a while and then figure out how to
solve it. And once again, the solution, the fact that with the run that
we were able to get KLOS involved not only gave us insurance, but it
gave us a much greater outreach. So we wanted 5,000 people, but how do
you get 5,000 people?
-
Collings
- Now, there's an article about the run in the book "Sculpting the
Environment."
-
Lipkis
- Yes.
-
Collings
- That seems like a--I mean, how did that happen that the stuff about
TreePeople and the run would be--
-
Lipkis
- How'd it wind up in the book?
-
Collings
- Yes, would be in a book about environmental art?
-
Lipkis
- Again, we're way out of sync, but I'll answer the question. It's funny
that while we were later in the Million Tree Campaign, an environmental
artist came to me named Baille Oakes, and he worked with wood and he
wanted to do something to contribute. At the time we were working on
creating a temporary portable forest in downtown L.A. That is a whole
other--it's a long story of a pretty significant failure. But the
Community Redevelopment Agency had invited us to take a lot at Fourth
and Grand, Fourth and Hill, on Bunker Hill, that at some time in the
future was slated to have a building on it, but in the short-term wasn't
going to. They said, "If you want to plant it, that would be great."
-
Lipkis
- So we began the process and really--you know, we thought, "Oh, this is
great. We need a downtown center, we can bring people from all over to
learn about and see what trees to plant and pick up the trees and do all
this stuff."
-
Lipkis
- So we built quite a head of steam on it, got some great design, and as
part of the design this artist got enrolled. So I will tell this. I
might as well finish this story. As we're building this enthusiasm all
of a sudden the CRA, the developer, I think, got cold feet and they were
afraid that when it's time to build their building that people will
chain themselves to the trees and not let theirs be taken out out and it
will block their multi-billion-dollar project. So they started pulling
the plug on it and they wouldn't do it upfront and they wouldn't do it
honestly, they just made it look like it was our lack of resources and
us why they were doing it. Yet, it was just--so it was kind of ugly
behind the scenes. Pulled the plug.
-
Lipkis
- The interesting thing is we had published designs and was quite exciting,
and CBS Evening News did a piece on it, and it didn't happen. Very
disappointing because a lot of time and energy went, like a year and
half went into planning and putting it together. The cool thing about it
is three years later the city of Glendale, actually, their Redevelopment
Agency, did it in their place. It became what we did to deal with the
concerns of the developers to say, "Okay, we'll make this a nursery. It
will be a portable forest. We can plant trees in boxes in the ground
where they'll get to grow and when it's time to build your building we
just pluck them up and take them to a school or a park, so trees aren't
getting cut down." But they wouldn't go for it. But that concept was
then implemented beautifully in downtown Glendale where they built a
park and it was there for two or three years and now it's new buildings
and the trees are wherever they are in the community. But we were pretty
depressed about it for quite a long time and frustrated.
-
Lipkis
- But the artist involved stayed connected with us, and that's Baille
Oakes. Many, many years later I was visiting him and he said he was
doing a book on environmental art. He said, "I think you're an artist,
and I want to invite you to do a chapter."
-
Lipkis
- I said, "Well, that's really interesting because sometimes I think maybe
I'm an artist, but no one else has ever said anything about that."
-
Lipkis
- So that got me thinking about everything I do from the perspective of
art. So I agreed to write that chapter from the perspective of artist. I
used to live in Sonoma County. I was there when Christo [and Jean
Claude] built the Running Fence. I've always been attracted to his work,
and the more I learned about what he did, the more I realized, oh, my
God, I'm actually doing the same sort of thing, involving community with
these massive projects that wind up being temporary, but changing
perspective. I had been noodling the notion of art for me as taking a
piece of the world, every day world, and putting a frame around it and
giving it back to people to see their world differently and to
understand something more about the world, something that's unconscious
to them. I think maybe that may or may not be what all artists do, but
that became my own working definition of art and then realized I was
doing that and then realized, oh, that's really an important educational
perspective. When I started looking back through all the stuff we did I
saw it over and over again.
-
Collings
- Did coming to that realization help you going forward or was it more a
thing of just kind of understanding what you were doing?
-
Lipkis
- It helped me understand what I was doing, but also it does continue to
drive what we do, and clearly that was a foundation for some much more
serious big projects that came later. The big, big stuff that we're
working on now, the T.R.E.E.S. Project. I mean, that's been--I started
on that in--
-
Collings
- T.R.E.E.S., the acronym?
-
Lipkis
- Yes. Trans-Agency Resources for Environmental and Economic
Sustainability. I started that in '92 after the Rodney King riots. So
I'm jumping way, way, way ahead. So I'll just mark it and saying that I
knew that we need to have people look at cities differently, very
differently, in order to get to sustainability. That notion, it's great
that you asked the question, really completely drives it. I had to
scientifically prove that, in fact, it works and we've now spent, since
'92 to now, doing that. So my next project is to actually go back into
the creative mode in writing and pictures and new media to share with
people a picture of the world and their life in a way that they see it
like they've never seen it and understand it like they've never
understood it. We'll hopefully joyfully enable them to participate in a
new way.
-
Lipkis
- So maybe we talked about that at the beginning. I'm not sure. A little
bit.
-
Collings
- Oh, yes, we talked in the beginning about your--kind of like overarching
philosophy.
-
Lipkis
- What comes back.
-
Collings
- Yes.
-
Lipkis
- So yes, that principle has been throughout and we have done other media
events along the way, but from 1990, on Martin Luther King's birthday,
planting the entire stretch of King Boulevard as a living monument to
him, now visible from space. So that would be a good picture. And the
actual culmination of the first phase of the T.R.E.E.S. project was an
interesting media event, as well.
-
Collings
- So up to this point, up to the Million Tree Campaign, the Marina Runs,
how was the staff--the staff was still volunteer at that point?
-
Lipkis
- No. Well, again, the story's being told in funny sync. So the staff was
getting paid when the disaster started and the Marina Run was during the
time when people were getting paid. Then 1980, I forget what the date,
actual date was, but June, July, when I came back and sort of shut it
down and reformatted, then nobody was getting paid. That lasted only a
few months, because once we put the word out that we were doing the
campaign, people started sending money again and resources, and we only
had a few staff.
-
Lipkis
- Bruce Flynt, who had been an education intern said, "I want to do
education, that's why I'm here." He was there as a volunteer in the
first place. He said, "I think I can set up a program that will make
enough money that it'll run on its own. So we'll just charge schools a
little bit."
-
Lipkis
- I said, "Show me your plan, I'm open to it." He did and I said, "Go for
it."
-
Lipkis
- So he and Chris Imhoff launched the Education Project, which instead of
being run by professionals, it was run by college interns, but it still
produced a lot of value and it was more sustainable.
-
Collings
- So when you started hiring staff back again, did you hire in a different
way than you had before? Did you structure things differently than you
had before?
-
Lipkis
- I don't remember. I was pretty reluctant to, because of my lack of
organizational and business knowledge and no training, I didn't quite
know how to just get an administrative manager and let them run the
stuff, that I would absolutely do it now. And we were going by the seat
of the pants in the campaign. So I hired people to come in with a clear
philosophical alignment and I would test that and basically say, "We
never know when we're going to be paid or not, so you've got to be
willing to work knowing that you might not get paid." Basically my
agreement with every staff person, volunteer, board member, is it only
works if you're here in the spirit of service knowing that you'll get
more than you put in as long as you're not looking for where you're
getting it. And sure enough, the satisfaction, the joy, the fulfillment,
really does pay off for people. I don't want anyone to be there in
sacrifice, because that just never works for morale and building a
strong team spirit.
-
Lipkis
- Now, we're so many years later, we're an institution, I don't do the
hiring, and we have administrative people, and we have HR people, and we
have all the issues that people have in organizations with staff, but
still we work to find people who are really aligned. We're getting to be
paying a little more towards normal, instead of just horribly
underpaying everybody, which is sort of--I guess that's the answer to
the question, my very naive response, and yet it was all we had the
resources for, was, "Okay, we can't pay much. I don't get paid much." I
was getting paid around $10,000 a year when I started taking a salary
again. I was even paying some other staff more than me. Basically it was
like, you know, "You've got to be committed to do this work, and there
will be some level, small level of under compensation, but that's it."
So that was kind of the filter.
-
Collings
- So how did that affect the decision-making process? Because you were
saying, like, with regard to the initial Peter Ueberroth offer that you
were having these four-hour staff meetings, and the staff didn't want to
do it.
-
Lipkis
- Oh, right. Right.
-
Collings
- And the staff didn't want to do it. Well, if you're hardly paying them
anything, it's kind of hard to not go with what--
-
Lipkis
- Listen.
-
Collings
- Yes, exactly.
-
Lipkis
- Yes. Well, actually those four-hour staff meeting times we were paying
people a little more. Sort of the more we paid the more dissatisfaction
we would have.
-
Collings
- That's interesting.
-
Lipkis
- Yes. Well, because we could never get to comparable scale.
-
Collings
- Yes.
-
Lipkis
- There was no comp. I mean, there's no model of equivalent of what we were
doing, except sort of we came out of the summer camp model, which you
underpay college students for a couple of months and that was it. You've
long passed that.
-
Lipkis
- But we underwent a lot of different decision-making models, from full
collective consensus to, I think, I'd have to look back through my
journals, but I'm sure of this, I said, "Okay. New decision-making
model, I'm always a collaborator and will always listen and take input,
but ultimately final decisions have got to rest back with me. So I'm
going to be making decisions more rapidly, so we don't have all these
long, long, long staff meetings."
-
Collings
- When did you say this?
-
Lipkis
- At the point when we turned on the Million Tree Campaign. it's like, I'm
the one who's responsible, anyhow, so I'm making the decision. I think
we did have a board by then, and it just wasn't active in management,
but I did inform them and had their support. But we've always had staff
meetings, communal input, because people do need to have that sense of
ownership if they're going to be involved at all. So that is as you
insightfully pointed out, the trade off.
-
Lipkis
- So we should try to get through the Million Tree Campaign in our few
minutes.
-
Collings
- Okay.
-
Lipkis
- We launched, then DDB came in and started doing all the advertising and
we were pushing away and doing events and various things. A person who
happened to have come to visit TreePeople the day that we launched with
the mayor and the army guard, his name is Lionel Fifield, he is an
Australian who had also been in Hawaii at this retreat that I went to.
It was called the One Earth Gathering, it was organized by the Findhorn
Foundation. It was all about doing things to help the planet. Being
there is what re-inspired me to launch the campaign. He came through
town to visit, was so impressed by the Army, the mayor, all this stuff,
and it fell to him to organize the One Earth Gathering in Australia. He
ran a place in Brisbane called the Relaxation Center, and he coordinated
with a bunch of different groups around the country, and thought,
"Australia's got all these problems and there are answers all around the
world." Deforestation was a huge issue in Australia. When Lionel
organized this stuff for 1982, we were halfway through the campaign, and
he invited me to come to Australia on a speaking tour for a month. I
thought, "Whoa, that would be fun." I'd never been there.
-
Lipkis
- So the campaign was well underway and in good hands, I thought, and I
went off for that month of speaking. While there after nearly a month of
being on the road, staying in people's homes, speaking every day, the
last major city was Melbourne. I can't tell the whole romance story, but
I was there getting ready to give my opening speech, welcome speech, and
there were people just from all over the world there, and then 800
people at the conference, here to learn these good new-age ideas. While
running through the lobby to find a tree that was out at a portable
nursery out front, I saw this person and a little voice said, "She's the
one." I went, "What?" Just instant recognition and spotting, which was
just amazing.
-
Lipkis
- I kept moving and then ran back through and saw her again, again that
recognition. Did the welcome session for an hour and a half or whatever,
and was standing in the foyer and talking to Lionel Fifield, who brought
me to Australia, and looking at Kate who was at a hunger project booth.
-
Collings
- Oh, it was a different event?
-
Lipkis
- It was the same. There were all these booths representing all the causes
that they had assembled people for to help solve these problems. No, it
was that same day, just ninety minutes later. We made eye contact and I
was asking Lionel where there was a native plant nursery that I had
heard of that I needed to go see. Kate was listening and said, "My dad's
a member, I know where it is. I'll find out for you," or, "he knows
where it is, I'll find out." We made contact and--
-
Collings
- The rest is history.
-
Lipkis
- The rest is history. Making a long story very short, we only had dinner
together and I had to fly off to Tasmania, two more cities, four days of
speaking down there, came back, and she met me at Melbourne Airport for
a hug at my invitation, and spontaneously got on the plane with me.
-
Collings
- Oh, my gosh.
-
Lipkis
- And flew to Sydney on her way to work, completely unprepared. She
just--we had this incredible collision at the airport and she said--she
was actually engaged to somebody else, and said, "I think I may have
fallen in love with you."
-
Lipkis
- I said, "I think I may have fallen in love with you."
-
Lipkis
- "So can you come back?
-
Lipkis
- And I said, "I can't, I've got to keep going."
-
Lipkis
- I had a TV show to do in Sydney in two hours or three hours. I said,
"Well, there's room for you there." She just did a 180 and went to the
counter. All she had with her was her American Express card with the car
left out in short-term parking by the curb.
-
Collings
- Oh, God. Still there, right?
-
Lipkis
- Yes. Well, she said, "Get me on that plane." We flew together, started
our work together immediately, she showing me around Sydney where she'd
grown up and it was great. Then I flew off and she flew home, and yes,
the car was there. She was here five weeks later for a visit and we
confirmed that it was right and she went home, packed her life, and came
back. We got married on the weekend of Earth Day, 1983. Yes, so we had
very, very little time to court.
-
Lipkis
- She was an advertising executive and came here and immediately joined the
team. Actually, while she was here, this is how incredibly effective she
was and we were together, while she was here on that short-term visit
somebody--no, it wasn't that short-term visit. Delete that. It was right
as soon as she arrived. There's all kinds of stories, which I'm not
going to tell, because we'll save that for the more romantic movie. But
she immediately helped with organizing the fourth Tree Run and the
publicity, but once she moved here, got here, went to work immediately
for TreePeople, no pay, and noticed that I was getting paid less than
several of the staff and thought, "That's crazy." At the time we had
what we called that annual payroll savings plan, meaning we didn't pay
when we ran out of money.
-
Lipkis
- Her dad was, at the time, an executive with Guide Dogs for the Blind in
Australia. So retired from business, but knew the philanthropic world
and knew business and the two of them saw how inexperienced we were in
management. Her mom and dad came over for our wedding and spent six
weeks here living with my parents in Westwood and they got along great.
Anyhow, he started volunteering and helping. At some point, Kate said,
"You know, the most important thing I can do--forget about advertising,
the most important thing I can do is somehow insure our fiscal
viability, so people will never not get paid again." I think she
probably wasn't willing to live under those shaky circumstances, but it
wasn't an ethical way to operate either. And she has met that promise.
-
Collings
- So putting together, like, a business plan?
-
Lipkis
- Yes, and a better fund development plan and real planning and all of
that. That's scratching the surface of everything she's contributing.
-
Lipkis
- But I should go back to that meeting point at the conference in Melbourne
when I said, "Well, what do you do, and how did you get here?"
-
Lipkis
- She said she was an advertising copywriter. I went, "We can use a
copywriter."
-
Lipkis
- Anyhow, she actually plugged straight into the campaign amongst all the
other things we were doing and took over from Doyle Dane Bernbach and
started writing the ads. I mean, once they did the initial stuff, they
were sort of done, and we got posters and a TV spot, and that was
fantastic. But we had a whole lot of need to quickly be writing spots
and turning stuff around.
-
Lipkis
- So that brings us to the last year of the campaign. We had recorded about
200,000 trees planted towards the million, so we were 800,000 short with
a year to go. We had given away, by then, not only the 120,000 trees
that we had, but with McDonald's we had developed a promotion.
McDonald's and Georgia Pacific tied up to give away a thousand trees
from each McDonald's in Southern California. Well, there were 300
McDonald's. That's 300,000 trees. We did that for two years and we
mobilized the whole thing and created instructions on their little tray
liners and all kinds of good stuff.
-
Collings
- So they were giving them away, like, with Happy Meals or something like
that?
-
Lipkis
- Yes, something like that. Come in, buy a meal, buy anything, and you got
a tree. They all ran out within a day. People really wanted them. It was
really easy.
-
Lipkis
- But here was the thing, we only agreed from the start, the rule we set is
we'll only count the tree if we receive notice in writing that it's been
planted. So every tree went out with a postcard, and people, if they
paid the postage and sent it back, then we counted it. But people knew
that the most important thing was to actually plant it, not tell us. So
part of our campaign became tell us all about it.
-
Lipkis
- We also created a postcard that was a tree tag that we put on nurseries.
-
Collings
- You needed to make the postcards like a raffle ticket.
-
Lipkis
- Well, yes, we didn't have an incentive. You're thinking where we are
today.
-
Collings
- Yes.
-
Lipkis
- But we were too pure for that and didn't even think about that. We just
thought, oh, people will want to do it. But we weren't that smart and I
was pretty stubborn.
-
Lipkis
- So we distributed by then 720,000 trees, but out of the 600,000 I think
we could only count 40,000 trees or something like that. So we were at
200, we were thinking, "We've got to get the word out," and we were
trying to figure out how we were going to do that. Again, no major
funding for this. We thought, "Okay, telethon. That gives us better than
sound bite. We can really do something with that."
-
Lipkis
- I started talking to all the TV stations to see if they would give us an
hour and we could roll around the clock on a weekend and do it for
little cost. It was looking like a good idea, but we were still going to
have to find money to produce it and stuff, but it seemed like it was
going to work. Well, when I called ABC, because I was calling every
station, they said, "Well, how about we do something better than that?
How about we give you a mini-series on the evening news and tell the
story every night for a week?"
-
Collings
- Wow, this was a gift.
-
Lipkis
- Yes. Yes. These things kept happening and telling the story now as
professional as we are it seems so irresponsible, but, again, we were
finding our way, we had no money, we were still essentially kids.
-
Lipkis
- The same thing happened with the [L.A.] Times, and I will tell that
story, because it's an important part of the campaign. But they said,
"Let us do it."
-
Lipkis
- I said, "Well, I want to go to all the stations."
-
Lipkis
- They said, "Don't worry about it, just we'll work with you."
-
Lipkis
- Together we outlined what the series would be and then we had this major
confrontation with them and said, "Look, we're going to get people
turned on." And they said, "It's not going to work to just have a
postcard, let them phone you or something." Remember, there's no email
in the world, no Internet, no nothing.
-
Collings
- Right. Yes, that would have made it really easy.
-
Lipkis
- Oh, simple. Pause.
-
Collings
- Pause. [End of interview]
1.5. Session 5 (January 5, 2007)
-
Collings
- Good afternoon, Andy. It is January 5, 2007.
-
Lipkis
- A very windy day.
-
Collings
- Right.
-
Lipkis
- So we're picking up with the question of incentives to inspire people to
make their trees count. So in our Million Tree Campaign, we offered no
incentive, the million trees for the Olympics, and people just had to
write us, or eventually called us. We allowed people to call a hotline.
That did a lot of good. Now, this was in the day before the Internet, so
people had to use a stamp. We required them to send us either a
preprinted postcard that we made or make up a postcard. But the only
incentive that we offered and we did not ultimately deliver on that
promise is we were going to create a monument with everyone's name on
it. We couldn't raise the quarter million dollars or half million
dollars it was going to take, which was almost more than the campaign
itself costs, so we let that go.
-
Lipkis
- But the interesting implications now are here Mayor Villaraigosa wants to
have a million trees planted in L.A. and they're sort of thinking the
city should do half and the public should do half somehow. But there
isn't yet, from my take, a compelling message to move people to do it.
That will come and we will help build it, but ultimately you've got to
have your tree count. So the question is, back again, what do we do to
motivate that counting, because it seems like so not an important act
compared to getting the tree in the ground and, of course, keeping it
alive. Now, we have the Web, and now we have all kinds of ways to do
stuff electronically to make it easy.
-
Lipkis
- So I've actually devised some whole Web-based approaches for helping
people choose where to plant, how many trees, what kind of tree to
plant, and then actually be able to incentify them right online for
getting free trees or discount trees, or having their stuff reported to
the Department of Water and Power, various things like that. But because
we want to--we can't make or coerce anybody, us for sure, TreePeople
can't, but the government isn't inclined to and it doesn't work well.
But I looked to incentives that would somehow be credible, that would
catch people's attention, to have them go take the extra steps, because
if we do that, then we can provide them a lot of expert guidance, and
that's exciting. I won't give more details, but that if we get the
chance to do it, I'm excited about relevant incentives. It might be
rebates, it might be discounts, it might--maybe it's some privileges as
being a community leader, a community caregiver, or like a discount at
Starbucks. You never know.
-
Collings
- Oh, that's a good idea. Last time you said that it seemed like the
Million Tree idea, as it was being proposed by Villaraigosa at the
moment just didn't seem to be having the momentum that the previous did,
and you said that you thought possibly because it had already been done.
-
Lipkis
- Well, in one sense it's been done and people know it. The other is that
because it's coming from a politician I don't think people know how to
deal with it, and the language coming from the mayor's office isn't yet
clear, because he tells people around the world that he's planting a
million trees, and well, people go, "Okay. Well, great, plant your
million, however you're going to do it." It hasn't yet turned into a
call for action that's saying, "Hey, you, personally, we're talking to
you."
-
Collings
- I'm just wondering if, like, perhaps, like at sort of the earlier period,
which was almost like a kind of period of flowering for grassroots
environmental groups, if there was more excitement about an idea like
that and that it's harder for people to get energized about it.
-
Lipkis
- I think that there's all kinds of things in the way, but that doesn't
mean it can't be done. It calls on us to use higher skill to communicate
what the tree will do and what people's role needs to be. For some
reason my son just an hour ago, he's never really showed a whole lot of
interest in this work at all, he went and watched a film last night,
which is a PBS documentary on making cities green and sustainable, and
we feature heavily in it. It airs Thursday night, next week.
-
Collings
- Oh, next week, okay. I saw it on your website.
-
Lipkis
- Oh, okay.
-
Collings
- I saw it.
-
Lipkis
- Well, he saw the film last night, there was a preview and he came out and
said, "You know, I used to tell you that I wanted to plant this striped
variegated lemon-lime tree, and I still want to do it, and I'd like to
do it as part of the million." We were talking about where to do it. So
that just happened like an hour ago, which is really interesting. So
something grabbed him and I don't know what. It would be interesting to
understand the motivation.
-
Lipkis
- I had proposed to the mayor's office as part of the planning and design
of this campaign that we need to do research, we need to understand
what's motivating people today, what messages, what issues, to link this
to. You can't just say, "It's a good thing, you ought to do it," because
there's too many cultures, too many agendas, too many everything, and
yet there's plenty of motivators, we just have to use the right ones. I
have a hunch I know what a lot of them are, but it is--the importance of
this piece of conversation is that this stuff does not happen easily. It
doesn't happen because you've got an idea and go, "It would be great to
plant a million trees," and that's been done. It takes a lot of work to
figure out who's going to do it and then who's going to keep it alive
and how you're going to motivate people. It's still needed.
-
Lipkis
- In fact, hopefully within the next couple of weeks I'll be writing a
piece for the website on how to make sense of the million tree goal and
what it means, so people can actually get beyond skepticism and
scratching their heads and going, "Well, is this me?"
-
Collings
- Now, one of the things that you had said about the Million Tree Campaign,
you know, when you were working with DDB, you said at one point--you
said later on you transitioned to highly tailored messages to different
communities, but that you weren't doing that then.
-
Lipkis
- Right.
-
Collings
- Do you see this new work with the mayor as being part of that?
-
Lipkis
- Well, we're suggesting it, and again, that's why the research. You've got
very different populations around town with very different needs. There
are people who need food, there's people who need to put down roots,
there's people who think that they're doing good already and they don't
need to anything more. One size message doesn't fit all, for sure, and
anybody who thinks it does is going to be sorely disappointed.
-
Collings
- So how do you tailor those messages to different communities?
-
Lipkis
- Well, you figure out which communities you want to hit and then you talk
to them, listen, you find out what are issues that are important, where
the pain is. I mean, for me tree planting is about healing, it's about,
if we're asking people to do something extraordinary, which is to go out
of their way to do something they don't normally do, do they have the
tools? Do they know where to plant? Are they ready to make a several
year commitment as a parent? We say it takes five years to plant a tree.
Because it requires a shift out of normal momentum, it requires a shift
of time, energy, values, and a commitment, that's big. So we have to
find out what is important enough in a person's life to cause them to be
willing to do that, because it's not only act. Even one act is big,
because it will be different.
-
Lipkis
- So like anybody doing sales work, you need to understand there is a
market and what is the interest. The fact is, the market, because of the
number and because of the goal, and I think the legitimate goal and
legitimate need is the target is between a half a million and three
million people in L.A. Three million residents, that would be everybody;
half million, so well everybody plants a couple of trees. But truly what
you need to do is because of what we're asking people to do, is to find
out what their needs are, find out how to have them see that planting
this tree is going to help meet some of their needs, whether connect
with their family, give them a sense of power, as with gang kids give
them their power back, allow them to make their mark in a different way,
feel connection with their team, feel connected to L.A. Maybe it's
financial or goodie incentive. Is it linked with religion or not, you
know, are there cultural roots that people bring some values that are a
message and can relate back to about their home or their village or
whatever it is that says that, you know, that's needed here, you're
needed here. But the question is always, what do we need to offer in
terms of context and way to think about this in order to grab people's
attention and cause them to go, "Oh, let's do something way different
than we normally do."
-
Collings
- So how can you find that stuff out? I mean, do you do like focus groups
with different communities?
-
Lipkis
- Oh, yes. We're doing community engagement work now. We're working in the
harbor, in the North Valley, we're going to neighborhood meetings, we're
going to neighborhood council meetings, and so we're talking to people
and we're interviewing people. At this point, just casual conversations.
With funding we would actually engage public opinion research people and
do telephone polling and focus groups to structure, properly structure
the questions so they know how to ask them and how to interpret what
comes back, and we have done that in the past. We've actually used focus
groups a couple of times to scientifically get to--because we always
want to know the turnoffs. It's really, really important, because
there's little time. You've got little time on the air, you can't afford
to really waste either the time or that communication, open the window
of their mind. But the city doesn't want to pay for that right now, they
don't understand it. So they've already gone through one whole cycle
with the mayor launching the thing and getting the word out, it's on
trash trucks, it's on banners, it looks cool, but it's not yet
motivating.
-
Collings
- Is there a chance that that's kind of like as far as it will go?
-
Lipkis
- Well, there are some people who think so, but I hope not, because if
that's all it does then it's dead. No, I would hope, and we're here to
help motivate them. Right now we're the prime funder of the mayor's
campaign, because people have promised money, but nothing is flowing.
We've engaged my time, the time of many of our staff, we're hired more
staff, and we're actually spending money doing planting and organizing.
If you go to the Million Tree Campaign website, you'll see we're the
only people doing anything. That's because we have private donors who
allow us to do work. Most of the other organizations rely entirely on
public funding. So if they're funded then they can do stuff. We're
going, "No, it's important to provide some leadership. This isn't a bad
thing, it's a good thing, and let's define it." Because for me I would
like to motivate a million people or more to take action as a community
to fix the environment. That's the opportunity now. We have to move the
society to be able to think consciously and act appropriately, and if
we're going to turn on a dime to address global warming and some other
mega issues that we're in seriously behind responding to global warming
and everything else. If we were to turn it around today and stop putting
carbon in the atmosphere, according to experts we've still got from
already in the atmosphere we've got two more degrees of warming already
in. That's a crisis, because two degrees is pretty much that's it. I
mean, major melting of the icecaps. Two degrees is pretty radical. Well,
we're going to have to move people to act very, very quickly to change
lifestyles and all of that. This work of just beginning to exercise that
muscle, to know that we could do stuff, that we as individuals can
choose en masse to do it, because it's unlikely that we're going ever
see sufficient legislation passed to compel people to do what's needed.
So I see a great opportunity to begin that, to exercise muscle that
people don't know they have. And that starts to point to where I'm going
from here and a little bit of where TreePeople is going.
-
Collings
- Yes. Have there been any times when you were conducting like community
research, where you discovered something that you would never have
anticipated, where you were surprised by--
-
Lipkis
- Messaging. Yes, a couple of things. Once we discovered that we had equal
or greater name recognition than the Sierra Club, which is this huge
national organization, that was interesting. Probably the most
eye-opening and sort of validating, was when we actually did focus
groups trying to build a campaign for DWP, and we did them in the
valley, in South L.A., and in Central. In South L.A. and in the valley,
there was an extraordinarily high distrust of government. People said
that they would actually trust TreePeople to bring gang members onto
their property to plant trees, but they didn't even want the government
spending their money doing it. They'd be more willing to make a
contribution, than to have government provide the funding. It was really
interesting data, because we hadn't realized the distrust was that high
or that people's trust of us was, on the other hand, that high that they
would take a risk of having, a youth at risk on their property doing
something for them.
-
Collings
- Interesting. You know, sort of spinning off of what you were saying about
getting people to recognize their own power and to improve their
neighborhoods and the environment, that's kind of sort of how--you've
sort of got into the trees thing through the Rodney King--
-
Lipkis
- Yes, the actual T.R.E.E.S. Project, yes.
-
Collings
- Yes. I mean, would you want to talk a little bit about sort of the
process of what the civil unrest at that time meant to you?
-
Lipkis
- Yes. I think it's important to state that in looking back every ten years
or so I have, not because it was scheduled, but just that's when the
itch came up to evaluate our effectiveness. Here I am spending my life
doing this and are we getting the job done? Is it time to change
strategies or change paths or whatever? After the first ten years, we
said, "Are our trees alive, and are we doing stuff right?" And we
realized in some cases they were and in some cases they weren't, and it
was important to change our tactics to get them to live, and that's how
we created the whole idea of citizen forestry, the training. Instead of
doing it "to" neighborhoods or "for" neighborhoods, we turned it around
completely to grow leaders. That became incredibly effective, because
doing the follow-up we found that 95 percent of the trees planted by
citizen foresters were alive after five years, while nationally most
urban trees are dead within seven. So that was huge, huge result s.
-
Lipkis
- I'm forgetting what the interim tune-up was, but I know we started doing
storm water education, the recycling program, and all of that in our
second decade, the Million Tree Campaign. Well, after twenty-something
years everything came together with me wondering if there could be,
should be more. The Rodney King riots hit on the heels of me getting to
understand about sustainability and seeing the global proportions of
this massive challenge that we're now facing. The Global 2000 Report,
which motivated us to do the Million Trees, we still hadn't turned
around that destruction of the planet.
-
Lipkis
- Is this okay with the music?
-
Collings
- Yes, it's okay. Yes.
-
Lipkis
- Okay.
-
Collings
- I mean, it's there, but it's--is that okay?
-
Lipkis
- It's not a problem.
-
Collings
- Yes. I mean, it's not drowning out the--
-
Lipkis
- Okay, great, because I could have then turn it down a little bit if you
want.
-
Collings
- That's your call.
-
Lipkis
- It's not distracting for me, because I'm used to, but if it will be a
problem I'll--
-
Collings
- No, it's fine.
-
Lipkis
- Okay. He has a friend coming over. Actually, let's freeze it, I will let
him know.recording interrupted]
-
Lipkis
- So I began understanding even more about learning about sustainability
and that it was a three-legged stool, environmental, social, and
economic, having to do with equity as well as keeping the planet livable
and getting people employed with meaningful work, rather than
non-meaningful work. That's when the Rodney King riots hit.
-
Lipkis
- Also I'm a founder of the L.A. Conservation Corp. I don't know if I've
got this on record in there, but--
-
Collings
- No, I don't think you do.
-
Lipkis
- In about 1985, approximately, I need to check the records when, but it
wasn't too long after I got married, TreePeople was approached to launch
a corps down here. We got the first grant and I recruited, helped
recruit the--
-
Lipkis
- Better stop that for a minute. [recording interrupted]
-
Lipkis
- Okay. So I helped recruit Mickey Cantor, who became the chair of the
board. I've been on the board ever since the beginning, recruited
people, helped hire the staff. Why I say that is because it also had me
attuned to the issues of youth unemployment, youth violence, youth
frustration, not that I didn't have the frustration myself as a youth.
But it was after the riots and hearing that a lot of the issues were
about unemployment and poverty, and the hopelessness linked to that, and
that there was a need for 50,000 new jobs in L.A., and that some of our
kids from the corps who had at one time used the--the purpose of the
corps was to be a steppingstone into the workforce. There used to be
job-training programs that would take the kids who the corps helped make
job-ready, how to dress, how to show up on time, how to take orders,
which they were missing those pieces, and therefore failing in
job-training programs. So the corps became this motivator, trainer,
missing link, and gave kids a real hope and sense of their power. But
the economy changed and those programs all ended, and so we're turning
the kids back into the most they can hope for is to work at McDonald's,
and that's pretty depressing.
-
Lipkis
- So some of the corps members had been killed in urban youth violence, and
that pushed me over the top to go, you know, we have to find a solution.
And on the heels of the riots, all that came together at one time, there
was that recognition that we needed 50,000 new jobs. I said, "Well, what
would that cost?" and found out it was a half of billion dollars a year.
That just was not on nobody's agenda, but I started thinking about
sustainability and how do you create full employment for people and
where could that money be in a healthy system.
-
Lipkis
- We had gotten a little bit of money, thirteen million from the Forest
Service for riot recovery, not to TreePeople, but to the Urban Greening
Initiative for programs in L.A. and jobs up in the forest.
-
Collings
- This was to sort of repair the city after the riots?
-
Lipkis
- Exactly. What that did was hire four hundred people who were put on buses
every day to go build trails in the forest, not a very compelling
program, but it was three months of jobs. I wasn't happy about that,
because it wasn't the right thing. The Rebuild L.A. people, when we were
say, "Hey, we need to fix systems," and all that, their response,
because our name was TreePeople was, "We don't need to talk about
landscaping until after we rebuild. We'll see you in a few years." We're
going, "You don't get it, that's not what it's about."
-
Lipkis
- Well, the next big federal check or program to show up in town was with a
half billion dollars was from the Army Corps of Engineers, no social
connection at all, no job connection. It was to raise the walls of the
L.A. River, because we'd so over paved L.A. that we created a major
flood problem. I thought, "Oh, my God, 50,000 jobs could be in that half
billion dollars, and they're talking about a flood control program, but
flood control is really water management, that's really watershed
management. Forestry, as far as I've ever heard, has always been
synonymous with watershed management. We're practicing urban forestry,
so are we practicing urban watershed management?"
-
Lipkis
- I looked and found that, "No, we were not." We were promising that trees
do all these good things, but in fact, we weren't practicing, or even
thinking of urban watershed management. Nobody was. It didn't exist as a
term. The watersheds were the upper forests. But the answer was, we
could be. We'd have to change what we do.
-
Lipkis
- We'd already built the human social neighborhood component so trees could
live, but what this required was a radical change from planting trees
randomly to very strategic focused precision planting, or strategic
planting, or the acupuncture of planting. Right tree in the right place
to effect healing. A completely different world.
-
Lipkis
- That's been an interesting message to get out, because everyone has a
romantic notion about what trees are, and we're talking about something
that's requiring science and focus in order to yield the results we all
actually want, not just a tree alive, but if a tree is going to create
jobs it has to do a whole lot of work, like control floods, like trees
in the mountains do, or produce water, or produce energy savings. It can
do all that, but trees don't do that randomly.
-
Collings
- They have to be part of a system.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, you essentially have to engineer a functioning community forest, as
we call it. So it's a system where trees are interacting, but you've got
all the other things in the forest, the mulch, the leaves that fall off.
-
Lipkis
- So anyhow, back at this point, I began understanding this stuff and
started trying to talk to agencies about the opportunity. Instead of
wasting a half a billion dollars, and I had to look deeper, the half
billion to build these walls, well, that had to be linked to a pretty
big problem. How much water were we leaking? It turned out we were
leaking about a half a billion dollars worth of water every year, and we
were spending another half billion dollars a year on the flood control
system each year to get rid of that water. So there's a billion right
there just in water, mostly just in L.A. city and L.A. county. Well,
voila, there it is. There's the 50,000 jobs that could be employing
people meaningfully tending L.A. to become this really healthier city
employing people doing it, and we wouldn't have to find any new money.
We'd just have to redirect. When all of that came together in a flash of
realization, I could not rest on my laurels. It was one of those
life-changing ah-ha's again, where I really had to go out and show that
this was possible.
-
Lipkis
- I actually did a personal strategic plan when I turned forty, which would
have been twelve years ago. So this is 2006--
-
Collings
- Seven now.
-
Lipkis
- But it was '94 when I--because I had started the work, really, in '92,
post-riot, and went deep in the planning of the retreat, and came out of
that and went to the chair of my board and said, "Okay, I have to stop
doing the day-to-day work, I've really got to make this project happen,"
and got permission to spend more time doing that. We ultimately hired a
executive director so I could really go deep. It took me two years to
get the funding together to get it started and then, by then the
TreePeople was going sort of down in flames from poor management. So I
agreed to come back and run the organization and bring that project,
that T.R.E.E.S. project with me. The key person in that was a friend,
former managing director of TreePeople, who was formerly my assistant.
Her name is Caryn Bosson, Caryn Diamond Bosson, who helped me write some
of the grant proposals and she coined the term T.R.E.E.S., Trans-Agency
Resources for Environmental and Economic Sustainability.
-
Lipkis
- Anyhow, what I set out to do was prove that it was technically and
economically feasible to retrofit the city to function as forest, and do
it with existing money and planned expenditures. L.A., not only
hemorrhaged that billion dollars a year, but had planned to spend about
$20 billion in new infrastructure, flood control, waste water, water
supply, storm water, but all in different areas, different projects, all
competing with each other, all disintegrated. My vision was to integrate
it. People thought I was crazy, and those who didn't think I was crazy,
who agreed that it would make sense on paper, just said, it's never
going to happen because agencies won't talk to each other.
-
Collings
- What was the relationship between that and the Los Angeles San Gabriel--
-
Lipkis
- Oh, well, this comes much later.
-
Collings
- Yes, okay.
-
Lipkis
- It does come.
-
Collings
- Because this was an effort to get agencies to talk to each other.
-
Lipkis
- Exactly, and in fact, so I went out and did the research, and we raised a
million dollars. A $150,000 challenge grant from the Forest Service
triggered the city then kicking in a quarter million and the county some
money, and the EPA, and the city of Santa Monica, and the Metropolitan
Water District. We brought all these diverse agencies together to fund
this economic analysis--there was another component for design. We
needed to design the retrofits of how you would change all the land uses
in town, homes, apartments, commercial, industrial and public land. So
we brought together a hundred of the best architects, engineers,
landscape architects, foresters, and hydrologists, from around North
America, and four days in design designing the retrofit of L.A. with
goals of capturing that water, eliminating storm water runoff, capturing
the whole waste, green waste stream, major reduction in energy use and
greenhouse gas production, 50 percent reduction in water importation,
create the 50,00 0 jobs. So these high-level designers worked for four
days and created an incredible set of engineering documents, guidelines,
for how you do the retrofit to fit into this economic price envelope
that was important. So that was design.
-
Lipkis
- The second was economics. We spent two years doing a deep cost benefit
analysis on the air quality, energy savings, water supply, water
quality, flood control, property value increase, health impacts, of this
strategic planting effect, if we were to change the land and make L.A.
function like a forest. That was a two-year effort, with 200 agency
scientists. Huge. It was led by a guy named Jeff Wallace, who started as
a volunteer and then got hired as a consultant. He came out of high-tech
software and engineering. He led this process the way they do software
development, which is all based on consensus, so that all your pros
agree with what you've--you don't have a garbage-in-garbage-out problem.
Everyone concurs. So all the major agencies participated, came to
consensus on the numbers, if they couldn't we didn't use them. So they
couldn't come to agreement on the values of water quality, and so we
didn't use it, but all these other things are in there. Huge process,
great value, because the water agency signed off on it and the energy
agencies and sanitation and all of this. So it was their numbers. It was
good stuff.
-
Lipkis
- Then we needed to build a demonstration project to show that it wasn't
just an idea. So we retrofit a single-family home in South L.A.
-
Collings
- In Crenshaw.
-
Lipkis
- Well, this Crenshaw high school and then a little further east and south,
50th and Western, the home of Rosella Hall.
-
Collings
- How did you choose that house?
-
Collings
- We needed a typical house. We wanted one not in a wealthy area, because
some of the people wouldn't--I was trying to convince agencies to get
into this urban watershed thing. County Supervisor Yvonne Burke said,
"You know, it's all right for the rich people, but not the poor people
in this town. There's no room to store water and put tanks and all
that."
-
Lipkis
- I said, "Well, there really is."
-
Lipkis
- So instead of being dismissed
-
Collings
- Something for Ed Begley, Jr.?
-
Lipkis
- --westsiders. Yes, yes, and people with money. We focused south and east
and reached out to Mothers of East L.A. and Concerned Citizens and
others and said, "Do you know people who might be interested in
participating?"
-
Lipkis
- It turned out that this woman was actually one of our donors whose
daughter had been in the Conservation Corps. We looked at a number of
homes and a couple people who offered them, but this one was just
perfect, classic California bungalow, and she was willing to do it and
maintain it. So her house was the model that we used in the charette for
a single-family home. We retrofitted her house and held a flash flood
rainstorm event in August of 1998. God, it's hard not to say 2000. And
that was revolutionary.
-
Lipkis
- We brought all the agency people back, the skeptics, everyone, and
brought a 4,000-gallon water truck and dumped the water on the house in
five minutes' time in this massive rainfall event, and it didn't leak
water. The water was captured. It went into cisterns, it automatically
went into the irrigation system, and people were blown away, especially
the agency people, and most especially one person, Carl Blum, at the
time head of L.A. County Flood Control, Deputy Director of L.A. County
Department of Public Works, who we had been suing earlier.
-
Collings
- That was the suit that you joined with FOLAR and Heal the Bay?
-
Lipkis
- Yes. And over the river walls proposal that we couldn't stop. We actually
asked--back to that, we had asked the county to include urban watershed
management as an alternative to the walls, and they said, "The watershed
is in the mountains, it's not the city, can't afford it, it won't do the
job."
-
Lipkis
- In the process, in talking to Carl Blum, I said, "Well, cisterns could do
it."
-
Lipkis
- He said, "Yes, but it would take a million." (20,000 gallons each)
-
Lipkis
- I went okay, so we're going to design for a million, but they, again they
thought, they either didn't understand it, didn't appropriately analyze
it, and they dismissed it. And that was why we joined the lawsuit,
because we wanted a judge to say, "No, you missed the point, you really
do need to analyze this as an option."
-
Collings
- But the lawsuit failed?
-
Lipkis
- Yes, they were allowed to move ahead and the only settlement was that the
county agreed they would start thinking about watershed management. That
led to that process.
-
Collings
- And that led to this organization, Los Angeles and San Gabriel Watershed
Council?
-
Lipkis
- Watershed Council. So Dorothy Green was the lead catalyst on that. I was
right there with her helping think it through, but she was certainly the
head and founder.
-
Lipkis
- So we began thinking, "Oh, this might be that integrated place," and it
certainly became that for a while. It ultimately became a nonprofit
organization, hired an executive director, and started taking on a life
a bit of its own, which was less council-y and more organizationally,
which was very challenging. It's coming back to councilness, but it
alienated some of the agencies, so it moved away from that great
integrated planning space that it had started to be. But it still, it's
a great organization and it's doing some really good stuff.
-
Collings
- In terms of these retrofits, has anybody sort of with means kind of
stepped up to do their house this way? I'm thinking of some of the
Laurie David and these types of people?
-
Lipkis
- It's interesting, a number of people are trying to do it on their own.
There's quite a lot of barriers. The city owns the rainfall and so the
old codes still apply, which require all water to go to the street. So
different people at Building and Safety pretty much tell you no when you
apply. If someone comes to us and tells us that they want to do it,
we'll help them get through the regulatory framework to allow it. One of
our donors didn't tell me, but she got turned down and was really,
really frustrated.
-
Lipkis
- But my approach was instead of trying to find more individuals to do it,
because it's really expensive to do on your own, it's the equivalent of
self-funding your own solar system, which is actually more money, more
money than the water catcher, but it's more than most people have to
spend. Nobody should have to bear that burden, because you're not asked
to chip in $10,000 each time a new sewage treatment plant is built or
power plant. A bond is purchased and you help pay it over time. That's
exactly the way this should be done, that it just shows up on your water
bill and it's not--you know, maybe there's a slight increase in rates,
but for the most part it shouldn't be a burden financially on you.
You're hosting this piece of public infrastructure that you share.
-
Lipkis
- So our approach has been to get the agencies to buy in and begin changing
policies, and that in fact, is happening. So that epiphany experience
that Carl Blum had at the house when we created the flash flood and it
worked so well, and there's great video footage from every television
station and newspaper showed up to cover it. He came back and said, "I'm
sorry, we didn't understand, we think you've cracked it."
-
Lipkis
- I mean, this was such a big day, because what had only been a concept in
his head from listening to me, nobody could picture until we built it
and then he saw how simple and elegant it was, and his whole mindset,
which is the mindset that afflicts most public works people in the
country, is that it requires unacceptable lifestyle change. People won't
do it and it's his responsibility to protect them from floods and all
this. If they're not going to do it, he's going to hang, because people
are going to get hurt and he's held accountable. So he didn't think that
what we were talking about was a viable option. When he saw how simple
and how doable it was and how manageable it can be on an ongoing basis
it totally turned him around.
-
Lipkis
- So at the press conference where we had this flash flood, when the report
said, "How much would it cost to do this?"
-
Lipkis
- I said, "Well, probably about $10,000 per house."
-
Lipkis
- He heard me answer and he blurted out, "But it doesn't have to cost that
much. We could do it in a weekend." He'd already been going through in
his head to see how viable this was. Everyone's house looked better. So
they would choose this, and it was not hard to do. So he called back and
said, "Sorry, we didn't understand. We think you've cracked it. We need
to blow up this model as quickly as we can, because we should spread it
throughout the county." And, "Andy, you said it's going to take fifteen
years, I, Carl Blum, know it's going to take fifty, and it's going to
cost more than you think, but we've got to start today."
-
Lipkis
- So we began working together. He said, "I have a potential place to try
this on a larger scale, it's called Sun Valley. We have a flooding
problem there, we were about to build a storm drain for $42 million,
I've just put it on hold. Let's do a feasibility study of scaling up
your idea here," and we did that. That resulted in them saying, "Yes,
let's move ahead," and then began full planning in the EIR. Six year's
worth of watershed planning for that neighborhood. And the Environmental
Impact Report and all of it was passed, approved, two years ago by L.A.
county supervisors.
-
Lipkis
- The interesting thing is it also included another cost benefit analysis,
an updated one, that showed that the cost of the option that they chose,
the path they chose to follow, would cost around $200 million instead of
forty-two million or fifty million, but even the $200 million, would
generate back $300 million in benefits to the city and the county, so it
was worthwhile. The county signed on and said, "Let's do this," and the
work has begun.
-
Lipkis
- So the first thing we did was retrofit was a park, which is at Sun Valley
Recreation Center, it actually grabs floodwater from the whole watershed
above it, brings it into the park, cleans the water through a great
filtration system, puts it in the ground underneath, two huge basins.
What the community got for that, what we brought in a grant of nearly a
half million dollars to build a new soccer area with lights, community
jogging track, the two baseball fields were renovated. So the community
gets better, the park gets better, underneath is this whole water
filtration, infiltration groundwater recharge machine. We transformed
the park from a water user to a water supplier. This one is good,
because the City Watershed Protection Division is managing the
underground equipment. The county paid the seven million for
installation. The Parks Department gets the park and manages the
surface. So it's a multi-agency affair and it's working well.
-
Lipkis
- We've built two other big projects, retrofitting two schools, putting in
watershed gardens or parks on the campus. Those have not faired so well.
They function perfectly, they did the right thing, but the school
district was lovely in that they let us raise money, bring more money
into the campus and change the campus, and even after approving the
projects they, on one in the valley, they now claim that it wasn't a
good design, and they don't know how it happened, because some trucks
needed to get to a certain place and were driving over this beautiful
green river that the kids had engineering and thought through. But the
district did approve it, because we couldn't have otherwise built it.
-
Lipkis
- Anyhow, we brought in the outside money in each case, but that was for
construction and no agency--well, the district won't even let another
agency maintain the stuff, as far as we know, but they're not deployed
around water quality and all of that. So they haven't done the kind of
maintenance that we think is needed to keep the systems functioning. We
need to have that more active partnership to bring in the flood control
and storm water and watershed agencies, along with the Department of
Water and Power, in partnership with the school district, to create the
right investment fund for both installation and maintenance.
-
Lipkis
- So there are stunning examples. One is called the Open Charter School
near Westchester, and the other is in Pacoima, the Broadous Elementary
School. Pictures of all that is available on our website.
-
Lipkis
- So here we are twelve years after I started that project, or fourteen,
depending on what you pick as the start date, and we've had an
incredible impact. There are 8,000 homes in that watershed, we're hoping
to retrofit up to 40% of them with cisterns, with whole new landscapes.
I would like to see more. The county is working to raise that money.
Good news, we have a new administration in Congress, we should be trying
to get some of that resource. But at least half the money should come
from local, and the city and the country are working together more than
ever before to combine their money. The mayor is very supportive, as is
the council.
-
Lipkis
- In the process of that watershed planning effort in Sun Valley, L.A. city
began it's every-ten-year waste water master planning process, as
required by the EPA. They decided to take a look at an integrated
approach, instead of just waste water, bring in water supply and storm
water and waste water just as I had been saying. They had been thinking
about some of that, you know, more and more the watershed mentality was
starting to catch on. So they asked the question, "Would it be feasible
to do this?" The answer back was, "Yes, and people would support it for
cost savings and efficiency in the long run."
-
Lipkis
- So we were part of that feasibility study. I was hired by the city during
that process and then stayed on as a consultant for the next round
mostly as an educator facilitator-translator to help translate the
message to different populations. Sometimes different engineers from
different fields couldn't talk to each other, because they used the same
words, but it meant different things. Definitely community members of
all sorts. We had 175 stakeholders, community leaders, as the steering
committee for this, and it included the Jarvis Taxpayers, as well as the
building industry, as well as environmental groups, really diverse group
of community leaders. It became my job along with city staff and
consultants to really educate them about what the possibilities were. We
took them to the house in South L.A. I ran a whole day workshop on our
cost benefit analysis and modeling tools. So especially the most
conservative could look at those numbers and understand what they meant,
where they came from, and that it was actually going to, long-term,
achieve a savings. Everyone signed off on the project with consensus.
The city had not seen that before. It was huge.
-
Lipkis
- So now that has been--it was called the IRP, Integrated Resources Plan,
for the city of Los Angeles Wastewater Program. It just passed the city
council through its environmental impact report, and early
implementation has begun. So we'll see more resources from that going
into Sun Valley, but also citywide. Hopefully, we'll be able to use this
to really scale up for the cisterns and gray water and all the things
that need to happen.
-
Lipkis
- So from, we just went through this very, very quickly, it's actually a
much longer story, but from that vision to reality, twelve years. Very,
very long road. Probably the biggest, clearly the biggest, longest
project I've ever done and most impactful.
-
Lipkis
- Now we arrive at today, and so where are we? TreePeople still trying to
increasingly practicing strategic planting, trying to get more people to
do it, but even getting the agencies to change that or come up with the
resources for it is a very long, slow process. We're looking forward to
a special planting coming up sometime, hopefully, this year in Venice,
where new storm water boxes that support--you cut into the curb and we
can create a cistern tree well, a place to plant a tree and the tree
helps collect the water and clean it and store it in that well all along
the street. So the polluted runoff turns into water for the trees. These
are being tested on the East Coast. We're going to try the first ones
here in L.A. soon, about fifty trees on Grand Boulevard. The technology
is very young and it's a bit scary, but there are other technologies
coming online with engineered and manufactured soils, which also can
support the trees and provide the water. So we're hoping to be able to
test all of those.
-
Lipkis
- TreePeople is in for the long run to keep facilitating as a partner with
the county the implementation of Sun Valley. It's a long-term project.
Politicians come and go, staff come and go, who's going to keep
[unclear]? It becomes part of our role and our promise to the community.
A huge long story about managing that stakeholder process, educating, in
a predominantly Spanish-speaking population to accept a longer term
solution that was not a storm drain, which they had been promised for so
long.
-
Lipkis
- So moving ahead, I took a sabbatical. I was granted one from the Durfee
Foundation, and I realized on it that if all I did--it would be possible
for me to stay so locally focused on Sun Valley and stuff, just to make
sure it happened, and our notion of integrated urban ecosystem
management happened, that that won't be all the way done with proof of
concept until sometime in my sixties or later, and we can't wait. The
world can't wait. So we've got the science, we've got the economics, and
it's time to start extrapolating. I sort of hate to do that on one hand,
because I'd love to have everything proved, but it's viable for the
engineers and it works. The biggest challenge is getting, now, the
public to see and understand this is a whole new way of looking at a
city and a whole new way of looking at their life. That cities and the
world doesn't exist without them. This notion that the humans are
somehow separate from the ecosystem just doesn't work anymore. Everybody
is truly a manager of the environment, whether they like it or not.
Every dollar they spend, every penny they spend is having consequences
often quite negative in people's lives, whether in China because of what
we're buying, or in the water that we drink is draining all the way from
Montana and Utah. It's killing off species of dolphin in the Gulf of
Mexico, because the water from the Colorado River isn't getting to the
end anymore, it's coming here.
-
Lipkis
- So what we do is causing great impacts. So the notion that you can make a
difference is really very harmful; you do make a difference with every
penny you spend, everything you do, it may be positive, it may be
negative, it's most likely negative if you're not well informed. It's
not that your intent was bad. We got a city of great intending people,
but right now we're one of the world's largest contributors to global
warming because our per capita income and how we spend it, because we
drive so much, because we use so much water and so much energy. We can
change that.
-
Collings
- Well, by shifting to watershed management, you're asking people to
envision the future. You're asking them to envision, you know, a
different way of doing things, whereas when you're focusing on the tree
planting there's something very, sort of nostalgic and sort of poetic.
Everybody knows the value of a tree.
-
Lipkis
- The poetic value, but not the--
-
Collings
- Yes, exactly, the poetic value, that's very easy to sell.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, it's mythical, it's poetic, it's romantic. Don't pollute it with
science, they say.
-
Collings
- Right. But precisely you're turning to this more systems model engineer,
and that sounds like a very different proposition.
-
Lipkis
- Well, it is. It is and it isn't. I, being a unifier, think it's the same.
It's this progression of--that's uncomfortable for a lot of people, but
it was uncomfortable when we started talking about recycling and it was
uncomfortable when we started talking about storm water and we built
major programs with the city for both of those. Many people come to me
and say, "You know, you need a new name, because TreePeople just doesn't
do it."
-
Lipkis
- I go, "Well, yes, and you need to understand what a tree is, because a
tree is a sustainability machine. It is a flood control machine. It is a
water supply machine. The tree and the mulch and everything around it is
one of the most effective water cleaning technologies known on earth. It
don't get much better than that. There are some very, very expensive
reverse osmosis treatment systems, but you can't drink water that comes
out of a thorough reverse osmosis system, it will kill you, because it
strips all the minerals out and acts as an acid that will eat your body.
In terms of purifying water and making it ready for humans and for life,
trees and the soil and that whole ecosystem around the roots is what
cleans and purifies and has for all the millennium that this planet has
functioned. And trees are energy machines and all of that.
-
Lipkis
- So we're toying with what's next. I am getting back to a level of
independence to work on vision and communication and leadership and
technology to help people see this stuff, help people be motivated, help
give people feedback so they can begin as individuals and as families
and as communities acting as these managers, and I'm very excited about
that. Huge, huge education job to do, to have people see and understand
the world works a lot differently than the mythology that they've grown
up with. Our challenge will be to make it romantic, not scientific, but
to have it be grounded in science, so they actually know and believe and
get the feedback that they are making a difference positively.
-
Collings
- So can TreePeople continue as a volunteer organization with this new
focus?
-
Lipkis
- I believe it can. So it comes back to the Million Tree Campaign as a bit.
Will the mayor's million trees be part of our ability to make this
change? I hope so some. I don't know if the sequencing is going to work.
I was talking with someone this morning, who was hearing me talk. She
said, "Yes, God, now post-[Hurricane] Katrina we begin to really see
stuff differently." This issue is not just Los Angeles, it's all over
the world, every new city, every big city. Europe is now having
perpetual urban flooding, people getting killed, because it's been so
over paved. Cities like London, where there's abundant water, is now
coming up water short in terms of drinking water. Their people have been
on water restrictions for the last couple of years, because of drought
and shortage of drinking water. Not a shortage of rainfall, not a
shortage of water, but drinkable water. Happening all over the world.
-
Lipkis
- So was invited last year to go to China to speak to officials in
Shenzhen, a city that twenty years ago had 50,000 people and today it's
nine million.
-
Collings
- Oh, really?
-
Lipkis
- Yes. Also met with the Chinese federal officials in forestry and
environment. They love our model. They want to copy it. They basically
said, you have to make it succeed so we can lift it and copy it, because
they know they're--they're also functioning unsustainably and as their
economy grows their consumption is starting to really expand. So many
places threatened to way overtake L.A.'s negative impact on the world.
-
Lipkis
- So what am I saying? We need to succeed here, but I can't just stay
focused on L.A. TreePeople needs to do what it does, keep educating and
motivating people. I need to go deeper in creating tools that will help
people see and understand what's possible. To see and understand that as
humans, part of their biological programming, is to participate in
healing and that that can make them happier and healthier. To get the
agencies to see that this can work. So I've got a lot of stuff carved
out for me. Is it going to be separate? Is it going to be still a
special project of TreePeople? To be determined.
-
Collings
- Yes, because earlier you were saying that you had given some thought to
whether TreePeople could become a national or international
organization, and then you had decided against it, because you felt that
it was, for an organization of that sort, to work it had to be grounded
in the community it came from.
-
Lipkis
- Local.
-
Collings
- Yes.
-
Lipkis
- Local information, local problems, local leadership.
-
Collings
- Right, but precisely you're suggesting this is not a local problem.
-
Lipkis
- Well, the problem and the technologies of solution there is an approach,
an ecosystem-based approach, an integrated approach, that there's an
international need for. The specifics actually turn into local again,
because each different ecosystem has a different function. We could call
them all forests, but they're all very different. There may be soils in
which you can infiltrate water and clean it, or maybe you have to use
cisterns, because there's more water available. The economics of doing
one thing isn't necessarily the same. We have tested the approach.
-
Lipkis
- I was brought to the city of Seattle to help run a six-day charette there
sponsored by their, basically their public works department. They needed
to put a forest back into Seattle, because they needed to recreate the
salmon habitat in the city because they had wiped it out under a good
premise. They took all their storm water and instead of sending it
polluted to the bays and killing the creeks and the bay, they took all
the storm water and put it through the sewage treatment plant. The
problem is they robbed all their water from the creeks where the salmon
spawn and they're going extinct and they need to reverse that, to fix
that, to bring the salmon back. We were actually hired to take this
T.R.E.E.S. concept and apply it in Seattle and it's very exciting. They
are taking it very seriously and well on their way. Their story was on
PBS last night.
-
Lipkis
- So it's interesting that you raise the question about that juxtaposition
of the community organizing strategy under the brand TreePeople and
having a homegrown citizen forestry operation, versus this
infrastructure approach. I mean, one is bottom up, which definitely
needs to be local, and one is top down, which there are protocols that
will be similar in every city, but the specifics have got to be
different everywhere, because the problems are all different.
-
Collings
- Right.
-
Lipkis
- So in every case, the notion of viewing and understanding the local
ecosystem is critical, bringing everybody to the table and managing as a
whole is critical. I mean, it's just like the human body. As medicine
got more specialized and you have heart people and liver people and
brain people and nerve people, all those different doctors who
specialized, they started fixing those systems that they knew and
missing other issues and losing the patient. Only recently has medicine
begun to get integrative. They quite resisted that and lost a lot of
people. So here the highest level professionals are the most resistant
to doing that integration. Cities are the same, and yet we can't afford
to be hemorrhaging the cash, the resources, the world can't sustain it,
our cities can't sustain it, our people can't sustain it. Learning to
think and do integrated is critical.
-
Lipkis
- So my question is, what's the highest best use of me, and what's the most
effective--me being one of the few champions of this at this point,
what's the most effective way to get the thinking out. We want
populations to demand the efficiency of their politicians and--
-
Collings
- Shall I pause?
-
Lipkis
- Yes, thanks. [recording interrupted]
-
Collings
- There you go. You were talking about individuals demanding the
efficiency.
-
Lipkis
- Yes. So my job now in short term is to take all the lessons we've learned
and put them into a really compelling package of a new vision to help
people look at the city and go, "Oh, my God, it's right there and we
never saw nature, that we're part of it, it's there." And to have people
begin to understand that adrenalin drip in them that actually compels
them to try to do stuff to help, but that all the pathways to help have
been cut off because we professionalized helping. When somebody's hurt
in an accident, we don't know how to do healing before the paramedics
and others show up. Well, the fact is just touching someone, talking to
them, holding them, can keep them from going into shock.
-
Lipkis
- You know, there are all these amazing signs that we have with research
that people have shown that people's T-cell counts go up when they
volunteer. So I mean, there's incredible evidence of the need for people
to engage with each other and helping, and yet you don't see pathways
and call for that.
-
Collings
- Shall I pause?
-
Lipkis
- Yes, thanks. [recording interrupted]
-
Collings
- Okay.
-
Lipkis
- So I hope to write a piece that will be a source document that will
become material for multimedia to deliver in the most compelling way. Is
it TV? Is it movie? Is it web? It may be all of those. That's what I'm
starting to work on now, actually talking to Google about a project and
we'll soon talk to some publishers about what this package is, because
it's important to get the vision out there. TreePeople doesn't have to
do it in any community. We have be asked to share the inspiration and
help in some way and we have to think about what that's about, but to
have a clarifying, transforming vision that it's time for, and people
are waking up. Hopefully they'll stay awake, but I don't know. The Al
Gore movie [An Inconvenient Truth] is helpful. But we've seen three
cycles of global environmental awareness and then drop, but it's kind of
a like a spiral, it never goes all the way down. But we need to keep
raising that literacy and that motivation.
-
Collings
- So you think that the engineering professionals that you deal with in
this project are like more environmentally aware in the sort of more
holistic sense, than the ones that you were dealing with perhaps twenty
years ago?
-
Lipkis
- Yes. A whole new generation, they came up with environmental ed. They're
still not getting trained in the schools how to do this integrative
management yet. That's another leap that has to happen. But they're
coming in with the values, they're coming in with the sensibilities,
there's more learning about watershed approach, low-impact development
approaches. So UCLA's starting to teach bits of that and the USC School
of Engineering, when I first started speaking at these infrastructure
summits that the American Society of Civil Engineers had, I was this
oddball. Well, they issue an infrastructure report card every year.
Well, in ten years it has radically changed. They're now
preaching--they're starting to preach more integration. They are
certainly talking watershed and water quality, because it's still
engineering.
-
Collings
- Right.
-
Lipkis
- The interesting thing from the companies, there are a couple of
companies, CDM, Camp Dresser and McKee, CH2M Hill, who were the leads on
the city integrated resources program. Montgomery Watson is another one
who worked with us on Sun Valley. There's others. They're increasingly
embracing this and getting business, doing it. City of Santa Monica is
hiring them. Another one is called Psomas. I did a training for their
staff and they want more. So it's happening.
-
Lipkis
- It's time for me, now at the--sort of finish this twelve, fourteen-year
cycle, and I have to now, and now going into a strategic assessment with
a number of key advisors to go, "Okay, we've shown what's possible, and
we've gone way beyond a single house, and a single school, to a whole
system, given what's happening in the world, the urgency is there. So
how now to most effectively deploy this information?" So it translates
into policies and programs and action.
-
Lipkis
- Because where I was going when the phone rang, is people need to demand
it of their governments, because the agencies don't want to work
together. It's very comfortable to have your own turf and it's very hard
to work together, and yet with computers we have the tools to synthesize
and do integration. The cost of lack of integration is hemorrhaging
cash, hemorrhaging lives. The cost of lack of integration, when it comes
to intelligence, is 9/11's, or when it comes to climate intelligence, is
unprepared Hurricane Katrinas.
-
Lipkis
- So the need for that is out there, but there's a public conversation of
people demanding that and there isn't yet places training people much
how to do that. That's starting to happen, but we really, I think that
this is a set of thoughts that can go critical. I'll have to pick which
piece.
-
Collings
- Yes. So earlier on, you were asking individuals to participate in the
sense of planting trees, and now you're asking them to participate in
the sense of learning something and demanding something?
-
Lipkis
- Well, believe it or not, it's still planting. We're basically saying to
people, our mission is to inspire, has been lately, to inspire people to
take personal responsibility for the urban forest and educate and
support them in planning and caring for trees in the urban forest where
they live and to improve the neighborhoods in which they live, learn,
work, and play. That's transforming slightly to inspire people to take
personal responsibility and participate in making this a sustainable
urban environment, as a model for the world. So that's TreePeople's.
-
Lipkis
- We've developed inside that a primary strategic objective of creating
functioning community forests in every neighborhood in L.A. So now we're
starting to say, "Yes, don't just plant a tree, you need to--" and that
whole notion still of where you live, learn, work and play, means
there's four areas where you're needed. Where you live for sure. Where
you learn, the schools in your neighborhood. Where you play, the parks.
Where you work. Those are the places you touch that are part of your
daily life and we want to invite people in a really fun, compelling, not
overwhelming way, to think about how they'll take action in each of
those, not just one of them, and how to do sustained action. That's
where the whole notion of incentives has to come back in.
-
Collings
- Yes.
-
Lipkis
- So I'm thinking of creating a world-class music event with people like U2
and all these people that will appeal to a mass, and it may not be one
event, it may be multiples, because of multiple audiences and all of
that. But you can't buy the ticket. You will want to do anything to buy
a ticket, but there's no way to buy a ticket. You actually have to earn
it.
-
Collings
- That's what they do with the--on KROQ, the rock station. You have to
basically earn tickets by calling in when they announce--
-
Lipkis
- Exactly.
-
Collings
- You have to listen to the station continuously to get a chance to call
in.
-
Lipkis
- Right, and that's the simple term. Well, guess what? You're needed to do
more than sit and wait, and if you go and volunteer and you plant, and
you attend three or four maintenance events, because you've made this
lasting commitment. We can't force people, but we can make it exciting,
and then you've got your ticket punched the five times that's required
for you to then go to the event for free.
-
Collings
- That's a great idea.
-
Lipkis
- And it gets more complex than that. I mean, you know, if, like, our
house, we've reduced our waste by actively recycling so much that we
only put a quarter bin of trash, if that, in a week. Well, that's saving
the city a lot of money. If we do it right the city should say, "Thank
you, you're saving money, here's a rebate for your troubles." Or if
we're paying our gardener more to tend the compost and these systems and
things that we've put in, and that's saving large quantities of water,
it's saving the city from being fined for water pollution and not having
to build more landfill space, they should be giving a rebate that says
you're a partner and you're getting the job done and here's some more to
share back with your gardener. That's how we started generating those
jobs. More hours tending the land as landscape, as watershed instead of
as landscape.
-
Collings
- Right. I mean, this is just sort of a general question, but how has your
environmental activity impacted your personal life? I mean, are people
in your family allowed to buy plastic things from China? [laughs]
-
Lipkis
- You know, it's interesting. Yes, and what do we eat? It's certainly
affected stuff a lot. I chose to try being a vegetarian because of the
consciousness, I stayed it because my arthritis went away. So here was a
benefit completely unanticipated. Arthritis was not a fun thing and
medicine was not working very well. Nobody's talked about if you stop
eating meat your arthritis goes away, but that was the result for me.
Well, nice benefit to sustain that action. My family's not happy about
the fact that I'm a vegetarian, because I'm the main cook. So I do cook
meat for them on occasion, but not as much as I probably would be if I
was eating it all the time. Though Kate [Lipkis] is also quite
environmentally conscious because of her Australian background and
because of being frugal, and so she's the one who beat me up all the
time about not bringing reusable bags to the store, and it took a while
for me to learn that. The whole family's done the waste reduction stuff.
T hen we keep converting light bulbs and slowly converting our
irrigation system. Our last house had fifty trees, most of them fruit
trees, and this is a very different environment and I'm very--because
I'm focusing on whole cities, I'm having a hard time just doing a garden
here.
-
Collings
- Yes, sure, you only have so much time.
-
Lipkis
- Well, and perspective is really different. To do the design here as
now--I used to make terrariums, really focused on a tiny space and
making a beautiful little landscape in it and I could do gardens quite
easily. It's hard for me to change the scale from a whole city down to
my own yard aesthetically, but I need to do that. So it's definitely
affecting our life, but we're not living environmentally radical
lifestyle as much as we would like. I mean, we have solar hot water on
our pool, we don't heat our pool. We have a pool, though. Driving a
Prius. I ride a bike whenever I can. But, no, we could be certainly 80
percent more effective.
-
Collings
- Well, I was just wondering.
-
Lipkis
- Yes, but we keep pushing our own envelope bit by bit, but I think my job
is as much to be a viable model and the more radical you are the more
easy it is for people to dismiss this as all right for some, but it's
not where we're going. This sport can't be dismissed.
-
Collings
- Yes. [End of interview]