Contents
- 1. Transcript
- 1.1. TAPE NUMBER: I, SIDE ONE OCTOBER 26, 1990
- 1.2. TAPE NUMBER: I, SIDE TWO OCTOBER 26, 1990
- 1.3. TAPE NUMBER: II, SIDE ONE OCTOBER 26, 1990
- 1.4. TAPE NUMBER: III, SIDE ONE OCTOBER 27, 1990
- 1.5. TAPE NUMBER: III, SIDE TWO OCTOBER 27, 1990
- 1.6. TAPE NUMBER: IV, SIDE ONE OCTOBER 27, 1990
- 1.7. TAPE NUMBER: V, SIDE ONE OCTOBER 28, 1990
- 1.8. TAPE NUMBER: VI, SIDE ONE DECEMBER 1, 1990
- 1.9. TAPE NUMBER: VI, SIDE TWO DECEMBER 1, 1990
- 1.10. TAPE NUMBER: VII, SIDE ONE APRIL 20, 1991
- 1.11. TAPE NUMBER: VII, SIDE TWO APRIL 20, 1991
- 1.12. TAPE NUMBER: VIII, SIDE ONE APRIL 22, 1991
- 1.13. TAPE NUMBER: VIII, SIDE TWO APRIL 22, 1991
- 1.14. TAPE NUMBER: IX, SIDE ONE APRIL 22, 1991
- 1.15. TAPE NUMBER: IX, SIDE TWO APRIL 22, 1991
- 1.16. TAPE NUMBER: X, SIDE ONE APRIL 22, 1991
- 1.17. TAPE NUMBER: X, SIDE TWO APRIL 22, 1991
- 1.18. TAPE NUMBER: XI, SIDE ONE APRIL 23, 1991
- 1.19. TAPE NUMBER: XI, SIDE TWO APRIL 23, 1991
- 1.20. TAPE NUMBER: XII, SIDE ONE APRIL 23, 1991
- 1.21. TAPE NUMBER: XII, SIDE TWO APRIL 23, 1991
- 1.22. TAPE NUMBER: XIII, SIDE ONE APRIL 24, 1991
- 1.23. APE NUMBER: XIII, SIDE TWO APRIL 24, 1991
1. Transcript
1.1. TAPE NUMBER: I, SIDE ONE OCTOBER 26, 1990
-
MASON
- We usually start off the interviews in a chronological order, but since
this show is only going to be here [Gregory Kondos Art Gallery,
Sacramento City College] for a limited amount of time, we thought it
would be better to talk about the show while it's here. The show is
called Christopher Columbus Did Not Discover America
and Other Related Works. I'd like to ask you how you got the
idea for the series and how you got started.
-
DAVIS
- I went to the Association of American Cultures conference in Oklahoma
City in June of 1990, and one of the concluding remarks by the
contingent from the Native American community was that we should make a
statement about the fact that Columbus did not discover America in 1992,
which would be the quincentennial of this celebration, which is a myth.
In leaving that conference, the most impactful thing to me was to do
that and to start now. So I decided to do a series of pieces that stated
Columbus did not discover America, starting in 1990 all the way through
or into 1992. I've called this the Mythbusters
series because it is a myth. There are several myths that we tend to
perpetuate in our society, and this is one. So this series sort of takes
a shot and makes some puns on different peoples or situations that are
related to this.
-
MASON
- What were some of the ideas that you had? You said you started off with
a theme, and then you started to work with some of them.
-
DAVIS
- Right.
-
MASON
- What were some of the ideas that you started off with?
-
DAVIS
- Well, I had a lot of ideas that I couldn't narrow down for a long time,
so the idea of doing this rolled around in my head for a couple of
months to approach in several ways. But I basically narrowed it down to
an activity that I would do. I would mail postcards or do postcards that
would address the issue. The first piece was really stimulated by
sending it to the postal workers union in Casper, Wyoming. I was going
to do it as a part of a mail art series. And then I—
-
MASON
- So you always intended it to be a public—?
-
DAVIS
- I did. I always intended it to be a public statement, yes.
-
MASON
- Could you talk about the overall format that you came up with?
-
DAVIS
- Sure. The overall format is that these postcards are mounted on a piece
of handmade paper, and this handmade paper has grommets in all four
corners and a mini-bungee cord that's expanded out from each corner so
that it's like a hide or a scroll that's suspended like you would see— I
would say like you would see a hide suspended with leather straps,
except I used real contemporary materials. And underneath the card,
which is collaged and addressed to a series of people or entities, is
either a feather or an Indian head or a small item of significance.
Other pieces include a tooth from a prehistoric animal, and another is
the shape of the earth, which is round, making a play—on that particular
card—on whether the earth is flat or round.
-
MASON
- If we could talk about some specific pieces—
-
DAVIS
- Okay. We'll see how far we can go with that machine.
-
MASON
- I'll just yell if it starts to— [laughter]
-
DAVIS
- This one is a card— And I try to use all of the cards from the U.S.
Post Office official postcard which had a buffalo and mountains in the
background, because that sort of set the tone for the series. In some of
them, I try to do a play on words or make it a pun. This one is
addressed to the World Is Round Club, Columbus Did Not Discover America,
1776 Flatearth People's Lane, Cambridge, Massachusetts. And then below
it is a collage of the world actually as a round sphereHere's another that was addressed to the Textbook Publisher's Historical
Revelations Department, Columbus Did Not Discover America, Tall Tales
Place, Suite 1492, Chicago, Illinois. Again, a statement on the fact
that the truth in history has not been recorded in most of our texts,
especially as it relates to people of color in the United States. Here's
another one addressed to George Bush, president of the United States. I
chose him because he is the president and because he keeps referring to
the United States as America as opposed to it being the United States on
the continent of North America.
-
MASON
- What's the—? You have a little strip of writing in the shape of
California.
-
DAVIS
- The strip of writing is Latin. So many of the peoples in the United
States feel that all traditions started with Latin, which is not true.
Then I have a presidential seal. I collaged a postage stamp indicating
the Bill of Rights and then an arrowhead on the bottom which is pointing
up and to the right, which reflects where he is politically.
-
MASON
- And there's a penciled-in arrow that's—
-
DAVIS
- Well, the arrows that I usually do that are sort of my personal symbol
are usually up and to the left, which is reflective of my philosophy and
the way things should go, the way I think things should go.
-
MASON
- So that means left politically?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. This next one is addressed to a woman who is an actress whom I met
in New York [City] in the late seventies. An interesting person, and
she's also an activist—Sandra Sharpe. And then the Frances Williams
Corner Theater— Frances Williams is an old actress in Los Angeles from
the black community, or African American community, who has been in sort
of the vanguard of people of color participating in the motion picture
industry. So this is addressed to her. It's her actual address and so
forth. She's in her eighties and like a godmother in a way. Just
someone, an older person, who was out there and involved and still is.
There are a lot of things I could say about Frances, but I think people
should do their research on her. She's priceless. This one is addressed
to Jack [D.] Forbes, professor of Native American studies. And then the
fictitious part of this one is called the Get It Right Club. He does
teach at the University of California at Davis, and he is of black
American and Native American ancestry and has written a book about that
crossover. This one is addressed to Immigration and Naturalization
[Service], Ellis Island Association, New York.
-
MASON
- Is there a reason that you collaged the feather, this time, over the—?
-
DAVIS
- No. [It's an] artistic statement more than a symbolic statement. This
one is a guy who's a scholar. His name was Ivan Van Sertima, and he
works with the United Nations. He actually is involved in writing a text
that recorrects history, and he's active in doing that now.
-
MASON
- He's most famous for They Came before Columbus.
-
DAVIS
- Right, right. Why don't we walk around the other way?
-
MASON
- Yeah. This piece in the middle is that—
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. This piece is a collaboration with tree branches with an artist
named Maru Hoeber, who's an instructor here. We've done a couple of
pieces together, and I thought that it would be real significant to have
this statement right in the middle of the room, with the sand at the
bottom. It's in a tepee-esque shape, but is really a statement towards
sensitivity towards nature, which, I think, adds drama to the exhibit as
well as makes its own little statement.
-
MASON
- How is it a collaboration?
-
DAVIS
- The two of us talked about doing it and how it should be arranged and
actually put it together and installed it. I've been doing a lot of that
with artists, and you'll see in the IDEA [Institute for Design and
Experimental Art] Gallery exhibit a whole series of collaborations. Okay. Let's see. This man is an African American who is named Samuel
Beeler and is a chief of the Cherokee tribe of Virginia. In that part of
the United States, there was a lot of mixing between the Cherokee people
and African Americans. This one is addressed to Nelson Mandela. When he was here in the United
States in 1990, while he made a significant impact on the African and
African American community and those other segments of the population
here who were sensitive to his message, the Native American people
approached him to speak or to give them some of his attention and he
wasn't able to for whatever reasons. But I thought it was interesting,
because he is a man from an indigenous population of his continent and
these are people who are the indigenous people of the United States. So
in some ways it was like insensitivity or— It just seemed that he missed
an opportunity to speak to these people, because it was appropriate
since they have the same situation here in this country that he has
there in South Africa. So it was a missed opportunity for him, I think.
He really missed something, because I think these people had something
to say. This is a guy named Chief Edgar Heap-of-Birds. I met him in Dallas,
Texas, in 1989. We had done sort of an evaluation of— Was it '88 or '89?
We sat on a panel discussion group talking about issues of peoples of
color who are artists in the United States. He is a Native American who
teaches in the art department at the University of Oklahoma. His artwork
uses a lot of letters and words, so I just thought it was really
appropriate to dedicate one of these to him. Oddly enough, I ran into
him again in San Francisco a week ago and told him about this piece. He
was really tickled to know that.
-
MASON
- How does he use letters and words?
-
DAVIS
- He makes signs like highway signs and uses statements of historical
significance. One of them was something very negative toward Native
Americans in Minnesota that Abraham Lincoln had said. So it was some
revelations from other people and other groups that sometimes you don't
associate with people like Lincoln, because you tend to think of him
more in terms of his statements about slavery and the Civil War and the
Gettysburg Address. I feel like we can hold off on talking about these pieces until another
time. They exist other places, and it would throw a little bit of the
continuity of this exhibit off. And these are what I call the "Other
Related Works" because they are politically significant but not totally
related. This one dealt with Jesse Jackson's attempt at the presidency
in '88. Mafundi Thundercloud is my nom de plume which I've used on a
couple of occasions. Mafundi was given to me by a woman I went to high
school with, and Thundercloud came about when I was in graduate school.
So at one point I just embraced these names. I don't know. So it's
Mafundi Thundercloud.
-
MASON
- Where is Mafundi from?
-
DAVIS
- I think it's Swahili for artist and craftsman. Yeah. And Thundercloud is
a sort of a Native American feeling. In this one, I used a stamp from
Haiti. I've been there a couple of times. It's a real interesting place,
real powerful place. [laughter] It had a lot of impact on me. I really
believe in travel and seeing other parts of the world. You'll see in
some of these that I have collaged stamps from correspondence that I've
gotten from all over, but especially places of either artistic or
personal significance. Anyway, this one is addressed to the Chambliss
Children's House in Tuskegee, Tuskegee Institute, Alabama, which was
where I went to elementary school and where my dad [Alonzo J. Davis Sr.]
and mom [Agnes Moses Davis] worked on the campus there.
-
MASON
- Why did you choose to go all the way back to Tuskegee?
-
DAVIS
- Well, again, this is like doing pieces that are historically relevant. I
learned in elementary school that Columbus discovered America, so this
is where the myth began for me, I'm sure in complete innocence on the
part of the instruction, but nevertheless— So if this ever had a chance
to go— I mean, it would be great if this could be a part of this
elementary school's art collection. It would be historically
significant, one, because I went there, and, two, because it's the
school that needs to bust the myth, so to speak. And it's relevant to my
childhood. And we came out with this headdress stamp in this country, so
I've begun to use these. As they come through my personal mail, I save
them. This was Buffalo Bill Cody, and he represented the Wild West and
the whole other side of the coin, so to speak.
-
MASON
- This element here is just suggestive of a landscape.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, and art. I mean, I really wanted these to be very interesting
little pieces and make a statement. I didn't want the statement to
overrun the creative statement. So it was really an attempt to balance
this out. This last one was addressed to Columbus Did Not Discover America,
Resettling the Dust, Gorman Museum, University of California at Davis.
Again, Davis is a campus where there is some sensitivity to the issues
that are related to these peoples and to historical significance and
telling the truth. Or, at least, on that campus there exist people who
espouse those things. [Carl N.] Gorman was a man who had worked at
Davis, and the museum is named after him. He's of Native American blood.
They have a collection on the campus there that's quite significant.
-
MASON
- And you're saying that it's going to continue for two years.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, this series. I will just be continuing to do a piece or two as I
can from now until 1992. And where will it go from here, I don't know. I
talked to the director of City Gallery in San Francisco, who expressed
an interest in seeing some of the slides and so forth from it. So it
will take its own flight, hopefully.
-
MASON
- I'm sorry, did you say before whether the words and the message is sort
of centered in—?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, it's a postcard which is addressed just like a piece of mail.
-
MASON
- So do you get the name first and then you create the images?
-
DAVIS
- In my personal process, no. I created these images, and then I try to
pick the images for whom I would want to address it. Occasionally I
would say I should do one, like the one with George Bush. Part of that I
had and I hadn't decided. I said, "Wow, this would be great to use the
card with the postage stamp with the Bill of Rights on it to use for the
George Bush one." So the idea to do it to him and the card existed
separately, and then they merged, so to speak. So this was the perfect
card, and I had planned to do one addressed to him anyway. And then I
had some business dealings with the State Department's office of
information, USIA [United States Information Agency], I think. There was
a presidential seal on a business card, so I collaged that onto the
artwork, as well. [tape recorder off] I'll say a few things about this as well, as if it's something else.
There are three other prints that are pieces that have political
significance. The reason I've been doing printmaking in the last few
years is to have multiples of art that are available, theoretically, for
less to more people. In quite a few of the pieces I've done, I've also
wanted to take this art form or format to make a statement. So this was
a piece called Art against Apartheid, and it was
done in 1986. It's a series of six panels that are about six feet long
and about fourteen inches high. It's like a long, narrow band of artwork
where I used what I call "up" colors, because I didn't want this to be a
depressive piece of artwork, even though the issue is a depressing
issue. So I used a map of Africa. I used what we call in printmaking—in
this case, silkscreen a split fountain, blue in the back with texture,
and a flowing line which will flow from one panel to the other. The
first panel has "South Africa" written in it, and then below that in
sort of subtle words, spelled out, sort of like— In a way, as I think
about it, talking about this reminds me of Sister Corita [Kent], who
certainly influenced a lot of us in the sixties and early seventies with
her silkscreen works of art that included words or made a verbal
statement as well as an aesthetic statement.
-
MASON
- So would you say that most of your, quote, "political" work does have
writing in it?
-
DAVIS
- In this series of prints that I've been doing in the last five years,
yes, definitely. And other pieces, sometimes there's symbols and
sometimes I used images. Do you want me to talk about each panel or—?
-
MASON
- Yeah.
-
DAVIS
- Okay. I used "This Land Is for All" with a map of Africa, and then,
under that, I used the names of three people whom I had met or whose
paths I had crossed: Nelson Mandela, whom I actually have given one of
these portfolios to; Bishop [Desmond] Tutu, whom I met in Los Angeles
at, I believe, an Urban League dinner; and Miriam Makeba, whom I saw in
1965, I believe, in the Tivoli Gardens concert area in Copenhagen. It
was the first time I had been exposed to artists and music from South
Africa and the music about the struggle. The second panel has a heart and a map of Africa imposed on it. It has a
little title that's written at the bottom called "Hearts against
Apartheid." The third panel is "Save the Children from Apartheid." Written across it
at an angle, it says, "Take What Is Yours." In very subtle turquoise
abstracted shapes are little Bantu huts that are imposed on an outline
map of Africa with a series of arrows sort of shooting up to the left
from South Africa. The next one, I really like the way I took the fourth panel and used the
words "Take Apartheid Apart." I separated the "a" and the "p" and put an
"x" between them in the word "apart, " so it is a visual separation of
it, and it reemphasizes the impact of that word. Again, the map of
Africa, in this case a series of arrows going up into the bottom of
South Africa, just impacting and signifying that area. The fifth panel is part of the southern part of Africa. The words in it
say "Artists against Apartheid," and then a big "x" over the map area of
South Africa. And then the last panel—
-
MASON
- Is that a call for artists against apartheid?
-
DAVIS
- When I did this, there was a call for artists against apartheid, and
this was my opportunity to make a statement. And the last, sixth, panel
is a one with a flower blossoming and one with a flower dying, a real
subtle map in behind. The statement in it is "Man above Diamonds," in
that we should be more concerned with humanity than abusing humanity to
extract jewels and symbols of wealth from the earth. This piece [Art Against Apartheid] was done in
collaboration with Kay Lindsey, who's an artist and writer, and a guy
named Steven Grace, who did the physical printing—he's a master
printer—and Self-Help Graphics, which is a silkscreen print studio in
East Los Angeles. This next piece is called Act on It, and it's a
serigraph. It was done in '86, I believe, '85, '86. I think it was '85
that this one was done. It uses the word "vote" in the middle of it. It
has a watermelon and a guy who happens to be Reverend [Ralph] Abernathy
marching through Selma, but it's abstracted, so you really can't tell
who it is. And you have an African American guy running with a torch in
his hand. These were symbols of the struggle, of where we've been, where
we're going, and that we should use this tool to make change—the tool
being exercising the right to vote—and that we have a lot of people in
our culture, especially in Mississippi, who lost leg, limb, and life to
fight to get the right to vote, and we shouldn't take it lightly.
Anyway, these symbols are right in the middle of the word "vote," in the
middle of the "o," and then the word "vote" has sort of abstracted
patterns in and around it.
-
MASON
- It's incredibly textured. How did you—?
-
DAVIS
- Well, there's about twenty passes of color on there, so that's why it's
so rich. This is something I hope to have, either this one or something
from this series, made into a postage stamp. It's sort of one of my
lifetime goals to do it, because I think it's significant for our
population. We have so many people in this country who don't exercise
that right. Not that it's the only answer, but it's a nonviolent one. This is another one from that same series of using the word "vote." The
piece is called Now Is the Time. This was done in 1988, and it's made or
it's printed as a postage stamp about thirty by forty [inches] actually.
This piece has, in the background, "Vote Jesse Jackson in 1988." It's
sort of real subliminal, and you have to look real hard to find it.
"Vote Jackson '88, Vote Jackson '88, Vote Jackson '88" is behind
everything. Then the words "vote" are printed on top of that. I used
"USA" in the corner and a circle, which is pretty much like the indicia
and a canceled stamp quality in that upper area. And this particular
piece is called "Now Is the Time, " meaning that this was the time for
this man, and, for people who thought that this should happen, this was
their opportunity to make it happen by using the power of the vote as
the tool.
-
MASON
- Okay, we'll probably get into this a little more later. But I just
wanted to ask you, some artists feel that political art or protest art
is their way of participating. But, in your experiences, do you
participate physically as well as artistically?
-
DAVIS
- I have participated physically as well as artistically. In different
periods of my life, and depending on what the issue was, my
participation has been more or less. It's interesting to look back at
what I did in my late twenties, what I did in my thirties, and now what
I do in my forties. There are a lot of things that I like to do, and, in
doing them, I like to have impact. In order to have impact, it's
important for me not to spread myself too thin. So a lot of times there
are more issues that I espouse than I actually act on. At this phase or
this period of time in my life, I tend to pick an issue, and that tends
to be the one that I will try to focus my energy towards for whatever
given period of time, and then I pick another issue. I think we all
should be active within the society in which we live. But I hate to
admit that, somewhere along the line, I learned that I couldn't do it
all or I wasn't going to have the total impact on the world, so I had to
pick as opposed to being spread and not impactful. So it suits my
personal rhythm at this time.
1.2. TAPE NUMBER: I, SIDE TWO OCTOBER 26, 1990
-
MASON
- As I was saying before, we usually start off chronologically. I'll ask
when and where were you born, and then we'll talk about your background
and family life and your family background. Don't forget to give us
names, too, because a lot of people say, "My aunt, who was really
important," but you never find out what—
-
DAVIS
- Don't hesitate to ask if you catch me doing that. I don't know that I
will, but—
-
MASON
- Okay. So when and where were you born?
-
DAVIS
- I was born in Tuskegee, Alabama. It was really Tuskegee Institute, which
was just outside of the city of Tuskegee, Alabama. They had a hospital
on the college campus, and I was born in that.
-
MASON
- And what year was that?
-
DAVIS
- That was February 2, 1942.
-
MASON
- And who are your parents?
-
DAVIS
- My mother's name is Agnes Moses Davis, and she's from Anniston, Alabama.
And my dad's name is Alonzo Joseph Davis—he's Sr. —and he's from
Washington, D.C.
-
MASON
- Can you tell us something about their background, their professional
background or their interests?
-
DAVIS
- My dad grew up in Washington, D.C. His people came from Virginia. On
both parents' side there was mixed blood of Native American, European,
and African.
-
MASON
- Is that something that you grew up realizing? Or was that something that
you came to realize later?
-
DAVIS
- I guess it wasn't significant in the first part of my life other than
realizing that my skin was lighter than someone else's, so obviously
there had to be somebody else in the picture. But I grew up as an
African American in a community that was all black and a college that
was all black.
-
MASON
- How did the mixture go? There was mixture on both your mother and your
father's side?
-
DAVIS
- Right, right. I don't know how it went on my dad's side that much. He
does, and he's told me, but I haven't held onto it. On my mother's side,
I don't know my grandfather [Stephen E. Moses]'s heritage as much. He is
from the Macon, Georgia, area. But her mother was Delia Brockman, and
she was from the offspring of a Native American Cherokee. I would
imagine both sides of the bloodline is Cherokee, because Cherokees are
in the Virginia area all the way into South Carolina. She was from South
Carolina, Charleston area. She was born from a union of— Well, the first
generation on this continent was a slave woman and a slave master. They
had a child that took the last name of the slave master, which was
Brockman. And then, from that union, there was a male child who married
and lived with a Native American woman who was Cherokee. So my
grandmother is from that mix. Her name was Delia Brockman, and as we go
through this interview, Brockman will keep appearing. That was the first
slave name on my grandmother's side of the family that we have an oral
history of back to slavery.
-
MASON
- So your mother would tell you these stories?
-
DAVIS
- My mother, my Aunt Clara [Moses Wilson], Aunt Sybil [Moses]. In her
family, there were seven sisters and four brothers. So it was a large
family. She was the last of the kids in that family, so I had a lot of
aunts and a number of uncles.
-
MASON
- Who was living in the Tuskegee community, as far as an extended family?
-
DAVIS
- You mean from that or outside of the immediate family? That would be
friends or—?
-
MASON
- Well, what—?
-
DAVIS
- There were no other blood relatives living in Tuskegee. There were blood
relatives living in Anniston and in Birmingham [Alabama] that I was
aware of in the South.
-
MASON
- So let's start with your father. What was his educational background and
his personal background?
-
DAVIS
- My father went to Dunbar High School in Washington, D.C., finished
there. He was the first member of his family to go to college, and he
went to Howard University. He finished Howard.
-
MASON
- Do you know what he studied?
-
DAVIS
- I believe that his undergraduate and graduate studies were the same.
After he left Howard, he was in the ROTC [Reserve Officers Training
Corps] for a while, so he did a little military. Then he started working
at Tuskegee. Somewhere or other, he also had a fellowship to go to Yale
[University], and he went there for a while. Then he finished his Ph. D.
in child psychology at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis.
-
MASON
- So he studied psychology as an undergraduate, as well?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. And my mother, her father was a contemporary of Booker T.
Washington. We have family photos of Booker T. with the other black
educators in the South or in that region of Alabama. He's one of them,
standing on the steps to the courthouse, I think, in Anniston. He
started the first secondary school or primary and secondary schools for
black children in Anniston. My mother went to what was called a
finishing school, which would be like a high school. It was a boarding
school, and it was called Barbara Scotia. He sent most of his children
there. Then most of them went to Talladega College in Talladega, which
was just outside of Anniston, right between Birmingham and Anniston.
-
MASON
- Did either parent have an interest in the arts at all?
-
DAVIS
- My parents' interest in the arts was primarily in feeling like it was
important to know how to play a piano.
-
MASON
- Why was that?
-
DAVIS
- It was part of having some culture. It wasn't important to be a pianist
or to be a composer, but it was important to know how. In all of my
mother's family, that was the real key in their education—that they have
a music background. But none of them were creative, to my knowledge.
They weren't making or doing original compositions. It was more works
that had been written that were significant for people to play, Brahms
or—
-
MASON
- No, not Eubie Blake. [laughter]
-
DAVIS
- Right. No, no, no. Eubie Blake was not in the picture. [laughter]
Probably in the picture for some of the boys in the family who took off
and did their own thing. But it seemed like that upbringing was pretty
conservative and traditional. And seeing that they all went to this
private boarding school and most of the women who taught in this school
were Anglo, from the North, with a classical, European approach to
education, their perspective on culture didn't include the things that
black Americans were doing at the time, or I wouldn't think so anyway,
other than maybe some of the Negro spirituals. Those were always around
when we were growing up.
-
MASON
- What did your family think about spirituals?
-
DAVIS
- It was important. Those songs were real important. And some poetry. Paul
Lawrence Dunbar poetry was always something that was "You've got to
learn this; this is real important"—something that they would push that
was culturally significant to black people. And then, growing up in
Tuskegee, we were on a college campus, so we had some privileges that
weren't available to a lot of other kids in the South. We didn't know
that until we came to the West. Like kids, I mean, you take it for
granted, because it's there all the time.
-
MASON
- So when you say "we, " you're talking about your brother Dale [B.
Davis].
-
DAVIS
- My brother Dale and all the other little kids who were growing up whose
parents worked at the college.
-
MASON
- So there were a lot of other families?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, a lot. It was a little family town in a way. I mean, everything
centered around this college. And small commerce was centered around the
college too. There were people who owned grocery stores and dry cleaners
and gasoline stations. Just about all of the shopkeepers were black,
other than downtown. Downtown was like this foreign zone for which there
was the Piggly Wiggly market [laughter] and the theater, for which it
was blacks and whites on different sides. And the dime store had
drinking fountains that were black and white. I didn't get upset about
those as a kid because I didn't have to have it and I didn't have to use
those fountains.
-
MASON
- Were you generally not encouraged to go downtown?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, we weren't encouraged to go downtown. We weren't held back from
it. I rode my bike down there a lot just to check out what the white
folks did over there. As I look back at our situation, we were somewhat
privileged for people in the South at that time. The college campus had
a swimming pool, and all the kids who lived around that part of the
college or area or city could go there. And there were tennis courts. So
there was an outlet for activity that was not relegated to the downtown
Anglo community. I mean, the only thing about that, they had their white
swimming pool, and because it was whites only, I was always curious. I'd
go over there and look to see what was different. Just because there was
a "no" in front of it, there was a need to understand that or have a
sense of it.
-
MASON
- And what do you remember was going through your mind when you saw that
it was just a swimming pool?
-
DAVIS
- Well, yeah, it was just a swimming pool. I probably had a little bit of
an attitude of wanting to swim in there only because somebody said I
couldn't, not that I didn't have access to an equally fine swimming pool
on the campus. So when I look back at that kind of situation that I grew
up in, I was privileged by comparison to some of the other people or
kids around me. And I still maintain contact. I have better contact with those kids from
Tuskegee than I do with the kids I went to high school with in
California. They were more about keeping up with one another. There was
a real high level of consciousness among their parents, and we grew up
feeling like we have to make a difference. That we're special people,
too, and we have to be twice as good to be equal. So in a way, that is
probably why I'm so highly motivated to do a lot of things, from all
those kinds of influences and things that were issued as values and
things of significance and things to achieve or to work toward.
-
MASON
- Do you have just one brother?
-
DAVIS
- I just have one brother, yeah.
-
MASON
- Is he older or younger?
-
DAVIS
- Younger.
-
MASON
- Do you think he was impacted the same way?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, it's hard to get— You can't— I mean, that kind of an environment
can make you or break you. Even though he was a lot younger than I was
coming out to California, you can't get away from the significance of
it. The Tuskegee experience follows you. It's like a great place to be
from, but probably an awful place to be stuck for the rest of your life.
I can't speak for him, but I'm pretty sure I'm pretty close to the mark
on the fact that our roots from there made a difference in who we are. When I first came to California— Well, when I first started teaching in
California, I was really surprised at how unmotivated a lot of students
were. Having come out of the South— And even going to high school out
here, I wasn't the best student, but I was motivated. I was curious, I
was goal-oriented, and I had plans. They changed all the time, but I had
plans. And I didn't find that with a lot of kids.
-
MASON
- You said Booker T. Washington, and he was obviously really important. So
when his philosophy was taught to you, it was more about achieving
things rather than the side of his philosophy we always get in high
school—where you can't do art, you have to do industrial things or
manual things. I mean, how did that play—?
-
DAVIS
- We never got into that dialogue. I didn't grow up being aware of the
Booker T. Washington controversy between him and [W. E. B.] DuBois and
the speech he made in Atlanta. But I had a lot of respect for the fact
that I came from a place where people had a sense of self-worth. They
knew how to go for it. They controlled their own destiny through
business and commerce for the most part. And they were managers and
operators and teachers and barbers and grocers and groundskeepers and
watchmen, from doctor to lawyer, all the way down or up or across,
whatever that means. But we had the full strata of layers of human
beings in terms of accomplishments, social level, etc.
-
MASON
- So what was your father teaching? You said he got his Ph. D. in child
psychology.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, my dad taught psychology and education. He was the dean of
education on the Tuskegee campus for a while. And my mother worked on
the campus in the library. Prior to working in the library, she was a
schoolteacher.
-
MASON
- So while you were there, the civil rights movement sort of started
coming along. Were you aware of that?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, we were very much aware of black-white issues and the Ku Klux Klan
and the difference between the music from both cultures, from the high
end and the low end, so to speak. So from black gospel church to blues
that was played late at night, that you could only get from Tennessee
when it was nighttime through a station that had a strong signal, to
classical music to hillbilly music. The advent of television was taking
place then, so you would see that. You would see the hillbilly or
country-western music on television a lot. You would just begin to see
a few blacks on television, either through popular music— I guess Hit Parade. I think that was— And what else came
on television? They had the "Coca-Cola Minute," which would be a minute
of some significant cultural contributions that black Americans were
making. The guy who conducted the Tuskegee Institute choir was on that
"Coca-Cola Minute" once, and that was a real big thing. We all were
around the TV and so forth.
-
MASON
- He was a man named Dawson?
-
DAVIS
- Right. Yeah, William Dawson.
-
MASON
- I read in one of your catalogs, I think, that you said that he was
influential.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, he was sort of a creative mentor in that I guess he just saw I was
sort of a right-brain child walking around. And I had an interest in
creative kinds of things. It wasn't defined or really nurtured. He would
have me listen to music and point out things and ask me certain things
to think about that dealt with the creative expression in music, but it
translated over into the visual arts, which is the area that I have
chosen.
-
MASON
- What do you mean it's translated? Specific things? Or a way of
expressing?
-
DAVIS
- How do I say it? It's hard to verbalize. Well, the kinds of things that
he would ask me to do— And how can I translate this into visual art, I'm
not sure. But the kinds of things he would have me do were listen to
music or listen to drums or identify instruments or ask me could I play
or where did that music come from or could I interpret. So it started a
curiosity toward that kind of thing. He had traveled to Africa, and he
did a lot of interesting things that were fascinating to me. I just paid
special attention to the kinds of things that he would put before me. I
can't give specific examples of them. But once, on that trip back from
Africa, he did show me some currency from a country in West Africa, and
it had the image of an African man on it. That was real interesting to
me because I had never seen any other currency other than the U.S.
dollar. That sort of turned my head around that there's something else
out there. There's other money that's spendable. There's money with
other people on it who are from other ethnic groups and cultural
significances, and that the only dollar wasn't the U.S. dollar. I mean,
at an early age, it was sort of a world view through currency that was
just a gesture, but it just opened up a door, a vista that I held onto.
I'm sure he had no idea how significant that was at that time. This guy
just had a lot of creative energy, and I used to liked being around him.
He would be listening and interpreting, and he would have body
movements, reactions to music and things he was listening to.
-
MASON
- You mean he was also a dancer?
-
DAVIS
- No. He'd just jump or raise his hand, or "Did you hear that?" Or "Whoa!"
[laughter)
-
MASON
- He was into it. [laughter]
-
DAVIS
- He was into it. Exactly. And he wasn't a heavy proponent of jazz or
anything like that, which I feel like— Gee. But he was really into Negro
spirituals, and he had written some classical music, as well, in the
same way. He was from Anniston, Alabama. He was a contemporary of— He
was a little older than my mom. Actually, he just died, 1990, this year,
so he was well into his eighties if not close to or ninety. He was a
giant, but he wasn't understood on the college campus. I mean, he was
what people would call a space cadet today, or an egghead. There wasn't
as great a need for what he had to contribute, or people didn't
understand his significance yet. So he had some conflicts and some
turmoil in his life. He wasn't able to keep the job at Tuskegee, and he
went to Fisk [University]. He did work there, and then he came back to
Tuskegee. So it was sort of interesting following his life.
-
MASON
- So they actually ended up firing him?
-
DAVIS
- I don't know what— Letting him go or firing him or not renewing a
contract. You know that process. George Washington Carver was still
living when I was born. I think he lived until '46. And his presence was
still real heavy around, having been the inventor of so many things.
-
MASON
- Did you ever meet him?
-
DAVIS
- I did, but I don't remember. I was almost one year old. I know that I
saw him because my folks have told me that I saw him. But I take pride
from coming from this little town. A lot of people, black Americans,
have ideological conflict with the kinds of things that came out of
Tuskegee. But I espouse independence and self-sufficiency, and I think
a lot of that came out of having grown up there.
-
MASON
- Yeah. I mean, when you read Up from Slavery in
high school, sometimes it makes you really mad. You think that Booker T.
Washington is trying to limit what black people can do. But, on the
other hand, when you read it again, it just seems like he's trying to
achieve a balance between trying to— Well, I mean, they call him the
great accommodationist, but he was just trying to achieve a balance
between the practical and the creative.
-
DAVIS
- Well, the practical and the intellectual. And I think, as a kid coming
up, there really was a big thing about being self-sufficient, being able
to do— And the examples, the role models, were those of people who could
do for themselves. They were self-sufficient.
-
MASON
- What about other artistic or creative—? I mean, I don't want to say folk
art, but what about quilters and craftspeople? Were there any of those
kinds of people around you?
-
DAVIS
- They were around. I wasn't really impacted by them. I was aware of some
quilts, but not people making them. Just that they were interesting
things. There was a guy who taught on the campus that did ceramics and
would have exhibits in a little showroom on the campus. I remember being
fascinated with the objects that—
-
MASON
- What kinds of—? Sort of like sculptures?
-
DAVIS
- No, they were pots, clay pots, for the most part. Interesting glazes and
colors. There was another man there who was an artist who had a stroke, and he
was bedridden for most of his life, I think. Freeman, Mr. [D'Edquard]
Freeman. He lived across the backyard, down the ditch, through the gas
station, between the car showroom and a gas station, and across a little
bridge over a ditch that— He was this man who lay up in the bed who was
a painter. He painted with a paintbrush in his mouth and his toes. His
daughter was an artist, and she was one of my art teachers. Elaine
Freeman Thomas was her name. So that was impactful. I had a buddy named Gene Ramsey, and we used to run around drawing cars,
not unlike any other teenagers, except we were really into it.
Interestingly enough, Gene, who I thought might go into art, because I
thought he was good, he went into psychology, into my dad's field. But
drawing those cars was real important. One of the times I remember
drawing cars was when there was a parade on campus. President [William
V. S.] Tubman from Liberia had come to the campus, and they had a
parade for him. Here was a man from Africa sitting on the back of a
Cadillac or whatever, and we were drawing the cars. Not only was that of
cultural significance, but it was right into what we were into as little
guys.
-
MASON
- Did you think of an art career at that point as being possible?
-
DAVIS
- At that point, no. I was just doing it.
-
MASON
- Yeah. You were probably seven or eight years old, whatever.
-
DAVIS
- I was just out there, right. I was just out there. I tried to play the
trumpet, and it got stolen. My folks wanted me to play the piano anyway,
so they said, "Well, the trumpet's gone, so you have to take piano
lessons." And it didn't gel. The first instructor was too rigid, and
the second instructor and I just didn't communicate. I don't know what
it was. I didn't accomplish anything. He really tried to work with me,
but there wasn't anything he could do with me at piano, I guess. I did a
little recital once, I think. And I got my parents to let me take typing
instead of piano. So I took typing for about a year and a half to two
almost. There was another significant art experience in I think it must
have been about the seventh or eighth grade. I did some drawings and
paintings that I got some acknowledgment and acclaim for. That sort of
tipped the scale of "Hmmm, maybe I can do this" or "Maybe this is
something."
-
MASON
- So you were put up in a show someplace?
-
DAVIS
- Either it was put in an exhibit or I think I got a little award for
being creative or, when they write your reports, "Shows artistic talent"
or whatever. And it's funny. Just a little thing like that can set a
young person's track or path or focus. Another thing that I did in elementary school that followed my life
pattern and my lack of fear of doing that kind of thing was public
speaking. I wasn't drama oriented or whatever, but they would have me be
an emcee. I was like a little master of ceremonies in the fifth grade,
but that stuck. And then once I had to do the Gettysburg Address in some
little exercise or assembly program.
-
MASON
- You probably still remember it. [laughter]
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, parts of it anyway. I don't think I did it correctly all the way
as a kid, [laughter] but it introduced me to public speaking. It helped
me move away from the fear of standing in front of a crowd and speaking.
And it's gotten to be something that I sort of enjoy. I enjoy moderating
dialogue. I'd rather be the moderator than the guest speaker in a way.
And I like facilitating things. I like introducing and then summarizing
and giving a synopsis or keying in on important points made by several
people on a panel. I think that that experience as a kid set the tone
for my professional practices in that area as an adult.
-
MASON
- Who is your Aunt Clara and where does she come into this?
-
DAVIS
- Aunt Clara was sort of the matriarch of my mother's family, the stable
element, the one in Birmingham who had the house. I mean, she was old
enough to be my grandmother. When you understand that line of time
between the youngest child and the oldest child, I think she was either
the second- or third-oldest child. She was a stable person who ran the
only nursery school for black kids in Birmingham and was a social
person. She was in the society of black people, so she was aware of a
lot of— Things that I wasn't aware she was aware of as a kid. So when my
parents had problems, we would go there, or when there were vacation
times, we would go there. She had no kids. She was really into her
nieces and nephews. She was a good aunt, and she was always looking out
for us, the family, the sisters. She was my grandmother's backup. She
was like the other stable element of what was a really strong group of
black women out of that family. In a way, she was the one real stable
element. She always had an interest in what we were doing. When I had
the gallery [Brockman Gallery], while she was living, she was into the
gallery. And she was into PR [public relations]. She was always wanting
to promote the gallery and let people in Alabama know what was going on
in California with this nephew and so forth. She was the communicator.
All things went though her, so to speak. She was the channel and the
vehicle for who was— She was pretty organized, too, obviously. You know
how organized people are when they die in that the will was in order and
certain things are in place. And she handled a lot of the funerals for
the other sisters who died ahead of her and stuff like that.
-
MASON
- Amazing.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, she was one of those. Rock of Gibraltar, bigger than life. You
didn't realize she was a short person. It was hard to realize she was an
old person because she had a strong spirit.
-
MASON
- Is there anything else that you want to add about your experience in
Tuskegee? Other family members? Were you and your brother close?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, but we fought like cats and dogs, [laughter] Not right now that I
can think of. There were a lot of interesting people around. We had
fights and played hard and took risks and fell out of trees and down
ditches and played in the little caverns where Booker T. Washington and
the people dug the clay to make the bricks and went to the basketball
tournaments on the campus. All the black colleges would come to Tuskegee
to play in this tournament every year, and I remember that as real
significant.
-
MASON
- Why?
-
DAVIS
- I just liked it. [laughter] Energy, activity. I liked knowing about
Clarke College or Xavier University or Grambling [State University] or
Florida A and M [University]. I mean, the fact that they were playing
basketball was important, but it was also significant to know where they
all came from and that there were all of these colleges. Alcorn [State
University] and Tougaloo [College], Fisk. I mean, there were all of the
traditional ones, but there were a whole bunch of other ones that you
know you never heard of except around these sports activities.
-
MASON
- Did you pick one out that you wanted to go to when you grew up?
-
DAVIS
- No, I didn't, really. I didn't. I think my parents sort of picked one
for me. I think my parents would have had me go to— What's that black
college in Atlanta that's all male?
-
MASON
- Oh, Spelman [College] is the women's college and—
-
DAVIS
- I keep thinking, Morris Brown [College]. I was fascinated with Morris
Brown, but it wasn't Morris Brown. Morehouse [College].
-
MASON
- Yeah.
-
DAVIS
- Morehouse. So I think I was destined— I was being pointed in that
direction, I think. But we came to California before that real focus
thing took place. I liked Xavier because the guys crossed their heart
when they were going to shoot a freethrow. [laughter]
-
MASON
- That's funny.
-
DAVIS
- I mean, little stuff that kids pick up that's— And I would like to go
down— I mean, I tried to play in a tournament. I wasn't good. They had
little tournaments for kids, and I was real insecure about getting out
there. It really wasn't my thing. I played tennis. They had these clay tennis courts on the campus, so I
enjoyed tennis as a sport.
-
MASON
- What was the religious background?
-
DAVIS
- My dad was brought up in the Catholic Church and my mother was brought
up in the Congregational Church, and then there was a Baptist church on
the corner of her block in Alabama, in Anniston. So somehow she was
Congregationalist by— But if you couldn't make it that Sunday to that,
then you went to the Baptist church. Or all the other little kids in the
neighborhood went to the Baptist church, so there was a crossover on her
side. And my dad's side was straight-ahead Catholic from a basically
poor, working-class community in Washington. My grandfather drove a coal
and ice wagon and had a little laundry business. So definitely business,
working-class kind of people who were like a lot of light-skinned black
people who were affiliated with the Catholic Church. They were staunch
Catholic, just didn't move from it, just ingrained. But it wasn't
ingrained in him. As soon as he got to be an intellectual of sorts, he
left the church as the vehicle for salvation. And so, growing up, my
parents let me do whatever I wanted to do. So they basically let me
find— I had to go somewhere Sunday. [laughter]
-
MASON
- So you had to go to church, but they didn't—
-
DAVIS
- I had to do something. I think I was real glad for the outing, too. So I
went on my own, and I ended up going to the Episcopal church, I think
because other kids were going there whom I knew was probably a high
motivator. The guy who was the minister or the father of that church was
easy to communicate with. And I think I enjoyed the ritual. That was an
intellectual church more than the traditional black church.
-
MASON
- Yeah, they seem to be highly motivated.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah.
1.3. TAPE NUMBER: II, SIDE ONE OCTOBER 26, 1990
-
MASON
- We were talking about the religious aspect of your childhood. You ended
up having to choose, and you chose Episcopalian.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. And you said they were like—
-
MASON
- They seemed to be highly motivated people.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. Now, I'm not sure I chose them because they were highly motivated
people. I think I could just connect. They were intellectual. They had
an interest in ritual. It wasn't so dogmatic. And I was comfortable with
that religious experience, I guess. When we would go to Anniston
[Alabama] or Birmingham [Alabama], we would go to other kinds of
churches. I remember the shouting and the really spirited songs and
gospels and so forth. While it was fun to go, I guess it just didn't
hold me. I had that choice at that time, so I kept going back to the
Episcopal church.
-
MASON
- I can't imagine your father [Alonzo J. Davis Sr.] as a Tuskegee
[Institute] professor going to a shouting church on Sunday or letting
you go.
-
DAVIS
- He didn't go to church on Sunday. He would go to chapel, and in some
cases that was required of faculty. So we might go to chapel in the
evening with him or we might not. They would have the invocation, they
would have a guest speaker, and sometimes they would have the singing of
spirituals. That was a rather high-art kind of experience when I think
back on it, even though there were black spirituals. It certainly wasn't
like the down churches. This was more thought out and processed and
practiced and rehearsed. It was treated more in a classical sort of vein
in a way. But all of those church experiences were good ones for me. It
was weird seeing people fall out in church the first times I experienced
that. It was hard to understand how that could happen. That was then.
And now, having seen it and experienced it from my travels and just
going in other places— In Los Angeles, I went to the Presbyterian church
when we moved out there, because that's where the kids across the street
went, and there were good constructive activities for teenagers. You
didn't know that you were being programmed and kept out of trouble or
that there was trouble around the corner if you didn't do some of these
things that your parents said or had you do.
-
MASON
- I'm sorry. You said that you did or did not know?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, I didn't know. I just took it for granted that we had to go to
church. You just had to do it. In a way, it was just like education. I
mean, when I came out here and went to public school, there were a lot
of kids who were satisfied finishing high school, but, man, not in ray
family. College. You had to go to college. And I'm glad I was capable.
[laughter] Because that was the rule of thumb, and you had to do it, and
you would not be thought of well if you didn't accomplish that. I had
counselors in high school tell me I couldn't cut it. And the way I went
about my education during that time, I guess they were probably right
for the majority of people who were like me, but they weren't right
about me.
-
MASON
- Okay, so at Tuskegee there was a special school for all the kids who
went to—
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, it was kind of like a college.
-
MASON
- So you were probably quite well prepared for—
-
DAVIS
- Programmed. Prepared, maybe not, but programmed, definitely. There's a
difference between being programmed and being prepared.
-
MASON
- How were you being programmed?
-
DAVIS
- Well, I feel like you were being programmed because there were these
expectations built and these goals that other people had established for
you.
-
MASON
- Were they really specific things? Or was it just—?
-
DAVIS
- Well, to be a professional something. I wasn't really being programmed
towards the arts, but I was being programmed towards being a
professional in a field.
-
MASON
- So the art—
-
DAVIS
- If not an educator, a doctor, and if not a doctor, a lawyer, and if not
a lawyer, a person of significance in the community that made a
difference through having gone to college. It was just—
-
MASON
- So when you got the art award, it was just—
-
DAVIS
- For them it probably didn't mean too much, but for me it meant a lot.
But I don't think I would have had the opportunity to take off if we had
remained in the South.
-
MASON
- What year did your family come to Los Angeles?
-
DAVIS
- My folks split up in ' 56, so my dad stayed behind, and my mom [Agnes
Moses Davis], trying to make the decision of what to do— The thought of
a black, middle-class family breaking up was considered wrong. You're
supposed to stick it out or stay together for the children and blah blah
blah blah blah. All of the values of the South were impacting that
decision, whereas in California we don't practice those things, it seems
like. So I think it was real hard for my mother to leave the security of
family life and to strike out on her own with two kids. So that's one of
her greater accomplishments in many ways.
-
MASON
- Were you close with your father?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah—
-
MASON
- How did his child psychology thing work in the family?
-
DAVIS
- Well, I don't think it worked too great. My dad went to the school of
"Don't spank the kid, " and I had to be spanked. I mean, I was just one
of those kind of— I was shuffling around, not obeying, and doing my own
thing, spacing out, and not being tuned in or focused in the
stratosphere, being a right-brained kind of person in the household of a
very structured man who was very orderly, very much a scientist in his
approach. For things to have real significance, they had to be able to
be proved scientifically. If it could be proved scientifically, it was
valid; if it couldn't be, then in a way it was like it's not real.
"You've got to be able to prove it to me." And he was a disciplinarian
and— I just had to get some spankings. So that sort of broke the school
of learning that he had, I think, worked in. I think there were a lot of
things about me he didn't understand. I'd take things apart and couldn't
put them back together. I was more interested in growing flowers than
killing chickens or raising food. [laughter] And I had two left feet
when it came to sports. I mean, I was out there trying, but when I look
back on it, I was next to the last guy picked on the baseball team.
[tape recorder off] Where were we?
-
MASON
- We were talking about your father and how you kind of confused him. He
couldn't quite understand you.
-
DAVIS
- Well, yeah. I was just a normal kid, and, I think, being a child
psychologist, he probably had training on what this is and what this
isn't. I feel like I was just a little different than all— Not all the
other kids. But I heard the beat of a different drummer and responded to
a different kind of stimuli. Which is interesting. Some of my attitudes
are real similar to his. Especially as I grow older, it's real
interesting to sort of see.
-
MASON
- Scary or interesting?
-
DAVIS
- Not scary. We talked about some values that we both had in common:
perseverance, persistence, being focused, all of those things, the
importance of those things. He was a real disciplined man, and at the
time, as a kid, I was just out there in ten directions. As an adult now,
I really try to be focused, and I've been successful because of my
persistence. I've achieved a lot of my goals through perseverance. I
think that sometimes you can't really talk about those things at
fourteen, fifteen years old. I mean, now it's like we can talk about it.
I'm forty-eight, and he's eighty-one. So even though some of those
things are instilled, they were things that I had to come to on my own
and learn to appreciate in him as an adult that would be, in some ways,
something I might react against or not see the value of as a teenager.
-
MASON
- So your parents split. Now, how did your mother gravitate towards
California?
-
DAVIS
- Well, I think my aunts, specifically Aunt Clara [Moses Wilson],
encouraged her, probably my Aunt Louise [Moses], who she was close to. I
think they were the sisters closest in age, and they had gone to college
together and to Barbara [Scotia], the finishing school or prep school,
together. So they were tight. Louise had come back from being in Germany
with World War II and—
-
MASON
- I'm sorry. What was she doing in Germany?
-
DAVIS
- She was a WAC [Women's Army Corps] and headed up the entertainment for
the soldiers. She came out of Fort McClellan in Georgia and then went to
Germany right after the war and spent some time over there. I don't know
that it was specific to the black soldiers or not, but I'm sure, to some
degree, it was—her work and so forth. So that was interesting—her coming
back from Germany and speaking German and bringing us German lederhosen,
those little pants. That also was significant in knowing that you could
go somewhere else. Anyway, as a kid, I wasn't aware of the problems my parents were having
with one another. They tended to keep that to themselves pretty well. So
the rift in the family I wasn't really aware of, or if I was aware of
it, I was interested in something else, and I didn't focus on it, and it
wasn't a major stumbling block in my emotional structure, upbringing,
whatever.
-
MASON
- So it wasn't as if your father was like an alcoholic and you knew
something had to be done.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. If he was an alcoholic, I didn't know it, or if he was playing on
the family relationship, I didn't know it. All of the things that tend
to happen in family structures that are negative I was unaware of. Or
the positive. I lived there too. Everybody did what they did. I was out
chasing butterflies, trying to get a little collection. And if my
parents were arguing when I was gone, or fighting, I didn't know it. So let's see, where was I at? So then, in the summer of '56, I guess, my
mother went to Birmingham, and then my dad came up there. They asked me
did I want to stay in Tuskegee or go to Chicago or California, I don't
remember. We went to Chicago first on that trip. I liked to adventure,
so I was into going to Chicago, even though that was the only time that
I could tell that it was a crisis. So I didn't know what to do. And the
other conflict was, well, I could go play Little League baseball back in
Tuskegee. So my concerns were those concerns. Anyway, it was worked out,
probably with them, that I go. So my brother [Dale B. Davis] and I were
with my mom in Chicago, and then we stayed with some friends in Ben
Harbor, Michigan, who were originally from Tuskegee, the Woodfords
family. I guess, during that time, they were working out what to do. But
I'm a high-energy kid, and they sent me to camp with a bunch of other
kids in Kalamazoo. And then, when the camp was over, we were going back
to Chicago to catch a train to California. So we took the Super Chief.
-
MASON
- So how did it feel being out of the Tuskegee environment for the first
time?
-
DAVIS
- It was just all a new thing. I think I was just wide open to new— I
wasn't afraid. And, well, coming out here on the train was exciting.
Since for me it wasn't family breaking up, it was adventure.
-
MASON
- Yeah.
-
DAVIS
- My brother was young. He was pretty young, so I'm sure he didn't really
know what was happening either.
-
MASON
- There wasn't any—
-
DAVIS
- Traumatic—
-
MASON
- Or there wasn't that feeling of— Well, you were in a more or less
segregated black community. So there wasn't that feeling of, "Well, I'm
going to be in the North now, and things are going to be different as
far as the racial stuff is concerned"?
-
DAVIS
- No, no. No, we were going to California, and it wasn't about getting out
of the South for racial reasons. Now, we were very much aware of how
difficult it was to vote. I remember my dad coming home saying he had to
pay a poll tax and he had to take a test and remarking on some of the
stupid questions that were given to black people to answer on these
tests to qualify to be able to vote, like "How many windows in the White
House?" Things that were really insignificant in terms of cultural
affairs or knowledge of government or good citizenship or anything. They
were just stupid. And then, coming out to the West was like eye-opening.
There were real cowboys out here, Indians at the train station, people
selling artifacts that were real artifacts as opposed to what you saw in
a Tom Mix movie or Roy Rogers or Hopalong Cassidy.
1.4. TAPE NUMBER: III, SIDE ONE OCTOBER 27, 1990
-
MASON
- Today we'll just continue. We'll pick up where we left off yesterday.
Your mother [Agnes Moses Davis] had left your father [Alonzo J. Davis
Sr.] and came to California. And when I was listening to the tape again,
I had asked you why she chose California, why she came out here, and I
wasn't quite clear on— You mentioned some of your aunts. I was wondering
if you could talk about that again.
-
DAVIS
- Sure. I think the influence to come to California was probably twofold:
one, to get as far away from the situation; two, there was a family
friend from Birmingham who had moved to California, and this woman's
husband was a bishop of the A. M. E., African Methodist Episcopal
church, so his widow was living in Los Angeles, and so it seemed like a
place that was far away where there were some extended family
opportunities. My aunts [Clara Moses Wilson and Louise Moses] had called
out, I guess, to California or corresponded to see if that was feasible.
And there was a house to rent when we got here. So we basically were
able to just transition right in immediately. The other reason was her
desire to get a master's degree in library science. That process meant
enrolling at the University of Southern California [USC]. We lived in a
neighborhood that wasn't far from there, right near Fourth Avenue and
Exposition [Boulevard]. So I think [it was] that combination of things,
California being the place of the future, on the Pacific, being far away
from Alabama, and being a good place to start over, because there was
extended family and educational opportunity.
-
MASON
- What kind of neighborhood was that that you moved into?
-
DAVIS
- The neighborhood was a primarily black neighborhood with working-class
people with a sprinkling of Asian Americans. I went to a junior high
school called Foshay [Junior High School]. It was really my first real
introduction to some really hard-core kids as well as a multicultural,
multiracial situation. It was predominantly black, but there were a lot
of Koreans and Japanese and Chinese students there. There were a number
of Euro-American students who were in attendance there. It wasn't far
from USC, so some of those people who were real strong advocates of
public education sent their kids to schools in the neighborhood and so
forth. That was a real interesting mix.
-
MASON
- Were there conflicts?
-
DAVIS
- Were there conflicts? There were only minor conflicts. I think what
really happened, it was more normal than abnormal. The conflicts tended
to be more on kids who were haves against the have-nots than white
against black. There was some tension between a few kids from the
Algonquin gang who were black and Hispanic and some other little gang
that was— And it seems that junior high school is a gang time, so there
were all these little groups of kids. I had to learn how to fight and
negotiate my way out of fights. And I had to learn how to cuss. So, for
me, it was a great revelation of survival to come to California, because
I had to deal and I had to learn how to work things out. I had some
buddies who would protect me on my way home if there were some guys who
wanted to jump me for any stupid reason that junior high school people
can come up with. I had one fight in a classroom. A guy slapped me on
the back of the head and I had to retaliate. And then my buddies jumped
in on that guy. It was just that kind of tension. The kids would want to
intimidate you for your lunch money. I mean, it's just really what I
regard as normal for that age period in a public school kind of
situation, which I was grateful for, because it really did make me a
little more streetwise, definitely more streetwise, than I was coming to
California. There was an area that we discussed yesterday that I didn't cover that I
wanted to mention. When we talked about the racial issues in the South,
although where I grew up it wasn't a real, real issue, we were all aware
of it, and there was a high consciousness of it. There was a lot of
conversation in the family and in the community about the white kids
over there or the white kids on the bus. There were issues related to
civil rights. I remember 1954, when the Supreme Court decision came
down, as a big sort of landmark time. As a kid, I was rather naive and I
thought, "Okay, well, everything's going to change now, because that's
the law of the land." Obviously, it didn't. Two years later, we moved
to California, and I'm caught up in a whole other series of events.
-
MASON
- There wasn't as much talk about civil rights here?
-
DAVIS
- In California?
-
MASON
- Yeah.
-
DAVIS
- No, it wasn't as much of an issue, and there wasn't as much black-white
dialogue as there seemed to be in the South. And I've always contended
that the multicultural aspect of California keeps the tension down
between black and white people because there is— It seems like all
groups need somebody to work against or they have tensions with, and
here in this state it's just so diversified that everybody is subject to
be disliked by somebody else or another group that comes in on another
lower rung of life or work status. It's the old immigrant adage of
"Those new people, they're going to ruin the neighborhood." It's more
the new people than the black people. Although, when I was in high school, I was in a neighborhood, or just
outside of a neighborhood, that was changing tremendously. We
experienced a white flight where blacks and a fair number of Asian
people were buying into what is known as the Baldwin Hills community.
All the white kids I was going to school with, their folks started
moving. They moved to the [San Fernando] Valley and West L.A. And what
was a real integrated community rapidly became a minority or
predominantly black community. And the real estate values dropped. The
market dropped out because of the black flight into these communities.
There was a lot of tension among adults during that time. We weren't one
of the families that moved in, so we didn't deal with any of that sort
of conflict. One of the things in coming to California, in terms of being an artist— I
left Alabama with an interest in art, and then, when I got here and I
saw I had a chance to have an elective, I took art classes. I'd always
kept that in my back pocket as something I was fascinated with. But
coming out of a first- or second-generation, middle-class family—well,
second generation on my mom's side, first generation on my dad's
side—there was this real push to be a professional. Since the
traditional family had broken down, I was a little bit more on my own.
But my mom was going to graduate school and trying to run the house and
trying to keep me and my brother [Dale B. Davis] fed and him and me in
school. I had a little more freedom, and I got out from under the thumb
of a lot of parental expecta¬tions to some degree. So I was able to find
my own way.
-
MASON
- How did the junior high school experience, the classroom, the teachers,
the kids—? Did the kids tease you because you wanted to draw? Or did
they think it was cool?
-
DAVIS
- I didn't have any teasing about art. I had kids teasing me about the
shape of my head, or white kids who had never been in school with black
kids who wanted to rub my hair because I was amenable to communicate
with them. So there were those little things. And I had a hard time
learning to discern the difference between the Japanese and the Koreans
and that there was not only some physical differences but there were
name differences and there were cultural differences. Chinese and
Japanese tended to be a little more clear, but the Koreans— But all of
that was a learning thing. And then kids from Mexico who wanted to be
Spanish and— All of a sudden there were all of these other issues that
came into the picture related to different peoples and their races and
their identity. So I took these art classes in junior high school in— what was it?—the
ninth grade, liked it, began to make some friends, was fascinated with
Spanish architecture in Southern California. When I first got into Union
Station, that was like, "Wow! Unbelievable." And then the palm trees
tripped me out. I had a buddy that would take me down the street where
there were a lot of palm trees. It's real interesting that, when you're
used to a certain kind of geography and you're thrust before something
else, and it's out of your references of experiences, you get befuddled.
So here I was in all of these palm trees, and I couldn't find my way
home, because I couldn't make out palm trees. Whereas, in the South, I
would know where the magnolia tree was in relation to XYZ. So there were
a couple of times in L.A. that I just couldn't figure out where I was
because all the palm trees looked alike. [laughter] Then I went to Dorsey, Susan Miller Dorsey High School. There I started
out as a science major, and I ended up a science major, but I would keep
taking elective courses and would go to summer school so I could have
art class. So I just kept doing it. I was pleasing myself and I was
pleasing my parental expectations.
-
MASON
- Did you see your father at all?
-
DAVIS
- My father came through a few times. He left Tuskegee and went to work
for the State Department in Indonesia. I think there were some attempts
or overtures towards getting the family back together. It just didn't
work out. It wasn't a real issue for me. It might have been a little
more of an issue for my brother than me. I had a new-found freedom. I
could take art classes. I could do my thing. I was out from under the
thumb of a real disciplinarian, and my mom was busy trying to— She was
in the survival mode, so I had a lot of freedom to explore the creative
end of art as opposed to just the cultural end of art. As I mentioned
earlier, the family was real strong on the cultural end but not
necessarily on the creative end, because they know artists starve and
all of these stories about artists' life-styles and so forth, half of
which are true and half of which are fantasy. But we all have to answer
our own calling or work that out somehow. In high school, I was pretty much a green kind of kid. I wasn't real hip.
I liked to hang out with the guys who were hip, and I was a little
intimidated by the girls, but I always liked to make gestures like I
knew what was going on. I wanted to play sports, but I really didn't
have it. I wasn't hungry for football or basketball. I fantasized about
playing basketball, but I didn't have that mean spirit, "I've got to."
I wasn't driven. So I got a job, and I worked for a black radical
newspaper called the L.A. Tribune, and I worked
under a woman named Almena Lomax, who happens to be the mother of
Michael Lomax, who is in Atlanta, Georgia. He's a county commissioner,
something like that. A real interesting family. Anyway, she broke me
into sort of a radical, left way of thinking, questioning authority,
don't settle for, and the police are not God, and there are people who
are abusing or taking advantage of people of color, or there are people
of color who are not—
-
MASON
- So was this a pretty popular newspaper?
-
DAVIS
- It was a weekly, relatively popular. It constantly had financial
problems. But it wasn't a lackey, paper. I mean, it took a bite. It had
strong editorial statements and a real scrappy, no-nonsense
editor/owner. I was a printer's devil. I worked five, six days a week
after school, and on Saturdays I cleaned up in the mornings.
-
MASON
- So you were really attracted to the paper's outlook or—?
-
DAVIS
- I didn't know what I was there for in a way. I was a kid who wanted a
job. I wanted to work. I believed in work and was raised with a strong
work-value ethic. Then I am in this situation. I'm going, "Wow, this is
really different from the other black newspaper in town. These people
work real hard, and they have a real strong philosophy about the way
things should be or not." So that was a real positive experience. In a
way, she was like what you call like a godmother or role model or that
kind of a thing. [tape recorder off]
-
MASON
- I have to ask you what a printer's devil is.
-
DAVIS
- Oh, a printer's devil is the lowest-rung person who works in a
printshop. They had a Linotype that ran on lead ingots, so I would take
the lead type, clean it, melt it down, skim it off of a big pot that
would be in the back of the storefront where the paper was made, and
then I would pour it into these molds and make these ingots. We'd hang
them over the Linotype, and then the guy would— So I did all the gofer
work. I ran and got coffee. I cleaned up. I washed the type. I melted
down the lead. I cleaned the bathroom. Just you name it. But it was a
great work experience. I did everything. I didn't have a car and didn't
have an opportunity to drive, but I did get a license. I took driver's
training. So after I got my license, I was able to drive this woman's
car on either Wednesday or Thursday nights when the paper went to bed,
as the term was. And they'd make these mats which would get the
impression of the type, and we'd take them over to a big printing house.
So I would get to drive her car to the printing house. It was a real big
thing for me. I mean, it wasn't more than maybe four or five miles, but
it was a big deal. I'd drive back past my mom's house and take the long
way home just to get. a little drive time.
-
MASON
- But you didn't start a fascination with the printing process?
-
DAVIS
- It didn't really start a fascination with printmaking. With the printing
process, yes. I did some illustrations that were included, and then I
tried to do some things for the school paper. So I did a couple of
little things for the school paper, trying to be an art editor, but it
wasn't much. In school, I was an average student. I didn't excel in any one subject
with any straight A's or anything like that. I was a B and C student
mostly. Occasionally I'd get an A in one class or another.
-
MASON
- Was there an art club?
-
DAVIS
- There was an art club, but I didn't really participate in it. But I
would take a lot of art classes. I just worked it out so I had a lot of
electives. By taking classes in the summer, it allowed me to have extra
time for things that I— It seemed like almost every semester I had an
art class. So I ended up with basically a science and art major by the
end.
-
MASON
- So what did you spend most of your time doing?
-
DAVIS
- Assignments and sketching and doodling.
-
MASON
- So you were mostly by yourself in high school?
-
DAVIS
- And fantasizing. By myself or in a classroom situation. The classroom
situation was very motivating, because there were all these people who
were supposedly better than I was. I was fascinated with what they could
do within the creative realm. I was one of those kind of students— I
don't think I really stood out. I worked hard at it. I was driven, and I
was fascinated, but, from my point of view, there was always somebody
better than me. It's been interesting as an adult to try to look back
and find some of those people and realize that some of those people
peaked then and that was it. A lot of them did not continue to pursue
art or to become artists. They took other avenues. That really surprised
me, because I was so into their abilities at that particular given time.
But then there was always the adage that I would always hear from time
to time, but I didn't believe it, that the B and C students are really
the ones that end up going the furthest. In a way, I see that happening
or I've seen that happen with a lot of my associates. They weren't
necessarily the best then. They evolved, they grew, or they matured with
what they did.
-
MASON
- I guess sometimes B and C students are— A students are kind of the ones
who conform, and the B and C students are maybe more rebellious.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. I even tell my students today, "I know you can do a good job and
you can do it perfect and you can answer this, but I would like to see
you do something more challenging. Take the risk. Risk the B instead of
the A. Take it further out." Which is hard for them to embrace. And
these are community college students. But high school was also a
socialization time, some girlfriends and interacting with people from
different cultures on a more concrete basis, having dialogues, going to
little forums.
-
MASON
- To learn about their—
-
DAVIS
- To learn about them or to learn about people from the white church
across town and what they did.
-
MASON
- You were still going to church during, high school?
-
DAVIS
- I was still going to the Presbyterian church.
-
MASON
- Yeah.
-
DAVIS
- And they had a lot of activities. There were some camps and—
-
MASON
- So you probably started to think about college.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. I didn't plan ahead. I had a counselor who said I would never make
it to college. That befuddled me, because I knew that this family I came
from wouldn't accept anything less. I had to go to college. But I was
insecure. I didn't have my focus on at that time. I didn't really know
what I wanted to do, and I couldn't really sort of take off. I didn't
have the direction or the good grades like all the other kids who were
marching off to [University of California] Berkeley or Dartmouth
[College] or XYZ college. I didn't have it together.
-
MASON
- Art school was not an option?
-
DAVIS
- Art school wasn't an option. I mean, within the family structure, it was
like four-year college. I didn't think I could get in, so I didn't apply
several places that I wanted to go. There were two places. I wanted to
go to Hampton [Institute] because it had a history of art. And it was a
black college, and I remembered it as a kid. And then I wanted to go to
Antioch [University] because they had an interesting program where
people would go to school a semester, then work a semester, and then
come back and go to school again. So it was a five-year program. There
was work-study involved, and there was a lot of traveling.
-
MASON
- How extremely practical.
-
DAVIS
- I was really fascinated with that kind of education opportunity. It
wasn't abstract. Or it wasn't just abstract. But I was walking around at
eighteen, nineteen years old thinking I couldn't get in. I needed the
confidence. And I had applied to one small college. There were two, I
think. I applied to two colleges in California, in L.A., that I thought
I could get into. That was Pepperdine [University] and Chapman College.
But even then I didn't do the follow-through that I would have, should
have. So I applied and went to LACC [Los Angeles City College], which was very
important. In some ways, I say I got my best education at Los Angeles
City College. I had some dynamite instructors. I had people to help mold
a direction. I started studying the social sciences and philosophy and
psychology. I got my English up to par from the low-level English to the
college-level English. UCLA has that too. There's an English that
they'll let you take in order to take— I don't know. I forget what they
call it. But, anyway, I got that together. It was also a period of time
when it was a real radical campus, and there were a lot of issues
related to civil rights and—
-
MASON
- So you went there about '61?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, '60, '61. The guy who was known as Maulana Ron Karenga was there.
There was another guy who was a nationalist who was there, who is dead
now, and I can't remember his name. But they used to have these
tremendous debates. So I started becoming a little more political and
issue oriented. These instructors I had kept pulling my brains and
making me think of things in different ways, reading Richard Wright and
Kafka.
-
MASON
- Had you read any black authors?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, I had, but I hadn't read anything as— Richard Wright was
frightening to me because everything didn't work out all right. He
wasn't— [laughter] It's like, "Whoa!" It frightened me. And then I
learned about world religions and atheism and agnosticism and all of
that through this philosophy. There was a German philosophy teacher—I
think her name was Rachenbach—and she just had one of those extended
heads. She just really put it on you and challenged you and made you
question and rethink. And I took one art class. I took a design class
from a man named Johnson. And the class was right— It was just in sync
with who I was. I made the decision then that I was going to be an art
major regardless of parental— I excelled and achieved in that class. It
was a design class. It just felt right, and it just fell into sync for
me. But the other thing that was happening around that college was the
counselors were saying that only one out of ten of the people who go to
that school are going to—or maybe it was one out of one hundred—were
going to go on to a four-year school, and that kind of freaked me out. I
was like, "Oh, man, I don't want to be one of these statistics. This
can't happen to me." So I said, "It's time to get out of here." So within a year I had transferred to Pepperdine, which had accepted me.
I think they'd accepted me— I don't know if there were any conditions or
not. When I applied or when I was accepted in and I got into the art
department, I saw that there were other kids there that were on
scholarship, and I applied for an art scholarship. So I got it, and I
worked in the art department. It helped to augment my tuition that way.
My dad paid for my education. He was back, I think, from Indonesia by
then and teaching at Florida A and M [University] for a short while, and
then he went on to North Carolina Central [University]. But the
experience at Pepperdine was one of a real conservative church school.
-
MASON
- Yeah, I can imagine.
-
DAVIS
- And that was like, "Wait a minute. This is not— Is this Texas or
California?". There were all these people, from the Church of Christ who
were from Texas. Their view and outlook in life was contrary to what I
thought the world should be about. It was exclusive as opposed to
inclusive.
-
MASON
- So they didn't really experience the sixties.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. Their sixties was hating John F. Kennedy. I mean, I had an
instructor who was like happy when he got assassinated. I was
dumbfounded when that happened. And I had these religion classes that we
had to take that would only embrace the philosophy of the Church of
Christ. It wouldn't acknowledge Buddhism or Catholicism or any other
isms. And I knew that wasn't right. I mean, there were just too many
other people in the world. So it really started causing me to shut down
on traditional, formal religious training.
-
MASON
- Did you live there on campus?
-
DAVIS
- I lived on campus. That was great. Living on campus was good. I mean, I
ran into some problems with some of the students. One kid had the
Confederate flag in his room, and we kept taking it down, and he didn't
understand. I mean, now I understand how he could not understand where
we were coming from. But, at that period of time, there was no way that
we could leave that Confederate flag up. I mean, it symbolized
oppression for those of us who were black students on the campus. But I
had some interesting experiences living on a campus. It was an
opportunity to be away from home, out from under maternal guidance, and
make some decisions on my own and some failures on my own. I worked a
little bit when I wasn't doing the little scholarship stuff. And then
the art history— Again, I was an okay student. I wasn't the best.
-
MASON
- Yesterday you were saying that it really put a bad taste in your mouth
how you were taught art history.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. Well, I was about to say I had an instructor named Mr. White, who
is gone now, but his view of art history was western European only.
Coming from an enlightened community in the South, I wanted to know
about who were the African American artists and did he know of any and
where were they. He couldn't deliver that information for me. I knew
there was some inequity in the information based on that. And then, in
the art history book, we might have covered two paragraphs on Africa,
two pages on Egypt, which was alluded to as not being African. And then
we'd get all the way up to contemporary time and we'd have maybe a whole
half a chapter on Picasso and very little to no discussion of the
influence of African art and how that played with what he did as an
artist and that whole period of other artists—Modigliani and Braque—just
that whole period of artists through that cubist phase and even in some
of the German expressionists. It just wasn't touched. So—
-
MASON
- How did you find out about it? Did you challenge him on that in the
class?
-
DAVIS
- Well, challenge to some mild degree.
-
MASON
- I'm just— You were in the radical sixties when people were really loud.
-
DAVIS
- Right. This was like '64. I'm leaving college, and, for me, things
didn't get loud until about '65, '66. So there were always things
happening, but they weren't happening in L.A. They weren't immediate,
and I wasn't confronted with them. I was trying to get out of school,
and the war in Vietnam was going on. So I finished college. It was like—I wasn't going to change schools. I
just wanted to get out of that school. It was a real lesson in
conservative America and its inability to embrace difference. It was a
proponent of sameness, Milquetoast, and— Anyway, I finished there. I
finished in the summer. I was a few units behind in a science class. I
had to take a science class in order to get my paper. So I did that.
-
MASON
- In one place I read you got your degree in art, education, and
psychology.
-
DAVIS
- That was Pepperdine. It was like art education, art and education— I
forget. I'd have to go back and look at the diploma to see what it
really was, whether it was art and education or whether it was art,
education, and psych. I know I took a lot of those classes.
-
MASON
- I was just wondering if there was some way you were trying to combine
all those things.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. The only way my folks agreed for me to be an art major was that I
prepare myself to be a teacher. So the education classes were a must. So
I left there and I went to— What was I going to do? I skipped a couple
of things. During college, I worked at Harlem Hospital the year after
the riots in Harlem, which I think was either '62 or '63. I worked with
hyperactive kids out of the psych ward with a buddy.
-
MASON
- Did you get a summer internship?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. A guy named "Tony" [Shelton] Bishop, whose aunt was the head
psychiatrist. Her name was Beth Hawes. And then the psychiatrist I
worked under was Chesarina Paoli, an Italian woman. So we spent that
summer, we worked together. Then, the next summer, I went back to New
York and— Maybe it was that summer. We heard about the civil rights
march on Washington [D.C.]. We delayed our return to go to that. So we
went to that in Washington, D.C.
1.5. TAPE NUMBER: III, SIDE TWO OCTOBER 27, 1990
-
MASON
- Okay. Did you want to talk about the Harlem Hospital?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, because the Harlem Hospital was a real interesting experience
because there were hard-core little boys. A lot of them were really
bright but what I call out of their bodies with energy. Either the
public schools couldn't challenge them because of all the distractions,
or they were just delinquent as that was the only way to get attention.
The socialization thing was really off for a lot of them—broken families
or families that were broken for which there was no structure for them
to participate in. I mean, I came from a theoretically broken family,
but there was such a strong family structure that I didn't really feel
like I missed a stride in my growth. But these kids, whew! And even some
of the families that were together were in such turmoil that the kids
were real confused. But anyway, my buddy Shelton Bishop and I, we drove to D.C., and we
participated to some degree in that march in Washington. We were in the
crowd, and we were just becoming acclimated to our issues that were
bubbling during that time. And I had—
-
MASON
- You heard Dr. [Martin Luther] King [Jr.]'s speech?
-
DAVIS
- I heard Dr. King's speech. I think my mother saw a photograph of me in
either Time or Life
magazine from when I was there. And it was me—she could tell by the top
of my head! I couldn't have picked it out. It's been interesting to have
that experience in common with a lot of people, a lot of whom I have met
later in life. I hardly met anyone there then. I mean, it was just me
and my buddy. We had this experience, and then we drove on back to
California. But there are a number of artists whom I've met who were
there. A lot of people who were in political situations I've been in
were there. So it was a very, very powerful time. As a kid, I didn't
realize how powerful it was. I was really into it, but I was into it at
a distance. And then, in the early sixties, like '61, '60-'61, I also—mentioning L.
A. City College—went to a lot of different political meetings and stuff,
some of which were communist oriented. Just real curious, just trying to
get the full expansion. And then I had people telling me I shouldn't be
at those meetings and that there were spies at these meetings and so
forth. I was kind of naive, and I couldn't see that. But, in retrospect,
in looking back and in looking at how some of the situations have worked
out or failed or have been infiltrated, that was definitely the case. We
didn't know who was who or whatever. Then I picketed for a stronger civil rights platform when the Democratic
[Party national] convention was in L.A. at the [Los Angeles] Sports
Arena there on Figueroa [Street] and what was then Santa Barbara
[Avenue], now Martin Luther King [Boulevard]. That was a real mixed
crowd of people from all different kinds of political walks of life.
That was the time that Adlai [E.] Stevenson was making a bid, and John
F. Kennedy got it and was the nominee from the Democratic Party. So
there were a lot of little things that— I call that a little thing. I
guess it's a big thing when I look back at it. I didn't get arrested, I
didn't get in trouble, I didn't have a run-in with the police or
whatever, so it was—
-
MASON
- You were careful?
-
DAVIS
- It was a safe activity. I don't know if I was careful or that maybe I
was just blessed. There was a guardian angel keeping me from being in
the wrong place at the wrong time. I'm trying to think if—
-
MASON
- So how are you working your art in around the activities that you were—?
-
DAVIS
- Well, I was just doing art. I don't think the art was socially relevant.
I was just politically active, and the art I was doing was something
else and more classroom-oriented assignments. I hadn't really taken off
to be the artist's artist as much as I was into doing art, but I needed
a structure, I needed guidance. I needed somebody to tell me, "Okay,
this is the next assignment. These are things to do." Now, I might do
little sketches and doodle and— And the art was not political, as I
remember. I did do some pieces that were African oriented. I tend to
think most of my work at that time was really one of cultural quest and
identity more than political rebellion. I would be out there on the
line, but I wouldn't be painting that activity. The paintings might be a
takeoff from African sculpture or reexamining my African American
heritage and trying to look at it from an African vantage point or
"where did that come from" kind of thing.
-
MASON
- So you were concentrating on painting and drawing.
-
DAVIS
- And sculpture.
-
MASON
- And sculpture.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah.
-
MASON
- What kinds of materials?
-
DAVIS
- All kinds. It was really an explorative period. Plaster, wood, resin,
welding. The paintings were mostly oil and maybe some watercolor. And a
lot of drawing assignments, which weren't my favorite, but I did them.
That kind of thing.
-
MASON
- Do you have any of those today?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, they exist. I'm trying to decide now about whether to keep them or
chuck them. They just take up space in a sort of a state of
deterioration. And then there are others that are good that I feel that
I should hold onto for historical reasons. But I don't feel like I need
to have all of that stuff, those exercises and drawings on newsprint;
that's going to disintegrate anyway. So, let's see, that gets me out of college, and then I was going to go— I
was going to New York every summer, it seemed like. I was just real
fascinated with the city and the cultural energy there.
1.6. TAPE NUMBER: IV, SIDE ONE OCTOBER 27, 1990
-
MASON
- I don't know where we are. You'll have to just take it from here.
-
DAVIS
- We're in Shingle Springs, California, which is about fifteen miles west
of Placerville and about forty-five miles, give or take, from
Sacramento. We're on a two-acre site in the middle of a
five-hundred-acre pasture in the country. This is a site where we
created an earthwork [Nine Phone Calls to the
Future]. This was done in collaboration with an artist from
Sacramento by the name of Tom Witt and myself and several students and
interested participants.
-
MASON
- This is your first earthwork?
-
DAVIS
- This is my first earthwork. This came about from the collaborations
concept through the IDEA [Institute for Design and Experimental Art]
Gallery exhibit. Tom and I had been talking about doing another piece in
the city of Sacramento, but what we wanted to do did not seem
appropriate for the spaces that were available and the loops that we
would have had to jump in order to secure those spaces.
-
MASON
- You mean you wanted to put an earthwork in the middle of an urban space?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. Originally we were going to do an earthwork and found-object piece
in the middle of a vacant lot in an urban space. My idea was to do
something a little more serene, more in nature, and more meditative in
concept. In this case, we talked to the person who owned the property,
Pat Brown, about using one of three or four possible sites on her
property.
-
MASON
- When did the project start to come together? Or when did you start to
conceive—?
-
DAVIS
- We started talking about this about six months ago, but this particular
site and getting permission from Pat to create it here happened in
August of this year. After we were able to focus in on the property,
then we identified the site. The intent of the site was to build a dam
that overlooked a ravine where there were a lot of oak trees, and that
this site would be a place where someone could sit and reflect either
away from the two-acre property or on the two-acre property. So you
could either look over into the ravine, which is where the five hundred
acres surrounds this property— And because we decided to build it in a
ravine, and there are two natural springs of water, we decided to build
a dam that would contain water that would overflow from the existing
ponds. So we secured the services of a guy named Everett Fox, who has a ranch in
this area, who is a retired Caltrans [California Department of
Transportation] road operator, so he has knowledge of heavy
equipment—tractors and back hoes. Once Tom and I had conceived of how we
wanted the lake or the mini-lake or the huge pond to be formed, then
Everett came with the equipment and scraped the earth and built the dam,
and we specified the shape that we would like to see it in. On the face
of the dam, we laid sheets of slate and river rock. On top of the dam is
a clear sheet of—I guess you would call it case-hardened or
tempered—smoked glass that is standing eight feet across and four feet
high. We built a form out of railroad ties that's about a half a foot
down that this glass is supported by. So it's a real kind of ethereal
piece. It's like a piece of glass that grew straight up out of the
earth, so to speak, because the railroad ties are buried in the ground.
It's a transparent yet obvious shape. The other thing that we did is we released the water from the two ponds
on the day of the sort of ceremony that we had here, and by releasing
the water, it halfway filled up the dam that we had created, and there
was a constant flow of water from the two spaces. Unfortunately, the
water table is not high enough to keep a continuous flow. This area of
California has had a drought for the last four years, so, when and if
the drought ends, there will be another or a greater body of water here. What we also did was we dug around a tree and cut it back and created a
little island that will have growth. So we planted tulips and daffodils
around that tree and then also on the side of places on the earth where
the earth was scraped. Today, when we came out, I planted or distributed
wildflowers that were in a blue hue in certain spaces and then
wildflowers that had a red hue that would be in other spaces. So these
are plants that will just keep coming up naturally. And I bought some
rye grass to plant. Since the winter season is coming, it will add a
really nice lush green area to that site.
-
MASON
- Do you have plans, when the drought's over, to somehow coat the bottom
or finish the bottom so you can keep a pool of water? I mean, is this
something that you want to come back and maintain?
-
DAVIS
- Well, I would like to come back and maintain it. The biggest issue is
the water table. If there's a constant flow of water from the ponds
above, there will always be water in the lower level. We had a
misunderstanding on the significance of reducing the table in one of the
ponds so that there would be a constant flow of water. At this point
it's dammed up, and it really needs to be reopened. Otherwise, we have
to wait for the rainy season and hope that the water table is raised a
lot higher in this area than it has been, in the last four years. If
that's the case, then we will have that constant body of water in there. There are also three poles that are sticking up in the north end of the
pond, and those are to house a painting that will be made— Actually, the
shapes and all have been cut out. The actual painting of it hasn't
happened yet. That's a pyramid form on corrugated tin that's been primed
and will be painted. It also marks a direct line to the glass and
theoretically will be reflecting the image of the sight line of the
glass. What it is, it really becomes a painted sculpture in the middle
of the pond. Once. the water table is high, then, at some point, the
water will probably touch the bottom of the painted sculpture.
-
MASON
- So the water trickling in— Do you mean to have that as another sound for
the sculpture?
-
DAVIS
- Well, there was no sound intent. There was a desire to have a flow, a
trickle of water, move over or cascade over rocks. There is a real quiet
sound that's generated by that, but nature will dictate that. And there are some other pieces here on this property that I might
mention. On this sculpture that's directly in front of us, this large
steel piece that's by an artist named John Riddle, who now lives in
Atlanta— When he was moving to Atlanta, I bought this from him. I had it
on some property in San Diego, and when Pat purchased this land here and
I had moved up to Sacramento, I thought that this would be a great spot
to put the piece and help her have a little sculpture garden.
-
MASON
- Yeah, it works really well from so many different angles.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. There's also a second piece that's over by the little guest house
that's in disrepair right now. The piece is by Kenzi Shiokaba, who used
to exhibit at Brockman Gallery. It's a wood piece, and because of the
heat and the dryness out here it really dried up. So what we've been
doing is soaking it in linseed oil so it will— Actually, it's ready now
to be reinstalled somewhere here on the land. I'm not sure where I want
to put it right now. Originally, I had it up by the pond, and now I
think I'm going to put it a little closer in to this other sculpture. John Riddle was also an artist that exhibited at Brockman Gallery and
made a lot of interesting social comments with his work and did some
real massive sculptures like this as well as a lot of smaller pieces and
paintings. In a way, it's kind of a loss for him not to be in
California, because he added a lot to the mix, so to speak.
-
MASON
- A lot of his smaller pieces were assemblage?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, a lot of his smaller pieces were assemblage. Social comment, a lot
of social comment in his work.
-
MASON
- What made you decide that it's now the moment for you to do an
earthwork?
-
DAVIS
- I have been fascinated with that for a long time, but I guess the
combination of having met Everett, who is someone who could actually use
that equipment, and Tom, who was open to collaborating on that kind of
idea, and then Pat, who was willing to make the property available to
let us experiment and play, it just created an opportunity that
hopefully will be repeated. And thinking about this artist in residency
coming up in Texas [at San Antonio Art Institute] and the vastness of
that state and the openness of the property, I kind of think I might try
to do something there as well in this medium. My focus in the last few
years has been more and more on doing more public-access kinds of
pieces and on stretching the ways that I view art and what I consider to
be art.
-
MASON
- And you had a ceremony.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, we had a ceremony. [tape recorder off] At sunset, we had a
ceremony, which was called an incident, called Nine
Phone Calls to the Future. [tape recorder off] We had this
conclusion to this earthwork by inviting a series of drummers to come.
About ten came to do a drum ceremony to this, what was called an
incident. The incident was called Nine Phone Calls to
the Future. There were a series of flares that were lit behind
a white partition, nine of them, along the base of the dam, so it gave
off this glow of light. The flares were burning and the drums were
playing as the day turned into night. It was just after sunset, so that
it got dark and we could see the stars. There were about thirty people
here. It was real quiet, real reflective, with the energy of the drums
and the burning of the flares. When that was over, everyone just either
left quietly or came into the house on the property. Some people had
brought food—it was sort of potluck—and that was the end of it. But this
piece will probably be most effective in the spring, because that's when
the flowers will come up, the bulbs that are planted around that tree.
That's when the hillside will be green and the water table should be
pretty high from the winter, from the melting of the snow in the
Sierras. I mean, this water comes all the way in from the Tahoe [Lake
Tahoe], Cosumnes River and Truckee Rivers, and underground springs. So
if that water table is real high, then this will probably flow even till
the summer of next year.
-
MASON
- Anything else?
-
DAVIS
- No, I'm sort of anxious to see this after all the stuff grows back.
Right now it feels a little raw to me. But there were a lot of learning
experiences in doing., this. There were a lot of chiefs and not enough
Indians, and everybody had five ways to one solution. There were a lot
of egos involved in the process. So I relearned some things about human
management and ego and timing. I ran into a situation where a lot of
people waited till the last minute to do their input, and that was
frustrating for me, because I had other obligations and things I needed
to do. And waiting for other people to give their input or change their
mind or—
-
MASON
- But that doesn't always happen on collaborative projects or--?
-
DAVIS
- It doesn't have to. It doesn't have to.
-
MASON
- What do you think it was about this project, then?
-
DAVIS
- The individuals. More the individuals than anything else. So if I were
to work with these individuals, I would work with them differently, or I
would chose a different group of individuals to do another project of
this nature.
-
MASON
- Is there one particular message or anything that you would like the
viewer to get out of seeing the piece?
-
DAVIS
- The intent was to create a contemplative space where one might sit in
nature and reflect. And hopefully that will happen when one is either
standing or sitting on the dam or overlooking into that glass area.
1.7. TAPE NUMBER: V, SIDE ONE OCTOBER 28, 1990
-
MASON
- Today we're in Alonzo Davis's studio in Oak Park [California], and we're
going to talk about Public Art Concepts:
Collaborations with Alonzo Davis.
-
DAVIS
- Okay, this exhibit is in the Institute for Design and Experimental Art,
which is a redeveloped firehouse, in which there are studios upstairs
that are disoccupied, and I happen to be in one. The institute itself is
a nonprofit organization that promotes contemporary art and experimental
art through an exhibition program. I applied to do an exhibit and then
subsequently got funded through the Sacramento Metropolitan Arts
[Commission] New Works Program to do this exhibit. This exhibit is about
collaborating with a series of other professional artists and students
on concepts for public art. I interacted with each one individually to
attempt to come up with a successful piece, and in most cases it worked
out. In some cases they were pieces that were actually realized, and in
other cases there are pieces that are concepts only.
-
MASON
- Where are they students?
-
DAVIS
- The students' works are throughout the exhibit.
-
MASON
- I mean, where they—
-
DAVIS
- Oh, the students are from the California State Summer School for the
Arts, which took place this summer at Mills College in Oakland, and the
other students involved are students from American River College, who
assisted with the installation, and a former student collaborated with
me on a piece, and two students from Solano Community College in Suisun
[City], California. Maybe I should list the artists. Let's go over to
the exhibit. I'll describe the two pieces that are outside of the gallery. There's a
series of chain-link fence that was designed for the inside and the
outside of the gallery as an entryway that would cause a maze. And the
way the chain link is painted, it creates a visual optical illusion and
moire pattern as the light is cast on it and as you look at it. And then
also, installed on the front of the building, is a graffiti mural by two
students from Solano Community College. This mural is made of Masonite
panels, four foot by eight foot, and they are stacked so that they are
eight feet across and twelve feet high. In this case, these were two
students of African American heritage, so I worked with them in coming
up with an imagery that would be sensitive to their heritage as well as
to the kind of contemporary statement they make. So their charge in
doing this spray-can artwork was to use an image with an African mask
and an Ashanti doll and to use the words "public art" and "idea" in it
in some kind of way. That was basically what they had to work with and
what they did. Another piece involves a concept with another instructor at the State
Summer School for the Arts, who is also an acknowledged artist in Santa
Monica, California. His name is Magu, also Gilbert Lujan, or a.k.a.
Magu. This concept came about just interacting after our class on what
could we do to collaborate for an exhibit. We came up with a bridge that
would alleviate some of the traffic congestion in East Oakland, South
San Francisco area, not that we know these communities are ready for it
or that there is money for the building of such a bridge, but this is an
imaginary bridge that two artists collaborated on. The idea was to bring
people from the Candlestick Park-San Francisco airport area across to
Alameda, where there is a large recreational beach, and then into East
Oakland, where there is the Oakland airport and Oakland Coliseum. The
bridge would use four lanes of traffic that would be a tube which would
be a public transportation tube that would have a bullet train in it
that you could enter and exit within ten to fifteen minutes on either
side of the bridge. Also, we played around with the support systems,
making them characters that might reflect an Aztec kind of Native
American image that would be the buttress support that would come from
the water level up above the bridge as part of a support system. We both
realize that it will take engineers and other structural
people—architects—as well to actually put this together, but this is an
imaginary concept. This is the kind of thing that could be taken to a
group of people and say, "Now, this is what we want to do. How do we
make this and what's the best way to make it happen?" Who knows? Maybe
ten, twenty years down the line it might be embraced as a viable
concept. This piece is a series of long, hanging strips over a pool of water
surrounded by river rock, and these strips are paintings that are on
paper. But the concept is that they be on copper or aluminum. They act
as a mobile in that they suspend freely and can turn or be wind
activated, depending on the flow of air through a given space. And this
was done in collaboration with students from the state summer school and
myself and the other people who were here helping with the installation.
The idea for the hanging part came out of the school. Tying it into this
exhibition I worked out with a fellow named Phil Brown and David
Lindsey. Phil is an artist, and David Lindsey is an architect and
builder. A lot of people have been responsive to this piece, especially
when they know that the paper material that they see has— The
possibility of doing it in metal or permanent materials is real
attractive. Over here is another work from the summer school project, and this is by
a black girl who I was real pleased to have in my class. She appeared
kind of slow in getting work done, and I really put a lot of pressure on
her to do this. She delivered, and I was really, really pleased later to
find out that she is a slow learner and just someone who has to work
real hard, but, yet, very determined. I was glad to have a chance to
talk to her mother to learn about her. Anyway, she just really took off
with this project. I took the students to downtown Oakland and I gave
them two sites to conceive works of art for. She chose the city hall
and developed a stained-glass window concept. It's really a very, very
dull city hall in the middle of a redeveloped area. So what she was able
to accomplish here was phenomenal.
-
MASON
- Yeah, it's quite beautiful. The sense of color is really amazing.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah.
-
MASON
- This area right now is just—
-
DAVIS
- It's just window. It's just a straight-up window, not very exciting at
all. This piece is the watercolor concept for the collaboration idea
with Tom Witt that we talked about yesterday out in Shingle Springs. It
is basically a rendering indicating what we had planned to do and what
we had talked about—the visual of our verbal conceptualization.
-
MASON
- Have you taken a lot of photographs of the site?
-
DAVIS
- I had a photographer come out and shoot the site before and after and
during. This piece is a piece by another student from the State Summer
School for the Arts, and she chose Laney College as the site she wanted
to develop a piece for. This is a watercolor of a sculptural concept.
The sculpture has several elements that are active. There's sort of a
windmill and a banner and a little symbol that suspends on an arm that
would be— Actually, three elements that would be wind activated: the
propeller or windmill-type form, the banner, and the symbol. This piece is by Robert Jean Ray, a local artist here in Sacramento of
African American heritage. We collaborated on doing an image that would
impact the community which in Sacramento is primarily a black
community—it's called Oak Park. Our concept and talks were about coming
with signage that would define this community and give it a sense of
identity and pride and image. So we developed concepts that would be a
banner, a billboard, and a stationary sign, so that, when you would
enter and exit Oak Park, there would be that sense of place. It was an
interesting challenge, especially for him, since he tends to work very
small. We did an actual, realized banner, which worked real well.
-
MASON
- Could you talk more specifically about some of the symbols that are
embedded?
-
DAVIS
- Well, the symbols are a takeoff of a sun—sunrise, sunset. There's a horn
that is blowing hot music. There's a symbol that's a suggestion of human
beings and trees and reaching up, and it's In black and white. This piece is a site-specific piece that came about through several
discussions with Maru Hoeber. First, we were going to do a park and
light a park. Anyway, we had several ideas, and then this one finally
came to be what we narrowed it down to. This is a series of about forty
tree branches or small trees that were taken from a piece of land that
was overgrown. The trees were cut down, stripped and sandblasted, and
installed in this area of the gallery, so you must walk through in order
to see other parts. So the idea is that you have to experience this
piece by going through it, not just standing back and looking at it.
This is a concept that, in terms of public art, that we envision being
used in the lobby of a building, especially a building that has sort of
a sterile entryway, so that you would have to pass through the trees in
order to get to the elevator or offices or what have you. It just kicks
off a whole different feeling once you're standing or walking through
these trees, even though they're in a gallery or a sterile
environment as opposed to out in nature. So it's to bring people, in a
sense, closer to nature or back to nature or sensitize them to nature.
And also we have installed, with this exhibit, a motion sensor, so, when
people walk through, lights go on in a subtle way. And we have a tape,
an environmental sound tape, on which birds sing and chirp. [activates
tape] You can see that. An interesting part of this one is that when we
had done the installation and gotten all these pieces up, the next day
there were a couple of feathers on the ground, and none of us could
explain how they got there. They weren't intentional. We took that as a
symbol that we were doing the right thing and also went out and gathered
more feathers and brought them in as part of the installation. This is the banner in full size, which is close to eight to ten feet high
and about four feet wide. Over here is a student piece from the state summer school. This young
lady had conceptualized putting an enormous bronze sculpture in the bay
of the Loop in Chicago. She said Chicago was a real masculine city, so
she wanted to put a male nude figure lying down, as opposed to a female.
Just to give you a sense of scale, the boats would tie up to the
sculpture, and people could walk inside the sculpture, and there would
be shopping malls and. visiting and restaurant areas and a hotel inside
the sculpture. So it lies across that whole large area there, probably a
half a mile or so. Over here is—
-
MASON
- How could you—? Is that feasible to make a bronze that huge?
-
DAVIS
- Is it feasible? Well, it's really dependent upon the human spirit, if we
want it. I mean, is a nuclear sub¬marine feasible? Yes, because we made
it, but it's pretty expensive and large to build. We have the Statue of
Liberty, and we have the Washington Monument, we have Mount Rushmore.
When you look at the scale of things like that, or the World Trade
Center in New York, I mean, it's not that big. It's not impractical. I
mean, it can be done. Whether the desire for it builds is a whole other
thing. But if the human desire is there to build it, we can build it. I
really believe that. I mean, we have the Dome [stadium] in New Orleans,
and that's an amazing structure too. This is a mural concept that came from a series of small drawings from
students from that same state summer school program. We've put two large
sheets or rolls of canvas together. This piece you're looking at is
about ten feet by sixteen feet or something close to that. Maybe it's
eight by twelve. Students actually collaborated together to come up with
this painting for a mural. Now, this could go on the side of a building,
and it could be enlarged three times its size, or it could be its same
size. It's a concept that was developed large that could go somewhere
else. I like the fact that the students worked out problems and were able to
set aside their personal egos to make this happen. That's not an easy
thing to do. They were also able to negotiate and make decisions on
leaving some things out that other people wanted in and develop a
rationale for that. They used a lot of personal symbols that were
important for them and a lot of symbols that I was surprised that some
of the students included, such as the image of Spike Lee here from the
movie Do the Right Thing. And the Aztec god and
pyramid. Here's a brother with a boombox next to a knight going into the
lightning. The knight is in interplay with an actual knight in shining
armor on a horse to a knight from a chessboard. So you can sort of get
that back and forth. This was an archway and column area on the campus
at Mills. One of the students took photographs and imposed that image
into this piece. And then a series of clouds and so forth tie the piece
together. Here are a few more pieces from that state summer school project. This
was a real exciting piece for me. This kid came up with an idea that I
was working on with someone else differently, but still real
interesting. This is a concrete wall that has an interesting form. It's
a graffiti wall. It's a wall where people can go and make their mark, so
to speak. It would be available to artists, painters, poets. Well, what
does he say? "This is a piece of concrete sculpture and built to
resemble a modern ruin." And after years, this piece could be
sandblasted or painted over, and then a new series of young people who
have new statements to make can come and make their marks on this wall.
So I thought that was an interesting piece to come up with.
-
MASON
- What about the point that some people make that graffiti artists like to
appropriate a space that's not theirs or that—?
-
DAVIS
- Well, here's a kid with an idea to create a space for it. I know there
are a lot of artists who want to do something because of the challenge
of it not being an appropriate space or a designated space, and that's
going to exist too. But in this case, it's at least made that process
easier. I mean, it's not a subway train, and you don't have to climb
over electric wires to get it and be run out of there by cops or
security guards. And it's okay, since that's the thrill of doing it,
especially at that time in your life. And I understand that, but—
[laughter] This is another piece for Laney College. This young lady had a piece that
would be a fountain that would have water streaming down from up high
and then fall into a pool that had sort of a colorful basin to gather
the water. It's an interesting one as well, especially how the water
pipes are wrapped around the structural parts. This framework existed on
campus, so, in order to get the water up, instead of hiding the pipe or
whatever, she had painted pipe go up and wrap around and then drop the
water down. This is a piece I did with a woman in Oakland. She's an African American
artist that I've been collaborating and talking about doing things with,
and we've started doing things together. Her name is Violet Fields. And
this is a piece that is— The actual size is eight feet by twelve feet,
and it's about eighteen to twenty inches deep. Now, this is a prototype
that's built out of wood, but it is to be a concrete sculpture that
would be cast concrete and either cast and tilted up or cast in place
and then with corrugated steel on the front and fiberglass. Concrete,
while it's wet, can be stained and painted and so forth, and that's the
way this has been treated. The concept is that this would be an
appropriate piece for a meadow or a park or a large piece of private
property or in a courtyard in a city mall. The piece is a sculpture, but
it also acts as an amphitheater. It has that sort of curved shape, so
that if there were some musicians or a poet that wanted to, this is sort
of a staging area in front of a work of art that would bounce sound back
towards the audience, as well. It's a fun concept to do, yeah.
-
MASON
- I've never seen fiberglass used as fabric that way ever in public, in a
public piece of sculpture. It's really beautiful. I hope you get a
chance to build it.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. This is a piece that is sort of a takeoff on Mount Rushmore. It's
a collaboration with my brother, Dale [B.] Davis. We have the little
figures here to sort of show scale of how this would be. And this is a
hat that would be reflective of kind of a— It's sort of a cross between
a cowboy hat and a Native American hat, so a western hat. So, in a way,
it's fun. It's a tongue-in-cheek piece instead of an obvious image of a
president or a specific person. This piece is a piece of steel that's
been welded into a sculpture. Again, it's mounted on a little platform
here with little figures and rocks and trees so that you can see the
sense of scale. And it's to be mounted over a pool of water. It would be
appropriate for a park or a corporate office exterior. I made this
homage to Richard Serra, because he was a sculptor who was of quite a
bit of controversy in the last few years about a piece that he had done
for a federal building in New York. There was a whole issue about it
being appropriate or inappropriate for the space. And it was—
-
MASON
- Yeah, people were saying there were drug deals going on behind this huge
wall.
-
DAVIS
- Right. Yeah. So it's homage to him. I don't know that it has— I mean,
it's not really taking up his issue as much as such a humungous piece
scalewise in relationship to everything else, and for all the trials and
tribulations he went through to defend his piece, right or wrong. This piece back here is a piece that we saw in progress yesterday at
Grant High School. It's a mural. The focus of the mural is to be
multicultural in nature, based on the fact that this high school has
people from all walks of life there: African American, Mexican American,
a lot of new Asian immigrants, Cambodians, Vietnamese, Thai are also
there, a number of young students from Russia. It's just a school that
is just amazing in that there are so many people represented there.
Anyway, this was an attempt to bring in cultural heritage, contemporary
and ancient. So we used some sculptural images from the ancient past and
incorporated them with contemporary figures or images of people. Here's
an Anglo kid in traditional dress with Levi's, and then, split in half,
another half being a Greek sculpture. Here's a young black kid doing one
of the sort of flips in the hip-hop dance kind of attitude. This will be
a globe of the world. Here's a Native American, probably mixed-blood
Hispanic/Native American, western-looking image. This is a Peruvian
sculpture. There's a sculpture from India, an African sculpture image, a
Japanese mask. This is an African sculpture that is split in half at the
head. One half of the head is African, the other half is robot, and a
telephone line is coming out from the ear. And this is an ambitious
piece in that it's 31 feet high and it will be 129 feet long. The theme
of the piece is A Place to Be Somebody. The
collaboration on the image and the execution involved students, other
artists in the Sacramento area, and was initiated by myself with Leslie
Pierson and Armando Cid. Okay. That pretty much covers this area. There's one other piece that— Here we go through the trees again. This
last piece is a piece that, for me, was a purely inspirational piece,
and it was installed in this room because it's a real quiet, isolated
space all to itself. This was done in collaboration with Maru Hoeber,
and it's called Light Sieve. It's river rock in a
long, narrow pile on the floor, and it's bordered with wood. And then,
as the river rock runs out to the ground, sand comes into play, so the
shape is sort of like a stretched pyramid, if you would. And it has a
tube of neon light buried in the middle of it. The light filters up
through the— It's a blue, sort of a river, hot, neon blue that comes up
through the rock. And then, in order to make this room quiet and
meditative in nature and give it enough light, we put some theater gels
over the fluorescent light up above in the room and disassembled the
other neon tubes that go in so that this room has a real quiet,
meditative quality. This was done in conjunction with Maru Hoeber and
myself. I have to say that it was inspired to some degree by the kinds
of works and my appreciation for the things that Isamu Noguchi has done
in his public-space works, [tape recorder off] The one thing about this exhibit is that it sort of represents a
cornerstone of transition for me in that this is the first opportunity
I've had to take on as ambitious a project [as this] in terms of a
series of ideas for public art. It also indicates a point of departure
in a sense that I want to do more of these things to be actualized for
public spaces. I'm learning to work with and am continuing to work with
and learn with other people from other professions and other artists
whose visions are different but whose egos can handle differences and
compromises and collaboration. How do we fuse our thoughts together in
order to make some of these things happen? One of the things this
exhibit has taught me about working with other people is that you have
to weigh a lot of variables and put a lot of combinations together
before making the final decision and how important it is to have people
who can take a concept and have it actualized or help make you realize
it who are not necessarily the people who are going to make the art but
who can help make the concept real. That was really what happened with
the assistance that I had in putting this up. And it's bigger than me. I
couldn't have done it by myself or it would not have been the same.
1.8. TAPE NUMBER: VI, SIDE ONE DECEMBER 1, 1990
-
MASON
- The last time we met, we left off talking about your summer trips to New
York, and you said that you were working in the Harlem Hospital.
-
DAVIS
- Right. I was working with the department of psychiatry in conjunction
with Columbia University. I was working with hyperactive young kids in
sort of a recreational therapy activity. At that time, I thought I was
interested in going into art therapy. It was something that I followed
into graduate school and then went another direction. But it was quite
interesting to do. In New York, I visited a lot of galleries and museums
and met a lot of artists and also traveled to surrounding areas. As I
think back about it, as a young person I had kind of a wanderlust. As an
adult I still do. But at the beginning of my graduating from high
school, I started traveling, and it became very important to my
life-experience education. I try to encourage people now, especially
students, to travel. It sort of fills in a lot of the blanks and makes
life even more meaningful.
-
MASON
- Well, I guess what would be good is if you could just talk specifically
about the things that you saw in New York and who you met and some of
the styles and influences and things that were current then and the
things that impressed you. Was Romare Bearden at the Studio Museum [in
Harlem]?
-
DAVIS
- Romare Bearden was there, but I didn't meet him at that time. I think
the Studio Museum was— I think it was going. New York got to be a mecca
for me, so I would just go every year for quite a while. It wasn't to
meet or interact with artists specifically until 1966, and then I went
across the United States. If I can jump and say. a little bit about that
period— When I finished college, I had studied a lot of art history, and
my instructor had never heard of any black artists. I knew coming from
the South that a lot of black artists existed, and, having lived in a
city where there was a black college as an institution, there was an
effort to be in touch with that history. I remember seeing pottery and
some paintings and things on the campus that were by either professors
or students. Anyway, that set me off with a negative attitude about the
institution where I was going to school, but it also allowed me to know
how limited contemporary art history was in terms of the big picture or
an inclusive picture. And also, taking a lot of art history classes,
Renaissance and so forth and the early impressionists and cubists, I
wasn't really thrilled with art history as a subject the way it was
taught. So when I finished college in '65— When did I? 'Sixty-four.
-
MASON
- 'Sixty-four.
-
DAVIS
- 'Sixty-four, yeah. So I finished college in '64, I got a job, I went up
to San Francisco State [University] to enter an art therapy program, and
they basically told me I would have to write my own program. So I came
back to L.A. to pack my bags— I left a deposit on an apartment. When I
got back, I had been admitted to USC [University of Southern
California]. USC did have an art therapy program.
-
MASON
- How long did you spend at San Francisco State?
-
DAVIS
- It was just a hot minute. I was just coming back to get my clothes to go
to school there, and here was a letter from USC, so I didn't go to San
Francisco State. So I enrolled in that with a man named Mr. Lanier. I
don't remember his first name at this point. Anyway, I did work toward
my teaching credential. While I was there, some people from the L.A.
Unified School District came on the campus and basically immediately
hired me from my master teaching classes. I did student teaching at
Washington High School and a junior high school here in the Los Angeles
area.
-
MASON
- You were teaching art?
-
DAVIS
- I was teaching art, yeah. So I got hired to work at Manual Arts High
School. I was living at home that semester, so I saved the money and
went to Europe that summer to see all of the art history that I had
studied that I wasn't that enthralled with and didn't do that well with.
[I was] just sort of a B and C student. And I got to make my own
decisions about what I liked. I went to Florence and Rome, Italy, and
the Prado Museum in Madrid. I loved El Greco and Goya and enjoyed
Michelangelo's unfinished works in Florence. I went to Venice. I just
got saturated: Paris, Belgium.
-
MASON
- So just seeing the things in person.
-
DAVIS
- Seeing the things in person. It made a big difference. I got to like it
on my own terms. I didn't have to remember the dates and when the guy
sneezed and— And I got to choose what was significant to me. I was
really impressed with van Gogh. I mean, it was like "Wow!" I went to the
van Gogh museum in Paris and the impressionist museum. I was just taken
aback by how much African art was in the London Museum in the basement—
numbered and categorized and stuck away. That was art history. That was
really art history. Then I came back, worked another year at the same
high school. My brother [Dale B. Davis] and I, who was a student at 'SC
[University of Southern California] at the time—I guess he was in his
first or second year after transferring from LACC [Los Angeles City
College]—we decided to go across the country and visit my dad [Alonzo J.
Davis Sr.] but to visit the black artists in the United States. So we
went from L.A. to Phoenix, Arizona, met Eugene Grigsby.
-
MASON
- Okay, I'm not sure how you began to identify who these artists were and
where they were exactly. Did you start reading things?
-
DAVIS
- I just rambled. I mean, I asked Eugene who—
-
MASON
- How did you find out about Eugene?
-
DAVIS
- His son went to Occidental College who was a friend of "Tony" [Shelton]
Bishop, who also went to Occidental College. I think I had met Charles
White by this time, and he had told me about some people. So it was word
of mouth.
-
MASON
- Now, where did you meet Charles White?
-
DAVIS
- In Los Angeles.
-
MASON
- Okay, I just— Let's see, he was at Otis [Art Institute]—
-
DAVIS
- He was Otis.
-
MASON
- —by '65.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah.
-
MASON
- So, okay. But how did you get to Otis? I guess what I'm trying to do is
really try to understand the black art community during that period in
Los Angeles.
-
DAVIS
- Okay. Here it is. When I went to Europe, the Watts riots took place.
When the Watts riots hit, all of a sudden there was a fusion of energy
from the artists' community in a reaction to— So then they had the Watts
Summer Arts Festival. And so I came back to that. So this energy is
beginning to percolate and bubble. Was I tapped into it? No. I was on
the fringe. I was just trying to get it together, so to speak. Just
finished college, trying to teach. The school I'm teaching at— There's a
revolution going on; it's bubbling. The US Organization was carrying
pickets in front of the school.
-
MASON
- The US Organization?
-
DAVIS
- US Organization, which was [Maulana] Ron Karenga's group. A lot of the
young students were becoming nationalist oriented. And the Black Panther
energy was beginning to happen around that time as well. There was the
beginning of a strong African consciousness and black power. So that
began to happen in '66, '67. And in the summer of '66, my brother and I
took off on a word-of-mouth trip in a little Volkswagen and a sleeping
bag, basically. One would sleep outside on the ground, the other would
sleep in the back of the car and rotate. Once in a while, we'd get a
hotel somewhere, if we felt like it was comfortable, when we were in the
South.
-
MASON
- Okay. So before you left, let's see— Who were some of the artists that
you were in contact with besides Charles White? Do you remember?
-
DAVIS
- No.
-
MASON
- Did you know Noah Purifoy?
-
DAVIS
- No, I didn't know Noah. I just knew of the energy and what was
happening. I think the questions that you are asking me, really— All of
that energy started to fall into place in '67. And I really haven't
chronicled my life, so this is an attempt to do it in this process. I
would imagine that some of these dates would be a little askew.
-
MASON
- Yeah. That's fine. No, I guess I'm just trying to—
-
DAVIS
- You're looking for—
-
MASON
- Before and after—
-
DAVIS
- Right.
-
MASON
- What did you leave? What did you come back to?
-
DAVIS
- Right. When I went to Europe, I left Los Angeles being really naive to
the energy that was happening in the Watts area and its problems. When I
came back, there was a riot that affected my community way away from
Watts and my brother telling me that the National Guard and machine guns
and so forth were on the street and we couldn't get home. I was like,
"But we don't live in Watts. This is an affluent, wealthy black
neighborhood. Where are the—?" And he said, "Well, the curfew went all
the way to Olympic [Boulevard] or Wilshire [Boulevard]." So, in effect,
the whole black community was shut down, which meant that middle-class
people and affluent people couldn't get away from it, and they had to
deal with it.
-
MASON
- You were in the Baldwin Hills area?
-
DAVIS
- No, Leimert Park. Yeah, Crenshaw district. So that kind of sunk in. And
when we decided to take this trip, it was like, "Hey, let's do something
this summer. We're twenty-one, twenty-two, -three years old, and it's
just time to get out, out in the world." So, no, we did not have a list
of artists to visit per se. From Phoenix, then we met Paolo Soleri in
Scottsdale, who is not a black artist, but his architecture was so wild
and so unusual and underground and subterranean that that was real
mindblowing and a very positive experience for me and for my brother.
I'll never forget that and the fact that he was working with students
and students were having that experience. We just walked upon it. I had
read something about it in Los Angeles Magazine
or something like that. And then, from there we went to Texas, and we
didn't meet anybody there. We knew of John [Thomas] Biggers, but we
weren't able to connect. And then, from Texas we went to Jackson,
Mississippi. In Jackson, we went on the campus at Jackson State
[University], met some of the art students, met the chairman of the art
department there, who I don't remember. He had done a lot of murals in
that area. It was also the time of— There was a march—Boy, what was that
guy's name who went to University of Mississippi? It's not Medgar Evers.
Boy, I'm always able to say it.
-
MASON
- A Panther or—?
-
DAVIS
- No. This was just a guy who was a student, James Meredith, pretty
innocent of the situation until it erupted. It was also the time that
Martin Luther King [Jr.] and SNCC [Student Nonviolent Coordinating
Committee] and the Panthers were air trying to deal with each other, the
Southern Christian Leadership Council. All different kinds of energies
were happening. There had been a march, and there was a march from north
of Jackson down into Jackson. There was a big situation where people got
tear-gassed and beaten.
-
MASON
- When you were there? That happened when you were there?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. Well, it just happened. I wasn't in that march at the time, but we
were in Jackson. I had called a white guy that I had gone to school
with. He was from Vicksburg. So he came over to my aunt [Celeste
Chambliss]'s house. He was a preacher, a student of theology. Wow, what
is that march called? Anyway, he came over and said, "Hey, this is a
real difficult time here in Jackson and in the state of Mississippi."
He covered our license plate, and he said, "You all will be viewed as
freedom riders, so you don't want to be seen here because your car might
be blown up. But not only that, your aunt's house might be burned down.
" So that was a real eye-opener. And then we went out to Tougaloo
College, where they had a big meeting. Either John F. Kennedy or Robert
F. Kennedy flew in, and James Brown performed. And King and all
the—Huey—Was it Huey? No, that's Huey Newton. The other guy whose name
is Sekou Touré now. [Stokely Carmichael]
-
MASON
- Oh, yeah. I can't remember the name either.
-
DAVIS
- Anyway, all the contingencies from SNCC and the Black Panther Party had
marched into Tougaloo. And, hey, everybody had a gun. My cousin [Mark
Chambliss] had a gun in his glove compartment. It was real. The state
troopers were out, and it was a mixed crowd. There was a lot of black
and white on the campus. And we knew the tensions were real high.
-
MASON
- So because you were traveling through, did you feel a part of this? Or
did you feel like you were sort of—?
-
DAVIS
- I felt very much a part of it. I felt a part of it, even though I wasn't
subject to the abuse that many of the people who were in the march had
to withstand. Then there was a big presentation on the state capitol
grounds in Jackson, and I went to that. So my brother and I and my
cousin or my aunt— Then from there we went to our hometown where we
were born. We went to Tuskegee [Alabama], and we saw Bill [William]
Dawson, who was inspirational to me. I had mentioned his name to you. We
visited several people who we had grown up with as children and we got
to remeet as young adults.
-
MASON
- How was that?,
-
DAVIS
- It was interesting and kind of fun. Their children were in college or
just out of college. I think most of the children who had grown up in
Tuskegee went away to school and would come back from time to time. We
were right in with that group. And we stayed at the president's house,
Foster, William Foster. His daughter was there, Adrian Foster. She had
gone to Oberlin College. And we went to the [George Washington] Carver
Museum on the campus there. Then we went up to Birmingham [Alabama],
which has become a homestead for my mother [Agnes Moses Davis]'s family,
and met some young artists there, students or people who were aspiring
to be artists. And I think Ron— Ron Adams? No, not Ron Adams. Ron Moore
was a fellow who was an art student there and subsequently came to
California, ended up working for Brockman Productions, a CETA
[Comprehensive Employment and Training Act] program, and has now moved
back to Birmingham.
-
MASON
- What kind of work was he doing then? What kind of work were the students
at the universities doing there? Was there a general—?
-
DAVIS
- No, it was real eclectic. There wasn't a black art movement per se. A
lot of these artists and art students did black mother-and-child and did
traditional watercolor painting. It was a real mix. They were doing
landscapes and still lifes, typical student work. Some of the
mother-and-childs were white.
-
MASON
- What was Ron Moore doing?
-
DAVIS
- I know Ron Moore more for the work that he did later as an adult. As to
what he was doing then, it doesn't stick. Then we went up to see my dad
in Durham [North Carolina]. He was teaching at North Carolina Central
[University]. And I didn't meet a lot— I met one or two artists up
there. We really met several musicians. And then we went to Washington,
D.C. but didn't go to Hampton [Institute]. I should have. It was just
one of those situations.
-
MASON
- You wanted to apply there because you knew about the artists there.
-
DAVIS
- I didn't have a connection. It wasn't part of the chain link of "You
ought to go see" referrals. So we didn't get there, but we did go to
Howard University and check out that whole scene. James [A.] Porter was
still living. I met him. I think Ed [Edward] Love was there. Lois Pierre
Noel was there.
-
MASON
- While Ed Love was at— I think he got his M. F. A. from Cal State in '67.
-
DAVIS
- So maybe he wasn't there then. Yeah, he did work at Howard and I made
trips there and met. him. He went to [California State University]
Hayward? He finished Hayward? Cal State Hayward?
-
MASON
- No, I have Cal State, but they didn't put down—
-
DAVIS
- Which one. Maybe it was California] State [University] L.A., because he
was from here. It was a lot of people.
-
MASON
- Yeah, a lot of famous names.
-
DAVIS
- So we would just shuffle from— I was just curious more than I was into
what they did or— I was really into how did they do it, what was their
survival.
-
MASON
- What were some of their stories.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah.
-
MASON
- What were some of the stories?
-
DAVIS
- I can't— I don't even remember them. What stuck out to me the most out
of this trip was that most of these people who were successful were
forty years and older, and that, as a young person in his early
twenties, I had a long race. It was a long-distance race. And that most
of these people were persistent and dedicated to what they were into. On
that trip from D.C., we didn't go into Baltimore. I think we went into
Philly. I had an aunt in Philadelphia. In Philly, we just did the
traditional Philadelphia School of Art. We may have met one or two
artists there. And then we went to New York, and that's where I met
Romare Bearden and Charles [H.] Alston. Romare was the kind of guy that
would connect you with a lot of other people. My connection to Bearden
was, for me, an interesting one, because he immediately just became
somebody I just had a respect for. He was unselfish with information,
and he was accessible and generous in his manner and very soft-spoken.
So he introduced me to—
-
MASON
- Well, they had that Spiral—
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, some of the artists out of that—
-
MASON
- Hale Woodruff was a part of it.
-
DAVIS
- Hale Woodruff I met through— I met Hale Woodruff.
-
MASON
- Charles Alston, Norman Lewis.
-
DAVIS
- Norman, that's the one I was trying to think of. I'm not sure if I met
Alston or not, now that I think of it. It was Norman Lewis. He lived in
a funky little studio above someplace in New York.
-
MASON
- Yeah, the Spiral was down in the Village [Greenwich Village].
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, yeah.
-
MASON
- I guess they all lived around there.
-
DAVIS
- They lived all over. Norman was a character and a little in outer space
in his life it seemed. And it seemed like he lived a hard life, it was a
difficult life. But he was a hell of a painter.
-
MASON
- You mean economically or personally?
-
DAVIS
- Maybe both. I didn't meet Jacob Lawrence on that trip. I was always
curious about who he was, and I had heard a lot about him. But just the
stories about these different people were enough to make me really have
a sense of there is a body of people who are black who are making a
statement who are artists who are out there doing it regardless of their
ability to be in a Manhattan gallery or to be—
-
MASON
- Well, some of them were in Manhattan galleries. I mean, they were
showing.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, but a lot of them weren't represented with any vigor and didn't
get the push that a lot of the other artists who were white got. Jake
did well; I think he was with the Terry Dintenfass Gallery. And Romie
did well.
-
MASON
- Yeah. Why do you think those two out of probably everybody else did so
well?
-
DAVIS
- It's hard to say. Right-place, right-time connections. I hate to say
this, but it was almost like the right white people picked up what they
were doing and ran with them. In a sense, they became the token for the
black arts community in New York. I don't know if it was that they were
singled out as a token, but they were the chosen ones.
-
MASON
- Did Bearden ever talk about how he felt about that? I mean, he had a.
show at MOMA [Museum of Modern Art] in '71, and it was a big thing.
-
DAVIS
- I mean, the guy was so modest, it was no big deal to him. He was like
just— He was just like your grandmother almost, just "Can I serve you
some cornbread?" or "Let's have a little glass of wine" and "How are you
boys doing? Where are you going from here? Well, you ought to see such
and such." He didn't brag. You wouldn't know that he was an artist of
stature by his demeanor. And he didn't wave his flag at all, hardly at
all. But everybody was like, "Romare Bearden, Romare Bearden." He was
like the word. [laughter] So, in a way, it was kind of funny. I feel
like, in a way, at this period, that I'm that way in Sacramento, as I'm
probably the only black artist in Sacramento that's getting any
acknowledgment. So people are always saying, "Oh, Alonzo Davis, have
you—?" But Romie was upscale, big-time New York, and so everybody
thought you were the ultimate. And if you are the ultimate, then you
don't have to promote yourself, I guess. He didn't.
-
MASON
- What did you think about his work? Was he doing collages?
-
DAVIS
- I was real fascinated, real fascinated with what he did and the fact
that he had been to Europe and was a student of the works of Matisse and
was influenced by some of the cubists. Even though I had been to Europe,
I didn't do any art over there and I wasn't part of a movement or a
hangout of artists, so to speak.
-
MASON
- Did you meet any black artists when you were in Europe?
-
DAVIS
- When I was in Europe?
-
MASON
- Yeah. I don't know if we talked about that.
-
DAVIS
- No. I did see Dexter Gordon in Copenhagen— musicians. I think Thelonious
Monk or— There were several black musicians playing in Paris. But it was
mostly that energy.
-
MASON
- Was music important to you?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, and jazz was important. I would say that it was more important to
me than other black artists at that time, because I had no focus on
other people. I was just trying to get myself together and trying to
find out who I was and have some life experiences. And then, from New
York, we went up to—
-
MASON
- Well, I want to ask you more about New York. Let's see. What about some
of the others in that group? There was Merton Simpson, who was a dealer—
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, I met Merton D. Simpson. Yeah, I met Merton.
-
MASON
- Now, what was he like and what was he—?
-
DAVIS
- But I think I met Merton another time, like in '68 on another trip. And
I was fascinated— And Romare Bearden, again, was the vehicle to Merton.
What was interesting was that Merton had this fabulous collection of art
on the East Side of New York in the high-rent district.
-
MASON
- He was a dealer.
-
DAVIS
- Well, he. was dealing African art, but he was also an artist. So Romie
made sure that Merton pulled out some of his work to show me, which was
real interesting that he interceded beyond Merton's business world into
his creative world. I don't know if he's still doing art now or not. But
he was running back and forth to Paris and New York selling
high-quality, high-priced African sculpture.
-
MASON
- Did you learn a lot about that from him?
-
DAVIS
- Well, it was sort of an entree. I've never been a real student of
African art, even though I have done some exhibits and sold African art.
I usually relied on scholars to authenticate and supply.
-
MASON
- Who else is there? Richard Mahey, Emma Amos. You don't hear much about
her.
-
DAVIS
- No, no. I only know her work through books.
-
MASON
- Yeah. Reginald Gammon and Al [Alvin C.] Hollingsworth?
-
DAVIS
- Hollingsworth I met. I don't remember a lot about him. I do remember his
work. And there was another guy, Eldzier—
-
MASON
- Eldzier Cortor?
-
DAVIS
- Right.
-
MASON
- Oh, yeah. He was from Chicago.:
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. I met him. And there was another little guy [Ernest Critchlow], he
was a feisty little tiger. He's still living, too, living in Brooklyn.
He was a part of that group. Anyway—
-
MASON
- Yeah. So did you ever participate in that group, with these people as a
group?
-
DAVIS
- No, no. And then I would go see a guy who I had grown up with and liked
his daughter [Michelle Murray] a lot. She had become a dancer with Alvin
Ailey, and his name was Albert Murray. He and Romie. were buddies. But
Albert was such a scholar, it was real intimidating to be around him in
a way, because he had so much knowledge, and he was always challenging
you. His thing was always to catch you at something you didn't know and
then pound you down to the peg. So, I don't know, when I would go see
Albert, I was just like, "Is Michelle here?" Anything else, it was like,
"Hey, I'm a blank canvas. There is no writing on this blackboard. Give
me a break." [laughter]
-
MASON
- Yeah, I've read some interviews or an interview he did with Romare
Bearden in a column, and you can see how much respect he has for
Bearden's work.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah.
-
MASON
- But some of the ideas it seems they were talking about in this Spiral
group were like— I guess, eventually, they tried to formulate a black
art aesthetic.
-
DAVIS
- Right. Yeah, I feel like it happened, it was impor¬tant, and then it
split off. Everybody went and did their own thing. I keep seeing that
happening over and over again. We had a black art association here in
Los Angeles.
-
MASON
- The Art West Associated?
-
DAVIS
- No, it was called Black Artists Association. They came together, had
meetings, talked about the black aesthetic and how to define black art
and what must black artists do. But then the artists who were hot and
had their self-confidence together and their focus and direction, they
tended to just hit in there. They did what they did, and then they just
went off and—So those groups have been significant for pulling people
together, creating a focus, and becoming a launching pad, and then they
don't serve much purpose after that.
-
MASON
- So you're saying the people would have been—
-
DAVIS
- There was a need, and it filled a need, and then it dissipated. And I
felt like Spiral did that. The only one that looked like it hung tight
was the Afri-Cobra group out of Chicago with Jeff [R.] Donaldson. He
was like the spearhead of that in a way. But even the Afri-Cobra group
kind of went its own way, although they still come together from time to
time. Nelson Stevens is in Massachusetts. Jeff is now in [Washington] D.
C. Another guy [Roy Lewis] who's a photographer is in Maryland. So it's
sort of split off, although that's the only group that seems to still
have some common thread running through their work.
-
MASON
- In Harlem, there was a Harlem Cultural Council that seemed to be
important to the community. They set up jazzmobiles and dancemobiles and
that kind of thing.
-
DAVIS
- I saw a lot of the jazzmobile, loved it, thought it was the ultimate,
and tried to do things like that here.
-
MASON
- What was it? What was the jazzmobile? Like a bookmobile kind of thing?
-
DAVIS
- It was basically an open-air truck or a truck with a lot of equipment in
it that you could break out. I think, again going back to music, I'd
take a break from Harlem Hospital or some of my trips in New York, and
it would just be music in a corner pocket, in the back of an alley, or
down at a cul-de-sac little street, or across from a restaurant. Or in
downtown Manhattan there was a brother playing bass in front of an
office building. It was like, "Wow!" I mean, it just was the ultimate to
me. So that really inspired me several years later to produce cultural
events for public places. I did a lot of concerts in parks and in
downtown Los Angeles in little venues, more as a producer of an event. I
mean, not as a musician. I just love to make that kind of thing happen.
Then I participated with an artmobile here in L.A.
-
MASON
- Was it part of the [Compton] Communicative Arts Academy or the arts
tours?
-
DAVIS
- No, this was part of L.A. city schools. It went around to a lot of
schools, including a lot of the black or predominantly black high
schools in L.A. Melonee Blocker was an artist involved with that, Bill
[William] Pajaud.
-
MASON
- About what year was this?
-
DAVIS
- And Doyle Lane was a ceramist who was— 'Sixty-six, '67 was when I
remember being involved. It was two portable trailers that were set up
as an art gallery with medium to small-sized works by a variety of
different people—Hispanic artists as well.
1.9. TAPE NUMBER: VI, SIDE TWO DECEMBER 1, 1990
-
MASON
- You were talking about the artmobiles here.
-
DAVIS
- Right, right. And you want to go back to New York to catch a plane.
-
MASON
- Yeah.
-
DAVIS
- I kept going back to New York. I mean, New York for me was the ultimate.
I thought that was the only place an artist would be successful. I was
going to New York every summer from 1962 on.
-
MASON
- What about some of the black galleries that were—? Were there any black
galleries then in New York in the early—?
-
DAVIS
- I remember the Studio Museum. There were some shops that sold African
artifacts in Harlem. I guess it might have been a gallery. But as a
professional space, I don't remember it per se.
-
MASON
- I remember now what I was going to ask you. It seemed after the Watts
riots, museum professionals were trying to look at ways of integrating
the arts with the community and bringing art to the community. And
that's maybe how some of these artmobiles, some of these artmobile
project things got started.
-
DAVIS
- It was a strange period. I mean, there was the Harlem riots—the riots in
Harlem—and then the Watts riots and the riots in Chicago. Detroit went.
It was just happening all over the country sporadically. The artists
were demanding exhibit time and space, and museum professionals were
trying to figure out which black artists were palatable or up to their
academic standards or whether the art by blacks was valid or legitimate.
I mean, there was a lot of— Whew. And it wasn't necessarily— I mean, it
was a reaction to; it wasn't a sincere effort of inclusion. It was a
reaction to and a response to pressure. It wasn't with a sincere desire
to understand what this segment of population in the United States was
making art about.
-
MASON
- What makes you feel that way—that it wasn't sincere?
-
DAVIS
- I mean, it was just sort of like what we were talking about coming up in
the elevator to do this interview. I mean, it's like these people were
nonplussed about what black artists were doing, and they were only
reacting to it. And they wanted to have an academic say about it when
some of the art was not coming from academia, and then they wanted to
judge it by European standards when the art wasn't necessarily
derivative of that experience. And then there was the argument that
African art is only valid to Africans and not to African American
experience, so that we shouldn't be showing that experience in our work.
Then there was work that was real revolutionary and riotous in nature,
and that was kind of contradictory to what we should be aspiring for. We
shouldn't be burning the flag. I mean, there were a lot of artists who
were doing flag pieces. And. this was going on not just in '66 but, I
mean, it hit in '65 from out here, and it went into the seventies.
-
MASON
- Yeah, I know in New York I think the big catalyst was the Harlem on My Mind show in '68—
-
DAVIS
- Right, right.
-
MASON
- —when the black merchants and cultural coalition came out with Benny
Andrews.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. So it was like sparks happening. And, again, I was maybe
twenty-four years old, reacting. Not a student of all of what was going
on. I was just a part of it and got caught up in it and was real curious
and just wanted to be around. I held all these other people in high
esteem, and I was in awe of who they were and what they were doing. I
never saw myself as a significant player for years. And even when I
opened the [Brockman] Gallery, I saw myself as a vehicle, not as a major
player, in a sense. I was reaching for, and I was a little insecure
about what I was doing, because I always thought, "Man, Noah Purifoy is
such a monster. He's such a mature artist. His stuff has got so much
going that—" What he and Judson Powell were doing in the Watts Festival
was just so gutsy. And John Riddle was doing this real revolutionary
sculpture and stuff. I just held these guys in awe, and I felt real
young and naive in a way.
-
MASON
- What about some, of the nonblack artists? Did you see any of the work by
[Robert] Rauschenberg and [Jackson] Pollock?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, I saw all of those guys' work.
-
MASON
- Andy Warhol?
-
DAVIS
- Andy Warhol. I mean, they weren't black and—
-
MASON
- Yeah.
-
DAVIS
- I mean, I was at a period of time where I was really impressed with them
and what they did, but the people who were putting them in the forefront
were not inclusive of the black experience, and therefore I wasn't
rushing out to hold them in high esteem. Those were the white guys. I
mean, right now it sounds unfortunate that it should be that way, but it
was, and it was real. We, as a people, were excluded and not written
into history and not included.
-
MASON
- Yeah. Did Norman Lewis have a connection with like—? Since he was
working in abstraction—?
-
DAVIS
- Norman was connected with like Mark Tobey and a group in that school.
While those guys were getting over, Norman was just kind of sliding
down. So he never really hit what I call fifth gear in his lifetime.
-
MASON
- Did you come in contact with their work maybe through him somewhat or—?
-
DAVIS
- No. I came in contact with their work through art history classes and
then by way of Romare Bearden and by way of Norman saying, "Well, I was
part of this, and da da da da da." Then I connected it, and then I
realized that, hey, Norman was part of it, but he wasn't included as a
significant member. His work was quite good. Quite good.
-
MASON
- What about reading? Were you doing a lot of reading? You mentioned
[Franz] Kafka and [Richard] Wright when you were at L.A. City College.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, reading about art? Contemporary art?
-
MASON
- Not just art, but books. I don't know, Autobiography
of Malcolm X or something. [laughter]
-
DAVIS
- I did read the Autobiography of Malcolm X. It was
good.
-
MASON
- Yeah. I guess everybody— I don't know, other things about philosophy or
even Asian, like Zen.
-
DAVIS
- Well, that was much later, in the late seventies, early eighties, the
real fascination with the Orient and sort of Zen philosophy. I was
fascinated. The Japanese prints had such an impact on the
impressionists, and then African art had influenced the cubists. That
whole controversy— In art school I just expected it, and then, when I
got among black artists, it was like there was an issue, a real issue.
That here these European artists were not crediting their influence, and
was it valid or invalid for them to use this influence in their work and
legitimate or illegitimate for them to not credit. I've gone with the
argument back and forth in many ways, but, at this point— It is
important to credit your influences. Once you do that— I mean, artists
are influenced by other art and other artists from other cultures, mine
as well. So it must be acknowledged, and it's important to be
acknowledged. It's as important for European Americans to acknowledge
any influence that they have from other cultures as it is for me to
acknowledge my influences as an African American.
-
MASON
- I was trying to get you to think if there are any books that stand out
that were important to you, not just about art but any kind of reading
that you were doing. Did you read the Négritude poets?
-
DAVIS
- Who?
-
MASON
- Négritude? [Leopold] Senghor and—
-
DAVIS
- No, but I did hear the Watts poets from the Watts Writers Workshop. I
wasn't into poetry too much at that time. I don't know that I did a lot
of reading. Even now, most of my reading is recreational reading or
business reading. It's not scholastic reading. When I look at Art News or Art in America
or Black Art International, unless I'm really
caught up with the artists, I'm usually looking and studying the visual
more than I'm reading the words. And when I get into reading the
words, then I go get a novel. [laughter] I'm not a student of catalogs
unless I'm fascinated with something and I want to pursue it. But that's
just who I am. I guess I had to come to grips with— In terms of reading,
I'm. a very visual person, and so most of my information with art is by
going to see it and spending time with it more than it is reading about
it and reading criticism and interpretation. Having disagreed with most
criticism and interpretations and my negative experiences in art history
classes probably reinforced that direction of drifting away from it.
-
MASON
- Okay. All right. Well, we can stop here unless there's something that
you want to add.
-
DAVIS
- No, I'm curious what your next question is. [laughter]
-
MASON
- Oh.
-
DAVIS
- What shall we cover next time?
-
MASON
- Well, hopefully, we can start to talk about the founding of the Brockman
Gallery.
-
DAVIS
- Okay. We're real close. I would say that, to finish off this trip, we
went up into Maine, we went into Connecticut, we went to Quebec and
spent a little time in Canada, then down into Detroit. And that was
interesting— Motown was hot. I had some cousins who knew other artists
and a cousin who wanted to be a designer, and I did see a couple of
people's works there in Detroit. I don't remember their names. But
Detroit had a lot of muscle and energy. And then in Chicago there were
murals beginning to happen. So I went from Detroit into Chicago and then
on out through the Midwest. I heard some jazz, went to some clubs,
Chicago and Kansas area, and then on back through Utah—beautiful—I guess
a corner of Nevada, and then back into L.A. But the significant part of
that whole trip for me was that I got to see artists of color, that they
were out there, that they were doing it, they were making a significant
statement. That the statements that they were making were interesting
and valid, and that these people were doing it, and that they were—to
repeat myself—forty years of age and older, which to me, at that time,
was old, and that it was persistent, and that there was room for me,
that there was an opportunity for a person of color to be an artist and
to make a statement and to do art.
-
MASON
- How long did the trip take you?
-
DAVIS
- It was basically a summer. Yeah.
-
MASON
- Okay. So we'll finish off with that next time.
-
DAVIS
- And then we can go into the gallery from—Because then the next year is
when the gallery opened. One of the things on the trip that we talked
about was, "Wow, we ought to open up our own gallery in Los Angeles.
There are no galleries that focus on the black artists." That was just
an idea that, as you have a lot of ideas, kicking them out with— It was
a fantasy and not anything that we started making concrete plans for,
that it was going to be an immediate reality. It was just put in the
atmosphere. And a year later we were making steps in that direction.
1.10. TAPE NUMBER: VII, SIDE ONE APRIL 20, 1991
-
MASON
- Today we're just going to finish up your road trip with your brother
[Dale B. Davis] throughout the United States. We left off in New York,
and you said that you went up into Maine and Quebec, and then you came
back down into Detroit, Kansas, etc., on your way back to L.A.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, after leaving New York City, we went and visited a friend who was
working a camp in upstate New York, a fellow named Harold Logan. And he
was a kid whom we had grown up with in Tuskegee [Alabama] and had gone
to school in the northeast and was running a camp there. Then we went up
into Canada.
-
MASON
- I'm sorry, what kind of camp was it?
-
DAVIS
- It was a camp for young people.
-
MASON
- Oh, like a summer camp.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, summer camp. This was a really, really smart guy. It was also a
part of reconnecting with our roots, kids whom we had known in our
childhood whom we hadn't seen since we left Alabama in the mid-fifties.
And then into Canada. That was an interesting experience in that we were
in Quebec, and we really didn't know that there were French-speaking
sections in Canada. The assumption was that it was an
all-English-speaking country. Then—
-
MASON
- So how did you negotiate?
-
DAVIS
- Well, like anywhere, if you can't speak the language, sign language is—
My brother had actually taken French in high school, so we were able to
make it.
-
MASON
- Did you visit artists?
-
DAVIS
- No, we didn't go to any art galleries or anyplace like that. But
Montreal was really interesting because of the architecture. We really
enjoyed looking at the city and its structure. And then, from there, we
came through Toronto—we didn't stay—and then down into Detroit. We had
relatives from Mississippi in Detroit. There we partied. It was—
-
MASON
- Motown, you said.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, it was Motown. [laughter] So we went out to a lot of little
nightclubs and dance clubs, so to speak, places, and stayed with a
cousin. What's interesting is that my cousin's children were also
interested in art, and I think that our trip through there helped
influence their direction.
-
MASON
- What's your cousin's name?
-
DAVIS
- Eddie Chambliss was my cousin's name. And his two children— They
actually had three children, but there were two— Butch [Chambliss] was
his son who went into graphics, and I forget the name of the daughter
right off the top of my head. [Wanda Chambliss] There were a number of
cultural institutions in Detroit, but we really didn't spend a lot of
time there looking at those things. Later, having gone back to Detroit
some other times, I went to the Detroit Art Institute and the museums
there. This other time in Detroit, I was really impressed with the
public art. It was phenomenal to see those works there. But that was a
trip that was probably sometime in the early eighties—late seventies,
early eighties.
-
MASON
- Was this with the NCA, National Conference of Artists?
-
DAVIS
- No, it was an independent trip. Yeah. And then from Detroit into
Chicago. Somehow I get the sequences of things mixed up in that I don't
know if it was this trip or another trip— Well, there was an NCA
conference in Chicago sometime later, and we were made very much aware
of the Afri-Cobra movement. I think that trip was in the seventies. Also
the murals of [William] Walker.
-
MASON
- The Wall of Respect.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, yeah. I was very impressed with Chicago as a muscle city. We also
had, again, the same friendship relationships that went back to
Tuskegee, people we had met and grown up with or who had come through
Tuskegee or friends of my parents who had gone to college together. So
it was networking and more dealing with cultural ties than art
experiences per se. When I think about it, that pretty much ended the
trip in terms of the discussion that might ensue from this kind of an
interview. But what did happen during that trip at some point— and it
might have been through Kansas or while we were bored in Iowa looking at
the corn—we kicked around a lot of ideas. One of those ideas was, "Wow,
wouldn't it be great if we opened a gallery? There seems to be no place
like this available for artists of color in the West." It was just
off-the-cuff kind of dialogue that we were having with no serious
intention. It was just "what if" or "let 's dream." There was no idea
that this would be a reality within a year and a half of those travels.
-
MASON
- Do you remember what some of the things you were dreaming about were?
Like who you would put in it or what it would look like or where it
would be?
-
DAVIS
- I had no idea what it would look like or where it would be. We did focus
on the fact that it should center around the works and efforts of the
black American artists. And we pretty much dropped it. I mean, when we
got back to Los Angeles, we got involved with our lives. My brother was
going back to 'SC [University of Southern California], and I was going
back to teaching in the classroom. We really didn't know that this was
even a possibility at the time. So I guess that took us. to the end of
the summer of 1966. Oh, now I remember. It was the James Meredith march
that I wanted to mention. When we had that last interview, I couldn't
think of James Meredith. In Mississippi.
-
MASON
- Okay. I'm glad you remembered. [laughter]
-
DAVIS
- Oh, boy. It really worried me that I couldn't remember who it was. It
just really disturbed me. It was such an impactful time, event, period.
There were so many issues and tensions going on related to that, the
Meredith march. I mean, there was Stokely Carmichael and Martin Luther
King [Jr.], and there was SNCC [Student Nonviolent Coordinating
Committee] and Southern Christian Leadership [Conference], and then a
lone student who just wants to go to [University of] Mississippi, Ole
Miss, and be left alone to do his thing. There was tension between the
black and white community, the North and the southern community. There
was also tension between the different factions in the civil rights
groups and strategy, nonviolence versus don't turn the other cheek.
-
MASON
- Yeah.
-
DAVIS
- So that was— [laughter]
-
MASON
- Okay. So where were you teaching?
-
DAVIS
- I had gotten a job teaching at Manual Arts High School in Los Angeles,
which was a predominantly black school on the edge of that community
that had responded to the Watts riots. So there was a lot of tension on
that campus related to the issues that came up.
-
MASON
- Yeah. I was just reading something about that, how the different part of
the black community responded to the Watts riots. For example, some
thought the riots were, well, a revolt.
-
DAVIS
- Over there.
-
MASON
- Well, no, they thought the revolt was constructive. And there were
others who thought that the revolt was basically destructive and people
should work to channel their energy in a. constructive way. Whereas
there were other people who thought that, because of the impression that
black people have suffered over the years, that we should rise up and we
should demand our rights and things like that. Basically the black
middle class versus the black working class.
-
DAVIS
- Underclass or working class.
-
MASON
- I don't know if that's the way you saw it or not.
-
DAVIS
- Well, I was in the "struggle for the people" kind of attitude. I think I
supported the civil unrest and response to what seemed to be an
oppressive kind of situation in Los Angeles, especially with the law
enforcement, which continues today. Some of the uprising of the students
was not necessarily well founded. A lot of it was reaction. But I feel
like the masses of people as a whole had sort of taken as much as they
could take, and then the reaction was a natural course. So it had a lot
of merit, and it also led to a lot of other things. I mean, the riots
were in '65. This period that I'm talking about, returning to Los
Angeles, was in '66, which is a year later. Some of it was just
filtering to students, and then some of the students, I think, felt a
great need to be heard. Some of it was a reaction to the way the law
enforcement community and the city fathers handled the riots. So there
was a lot of tension. That tension came about from within the school and
from external forces off campus. One of the issues that I was really
concerned with as a teacher at that school was interfacing with the
young black male students. While I taught art, I was really interested
in them understanding life and its processes and kinds of things that
they would be confronted with, such as contraception, self-worth, an
attitude of independence, and self-reliance.
-
MASON
- How did you try to convey that?
-
DAVIS
- Well, one of the ways that I projected that was through an example of— A
lot of the youth were working, or the ones that I was dealing with might
have been working, for a liquor store or a car wash. Their view of that
kind of employment was that they were content to continue to stock the
refrigerator. I was trying to project that they had the opportunity of
ownership and control of the business that affected their community or
that was in their community. That all people didn't necessarily go to
college, but all people still had to make a living. That they had a
right to be businessmen and they had a right to ownership. So that was
like kind of what I used to try to project. Having come from Tuskegee, I
lived that kind of experience in that community, in that city, town,
where we owned everything in our community: the laundry, the cleaners,
the dry goods, even the car dealership.
-
MASON
- Was this message also part of some of the black radical organizations?
Because you talked about [Maulana] Ron Karenga and the US Organization
last time, or the Black Panthers, or that kind of thing.
-
DAVIS
- I really don't know, in total, if that was the case. I wasn't formally
affiliated with either group. I do think that I was influenced by a lot
of the aspirations and rhetoric of those groups, and I picked what
seemed meaningful to me. In '67, which was the following year, I
transferred to another school [Crenshaw High School]. It was also the
year that I opened a gallery. So I guess in December of '66 I took off
some time, and I was looking in several communities in L.A., actually.
I was looking in the Silver Lake area, and I was looking in the Crenshaw
district.
-
MASON
- Now, Crenshaw at that time, wasn't it like a changing neighborhood? It
was kind of integrated but becoming mostly black? Or had it become
mostly black?
-
DAVIS
- Well, Crenshaw really changed in '60, between '60 and '65, it seems.
There was a tremendous amount of white flight in the sixties—well, in
the late fifties and early sixties. When I was in high school, it was
not quite 50 percent minority or non-Anglo. And I think by the time my
brother finished Dorsey [High School], it had tilted over the other way.
I think when he started Dorsey, which was just as I left, in '60, it was
about fifty-fifty. Then there were a lot of racial conflict situations,
and it just perpetuated the continuation of what was known as white
flight. So that community really flipped ethnically between '56 and '62.
-
MASON
- I just brought that up because I was wondering if you were trying to
look specifically for an integrated neighborhood so you could—
-
DAVIS
- No, I was really looking for an interesting place. I've always enjoyed
an integrated kind of multicultural setting. I had taken some time off,
and I was looking in a couple of neighborhoods. I came back to the
neighborhood which was Crenshaw/Leimert Park and was walking around that
neighborhood and ran into another artist named David Bradford. He was
just looking around too. We both went in this space on Degnan
[Boulevard] and said what a nice studio or art gallery it would make. I
think we looked at two or three places on that block. What had happened
was a lot of the shopkeepers were leaving that community. It was
predominantly a Jewish merchant's neighborhood. There was still a
delicatessen on the block. There was a large restaurant called Raffle's.
But the small merchants were beginning to make a move, and eventually
the big ones left too. I said to David, "I'm going to get that spot." I
think while David was thinking on it, I was acting on it. So I went back
and sort of announced to my mom [Agnes Moses Davis] that I had found
this place and that I was going to rent it and open an art gallery and
that my brother and I had talked about it when we had gone traveling. It
was really not a planned, well-calculated event. We didn't have a
business plan or a strategy or any of all of those things that a
business school would tell you to do.
-
MASON
- So you were looking at it as a studio/gallery space, really.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, yeah. And I got the usual parental concern: "Do you know what
you're doing?" and "You don't have any business experience" and "You
didn't take business in college." "Do you know what. you're doing?" So,
obviously, I couldn't be deterred. I was told to see the lawyer next
door and get his advice and see to it that the lease that we wanted to
take would be legitimate. He gave us some advice, just basically
straight-up legal advice, and I signed a lease, and I had the space in
January.
-
MASON
- Where did you get the money to rent it, though? It seems like it would
be really expensive.
-
DAVIS
- Well, I was teaching, and I had a personal cash flow and a small
savings. So—
-
MASON
- So you didn't have to take out a big loan.
-
DAVIS
- No, and I didn't know what I was doing, [laughter] And the place was set
up in a way that it didn't cost a lot to establish the— I didn't have to
do any major renovation. Basically, I had to put in some lights, and I
might have put in a new carpet—I don't remember—or have gotten the
landlord to put in a new carpet, painted the walls, and then tried to
figure out what am I doing. So from January to March was planning time.
Of course, when we got it, we thought we'd just set up an art gallery
right away, boom. But it took two or three months of process. All of a
sudden, now we had to print an invitation, come up with a name, do a
mailing, find artists. So what we ended up doing was going back and
forth on the name, and we finally decided to settle on a family name of
historical significance. I don't know if I mentioned anywhere else in
the interview about the name Brockman, but—
-
MASON
- Yeah, you said it was the first—
-
DAVIS
- First slave, and it was also my brother's middle name. There were no
Brockmans to carry the name in terms of offspring, male offspring, in
the family. So we settled on that. It made the family happy, and we went
on into "I don't know what we're doing, " but it was an art gallery.
[laughter] And the sophistication of it really came through learning by
the seat of our pants.
-
MASON
- Did you go around to other galleries to see what they were doing?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, we checked out a few, but there's nothing like doing it. You go to
other galleries, and they have what they have. It's up, but you can't
figure out what their process is. We got some advice. I think as we got
into it we began to check out other galleries more than when we started.
There were a couple of galleries in Los Angeles that were quite helpful
to us, one in just being willing to talk and, in some cases, doing
business with us. That was the Ankrum Gallery and the Heritage Gallery.
-
MASON
- They weren't showing black artists then, were they? Because I know they
eventually started to show them, like in the seventies.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, I'm not sure when Charles White established his relationship with
Heritage. I'm not sure. Bernie [Bernard T.] Casey was showing with
Ankrum, but I'm not sure when. But I do remember that Joan Ankrum and
Ben [Benjamin] Horowitz were people who were just willing to talk,
willing to have dialogue. I guess we were odd in that there was nobody
like us in that kind of business, and we also had that business away
from the mainstream of the art community in L.A.
-
MASON
- Did you go to Golden State [Mutual Life Insurance Company] and talk to
Bill [William] Pajaud?
-
DAVIS
- No. We were led to Bill and visited him as an artist, not as a curator
of a collection. I was very fascinated with his work and his
watercolors. We eventually had several exhibitions of his work. But what
I remember most vividly is going to sort of a backyard exhibit sale at
his home in Los Angeles somewhere off of Washington Boulevard and being
really impressed with his watercolors.
-
MASON
- I was just wondering about that, because in one article I was reading
you said that since the L.A. [Los Angeles] County Museum [of Art] had
recently relocated in '65 out of the community over to Wilshire
[Boulevard] that you thought the Brockman Gallery could kind of fill a
cultural void for that area.
-
DAVIS
- Well, there were a number of interesting coincidences and what seemed
like a logical move for opening the gallery in that community. The
county art museum had left the community. There was no commercial venue
for exhibiting the works of black American artists.
-
MASON
- There was always the Watts Summer [Arts] Festival.
-
DAVIS
- Well, the Watts. Summer Festival had just started. There were the
socialite women's groups that would have a show every once in a while,
but it didn't perpetuate support of the artists in a financial way. It
was more social. And it wasn't professional. Although what they did, in
many cases, was quality or it had merit, it wasn't business. And we had
set up a business. We weren't establishing a social organization.
-
MASON
- So did you perceive that there was a market, then, that you were kind
of—?
-
DAVIS
- Well, we felt like there was a market. We moved into what was the
wealthiest black neighborhood in the city of Los Angeles, which had
successful professionals living in it. So it seemed like a natural. But
come to find out that, at that time—and it may have changed now—there
tended to be a pattern of those people that we felt that we had the
natural niche towards. And part of it was our inexperience and part of
it was this pattern of spending outside of the community. So it tended
to be the fact that, on one hand, it was probably a bad move to attract
the wealthy or the more financially solvent black middle- and
upper-middle-class people in their own community. We would have probably
been more successful if we had moved to La Cienega [Boulevard], because
it was just a greater attraction to go somewhere else to buy. That
happened with the Crenshaw shopping district as well. It crashed
financially. Now, it's taken a change since the last two or three years
since it's been developed. There's also a greater consciousness of
support of black businesses by the black population.
-
MASON
- So when did you start to realize that the black community wasn't really
coming out? And what did you do?
-
DAVIS
- Actually, during the civil rights period, I noticed a pattern, somewhat
of a pattern, that we had a lot of white clients. And a lot of the white
clients initiated response from blacks. Once the civil rights era was
over and once we really wanted to focus more on having blacks become
collectors and consumers of the works of black artists— And we lost that
clientele, which was, on the one hand, foolish on our part to have let
it slip out of our hands. I don't know what I could have done. Probably
more marketing, making a geographical move, and, on the other hand,
maybe nothing at all. I mean, the time and the situations changed, and
the support of issues changed. So there was not that thrust from that
community to buy the works. There was more of an emphasis on supporting
issues related to women or Hispanics. Those things were valid too. But I
think we were caught up in a trend, and while we rode the trend, we
didn't find a way to capitalize on it and make it perpetuate itself. So
we were left with this wealthy community that didn't buy art. [laughter]
-
MASON
- Yeah. Well, you've been there. You're the oldest black gallery in Los
Angeles, so you must have done something right.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, we did something. [laughter] We're survivors.
-
MASON
- No, I mean something right.
-
DAVIS
- Oh, yeah. I'm sure we did a lot right. Again, we were not experts in the
field. We were really artists doing a gallery. We became relatively
sophisticated in the process as we sort of learned by doing. We were
recognized nationally for the kinds of exhibitions and challenging
exhibits that we put together. In some cases, a lot of what we did was
artistically excellent but financially unsuccessful. We also learned
that there was a spending curve, too, at galleries. While you would have
exhibits that would be successful, then you would have two or three that
wouldn't be. And then you might have one that gave you a lot of
notoriety. So there tended to be a pattern of— And there were also times
of year that there tended to be greater spending.
-
MASON
- Well, Christmas.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. So—
-
MASON
- Off the top of your head, what was the best show you did in terms of
money? And what was the most sort of controversial or, you say,
"artistically excellent" but nonpaying show?
-
DAVIS
- Well, I thought of anticipating that question. The most artistically
challenging exhibition was the environmental exhibition that Noah
Purifoy did [Niggers Ain't Never Ever Gonna Be
Nothin'—All They Want To Do Is Drink + Fuck]. It was just— It
knocked everybody out. There was nothing for sale. And it was an
experience. It was site specific. Nobody else had been doing those kinds
of exhibitions at that time. I think even those shows that were financially successful were excellent
exhibits as well. David Hammons did real well with the body prints. John
Outterbridge had two or three exhibitions that sold well and that were
aesthetically challenging. Elizabeth Catlett had her first exhibit in
the United States in many years at Brockman Gallery, and that worked. A
good number of pieces sold there, and it moved on to other institutions
and sold there. We did put together two exhibitions of West Coast black
American artists for the Studio Museum in Harlem, and they were received
quite well. Then we had other exhibits by interesting artists. Dan [R.]
Concholar did real well with us. Gloria Bohanon. There was a guy named
Eugene "Legend" Hawkins who did interesting work. I mean, he was a
legend. You heard of him; you didn't hear, of him. He passed through
time. He ended up doing portraits in the streets of Berkeley after the
late sixties, early seventies. He would drop in and drop out, but in the
files you will see records of his exhibitions. And I exhibited. My
brother exhibited. He was doing a lot of ceramics at the time. I was
doing collages and screen printmaking and a little painting. It was
interesting that the artists who came to us were recom¬mended by other
artists by and large.
-
MASON
- Well, what was your first show?
-
DAVIS
- I think that first show was Dale's work and my work. And then I think
the second show was Eugene Hawkins. Because I've been moving so much in
the last few years, it's like— I do have a book that has all of those
exhibits, but I don't know if it's in Sacramento, L.A., or here in [San
Antonio] Texas.
-
MASON
- Oh, that would have been a good thing to have.
-
DAVIS
- I know it's not here in Texas, actually, but I do have it. I think it's
in Sacramento. We also did exhibitions that included artists who were of
other ethnic groups. We tried to focus on Chicano artists. We exhibited
a number of Japanese American artists and a fair number of Anglo artists
as well.
-
MASON
- That was right away that you did these?
-
DAVIS
- Pretty much. Pretty much within the first year or so, yeah. We really
did respond a lot to that civil rights period, and we did show a lot of
art that reflected the movement. We did a fund-raiser for Angela Davis.
-
MASON
- Right. She mentioned that in her autobiography.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. And we were able to raise a good— Well, a number of artists
responded to the call and submitted work. It was also financially
successful. They were able to raise quite a bit of money. They kept
their own books because it was a fund-raising activity.
-
MASON
- These were the Soledad brothers?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. I'm not sure. I just saw the art move. We helped process the
artwork.
-
MASON
- Yeah. I don't know if this is a good time to bring it up now, but in the
files I was reading an exchange that you had—and this seems like it was
either a Black Artists Association meeting or a Black Arts Council
meeting— something between you and John. I don't know John who— Riddle
or Outterbridge. It was just kind of a snippet of the exchange. But you
were talking about the issue of standards and quality. John Riddle or
Outterbridge or whoever the John was saying that the message is
important—you have to look at where the artist is coming from—and you
were saying, "But standards and quality are important." And that's one
thing that I was reading that you said about the gallery, that standards
and workmanship and craftsmanship were really important to you.
-
DAVIS
- I'm glad you brought that up, because, again, it's one of those areas
that I forgot about—the Black Arts Council or the Black Artists
Association. There were a number of attempts to try to pull together
groups of artists to sort of form a unit, not necessarily to do the same
art. It wasn't a format like Afri-Cobra or anything like that, but I
think most of us were college-trained artists, so we were aware of the
different periods and movements of artists throughout history. If you
look at the cubists or impressionists, that was like a group of people
moving toward a certain kind of aesthetic statement or dealing with a
certain question. We were black artists dealing with the question of
civil rights and nationalism and African heritage and living in America,
or the United States of America. While all those were issues— Well, the
issue of black art versus being an artist of color, and was there a
black art statement— I think, in the beginning, we really did try to
have it as a movement. And like many movements, it gets started as a
tremendous momentum, and then one or two people carry it, and then other
people either drop out or—
-
MASON
- People split off and form their own groups.
-
DAVIS
- —split off, and there are factions. I think we were young and naive
enough to think that there would be no factions. We'd have these great
discussions and drink wine and talk, talk, and try to come together to
solve all the world's problems with art. John Riddle was another artist
who was a sculptor, and we did quite well with his work, and he was very
much concerned with issues. So we really got to what came first, the
chicken or the egg, in our discussions—whether a statement was more
important than art or the craftsmanship, etc.
1.11. TAPE NUMBER: VII, SIDE TWO APRIL 20, 1991
-
DAVIS
- There was a woman there in Los Angeles who came by the gallery when it
first started. She just quietly came and looked in the window and then
came in the door. Her name was Ruth [G.] Waddy. Ruth is still living
today in the San Francisco area, but she has been instrumental, she and
her sister [Gladys Gilliam Little], with taking works of black American
artists to Russia in the fifties. And she coauthored that book Black Artists on Art with Samella [S.] Lewis. She
was a very powerful force and one of those kinds of people who had a
real clear point of view about who she was and where she was coming
from, and her sister was even stronger. I would go and spend a lot of
time listening and talking to her. She had a lot of influence.
-
MASON
- Yeah, she had the Art West Associated group. So you went to participate
in those meetings? Or just a personal contact?
-
DAVIS
- More a personal contact. I may have gone to a few of the meetings. The
thing about being in business or being an art dealer was that there were
things that I was interested in exhibiting, and there were artists whose
work I was interested in, but I was not necessarily interested in
everybody's work in all of those groups. It got to be that a lot of work
that I didn't care for or didn't think I could move would be done by a
lot of artists in those groups, and they would think or feel slighted or
that we were uppity Westside people who weren't concerned with the
movement. But, really, we could only handle so many artists. There
needed to be five or six other galleries to represent all of the other
strains that were out in the open being done by artists in the L.A.
community. So there were factions and different splinters.
-
MASON
- I'm sorry, I wanted to ask you— Because you were talking about Ruth
Waddy, and you were saying that she had a strong point of view, I wanted
to ask you what that was, because the work that I've seen that she put
in her book is more social protest kind of work. And I was wondering if
she was doing that really early, if that's her point of view or—
-
DAVIS
- Her book was pretty— I think what I got from Ruth was her strength of
belief in the African American culture. Aesthetically, I don't think
that we always saw eye to eye on what was of merit. It was very
difficult for me to deal with the desires of people and what we could
actually exhibit and sell. We were not a nonprofit organization and we
weren't a charitable organization. Even though we were a community-based
business, we were still a business, and the doors in a business are open
based on your ability to sell a product. We had to sell art, so we had
to acquire art that we believed in that we could sell.
-
MASON
- Well, she did mostly prints, though. It seems like prints would sell
pretty easily. I mean, I don't know—
-
DAVIS
- We did sell some of Ruth's work. I am not necessarily speaking about
Ruth's work as much as I'm speaking about some of the artists in that
organization that she initiated [Art West Associated].
-
MASON
- I don't know if you can be more specific about— You said there was some
art that just didn't appeal to you or you didn't think you could sell.
-
DAVIS
- Well, it would be in poor taste to mention who they were.
-
MASON
- No, I don't want you to mention names, but I didn't know how you could—
-
DAVIS
- How I could make a judgment? Well, let's just say that if we had three
or four artists who we were exhibiting who did works that were
figurative of black imagery, well, that's really about as much as we
could market or handle. And then, of those, maybe there were twelve
artists doing that kind of work at that time, and we, in theory, had the
four best.
-
MASON
- Right, okay.
-
DAVIS
- But the fifth through the twelfth certainly felt that theirs was of
merit if not better than who we selected. Or if we had those artists,
why weren't we showing them, as well? We tried to compensate for that by
having group exhibitions that included their work. But, by and large, we
weren't successful with their work,, even though we had nice exhibits
that included them. So you had to make selective decisions, and in some
cases you became the bad guy, which I wasn't ready for, but when you're
in the playing field, you have to learn fast that that's part of it. You
learn to develop a strong ego and have a good shell. I mean, there were
times when it really disturbed me, and I would take it personally and
not understand. But in hindsight it's real clear.
-
MASON
- So through all this you had time to do your own work? [laughter]
-
DAVIS
- Well, I tried. I was a young, strong, and a strong-willed,
Renaissance-type person, so I really felt that I could do all of these
different things. The more people would say, "You can't, " the more I
would try to prove that I/we could. So I was teaching full-time, I was
running the art gallery, I was doing my art, I was having a social life,
and I was driving a sports car. [laughter] I was just out there. By the
time I was— I guess after three years. into it, two or three years into
it, I really had what was close to a physical breakdown, because I was
just pushing all of the ends and both candles, if not all four candles.
And I ended up in a hospital with a double hernia, and I don't know if
it was from helping lift John Riddle's sculpture or from emotional
pressures that I was under—I also got married during that period of
time—or dealing with the artists in the business. So I ended up with a
double hernia. But I remember in the hospital thinking how good it was
to just be in the bed. [laughter]
-
MASON
- To just kick back.
-
DAVIS
- And I really had not learned how to rest. I had just learned how to do,
and I grew up with that strong work ethic. You had to be twice as good
to be equal. So it was always that push. And that hospital bed was
wonderful. From that point, I sort of— I can't say that I really
stopped, but I started pulling back on some things. So at that point—
Let's see, that was about '69. And then in 1970 I decided to stop
teaching, that I was really more interested in doing my own art, and I
really did not want to give up the gallery. In making the choice between
the three things—which one to give up—I gave up the classroom. I tended
to feel that the classroom was taking all of my creative juices. I was
giving it to my students, and I wasn't exercising it or practicing it
myself. They had all my ideas. I wasn't doing it as much. I was fast
becoming a Sunday painter, which I resented and resented on other people
as well as myself. So in '70 I left the classroom.
-
MASON
- I was just wondering if you could—
-
DAVIS
- I was over at the black students union, and they were burning down the
school. And Martin Luther King [Jr.] got assassinated and—
-
MASON
- Yeah.
-
DAVIS
- So I was doing all these things to sort of quell that energy, then
exhibit that energy, and also deal with my own personal feelings about
all of those things at that time.
-
MASON
- Yeah. That's what I was trying to get back to— work—not to say that the
work that you were doing was a direct response to any one of these
events, but I guess I was just trying to gauge maybe how you perceived
your work was changing at that time or things that you were doing at
that time or experimenting with. Like, the two prints that I've seen,
the Black Modern Dance and the Heart Dance, they were abstractions, kind of figurative
abstractions. I'm wondering if you had been doing that recently or—?
-
DAVIS
- Well, through college, I really was doing work that was assignments and
more traditional landscapes and still lifes. That work was not about
self-discovery or ethnic identity, and there was never any lead in that
direction on the part of my formal education in art. So I would say
that, like, the Black Modern Dance and the Heart Dance were a beginning towards that kind of
consciousness coming through my work. It was there in my rhetoric but
not necessarily there in my art.
-
MASON
- Okay. How was it there in those two prints? I mean, was it just
abstraction? Was that experimental? Or was it—?
-
DAVIS
- I guess, in a way, it's like it's not obvious, but, for me, I was very
much moved by the black dance, contemporary dance. So those were sort of
my attempts to sort of capture that kind of statement that was being
made by Alvin Ailey and George Faison and any other number of people at
that time. I would just go to these concerts and be turned on. I don't
know that I did it related to music at that time, but I would be
influenced quite a bit by just going to jazz concerts and sort of
checking out the, quote, "scene, " unquote.
-
MASON
- Yeah. I guess we can talk about that more later, because I wanted to ask
you about Larry Clark, because he was trying to do things also between
the visual and the music. And I'm wondering how that kind of—
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, yeah.
-
MASON
- But that's later. That comes later.
-
DAVIS
- Actually, it's not far away. That's interesting that you bring his name
up. Also, during this period, we were the only ones on the scene, and we
became the Westside art gallery or so forth. So it set up a certain
amount of tension for artists who were in the other parts of the
community, Watts and Compton, who didn't necessarily have access to what
we were doing. Then there was another woman who started a gallery that
overlapped ours. She did quite good work, and she had a good gallery—I
think it was Gallery 66—which was Suzanne Jackson.
-
MASON
- Yeah, Gallery 32.
-
DAVIS
- Gallery 32, right.
-
MASON
- How was that different from—? I mean, I hear things about her gallery.
People always say, "Oh, you could do things there that you couldn't do
other places."
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. I think she probably allowed greater experimental kinds of things
at her place. I'm not sure that she was as focused on sales as we were,
although she had to be to some degree. It was the new place, so as
Brockman was in '67, her place was in '70 or whatever year she opened.
So everybody wanted to go over there. And, again, it was not in the
black community, so it had the lure—
-
MASON
- It was on La Brea somewhere?
-
DAVIS
- Well, it was near Otis Art Institute, near MacArthur Park, in a building
with a lot of designers and so forth. So it had a whole other mystique.
She was this woman who had come from Alaska and San Francisco—and
Aquarian, also. Interesting that we were both Aquarius and sort of had
foresight and vision to do these, and we were willing to be risk takers.
-
MASON
- Yeah. Did you find yourself competing with her, with her art?
-
DAVIS
- In a way we kind of competed, and it was probably unnecessary. A lot of
the artists would sort of pit us against each other, which was really
petty. There would be this, "Well, I'm not going to show with you; I'm
going to show over there, " or back and forth, when, really, Suzanne and
I, we had the control. But pettiness and devisiveness always finds its
way in a lot of situations, and that happened to some degree.
-
MASON
- What about the other galleries?
-
DAVIS
- But I had a lot of respect for her, and I still do. She's an interesting
person.
-
MASON
- Yeah. You exhibited each other at other galleries too.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah.
-
MASON
- What about the other gallery? Your friend I met on the plane—Dawson?
-
DAVIS
- Oh, Ralph Dawson?
-
MASON
- Yeah, Ralph Dawson, who had Chicago West. Oh, and there was the other
one, Gallery Negre, which you don't really hear— I don't really know
what that was all about.
-
DAVIS
- Boy, I really— Where was that one?
-
MASON
- I don't know.
-
DAVIS
- Gallery Negre. Was it in Pasadena?
-
MASON
- I don't know. I've just seen the name, but I—
-
DAVIS
- I tried to start a second gallery with some artists in Pasadena.
-
MASON
- Oh, really? When was that? In the seventies?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, early seventies. It didn't last long. But it was like a satellite
site. And then Chicago West was an interesting gallery, and it brought
some artists who were from other parts of the city and others who also
were new to L.A. from Chicago on the same—
-
MASON
- Hence the name.
-
DAVIS
- And it was in the community of Brockman Gallery. It was a nice space. I
liked what they were doing. That gallery didn't really conflict with
Brockman and its objectives or artists. There wasn't that conflict
between the artists as much. There were artists who were loyal to
Brockman, and then there were artists who were not loyal to any gallery
and just wanted to run between all of them, to hook it up and do their
thing. We tried to control that, and I don't know if that was good or
bad at this point.
-
MASON
- So you would, say, represent John Riddle or someone?
-
DAVIS
- Right, right. If we represented John Riddle, we really didn't think he
should be exhibiting somewhere else. Or, if he did, it should be
courtesy of Brockman Gallery. Many of the artists didn't feel like they
should have any allegiance. Part of it was a lack of sophistication on
their part, and part of it was a lack of our ability to develop the
loyalty and to establish a kind of formal contract that would lock them
in. In retrospect, I don't think that would have been a good thing, the
formal—
-
MASON
- You kind of think of it as an artist yourself, how you would—
-
DAVIS
- Well, as an artist myself, I'm so much aware of all of what happens, and
I tend to only try to deal with one business in one city just to avoid
the sort of petty back-and-forth stuff. Or, if I do have a relationship
with a business and consider doing business with someone else, I mean,
I'll say, "Look, I have this opportunity, and is this in conflict with
you? Or can you match it?" So I learned a lot. [laughter] I learned a
lot, oh, boy, the hard way and, in many cases, just through experience.
The lessons of common sense and the lessons of failure and the lessons
of success. And a lot of these things, it's like dealing with artists,
but it's like learning how to handle and manage people and their
product, and, in this case, their love product, because it's not just a
product, it's their art, and it has a very personal attachment. You're
dealing with a lot of different kinds of egos and sensitivities. And
then you're dealing with people who feel very strong about what they do,
and they really want to tell you what to do.
-
MASON
- Did you find that you functioned sometimes as a critic for some artists?
I mean, when you went out to look for artists, did you become aware of
somebody's work and then say, "I like what this person does so I want
their work in my gallery"? Or did you kind of like go out to see what
people were doing and say, "Well, maybe in a couple of years we can—" I
don't know.
-
DAVIS
- There was not a formal process. I recently gave a talk at the San
Antonio Art Institute to what is called the senior seminar class, and I
said that the artists that I really tended to look at most critically
were the artists who were recommended by other artists that we
exhibited. So those tended to be the best referrals. Those people who
came in cold, it was always awkward and difficult. I did go out to
different venues where artists would exhibit and sort of do on-site
research. I met Dan Concholar in a park behind a library. in Los
Angeles, in South Central L.A., and was really impressed with his work,
and we established a relationship based on that work that I saw. So if
there was work I saw, I would talk to them, tell them I had a gallery
and would be interested in exhibiting their work at some time. I didn't
try to nurture artists. I did court those artists whose work I thought
we should exhibit, and that would be by either, offering them a show or
asking for them to consign some work to us for a limited period of time.
-
MASON
- How does that work exactly, consignment?
-
DAVIS
- Well, consignment is a business relationship where a person will put
their art—in this case, art—in your charge for a period of time for you
to sell and generate a percentage for them, and then you take your cut,
so that there's— They're taking a risk that you can sell their work, so
they're willing for you to have it tied up for a period of time. You're
taking a risk that you can sell their work and keep it in good shape and
that you think you can sell it. So you basically bring it into your
inventory. But you don't own the work. You're not buying it with the
hopes of selling it. So you're not accumulating an inventory that's
taxable at the end of the year. It's an agreement to loan short-term for
the purpose of a sale.
-
MASON
- Okay. I don't know if you want to continue or if you want to just pick
up.
-
DAVIS
- Well, I think it would be interesting maybe to pick up or to try to get
to 1973. When I left the high school in '70, I had decided to go to
graduate school, to throw myself back into the mix of being an artist, a
producing artist, and to be challenged and to be around and among other
people doing that. So I applied to go to Otis Art Institute. I had to
put together a portfolio, which was, I guess, not the strongest but got
me in. And they let me in the B. F. A. [bachelor of fine arts] program,
not the M. F. A. [master of fine arts] program, so I couldn't move right
towards a master's. The other goal was that, if I was going to teach, I
wanted to have the option to teach on the college level. The B. F. A.
meant that I had to spend an extra year. I had a B. A., but I didn't
have as much studio time as was required through a B. F. A. program. So
they let me into the fourth year of a B. F. A. program. And, under that, I studied with Charles White, among a number of other
artists. But Charlie was— We really fought, in a way, because it was a
real struggle. I wasn't a draftsman, per se. A lot of my focus was in
the design area and in printmaking and not necessarily in figure
drawing. So I struggled in that class with him, and he gave me a hard
time. But he was real supportive, and we began to develop a friendship
relationship that was sort of a back and forth. And he did things that
would help support the gallery in some ways. I mean, he would buy a
work, and he would refer me to his dealer related to his work. And
Elizabeth Catlett was exhibiting at Brockman Gallery, and that was his
first wife. He offered to help support that exhibit in a discreet
manner, because there was remaining tension with her in relationship to
him.
-
MASON
- But she was all the way in Mexico. [laughter]
-
DAVIS
- Bad blood goes wherever. [laughter] And there was definitely bad blood.
So that was a pretty interesting time. Also, my marriage broke up.
-
MASON
- Was your wife an artist?
-
DAVIS
- No. She [Rebecca Braithwaite] was in the banking business. But I was no
longer the financial end. I mean, I wasn't working anymore; I was living
on savings. That probably didn't help at all. So that was 1971. And I
finished that program, and then— I'm trying to— When did [Richard M.]
Nixon come into office?
-
MASON
- That was like '68.
-
DAVIS
- Okay.
1.12. TAPE NUMBER: VIII, SIDE ONE APRIL 22, 1991
-
MASON
- Today we thought we'd backtrack a little and sort of finish up the late
sixties maybe and early seventies and talk about the relationship of
black artists to institutions like LACMA [Los Angeles County Museum of
Art]. In the late sixties the Black Arts Council was formed with Claude
Booker and Cecil Fergerson, and apparently they tried to put pressure on
LACMA to get black artists in. And there were a few shows. In 1972,
there was the Panorama show [Los Angeles, 1972: A Panorama of Black Artists], and before
that there was a show, Three Graphic Artists: Charles
White, Timothy Washington, and David Hammons. But the black art
community didn't seem to be satisfied with the museum's response to the
demands by the council, so I was wondering if you could talk about your
perception of that.
-
DAVIS
- Sure, it's interesting to address—what?—almost twenty years later, and
so I have a maturity-growth response as opposed to the one that was
immediate at the time. There was a real issue of artists of color not
being included and/or considered as part of the artistic community doing
works of art of excellence, and there was a lack of understanding on the
part of the curatorial and historical arts community related to the
impact, significance of, and the kind of work being done by, in this
case, the African American artists. This was also a period of time that
was after the Watts riots. There was a tremendous surge of
self-identity, self-pride, and sort of a cultural renaissance that was
taking place in the black community. Not that artists didn't exist prior
to that, but there became a greater need and a greater demand to be
heard. So several entities began to take place, and energies sprang from
that particular period. There were a series of exhibitions that were initiated by Noah Purifoy
and Judson Powell. They had a series of summer exhibitions in Watts [at
the Watts Summer Arts Festival]. I participated as an artist and also as
a gallery person bringing artists to the exhibition in addition to all
the other artists from in and around the community. These were real
powerful and important exhibits for which there was very little coverage
from and attendance from so-called mainstream communities, especially
the art critic community. Then there was a gentleman by the name of Jim
Woods who had— I think it was called Watts—
-
MASON
- Studio Watts?
-
DAVIS
- Studio Watts. This was set up to do any number of creative things, but
my recollection of it was primarily focused on the visual arts. It was a
fantastic situation where they had a sort of visiting artist program,
they had community art activities, and they brought artists in from
other communities to impact on the artists that were a part of that
program. Out of that grew, not necessarily directly, a number of
community exhibitions: Brockman Gallery, the Black Artists Association.
The two gentlemen you mentioned, Claude Booker and Cecil Fergerson,
began the Black Arts Council— Was that—?
-
MASON
- Yeah. How was the Black Artists Association—?
-
DAVIS
- Black Artists Association. Then there was something like the Black Arts
Council.
-
MASON
- Right. No, I was asking how those two groups were different. Was the
Black Artists Association kind of split from the—?
-
DAVIS
- The Black Artists Association was just artists, and this was an attempt
to get together and communicate about things and issues and aesthetic
statements that were related specifically to their immediate concerns
and work. The Black Arts Council's focus was more towards generating
opportunities for artists and stimulating and creating greater audience
base within the black community as well as the community at large. So
they focused more on doing exhibitions and generating those kinds of
things. They did sell some art, and they did do advocacy efforts towards
major art institutions and interacted with boards trying to make sure
that. blacks were represented in decision-making places where the visual
arts were concerned.
-
MASON
- Because I noticed there was a conflict between the Black Artists and the
Black Arts Council, like in the seventies, when it seems that artists
felt that they were sometimes left out of the Black Arts Council, some
decision making, and that they didn't really have any— It seems that the
Black Arts Council might have— There was a communication gap, I would
say.
-
DAVIS
- Well, the Black Arts Council became successful in making things happen
in a short period of time. Many times those people who are operating in
what we call left-brain activity tend to forget the creative people's
input is necessary, because systematic processing is necessary to make
some of these other things happen. This is not peculiar to black artists
or black arts organizations, but it was certainly something that was
felt by this group, because all of a sudden people are affecting who you
are and what you do without getting your input. In many cases, it felt
like it was an intentional exclusion and that it was particularly
peculiar to this particular group, when, in fact, I found over the years
that, hey, it happens all the time, that most museums are not cognizant
of how important it is to have an artist sit on the board as well as the
banker and the lawyer, that all disciplines need to be represented, and
it is the business of the artists. Therefore it is significant that
artists participate in the decision-making process, the visionary
aspects of it, and the long-range planning. It's just key and critical.
But that mistake is made across the board all too often, and, still,
here in 1991 it's an issue and valid. Those arguments were valid at that
time and are still valid now. But we as a group took it real personally,
and I tended to have to walk both sides of those issues. I was a
practicing artist too. I was a gallery owner. And the third issue was
that I was not in the nonprofit end of the art scene. My business was a
for-profit business, and therefore I had a whole other point of view
that, in some cases, was unlike anybody else at the table and so not
necessarily understood. A lot of people operate on the point of view
that artists suffer and the starving artist syndrome and that we need to
do these things for artists for exposure more than for artists to have
economic success. My attitude is artists eat, too, so they deserve the
same kind of $50 ticket that you deserve to whatever it takes to feed a
family. So these were real issues, and they came up. Now, in terms of the museums, the Black Arts Council was a real driving
force with the museums. Number one, Booker and— I think Booker was a
guard with the museum originally and moved into an assistant curatorial
position, and I believe a similar kind of growth thing for Cecil
Fergerson— And then there were a number of other gentlemen related to
this. And I think, very significantly here, these are black guys
overseeing the security of the institution, and they're not represented.
Their culture is not represented, their history is not represented, and
the people who represent their creative force are not considered. They
were in a position to affect an institution that claimed to be American.
It's not American to me unless it's inclusive as opposed to exclusive.
So there were meetings and stirring kinds of rumblings going on within
the black arts community that they weren't being represented, so they
decided to bring force on the institutions that were responsible and
public institutions. So there was a basement exhibit that was what I
would say token and not of high quality, but it was something that the
museum just threw at the—
-
MASON
- You mean the Panorama?
-
DAVIS
- I believe that's the one. I don't—
-
MASON
- In 1972. It was a big survey of—
-
DAVIS
- There may have been two. And it was in the rental gallery of the museum,
as I remember.
-
MASON
- Yeah, that would be the Panorama show.
-
DAVIS
- It answered the need, in a way, of the Black Arts Council in that it got
a lot of people exhibited, so it addressed many artists. But it did not
necessarily address quality, it did not address curatorial excellence,
and it did not address the need to be exhibited and seen in the better
spaces of the museum. So it was a token or pacifying activity from my
vantage point.
-
MASON
- What was the artists' response?
-
DAVIS
- Well, artists were glad to be included and glad to participate, and
those who weren't included were jealous and so forth. But it wasn't that
good.
-
MASON
- Now, why wasn't it good? I mean, it seems that—
-
DAVIS
- There were some good things in it, but—
-
MASON
- Okay, but they got a black guest curator, too, if we're talking about
the same show. This guy Carroll Greene, he was a curator who was brought
in. It wasn't like some of the things that happened in New York like the
Whitney [Museum of American Art] show where they would have their
regular curator who would just go out and pick whatever he wanted. It
seemed that it could have been a good opportunity for—
-
DAVIS
- It was an excellent opportunity.
-
MASON
- —to show—
-
DAVIS
- It was an excellent opportunity. It was in a poor site within that
institution. And it tried to address too many issues, and it tried to
include too many artists. So if you're talking about excellence, then
the exhibition with Charles White, David Hammons, and Timothy Washington
was the one that had curatorial excellence and the greatest impact.
-
MASON
- In terms of—?
-
DAVIS
- In terms of the institution, in terms of being a major exhibit, in other
words, in a sense, almost a retrospective of the kinds of works that
those artists were doing, and the work was real challenging. But that
exhibition caused a tremendous amount of uproar. And I remember us
having a meeting at Samella [S. j Lewis's house that Charlie White did
not attend for whatever reason.
-
MASON
- This was the Black Artists Association or just—?
-
DAVIS
- I believe—I don't know—it was probably everybody. It was a real tough
meeting, and I had a hard decision to make there, personally. The
artists at the meeting wanted the exhibition to be open to all artists,
and they felt that this was a token exhibition and that it didn't do
anything for the arts community at large in the cry of addressing this
community. I represented two of the three artists, and those two artists
were David Hammons and Timothy Washington. As the gallery owner, I
couldn't take a personal point of view. I had to back and respect the
point of view of the artists that I represented, and that was my
position. Personally, I was in a real conflict about it, because I had
strong feelings that the masses should be represented and so forth. But,
yet, here were probably two of the strongest artists who exhibited at
the gallery with an excellent opportunity, with excellent work, and to
be exhibited along with the dean of black art, Charles White. So it went
back and forth with David and Timothy, and both of them said, "Hey, we
have an excellent opportunity. We think our work is of merit, and we
think we'll have impact, and it makes a black statement, and we want to
do it. We don't care about everybody else saying all of these other
things, " that that wasn't their issue. They happened to be selected,
and they wanted to do it. So, at the end of the meeting, I basically
said, "Well, I represent these two artists. They want to do it. I'm
going to go forward with it. I'm not going to. shut it down." And it
really pissed some people off. I mean, it was tough. It was real tough. The same group of artists and a number of activists in the community
decided to picket the exhibit. Having been a pro-union person and a
person who had gone out on strike and a person who had always refused to
cross picket lines, to face a picket line, that was against something
that I was doing or responsible for to some degree. Probably one of the
hardest things I ever had to do in my life in terms of ray personal
principles was to cross that picket line and to be cussed out by those
people who I felt a part of. But I crossed the picket line, and I went
in the exhibition. Oh, man, my head swims now from that feeling. And
then going in and running into a few artists there who— I mean, John
Riddle just laid into me with the most negative series of four-letter
words. Yet, when I got in there, it was a hell of a good exhibit. The work made
a statement. It was black. And there were a lot of black people in
there as well as white people, and that made me feel real good. So I
feel like it was the right thing. And a level of excellence existed. So
it was better than the other show that we just mentioned, the Panorama, for the right reasons. These artists
needed to make an impact on this institution, and it didn't need to be
in a token space or a token situation. The treatment was first class,
the art was first class, the exhibition was first class, and the
response to it was serious—it was financial. The museum purchased works
from that exhibition for their personal collection, and major collectors
came out of that exhibition.
-
MASON
- Who?
-
DAVIS
- These were private-party people, but they were major collectors. These
are people who were wealthy people in the L.A. area who bought the work
and followed these artists.
-
MASON
- Even over in the Crenshaw district when you had Charles White over
there?
-
DAVIS
- I think, as a result of that, there was a greater response and respect
for David and Timothy's work. Those were the two artists that I was
representing at the time. So in thinking about it and thinking about the
museum and its responsibility and all of those issues, the failing of
the museum was to not continue to do things on that level, and the
failing of the museum was to not initiate things as opposed to react and
respond. It shouldn't have been necessary to continue to have the black
arts community clamor and revolt and do the militant move all the time
to get the museum's attention. So after the David Hammons show there
should have been—I mean these three artists the museum should have
planned another exhibition three to five years away reflecting artists
coming from maybe another point of view or do a national survey. I mean,
because there was a lot of energy, there was a lot of interest, and
there was a lot of attention focused on it. And they should have given
Henri Ghent an opportunity to do it as a major exhibit like Philip
Morris [Inc.] did, that—
-
MASON
-
Two Centuries—
-
DAVIS
-
Two Centuries of Black American Art.
-
MASON
- Was that also brought about by pressure and bickering and arguing?
-
DAVIS
- Sure. But advocacy is important. And—
-
MASON
- Well, the reason I'm asking that is because when you read— Like Kenneth
Donahue did an interview, and you read in newspaper articles and stuff
that he always says, "Well, we really saw this need, and we decided to
address it, and we did this on our own."
-
DAVIS
- No, the need was confronted. They were. confronted. So, being
confronted, the need was being broadcast. Whether they heard it or not
becomes another issue. There was a thing where, once black artists or
artists of color or African American artists achieve a certain amount of
notoriety, then they don't want to call them black. So it was fine to
have a second-class subcategory until the artists achieved a certain
amount of recognition, and then, from that point, there was a resistance
to deal with any labels that might be indicative of where that artist's
major influences came from. I just don't think that— If you want to find
Brer Rabbit, you have to look in the briar patch. You can't look out in
the ocean, and you can't look out on the desert horizon line. So these
people would say, "Well, we're concerned about black American artists,
but we don't see any." But they didn't go to where they were. It's as
if you go to Mexico and you don't speak Spanish and you say, "Well, I
didn't meet any Mexican artists who spoke English who could communicate
with me, so we didn't include any." So that kind of mentality and logic
sort of followed what you might call a racist pattern or an exclusionary
pattern or an old-boy-school pattern. These things are just gradually breaking down, and they're just
constantly being broken down. I guess what was happening in California
was kind of like a jackhammer. These artists were the jackhammer, and
they were just making this noise and shaking these people up and causing
all these problems. It's like, "Well, you don't have to raise all this
noise and cause all these problems for us to hear you, " but then they
weren't heard unless they made that noise. And then that made a way for women artists to say, "Well, wait a minute,
hey. These are predominantly white male institutions that are bastions
for this kind of an exclusive group." And the Chicano artists are
saying, "Wait a minute. We're here, too. We are American citizens, and
we make cultural statements that are significant. If this is the United
States of America, then it is a diverse country with diverse images,
issues, statements. If this is a white museum, call it a white museum.
If it's a Los Angeles County Art Museum, goddamn it, let's have Los
Angeles County represented here." Not necessarily that area artists
have to be from L.A. County, but it has to reflect the kinds of things
that the county should be exposed to, and that does not mean exclusively
Western European artists or artists that are making only one kind of
statement or that are only Anglo and male. I don't say that to put those
artists down. They just need to be included with the rest, not exclusive
of the rest.
-
MASON
- Sort of one last thing I was wondering was how did those shows have an
impact on Brockman Gallery and the—? I guess what I'm asking is you were
saying that the museum was opening up, but you kept having to pressure
them. But did it seem like the museum was finally going to open up? And
did that have an effect on the black arts community in terms of seeing
the possibility of finally being represented in these museums, finally
being a, quote, "success, " unquote, finally being part of the
mainstream or successful or whatever you want to call it instead of just
kind of being in the background all the time? Was that a new possibility
that people were thinking—?
-
DAVIS
- Well, that was the hope. But institutions like that pull the safety
valve, get the heat off their back, and then close back up. So without
the pressure of the Black Arts Council and— Samella Lewis was active.
She was employed by the museum to—
-
MASON
- Yeah, the education—
-
DAVIS
- The education program, but that was still token. It was like "Get
somebody in here." And while that was okay, they didn't really give her
the kind of run that she would need to develop an excellent program or a
program that would address issues of the black arts community.
-
MASON
- I think I can say my question more succinctly. The possibility of being
involved in the museum, do you think that maybe created a new
professionalism among black artists?
-
DAVIS
- Oh, I think so. It created the fact that, one, they could exhibit in
those kinds of institutions, that the possibility existed for other
artists. But it didn't happen as much or as fast as a lot of them would
have liked to have seen it happen.
-
MASON
- Okay. Well, now that we've gone over that, I just wanted to go back to
the history of the Brockman Gallery and maybe talk about your shows
there and the changes in Brockman Gallery, like when Leonard Simon came
in and those kind of things. I guess we could pause for a minute, [tape
recorder off] Okay. I'm just going to go through some press releases,
and whatever you want to say about the shows, how you responded to their
work or how you chose it or whatever strikes you about the shows, just
say it. Maybe we should try to get the title or something.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, you had asked me about Pasadena artists, and I wanted to address
that. So this might be a little time to do it. There did seem to be a
lot of black artists who lived in the Pasadena community,
Pasadena-Altadena. Not that there weren't a lot of artists in that area,
period, but then there were those who were black as well. So it seemed
like a little haven or a place that creative people were drawn to to
live. John Outterbridge was one and probably one of the more successful
and loyal artists that the Brockman Gallery was involved with. I
consider John the poet, the prophet, philosopher, and the new dean of
the black artists in Southern California. There was Curtis Tann, who was
the then director of the Watts Towers [Arts Center], an enamelist. And
then this exhibit that I'm looking at of three Pasadena artists: Cecil
Burton, who came out of Long Beach, who did cast resin sculpture which
was quite interesting. John Stinson, who was a relative of Curtis Tann.
John did real fine, small paintings and drawings and some enamel work.
And John Martin, who— I don't remember his work that well. I do believe
that these were drawings that were included in this exhibition.
-
MASON
- It was 1969.
-
DAVIS
- And this was a 1969 exhibition. This was a series of works at Ankrum
Gallery that were reflective of artists that exhibited at Brockman
Gallery. As I said, Ankrum was a pivotal point and was open to— In a
way, like the Panoramaexhibit at the county art
museum, we did some real large group exhibits in other places outside of
the gallery. And Ankrum was a first-class space that was open to doing
these kinds of exhibits. So this one was an exhibit of the artists that
the gallery represented over a period of time. [tape recorder off] Okay.
In this exhibit were. artists John Outterbridge, Kenneth Kemp, Doyle
Lane, Bill [William] Pajaud, Timothy Washington, Dan [R.] Concholar,
John Riddle, Ron Adams, Samella Lewis, George Clack, Melonee Blocker,
Milton Young, Marion [A.] Epting, Ruth [G.] Waddy, David Hammons, Dale
[B.] Davis, and Alonzo Davis." There's just a couple of things that I
would like to say about this exhibit that are included in this sort of
statement on the show: "The Brockman Gallery features black artists and
is devoted to the impact of their art on the black community. The Ankrum
Gallery is devoted to self-expression of the artist and his reflection
of the human condition in our society." That sort of gives you a
feeling for that. The date on this exhibit I believe was 1969. Yeah.
-
MASON
- Did you sell a lot of work?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, we did. Ankrum was real good about helping us sell work through
their gallery. I actually bought pieces from them for my personal
collection as well. John Riddle had his first one-man exhibition at
Brockman Gallery in November, 1969. He did the American Dream series.
What I liked about Riddle's work was that it was aesthetically real
strong and very specific in terms of making a statement. His work was
very statement oriented and very much concerned with his portrayal of
the black condition. And to quote this writing on John, it says, "Mr.
Riddle's work is extremely strong yet sensitive and deals with black
America." John was born in Los Angeles and now lives in Atlanta,
Georgia.
-
MASON
- Did he also go to Otis [Art Institute]?
-
DAVIS
- No, he went to California] State [University] Los Angeles, and,
actually, I was one of his— He's older than I am, but our cycle in life
was a little different. I was a master teacher for him when he was
getting his teaching credential and doing student teaching at Los
Angeles High School, L.A. High. I helped him break into the system, so
to speak. I own several pieces of John's work, and my brother [Dale B.
Davis] does too. The ones that I am most fond of are the large metal
sculptures that he did. Dan Concholar exhibited with the gallery many
times. It's interesting that we're doing this talk in San Antonio,
Texas, and he was born in San Antonio in 1939. Then he grew up in
Phoenix, and then he moved to Alhambra [California], and later on into
L.A. proper. He's the artist that I mentioned earlier that I met in a
park. I really liked his use of color and so forth.
-
MASON
- He was really interested in African-oriented work.
-
DAVIS
- Well, he did a lot of series. He was an artist who really worked in
series. He did a yellow bus series that dealt with the busing issue. He
did a broken heart series. He did an African series. And they were all
quite intriguing. There's a quote here by William Wilson describing his
work from the Los Angeles Times: "His torn,
organic forms, with rectilinear organization, masses of earth color,
dramatic line, flashes of high color saturation—" And that kind of quote
is real interesting because it really sort of skirts some of the other
issues that Dan was dealing with, which were ethnicity, cultural
identification, and exploration. These will always be issues that we
would face, and we generate a lot of information on these artists to the
press. By and large, we just didn't get a lot of response, and there
were all these criteria and so forth that galleries had to— That they
would not review any group shows or that gallery hours had to be within
such and such or
-
MASON
- Really? I never heard—
-
DAVIS
- Well, just they wanted to deal with institutions that had a standardized
pattern of operation, which I guess may be convenient for them to review
exhibitions during their work hours.
-
MASON
- Yeah, like I said, maybe they only had— Well, the L.
A. Times was like Henry Seldis and William Wilson, so maybe
they just felt like they didn't have enough people. But Wilson did the
Watts Summer Festival once, so I don't know. Well, was he invited? Did
you invite them to the shows and they just didn't come or—?
-
DAVIS
- They would come to one or two over a number of years. It wasn't within
the area of interest they were reporting.
-
MASON
- Yeah. So Wilson basically really didn't have an impact on what black
artists were doing? I mean, did black artists kind of—? I mean, he
always had something negative to say about black art. Did that affect
people? Were they upset? Or did they just—?
-
DAVIS
- Oh, yeah, people would be mad.
-
MASON
- Or did they just ignore him, saying he didn't know what he was talking
about?
-
DAVIS
- No, they didn't ignore it. They took it personally. I don't know what to
say about that. He was the only one. People were so dependent on him
writing something about them, and then, if he didn't say something they
liked, they gave him greater power and greater impact than I think was
deserved. Somehow the myth of the critic making the artists was
perpetuated. So many of the artists bought into what I would call the
western European myth that if you get good reviews then you're going to
be famous, wealthy, wise, and successful, and all doors to Rome will
open. I probably bought into that to some degree as well. But I learned
fast that that doesn't necessarily make or break an exhibition,
especially one that was so singularly focused as the kinds of things
that we were doing.
-
MASON
- What about the black newspapers?
1.13. TAPE NUMBER: VIII, SIDE TWO APRIL 22, 1991
-
DAVIS
- There were no black art critics and there were no black art historians
or black artists who were writing criticism. So the L.
A. Times was the only publication. And then a lot of the
artists really wanted the L.A. Times because it
reached the public at large and not a singularly focused audience. So it
was kind of a catch-22 there. But I think there's fault there with the
[Los Angeles] Sentinel not making an effort
to catch the bandwagon and hear the cry of this particular segment of
the black community. The kind of reporting that was done on art was more
in the line of the social page. But I think the Wave was more responsive, which was a weekly sort of an advertiser
that had excellent coverage and had greater impact in the community. I
think the gentleman's name was Chester Washington. Chester Washington
was the owner and publisher of that paper for some time, and they tend
to have a certain amount of sensitivity to the arts, openness to it.
-
MASON
- The reason I was asking is because, like you said earlier, in some cases
the critics do—at least in the so-called mainstream art community—make
or break artists sometimes. And when you think of like Clement
Greenberg's relationship to the New York school and Jackson Pollock and
his impact, and there weren't any critics dedicated to reviewing black
art, one wonders whether black artists saw that as a plus or a minus,
because if they felt that they were going to be ignored anyway, then
they could do whatever the hell they wanted to anyway. So just basically
I was asking, looking back on it, I mean, was it really a big deal
that—?
-
DAVIS
- Well, even looking back on it, yeah, it was a big deal. I mean, it was a
big deal for the artists and it was a big deal for the gallery to be
published in the major, mainstream newspaper. There were a lot of people
who read it. And it's more important that something was said than being
totally ignored. So if that something was negative, that was great. At
least we provoked something, stimulated a response. It's almost like
saying there was an accident on highway 405; everybody wants to go look
at the accident. So if William Wilson wrote something and it was
negative, everybody wanted to see, "Well, why did he say it was
negative?" So it would just fester. And if it was positive, then there
would be other kinds of people who would come out, because they'd say,
"Well, this must be something." So the art critic was critical, but it
was not the end-all tool to marketing. Looking at another exhibit here in '69 of Marion Epting and Michael
Rougier, Marion Epting is an instructor at Chico State, California State
University at Chico. He was an interesting painter/printmaker, primarily
a printmaker now. A tremendous amount of energy, a universal focus in
his work, and a student of Charles White. A real eccentric guy, a real
little guy who was a high school football quarterback, so, I mean, he
had a lot of spirit, and feisty. Michael Rougier was not a black artist.
He was Canadian and a craftsman and did very interesting and creative
inlaid wood works and later moved to Vancouver Island. What was
interesting is that a lot of his things at this particular time
reflected patterns, land patterns and land masses that you would see
maybe in Amsterdam or in Japan. When questioned about it, he reflected
on flying for the Royal Air Force over Japan and the sort of aerial,
topographical kinds of images that you would see were reflected in his
work. This one is an exhibit of works by David Hammons. He had won an award at
the Municipal Art Gallery in downtown, Barnsdall Park area, Los Angeles.
So the members of the Black Artists Association did a little
announcement to say congratulations. This really is a comprehensive list
of those artists who were in that association, and it's probably
significant that I read it off: Melonee Blocker, Gloria Bohanon, George Clack, Dan Concholar, Alonzo
Davis, Dale Davis, Marion Epting, Ernest Herbert, Kenneth Kemp, Doyle
Lane, Samella Lewis, Mike McLinn, John Outterbridge, Bill Pajaud, John
Riddle, Arenzo Smith Jr., Raphael Vendange, Ruth Waddy, Timothy
Washington, Milton Young. All of these people weren't necessarily active all of the time, but they
did make up a core of artists who were black who were interested in
issues who were willing to come together and talk who didn't necessarily
agree but agreed to disagree. And these were artists, too, that the
gallery sort of said, "Okay, this becomes the core group or the umbrella
group that is exhibited at this space." That's a great image of David Hammons's work. It's sort of a body print
of a man wrapped in the American flag. At the [Los Angeles] County
Museum [of Art], just reflecting back on that, the work that David
Hammons did was body prints, in some cases with painted images, symbols,
and so forth. I think the one that County Museum purchased was a piece
reflecting Bobby Seale being tied in a chair.
-
MASON
- Yeah, Injustice Case.
-
DAVIS
-
Injustice Case, with a bandanna around his mouth
where they wouldn't let him speak at the trial which had taken place in
Chicago. It was a pretty powerful and impactful piece. And then
Timothy's works were, at the time, on a metallic sheet where he would
spray or paint a mat black paint and scratch through, etch through,
images in a dry-point process, and in some cases he would assemblage
elements into the piece itself or onto the piece itself. They were also
very strong pieces. Gloria Bohanon exhibited with us quite a bit, and
her work tended to be towards the abstract and sort of spiritual in
nature, very quietly lively. She explored a lot of things that related
to feminine qualities. Let's see. Oh, yeah, Nathaniel Bustion. Sonny
Bustion was an interesting artist to work with. He had been a
professional athlete. He was born in Anniston, Alabama, which was my
mother's hometown. We were in graduate school together at Otis Art
Institute. He was one of those artists that, for me, was hard to deal
with in that he had sort of a split personality. At one time he would be
just this big, six-foot seven [inch], three-hundred- [pound ] gentle
giant, and then you turn around and you're dealing with a
three-hundred-pound hostile bear kind of—
-
MASON
- He was a big guy. I can imagine he was a threat.
-
DAVIS
- He would maul you. He did good work, good work. He got a lot of energy
and expression and his inner gut out in his work, and worked well in
clay, worked well with paintings with pastel overlays that had a Francis
Bacon quality. But my business relationship with Sonny was different
from my personal relationship with him, because he would exhibit and
then we might make a sale or we might get a deposit on a work, and then
he would want to be paid right away, or he would have another
opportunity at another place, and he would want to come and take the
work out after we had gotten it all set up to run for a month. So we
finally just said we wouldn't show his work anymore. It was one of those
situations—and I talk about this in art school a lot—where sometimes the
artist being his own representative is his own worst enemy and that
sometimes artists' communication skills are just off. In dealing with
all of his hostility and anger and demands, it was like, "Wait a minute.
I'm in business, and I want to enjoy being in business. If I need all
this hostility, I may as well go back into the classroom in a hard-core
school and get that from those kids." So we just refused to exhibit his
work at the gallery anymore, at least while I was at the helm. Some
years later he called and said, "Well, what did I do? What's the deal?"
I tried to tell him that his communication skills clash with the
objectives of his art and of us, and that we would be glad to exhibit
and handle his work, but he needed a business representative to handle
his communications and consignment and contractual relationships with
us, because it just wasn't working. I don't know that he ever resolved
that or if that ever made any sense to him, but it was an interesting
situation. I usually try to talk about those things to artists,
especially aspiring artists or artists who feel insecure about
communication or who have all these pent-up energies that don't come out
right when they're talking to somebody they really wanted to talk to and
everything goes wrong. Van Slater is an artist who died within the last three years. He was a
printmaker out of UCLA and taught at Compton College and had a large
family and was just a real interesting, steady guy. He did good work,
was always suspicious of galleries and the people who dealt in the
business of art. So although we exhibited his work from time to time, we
never really developed a strong exhibit relationship. We liked him, but
he wasn't one of the artists that we were successful with. It was really
unfortunate, because the work was good. I think we could have gone
further with it than we did, but we couldn't get beyond our personal
communication barriers. Another artist, named Arenzo Smith, exhibited with Van Slater in one of
the exhibits we did. He did a lot of drawing and watercolor and had
moved to California from Philadelphia. He was very active in the black
art movement, and he was always there, present and vocal. He later moved
to Hawaii and worked over there for quite a while. I haven't heard from
him in the last ten years. He was also a person who was at an early,
real early phase—unrelated to art—really into diet and health food and
vegetarianism and so forth. Elizabeth Catlett had an exhibit in 1971 at Brockman Gallery, and it's
probably one of the stronger exhibits that the gallery has had. It was
prints and sculpture, very powerful work, wood and stone and one or two
bronze pieces. She had done a piece called Unity
that I have ended up collecting that was a fist with two faces on either
side, and it represented student revolt during the Olympics in, I
believe, '68 in Mexico City, and also the fist representing black power
and John Carlos's statement and the three guys who ran the relay down
there. There are some things here that we wrote about Elizabeth that I
think are real interesting. She was an expatriate from the United
States. She at one time was married to Charles White, and they had a
very hostile separation. She married a Mexican artist, Francisco Mora,
and they had three sons. Both of them are still living and active today.
He's a printmaker, and she's still doing sculpture and some printmaking.
One of the successful pieces that we sold quite a bit of was a piece
that she did called Malcolm Speaks to Us, which
was related to Malcolm X and the impact that he had on the black
community internationally.
-
MASON
- She was nationally known by the way. She was the first nationally known,
celebrated, famous artist that the gallery showed. I was wondering if
this was like a turning point in the gallery's life or if it was just an
opportunity that presented itself.
-
DAVIS
- The opportunity to exhibit Elizabeth's work sort of came about from a
trip I took to Mexico City in 1967 or '68. I'd seen her work, and we'd
just started the gallery and initiated some communication, so it
resulted from a relationship that was being nurtured and developed from
when we first started as opposed to like all of a sudden in 1971 we
exhibit her work. She had not been exhibiting in the United States and
had basically lost her public in this country. So her exhibit really
became an introduction to the United States from her exile. And then for
her it just snowballed. Once the momentum got going from the Brockman
exhibit, then there were some other exhibits, and other people were
interested in her work, and probably four or five major exhibits
happened as a result of this introduction into California and then back
into this country. She was a feisty woman and very opinionated and very
on top of it. I had a lot of respect for her. I tiptoed around her on
some occasions just because I knew that she was going to catch me if I
slipped up. So it was very important to sort of get it right in terms of
dealing with her. She was also a longtime friend of Samella Lewis, and
that relationship resulted in a book [The Art of
Elizabeth Catlett/Samella Lewis] and some other lectures and
exhibitions.
-
MASON
- Right. Did she actually come to Los Angeles for the exhibition?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, she came. And we had to get bonded to get her work out of Mexico.
The work was shipped up to Tijuana. She couldn't ship it out. I had to
go get it. Then it was going to be real expensive to get it into the U.
S., so I went to Tijuana to get it. There was a Japanese guy who owned
the warehouse, and he didn't speak English. So I was going through the
Mexican group next door to get them to translate to the Japanese guy
about how to get this work out. Then I loaded it up in this little
Volkswagen van I had and drove it to the border. Then the border guards
wouldn't let me go with this work because they were declaring it a
national treasure, although they didn't know of her. So then I had to
get all of that stuff bonded. It was quite an interesting, complicated
process. Fortunately, I was traveling with some checks and could do
that. But it was a hell of an exhibit. And, again, it was one of those
that should have been reviewed and published and been in major
publications, but it didn't happen. We did sell a piece out of the show
that we had to Bill Cosby. We sold a number of pieces, and that ends up
how I happened to get that piece called Unity.
Bill and his wife had bought a lot of works. We schlepped them out to
the studio and set up a long hallway, and he would come through and say,
"I like this one, I like that one."
-
MASON
- How long had he been involved in the gallery?
-
DAVIS
- Well, he wasn't involved in the gallery. But he—
-
MASON
- I mean, coming to see the work.
-
DAVIS
- He didn't come. His agent or his set designer would come and say, "Well,
we would like to have some works that are representative of the black
community or black artists, because Bill Cosby wants it, and we're
sensitive to it." Cosby was also interested in acquiring some pieces
himself. So you took the mountain to Muhammad. Anyway, we had sold quite
a few pieces to Bill, including some of Varnette Honeywood's work. He
really likes her work a lot. But for some reason this Catlett piece
either bothered him or Camille [Cosby], or they were concerned about it.
After acquiring it and invoicing and so forth, they decided not to take
that piece. And I had basically said to Elizabeth we had sold the piece.
So here's the piece back, and I was stuck with it. I ended up
subtracting some money from another financial operation, actually from
the Louis Armstrong commission, deducting, my cut
or my commission from that. So that's how I ended up being the official
owner of the Unity piece. I feel real good to
have it. It's a strong piece and a historically significant piece. Ray Holbert is a guy who exhibited with the gallery in '72 and an
interesting person, a real interesting person that I just connected
with. I went visiting David Bradford, who was an artist who had
exhibited with the gallery off and on for a long time, and David had
moved to Northern California and was teaching at UC [University of
California] Berkeley. This guy Ray Holbert was one of his students, and
Ray was just always in the studio. So I actually was going to visit
David and I would always be impacted by Ray. Ray did real meticulous
drawings and Prismacolor pencil and Xerox combinations and etchings and
paintings that would be like the side of a head and what's going on
inside the head instead of an exterior portrait. I was really fascinated
with him. We became good friends, and I'm still in communication with
him today. One of the interesting things about Ray was that he was a
book artist, so he kept a real detailed journal of every day in his
life. He would do it as a journal and as a work of art. So now he's kept
these journals— He must have fifteen, twenty journals representing
twenty years of his life. We had an exhibit of his journals and of his
prints. We were never financially successful with his work, but his work
always made a very strong statement and drew an interesting crowd and an
unusual group of people. He's an artist that still deserves to be
recognized, and I'm real interested in his growth. He's interested in
computers and drawing a lot of computer-generated stuff now, and he's a
teacher at San Francisco City College. [reading] Art has always been difficult for me to verbally describe, but it does
involve the six senses we all have, including what we have managed to
learn verbally and academically from several sources. Otherwise, art is
as everything else is. I don't always paint or print in an obvious black
imagery because some of my work does not involve any faces or figures
that directly relate to black people only. I have no limit of who I want
to reach. Everyone seems to count. I'm fascinated by fantasy. It runs a
little ahead of reality before it becomes reality. I like to pursue my
fantasies when I paint and/or print. There are exciting things happening
in our heads, and fantasy and make-believe dreams stimulate me into
creating new images like nuclear scales and vitamins, battery-powered
electrical storms, or molecules and atom factories.
-
MASON
- And that's his theme?
-
DAVIS
- Yes. And this was that Elizabeth Catlett brochure. Wow, what a surprise
this is. Is this your writing or is this mine?
-
MASON
- No, that's mine.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. We did have a collection of work or a body of work that Brockman
Gallery— We call it the Brockman Gallery
Collection. It's really the art that my mother, Agnes [Moses]
Davis, my aunt, Louise Moses, my brother, Dale Brockman Davis, and
myself would purchase to support the artists and to support our interest
in what we thought were good or successful pieces. In 1975, we had an
exhibit [Brockman Gallery Collection] at
California State University at Los Angeles of that body of work which
represented probably fifteen or twenty different artists. This is an
exhibit in 1977, Third World Women. What's
interesting about this exhibit is that it's really reflective of the
sort of multiethnic interests that Brockman had. Even though its focus
was on the black American experience and black American artists, we were
always integrating or interjecting works by other artists who had
certain kinds of ethnic sensitivity to their work. And this one I've
just looked at, Isabel Castro, Irena Sabantas, Terri Hamada, Donna Nako,
etc., who were Asian, Hispanic, as well as black artists like Varnette
Honeywood, Kinshasha Conwill, and Melonee Blocker.
-
MASON
- Why did you want to group the women together? Were women, overall,
making different kinds of statements than men were? I know it's a
difficult question.
-
DAVIS
- Women's issues were very much alive, and the issue of artists of color
was a significant area to explore. So, in this case, it was a group
exhibit to get at what was happening among, in this case, fifteen
different artists. I would say that the Elizabeth Catlett exhibit was,
in a sense, the same kind of statement: a black woman of African
American heritage living in Mexico and influenced by their culture, very
much influenced by their culture as well. But these were women living
and working in L.A. I guess we focused on this exhibit and came up with
these people or these people referred other people to participate. Bill
Pajaud— I probably talked about him a little bit before. It's kind of
like Sonny Bustion in a way; we ran hot and cold with Bill. We really
liked his work, but he was subject to some moods that made it hard to
have a consistent, ongoing relationship with him. He had some real high
expectations, some of which we couldn't always meet.
-
MASON
- In terms of—?
-
DAVIS
- In terms of the business end of sales and so forth. And while we did do
well with his work, it ran hot and cold. So he later went with Heritage
Gallery, which was Charlie White's gallery, and that went about the same
way, which was real interesting. I didn't get that from him, but I did
get that kind of information and knowledge from Ben [Benjamin] Horowitz,
who was the owner and director of Heritage Gallery. And I think Bill
always felt that he wasn't acknowledged or he didn't achieve to the
level of some of his peers or people in his age range or group. He would
see people get local and national success.
-
MASON
- Other people from L.A., you mean? Because I can't really— I mean, other
than Charles White—
-
DAVIS
- Well, he and Charlie were buddies.
-
MASON
- Yeah.
-
DAVIS
- They were partners. But Charlie just went boom.
-
MASON
- Yeah. But he had already had—
-
DAVIS
- But Bill was and is a significant artist and did work, I think, of real
high quality and merit. His watercolors are excellent. And he did things
that dealt with the black experience—I mean, with other experiences as
well. But the things with the—
-
MASON
- The New Orleans Jazz series.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, the New Orleans jazz, the church, Eureka Jazz Band Parade are just
really really very, very special. But Bill wasn't one who got picked up,
and his work never sort of— His success never caught on fire, so to
speak.
-
MASON
- I guess what I was saying was Charles White had been shown in New York,
and I wonder if that was one big advantage that Charles White might have
had over—
-
DAVIS
- Hard to say. Good work is good work. And then David Hammons and Timothy
Washington jump out there, and here's the two Young Turks, and they're
getting it. Even I experienced some of my own personal, professional
jealousy with the success of David and Timothy, and I had to come to
grips with that, as well. But that was not my period to be recognized. I
was in another role and sort of— I have come into my own much later.
Fifteen, twenty years later I've gotten my notoriety act together in
terms of being published and being included and being recognized, so to
speak. But, nevertheless,. Bill had excellent work, great mastery of the
watercolor medium. He was instrumental with the Golden State Mutual
[Life Insurance Company] collection, and that was a real major kind of
undertaking. He has now moved to Las Vegas with. his family, and he's
living in that—
-
MASON
- Oh, he must have just moved there.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, just recently.
-
MASON
- Yeah, because he was talking about going.
-
DAVIS
- John Outterbridge, this was an exhibit announcement from 1982 [Ethnic Heritage]. John has sort of been with us
at the gallery since its inception. He did metal assemblage, metal and
wood and leather assemblage pieces. Then he did this exhibit here with a
series called the Ethnic Heritage Group, which were sort of doll-like
images that were reflective of high tech, new world, yet very African,
African American images and throwbacks, kind of dealing in both contexts
of new- and old-world images. Very, very, very thought provoking and
challenging. And John's statement here: If the Ethnic Heritage Group is about anything, it's my attempt to lend a
note about the journey of a people through the ages I work out of a
spiritual force. The significance of this body of work is that it is
very much in progress. There are so many untold tales about us. So many
of these pieces aren't titled. The people provide the titles: children,
writers, winos. The works utilize a variety of materials: fiber, metal,
fabric, hair from a barbershop floor and from friends. It's kind of
spontaneous. I like to speak a little beyond the understanding of
humanity. And that says it. In our gallery note we say, "Brockman Gallery offers
this rare opportunity to preview an outstanding new group of collector
items by this important, powerful, and dramatic artist." And it's very
much there. John is still very much alive and active in the community.
John now, interestingly enough, is the ongoing director of the Watts
Towers and the Watts Towers Arts Center, which includes the towers, and
he's given it a tremendous amount of vision and growth. He's still
active. He will be exhibiting at San Antonio Art Institute. His exhibit
is scheduled for October of 1991.
-
MASON
- A one-man show?
-
DAVIS
- A one-man show, yeah. And he's beginning to do some public art pieces,
too, and has recently gotten a commission.
1.14. TAPE NUMBER: IX, SIDE ONE APRIL 22, 1991
-
DAVIS
- Okay. So we're continuing the talk about artists' exhibits at Brockman
Gallery. There was a woman that we showed a lot named Enrica Marshall. Enrica was
originally from Tanzania and of mixed-blood heritage—British and
African. We met her through a referral of another person who used to
work at the gallery, I think Pat Johnson. We heard about her work off
and on for a while and finally got a chance to meet her. She did mostly
works that were serigraphs that dealt with scenes and imagery that were
reflective of Africa. And she still lives and works in Southern
California. Then we would also do exhibitions for Black History Months. We got that
annual call that some of the artists sort of resented, but it did become
a time of year that the community at large was open and interested in
the works that were being produced by black American artists. Other artists that we exhibited were Paul Goodnight. Paul lived in
Boston. We exhibited a group of works from his Haitian series. We had
traveled in Haiti around the same time as a part of a conference. I
think it was late seventies, '76, '77, somewhere in there, as I
remember. I would constantly run into him or his work when I would
travel in the East. I was very impressed with the technical quality of
his work and his portrayal of African and African American imagery
through his paintings and drawings. Varnette Honeywood was another artist that we had a fairly long-term
business relationship with. We own some of her work in our collection.
Her people are from Mississippi. I'm not sure if she was born in
Mississippi or Los Angeles. I know that she went to Los Angeles High
School and then went to college at Spelman [College] in Atlanta. She
does real interesting work that is collage and painting and deals with
the black genre, scenes that would be peculiar to our cultural group
that may have carryovers into other groups, as well, but they're
certainly peculiar to some of the black American experience. Such as Dixie Peach, where a woman is having her hair
pressed and straightened and using this Dixie Peach grooming oil. That
was certainly a real popular piece that she did.
-
MASON
- Had she always been doing those kinds of collages?
-
DAVIS
- All the work that I've known of hers has been oriented that way in terms
of style and imagery. And she's gained national attention with her work
and prints. It all tends to be statement oriented and pretty positive in
its approach. Bernard Hoyes is an artist who was born in Jamaica, lived
in Los Angeles, and I think was related to John Riddle in some way. He
always tried to capture that little bit of both cultures, the Jamaican
experience and the African American experience and some throw-ins of the
sort of reggae-Ethiopian philosophy and spiritualism. LaMonte [F.]
Westmoreland is an artist who is from Wisconsin, came to Los Angeles,
and spent quite a bit of time teaching at Santa Monica High School. He
really became a student of the black art movement, has done a lot of
documentation, research, and collecting of black artists, as well as
being an artist himself. His works are pointedly sort of
tongue-in-cheek.
-
MASON
- Yeah, he did like a Cream of Wheat series and—
-
DAVIS
- Right, a watermelon series, Cream of Wheat series, Aunt Jemima series, a
lot of collage and painting in his work, and a lot of point-counterpoint
using imagery that might otherwise be contradictory. In many cases, his
statements are sort of humorous. Another series he did was his target
series. I liked his work a lot. Something that I'm real sensitive to
that I wasn't able to address in a proper way with LaMonte—and I still
have flashbacks on it— was that one of the exhibits that we did with
him, we had a break-in in the gallery at a time when we didn't have
insurance, and some of his work was stolen. So we were never really able
to settle with him in a financial way, and we were only able to get him
to assume the loss, so to speak. To this day I regret not having found a
way to compensate him for it. The work was never found by the police or
whatever. We did a reporting and so forth. This broke down the
significance of our relationship, and so then he really shifted over to
exhibiting with some other galleries.
-
MASON
- They stole everything or selected pieces?
-
DAVIS
- Selected pieces, two or three pieces, but—
-
MASON
- That's really strange.
-
DAVIS
- I don't know. Well, we were both handled by Lizardi-Harp [Gallery] for a
while—I don't know if he's still with him—and he was exhibiting with
Tanner Gallery also. The Tanner Gallery was owned by Joyce Thigpen, and
she bought it from Samella [S.] Lewis, which was called the Gallery for
a while. Before that, I think Samella called it—
-
MASON
- Contemporary Crafts.
-
DAVIS
- Contemporary Crafts. So that had a sort of interesting history and
change. I'm not sure how active the Tanner Gallery is now. I know Joyce
ran the cycle that we all do where, while she was doing okay, it wasn't
really turning the kind of profit margin she needed to see for it to be
a sole entity. Marie [E.] Johnson, San Francisco-area artist, born and reared in
Baltimore, Maryland, daughter of a minister, and the church is in her
work. She was also militant or responsive to the militant issues of the
period. She did assemblages that reflected black culture and everyday
life¬style. She's done some installations that reflect the black church
and that experience. She's also an active organizer in the San Francisco
Bay Area and has been instrumental in stimulating and perpetuating the
communication between young aspiring and established artists in that
community and also continuing to keep the community exhibit link
together. She has a daughter, April—I think it's April Johnson or— Yeah.
I don't know if she's changed her name now. She is a weaver and
assemblage artist. In 1981, we did a joint exhibit [Prints by Jacob
Lawrence] with a woman named Pat Johnson, who used to work at
Brockman Gallery. She got her first job in the arts with Brockman. And
she opened a gallery with another woman in San Diego called New Visions.
Collectively, we purchased a number of works on paper by Jacob Lawrence
and had an exhibit and brought Jacob down from Seattle and had him give
a talk and visit and do a little presentation to some young people. It
was just really a very special exhibit and presentation. We had the
John Brown series and the Builder series, which were historically and—
The John Brown series was historically important to black people, and
the Builder series was certainly important to the strong work ethic of
certain groups of people in the United States and to unions and then to
carpentry and masonry and so forth. And not a lot of artists have taken
that working-class group of people and made art from people who walk on
scaffolding or who hammer nails and do construction.
-
MASON
- But do you think they feel like the art community would kind of ignore
them because they'll say, "Well, that's just social realism, that was
already done in the 1930s"?
-
DAVIS
- Well, Jacob Lawrence was a part of 1930. He was out of the Harlem
Renaissance period and the WPA [Works Progress Administration] period.
And out of the WPA, he was probably one of the younger artists involved,
and he was also successful at a very young age. Jake is a very
significant artist today, and I feel that he is continuing to be
recognized by major institutions.
-
MASON
- Yeah. You said he gave a presentation. When artists like Elizabeth
Catlett and Jacob Lawrence come, do they give more technical things? Did
they show how they work? Or was it more of just a historical
presentation?
-
DAVIS
- A more historical—
-
MASON
- I guess a workshop or a—
-
DAVIS
- More a historical overview of how they became artists, what some of the
major influences in their lives were, the kinds of things that they were
attracted to. We really didn't do workshops that dealt with technique or
process. Very seldom. I'm sort of reaching for any that we may have
done, and I really can't think of any right now. Also in 1981, we had an exhibit of works with Charles Dickson. Charles is
from South Central Los Angeles, went to Fremont High School, and lives
in an industrial space in Compton. In a way, Charles has been oriented
towards being a street artist in that his goal of exhibiting and putting
his work before the public was probably solely initiated by him, and he
controlled the activity, so to speak. He was not dependent on a gallery
structure to exhibit his work, so we never really developed an ongoing
relationship. I think he always felt, wanted to be, and probably still
is independent of galleries for his creative exposure. But we did do
some exhibitions with him. We were successful with selling his work a
few times. And his work is real good, real good.
-
MASON
- Yeah.
-
DAVIS
- We did do a number of autograph parties at the gallery. The gallery
became a focus for a lot of activities that were not necessarily
visual-art oriented exclusively. There was the Black Librarians Caucus,
which would use the gallery for autograph parties, and sometimes we
would have receptions there and opportunities to meet people who might
be in town who were dignitaries or whatever. We did an autograph party
for Roy Decarava, a photographer from New York who did a documentation
of black imagery. As I think about it, we also had—
-
MASON
- Gordon Parks?
-
DAVIS
- We had some works— Well, we had a book of Gordon Parks. We had a book on
Romare Bearden that Abrams published. We had a book on Charlie [Charles]
White that we were able to make available for a short period of time.
-
MASON
- I thought you were trying to think of other photography exhibits.
-
DAVIS
- No. So there were a series of those kinds of activities that took place
as an undercurrent to the ongoing exhibition program, and that was kind
of interesting. We didn't talk much about Doyle Lane, but Doyle Lane was an artist that
we exhibited a lot. He was a potter or ceramist. He lives in the
Highland Park area of Los Angeles. He's originally from Louisiana, a
very quiet, almost withdrawn guy, but when you see his work, it's just
extremely dynamic and very, very delicate and very sensitive and very
well crafted. He was a master at glazing and glaze formulas, especially
in the low-firing techniques. I just wanted to make sure that we
included Doyle in this. There was another woman whom we met through Doyle who was a Russian
immigrant named Anna Martin, and she was also an excellent craftsperson
who was a jewelry maker. We've continued to have and exhibit her
work-annually at the gallery. She lived in Los Angeles for a long time
and then moved to Northern California, now resides in Santa Cruz. Okay. In 1984, we did an exhibit of works by Varnette Honeywood related
to the Olympics, and that was a real interesting body of work, collages
and watercolor combination. In '86, we did an interesting— This is a sort of an exhibition schedule.
We did an exhibition of some artists who had done a lot of murals, and
it included Richard Wyatt, Kent Twitchell, John Valadez, David Bradford,
and Charles White. In May of that year, we did a print exhibition [Romare Bearden] and some original on-paper pieces
by Romare Bearden. We basically borrowed that collection of work from a
private collector in New York. We were real successful with the prints
and weren't able to sell the originals; they were quite expensive. We also had handled and represented some artists from outside of the
country or outside of what I would call the forty-eight states. We had
the works of Martin Chariot, who is an artist of Mexican and French
heritage who lives in Hawaii. His things range from murals to oil
paintings and are reflective of Hawaiian culture. He's the son of
another famous artist and painter in Mexico. I'm trying to remember his
dad's name. Jean Chariot. Something like that. And then we had an artist from Brazil, whose works we exhibited quite a
bit, named Terciano. He was from Salvador de Bahia, and watercolor and
oil painting of the African cultural influence in that part of Brazil. I
think that exhibit was in 1989, so you can—It's gone quite a bit. My last exhibit [Recent Works] at Brockman Gallery
was in 1990, and it was reflective of a Blanket
series that I've been working on since 1980. So it represented pieces
from ten years of work. [tape recorder off] In the effort to do a lot of outreach and move the work out of the
community and into the greater community of Los Angeles and Southern
California, Brockman Gallery did a lot of satellite exhibits. Some of
them were in community centers like the Westside Jewish Community
Center. Some of them were in other galleries. I think I mentioned Ankrum
Gallery. We did exhibits in Santa Barbara or just south of Santa
Barbara. It's Montecito. Just south of Santa Barbara in Montecito
there's a gallery, Galleria del Sol, and there was a guy there who did
outreach for that gallery. His name is MacDuff Everton. MacDuff had come
to do some documentation for a slide company on black artists in Los
Angeles and saw the work and made the connection with us and this
gallery in Santa Barbara. We did a number of exchange kinds of
exhibition activities with him. He's sort of been someone who has
constantly stayed in touch with us through the years. He's an Anglo
artist, photographer, who does photographic documentation that's
primarily focused on western life-style, western cowboy life-style, in a
way, and Mexican culture. He's exhibited at UC [University of
California] Santa Barbara. [tape recorder off] Let's see. Where were we?
-
MASON
- You were talking about—
-
DAVIS
- Oh, yeah. And he's been published in National
Geographic and has constantly been a link for us to things that
were happening in other communities that we might want to be aware of or
participate in. This is an announcement of an exhibit we did with a
furniture company called San Fernando Furniture. It was in Los Angeles,
another segment of Los Angeles. And it was, again, an opportunity to do
outreach and attract people from other communities. As I remember, one
of the people that came to this was the then state senator Alan [G.]
Sieroty, who was very instrumental in arts legislation. Alan became
someone who would frequent Brockman Gallery as a result of the kinds of
things that we were doing. I would visit him in Sacramento to discuss
issues related to black artists and to artists in general. He has been a
collector of art from Brockman as well as other galleries. I've had
ongoing conversations with him in terms of artists' rights and artist
issues. I still talk with him today from time to time. He is no longer a
senator or no longer in the senate. You were going to say? MASON; You
said he was involved in arts legislation. You mean in terms of like
getting the California Afro-American Museum started?
-
DAVIS
- Well, certainly that was something that he would support and have to
vote on. But he was instrumental in issues that dealt with artist,
rights. He was instrumental with the California State Summer School for
the Arts, the California Confederation of the Arts, the royalties
percent act, Arts in Prisons, the California Arts Council. All of those
have been areas that he's fought for and championed. He was like open to
everybody. He wasn't someone who ignored the plea of the black artist,
nor was he someone. who dealt exclusively with the black artist. I'm
trying to think of— There was something recently— Oh, yeah. Then we had
a big fund-raiser, "Art Against Apartheid, " and he bought works from
that auction. Several of those pieces he donated to the city of Los
Angeles. So he's been instrumental in not only buying but placing art in
collections of museums and municipal institutions that sometimes don't
see what's going on in alternative kinds of communities and settings. Robert Gore is an artist who exhibited with Brockman off and on for a
while too. He's an Anglo artist who is from Missouri. I worked with him
at Manual Arts High School. He traveled to Spain and did some tremendous
pieces while he was living there, and we had exhibited his work off and
on. Another artist who was an Anglo artist, who was called the "father of
serigraphy, " is from the New York area, a gentleman by the name of Guy
MacCoy. He was a master silkscreen artist, and he had one or two
exhibitions at Brockman Gallery as well. Another woman, Elaine Towns, exhibited with Brockman, who was an artist
who grew up in Los Angeles in a predominantly black community and did
her undergraduate work at UCLA and then was awarded a Fulbright
[scholarship] and went to Spain and lived in Europe for a long time.
Upon returning to Los Angeles, she began to make herself known through
exhibitions, which included shows at Brockman Gallery. There was another artist that we had sort of a long¬time working
relationship with, and that was Stan [Stanley] Wilson. Stan was an
artist who grew up in Pasadena—in Los Angeles and Pasadena, actually—and
we met at the Otis Art Institute. Stan did work that was of clay and
fiber actu¬ally. He did some weaving, fiber pieces, that all had real
strong African ancestral statements in it. Stan went to FESTAC [World
Black and African Festival of Arts and Culture]-Nigeria, and upon
returning from that did even more African-oriented or African-influenced
works that became installation pieces and little temples and real
special statements. He also did some real interesting drawings, a
combination of those two things. We felt real good about the kind of
work we were able to exhibit of Stan's, and we had real interesting
collectors interested in his work. Here's a quote by Stan: "My
inspiration comes from my day-to-day existence." [A critic wrote: ]
"What has evolved in Stan's work is a compelling interpretation of the
black American experience informed by the potent cultural presence, the
ancestral fragments, of the African forebearers." This is just extremely
visible and powerful in Stan's work. He was one of those artists who had
a lot of energy and was really eager and willing to participate in a lot
of the kinds of things that Brockman Gallery was projecting, and he was
pretty loyal to his working efforts with us. We had a lot of respect for
him and his work.
-
MASON
- I don't know if we want to—?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, we've got another question.
-
MASON
- Okay. Well, I was just going to ask if you had anything to say sort of.
overall about the exhibitions or the things that you were trying to do
in the exhibitions.
-
DAVIS
- Well, there are a lot of different kinds of exhibits, and, being in
business, we had to take into consideration that we needed cycles of
work that was marketable or that we could attract clients or collectors
to. We also liked to exhibit work that was challenging that might not be
financially rewarding for us. So there was always a concern for balance
and a desire to have successful exhibits. Sometimes the public really
wanted the "nice exhibits, " quote, unquote, and we couldn't always
provide that. We wanted challenging kinds of things instead of things
that might be a little more traditional or— I don't want to say— Well,
let's just say what I wanted to say. Challenging would be things that
would not necessarily be immediately embraced. It might be real
provocative. It might not be nice. It might not be pretty or reflective
of the positive side of our culture.
-
MASON
- Outside of Noah Purifoy, the exhibition that you mentioned [Niggers Ain't Never Ever Gonna Be Nothin'—All They
Want To Do Is Drink + Fuck], is there any other exhibition like
that that you can think of? Because when you were going through that I
didn't really—
-
DAVIS
- Well, David Hammons's work was real challenging. He did a penis series
that a lot of people didn't understand. The artist whom I mentioned from
Pasadena who did the cast resin works [Cecil Burton] was real esoteric
in a sense and nonblack oriented in terms of its visual context. It was
done by a black man who was an artist, but the public had a hard time
embracing that work. Stan's work was real hard for a lot of people
because it was so African, in a way, and so demanding, and not
necessarily something that— I would get comments like, "Well, we really
like it, but it's not something I would want to put in my house." It
just provoked too much voodoo, if you will, that kind of—
-
MASON
- Well, on the other hand, Betye Saar's work is extremely popular, and
hers is—
-
DAVIS
- And we didn't really handle Betye Saar's work. Yeah. I think we had one
or two exhibitions that were group shows that she had work in. That
would just be a response we would get from some people. Now, that's not
to say that with Stan's work we didn't have some success. There were
some other people who— Maren Hassinger exhibited with us just once or
twice. She did cable art, and we weren't able to generate collectors to
respond to her work.
-
MASON
- Yeah, but she had had a show—maybe that was later— at the L.A. [Los
Angeles] County Museum [of Art], though.
-
DAVIS
- That was later.
-
MASON
- That was later?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah.
-
MASON
- So do you consider yourself one of the earlier venues for her, then?
-
DAVIS
- No, not really. I mean, we didn't really work with her. I mean, she
just. happened to show with us more than she was someone who was one of
the artists who was part of the main group. There were a lot of artists
who would just come through Brockman, so to speak, and I would say she
was one of them.
-
MASON
- The main group being?
-
DAVIS
- A lot of those people that—
-
MASON
- Oh, the Black Artists Association?
-
DAVIS
- Or the people whom I mentioned, whom I read from those press releases.
-
MASON
- Okay. So, overall, would you say—? I'm not going to ask is there a black
aesthetic. I don't know. That's a strange question. But would you say
that there was a kind of black mainstream artist? Or was it that
everybody's work was just so diverse or so individual that you wouldn't
even—?
-
DAVIS
- Well, I'm going to address the black aesthetic question and say that
like any group of artists that comes together or anybody of people that
have collective thought or who have a common denominator that they work
toward, it's valid to call it impressionism or cubism or the black
aesthetic or the black art movement of a certain period, just like the
Chicano art that came out during the seventies and early eighties. I
mean, it has a certain character that is peculiar to a culture or a
message or a statement or—
1.15. TAPE NUMBER: IX, SIDE TWO APRIL 22, 1991
-
DAVIS
- I think there's a black aesthetic that is peculiar to the kinds of
statements that a lot of black artists are compelled to make and
portray. There's a guy out of Boston who does— Dana Chandler is a big
proponent of that kind of thing, and he exhibited at Brockman Gallery
and did a body of work that was just directly hostile toward the white
establishment and the white aesthetic and purported to espouse a black
aesthetic. And a number of artists have worked and focused in this kind
of a direction. And just as any image is valid to paint—Texas landscapes
or Norwegian still lifes or New York skyscrapers—the imagery that black
artists choose to paint is valid also. Because it's done by a black guy
doesn't necessarily make it good, nor does it make it valid or good if
it's done by a white artist. It's the quality of the work, and the
subject is the choosing of the artist. The artists have that right. If
it's that which they choose to express and they are participants in this
culture, then they deserve and should be recognized as a part of what
goes on in the United States of America and cannot and should not be
ignored. On the other hand, it's not valid to pigeonhole all black
artists into the, quote, "black aesthetic, " unquote, in that there are
many artists who acknowledge their ethnic heritage but choose to paint
outside of that experience or in addition to that experience or include
that experience in the big picture of all of what they do. So some of
those artists I would say would be Richard Hunt and Martin Puryear and
Sam Gilliam [Jr.]. And I tend to think in that direction at this time.
-
MASON
- So what you're saying is there isn't a black aesthetic.
-
DAVIS
- No, I'm saying there is a black aesthetic among a certain group of black
American artists, and that it is valid.
-
MASON
- Okay. So that's mostly social protest and—
-
DAVIS
- Well, it's more art that deals with and is concerned about black
imagery, black issues. I wouldn't say it's limited to social protest.
It's bigger than social protest. It encompasses sort of the spectrum of
the black experience, which is church, which is dance, music, and so
forth. I would say that Varnette Honeywood's work is within the context
of the black experience and so is Faith Ringgold's work. So you've got
two real divergent kind of energies still dealing with the same thing.
Charles White and Romare Bearden. None of these artists are afraid to
call themselves black, and being black is not— the issue with them as
much as being allowed to make the kind of statement they want to make
and be recognized for it and it being considered valid within the
context of the culture and place and experiences that they have and
live.
1.16. TAPE NUMBER: X, SIDE ONE APRIL 22, 1991
-
MASON
- We're going to talk about your going back to graduate school. A couple
of days ago you mentioned that you wanted to get back into a community
of artists, and you got into the fourth-year B. F. A. [bachelor of fine
arts] program at Otis [Art Institute] as a preliminary to going into the
M. F. A. [master of fine arts] program. So if you could just talk about
that and why you chose Otis and what you learned there.
-
DAVIS
- I guess at that time, 1970, I had become frustrated to some degree with
my own productivity and felt the need to take classes by going to school
and being among artists and also wanting to acquire an M. F. A. degree
in order to increase my mobility within the education community, thus
allowing me to qualify for jobs that a B. F. A. would not. I chose Otis
because it was an art school but also because Charles White was there,
who was the noted black American artist. And there were a number of
other black students there that I was aware of, so that common ground,
that common bond, was an attraction, especially when I went on the
campus and talked to a few. [Charles] Ron Griffin was an artist there, a
student there at the time. Marion [A.] Epting was finishing, and Stan
[Stanley] Wilson was a year ahead of me at Otis. And then the other
artist I had mentioned, Nathaniel Bustion, and then sometime, I guess a
year or so later, Gloria Bohanon entered. So there seemed to be a
movement of a small but significant number of us who wanted greater
social mobility, and we saw this as a vehicle. I think a lot of us were
attracted to the school because it was accessible within downtown Los
Angeles, because Charles White was a famous black American artist that
we all admired, and because there were other students of color there.
So, really, that's sort of how I entered. I took drawing with Charles White and enjoyed his ability to preach and
teach. He was quite an orator and tended to reach into the black church
to communicate when he got wound up, talking about figure drawing or art
or life and what it meant and took to be an artist. So he was inspiring
and intimidating because he was certainly a master at his craft. But he
had a tremendous amount of spiritual power that he was able to cross a
lot of borders with.
-
MASON
- What did he teach you about drawing?
-
DAVIS
- Well, I can't say he really taught me a lot about the technical aspects
of drawing per se. Most of the instruction there was leading by example
and giving direction. It wasn't a school that pushed the development of
technique or explored a lot of techniques. It basically took what you
had, what you brought— What you brought to the table is what you had to
work with, and that's what they would either criticize or evaluate and
make suggestions on. My drawings were not my strongest suit, yet I did
struggle through that class. It was primarily figure drawing. Again,. I
think I learned more from Charlie about life and about being an artist
than I did about doing drawing per se. If anything, drawing was his
platform or his pulpit, so he preached from his pulpit. He had you in a
drawing class, but drawing was not the sermon.
-
MASON
- What was he concerned with? What things did he preach about?
-
DAVIS
- Well, what it took to be successful, the kind of effort and commitment
you had to make to your art and your profession, your career, the kinds
of life hurdles that one has to face, and the options and directions
that were open to you and also the doors that would possibly be closed
to you, especially as a black artist. So that's not necessarily the kind
of thing he would relate to you in class. He might talk about his own
personal experience and some of the things that did not happen that
perhaps should have happened for an artist of his talent, some
opportunities that he didn't get, but also about his personal
perseverance and fortitude. Here's a little guy who had a lot of
obstacles, born in Mississippi, raised by his mother in Chicago with
very little, was in the war, had one lung that he lived on, and he was a
heavy smoker and drinker. I guess another word for Charlie was that he
was feisty and that he thought big. I mean, he had great vision, and he
was a universalist in his work. Although his portrayal was of black
imagery, the spirituality of his images was universal.
-
MASON
- Did he teach you anything about murals? Did he talk about that?
-
DAVIS
- No, no.
-
MASON
- He started some political group in the fifties for black artists. I
think it was in response to the House Un-American Activities Committee
and that problem with Paul Robeson and the communists and stuff like
that. That seemed to have been a part of his earlier life—involvement in
political activities. Was that still true then?
-
DAVIS
- No, I wasn't aware of him being actively politically involved. He was
certainly verbal and vocal about things that he felt strongly about.
What they were specifically, I can't really recall. But he had this sort
of great ability to pull people together, to get people to come around
him, and to be a catalyst for energy, for art. I mean, he made people
draw, and he made them work hard at it, and he pushed his students as
far as he could get them to be willing to go.
-
MASON
- And you said that you had had a conflict with him about something.
-
DAVIS
- Oh, in my second year at Otis, when I entered the M. F. A. program, I
guess I was maybe too serious about my goals and what I had to get out
of it and so forth. So Charlie would come up and shoot the breeze and
sort of kid around with me and the other black students who were in that
studio. I tried to relay to him that I didn't want to joke around. I
didn't want to play. I didn't want to shoot the breeze or play the
dozens related to art. And I think part of it had to do with just being
extremely serious and, in a way, probably a little uptight. It was a—
-
MASON
- You mean he would criticize your—?
-
DAVIS
- I was just— It was more like— It wasn't necessarily— It wasn't academic
criticism. It was more like— I really didn't want to work with an
adviser in that kind of a loose capacity. While I had a tremendous
amount of respect for him as an artist and as a man, my attitude in the
studio was real serious. There was a time when I was going into debt in
order to stay in school, and my little financial fiefdom had fallen down
because of my car, and I was changing my personal marital status, and
business was tough at that time. So I guess we had to separate our
agendas, because our communication patterns were real different.
Although I did then and do now respect him, I asked to have him
withdrawn as an adviser, because I didn't feel like it would be mutually
beneficial for me and it would have been an unhealthy situation for the
two of us to constantly be at each other's throats. I think he was a
little hurt by that, also, because he had stuck up for me in some
situations. But it was just a decision I had to make. And I continued to
communicate with him and relate to him in a less formal way.
-
MASON
- So what role did he have in your final thesis?
-
DAVIS
- None. Not in a direct way. My studio work was primarily under the advice
and criticism of a guy named Wayne Long and Manuel Fuentes. They were
the ones who were assigned to oversee my activities.
-
MASON
- So do you want to talk about your thesis project?
-
DAVIS
- Well, it's kind of interesting to resee this, and I really appreciate
that you pulled it out of the files, because it sort of helps me
reunderstand who I was and my interests and my areas of growth at that
time.
-
MASON
- I was wondering what you meant by the first statement.
-
DAVIS
- My graduate adviser, Wayne Long, was a white instructor, and what I said
about him was that he allowed freedom to grow and develop in the chosen
black direction in that he didn't put it down, he wasn't critical of it,
he really supported whichever way I wanted to go, and just really gave
me advice on trying to make it work aesthetically and within the context
of who I was as an artist. And I appreciated that freedom. It was a
predominantly all-white school other than one or two other instructors
of color, and I had real strong ties to the black art movement and
wanted to continue to pursue art that was at least intellectually
connected to it, if not spiritually, and in some cases imagewise as
well.
-
MASON
- Yeah, I was just wondering if being an art student at that time when
there was so much attention being paid to American art—you know, pop art
and op art and abstract expressionism—I was just wondering if you felt
that there was a push by instructors at times to be like Jackson Pollock
or to be like Andy Warhol.
-
DAVIS
- There were some instructors who had strong leanings in certain
directions. In the M. F. A. program we were basically given advisers to
work with. So my advisers were selected based on those who were going to
impose an ideology or school of art on me. There was one guy whom I was
real fascinated with, but he was way out in a whole other place, and we
could never really come together in terms of our thinking. His
statements were real esoteric and psychedelic. As much as I was
attracted to this guy's knowledge and being really hip— He told me that
he didn't want to be my adviser because where I was coming from just
didn't match and it would have been a bad mix. So I felt like this
adviser system worked pretty well for me. I had a lot of freedom, and I
worked real hard. I spent that two years working on the Symbol series and using the symbols
as sort of— Well, to go back on that, I started exploring ancient and
contemporary symbols and using a lot of Egyptian symbols in my work and
a lot of contemporary symbols. I was just full of symbols and
overwhelmed by them. And then it started narrowing itself down to, I
think, arrows and stop signs. The arrow became a real important symbol
because it transcended ancient and contemporary times. It showed itself
in caves, and it shows itself in everyday life. Beyond the physical
importance of the arrow, it also became a philosophical symbol in that
it represents direction. We're all faced with taking and making
decisions based on directions that we want to follow in our lives. And
it represents, in a sense, a fork in the road. So it represents decision
making, deciding which way to go. Then I also used it to indicate
positive and negative, up being positive, down being negative. A lot of
the arrows in my work are up and to the left, which is indicative of a
political attitude as well.
-
MASON
- You said you'd been looking at Egyptian symbols. Why Egyptian?
-
DAVIS
- The Egyptians used symbols as a language probably more than anyone, and
I was fascinated with the kinds of stories and images that they would
tell by using pictures and symbols in their communications. I thought this was. interesting here in this little foreword: "I see
myself as a message bearer. The projection is of and for the future of
mankind and black peoples. As most men see their mission on earth, I am
going to pursue mine through my art and life-style." Rereading this, it
carries through to today and how I'm living my life and how I carry or
project myself and also how I communicate with students. I've
definitely, in the last few years, been very much a part of the
multicultural or the culturally diverse movement in California and take
a lot of pride in projecting my history as an African American and my
ancestry and my roots in Alabama. And I make an effort to seek out
students of color, to be a role model—not necessarily an example, but a
role model—that they too can be successful and how this was the way I
did it or this was a way to look at it. And my life-style— I've had
certain levels of success that they too can achieve. I like to give
example by doing or by having done, as opposed to saying what someone
should do without having done it or experienced it myself. Being a person from African American culture, I'm extremely aware of the
lack of documentation in journals, publications, history books, and so
forth. Even in doing this paper for Otis, my research for my paintings
and for this paper was done more by seeing and hearing and talking with
other respected black artists throughout the U.S. It was done with
interviews and travels in different parts of the country. I think in the
back here it listed all the conferences I went to and all the different
people I talked to, so that was kind of— Or for me, in a way, it was
like this approach that we're dealing with—oral history. The references
aren't there in the books, and no one was making an active effort to
document what the artists were doing in the sixties, especially among
the black American artists. So it did happen to some limited degree, and
there was certainly a lot of catch-up going on. But this kind of
tradition is as valid as anything else. It's just a matter of getting
this into the learning system of mainstream America so that it doesn't
get lost and it becomes a part of the whole.
-
MASON
- Well, maybe you could talk about the work that you did.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. Let me see. A lot of this work had some political relationships
and the fact that artists of color are not necessarily being addressed
in history. I say here that "The black man in the United States is a particular species in that he
has been bitterly enslaved and has come through a hundred years plus of
abuse to understand the Western world's technology through Western
education, philosophy, language, values, and culture, aesthetic and
beauty standards. The situation of an aware black student in the
Western-directed schools is a strange one. Symbol series addresses
itself to a concern about the direction of black American people and the
way they relate to the rest of the world and other black peoples. This
project is addressed to that direction, though all the images are not
black, nor are all of the symbols obvious. Black means first: first man,
first mother, first madonna, first language, first religion, first
music, first civilization, first government, first art, first culture,
first direction." I guess, in describing. a work that I did— You put this one piece here in
front of me. This one is called Caution, 1971.
And it was a pretty interesting description, and I'd rather read it than
try to recapture it from memory.
-
MASON
- I remember you just talked about what each—
-
DAVIS
- Each symbol is, yeah.
-
MASON
- And here you have a profiles kind of a— Not realistic, but—
-
DAVIS
- Well, that one—
-
MASON
- Which doesn't really appear in any of your other works that I know
about. The use of—
-
DAVIS
- Of images?
-
MASON
- Yes, but recognizable, human—
-
DAVIS
- It does appear in some paintings, but they haven't necessarily been
published. I do remember several figurative pieces that I did the year
before doing this, which was '70, '71. And then the Self-Portrait series
used profile a lot.
-
MASON
- Yeah, I haven't seen any work from that series.
-
DAVIS
- None of that was ever published. And then I used abstract derivatives of
African sculpture in a lot of work also. But in this particular piece
the arrow is for misdirection. Then there's a yellow caution sign which
is cautioning for the black man. The cross is for the repressive force
in the black community. In Los Angeles we've always had a real problem
issue with police and police mentality and police abuse, and here in
1991 we have that as a very obvious case within the city of Los Angeles
where seventeen policemen participated in the beating of a black man
[Rodney King] for speeding. I use the black power sign with the raised
fists, the symbol of a political button here which is collaged with
rhetoric on it, and a Christian symbol behind the rhetoric of a cross,
and then a caution or stop sign with the image of a man's head bandaged
on it. And I say here that The black man has a bandaged head from being
bombarded by all of these "correct" misdirections. The circle button
with words is for the politicians who promise everything until elected.
The star is for the law, a repressive force in the black community. So a
piece like this is sort of interesting in that it has. a lot of meaning,
and the meaning sometimes means more for the artist than the viewer on
first sight. I think that was true with a lot of the work that I did
during this period.
-
MASON
- You mean in terms of the—?
-
DAVIS
- In terms of the artwork itself in that it was very stark and real
challenging, but it wasn't necessarily literal in its—
-
MASON
- No, I mean the symbols are really direct, so you mean that there are
other—
-
DAVIS
- There might be other —
-
MASON
- —interpretations.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, there might be other interpretations of this piece. And then I
think of some of these other pieces, The White
Aesthetic, the Yellow Bus series, they
were— The Yellow Bus piece really dealt with the
redirection for busing of young people, not necessarily busing for
integration but for quality education, and that it was not enough just
to bus black children to white schools or to predominantly white schools
and vice versa. I mean, everyone wants their children to get a quality
education and grow up with a healthy, wholesome self and sense of self.
I was concerned that black children be bused towards a pan-African
direction and an understanding of the universal world, not just an
occidental world or a Western society. So that was sort of the impetus
for that particular piece. Then there was a piece that was an all-solid
piece, an all-solid, black piece called The Black
Aesthetic, I used the symbol of black to reflect black people.
It had a rope from it, and it had a button on it, sort of a Third World
button on it, and it kind of stood for being careful and not getting
hung up. That was the use of the rope and the noose kind of symbolism,
the kind of thing that we've always had to strive away from, which is
being physically abused as a people. That's something that has
historically happened. Now we may not have as much physical abuse,
except in Los Angeles, but we may be victims of psychological abuse.
Where's this other one?
-
MASON
- In the bag?
-
DAVIS
- No. This one, which has a lot of shock element to it: The Niggers Will Survive the White Aesthetic. And this was an
all-white piece that had a symbol of an African mask in it, and it—
-
MASON
- You mean it was a canvas with—
-
DAVIS
- No, it was a collage that was suspended on a board. It was like raised
from the surface, and then it had this African mask sort of breaking
through this collage and then, underneath, it had some plastic tubing. I
don't quite remember what I had inside the tubing, but it was like
either water or a liquid. But to read this short paragraph: This piece
deals with the ability of the black artist to be included in art
publications, museums, galleries, and other white or so-called white
institutions and what he has given up in order to be included and what
eventually happens to the relationship of his thinking before thus being
pulled away from his people to be in the mainstream or to be hung by the
system. This problem, oddly enough, is a burden on the revolutionary
Caucasian-American artists. The White Aesthetic
uses elements of simplicity, white, the absence of color, basic shapes
with texture, the symbol being that of color and the noose at the end of
the rope. And that really sort of addressed the issue of what it might
take to be included in the mainstream of the art community.
-
MASON
- Was it a reflection of what the L.A. [Los Angeles] County Museum [of
Art] did?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, and also a reflection on the struggle that all of these artists
had to deal with, and the fact that so many art historians, educators,
critics really would say you have to give up the kinds of things you do
in order to be successful within the structure or confines of the
contemporary art world instead of the artist making it and defining it.
It was just really a slap in the face for people whose history and
direction didn't come from the same motivation or influence or culture.
-
MASON
- Do you have somebody in mind who was telling you these things?
-
DAVIS
- It was just really the whole art system and just having seen it and
watching how difficult it was for artists to break through and
participate in the major league or to not be relegated to being
second-class citizens in the art community by virtue of the fact that
you weren't doing what the majority of artists were doing, or you
weren't a part of that group. I had here a closing statement: To play
games with and to challenge the white aesthetic is dangerous, but it
cannot be ignored. It must be understood. It is like fighting the sea.
The black aesthetic must develop an understanding of technology and
media without losing sight of its message, its audience, and its
cultural heritage.
-
MASON
- So then you're back to the issue of quality and standards and
craftsmanship.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. I mean, we live in the fastest-paced society on the planet, one of
the highest technologically developed societies, certainly one of the
more industrially advanced societies and economically strong societies.
We can't ignore that. And nothing told me more about that than when I
went to Africa with my thoughts about what Mother Africa was and what my
roots were and my sense of Africanism.
1.17. TAPE NUMBER: X, SIDE TWO APRIL 22, 1991
-
MASON
- What year did you go to Africa? I mean, about what year?
-
DAVIS
- I think that was '76 or '77. But the African American is a peculiar
breed. I mean, he has an African heritage and African roots, but he's
also a product of a Western technological society. So, in a way, we're a
hybrid between the two, and that's an interesting thing and an important
thing to come to grips with, and not losing sight of either one.
-
MASON
- You said that you had a certain perception before you went to Africa and
after you came back. How did your relationship to Africa change or
deepen?
-
DAVIS
- Well, it let me know how Western I was and how important Africa was to
me in terms of my roots, but in terms of my life-style and pace and
patterns, those were very Western. But what I'm really trying to say in
this discussion in this area is that quality is important, understanding
of time and place is important, embracing those things that we can take
advantage of in the society that we live in is important, and also
coming to grips and acknowledging our past and current cultural
histories. It's important to know and to acknowledge our African
ancestry. It's also important to know and acknowledge that we live in a
multicultural society in the United States, that it's culturally
diverse, with many groups of people bringing all kinds of things to the
table from their backgrounds and their histories, and that we can't just
accept one direction or one point of view. That all of it is important
and valid.
-
MASON
- Okay. When did you start your Africa series?
-
DAVIS
- The African Consciousness series started really right after— I think it
started right after Otis. So it sort of progressed from this body of
work into the African Consciousness series, which I worked on for about
three years. And then I went to Africa. Then I did a series of pieces
upon returning from that. And then, somewhere in between there, I did
the Self-Portrait series that I told you about that sort of reflected
directions and changes that were going on inside my head.
-
MASON
- Okay. Well, you can talk about that now, I guess, unless you're tired.
-
DAVIS
- Well, this was an interesting group of names here of people and
experiences that I had that I used as references for this graduate body
of work and paper. Charles White was obvious, whom we've talked about. A
guy named Ed [Edward S.] Spriggs was the director of the Studio Museum
in Harlem at the time.
-
MASON
- Did you know him when he was in L.A.?
-
DAVIS
- Ed Spriggs?
-
MASON
- Yeah.
-
DAVIS
- No.
-
MASON
- Well, I don't know if he was in L.A., but he was on the West Coast. I
always see him referred to as a "West Coast filmmaker, " so I was just
wondering where he was.
-
DAVIS
- David Hammons, whom we've talked about; Ron Griffin, who was a student
there; Camille Billops, whom I had met through the National Conference
of Artists; Benny Andrews, who is an artist in New York whom I talk with
a lot; David Bradford I mentioned, who would exhibit at Brockman
[Gallery]; Ray Holbert at UC [University of California] Berkeley;
Samella [S.] Lewis, who was at Claremont [Scripps College] by that time;
Elizabeth Catlett, with whom I had a lot of dialogue (I don't know if
you saw any of the letters in the files; there were some interesting
letters); Ed [Edward] Love, who was an artist who had been overseas who
had returned to the United States and was working as a sculptor and
teaching at Howard University.
-
MASON
- Yeah, he's also really into Egyptian motifs. Did you talk about that
specifically?
-
DAVIS
- To some degree. He's in Miami now. Did you know that? Yeah. He's head of
an art school in Miami. Barbara Jones, who is an instructor at Malcolm X
College, who is, I think, one of the only women in the Afri-Cobra
movement; Nelson Stevens, who is an artist with the Afri-Cobra group;
Bing Davis, whom I met at an NCA [National Conference of Artists]
conference; Richard Hunt; Jeff [R.] Donaldson, who was at Howard
[University] and had left Chicago, who was the spearhead of Afri-Cobra;
Harold Dorsey, a guy I met and talked with in Jackson, Mississippi; John
Outterbridge, whom we have spoken about; Larry Clark was a filmmaker
whom I had a lot of interaction with.
-
MASON
- Yeah. Last time I was wondering whether you both were sort of interested
in music and jazz music— Well, he's interested in using a kind of jazz
aesthetic in his films, and I was wondering if that's where you drew
that idea from or what was—
-
DAVIS
- Not specifically. We had a lot of dialogue and even arguments on the
black aesthetic. Larry was sort of a Marxist in his approach. We tried
to collaborate on some things together, but I think we explored the
revolutionary issues together a lot and had a lot of dialogue. And he
was very heavy into John Coltrane, and I learned a lot about John
Coltrane through Larry. Huey Beckham, who was an artist in Houston and
still is (he teaches at University of Houston); my brother Dale [B.]
Davis; and Beverly Robinson. Then I attended several conferences that
were quite interesting, National Conference of Artists in '71, '72, and
'73, the Black Academy of Arts and Letters in Chicago in '72.
-
MASON
- What was that?
-
DAVIS
- It was a group that had Charles White to speak as well as a number of
other artists from the East. And they presented papers and gave
lectures. I caught a plane, went to it. I actually tape-recorded it, but
the tape was real poor. I really wanted to document Charlie and his
talk. And this one was a real interesting one too. It was a black arts
conference that was sponsored by the Carnegie Institute in Pittsburgh.
There was an exhibit, Dimensions in Black
Artists, La Jolla Museum [of Contemporary Art] in San Diego, which
was quite good. I guess that's pretty much it. I did visit the DuSable
Museum [of African-American History] in Chicago. There was an
organization that doesn't exist anymore called the Communicative Arts
Academy in Compton. The Southside [Community] Arts Center, which was an
arts center that fostered the growth and development of a lot of black
artists and had a lot of historical significance.
-
MASON
- What did you get out of the Communicative Arts Academy?
-
DAVIS
- Well—
-
MASON
- That was John Outterbridge.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, he really developed a community arts center. They took an old
boxing gym and made a gallery, classrooms. And it was an environmental
piece. I mean, the doors were art, everything that they touched was
turned into an art: the doorknob, the windows. So it was really a total
environmental space for which black artists had all kinds of activities
going on: exhibits, booths, classes. I think the Paul Robeson Players
started out there as a little theater group. The [George Washington]
Carver Museum in Tuskegee, Alabama, which I have work in and for which,
for me, had an important collection, because it represented my first
beginnings in Tuskegee. I've mentioned here the street murals of
Berkeley and Oakland and really Los Angeles, too, because there was a
strong public art effort being made by Chicano artists and the Latin
communities.
-
MASON
- Okay. You said you started the African Consciousness series right out of
Otis. Oh, and did you mention this or did I read it? That Charles White
got you to think in series instead of—
-
DAVIS
- Oh, yeah, yeah. I guess when I first started into the Otis process, I
was really jumping around a lot and trying to do a whole bunch of
things. Charles White was one of those artists who said how important it
was to explore a single idea and to pursue it to its fullest and exhaust
all possibilities of other things that you could do with it before going
on to something else. That was real meaningful for me, because it helped
me focus, and it helped me develop a body of work that had continuity
and that had a single thought pattern that ran through it. I continue to
try to work that way even now.
-
MASON
- So how did you first conceive of the African
Consciousness series?
-
DAVIS
- It was just a direct evolution from the work I was doing at Otis. I
mean, I was beginning to incorporate African art in my work, and I was
very much interested and concerned about Africa and African American
relationships to it. And from there it sprang, and my political energies
ran into it, and my cultural energies ran into it.
-
MASON
- Was it like the Symbol series, where you had some collages and some—?
-
DAVIS
- It was like the Symbol series in the sense that I was using vacuum-form
African images, masks, out of plastic and painting over them, and then
collaging over them.
-
MASON
- I'm sorry, you were using plaster African—
-
DAVIS
- Plastic.
-
MASON
- Oh, you were making, your own masks from an African— I haven't seen any
pictures from this, so I'm not really sure what you mean.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. In that series that I did at Otis, I started vacuum-forming some
three-dimensional kinds of images so that they became in plastic but
raised, and then I would paint over them and incorporate them into the
work. Then the African Consciousness series, as I think about it, it
started out using that, but then it really went into a collage almost
exclusively with a lot of texture and the interplay with the silhouette
symbol of the map of Africa. I did that for a good two or three years.
-
MASON
- About how many—?
-
DAVIS
- Pieces did I do in that series?
-
MASON
- Yeah.
-
DAVIS
- Probably somewhere between fifteen and twenty.
-
MASON
- Was this part of it?
-
DAVIS
- No. But that is a vacuum-form image, part of that mask there. What year
is that?
-
MASON
- 'Seventy-six. It's called USA Bicentennial
Reflection.
-
DAVIS
- So that was the end of that. And that particular one was— It was the
bicentennial year for the United States of America, and I wanted to make
a statement that was inclusive of the African American experience. So I
incorporated, I think, half of an African mask image, part of a symbol
that delineated the flag, then I used electrical wires there to go
around the crest of the mask and come out a part of the collage form in
the piece.
-
MASON
- So it seems that formal issues of texture and juxtaposition of textures
was important to you.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. It was always important, yeah.
-
MASON
- How would you say that your use of African symbols was different from,
say, European artists' use of African work? Or if it is different, if
you see it differently.
-
DAVIS
- Well, I see it differently because it's my culture, and I think I place
more cultural significance on it, not just aesthetic significance on it.
So not only am I interested in the delineation of line and form and
mass, but I'm also interested in its spiritual significance, its
symbolic use, its cultural heritage, and my relationship to it.
-
MASON
- And then your Self-Portrait series was around the same time.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, I think it was around that same time. I had just finished art
school. I was trying to see where I was at and exploring what was inside
my head, so I did a series of pieces that were silhouettes, which were
tracings of my profile. I cut them out and made a stencil and sprayed
and painted them on a series of small canvases and painted all kinds of
symbols and images inside these heads. And then I did a few large ones
that had— I have to look for the catalog. I think it's in my study in
the other room. In them I used the head, that profile looking left and
looking right, and then I had a series of neckties and string and rope
that I had hanging out of the painting, which symbolized giving up using
those kinds of uniforms to be successful. I was letting go of formal
dress. I think in some of those I also used a transparent African mask
so that it was there and it wasn't there. You were looking through it.
That was also a vacuum-form plastic shape that was attached to the
canvas.
-
MASON
- I suppose the sort of obvious question is, when do you know you're
finished with it? When does a series play itself out?
-
DAVIS
- When does a series play—? I guess you just have a sense. I mean, when is
a song over? It's just when you can't do anymore, when you've exhausted
it. Sometimes you think, "Oh, wow, I could do more." There's probably
been an occasion or two where you sort of go back and hit it, but you're
not inspired to go much further. So it's over. It's like, when is a
painting finished? Well, it's never finished. You could always do
something else to it, but it's— When you've exhausted it and it's
exhausted you. Yeah.
1.18. TAPE NUMBER: XI, SIDE ONE APRIL 23, 1991
-
MASON
- You wanted to start off talking about Brockman Productions.
-
DAVIS
- Okay. Brockman Productions came out of an outgrowth of Brockman Gallery.
We had been doing community-related exhibits and activities since the
inception of the gallery. Due to our financial management problems of
the business versus the community and do-good activities, we were
advised that some of the community-related exhibitions and exhibits and
concerts in the park should fall under another type of business
structure. So in 1973 we formed Brockman Productions as a nonprofit
community arts agency to do the community-related activities that
Brockman Gallery had originally done. Through the support of our
political constituencies, we learned about support systems throughout
the state, within the city, and the National Endowment for the Arts
[NEA]. And Congresswoman Yvonne [Brathwaite] Burke was instrumental in
pointing us to a program at the NEA that our organization would fall
under, and that was the Expansion Arts Program, at that time headed up
by Vantile Whitfield. We were able to receive NEA grants through that
category to continue to fund the outdoor exhibitions, the concerts, and
we also initiated a film festival series. This film festival series was
focused primarily on black and Third World and independent filmmakers,
as well as students from those communities. The exhibitions were
community oriented, and it allowed a lot of the artists who were
interested in exhibiting at the gallery that the gallery couldn't handle
on an ongoing basis an opportunity to be exposed to the public through
another activity and source. Concurrently with that, we did a series of
jazz-related music in Leimert Park, right up the street from the
gallery.
-
MASON
- This was part of the Leimert Park Festival?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. I think one of the most notable musicians that participated with
us in this program was Horace Tapscott and his Pan-Afrikan [Peoples]
Arkestra. These were real exciting periods, because these kinds of
activities hadn't been happening in this particular community. Through
the growth of these activities, and with an ex-student, Greg Bryant, we
initiated the first Watts Towers Jazz Festival. That series is annual
and is ongoing today. So that's been over fifteen years, probably very
close to twenty years of activity. We did not continue to produce it
after the first three years. It was then turned over to the staff of the
Watts Towers Arts Center. So Brockman Productions began to answer these
things for the community, and it got to grow into a real community arts
agency. In some cases, it overshadowed the activities of the gallery for
a period of time. At this time, also, my brother Dale [B. Davis] had
indicated a desire to change his relationship with the gallery, and I
wanted to continue it.
-
MASON
- You mean because of the change in the gallery's focus?
-
DAVIS
- Well, he was just tired of the gallery business itself and just wanted
to change his own personal focus. He later became involved and active on
the board of the community arts agency [Brockman Productions], the
production side. I had been involved in a series of meetings with Jim
Woods, whom I had mentioned earlier, who had the— What was that called?
-
MASON
- Studio Watts.
-
DAVIS
- Studio Watts workshop. He was involved in housing development for the
Watts community, established the Studio Watts Foundation, and was
involved with some HUD [United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development] grants, and was doing conceptual pieces with artists
related to that housing. Having participated in a lot of these
brainstorming meetings, I found that I was giving up a lot of ideas and
concepts and so forth, and once they were funded and initiated that,
one, I wasn't an active participant, and two, the activities went to
other artists, and in many cases from outside of the community. So I
sort of picked a bone with him and kept pushing at him. Some years later, he came by the gallery, and he wanted to tell me about
a program he thought that would be appropriate for Brockman Productions
and that we should apply for it. That was the CETA program, the
Comprehensive Employment and Training Act. So X got the applications for
it from the city of Los Angeles and was probably totally bamboozled by
the amount of paperwork it required to go for it. But myself and a woman
named Judy Hopshite, over probably a two- or three-week period of time,
put this proposal together and were able to generate a request for
funding. We circulated it to our political constituencies in the
community as well. We received our first $50, 000 grant to employ
artists to do works of art in public places. [tape recorder off] So from
that initial grant, at that dollar amount, I had a revelation that here
was a window of opportunity and a chance to take off and fly instead of
doing real small, token kinds of projects. I was teaching part-time at
the time at California] State University, Northridge. I think that
application went in in '85, and by '86 I realized that we had a real
good operation opportunity. So I left that position at Northridge and—
-
MASON
- You mean the CETA application?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah.
-
MASON
- It's just that I have '78 as when you got the CETA.
-
DAVIS
- No, '76 was when we got that first CETA grant, as I remember. I don't
know what you have that would say differently. Where did you—?
-
MASON
- Let's see. I saw something in the International
Review about the CETA program. But—
-
DAVIS
- Anyway, I left Northridge and became executive director of the nonprofit
corporation on a three-quarter time basis—close to full-time—to run that
program. We hired artists who were not employed but who had a track
record of interest in public art. We hired them to do and produce murals
in public places in and around the city of Los Angeles. We had a really
strong group. And then we continued to apply for funding, doubling and
sometimes tripling and more each year. We operated under two titles. I
know one was Title VI, which was the artist program, and then there was
another program that we took on which was a program that was a
support-training operation, where we were training young people to work
in artist-oriented or. art-oriented facilities. We branched from just
the mural concept to sculpture. We hired musicians. We hired several of the musicians from the now
well-known Hiroshima jazz fusion group. We were able to initiate their
first recording contract with a major company. I think it was A
& M Records. We also hired Kenny Dennis, who is a well-known
drummer, and then we had another musical group called Baya, which was a
Latin jazz group. So we had concerts going around the city of Los
Angeles in different venues, school workshops, public parks, open
courtyards, and little satellite sites like in downtown Los Angeles. We
did some streetcorner events as well. Then we established a graphic arts
program. We hired a graphic artist named Camille Higgins to run and
manage that program. They trained artists who had an orientation towards
graphic design to do and produce brochures, flyers, invitations, etc.,
for nonprofit civic and community organizations. You were going to ask a
question somewhere in there.
-
MASON
- So you got funding for the separate programs. You would put in
applications saying you wanted to have a graphic arts program? Or you
would just put in a general application, and then they would give you
money, and then you would devise programs, and you could do whatever you
want? I mean, did you have to get approval for every program that you—?
-
DAVIS
- When we wrote the proposals, we wrote the proposal that was inclusive of
the program. In other words, under Title VI, we applied for muralists,
musicians, graphic artists. So as the years developed it built. But it
wasn't a separate application for each category. That went in as a total
part of the package that we offered to do.
-
MASON
- Okay. What was your part? Did you oversee? Did you have a staff that you
put together to brainstorm ideas? Or were they mostly your ideas and you
got people to help you implement them?
-
DAVIS
- Well, beyond the first one, I was able to put together a staff and
employ a team. The paperwork load was awesome, so I hired an assistant,
an accountant, a fiscal manager, and a program coordinator. Well, I had
a program coordinator for each program that we were doing. So there was
someone over music, there was someone over graphics, there was someone
over the public art projects. Some of the artists, also, that I thought
would be interesting to mention who initiated this program were Kent
Twitchell, who has done extremely well in Los Angeles with murals.
-
MASON
- I'm sorry. Initiated what program?
-
DAVIS
- The mural, the public art. The artists who were directly involved in
doing public art. So these were like artists that did murals.
-
MASON
- So they were responsible for—
-
DAVIS
- They were artists.
-
MASON
- —for getting the— Okay, they were artists who were responsible—
-
DAVIS
- They were not responsible for grants. They were responsible to make art
in public places.
-
MASON
- I thought you were saying that they were the ones responsible for
getting the government to implement—
-
DAVIS
- No. But they did major murals in L.A. Kent Twitchell was one, Tito
Delgado, Suzanne Jackson, Dan [R.] Concholar, Richard Duarto. These were
some of the first artists who worked for us.
-
MASON
- Some people have said that the CETA program was like the WPA [Works
Progress Administration] all over again. Would you go that far to say
that there was really that much money and support for artists and
programs who received it?
-
DAVIS
- I thought that the CETA program was like the WPA period in that it began
to initiate government support for the arts. But then it didn't last
long. So the depth of that support was short lived. But I do think it
was an important movement and an important phase of this era's support
of artists and of art in public places. And it came in, I think, under
[Lyndon B.] Johnson and [James E.] Carter. And when President [Ronald
W.] Reagan was elected, it was terminated rapidly. We saw one title
close down in thirty days, and the second phase of our funding support
shut down within ninety days. So, to my recollection, we were operating
from '76 to the beginning of '81.
-
MASON
- Thinking back on all the different programs and activities, which things
were you most excited about?
-
DAVIS
- I really liked the mural project that we had in the beginning, because
we had a dedicated core of artists who had a commitment to public art.
They had good training. They had good work habits and a commitment to
excellence. By the end of that visual arts phase, we had a lot of
younger artists who did not have the same work ethic and tended to be
right out of school and had not, quote, unquote, "paid their dues." So
there was more contemplation about doing the work than actual doing it.
And while it was a nice holdover for them, it wasn't my vision. The
music groups that came through were extremely exciting and very dynamic
and certainly carried their weight and did some very innovative
programming. Then the graphic arts program went pretty well. It sort of
was a roller-coaster project.
-
MASON
- Would you say, then, that the program in general had more impact on you
as kind of an administrator? Or did it also have an artistic—?
-
DAVIS
- Boy. That was during the phase of my Mental Space
series. That series of work was really my escape from the tremendous
amount of administrative work that I was confronted with. But, yes, I
did learn the ropes of administration and management, financial and
personnel. It became a never-ending kind of commitment to keep those
kinds of projects rolling on the level and scale you wanted them to be
on. So, I mean, I was devastated when it ended. I was also sort of glad
when it ended. I didn't feel obligated to keep trying to perpetuate what
I had done. It certainly took a while to decompress from trying to find
a way to keep that kind of operation running, because we had worked up
to about a $2 million operating budget. Losing that kind of money in
ninety days was like falling down a well. We went from that to about
$30, 000, which was close-out money, and a few grants from the state and
the NEA. It was like when it was over it was over. There was no
recourse. There were no other places to reach to augment, supplement
that kind of operation.
-
MASON
- But you had actually been doing murals before the CETA came in.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, yeah. My initial interest in murals or public art started around
1970 when I left teaching and started at Otis Art Institute. I worked
with the Good Shepherd Episcopal Church. They were building a manor
across the street from the church, and the pastor had a lot of vision
and willingness to allow creative things to happen, so I did an
assemblage on the walls of the construction site, around the
construction site.
-
MASON
- Out of what kinds of material?
-
DAVIS
- Wood, tin cans,, bottle caps, leather, paint. So it was a temporary
piece, but kind of unusual.
-
MASON
- Yeah. It's a lot different from the other works we were talking about
yesterday. Well, not a lot different, but maybe conceptually different,
would you say, from the Self-Portrait series or the African
Consciousness series?
-
DAVIS
- Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. Most of the stuff that I was doing in those series
that we talked about was flat. This was three dimensional. And either
later that year—I think it was later that year—a couple of us decided to
paint a wall on Crenshaw Boulevard that was between Fiftieth [Street]
and Fifty-second Street, or Fifty-third [Street]. Somewhere.
-
MASON
- Around Fiftieth and Crenshaw. [laughter]
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, Fiftieth and Crenshaw. And that became the Crenshaw Wall. We
started doing images on this wall without permission and learned fast
that we needed city permits. The police came. So we had to sort of
regroup. But I think that energy came out of wanting to have greater
visual-art impact on the public. We were finding through the gallery
that there were a lot of people who liked art, but we weren't reaching
the working class, certain segments of the middle class, and everyday
people. They weren't coming in the doors. Whereas, with murals and art
in public places, they were confronted with it in their everyday traffic
patterns. So we tended to continue to look for public art sites where
there was a lot of foot or automobile traffic. Los Angeles being an
automobile city, it tended to make sense to put the art where there was
the greatest circulation of people. They tend to be in cars. So that was
the logic behind that and a number of other murals that I initiated in
L.A.
-
MASON
- What were some of the other areas?
-
DAVIS
- Well, the Crenshaw Wall became a changing wall. Every two years there
would be a new series of murals up, and it would be done by a group of
artists selecting a certain space on that wall.
-
MASON
- Did it have a specific theme every couple of years?
-
DAVIS
- It did and it didn't. The first two times out, it had real specific
themes, or you could tell that the artists were either revolutionary or
nationalist in their sort of political orientation.
-
MASON
- Lots of raised black fists?
-
DAVIS
- Right. That was there. African imagery. Then it changed, became more
spiritual. Then it became more scenic with sort of black genre pictures
of football players or role-model images. Then there was a guy named
Snake Doctor who initiated a graffiti youth movement to do the wall. So
a large number of graffiti artists from all over the city and in some
cases from outside of the state came to that wall to make a statement.
The work was excellent, but there were a number of people who couldn't
embrace the graffiti, I mean the fact that it was graffiti. So one
artist painted it out and did his, what I call, tired Martin Luther King
[Jr.] dogma on the wall. That may still be there today; I don't know.
But the beauty of the wall is that it reflected the attitudes and
changes in the community and the sensitivity of that community. We did
try to stick within that Crenshaw community for a long time. Once the
CETA program came on, then we went all over the city of Los Angeles with
mural pieces. It became where artists found sites or where agencies or
entities would call. So from the back wall of Otis Art Institute to the
Inner City Cultural Center.
-
MASON
- I noticed that some of your murals seem to be related to the work that
you were doing. Like in '75 you did the Mental Space mural at La Brea
[Avenue] and Veronica [Street]—
-
DAVIS
- Veronica, yeah.
-
MASON
- How would you say that your murals and your paintings are related?
-
DAVIS
- I try to keep a close correlation even though I've always felt some
obligation to do things that the public would relate to. [tape recorder
off] Where were we?
-
MASON
- Well, I was asking about the relationship between the murals and
paintings, and you were saying that you wanted to—
-
DAVIS
- Oh, yeah. In some ways I was torn about, "Do I do what I think the
public wants or do I do what I'm about?" I made a middle passage there
of trying to do the kinds of work that I would do in the studio but in a
way that it would have public appeal and would generate sort of a good
feeling for people who would be impacted by it on a daily basis.
-
MASON
- So what did that mean, then? You said that the murals are on the
freeways, and there's also the element of speed and having to comprehend
something really quickly sometimes.
-
DAVIS
- I tried to use things that would be simple and easy to grasp. These were
like little thoroughfares, so you could really only take in so much at a
time. They became quick messages or quick— In some cases, I call them a
color bath. It's like-driving through a color bath. You may not grasp
all of what's happening at one time, but it would be an interesting
thing to pass by. And as you continue to pass by this kind of an image
or whatever, you would sort of comprehend more and more each time.
-
MASON
- Do you want to talk about the mural at the Watts Towers, Homage to John Outterbridge?
-
DAVIS
- Oh, yeah. That was an interesting opportunity. John Outterbridge took
over the Watts Towers and began his directorship of it. It had been
redesigned, rehabili¬tated. It was basically a new structure from what
used to be an old house that was a studio space. And he wanted images.
He wanted some public art images out there. He wanted some murals. So I
did one with some abstract forms and elements that had Adenkra symbols
and a zebra stripe and a big moon or a sunlike image, and I entitled it
Homage to John Outterbridge, because I
believed in him and his vision for the place, and I wanted to make a
historical statement in his behalf to him.
-
MASON
- Well, eventually the [1984] Olympics came, and there was a commission
for that.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, that was interesting. Actually, I started trying to continue that
public art effort in, I guess it was, 1970— When was that? When was the
bicentennial?
-
MASON
- 'Seventy-six.
-
DAVIS
- City. The city bicentennial.
-
MASON
- Oh.
-
DAVIS
- Maybe it was '82 for the city of Los Angeles. So I got involved with
them trying to carry the thrust of some of the public art projects that
we had running during the CETA period. I worked with Jane Paisano and
Hope Tschopik with very little success. We were able to secure one mural
site in downtown Los Angeles and eventually got a grant, a partial
grant, for Kent Twitchell to execute a mural in downtown L.A., but it
ran way beyond the bicentennial. So the effort, in that respect, failed
in terms of it being a big, impactful opportunity. The bank was Security
Pacific, as I remember, that did sponsor that one. But the connection
with Hope and Jane Paisano I thought was a good one. Eventually, Hope moved over to the Olympic organizing committee and
worked specifically for the Olympic Arts Festival. She had not given up
the vision, and I continued my dialogue with her about the possibility
of doing these murals. So eventually I wrote a proposal that went to Bob
[Robert] Fitzpatrick, who was her boss, and it was turned down twice.
And then I tried to go out and get it funded privately, through private
industry. I contacted Peter Clothier, who had recently left Otis Art
Institute as its director, to see if he would be sort of a development
director for the project. While he was interested in beginning to take
some initiative on it, he fell into another opportunity to head the
Loyola Marymount [University] department of art. So the ball came right
back to me again, and it looked like it wasn't going to happen. Then we
started renegotiating some other events to do with the Olympics in terms
of music concerts and performances, and that did happen. But somehow
Peter Ueberroth spoke to Bob Fitzpatrick and said, "How come we're not
doing any murals? Los Angeles has this history of murals, and more
murals in this country are in Los Angeles than in any other area." So
Bob spoke to Hope, and Hope called me and asked me to redo this
proposal. There were other artists who had proposals in for murals. I
think that I had had the first one in and had the one that was most
comprehensive and most inclusive of the total Los Angeles community, and
that's probably why I got the contract. So it was something I initiated
and managed and negotiated. From there, the concept was to select artists who were good, had a high
standard of excellence, who had done two or more murals in and around
the Los Angeles area, and that hopefully that group of artists would be
representative of the city and its various communities, ethnic and
otherwise. So we were able to put together a pretty comprehensive group
of people to participate in the program. Then, the next problem with that project was where we would put the
murals. We had basically ten artists. We needed ten sites, and we needed
ten highly visible sites. Originally, they wanted to put it along the
course where they would run the marathon. The marathon ran from Venice
and all through Hollywood and Crenshaw and central L.A. and Wilshire
[Boulevard]— It just wasn't going to work. So we were able to negotiate
with Caltrans [California Department of Transportation] to put the
murals on the freeway, which was, again, from my vantage point, the most
visible place in the city, where the most amount of people travel. It
was the gateway from the Hollywood Freeway and the Harbor Freeway into
the [Los Angeles Memorial] Coliseum area where the games would actually
take place. So we were able to secure support under "Jerry" [Edmund G.]
Brown [Jr.]'s administration to initiate it, and it was with Mayor
[Thomas] Bradley's blessings and the department of Caltrans and the
Olympic Arts Festival. And it came out of the support of a grant given
by the Los Angeles Times foundation. I have to
give a lot of credit to Hope. And then the guy who oversaw our activity
in the Olympic Arts Festival was a man named Ted Welsch. He sort of was
an ombudsman between all of the various factions and made sure the
project ran smoothly.
-
MASON
- So your Olympic mural—
-
DAVIS
- The Olympic mural [Reflections on L.A.] is,
again, tied to the kinds of work that I was doing in the studio. While I
tried to tie it into the Olympics and into Los Angeles, I. did it in the
format of the Blanket series.
-
MASON
- By the time you painted that mural, what things had you learned about
painting murals from your other experiences that you brought into the
Olympic mural project?
-
DAVIS
- Well, in this particular case, this mural faced the direction where it
was going to get a little more sunlight than I wanted it to. So I did a
lot of overpainting. The main thing with this one was to do real good
wall preparation so that it wouldn't deteriorate fast. Then I used a lot
of colors that wouldn't bleed underneath, so it had a strong
underpainting. And then those colors that did tend to fade to some
degree I would tend to paint in layers, so there might be layers of some
of the warm colors that might be three or four layers deep instead of
one or two.
-
MASON
- Okay. Was there anything else you wanted to add about your murals in
general or the Olympic project?
-
DAVIS
- I think that it probably had— It was one of those projects that wasn't
planned and that a lot of people were skeptical of. They thought that
they were going to cause automobile accidents. But there were none that
happened during this project. It did take the monotonous quality of
freeway driving in this slow, drudging, rush-hour section of downtown
Los Angeles and make it a little more interesting and give riders a
visual break. And I was really pleased with the work of the artists who
participated in the project. Very few of the pieces have had any major
vandalism. In a city like Los Angeles, you have to expect that kind of
thing to happen. It did with one or two artists, but we had the support
of private companies that provided some graffiti guard materials for us
and we were able to protect them for the most part.
-
MASON
- And you're working on a couple of murals now. The one in Sacramento, is
that—? We should talk about that.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, I did one. It's completed.
1.19. TAPE NUMBER: XI, SIDE TWO APRIL 23, 1991
-
DAVIS
- It was interesting. After finishing that mural project in Los Angeles, I
really looked around, and there was nothing else to do in a way. I
wasn't able to sort of put together that kind of thing with that kind of
impact. So we ended up doing some little small projects here and there
but nothing really major. I needed a change from that geography, so I
moved to Sacramento to run the city and county's public art program
[Public Art Program of the Sacramento Metropolitan Arts Commission]—it
was a "percent for art" program—and initially got thrown into that
community's activities. But last year I did an exhibit of Public Art Concepts, Collaborations with myself
and other artists. One of them was to do a mural for a high school
called Grant High School in Sacramento. It's 33 feet high and about 150
feet long, so it was sort of the largest undertaking that I had done. I
did this mural [A Place to Be Somebody] not
necessarily as my own imagery. I did it as a collaboration with Leslie
Pierson and Armando Cid and then hired other artists in addition to them
to actually execute the mural. This particular emphasis of this
particular mural was to dwell on the cultural diversity of that
community and the population of the school.
-
MASON
- And it's all finished?
-
DAVIS
- It's finished, yeah. I couldn't come to Texas unless it was finished, so
it was like—
-
MASON
- Yeah, yeah.
-
DAVIS
- And, boy, did I work hard at finishing, because the time was creeping
up, the rainy season was starting, and it was getting cold. So we
started in— Well, the attempt was to start in the end of August, and I
guess we did to some degree, and we didn't finish till the first week of
December.
-
MASON
- How do you feel about that mural now?
-
DAVIS
- I have mixed feelings about it. It's a good piece. On anything there are
things you could do different and so forth, but it isn't my statement
totally. So that's interesting to let your ego out of it and let your
own personal statement be separated from it. When I look at the slides,
it's hard for me to say, "That's an Alonzo Davis." And it isn't. It is
an Alonzo Davis collaboration with various considerations based on the
school's desire to have something that was culturally diverse and to
work with the concepts of other artists who were very prominent in the
kinds of imagery that would be portrayed. But, again, it's a good piece.
I'm proud of it.
-
MASON
- And the mural that you're helping out with now in San Antonio?
-
DAVIS
- Well, I have an advanced painting class that I've been teaching. When I
initiated the class I had said that I hoped that we could get to do a
mural before the end of the semester, so I'm basically turning students
loose here at the end of the semester to do two or three murals on Saint
Mary's Boulevard, which is the college strip hangout of little
restaurants and beer joints and dance places. It's their work, and I'm
simply the guiding, driving force behind getting it done. [tape recorder
off] I wanted to mention and credit the artists who participated in the
Olympics project, because their energy and input was critical to having
made it happen. It included Roderick Sykes, Richard Wyatt, Kent
Twitchell, Terry Schoonhoven, Judy Baca, Frank Romero, Glenna Boltuch,
Willy Heron, and John Wehrle, as well as myself. So that comprised the
ten artists who did the images for the Olympic mural series. There were
other murals that happened as a result of this energy simply out of
other artists' desire to do things that were related to the games. This
just happened to be the only one that was sanctioned and supported by
the Olympic Arts Committee.
-
MASON
- Did any of those artists have an influence on you in the way you did
your murals? Any techniques or—?
-
DAVIS
- I think to some degree. I mean, we had like collective meetings from
time to time to discuss wall preparation, kind of material used. One of
the artists had a contact with Liquitex paints. We tried to negotiate a
deal with Novacolor paints and weren't able to, so we bought Liquitex
from their warehouse at a substantial savings. Several artists had real
intricate presentation formats for showing the proposals of the work
that they wanted to do, and some of the artists had some problems
getting that together, so that was a shared activity. And it was a
learning activity for me. I hadn't seen such elaborate renderings for
these kinds of projects as I had seen with some of the other people's
work.
-
MASON
- When I look at the murals from your latest series, the Blanket series and the Mental Space series, it seems that
there are some big differences, obvious differences, between that body
of work— To me, anyway, since I haven't seen your whole body of work—
But between those and the work that you were doing right out of Otis,
the Self-Portrait series and the African Consciousness series, in terms
of— I mean, it seems later there is a move away from including your
references to the figure, except maybe the use of, like, an eye or
something like that. The imagery seems to be much more positive and
self-confident. There's really complex layering of imagery and media. I
don't know if you agree with that or not. Would you say that that's a
difference between, say, the Mental Space series and the previous
series? And could you talk about the Mental Space series and about how
it came about and how you—
-
DAVIS
- Well, if I can just maybe address the difference. All of these stages
are stages of growth and development and learning from others as well as
by doing. I would say after the African
Consciousness series, I didn't
feel as great an obligation to have to continue to dwell on the African
theme or that I had to continue to emphasize an obvious ethnic thing.
-
MASON
- Why? I mean, why had you felt obligated and why did you—?
-
DAVIS
- Because I was very much a part of revolution and the civil rights era,
and it was a major issue with me. And after that trip to Africa, my—
It's like after Malcolm X went to Mecca he was no longer singularly
focused on the energy of the black American— It was like his energy was
focused on the black American in the United States; his energy was
focused on the black American being universal.
-
MASON
- You never said exactly where you went in Africa.
-
DAVIS
- I went to Ghana and Nigeria.
-
MASON
- Okay.
-
DAVIS
- So I think after that series, upon my return, it was that burden of what
I was trying to do and trying to say was lifted, and other things became
important in terms of what I chose to do. I also began to have a— I
can't say these things won't change, but I began to have a focus on
doing art that had a more positive statement after that trip, as opposed
to a reaction to or the desire to sort of right the wrongs of society. I
pretty much said, "Well, I'll paint the rights and I'll react to the
wrongs in another way." So I've tried to have the work be more
spiritual in nature, have a more reflective quality, a more curious kind
of development, and, hopefully, a little more universal appeal. It
doesn't take away from who I. am and how I view myself culturally in
this society. It's just how I choose to blow my horn or to play my music
at this time. In 1980 I got involved with a printmaker I had known for a long time
named Ron Adams, and I did a lithograph right after the death of an aunt
[Clara Brockman] in Birmingham, Alabama. That print that I did was sort
of an image of a floating cloth, or a floating piece of cloth with a
fabric texture, quality, with a lot of symbols in it. I called it the
Blanket series and Homage
to Aunt Clara. That set a whole other direction for me. I
started looking at some other things that had ethnic reference, but they
were more related to quilts and patterns and clotheslines and textures
and things that I would see from my travels. The Blanket series evolved from the print to paintings that were
stretched out like hides, not on stretcher bars, to strips of narrow
strip paintings that were pretty much in the format, not the imagery but
the format, of kente cloth, which I had seen in the northern Ghana, that
the men would weave. That was real fascinating to me. So I started
doing these little strips of canvas as paintings, and eventually that
evolved into woven kinds of pieces. I started doing woven paper and
woven canvas as paintings. This is the longest series or body of work
that I've been involved with. It's interesting, and it doesn't seem to
end. I still seem to be with it. You had mentioned another series that you were interested in that I did,
and that was the Reflections on Haiti after Brazil. That was a real
impactful body of work, because I had gone to those two countries and
found them very fascinating and was very fascinated by the kinds of
cultural patterns and statements that were being made by the indigenous
people, the people of African ancestry, and those who were of mixed
blood, especially in Brazil, in the music and samba schools. I didn't
necessarily go there and say, "Okay, this art is going to be like this.
" I find that a great deal of what I do at this particular time comes
from the subconscious mind and motivation, so sometimes it just is art
that moves through me as opposed to art that I'm doing consciously. And
then, going to Haiti, I got caught up in some voodoo kinds of ceremonies
and practices. Probably why it affected me the most is because I said it
wouldn't affect me. Intellectually, I sort of ruled it out.
-
MASON
- I'm sorry. You said it affected you. How did it affect you?
-
DAVIS
- Well, let me finish that train of thought. Intellectually, I tried to
rule it out, and I thought I wasn't going to be affected by it. But then
I found myself having visions and dreams. A friend went to a sort of a
fortune-teller, wisdom person and came back with some information that
was very much related to who I was and what I was about. I was like
shocked that a medium could delve into my psyche. When I came back to
the United States from Haiti, I was like under a spell and just had a
real hard time shaking it. I started doing a body of work that was
called One Day After Haiti, Two
Days After Haiti, Three Days After
Haiti, so I would just work on Seventeen Days
After Haiti, Twenty Days After Haiti. It
became a series of pieces that was just my catharsis of working this
out. And then, after that, I started thinking about that trip to Brazil and
sort of the impact and ceremonies and things that I had experienced
there. So then it merged. As I evolved out of the Haiti experience, it
merged into the Brazil series. So that's why that series was called
Reflections on Haiti after Brazil. After working it out, I was freed of
whatever this was. And it's hard— I can't tell you that— I don't have a literal explanation
for what it was that I was experiencing or was under, but I would
imagine it's like some of the things that you see when people are in
church and are captured by the spirit and are so moved to do things that
they're not aware of themselves doing it in their conscious mind.
Anyway, after that, and after having worked through it and worked it
out, I went back to Haiti just to see if my spirit and soul was clear
and so forth, and I didn't have those kinds of experiences or anxieties
or fears or overwhelming energy. So that's how that particular series evolved. It was not a long duration
of time; it was maybe three or four months of working on those. So it
was a catharsis. It was a way to work it out. But I liked it. I liked
the result, and I liked what happened.
-
MASON
- What did the work look like?
-
DAVIS
- It looked like wings and hearts and crosses and arrows and energy, a lot
of use of energy. Oil pastels. What I did is I had a silkscreen format
that laid down basic shape, and then, within that basic shape, it was
like a hand-colored print, one of a kind, from an initial same image,
and then it just evolved. I used acrylic paint and I used oil pastels.
-
MASON
- In other words, in the series each work is—
-
DAVIS
- Each work is almost all the same, and yet everything is different.
-
MASON
- So it's not a linear progression. Each work is sort of a complex
reflection of the other work, and it all—
-
DAVIS
- Each day was different. Each thing I had to work out was different, but
they all are related, not in a structured way. I didn't base what I did
yesterday on what I would do tomorrow, but the approach and the media
was pretty much the same.
-
MASON
- And in some of the Mental Space series, like this collograph [Metamorphosis] you did in 1977 and some of the
things that you were saying about the Blanket
series, it seems that you were— I don't know. This whole thing seems
like you just started to really have fun and really enjoy yourself.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. I think I sort of let go of the weighty obligation to deal with
social issues and just, in a way, have fun, try to do things that
portrayed—not portrayed— gave off positive energy and sort of lifted the
cloud from over my being. I always— I mean, I don't know if— You make these comparisons. But I
look at Miles Davis's music, and it fascinates me that he did these
really fabulous pieces in the early phase of his life, and so many of my
jazz friends and fans are like stuck with what he used to do. And now
his work is like even more demanding and challenging and growing. I saw
a PBS [Public Broadcasting System] documentary of him and his discussion
of creativity and evolving. I like to think that I am moving in that
kind of direction and that I'm not getting stuck and that the work
continues to be fresh and well done and new. I'd like to be a twenty-first-century man. I mean, I'm moving in that
direction. I'm not interested in being a nineteenth-century painter. So
I don't want people to say my stuff is tired. I mean, I really want them
to say it made them think or it made them feel good or it challenged
them or "Here was an artist who came out of this community who did some
really thought-provoking work or really well-developed pieces." And I
guess energy is really a major part of my work. I like to portray
energy, and, hopefully, it's positive energy. I got that out of William Dawson. I mean, that goes back to an interview
I did with him in, I think, my last year in graduate school, in '73,
when I went to visit him. He talked about the energy in his music. And
he was so animated and such an old man to be so vibrant and vital. That
session we had was just fabulous. So in coming back from that
experience, it made me want to do something about Tuskegee [Alabama] and
my roots and my experience with him. I had started a painting, and I
just couldn't get it. I was ready to give it up. And I had it in the
studio. I think I had turned it upside down somehow. It was just to get
it out of the way. And upside down was the vision. I felt free to mess
it up almost. And then, all of a sudden, things started happening.
Instead of trying to paint the chapel and the chorus and the literal
Tuskegee. experience, I really got into painting the energy that I got
from the man who was the composer and the conductor.
-
MASON
- What was the name of that painting?
-
DAVIS
- Well, I didn't have a name for it. And he came to visit my studio in Los
Angeles some years later, and he asked me did I have a title for it, and
I said, "No—" But I explained to him what I— He said, "Call it Energy. Just call it Energy." And, again, that stuck. It had a lot of impact. He was
also the first person to show me a coin and paper money that had an
African man's image on it, and that was something that made me realize
that the world was bigger than— And I don't know if I mentioned this
earlier in the tape.
-
MASON
- Yeah. On the first tape we talked about it.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, I did. But it's like little things, as a kid— You never know
what's going to affect a kid and how that's going to impact. But there
were little things like that that were just like little clues to say,
"Hey, the world's different than the world you live in." Because of
that kind of thing, whenever I travel outside of the country, I'll send
paper money back to a kid I know or to my daughter [Paloma Allen-Davis],
because it can just set something off. It can be real interesting how
that affects someone further down the line in their life.
1.20. TAPE NUMBER: XII, SIDE ONE APRIL 23, 1991
-
DAVIS
- I'll sort of give a verbal response to some of these visual pieces that
we have here and talk a little bit about the Mental
Space series and the
Pyramid series, I guess, to begin with. I
think I did address the Mental Space series. It was really a body of
work that was done when I was under a tremendous amount of mental stress
and working as an arts administrator during that Brockman Productions
phase. I used it as the release, the escape valve. In a way, it was like
it saved me from the madness— or I felt like it was madness—that I was
dealing with in terms of being an executive director type. I did a lot
of things that sort of had space or airy kinds of qualities, things that
were suspended in space, or things that dealt with illusion, and things
where you might cut through a surface and find another surface or cut
through another surface and find sky. So some of the pieces in that are
reflected in a lot of the drawings that I did. There was also a piece
entitled Beyond, a piece called Metamorphosis. A lot of these had to do with— Well, the
technique involved a printmaking process that I did with a fellow artist
named Bill Wheeler. He and I had gone to Otis [Art Institute] together,
and he had established a graphics studio in the Silver Lake area. I
worked as the artist and he worked as the master printer in this case,
so he was very instrumental in helping me produce these editions. Also during that period I was involved with doing collographs—well,
actually a little later—of what I call the Pyramid series. With this series I used a lot of transparencies
with layers moving in and out of a pyramid form. Again, the attempt to
create illusion. There were collographs in this series, and there were
paintings on unstretched canvas. The paintings were, in many cases, done
to give the feeling of lifting off or levitating from a surface or from
a sort of defined gravity, if you will.
-
MASON
- You mean the painting—?
-
DAVIS
- The image of the pyramid on the painting. It was like the pyramid was
lifting up. Then I experimented with some sewn forms. This one that was
called Ethnic Pyramid I did with unstretched
canvas, and then the pyramid shape was cut out. The pyramid shape was
cut out and then sewn back in so that the pattern of the pyramid was
created by the sewing as opposed to with a painted line. It's like it's
there and it's not there. I attached, in this particular case, some
beading and wire and feathers and little bells that would hang down from
the painting itself. You can see by the title sometimes. I call it Ethnic Pyramid, and then I also said it was for
the Mental Space series. So these bodies of work were running so close
together. I was in a way working on two series at one time and hadn't
defined which way they were going. As late as 1980—'79-'80, I believe—I
did a mural that reflected that image on the side of the studio wall on
Degnan Boulevard. [tape recorder off] Let's see. There was also a series called Bag series that overlapped on
the Mental Space series, as well. This Bag series was really a pun. It
started out with me thinking about some of the people that were working
at the time who had all of these different places that they were coming
from, so to speak, or different ideologies, different focus areas. There
was a term in the community of "What's your bag?" or "What are you
into?" So I started doing these drawings and paintings of paper bags
with a reflection on different people coming from different bags, so to
speak. That was also a small series. There were not a whole lot of
pieces in that. It was a fun group of drawings and paintings to do.
-
MASON
- You did that in the Otis—? When did you start that?
-
DAVIS
- What's that?
-
MASON
- The bags.
-
DAVIS
- I don't know that I have a specific date on that.
-
MASON
- I was just wondering if that was a part of your thesis project.
-
DAVIS
- No. No, no. It overlapped the Mental Space series and the Pyramid series. So it was in the '78, '79 period
of time, to my recollection. 'Seventy-seven, actually, is on this
particular piece. So '77, '78. I think that pretty much takes us through
that particular phase. Somewhere in the early eighties is that Blanket
series I talked about that I started in New Mexico, in Santa Fe. After
that one print, then I just really started to jump into a lot of
different pieces and just began to take on that cloth influence,
cloth-like quality. I think all of these bodies of works are still
tending to deal with a message or statement or social concern, some
dealing with family or real personal kinds of things, and others sort of
national, universal, or ethnic concerns. One of those strip paintings
that I talked about that had kente cloth, kind of a long, narrow format,
was a piece called Of Nuclear Concern. It was
acrylic and collage on canvas. I did another piece, a piece I really
liked a lot, called Who Shot the Sheriff? It sort
of dealt with or was a reflection on the song ["I Shot the Sheriff"] by
Bob Marley. Most of these pieces that I'm talking about now were
probably started during the period that. I went to Dorland Mountain Arts
Colony. I spent probably two to three months in an artist retreat space
finishing the Pyramid series, actually, and
beginning this new series of pieces from the Blanket influence. I have a quote here that I wrote regarding
this: "The Blanket series represents a discovery
of self through family relationships, old communal traditions,
allegiances to maternal lineage. Discovery of self through fatherhood
brought a resolution and culmination of the Pyramid series" —that's sort of a comment on my daughter [Paloma
Allen-Davis] coming into the world around that time—"and expresses the
self beyond self, natural order, cosmic awareness, universal oneness,
and an attunement with a higher order." I also feel like the Blanket series is influenced by images from the
Southwest, Native American hides, Mexican blankets, clotheslines from
the South, fabric and folk art that I would see in Brazil and Haiti and
in other travels. Then there were a few pieces that dealt with where I was at emotionally
in terms of relationships that came out of that series. I did a series
of sort of drypoint etchings that I printed as a line print and then
painted them as individual pieces, so they had the same image but they
were all one of a kind based on the fact that each one was painted and
treated differently. There were probably fifteen or twenty of those
prints that I did. Again, this Blanket series involved, in the early
stages, a lot more symbols than what I'm using now. I used the symbol of
a watermelon, the sun symbol that you see on the flag in the state of
New Mexico. I used some paper airplanes painted in, a symbol for
infinity, as well as arrows. In 1987, I exhibited a number of these pieces at the Isobel Neal Gallery
in Chicago. It was a one-person show [Alonzo Davis:
Soundscapes] during June and July, and a lot of the works from
this particular series were first shown at her gallery. This one that
I'm looking at is called Redwood Light, and it
sort of gives the kind of impression that you get when traveling in
Northern California in the redwood trees and the light sort of filters
down through the tops of the trees and across that reddish-brown bark.
It's a magical kind of quality. This painting is an attempt at reaching
that kind of quality or mood or attraction. There were a couple of other
pieces that were in that kente-cloth-strip phase. One was Great Leaper, which has sort of an oriental
character to it. Another one was influenced by going to a Catholic
church of the Paba Indians right off the grounds of that reservation in
northern San Diego County. It was during an Easter period, so it
influenced me to do this piece with a heart and the cross coming out of
the heart and the bottom of it having sort of an Easter-egg shape. So it
was Homage to the Paba Indian in that community. During all these periods, and even now, I continue to try to do
printmaking. I have a love for printmaking. I don't necessarily function
best in that process totally, so I tend to try to involve a master
printer with my work because it gives me a certain amount of control.
And being a painter, the inks tend to work different than paint. With a
master printer, I don't have to address my impatience with the long,
tedious process of edition printing. So with the prints in the last few
years, I've tried to make them make some statements. I try to pull an
issue out that concerns me, and I try to address it. In 1983, '84, somewhere around there, I did a piece called Act on It, and it had to do with citizens having
the right to vote. I incorporated the word "vote" in the print, and I
had little subliminal as well as obvious images. Having come from the
Southland having had relatives in Mississippi who gave up arms and limbs
and took great risks to vote, I think it's a privilege and it's
something that we should not ignore. It is a tool for social change and
a nonviolent one. So I wanted to stress that. And then I ended up doing a series of paintings called the Voter series
and exhibited those during that '84 period, since that was an election
year. I just tried to do that particular series as a
consciousness-raising series, not taking a political stance one way or
the other but more of initiating one to act. I remember my mother [Agnes
Moses Davis] was really reluctant to vote when I was a kid, and my folks
had to pay a poll tax. I remember my dad [Alonzo J. Davis Sr.] having to
take a test in order to vote, and the test had ridiculous questions like
how many windows in the White House. Now that we've sort of overcome
that denial, it's just something that I think is important to do. In '85, I did a print called Art against
Apartheid. I did a series of six for a portfolio. These prints made
statements about apartheid. I used words as well as a silhouette image
of Africa, and then I singled out the South African area in this map.
-
MASON
- We talked about those when they were all hung up together in the show at
the [Sacramento] City College, the very first session we had.
-
DAVIS
- Oh, yeah?
-
MASON
- Yeah. You had the postcards, and then on the wall by the door there was
a—
-
DAVIS
- Okay, great. Again, it's sort of using printmaking to make a statement
with multiples that are more accessible than paintings. Then we did
another piece. Maybe we— Oh, yeah. That was in the Sacramento gallery
[Gregory Kondos Art Gallery], yeah, in Sac City. Did I talk about the
piece Now Is the Time with Jesse Jackson sort of written underneath as
subliminal?
-
MASON
- Yes.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, okay. Well, those three prints— Let's see. The Jesse Jackson one,
Now Is the Time, and Act on
It and this recent one I did on El Salvador were done in a
postage-stamp format, so it's as if it's an enlarged stamp. I hope to
continue to do that. I like the stamp as a possible image to work with,
and actually at some point in this lifetime I'd like to produce a stamp.
In a way, that's an ultimate public art form since it reaches everyone
through the mail, millions of people. Also in '84, I was doing these
murals, '83-'84, but I also did some paintings related to the Olympics
coming. They were studies on canvas and on paper. And they were kind of
fun, using the Olympic rings and suggestions of a pole-vault image and a
shadow casting down from it. Actually, I had put these pieces away, and
it would be nice to see them again. I remember enjoying those paintings.
I don't think I've exhibited them in any major way, so, yeah, I need to
rediscover them. I have a show. in '92 at Lawrence University in
Appleton, Wisconsin, and I want it to be reflective of the eighties and
nineties.
-
MASON
- You mean it's a retrospective?
-
DAVIS
- Well, eighties and nineties. That's not really a retrospective, but it
encompasses ten years of work, give or take. I guess I'll talk a little
bit about Hawaii.
-
MASON
- I just wanted to ask you some overall questions.
-
DAVIS
- Sure.
-
MASON
- But— Okay, well, you can talk about that, and I'll, just save them for
the end.
-
DAVIS
- Okay. In 1988, I got a fellowship and was invited to the [University of
Hawaii] East-West Center to be an artist in residence there. That was
for approximately five or six months. I was invited there to paint, to
give a talk about what I did, and to do an exhibition of the works I had
done there, as well as to bring some works that were in that series.
This was a great opportunity for me because I could focus exclusively on
the work without worrying about earning a living. I worked with a
gentleman and fellow artist named Marshall Kerry as a studio assistant.
There was another artist there named Reihana MacDonald from New Zealand,
of Maori ancestry. We tended to respond to similar stimuli. I tended to
work on the Blanket series with much larger
formats on canvas and paper. This was where the canvas started becoming
sewn as opposed to glued together. I did pieces that reflected a certain
sensitivity to my experience of being in Hawaii. I think one was called
the Royal Navigator, which dealt with the water and the sea. There was
another one called Cloak for King Kamehameha. Then there was another one
called Hibiscus Winds, another Mango Lover. And these were all
reflective of an influence of being in that part of the world, the
planet, or— In a way, it didn't feel like the United States, even though
it was. I really enjoyed the cultural diversity of the islands and the
mix of people and interacting with people from Asian-Pacific
backgrounds. And I did one that looked like a kimono in a way as well.
So they were six, seven feet by four, five feet.
-
MASON
- So how is that related to—? What's the name of this one?
-
DAVIS
-
Shelter. Shelter was done
in Sacramento before going to Hawaii, and it has more of a Native
American feel to it to me. I guess in that Sacramento period I did some
pieces called Studio Jazz, which related to a guy
named Le Grand Rogers, who is a drummer whom I used to hang out with
there. And I did another large piece called At
Juanishi's Invitation, and it was a piece that reflected going
to a Native American sweat ceremony.
-
MASON
- What kind of ceremony?
-
DAVIS
- Sweat. Having come back from that sort of cleansing, it just really
jumped into this painting. I mean, it just flowed right out. It was sort
of interesting in that, having gone to the sweat lodge and through the
ceremonies, it just sort of pulled the creative juices up in me and
these paintings came out. I would say that just before leaving for
Sacramento I was just at the beginning of weaving the paintings. Then I
really started weaving the small ones once I got to Sacramento. Somehow
they came out of that experience there.
-
MASON
- So sometimes your woven ones are— When I saw your show at the Brockman
Gallery when it was up, sometimes they're painted strips that were cut
up and then sewn, and sometimes it seemed like they were all sewn
together and then painted over the top of the pieces. Was there a
difference in technique between the glued ones and the sewn as far as
cutting them up and sewing them together? Or did that have any
significance?
-
DAVIS
- It would vary, it would vary. Usually—if we take the paper pieces as an
example—I would paint them, do sort of a painted treatment on them, and
then I would end up using two sheets of paper of this sort of handmade
paper that I would buy from a distributor. And then I would cut them
into strips, weave them together, and paint them again to make that a
completed piece. There were occasions where I would— Well, like with
Hawaii, I think I gessoed the canvas, the large canvas pieces. I gessoed
them, wove them together, and pinned them. Then I took them to an
upholstery shop, and they sewed them, and then I painted them. So the
steps varied somewhat, but most of that work had a tremendous amount, of
layers and transparent colors and overlapping kinds of qualities on
them.
-
MASON
- I noticed in some pieces there were— Well, I can't find one here, but
there was a kind of Jackson Pollock layer where you—
-
DAVIS
- Yes. That's usually the first layer that goes down, where there's a lot
of free-splatter brush stroke, loose kind of quality. That would usually
go down on the gessoed surface, and then the painted pattern of
transparent colors. Then sometimes I would do splatter on top of that
again, so it would— Sometimes some of these paintings have ten or
fifteen layers of paint and approach. This one that I've been working on
here in San Antonio is this large paper piece that's out here. I mean, I
brought it from Sacramento. I couldn't resolve it there. I've added two
or three layers to it here, and I don't know how much I had on it when I
left Sacramento. I like for the paintings to have a lot of body and a
lot of depth and a lot of surface quality. I really just work on them
until they resolve themselves. Some paintings take years, and the same
format of another painting might take a month or two.
-
MASON
- Would you say these are your most abstract or—?
-
DAVIS
- These tend to be the ones with the least amount of symbolism in them.
Even the arrow has been dropped in a lot of these, not consciously. It's
just that they resolve themselves before I can mess them up with trying
to put a message in them. And I don't mean that in a derogatory way.
It's just that I'm sort of the vehicle that does these art pieces, and
they surprise me sometimes. I've used the arrow as a symbol, as almost—
It's almost become a signature in my work, so a lot of my friends and
associates have come to expect that. There was a period of time where I
almost felt obligated to throw it in somewhere so that it would appear
to have my signature. But these last few pieces that I've done here in
San Antonio don't have it for the most part, or, if they do, they're
very subtle. It's almost something you would have to discover.
-
MASON
- Did you kind of rediscover the abstract expressionists? Or was it more—?
Well, you were just saying that it kind of surprised you that you
decided to stop before you added the symbols. So why was that
satisfying? And when was that?
-
DAVIS
- I never really stopped to analyze it, but I can say that I've always
been drawn to abstract expressionism and liked the energy that evolved
from the works of art that came out of that period.
-
MASON
- Even at Otis?
-
DAVIS
- Even at Otis, yeah. And if I wasn't doing it, I admired it in other
people. However, I don't feel compelled to be in a school of art or feel
like I'm obligated to have a certain influence in what I do. What I do,
it happens to be what I do. I guess a few years ago I've become more and
more aware of Helen Frankenthaler's work and really like it, but I don't
necessarily base what I do on her work. But I do see relationships in my
work.
-
MASON
- In terms of color or—?
-
DAVIS
- In terms of color and technique and approach and maybe even attitude.
I'm not sure. I think she's learned to stop a lot sooner in her work
than I have. Mine still tends to go on and on and on, whereas she is
able to sort of stop at a place that's kind of interesting and is
fascinating for me. Because she is a respected artist, and it's like,
"Wow, why did she stop there?" or "That was great that she could stop
there."
-
MASON
- So why did you decide to try to get away from the square canvas? You
wrote in your thesis that that was one of the things that you were
trying to do then, but why was that important to you?
-
DAVIS
- I guess the square canvas represented the same old traditional way of
looking at art and at painting, and I really wanted to have a fresh
approach to what I do and did. I tried making those bags out of canvas.
That wasn't necessarily successful, but I worked on it. Then looking at
sort of Native American buffalo hides, they were real irregular and
stretched with leather or rope, so those were fascinating forms. And the
fact that I started becoming mobile in my life-style made that attitude
and approach to art complementary with what I was doing. So not only did
I have sort of another format but I also had eliminated a shipping
problem. Now I roll the pieces up and put them in a tube instead of
building a crate to ship them flat. And a lot of the work doesn't
require a frame. That's an interesting way of looking at— It's almost
like hanging a rug on a wall or a tapestry or a skin or a hide.
-
MASON
- So you're kind of walking the line between so-called crafts and
so-called fine arts.
-
DAVIS
- I don't see it as craft at all. I think craft is sort of more involved
in another direction.
-
MASON
- And what direction is that?
-
DAVIS
- Craft? It's more tooling and— I mean, there's craftsmanship in your
work, but, when you say craft, it makes me think of furniture or pottery
or jewelry.
-
MASON
- You mean functional things?
-
DAVIS
- Functional, even nonfunctional, but from the structure of a craft
approach. If anything, I think my paintings are approached from more a
design quality than from a craft quality. I did study a lot of design,
and I know that I do design problem solving when I get caught in the
work. I start taking it apart or do drawings that would be almost a
design problem as to how to approach or solve this piece. One of the
things that I'm really beginning to focus on now is doing installation
pieces and collaborations with other artists for public art kinds of
things. So I really see the work evolving into more temporary kinds of
statements. I have an altar concept that I would like to do in an
abandoned gas station here in San Antonio in a community. I'd like to do
it with light and candles and painting and memorabilia and just begin to
create a three-dimensional assemblage of stuff and make it an art
statement, and probably a statement that would evolve over a three-month
period of time but would maybe only last a week or two after it was
complete. And I recently did a piece here called Twelve Phone Calls to the Future, which was a neon— Did I talk
about this one, the neon piece?
-
MASON
- Not on tape, no.
-
DAVIS
- Okay. It's a neon piece that was elevated on a float about four feet
high, four to five feet high, and this float was covered with black
cloth. The neon was attached to the top with two candles on either side,
and then there were ten candles down at the bottom of the pontoon. So
there were twelve candles lit. And, at night¬time, I had the neon turned
on, and I floated it out in the middle of this pond so it just sort of
glimmered and glistened. I hired a drummer to play rhythmic patterns at
the head of the pond, and I had a guy who was a pyrotechnic sculptor set
off fireworks at the back end of the pond where the water sort of goes
into— There's a little stream that sort of goes into the pond. All of
this was done from sunset in about an hour's time. So it was a temporary
experience, but it was a very moving kind of reflective, interesting
piece. So I'm looking to do some more pieces that have that kind of
quality.
-
MASON
- You mean temporary or—?
-
DAVIS
- Temporary. And in a way it was sort of an illusion, because the neon and
the candles were reflecting off of the water. Then I had an additional
twelve little boats of styrofoam with candles in it also floating out in
the water separately. And this was influenced by this guy here, this
sculptor I mentioned, Bill Fitzgibbons, and an artist in Sacramento
named Tom Witt, who had done a piece around another kind of body of
water that he and I collaborated on to make a—
1.21. TAPE NUMBER: XII, SIDE TWO APRIL 23, 1991
-
DAVIS
- I was saying this artist Tom and I collaborated on creating a pond.
-
MASON
- You talked about that, too.
-
DAVIS
- The smoked glass and the sculpture in the middle of the water and then
lit these flares around it and had drummers come and sort of do a
ceremony.
-
MASON
- This was at Shingle Springs [California]?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, at Shingle Springs.
-
MASON
- Okay. How did you see the relationship between the public permanent
pieces like the murals and the private temporary pieces like the
installations?
-
DAVIS
- Well, the permanent pieces have to take into consideration a lot more
elements. I've been looking at trying to do a piece for a building in
New York, and I have to be concerned with the kind of stone and the kind
of pavers, because this would be a mosaic kind of image that would come
off a building and down to the ground. It would have a fountain,
hopefully. It sort of involves the public at large, safety factors,
security, permanence, so a lot more things go into it to make it happen
than some of the temporary pieces. Temporary pieces tend to be away from
people, and the people are tending to watch it. It's almost like a
performance piece instead of a permanent work of public art.
-
MASON
- Are you doing any other kinds of performance?
-
DAVIS
- No, not yet. I've actually talked with a couple of students here [San
Antonio Art Institute] about working together. There's a woman named
Bettie Ward who is a senior at this college. She's what I call an older
student—she's forty—and she's done a lot of performance pieces and has
been a singer and is now graduating in sculpture. So we talked about
doing a performance piece of some sort, but nothing has been nailed down
yet.
-
MASON
- Will it be the same kind of thing as with the Tom Witt project? Will you
build something?
-
DAVIS
- I don't know. It will probably involve some structure and involve us
creating something that would happen and be for a limited number of
people, sort of invited guests, or take place on private property and
hopefully be documented by videotape.
-
MASON
- Well, you said you had slides of the Twelve Phone
Calls to the Future.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, yeah.
-
MASON
- What about the piece at Shingle Springs? Did you say you videotaped
that? Or did you take photographs?
-
DAVIS
- I have some photographs of it, yeah.
1.22. TAPE NUMBER: XIII, SIDE ONE APRIL 24, 1991
-
MASON
- Today we wanted to talk about the Brockman Gallery, why you left it, and
what's going to happen to the gallery now that you've gone.
-
DAVIS
- Let's see, I left Los Angeles in 1987. I was in the process of slowing
down and phasing out a lot of the activities I was involved in within
the city of L.A. I had served on a lot of boards or organizations and
had also been running Brockman Productions, so I resigned as executive
director of Brockman Productions and turned its operation over to the
board but continued to run the gallery. I think that happened in the
'85-'86 time frame. It got to be kind of hard to pull away from a lot of
the community activities and the boards I was involved in, so that
weighed in my decision to leave Los Angeles. And also, I had
accomplished a lot of things in L.A., and I just really felt like it
was the time to change, and I wanted to move to and live in a smaller
community. While a lot of people ask why didn't I move to San Francisco
or Chicago or New York, which sometimes tends to be the pattern of
artists in the West, I just decided it was not necessarily what I was
looking for.
-
MASON
- Why not?
-
DAVIS
- I wasn't interested in being in a major metropolitan area. I wanted a
slower-paced place with just a different rhythm, a different beat, a
different speed. So I left L.A. for that reason. I didn't necessarily
leave to shut down the gallery operation. I tried to leave it in place
with what became two managers of the business, a woman named Alicia
Griffin and then Debbie Byars. For some time I had been trying to shift
the responsibilities of the operation. Financially, it just really
didn't have enough money to pay the kind of salary that needed to be
paid for a full-fledged director/curator. I had tried to do that with
Leonard Simon a few years before that, and it just couldn't make that
shift. I kept finding myself stuck with management and operations and
curatorial decision making. So I was trying to remove myself from that
but yet still have a viable entity happening. And then I went through
the two managers of the business in a way that the same kind of
standards weren't necessarily there. Although these people had good
intentions, sometimes their business skills or communication skills were
detrimental to the sort of public relations and marketing end that we
had established over a period of time.
-
MASON
- When you say that the managers, you mean Debbie and—?
-
DAVIS
- Right, Alicia. They were certainly sincere and made great efforts but
couldn't turn a corner financially. In many cases, some of the
exhibitions suffered, and some of the communication with the artists
suffered. So operating at a distance just didn't work out. As of this year, I have technically closed the gallery operations down in
terms of being a formal art gallery, a formal retail space, and have
approached it with another format. Still wanting to have a business
space and being affiliated with Los Angeles, I decided to maintain the
space and to make it available to creative people on a short-term basis.
It falls in line with another thing that I've been doing, which is
acquiring artists' spaces. As I left them, I'd sublet them to other
artists so that there was sort of a continuity and it always stayed
within the hands of creative people. I wanted to keep art on the block
in Los Angeles. So I have two studios now, one that is sublet to Darryl
Evers, who is an artist in residence with us, and Kamau Daaood and Billy
Higgins have the other space. And Kamau is a performance artist, poet,
and Billy Higgins is a jazz drummer. So they do these ongoing programs.
We call them BG studio one and two. So the natural succession for the
gallery space was to move into that direction but to keep it somewhat
limited so that it wasn't a long-term use opportunity, that artists
could use it up to six months. It's wide open, and they can do whatever
they want to do in there. I mean, they can do exhibits, they can use it
as studio space, it can be mixed-use space, it can be performance
space, they can do screenings in there. One guy is a computer artist
who's interested in the space. In the fall, or right now, there's a
family—two sisters and a brother [Mary, Jackie, and Alden Kimbrough]—who
have a major collection of revolutionary art and historical posters that
will have the space through August. I guess they came on in March.
They'll have it for this initial six-month period, and so it's the
Kimbrough collection, it's not Brockman Gallery.
-
MASON
- Okay. I'm still not clear on your relationship to the gallery. You're
just a landlord? Or if an artist wants to use it as an exhibition space,
do you provide like a consultancy for that artist? Do you do any kind of
management or—?
-
DAVIS
- I provide a consultancy and we provide— There's track lighting, there's
a pedestal, there's space. But, in a way, I'm sort of like a landlord in
that I'm making a space available. I'm not doing programming.
-
MASON
- Right, but you offer some management.
-
DAVIS
- But we probably take it a little further because we do technical
assistance. We try to help them get off the ground. We have a mailing
list that's available to them that is accessible for their use.
-
MASON
- Do you think there's—? Are you trying to keep the galleries a
multicultural—?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. My personal focus is that it be available to whomever comes
through who has a concept of merit. So it's not exclusive to any one
particular group.
-
MASON
- So then, when you left for Sacramento, that was a permanent move?
-
DAVIS
- It was sort of a trial balloon. I mean, you go, and you decide to rent
an efficiency apartment instead of a two-bedroom apartment because you
don't know how it's going to turn out. I wanted to make the move, but I
was doing it cautiously. I was trying to see if it would work out, and
it did. It served the purpose of breaking that bond with the city of Los
Angeles. I was able to be more involved and more creative with the kind
of output just because I was able to say no to situations there that
were difficult for me to say no to in L.A., especially in terms of just
getting involved and being a part of the community. I had paid those
dues and really just needed a break to focus on my own directions.
-
MASON
- You began to do installation pieces there, earthworks and things like
that, that you probably couldn't possibly do in L.A. What other kinds
of things do you think you were able to do in that setting that you
couldn't do in L.A.? And how has being there affected your work?
-
DAVIS
- Well, I had a large studio in Sacramento, and that was a really good
space. I was able to really focus on being and working in that space
because I had fewer distractions and I was more driven and determined.
And the weather, the mood changes in being in that sort of climate— You
know, it had the four seasons, and that was interesting. So I would do
things that reflected on the fall or the winter or the spring, which
tended to just be more dramatic than in Southern California. Also, I was
close to the Bay Area—within a two-hour drive—so I was still not totally
removed from creative associates. I would go over there from time to
time. It wasn't a criteria to be there, though. It was really nice not
to— It was like it was great to visit, but you didn't have to get caught
up within the total spectrum of that other art community. The earthworks
and those kinds of things just kind of happened as things were
available. I had a friend [Pat Brown] who had property outside of
Sacramento, and I would spend a lot of time there. Just sort of access
and someone who was open to something happening on their land allowed me
to think in that kind of direction. I didn't have to pursue someone or
pursue the unknown to find access. So conversations and those kinds of
things led to that.
-
MASON
- What about in terms of your audience or public or just the general
attitude towards art in Sacramento? Do you think there's a greater
receptivity for the kind of work that you're doing than there was in L.
A.? Because one usually associates the more northerly California
artists with a certain kind of spirituality. It seems that they have a
greater spirituality in their work than the—
-
DAVIS
- I didn't necessarily find that true.
-
MASON
- It's just a cliché?
-
DAVIS
- There were a lot of artists in the Northern California area. Sacramento
has a rich group, of artists there that maybe you wouldn't think you
would find, but they tend to be a little bit too regional. They don't
reach out as far as I think they could and should. I think probably the
influence of possibilities had to do with having worked with the city's
public art program and being exposed to the number of proposals and
concepts that the artists would submit or attempt to do. That opened my
head a lot. And then I had a greater opportunity to interact with the
artist community at large based on my contacts through that and being in
a studio where there were a lot of other artists doing a myriad of
different kinds of things. And it was a smaller community. There were
not as many black American artists there, so my associations changed
quite a bit. A lot of the artists that I associated with were Native
American or Chicano and Anglo. So I had a greater awareness of their
activities, as well, than I had in Los Angeles. In terms of the public,
I had a greater public in Los Angeles, actually, but this was sort of a
fresh public, and I was a new kid on the block, so to speak, so that
helped attract people to what I was doing. And then I had been teaching
there—sort of reentered the teaching community in the summer of '88—so I
had students who sort of followed my activities and came to studio
events.
-
MASON
- I want to talk about your teaching, but I also wanted to ask you, who is
your public? Who do you feel your audience is?
-
DAVIS
- I think it's real mixed. There's a natural association with those people
who follow the works of African American artists, so that's one audience
that's constantly available to me, not that they necessarily understand
the kinds of things that I'm doing in some cases. There's a student
audience—those people who are looking for new things and for artists who
are teachers, trying to learn and discern from that kind of an
experience. Then there are those people who just like way-out things
who tend to be followers. Then there's just the arts community in
general, some of which is interested in contemporary art. So I tend to
draw down from all of those groups in varying ways and at different
times. It's probably peculiar to the kind of thing that I'm doing at one
time or another. So the earthworks or the installation pieces might draw
one kind of crowd and the paintings another to some degree.
-
MASON
- Well, Kay [Lindsey] asked you a good question. She asked whether you had
one person in particular who seems to follow your career.
-
DAVIS
- This woman just died last week. Her name was Camille Higgins. It was
always important to her to keep up with who I was and what I was doing,
and I really enjoyed that kind of connection. Also Cheryl Dixon, writer
and professor of art at Dillard University in New Orleans. There are
other people who follow through, but it's hard for me to say. It's like
defining those people who try to keep up with me as an artist and my
work, or is it the friendship relationship that I have with them that
also connects to art in some way? I work with a woman named Mary Lynn
Perry. She's my agent in Sacramento. She keeps a real close monitor on
what I'm doing. I work with a woman named Winifred Day and with Harvey
Evans, who have a business called Corp Decor in Oakland, and they sell a
lot of my paintings to the business community. We have an ongoing
relationship. John Outterbridge has been one of those people who's
always been there, and we have this brotherhood as men and as artists
and as people who have crossed the burning sands together so to speak.
I'm sure there are others; I just can't recall.
-
MASON
- You mentioned having a spiritual relationship with Matthew Thomas.
-
DAVIS
- Well, I have a real strong connection with him and his work, but I can't
say that we follow each other's career or that we're that type or
maintain that kind of parallel connection that I think John and I do.
-
MASON
- So, in other words, in your relationship with John Outterbridge, you
discuss art issues, you discuss—
-
DAVIS
- Being human beings.
-
MASON
- What about your teaching? What kinds of things do you think are
important for younger students to know?
-
DAVIS
- Well, I'll answer your question a different way than you're asking it
and say that I taught in public schools in L.A. for five years, from, I
think, about twenty-five years of age to thirty. And, when leaving, I
said, "I'm good at this, it's something I can do well, but right now I
can't bring enough to it. And it's also very draining, and it's a major
distraction in terms of my personal goals and so forth. What I would
hope to do is reenter the education community when I'm a more mature
person, when I can bring life to the classroom and be able to give a
much fuller kind of experience." I left teaching full-time in 1970.
Then I did part-time teaching in the community colleges in 1971 through
'76, actually, teaching at community colleges and state universities.
-
MASON
- What subjects did you teach?
-
DAVIS
- Afro-American art history, beginning drawing. Those are the two main
subjects. But then I left that in '76, one, because Brockman Productions
was getting off the ground and, two, I was tired of being pigeonholed
into the Afro-American art history when my degree was in painting,
printmaking, design. I had an M. F. A. [master of fine arts] and was
sort of qualified to work on the levels that a lot of other people were
getting and weren't made available to me. And one of the other reasons
to reenter the education situation was I had the skills, I had the
experience, I had the track record. I could bring the pitfalls and the
glories of success as an artist to the classroom. I felt like I could
give a real hands-on life experience, and it also would provide me with
a steady income between the ages of fifty and sixty, which would be the
time to sort of look at retirement or look at a saving-for-retirement
kind of situation. I also know that I have to balance that to my
creative energies as well. So, this time at it, I think I can manage it
better than I could when I was in my late twenties.
-
MASON
- The way you're describing it, it sounds like your teaching style is
somewhat similar to Charles White's in the classroom in that he spent a
lot of time talking about life experiences. Would you say that's true?
-
DAVIS
- I would say that's true. I try to bring a realistic picture, I try to
give real challenging assignments, and I try to talk about what it takes
to be an artist, what the sacrifices are.
-
MASON
- And what are those?
-
DAVIS
- Well, before I say what they are, let me say that I also try to prepare
people to get organized towards what is expected of them as professional
artists as well. So the pitfalls are the things that you don't get
together. It's like if you don't have your resume written, and it's not
typewritten. That's a pitfall. And a lot of artists just kind of play it
off. But if you go to college, then you're working toward being a
professional, and you need to have your act together on all levels. So
how to make presentations, how to present yourself, how to get your
slides together, how to write proposals, how to be clear about your
intent, how to put a biography together, how to use a computer to your
advantage in terms of moving information around so that the person who's
going to be reading your stuff will be able to focus in on it. What kind
of money you can expect to earn in a lifetime, how to protect your
financial interests in a grant situation, how to ask for what you want.
All of these things to me just sound like commonsense activities, but
they really aren't. Art students want to paint. It's like, "I don't want
to get involved in all these other things." But—
-
MASON
- They feel if their work is good, somebody will notice anyway.
-
DAVIS
- Right. I tend to tell them that the best artist that paints in a closet
is one that's never seen. They've got to be good, and then they've also
got to find a way to communicate what they've done to the people who
handle or respond to or support or purchase the kinds of things that
they do.
-
MASON
- Do you tell your black students anything in particular about being black
artists?
-
DAVIS
- Well, I always try to pull the students who don't have a consciousness
aside. Like here there's only one black student on this campus, and he's
not really aware of the history that follows him. So I've made a point
to say things about Charles White or Jacob Lawrence or Romare Bearden.
His style is like Hughie Lee Smith's, so I'm like, "Well, there's a guy
named Hughie Lee Smith, and if you can't find it in the library here,
you ought to go to Trinity University and see what you can find over
there." So I try to lead. I can't hold his hand and do that. I talked
about John [Thomas] Biggers. He's a Texas artist, and he's black. He's
accomplished major things, and he's done murals. He was doing a picture
of a boxer. There's a guy in Birmingham, Alabama, who did paintings of
boxers who went to the San Francisco Art Institute, but it was like the
paintings of boxers he did showed that energy of the punch as much as it
showed the portrait of the person standing behind the gloves. So I try
to relay that kind of thing to him as well. But it's a slow process, and
he's got to be curious. He's got to want for it. But the kind of impact
I'm having on this campus just as an artist and person is something also
that he takes pride in, just me being here. So there is a little power
in presence as well.
-
MASON
- Is there a particular student that you think you've had a great impact
on or that you perceive that you've had a great impact on in their work?
-
DAVIS
- Wow, it's— The answer is yes, and there's not a particular one. It seems
to be that a number of them have expressed that. But then the burden is
on them to continue through their life to make it happen. And I really
try to prepare them for it. The advanced painting class here at San
Antonio Art Institute has been exceptional. I think that I've reached at
least four or five or the eight students, that I've turned them on. They
relay things back to me that are real positive. They've taken to heart
the kinds of things that I've asked them to do, which is like go beyond
painting and get ready for life. I even require them to do a long-range
plan which would project who they saw themselves as and where they
wanted to be in five years. It was a real difficult exercise for many of
them, but at least it got them thinking and establishing some goals. I'm
sure those goals will change with many of them, if not most of them. But
there's a sort of a process to looking at where you want to be and
avoiding some of the pitfalls and the other distractions. that are out
there. And you can see them in the projects that they write for me.
-
MASON
- So you're trying to prepare your students for the world and for—
-
DAVIS
- For life as artists.
-
MASON
- We've been talking a lot about how black artists are excluded from
institutions, galleries, and publications and things. Do you think
that's changing? Do you think there is a de-emphasis on race as far as
the art market and the world—?
-
DAVIS
- Well, there's a catch-22 on that. There's a de-emphasis on race, but
then, all of a sudden, you still find that there is still a small number
of artists of color being included in the big picture. So I question the
de-emphasis of race in that people want to de-emphasize it when those
artists attain a certain level but then perpetuate it as a category
sometimes to keep a division. So it's just not equity across the board.
I don't know. I look at this school. There's not enough recruitment.
There certainly needs to be more black students, just looking at the
numbers in the state of Texas. Somebody's not doing their job. That's
the picture that I have.
-
MASON
- Well, I guess I was also thinking in terms of do you think that there is
kind of an alternative structure for black artists to become, well,
quote, "successful, " unquote, or well known? Because there are
obviously black artists who have been successful, it seems, without
those apparatuses.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. I mean, there is the network within the culture that can carry
these artists or a fair number of these artists. It's just a limited
amount of access they have to the art public at large. But, yes, they
can be successful without mainstreaming.
-
MASON
- So that network consists of places like the Brockman Gallery, the
California Afro-American Museum?
-
DAVIS
- Yeah. The California Afro-American Museum, the Studio Museum in Harlem.
I mean, these are like institutions that are established that are strong
cultural entities that give young, promising artists the opportunity to
get their stuff out there before a public that they may not have access
to through the mainstream. But each generation's obligation is to create
these kinds of spaces for their artists.
-
MASON
- So you don't see a general phasing out of the need of that institution?
-
DAVIS
- No. No, I don't know that that— Because there are so many people who
don't go through the traditional education process who are still artists
and whose communities or whose ability to network outside of their
community is limited. So the institutions are still needed, and the
artists still need those institutions, [tape recorder off]
-
MASON
- Okay. I think it's clear by now that you're not only interested in
African American issues. You're also interested in other cultures.
You're interested in multicultural issues. How have you been able to
address that interest since you've been in San Antonio? And how do you
want to address them in the future?
-
DAVIS
- Well, I guess over the years I've been, a part of a movement to
acknowledge the cultural activities of the diverse population,
especially in California, and acknowledge the contribution and the
influences of the historical homeland and its fusion with North American
culture. So I participated on the panels of the multicultural artist
programs for the California Arts Council, and I represented those
interests on a number of boards that I sat on in Los Angeles. I've
always made an active effort to include that community in the audience
development that I would do for my own work or exhibitions. Here in
Texas, I'm here as an educator, a visiting professor, and happen to be
an artist of color. I just think my presence makes a difference for a
lot of people. I always address my history and where I come from and
what my background and bloodline is to all of my classes. It's just a
point of reference. I try to-be real clear about it without evoking any
prejudice or alienation of any other group or groups. And in working
with the college president here [San Antonio Art Institute]— We have
sort of weekly sessions on Wednesday afternoons, and I've said, "Well,
if you're going to be in Texas and you're going to be the only art
school in the Southwest, you need to attract other people." There's
such a large Hispanic community in this part of Texas—we're only a few
hundred miles, if that, from Mexico—and there's a tremendous amount of
potential to reach students from Central and South America. I also felt
that this school had an excellent opportunity to attract students from
the Pacific Rim countries, especially countries like Cambodia, Thailand,
Indonesia, Korea, and even some of the Vietnamese people. So I always
make that kind of presence known and way of thinking known. There's a
change in the recruitment position, and one of the things that I have
said is that whomever takes on this position should be Spanish speaking
or be willing to learn so that they can communicate in that other
language, should it be necessary. There's just a large number of people
like that who need to feel at home sometimes, and using another language
is sometimes that key to breaking barriers of insecurity or dealing with
the unfamiliar.
-
MASON
- Well, how has that gone down with the board and the administration?
Because, of course, a lot of people see different cultures as threats
and not as equal.
-
DAVIS
- Well, I'd just say that it's open, that people have been open to what
I've had to say about it. But I'm not playing— I'm not on the board. I'm
not privileged to board decisions, and I'm not trying to participate on
that level at this time. It's one thing to say these things; it's
another to put them into action. But there's a receptivity and, I think,
a desire to move in that direction. This is not to be done to move the
white students out of the picture. It's just to make this international,
and it's an excellent opportunity for this institution.
-
MASON
- Do you see art as a way of bridging the gaps between different cultures?
-
DAVIS
- Well, there are so many ways of bridging the gap, and art is simply only
one. I mean, music is another, literature is another, business is
another, trade is another, commerce, travel. I really try to emphasize
travel among students. Learning other languages of other people and
world history. All of those things coming together make a difference.
It's real easy for people to isolate one thing and then not deal with
it. But to have an infusion of all of these kinds of things I think
makes it truly international.
-
MASON
- Do you want to talk about the Oil and Blood, the In Lak'esh project?
-
DAVIS
- That's a project in Sacramento that's a collaboration of thirty-one
artists and thirty-one poets. They've been paired off so an artist and a
poet produce a product that is the result of their collaboration. I'm
one of the selected artists to participate. I'm working with a poet
named Teresa Vincigerra. We've talked about—and we haven't finalized
it—but our concept is to do bus stops. So we were thinking of doing a
series of bus stops that use poetry as language. And we talked about the
poem being in several languages or languages that might be peculiar to
the different communities that these bus stops might find themselves in.
So it might be in Cambodian or it might be in English, it might be in
Spanish, probably the same poem. And these bus stops would be designed
and executed in an artistic way as well as having language as part of
their structure.
-
MASON
- So it's sort of a mural concept for the bus stop? Is that it?
-
DAVIS
- Well— It's hard to call it— I don't know yet. Yeah. I mean, it hasn't
really been determined whether it will be painted, whether it will be
three-dimensional, whether it would be cut out, and whether it will be
models for bus stops, or whether we'll actually do actual bus stops. So
the collaboration effort is towards that. We'd like to do some actual
ones, but we don't know what—
-
MASON
- Oh, I thought you were working with bus stops which were already in
place.
-
DAVIS
- No.
-
MASON
- Oh, I see.
-
DAVIS
- No. These are concepts for—
1.23. APE NUMBER: XIII, SIDE TWO APRIL 24, 1991
-
MASON
- Do you consider yourself a successful artist? Are you where you want to
be right now in your career?
-
DAVIS
- Interesting question. Am I where I want to be right now? I think I'm
moving toward where I want to be and successful to some degree. I'm
never complacent about being totally satisfied. I mean, there's always
something new you want to do or another opportunity that might be
challenging. There's always something around the corner, so I'm not
complacent in any shape or form. But I'm challenged and I'm always
looking. And as opportunities come, if I have the opportunity to do them
and become successful, then I've gotten to that step of the hill. And
then I'm looking up at the next one. And that's true with
artist-commission opportunities.
-
MASON
- You talked about the stamp. You were hoping to get a stamp commission.
-
DAVIS
- Yeah, I'd like to do that at some point. I'd like to see it happen in my
lifetime.
-
MASON
- Is that your next big dream?
-
DAVIS
- Well, it's one of those long-range dreams. Those are the kinds of things
I'm dreaming after, pursuing, fantasizing. I'm almost fifty, and I'm
looking at that as that particular period of time when I want to put
some financial security together so I can be a retiring, working artist.
That's part of my dream, to find an institution or work situation that
will support my creativity, but I can also earn a living to realize that
last phase of my lifetime, if I am able to have a long life.