Contents
- 1. Transcript
- 1.1. TAPE NUMBER: I, SIDE ONE AUGUST 13, 1987
- 1.2. TAPE NUMBER: I, SIDE TWO AUGUST 13, 1987
- 1.3. TAPE NUMBER: II, SIDE ONE AUGUST 21, 1987
- 1.4. TAPE NUMBER: II, SIDE TWO AUGUST 21, 1987
- 1.5. TAPE NUMBER: III, SIDE ONE AUGUST 21, 1987
- 1.6. TAPE NUMBER: IV, SIDE ONE AUGUST 28, 1987
- 1.7. TAPE NUMBER: IV, SIDE TWO AUGUST 28, 1987
- 1.8. TAPE NUMBER: V, SIDE ONE AUGUST 28, 1987
- 1.9. TAPE NUMBER: VI, SIDE ONE SEPTEMBER 1, 1987
- 1.10. TAPE NUMBER: VI, SIDE TWO SEPTEMBER 1, 1987
- 1.11. TAPE NUMBER: VII, SIDE ONE SEPTEMBER 11, 1987
- 1.12. TAPE NUMBER: VII, SIDE TWO SEPTEMBER 11, 1987
- 1.13. TAPE NUMBER: VIII, SIDE ONE SEPTEMBER 25, 1987
- 1.14. TAPE NUMBER: VIII, SIDE TWO SEPTEMBER 25, 1987
- 1.15. TAPE NUMBER: IX, SIDE ONE OCTOBER 2, 1987
- 1.16. TAPE NUMBER: IX, SIDE TWO OCTOBER 2, 1987
- 1.17. TAPE NUMBER: X, SIDE ONE OCTOBER 8, 1987
- 1.18. TAPE NUMBER: X, SIDE TWO OCTOBER 8, 1987
- 1.19. TAPE NUMBER: XI, SIDE ONE NOVEMBER 20, 1987
1. Transcript
1.1. TAPE NUMBER: I, SIDE ONE AUGUST 13, 1987
- DONAHOE
- Okay. Why don't you tell me where you were born and something about your
early family life.
- FIERING
- I was born on the Lower East Side in New York City in 1913, March 4 to
be exact. When I was about six weeks old, my family migrated to
Cleveland, Ohio. My father [Nathan Fiering], mother [Anna Fiering], and
I moved there in search of work and he worked there. I was the firstborn
child of my parents' marriage, and he did find work in the steel mills
in Cleveland. We lived in Cleveland for about six and a half years and
had to move back to New York because my father suffered a blacklist as a
result of the steel strike of 1919, and couldn't find work in Cleveland.
During that period I had three sisters born in Cleveland, Beatrice
[Fiering Koslofsky], Dorothea [Fiering Wolf], and Nettie [Fiering
Rubinstein]. After several years in New York, my parents adopted my
brother, Louis [Fiering].
- DONAHOE
- He had been trying to organize steel and that's why he--?
- FIERING
- He worked in the steel mill. There was a national steel strike in 1919
in which he participated as a striker, which was broken, and he couldn't
get back into a shop, couldn't get a job. He was blacklisted. So he had
to scrounge whatever way he could to make a living. Couldn't make a decent living so--He had a brother who lived in New York
who owned a furniture shop, and his brother [Max Fiering] arranged to
have the family moved back to New York and my father went to work for
his brother as a furniture worker, as an upholsterer--a trade he was at
for the rest of his life.
- DONAHOE
- So you moved back to--?
- FIERING
- So we moved back to New York in late 1919 and lived in East Harlem and
then the Bronx.
- DONAHOE
- And what about you and your schooling? You went to school--?
- FIERING
- Yeah, I went through DeWitt Clinton High School, went to CCNY [City
College of New York] close to five years at night while working during
the day, or trying to look for work during the day and my interests were
diverted to other things than my schooling. One of the interests was of
course the radical movement.
- DONAHOE
- What year was this?
- FIERING
- Well, 1929 is when I graduated from high school and went to CCNY in the
fall of that year. Never did get a degree. I went to work on Wall Street
during the summer of that year, as soon as I did graduate, and I didn't
become a millionaire immediately. I saw I couldn't be one before I was
twenty, so I quit. I worked for Hornblower and Weeks at the time.
- DONAHOE
- Why did you go to Wall Street?
- FIERING
- Because that was my orientation. I wanted to be rich.
- DONAHOE
- You're serious.
- FIERING
- I'm serious.
- DONAHOE
- Okay.
- FIERING
- Yeah, I had my eyes set on being rich.
- DONAHOE
- What capacity were you working for?
- FIERING
- I used to deliver securities. That's what a beginner would do on Wall
Street.
- DONAHOE
- So very rapidly-
- FIERING
- Very rapidly I was disillusioned. I left before the crash and I got work
as a shipping clerk in the garment industry there in New York and, of
course, the crash came. After working for about a year, year and a half,
I was laid off, and couldn't get work for nine months after that. I was
out of work for a long period of time. I went to school at night, but my
mind was really not on it. In fact, at that time, I was pledged to a
fraternity [Lambda Gamma Phi]; I was still in that mode. Gradually with
the deepening of the Depression, of course, my interests changed. I then
got work again, laid off again, got work again, and the rising movement
of the unemployed got to me and the radical movement got to me. I was
thrown into a milieu of many radical youth and became radicalized.
- DONAHOE
- And this was the heart of the Depression?
- FIERING
- This was the heart of the Depression. This was before 1933.
- DONAHOE
- So like between 1930-
- FIERING
- Nineteen thirty-one and 1932. I became involved in many of the
activities of the radical movement, particularly the communist movement,
with the unemployed, and with the antifascist movement.
- DONAHOE
- So at this point you hadn't really had a regular job or a skill. You had
been working at various jobs.
- FIERING
- I had no skill, that's right, I had no skill.
- DONAHOE
- But this was more or less your introduction also to the labor movement.
- FIERING
- That's right. This was my introduction and my interest; it's when I
developed an interest and awareness of the labor movement.
- DONAHOE
- Because of your meeting with these radical people and what was going on
in the country and in the world. Okay, you want to tell me some more
about that? Like what you did with the unemployed.
- FIERING
- Well, what happened with me was I became involved with what at that time
I think was known as a workers club, and at the ripe old age of
nineteen, I became its president. Now, you have to understand, the
workers club was made up of mature individuals, older people, and my
expression of interest was of interest to them. I was active in it, and
[for] whatever it was they saw in me, they made me the president of it.
It was the Tremont Workers Club at the time in the Bronx.
- DONAHOE
- Tremont?
- FIERING
- Tremont. And we used to go out and make speeches on street corners and
all that kind of thing that you may or may not have heard about.
- DONAHOE
- Not the workers clubs.
- FIERING
- It's strange today.
- DONAHOE
- I heard of making speeches on the street corners.
- FIERING
- We used to have little platforms we used to carry out to get up on it.
- DONAHOE
- The soapbox.
- FIERING
- That's right.' Then I made the move to join the YCL [Young Communist
League] in 1932.
- DONAHOE
- Now, the workers clubs, were they made up of all kinds of workers?
- FIERING
- Yeah, all kinds of workers. They were not set up on the basis of skill
or trades; they were set up on the basis of neighborhoods.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, I see.
- FIERING
- They were a factor in all the working-class neighborhoods in New York.
Of course, in New York, the radical movement was a whole lot different
than anything else that went on in the United States because of
tremendous numbers of immigrants, the radicalization of the immigrants,
and the socialist sympathies generally of immigrants there, particularly
among Jews. I don't think it was mimicked anywhere in the country, but
that's because of the peculiar situation.
- DONAHOE
- All the factors.
- FIERING
- Yeah, all the factors in New York, right.
- DONAHOE
- Do you think that there was involvement of any socialists or communists
in the workers clubs?
- FIERING
- Oh yes, there was. Oh yeah. As a matter of fact, there was a part of the
program of the CP [Communist Party] to build workers clubs.
- DONAHOE
- And on this neighborhood basis, which was really important.
- FIERING
- On this neighborhood basis, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- So that was your first real involvement.
- FIERING
- I was involved, became a member of it, active in it.
- DONAHOE
- And they liked you?
- FIERING
- They pushed me for leadership because I suppose at that time I looked
quite Anglo and quite American--all that jazz. College boy, you know,
that kind of thing, guess. It all contributed.
- DONAHOE
- So the workers themselves had elected you to be president.
- FIERING
- Oh yeah, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- So then after that is when you joined the YCL.
- FIERING
- Yeah, about that time, 1932. Yeah, I was about nineteen years old then.
- DONAHOE
- And what did that involve? What kinds of activities?
- FIERING
- Oh, what's involved in joining the YCL is essentially joining supposedly
a youth group of the political party, but in essence it doesn't operate
any differently than the political party, except it operates among
youth.
- DONAHOE
- But you were still involved in labor.
- FIERING
- Well, I was involved with the workers club. But in 1933 after Roosevelt
was elected and the NRA was passed- don't know if you've heard of the
NRA, National Recovery Act, with its section 9 or section 7.
- DONAHOE
- Section 9.
- FIERING
- It was section 7, wasn't it? It was a whole upsurge of organization of
workers allover the country, particularly in New York, and in the
garment industries, they took heart and regarded this as a Magna Carta
for union organization. At that point, I made my first foray into direct
contact with the union movement and went down to the Textile Workers
Union [of America] and offered to volunteer as an organizer.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, so that was your first real organizing job, the Textile Workers
Union, and that was--?
- FIERING
- But that was not a paying job, I wanted to do it. It was the
idealization of being related to a union, doing something for a union.
- DONAHOE
- So you were a volunteer.
- FIERING
- I volunteered, yeah. I did and several other young people did along with
me. I remember meeting with the organizer and he had a bunch of, I look
back on it now, he had fresh meat on his hands. A bunch of patsies ready
to go out and do work for nothing. To the old labor leadership, that was
unheard of too. But, in any event, we tried to do some organizing.
[There was] some excitement. It was really exciting to us, just the idea
to be able to say we were associated with a union. I can't recall what
specific organization we achieved. I do remember we used to go into some
textile plants in the garment industry, just shut down the plant, turn
the workers out, and the organizer would talk to them. One time I got
chased by this guy with a great big stiletto, and I never knew I could
run so fast. [laughter] But, in any event, it was relatively
short-lived, but it was my introduction to a union. Not long after
that--But then, of course, I continued to operate in my neighborhood as
far as YCL was concerned. It was really part of a learning process in a
way, because they coopted me into the national office of the YCL as part
of the organization department. I was given an assignment to teach YCL
units, YCL groups, how to set up an organizational apparatus so that
they could protect themselves from being found out and discharged. What
it really did for me was it taught me elements of organization. It was a
valuable lesson.
- DONAHOE
- Teaching the other people, you learned yourself, right.
- FIERING
- I learned myself, right, because I didn't know a damn thing about it.
- DONAHOE
- And this is for on the job. I mean, you were teaching them for
on-the-job situations-
- FIERING
- That's right, that's right.
- DONAHOE
- --how they could stay there.
- FIERING
- In fact, I remember one instance I had had a meeting with a group of the
YCL unit in Macy's. After I got through with them, I began to hear a
tremendous uproar from the YCL. I had gone in there and taught them how
to bury themselves so deep nobody could find them.
- DONAHOE
- How did you learn this to tell them?
- FIERING
- I didn't, I just improvised. I said, "This here is an assignment you
got, they said this is what you're supposed to do, and they don't know
whether you can do it or not. Nobody else knows how to do it either, you
know." So I did it. But I learned a lot out of it.
- DONAHOE
- What kinds of things did you do?
- FIERING
- I learned something about principles of organization, which has stood me
in good stead for the rest of my life. I really became a very, very good
organizer, even if I say so myself.
- DONAHOE
- I've heard a lot about it. What did you tell them? Do you remember the
kinds of things you told them, generally?
- FIERING
- Generally, how do you operate among large groups of people when you want
to organize it. How do you operate among them when you want to
politicize them. When I think back on it now, I was being very
presumptuous. I had never experienced it myself, because when I worked
in a shop, had worked as a shipping clerk, or I had worked as a clerk in
another office, not with large groups of people, just with a couple of
people. I never had a chance to experience that sort of thing. Very
likely, as I think back, very likely I had read about that in left-wing
literature, in Marxist literature. And whatever it was I gleaned out of
it is what I was parodying in a way. But, in any event, the sum total of
it was that it was a learning experience for me. Then a group of us
organized out of the national office of the YCL--or the district office
of the YCL. We were assigned to organize a new union, and we were all
shipping clerks.
- DONAHOE
- Where were you working?
- FIERING
- I was in the garment industry.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, you were still in the garment industry. All this time?
- FIERING
- Well, yeah. In fact, at this particular time, was a clerk, an office
clerk in a credit house, which was a credit house for the garment
industry. A group of us had gotten together who worked in the industry
and we were told that we should organize a shipping clerks union. You
have to know something about the garment industry too there. There are
hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of small garment and textile shops,
and everyone of them has got shipping clerks. The ILG [International
Ladies Garment Workers Union] and the Amalgamated Clothing Workers [of
America] had been successful, by the way, as a result of Section 7 of
the NRA. Even though later it was declared unconstitutional, they
established a good base in the industry. Then we came along and wanted
to take that group that was not eligible to join the--or were not
organized by the ILG or the Amalgamated. Those were shipping clerks.
That was one of the classes of work. And there were eleven of us, all
YCL members, at that time, and I was the chairman of the group of the
YCL group, and one other fellow became the business agent of the group.
We had eleven members and the union had eleven members--the same eleven
members. We struggled along there, not with very much success for quite
a spell. That was a period when I met my wife [Clara Wernick Fiering],
too. And eventually though, after I'd left New York, that outfit became
District 65.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, really?
- FIERING
- And the guy who was chairman of the union group, whereas I was the
chairman of the YCL, became the guy who was a leader of District 65.
- DONAHOE
- Now, is that the retail clerks?
- FIERING
- Well, now they're in the UAW [United Automobile Workers of America].
- DONAHOE
- What were they initially?
- FIERING
- They were initially independe nt.
- DONAHOE
- But what were they called?
- FIERING
- The Shipping Clerks Union. I was in the Midwest in 1936 when they
retitled themselves. I don't know much about that.
- DONAHOE
- That's it, just Shipping Clerks Union?
- FIERING
- That was it, Shipping Clerks Union. There was a lot of talent there. One
of the guys from there, one of my very close friends--Well, this is
right after I left New York. We struggled along for about a year or so.
And he went over to the furriers union [International Fur and Leather
Workers Union] and became a leader of the furriers union. He died about
five years ago.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, we were discussing the Shipping Clerks Union.
- FIERING
- Right, and one of the people from there went into the ILG and I
understand he became the education director of the ILG. There were
others who went in different directions, but the eleven of us summed up
a lot of talent. All the guys there (in an expanded left group of all
shades) were bright boys, all bright boys. As a matter of fact, you can
say that for the left. They were really bright. I can't begin to tell
you about the stimulating-Before the thing started to, what's a good
expression, before it began separating out into a distinct YPSL [Young
People's Socialist League] group that was anticommunist or a YCL group
that was anti-YPSL, or social democrat or Trotskyist group-
- DONAHOE
- The factions.
- FIERING
- All before that and when it was all together, it was the most
stimulating bunch of young people you would ever want to meet. Highly
intelligent.
- DONAHOE
- So this was before all the different splits and everything?
- FIERING
- This was before the splits. This was my initiation into the
movement--that kind of atmosphere. Of course, I don't want to start
assessing blame here and stuff like that. A lot of that will come up and
some of this as we go along. But it was most unfortunate that it began
separating out that way into the various groups. That's my vision of a
real socialist movement, where you have that kind of thing, see, and I
was fortunate enough to at least experience it for a very limited time.
- DONAHOE
- For a short time, yeah.
- FIERING
- Very short time. It was so stimulating.
- DONAHOE
- Now, can I just ask why you had decided to form a new union and not go
with the ILG?
- FIERING
- Well, it was a directive. For one thing, the ILG was anti-red.
- DONAHOE
- At that time?
- FIERING
- Yeah, there was already a deep split in the ILG between the left--well,
it was all left--between the far left and the near left. But I would
imagine if we had approached the ILG, they would have looked down their
nose at us. If they had perceived who we really were, they would not
have had anything to do with us. But we never got that far. It was just
decided, a directive that we were handed: go organize a shipping clerks
union; wherever it may take you, go organize a shipping clerks union
unaffiliated to anybody.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, because I was wondering if that was the time of the independent
unions and saying not to go to-
- FIERING
- It had nothing to do with the TUUL [Trade Union Unity League]. It had
nothing to do with anything or anybody. Whatever somebody else may have
had in mind, see, it had nothing to do with anybody. Well, nobody is
really that much sophisticated about unions in the left, [that's] my own
view.
- DONAHOE
- In this time.
- FIERING
- There wasn't that much sophistication. The idea was just organize,
organize.
- DONAHOE
- Obviously people were really ready for organization.
- FIERING
- Oh--Well, of course, it's hard for your generation to really get the
feel of what went on in America at that time. It's difficult enough to
just relate it in words. It's much more difficult to transmit the
feeling of the people at that time after some years of Depression and
terrible suffering. When I talk about suffering, I'm talking about what
you may casually read about what people were doing and think, well,
that's kind of exaggerated. People did eat out of garbage cans. People
were not eating, they were thrown out of their homes. They had nothing.
It was terrible suffering and you have to experience it to fully
understand it. It cannot be--I have found at least, in my experience
with young people, that while they try to be receptive, try to
understand it and there's some feeling about it, it is almost impossible
to really convey the experience unless you experienced it. Anyway, there
we were with--Well, we didn't care. We were young and we didn't care if
we missed meals, we didn't care about going hungry. That was not the
important thing in my life. A few of us were married. But even if you
were married, you weren't married to concentrate on raising a family.
You were married because you married somebody who [along] with you was
married to the radical movement. That's all you really thought about.
That was what the world was all about.
- DONAHOE
- This is an aside, but you had said that you started out going to Wall
Street to make a million and now you went the exact opposite you can
say. How did your family feel about your changes?
- FIERING
- My father was always a socialist. In fact, when we lived in Cleveland,
there was a time when--And I didn't know this until later in life, as a
matter of fact. When I was younger he tried to influence me about
socialism and I was very unsympathetic. He was glad to see me become
sympathetic to it, but it wasn't until then that I had learned that my
father was involved in the socialist movement in Cleveland and was at
the convention where there was a split between the lefts and the rights
that set up the CP and the SP [Socialist Party]. I didn't even know
that, because had I known that I would have taken a lot more interest in
my father's background. But my father then was oriented towards feeding
his kids once we got to New York. Well, anyway, where were we?
- DONAHOE
- Okay, so you had organized the independent Shipping Clerks Union with
the eleven people.
- FIERING
- I don't know how much mileage we made, I can't recall now. We hustled
around, we met, we passed out literature I remember. We had meetings,
and I can't even think back about the substance of many of the meetings
or how many were there, how many were not there. We went for quite a
while. In fact, I didn't leave New York until '36, and as I recall, we
were still meeting then, not making much progress, but we were still
meeting. That union really came into its own. That group really came
into its own beginning with '36. That's when whatever it was Dave
Livingston did, he did a hell of a job as its president. received an
assignment from the YCL to be the district organizer of the YCL in
Missouri, Arkansas, and Kansas, and she went there in 1935. She had been
at a women's college (what is now Rutgers[--the State University]) on
scholarship and left when she was seventeen years old and came and
joined the movement in New York and devoted full time to the movement.
So she became a full-time organizer, a fulltime official as a section
organizer in Brownsville and then given the assignment in 1935 in the
Midwest as the district organizer.
- DONAHOE
- She was pretty young.
- FIERING
- Well, she was a little over a year younger than I was. In 1935 she was
twenty-one years old.
- DONAHOE
- It was Clara.
- FIERING
- Clara, yeah. And we had sort of committed that we were going to get
married. It was not a smooth path.
- DONAHOE
- Two headstrong people, huh?
- FIERING
- Yeah, especially at twenty-one and twenty-two and her eleven hundred
miles away, but that's not important.
- DONAHOE
- What was her maiden name?
- FIERING
- Clara Wernick. She was really the best organizer I have ever met. That
covers a long time.
- DONAHOE
- Political and trade union?
- FIERING
- Political and trade union, yeah. And so, anyway, she would come back;
she came back a couple of times--she was headquartered in Saint
Louis--came back a couple of times to New York, and of course we were
always together and corresponding. Then in '36 we sort of agreed I was
going to leave New York and I was going to go out there to Missouri. So
I arrived there in April of '36, and no job, no nothing. She was making
the grand salary of five dollars a week, but we didn't worry about that.
- DONAHOE
- So you got a job?
- FIERING
- Oh yeah, I looked for a job. When I was in New York I had long periods
of unemployment which really opened me up to all of this, because once I
was out of work for nine months, which was murderous, murderous. That's
when I opted out of my fraternity and everything else. I began to see
things differently. But I didn't have a lot of difficulty getting jobs
in Saint Louis. I was very young and naive, that kind of thing--very
hirable.
- DONAHOE
- Did you do any particular kinds of things, or just anything?
- FIERING
- Anything. I worked for Purina Mills in Saint Louis for a while. I worked
for some other outfit for a while. I forget its name.
- DONAHOE
- So really at this point, you didn't have a skill?
- FIERING
- I had no skill, absolutely no skill. Matter of fact, in New York, the
YCL was trying to colonize a number of plants, and I did try to get into
a number of plants. used to go down and try to get work there and did
not succeed. I can only guess why. Companies were on their guard against
people colonizing; they knew about the radical movement, what the YCL
was trying to do. New York employers were much more aware of the radical
movement and its intentions. But I didn't get a job anyplace where I
could develop a skill.
- DONAHOE
- So these plants, they would be like industry, basic industry?
- FIERING
- No, no. I was in the shipping department at Purina Mills, not a highly
skilled job.
- DONAHOE
- No, the one where the YCL wanted to colonize.
- FIERING
- Oh, now you're talking about New York again. Well, what it was they were
plants that employed large numbers of young people. They were not
necessarily basic plants at all. One of them was the Eagle Pencil
Company, if you've ever heard of Eagle Pencil. But the reason for
wanting to colonize it and organize it was because it was a big plant
and employed lots of young people, a couple thousand young people. So
they wanted to get where there was a big base they could work in. It was
that kind of colonization. There was no real basic industry in New York
as we know it in the Middle West. So that was for that experience. But,
anyway, in Missouri I didn't have any skill, but what I did do I did get
heavily involved in the youth movement.
- DONAHOE
- In Missouri.
- FIERING
- In Missouri. And I became the head of the youth movement, which included
church youth, university youth-oh, all kinds of youth organizations,
language groups, ethnic groups of youth; now, you had a lot of that in
the Middle West. You had Croatians, Poles, Italians. Because the
immigrants were relatively fresh immigrants, not too long in this
country, and so their children militated to the ethnic organizations
that the parents belonged to because the kids started in them when they
were young. And then they grew up in the thirties; they were in their
late teens, early twenties. They had grown up together, so they
maintained themselves as ethnic organizations. Those things to a large
degree have disappeared as they became Americanized. But at that time,
that covered a lot of territory of young people. I remember most
distinctly the Croatians; we were very close to [them]. And so we used
to raise a lot of hell in town. We made a lot of noise in town, very
active, and developed community issues. I remember one of them was an
issue for a community college. There was no such thing at that time as a
community college. I remember we came in with this fresh idea of a
community college, which became very popular. And there was of course
the antifascist movement, the peace and democracy [movements] at that
time, which were very popular. I was the head of that American Youth for
Peace and whatever it was called [American Youth Congress], in Saint
Louis. As a result of that, I was contacted by the CIO [Committee for
Industrial Organization; after 1938, Congress of Industrial
Organizations] regional director.
- DONAHOE
- As a result of your youth activity?
- FIERING
- Yes, as a result of my youth activities. And, what the hell was his
name? I just talked about him the other week to somebody who knew him
well here. John, John, John, John, John-
- DONAHOE
- Let's see if I have his name somewhere here.
- FIERING
- Oh, man, his face is in front of me. I'll think of it somewhere along
the line because I-
- DONAHOE
- He was the CIO regional director in Saint Louis.
- FIERING
- Yeah. [pause] This is, oh, God, the first time I've forgotten his name.
- DONAHOE
- It will come back to you afterwards. When you try to remember you can't.
[John Doherty]
- FIERING
- Yeah. Anyway, he got ahold of me and he called me in and wanted to know
if I'd work for him and the CIO. I said, "Gosh, yes, I certainly would."
- DONAHOE
- For money this time?
- FIERING
- For money, too, for pay. The pay wasn't so hot.
- DONAHOE
- But it was something.
- FIERING
- But it was something, that's right. It was more money than I had made I
think at any job I had worked in.
- DONAHOE
- And they were just getting off the ground.
- FIERING
- They were just getting started, the CIO was just getting started, right.
And he thought, well, here's a guy who--He knew that I had had contact
with all these young workers, you know. I established something of a
reputation with the noise that we were making there, I suppose. I agreed
I would go and he told me what my assignment would be. I went and he
assigned me to the Steel Workers Organizing Committee.
- DONAHOE
- The SWOC.
- FIERING
- The SWOC, right.
- DONAHOE
- So that was your assignment, to help organize steel.
- FIERING
- Steelworkers.
- DONAHOE
- And you didn't have the experience for that at all.
- FIERING
- I didn't know a steelworker from any other kind of a worker, except in
my imagination you idealized the basic industry workers, you know--oh
boy, this is great. There were a couple of plants that I was asked to
start in on; one was the American Machine and Foundry, and the other was
the Saint Louis Car Company.
- DONAHOE
- Okay. Saint Louis Car Company?
- FIERING
- Yeah.
- DONAHOE
- That was a steel-
- FIERING
- Oh, yeah, sure. Street cars were basically a steel product, and they'd
forge steel and melt it and everything. But my job was just to go out
and sign people up, sign up cards. Well, before I started doing it,
anything sounded romantic, you know, so I started doing it. During that
period the UAW [United Automobile Workers] strike in Flint [Michigan]
broke, and with that, the UAW wanted some of the other General Motors
[Corporation (GM)] plants shut down. One was in Saint Louis, the Fisher
Body Plant, a division of General Motors. So we helped with that. We
weren't key, but we helped because they had a small number, relatively
small number of people in the union. They had about four thousand people
in the plant. GM was out there in full force with all its guards
(security guards) and the police and everybody else to break any attempt
to shut the plant down. The UAW tried to organize the best it could and
needed some help, and we helped. But we kind of held the picket line for
quite a while. There were a lot of struggles, a lot of warfare there.
They succeeded in shutting the plant down though.
- DONAHOE
- They were making the bodies and the chassis?
- FIERING
- They were making the chassis for GM cars, that's right.
- DONAHOE
- So it was very important.
- FIERING
- Very important, very important. But that was a good experience, a
learning experience for me, too. And it was a thrilling experience to
participate in that.
- DONAHOE
- But you were still working for the CIO?
- FIERING
- I was working for the CIO. As a matter of fact, they were the ones who
said this is going to happen. They got their orders from [John L.] Lewis
to send over whatever people they could to help the UAW people, and so
we went over to help too. I would just stay and just help, that's about
what it amounted to. But it was a nice experience. So I got in on the
key strike, all the elements of a strike. It involved all kinds of
struggles, the organization of unions during a strike. [pause] Lessons I
had to apply to my own shop a short time later, almost the identical
thing. And then, of course, we went back. I maintained the work of my
assignment of signing up people, and it was very difficult in a way.
Signing up people themselves was not hard in those days, but for me it
was not what I had dreamed about in being an organizer, and it got very
boring. Not only that, but I didn't drink. The story I like to tell is
my wife would know by the way I staggered into the house how many people
I had seen that night.
1.2. TAPE NUMBER: I, SIDE TWO AUGUST 13, 1987
- DONAHOE
- This wasn't the way that you preferred to organize, that is, drinking.
- FIERING
- Yeah, not only that, but you see, people like the guy I was working for
had come out of the miners union. John L. Lewis had staffed CIO
leadership with ex-miners, and this guy was not even a miner, he was an
accountant for the miners. John Doherty was his name. So he had not gone
through even the experiences of the miners, you know, and their
struggles to organize their union. And didn't know much that he could
give me to help with organization. So I was on my own, and that kind of
activity, that limited activity, was just not my cup of tea. So we had a
talk about it, I leveled with him, and he understood where the hell I
was coming from. He wasn't very happy about the way I felt, and we
agreed to separate on friendly terms. But we agreed to separate and I
went my own way. About this time--[tape recorder off]
- DONAHOE
- Okay, so you found this kind of organizing boring and you decided to
part.
- FIERING
- Right. See, about this time, one of the things that provided the
incentive for that--for me to leave--was that the YCL had made a
decision. The UE [United Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of
America] had just gotten off the ground that year. They had formed UE in
1935.
- DONAHOE
- Nineteen thirty-six?
- FIERING
- Nineteen thirty-five.
- DONAHOE
- A lot of things were happening that year.
- FIERING
- Oh, 1936 was an exciting year. They're interested in organizing their
industry, the UE, and the basic parts of the industry are GE [General
Electric Company], Westinghouse [Electric Corporation], and the major
independents--the major competitors of GE and Westinghouse.
- DONAHOE
- Like Philco [Corporation]?
- FIERING
- Philco is in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and was part of the original
group of union locals to form UE together with GE and Westinghouse
locals. Well, Philco in the radio industry, but otherwise Saint Louis,
Missouri, see. They had the big electrical manufacturers who were the
chief competitors for the national companies: that was Emerson [Electric
Company], Wagner [Electric Company], and Century [Electric Company].
- DONAHOE
- Emerson, Wagner-
- FIERING
- And Century, the major independents.
- DONAHOE
- Those were the three.
- FIERING
- Those were the three biggies.
- DONAHOE
- Challenging?
- FIERING
- They challenged Westinghouse and General Electric. Now, they didn't have
the range of products that GE had, but in specific areas they were just
as big a manufacturer as GE and Westinghouse, see.
- DONAHOE
- And they were all housed in Saint Louis?
- FIERING
- They were all in Saint Louis, right. So the word went out, and of
course, UE was led by a left leadership, by the party people.
- DONAHOE
- I was going to ask you about that. Okay.
- FIERING
- A lot to be said about that. But the word went out that UE had to be
helped, and so the party kind of took that assignment down to help the
UE grow, to help the UE build. That translated itself into a decision
that the YCL was going to undertake organizing the electrical
manufacturers in Saint Louis. That was its baby. At this time, there was
the beginnings of the turn in the Depression, too. Companies were
starting to hire people, things were starting to move up, ever since '35
it started to move up. The deepest part of the Depresssion was '33, '34,
see. So here we were a bunch of young guys and gals. My wife was head of the YCL, and she was the one who got the group
together to transmit the decision, to work out details on the decision.
We picked our territories and I went into Century. There was a little
bit of a base already at Emerson. Emerson had a company union which
showed signs of independence and, to make a long story short, there was
a lot of skill in working with that, and eventually they affiliated with
UE. They destroyed themselves as a company union and decided to support
UE.
- DONAHOE
- Was that the--?
- FIERING
- [Local] 1102.
- DONAHOE
- That was 1102.
- FIERING
- That's 1102. Emerson was 1102. I was in Century, and I was the only one
in Century.
- DONAHOE
- All by yourself?
- FIERING
- All by myself. I had managed to g et in there.
- DONAHOE
- To get hired.
- FIERING
- I got hired. I had no problem getting hired. I had problems staying, but
I had no problem getting hired. Then there were a couple of guys went
into Wagner, which was the biggest plant. Wagner employed about seven
thousand people.
- DONAHOE
- I had read that Emerson had a fifty-five-day strike.
- FIERING
- Yeah, a sit-down strike.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, my goodness. So was that when they entered the UE or when they had
that--?
- FIERING
- No, that was after they affiliated with UE and requested recognition and
were denied. That was after, but it was all part of the--This was
before--See that's another thing I was going to bring up. This is all
before the National Labor Relations Act [NLRA] was declared
constitutional. It had been passed in '35, during which there was a
spurt in organization. When the NLRA was declared unconstitutional, the
Congress then revised the unconstitutional parts and then passed the
Wagner Act in '35. And in '37 it was declared constitutional, but this
was prior to its being declared constitutional when this organizing took
place. It started in '36, see. So we didn't have the protections then of
the National Labor Relations Board.
- DONAHOE
- So that's very interesting. So actually a lot of the sit-downs and a lot
of the work was undertaken before the actual government protection.
- FIERING
- That's right. They were organizational efforts and organizational
strikes.
- DONAHOE
- That's very important.
- FIERING
- So I developed an organization at Century, and there were a number of us
fired, and the organization was growing very rapidly at Emerson,
particularly since the leadership of the company union had been won
over. Emerson couldn't get recognition by asking for it, that is, UE
couldn't get recognition by a request for recognition. They couldn't go
through an election, because the Wagner Act wasn't recognized. So they
declared a strike, and their strike was a sit-in. We had a bunch of
people fired (I was one of those fired, too) and it was hindering the
development of our organization, because people were frightened. In
Century they had tried organization in 1934--the machinists had.
- DONAHOE
- Before you had gotten there?
- FIERING
- Yeah, and they had a strike and the company broke the strike. The
Century management was the most rabid anti-union management of the
bunch. They were the ones who headed up what was called the National
Metal Trades Association, which was a spy organization, a labor spy
organization.
- DONAHOE
- The National Metal Trades Association.
- FIERING
- So what we did, we decided, "Well, we're going to go for broke." We had
just a relatively small (fifty-two) handful of people out of 1,500. But
we had a lot of sympathy, there was no problem about the mood of the
workers. The mood of the workers was to fight at that point. I'm not
just talking about Century workers, I'm talking about workers allover.
They were mad by this time. They wanted to do something, because they
couldn't get in any worse shape than what they were. So there was only
one way to go and that was up for everybody.
- DONAHOE
- And the unions offered that answer.
- FIERING
- Right. The unions offered the answer. Not just UE, but the unions.
Because when you're talking about unions, you're talking about the CIO
drive at that time, which was conducted in large part, in not just that
area but throughout the Middle West, with party people in the lead who
had been assigned on the basis of an understanding that Lewis had with
the party.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, really?
- FIERING
- Sure, of course.
- DONAHOE
- I was going to backtrack for one minute, when you said that the fellow
from the regional office of the CIO had approached you, but he knew you
were YCL.
- FIERING
- Of course he did.
- DONAHOE
- So this was their policy?
- FIERING
- This was their policy. They knew who the best organizers were, the most
devoted people.
- DONAHOE
- Well, we hear this all the time, but we don't-
- FIERING
- This is true. The most devoted people, the best organizers would go
through hell or anything, would not make any demands on anybody. And,
hell, we had Ralph Shaw (he just died a couple of weeks ago), who had
been a party organizer in Missouri and had been organizing for the party
in the mine areas for many years, too. He was one of the people that
Lewis dealt for to get onto the CIO staff. So was Bill [William]
Sentner. So was Gus Hall. As a matter of fact, Gus Hall was the one who
made the first breakthrough in one of the most important steel mills,
the Youngstown Sheet and Tube [Company], I think. That was a landmark
victory, that organization. There's a whole lot I got against Gus Hall,
but I'll say that f9r him. The only condition was, as Ralph told me, his
instructions from [John] Brophy, Lewis's assistant, "Keep your card in
your pocket."
- DONAHOE
- So, in other words, John L. Lewis of the CIO actually made some-
- FIERING
- He made an arrangement.
- DONAHOE
- Made an arrangement to utilize-
- FIERING
- The party organizers. *[Look, I wasn't there at the meeting. But it was
pretty well understood.] * Mr. Fiering added the following bracketed section during his review of
the transcript.
- DONAHOE
- The party organizers.
- FIERING
- The other guys organized the basic industries, especially the steel
industry and the electrical industry. And the auto industry, of course.
And the auto industry, it was pre-[Walter] Reuther. And rubber for that
matter also.
- DONAHOE
- Well, a lot of people do acknowledge this. All basic industries sure.
- FIERING
- Lewis dominated the CIO even though party people may have been the key
organizers.
- DONAHOE
- But I had never heard this actually, you know, that they made some kind
of arrangement.
- FIERING
- There was no secret about who these people were.
- DONAHOE
- In those days there wasn't that much of a problem, the political problem
wasn't as-
- FIERING
- Well, there wasn't as much of a [problem] it's true, because people who
are hungry enough don't give a god-damn about labels. And people like
Lewis, who was determined to organize, he sensed that, he recognized
that, and he knew what he could do with a good organizing machine with
good organizers.
- DONAHOE
- All right, so now you're in Saint Louis and-
- FIERING
- And so what we did we called a meeting of the shop--I'm talking about
myself now, not so much anyone else.
- DONAHOE
- At Century, right.
- FIERING
- Yeah, at Century.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, now I understand.
- FIERING
- And even though we had probably less than a hundred cards signed up, we
had a meeting that had about 250, 300 people there; we had about 1,500
to 1,700 people in the shop. But I think we had that many people come
out to the meeting, because we announced that we were going to have a
strike vote, see. Emerson was already out, and they had a picket line
and they had a sit-in strike going. They had both. They had a force of
people inside the shop holding that down, and then they had a picket
line supplementing the sit-in. So what we did, we declared a strike at
Century and we used the Emerson picket line as our picket line while the
rest of us went around assuring that no scabs would get into the shop,
that we were going to close down the shop. So we were in and out of jail
all week, all month as a matter of fact. We were out for twenty-eight
days. We closed the shop in three days; it took us three days, we closed
the shop.
- DONAHOE
- You closed the entire shop?
- FIERING
- The entire shop. They had it closed down. You know, you can't do that
today anymore. The Emerson people only got involved to the extent that
they maintained the picket line. The rest of us did all the other work.
The strike went for twenty-eight days, at which time the Supreme Court
declared the Wagner Act constitutional. It was in April of '37. April of
'37. That became the basis for a settlement of the strike: that the
company would agree to an election, we, including all discharged
workers, would agree to return to work.
- DONAHOE
- Who worked it out?
- FIERING
- Bill [William] Sentner. You see, Bill, though on the CIO payroll, was
assigned by the party to work with the UE, and Bill became the leader of
the UE, leader of the whole UE there. He left the CIO payroll once UE
was established.
- DONAHOE
- He had been with the party?
- FIERING
- He had been a party organizer. The CP considered people like Shaw and
Sentner on loan to the CIO.
- DONAHOE
- And Sentner became the head of the whole UE?
- FIERING
- He became the leader of the UE.
- DONAHOE
- Of that region?
- FIERING
- Of that region, that's right. He became a vice president of the UE,
national vice president of the UE on the basis of that. The guy made a
lot of sacrifices, a lot of sacrifices. He wasn't really elected at that
time. He just took it over and we all agreed. Later he was elected.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, but that should have been a democratic procedure.
- FIERING
- Well, you think of it today as such. You wouldn't think of it at that
time. He probably couldn't have gotten away with it with anybody else,
but he could get away with it because the party wanted it and we
supported it. No one would challenge him. The union was in a formative
stage. I was going to be the full-timer.
- DONAHOE
- Organizer?
- FIERING
- Business agent of my local.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, okay.
- FIERING
- My title was financial secretary, but in effect I was the business agent
of the union. The contract was yet to be negotiated, and that's where I
played the leading role.
- DONAHOE
- So all they did was recognize you.
- FIERING
- They didn't even recognize us, they agreed to an election, see.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, boy, one step beyond.
- FIERING
- That's right, but it was a tremendous victory, see. Especially with this
company, which was, of all the companies in Saint Louis, the most
bitterly anti-union company.
- DONAHOE
- And they were just called Century. Did they have like Century
Electric-
- FIERING
- Century Electric Company.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, okay. I was wondering what their full name was. Were they all called
that?
- FIERING
- Wagner Electric, Emerson Electric, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, so that was just part of their title like Bethlehem Steel. When
you became the business agent or the financial secretary, was it for all
of UE or was it just for this particular local?
- FIERING
- Just this particular local.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, and what was that local?
- FIERING
- Local 1108.
- DONAHOE
- That was 1108. Okay.
- FIERING
- I was the first member, and I was the one who organized it.
- DONAHOE
- So now it was up to you to negotiate a contract.
- FIERING
- That's right. Then we elected a committee. We went through the
procedures, we had an election which we won, and we elected a committee,
a negotiating committee, and I was the head of the committee. We went in
to negotiate a contract and I had a big run-in with Sentner then,
because the company finally offered us--Of course, when you talk about a
contract then as compared to what a contract is now, there's a world of
difference. All you negotiate is a wage increase, a grievance procedure,
and a modified seniority clause. That was the basic contract. There was
no union security clause. It was an open shop. There might be a few
other conditions around it, but ess~ntially those were it. You don't
think of it as elaborate as it is today with fringe benefits and all
that. They didn't exist then. And the company offered finally the
minimums we wanted on conditions and also a two-cents-an-hour raise,
which at that time was supposed to be a good raise and which I rejected.
I got into another hassle with Bill, who insisted that I was going to
have to accept it, and I told him I was not going to accept it. rallied
the workers around it and we got a four-cents-anhour raise, which was a
very good raise, see.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, for that time.
- FIERING
- For that time it was a very good raise. I'm really pointing this up
because we're talking about 1987 now and what four cents means now
compared to then.
- DONAHOE
- I think they'd like to go back to that today.
- FIERING
- Yeah. And so I became the business agent of the local and I lead the
local, and we had some significant things happen. Oh, we might mention
too that, you know, my YCL activity--Both before my entry into Century
and even after, we were involved in a lot of things as part of the youth
movement there, with the unemployed struggles, you know. We used to have
a group of guys who would go around town whenever we heard of an
eviction and we would go up to the house where people were being
evicted. Have you ever seen an eviction?
- DONAHOE
- Putting people's things on the street.
- FIERING
- Where the sheriff goes in there and he supervises a moving company or
somebody taking the people's stuff out of the house and putting it out
on the street. Everything. It's horrible, it's cruel, and the people
then are left out on the street with no place to go--nothing. And the
landlord had to pay twenty-five dollars to get the sheriff to do that;
it was a fee. Well, we used to stand by and watch the things being put
on the street and as soon as the sheriff left, we'd pick up the things
and put them back in the house.
- DONAHOE
- I've read about that.
- FIERING
- And if it happened again, we were there again and we did the same thing.
Wherever that happened, if we heard about it we were there. It became
unprofitable for a landlord to do it, because he wasn't even getting
that much in rent. Twenty-five dollars rent was a whole lot of rent in
those days. And so rather than suffer that, the landlord would just
permit the people to stay there until better times when he could
,extract the rent from them, because he was losing money. But that was
part of the kind of things that we did. Unemployed demonstrations,
there's all kinds of that. There were demonstrations at the relief
offices and all of that, part of which I learned some experiences which
reminds me what I wanted to get to because it reminds me of my being a
business agent too.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, okay. Like the unemployed councils?
- FIERING
- The unemployed councils and these--Because these were learning
experiences also for me, which I then used as a business agent.
- DONAHOE
- They're all helping you learn how to organize people.
- FIERING
- Not just organize people, but maintain the union. (I'll show you what I
mean in a minute.) One of the things that we had to contend with in a
contract was you didn't have checkoff. You collected dues whenever you
could. We had an office set up right near the shop, and people would
have to volunteer to come across and pay their dues once a month. It was
a very difficult way to make dues payments because people would put it
last on their list. By the time it got to dues-paying time each month,
they didn't have the money or they could use the money for something
else. And so it was a constant struggle to maintain the union that way.
But one of the tactics we used was something we picked out of a
newspaper article that carried a story from France about picketing
people's homes. You couldn't possibly do that today. It would be
antisocial and create tremendous antagonisms today. But at that time
when everybody was in a ferment and pro-working class and everybody was
strong for a union, what we would do for the picket line is take a group
of guys out of the shop and we'd go over to somebody's home who refused
to join the union, who was giving us a hard time, and we'd set up a
picket line at that person's home. So the whole neighborhood would know
this is an anti-union neighbor you've got living in your neighborhood.
We used to drive those people up the wall after we came through.
[laughter] We used to do this on weekends and we'd wind up in jail every
weekend. And we knew it. The first time we were unprepared for jail and
we had to spend time there overnight.
- DONAHOE
- What did they arrest you for?
- FIERING
- They arrested us for being a public nuisance or because there was a
complaint. There was no law against it, you know.
- DONAHOE
- I was going to say, what's the law?
- FIERING
- But of course after the first or second time, after we'd experimented,
we learned to have a lawyer ready so that by the time we got down to the
jail, we had a lawyer who was already there and who was ready to spring
us. But every time we'd pull something like this, it would get allover
town and the next Monday morning--this was on a Saturday when we did
it--the next Monday morning the streets would be lined up for two blocks
with people waiting to come in and pay their dues. [laughter] Before
they went to work.
- DONAHOE
- That's wonderful.
- FIERING
- I'll never forget that. Eventually the newspaper started to editorialize
and write us up and just tear the hell out of us. We just kept on until,
by golly, we'd established a good solid corps of dues payers in the
shop. Then at that time, the recession hit, 1938. It was another
recession and thousands of people were laid off out of the shops. We had
about five, six, seven hundred people laid off out at Century. Well,
what do you do with them? Well, you see, all these experiences were
registering with me, so the first thing I did, I said, "We have got to
have some action. We have got to show action, show some leadership
here." So we called, as soon as the layoffs were announced, we called a
meeting of all the people laid off. We had a meeting of hundreds of
these people laid off, and a rip-roaring meeting. We elected a big
committee of about seventy-five or eighty people, that's our committee.
We said, "We're going down to the relief office. We're not going to
suffer through what we did before." And everyone of these people who had
been on relief knew what it was about, see. And had gone hungry or had
gone without rent paid or without coal or anything. And winter was
coming on, so we took these people, we took the whole bunch of them down
to the relief office. As a matter of fact, remember I showed you that
letter I got from Saint Louis from this woman who's doing this study.
That's one of the things that she picked up that she wants the story on,
on what happened in the relief office, because my local came through
that thing and everybody was asking how we did it. Well, what happened
was we took the whole crew, the whole committee, to meet with the
department head of the relief office. There's another side I'll never
forget. Here we were at a tremendous table, a long table, and he's
sitting--a tremendous room--and we've got people lined up on both sides
of the table and back towards the wall, you know. I'm on one end of the
table, and he's on the other end of the table, and I'm the spokesman for
the laid off people. I say, "Our people are going to be laid off now.
They just got their notice, they're being laid off. I want you to know
that we don't intend for anyone of them to go hungry, to worry about
their rent, or to worry about food. Where are you on this?" So he
started hemming and hawing, and we had an argument. I said, "I want you
to understand one thing, we're not leaving here. You see this office?
This office is going to be a shambles before we get out of here unless
we get your commitment that not one of these people is going to go
hungry, worry about coal, or worry about food or shelter." And we got a
commitment from him, and through that whole recession, there was not one
member of my union that had to worry about a single thing in that
recession.
- DONAHOE
- So they were guaranteed relief?
- FIERING
- Guaranteed. If ever there was a slip up, all I had to do was get on the
phone and, by God, we got action immediately. I used to have people
coming up from all over, asking me, "How do you do this? How did you get
this done?"
- DONAHOE
- Because that was so important.
- FIERING
- And that made the union, that made the union. When those people went
back to work, because they all went back to work--by '39 they were all
back to work--that made the union. Not only that, but after I left Saint
Louis and they had the strike again in 1940, that was a solid
organization.
- DONAHOE
- Because they knew that the union would back them up on everything.
- FIERING
- That's right, that's right. Because they never forgot that experience.
They'd never had that kind of experience through the whole Depression.
They never forgot that experience. There was one other thing there about
that time that was important. Jesus, what the hell, the thought just
crossed my mind and it slipped my mind. Maybe I'll think of it as we get
back.
- DONAHOE
- In terms of making this the solid union with different experiences that
you had learned from?
- FIERING
- Yeah, oh yeah. The other thing was, I was a paid official as a business
agent. When the people got laid off and the finances of the union ran
down, I took a layoff with the people, and I went on WPA [Works Progress
Administration]. I got a job as a teacher on WPA and most of my classes
were the stewards' classes of my local or the executive board meeting of
my local. I became educational director for the upholsterers union, the
upholsterers district council, Upholsterers International Union, AFL.
When those people went back to work, because they all went back to
work--by '39 they were all back to work--that made the union. Not only
that, but after I left Saint Louis and they had the strike again in
1940, that was a solid organization.
- DONAHOE
- Because they knew that the union would back them up on everything.
- FIERING
- That's right, that's right. Because they never forgot that experience.
They'd never had that kind of experience through the whole Depression.
They never forgot that experience. There was one other thing there about
that time that was important. Jesus, what the hell, the thought just
crossed my mind and it slipped my mind. Maybe I'll think of it as we get
back.
- DONAHOE
- In terms of making this the solid union with different experiences that
you had learned from?
- FIERING
- Yeah, oh yeah. The other thing was, I was a paid official as a business
agent. When the people got laid off and the finances of the union ran
down, I took a layoff with the people, and I went on WPA [Works Progress
Administration]. I got a job as a teacher on WPA and most of my classes
were the stewards' classes of my local or the executive board meeting of
my local. I became educational director for the upholsterers union, the
upholsterers district council, Upholsterers International Union, AFL.
- DONAHOE
- Even though you were working for UE-
- FIERING
- Well, I was working for the government.
- DONAHOE
- I see, so then you went to work for the government, but you were still
doing your-
- FIERING
- They gave me a title. They didn't have to pay me, because the government
was paying me, so they gave me the title as educational director of the
Upholsterers International district council.
- DONAHOE
- That's pretty funny when your father had been an upholsterer.
- FIERING
- At that time he was already an upholsterer. He was in that union, as a
matter of fact, in the East, in New York. But, anyway, it was an
accumulation of such experiences. We set up a stewards council, we set
up a good internal mechanism in the union; it was a good union. And we
used to have rank and file actions.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, I wanted to ask you about that, about the actual structure,
because it's really important. You know, other unions didn't always have
this rank and file activity in the stewards system. How did you set that
steward system up?
- FIERING
- Well, we got recognition of the steward system. We had a grievance
procedure recognized on the basis of a steward system in our contract.
But you see, some of that education came out of learning about the labor
movement from the CP. I never knew anything about stewards. But I knew
if you set up a union, a good rank and file union has got to have a
steward system. So the workers handle their own grievances, they handle
their own problems. That's a rank and file union. So we had a very
effective--Oh, I know what I forgot to tell you now.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, you tell me that and then we'll go back to the steward system.
- FIERING
- Okay. When I set up my union and became the full timer--See, you have to
understand Saint Louis. Saint Louis is a Catholic town; the Catholic
church is very, very strong there. What brought it to mind is the ACTU
[Association of Catholic Trade Unionists] that you mentioned. Well,
because then by '41, they started organizing as an opposition to the
left-wing leadership. But Saint Louis--and the majority of my shop was
Catholic, and devoutly Catholic--but Saint Louis is run by the Jesuits,
the Saint Louis church. Saint Louis University is a Jesuit school.
- DONAHOE
- They were liberal?
- FIERING
- Well, they were, yes, I would say by comparison they were liberal. They
were anti-red, but they were liberal. But they were peculiarly
interested in me and went out of their way to be friendly. And I wasn't
smart at all. If I was a little more human I would have done didn't. I
was too hep on the party line--like a lot of other party people who
gradually more and more became paranoid--everybody's against you, that
kind of thing. Well, at that time also, the Spanish Civil War was on,
and the role of the church in the Spanish Civil War prejudiced your
feelings against it. But these were nice guys and they invited me up to
their cloister, something that they didn't do with everybody. And by the
hour we would sit and talk and philosophize. They were extremely nice to
me and wrote me up in their school paper (Saint Louis University) as
what every good young Catholic should be like. So I got a national
write-up in the catho1ic Worker also the same way.
- DONAHOE
- You mean they wrote you up as--1 Oh, my God.
- FIERING
- They wrote me up--this is what a good young Catholic should be like.
- DONAHOE
- Isn't that incredible?
- FIERING
- And I didn't save the damn clipping.
- DONAHOE
- So in other words they were pretty much in control of the church in
Saint Louis--I mean of the Catholic population.
- FIERING
- Well, yeah, they ran Saint Louis University for instance, and that's
where the cloister was.
- DONAHOE
- They were very interested in you.
- FIERING
- They were very interested in me.
- DONAHOE
- And unfortunately you are saying you didn't realize the potential.
FIER1NG: I just didn't handle it right. I'm very ashamed of myself for
that now. It's a little late now but--I didn't appreciate it. I was a
young snot nose and I was arrogant.
- DONAHOE
- Did you alienate them?
- FIERING
- No, never alienated them, but I kept them at arm's length.
- DONAHOE
- You could have worked a lot closer?
- FIERING
- I could have worked a lot closer.
- DONAHOE
- And that would have had an influence in terms of the workers, too.
F1ER1NG: Of everything, of everything, that's right.
- DONAHOE
- Looking back, we don't know though. Hindsight is what makes us all
geniuses.
- FIERING
- And it's not the only mistake I made, so. But regret that one for a lot
of reasons. Anyway, I came out in 1937. There was a whole lot of
red-baiting at that time too, I mean the UE was being red-baited way
back from the time it started. And so the party made--YCL had made a
decision. (I wasn't in the party; I was not a member of the party.) But
the party had made a decision that somebody has to come out openly, to
show, you know, that communists are human. Nobody asked me to do it, but
I decided one day while at a stewards' meeting and there was a lot of
red-baiting going on, in my own stewards' meeting, see. I got up and I
said, "Listen I'm a communist. So what do you want to do about it?"
Well, I got not quite unanimous [support]; there was one guy who was
against me. I said, "Do what you want about it." I knew I could handle
it, I felt very confident. And they voted me a vote of confidence and
all of that, you know, I'm a great guy and all of that jazz. But one
older guy after the meeting came up and took a swing at me. [laughter]
And I took a swing at him, and people broke it up, and that was all
there was to it. Tony Broz, I'll never forget his name. Good old guy,
good guy.
- DONAHOE
- Tony?
- FIERING
- Tony Broz. Yeah.
- DONAHOE
- What was--?
- FIERING
- He was a worker, a steward of ours, a good union guy.
- DONAHOE
- No, I mean his name sounds-
- FIERING
- It's Croatian. Good, good guy. But it was unfortunate about that. But I
was accepted, and all the time I was there, I was elected and reelected,
never had any opposition. As a matter of fact, the company played a very
active role with trying to take advantage of that, splitting the union
using all the publicity in the papers. Generally, they attempted to
create a red-baiting atmosphere. They called in the leaders next to me,
the leaders of the union who were Catholics. Called them into a meeting
with the heads of the company and tried to convince them to dump me, and
these were young guys. And these young guys told them to go shove it.
They came and told me the story of what their answer was to the company.
They asked the company, "If you were sick, what would you do?" (The
plant manager was a vicious bastard.) He said, "I'd call a doctor." And
the spokesman for the workers answered, "Well, that's what we did. We
were sick, we called the doctor. Henry's a doctor."
- DONAHOE
- That's really incredible.
- FIERING
- So I made it stick.
- DONAHOE
- Even though you weren't technically a member.
- FIERING
- I was not a member. But I was YCLer, so I say I'm a communist, you know.
- DONAHOE
- Did you make a distinction to them?
- FIERING
- They wouldn't understand the distinction. I mean, if you believe in it,
then you are it. It's not a question whether you are affiliated or not.
That is not the important thing.
- DONAHOE
- Since people weren't upset, do you think they understood that you had
been politicizing people earlier?
- FIERING
- I did politicize people. As a matter of fact, even though I was not a
member of the party, I recruited forty of them into the party.
- DONAHOE
- So your politics wasn't a secret. I mean, that's a lot of people.
- FIERING
- That's right. Because I was open about it. Not only open about it, but
actively pursued it, and I had forty people. Do you know what a unit of
forty people is? And we used to line up with literature and they'd put
out the literature at all the meetings and all of that. But essentially,
they followed me because of bread and butter. Because when I left, it
all fell apart.
- DONAHOE
- They left too.
- FIERING
- With the exception of maybe three or four of them, it all fell apart.
Because their interest in me was bread and butter, see, that's what they
saw in me. And whatever I would do, it was okay.
- DONAHOE
- So, in other words, you're saying they respected you because of your
trade-union-
- FIERING
- Leadership.
- DONAHOE
- --leadership and you came through for them all the time. But they went
along with your politics because of your trade union.
- FIERING
- Yeah, and if I said this was okay, it was okay.
- DONAHOE
- That's also interesting because there have been similar experiences for
people. But you were always open about your politics.
- FIERING
- I was open, always open, that's right, from that point on when I got up
in the meeting. There was no secret about it in Saint Louis anyway,
before then. I wasn't hiding it in the youth movement, I was open there,
too. But that had no relationship to the shop. They didn't know it, they
were not involved in anything I was involved in. The shop and the union
were an entirely different thing, and when I came out openly there, it
was new to them. But it's an interesting lesson about people and about
the times. You couldn't do it today. Couldn't do it today and survive.
Though I don't know. I have my past today and I'm accepted. I don't hide
it from those who don't know it and the old-time leadership knew it
anyway.
- DONAHOE
- Now, okay, let me go back for a minute. I was just going to focus on
this for another second. Most of these people that followed you, they
were Catholics also?
- FIERING
- Catholics, too. There was a cross-section of the workers there.
- DONAHOE
- It seems like that's been a common experience, that workers, when they
did follow people on the left, you know, members of the party or
whatever, they did it again on the basis of the trade union, and not
necessarily the politics.
- FIERING
- It was the economics. I wish I had my daughter [Roberta Fiering
Segovia]'s paper here. She made a real study of it.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, I'd love to read it.
- FIERING
- I hope she contacted the university. She said she would.
- DONAHOE
- That's very important. I'm not sure what this says about American
workers in terms of their political understanding.
- FIERING
- Their political understanding is low, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- Okay. Also your being open, though, was important because then you
didn't leave yourself open to be red-baited. You had already taken the
offensive, which is very important. Now, I was going to ask you about a
steward system, how you knew how to set up a steward system and what it
was like.
- FIERING
- I really knew how to set it up, because I used to read the Dai1y Worker,
organ of the CP, believe it or not. It was a good paper at that time. I
don't think it's worth a hell of a lot today. But at that time it was a
good paper. Of course, the reason it was a good paper was because there
were a lot of reds and they were allover industry and the paper had a
lot to report on in terms of experiences. And the party was immersed in
the workingclass struggles of the time, see, and it was reflected in the
paper--had a lot to teach. I was an avid reader of it to pick up
experience, and I did. That was one of the experiences I picked up, from
the kinds of struggles they conducted elsewhere. I picked up the
short-term struggles, the stoppages, inside-the-shop struggles in the
settlement of grievances, rank and file actions. Not just the mechanics
of the grievance procedure, but the basic things in a grievance
procedure--the constant support of the rank and file in the grievance
procedure and how you mobilize the rank and file for support of the
grievance procedure. For the day-to-day support of a union, and it's not
just the mechanics, see. I learned a lot that I must admit. And I teach
it today.
- DONAHOE
- Well, that's really important.
1.3. TAPE NUMBER: II, SIDE ONE AUGUST 21, 1987
- DONAHOE
- We're going to go back a little bit and talk about how your parents
[Nathan and Anna Fiering] felt about going to Saint Louis and even the
area, because we were going to go back and do that. And then w~'re also
going to talk about your wife [Clara Wernick Fiering]. So first we'll
talk about your parents.
- FIERING
- We were rather a tight family, pretty close family. I was brought up
very close to home. Although I had a lot of leeway in what I did, what
freedom in what did, nevertheless I was close to home. I lived at home
up until the time I left to go to Saint Louis, and at that point--Well,
prior to that time, I had had a serious love affair with a girl who was
not Jewish. That created awful trauma in my family. In fact, she was
half-Jewish. That wasn't good enough; she had to be all or nothing.
- DONAHOE
- With all their politics.
- FIERING
- Yeah, well, my mother was not really into politics anyway. She was very
traditional. And my father just wanted to keep her happy, because my
father didn't care. But anyway, it was a very upsetting period when I
was about twenty or twenty-one. And I "harbored a lot of resentments,
but nevertheless, I did live at home, and I was a good son. I brought my
paycheck home like all the Jewish boys did, gave it to your mother and
she gave you an allowance. And we were a nice family, as families go we
were a pretty nice family. Until I made my decision that I was going to
leave to join my girlfriend in Saint Louis. I brought her to the house,
oh at least a year before that, and introduced her as the girl I was
going to marry. Took her mother [Dora Wernick Bohn] up, introduced her
to the family. But we didn't do the traditional things that families do
in mixing prior to the marriage. Talking about a formal marriage, I just
announced I'm taking off and that was traumatic. It was hard to live
with for the period before I left, hard to live with. Tears and tears
and more tears. And I wouldn't listen. My girlfriend, as you might
surmise, was a very modern-type girl. She wasn't about to come back and
participate in a formal marriage. So I made a decision to go. So one day
I packed up and took a bus downtown and then took a bus to Saint Louis.
One of my best friends, Seymour Rubinstein, was nice enough to accompany
me to the bus. It was a very lonesome feeling. Today he's my
brother-in-law.
- DONAHOE
- Just like that.
- FIERING
- Just like that. Saved up enough money for the fare. I don't recall
whether I had a job and left it. may have, as I was working on and off.
I would have left the job anyway. It didn't mean much to me, because the
big thing to me was the whole working-class movement, that was the thing
in my life, nothing else was important. And so I arrived in Saint Louis
and we settled down to it.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, now the yeL [Young Communist League] didn't say anything about
whether you were leaving New York.
- FIERING
- No.
- DONAHOE
- They didn't do anything like that.
- FIERING
- No, in many respects I was somewhat undisciplined. I used to do what I
wanted to do and I didn't bother to consult anybody.
- DONAHOE
- You didn't even tell them?
- FIERING
- Oh, I told people there, oh yes, I was going, I had some position in the
national office there. It wouldn't have made any difference. At that
time they might have called it irresponsibility. But when I make up my
mind to do it, I do it. So I did it. Of course, they probably didn't
mind it either, they probably thought it was a good thing. Here's
another force going out to the wilds, because my mother said, "Where is
that, where is Saint Louis?" There's a Yiddish expression, "Du geist in
aIle shvartz yorn," it means every black year. It has no relationship to
race, but it means darkness--the end of the world. And it was far way
from New York, boy, far away. I had never been farther west than
Paterson, New Jersey. Anyway, so we set up housekeeping and neither of
us knew how to keep a house, but it didn't matter much. I maybe did not
take my marriage as seriously as one would, or as one should. I was a
good boy, but I didn't take it seriously. It was 8 little bit rocky, and
I was not really prepared for it.
- DONAHOE
- You were only twenty years old?
- FIERING
- Twenty-three. At that time I was twenty-three.
- DONAHOE
- That's still young.
- FIERING
- Still young, yeah. By today's standards, too young, of course. And it
was rocky. Our first child [Maxine Fiering DeFelice] came along--Well,
as a matter of fact, we had separated for a while in--Iet's see, my
daughter was born in '38, we separated in '37. And we got together again
at the national convention of the American Youth Congress. I think it
was the American Youth Congress which was the organization. I think the
convention I was talking about right now is either the League against
War and Fascism or the American Youth Congress.
- DONAHOE
- I think you said the League against War and Fascism. That was like '381
- FIERING
- That was in the middle thirties, '36, '37, '38, yeah. There was a
national convention in Chicago and I was a delegate to that representing
the Saint Louis youth organizations, and my wife was a delegate also. We
got together again there, and we went back together.
- DONAHOE
- You had how many children by now?
- FIERING
- I had none yet. In fact that was the night my first child was conceived.
I keep telling her, my daughter Maxine, I know exactly when you were
conceived, the date and everything. [laughter]
- DONAHOE
- She was born in '381
- FIERING
- Yeah, she was born in '38.
- DONAHOE
- And then you stayed together after that.
- FIERING
- Yeah, well, we stayed together after that, but not permanently; we had
another split-up. We split up when I left Saint Louis for Ohio, that was
a split.
- DONAHOE
- When was that?
- FIERING
- That was the end of '39.
- DONAHOE
- So that was like two years later again?
- FIERING
- Yeah. That's when I became an international rep for the UE [United
Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of America], field rep for the
UE. That was my first assignment, it was in Ohio. So it sort of became a
convenient thing. If I had an assignment to go to, it was away from
Saint Louis. That occurred at the same time as our split-up. It was a
heavy moment, that was a heavy moment. I never did--I wasn't the best
parent, but tearing myself away from my children was always traumatic.
- DONAHOE
- But then you all got back together again.
- FIERING
- Oh yeah, we got back together, in '41, we got back together.
- DONAHOE
- 'Forty-one?
- FIERING
- Yeah. As a matter of fact in 1941, yeah, it was in '41.
- DONAHOE
- And you were still the international rep for--?
- FIERING
- Yeah, by that time I was the international rep in Ohio. There's a
difference between a field rep and an international rep: the
international rep is a sort of a supervisor, the regional director.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, and did you then move back to Saint Louis?
- FIERING
- No, no.
- DONAHOE
- You still stayed in Ohio.
- FIERING
- No, Ohio and Kentucky were my territory, and my wife came to Ohio.
- DONAHOE
- So the family moved to where you were.
- FIERING
- Yeah. As a matter of fact, she went to Chicago on an assignment to lay
low, because there was a great feeling that the CP [Communist Party] was
going to be outlawed and they wanted to develop an underground apparatus
to stay alive. She was assigned to go to Chicago and just be quiet, lay
low and hide out there.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, so that brings us to about '41, I guess.
- FIERING
- Well, yeah, but of course it doesn't tell what happened-
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, what happened between '38 and '411
- FIERING
- Oh, there was a whole lot. We built the union on struggles and on good
organizing experiences, internal shop experiences, because you didn't
have checkoff at that time.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, we talked about that and how you went to the people's homes and
picketed and everything.
- FIERING
- Before that, we used another tactic to pick up dues and new membership.
We had big groups out in front of the plants, I don't think I mentioned
that. It was dues day and we were to have all of the stewards and
activist rank and file out in front of the plant, collaring people as
they went in in the morning, reminding them that it was dues day or we
solicited membership. And then, of course, that spirit carried over into
the plant and there was general turmoil in the plant. And we were
operating by union contract by now. But of course an open shop.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, yeah.
- FIERING
- But no checkoff, you had to collect dues by hand; people had to
volunteer to pay dues and volunteer to join. And while there were good
intentions to pay dues, dollar dues were still--a dollar was a lot of
money. And it was a universal experience. One month they tell you,
"Well, I'll give it to you next week, or tomorrow," and tomorrow never
comes. So the dues liability built up for these people and that occasion
is using this tactic, which--I forget where I picked it up, [it was]
some damn place. But it worked, going out and picketing. Picketing
people at their homes, all of whom lived in working class neighborhoods,
and everybody was becoming pro-union, militantly pro-union. People were
masquerading as prounion people who were not. My particular plant had
undergone loss of a strike in '34, and there was a large area of
conservatism built up and fear about the union people. We just had to
take more extreme measures to convince them to join the union. And so
somewhere I picked up this idea about picketing and I used it. We were
the only ones that did it, but it work ed.
- DONAHOE
- It worked.
- FIERING
- It worked. The next morning the streets were black with people lining up
waiting to get to the union hall to pay their dues or join up.
- DONAHOE
- So once the UE was formed, that was in March of '36, I think, then, and
you had organized Century [Electric Company], right?
- FIERING
- In '37.
- DONAHOE
- 'Thirty-seven. FIERING: I went to work there at the end of '36, and I
went through that period where we had a strike. A bunch of us were
fired, we called a strike with a minority of people, and used the
Emerson [Electric Company] people for picketing.
- DONAHOE
- Right.
- FIERING
- Yeah, the Emerson people had an interesting experience in their
organizing. That was a different story there. They had an independent
union, a company union, it was called. Anything that wasn't affiliated
was a company union. And they had a couple of influential radicals in
the--matter of fact, they were YCLers [Young Communist League] working
in the shop. They had a number of people who were socialist,
socialist-minded people, working in the shop. These people had managed
to work their way into that company union, and with the organizing
effort, signed up people in the UE. There were pressures built up on the
company union and they were convinced ideologically for a change and
something had to be done, because they were pressing the company for
answers to their problems and they weren't getting them. And as they
were not getting answers, they were moving to the left. So the
leadership was convinced that they should affiliate. And that, together
with the movement for building UE, UE organizations, swung that whole
shop over to the UE, and that became the occasion for a good strong
organization. They declared a strike before Century did. You see, we
tried to work things in tandem. We couldn't move fast enough because
they were getting our key people too quickly. And so the Emerson people
voted to strike and they organized a sit-down strike. They had a
fifty-fiveday sit-down strike. I think at that time, next to the UAW
[United Automobile Workers] Flint General Motors [Corporation] strike,
it was the longest sit-down in the history of the country. Well
organized, well organized. It was a beauty of organization. I have to
give it to [William] Sentner: he did a good part of the organization of
that. He led it. And I would get in there. I was in there once or twice,
slept over to see what it was like-just like a machine, very well
organized. And, of course, that was also eventually settled, but we used
them at Century to help us close that plant. They held the picket line
while the rest of us did the fighting to keep the scabs out. And then--I
think I covered that the National Labor Relations Act was declared
constitutional-
- DONAHOE
- Right, right. So that came in.
- FIERING
- --during the course of the strike, and that became the basis for
settlement.
- DONAHOE
- The recognition of the union.
- FIERING
- Well, it wasn't recognition, it was an agreement to an election.
- DONAHOE
- Recognition to hold an election. [laughter]
- FIERING
- Yeah. Up until then, we had petitions filed with the National Labor
Relations Board, but they didn't mean anything, see. But with that
decision, of course, both companies agreed to elections. So on that
basis, with the agreement for an election, we convinced the workers to
return to work; it was a victory. Went back to work, elections then
came, they were won overwhelmingly, and then Wagner [Electric Company]
didn't have to strike. They had an election without a strike.
- DONAHOE
- So Emerson and Century set the pattern for Wagner.
- FIERING
- Yeah. By that time Wagner just rolled on in. That was a big shop; that
was the biggest--seven thousand.
- DONAHOE
- Seven thousand? Oh, okay.
- FIERING
- Big shop.
- DONAHOE
- And you won overwhelmingly in all of them.
- FIERING
- Oh, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- So UE solidly-
- FIERING
- UE rolled right through Saint Louis then, because that was the big
industry in Saint Louis.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, so that was about 1937 or so.
- FIERING
- That was '37, yeah, the first half of '37.
- DONAHOE
- Initially, then, you became the financial secretary-
- FIERING
- And business agent.
- DONAHOE
- --and business agent of your local.
- FIERING
- Of my local.
- DONAHOE
- But then later you became the international rep for the-
- FIERING
- The field rep for UE, not there, [but] in Ohio.
- DONAHOE
- Right, but that was when you moved up in the union.
- FIERING
- Yeah, well, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- You told me that one of the parts of the settlements was that you
wouldn't work at Century.
- FIERING
- I wouldn't return, right.
- DONAHOE
- And Sentner signed that agreement.
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, but then the UE offered you this position of international rep.
- FIERING
- Well, I wasn't concerned about that because I knew I was going to be
elected as a full-timer; there were enough people there to support a
full-timer. That didn't concern me. I should have been, just as a matter
of principle. I should have fought it. But the other didn't come until
two and a half years later.
- DONAHOE
- After the organization of the-
- FIERING
- Yeah, I was a business agent for more than two and a half years before I
got the offer to be a field rep.
- DONAHOE
- So you were in the area still for two and a half more years.
- FIERING
- Oh, yeah, I worked as a business agent for them, right until Christmas
week, 1939.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, okay. And then the offer came through to go to Ohio.
- FIERING
- Yeah. Now, you wanted to know about some specific organizing?
- DONAHOE
- I wanted to know about your organizing campaign.
- FIERING
- Yeah, well for instance, starting with Century, I got a job there as an
assembler. They used to manufacture motors, electric motors. I got a job
as an assembler, and, I was making twenty-eight cents an hour. Before I
got fired, I was making thirty-two, a big raise, of course.
- DONAHOE
- Four cents.
- FIERING
- That was a big raise. And my wife was working in the Century Electric
plant also for a while, before I got there, but eventually she got fired
because someone tracked down that she was a red. She then went to work
at American Can--it was American Can or Continental Can--yeah, she went
to work at one of the can companies. It might have been Owens-Illinois.
Then there was a great expose on her while she was working there, and
[it] showed her leading meetings with reds in town. There was her
picture in the paper. She didn't last long; she got fired. But none of
that stuff really fazed us. You know, we were too young to know better
or to be worried about things like that, and whether we ate or didn't
eat really didn't amount to much either. And we really didn't have much
to eat. At one point we were both unemployed, and I remember we had one
slice of bacon between us for the day and that was it. You didn't care,
you didn't care where your next meal was coming from. There were some
nice people in town, older people with the left movement, who used to
act like our parents and sort of assured that we would get something to
eat. But it was a nice--it was a good period in a way, an educational
period.
- DONAHOE
- When you went into the plants, did you come right out and tell people
your politics?
- FIERING
- Oh, no. Oh, yeah, let's get back to that; I get sidetracked sometimes. I
went into the plant and I kept quiet for a while just to establish
myself as a good worker. And I was a very good worker, very fast. And
the department supervisor wanted to keep me, you know, I was productive.
My first thing was to just get acquainted with people, because I had
known about the history of the plant in a previous strike, busted
strike, there. So I wanted to find out where the hell I was at, who was
there, who I could talk to--get acquainted with some people, which I
did. It took me a week or two to get acquainted with some people, and
when I sounded them out and I knew who I would talk to, I would talk to
an individual here, an individual there about the union and either
managed to slip them a card there, or else I would arrange to go to
their home at night and sign them up. That went on for a little while
and eventually the company caught up with me and I got fired.
- DONAHOE
- There were spies I'm sure, allover the place.
- FIERING
- There were eight of us fired.
- DONAHOE
- All at one time?
- FIERING
- Not at one time. I was the first one fired, then another one was fired
and then another one. But even after I was fired, I continued to work on
the plant, on organizing the plant. The times were different. The fact
that I was fired did not create panic like it might today, see. If you
announce today when you go out to organize that you're organizing
something, some key person gets fired and you can't do anything about
it, it creates a panic. Well, we didn't have a National Labor Relations
Board at that time to reinstate me; you were on your own. But there
wasn't the feeling, because at that time the workers were in a different
mood. They were coming out of the Depression, things started to shape up
a little better and there were jobs opening up. The country was
beginning to pullout and people were angry. There had been auto strikes
in the country--and not too far from Saint Louis for that matter. As a
matter of fact, there were shutdowns in Michigan, which is not too far,
and there was the Flint [Michigan] strike, and you had the Toledo
Auto-Lite strike in '34, you had the longshore strike on the West Coast.
We didn't feel too much about what was happening on the Coast, but in
the Middle West you felt pretty much everything. There was a whole
movement by. the CIO [Committee for Industrial Organization; after 1938
Congress of Industrial Organizations] see, and it was making headway,
penetrating the basic industries, and the workers were in a militant
mood and the fact that somebody was fired did not stop or put a damper
on that militancy, didn't stop them from organizing. You could go ahead
and talk and organize.
- DONAHOE
- So you still have a corps of workers within the plant to work with even
though you're outside. You can still do it, which is really important.
- FIERING
- That's right. But the most important thing is to appreciate the mood of
the working class at that time, a generally rising militancy. And when
that happens, they don't give a damn.
- DONAHOE
- They're ready.
- FIERING
- They're ready. Nothing is going to frighten them. And that's the mood
that they were in, thanks to the CIO and John L. Lewis, which is what we
need today.
- DONAHOE
- A new one. [laughter]
- FIERING
- Yeah. I feel today that something like that could happen if we had a
strong leader like Lewis who could inspire the kind of spirit you saw at
that time. There are some unions today that may have that kind of
leadership ready for a John L. The workers are.
- DONAHOE
- It almost has to be rebuilt.
- FIERING
- So anyway, you organize that way and--See, the reason I mention the
Emerson thing was because that was different; no one was fired there,
because of the company union thing which had broad support. It was a
company-created instrument; the company permitted it to be created years
before, I think in about '34. It wanted to use it and bend it to its own
purposes, but the times moved it in other directions. So it was a mass
organization, and they handled problems of workers. They were
ineffective up until this point--not too effective, put it that way. The
company might give them a crumb here or there, but with the rising tide
of organization, it became more effective in handling problems. They
kept pushing and pushing and pushing, and as they did, their
expectations became larger and they thought in broader terms than they
did in just settling a grievance. The whole idea of union with a
contract became a big issue, and, with their broad base, they were able
to--Well, here was the UE signing people up and building its
organization, and here was a company union which already had an
organization to merge, so you had the ingredients of a tight enough
organization to pull a sit down strike. They had practically everybody
in the shop in the union. Once the company union affiliated with the UE,
announced an affiliation, endorsed the union, then everybody became a UE
person. That's another way to organize. You don't find that today
because you find very, very few company unions. There are still some
really independent unions that are kept alive because the company
prefers that and gives them concessions so they don't join the AFL-CIO
[American Federation of LaborCongress of Industrial Organizations], that
is, the general labor movement. But other than that--Of course, if you
want another experience, we can go to different techniques in
organizing. My first experiences as a field rep for UE, I went to Ohio.
My specific assignment was the Hoover [Company].
- DONAHOE
- Hoover?
- FIERING
- Yeah, Hoover vacuum cleaner. Here I'm thrown into it--well, they'd say,
"Here's a plant, go organize it." What they had there was also a company
union, but a real instrument, and we had few UE sympathizers in the
plant and my job was to get them together to see if we couldn't take
over, bust the company [union] and sign people up-enough people so that
we'd qualify for an election and have an election. Well, what happened
was that the company union got the jump, they saw what was coming, and
they petitioned for an election. And we didn't have enough to win, [but]
we had enough to get on a ballot. So there was a big argument that arose
inside the ranks of the UE organization about what course to follow, and
that's where really came into the picture. The union had nobody else in
direct contact with them and that's why I was sent in. So I was given a
line to follow: We didn't want to get on the ballot and lose an
election.
- DONAHOE
- What percentage of the workers do youthink you had at that time?
- FIERING
- Oh, maybe, looking back, we might have had (in cards) 10 percent, I'd
say.
- DONAHOE
- That's all?
- FIERING
- Oh, yeah. Well, there was no campaign there. We had some people who were
sympathetic who would write to New York and say, "Send us cards, we want
to organize the UE," and so they did this on their own. We had minimum
organization that way, had nobody to guide it. So here was an election
schedule and the question was what position should we take. So I was
given a line. We didn't want a loss, so the next best thing to do was to
fight to defeat a victory for the company union in the election by
advocating a "no" vote. The ballot would be market "yes" or "no" for the
company union. So I had the job of sitting down with people and
convincing them. They thought it would be the end of the world if you
didn't get on the ballot and try to win, you know, it would be the end
of the world. I had to convince them, "Well, we'll be patient. We'll
take our time and then we'll wait the one year and we'll be ready to
come back if we defeat this company union now." And to make a long story
short-Because it was very interesting getting into these discussions
with these workers. You discuss it with them, and they come up finally
with the decisions, see. You just argue and you give them an argument
here and an argument there. But they among themselves come up and make
the decision on what the right thing is to do. And they agree that we
would go into a negative campaign, a "no" campaign. And we were
successful in pulling it off, and so we defeated the company union. They
thereby lost sale collective-bargaining rights. Then we started
organizing our own union, and we were ready by the end of he year to
file our own petition. And this company was fighting us viciously. This
is a plant--Hoover's located in North Canton, Ohio, which is right
outside of Canton. Canton, Ohio, is a steel town. Do you know much about
the area-Canton, Massilon?
- DONAHOE
- Isn't that near Youngstown and everything else?
- FIERING
- Yeah, Canton, Massilon, Youngstown, all those.
- DONAHOE
- Right, all the big steel mills. Canton was not. See, interestingly,
North Canton had a population which was more native American. Canton,
Massilon, Youngstown had a heavily ethnic population. North Canton, a
black couldn't live in the town--couldn't get into the town--which was
not true for the mill towns.
- DONAHOE
- A lot of Slavic people too.
- FIERING
- Mostly Slavic or Italian. Slavic mostly, the great bulk of immigrants
were Slavic. Those are the kinds of people I worked with in Saint Louis
when I was working for the CIO, those Slavic groups. One of the reasons
that they asked me to work for the CIO was because I had a lot of
contact through the movement, through the left movement, with the Slavic
groups.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, you had been telling me, especially the Croatians.
- FIERING
- Especially the Croatians, who were very politically hep. And, well, very
pro-union, of course. But they were politically aware, very politically
aware, and would naturally take a lead in organizing the unions.
- DONAHOE
- But in North Canton it was totally different.
- FIERING
- In North Canton it was totally different, totally different, WASP and
native Catholic. So during that year I would be in Canton and I went
down and did some work in Sharon, Pennsylvania, on the Westinghouse
[Electric Corporation] drive, which was essentially the same kind of
thing I experienced in North Canton, because there it was the beginnings
of a drive--we were faced with an election, we got in late and so the
best we could do was prepare for the following year. That was a big
Westinghouse plant.
- DONAHOE
- In Sharon.
- FIERING
- Sharon, a big Wes tinghouse plant.
- DONAHOE
- They have one out in West--Mistvale or something like that.
- FIERING
- West where?
- DONAHOE
- Right outside of Pittsburgh?
- FIERING
- Oh, Midvale. Oh, East Pittsburgh, that was their big plant.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, it's still there.
- FIERING
- It's still there. It's not nearly as big as it used to be, but it's
still there.
- DONAHOE
- So in Sharon you had the same kind of situation as North Canton in terms
of the company.
- FIERING
- Somewhat like North Canton, yeah, the same kind of thing. There was
another case where the first--But this was during that period when we
were building a union in Hoover. So while the people were signing people
up, was running down to Sharon--I was working on that plant. There was
another guy with me at the time, too, in Sharon. We essentially did the
same kind of thing that we did before. We prepared the way for when we
would be in command of the situation.
- DONAHOE
- So eventually you managed to win the union elections.
- FIERING
- Oh, yeah, yeah. And we had eliminated the company union the previous
year. Well, so in Canton we finally--There was a lot of resistance by
the company, a lot of resistance. And we won the election. But how do
you build it? You build it brick by brick. You sign up people, then you
build committees, then you organize it in the departments, and you
carryon what today is called-They got a fancy name for it today. They
[are] looking for ways to avoid strikes, so they carryon actions within
the plant. What do they call it?
- DONAHOE
- ' I know the term that you mean, right. Instead of going on strike, it's
an internal situation.
- FIERING
- Yes, that's right. Well, you know, that's just the past resurrected, but
that's the way we built the unions before. You build a union by getting
a corps of people, sign up a bunch of people, you set up a committee,
you spread your organization in the departments, you consolidate a
department organization. You don't wait. If there are problems there you
figure out how you can tackle solutions to those problems with the
organization that you have. Even though you're still illegal, not legal,
you don't have legal recognition, you learn to work, you learn to
motivate and to push people into action en masse, see, so they each
protect the other. See, what I mean? It's difficult for a company to
grab hold of any one person to make a sacrificial goat out of him.
- DONAHOE
- Because you have enough-
- FIERING
- And that's the way you organize it. Today . they've rediscovered it and
they think they've invented it, you see.
- DONAHOE
- It also seems like you're saying patience is very important.
- FIERING
- Patience, that's right.
- DONAHOE
- You don't move ahead too fast before people are ready.
- FIERING
- So we carryon these day-to-day struggles and you build the union. Every
time you move people into motion that way, the primary thing is sign
cards up, build the union, build the organization, and when an
organization is built very well in the department, that department can
move ahead and start getting solutions to problems without any one
person being out there way out in front getting chopped off. The company
can't zero in on somebody. And there are techniques that you develop on
how the mass moves to solve a grievance, how you present a grievance,
and how the grievance is made known to the management. And that used to
be ABC in the building of a union and the UE was expert at doing that.
- DONAHOE
- On involving everybody?
- FIERING
- On building a union like that.
- DONAHOE
- A real rank and file democratic union.
- FIERING
- A real rank and file.
- DONAHOE
- I wanted to ask you about that, about the structure of the UE. It's sort
of at the end here, but the UE has a reputation as being one of the most
democratic unions-
- FIERING
- Yeah.
- DONAHOE
- --in terms of the structure of, you know, some of the other ones. And I
was just wondering how that actually worked in practice with stewards,
and constitutional conventions--?
- FIERING
- Internally in a local union, the UE was extremely democratic. It was
democratic, I'd say, to a fault. I think it was a fault because you did
not have the" discipline that you have in unions like developed in the
UAW, where there is a top national leadership that enforces a certain
discipline on the membership as a whole. Shop by shop, you couldn't beat
it, you couldn't beat the democracy in the UE. But the UAW was a
democratic union even then also. Today it is too.
1.4. TAPE NUMBER: II, SIDE TWO AUGUST 21, 1987
- DONAHOE
- Okay, we were talking about the structure of the UE.
- FIERING
- Well, the structure of the UE. How do you start, what do you want to
know?
- DONAHOE
- Okay, like, did you have an elected stewards system?
- FIERING
- Yeah, that was ABC. You had to have a steward system by election, an
internal organization to enforce the contract, which was completely
democratic with stewards elected democratically and a grievance
committee elected democratically. Local union officers--all elected
democratically. Freedom of speech-
- DONAHOE
- How many stewards did you usually have?
- FIERING
- Well, as a general rule, you have to play it by feel, because you could
have a plant which had a department, say, with a hundred people and
you'd want to have a representation of about one to thirty on the
average. Or you might have a department which was isolated which had
fifteen people, so you would want somebody from the department who knew
something about the work to represent those people, so you had one
steward for people like that. You'd compensate for it, because the
management didn't want too many generals walking around. There was logic
in that--couldn't have too many generals walking around. So where you
had one for fifteen someplace, you'd compensate by one for forty in
another place where you have forty people working closer together doing
the same kind of work, you'd have one steward who could easily look
after the needs of those people, see. The more important thing is that
the philosophy of the union, of a rank and file union, is that you have
to enlist the constant support of the rank and file in the solution of
problems, the solution of grievances. It is not a mechanical thing just
like electing a steward going in there and outsmarting the boss. The
steward had to learn how to enlist the support of his membership if he
was going to be effective in representing them with their immediate
boss. That was the difference in the UE, and a union like the UE, and
that's what our people were brought up to understand--our stewards were
made to understand. See, after a while it became almost routine. If you
have a rank and file union which operates on its muscle all the time,
then whenever a steward goes in, he doesn't have to worry, "How am I
going to line up my membership to put the pressure on this boss," unless
he needs it, unless it becomes--in the unusual case he might need it. He
might need some kind of demonstration of strength. But where a union is
created, the people are educated to understand that the operation of the
union involves their involvement, constantly. They are responsible, in
the last analysis, for the solution of problems. The steward eventually
goes in and when the foreman or the supervisor or whoever it is he deals
with, deals with it, he knows he's got a militant group backing him that
the foreman has to be concerned about. Or else what happens is it
degenerates and the steward operates as an individual and he forgets
about his base and the base lays there dormant and things go downhill.
That's what happened in a lot of industries.
- DONAHOE
- Definitely. Like, see in the auto workers, they used to have the steward
system. Then, after the war, it was changed to the "committee" people
and they kind of did . away with the name "stewards" and everything
became more formalized in the grievance procedure where you couldn't
really resolve things on the shop floor. Now, this is in the big auto
plants. It didn't involve-
- FIERING
- Well, it wasn't--I don't know if it was a--See, we had General Motors
[Corporation] plants--I made before mention about Frigidaire--and I was
involved in the organization of the GM plants in the UE. See, General
Motors had an electrical division and we happened to get there first.
The UAW was furious about it. They figured that belonged to them because
it was General Motors. What it came to was we represented 10 percent of
the General Motors workers, 35,000. There was Frigidaire [Company],
there was Delco Products, there was Moraine Products--all in Dayton,
Ohio. And in Rochester you had Delco Products. In Syracuse [New York]
you had a Delco Products plant. In Warren, Ohio, you had what was called
Packard Electric, which made the electrical systems for automobiles, but
it was a UE plant. And there was another one. In any event, we got the
backlash of what happened in the UAW with respect to their grievance
setup. And it wasn't really that bad. We had stewards, we
had--Essentially, the structure of the grievance system was based on
what they called committeemen, because the company couldn't stand the
word "stewards." And the committeemen represented the bigger group than
what we normally would allow stewards to represent. We carried it over,
but we made it work, and we made it work the same way that stewards
work. We called them committeemen, but they were really stewards, see.
And they were, by contract, set out so that each committeeman covered x
number of people, a hundred people or something like that--seventy-five
people, whatever.
- DONAHOE
- It was quite larger.
- FIERING
- Whereas in most--they were much larger--in most contracts you would have
a breakdown of one for forty in thecontract, but there was flexibility
in how it was -applied. But we made it work like a steward system and
what happened was, of course, the committeeman, because they had larger
areas, the concession the company made in order to avoid stewards with
smaller groups was that they gave them more time, so that you had your
grievance committee of seven people in a plant, a big plant, who did
nothing for eight hours a day, but walk around settling grievances. In
other words, they were full-time grievance people, see. And that was
your top committeemen. The lower committeemen had a set number of hours
in which they could use for settling grievances. Everybody got paid time
because they had larger groups, whereas normally what we had in
contracts then was, where you had the steward system, you had one for
forty, one for thirty and you had people who would take time as they
needed it. In some places they would run away with it, that is the
stewards would run away with it and really abuse it, so the contract
might limit the number of hours. But if it wasn't abused, there was no
problem if you had a strong rank and file. But that was the thing about
the auto plants and the UAW contracts versus the way-
- DONAHOE
- Exactly.
- FIERING
- So we carried that UAW setup over. It was pushed on us, but we adapted.
- DONAHOE
- But you turned it around--?
- FIERING
- It worked, it worked very well. I remember one instance we had in
Frigidaire. I became secretary of what was known as the General Motors
Conference Board in UE after we had the GM electrical division
organized. And was handling--I was in Dayton at that time. I moved to
Dayton because that was the hub of the GM electrical division, and I was
in on the organization of the GM plants there, too. And we had one
foreman--We had one department where the company started to kick up its
heels and they would refuse to settle grievances. Our contract provided
that each individual worker--See, it's a question of being able to take
advantage of the legalities in a contract to be able to move people into
action. Contracts provide that each individual has got a right to handle
their own grievance. Now, I think this is a result of the law.
- DONAHOE
- With the help of the-
- FIERING
- No, they could have a steward if they wanted. In some cases the steward
had a right to be there, even if the worker did not want him, because it
might be dealing with a contract question, and it's our contract, it's
the union's contract. But the individual had a right to take up a
grievance for himself. Anyway, in the contract, in the GM contract it
specified that. We had a contract with Chrysler [Corporation] in Dayton.
It was the same thing. It was uniform for their industry, so wherever we
took over plants that were in their industry, we pretty much emulated
that type of contract. But here's a case where the supervision wouldn't
settle grievances. So we had this provision in the contract which said
every individual has a right to take up their own grievance. Now, the
alternative to that is that the steward can take up a grievance for the
whole group. So everybody is working while the steward goes in and
argues the grievance. But if you're not going to get a grievance settled
with a steward, what do you do? Well, here's another section in the
contract that says the individual can take up a grievance. So we lined
up all the workers in that department to put in their grievances
individually and to go in and handle their own grievance. And you had a
large number of workers. So for three shifts--it was a twenty-four-hour
operation at Frigidaire-for three shifts you had workers lined up
waiting to present their grievance. The foreman legally had to listen to
the grievance within a set period of time from the time they filed
it--like twenty-four hours, see. So he had to sit there and he would
listen, first one worker, then another worker, then another worker, and
you're talking about one hundred or two hundred workers and three
foremen couldn't do a thing. All day they couldn't supervise, they had
to listen to the grievances. Well, they finally came to the conclusion
it's much easier to deal with a steward and have production going than
to do that. And all we needed was one lesson like that.
- DONAHOE
- To show them. But it was important to involve the workers.
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- That's the main thing, because it seemed that when the Auto Workers
instituted that committeeman system, they really cut off-
- FIERING
- It was a step away from-
- DONAHOE
- --it was away from the rank and file.
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- But you turned it around to your purpose, yeah.
- FIERING
- They worked it well. And, of course, the UAW has a little bit different
setup than ours; it became more a machine setup. The factionalism and
red-baiting fed that. But we became that too somewhat.
- DONAHOE
- Theirs became less democratic.
- FIERING
- Well, I wouldn't go that far, I wouldn't go that far. I think the UAW is
a good union, a damn good union. You can't minimize its achievements to
me. But we had differences with [Walter P.] Reuther so we used to say
they're not so good. Well, Reuther is another one of these people who
said he's sorry he did what he did, made a mistake, before he died. Like
Father [Charles Owen] Rice. But then, a lot of UE people say the same
thing for UE. We made our share.
- DONAHOE
- It really turned around in his face, didn't it? He never thought it
would go that far.
- FIERING
- Well, if he had been living today he would be different, I think. In any
event, you wanted to know how--You're really concerned about rank and
file involvement, am I right? Now, so UE was a democratic union in that
regard. But this is kind of summing up of the final of what I'm saying,
but I'll say it now. The attack on the left--which was so sustained and
so severe, even though the UE local in its internal operations was
democratic, in terms of the operation of the UE, as I view it looking
back, the attacks on its leadership and on the left made us paranoid and
what it did more than anything else was encourage the factionalism, much
like the factionalism that you had in the UAW or anyplace else--the
lefts against the world.
- DONAHOE
- And it happened within the UE too?
- FIERING
- Oh, of course, it happened within the UE. And we were very concerned at
all times as to who was going to be elected to what. Because, "Did we
control this guy, or didn't we control him?" "Did we influence this guy,
or didn't we influence this guy?" And it did not make for the kind of
wide-open thing that, for instance, what I learned later when we came
out here, that you had in the ILWU [International Longshoremen's and
Warehousemen's Union], which is to me the most democratic union in the
country, was--and still is--under Harry Bridges. That was the way to run
a union. But, of course, when you're talking about the Coast, you're
talking about an isolated section of the country, you're not talking
about everything that went on in the Middle West for instance or the
East, where you had UE thrown among a milieu of tremendous political
union struggles, political struggles. The ILWU operated by itself here;
it was isolated from the mainstream of American industry and from
everything that went on in American industry. We constantly felt the
pressures of the Auto Workers, the [United] Steel Workers [of America],
all the rest of the labor movement, the rest of industry, and the rest
of politics, and it made us paranoid, I think, so that we operated in
kind of a factional way.
- DONAHOE
- But wasn't that a little bit later when that happened? That
factional-type--?
- FIERING
- Well, when you talk about later, it can't be too much later, because you
had the [Martin] Dies committee [House Committee on Un-American
Activities] in the 19308-
- DONAHOE
- Nineteen forty-one.
- FIERING
- --and 1940s, yeah. You had the Dies committee, right? And shoot, they
were gunning for us from the word go. Then after the Dies committee you
had--I forget who the hell the head of it was, whoever he was--but the
House [Committee on] Un-American Activities was constantly in operation.
And you had the hysteria about the reds all the time, even during the
war, even when we were helping the Soviet Union, when we were allies
with the Soviet Union, there was still a violent anticommunist hysteria.
Well, I'm sure you've read the [James J.] Matles book [Them and Us:
Struggles of a Rank and File Union] where he talks about [James B.]
Carey.
- DONAHOE
- But then, it seemed that so many of the political people were in key
positions in the union, like [Julius] Emspak and [Albert J.] Fitzgerald.
- FIERING
- Yeah, sure they were, but how did they stay there? We had to convince
the people that we were good leaders. And how were we good leaders?
Because we were militant, we brought home the bread and butter, see. And
many workers took the position, "I don't give a goddamn what he is."
This was like in my own local in Century when I came out openly. They
said, "We don't give a goddamn what he is," they told the boss at the
plant when he called in a group of people to tell him. "We don't give a
goddamn what he is, he's doing the job for us." And that's generally
what convinces workers. As long as the union is militant, was doing the
job, bringing home the bread and butter, that was the primary thing. And
Jesus, my daughter [Roberta Fiering Segovia] can't get that thing. She
called up [University of California] Berkeley, and Berkeley destroyed
it; they destroyed the stuff after--I was after her for years to save
that. That was the thing about her piece, too, that her research brought
out. The reason that the left was able to maintain itself in leadership
was because they could do the economic job. But they didn't do the
political education to go along with it.
- DONAHOE
- That's what we're finding out. I've been finding that out in my own
work, the same thing. They're respected for their trade union work.
- FIERING
- But they were never able to carry it over politically.
- DONAHOE
- To politics?
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- I don't know where that leaves us.
- FIERING
- And so as the attacks became more intense, we became more paranoid. We
only looked for people who we could count on. We were afraid of people
who had slight differences, because those differences might in the
course of time with pressure become more and more magnified and drive
people away from us, just because they were afraid to associate. That's
really what happened to a large extent when the crunch came. A lot of
people who left us, left us crying, literally crying. They just couldn't
take the pressure. They were good and they loved us, but they couldn't
take the pressure\
- DONAHOE
- Do you think that's it? Like, it's not that you weren't open
politically, it's not that you didn't try to explain things to people?
- FIERING
- Well, I don't know. There are all kinds of evaluations made on where
were the mistakes made about that, and that's one of them. If we had
been open from the beginning, would it have been different?
- DONAHOE
- Well, you couldn't be open from the day you walk in a plant.
- FIERING
- Not [the day] you walk in a plant, but once you've established yourself,
like I did with my plant.
- DONAHOE
- Right, but you were-
- FIERING
- That was right in the beginning. As soon as we won the election, we had
a contract, we got the stewards set up, I was accepted as the leader
unquestioningly, and I came out.
- DONAHOE
- Told them who you were?
- FIERING
- I told them who I was and I was accepted. There was never a question
anymore while I was there, about redbaiting, at least not by my own
local; I was red-baited by everybody else, but not by my own local. But
who knows, I don't know whether that was so. You know, you can't compare
the United States to other countries. The general political level and
the background of our own history is a lot different from what it is in
any other part of the world.
- DONAHOE
- But there's always been such a concerted effort on the part of the
government and everything against any kind of leftism, you know,
socialist ideas.
- FIERING
- Well, that was a part of weakening the union, that was their strategy.
- DONAHOE
- I mean stronger than in any other country.
- FIERING
- Stronger than any other, but they had the material to work with here.
You didn't have a history in the United States like you had in the
European countries or colonial countries of a socialist consciousness.
This is the land of the rugged individualist, you know, and developing
capital. So who can say? I don't know.
- DONAHOE
- It's a very hard question to answer. We could probably go on forever.
- FIERING
- That's right, even a Monday morning quarterback can't answer that one.
- DONAHOE
- So did you have much contact with most of leadership, the top
leadership, like Carey?
- FIERING
- Oh, of course. I was the international-
- DONAHOE
- It was such a small organization that you had lots of interaction with
each other.
- FIERING
- You're talking about within the UE? Of course, had constant interaction
with them. I was the international rep. That means I had a chunk of
geography that I was ~esponsible for. I was in and out and I dealt with
major corporations, so I had to have constant contact. And I wouldn't
want to forget my wife because she was involved in General Electric
[Company], and she and I were involved in the landmark cases on equal
pay for equal work, War Labor Board cases in GM, GE, and Westinghouse on
equal pay for women.
- DONAHOE
- Right, that was very important.
- FIERING
- She and GE, me and GM. She did the best job. We were the only two that
successfully negotiated the equal pay decisions, and I did so with
concessions. She did without concessions.
- DONAHOE
- That was during World War II, wasn't it?
- FIERING
- That was a result of the War Labor Board decision.
- DONAHOE
- You were the only union that did that.
- FIERING
- That's right. And she negotiated with GE.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, that was a landmark.
- FIERING
- We won two decisions from the board, one in GM and one in General
Electric. I think Westinghouse also, I'm not sure. But in any event,
following the War Labor Board decision, then the order was go ahead and
negotiate. Well, I was at GM and I was in charge of GM, so I picked it
up at GM, see, and she was at General Electric, so she picked it up at
General Electric and we negotiated to a conclusion. Others went into
negotiations but before they could resolve the problem of equal pay, the
war ended, and with that the decision went out of effect.
- DONAHOE
- The whole thing, yeah. Well, I know you were the first ever to take that
up. Now, I was wondering, you said the Dies committee began in 1941, and
that was kind of the beginnings of the ACTU, the Association of Catholic
Trade Unionists?
- FIERING
- Well, they started out about--I forget if it was 1940 or 1941 with Carey
or before that. I don't recall hearing about it before 1941.
- DONAHOE
- Was that the first time they were really starting strongly to exclude
communists? It was a Lynn [Massachusetts] group that wanted to change
the constitution.
- FIERING
- Yeah, well Lynn was a General Electric plant which brought an amendment
to the constitution. They weren't the only ones. I'm sure there were
other locals that also periodically brought in amendments to the
constitution at conventions barring reds. We had all these pressures on
us from outside, you know, that were being used as examples, like the
UAW. The UAW did it. They modified their constitution to bar them.
- DONAHOE
- That early?
- FIERING
- Well, during Reuther's period. That's how he got elected. That was in
the early forties, and he was head of the GM department from '40--See, I
used to meet with Reuther every year when we both were going in on
contract negotiations, so we lined up our demands so that there was
similarity in our demands. At that time he was head of the GM
department. That was his springboard to win the UAW presidency, and that
was '45 or '46.
- DONAHOE
- I think it was '46 he was elected against [Rolland J.] Thomas and some
of those people.
- FIERING
- R. J. Thomas, yeah that's right.
- DONAHOE
- And that's when he started using the whole redbaiting campaign.
- FIERING
- Well, he was using red-baiting before then-
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, but he used it real strong.
- FIERING
- --and that culminated in him getting elected president on the basis of
isolating the reds.
- DONAHOE
- But that wasn't happening as strongly in the UE, was it?
- FIERING
- Well, they couldn't get off the ground, because we were more firmly
entrenched in UE than the left wing was entrenched in the UAW. I suppose
we could start examining what the factors may have been. We organized
the UE, and as we organized the UE, we built support for ourselves. We
circled the wagons and always protected our rears. In the UAW you had a
lot more volatile situation because it was a different kind of an
industry, different industry. In any event, our counterpart for Reuther
would have been Carey, but he was not as smart as Reuther, he was
ineffective. He was 8 self-seeker. All he was interested in was getting
promoted. In 1937 there was a big article in the New York Times. He got
nationwide publicity--the youngest labor leader in the CIa. And so he
was made the secretary of the CIa by John L. Lewis. He was a youngster,
he was in his twenties, and the New York Times wrote an article: It
looks like some day we might have Jim Carey be the president of the
United States, because he's just young enough and the labor movement is
growing so powerful, you will be able to elect the president of the
United States. I'm paraphrasing, of course. He believed it, see. That
was his fatal mistake. He believed it, he never let goof that. And in
terms of his ability, it just didn't measure up. He was a very shallow
guy who was ambitious, but he didn't have enough moxie to back it up. He
organized the Philco [Corporation] plant, that was his main achievment
when he was in his early twenties, very early twenties; he was a boy
wonder. On the basis of that when UE was formed in 1935--in Philadelphia
Philco, GE in Schenectady and Lynn, RCA [Corporation] in Camden, and a
couple of other plants--he was made the president. It should have been
Emspak, but it wasn't.
- DONAHOE
- And he knew the pol!tical outlook of these people, like Fitzgerald,
Matles, Emspak, and you. He worked with them.
- FIERING
- Fitzgerald was a conservative, by the way.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, he was?
- FIERING
- Oh, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- I couldn't quite figure Fitzgerald out.
- FIERING
- He was an honest conservative.
- DONAHOE
- He was a progressive.
- FIERING
- He was really an honest Joe. He was not flashy, that was the problem.
- DONAHOE
- But he worked very closely with Emspak and Matles, and he was
conservative?
- FIERING
- Because he was honest, and he was for building the union.
- DONAHOE
- Through the good trade union person?
- FIERING
- Yeah. And these guys--You know, Matles was a goddamned good organizer. I
know, I organized with him. He was a crackerjack negotiator, smart. I
learned a lot from him. And that's what Fitzgerald wanted, that's all he
wanted. As far as politics were concerned, he believed in UE democracy.
- DONAHOE
- But Carey--?
- FIERING
- I give Fitzgerald a lot of credit. But Carey was dishonest.
- DONAHOE
- I mean you hear the story that Carey utilized the left to help build the
union and then later would turn against them.
- FIERING
- He didn't utilize the left. Carey didn't have the brains to utilize
anybody. He was trying to ride along with the left in a growing
influential union, and he was the president, he would be king, so he was
just trying to use all that. He wasn't using the left, he couldn't
use-He didn't have the brains to utilize anybody. And so when he went
too far afield, he was dumped. You can see how effective he was, it was
so easy to dump him. A guy who's really the president of an
international union like that, that kind of a union, who's got his
roots sown into the rank and file, you can't dump him. Not if he's
anywhere near a half-smart operator. But this guy was dumped like
nothing.
- DONAHOE
- Who became--1
- FIERING
- Fitzgerald.
- DONAHOE
- Fitzgerald, right. Now, oh, let's see, I'm trying to get the dates. The
Dies committee started in '41 and they start a whole big political
problem and that eventually led to a spl~t in around '451 Was that the
first split within the UE1
- FIERING
- Well, the first split within the UE was in '41 when Carey was defeated.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, so that was the actual first split.
- FIERING
- From then on he became the center of a developing faction, and of
course, basic to that faction was the ACTU because he was a Catholic.
- DONAHOE
- He was very strongly involved with the ACTU. mean, they were like
entwined-
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- --like Father Rice.
- FIERING
- Father Rice took up the cudgels against the reds and we had a factional
fight at every convention.
- DONAHOE
- But at this time they weren't trying to form the new union.
- FIERING
- No, that didn't come until 1949.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, that was 1949.
- FIERING
- When Phil [Philip] Murray stepped into the picture, see. He gave Carey
and his people a charter and it was an invitation to the UE to get the
hell out. The UE says, "Well, we left the CIO." (They hadn't left it.
They were pushed out.)
- DONAHOE
- Okay, I want to talk about that.
- FIERING
- You've got a way to go before we get to that.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, so back in the forties they're starting to form a whole new
faction, but Fitzgerald is president at this time, and he's working with
Matles and Emspak and all these people. So things are pretty strong
still. And then no other groups were successful at this point in
changing the constitution in terms of excluding communists from
membership. Nothing like this is happening.
- FIERING
- No. We’ll talk about the mistakes later, about the noncommunist
affidavits.
- DONAHOE
- Well, that doesn’t come until ’47.
- FIERING
- That’s right.
- DONAHOE
- So what I wanted to ask you about right now was that southern organizing
drive that you started telling me about that happened right after World
War II.
- FIERING
- You wanted to know about my activity?
- DONAHOE
- Right. I thought you said you had been involved in that.
- FIERING
- Oh, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- I want to know everything about your activity from your perspective.
- FIERING
- Chronologically, my activities. My first shop was the Hoover plant,
which I organized. It was about three thousand people; it was a nice
victory. And then I did some work in Sharon, but then I was then
reassigned to Dayton, Ohio. That’s where we were conducting the big
organizing drive against General Motors. That was in 1940. And I was
still handling Hoover vacuum at the other end of the state.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, and now it’s General Motors.
- FIERING
- That's right. And there were four of us assigned there. Four of us, all
still living.
- DONAHOE
- Just great. [laughter] Do you remember who?
- FIERING
- Yeah, let's see, there was Bob Kirkwood, Art Garfield, who later became
a judge, I hear, in Colorado or Wyoming, and Ernie DeMaio.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, I've heard of his name.
- FIERING
- Then later on two other people were brought in, Bob Logsdon and Dick
Niebur. Ernie and I were the key people in the drive. He used to do the
speeching and I used to do the organizing. My specialty became
developing the internal mechanism in the organizing; building the
apparatus inside--what I was describing to you--signing up; the creation
of an organization out of what we got signed up; motivating them for
more signing up, more organization, and so on. And that's how we
organized these. Hell, it was thirty thousand people involved in both
plants.
- DONAHOE
- And you were on full time.
- FIERING
- Oh, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- So you were working basically from the outside of the plant.
- FIERING
- Not basically. I was working from the outside.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, okay. [laughter]
- FIERING
- Ernie was technically in charge of the staff and he used to be the
speech maker. He's a born agitator, and we would have meetings of our
stewards--I don't remember whether it was every week or every two
weeks--in these plants. Three GM plants going at the time and there were
a number of other plants in the area which we were tackling peripheral
to what we were doing. Centrally GM was first. And when we organized,
everybody got into the act, including Congress. My job, I was handling
the internal organization, I developed the stewards council, which was
the organizing mechanism that we used. We'd get them to a meeting and
we'd have a couple of hundred stewards. Every one of them was a member
of an organizing committee; it was not a stewards council, it was an
organizing committee. And Ernie would get up and make a speech, and that
son of a gun could speak. He would drive their enthusiasm to new heights
at each meeting. He was a marvelous orator, marvelous. We honored the
people who did the best signing up, you know. I'd call them up. At a
certain point, I'd say, "Who has cards?" I'd get people marching up
proudly with membership cards and everybody would.applaud. It was nice
fun and stimulating. And all of us on the outside with the papers
tearing us apart, the Congress tearing us apart. But didn't nothing make
any difference. Can you imagine speeches on the floor of Congress with
resolutions against UE organizing General Motors when steel, auto, and
rubber had already signed with CIO. It was intended and did make
headlines in the press to frighten workers. We had an election in 1940. We failed to get a majority, but we got into
a runoff. I forget who the hell was opposing us--some company union or
other was opposing us. Then we had the runoff election and we won it.
Boy, with all the obstacles everybody tried to throw in our way in the
runoff! They tried to stretch it out to give them time to work out on
our people. In any event, we survived it, we won it. And it was a very
critical victory for the UE. It established a certain relationship with
the UAW, with GM, which was the biggest company in the world at the
time. I became the secretary of the GM Conference Board and the
international representative for the UE in Ohio and in Kentucky. We
built a union. God, we did a remarkable organizing job, and then
extended it right through the war years.
- DONAHOE
- The war was just beginning, right?
- FIERING
- Just beginning, yeah. Then in '42, '43--we had a staff of fifteen people
in Ohio--we had sixty-seven elections and we won sixty-six.
- DONAHOE
- That was fantastic.
- FIERING
- It was fantastic, it really was. It was an unusual experience for the
labor movement. And we consolidated a pretty good union--very lively,
very effective, and very influential. UE had a hell of a good reputation
allover. Not only in industry, it had a good reputation in the state.
Played a good role. Not a sufficiently strong role, because we were more
into organizing and consolidating our union. We weren't into really
plunging into the political situation, which is what we should have
done. But that reflects pretty much the people who are leading it--me,
for one. Here I was--as far as the nonelected people, I was a leader of
the union--and was organization oriented and bread-and-butter oriented.
I'm not really political; I'm not knee-deep into the politics,
unfortunately. If we had had someone like that, we would have played
more of a role in the political life of Ohio, because we were very
influential in the state. But, in any event, we did a fair job and had a
good union.
1.5. TAPE NUMBER: III, SIDE ONE AUGUST 21, 1987
- FIERING
- Because I think we just instinctively knew that our survival depended on
retaining the close relationship with workers, and the way to do that
was the bread and butter job. And we did it, we did a very excellent job
on that. UE [United Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of America]
had the best contracts in the state. As a matter of fact, now here's an
interesting story. That reminds me of this story I told to USC
[University of Southern California]. They've got it as one of the
experiences they've got in their book [The Homefront: America during
Wor1d War II]. You know what they did. They did a thing on the
fundamental changes in the country during the war years, how the war
changed the U.S. from '41 to '45.
- DONAHOE
- I think you showed me that book, yeah.
- FIERING
- That was one of the things they picked up. I think it was just before,
or maybe after, the war started when [Franklin D.] Roosevelt issued his
executive order on fair employment practices. It was the first FEP[C]
[Fair Employment Practices Committee] order that was ever issued. You
couldn't get Congress to pass it, so he issued an executive order. And
with that, the plants--well, they were drafting a lot of the young
men--the plants started to run into shortages of man power and woman
power, and the Hoover Electric Company plant in North Canton [Ohio],
which had been lily-white ever since it started, ever since there was a
town, had brought in some black women to work there. I'm up in
Cleveland, my headquarters was up in Cleveland at that time. We had the
state kind of divided. I was handling the northern half of the state,
and Art Garfield was handling the southern half of the state and
Kentucky. And so I get a call one day from the president of the local.
He says, "Henry, our plants have shut down and walked out. The company
just hired some black women." So I said, "Jesus Christ." "We can't do
anything with it." He says, "Everybody's out and they're refusing to
work." I said, "I'll be down." So I called up the guy in Cleveland who
was connected with the FEP[C] office there, a black guy, told him the
problem, and asked him to come down with me, because I wanted a
government official with me for impact. We came down to the plant, met
with the committee and the company, and before we had that meeting, we
had a meeting with the committee and I told them, "Now look, this is an
executive order of the president, this is the law,. It's not a question
of what you like and don't like, you have an obligation to tell your
people that they have got to do this." And they said, "We can't." They
were scared to--well, there was hysteria. You don't know what hysteria
is. I saw my first experience with a lynch mob. I never knew what a
lynch mob was except for what I read in the papers. This was my first
experience with a lynch mob. So I said, "You've got to go out there and
tell these people this." They says, "We can't, we're not going to go
out." So I says, "Well, let's meet with the company." So we met with the
company, and the company is sympathetic with us and they say, "We want
to do what we have to do, but this is the situation. You've got to do
something about it." So I turned to this guy, who was a black guy from
the FEP[C] and I says, "Do you want to speak to these people?" And he
says, "No." He didn't want to speak to them. And justifiably. I mean, of
all the people, I should have had more sense than even to ask him or
even think he would. He was scared to death, he was shaking. Well,
that's only one alternative that leaves and that's me. I says, "I'm
going out and I'm going to face those people." I don't know whether it
was I didn't have any sense or not, but I had a very strong feeling
about my relationship with those people. I just negotiated their first
contract, and it was a beauty. Not only that, I'd won a very important
arbitration case right after the contract and they won, oh, hundreds of
thousands of dollars. The company thought I had screwed them. The fact
is, as far as the workers were concerned, my standing was excellent. So
I just took it for granted that I could go out and talk to them. So I
went out and I got on a soapbox or some damn table. Here's a couple of
thousand people surrounding me, and I open my mouth, and those people
start screaming at me and threatening me and calling me everything under
the sun. They loved me just ten minutes before that.
- DONAHOE
- Really?
- FIERING
- Hey, listen, there's interesting things that happen. And the more I
stood there the more determined I was that I was going to have my say
and I was going to win this goddamn thing. So for about two hours we
went back and forth like this. And these people were hysterical,
hysterical. I had never seen and never have since seen a group of people
in that shape. If a black had walked in there, they'd have strung him up
right then. And I took on the whole goddamn bunch, and the more time
went on, the quieter it became, and eventually I convinced them to go
back to work and to accept the situation.
- DONAHOE
- How long did it take you?
- FIERING
- It took me a couple of hours. They went back to work, the black women
went in and worked. The company continued to hire black women, and those
women became the highest-paid women in Ohio during the war. They made
more money than any plant paid any women in Ohio.
- DONAHOE
- Because of when you got the comparable pay and everything?
- FIERING
- No, it had nothing to do with comparable pay, had nothing to do with
equal pay. See, they had incentive systems at the time which were
piecework systems. That's one of the ways I beat the company in an
arbitration case, see. I had a wording in there which was just ideal for
the workers, and the piecework system paid off in such a way that they
became the highest-paid women. The rates in the piecework system. And
with this they built a hell of a good union.
- DONAHOE
- And that was in North Canton?
- FIERING
- Um-hm. What an experience that was! I'll never forget it.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, so with that we were talking about what your wife [Clara Wernick
Fiering] had been doing also while all these elctions were going on.
- FIERING
- My wife worked for--she was a business agent for a big General Electric
[Company] local in Cleveland, which is called NELA Park. That stands for
National Electric Lighting Association. That's got a long history about
how General Electric bought up some independents and created this big
complex, the center of their bulb manufacturing industry, and they
called it NELA Park. It was set out like a park too. She became a
business agent of that local, and with that she rose in the whole GE
setup in the UE and was a member of the national negotiating committee
and was one of their best negotiators. In fact, she wasn't the GE
coordinator, but she was the best negotiator that they had. In fact GE
made an approach to the officers of the union. They called [James J.]
Matles, [Julius] Emspak, and [Albert J.] Fitzgerald, had a special
meeting with them and said they would like to hire Clara to be their
personnel director. She wouldn't have to face the union or anything,
just be the personnel director, because they said she was the nearest
thing to Frances Perkins that they had ever seen.
- DONAHOE
- Oh my goodness.
- FIERING
- She was quite a woman. As I said, she subordinated her life to me, which
was a tragedy. If I was smarter then, I would have subordinated my life
to her.
- DONAHOE
- Maybe you did, you don't realize it.
- FIERING
- She was extremely capable, very capable. She was the best organizer I
have ever seen. Excellent negotiator, excellent leader, excellent
leader. She did stuff with people--I'm pretty good and if I would have
to say one person who was better, she was.
- DONAHOE
- You must have learned from each other too.
- FIERING
- Well, I suppose we did. We'd sit--That was one of the problems we had
with the kids. My kids, by the way, are Maxine [Fiering DeFelice], Fred
[Frederick Fiering], and Bobbi [Roberta Fiering Segovia]. We'd sit there
at supper, you know, and we'd talk back and forth, having a lively
conversation about the union. The three kids would be sitting there
listening to us and not involved in the conversation much. They remember
that to this day. But they evaluate it as being competitive, see. That's
the way it came across to them--that we were competitive. And they
reminisce about that to this day. And two of them are now in middle age,
but they won't let me forget this. They felt left out.
- DONAHOE
- So you were on the General Motors [Corporation] Conference Board and she
was--?
- FIERING
- She was on the General Electric Conference Board.
- DONAHOE
- General Electric Conference Board. Okay. And like, all this time, all
these years you were building a strong union movement in that whole
area.
- FIERING
- Well, anyway, there were all kinds of expe¬riences. I suppose if I start
thinking back about indi¬vidual things that you're involved in, in the
organizing-¬you just constantly organize. You have staff people involved
in the campaigns, and I was there; I was in it with them. I participated
in a lot of organizing. In that two-year period we organized--I have to
start figuring the numbers out--from '41, '42, '43, I think we organized
about ~75,000 to 80,000 people.
- DONAHOE
- That's when you said you had about sixty-six, sixty-seven elections.
- FIERING
- Yeah, sixty-seven elections in 1942 and 1943.
- DONAHOE
- Now, this was during the war. How was the war? Obviously it's not taking
away from the organizing campaigns. What about the no-strike pledge and
these things?
- FIERING
- Well, we did it within--Life is not a smooth path, you know. I mean,
just because you've got a no¬strike pledge doesn't mean you're going to
sit on your fanny and take a beating. You don't call formal strikes, but
nevertheless, you're not going to keep the people from reacting to
grievances. If they are severe enough, they'll react in severe ways.
They'll either have slowdowns, or stoppages of work, or walkouts. Well,
that's what happened as a matter of fact, with the GM [General Motors]
plants. They had that, they walked out one time. But that stuff goes on
all the time. You still have a no-strike pledge, so you don't have a
normal strike. You don't take a strike vote and have a regular strike.
- DONAHOE
- How did most of the people that you were in contact with feel about it?
- FIERING
- I think they were sympathetic to it because the war was the major thing
in everybody's life. But you're not going to take a lot of crap just
because you signed a no-strike pledge. You're not going to let the boss
kick you in the face. And you are in a good position because you've got,
to some degree, government backing for continued production, but you
also have a shortage of man power, so, you're in a good bargaining
position. So if a boss goes off the deep end once in a while and you hit
back, chances of your coming out okay are pretty good. You're not about,
you don't have to worry too much about more severe reprisals like
discharge. Once in a while you do have a discharge, but then, at that
time, of course you had the creation of the National War Labor Board.
The War Labor Board was pushing arbitration into all contracts so you
have an out; you could go into arbitration. In some cases, an employer
had to discharge people as an example. He had to. So you go to
arbitration instead of fighting inside the shop to get the guy back to
work. And if you had a good enough case you won it, and if you didn't
have a good enough case (and in some cases you didn't), it was deserved,
discharge. The guy lost and people accepted. But the war was the main
thing in everybody's life then. Whatever you had to do to keep
production up, people were sympathetic to that.
- DONAHOE
- But you found ways of getting around that?
- FIERING
- Oh, yeah, you don't put your people in a strait¬ jacket; you don't tell
them you're going to suffer all kinds of what do you call it. But, you
see, there were a lot of grievances being built up during the war and a
lot of purchasing power being built up during the war, and when that war
was over, there was an explosion. Then there was a whole rash of
strikes.
- DONAHOE
- Nationwide.
- FIERING
- That's right. GM was one of them, and I headed up the GM section--the GM
strike in UE--and at the same time that the UAW [United Automobile
Workers of America] was out. Matles was the main contact guy with GM in
Detroit, and I was secretary of the conference board. used to head up
the negotiating committee. Matles was a very, very clever operator, very
clever strategist, and at that time, for instance, right after the war
(this was in '46) steel went out, rubber went out, auto went out, UE
went out in GE and Westinghouse [Electric Corporation]. The UE GM strike
didn't come until much later. And the general pattern of agreements was
eighteen and one-half cents an hour.
- DONAHOE
- I remember that.
- FIERING
- Remember it? And [Walter P.] Reuther got hung up. He got into a box on
nineteen and a half cents an hour, and the company came in with
seventeen and a half cents an hour. They were perfectly willing to
settle, but it meant one of them would have to compromise. And neither
of them wanted to be the first to offer compromise because it would look
bad. It was a face-saving thing, see. Somebody had to. So here is UE
sitting there on strike also. So we went in and we settled; we didn't
have that hang-up about nineteen and a half cents. We just go in for a
general increase that is satisfactory. Everybody else settled for
eighteen and a half and here's Reuther with nineteen and a half, see,
and GM with seventeen and a half for auto. So here comes UE and says,
"We're arguing for more and more money," and finally says, "We'll settle
for eighteen and a half," and GM says, "We are settled-¬eighteen and a
half." That broke the back of UAW. They settled for eighteen and a half,
for which Reuther never "forgave" the UE. It was an excuse for him.
- DONAHOE
- I know he was very angry.
- FIERING
- Very "bitter," publicly.
- DONAHOE
- Because that broke the pattern or something?
- FIERING
- Of course not. It was the pattern, and it made sense. He got himself in
a goddamn box, and the people were out for a penny.
- DONAHOE
- A penny.
- FIERING
- And they suffered. You know, they were out for several weeks for a
goddamn penny.
- DONAHOE
- One hundred and twenty days.
- FIERING
- Well, yeah, but they didn't have the eighteen and a half cents until
toward the last several weeks.
- DONAHOE
- What about the other--? I know Reuther, that was when he made his big
demand that GM should open the books to prove that they couldn't afford
it.
- FIERING
- Yes, that was in 1946, I think.
- DONAHOE
- Yes, this was the same strike.
- FIERING
- This was also '46. *[Now you remind me of the chronology of events. Its
an interesting story, because that strike propelled Reuther to the UAW
presidency. The strike was another tool for him in that drive. If my
memory serves me correctly, he jumped the gun on everyone being the
first to strike with a perspective looking to the best settlement in the
basic industries. In the meantime with the auto wokers still out,
everyone else was settling for eighteen and a half cents. UE was still
in the shop at its GM plants, assessing the situation. We moved
cautiously so we wouldn't be caught with our people on the street and no
voice in a GM settlement in auto. When we knew GM and UAW were
deadlocked and we could be a factor in a settlement, we pulled our
people out. Then after a one-month strike, we moved in to make the
settlement which Reuther had to accept. Now, on the "open the books"
issue. Reuther added that to his demands for PR purposes. No one felt he
was serious about it being a make-or-break issue in a settlement. But
what happened was that he was able to get huge mileage with the national
community around that issue and in the end was left with a two-cent
difference between him and GM and "open the books." The books issue
caught on with the strikers so that it enabled him to hold them in line
over a one-cent compromise. So in settling with GM and selling the
settlement to the strikers, he blamed UE for undercutting him and
withdrew the "open the books" issue but filed unfair practice charges
with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) against GM. The important
thing was he carried the strikers with him all the way and then to the
convention. We weren't hung up on the "open the books" demand. We were
interested in a settlement. It was a farsighted proposal because
eventually that point did win; it became legal. The NLRB later ruled
that it was a legitimate demand and companies had to open their books. I
don't think Reuther was that serious about it when he first proposed it.
But it made great PRe You have to understand how Reuther used the
demand, "open the books." It never was a serious demand. When the CIO
(Congress of Industrial Organizations) leadership agreed on a common
money demand, twenty-five cents, that was the number one issue--money.
Reuther then came up with the "open the books" demand to put GM on the
defensive. But as the other industries negotiated the eighteen and a
half cents, Reuther felt the ground being cut under him. So he kept the
"books" issue alive. He did a hell of a PR job on it, and it helped hold
the strikers in line and GM on the defensive. It won a lot of public
support. He needed a good second issue to get a better wage settlement
than anyone else. But GM would have folded before they'd cave in on
that--at that time. So when settlement time came and he had to accept
the eighteen and a half cents, he carried his membership by announcing
he was running to the NLRB for justice on the "open the books" demand.
On the other hand, the job he did in the strike, in my opinion, was
what forced the NLRB to rule favorably. I think it's important to point
up the significance of the General Motors strike to the changing
complexion of the CIO. The UAW was critical to the right or to the left
in determining the course the CIO would take. Reuther gambled in pulling
GM workers out ahead of the pack and with goals that would exceed the
other CIO unions in wages and benefits. Yet at the finish line, GM
workers were on strike months longer than other industries, and yet had
to settle for the same eighteen and a half cents which they could have
gotten much sooner. Reuther, using the strike, became the foremost
figure in the UAW a~d arguably even over Philip Murray as a popular
workers leader in the country. He went on to the presidency of the UAW
and, allied with Murray, weighted the power relationships so heavily
against the left, so as to make possible the dissolution of the left in
the next couple of years. We can speculate as to what might have
happened if the left-wing and the R. J. Thomas forces in the UAW exposed
Reuther's opportunism and challenged his strategy of the strike and
negotiations and his use of GM workers in his bid for power and defeated
him for the presidency. But they were paralyzed into inaction. The UE
didn't go out on strike in GM until UAW had been out for several weeks
or months and the signs of a settlement in the basic industries were
already clear. Prior to UAW going out, Reuther contacted Matles to try
to arrange for joint strike date. Matles was always wary that Reuther,
Phil Murray, et al., would look for a way to hang us out to dry and that
corporations would love to join them. Matles agreed to a joint strike
and proposed a joint strategy and an agreement that neither union would
settle without the other. Reuther refused this condition, so UE delayed
striking until we could see playing an independent role instead of a
tail to the UAW. In the meantime, steel, electrical (GE &
Westinghouse), and rubber were settling. Reuther, as part of his drive
to power in the UAW and CIO, seemed bent on the "best" settlement of any
agreement that had been made. As UAW and GM, moved towards a deadlock,
UE finally made its move and went out. UE was out one month. GM needed
to find a way to break its deadlock. UE and GM, like with UAW, moved to
seventeen and a half cents and nineteen and a half cents. But unlike
UAW, we were not set in concrete. UE, nego¬tiating independently,
proposed (Matles) to GM (Charles E. Wilson, GM president) a settlement
of eighteen and a half cents. The two committees (UE and GM) met in
Detroit and signed a tentative agreement. When it was announced, GM
could then propose it to UAW. They had to accept. And Reuther could
accuse the UE of selling him out. It was a bizarre situation with the
settlement figure as plain as the nose on his face. I have to admit
though that he handled it well with the GM strikers. He kept the support
of the strikers behind him all the way and into the convention.] Of
course, I have to say this for Reuther. It was a farsighted proposal
because eventually that point did win; it became legal. The National
Labor Relations Board then ruled that companies had to open their books
to unions. * Mr. Fiering added the following bracketed section during his review of
the transcript.
- DONAHOE
- I didn't know they ever got that ruling ever.
- FIERING
- Oh yeah. Oh yeah.
- DONAHOE
- Because I thought they just said, oh, no way, and then that was the end.
- FIERING
- No, there was eventually a decision by the National Labor Relations
Board on that issue. So while it wasn't the issue that settled that
strike, later on it stayed alive, and we were critical of it, you know.
Our differences were politics, political--left and right politics. (It
wasn't really right-wing politics.) But we sought to translate our
political differences into union differences. So we pooh-poohed it and
we said Reuther stinks, and he's selling out workers with this kind of
demand and all this crap. And when he came out with the demand for
guaranteed annual wage, we said the same goddamn thing, and here he
comes in with a 95-percent wage guarantee. This was the compromise, his
guaranteed annual wage demand, I think in 1950.
- DONAHOE
- Which wasn't bad.
- FIERING
- Damn right it wasn't bad. Damn right it wasn't bad. But I feel foolish
that we said he was selling out the workers with that kind of demand,
you know. It was stupid, stupid.
- DONAHOE
- Well, it seemed at that time with Reuther that demand to open the books
doesn't seem like it was a bad demand. I think it was pretty good, you
know, that he was saying, "You say you can't share your profits, but let
us see your profits." But later, around that same time with this
management's rights clause really became--How was your feeling about
that with UE?
- FIERING
- Well, again, what we--Now I understand the management's rights clause.
At that time, all we could see was management's rights. And if Reuther
was for it, we were against it, it was a sellout. When actually we today
can understand management's rights, what it is. It's not that you are
for it or against it. What essentially it is, is that when you open a
contract negotiation--all of management's rights are on the
table--everything that is bargainable by law. And you get whatever
you're strong enough to carve out of management's rights. Whatever you
can't carve out, remains management's rights. So they still technically
have some "management's rights"--whatever you weren't strong enough to
force them to give up.
- DONAHOE
- But over some very important things like profit investment and
productivity.
- FIERING
- Well, so, if you're strong enough you can carve it out when you're in
negotiations. Those are two bargainable issues. If not, you suffer for
the contract period whatever it is that you had to concede. You are not
strong enough. Like any other bargaining, it doesn't make any
difference, you didn't have to talk about management's rights. Some of
the complications came in long before that time. Well, before the whole
arbitration process became stabilized as to what the parameters were for
an arbitrator too. But before that time it was kind of wide-open
arbitration. An arbitrator could rule almost anything. And if there was
no firm guideline in the contract to follow an arbitrator could go far
afield and decide whatever he wanted on the basis of what he considered
"equity." So that if you put in a management's rights clause and
proscribed "management rights" as outside his purview, an arbitrator
couldn't go outside the contract like he did before. The "arbitration
clause" contained that limitation. But that was coming anyway; the
arbitrators themselves were coming to that conclusion. So it was really
another thing: Reuther said it, it's no good, it's a sell-out. And we
were caught in this goddamn peculiar bind of every time these people say
it's good, we say it's no good, it's a sell-out. We are more militant
than them, therefore, we're not going to go that route. Of course, this
1s hindsight, you know. If you had to do it today, it would be done
over. It would be different. Of course, Reuther would do his thing
different, too, because-¬
- DONAHOE
- Probably.
- FIERING
- --he admitted he was wrong, he had made mistakes with his red-baiting.
- DONAHOE
- So, in other words, you're saying that there were times when you didn't
examine the issue closely enough. You just kind of got clogged by what
you thought was the right political path.
- FIERING
- There was no really thinking through. But there was not really that much
experience either, you know. Everybody was in a learning phase. We were
learning. Now, make speeches about management's rights in teaching
stewards what it really is. It's an eye-opener to them. They see it in a
whole different light, whereas before they were afraid of a management's
rights clause all the time because they thought it put them in a
straitjacket. I teach them what it really is, and they love that
education. Now they approach negotiations in a different way. They see
management's rights is not an instrument to castrate the unon, to leave
them powerless. [recorder off]
- DONAHOE
- We will pause at this point and take up next time, I guess, still around
the war years?
- FIERING
- Well, I'll start thinking about more stuff during the war years. It
wasn't until after the GM strike that I went South.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, then we can get into the southern organizing campaigns.
1.6. TAPE NUMBER: IV, SIDE ONE AUGUST 28, 1987
- DONAHOE
- We're on the war years.
- FIERING
- The war years and the experiences I had in Ohio and Kentucky. And I used
to get into upper New York state with General Motors [Corporation] and a
little bit into . Indiana, because it was very close to where I lived in
Dayton at the time. This was symptomatic of the tremendous growth of
both the CIa [Congress of Industrial Organizations], a continuation of
what went on in the thirties, and particularly the UE [United
Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of America]. And it sort of
endorsed the type of organization the UE had--the policies and
principles of the rank and file. It was a very much admired union, much
admired union.
- DONAHOE
- Really based on rank and file participation?
- FIERING
- Yeah. It was a minimum of factionalism at the time despite the fact that
there was a lot of red-baiting. But because of the atmosphere of the war
and the fact that the U.S. and the Soviet Union were allies, it was
minimized. It wasn't a big deal, but it reflected itself in the
affection workers felt for the organization. But it stimulated a lot of
rank and file activity, the kind the country had not seen before, not
even in the thirties-political items. While we were active in a sense
politically, it was the usual, I think now what we would call
participation in the ordinary politics of the country--an attempt to
emphasize the power of the unions which were seeking a bargaining
position with the political parties. But it also stimulated a lot of
rank and file workers, members of the union, to get into politics, run
for office, which was new. Something that the country had not ever seen
much of before. People just popped up who had talents--Not necessarily
an organized campaign searching out people around you. People who had
the talent got into the political arena, ran for office, and were
elected. It was an unusual period. But talking about the no-strike
pledge, there were stoppages of work. Employers tried to take advantage
of workers. The position of our union, which compared to some other
unions, was a lot different. We went in there and decided to try to
resolve problems by settling the issue that troubled workers. We didn't
do what some other unions did, which was go down there and order workers
to go back to work. That kind of policy, in fact, was contrary to our
policies. So the UE was looked upon in the community as an ideal union.
The kind that people always wanted to have. And of course, it was
reflected in its successes. What else can you say about that?
- DONAHOE
- So they actually were really integrated into the communities.
- FIERING
- Oh, yes.
- DONAHOE
- Because people were running for office.
- FIERING
- Oh, yeah, the union was well integrated. It was a factor. It's 8 funny
thing. It was integrated into the community, well, it was integrated
into the community. In the smaller communities, it was well integrated
because there was not much competition with other labor unions because
we were the big union. Usually there was a big electrical shop we
organized. In the larger communities we--Well, I wouldn't say we
operated separately or in isolation from the other unions. We didn't do
that; we wanted to operate together with other unions. But other unions
were a little bit afraid of us. They were jealous of us, too, by the
way. We were not as totally integrated as we would have liked to be, but
it was not entirely our fault. But I'll say, the leadership of the other
unions kept us to some degree at arm's length, and also the red issue
had an impact in their relationship with us.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, like say about this time, you start hearing about the change in
social unionism, where the union is involved with the community and
social issues are important, and the transition to business unions.
- FIERING
- Yeah, well, but even what you call the business unionists, they still
felt that they still played a role in the community. Their social vision
wasn't what ours was. But the attitude of the leadership of the other
unions-what you'd call a business union--was to a large degree a job.
But they were felt a part of the community and tried to playa role in
the community but not pushing the community on social issues the way we
felt about social issues.
- DONAHOE
- So you took the lead kind of on that--?
- FIERING
- Well, we organized the union for bread and butter and realized that was
the essential thing in bringing people together, but we' had a
perspective on the role of the union on the inside that other unions did
not have. And, of course, that was where we drew the line between social
unionism and business unionism. The ordinary business agent, for
instance, of another union or leader looked upon his job as a job, and
all you had to really be concerned about was whether the workers had
good contracts every now and then and, for himself, whether he was a
part of the establishment and accepted by the establishment. Pushing
labor's point of view, but in the establishment. It was a little--not a
little--it was a lot different than the attitude the UE had in trying to
remold the society in a sense. That was kind of heavy in a way, but that
was what we dreamed of, that was what we thought about.
- DONAHOE
- But there wasn't, like you said, a real concerted effort to get workers
involved politically. They kind of did it on their own?
- FIERING
- A lot of it they did on their own. There was no-You didn't have to. Once
you lowered the bars and you turned people loose, people were there to
express themselves in all kinds of ways, and one of them was
politically, running for political office. They were ambitious. They
had opportunity, they had backing, they were willing to follow
constructive programs.
- DONAHOE
- So it gave them some kind of confidence.
- FIERING
- Oh, yeah, sure.
- DONAHOE
- From the union.
- FIERING
- Their involvement in the union opened up new vistas for them that they
had dreamed about but never thought possible until the union became
established. It was quite a period. It was an exciting period. Now, of
course, there were some social issues in which we took the lead on. One
of which was equal pay for equal work for women--women's issues.
- DONAHOE
- That was very important.
- FIERING
- Race issues, because [James T.] Matles makes mention of the women's
issues, the equal pay for equal work. He mentions specifically
Westinghouse [Electric Corporation] and GE [General Electric], but there
was also General Motors where I was involved. You see, he was there. We
had a committee on each of these. We had our hearings at the National
War Labor Board, and they represent the national setup. We had attorneys
there, Matles was there--he participated. But it was those two decisions
brought down particularly in General Electric and General Motors. The
two that were implemented--the only two that were implemented. And one
of them, my wife [Clara Wernick Fiering] was involved in General
Electric in negotiating the results of the War Labor Board decision with
GE. And I was the one negotiating in GM [General Motors].
- DONAHOE
- That was extremely important. UE was the one that really took the lead
on that comparable pay.
- FIERING
- UE took the 'lead on it.
- DONAHOE
- I don't think the other unions picked it up.
- FIERING
- It's interesting. The UAW [United Automobile Workers], we used to try to
work in tandem with them, and oftentimes, there may have been issues in
which we had worked in tandem and we may have had a set of demands. And
we may have had one issue that they didn't have. And if that was the
case, they picked up our issues. And if they had issues we didn't have,
we picked up their issues. This . was true in General Motors' case. And
so we both appeared jointly at the War Labor Board. In one case
involving skilled workers, I represented the UE and [Walter P.] Reuther
represented the UAW. That set of skilled workers and special demands
that they had. But it was interesting that on the women's issues, on
equal pay issues, the UAW didn't pick it up.
- DONAHOE
- Now, during the war years, a large section of the workers were women and
minorities employed in basic industries because of the war.
- FIERING
- Large, large numbers of women and for the first time large numbers of
black workers.
- DONAHOE
- And they weren't by and large getting equal pay?
- FIERING
- Oh no, they weren't. As a matter of fact, I am thinking about-
- DONAHOE
- Hear about Rosie the Riveter and everything? [laughs]
- FIERING
- I'm thinking back on both cases, the GE and GM case, the principle was
not just equal pay on the same job. The principal was really comparable
worth, what we know today as comparable worth.
- DONAHOE
- Right, I keep using term comparable pay and I was thinking of comparable
worth.
- FIERING
- They're two different issues. The equal pay for equal work on the same
job is one issue. Now, there was an Equal Pay Act passed in 1963.
- DONAHOE
- 'Sixty-three?
- FIERING
- 'Sixty-three.
- DONAHOE
- And we're talking forties.
- FIERING
- This was the forties, almost twenty years earlier. Nineteen forty-four I
think that was passed--that the War Labor Board decision came down. In
1943 the case was heard, so we're talking about twenty years. And, on
the other hand, we are talking about another equal pay issue called
comparable worth. Now, the issues involved in those cases twenty years
previous were not equal pay for equal work on the same job. They were
really comparable worth issues, which was like--what is this, the
eighties?-forty years ahead of its time. Because it's just now that the
union is beginning to crack through. Like the case up in San Jose with
AFSCME [American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees]
and SEIU [Service Employees International Union] cases. That's a whole
different bag. You have to understand the difference. Do you understand
the difference?
- DONAHOE
- No, you should explain it to me.
- FIERING
- The equal pay issue on comparable worth involves assessing different
jobs on the basis of a same set of standards, see. Now, they're
completely different jobs, but the same set of standards are used to
assess their value. Now, equal pay for equal work on the same job-we're
talking about the same job. For instance, you can have a laborer and a
stenographer on a comparable worth issue. That's two different jobs. But
the criteria for measuring the values of each of those jobs has to be
the same. In other words, how much education is involved, how much labor
is involved, how much skilled work is involved. Those are the set of
values that you-
- DONAHOE
- Okay, so the equal pay for equal work, like say it's a man and a woman
are both pipefitters. Then you're trying to evaluate them the same.
- FIERING
- And now, a woman would get less pay than a man for being a pipefitter.
- DONAHOE
- But then that was challenged.
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- But comparable worth is a traditional woman's job would be evaluated
with a traditional man's job and trying to use the same criteria
for-
- FIERING
- Measuring the value of the job.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, I see the difference now. It's a much more advanced-
- FIERING
- Oh, far more and that is the big issue now in equal pay.
- DONAHOE
- I keep using them interchangeably, but I see the difference.
- FIERING
- The women's movement today--that holds a lot of promise for raising
women's wages.
- DONAHOE
- That was the issue I think at Sears, and at Yale, and all these
decisions.
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, okay, I see the difference right now. And you were actually--?
- FIERING
- What it involved was comparable worth as well as equal pay.
- DONAHOE
- Back in '44, right.
- FIERING
- For the same job. They took it all together; we lumped it all together.
- DONAHOE
- But it's interesting. Like you hear so much about the women and the
minority workers during the war, and the steelworkers and the auto
workers--they didn't take it up at all.
- FIERING
- Not at all, not at all. Of course, steelworkers didn't have that many
women. They had some women in their plants. The basic steel industry has
very, very few women, so they weren't pressured on the issue. Auto had
considerable numbers of women.
- DONAHOE
- A lot.
- FIERING
- But UE had a hell of a lot of women. We had a lot of light work in the
electrical plants. And so it was a big issue there. Not the
comparable--well, the comparable worth issue was an issue but even more
so, the immediate, the more glaring issue of doing the same work and
getting less pay. But they were both issues.
- DONAHOE
- Now, what happened to these people after the war? Like I know in auto
and steel, they had agreements that for the people that went to the
war--the males--that their jobs would be waiting for them when they
returned and you had the same kind of--?
- FIERING
- Oh, yeah. Everybody had that. That was law.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, for returning vets.
- FIERING
- It was written in the contract, but it was also the law.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, I didn't know that.
- FIERING
- That a company had to hold a comparable job open for the male returning
from the service.
- DONAHOE
- So did a lot of the women and minorities have to leave?
- FIERING
- No, as a matter of fact, we were all concerned there was going to be a
recession after the war. When the war production would stop, the plants
would close up and millions of people would be thrown out onto the
streets. And I remember in Dayton we were trying to prepare for that. We
tried to tie it together with an organizing campaign we had at the
National Cash Register Company, which was the big unorganized plant
there, and we arranged a meeting with some officials in the Pentagon to
try to ease the conversion process so you would not have that-Guarantee
this plant work. And I had led a delegation to the Pentagon and met with
them--with some of the people in charge of war production to ease the
situation. But as it turned out, there was such a pent-up demand for
buying-there was so much money that people had saved up during the war,
looking for ways to spend it--that conversion was relatively easy. And
the war plants that had switched to war production from commercial
products, consumer products, could hardly wait to get back to consumer
products to take advantage of what was really out there. And so
unemployment was minimized. It was minimal. There were some dislocations
here and there. But on the whole, it was nothing at all like we had
feared.
- DONAHOE
- But in auto and definitely in steel, the women and the minorities were
kind of bumped out. That was just-
- FIERING
- Well, it wasn't true where we were. We didn't have much of a problem on
that.
- DONAHOE
- Well, that's good. Well, you were probably a union that was more
concerned.
- FIERING
- Well, I'm thinking of plants that I had to do with, the GM plants in
Dayton--Well, we had all three. In Ohio and there were a couple of areas
in Kentucky we had big plants at GE and Westinghouse as well as a big
concentration in Dayton at General Motors. And, shoot, we didn't have
much of a problem at all. If you had that kind of problem, how the hell
could you mount a strike like in '46, which was solid, solid. Of course,
it reflected a lot of pent-up grievances that the workers had, but
still, if there were large areas of unemployment, you would expect that
people would be afraid because somebody would, you know, worry about
what happens to my job. You didn't have that. When the plants shut down,
they went down solidly. No scabbing. The company didn't even try to hire
scabs because they knew it meant big, big problems for them. In fact, I
think we had discussions about it before the strike at Frigidaire
[Company] in Dayton about what were they going to do. And they said,
"Well, if they walk out, we're just going to shut it down. Not even
going to try to run the scabs through." They'd get big, big, big trouble
for that. There was such overwhelming support for the strike that
scabbing would be minimal and it would create havoc. So they decided to
sit it out, the only thing they could do. And that's what happened in
order. They didn't try and pull people out and keep plants from
operating, because workers were on their muscle; they felt strong. And
the companies were hot to get back into production.
- DONAHOE
- I bet. You know, it's interesting that the union really grew during the
war years-
- FIERING
- Oh, tremendously.
- DONAHOE
- --with organization when it was still like so many of the workers were
in the war. And yet, you were still able to organize these plants, and
there was that spirit still. That's very interesting.
- FIERING
- Well, that reflected a couple of things. First of all, it was a
carryover from the Depression and the upsurge in organization was very
east[ern], that was one thing. And if there was work, it carried on into
the forties, because there was work. And secondly, you had a good
objective situation for organizing: plenty of work, and people were in
demand.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, so after the war, then the strike broke out in '46 and all of you
were out together, right?
- FIERING
- Everybody was out for a twenty-five cents an hour raise. That was the
big thing--fantastic raise.
- DONAHOE
- And there was still a war labor board, wasn't there?
- FIERING
- In '461 No, there was no war labor board then.
- DONAHOE
- There was something because [Harry S.] Truman ruled something with the
steel-
- FIERING
- No, that was something else. I don't think it was with steel though. I
don't think it was with steel. It was with coal miners.
- DONAHOE
- I thought steel also. You said the steel companies, if they negotiated
such and such a wage package, then they could only raise the cost of
their steel a certain amount. They were arguing about that.
- FIERING
- Oh, that was--what the heck was that?
- DONAHOE
- It was Truman, I know, but I couldn't-
- FIERING
- It might have been a war production board or a wage price board.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, there was something that seemed still in effect.
- FIERING
- I think it might have been a wage price board. That might still have
been operating. But the War Labor Board went out of business in 1945 at
the end of the war, as may have the War Production Board.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, okay.
- FIERING
- But my memory might be somewhat fuzzy. I'm pretty sure there would not
have been that strike if there was a war production board, but the same
authority you had during the war. But everybody went out. All the basic
unions were agreed on one approach: twenty-five cents an hour was the
goal. Twenty-five cents an hour was like-
- DONAHOE
- A lot.
- FIERING
- Oh my God, undreamed of--that kind of a raise. And of course we settled,
steel settled. I think we settled in GE and Westinghouse strikes. We
couldn't settle in General Motors because of UAWi we had to go in tandem
with them.
- DONAHOE
- They were out for like a 120 days?
- FIERING
- They were out a long time, yeah,
- DONAHOE
- I think steel was out for about a month. UE must have been out-
- FIERING
- We were out for just about a month, not more than that. About a month,
yeah. And we thought there might be a settlement, so we hesitated going
out. But the thing got complicated between Reuther and [Charles E.]
Wilson, who saw that there was no alternative, Reuther had his own
agenda. We couldn't afford to settle. First of all, we didn't want to
appear to be undercutting UAW. We didn't have a settlement offer that
was acceptable. In fact, I think--I'm just trying to reconstruct the
damn period. think Reuther went out before anybody.
- DONAHOE
- Well, I think they started in November 1945. November they went out.
November something--the middle of November right before Thanksgiving
1945.
- FIERING
- Yeah, I think steel settled on the way somewhere.
- DONAHOE
- They didn't go out--until I think January of '46, so auto was out by
itself for a while.
- FIERING
- Yeah.
- DONAHOE
- But I'm not sure about UE and rubber.
- FIERING
- UE was out for a month in I think it was March or April. They all had
settled for eighteen and a half [cents an hour]. And the gap narrowed
between UAW and GM. And at a certain point, we saw there was going to be
difficulties and we went out. And then, of course, when the gap narrowed
to seventeen and a half, and nineteen and a half, then UE worked out the
eighteen and a half settlement. So Reuther had somebody to blame.
- DONAHOE
- Said you undercut him?
- FIERING
- It really took him off the hook, because it was the most fantastic
situation. I was in Detroit with the committee and Matles came in from
New York. And I remember we were sitting there and we were waiting for
GM to come in and start. The rest of the GM committee was in there and
they're waiting for Charlie Wilson to come in. That guy looked like he
had been through a wringer. You know you think these guys are cool and
calm and they know what they're doing. He looked like he was punchy.
Reuther really had him going. Of course, he probably had Reuther going
too. But Reuther really had him going. He looked like he was punchy when
he came into that negotiating session. And we sat down and worked it out
in short order. Matles on the phone really worked the thing out as to
how it was going to be and we went kind of through the motions, see. And
so we got the eighteen and a half and everybody shook hands all the way
around and then we had to wait and see what was going to happen.
- DONAHOE
- And Reuther was there while you were agreeing?
- FIERING
- No, he wasn't. Oh, no.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, okay.
- FIERING
- They were out. They knew we were meeting, you know. Matles had called
Reuther to tell him UE was meeting with Wilson. It was really a courtesy
call. But I'll never forgot that meeting. You think of these guys that
run these big companies as cool and calm, like they know what they're
doing. They don't know what the hell they're doing. They don't know
where it's going to take them anymore than the labor union knows where
it's going to take them.
- DONAHOE
- Really?
- FIERING
- This guy Charles Wilson--I will never forget the expression on his face
when he walked into that room. He looked like he had to carry himself.
He was ready for a settlement and he was glad somebody was there that
might take him off the hook.
- DONAHOE
- So the UE felt that demand for nineteen and a half was--?
- FIERING
- Well, you had a ridiculous situation. Neither of them could make a move
because of loss of face. It wasn't the two cents. It didn't mean
much--or the penny. It was really a penny. Because they both knew
eighteen and a half would settle it, but neither of them could propose
it because each thought they would lose face if they proposed a
compromise--Reuther if he had retreated from nineteen and a half and
Wilson if he advanced from seventeen and a half. It was a funny damn
thing, and here the workers were out on the street.
- DONAHOE
- Waiting.
- FIERING
- It's supposed to be a big matter of principle. Two principles--two
cents. Or one principle--one cent.
- DONAHOE
- But what about the other demand? Like how did the UE view that at the
time about the "open the books" demand that he was also holding fast on?
- FIERING
- Well, the UE, that was a funny thing about the UE and Reuther. Was the
"open the books" demand in '46?
- DONAHOE
- Yes.
- FIERING
- Well-
- DONAHOE
- With the penny.
- FIERING
- The UE looked down its nose at that; it ridiculed Reuther for that. Why?
Really because it was a more conservative position. We took a more
conservative position than he did. Why? Because it was Reuther. See, we
couldn't afford to let a social democrat be ahead of us. I know I felt
that way, too. Though in the long run, he won the issue.
- DONAHOE
- No, he lost that one.
- FIERING
- Not there. But in the long run, later on he got a decision in favor of
it. He pursued the issue and he won it. No, there in '46 it was settled
at eighteen and a half and there was no opening of the books or
anything. Well, he threw it in because it in had a lot of appeal. But it
turned out that he then grabbed onto it and held onto it, so it had some
practical value too. It helped broaden the issues in the strike to hold
the rank and file in line. It would have been difficult to do that if
the only issue holding out 35,000 strikers was one cent or two cents.
And so in successive years, that contract I think was in 1950, and I
think it was as well that contract, the decision had come down from the
labor board or the courts that opening the books was a justifiable
demand. It was within the realm of collective bargaining. But, hell, he
was looking for that publicity and he did win a lot of sympathy with it.
He was great on PRe You have to say that, the guy was great on PRe But
we looked down our nose at it. We knew it was a ploy. Because when one
penny is separating the party, what are you doing to do? Somebody's got
to make the move then. So, anyway, that was a good experience.
- DONAHOE
- That was like the closest thing we've ever had to a general strike?
- FIERING
- General strike, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- All the basic industries were out and so many workers across the
country.
- FIERING
- But the objective situation was just so favorable that it didn't take a
hell of a lot to make industry pay them. And there were good contract
terms in addition to the money.
- DONAHOE
- That were negotiated frOID this, yeah. And the involvement of the public
was tremendous too. People were very sympathetic to the workers.
- FIERING
- And see, that was to a large degree, well, because labor was positioned
well 1n the national community. And I've got to say it, Reuther did a
hell of a good PR job. The "open the books" demand won a lot of sympathy
and helped hold the workers in line.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, GM was not looked upon as favorable.
- FIERING
- That's right. They had made a killing in the war.
- DONAHOE
- Yes. But that was so different in how the strikes were conducted in
those days, like really involving the community and having rallies,
picnics, and you know just-
- FIERING
- Well, it shows you another thing. See, look how the political
differences served to split the unions apart rather than bring them
together. What it did, it separated us further from UAW, which was
really a sister union--the union closest to us. It gave ammunition to
Reuther. It just intensified, used it to justify his red-baiting, so the
UAW people could holler sellout. And it should have had just the reverse
effect, if it had not been for the political differences.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, because that was a point where there was a chance, like you said,
to work really closely and start promoting a better unity and instead
it--the steelworkers, don't think would have even gone along with it.
- FIERING
- Even where--You know, the thing about the Middle West, which was the
industrial heartland of the country, you had UE, and steel, auto, rubber
all within the same communities--close communities--and you couldn't get
everybody working together 1n a strike at that time. They each did their
own thing.
- DONAHOE
- Oh really? They didn't even work together in that way?
- FIERING
- There was no unified strategy in a sense. On the lower level there was
no unity. I don't know to what degree there was on the top, but I think
it was minimal. But there was certainly contact at the top because you
had one CIO. And you might say that before Phil [Philip] Murray made a
settlement, he probably called up everybody and said, "I'm ready to make
a settlement on eighteen and a half. I'm going to make a settlement." He
told the other unions. Just like Matles would have called Phil Murray
and told anybody, "Look, he's the president of the CIO." The UE would
have done that just so we were sure we would have touched bases all
around so that we can't be accused of going off and undercutting
anybody. But that kind of thing was done. But I'm talking about the
communities.
- DONAHOE
- Well, yeah, that's what I thought there was.
- FIERING
- You had no working together. You might have been thrown together in the
CIa council and everybody was on strike there--you know, they had the
delegates there--but in terms of like say one strike committee
representing all the unions for the community-
- DONAHOE
- Well, see like in Los Angeles, which you know would be a different
setup, but they were all out together here, and they did have joint
rallies and more communication--the auto workers, steelworkers, UE-
- FIERING
- Not in '46.
- DONAHOE
- --in '46, yeah. Because I have the records that they had these joint
rallies, but they had their separate strike committees.
- FIERING
- Well, you had to have strike committees anyway.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, but they seemed like they worked together more than they ever did
in later years.
- FIERING
- Well, you didn't have anything out here that affected anything in the
Middle West or the East. Not as far as UE was concerned.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, but I would think you would have so much-
- FIERING
- And not as far as [United] Auto Workers were concerned either. You had
aircraft plants here, but was not the industrial heartland of the U.S.
You had U.S. Motors here, but that had nothing to do with the national
picture.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, yeah, but I just always thought that in that strike there was a lot
of cooperation among the workers in the local.
- FIERING
- There may have been. The CIO setup here was left-leaning by the way. The
CIO leadership here I think was somewhat to the left at that point in
Los Angeles.
- DONAHOE
- So maybe they made more of an effort.
- FIERING
- But you see L.A., outside of the ILWU [International Longshoremen's and
Warehousemen's Union] and during the war years, the establishment of the
aircraft plants--And, of course, you can't discount the machinists who
were in the AF of L [Americ~n Federation of Labor]. They had no contract
and they were competing with UAW. The coast was a farm area, an
agricultural area. We didn't feel it. I don't know if there is anybody
around from UE in that period. There were a couple of guys in the
forties, but you didn't hear about California and UE back in the Middle
West. There's nothing of significance.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, yeah, yeah. But the only point that I was surprised [about] was when
you said that it wasn't a real concerted effort, that you didn't have
that kind of cooperation. Because I thought in the forties it was
different. Didn't UE make an attempt to reach out to other unions?
- FIERING
- Well, thinking back, my bailiwick was Ohio. We didn't because we didn't
need to. Wherever we were we were the power. We were the big ones. Well,
of course, in Cleveland you had everything. You had General Electric.
You had General Motors, the Fisher Body plant for GM there. I don't
remember--it's a long ago--if there was a Ford [Motor Company] plant
there. You had a Fisher Body plant. [pause] That's the only big
community I can think about where you might have had that kind of thing
but I don't think that even there, there was the cooperation among the
union management of each international. And where I worked--well, in
Mansfield, Lima, Cincinnati, and Dayton, Ohio--there were big
Westinghouse and General Motors plants. Warren, Ohio, a GM plant, we
just ran our own shop. We didn't need anybody. So, you know, I'm not
blaming them. There were political divisions that carried on all during
the period when there was red-baiting, sharpened up during the war when
Reuther became more and more of a factor in the UAW. But it helped to
kind of make us feel self-sufficient. There was no need, put it that
way. We didn't feel impelled to do it to survive. We were big enough to
survive.
- DONAHOE
- But given your outlook-
- FIERING
- Take a town like Dayton--shoot, the whole population of the town was
something like between three and four hundred thousand men, women, and
children, and we had over thirty thousand out on the streets--thirty
thousand workers. What do you need? We were a power in the town.
- DONAHOE
- But in terms of your outlook in promoting solidarity and all those kinds
of things.
- FIERING
- We didn't think of--Well, that was one area of my own where I was very,
let's just say unaware. I was really a, well you've heard the term,
"economist." You know, that was me, really. My thing was bread and
butter shop grievances, I didn't care too much for--Well, I supported it
because I was the international rep in Ohio and all of that. But I knew
my easiest way to go to protect my union. And so I survived it. I just
wasn't into the political thing. I did what had to be done, put it that
way. Other people came forward politically with the political action. I
helped them on whatever they needed to support them. But myself, I
protected my union's economic position. That was my style. Other people
went other ways. [pause] I regret it now, but-
- DONAHOE
- So in this period, like during the strike, each kind of union was just
protecting its own?
- FIERING
- That's right. It had its own thing. And even though they worked in
communities right adjoining each other or the same community, it did not
happen. And, of course, it was a mistake on our part because we should
have pushed for it. It would have gotten us closer to the other unions.
It would have perhaps made our whole political relationship better too.
We didn't.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, there's something else I want to ask you about that. Now how did
this-
1.7. TAPE NUMBER: IV, SIDE TWO AUGUST 28, 1987
- DONAHOE
- So when did the southern organizing drive actually begin?
- FIERING
- Well, that began the middle of '46. Phil Murray was getting together the
unions to penetrate the South. This was not long after the war, you
know, and everything was on the upgrade and he figured that this was the
time to crack the South. Thought that the South would receive the CIO
the way the northern worker had received the CIO. So I was assigned by
the UE to be part of the southern organizing drive. We had some budding
key plants down there and some other industries down there. We had in
Winston-Salem [North Carolina], not in Winston-Salem, but around
the--Well, Western Electric was building some plants, one in
Winston-Salem and one in I think it was Burlington, North Carolina.
- DONAHOE
- I was going to say North Carolina.
- FIERING
- And there was an RCA [Radio Corporation of America] plant in Virginia.
There was the Union Carbide plant in Charlotte, North Carolina. There
was the Singer [Company] plant in South Carolina. Some industry we had,
but, of course, the idea was for cooperation among all the unions and
doing everything they could do to organize. The main target was the
textile mills. Murray assigned Van [A.] Bittner to head up the southern
organizing drive.
- DONAHOE
- What's his first name?
- FIERING
- Van.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, that is his first name?
- FIERING
- Yeah.
- DONAHOE
- I thought that was his whole last name.
- FIERING
- I always thought that it was his last name, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- Van Bittner like Dutch.
- FIERING
- That's what he used to be called, Van Bittner like that was his last
name. Somewhere I learned that Van was his first name. Bittner was his
last name. This guy came out of the coal mines originally with [John L.]
Lewis. But he stayed with Murray when Lewis split with Murray. Lewis
left the CIO. Oh, by the way, that reminds me. The guy whose name I
[couldn't] remember--the guy who hired me in the CIO--his name was John
Doherty.
- DONAHOE
- Okay.
- FIERING
- John Doherty. Later he moved to Chicago and became a member of the
school board in Chicago. He has died since.
- DONAHOE
- So the CIO, their main emphasis was going to be to organize the textile
mills in the South, but they wanted the cooperation of all the unions.
- FIERING
- They wanted the cooperation of the other unions too, but each of the
unions had its own thing.
- DONAHOE
- Sure, sure.
- FIERING
- So I had a small staff down there with UE, four staffers and me. I was
on the UE payroll, and I had a small staff with the UE. They brought in
a couple of the natives, southerners. I was just a carpetbagger. So the
campaign got going, but this guy, Bittner was just a lot of mouth. He
just was lost for a guy to handle a campaign like that. His organizing
abilities were really not up to it. He was just a narrow trade unionist,
and that was not what was needed down South. At the time we needed
somebody with real vision, a political guy who was of the caliber of
Lewis if we really wanted to crack it. The South was just different.
It's not the South of today. They tell me it's just completely
different. When you crossed the MasonDixon line, you were in another
country, just another country.
- DONAHOE
- Especially in those days.
- FIERING
- Having lived in the North all my life, the closest I got to the South
was Saint Louis. And to go down there and see what they were doing down
there, you know, the mores down there, the people down there--just
another country. Not only did you have different kinds of people down
there, you had the small-town southerner who was very narrow and
bigoted. You had the hill people--the people who lived back in the hills
who had a history all their own. It was fascinating history. It was just
a fascinating experience for me, just a wonderful experience. I had some
great experiences too. And so the UE was in the midst of organizing a
plant that was a part of a big radio outfit in Chicago called
Bassick-Sack, and there was a guy who had kept going from the North to
the South, Will Bliss, who had already started organization there. I got
there close to the time of an election so I participated with them. We
won that election. The problem arose about--well, we negotiated the
first contract for a year. What the hell was that radio company? It was
a big radio company from Chicago. [Admiral Radio Company]
- DONAHOE
- You'll remember it later.
- FIERING
- Anyway, it was a subsidiary. And then we went on to Western Electric
[Company, Inc.] where we lost. Well, the long and short of it was we
lost the election at Western Electric. There were two plants
involved--one in WinstonSalem, one in Burlington. The NLRB [National
Labor Relations Board] ruled that both of them had to go together. We
were strong in one plant, and we were weak in the other plant. To
combine both is what killed us. We couldn't keep the voting separate.
Then I was servicing this shop that we organized, a little metal plant
that we organized in Winston-Salem, and traveling around to Virginia,
Tennessee, South Carolina, Charlotte [North Carolina] and also
cooperating with the Food, Tobacco, [Agricultural, and Allied Workers
Union of America] workers, who were running into great difficulties 1n
their contract negotiations, who had a contract with the [R. J.]
Reynolds Tobacco Company which was running out. They were facing a very,
very difficult situation. The FTA, which was also a part of the southern
organizing job, had great difficulty in recruiting the white workers.
You had a plant--you know, they made Camel cigarettes--they had a plant
with over 10,000 people, half of them black and half of them white. They
finally got boxed into a corner and they called a strike and all 5,000
blacks walked out and about 128 whites. I'll never forget that number.
Stalwarts, 128 whites. We played a role in that strike. When I say we, I
mean my wife and myself. I did, my wife volunteered. But I played a role
consistently because it was a part of the CIO. And we were a part of one
of the most fascinating strikes I ever saw. People were organizing on
the basis of their churches on their picket lines. That's how they held
the picket lines for--let's see, how long they were out? They were out
for at least a couple of months.
- DONAHOE
- That long?
- FIERING
- Oh, maybe more. They were solid, solid. Was my wife--? My wife was not
on the staff at the time. And then she was put on the staff. She took
over the servicing for that metal plant for a while. But, anyway, the
strike was finally settled--the Reynolds strike was finally settled but
a weak contract. The company gave them a contract and they figured it
would take another year to tear them apart, which was what happened.
- DONAHOE
- Now, those other like almost 4,000 white workers-
- FIERING
- Five thousand white workers.
- DONAHOE
- Well, I would say that about 128 went out so-
- FIERING
- Minus 128.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, whatever. Were they scabbing all this time?
- FIERING
- Yeah.
- DONAHOE
- And you still were able to stay out for a couple of months.
- FIERING
- Oh yeah. See, that's the peculiarity, because it was not just a strike.
As far as the black workers and, well, the white workers, too, it was
not just a strike over wages, hours, and conditions. It was a
race-related strike, too. Racial issues ran very, very deep on both
sides. What the black workers were fighting for was some measure of
equality. And that's what kept them out. I tell you, there's no place I
know that I would rather go on strike with a bunch of workers than in
the South. Once those workers--either white or black--make up their
minds, they really want to fight. When they make up their minds, they
will starve before they go back. Anyway, the picket line used to bring
people from miles around. The way in which they held those picket
lines--And they were mass picket lines all the way through. During that
period, Paul Robeson came down, Woody Guthrie came down. Well, they
would come down just to keep our spirits up anyway in the South. But it
assumed political proportions because of the black-white issue. I've got
a picture of a picket line somewhere around here, one of the picket
lines. The leading church elder or preacher would be in the middle of
the picket line and the people from that church would hold a certain
gate. That is the way the gates were held all the way around. And they
would chant slogans or church songs which were oriented to union songs.
It was the most moving experience. Not only blacks came down, whites
came down from miles around to see those picket lines. But you couldn't
budge the whites out. They were afraid more than anything. Not that they
didn't realize the need for support for the strike, but they were afraid
and it was the race issue that divided them. Well, anyway, they finally
settled the strike.
- DONAHOE
- Even with the majority of whites staying inside?
- FIERING
- With the whites staying in. They got a contract. The contract was a weak
one, and it really gave the company a lot of concessions which enabled
them to make inroads into the union over a period of the next year or
two, and eventually, of course, they destroyed the union. It is
destroyed to this day. They never could rebuild it. But, meantime back
at the ranch, the UE plant in Bassick-Sack was another kind of example
of black-white relationships. We had a young president there who was
white. Well, first of all the organizing of the plant and the
formulation of the first contract was a real experience for me. It was
different. Everything was segregated. That was the custom, segregation.
As a matter of fact, even with the unions, they didn't meet together in
one hall. The machinists, for instance, would have separate local unions
for blacks and whites. The landmark decision on the, what do you call
it, fair practices?
- DONAHOE
- Not the fair employment practices?
- FIERING
- Not the fair employment practices, but I forget and I teach the goddamn
thing. I forget what it is, what the initials are. It came out of a
fight, a decision in 1944 from the U.S. Supreme Court involving the
machinists where they had separate locals for blacks and for whites, and
separate seniority lists. The whole grievance setup was based on you had
to be a white. If you were black from Local B then you had to go to a
white steward in Local A to handle the grievance. As a result--the case
was Stee1 v. Louisvi11e Nationa1 Rai1road. The union was a machinist
union [International Association of Machinists]. And Steele was a black
worker who decided to challenge it, and he did and successfully. And in
'44 there was a U.S. Supreme court decision which determined it was an
unfair labor practice. If it wasn't corrected, the machinists were told
they would lose their bargaining rights. So they integrated--nominally
anyway. But that was the pattern throughout the South. Interestingly,
that decision, the duty of fair representation, has had impact on the
labor movement to this day.
- DONAHOE
- But the CIO unions weren't organized like that, were they?
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- They were?
- FIERING
- Yeah. When we organized, we had a policy and that is, there's no
segregation, no separation. If you want to organize with the CIO,
everybody met in one hall, and everybody was in one local, and everybody
was covered by one and the same contract. When we organized this
Bassick-Sack thing--and then the same experience--and went into the
contract negotiations, I was handling the contract negotiations by this
time. Will Bliss had already gone back North. When we called meetings of
the workers, the people would come in--and this went on during the
organizing drive, but it really was a process--blacks would sit on one
side of the room and whites would sit on the other side of the room. We
didn't say anything, we just let people sit wherever they wanted to sit.
We didn't make a point of saying--All we did was provide the hall. No
segregation. But they segregated themselves. So you hold a meeting like
that--this is an interesting process--you hold a meeting like that and
you involve people in discussions. Minimal discussions from the black
side, most of the discussions from the white side. In successive
meetings, you'd gradually see the blacks would then move into the same
section with the whites, but they would sit at the back of them. The
whites would be sitting at the front on both sections of the hall.
Gradually, over a period of time, the blacks moved forward and it became
mixed.
- DONAHOE
- Integrated finally.
- FIERING
- It was a remarkable process for me to sit back and watch that. I had
never seen that before.
- DONAHOE
- How long did it take?
- FIERING
- It took the period of the formulation of the contract in negotiations.
- DONAHOE
- It would be like months.
- FIERING
- Well, it didn't take months. I would say it took--during that period
everything was telescoped--so it took about, thinking back, five, six
weeks. Not too long, but you're holding meetings, you know, regularly.
And you're throwing these people together much more frequently than they
have ever been thrown--they had never been thrown together before, see.
So we had a young guy who was the president of the local, a young white
guy, by the name of Matthews. And, I would start to work on him on the
blackwhite issue, very gently. I would get into discussions with him to
get close to him, and I would use the occasion, whenever I could create
it, to point out to him why it is that races are separated. The basis
was economic, couldn't let that happen, it hurt them. I didn't push
hard, just very, very gently. But I maintained good regular contact with
him visiting him at his home. And we became rather close that way. And I
would be doing a job with the management so and he was there. And he
liked the job I was doing, so there was a certain degree of
friendliness, you know. He accepted what I had to say. He didn't agree
with me, but he accepted it. He found it hard to accept, but he listened
to what I had to say. He found it difficult to accept. But I kept
pecking away and pecking away. You never know what's going to happen. In
the plant, we had another white guy who was the chief steward. This guy
was the son of people who had participated in the Gastonia strike. Have
you ever heard of the 1929 Gastonia strike, North Carolina? It was a
terrific strike in the Gastonia Mills. It was led by the left wing, by
the way, 1929.
- DONAHOE
- So really early, right.
- FIERING
- Yeah, and he was just a little kid at the time. But he remembers his
parents' par~1cipation in that strike. And, of course, the left wing was
very strong on the racial issue. You never know how is it going to
affect the kid. Now he has grown to manhood and here he is in this shop,
he's one of our leading people, and he's elected chief steward. And he's
telling me the story about Gastonia. We get to talking about racial
issues and his attitude on the racial question is pretty fair, you know.
But how do you know until you test it out? During the course of the
enforcement of the life of the contract, an issue arose involving a
promotion. Now, it was an almost unwritten law that no matter what a
contract was like, when jobs opened for promotions, they were high-rated
jobs that a white would qualify for the job and a foreman would appoint
a white to the job. It was based on the condition set out in the
contract which might have involved seniority and so on and so forth. So
I also established good contact with a black guy who was the leader of
the blacks, but he was a janitor. I forgot the chief steward's name, but
I remember the black's name. Oh, I wish I remembered his name. He was
such a beautiful gem. But the black guy was Robinson; he was a preacher.
Very quiet, unassuming man. But he was a janitor in the plant like the
other blacks who worked on the menial jobs. So a job opened up on the
production line. I went to this guy Robinson and I says, "Listen,
Robbie, why don't you file for that job? Go ahead and do it." [He was]
very fearful about it. I kept pushing and pushing him. Finally, he did
it; he filed for the job. So when he filed for the job, Christ, the
foreman nearly went crazy. What does he do? Because he was in line for
the job. I told him, "Look, you are in line for the job. The contract
gives you the right. We don't have any discrimination in the contract.
Why don't you try it?" And, with him, it was more than just trying it,
because they had a lot to be afraid of as well as trying. And do you get
past that fear? Anyway, he filed for the job. When he filed for the job,
shoot, that foreman went nuts. So I had a talk with the chief steward
who was the contract enforcer. And we had an understanding that he was
going to support this guy. And the question was how do you support him.
Well, once Robbie made the first move, then the foreman went around, and
he got a petition up, and he went around to every worker in the
department. The petition said we don't want this guy to work with us. He
went to every worker in the department one by one and asked them for
their signatures on the petition. And when he started to do that, this
chief steward went with him. He wasn't asked, but he went with him. And
as the foreman went to the guy to talk about putting his name on the
petition, the chief steward says, "Don't put your name on the petition."
- DONAHOE
- So, he did come through.
- FIERING
- He came through.
- DONAHOE
- Strong.
- FIERING
- Very strong. Not only that, but he was so successful, the guy couldn't
get one signature on the petition.
- DONAHOE
- That's incredible .
- FIERING
- And that settle d that issue.
- DONAHOE
- So Robinson-
- FIERING
- He got the job. The first breakthrough for-
- DONAHOE
- Wow, fantastic.
- FIERING
- --integration on the job. But that plant offered some-
- DONAHOE
- Some lessons.
- FIERING
- --real lessons on what could be done with people if you work closely
with them. Then we went into the second contract negotiations. And it
was a hot negotiations.
- DONAHOE
- What year are you in by now?
- FIERING
- 'Forty-seven.
- DONAHOE
- Now you're up to '47.
- FIERING
- 'Forty-seven. This was also the year in which the FTA strike took place.
This was a hell of a year. The contract negotiations went around and
around and around and people came in from Chicago, the head honchos from
the main plant in Chicago, who were not hung up on discrimination
really. It wasn't their bag, because Chicago was different. It was a
northern city, and this was already the forties, and they had gone
through the experiences of the war and everything. We wound up the
contract one time I think it was four or five o'clock in the morning.
The first shift was scheduled to go on at something like seven o'clock.
The day before the workers had made the decision they weren't going into
work the next morning. They were going to set up a picket line and they
weren't going to start the work until they had a chance to vote on the
contract. Well, the contracts wound up at five o'clock; we all stayed
over for the next hour or two hours. As people came to find out what to
do, we says, "We wound up the contract, but we told the management that
nobody was going into work until one o'clock. So that gives us a chance
to meet, review the contract and ratify it." And everybody was happy
with that decision. We didn't have to start picketing. So about nine
o'clock we went up to the FTA hall and we had our meeting and the
contract was accepted. It was a good contract, but it didn't take long.
It was a good contract so it didn't take a hell of a lot of debate.
People then started to walk into the plant, you know, after twelve
o'clock, twelve thirty, to start work at one o'clock. I went home and
went to bed. I get a telephone call from this Matthews, the president of
the local. He goes, "Henry, we got some problems down here. We want you
down here right away." I said, "What's the matter?" He said, "Come on
down, I'll tell you about it." So I got dressed and went down to the
shop. And I found out what happened was that everybody had started to
work, but there were three blacks who had come in late and the company
had fired them. So Matthews greets me and he says, "I'm telling you now
we are not going back to work unless those three black guys go back with
us." The whole plant shut down.
- DONAHOE
- And he wasn't black.
- FIERING
- He was not black. As a matter of fact, next to the Reynolds, he was a
descendant of one of the largest slave-owning families in that area in
North Carolina. So his racial roots ran deep, they ran deep. I should
have mentioned that before. This was a guy who had deep feelings about
the race issue, and here he is telling me we are not going back to work
unless they go back to work. See the issue was not really just the
blacks then. It got mixed up with other issues. It was not just his
responsibility to all the workers, which he had and which he felt, it
was a question of his own integrity. He was the leader of the union, and
the company was doing this not just to the blacks, but they're doing it
to the union of which he is the president, see. So those issues get
mixed up, and, in this case, in a beneficial way.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, I know, it's good.
- FIERING
- See. But he's telling me we are not going back unless they go back with
us. Okay, I accept anything he tells me. I says, "Okay, let's go back in
there and have a meeting with the management." (And people from Chicago
were still in town.) So we go back in--the whole committee--and we're
talking to the management and I just turned it over to him, and he lays
the law down to the management: they're not going back unless these guys
go back. So everybody asks for a caucus. The company wants a caucus, we
say, "Okay, we'll go outside and caucus." We come back in the company
says, "Well, okay, I'll tell you what we decided. Instead of them being
fired, we will give them two days off." We said, "That's not good
enough." We said, "They're going back with us." So we fight some more
and argue some more and it went back and forth. And the company says,
"We'll take another caucus." We come back in and the company says,
"Well, we decided we are going to take them back, but we are going to
give them the rest of the day off. That's their penalty." They came back
somewhat drunk, by the way; that was the other thing. People had nothing
to do, you know, they had nothing to do the rest of that morning, so
they went into a bar. So he says, "We're just going to give them the
rest of the day off without pay. That's their penalty." So he [the local
president] says, "That won't do. They got to come back the way we came
back if you want us to come back." So we went at it again. Another
caucus. And finally the company caved in. It was a tremendous victory.
Tremendous victory.
- DONAHOE
- That is. That's incredible for such a short period of time.
- FIERING
- That's right. That's right. But it shows what can happen, what you can
do with people. And I send that up as a lesson to people about
southerners.
- DONAHOE
- So you had some very successful experiences.
- FIERING
- This was in the forties. Now, it just served to entrench our union all
the better in the shop. In '47, in that year, there was an election in
Winston-Salem for the city council. A black ran by the name of Williams
for the city council.
- DONAHOE
- For the city council, boy.
- FIERING
- We succeeded in getting the whites involved in this election campaign,
women and men. My wife did most of that. She was a poll watcher. And she
got some of the women involved in poll watching for this guy--and some
of the men--and he was elected. It was the first black elected to a
public office since Reconstruction in the South.
- DONAHOE
- Now, what town was this?
- FIERING
- Winston-Salem.
- DONAHOE
- Winston-Salem, that's a pretty big place.
- FIERING
- Yeah, the first black since Reconstruction. That to me was a historical
event and that we participated the way we did and that we got these
whites to participate.
- DONAHOE
- Wow. Now, how long were you there all together?
- FIERING
- I was there two years.
- DONAHOE
- Just two years.
- FIERING
- Yeah, because there wasn't much for us in the electrical industry down
there. We had lost the Western Electric shop.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah.
- FIERING
- But then we went through another experience. There was a--Oh, I traveled
around. South Carolina, I went down to a little town called Pickins.
Now, you know, Pickins is named after General Pickins of the Confederate
army, which is right outside Greenville, South Carolina. There was a
Singer [Sewing Company] sewing machine shop down there, which was a
subsidiary of Singer Sewing in Cleveland. And we, one guy or two guys,
had written our national office a letter about UE, so I went down there
to check it out. And I got down there, it was just very shortly like a
matter of less than two weeks after a lynching had taken place. And
that's another thing. You walk into a town where there's a lynching and
the atmosphere is just thick, just thick, a horrible experience. It was
a lynching that made the papers nationwide. I forget the name of the guy
who was lynched, but it was in Pickins and the atmosphere was just
indescribably heavy, it was very heavy. So I went in very quietly and
unobtrusively, made no noise, you know. I made contact with one of the
guys whose name had. He came to see me and I gave him the name of the
second guy and they said they were going to let me know, they were going
to get back in touch with me. I stayed at the hotel. They came back, I
think it was one or two days later. They says, "Oh, we were contacted by
the Ku Kluxers [Ku Klux Klan] and they sent you a message." They said,
"Pack your saddle bags and get out of here right now." I had no base
there. They advised, "Get the hell out. Get out." So I did. I had no
base, nothing to fight with. I wasn't about to make any noise or be a
hero by myself, so I got out. But that's an experience, I just had to
relate that in. The way he carried the message to me: "Pack your saddle
bags. Get out." I won't forget the phrasing.
- DONAHOE
- And didn't say carpetbagger?
- FIERING
- He didn't say carpetbagger. I can't forget the phrasing that he used.
"Pack your saddle bags." Anyway, we had another plant we were organizing
up in--what do you call it--Pulaski.
- DONAHOE
- Pulaski?
- FIERING
- Virginia.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, Virginia.
- FIERING
- That's in the western corner of Virginia.
- DONAHOE
- I was thinking of Michigan.
- FIERING
- If you know anything about that country, that's the hill country.
Fascinating people, fascinating country, beautiful country. RCA
[Corporation] owned that plant. They were using the plant to build
cabinets, radio cabinets, because we didn't have TV yet then, see. So I
had a guy in there, and he started to make a break in there in signing
some people up and the organization started to move along. The thing
about the area was it was an agricultural area, and it was set in a
walnut forest. That's what was being used to make cabinets; they were
making walnut cabinets. When we got along to filing a petition for an
election, we filed the petition for an election. But before we filed a
petition for an election, while we are struggling to get to a
majority--It was right over the hill, right over the Blue Ridge
Mountains from, you know that cuts off Virginia from the Piedmont
section of North Carolina. Well, I was in and out of the place in the
organizing drive. Finally, one day I get a call from this guy who was in
there helping. He says to me--he lived with me in Winston-Salem
also--no, it wasn't from him, it was one of the workers who called me at
home on a Sunday. He says, "You better get in here. I says, "What's the
matter?" He says, "Well, we just got a copy of the Sunday newspaper and
there's a big article about you in it." I said, "Okay." I got an idea
what it was about if he said it was about me. I hightailed it in there
and I take a look at that paper. It was a full-page ad put in by some
rump group with my name right in the middle, a big box, and [it reads],
"This man is a well-known communist. He is in our town now." A whole
page.
- DONAHOE
- Ad?
- FIERING
- Yeah, it was an ad. It was in the newspaper.
- DONAHOE
- Sounds like a wanted sign.
- FIERING
- It was, but here's this-
- DONAHOE
- Not a picture?
- FIERING
- And not a picture. They didn't have a picture of me. What do you do?
This is a town which if you know--do you know anything about the hill
people in the South?
- DONAHOE
- Just that they keep to themselves and they have their own set of rules.
- FIERING
- Very much. They have their own set of rules, keep to themselves--Well,
you know where they're from. They are people who were descendants of
indentured servants who escaped. They ran away from the East and hid
back in the hills where nobody could find them. They raised families
generation after generation there since the period before the
reVOlution. And they have their own mores, their own code, you know.
- DONAHOE
- I know. They don't even recognize the laws of the government.
- FIERING
- They are highly individualistic, highly independent and keep to
themselves. Difficult to get next to. But if you ever win their loyalty,
they will absolutely do anything for you. But winning their loyalty is
very important. They are very suspicious of outsiders, let alone being a
northerner--very suspicious. Anyway, so here's an area whether you are
either--there's no middle class. You are either very rich, or you're
very poor. That's where I learned how to drink white lightning.
- DONAHOE
- Is that the homemade?
- FIERING
- That's homemade brew. Also, homemade beer, too; they make their own beer
too. I've never drank it before. But I developed a certain loyalty among
the members, because we had a pretty good campaign going.
- DONAHOE
- You were by yourself?
- FIERING
- Well, I had this one guy who was with me who was on the UE staff in the
South. He also went in there, but the responsibility was mainly mine. It
was not my assignment, I took whatever--This was a key plant, so I had
to take it on by myself. But I was responsible, and I was the one
attacked when the attacks came.
1.8. TAPE NUMBER: V, SIDE ONE AUGUST 28, 1987
- DONAHOE
- Did the workers call you in?
- FIERING
- Yeah. This was after the war. A number of the people had become a little
more sophisticated and recognized there was an outside world. I think
somebody there made contact with our national office and that's how we
got our first contact in the plant. I don't think it was a case where
the national office knew of all the RCA [Corporation] plants and sent us
in cold. I don't think that was the case. I think we had a connection
there, somewhere to start with.
- DONAHOE
- You went there. You must have contacted somebody.
- FIERING
- Sometimes you didn't. I've gone into towns where I didn't know anybody
and walked up to a plant--during the war--walked up to a plant, made my
contact right there and then, and went from there. When I walked away,
there was a contract in the shop. I've had that kind of experience too.
- DONAHOE
- But this is so unusual. I mean these kind of people.
- FIERING
- These kind of people--it would be unusual, yeah. We must have had a
contact that had been sent to us.
- DONAHOE
- So you remember working with some of the people?
- FIERING
- Oh, yeah. Well, we had to build a union. Wherever we started from, we
had to do it with the people. We built an organization a certain way.
You get the people together. You get a committee together. You start
organizing. You develop your committee; you develop organizational
departments. Build as you go. But the area itself was a typical hill
country area. The community itself--the area was either rich, and you
had enough money, or poor. Workers were paid miserably. The plant
manager had previously owned the plant and sold out to RCA. In return
for which he got not only money for the plant, but he got a guarantee of
a job as manager of the plant for a number of years, which later became
a pattern in a lot of industries. Interestingly, when this son of a
bitch came into town, people had to get off the sidewalk to make room
for him. Now, that's literally true. It sounds ridiculous today, but
literally true. People were scared to death of this guy.
- DONAHOE
- He was like nobility.
- FIERING
- That's right. He was the nobility. And you had a Republican and
Democratic Party that were controlled by the same people. It didn't make
any difference. Same people controlled both parties. So they had a
monopoly on the situation. We had to confront that one time. We had a
meeting talking about that. Of course, by the time we got through with
that bastard, he was afraid to come into town. But that's another story.
We'll talk about that later. Anyway, here I am. Suddenly, I get this
telephone call to come in, so I came into the town. See, I'm not trying
to politicize this much at all. I'm just really giving you my own
persona1--I'm aware of that. I don't know if that's really-
- DONAHOE
- No, this is good because it's giving me specifics, too.
- FIERING
- So this was a Sunday, April 12. God, I remember that date. Because I'm
thinking about what the hell can we do to counter this thing. This was
Sunday. We had to counter it right away, because the guy told me that
it's having an effect throughout the area, throughout the town. When you
holler "communism," they didn't know how to spell it. But they knew the
word, you know, and it created all kinds of feelings among them.
- DONAHOE
- This is the ad.
- FIERING
- This is the ad, right. And I had to do something immediately. So April
13 was Jefferson's birthday. That's how I remember. It was April 12, the
phone call from Pulaski; it was my daughter [Maxine Fiering DeFelice]'s
birthday. I had to leave her birthday party. April 13 was Jefferson's
birthday, and Jefferson was a hero in Virginia. He still is, he was
always. So I immediately rushed to the radio station and logged on some
time the following day. It was the first opportunity I ever had to
answer. I stayed there that day and wrote a speech that I was to deliver
on the radio the next day. The speech centered around Jefferson,
Jeffersonian democracy, the fight against colonialism, the role of big
corporations in the North coming down to the South and raping the South
of their wealth and taking profits back to the North while they were
paying workers in the South low wages. The impact of that speech is one
have never experienced before and haven't experienced since, and I don't
know of anybody that has. There was only the one radio station in the
area. They were telling me after it was over that people in the
restaurants, people in the poolhalls, people everywhere, whatever they
were doing, they stopped doing it to listen to the speech. It was one of
those unforgettable events in my life. Whatever they were doing,
everything stopped in the town to listen to that speech. When I got
through and I left the radio station and started walking through the
town, everybody in the town was going like this [raises a clenched
fist].
- DONAHOE
- Really?
- FIERING
- [laughter] Honestly to God. It was the damnedest thing I ever saw.
Damnedest thing I ever saw. Christ, there wasn't enough they could do
for me. It just struck such a responsive chord. From that time on, we
just kept rolling. We got a majority, and we filed a petition for an
election. During the course of the hearing with the [National] Labor
[Relations] Board examiner I pulled a ploy--a stupid mistake. I decided
to put some pressure on the company and on the examiner arid suggested
to people that they slow down and start moving towards the hearing room
to put pressure on to get an election right away. Because the company
was going to stall us while they were going to tear us apart. If you
know anything about labor board procedures at that time, they didn't
have to consent to an election. They could delay it. In order to ask for
a hearing--The hearing takes time. In the meantime, they were tearing
the hell out of the union. We wanted to avoid that. We felt by putting
pressure on, we could get them to consent to an election immediately.
Well, that was really a blunder. The result of which was the company
decided they had the sympathy of the examiner, because she wasn't about
to be pushed around either. And they saw that, and they fired 163
people. So here I am with 163 people fired, and the examiner didn't even
continue to hear the meeting. She adjourned the meeting. So, we didn't
have a hearing either.
- DONAHOE
- Why did they fire them?
- FIERING
- Because they left their jobs without permission.
- DONAHOE
- I see.
- FIERING
- It was a stoppage of work. Unauthorized. In a way, of course, I suppose
it could have been considered legal if they had walked out. But we
weren't in a position to fight that issue at the time because nobody was
thinking of a strike. So we had to do something with 163 people. Well,
what could you do? The only thing you could do--it was all or nothing.
So we called a strike. The rest of the people said we've got to support
those people. The only way they could support them was to walk out. If
we hadn't, we would have lost the plant. The plant employed almost 1,000
people, which was a big plant at that size.
- DONAHOE
- So you were backed into that action.
- FIERING
- I was really backed into a corner. So we played the militant role, and
we say we're going to go out to support them and all of that, and we
did. We walked out; we shut the plant down. After a couple of days,
however, the company was working, and these people had got frightened
and some of them started to go back. Within about two or three days,
they had about 300 of those people back at work. We had everybody out,
see. They had about 300 of them back at work, and I had to make some
decisions. Because if it was going to go on as it was, the whole strike
was going to deteriorate. Break up and the union with it. But
fortunately, the way we had built our union, we built our union on a
good solid basis, the way you organize. You set up an organization, you
get leadership and a department, another organization with a leadership,
and tie them together. You wanted to know how you build a union. [It]
stands you in good stead under all circumstances. Inside the shop and
out, you can fight anytime, see. You don't just sign people up on cards,
but you're fighting for conditions at the same time. That's how you
build a union.
- DONAHOE
- An involvement.
- FIERING
- An involvement. That's inv olvement. How else can you win?
- DONAHOE
- Exactly.
- FIERING
- So we had a good solid organization. We had about forty stewards in that
shop. I called a meeting of the stewards. I says, "Look, let's try this
strategy. If we continue on the outside, we're going to lose this thing.
The only way we can fight is on the inside." I suggested the following.
I says, "You guys who are the key guys should go back into work. After
you guys go into work, we'll send the rest of the people back into work.
But, before you guys go back into work, we're going to clean up some of
these guys who scabbed. And they had Virginia police allover the
goddamn--Virginia State Police, you may have heard about them. You don't
hear about them today, but they were rough, rough, rough. We had some
arguments on the picket line. Christ, they'd come with shotguns. They
don't just come there with their pistols in their [hands]. They come
with shotguns. And they collar a couple of people. I come running over,
and I want to defend those people. So they took me down for--first of
all, they threatened to kill me. Pointed their goddamn shotguns. Then
they took me in for about fifteen minutes, and they released me soon
enough. But they let me know quickly if I stepped out of line once, that
was going to be my finish. And they could get away with it. At that
time, it was like the Pennsylvania Coal and Iron Police in the thirties
and the pre-thirties, they could kill anybody with impunity.
- DONAHOE
- Right.
- FIERING
- They were rough. It was frightening. Anyway, so we got the thing set up
so that when these stewards went back in, we had shown some strengths.
We cleaned up on some of them so that when our people went back in they
went back in on a high note. I also advised the stewards to be friendly
to everyone and build bridges. And then the next day, we called
everybody together and we says, "NOW, you guys go back in. We're going
to carryon this fight inside the shop." And everybody marched back into
the plant, see, except the 163 people. But it was upbeat, see, because
of what they had done the day before. We had our leadership all set as
to what to do, and they carried on the fight from the inside and the
company continued producing. But they couldn't ,get anything
satisfactory off the end of the assembly line. People went in. They used
knives for one reason or another, and they had some other tools. And as
those cabinets came down the line they were smashed to bits, and the
company used to sell them for firewood. They couldn't use them; they
couldn't produce. This went on for about two or three weeks and the
company was tearing its hair out. They finally approached the union for
a settlement. They wanted to settle. They agreed to reinstate the 163
people, and they agreed to an election. [laughs] With that bit of news,
our guys went back. The 163 people went back, and we had a consent
election a week or two later by the labor board. No hearing. And we won
the election 839 to 3.
- DONAHOE
- To 31
- FIERING
- To 3. And nobody figured there was even going to be three people against
the union. And they found out who the three people were because two of
them had to sit there and represent the--When you give out ballots and
count the ballots, you have to be on both sides of the fence: one
representing either a neutral party or no union, and one representing
the union. They found out one of them that way, and then they found out
in the shop who the other two were. The next morning after the election
they met them at the door coming into the plant, gave them their walking
papers, turned them around, and sent them home. But that was the
election, 839 to 3. However, before that, we had to take on both
political parties. We thought we could at least work with the Democratic
Party in there. But the Democratic Party was no different than the
Republican Party. They were controlled by the same people. We tried to
get a meeting hall. They had a community center that was built by--I
forget whether it was donated by the Republican or Democratic Party. I
think it was the Democratic Party. We thought we could get that. So we
made arrangements for that for a meeting hall during the course of this
whole organizing thing. We get up to the meeting hall and we found out
somebody had come there earlier and had asked for the key. Said he was
from the meeting and absconded with the key and had put an announcement
on the radio that the meeting was postponed. And we're there and hardly
anybody shows up. What the hell do you do? So we had tremendous sympathy
in the area because of that radio speech. That radio speech was
just-mean, I'm telescoping things and moving events one ahead of the
other. These instances, they rise in my mind. They're so memorable. We
had one old guy who was the father of one of the workers who went up and
down--what do you call the "hollers" [hollows among the hills], the
hills hollering--He had a general store. Picture a general store with a
little potbellied stove in the middle. A little potbellied stove there
and all the candies, groceries, and everything around it. And he went up
and down those hills hollering [that] there was going to be a union
meeting tonight at "my general store." And finally, he got a meeting
together for us. It was very helpful organization--to talk to people
just before the elections. It was one of those memorable events. By the
time we got through, that plant manager--Oh, one of the conditions of
the settlement here was--Like I told you when they settled my strike in
my plant, they wouldn't have me back. One of the conditions RCA insisted
on imposing when the election was over and the contract was going to be
negotiated, I would not be in the negotiations.
- DONAHOE
- They wanted to get rid of you.
- FIERING
- They wanted to get rid of me. The international-
- DONAHOE
- But you wouldn't be part of the negotiations.
- FIERING
- I would not be a part of the negotiations. The international agreed to
that. They found it very easy to agree to that.
- DONAHOE
- How did you feel?
- FIERING
- I felt lousy about it.
- DONAHOE
- Especially negotiating the contract.
- FIERING
- There was nothing I could do about it.
- DONAHOE
- Did you work with the people who negotiated? Did they allow that
- FIERING
- Of course. 1 worked with them. I still was working with the local union,
but [1 was] going in and out of Pulaski.
- DONAHOE
- Because you knew the people.
- FIERING
- I knew the people. But that didn't [matter]. I wasn't down there much
longer after that anyway, and I had other places I had to go. Anyway, I
made a lot of friends there. It lasted for quite a while.
- DONAHOE
- One thing, I just wanted to ask. Like these are really memorable
experiences. You really made trememdous breakthroughs with all these
different examples. How do you think they were able to sustain a lot of
these things. Were you able to find out afterward? FIERING Yes, yes. I
think where I built the union, I can say this, where I built the union,
where the plants survived, the union survived. Pretty much everywhere
that I built a union.
- DONAHOE
- It seemed like you were building things with the idea of you leaving and
them being able to carryon after you left, which is the strongest way to
build it.
- FIERING
- I think I can say wherever I built a union, the union survived. Now, it
may not have always been the UE [United Electrical, Radio, and Machine
Workers of America]. A lot of the unions took off after the split on the
red-baiting issue.
- DONAHOE
- That's true. That happens later.
- FIERING
- This was one of those plants. Matter of fact, on the racial issue, this
was an all-white area, all-white manned. I understand a couple of years
later they brought some blacks into the plant. A few people raised an
awful rumpus. But that was not even an issue when I was there. There was
not a black in the region.
- DONAHOE
- Because they were all people that lived there.
- FIERING
- That's right. So I said that plant manager who was king before this all
started, he didn't show his face at all in town when it was allover.
People would walk up to him and spit in his face. People who were
fearful. What a change in the people.
- DONAHOE
- Well, did they make any impact with the political parties after that?
- FIERING
- I don't know. That I don't know. Because by that time I was gone. They
probably had an impact. But it would be speculation somewhat, of course.
They were a strong, strong bunch of people. When I got through with
them, you could imagine what the experiences they had been through, the
struggles. What a strong bunch of people. Focus, perhaps a little
narrow, but it was inevitable when you're participating in a community
that you're not going to be involved in from the community level. We
succeeded in recruiting some CP [Communist Party] people out of it. But
how lasting that was, it's hard to say. I think in a couple of instances
it was lasting. A couple of people took off from there, moved to other
places. Otherwise, it's hard to say.
- DONAHOE
- So, when you left this town, were you still in the South?
- FIERING
- Yeah.
- DONAHOE
- So you just moved on. FI~RING: See, I'm picking some of these
experiences which were particularly memorable.
- DONAHOE
- They had many important lessons.
- FIERING
- : But, not necessarily in order. One other experience I had in the plant
in Tennessee--Bristol, Tennessee. A plant where we also had one contact.
Somehow, we got his name. I went and I organized the plant. It was a
small plant about seventy-five to one hundred people.
- DONAHOE
- What kind of plant was it?
- FIERING
- It was an electrical [plant]. It made some metal-
- DONAHOE
- It wasn't like RCA?
- FIERING
- No, no it was not a big plant. But the employer when he first heard the
union was coming, that was UE, he really took out after us and he
conducted a vicious redbaiting campaign. My name was involved. I became
the target of that campaign. The question was--Then all of a sudden he
felt strong enough, as we were approaching the election--as we were
approaching the period when we could have an election--to issue a public
challenge to me to debate him in front of all the workers. What do I do?
I knew how he had built up to it, had built a terrific redbaiting
campaign. He figured he had people all ready to hang me. So the only
thing I could do was accept or else run away, one of the two. I said I'm
not going to run away. I'm going to meet him on his own terms, something
I hadn't done before, but I figured anything goes in this case. So he's
sitting there, he and I in front of the whole shop and the workers, and
he's saying to me, "Well, do you want to speak first, or do you want me
to speak first?" I said [to myself] I'm throwing down the ground rules
so this guy can't--"I'll speak first." So I got up and I spoke. And, I
did the reverse red-baiting job on that son of a bitch. That bastard, he
could barely crawl out of that goddamn meeting. I just tore him up. I'd
say it was not a positive approach. On that issue, it was a negative
[approach]. It was kind of reverse red-baiting. When we had the
election, we just won it hands down. After we won the election, this guy
was so humiliated he closed the shop. [laughter] He closed the shop.
That was an experience. But, on the other hand, there was a radio
subsidiary [Magnavox Company] in Johnson City, Tennessee, where the CIO
[Congress of Industrial Organizations] had signed up some people, and
then I learned about it and I wanted to go in there, because it would
have belonged to the UE had I gone in there. I confronted the
management, I say, "I'm from the CIO." He knew the difference between
the CIO and the UE. He stalled me, on the understanding that I would be
back. When came back, he had his workers all organized, and they met me
in front of the shop. That was an experience where I learned that I
could run backwards as fast as I could run frontwards. [laughter] I had
to talk my way out of that one to get out with my skin alive. That was a
rough experience. But I survived it. And we lost it; we didn't even make
it. In fact, that plant then remained unorganized until after 1950 when
the IUE [International Union of Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers]
eventually organized it.
- DONAHOE
- A long time.
- FIERING
- A long time, yeah. This was the beginning of 1948, end of '47. Then we
had another bad experience. The same goddamn thing with us in the Union
Carbide [Corporation] plant in Charlotte, North Carolina. The CIO filed
a petition when we weren't ready, and that was another plant that should
not have been lost.
- DONAHOE
- Under what grounds were they organizing, under the general CIO? Didn't
you have to have a specific union within the CIO?
- FIERING
- Not necessarily.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, I didn't know that.
- FIERING
- You could sign them up on CIO cards, and the CIO could file, or any
union with the CIO could file on behalf of the CIO.
- DONAHOE
- I didn't know that the CIO-
- FIERING
- Or they filed on the behalf of us as the CIO. On this particular
thing-
- DONAHOE
- They filed on behalf of the union.
- FIERING
- And it was accepted by the NLRB. But you see the schism had already been
growing at that time. And this guy by the name of [Bill] Smith was the
regional director for [Philip] Murray down there. He was arrogant as
hell. When I found out, I called [James J.] Matles. I remember Matles
was furious. I called him up, but he couldn't do anything. He [Smith]
told Matles to go to hell.
- DONAHOE
- So they were doing that on a regular basis.
- FIERING
- They did it with me in that case.
- DONAHOE
- In Tennessee, too
- FIERING
- Well, I don't know who they were doing it with. In Tennessee, they
didn't do it to me. It was a bad situation. It was getting worse and
worse and worse. Well, on the whole, the UE stake in the South was
minimal, and we thought it was going to grow, because we thought there
was going to be a big shift in industry in that period in the South.
There was, but it came later. It was a little premature. There was a
large shift in industry. Matter of fact, a big shift came I think in the
fifties when General Electric [Company] opened up a big appliance plant
in Kentucky. That was the beginning of the shift. It was a little
premature in the forties. It wasn't as big a stake as we thought. There
wasn't that much there in terms of anything that was basic to us. What
might have been basic might have been--Well, the RCA plant was
important. That was important because it was part of our national RCA
setup. And the Western Electric [Company, Inc.] plant might have been
important. But we didn't have--By the way, Western Electric would have
been a break for us in the Western Electric chain. It would have given
us a foothold in AT&T [American Telephone and Telegraph Company]. I
think the IBEW [International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers] was the
big union in Western Electric up until that time in the North. We
thought if we had gotten down there early, we might have been able to
block out the IBEW, and we might have been able to make some mileage.
- DONAHOE
- But then you never did?
- FIERING
- We did not. No, we didn't get it.
- DONAHOE
- Later it became CWA [Communications Worker s of America].
- FIERING
- It probably may have become CWA, yes. CWA and IBEW, that's right,
controlled the Western Electric section.
- DONAHOE
- Was that Joseph Bierne?
- FIERING
- Joe Bierne. That's right. I forgot about their role in this thing. They
were not on the ballot, I don't believe. I think it was a yes or no.
But, in any event, we didn't get it.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, that's why I was surprised when you mentioned Western Electric,
because I didn't know you had tried.
- FIERING
- Yeah, it would have been our first under Western Electric.
- DONAHOE
- That would have been great.
- FIERING
- Yes, it would have been.
- DONAHOE
- It seems like a lot of the industry didn't come until the fifties and
the sixties.
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- Even the sixties.
- FIERING
- That's right. 196
- DONAHOE
- And then it seems that a number of the unions, or the UAW [United
Automobile Workers], I think they dropped their southern campaigns
pretty much.
- FIERING
- Well, they followed--Yes, I don't recall them as a factor at all. As a
matter of fact, the unions that were a factor were the Textile Workers
Union [of America]. They were the big factor. If they had been able to
make it, then it would have openedup the South to everybody, because
textile was the dominant industry. There was more and more of the North
in [the] textile industry moving down to the South, too.
- DONAHOE
- From New England.
- FIERING
- Yeah. The next big industry was, interestingly, woodworking--the
[International] Woodworkers [of America]. The [United] Furniture Workers
[of America] tried to penetrate and did to some degree. They made some
progress down there. The woodworkers were in the deeper South--the
central South states particularly. But the furniture workers had
something in North Carolina. And, I'll tell you, there's another
interesting thing about that. Now, take a union like that where you had
no discrimination in employment, you had a mixture of black and white in
those plants from the very beginning. Those plants were organized that
way--black and white. And they stayed black and white. When the unions
took over--when they became unionized--they were black and white. There
was not the separation of the races or the segregation I talked about in
Bassick-Sack or in other industries. Of course, in the cigarette
industry, the tobacco industry, you did have separation. No question,
the blacks got menial jobs, not only that, but even where they work on
the same jobs with whites, they got lower pay. And they were the--They
did the heavy labor. They did the heavy labor.
- DONAHOE
- So the woodworkers were the only-
- FIERING
- But the woodworkers were the only union that I know of where you had a
normal integrated set up like we knew in the North, which was an
eye-opener for me.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, but the textile [industry] was horrible.
- FIERING
- Textiles--the blacks only worked on menial jobs. But the South was
different. Everything there was different.
- DONAHOE
- Well, you made some major breakthroughs.
- FIERING
- Pre-civil rights.
- DONAHOE
- Pre-civil rights.
- FIERING
- Pre-civil rights.
- DONAHOE
- Well, it certainly was.
- FIERING
- Premature.
- DONAHOE
- But, even in textiles, J. P. Stevens wasn't settled until what, 1981?
- FIERING
- Yeah.
- DONAHOE
- That late.
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- And that was a major breakthrough.
- FIERING
- Yeah.
- DONAHOE
- And look how long they had been working there .
- FIERING
- Of course, many of the young blacks who came back from the war had high
expectations. They were quickly dashed. In fact this lynching in Pickins
was an indicator of that, see. They dashed those hopes. Just like after
World War I. [In] reading some of the history of World War I, the blacks
came back from the war then also with higher expectations. In World War
II, they had perhaps more rights; there were more of them involved. But
they were quickly taken to task, hopes dashed.
- DONAHOE
- That's when you had a lot of migration up North.
- FIERING
- Yeah, you had a lot of them, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- So, I think they realized the limitations.
- FIERING
- That's right. But we were--that's one thing my wife [Clara Wernick
Fiering] and I are very proud of--we had already moved to Los Angeles.
This was back in the early fifties. The blacks in North Carolina, in
WinstonSalem, who were involved--particularly those blacks in that
strike--were the leaders of the black community. Not only in
Winston-Salem, but in a large section of North Carolina, because it was
a very influential group of black community leaders, the core of which
was the FTA [Food, Tobacco, Agricultural, and Allied Workers Union of
America] leaders, the largest organization of black paople in
Winston-Salem, which was a very influential town.
- DONAHOE
- A big town.
- FIERING
- And the people who worked in the plant were very influential people. The
blacks put on all kinds of pressure for me and my wife to come back. We
were the only whites who were asked to come back in this town.
- DONAHOE
- And you had been gone a while.
- FIERING
- Oh, we had been gone three or four years. They put the heat on
Matles--heavy heat on Matles to get us to come back. But we weren't
about to.
- DONAHOE
- You didn't want to or--?
- FIERING
- No. It was really an injustice to my kids.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, I was going to ask--Let me just backtrack on that. When you went to
the South, in mid-'46, the whole family went.
- FIERING
- Oh, my whole family. My baby was six weeks old. Matter of fact, I came
down here, and my wife was about--not far--she was a couple of months
from giving birth. A month or two. Her mother [Dora Wernick Bohn] was
out here. She came out here.
- DONAHOE
- California?
- FIERING
- Yeah. To stay with--because I had to establish a home down there. So I
went out there to stay for a while. When she came out here, I went down
to WinstonSalem and was looking around and bought a home. In the
meantime, she was getting close to delivery time. So I came out here for
my vacation period, just at the time she was due to give birth. She gave
birth just forty-one years ago Sunday to our youngest, Bobbi [Roberta
Fiering Segovia]. She stayed with her mother for six weeks, and
meantime, I established a home there--bought a house and sent for her.
The baby came down when she was six weeks old with my two other kids.
One was three and a half and one was eight and a half. DONAHOE That was
your oldest daughter.
- FIERING
- Yeah.
- DONAHOE
- And your wife had agreed that it was a good move to go to the South.
- FIERING
- Well, she was willing. That was the thing. My wife never objected. We
didn't spend much time discussing. When the UE made a demand on us,
we-
- DONAHOE
- So you had gone together as organizers, too
- FIERING
- I wasn't thinking clearly, but it was foolish. But that was my
conception of being loyal to the UE and to the movement. It was stupid.
- DONAHOE
- No, it was not a bad move to go there and do the things you did.
- FIERING
- All I can say for it, I had had some memorable experiences. Matter of
fact, my daughter Maxine is still in touch with some of the black women
who were in the leadership of that movement, that strike movement down
there. A couple of years ago, she took a trip to--she wants to write a
book about her mother--she took a trip east to visit some of these
places we lived at. She made contact with some of the women who were
leaders in the strike. She's still in touch with them--those that are
still living.
- DONAHOE
- But your wife did organizing, too.
- FIERING
- She did organizing, yes.
- DONAHOE
- She helped you at every step of the wa y.
- FIERING
- Yes, my wife did organizing. In fact, she handled an arbitration case
for the FTA. Strange arbitration case. She related it, not like up North
[though]. The guy who was a lawyer for the company, for the [R. J.]
Reynolds Tobacco Company, walks into the arbitration hearing and they
sit down and begin the case. And here you present your case like you do
in a court room. This guy didn't mince any words. He just told the
arbitrator, he says, "If you want to continue being an arbitrator down
here, you know the decision you have to make." [laughter]
- DONAHOE
- Boy, blatant, huh.
- FIERING
- That's the way it was. He was an influential guy, this guy who was
representing them.
- DONAHOE
- So the whole--And then the Taft-Hartley [Act] thing broke out while you
were in the South.
- FIERING
- While I was in the South.
- DONAHOE
- Okay.
- FIERING
- And the race for [Henry A.] Wallace broke out while I was in the South.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, that's right.
- FIERING
- The other thing.
- DONAHOE
- Well, I'm going to stop this now, and then we could pick up next time.
And that would be like a natural break.
1.9. TAPE NUMBER: VI, SIDE ONE SEPTEMBER 1, 1987
- DONAHOE
- You had told me that as early as '46 and the forties there were
beginning to be divisions within the CIO [Congress of Industrial
Organizations] that early while you were down in the South. Could you
elaborate on that a little bit?
- FIERING
- Well, of course, there was red-baiting going on inside the CIO all
through the years. You might say from the conception of the CIO, the CIO
as a whole was red baited. And then specific unions were singled out,
like the UE [United Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of America].
But it didn't amount to much because red-baiting just didn't take in
those days. In the forties, it was exacerbated; red-baiting was
exacerbated. It still didn't take because of the war, and everybody was
united behind the war, so they couldn't single out any organization for
any reason. After the war, it took on greater and greater proportions;
it was intensified. When I went down South, could feel it in my
relationship with other unions there, but specifically, the way it was
exemplified was in the specific experience that I had had when the CIO
regional director, Bill Smith, [who] was running a part of the CIO
southern organizing drive, unilaterally decided he was going to file a
petition for a plant that I [said] we were organizing. But [we] were not
yet ready to file it, not by a long shot. We weren't prepared for any
kind of an election. When I found it out and confronted him, he in
effect told me that there was nothing I could do about it. I called my
national office, [James J.] Matles in particular, and Matles was
incensed. He [Matles] called him [Smith] and in effect, he told Matles
to jump in the lake. To have pulled the petition out would have ruined
the drive because it would have discouraged the workers after all the
publicity they had put out that we had filed a petition, which meant we
were ready for an election. So it would have signaled a backward step.
We were afraid it was going to demoralize the people. So we went ahead,
but we lost the election. We expected to. But there wasn't much we could
do about it because we would run into a big fight with the CIO, so we
backed down. But from there on we tried to keep them at arms length with
respect to things we were doing.
- DONAHOE
- The CIO.
- FIERING
- The CIO, right. And we got into whatever we wanted to get into. We got
into a thing with the FTA [Food, Tobacco, Agricultural, and Allied
Workers Union of America] and the [R. J.] Reynolds [Tobacco Company]
strike, and that was our participation. The CIO hardly helped them as a
matter of fact, which is significant. Now, that was a left union. It was
a key strike 1n the South. As a matter of fact, I think the Reynolds
plant was the biggest shop in the South. It employed over ten thousand
people.
- DONAHOE
- Ten thousand? Oh, was that the one with the five thousand--?
- FIERING
- With the five thousand. Five thousand were in, and five thousand were
out.
- DONAHOE
- Except the 12"8. [laughter]
- FIERING
- Five thousand blacks were out, five thousand whites were in with the
exception of 128 whites.
- DONAHOE
- I remember that figure too.
- FIERING
- I'll never forget that number. They were stalwarts. To this day, I
admire the courage of those people.
- DONAHOE
- But they managed to get a contract. You said that-
- FIERING
- Well, they got a contract, but the contract was the easy way out for the
company. The strike had gone for a couple of months, at least a couple
of months as I recall. [tape recorder off] Let me go on, on that strike.
It was the biggest industrial plant in the South. It was key to anything
that anybody would have done. If they had lost that, it would have been
a tremendous setback. If they had won that, it would have been a
tremendous asset in terms of any organization anywhere, especially in
that area which was the center of the textile area. Winston-Salem [North
Carolina] was not just a tobacco area, it's the center of the textile
area in North Carolina. Huge mills all around that area and all the
small towns around that area.
- DONAHOE
- That's a big plant by any standards--ten thousand.
- FIERING
- And in terms of CIO support, absolutely nil.
- DONAHOE
- Really?
- FIERING
- Nil. I can't recall any kind of support. They may have shoveled them a
little bit of money. But you would think they would send people down,
they would send forces down, you know, experienced people. Not one, not
one because it was the FTA.
- DONAHOE
- And that was considered a left-
- FIERING
- Oh, the FTA was a left union.
- DONAHOE
- Now, who was the--You were involved.
- FIERING
- I was involved heavily; my wife [Clara Wernick Fiering] was involved
heavily.
- DONAHOE
- That's what you told me, but yet, you were UE.
- FIERING
- I was UE. That's why I was involved heavily.
- DONAHOE
- Because UE wanted to support [them].
- FIERING
- UE would support, sure, UE would support them.
- DONAHOE
- But not with the approval of whatever, anything with the CIO. You just
kind of did it on your own.
- FIERING
- We did it on our own, that's right.
- DONAHOE
- Because I remember you told me how involved your wife was and how
involved you were.
- FIERING
- Yeah.
- DONAHOE
- So this was like a real indicator that the CIO wasn't that interested.
- FIERING
- Not only not interested, but also an indicator [of] how shallow the
leadership of the CIO was not to have seen the significance of the
strike at that time. This was a product--you're talking about a product
that a company makes which makes the company vulnerable.
- DONAHOE
- So what other indications were there, too, that there were divisions
within the CIO. Political divisions, assume you mean, too.
- FIERING
- Well, it starts with political divisions. On occasions we would be
called to meetings of the staff, all the CIO staff. We would sit down
and listen to a lecture by Van [A.] Bittner. But--First the objective
situation was a difficult one. The caliber of the leadership didn't
begin to measure up to even an average situation, much less the
objective situation, like the South presented, [which was] a difficult
situation. And so more and more we--well, like most unions since the
southern drive started to turn things around in the South, the deep
South, in every way, each in his own way.
- DONAHOE
- Well, I actually remember reading things like the CIa wasn't really
serious about this southern organizing drive because they didn't really
follow through like they could have.
- FIERING
- Well, they were serious about it. They didn't know what the hell to do
about it. They didn't have the kind of people to give it the leadership
it needed. *[At this point, we were well into 1947 and the Taft-Hartley
Act non-communist affidavits. I haven't thought about it for a long
time, and it was a period when events followed up on each other rather
rapidly. So I can't accurately detail the day-by-day developments. But
as I recall, initially, both the AFL (American Federation of Labor) and
CIa refrained from signing. That lasted a relatively short period. The
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) granted a "grace period" when
confronted with a united labor movement. That was the "graceful" way out
for them, because if the labor movement had hung together, I don't think
there's any question they would have killed the affidavit issue. But
that was not to be. The AFL saw an opportunity to upstage the CIa and go
after them. So I think early in '48, they capitulated and decided to
comply. Now, that was a pretty important principle involved, but nobody
could accuse the AFL leadership at that time of letting a matter of
principle stand in the way of advancing--as they saw it--some narrow,
self-serving, interests. They saw a chance to split the CIO--wholesale
raiding of the CIO--and they opted for that course. Inside the CIO, on
the surface at least, everyone hung fast, though you knew there was
anxiety and discussion and a lot of wavering. Finally, Walter P. Reuther
kicked over the traces saying he intended to defend the United
Automobile Workers (UAW) against developing raids; he also became a
raider, going full blast after the FE, the United Farm and Metal
Equipment Workers of America, a sister union of the CIO. But the left
wing kept shouting, "It's a principle. We won't sign," while its unions
were being torn apart. For my part, I followed the line unquestioning. I was shocked into
reality when UE decided to join the crowd and file its own affidavits.
By that time, we all realized there was no way out, except to walk away
from it. That's like being a Monday morning quarterback. That was by
convention action, at the '49 convention. But the decision had a
somewhat traumatic effect on a number of us. You looked at this
"principle" from a different perspective. We'd come through a period of
explaining to our members why we wouldn't sign. Now you agree to concede
the principle, and if you do it now when they're kicking the hell out of
you, why didn't we do it when we were better able to fight to save
ourselves? Think about it. It was the left wing they were out to
destroy, and we fed their fires until we were almost consumed. We were
on the defensive in the eyes of our members from the word go. If we had
moved in following the UAW's move and said, "Hell with them, we've got
to defend ourselves," we would have looked differently to our members.
But who knows. Feelings about that period run deep. And there is
ambivalence. It's forty years later. Would it have made a difference?] * Mr. Fiering added the following bracketed section during his review of
the transcript.
- DONAHOE
- What's the UEMDA? That's the precursor to the IUE [International Union
of Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers]?
- FIERING
- UEMDA is UE Members for Democratic Action, [James B.] Carey's faction in
UE. They became the core group for the lUE.
- DONAHOE
- Let's see, there's something else to ask you. Okay, so initially
[Philip] Murray-- FlERlNG: This was the [Communist] Party's doing, by
the way. Everybody's following the party line.
- DONAHOE
- They're saying don't sign.
- FIERING
- It's the principle, you must not sign. You must not sign. *[I don't mean to downplay the philosophical importance of the
affidavits. It runs to the whole question of union democracy, autonomy,
and the myriad issues that flow from that. But any chance of survival
demaded a retreat.] * Mr. Fiering added the following bracketed section during his review of
the transcript.
- DONAHOE
- So the unions where the left had great influence didn't sign.
- FIERING
- We really didn't have to be afraid of anybody. We had, in my opinion,
the best organizing staff in the labor movement. And I'm not saying that
being subjective. There was no staff that any union had to compare with
ours in ability. If we had done the things we had to do to protect
ourselves when we could have protected our selves, things might have
been different. There was a lot of discussion and argument and concern
as we watched our position deteriorate. I didn't get into the argument.
I followed the official line. There were some personal things involved
with the relationships with some of our top officers with other unions
that made it difficult. I was going to be a UE person. I was either
going to go up with it or go down with it. I wasn't going to desert it. Anyway, we tried to survive. Along with that, of course, was the Henry
[A.] Wallace campaign. In the South, that was a very, very difficult
campaign. This was in the middle of the southern organizing drive, as
difficult as that was. And we got involved in the Henry Wallace
campaign. Couldn't get involved very, very deep because there wasn't
very much of us to get involved. Now, of course, there again the UE
didn't endorse Wallace technically. Technically, that's so, but the
natural fact [is] the UE supported Wallace. And we were all told this is
our line, this is the line: support Wallace. And shoot, we got almost
nowhere. I got my house stoned for my troubles.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, wow.
- FIERING
- But that was small potatoes. We survived that. Before the Wallace
campaign was over, before the elections, moved back to Pennsylvania.
That was the only assignment open that I could get.
- DONAHOE
- You wanted to leave at that point?
- FIERING
- I wanted to leave; I was ready to leave. It was not really doing my kids
a hell of a lot of good living in that atmosphere.
- DONAHOE
- The difficulties, you mean, of living in the South?
- FIERING
- Living in the South with the prejudices there and the kids trying to
conform, finding it difficult to conform because of us. And there were
just two families like us with children. One was an FTA organizer, Jack
Frye, who now lives in Massachusetts, and us. They had three kids at the
time, and we had three kids. And it was difficult for the children. We
were the only white families that we knew of that socialized with
blacks, too. And our homes were the only homes, white-owned, that blacks
could come to that were open to them, which is one of the things, I
guess, that contributed to the stoning of the house. But it just wasn't
worth the sacrifices that we were making. I wouldn't mind it for myself,
you know, but for the kids, it was not good.
- DONAHOE
- But what about the Taft-Hartley, how did that affect you and your family
while you were in the South?
- FIERING
- Well, how did it affect us? It didn't affect us. Well, let's see, the
NLRB election in RCA [Corporation] in Pulaski, Virginia, was in '47, so
Taft- Hartley did not affect us yet at that time. Nobody had signed it
and there was a grace period, so we could use the board then. We didn't
have elections in '48 that I recall down there. We might have been
stymied from an election. I can't remember. There was some organizing
going on because we had some staff people down there. I had a staff of
at least three--oh, there were four--four people I had on the staff with
me. And so there was organizing going on, but I just can't remember what
some of the problems may have been. I can't remember that Taft Hartley
played any kind of a role. When I moved out of there, it was already the
middle of the year, in '48. I don't remember any more just what the
status of what organizational campaigns were, what we had on underway,
can't recall. If we had been stymied by Taft-Hartley I think I would
have remembered that. However, I don't remember much about that era,
that section. I do know I wanted to get out of there because there
wasn't much I could do. I just felt there wasn't much I could do, I was
wasting time, the family was paying a price; I just had to get out.
- DONAHOE
- Also there was more red-baiting, like you said, in the Wallace campaign.
- FIERING
- Yeah, there was a lot of red-baiting down there. But you see, our circle
was kind of a closed circle. The plants we had, which weren't
many--there were a few plants--but where we were, we were solid. Nobody
could attack us; no matter what anybody said, we couldn't be attacked.
So it wasn't that, but outside that area, that sphere, we didn't move
much in the community. Except, we moved among some of the native
progressives from the South (some of those were admirable people) and
the black people, particularly people from tobacco. There, of course, we
felt very warm and comfortable. But that wasn't satisfying enough, I
mean, we weren't paying back; we weren't contributing much. So we had to
get out of there. So when we went out, Matles didn't give a damn if I
went anywhere; he didn't care. By that time, he and I were somewhat on
the outs. Well, I took an assignment in Pennsylvania, up in
Williamsport--North Central Pennsylvania is what it is called--and there
we did some organizing. We had some plants up there, we did some
servicing. I lived in a little town called Muncy, fourteen miles from
Willamsport. A little town about twenty-five hundred people. Beautiful
area, I'll say that for it. It is just west of the Poconos, beautiful
country. We had some plants, and we did some servicing there--tried to
do a little organizing. We did some organizing. We had one other staff
guy there besides me. I was in charge of the area, and I moved around
from there, servicing the shops we had in the area, grievances, contract
negotiations, etc. Once in a while they asked me to go down to the
southern part of Pennyslvania to help out with something, go on to the
Pittsburgh area to help out with something, because there wasn't that
much work. And so I moved around there, but essentially I was based up
in Williamsport. That was in '48 and then, of course, in '49 came the
big blow up.
- DONAHOE
- Okay.
- FIERING
- But there were some stories about that area with--We were the only Jews
1n town. [laughter] We stood out like a sore thumb, everybody-
- DONAHOE
- Oh my God.
- FIERING
- People that were not used to knowing what a Jew was. You have to know
that about small, isolated towns like Muncy and a number of places where
we lived.
- DONAHOE
- Sure.
- FIERING
- People were, well, parochial. But we were, as it turned out, quite well
accepted. *[we had a local union in this small community which I
serviced. I was very close to our membership. All our neighbors. And you
work at and earn the privilege of being well accepted. Well accepted and
protected.] When the raids came--Well, first of all, in '49, one of the
big companies there, Rayovac, decided to take on the union and bust it.
And we had a bitter strike for, God, it want for almost two months or
four months. forget exactly. *[The company first opened the plant to scabs. They didn't get many. So
they called in the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
(IBEW) to solicit scabs from among the strikers. There was some violence
involved and three of us were convicted under an ancient. Pennsylvania
law taken over from when the state was an English colony termed "riot
and affray." It was originally intended to be used against the colonists
who were protesting British occupation. It permitted a maximum sentence
of three years. We were looking for help and asked the CIa council
leaders to send a delegation to the judge to intercede for us. They
interceded, but against us. They asked the judge to give those "red
bastards" the full three years. So much for brotherly love. The judge
gave us six weeks. It was an interesting six weeks, however. Some years later, I wrote a short story about it which my "creative
writing" instructor at Valley College tried to sell for me in New York
on a trip he made there. Much humor and pathos. A hunger strike led by
the three of us. A sheriff stealing money allowed for inmates' food with
which he threw big feasts for local politicians in a race for mayor. A
huge man, named Shmucker, appropriately I thought. And from intense
intimidation against us until our hunger strike; in one day, the most
marked improvement in the quality of the food to a big feast for all the
inmates on the morning of our release, eggs and ham, bacon and all the
trimmings. First eggs were served in the ninety-year history of the
jail. It was an interesting experience. For everyone it became very
touchy, because we had the aura of political prisoners. The irony was I
wasn't even involved in the violence, but as the judge put it, being the
leader of the union, I "could have stopped it." So I was culpable. Anyway, I got away from the point of the story about my relationship with
these people in this small town of Muncy. We were confined in the county
jail of Williamsport. During the whole period, my wife and children were
treated as warmly as if we had lived there all our lives. Not one child
mentioned, even once, to my children the fact that their father was in
jail. Not till the day after I got out did they remark, "We're glad your
daddy is home." I am touched to this day. This was, I think, end of
August or first of September, 1949. Because shortly after that, I was at
the UE convention where we again outgunned the Carey forces (UEMDA); the
national officers wre building their case justifying the coming split
with the ClO. The following month, October or November, was the CIO convention. The CIO
took action to expel us along with the other left unions. The UE
executive board claimed it had acted first to withdraw from ClO. I can't
lay claim to any great heroics. I was carrying the line for the UE in
the trenches--all the way. We stayed very close to the rank and file,
trying to keep everyone focused on shop issues, and pointing up the kind
of union UE was, its autonomy, rank and file control, caliber of its
contracts. Nothing fancy like the Marshall Plan, foreign policy. By this
time, UE had filed the affidavits, the Taft-Hartley noncommunist
affidavits. That caused some soul-searching and trauma. Like Monday
morning quarterbacking. It really was a matter of high principle, but if
we could sign now, why didn't we do it sooner? We waited too long. We
should have foreseen events. We should have done it when UAW did it.
Instead Murray had us in a box. We were given the argument, "How could
we sign, ~f Murray hadn't signed." This was the Communist Party line.
And Murray knew this. Of course he didn't have to. But we were being
torn apart. Murray signed after the CIO convention, and we were suckered
into delaying until it was obviously in the eyes of our rank and file, a
defensive act. We were pushed into it. We tried to make the best we
could of a very difficult situation. After the CIO convention, Murray chartered the IUE, the International
Union of Electrical Workers. They started sign-up campaigns, and the
companies, GE (General Electric Company), Westinghouse (Electric
Corporation), and a host of others, came to their rescue by filing
petitions for elections with the NLRB, claiming the split in the CIO
made it impossible for them to know who to bargain with, UE or IUE. The
IUE had sent in formal notice demanding recognition even though they
didn't meet the requirements the NLRB set out for qualifying for an
election. Not enough cards, for instance. The NLRB obliged by changing
its policies and accepting the petitions as valid. At any rate, it was a busy and desperate time. Matles asked me to go down
to Dayton to take on the raids at the GM (General Motors Corporation)
plants, Frigidaire (Company), and Delco Products (UE Locals 801 and
755). Anyway, Lou Kaplan and myself were assigned to 30,000 people. And
both these locals were cornerstones in the anti-UE fight. When I went to jail, Matles asked Clara to service the Sylvania Electric
Products, Inc., plants. When I went to Dayton, Lloyd Lutz, another
staffer, who had been in jail with me, took charge of the area, though
Clara still handled the Emporium Sylvania plant. One bitter note I want
to record here is when I went to jail, Matles decided to stop paying me
because, as he said, "Clara was being paid." Unheard of in the labor
movement. I eventually got my money, but a big clue to Matles's
character and attitude towards people and especially staff members. Of
course, if I were smarter, I would have left UE then. By the time, I remember, I got into Dayton, the IUE had a running start.
We made a fight out of it, but history records we lost. We tried to pull
together what had been in other years a strong, supportive core. But
people were frightened by the anti-red hysteria. It was too little, too
late. From Dayton, I went to Sharon, Pennsylvania, to help with the
Westinghouse raid, but that was lost. I can relate a couple of victories. By the time I got back, the Sylvania
Company had moved to decertify UE in its two key plants, Lock Haven and
Emporium, Pennsylvania. handled Lock Haven, and Clara was assigned to
Emporium. Matles also persuaded Ruth Newell to work with Clara. She came
out of retirement and was exceptionally capable. But the stakes in both
plants were four to five thousand workers. It was a great sacrifice for
Clara and me. Emporium was too far from Muncy to commute everyday. I had
hardly been home in two or three months. In the South when we both
worked, we had a housekeeper looking after our kids. We called on her
and she agreed to come up from North Carolina to help us out. Clara
would be away five out of seven days, and I would be home two or three
nights a week. Yet of all the places we lived, this area is the one of
which my children have the fondest memories. Another interesting item. Once in a while Clara would take our youngest,
Bobbi (Roberta Fiering Segovia), who was four at the time along with
her. And Ruth would bring her youngest, Amy, with her. She was three.
Today Amy Newell is the national secretary-treasurer of UE, or what's
left of it. That's no reflection on her. She's a brilliant and able
leader, I hear. Trying to reconstruct, Sylvania was probably waiting for the anti-UE
momentum to build up, so we would fall down dead when they moved against
us. We had a pretty solid pro-UE leadership in both plants. I'm trying
to recollect whether IUE was on the ballot. I think they tried, but
failed to get enough cards. But the campaign to decertify us was under
way. We paid a whole lot of attention to shop conditions, and one day
while I was handling an arbitration case, I get a tap on the shoulder
from a hotel employee (where we had rented a meeting room for the
hearing) saying someone outside in the lobby had to talk to me. So I
called a short recess and walked into the lobby and a stranger walks up
and hands me a piece of paper. I asked what it was, and he says it's a
subpoena from the House UnAmerican Activities Committee to appear at a
HUAC hearing in Washington, D.C. I was stunned and swallowed hard. I
took it off. I could see the next morning's headlines. I went back into
the arbitration hearing and made short work of it. When we adjourned, I
called the radio station and arranged for paid time the first
opportunity that evening. The town was going to hear it from me first. I
think that was the first time--used many times after that- that the CIO,
IUE, and the companies, used HUAC during these raids to fire up the
red-baiting attack against UE.] It was a [radio] program in which 1--I was the one who made the report
that I was subpoenaed [by HUAC]. I didn't wait for the newspapers to do
it. I got there before the newspapers and I put it out the way I wanted
to put it out. And that's what stuck, see. And that saved our butts. It
had a hell of a good impact. It put us on the offensive against the
subpoena. Then they could holler all they wanted to about the subpoena.
It didn't matter. It had the impact we wanted and we sailed on the
offensive from there on. Election time came and we just drowned them in
votes, in both plants [Lock Haven and Emporium, Pennsylvania]. * Mr. Fiering added the following bracketed section during his review of
the transcript.
- DONAHOE
- What did you say? Like when you-
- FIERING
- I forget exactly what the hell I said, but it was good. I took the
politics, the red issue out of the fight, and kept the conflict between
the boss and the workers, bread and butter.
- DONAHOE
- You said, "I've have been subpoenaed and--"
- FIERING
- I've been subpoenaed, this is the reason for the subpoena, and this is
why I was subpoenaed: because the sons of bitches are helping out the
company and are using the government agency as an instrument to beat the
union.
- DONAHOE
- So you related it to trade union struggle and what was going on there.
- FIERING
- I related the whole community, the whole community to the union's fight
for survival. Now, we had a guy from the international sent in who was a
good--who did some follow-up work on radio on that, a PR guy,
Allen-forget his last name. Then we had a whole series of radio
programs, that first one was so good. And the general manager of the
plant was a guy by the name of O'Reilly-I'll never forget this
[laughs]--and our PR guy started a series of radio programs playing on
the theme nOh, really? No, O'Reilly." [laughter] We drove that son of a
bitch crazy, we drove him nuts. But of course the payoff was in the
vote. We just drowned them in votes. I recall now we beat them by four
or five to one, and the plants had almost two thousand people in that
one plant. The other plant, which was Clara's assignment, we drowned
them too. That was the Emporium plant and even larger.
- DONAHOE
- These were the Sylvania plants.
- FIERING
- These were the key Sylvania plants, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- And you won the elections overwhelmingly despite the fact that you had
just been subpoenaed by the-
- FIERING
- Subpoenaed by the House Un-American Activities Committee, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- And despite the raids.
- FIERING
- And despite the raids. That's right.
- DONAHOE
- Did you feel at this point that you were getting the backing of the
international?
- FIERING
- Yeah. Yeah, I was getting the backing of the international, sure. What
the hell, why not.
- DONAHOE
- Well, were you kind of like having differences?
- FIERING
- Well, I had differences with the line they were following and the whole
question [inaudible] with the affidavit [Taft-Hartley communist
disclaimer]. I didn't like that, but I wasn't too vocal about it. See, I
wasn't taking on the national office. That's following a line. But I
know how I felt about it was why aren't we not only doing this, but I
felt the same way about the Marshall Plan. What are we fighting these
bastards about--we aren't that significant in the life of the
country--when we have a chance to save this union. And that to me was
the most important thing. Because if we had saved the goddamn union to
fight another day, I think we would have made a hell of a difference in
the whole labor movement.
- DONAHOE
- So in other words, you felt that you should have just signed the
affidavits in the beginning.
- FIERING
- Sign the goddamn affidavits-
- DONAHOE
- Back in '48.
- FIERING
- --and if Murray says we are supporting the Marshall Plan, shake your
heads and say, "Okay, Murray, we are supporting it." So what.
- DONAHOE
- But by this time you had already signed it.
- FIERING
- By this time they had signed them. That's how we could appear on the
ballot, that's right, see. But a lot of damage had been done by this
time. As a matter of fact the damage was done--This was part of what I
did. I had gone down to Dayton, Ohio, to the General Motors plant then,
prior to our signing of the affidavits. And this was also in late '49,
just after the convention. It was just before Sylvania or after
Sylvania; it was before Sylvania. I traveled allover. I traveled to the
GM plants, I traveled to Westinghouse plants fighting off raids. But it
was too little, too late. By the time, remember, I got into Dayton, the
IUE had a running start. Now, these are plants that I helped organize.
- DONAHOE
- I remember.
- FIERING
- I had status in those plants. Not only I, but so did Lou Kaplan who was
with me. Tremendous status in the town and in the plants,-among the
workers. We had fought for them, they had supported us. And we had to
calIon the loyalty of many of them who deserted us, because they just
were afraid by that time. They didn't want to have anything to do with
the label "communist." But we had already sacrificed any chance we had
to cover ourselves on that label by waiting so long with the filing of
the affidavits. So anyway, we went through the 10sse8--I'll tell you
everybody admitted we made out a hell of a lot better than anybody
thought we would in Dayton with the General Motors shops. From there I
went to Sharon, Pennsylvania, to help out in the raid on the
Westinghouse plant, where I knew some of the players from 1940 and '41.
There we were surrounded by steel and everything, where I was also in on
the initial organization. And I know a couple of other places I went.
Then I wound up back again at home, in my home base which was
Williamsport, the northern tier of counties up in Pennsylvania. With the
victories at least in Sylvania, after that, I took a leave of absence. I
had had it. I was running around hardly sleeping. And [pause] geez, I'm
trying to think of some incidents--good and bad both but, you know,
exciting anyway. Fighting all the time.
1.10. TAPE NUMBER: VI, SIDE TWO SEPTEMBER 1, 1987
- DONAHOE
- Let me just ask you. It seems at this time that the UE is fighting on so
many different fronts all at once, you know that there is the whole
government with the HUAC, the Smith Act, and the McCarran Act. Then
there's the CIO with all the raids and kind of, you know, really-
- FIERING
- Not only the CIO, you had the whole government.
- DONAHOE
- --AFL, everybody. Well, I'm saying the government, the CIO.
- FIERING
- The government, the AFL, the CIO, and the companies, and the whole
establishment, newspapers, etc.
- DONAHOE
- Right, and the companies. So it's like on all- everywhere you turn.
- FIERING
- We had everybody. Everybody. We were surrounded.
- DONAHOE
- And do you-
- FIERING
- There was trememdous- If you can think of a more complete opposition, I
can't.
- DONAHOE
- No, I can't either.
- FIERING
- And we staved them off in many cases, and that was interesting.
- DONAHOE
- Which was amazing, like you were saying, how you won these elections in
two plants despite all this. Because this was right in the heart of it
all.
- FIERING
- Yeah.
- DONAHOE
- I just want to go back for one second. Do you feel that, way back in
1947, if the UE had just taken the position of just signing the
affidavits and going along with different things and just working on
building the union, that a lot of this could have been avoided?
- FIERING
- *[Perhaps. Remember this is forty years later. I'm not sure it could
have been avoided. It's interesting to think about the different set of
circumstances it might have created. To speculate like that is like
playing with yourself. You have to deal with the realities of that
moment, and that is difficult forty years later. You can't deny the
principle of autonomy. I don't know to what extent that was really an
issue. Anticommunist policy and the Cold War were really the issues.
Survival of the union is a principle. Looking back on it after filing the affidavits and the fight we went
through, I think we should have related the issues differently. Reality
at that time was: the Communist Party line was "no surrender." The hard
core of the party people in UE, at that time, were incapable of a split
with the party. That included me, despite difficulties I had had in the
past. Our response was to circle the wagons. To us, the party could do
no wrong. It didn't dawn on us until too late that these so-called
experts on trade union policy didn't know a hell of a lot about trade
unions, certainly not as much as us. In fact, many of them never worked
in a shop much less in a trade union. And they were making trade union
policy. I was carrying it out. There were fires to put out allover the
place. No time to sit back and think.] I told you once before, I'm a trade unionist--I used to have people (we
would sit in meetings, party meetings), and I'd be criticized by some of
those bastards. And this was not once, but over a series of times that I
did this wrong, I did that wrong, I did the other thing--I didn't think
it was wrong, because the workers accepted me. See, they followed me. It
began to gall the hell out of me: What the hell am I doing here with
these people and who are these people? It began to dawn on me these
goddamn people don't know a goddamn thing about the labor movement, and
here they are trying to determine policy for the labor movement. * Mr. Fiering added the following bracketed section during his review of
the transcript.
- DONAHOE
- They weren't people that had been involved in the labor movement at all?
- FIERING
- Many of them never worked in their lives, never worked in a shop in
their lives.
- DONAHOE
- And they're making trade union policy?
- FIERING
- And they were making trade union policy. And there they are running into
conflict with me, but I am a loyal guy, you know. Like I used to call up
every morning and say what's the line today, see. But it began to grow
on me and I began to resent it, you know. I didn't like being attacked,
but it took time for me to finally realize what I was dealing with here.
But, in that process, I begin to think too, how important is this
so-called principle, and what is the principle. I have always thought
that the main principle was keep your organization alive. You've got an
organization, you've got something to fight with. Keep it alive. And I
can't see a great big thing about making a concession, either to Murray
or to anyone else either about affidavits or about any other thing. Of
course, this is all post-mortem, afer the fact, another case of a 20-20
hindsight.
- DONAHOE
- You mean they signed?
- FIERING
- Not only signed, but they merged with the butcher workers.
- DONAHOE
- Because I thought they were destroyed in the end.
- FIERING
- First they signed--the [International] Fur [and Leather] Workers [Union]
merged with the butchers [Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen
of North America], see. Oh, that was a little later. But everything was
kosher, everything was fine because they merged. Because the leadership
of the fur workers remained intact, see. So what is a principle? And
then it begins to dawn upon me who are these people who are being
critical of me. What do they know, never having been in a union, how the
hell a union should be run.
- DONAHOE
- And they wouldn't listen to the people that were involved in the daily
struggles in the world.
- FIERING
- Nobody could tell them. Listen, you know how they operate: they got
their own committee, their own setup. They determine the policy, then
they call you in to discuss the policy.
- DONAHOE
- After.
- FIERING
- After. Even if they talk to you about it, they'll still dominate a
union, and they'll make the policy.
- DONAHOE
- So it's like the top union.
- FIERING
- Jesus Christ. And I just stood for that shit and didn't realize that for
all those years. I could kick myself. Well, there was a whole process
with me, honestly. Then, of course, with the raids and running around
half nuts took some of the steam out of me. You could picture that
period in between the latter part of '49--this was after the convention
of '49--and the middle of 1950. I was seldom ever at home; I was always
moving. I spent time in Dayton, I spent time in Pennsylvania, and I
spent time in southern Pennsylvania, time in northern Pennsylvania and
they sent me here-
- DONAHOE
- You were allover.
- FIERING
- They sent me allover the goddamn lot on the raids. Raids are much more
difficult than an organizing drive.
- DONAHOE
- Terrible.
- FIERING
- A terrible beating we take, terrible beating.
- DONAHOE
- That seems it was one of the worst things that was happening.
- FIERING
- Oh, our people took such a beating then. That's why some of them
cracked.
- DONAHOE
- What was the CP [Communist Party] position on that?
- FIERING
- See, as long as you were alive, the CP position was--They weren't even
clear, and you'll see how this develops. Because in some instances they
told the unions, they told some UE people go into the lAM [International
Association of Machinists] or go into the IUE, wherever you can get in.
You know they did do that.
- DONAHOE
- Yes, I know.
- FIERING
- Then in 19--I forget if it was 1954 or 1956--1 am sitting there at a
meeting with the top fractions of people, without mentioning names. Two
of the very top UE people were party people. Came back from a meeting
with the party leaders and they--I'll never forget this--they walked
into our meeting (and we were just a small group of us; this was the top
fraction, the top group of them) and we says, "Well, what did they say?"
And they shook their heads and they said, "They said we should dissolve
the UE."
- DONAHOE
- That was '55.
- FIERING
- Either '54 or '56. '55? If you have it in '55, then it must have been in
'54.
- DONAHOE
- Right. But that was the position: leave the UE and go into the IUE?
- FIERING
- Go into the lUE and the lAM. Some people did, see. That's where sections
of the union broke off right there and then.
- DONAHOE
- That was the left split.
- FIERING
- The left split, right. Then I understand at another point they made a
decision to stay and maintain the UE. And here these people are making
these decisions. They don't know a goddamn thing. They don't know what
to do, and they are transmitting it like it's a directive.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah.
- FIERING
- And here we've got people who are knowledgeable, who are involved in the
struggle, who are listening to these jerks.
- DONAHOE
- And they really didn't have the say-so like the top leaders of the
union.
- FIERING
- I tell you, it's amazing to me. I'm thinking of these two people
particularly--highly sophisticated people--coming back in and they took
it like little kids. Like little children, you know. To this day, I
can't figure it out. And I'm sitting there stunned myself.
- DONAHOE
- But in the earlier period when the party must have seen what was
happening with the raids and how the CIO was behind the raids and
everything, and they didn't take a position on this, saying that--?
- FIERING
- Well, the party position--Well, that's a very interesting question. I
made note in what's his name's book that I read. The party position was
as long as it's good for the USSR [Union of Soviet Socialist Republics],
it's okay. Because the most important thing in the world is that the
Soviet Union must be protected.
- DONAHOE
- Then, how did they get to that point?
- FIERING
- Because the unity between U.S. and the Soviet Union was very important.
So anything that would help maintain or promote that unity and anything
that would provide discord would tend to dissolve that unity. Because if
you antagonize Murray, he would go out on a red-baiting binge, you see.
- DONAHOE
- So Murray-
- FIERING
- And after all that he would turn it against the Soviet Union. Everything
that was determined was what is good for the Soviet Union. Of course,
the argument that is made that the party was just an arm of the Soviet
Union in my opinion is absolutely true. They had no identity of their
own; that's what they were, see.
- DONAHOE
- So it was pretty far-fetched-
- FIERING
- The worst thing that happened to us was our linking ourselves at all up
with that outfit in terms of a union. Took a goddamn good union--could
have been the best fucking union in the country--and destroyed it. I
can't forgive myself because I was just as stupid as most of the idiots.
- DONAHOE
- Well, you didn't know.
- FIERING
- I didn't break. I didn't break, and I should have. Shit.
- DONAHOE
- But at the time it sounded right.
- FIERING
- Well, listen, more loyalty than right. That's what it was. You felt you
would be a deserter, a traitor. Couldn't do that; you have to be loyal.
That was terrible, terrible.
- DONAHOE
- Well, probably you believed in the principles at that point.
- FIERING
- And principles, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- But that's what you believed in.
- FIERING
- But there were no principles. The only principle was survival.
- DONAHOE
- So when they finally did sign the affidavits, what was the basis of
that? How did they switch their position?
- FIERING
- They switched their position because that's the only way they could get
on the ballot. .Because everybody else was eating them out from the-
- DONAHOE
- They didn't need an argument?
- FIERING
- No, you didn't need an argument. Everybody else was eating them out from
the inside. And either they could stand on the side and watch themselves
being eaten to death or else sign the affidavits and make a fight of
it--some kind of a fight. But 'by the time they did, though, see, the
enemies of the UE already had a huge chunk of it they had digested. They
had their base and a hell of a lot of good people who were cussed like
hell by those who should not have cussed them. People like Leo Jandreau
and others in Schenectady [New York] and from other plants who did make
the jump were absolutely justified in doing it. Because how the hell can
you listen to a leader, to take leadership from outfits like this or
from individuals like this who didn't know a goddamn thing, and sit
there and take a beating. Take a beating. And I tell you, you can't
visualize what it was. The pressures were enormous. Enormous. Enormous
to sit there. These people did the only thing that made sense. And they
are cussed to this day by some of these people. Can you imagine? I'm
talking about people who, I would say, caved under the pressure. Not
just caved under the pressure, it was the only thing left to do. And
these were people who built the union, who put their lives into the
union, you know. They wer en't looking for anything for themselves.
- DONAHOE
- Self-sacrificing, really.
- FIERING
- Yes, all their life. All their life. Son of a bitch.
- DONAHOE
- Now, were you at the convention-
- FIERING
- Yeah, in '49.
- DONAHOE
- --when they were going to charter the IUE and everything?
- FIERING
- Yeah, I was at the UE convention in '49. That was before the national
convention of the CIO when the big split took place, when the motion was
made to withhold per capita. I thought, hooray, they're going to
withhold per capita. Why pay the bastards when they are fighting you,
shit.
- DONAHOE
- So you all left, or what happened?
- FIERING
- No, we stayed. I mean, it was our convention; it was the UE convention.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, okay.
- FIERING
- The others walked out. They knew where they were going. We didn't know
where they were going. They knew where they were going.
- DONAHOE
- What about the CIO convention?
- FIERING
- Well, I wasn't at the CIO convention.
- DONAHOE
- And that was when, at the 1949 UE, you decided not to go to the CIO?
- FIERING
- Look, in 1949 they made the motion to withhold per capita unless the CIO
agreed to call off the raiding.
- DONAHOE
- Okay. Because that was really, really getting out of hand, you know.
[pause] So that was like most of the people voted for that?
- FIERING
- Oh, yeah. That's one thing we could do: we could control UE conventions,
see. We always thought we controlled the rank and file because we
controlled the conventions. That wasn't the case. We controlled that
convention, but we didn't control the rank and file.
- DONAHOE
- So they were going to the IUE?
- FIERING
- They were going. They were going allover the lot.
- DONAHOE
- To everything, okay. So then by that time, did you know that the IUE was
being chartered?
- FIERING
- No, we didn't know it. I don't think at that time we knew it. But it was
right after that that the IUE was chartered. At the CIO convention, the
left unions were kicked out and the UE officers had their talk--or it
was before that they had their talk with Murray, because the UE
leadership didn't show up to the CIO convention. That was another thing
that UE was criticized for. He should have gone to the convention and
made an argument at least.
- DONAHOE
- But you didn't; you boycotted it.
- FIERING
- Don't say I did. US did.
- DONAHOE
- No, I meant UE boycotted it.
- FIERING
- The executive board boycotted it. Well, I can understand what they were
afraid to face there, but they should have gone. Harry Bridges was never
afraid to go.
- DONAHOE
- But he was expelled. Wasn't the ILWU [International Longshoremen's and
Warehousemen's Union] expelled at that convention?
- FIERING
- Expelled, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- And twelve others or eleven others. Quite a few.
- FIERING
- I didn't--there were ten other unions. Harry Bridges was at the
convention anyway. He had the guts to go in.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, I think he did go and fight and they expelled him.
- FIERING
- Yeah.
- DONAHOE
- And then they expelled all the others. Now, the furriers? The furriers,
the International Fur and Leather Workers Union, were saved?
- FIERING
- No, the furriers were expelled too at that time.
- DONAHOE
- That's what I thought.
- FIERING
- Everybody was expelled. The furriers didn't merge with the butchers
until later, in the early fifties.
- DONAHOE
- I forget all the names.
- FIERING
- When they saw they were losing out, they made the smart move; they went
in. And the butchers union, the Amalgamated Meat Cutters of North
America, turned out to be a pretty good union. Now they're part of the
United Food and Commercial Workers [International Union].
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, a lot of problems now.
- FIERING
- But it's not a bad union.
- DONAHOE
- Then.
- FIERING
- They're taking good positions. It shows you history does tricks with
you.
- DONAHOE
- Well, you can't make-
- FIERING
- What is principle therefore? What is principle?
- DONAHOE
- Reality is more important.
- FIERING
- Well, anyway, what I did was after the Sylvania elections, it was a good
time to take a vacation. I was whipped. I took a six months' leave of
absence.
- DONAHOE
- That's the first one you took in years.
- FIERING
- That was the first one I ever took.
- DONAHOE
- Because you had been going all through the thirties, the forties,
everything.
- FIERING
- I'd take a vacation once in a while for a little while for a week or so.
- DONAHOE
- But not six months.
- FIERING
- But oh no, never six months.
- DONAHOE
- This was 19501
- FIERING
- 1950. I took a six months' leave and came out here. I did get my pay, at
least for this period.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, you came out to California.
- FIERING
- Yeah, my mother-in-law [Dora Wernick Bohn] was out here yet. I needed a
place to come to. Didn't do her much good, taking on five people: three
kids and a couple. I went to work in a shop here, Domestic Thermostat.
- DONAHOE
- You were coming out to move or to-
- FIERING
- I just came out to rest. Just came out to rest. I had no intention of
staying out here. I just wanted to get away from everything. By that
time I was completely exhausted. When I was out here--Let's see, I'm
trying to think of some other incidents that I went through back then.
- DONAHOE
- Well, you-
- FIERING
- Everyone of these things--You see, I remember the things I was most
intimately involved with.
- DONAHOE
- You went through the trial, you were called in front of HUAC back there.
- FIERING
- Oh, that's right, August 30, 1950, in Washington.
- DONAHOE
- And, say, that's a big one.
- FIERING
- Oh, I'll tell you about the HUAC. That comes in right now as a matter of
fact. Well, here I had the subpoena, yeah, but they kept postponing the
date on me to appear. In the meantime--this was while I was living in
Pennsylvania--in the meantime, I decided to take this leave and I came
out here. I was completely oblivious to the subpoena; I had forgotten
about it. Finally, I get a notice from the HUAC: you've got a hearing
date, August 30, 1950. And I'm living out here. I got to go, so I made
arrangements to drive in with a car--party of a carpool, used to drive
east. So I made arrangements. I'd drive a car with some other people and
I saved a fare for myself because I didn't have any money anyway. So I
got to Washington and I get ready for the hearing. I go to the hearing,
and the guy in front of me, who testifies in front of me, is Lee
Pressman.
- DONAHOE
- [gasps] He had been the attorney for the [United] Steelworkers [of
America], right?
- FIERING
- By that time he was not anymore.
- DONAHOE
- They had dumped him.
- FIERING
- They had dumped him. The scuttlebutt was that he had made some kind of
an agreement with Phil Murray that if he would testify favorably to HUAC
and Murray that he would get to handle a case for them at a pretty
good-sized fee. That was the scuttlebutt, but I don't know how true it
was. Anyway, I'm looking at this guy testifying and listening to him crawl in
front of that committee. It was disgusting, guy of his stature. Jesus.
- DONAHOE
- Brilliant man and everything.
- FIERING
- I'm trying to think, was Larry Parks there that day? I don't think so.
Lee Pressman was the guy I remember the best; he was right in front of
me. And then they called me and I stood on the Fifth Amendment most of
the ways. I wasn't about to open up any doors, I wasn't challenging
anybody. I just wanted to get the hell out of there. We had a lawyer
there too. (The national office had an attorney.) So I just took the
Fifth, and the Fifth, and the Fifth, and the Fifth. "I'm sorry," I said,
"I take the Fifth." I forget who that chairman was at that time, but
[Richard M.] Nixon was on my committee. He was there. He was there.
- DONAHOE
- For HUAC?
- FIERING
- Yeah.
- DONAHOE
- I thought he was just the California-
- FIERING
- No, no. Nixon was not on the California HUAC ever.
- DONAHOE
- I thought he was on that Senate investigation committee.
- FIERING
- You're thinking about [Jack B.] Tenney, the state senator. The Tenney
committee [California State Legislature Joint Fact-Finding Committee on
Un-American Activities]. Nixon was not a state official ever, he went
right to Congress in his first election. In 1950 he was still in
Congress at that time. Then he became a senator. He was running for the
senate against Helen Gahagan Douglas. That election wasn't until
November. This was in August.
- DONAHOE
- And he used red-baiting against her.
- FIERING
- He would red-bait. Oh, yeah, that's how he got elected. But he was on
the HUAC committee at that time. And I remember him sitting there, and
walking around. forget who the name of that chairman was [J. Powell
Thomas]. He was a mean bastard. Anyway, he was telling me, "You don't
have to be sorry. You can answer our questions." I said, "Okay, I'm not
sorry. I'll take the Fifth." Because these were the early hearings where
the First [Amendment] was not established with the status it was in
later years.
- DONAHOE
- That was like in '53 or something?
- FIERING
- This was '50.
- DONAHOE
- No, I meant when the-
- FIERING
- Yeah, that was three years later.
- DONAHOE
- --when the Hollywood Ten did the First Amendment.
- FIERING
- Well, the Hollywood Ten did it not long before me. It was the late
forties. It was similar to whatever the line was. It was the same kind
of a line.
- DONAHOE
- But then later they decided to test the First Amendment.
- FIERING
- Later they started to test the First, yes, that's right.
- DONAHOE
- And they all went to jail for it too.
- FIERING
- Yes. So I did my turn. When I went out I had talked to a guy by the name
of Louis Russell, who was an FBI [Federal Bureau of Investigation] agent
assigned to the HUAC. He was the guy who was handling all the
arrangements, you know, bird-dogging all the people. I went to see him
about--I said, "Who will I see about my expenses?" So they sent me to
him. I went to see him about my expenses and he wanted to give me
thirty-five dollars. I said, "What the hell are you talking about
thirty-five dollars? I came all the way from California." He says, "I'm
sorry. We can only give you expenses from the point at which we gave you
the subpoena and return." I said, "Bullshit." We had it around and
around. Oh, I was making noise there in the offices back there. I
wouldn't take his money. So when I got back (it was a couple weeks
later) I got a check for three hundred bucks. And anyway, I lived in Los
Angeles for this period, and I was just relaxing. And then I went to
work in this shop which was bought by Minneapolis-Honeywell [Regulator
Company], called Domestic Thermostat. And then I ran into some of the UE
people too, down in the UE office. The guy who was in charge there asked
me if I could try to arrange for a transfer out here.
- DONAHOE
- This is in Los Angeles, right?
- FIERING
- Yeah. So when my six months was running out, wrote Matles and told him,
"Say listen, I want to get a transfer." He said, "Nothing doing." So we
went around and around about that for a few months, and I finally told
him, "It's either I'm going .to get a transfer or else I'm going to
quit."
- DONAHOE
- He wouldn't let you transfer on what grounds?
- FIERING
- Because they needed me in the East.
- DONAHOE
- Why couldn't they use you in the West?
- FIERING
- California was never much on UE. When you're talking about UE, you're
talking about everything up to Iowa. He needed me to help fight the
raids in the East.
- DONAHOE
- That's it?
- FIERING
- That's it. Anything west of Iowa just didn't exist. They had a couple of
shops out here, but it was never much of a factor. So I told him "I quit," and I left it at that. So he sent me a wire back
[saying] that he'd give me a transfer. But then we had an understanding
that I would get a transfer here, which meant I could move my family
here on the condition--they were here, of course, but I needed to set up
house--on the condition that I would troubleshoot in the Middle West and
the East.
- DONAHOE
- You mean travel back?
- FIERING
- Back and forth, yeah, which I did for six years just like it was across
town.
- DONAHOE
- So even though you moved out here, you were still traveling more than
ever.
- FIERING
- Yeah, because there was continual raiding going on.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, but which is even worse.
- FIERING
- So I was in Indiana, in Illinois, Michigan, Ohio--raids in all of those
places. Wherever there was a problem, I was there. Some we lost, some we
won. I earned my money I'll tell you. I was organizing and
troubleshooting Sunnyvale [California], Seattle, Oakland, and so on,
here, just before that. That's when I started to organize and [found]
this plant called Standard Coil on the east side of Los Angeles, Soto
Street and Valley Boulevard. This was a plant of about eight hundred
women, almost entirely Chicana, the only one of its kind making electric
parts.
- DONAHOE
- Were they English-speaking or all Spanish speaking?
- FIERING
- They were both. Bilingual, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- Both.
- FIERING
- Yeah.
- DONAHOE
- So they w ere like second-generation.
- FIERING
- Most of them second-generation, yeah. Most of them young ones (they were
young) and most of them secondgeneration. The older ones, if they were
first-generation, having come from areas close to the Mexican border
where you spoke nothing but Spanish like Arizona, Texas, lower
Texas--particularly Arizona, the Arizona mines. We started a movement
there, and it was a dilly. We built a UE organization just like I
described to you; we built a UE union. And of course, from my view, I'll
tell you if you're going to get into a fight with a company and you have
your druthers, the first ones I would choose to be on my side would be
women. When you convince them, there's no better fighters, no better
fighters. They're harder to convince but once they're convinced-
- DONAHOE
- Well, they have more problems with families and husbands and everything.
- FIERING
- But once they make up their mind, they are fighters. And, of course, the
experience I had with the hill people from the South were somewhat
similar. So we built the union on the inside. Joe Houseman, a UE staffer, worked
with me. We acted like a union from the word go and we got our hands on
the first group of people. Taught them how to solve grievances, how to
fight grievances while they were building the union. And we did it in
such a way so that they protected themselves; they had an organization.
They learned how to work with that organization, how to move it on the
lines. We carried on slowdowns, and the boss didn't know who was
responsible, how it got started. We taught them how to deal with a boss
while they were in this kind of a situation. Then the IUE came into the
picture.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, they were out here, too?
- FIERING
- They were out here. They were called into that picture really by the
CIO.
- DONAHOE
- Had they been that active out here before?
- FIERING
- They had not done a thing here.
- DONAHOE
- Until they started-
- FIERING
- Until the CIO created them. And why did the CIO create them? Because
everybody became alarmed at the progress we were making with these
people. They knew if we had a union of that kind, the UE would be really
a special kind of a union. It had strong political implicatons. And we
had against us editorials in the L.A. Times, in the Hearst paper, L.A.
Hera1d. We had speeches in Congress about it. We had the L.A. Chamber of
Commerce issuing resolutions, hitting the daily press. We had the
[International Brotherhood of] Teamsters involved in it, and they
weren't even in the campaign. We had the AF of L [American Federation of
Labor] involved; they were not in the campaign. The CIe was involved. We
had everything on us, everything, and the CIa was actively involved.
Boy, they used to come with sound trucks to the plant gate, and our
people would tell me, "Just stand aside, stand aside. We'll take them
on." Those women used to just tear them apart. But, of course, it became
divisive with the CIO in there, particularly since we made the great
mistake in starting off by championing the cause of two people who had
been victimized because they were Chicanos, one of whom was a CIa
worker. And he comes out with a blast against us-Tony Rios. He's still
around, by the way we're pretty friendly today. Of course, time does a
lot of things that you appreciate. Later we wound up on the same side in
another kind of a fight.
- DONAHOE
- He was CIO then.
- FIERING
- And he was working for the CIO. As a matter of fact, he was really
deputy to what's his name, the congressman. [pause] Mexican congressman
from here.
- DONAHOE
- [Edward R.] Roybal?
- FIERING
- Roybal. That's when Roybal was on the Los Angeles City Council, first
Chicano on the city council. Roybal created the eso, Community Service
Organization. Tony Rios was the head of the CSO, and Roybal became the
city councilperson. And then Tony Rios went to work for the CIO. You
see, it was both. We made the mistake of singling him out to defend him.
Then, of course, he used that to attack us. Then he brought in the lUE,
and it became divisive. And together with all this opposition we were
facing, they established a foothold there and was getting pretty close
and we had filed for the election. In the first election we came in with
a top vote, but we didn't get a majority, so we had a run-off. And in
the second election, which I should have foreseen, but I didn't, 1 went
down to the plant gate on election day to give the workers a shot in the
arm. And right when I'm standing there--there's crowds of people, gates
open up and the people go in, there's crowds of people there--all of a
sudden out of nowhere pop up photographers and reporters and a guy from
the House Un-American Activities Committee gives me a subpoena. And
everybody's taking pictures.
- DONAHOE
- In the middle of the whole thing?
- FIERING
- In the middle of this whole thing, the morning of the election.
- DONAHOE
- Oh no.
- FIERING
- And everybody, the company and everybody made their moves then.
- DONAHOE
- This is your second subpoena?
- FIERING
- Yeah, this is my second subpoena.
- DONAHOE
- And what year was this?
- FIERING
- This is '52.
- DONAHOE
- 'Fifty-two. Oh no.
- FIERING
- And we lost by thirty-two votes. It was heartbreaking, it was
heartbreaking. But here again-
- DONAHOE
- That's not bad, considering.
- FIERING
- That was not bad, considering. It would have been better if we'd won.
- DONAHOE
- Of course.
- FIERING
- But here again, you see, I made the mistake. wanted to do something for
the so-called progressive young people, so I suggested to the party they
colonize Labor League Youth members in the plant; they start sending in
young people; Anglos, Jewish. And before I knew it, I had an opposition
which I really didn't-
- DONAHOE
- In the plant?
- FIERING
- From these people.
- DONAHOE
- The young, political people were building an opposition?
- FIERING
- They didn't like the political line I was following and it became my
opposition. Funny thing, wasn't even following any political line.
- DONAHOE
- So these were young leftists.
- FIERING
- And they're tearing these people in the plant apart in a debate about
whether they should support the IUE or support the UE.
- DONAHOE
- At this point?
- FIERING
- At this point, before the election. That's how I make trouble for
myself.
- DONAHOE
- But they didn't discuss it with you?
- FIERING
- No. I had learned about it after I got hit. Son of a bitch. Anyway,
that's some of my troubles. And with all of that, here again, I'm
meeting with some of this criticism--you know, that I am a lousy trade
union leader. The politicos are telling me I'm a lousy trade union
leader. Where did they ever work? Who did they ever organize? Never,
nothing. But they're telling me. Same thing went on in the South.
They're coming down telling me the contract negotiator, the UE
negotiator, was no good. Why was it no good? Didn't get enough money. It
was the most we could get under the circumstances, the best we could
get, as good as anybody got or better. But they said it was not good
enough, because they always had to be more militant, see. It was, I'll
tell you, a marvel that I put up with it. Something wrong with me?
- DONAHOE
- This one is very strange. I mean, you call these people in and instead
of working with you-
- FIERING
- They attack me.
- DONAHOE
- So naturally the workers are totally confused.
- FIERING
- Well, the workers didn't make choices between-The workers only hear the
union's no good, the union's following the wrong line, or I'm following
the wrong line, see. Therefore, they ought to consider joining the IUE.
They may be better. And you had this kind of a debate in the middle of a
hot organizing fight, you know, with all these forces against you. What
the hell does it do to the workers?
- DONAHOE
- Right.
- FIERING
- Anyway, I have to blame myself for being a fool for so long before I
finally recognized what the hell was going on.
- DONAHOE
- This is the-
- FIERING
- But you know, "What the hell do they know about a union?" I asked at
that point. "Where the hell did you get your credentials?"
- DONAHOE
- Did you ever take this up with not just them, but say the party itself?
- FIERING
- Well, I did. Matter of fact, I saw a guy last night who was the last guy
I talked to before I finally took off. And at that time I says, "You
know, the best thing you guys can do," I told them, "I'm taking all this
criticism from you guys, from these people who never worked, for
Christ's sake, telling me how to run a union." I says, "You know the
best thing you could do--" And I won't tell you his name. He's an olq
man by this time. I says, "You know the best thing you can do is go to
work in a shop to see what it's like, and join a union." Many years
later he did that.
- DONAHOE
- Really? That's a surprise.
- FIERING
- The first time in his life he went into a shop to earn a living, an
honest living.
- DONAHOE
- But I mean at that time, did you bring this up with say the party policy
and say, "What are you doing? This is the strangest campaign."
- FIERING
- Yeah, I'd argue with them. Oh yes, yes, I raised hell about it. But
they'd try to justify it. Or shrug their shoulders.
- DONAHOE
- And then in the middle of this when you were served by HUAC, I mean, it
seemed like you weren't getting any support.
- FIERING
- Of course, what it does, it makes me try to guess at what point wasn't
the CP even run by the FBI, see. Because it has all the earmarks of
that. I mean, even naive people couldn't be that goddamned naive. And I
have to think at what point weren't they run by the FBI.
- DONAHOE
- Just blinded by loyalties like you said.
- FIERING
- Well. Anyway, it took me a long time to wake up. Well, finally in that
period from '51 to '56, I was organizing; I did some servicing and
trouble-shooting. My wife went to work as a business agent for the UE
local here, by the way.
- DONAHOE
- It seems you were doing this on your own a lot because-
- FIERING
- What?
- DONAHOE
- The organizing.
- FIERING
- Well, no, you know, I was an organizer. Whatever there is to organize, I
organized.
- DONAHOE
- But you took a lot of initiative on your own.
- FIERING
- Oh, yeah, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- Because like you said, you went to this plant, Standard Coil.
- FIERING
- Well, my job was to build a union, look around where you can build a
union.
- DONAHOE
- Like how did you get to this Standard Coil in the first place? How did
you, did somebody-
- FIERING
- How I got to it? It's probable that we were contacted by somebody in the
plant. We did it with maybe one or two people. That's really all you
need.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah.
- FIERING
- Then you go out and look at the situation and you see is it ripe for
something or not. And if it is, it's my job, I want to build the union.
I can't sit still. It's right-
- DONAHOE
- You really were an active organizer.
- FIERING
- It's like nature abhors a vacuum. I can't stand an unorganized worker.
You've got to organize.
- DONAHOE
- So you came back to California for a little breather and look around and
see what had to be done.
- FIERING
- Anyway. And then, of course, during those years we had problems with
raiding up in Westinghouse in Sunnyvale and I went up there and we saved
that thing.
- DONAHOE
- Northern California--oh yeah, okay.
- FIERING
- There's a strike in Westinghouse also and I had to go up to Seattle, to
Emeryville [California] and Sunnyvale--particularly up to Seattle.
Walked into Seattle and there's a bunch of people starving to death. And
that was a union town. And people had union inbred in them.
- DONAHOE
- Seattle, Washington?
- FIERING
- Seattle, Washington. There was a Westinghouse shop there. And these
people had absolutely no support, no contact with anybody in the East.
Didn't know what to do themselves, had no money coming in, and literally
living on bread and water. And I walk in there--I was asked by Matles to
go and just to look and see what it's doing--I walk in there and these
people are going literally hungry, and their families are going hungry.
And I asked them, "Are you getting any money?" They said, "No." I says, "What kind of help are you getting?" "We're not getting any." "What are you getting for food?" "We're not getting any. We're not getting nothing." "How about your rent?" "We're not paying it." Jesus Christ, for the UE to run something like that- really it was just
not UE. But I called up Matles and told him the situation and he sent
some money out immediately. He helped set these guys up so that--And
they saw their way through the strike. We wound up the strike, settled
it, and negotiated a good agreement there. But then there was a
nationwide strike at Westinghouse which I was participating in. Also out
here-
- DONAHOE
- What year was that?
- FIERING
- That was '54, I think.
- DONAHOE
- I keep thinking something happened in '53.
- FIERING
- It was '53 or '54.
- DONAHOE
- When the lUE really took off or--FlERlNG: One of those years, yeah.
Well, eventually they lost the Sunnyvale plant and that-
- DONAHOE
- To the lUE?
- FIERING
- I don't know. I don't know if it was lUE. wasn't in on it. I was in the
East then, particularly from the beginning of '54 when there was a whole
massive raid and defections started again against UE. And I was on one
of my tours back to the East. I was there between '51 and '54, maybe
once or twice. But then '54 really went full blast for a long spell. And
then in '56 I went in for almost the entire year. During '56 I was in
Chicago and was staying over at Ernie DeMaio's, the UE vice president
from Chicago, and it was that day that the newspapers broke [Nikita]
Khrushchev's speech [about Joseph Stalin and the purges]. Have you read
that speech? Wow. I was up all night thinking to myself. I reviewed
everything I'd been through with that.
1.11. TAPE NUMBER: VII, SIDE ONE SEPTEMBER 11, 1987
- FIERING
- I want to add this little piece about the proposed pact that [James J.]
Matles made to [Walter P.] Reuther about no separate settlements. [tape
recorder off]
- DONAHOE
- Okay, we are going to begin with a few things from last time that you
wanted to bring up.
- FIERING
- One thing, I want to put in this so it fills in the missing part of a
record, particularly, because of the importance of those strikes and the
fact that the three biggest unions in the CIO [Congress of Industrial
Organizations] were out at the same time.
- DONAHOE
- Okay.
- FIERING
- As much as it meant to the continued existence of the CIO. When GM
[General Motors Corporation] was out, Reuther, as the leader of the GM
strike, was not harassing but at least he was accusing UE [United
Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of America] of undercutting the
UAW [United Automobile Workers]. Because we were still at work at that
time. We had not yet taken a position on striking our GM plants. We were
waiting to see what happens. GE [General Electric Company] and
Westinghouse [Electric Corporation] were out. During that period while
he was undercutting the UE because the UE was still working, Matles made
a proposal to Reuther. He says, "We would be willing to go on strike
with the UAW." He said, itA condition of such an action would be that
the UAW would agree with UE that there would be no separate settlement."
That if both unions went out together against GM (and he was talking
about the UE section of GM which included about thirty-five thousand
people) that neither union would settle by itself--settle alone and go
back without the other having settled too. So the idea being that if
they go out together, they go back together. This was in response to
Reuther's demand that UE pull its people out in its GM plants. And
Reuther refused to accept that, so we had to play the game ourselves. We
had to adopt an independent position on how we would approach our
negotiations with General Motors. Eventually, of course, we went out,
and the settlement that was arrived at was the compromise between the GM
proposal to UAW and the Reuther proposal to GM. But it did fit in with
the general agreedupon settlements in steel and elsewhere of eighteen
and a half cents. At that point Reuther was stuck on nineteen and a half
cents and [Charles E.] Wilson of GM was stuck on seventeen and a half
cents. We agreed to a settlement after about a thirty-day strike of
eighteen and a half cents, which was accepted by GM. I remember our
being in Detroit where the proposal was made, where the settlement was
arrived at, and we went back and got it ratified by our members. Shortly
after that, of course, the UAW settled on eighteen and a half cents. But
it left Reuther an out just in case he was attacked for keeping people
out for five months and being hung up on a penny. He could point to the
UE and say they settled for eighteen and a half cents and steel settled
for eighteen and a half cents and he had no alternative but take the
monkey off his back.
- DONAHOE
- Right, I see. So he didn't want to go out together?
- FIERING
- The important thing to fill in history was this-Where he was attacking
us, we did make a proposal for unity--a unified strike action. The
condition being that both unions agreed that neither would go back
unless the other had settled and was ready to go back too. The principle
being we go out together, we go back together. Reuther refused to accept
that.
- DONAHOE
- Which would be real solidarity.
- FIERING
- That would be real solidarity.
- DONAHOE
- Okay. That's important.
- FIERING
- I thought Matles's role was very commendable.
- DONAHOE
- Last time we had kind of ended at the point of [Nikita] Khrushchev's
speech in '56 [about Joseph Stalin and the purges].
- FIERING
- Yeah, I was over at Ernie [DeMaio]'s house; I had stayed over his house
that night. I happened to get into Chicago on some union business and so
he and his wife [Mary DeMaio] invited me to stay over, which wasn't
unusual. We were pretty close. That was the day that that speech broke
in the papers. I remember at three o'clock in the morning--I didn't
sleep that night--I kept reading and rereading that article. Three
o'clock in the morning, I remember Ernie walking 1nto my bedroom because
the light was on. He wanted to know if anything was troubling me because
I wasn't sleeping. We had discussed the article a little bit, and I told
him this was it, and I was very, very upset about it. His concern was
that something may have been troubling me to keep me from sleeping.
Ernie and I always got along very well. But that thing, of course, was
the final straw because I had become gradually more and more
disillusioned with the [Communist] Party and its role in the trade union
movement anyway. Especially, I think I told you about their attitude
towards UE, and finally, finally I realized I was dealing with people
here [who] know nothing about a union. Never worked in their life.
Trying to dictate policy for a trade union movement, and they were
leading it right down the sewer. Coupled with this latest thing on
Stalin, it just left me totally disillusioned. Then I attended a caucus
meeting in New York. These two people came back from a meeting with Jack
Stachel, a Communist Party leader, and we asked them, "What's the word,
what's the line?" And they told us. They said they were stunned, could
barely talk. They said, "We were told the UE should dissolve, let
everybody go wherever they could get in." Terrible. It was terrible.
- DONAHOE
- I remember that, yeah. So that was the party policy, to disband the UE
and to join "the mass."
- FIERING
- They switched positions. One time they would say disband; the other time
they'd say fight it out. That time they said disband. I forget whether
it was in '54 or '56.
- DONAHOE
- Well, according to-
- FIERING
- I think it was '56.
- DONAHOE
- Matles's accounts and everything he's saying that that was in '55--that
maybe it came out in '55, publicly-and he calls it the left split.
- FIERING
- Well, yeah, there was a big left split in '54. Must have been '54. There
was a big section of the New York-New Jersey group that took off at that
time to join the [International Association of] Machinists (lAM) and
some the IUE [International Union of Electrical, Radio, and Machine
Workers]. But I think this meeting was in '56, my last meeting of that
kind.
- DONAHOE
- It just must have played such havoc with the union because you have
everybody leaving.
- FIERING
- You have no idea what-
- DONAHOE
- The whole core is gone.
- FIERING
- The fact that we survived physically--I won't say anything about
emotionally--physically is a marvel.
- DONAHOE
- Because this comes right on the heels of the government attacks, the
HUAC [House Committee on UnAmerican Activities], the raids and
everything.
- FIERING
- Years of it. Years of it.
- DONAHOE
- And now this.
- FIERING
- Just picture the CIO unions, not just CIO, but the steel union, the auto
union, IBEW [International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers], IAM--any
union that could get a piece of us was in there. The companies just
arbitrarily recognizing the IUE or challenging our right to represent.
The government with its HUAC going from community to community, like in
1950 where I was confronted with a subpoena, which they did in
collaboration with the IUE and Sylvania, and which then immediately hit
the papers, on the experiences I had in '52 here in Los Angeles. They
had cameras and newspapers down there. The IUE organizers all knew what
was going to happen, and here comes the HUAC people with the subpoena to
serve me in front of the gate. That experience is being repeated all
around the country.
- DONAHOE
- Couldn't have planned it better.
- FIERING
- And the newspapers and Congress. It was a hell of a time. It was a hell
of a time.
- DONAHOE
- Well, how could they justify this? Why disbanding the UE? Why couldn't
they see this is a good union [and say] we should really try to salvage
it and build it?
- FIERING
- Because the UE was falling apart. That's what they could see: the UE was
falling apart. There was no way it could be held together. Part of the
organization has held together--a small part--has held together through
the years since then. And of course the atmosphere has changed; it
permits them to stay alive. They're no longer being victimized the way
they were, see. But how could they come to that conclusion? Well, these
are people that don't know anything, they are not grounded in anything.
They have no mass base. What do they know?
- DONAHOE
- See, that's very puzzling also that none of the leadership people had
any work experience or could be making policy for situations that they
didn't even know about.
- FIERING
- But they presumed to know about it. They all thought they were geniuses,
that they were the vanguard of the working class. Because they had a
title. That made them the vanguard, and because of that title they,
therefore, knew more than anybody.
- DONAHOE
- But what about the people that actually worked there or people that were
heading the union. They didn't really have a say-so as far as this work?
- FIERING
- Yeah, they had input.
- DONAHOE
- Input, I guess.
- FIERING
- Sure they had input. But I'm remembering some meetings I went to like in
Ohio. We'd have a fraction meeting and I had input; after all, I was the
head honcho in Ohio. After I had my input, I was properly put in my
place and almost, in effect, censored for daring to question anything
that the party guy would say [that] this was the way it ought to be
done. Looking back on it, it was just unbelievable that I could let
myself get stuck in a situation like that. It wasn't like me because I'm
more an individualist and a maverick, maybe a disciplined individualist.
But anyway I did.
- DONAHOE
- And then, like the top UE leadership didn't agree with it either later.
Matles disagreed; he didn't disband, he stuck.
- FIERING
- Well, I don't want to--Matles gave his oral history to this guy
[Pennsylvania State University Oral History Collection]. I'm not going
to contradict that. That's his oral history, and, as far as I am
concerned, he spoke what he saw was the truth.
- DONAHOE
- No, but I mean the UE did survive.
- FIERING
- Well, the UE survived, but every year it was less and less of a UE that
was surviving, see. It wasn't finally stabilized until the sixties
really. In fact, to this day they have great difficulties winning a
strike in small shops. That's an extraordinary situation. And they have
some very talented people. There are some things they carry through
which are very credible, very commendable. A lot of brainy, young
idealists militated in that direction. Some of them are there now. They
are still carrying on the fight. I have my own feelings about what they
could do that is best for the union that's left and for themselves, but
very few people have asked me. Whoever has, I have told them. But nobody
listens.
- DONAHOE
- So, about at this point like around between '54, '56, you had felt like
it is a losing battle.
- FIERING
- I said, "This is ,a losing battle. I'm wasting my time, I'm wasting my
life. I'm sacrificing, and because I'm sacrificing, my family is
sacrificing. I'm going nowhere with it. It's time to get out. Time to
get out." I didn't know where I was going, I didn't know what I was
going to do. I had nothing. I had no trade, I had no job. I had nothing.
I had told Matles, "I'm getting out."
- DONAHOE
- Now, you had moved to California in '51.
- FIERING
- In '50 I first came out here, in August.
- DONAHOE
- You were sort of-
- FIERING
- Well, I had this agreement with Matles that whenever he wanted me to go
East to troubleshoot I would, and I did. I spent a considerable amount
of time--In fact, all of '56 was spent in the East--the whole year. In
between '51 and '56, well, I spent time here--had that shop I was
organizing. I was here in '52. I spent part of the time in '53 here. In
'54 my time was split between here and the East. I spent a lot of time
in the East on some troubleshooting there in Michigan and Indiana and in
Ohio. And then, of course, in '55 and '56 I spent there. 'Fifty-six I
spent practically the entire year there. And in January '57, that's when
I told Matles that was the end for me.
- DONAHOE
- But it seems from what you say that even when you came to California in
'50 you were getting kind of-
- FIERING
- Well, when I came here in '50, I had been through a very, very rough
period. My wife [Clara Wernick Fiering] and I both because she was also
on the staff. We needed a rest. And we had been through an extremely
rough period. That was the height of the raids, when the biggest raids
took place in General Electric, Westinghouse, Sylvania [Electric
Products, Inc.], and General Motors. I was involved in both the
Westinghouse and General Motors raids. She was involved in GE and
Sylvania. Interestingly, we won the Sylvania plants. After that in June
of 1950, after Sylvania elections where we had at least registered some
victories, I said I just had to get a rest. I just had to take off. So
we agreed on a six-month leave with pay, though the pay was never any
great big shakes in UE. There was always not much money. And my
mother-in-law [Dora Wernick Bohn] was out here and we came out here--my
wife's mother. And I went to work in a shop while I was here. I got
tired of just hanging around the house resting. That's not my thing. So
I went to work in a shop, and it happened to be a UE shop that was under
raid at the time. I didn't get there in time to win it. We lost it--the
election. During that period, the people here asked me to try to effect
a permanent transfer to stay here, which I did. Matles had refused it at
first and then I told him it was either that or I am quitting, one or
the other. I didn't want to go back East anymore. I took to California
and my kids liked it here. My wife was close to her mother. So he agreed
on the condition that I-
- DONAHOE
- Be the troubleshooter.
- FIERING
- --be a troubleshooter.
- DONAHOE
- So what I was saying is that as early as '50 you were getting kind of
disgusted with things. Kind of worn-out.
- FIERING
- I was worn-out, physically I was worn-out and emotionally worn-out. We
are talking in terms of plants that employed many, many people. Like the
GM plants with thirty thousand people. You know it was a big fight. The
Westinghouse plant was about five thousand to seven thousand people, the
one in Sharon [Pennsylvania]. And the Sylvania plants were a couple of
thousand people apiece, you know. We're talking about big shops. And
there's all a lot of little stuff going around at the same time and
you're running around like mad every place trying to hold things
together. It was a pretty rough period.
- DONAHOE
- So it's like all these years of organizing and building-
- FIERING
- I had gone without a stop.
- DONAHOE
- --collapsing.
- FIERING
- Collapsed. And that was the thing--you see.
- DONAHOE
- And you see it in front of your eyes.
- FIERING
- See, everything you've done, that you take a look at--you have worked
your tail off, you know. You have accomplished things. People have loved
the union. You fought off attacks from the factions in the union who
were attacking it from the inside. And then, everything came crashing
down. It comes crashing down and it leaves you a little bit kind of
dazed.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah.
- FIERING
- You don't know what the hell to think. But again, it appeared to me that
was the direction that everything was going to go. Because when you see
GE going that way, you see big GM plants going that way, and
Westinghouse, you know that's the heart of the industry. If that goes,
the UE is not a factor in the industry anymore, and, therefore, not a
factor in the basic industries.
- DONAHOE
- So you feel that if they had just initially signed the clause and had
been done with it that they could have salvaged a lot of this.
- FIERING
- Of course, at that time I still followed the line. But even during that
period I did wonder why, why did we have to stick that close to this
kind of policy when if we did bend, see, and sign, we'd have some way to
get in there and at least defend ourselves. The thought crossed not only
my mind, it crossed other minds too. But this was the policy, by golly,
so we followed the policy. You try to justify it. You try to justify to
yourself first so you could at least justify it to everybody else. But
in retrospect, all these things that were troubling me, I can see now I
should have pursued them. I should have pursued them--been more openly
critical. But anyway.
- DONAHOE
- When you are living through it you are not quite sure what it is
exactly. You know you just try to do the best you can. Well, what do you
think--I mean the effects on your family life must have been really
terrible. All those years of organizing and being away.
- FIERING
- Yeah. Of course, it has an effect on my marriage too. Because whatever
problems there are in the marriage are exacerbated. And it had its
impact on the children. The marriage had its impact. The fact that we
were constantly on the go had its impact. And it created some problems
for my children which stayed with them. They all survived, but we all
could have done better. We all could have done better. Anyway, it can't
be undone.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, sure. You were gone a lot.
- FIERING
- Oh God, yes.
- DONAHOE
- You were hardly ever home. You told me [about] all those times when you
were gone.
- FIERING
- There was a period there when I used to come home maybe once every six
weeks for a weekend and I'd take off again. I'd be travelling the whole
Middle West. That period lasted from--Well, as a matter of fact during
the period of the Sylvania affair, we hired a housekeeper. It was the
same housekeeper we had in the South. She agreed to come up and take
care of the kids and the home. My wife used to take my youngest one with
her to the Emporium, Pennsylvania, Sylvania plant, and she was away all
week, and here I was away all week. That kind of thing went on
for--Let's see, I went back to Dayton in '49, the end of '49 when the
raids started--and this thing didn't let up until June of 1950. I was
rarely around--and my wife away too. Fortunately, we lived in a small
town and I told you about the experience when I was in jail. DONAHOE
Yeah.
- FIERING
- The people there were very nice, very nice. It made it easier for us. It
could have been worse considering what the local Williamsport
[Pennsylvania] newspaper did try to do with me. It could have been a lot
worse.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, really. I can imagine. Do you think it was easier when you moved out
to California because the grandmother was there.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, yeah, sure.
- FIERING
- Was your wife home more then?
- FIERING
- Well, she didn't work when we came out here; she didn't work at first. I
didn't work either, you know, for the UE. She didn't work either. And
she didn't go back to work for the UE for a couple of years. I think not
until '53.
- DONAHOE
- So she was mainly home even though you were traveling allover and doing
organizing.
- FIERING
- Well, yeah. Yeah. Well, most of the organizing I did was around that
shop on the east side.
- DONAHOE
- The Standard Coil, yeah.
- FIERING
- Standard Coil, which was in town at least, you know.
- DONAHOE
- You went out a lot. You went out of town a lot.
- FIERING
- I went out of town on occasions, yeah. So that was until about '53 she
became a business agent of the the UE. She didn't work either. And she
didn't go back to local union here. [pause] No, she was asked to take on
a special assignment up in Oakland and Emeryville [California] where the
IUE was raiding us in a Westinghouse and General Electric plant.
- DONAHOE
- So she went up there?
- FIERING
- She went up there, yeah. I don't want to make a big issue about our
personal feelings. We were kind of taken advantage of because the guy
who was up there who should have been able to handle it--because we
didn't have a terribly big union in California--was "able to finagle
something else. But that's another story. In any event, she went up
there, she did the job. She won. She succeeded in winning out against
the raids. She was a very special kind of organizer.
- DONAHOE
- And you and the children stayed behind.
- FIERING
- The children were here, of course, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- And then after that, were you both mostly home?
- FIERING
- Well, she was home. She then went to work as a business agent for the
local down here. I continued to move around and did some work here
including negotiating contracts. Anyway, that plus these other factors
produced the situation where I decided I had to get out. I didn't know
where I was going or what I was going to do. I just had to get out. I
didn't know. As I say, I had nothing to go to. I should have been a
little smarter than that. should have at least tried to line up
something to go to. Some of the other guys did; they lined up a job in
another union.
- DONAHOE
- Really?
- FIERING
- Oh, sure.
- DONAHOE
- People that wanted to leave the UE?
- FIERING
- Yeah. I couldn't do that. I just couldn't see myself doing that.
- DONAHOE
- You felt it was disloyal.
- FIERING
- I felt it would be selling out the UE, selling out my principles about
the UE. But most of the other guys who did take off, they took off with
understandings with other unions or at least had something to go
to--they lined something up.
- DONAHOE
- Was this at the point where the position was to disband the UE? That
people decided they were going to leave and go other places?
- FIERING
- There was no position to disband. Individuals or groups just took off.
They either went to IUE or they went tothe IAof M.
- DONAHOE
- Did they get backing from the party to go to any of these places?
- FIERING
- Yeah, sure. In fact, they were encouraged. Anybody could go wherever
they wanted.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, I thought maybe they helped-
- FIERING
- No, it was not a party decision. The party, if asked, was patting them
on the back, [saying] go wherever you can to survive.
- DONAHOE
- But they didn't help them in any way.
- FIERING
- No. They couldn't. They didn't have the means.
- DONAHOE
- The party didn't have any kind of connections where they were going.
- FIERING
- What did they have? They had no connections any place. They had nothing.
Who the hell could they help? But, as if they could help, they would pat
them on the back as if they really had some authority, you know. They
were a--what's the word?--they didn't make any difference. There's a
word for it, irrelevant. But, shoot, we had some goddamn good
organizers, and other unions were glad to get them. Some of them thought
they could make a deal and they went and made a deal and brought their
membership over with them. And then they got fired and the membership
stayed with the union that they transferred to. That happened too, by
the way. The machinists union particularly. To some extent the IUE. They
made a good deal. They thought they had a good solid job lined up, took
all their people with them, and then they got fired after a few months.
They deserved it.
- DONAHOE
- Well, I was curious that there was this position to disband the UE and
go to other unions, but say a person like you didn't agree with that.
- FIERING
- There was no position. More like anarchy. I was not going to sell
myself, sell my membership for a job. That's really how I felt.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, right. No, I agree with [you], but you know, I'm saying but then you
decided to leave the UE anyway.
- FIERING
- I decided to leave the UE, just leave it. I wanted to leave it, so I
left it. But I wasn't going to sell my membership for a job someplace. I
didn't know what I was--I had no job.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, right. But you didn't think there was any point in staying in the UE
anyway.
- FIERING
- That's right. I thought it was a waste of time. It was just hard on the
nerves. I was paying too big of a price for it at that point. And I just
said, "Well, I will make my own individual decision for myself; I'll get
out." And I got out. And I just felt contempt for these guys who bought
a job. Looking back on it now, I don't really blame them that much. I'm
not that critical of them. But time mellows a lot of things really,
that's what it is. I could not see myself doing that. As a matter of
fact, a couple of years later I got a job offer from the IBEW. I met
with them and I agreed to go to work for them. And then on my way
home--this was on Friday and I was to go to work on Monday-
- DONAHOE
- To work for the union.
- FIERING
- For the IBEW, yeah. It's a good union, you know.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah.
- FIERING
- It's just that I happened to have a lot of fights with them during the
period when the UE was growing; UE used to raid them. The reason I went
to jail was because they broke a strike that I was leading in
Pennsylvania-Williamsport. But, anyway, so we had the j~b set and on the way home I got to thinking
why do these guys want me. They didn't ask me for anything, they just
wanted me. I said maybe after they have me--and this was kind of screwy
thinking-maybe they'll insist that I raid the UE. So when I got home I
called up the guy who was the head IBEW international guy here, Larry
Townsend. And I said, "Listen, one point I just want to get clear with
you. I want to go to work for you. I agreed to it, that I want to work
for you. But I want one thing understood: I'm not going to be asked to
raid the UE." When he heard that he said, "Forget it."
- DONAHOE
- So he did want you to do that.
- FIERING
- No, doesn't mean that. But who the hell was I to start laying down
conditions of any kind. He didn't ask that. It was very foolish on my
part, because I could have always said, "I'm not going in for that" if
they had ever made a demand like that on me. And I would not have done
it. So, here I want to be the-
- DONAHOE
- Principled.
- FIERING
- [laughter] The principled guy. What a stupid thing that was, because if
I had gone to work for the IBEW then it would have--now that I know the
IBEW now, I know them here and I work with them here--it would have been
a great thing. I could have done a lot of organizing, a lot of
organizing. In fact, they would have given a job to my wife because my
wife gave them a stiff pain in the ass. She challenged them in a number
of places and she beat them, or else. if they did win, it was a hell of
a tussle. And they had a tremendous amount of respect for her too. She
wasn't involved in the consideration for a job then; she was working for
the UE. But the Fiering family gave them one hell of a problem. They had
a lot of respect for us as organizers. So that was stupid.
- DONAHOE
- Well, what about the people that stayed in the UE? What did you think
about--did you just feel that they were wasting their time?
- FIERING
- I felt they were wasting their time. I didn't think they were going
anywhere, but-
- DONAHOE
- But you didn't feel any hostility towards them like you did towards the
other ones, yeah. Right.
- FIERING
- Oh, no. No, these were people I worked with and struggled with and
sacrificed with for so many years. I felt very close to all of them.
Jesus, they were a big part of my life. There was none of that. No,
there was none of that. And my feeling about them was, look, you know,
you make your decision, you want to stay, you stay. It's not up to me to
make up your mind for you. So I made up my mind for myself. That's all.
- DONAHOE
- But what about your wife? It seemed like she didn't leave.
- FIERING
- No, she stayed with the UE until '63 when her heart went bad.
- DONAHOE
- So she stayed for almost ten years more.
- FIERING
- Ten years, yeah. Six years after I left. In '63 she had to quit because
of her heart. I went to work knocking around trying to decide what
direction I was going to go and decided I was going to stay with the
working class. Stay close to the trade union movement. Which I don't
know, I don't know if it was a smart decision. Probably. Maybe. I might
just as well have decided to look for some way to make some money,
because we didn't have any.
- DONAHOE
- She wasn't being paid?
- FIERING
- She was being paid, but you have to know the UE.
- DONAHOE
- It's not enough, right. I can imagine.
- FIERING
- You have to know the UE. We mean we used to follow Matles boasting that
we got the lowest wages in the trade union movement, you know. We were
doing it because it was an ideal, it was a cause, which was Matles's
idea which he convinced us of and which was his way of getting away with
paying low wages. Because he never really thought too much about the
individuals on the staff. They didn't really mean that much to him.
Which I didn't realize until later how little. A year after I quit they
put in a pension plan. I'd put in twenty years in that union. And a year
after I quit they put in a pension plan, and they wouldn't even make it
retroactive for the one year so I could at least be eligible for a
pension sometime or another.
- DONAHOE
- So you got nothing.
- FIERING
- Got not a nickel. And I'm not the only one.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, there are probably a lot of people in your condition.
- DONAHOE
- There are others like that too. Put in the best years of our lives and
that son of a bitch, Matles--Not only that, but when I was in jail,
Matles cut off my pay because I wasn't working. Can you picture that?
Can you picture that?
- DONAHOE
- Oh, my gosh. Just like the boss.
- FIERING
- I resented that terribly.
- DONAHOE
- I can imagine. Especially when your family needs it the most.
- FIERING
- His rationale was that he put my wife on the payroll. She worked,
therefore, he was justified in cutting off my pay.
- DONAHOE
- But a lot of times you both worked and you needed two incomes.
- FIERING
- We needed it. Anyway, when I quit I made a big stink about it and let a
lot of people know about it, and he couldn't take that. So he paid me
that money back.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, from when you were in jail?
- FIERING
- But that was already seven years later, seven and a half years later--or
eight years later.
- DONAHOE
- But they never gave you a pension?
- FIERING
- Never gave me a pension. No pension rights.
- DONAHOE
- That's what happens to a lot of good organizers?
- FIERING
- I outlived him anyway. That's one satisfaction I got.
- DONAHOE
- And went on to do other things too.
- FIERING
- The thing that grabs me most is I used to think so highly of the guy,
you know. Of course, he was still a terrific organizer and negotiator.
He's not the trade union leader I used to think he was now that I
reflect back and I know a little bit more. But his attitude towards
people--the people on the staff--was inexcusable. I'll never forgive
him. [I started out protesting the evils of the Depression, its dehumanizing
effects. I was propelled towards socialism as the solution. The route
and hopes had may have been unrealistic, but I still think socialism is
the answer for those looking for a more just and humane society. The
conditions I saw in my youth--the hunger, misery, unemployment--prompted
me to look for the reasons millions of people could be ground down,
unable to help themselves. They lacked power. The answer was
empowerment. Union organization was empowerment and the instrument to
improve their lot and control their futures. I've organized tens of
thousands of people. I've taught them that lesson. To have power, stay
organized. Wherever they are today, they still have a union, maybe not
UE, but a union. That, to me, was time well-spent. That gives me a sense
of satisfaction.]
- DONAHOE
- Was it hard then on your family when you had two different positions
like this when you had made the break with UE and your wife was still on
the staff?
- FIERING
- She was working, and of course we had to adjust to her salary. Mr.
Fiering added the following bracketed section during his review of the
transcript.
- DONAHOE
- But I mean you had different outlooks sort of?
- FIERING
- No, no, no. My wife was very sympathetic with anything I wanted to do,
that's one thing I could say. She was very sympathetic to everything I
wanted to do, and when wanted to quit, she agreed that I should quit.
- DONAHOE
- And you agreed that she shouldn't quit if she didn't want to quit.
- FIERING
- Yeah. And she didn't want to quit anyway.
- DONAHOE
- But that didn't make it hard like having a difference.
- FIERING
- Oh no, no. No problem except financial problems.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, I can see that.
- FIERING
- Because I was without a job. One of my kids, let's see, she was in
college. One was in high school, and one was just entering junior high.
- DONAHOE
- That's when you need money the most.
- FIERING
- That's when we need the money the most, right.
- DONAHOE
- Boy.
- FIERING
- So I ran into some people who told me about-Well, I decided I'd go to
work instead of trying to become rich. I didn't know how I was ever
going to become rich. But instead of trying to look for ways to make
money, I decided I'd go to work in a shop, which I suppose down the road
saved my life. Hard physical work was what I needed. After some little
period of kicking around at what I was going to do, some people
acquainted me with the fact that the sheet metal people--There was a lot
of work in the sheet metal industry and the construction industry.
- DONAHOE
- As a worker.
- FIERING
- As a worker.
- DONAHOE
- Not an organizer.
- FIERING
- No, as a worker. So I went down to the sheet metal union [Sheet Metal
Workers International Association] and tried to get in, but I couldn't
because I didn't know the trade. You had to have an apprenticeship
training and a full record of having worked in the industry. But the guy
who was the dispatcher did tell me that if I could get a welding
certification he might get me a job--get me into the union and then a
job. The dispatcher is the guy at the window at the union who dispatches
people out to the work. Because the hiring is done through the union
hall. So how do I do that? I asked around and so a couple of guys who I
ran into told me that the thing to do would be to go to--Well, one of
them tried to teach me the damn trade out of a book to prepare me for an
exam which you have to take. I just couldn't get anywhere with that
book; my mind just wasn't with it. Another tried to teach me some
welding, and he didn't get very far with me. So they suggested I go to
Trade-Tech [Los Angeles Trade-Technical College] and take a welding
course there. I signed up for the course and 1--First you sign up and
they give you a qualifying test or an IQ test or some damn thing, and I
came out very good and they asked me what the hell do you want to get
into this for with what talents you got and so on. [I said] "I want it.
I have to have a job." So they said, "All right we'll send you up to the
guy. You show him this." And they gave me my papers and all of that and
they sent me up to the instructor of the welding class. He was a hell of
a nice guy. He was a former ironworker himself, and he put me to work
and watched over me. And then weeks went by and I was getting edgy. This
is a two-year course we're talking about. After about eight weeks, or
seven weeks, I went up to him and I says, "Listen, this is for the
birds." I says, "I've got three growing kids. I have to have a job. I've
got to be able to pass an exam immediately. I can't hang around." He
says, "Give me a few days, and I'll work very closely with you." And he
did. Then I told him, "Well, I've got to take my chances on that exam."
So they have state-certified agencies that test you for these so that
you qualify to work in construction. (Because everything is subject to
building codes, you know.) I went down there and I took the test. And I
was having a very difficult time with it because I really didn't know
what the hell they were talking about. I had to play it by feel. And
finally, the guy who--after two and a half days of working on this thing
(it should take a half a day, and I am struggling with it for two and a
half days) the guy who was in charge of the place came over and he says,
"What's the problem?" He says, "Let me see." You know how welders have
a--I says, "Listen, I have a job. But, I've got to have that piece of
paper."
1.12. TAPE NUMBER: VII, SIDE TWO SEPTEMBER 11, 1987
- DONAHOE
- So you are telling the man that you have to speed this process up.
- FIERING
- I said, "Listen, I can't wait. I've got a job, but I need this piece of
paper." So, he says, "Let me see what you're doing." There are several
different kinds of welding that you have to pass in order to get what's
called a certification. There are different kinds of certifications: one
for working in the sheet metal trade and one for working in the heavy
construction trade, you know [where] you see them putting up these steel
structures. And I was going for both of them. So he takes a look and he
says, "Give me that." And he takes the tool from me and he starts doing
this thing for me. When he gets through he says, "Let's take 'him' [the
steel plates] over and get 'him' checked out." He would take them to a
test place and they would check the stress to see whether it will stand
the stress. And they stood the stress test, and he says, "Well, that's
okay now." And he took me over and he gave me the piece of paper.
- DONAHOE
- Just like that?
- FIERING
- Just like that.
- DONAHOE
- And this was the man from the class, the instructor from--?
- FIERING
- No, no. This was not the instructor. This was the guy from the state
agency that gives you the test-DONAHOE --that you were down there doing
for two and a half days.
- FIERING
- That I had to pass. He was my test taker.
- DONAHOE
- And he gave you a certificate?
- FIERING
- He gave me the certificate. So I went back down to the union hall and I
saw the dispatcher and I says, "I've got that paper." (This was eight
weeks later.) He says, "What the hell are you talking about." "You told me to go get this welding certification and you would have a
job." He says, "What are you talking about?" And I started getting very
excited, you know, and angry. And he says, "Okay, okay, okay, let me see
it." He sees it and he says okay and he sends me out on a job.
- DONAHOE
- Do you think he was putting you on when he said go to Trade-Tech,
because it was a two-year program? You wouldn't be back for two years.
- FIERING
- No, he needed welders. All he said to me was get a welding
certification. He thought I was a welder. I just didn't have the
certification.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, he didn't even realize-
- FIERING
- I had never welded a thing in my life. I never saw-
- DONAHOE
- It was probably unheard of that you did this twoyear in eight weeks and
got a certification.
- FIERING
- That's right, that's right. He thought I was a welder and all I needed
was to pass the test and get--I didn't know-
- DONAHOE
- It's like somebody who was a teacher and had to get a California license
or something like that.
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- You never had a day of experience.
- FIERING
- I didn't know welding from apple butter.
- DONAHOE
- So he sent you on a job.
- FIERING
- So he sent me on a job. Once he sends you on a job, you fill out the
union application form and you are a member of the union.
- DONAHOE
- Automatically?
- FIERING
- Automatically. That's the most important thing: to become a member of
the union. Doesn't matter if you don't know anything. And I didn't; I
didn't know anything.
- DONAHOE
- Well, there was no initiation period or anything like that?
- FIERING
- Well, you pay your initiation fee. But you can stagger the initiation
fee so you pay it off so much a month. The initiation fee at that time
was $324, I remember. It was a hundred hours' pay. The rate of pay was
$3.24 an hour, which was high. That was good money.
- DONAHOE
- Was there a probation period?
- FIERING
- No. There's no probation period there.
- DONAHOE
- There couldn't be.
- FIERING
- Because you must be a journeyman to get into the union. It means you
served your probation when you served your apprenticeship.
- DONAHOE
- That's it, right. But you skipped everything.
- FIERING
- I skipped everything.
- DONAHOE
- Nobody ever knew.
- FIERING
- Of course, later on many of the guys who I went to work with on the job
used to come over and say, "How much did you pay and who did you payoff
to get this certification?" I couldn't convince them that I didn't pay
off anybody.
- DONAHOE
- It was a real fluke.
- FIERING
- It was a fluke, right. I didn't realize until later how lucky I really
was.
- DONAHOE
- And you had such a good-paying job.
- FIERING
- That's right. Of course, I had to know the job though. So they sent me
out on a job. First job I lasted was about five to six days but it was
the kind of stuff I picked up right away and I could last. But then when
they started asking me to do something different and I didn't know what
the hell they were talking about, they saw that quick enough and I got
fired that day.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, no.
- FIERING
- So I went from job to job. So what do I do? go down to the union and get
back on the list, and [if] there's a lot of work, you get sent out right
away because there are plenty of jobs. They put you on the bottom of the
list if you come in and then you work your way up to the top of the
list. But with the number of jobs there were that was nothing. It was a
matter of a day or two, see.
- DONAHOE
- So they had a lot of jobs.
- FIERING
- Oh, they had a lot of work. That was a very busy period in construction,
yeah.
- DONAHOE
- It was mostly construction.
- FIERING
- Oh, it was all construction. Sometim es in a shop, but mostly out of a
shop.
- DONAHOE
- The union couldn't do anything like if you got fired off a job, they
wouldn't penalize you in any way and say, "You don't know what you are
doing. How can you be in this union?"
- FIERING
- Oh, no. They don't know whether I was fired or not.
- DONAHOE
- Oh. They don't know anything about it?
- FIERING
- Because see in that industry, you don't have to be fired, you can just
quit a job. Go down to the union and say, "I didn't like that job. I
want another job." So they put you on the list, you wait your turn, you
go up, and then they send you out on another job.
- DONAHOE
- You never have to do any explaining to them.
- FIERING
- Nothing, nothing.
- DONAHOE
- So they would have no way of knowing that you were learning on the job.
- FIERING
- They had no way of knowing. And they didn't care. They didn't care.
- DONAHOE
- Which is good. You went into a good industry.
- FIERING
- I was very, very lucky. It was a good union, too, besides. It was a good
union.
- DONAHOE
- Now, what is the name of that union?
- FIERING
- The Sheet Metal Workers.
- DONAHOE
- The Sheet Metal Workers, yeah, of course. And they hire them-
- FIERING
- Local 108.
- DONAHOE
- --Oh, of course. Not too many unions have that kind of hiring policy.
- FIERING
- Well, all the construction unions have it.
- DONAHOE
- They do have that.
- FIERING
- Oh sure. That's typical of the construction trades. Sure.
- DONAHOE
- Did you have benefits?
- FIERING
- Oh, well, I didn't need any benefits. No, I didn't stay long enough on
the job to get benefits. You have to have so many hours to get benefits.
I didn't have the occasion to because my wife had benefits on her job.
Or did she? I'm not even sure. I don't even remember back then whether
she did or not. I think she did. And whether I had them, I don't think I
worked enough hours. Of course, in the beginning, I didn't have them I'm
sure because I didn't have the hours in. I think later on I did have the
hours in to get medical benefits, but I never got the hours in to get
vacation payor pension rights. But, anyway, so I went down and they sent me out to another job. So I'd
last on the job a day or two days and they'd find me out and they'd fire
me. You've got to do a head trip. You've got to steel yourself to that
kind of thing. I went through about forty or fifty jobs in a year.
- DONAHOE
- That many?
- FIERING
- That's right. Job to job to job. And every place I'd go, I'd pick up a
little bit, see. I learned how to install air-conditioning. I became an
expert welder. In fact, I became a foreman, too.
- DONAHOE
- So you had to view it as a learning experience.
- FIERING
- That's it exactly. You just got to steel yourself that this is what you
are going to go through, or else you get demoralized.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, right, [from] being fired all the time.
- FIERING
- I said, "This is my training." That's all. So people were very nice too.
They helped carry me--workers on the job. I wasn't hard to get along
with; I was, you know, pretty amiable.
- DONAHOE
- And you were older too at this time.
- FIERING
- I was middle-aged. I was forty-four years old.
- DONAHOE
- So that wasn't easy.
- FIERING
- That was not easy.
- DONAHOE
- Learning a whole new trade, right.
- FIERING
- Especially after not having done any physical work for more than twenty
years. It was not easy. And that's heavy work, heavy. It's metal, you
know. And you're lugging around metal all day, lifting it and carrying
it, and some of those piles which you carry are heavy. I used to fallout
of my car when I'd come home at night and crawl into the house and into
bed. It was rough. So I stayed with it until 1964. But during that
period there were periods of unemployment. Or the UE would call me and
say, "Look, we've got a hot situation, and we would like to know if you
can help us." Either with organizing or--That's another time I went up
to Sunnyvale-Westinghouse. Or locally in Los Angeles, Western Wire, with
some negotiations they needed some help with.
- DONAHOE
- So this was like between '56 and '64 this is all happening.
- FIERING
- Nineteen fifty-seven.
- DONAHOE
- 'Fifty-seven. Okay.
- FIERING
- I went to work in sheet metal in--let's see, I quit UE in January--I
went to work in sheet metal in April or thereabouts in '57. Then the UE
would call me on and off. They would call me in 1959 for a spell and in
1961 they called me. But then I'd go back to work in sheet metal, see.
Or if there was an extended period of unemployment, I went to work in an
oil company--Baker Oil-out here. I went to work for--I used my welding
certification as a maintenance mechanic, which I knew nothing about
either. But it got me into the shop. My welding experience got me into
the shop. I became a shop chairman in that oil company and I became a
member of the oil workers union [Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers
International Union]. I was the shop chairman of that particular thing
and negotiated contracts. John Day got me in there. I don't know if you
know him.
- DONAHOE
- No. From the oil workers or is he a--1
- FIERING
- Yeah, he was working in that shop. But I had known him for many years. I
knew him in Saint Louis and then when he came back here. But then most
of the time I worked in sheet metal. Whenever work picked up, you know,
I went back because it paid a lot more.
- DONAHOE
- It seems like this a long period of transition. You were learning a
trade and still-
- FIERING
- Doing organizing.
- DONAHOE
- --and still doing organizing. But still not clear what were you going to
move in terms of organizing.
- FIERING
- Well, gradually and then I got the itch to go back. I wanted to get
back.
- DONAHOE
- But not to UE.
- FIERING
- No. Not back to UE.
- DONAHOE
- But you really didn't make a break with them.
- FIERING
- I don't think Matles would have wanted me back in the UE by that time,
because I wasn't too friendly when I walked out. I just walked out, you
know.
- DONAHOE
- But you said the people still called you to do organizing, West Coast
people.
- FIERING
- Oh, yeah. As a matter of fact, it was Maties who asked me to take on a
part-time job. He didn't mind that, see. But he didn't want me around
him permanently, I don't think, anymore. But that period is kind of
vague in my mind--a little hazy. But I did go back at the urging of the
international--that means Matles--to take on a specific negotiation or
to help out in organizing like going up to Sunnyvale. That I could only
do if Matles asked me to do it.
- DONAHOE
-
- FIERING
- So it wasn't like a total break. No, it wasn't a total break. But I just
couldn't get the trade union movement out of my system (never really
did), and I began to get the urge to go back after a few years.
- DONAHOE
- To organizing, not just working.
- FIERING
- Yeah, that's right. And I laid low in my union-the sheet metal workers
union Local 108. As a matter of fact, they went on a red hunt while I
was a member of it while I was working in the trade. But they missed me
because I was very quiet. But they were after a number of other guys
whom the [Jack B.] Tenney committee [California State Legislature Joint
Fact-finding Committee on UnAmerican Activities] had fingered.
- DONAHOE
- The late fifties?
- FIERING
- Yeah, the Tenney committee got them. And once the Tenney committee named
them, why the local people checked them out and they just raised hell
with a lot of lives. I mean, the local union went on a red hunt. Because
these guys were noisy in meetings, you know. They were trying to carry
the line in meetings. They were still in it--that is, they were still
making a revolution.
- DONAHOE
- This was still a bad time, yeah.
- FIERING
- But I was very quiet. I was not on the California list. I was on the
HUAC list. They didn't look at the HUAC list. They only looked on the
Tenney list. So they didn't come across my name.
- DONAHOE
- That Tenney committee, was that--what do they call it?--the senate
investigating committee?
- FIERING
- The state senate investigating committee.
- DONAHOE
- State senate.
- FIERING
- Senator Tenney, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- John or Jack?
- FIERING
- I think it was John Tenney--Jack Tenney.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, I remember that one. That's the one I thought [Richard] Nixon was
on, and I just got confused with that, yeah.
- FIERING
- No, no. Nixon was on HUAC. He was on my committee.
- DONAHOE
- So you survived that.
- FIERING
- I survived it because I was very quiet. These guys would get up at
meetings and raise hell, and my attitude was the hell with that shit.
I'm not there for that.
- DONAHOE
- Had they been there for a while?
- FIERING
- Well, they were in there longer than me. Yeah, they were in there longer
than me. But that's not what I am here for. I'm here for a job. I'm not
here to make any kinds of revolutions.
- DONAHOE
- Were you interested then in working more in the union itself just as an
organizer with the Sheet Metal Workers?
- FIERING
- Well, the opportunity never came up. I don't know. As I look back on it
now, I know more about the building trades; I would have enjoyed it. I
don't think I would have enjoyed it as much as the basic
industries--mass production industries. That was really my meat, see.
Being a business agent in the building trades union, it's a different
kind of an industry. A different kind of job, different kind of
organizing. So I did learn one thing. I learned, by God, that despite
all those things I had said against business agents in other unions, it
was all a lot of crap. People are essentially, the people in the trade
union movement-- What I was talking about was my attitude towards other
business agents and unions, which came about as a result of this elitism
in the UE which was used to fortify us. That we were the best and the
only and so on, which was just so much crap. So I learned a lot about
business agents and other unions. By and large, I'd say that the people
in other unions worked just as hard and were just as honest, just as
dedicated. Have a different point of view, that's all, than people in
the UE. But they are good people. And they could work for me anytime.
They work very hard, and I admire many of them. I admire many of them
for what they put in. They've made sacrifices.
- DONAHOE
- So it was an eye-opener.
- FIERING
- It certainly was an eye-opener to me about the rest of the trade union
movement.
- DONAHOE
- You had really been isolated a lot.
- FIERING
- Well, we isolated ourselves. We isolated ourselves. God damn it--a lot
of things to regret. But that's what I learned about these guys in the
sheet metal union and then, since that time, people I have worked with.
Learned about them. The general run of people that are working for the
workers are damn good people.
- DONAHOE
- So you just started kind of looking around or thinking where did you
want to go into the trade union movement.
- FIERING
- Well, what I wanted to do is get back in. So what happened was I applied
for a job. I had heard that AFSCME [American Federation of State,
County, and Municipal Employees] had been looking for a business agent
or somebody to handle grievances. I didn't know AFSCME from a hole in
the ground. I didn't even know what it stood for at the time.
- DONAHOE
- That was such a change, yeah.
- FIERING
- They told me it was a union in the public area. So I applied for the job
to the district executive board and was interviewed my them. As I was
walking out of that office, the guy outside in the waiting room there
says to me, "You're Henry Fiering, aren't you?" And I said, "Yeah." "And your wife is Clara Fiering." I said, "Yeah. Who are you?" He tells me his name is Ed Lingo. "Who's Ed Lingo?" He says, "I'm the assistant director of the Los Angeles-Orange County
Organizing Committee, the AFL-CIO [American Federation of Labor-Congress
of Industrial Organizations] here." Didn't mean anything to me. I says, "Yeah, yeah. How do you know my
name?" He says, "Well, that's a long story." "Yeah, but how do you know it?" "Well," he says, "you remember you used to work in the South. I used to
work in Bethlehem Steel in Scranton, PA. And in 1950, the CIO asked me
to go on their staff and asked me to go South." (That was two years
after I had left the South already; I left in '48.) He says, "And it
just happens that I went to a lot of the places you used to work at and
I heard a lot of stories about you. They were very, very interesting and
I started collecting a lot of material about you and stuff that you had
put out--material you had put out." So he says, "I do know something
about you." He says, "I'm glad to run into you. You just applied for
that job didn't you?" I says, "Yeah." He says, "Well, you are not going to get it." Well, what I later learned was that I was on the blacklist. The AFL-CIO
was not going to hire me.
- DONAHOE
- That late?
- FIERING
- Yeah.
- DONAHOE
- It was because of your politics.
- FIERING
- Yeah, because of my past history. In that I had to be cleared--I don't
know, they had a machine that they had to clear you all the way up to
[George] Meany's office, or some crap. Anyway, he says, "You are not
going to get it. But I would like to see you back in the labor
movement." So I said, "Well, I want to come back." The next thing I
knew, I got interviewed by the IBEW. I got a call from the IBEW. So I
went down and talked to them. I don't know whether you put that story I
told you before on the tape. I wasn't talking on tape at the time.
- DONAHOE
- No, I don't think so.
- FIERING
- So I went down and saw the guy, Larry Townsend, I think it was, the
international rep for the IBEW here at the time [who] did the hiring. It
was for a field rep's position. He interviewed me and he offered me the
job. And I said, "Fine." He said, "You start Monday." It wasn't until I
was on the way home that I got to thinking, you know, what I was telling
you.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, okay.
- FIERING
- Why do these guys want me? I was suspicious that they wanted to use me
for what I thought was a nefarious purpose, which was against my
principles. And so I got home and I called him up and I says, "Hey, that
offer of a job is pretty nice and I want one thing understood. I want it
understood that I am not going to be used to raid the UE." And with
that, he says, "Forget it." He probably had no more intention of raiding
the UE than the man on the moon because the UE didn't have anything
significant that they really wanted. Nothing significant that they
wanted. I was foolish to even think it.
- DONAHOE
- He was upset that you were setting conditions?
- FIERING
- Of course he was upset. Who am I? I haven't even started to work for him
and I'm laying down conditions under which I'm working.
- DONAHOE
- Now, were they in the AFL-CIO?
- FIERING
- Yes, oh, they're a powerful union.
- DONAHOE
- Well, how come you weren't on the blacklist there?
- FIERING
- Well, because by that time they were ready. They were ready. Ed Lingo
had done that for me.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, but how much time had passed?
- FIERING
- At that time, let's see, that was-
- DONAHOE
- Between AFSCME and this?
- FIERING
- I'm trying to get my dates straight on that. By that time there must
have been about almost two years that had passed.
- DONAHOE
- So he was probably out there working for you.
- FIERING
- This was not like one day and then tomorrow. Oh no. No, no, no. As a
matter of fact, he kept in touch with me. He kept in touch with me until
I finally went to work for AFSCME.
- DONAHOE
- So he was actually probably working behind the scenes for you all the
time.
- FIERING
- He was working for me. When he told me, he says, "I'm going to get you
back in the labor movement."
- DONAHOE
- And he meant it.
- FIERING
- And he meant it.
- DONAHOE
- Wow. And he was just a regular guy? He wasn't really a political person?
- FIERING
- Well, no, he was just a steelworker, just an ordinary steelworker. He
was a leader in his union. To be offered a job as a full-time rep for
the CIO you would have to have been a leader of the union, in this case
the [United] Steel[workers of America] and Bethlehem Steel, a powerful,
strong section of the union. But he was an ordinary guy. He wasn't a
politician in the sense that he would follow-
- DONAHOE
- But you must have made such an impression.
- FIERING
- With the stories he had heard about me--and this was after a two-year
hiatus, you know, a two-year lapse--I was very flattered. I don't mind
telling you. You can tell [because] I'm telling you the story here, and
this is now twenty-seven years later--twenty-six years later. I feel
very good about that.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, well, it really sort of ascertains a lot of things.
- FIERING
- Well, I made some noise in the South. That's what I did. Anyway, so he
was the one who put the IBEW on my tail. And so the IBEW called me. What
happened is what I told you about that transpired. Then, I didn't get
that job. I was still working in sheet metal, and on odd occasions I
went back to work in that oil company. They always had a job for me
whenever I wanted to go back, which was very interesting. But times were
good so it wasn't too difficult. In 1964, I finished working on the
Music Center [of Los Angeles County], the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion, and
the new [Los Angeles City Department of] Water and Power Building
downtown as a sheet metal worker. I won't tell you about some of the
experiences I had in the sheet metal trade. That's another kind of
story, but it doesn't fit in here anyway. Very interesting to me and
interesting to my kids. My kids get a big kick out of it. I then went on
to work on a couple of jobs after I had gotten laid off from the Music
Center. I was sent out on a job on a construction job in the [San
Fernando] Valley--a new building which turned out to be extremely heavy.
By that time I was already in my early fifties. Construction workers
should be retired by that time. It was very, very heavy work. When that
job was halfway over--As a matter of fact, I asked the foreman if he
wouldn't lay me off. And he wouldn't lay me off. So I just sat down on
the job and he had to fire me if he wanted to get the job done. I went
back down to the union hall and got another job. I went out to a new
hospital that was being built out in the Valley. That was also very
heavy work where the guy running the job was a very tough foreman. And I
stayed on that job just a short while, and during this period, by the
way, I developed back problems. I thought it was the heavy work. And a
couple of times, I had to be put into the hospital for a check-up on my
back. To make a long story short, I found once I quit the trade, I never
had a back problem.
- DONAHOE
- Really?
- FIERING
- It was in my head.
- DONAHOE
- No, but it was heavy work.
- FIERING
- It was heavy work, but I didn't really have back troubles. It was really
psychological--like I wanted to have back troubles. Like back troubles
should come with that territory. Anyway, this job on Saint Mary's
Hospital had a very tough foreman. And I thought, I really don't need
this. I had met a a friend of mine--I had met a guy, Hugh Weiss, and we
became somewhat friendly, who owned a real estate company. And he was
begging me to come to work for him. That field was also good at the
time. I had met him because two years previous to that I had undertaken
a job as a campaign manager for a guy who was my daughter [Roberta
Fiering Se~ovia]'s teache~, Gary Lipton. He was running for city
council. And so I met a number of friends. And then one of the people I
made friends with was this guy who owned a real estate outfit--a real
estate broker--who was on me to come to work for him. Well, I had had it
in 1964 with that hospital job. So I thought, I've got to make a change.
So I quit and I maintained my dues in the union because I didn't know
which way I was going to go in case I needed a job. But I went and saw
this friend of mine--this real estate broker--and he gave me a job
immediately. I worked in a real estate thing for little over a year, and
I made a lot of money. I made money from the first day I went to work
there.
- DONAHOE
- Selling houses?
- FIERING
- Yeah. It was just fantastic. I made more money than I ever made in my
life. But I quit him because I didn't like the way he was treating
people. And I went to work for a big outfit in the Valley.
- DONAHOE
- Real estate.
- FIERING
- Real estate outfit, yeah. Gribin-Von Dyl.
- DONAHOE
- Which one?
- FIERING
- Gribin-Von Dyl. It's the biggest outfit in the Valley, and I became
their number one guy. They were big out there; they had offices allover
the Valley. I stayed there for a while, and I was very successful. I
made money, but it got to be very boring. I had only been in this thing
for over a year, but it got to be so boring, and was wishing I could get
back into the labor movement. One day, I am sitting at this desk feeling
sorry for myself and this guy, Lingo, calls me up. He says, "Are you
ready to come back to the trade union movement?" I says, "Just tell me
where and when." He says, "I've got an appointment for you today if you
want to." I says, "What time?" He says, "Two o'clock." I says, "Give me
the address; I'll be there." So I hung up and I walked out of that
office, and I never came back.
- DONAHOE
- Perfect timing.
- FIERING
- I went down and I met the district director of AFSCME.
- DONAHOE
- So it was AFSCME again.
- FIERING
- It was AFSCME again. I had an interview with them and he asked me a
series of questions primarily about my background and my past. I said to
myself--political past--and I says, "Look, I ain't going to bullshit
about this thing. These guys probably know as much about me as I know.
I'm going to level with them. If they don't like it, the hell with'
them." So I leveled with them. So when I get through, he says, "Well, I
just wanted to see if you were telling me the truth." He pulls a dossier
out of his desk and he says, "Here, you take it."
- DONAHOE
- He had it on you all that time.
- FIERING
- He had it all that time. He says, "You take it."
- DONAHOE
- But what did you tell them?
- FIERING
- I says, "Look, I ain't going to bullshit you. I just want to tell you
the hell where I come from." I says, "I'm not apologizing for a goddamn
thing. I did a hell of a lot of work for the trade union movement. I've
got a good record. If you want somebody competent, I think I'm
competent. That's the way it is." He liked it.
- DONAHOE
- But you didn't go into all the big details about your political life?
- FIERING
- No, no, I didn't have to go into my political life--except to state
generally, yeah, I was a radical and all of that, come from a left-wing
past. That's all, I didn't have to go into more than that. Then he pulls
me aside and says, "I just wanted to see if you would tell me the truth,
that's all." He wanted to see if I was honest with him.
- DONAHOE
- Where did they get the dossier?
- FIERING
- My dossier is floating allover the place. They get it from the HUAC. Who
do you think?
- DONAHOE
- And they send them to all the unions?
- FIERING
- Of course. The AFL-CIO goes down there and would get it; all they had to
do is ask for it and they would get cooperation immediately from HUAC.
How do you think they get all the stuff on you that they put out about
you from the year you were born, for Christ's sake?
- DONAHOE
- : Oh, I know. Yeah, I have seen them.
- FIERING
- That's where they get it.
- DONAHOE
- Every step you took.
- FIERING
- When they want to attack you, for Christ's sake.
- DONAHOE
- So what year was this?
- FIERING
- This was 1965.
- DONAHOE
- 'Sixty-five. So actually, it's almost ten years.
- FIERING
- Of what?
- DONAHOE
- That when you left-
- FIERING
- It was '57 to '65. It was eight years.
- DONAHOE
- Eight years, yeah.
- FIERING
- Eight years. He told me the rate of pay. I didn't even ask him, he told
me the rate of pay. I cut my earnings by more than half of what I was
making--by more than half. Which some people say I was crazy to have
done, but I was happier. Because I was making good money in real estate.
I would have been rich today I guess. For Christ's sake, the first
couple of months I was there I bought a couple of houses. I had never
owned a piece of property in my life, for Christ's sake, and I had
already bought a couple of houses. Anyway, so he gave me the job and I
went to work for him. My thing, you know. As it turned out after a
couple of years, I became his boss.
- DONAHOE
- What did he hire you as?
- FIERING
- What did he hire me as? To handle grievances and to organize the War on
Poverty workers.
- DONAHOE
- Okay.
- FIERING
- See the War on Poverty program came in with [Lyndon B.] Johnson in
1965--'64 and '65. I don't know if you remember that or if you know
anything about it.
- DONAHOE
- I do.
- FIERING
- So here were all these workers. That was a waste of time organizing
them. I could have organized a lot of other people in that period; it
would have been permanent. In any event, I organized them and then what
happened was--and I did some other little organizing, what they call
servicing. You know, you go out on grievances, settle grievances. We
didn't have any contracts then because there was no legal recognition of
unions by public entities at that point, see. All we had was a law which
said that management had to meet with you. And so if they met with you,
that's what we used to build the unions. In 1967, exactly ten years ago
last week, the international AFSCME calls me up and wanted to know--No,
it wasn't international; it was the district setup we had here in
California--in the West. The AFSCME setup in the West: the leadership of
the international representative, the district president, and the
district director. We had a different change-up. There was a different
district director at that time than the one who hired me, because the
whole setup changed in California. They amalgamated everything in
California, with the exception of a couple of locals, into one big
statewide setup and set up California Council 49. They wanted to know if
I would go up north to Humboldt County because they had some problems
there. But really the situation was that every one of them was afraid to
go up. We had a local union there that affiliated to us. It was an
association, an independent association of county employees in Humboldt
County, the Humboldt County Employees Association, and they had
affiliated with us. They expected big things out of the affiliation with
the AFL-CIO. And they were running into trouble with negotiations and
the board of supervisors up there told them to go jump in the lake. They
wanted a raise, and they were becoming very unhappy with the union in
not getting what the union had told them to expect--all the promises the
union had made to them. They were going to jump the traces and
disaffiliate. They were that unhappy. So the people who were down here
were very much afraid to face that kind of a situation. That's what we
had; that's what AFSCME was at that point. So they asked me if I would
go up. And me, I loved challenges, so I went up. I walked into this
place--I had never heard of Humboldt County from a hole in the ground--I
walked into a setup. They had a negotiations meeting set with the chief
administrative officer of the county, Vernon Fletcher. He apprised me of
the situation that people were very unhappy with AFSCME. didn't know
this until I got up there. This is what I learned from them. See, people
down here wouldn't tell me that. All they would tell me was you are the
guy who maybe can do it. So I went in, sat down, and took over
negotiations. And as luck would have it, I worked out an agreement with
the chief administrative officer and with the committee. We had a
representative committee there. And the people were very happy with the
way I handled the thing. So the chief administrative officer said, "Now
that we are through, I have to go. The board of supervisors is meeting
next door. They're waiting to hear what the results of our meeting are."
We had been in session for about two hours. So he walks in there. He's
there for about ten minutes, and he comes back and he's crying,
literally. Literally, tears coming down his cheeks. So, we asked, "What
is it, Vernon?" He said, "I'm sorry to tell you that when I., walked in
there, I told the board of supervisors that we had just arrived at an
agreement and they told me that it didn't make any difference. They had
called the press an hour ago and told the press there was not going to
be a raise. We have nothing." So when the committee heard that, they
were incensed, and this guy is humiliated. He was a good honest soul, he
was just humiliated. The least you would expect was that the supervisors
sent him in to negotiate--and this is the chief guy who runs the county
for them that they at least respect him to the degree that they would
stay behind him. And if he negotiates an agreement, they would accept
it. It's usually just a formality. Or else, pull him out, don't send him
in. But when you send him in with instructions, you know, you are
expected to back up your man. Anyway, so here he is sitting there and he is totally humiliated and I
get up cheerful as hell and I say, "Don't worry, Vern." And I am walking
and I'm patting him on the back. "Everything is going to be okay." It
was an ideal situation for us. And that comes from experience, see. That
comes from experience knowing people and how they will react in certain
circumstances. So I told the committee, "Let's go." The committee
followed-me out, we went, we had a meeting and called the executive
board of the union together. I put it to them that it wasn't just that
the CAO was humiliated, everybody was humiliated. What the supervisors
did was spit in our face and they could see crap and are we going to eat
it. And money was not the issue anymore. Their integrity was the issue.
And that's the way people are. If you want to keep them out for a long
time, you need more than money. Like the survival of the union--you've
got to convince them that it is important. To these people, they didn't
have the understanding about the survival of the union, but this was
just an insult, a heavy insult to them that they could be treated that
way with such indignity. So we agreed that we weren't going to take a
strike vote. We would just pass the word around the county and let the
people tell us what to do. And so we set up a meeting the next day at
eleven o'clock. And we sent the word allover the county: here's what
happened in our negotiations today and if you want a meeting, we are
meeting at eleven o'clock. And the people sent back the word--if you
know Humboldt County, it's a tremendous place. It's bigger than Los
Angeles County in territory. And people sent back word from everywhere.
They're coming off the job and they are coming to the meeting. So we had
the meeting and the whole county was at the meeting. Everybody was at
the meeting. So I made a report for the committee, and, you know, I was
excited myself. We left it open for feedback and, of course, the line of
the report geared the kind of feedback that we were going to get. They
told us, "Give them hell. Let's strike." One after the other, county
employees struck this refrain. These are people who are among the most
conservative group of people in the state working for a public entity.
- DONAHOE
- I can imagine.
- FIERING
- They would not have said the word "strike" if they had a mouth full of
shit. Here they are, one after another, talking about strike, let's
strike, let's strike, let's strike. We didn't put a strike vote--the
leadership did not ask for a strike vote. We had it come from the floor.
Then somebody made a motion for a strike, we put the vote, and it was a
unanimous vote. When did we start striking? We started striking right
away. *[That experience taught me a lot about the power of the public employee.
Our communities are viable today only to the extent they are assured of
the daily services that government provides. Shut down these services
and the communities grind to a halt. That's what happened to Humboldt
County. This is even more true when the public employee has the support
of the labor movement. We had two instances like that, both of which
helped push the Humboldt County Central Labor Council to threaten a
general strike. Eureka is a big shipping port. We sent one picket down to the docks with
a picket sign. The longshoremen, organized in the ILWU (International
Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union), to a man refused to cross that
line where the picket stood. Everything shipped out of the country has
to be checked by the tax assessor and everything unloaded off the ship
has to be inspected by the agricultural inspector. These county
employees were part of our strike. The docks had to shut down and ships
could not be unloaded. The other incident occurred at a huge building project. Every worker was
a member of a building trades union. We sent one building inspector, a
striker, out with a picket sign and every worker walked off the job.
Remember, every phase of building requires an okay from the county
building inspector before it can proceed to the next phase. So a $25
million project came to a halt. There was tremendous pressure on the
county supervisors to settle the strike. They were meeting every day in
the county auditorium packed with concerned citizens demanding an end.
We held the high moral ground and a united group of employees. At the
end of the fifth day, following a threat of a general strike by the
central labor council, they instructed their CAO, Vernon Fletcher, to
resume negotiations and on the sixth day, approved his recommendation
five to zero. It gave me a new appreciation of the public employee's
role in the community as well as his power.] * Mr. Fiering added the following bracketed section during his review of
the transcript.
1.13. TAPE NUMBER: VIII, SIDE ONE SEPTEMBER 25, 1987
- DONAHOE
- Okay, so you finally became hired by UE [United Electrical, Radio, and
Machine Workers of America]-
- FIERING
- By AFSCME [American Federation of State, County, and Municipal
Employees].
- DONAHOE
- AFSCME, excuse me.
- FIERING
- In 1965.
- DONAHOE
- In 1965, okay. And I'm trying to find out how did you find working in
the public sector? Was it different from working in the industrial
sector?
- FIERING
- It was a new animal to me and I didn't know what to expect. I had no
conception of the kinds of problems that they deal with or how to
approach a public entity, its problems or public employees, for that
matter. But I decided, "Look, I am an organizer and I'll just approach
it like I would anybody else." And I found to my amazement that workers
are workers no matter where they work and a boss is a boss. You have to
treat a boss as a boss. And that background, that industrial-union
experience, was what was really needed in AFSCME and that's what [Jerry]
Wurf was searching for in hiring people. He didn't hire me. was hired by
the district council, but in a way he really approves or disapproves of
staff people. But that's what they were looking for, people with
that--He recognized the need for people with that kind of background. If
he was going to do the job, he wanted it done. Of course, he made a
tremendous contribution to the union.
- DONAHOE
- He was the president?
- FIERING
- He was the national president.
- DONAHOE
- The national [president], that was his actual title.
- FIERING
- Yeah. He had taken over the presidency I think two years before. He had
defeated a conservative leadership which had controlled AFSCME ever
since its inception. He came in with a struggle program, and he did one
hell of a job organizing public employees. He set the tone for all
public employees in the country. He made a real contribution. It was
mainly as a result of his leadership that the union grew as it did. Not
only that, but that other public unions grew also. He made public
employment an inviting thing to many unions and they started penetrating
it in order to build their memberships. But AFSCME became the dominant
union in the field. But what I learned is that you--I just took whatever
I knew and I applied it. And it works. I found that struggle works. A
boss is a boss, and you organize workers on the basis of a struggle
program. The mood among public employees for struggle and militancy was
growing at that time. They felt very discriminated against in comparison
to people in the private sector, who were way ahead of them. It wasn't
difficult to grab ahold of that kind of feeling and go to work with it.
So my first job was in Pasadena [California], and it worked well. Hell,
we set up an organization in Pasadena, and we became a dominant force in
the union setup in Pasadena. There had been some older established
unions like the IBEW [International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers]
and the [International Union of] Operating Engineers that had small
groups of people. But we became the bigger union.
- DONAHOE
- Was this for the city of Pasadena?
- FIERING
- Of the city, Pasadena city.
- DONAHOE
- So you were organizing the city into AFSCME.
- FIERING
- Yeah, that was my first assignment. My first assignment.
- DONAHOE
- Pasadena.
- FIERING
- It's a conservative community, strangely enough, but it didn't make any
difference. Like every place else, the worker is a worker.
- DONAHOE
- And they had approached AFSCME to be organized?
- FIERING
- Yeah, they had approached AFSCME, and at their first meeting I was taken
out there--I think it was their first real big meeting--I was taken out
there by the district director who hired me, Sam Hunegs. He had met with
the committee from there before--a large committee. And then when he had
set up this meeting by that time, I was on the staff. So he took me out
and tossed it to me. And I took it from there. I found out organizing
public employees was just like it used to be in the thirties. It was not
difficult at all.
- DONAHOE
- This was in the sixties.
- FIERING
- This was in the middle sixties.
- DONAHOE
- And the public employees are kind of on the move.
- FIERING
- They were on the move, right.
- DONAHOE
- Similar, as you said, to the industrial workers in the thirties.
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- So they're the one kind clamoring for organization, right.
- FIERING
- They were clamoring for organization, right.
- DONAHOE
- I was going to ask you, like, what was the level of the status of the
public sector when you entered it in the mid-sixties?
- FIERING
- Well, when I entered it, it was largely unorganized. *[Let me digress
here for a few minutes. To say public employees were unorganized is not
entirely accurate. If by organized you mean union organization, that is
true. Public employees over many years were organized in self-service
organizations called associations. The focus of these associations was
not on collective bargaining, an adversary relationship with management,
contracts detailing wages and conditions. They attempted to provide an
instrument for public employees in areas outside the job to enhance the
employees' security, providing insurance programs, death benefits, all
of which the employees paid for, using the mass-purchasing power of the
association to bargain better rates, and so on. These associations dated
back almost to the inception of the public jurisdiction they were a part
of. This is very brief, but I don't think we have room here for the
history of union organization in the public sector in which these
associations later came to play the key role.] However, from a union perspective, out here it was just about totally
unorganized. You had spots of organization, for instance, the building
trades. In the county, you had some organization that had been going on
there for many years among hospital workers. And in the city you had
organization that had been going on among the blue-collar workers who
ever since the forties and fifties, had established first an independent
union, by the way, which then affiliated with the SEIU [Service
Employees International Union]. * Mr. Fiering added the following bracketed section during his review of
the transcript.
- DONAHOE
- For the city of Los Angeles.
- FIERING
- Yeah, that was Elinor Glenn. She was a part of that at that time. That
showed the shortsightedness of the old leadership in AFSCME, which could
have had them, and they then became the key to the organization of the
majority of workers in both the city and the county. But if it had been
Wurf, he would have made an accommodation. He was not the president at
that time when they were in trouble--See when the split took place in
CIO [Congress of Industrial Organizations], the public workers, which at
that time were SCMW [State, County, and Municipal Workers of America].
- DONAHOE
- What was it?
- FIERING
- State, County, and Municipal Workers.
- DONAHOE
- And that was like an independent-
- FIERING
- They were expelled from the CIO.
- DONAHOE
- They were?
- FIERING
- Yeah. When they were expelled, they went independent, and they were
decimated. But they maintained a group in L.A. city and L.A. County. And
they also maintained a group in Hawaii. In Hawaii they became a powerful
force among the blue-collar workers in Hawaii.
- DONAHOE
- So they were expelled in 1949?
- FIERING
- Nineteen forty-nine. At that CIO convention.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, way back, I see.
- FIERING
- Way back. And here we are in the middle of the sixties now and they have
a firm base.
- DONAHOE
- So they were still going?
- FIERING
- They were still going. Why? Because in the early fifties the
international president of the SEIU, George Hardy, was smart enough to
make a deal and offer them conditions which they couldn't refuse. He
took them in as they were, no questions asked about their politics or
anything. See, that was not possible with AFSCME. The old president of
AFSCME wouldn't do it. That was--I forget what the hell his name was
[Arnold Zander]. If he had been Wurf, it would have been different. And
the whole situation of AFSCME in California would have been different.
- DONAHOE
- So the former leadership of AFSCME before Wurf was really too
conservative to recognize a lot of the potential.
- FIERING
- The possibilities, the potential.
- DONAHOE
- They missed a number of important things. But didn't they organize the
county workers, the Los Angeles County workers?
- FIERING
- Yep, but that was a whole different thing, very involved.
- DONAHOE
- I was involved in that later.
- FIERING
- You were involved in that?
- DONAHOE
- Yeah. There had been an independent union there too.
- FIERING
- Well, there is an independent association, the Los Angeles County
Employees Association, which affiliated with the SEIU.
- DONAHOE
- The SEIU. I thought it was the--?
- FIERING
- Local 660, that became 660, which affiliated with another part of the
workers. The hospital workers were Local 434, which was Elinor Glenn's
union, which had been in SEIU and already had a base of several thousand
members.
- DONAHOE
- I see. It became very complicated.
- FIERING
- It is. It was complicated all right.
- DONAHOE
- So when you came on the scene it was basically unorganized?
- FIERING
- Unorganized, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- Or some independent unions?
- FIERING
- Well, which was typical. It was true in the city, too. There were
independent associations as well as the SEIU. We had a scattered
membership.
- DONAHOE
- And what was your main responsibility?
- FIERING
- Well, my responsibility--At that time I was assigned to Pasadena.
- DONAHOE
- But weren't there restrictions about what you could do and what you
couldn't do? The limits of this public organizing in the public sector?
330
- FIERING
- I was told to organize them and to service them.
- DONAHOE
- I thought you could just handle grievances?
- FIERING
- Well, originally when I applied for t~ job in 1961, at that time what
they were looking for and even in-it's true in '65--what they were
looking for was a grievance handler. Somebody would sit in the office
and wait for telephone calls from people with grievances. And when you
had a grievance, you would assist them in handling the grievance. There
was a limited law at that time called the Brown Act--it still exists as
a matter of fact--which permits such kinds of representation. It doesn't
permit contract negotiations or real collective bargaining, but it
permitted that kind of representation. And it became a handle for the
unions to move in and organize. So that's what they were looking for. We
had a rather conservative leadership in the district council. The guy
who hired me was a rather conservative guy. And that's as far as--So he
didn't have vision either; he was part of the old setup in AFSCME. So
when I came on, essentially I was supposed to be a grievance handler.
But here this thing breaks out in Pasadena and he was busy with other
things, so he took me out just at that time and he gave it to me like,
handle their grievances. So we had a meeting, and the thing was to
organize them, not just to handle the grievances.
- DONAHOE
- It was beyond the grievances.
- FIERING
- Of course. I did what I knew how to do best: organized them. And when I
organized them, I represented them· the same as you would if there was
collective bargaining: set up a committee, set up a stewards, a
structure, set up a local union and went to work just like a local
union. But once I had got into that and while I was setting that up, the
OEO [OCCupational and Educational Opportunities Act] program broke open,
the War on Poverty. (In L.A. it was the Employment Youth Opportunities
Agency, EYOA). And I didn't know the difference between OEO and AEO or
anything else, you know. This was all new country to me. Except that
there was a clamor and there were certain political ties this guy
had--this boss of mine had-and there were pressures to organize these
people. They wanted to organize, so he turned it over to me. If I had
known at that time what I learned later, I would have told him it's
nothing. But as it turned out, it was a year and a half of wasted time
and effort. Completely wasted. I organized over a thousand people. We
had about twelve hundred people in the union, and we had some contracts,
too. But it was an ephemeral kind of thing, you know, he's here today
and gone tomorrow. It depends on funding from the federal government and
the political atmosphere. Nothing permanent like a city is permanent or
a county is permanent.
- DONAHOE
- So the War on Poverty program had been set up by the government sort of
in reponse to community demands?
- FIERING
- Well, it was Lyndon JohriSon's War on Poverty. There was a certain
latitude giveR to workers in community organizations at that time. And
they seized on it because there was money involved. And they got grants
of money. And they got an opportunity to set up the leadership of these
various organizations that were springing up allover with demands from
the funding agencies of the OEO to make their organizations go, for
whatever the purpose. Either it was job training or I don't know
what--Head Start at that time. All kinds of programs that would give
people work and would be community-based, community-run, and highly
political. Because whoever had the political muscle in the community was
able to latch on to money, you know, and the politicians in that way
used it to control the Hispanic community and the black community, where
most of the money went. And the people were given a lot of latitude, so
it wasn't difficult to organize them at all. And we had easy entry and
cooperation, because they recognized that a union could help them
maintain their funding. The union was a political organization. So we
had a good deal of cooperation also. There was the boss/worker
relationships, adversary relationships, where there might have been a
contest for control of the work force.
- DONAHOE
- Okay. We were discussing that there was an adversarial relationship
present so that you did have a worker and a boss situation. But can
you--?
- FIERING
- You mean in the public area, in public employment. You do. You have
people who make decisions, the management, and you have workers who they
direct. I mean, they've got a job to do in administering of budget and
administering departments, providing community services, and they
supervise workers.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, I can see that because my husband works for a city, and he organized
a union there. But I was wondering-we were talking about the War on
Poverty there for a minute--and I was just wondering how that actually
applied.
- FIERING
- The War on Poverty, you see, it applies. It applies, because in any
event, you've got an agency, you've got a director, and you've got a
board of directors who run the agency. They set up a director to manage,
to carry out the decisions of the board of directors. See, the board of
directors is set up as a condition of a grant of money, and it's
composed of community people. They appoint a director and a director
appoints a staff, and their job is to administer whatever the function
of that agency is, whatever the terms of the money grant are. Whatever
it may be. Head Start, it's easy to visualize. In the job training
program, it's easy to visualize. And they supervise people. And you have
conflicts in terms of people versus people and you have conflicts in
terms of the way direction is given; you have grievances. You have some
directors that ride roughshod over workers and others who know how to
treat workers. So these people organize in order to have something to
say about their jobs and about the budget and how the budget is divided.
So that they get some conditions that they would want as workers, like
health and welfare conditions, which they normally would not get. An
agency would not give it to them because they want to use the money for
the community people it's supposed to serve. It's that kind of thing.
- DONAHOE
- Did you find it more difficult organizing there? Was there resistance?
- FIERING
- No.
- DONAHOE
- Was there a lot of resistance from the director?
- FIERING
- There was resistance by some of the agencies, yeah. They didn't want
anybody interfering with their operation. They assumed the same position
towards the union that any employer would: that the union was going to
try to dictate to them how they were going to run the agency. In other
cases, you had people who were very sympathetic to a union and who made
it easy for us to come in and deal with them. You had both kinds.
Sometimes you had to have strikes or walkouts or protests of one kind or
another. We had all kinds of demonstrations going all the time. But the
bottom line was it was not permanent.
- DONAHOE
- But no one knew at the time.
- FIERING
- No one knew it at the time, that's right. But what happened was that the
politicians were becoming afraid of it, because the people were getting
out of hand; they began to believe in the War on Poverty. It was really
a war on poverty and they thought they should take it over and direct
the War on Poverty and [that] they should have a lot more impute The
politicians were afraid of that, so gradually they chipped away and
chipped away at control of it until there was very little left of it.
Some programs, like Head Start, which had proven themselves were left
and that [Head Start] continues on today. I think its funding is still
federal. I'm not sure, I think it's still federal. And some other
programs, community programs, probably exist. Some of them became
privatized like TELACU [The East Los Angeles Community Union] over on
the east side. That's how it got its start; it got its start in the War
on Poverty. TELACU on the east side and-
- DONAHOE
- And now it's private?
- FIERING
- Of course. And the Watts Labor Community Action Agency [WLCAA], Ted
Watkins's program, got its start the same way.
- DONAHOE
- So that was Ted Watkins?
- FIERING
- That's right. And you know, that's still a going program. It has been
very successful in many areas.
- DONAHOE
- TELACU too?
- FIERING
- TELACU too is very successful, financially successful, yeah. *[Walter
Reuther and the United Automobile Workers (UAW) were responsible for
getting the funding that created TELACU and the WLCAA. He staffed each
of them with a UAW representative, Ted Watkins in WLCAA and Esteban
Torres in TELACU. Watkins is still there; Torres went on to becme a
congressman.] * Mr. Fiering added the following bracketed section during his review of
the transcript.
- DONAHOE
- That's interesting. So the government began cutting funds to most of
these?
- FIERING
- Began cutting funds and began restricting the authority of the local
agencies. By the time the--Let's see, it was 1965, '66, '67--by 1968
even.
- DONAHOE
- That short?
- FIERING
- You wouldn't have recognized it.
- DONAHOE
- Really?
- FIERING
- Of course. Once the government made up its mind to move in and put a
stop to all this free movement, they clamped down pretty hard and that
was it for a people's movement. There was no people's movement anymore.
But over the long pull, which is really not so long in terms of time,
the thing dissipated and didn't amount to anything. It was not a factor,
it was not permanent. You never could count on money. A constant fight
for survival. And less and less funds being allocated to it and it took
different directions. And it was just a waste of time. I could have used
that time organizing public workers.
- DONAHOE
- And so at that time you could have been in the county, the city, and all
these other things, and yet you were putting all-
- FIERING
- All my energy and all my time was in that. That was my assignment that
this guy gave me.
- DONAHOE
- There were thousands of others allover.
- FIERING
- And everything out there that was so essential to AFSCME was going
neglected. It was really neglected, yes. Well, anyway.
- DONAHOE
- The other thing I wanted to ask you about AFSCME and this public sector
was I thought that collective bargaining wasn't legitimized in the
public sector for a long time.
- FIERING
- After 1969, October 1969.
- DONAHOE
- So, how were you organizing Pasadena and how did the--?
- FIERING
- Because the Brown Act permits--See, the Brown Act followed the Kennedy
executive order for federal employees, presidential Executive Order
10988. The Kennedy executive order permitted public employees to present
grievances to management and to have representatives they desire to
represent them on grievances, period, see. In 1961, George Brown, who
was in the California Assembly at that time, promoted what came to be
known as the Brown Act, which permitted the same thing for public
employees below the federal level, the state down to local communities.
Now, all you really need is a right for an organizer to go in and
represent a worker and that becomes an entry point for a union. As a
matter of fact, it is much more than you can get in the private sector.
In the private sector you didn't have that right. You had to first
organize and win an election. But here any worker could join or not join
a union and ask for representation if he wanted it. So people would join
the union then because they could get representation. They couldn't get
a contract [though].
- DONAHOE
- They couldn't get a contract, but they could get representation.
- FIERING
- But they could representation. Then, if enough of them joined the union
just on that basis, they could then pressure the governmental agency,
the entity, the public entity for improvements of a general character.
And they could mount a campaign for it, see.
- DONAHOE
- So AFSCME then used this as a means of organizing--?
- FIERING
- Of building a union, of organizing, that's right.
- DONAHOE
- Of building a union and instituting collective bargaining.
- FIERING
- Well, AFSCME was a big factor in California in getting it. When the
terms of the county--Well, we were involved with UCLA, a big, big factor
at that time. I was involved with UCLA and with a couple of other unions
out of the AFL-CIO [American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial
Organizations] in determining the character of the law that would
permit, well, a limited form of collective bargaining, but really not so
limited, too. And then, in L.A. County and L.A. city I was involved with
what was known as the Aaron Committee, Ben [Benjamin] Aaron from UCLA
and his committee, again, who pulled together the city management and
the AFL-CIO union committee and the county management and the board of
supervisors and the AFL-CIO union committee to the determine the local
ordinances based upon what was in the Meyers-Milias-Brown Bill, which
was winding its way through the state legislature, but passed late in
1969 as the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act for County, City, and Special
District Employees in California.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, this is the Brown Act again.
- FIERING
- No, that was since the Brown Act. See, what happened with the Brown Act
was that it didn't quite do the job in keeping the lid on all the unrest
among public employees. So they had to come up with something better.
The something better was something that looked like real collective
bargaining. That was the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act in 1969. The Brown Act
was a door-opener: it enabled us to organize. Once we used it to
organize a bunch of people and we got these people in motion, then the
Brown Act did not suffice. It wasn't enough. They needed something a
little more comprehensive to deal with this now-growing mass of people
that were demanding to be heard, recognition, see. And so came the
Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, it's called, MMB.
- DONAHOE
- And when was that?
- FIERING
- That was in OCtober '69 that it passed the legislature.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, so that's actually what you consider the institution of collective
bargaining for public employees in California.
- FIERING
- And that is still what is governing in California, the
Meyers-Milias--that is governing only for city, county and special
districts. There are four other laws, three or four other laws, that
govern other areas of public employment, like the universities, the
public schools, and the state employees.
- DONAHOE
- What about like the small cities?
- FIERING
- They are governed by Meyers-Milias-Brown.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, they are?
- FIERING
- Yes. All cities-
- DONAHOE
- I thought there were certain charters or something.
- FIERING
- Well, there are different forms of authority that are granted local
community officials in some city charters which may exclude some areas
they have a right to bargain about with the unions that represent their
employees. But in terms of recognition of the employees, that's
standard, that's uniform, see.
- DONAHOE
- So that must have been quite a struggle in itself just to even get to
that point.
- FIERING
- Oh yeah, yeah. That was the big fight in the sixties, see.
- DONAHOE
- It was to win this.
- FIERING
- Right.
- DONAHOE
- So you had been involved-
- FIERING
- I was involved with the big movement of public employees in California
and I was-
- DONAHOE
- Beginning in Pasadena, then going to Humboldt County.
- FIERING
- Beginning in Pasa--Well, you see, that thing in Humboldt County was a
fluke, but at least it got me out of the War on Poverty.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, so that was after the War on Poverty.
- FIERING
- That was in '67, it was in September, '67. And as I mentioned before, my
going up there was a fluke. *[But that whole incident came at a
propitious moment. Stoppages and walkouts among California public
employees were spreading, almost four hundred in 1967. Anxiety was
mounting in Sacramento. As an aside, if you want to include this, I just
saw a friend of mine who was on the staff of AFSCME when I was the
executive director of the California District Council. He's involved in
a study the UC Berkeley history department is doing of the labor
movement in Humboldt County. Humboldt County was a base for the Wobbly
(Industrial Workers of the World) movement way, way back in the early
twenties. They're having a celebration about it in November. They are
presenting all the papers, a whole sheaf of papers to Humboldt State
University. The story and papers of this AFSCME strike will be a part of
that history. It was only a one-week strike out of years of history, but
a very significant strike.] Anyway, I gave you the story of the strike. It was the first successful
county-wide public employee strike in California's history. And I think
I went into considerable detail [before]. What brought it to a
victorious conclusion was we finally got the Central Labor Council in
Humboldt County to agree to go to the board of supervisors and say,
"Tomorrow if you do not settle, there will be a general strike here."
That helped settle it. We had the whole town shut down anyway. In fact
the labor movement was very reluctant, they had to be pushed. But there
was no alternative for them. But it was a tremendous experience. * Mr. Fiering added the following bracketed section during his review of
the transcript.
- DONAHOE
- Well, that must have served like as an inspiration for other public
workers.
- FIERING
- Well, you see the interesting thing about it was that it was more
publicized in some eastern parts of the country and in Canada than it
was in Southern California. The people here were afraid to publicize it
because they were afraid it was going to be a loser, and they didn't
want other public employees to read about a loser. I remember so clearly
[how] they would call me up and beg me to call it off. They thought it
was going to be a catastrophe.
- DONAHOE
- But what happened after you won? Didn't they publicize then?
- FIERING
- They publicized then, but you can get most of the publicity while it's
on, not after it's over.
- DONAHOE
- But it seems it would be an inspiration that you say, "Look what they
did in my county."
- FIERING
- Then they can talk about it. They would talk about it, but the most
publicity you would get out of it is while it's on. At that time they
could have used it, because [Ronald W.] Reagan was right in the middle
of it. He had his guy almost living with me, and his office was calling
more than once a day to find out what was the status of that thing. You
have to know how things were rocky in the whole public employment area
then. And so I remember so clearly how they would call me up and they
would say, "Please, call it off, call it off." And I would say, "What
are you worrying about? We've got them in a box. Just sit still. It's a
winner. It's a winner." Couldn't help but be a winner. I knew it.
Anyway, of course, when you win everything is great, you know. Winning
that strike propelled me to the leadership of AFSCME in California. I
became executive director of the State Council 49 shortly after.
- DONAHOE
- Did SEIU take advantage of it at all?
- FIERING
- No. We didn't even take advantage of it like we should have, which was
too bad.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, because it seems like it would have been very important.
- FIERING
- That's all history.
- DONAHOE
- Just one thing I want to go back to for a minute like when you became
involved in AFSCME. From what I heard, a number of organizers like you
came from basic industry. Is that true?
- FIERING
- Yeah, that's right.
- DONAHOE
- So why was that? Similar to you, were people--?
- FIERING
- Well, Wurf was looking for people from basic industries then, see. He
saw that it was the kind of experience that was needed in the public
sector. First of all [it was] a struggle experience, and he was a guy
who was for struggle; he was not afraid of a strike. And secondly, [he
was] somebody who could conceptualize organizing on an industrial
basis--all employees in the public jurisdiction in one union, see.
- DONAHOE
- So it's much more like an industrial organization in--that they want to
break down that craft approach, t~.
- FIERING
- That's right. See, the 'organization that was built in public
employment, up until that time, was essentially a craft organization.
Like in the county, the building trades workers had been organized since
1950, and they had made a political deal with the board of supervisors
on the kind of pay and conditions they would get. Didn't affect anybody
else in the county, only the building trades because of their political
power, their political connections. Part of all those agreements are
that you are not going to spread organization, are you? And they were
agreeable not to spread it. All they cared about was the building trades
people, their membership. don't fault them for that. Or you had the IBEW
in various sections of the public employment throughout the state. But
they were organizing the electricians. Or the [International Brotherhood
of] Painters [and Allied Trades], the Sheet Metal Workers [International
Association,] other crafts, see. These are strong crafts. These are
people who control like you control production. They control whether or
not an operation goes, you know. They were successful in organizing some
people in other parts of the state and here, too. But as far as the
great mass of public employees were concerned, they were neglected
completely by everybody until this.
- DONAHOE
- When AFSCME finally did organize, say, the public sector at UCLA or the
city, what about these craft unions? Did they affiliate or were they
still separate?
- FIERING
- Well, the craft unions were part of the AFLCIO. We all were. No, they
didn't affiliate, they maintained their separate indentity. But they
were a part of the AFL-CIO. So if we had a public employee council in
the AFL-CIO, they were a part of it. The building trades were a part of
it. The Operating Engineers were a part of it. Using one example. And
there's a public employee council in the L.A. County Federation of
Labor, which is representative of all public unions in all public
jurisdictions in L.A. County. And they are a regular department of the
AFL-CIO, the L.A. Federation of Labor. And they work out cooperation, or
within the county you have a council of public unions--of all the
AFL-CIO unions. And there are quite a number of them, each one having
its own little thing: the sheriff's deputies union, ALADS, [Association
of Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs] have got the sheriff's deputies, see;
the [International Association of] Fire Fighters have got the fire
fighters; the Operating Engineers have got the operating engineers; the
building trades have got theirs. The big, well, Local 660 SEIU [Service
Employees International Union], which is the biggest group, represents a
majority of the county employees but is not a part of this because of
some disputes they had about representation. They used to be. When we
got it started--See, I start to run over jurisdiction and it gets a
little confusing. We had one from each union. Then they changed that as
time went on. After my time they had some form of organization depending
on a different form of representation. They ran into some disputes with
660 as a result of that. They wouldn't give 660 credit for being the
biggest in terms of numbers. But that's nothing for us here.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, so when you first went in to AFSCME, it must have been kind of
exciting in some ways.
- FIERING
- It was very exciting.
- DONAHOE
- Because it was wide open.
- FIERING
- Wide open.
- DONAHOE
- And they didn't even have collective bargaining so you had a lot of
things to aim for.
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- Did you kind of work out plans as you went along?
- FIERING
- Well, the big plan was just to organize wherever you could organize. For
instance, right after that strike in Humboldt County and I came back, I
resolved that I was going to separate myself from the War on Poverty
because that wasn't where the action was.
- DONAHOE
- You were clear at that point then?
- FIERING
- Well, I wasn't altogether clear. There still-You know, I had organized
it and people had a claim on me. So I was trying to handle whatever I
could there, but was trying to move out of it into other areas. After
that strike, people called from Arcadia [California], for instance, and
they wanted to organize.
- DONAHOE
- The city of Arcadia.
- FIERING
- The city of Arcadia. So I went out there. We had very few staff. We
didn't have the money for much staff, and the international wasn't ready
to plunge with a lot of staff at that point. We didn't have the
MeyersMilias-Brown Act; we didn't have the makings of it even. This was
in late 1967, beginning of 1968. So we had two or three people on the
staff. So whatever work there was they had to divide among them, and
whatever you had going of any kind, you just had very few people to
divide it amongst. So I took on the Arcadia thing. I went out there and
I called the people together. They were hot to organize so we signed
them all up. I called up the management the next day and I says, "I want
a meeting with you. We want some recognition." Management met all right
and they started stalling me along. Well, you got choices then: If you
let them stall you along, you are going to lose the workers, or else you
are going to bring it to a head. So we figure what have we got to lose.
So we called a strike. We just shut down the whole city operation;
everybody walked off the job. And when they did, the city which hadn't
been expecting it--they thought they would soft-soap us or spoon feed
us--they went nuts. So they called me up and then said they are ready to
deal. Now they are ready to recognize us. So they recognized us and we
sat down and negotiated an agreement. That was my MO [modus operandi],
you know, and that I brought in from the private sector. You organize on
the basis of struggle. You don't horse around, you don't crap around.
You know what you have got to do. You follow the procedure you have to,
and when you've got to, you just lay it to them. And I did that in the
county. A group of mechanics in the county wanted to organize L.A.
County so I got them together, and, in the interim, I had a coronary.
- DONAHOE
- You what?
- FIERING
- In the interim I had a coronary.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, I thought you said that. I said, "What?" You kind of like brushed
over it.
- FIERING
- Yeah, yeah. That was twenty and a half years ago.
- DONAHOE
- You mean between Arcadia and L.A. County?
- FIERING
- Between Arcadia and L.A.--No, first, right after Humboldt I went to
Arcadia and at the same time the county people started to move. First,
we got the Arcadia thing; we got to where we got the recognition. We had
the stoppage, we got the recognition, set up a committee, and the
committee would handle stuff for us. And I was moving with the county
mechanics too. Here also, we had management that was soft-soaping us,
see. And so I said, "I'm not going to crap around with these guys." The
guys were militant, and they had a pretty key operation. Everybody rolls
on wheels and they did everything that rolled on wheels. So we just told
the management--We played it very rough. You know, it's interesting
about these experiences. These people are in touch with me to this day,
and this happened twenty-one years ago. And they are in touch with me to
this day, and many of them are retired. But when we get together, they
relive these experiences as if they happened yesterday.
- DONAHOE
- It's probably one of the most significant things in their lives.
- FIERING
- Yeah. For instance, on the first committee with the mechanics, the
blacks were badly discriminated against. Badly. They couldn't get--It
was unusual for one of them to get beyond the class of helper. So what
did immediately, I set up a committee to meet with management and
included on the committee was at least one black, and they walk in kind
of scared. My first job is to educate the committee to show them that
the boss is just like they are--he puts his pants on one leg at a time
[too]--in order to give them courage so that they'll know, because
otherwise there is a lot of fear in them. In this department anyway--and
in a lot of departments. So the first thing I do is to show them I am
not afraid of the boss. And I talk to them the same way I would expect
to be treated. And, to this day, they recall that meeting. It's
twenty-one years ago, and they recall that meeting to this day,
especially that black worker. Because then when we came out, the blacks
really--And, of course, that's one thing, AFSCME was hot on the issue of
discrimination. And it took a little bit of doing, but we opened doors
for the blacks there.
- DONAHOE
- I can imagine.
- FIERING
- We opened doors.
1.14. TAPE NUMBER: VIII, SIDE TWO SEPTEMBER 25, 1987
- FIERING
- It happened before the boss, and that meeting just turned them
completely around. From that time on they knew how they had to treat the
boss, because they saw how the boss backed up when I took them on. He
didn't know what we had.
- DONAHOE
- That took a lot of courage.
- FIERING
- And so they mimicked what went on in that meeting from that time on and
they began operating on their muscle. And so when we went in there with
a committee and we started negotiating for certain things demanding
certain things and we didn't get an answer, they asked what do we do. I
says, "You know what to do. There's only one thi~g you can do." And
that's where experience comes in--on different kinds of strike
strategies, stoppage strategies, that you use so that the workers are
protected when they do it.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, because they weren't allowed to strike.
- FIERING
- They were not allowed to strike. Oh no. But it's just like the thing in
Humboldt County. You can pull a whole county out, and they didn't dare
fire a single worker. The same with these mechanics and with the people
in Arcadia. You have got to do it in a way so that they are all united
and they are so determined that the management is in a quandary about
how to deal with it.
- DONAHOE
- But this is a lot harder because it is one department. Before you had
the whole city.
- FIERING
- Right.
- DONAHOE
- This is just a department in the county. How did you do it?
- FIERING
- What we did here, I went to the key guy and I put the bug in his ear on
how it should be developed, and he was willing. And he passed the word
down so that he wasn't way out front or the committee wasn't way out
front. It became a spontaneous, rank and file action, see. People just
walked off a job; they are mad and they walk off a job, and the
committee walks off last. The committee says, "What can I do?" And they
walk off last. "We got to be with our people. They're going out." The
first thing I know I'm sitting in the office making believe that I don't
know what's going on and I get a call from the management: "These people
are out." I says, "No kidding, you tell me they're out?" They are asking
me to help get them back. I says, "Great. I'll get them back. But you
know what you have to do to get them back? You have to give me something
to help get them back." And this happened time and again, time and
again. And they developed that technique down to a-
- DONAHOE
- And there were ways they got around it because they weren't liable for
violating anything?
- FIERING
- Nothing, no. Well, of course, there was a rule in the county that if you
were off more than three days, why you were automatically discharged.
But enforcing it-
- DONAHOE
- You mean, with no excuse.
- FIERING
- No excuse. But what happened was, for instance, the first time taught
the county a lesson about that, that they've got to get into it quickly
to put a cap on it. These guys all walked out. There were about five
hundred mechanics. They all walked off the job, and when they did-
- DONAHOE
- All of them?
- FIERING
- All of them. Oh yeah, they cleaned out the department. When they did,
see, here's the hundreds and thousands of other county employees looking
and seeing these people down there in that building walking off the job.
And they run over to find out what's the matter and they're told, "The
hell'with the county, we're going out." And the word begins to spread
and [it] becomes infectious, especially in the unorganized situation
like that when unionism is new and people do have a lot of grievances.
And they found that people without leadership, without anything from
other departments and other units-had nothing to do with this
department--just decided, "Hell, if they are going to do that, I am
going to do it too." That started to spread all through the county. The
only way the county could get a handle on it was to get these guys back
and they called me to help get them back. And in order to get them back,
we settled the problems, and we had no hesitation about it. It was just
a question of doing it, so it was done properly. And it became a very
militant department. Well known for that and, of course, it enhanced
AFSCME's reputation. We had the same thing-We had a lot of probation
officers, several hundred of whom had been members of the union. And
they were brought up on that, see. They would demonstrate constantly in
one way or another. They wouldn't have extended off-the-job walkouts,
but they would come down during their lunch hour or after work or some
damn thing and just demonstrate.
- DONAHOE
- There were things like informational picket lines or something like
that?
- FIERING
- It enhanced our reputation as the most militant of the unions.
- DONAHOE
- So what happened? Here you have this great in with the mechanics and the
probation officers and there was this opportunity to really spread
throughout.
- FIERING
- Yeah, what happened? Well, for that, that's a very complex story. I
suppose blame is to be divided, because we had an opportunity to get all
the county workers in AFSCME and I had set up a meeting with the
leadership of the [Los Angeles County] Employees Association (LACEA) and
Wurf. And he came in and had a meeting with them. He had them thinking
hard about affiliating their organization to us. On the basis of that
meeting, he came in a second time, and in the meantime, we're conducting
an organizing campaign. By this time, he calls me up and he says to me
would I mind, because I was the director of the union here at that time.
I became the director of the union not long after that thing in Humboldt
County.
- DONAHOE
- So that was like '67.
- FIERING
- No, '68.
- DONAHOE
- 'Sixty-eight, okay.
- FIERING
- They took everything in California and combined it, with the exception
of a couple of locals outside of here: one in San Diego, in San
Bernardino and in San Jose. They took everything in California and
combined it into one California council (AFSCME District Council 49) and
I became the head of that. So the thing started to open up and became
ripe for a real organizing drive down here, so I suggested to Wurf that
he decentralize AFSCME because California is too big for that. We
decentralized and we set up a council just for the area here, Southern
California, and I became the head of that, executive director, District
Council 36.
- DONAHOE
- Would that then include San Diego?
- FIERING
- No, it did not include San Diego, nor San Bernardino. Other than that,
it included everything else in Southern California.
- DONAHOE
- Because it was too big?
- FIERING
- No, because the locals there were used to operating autonomously, and
they were old established locals from many, many years back and he
didn't want to make any waves. There wasn't any point to it, so he let
them continue on as they were. And you had a leadership which developed
in these outfits which became--they considered it their little patch of
territory and they didn't want anybody else to have anything to do with
it. Anyway, he called me up--Well, he had a guy in here who was assigned
to conduct the organizing drive here and for all of California, but he
was instructed to provide a staff here. And this guy was using me and
telling me what to do in terms of filing petitions for elections, which
I'm just assuming you know something about. I don't want to have to
explain all of this. He was telling me the kinds of units he wanted and
he was the California director and I was following whatever he wanted to
do. I didn't agree much with what he wanted to do, but this was what he
wanted done, so we filed the petitions. And then he started his
organizing campaign and I became very unhappy with the way he was
organizing. I called up Wurf and I told Wurf, "This guy just doesn't
know what the hell it's all about, and if you are going to do anything,
you'd better take him out because he is not the guy for you." So for a
short period there I was doing whatever organizing there was with a
couple of other people who were assigned. And Wurf calls me up and asks
would I mind if he sends in one of his hotshots to take over the
leadership of the organizing drive. And I say, "No, send him in." It was
not a big thing for me, I didn't think, at the time. It became a big
thing, but it wasn't then. I wasn't out to build an empire or looking
for glory really. So he sent in a guy [Tom Fitzpatrick] and then we set
up another meeting for Wurf. Wurf came in a second time and this time he
met again with the leadership of the association. It's called LACEA.
- DONAHOE
- L.A. County-
- FIERING
- --Employees Association.
- DONAHOE
- --Employees Association. I remember that.
- FIERING
- He had them in a meeting, he could have had them, but he scared them to
death. He scared the hell out of them. He was too aggressive and
insensitive to their reaction to him.
- DONAHOE
- Wurf did?
- FIERING
- Wurf did. He made them afraid that once they affiliated, they were going
to place themselves in a position where they could be taken over. They
would lose control and Wurf was not sensitive to that. The SEIU then
made its move with these people and the SEIU then offered them a deal
with complete autonomy, the right to pullout any time they wanted to,
and the AFL-CIO label, which is really all they wanted so they wouldn't
be subject to raids.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, and they wanted some kind of clout, too. They didn't have
anything.
- FIERING
- Well, clout wasn't so much to them; it was more survival. As long as
they were independent, they were open to attack by any union. But once
they had an AFL-CIO label, and this became the standard modus operandi
for many associations, then nobody could touch them. And the SEIU
offered them that label and a deal which guaranteed their autonomy and
the right to pullout if they didn't like it, their affiliation, and
whatever [else] they wanted. And Wurf was not sharp enough to sense that
when he was here.
- DONAHOE
- Which is interesting.
- FIERING
- And so they signed up with the SEIU. In the meantime, we are sitting
there with these petitions. The county established its own law [Los
Angeles County Employee Ordinance Act 9646] based on Meyers-Milias-Brown
and proceeded to hearing and stuff and we are carrying on an organizing
campaign in opposition now to the SEIU. An awkward position because they
were entrenched with the LACEA. So, well, the upshot of it is that--I
suppose blame could be spread around to a lot of people. I pointed some
of it at myself though I determined later that that was unjust. Some of
it I pointed at Wurf because of missed opportunities when he could have
cleaned the whole thing up in one fell swoop. And some of it to this guy
he sent in, who was a hotshot organizer, who was on to me because of
these mechanics who were part of the blue-collar group. He wanted them
united with the rest of blue-collar workers and I had committed not to
and I wouldn't break my word, though I finally did, I did petition to
have them included with the rest of the blue-collar unit. But what I
didn't know had taken place--and didn't learn until much later when I
became friendly with Harry Gluck--was that the personnel director of the
county [Gordon Nesvig] and the head of the SEIU had met with the head of
the L.A. County Employees Relations Commission, which supervised the
elections, and had convinced him that the mechanics should remain
separate. So even though I petitioned that they be united with the other
blue-collar workers, they were separated. As the election turned out,
this guy who was sent in and handled the organization for the
international decided he was going to be very smart and he had told
Wurf, "We don't need them anyway." He told Wurf that I was raising
questions about uniting both units and he was telling Wurf, "The hell
with Fiering. We don't need him. We are going to whip him without it."
But he didn't count his votes right; it turned out that those mechanics
made the difference. And so they found it easier to blame me. I felt
very bad about it. I thought for a while I was to blame, because if we
had won that blue-collar election, we might have sailed through the rest
of it, too, and won the whole kit and caboodle. But this guy had
already--if we had won, of course, what would have happened was I would
have been out--this guy had an understanding with Wurf and already made
arrangements on buying a house here, which I didn't know about this
until later, that he was going to settle here. If he had settled here,
there was no room for me, see. But he had done that and he had already
put in a request for leasing a sailboat. He was going to live the good
life here, and I didn't know about this until later. In any event, as it
turned out, whatever happened at least permitted me to survive here,
which otherwise, I would not have. But I had felt very guilty about the
fact that maybe this did make the difference, though I felt relieved to
find later that I was not at fault. So at least I could live with
myself. But really what it was, if this guy had done what he had to do,
we could have moved in and perhaps really, not only won that blue-collar
thing, we might have been able to overcome the conniving that had been
going on, which we knew nothing about, to combine that blue-collar unit.
That was a key election.
- DONAHOE
- It seems like it would have been.
- FIERING
- Because then followed the white-collar [election], see. We lost the key
election, the blue-collar election. We were not in a good position to
pursue the white-collar [election]. If we had won, we would have been in
a position to pursue it.
- DONAHOE
- Well, did you ever find out why Wurf wanted to bring this guy in in the
first place, since you had the good track record?
- FIERING
- Well, this guy had been working for Wurf for some years. Incidentally,
he had also come out of UE.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, really?
- FIERING
- Then out of the IUE [International Union of Electrical, Radio, and
Machine Workers]. He was one of the people who led the break to the IUE,
see.
- DONAHOE
- He led the break?
- FIERING
- Yeah. His father was one of the founders of UE. And also, as a matter of
fact, if you read all this stuff about UE, you know about the East
Pittsburgh [Pennsylvania] Westinghouse [Electric Corporation] plant. His
father [Michael "Red Mike" Fitzpatrick] was the leader of the union in
East Pittsburgh Westinghouse.
- DONAHOE
- The name of the town was Swissville. That's what thought.
- FIERING
- You're thinking, not Swissville, you're thinking of Westinghouse Air
Brake [Company].
- DONAHOE
- I know East Pittsburgh, but I thought they called that Swissville too.
That's what my husband said.
- FIERING
- He did? You may be right. But you're not right about this. It was East
Pittsburgh.
- DONAHOE
- Because I know people who worked at that plant; we knew people from back
there. It's the biggest Westinghouse [plant].
- FIERING
- Well, if you knew people, they knew the Fitzpatricks.
- DONAHOE
- Is that what their name is? The Fitzpatricks?
- FIERING
- Yeah. And his father was known as "Red" Fitzpatrick. Because he was red.
- DONAHOE
- What was his first name?
- FIERING
- Huh?
- DONAHOE
- What was his first name?
- FIERING
- His brother's name was Tom and that's what this guy's name was. He was
named after his brother, this guy's. son.
- DONAHOE
- The one who came out here.
- FIERING
- The one who came out here.
- DONAHOE
- So he was a Tom.
- FIERING
- He was Tom, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- It's interesting that he came from the UE like you.
- FIERING
- Yep. And he was a good organizer. He was a good organizer.
- DONAHOE
- So he had been working--?
- FIERING
- And he had been working for Wurf several years and he had organized the
Wayne County [Michigan] area and some other places for AFSCME. He had
done some good work.
- DONAHOE
- So he came out to kind of--?
- FIERING
- To handle this campaign. I thought at first he came out just as an
international rep to handle the campaign he had begun. As it turned out
he had other plans.
- DONAHOE
- Well, what happened to the poor mechanics who had been withdrawn?
- FIERING
- The mechanics were still in AFSCME.
- DONAHOE
- And the probation officers?
- FIERING
- Still in AFSCME.
- DONAHOE
- So those two departments went with-
- FIERING
- See, we had my plan and it was working out up until this break. We had
five bargaining units, and they were the first--I rushed in to file
first petitions. They were the court clerks.
- DONAHOE
- The court clerks?
- FIERING
- Which was a very, very conservative group. And these two groups-
- DONAHOE
- Mechanics a nd pro bation, yeah.
- FIERING
- Mechanics, yeah, probation, and agricultural inspectors, which was a
small group--those were the first four and later we organized the fifth
in opposition to 660. We defeated them in elections. But my idea was to
start a snowball effect. And so I rushed in to file the first petition
as soon as the L.A. County Employee Relations Ordinance was passed. So
that the first petitions that the commission would have to consider
would be ours. And the first election that came up, the first hearing
that came up was for the court clerks. And I handled that hearing. And
we did quite well, we got the unit established. At that time the whole
question of formation of units was unclear, because California was just
in the throes of learning something about the establishment of
collective bargaining in public employment. But they learned fast. But,
at that point, this was the first experience, this was the first
bargaining unit anybody had applied for in California under
Meyers-Milias-Brown. And so the next hearing was the probation officers.
- DONAHOE
- This was 1969.
- FIERING
- This was 1970 already.
- DONAHOE
- Because I worked '70.
- FIERING
- Nineteen seventy, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- And I remember going through it.
- FIERING
- So we won the elections for the court clerks. Then the probation
officers came up and we won the elections for the probation officers and
so we were on a roll. Then the agricultural inspectors came up and we
won the elections for the agricultural inspectors. So AFSCME was winning
and winning and winning. Then by the time the mechanics came up, which
was my plan for the fourth one, the commission by that time called a
halt and said, "NO, we want to take time out to determine how we are
going to be setting up units." If we had been able to get by that, it
would have been a whole different story. But, we didn't. And so what
happened is history.
- DONAHOE
- And then the other factors: Wurf meeting with the leadership of the
LACEA and-
- FIERING
- Well, this was all going on at the same time.
- DONAHOE
- So these initial bargaining units remained in AFSCME?
- FIERING
- Yeah. Oh, they are still around, sure.
- DONAHOE
- And there was a fifth one you say?
- FIERING
- Yeah, well, we then competed with Local 660 for the psychiatric social
workers. And we beat them on it.
- DONAHOE
- But they won the clerical workers?
- FIERING
- But this was after collective bargaining had already been established.
This was one of the independent groups that remained after all the
elections had taken place.
- DONAHOE
- So after that SEIU then won clerical workers and social workers?
- FIERING
- That was in '70, also. See, all these elections outside
psychiatric--forgot about that, that was later. That was three or so
years later. Four years later.
- DONAHOE
- So what happened was LACEA actually rejected AFSCME and went with SEIU?
- FIERING
- That's right. AFSCME withdrew from the clerical election. That was the
big thing.
- DONAHOE
- So it wasn't like they were really fighting each other at that point,
because there was nothing more you could do.
- FIERING
- Well, of course, there was. Everything was wide open then.
- DONAHOE
- No, I mean at that point, when they decided they didn't want to go with
AFSCME.
- FIERING
- No, at that point everything was still wide open. That's when it was
determined by the AFL-CIO, which has a no-raiding clause in its
constitution, that that particular situation would not have been deemed
to have been raiding, because we had petitions in for these people, see.
After that it was raiding, because after that people became dissatisfied
with SEIU and they came to us. If we hadn't had that Article 20 in the
AFL-CIO national constitution prohibiting raiding, we would have torn
the hell out of them.
- DONAHOE
- Really?
- FIERING
- That's when everybody else was gone from the internationals; [it was]
just me and my council and people started coming to us. They wanted us
then, see, because we had a militant reputation, and so I did do
something about it. I decided I would move in on 660 and I started to
take over their grievance machinery because the peculiarities of the law
permitted that kind of thing. And I organized a bunch of people in a big
unit of theirs that had about three or four thousand people. As a matter
of fact, do you know the Kaufmans, Annie and Mike Kaufman?
- DONAHOE
- Sure.
- FIERING
- Sure, you know the Kaufmans, I saw them down there at that event.
- DONAHOE
- At the play, they were there that night, yeah.
- FIERING
- Mike was one of the leaders of that move to come-
- DONAHOE
- They worked for the state, I thought.
- FIERING
- They worked--No, later on. At that time, Mike was a computer operator in
the computer department for the county, see, and he brought a bunch of
people to us and we started to organize them and I moved in to take over
the grievance machinery of 660. And I had an arbitration case set up and
they were bringing members into our outfit. We would have just torn them
wide open, we would have taken over the whole goddamned kit and
caboodle. Just what we didn't take over a couple of years previous we
would have taken over then. But they filed charges in Washington with us
and the AFL-CIO held for the SEIU and ordered us out of the picture,
that it was raiding in violation of Article 20, so we had to back out
and that was the end of that. So from there I decided, "Well, if we
can't fight them, why let's be friends with them because our interests
are mutual, we both have a common boss to fight." So I made an approach
to--But we maintained our excellent reputation because we were militant,
we were the militant union. I made an approach to the leadership of 660
and it wasn't easy. Between Elinor Glenn who had a terrible dislike for
us because of the way we handled her on the organizing campaign and a
guy by the name of Harry Gluck, who was the leader of 660--she was the
leader of [Local] 434--but between the two of them, they were the SEIU,
pretty much. There were social workers in [Local] 535 but you
figure-
- DONAHOE
- Oh yeah, I remember that one.
- FIERING
- That was a separate bag. Anyway, so I made an approach to develop some
friendship and cooperation between us, even though we were really a
minority union. They far outnumbered us. It was difficult for them, very
difficult-they were suspicious of our industries--until 1973 when they
ran into difficulties in negotiations. They ran into difficulties
because of their inexperience and we didn't, and the reason for it was
because of the difference in our experiences. We were making mileage in
negotiations, coming out with some concessions, and we were stuck short
of a final settlement because the county couldn't move until the big
unions were moved. And one day Harry Gluck called me up and wanted to
meet with me, Harry Gluck, and Elinor--And Dave Crippen of the Social
Workers Union (Local 535).
- DONAHOE
- Elinor Glenn I've heard of a lot, yeah.
- FIERING
- He says, "I'll have Elinor there and Dave Crippen and myself. Would you
like to meet with us?" And I says, "Sure." So that was an important
turning point. In the county, it was at that point historic. It was an
important turning point. So we met out for breakfast one morning and
they asked me what my suggestions were; they asked me for advice. So I
laid out what I thought we could do and what they ought to do. I thought
what we ought to be shooting for was a strike and they had the troops
and I had the imagination. I had the troops who were willing if we could
get more of them, because I wasn't about to stick our neck all the way
out without some guarantees. So they were so desperate, because they
hadn't moved off of ground zero in negotiations and here we're in the
middle of negotiations, they agreed and I outlined a little strategy.
They adopted that, and the strategy was we will go back immediately and
start telephoning all the stewards, that we are having a special meeting
of stewards to talk about strike, pull them off the job in the middle of
the day. And hit hard and fast. We would call this meeting quickly
before management had a chance to start clamping down on people. And so
that was the agreement we made and we broke up after breakfast and went
back to our offices and on the way I'm thinking to myself, "These people
don't look too solid to me." So when I went back, the first thing I did
was get on the phone and I started calling up all our stewards, told
them about the meeting, what the agreement was, and they were
enthusiastic as hell, and I says, "Be sure you get everyone of the LACEA
stewards, SEIU stewards, and tell them that we have got this agreement."
And they did and the word started to spread among them, and sure enough
when I got back--I was back in the office a little while--I get a call
from Harry and he says, "You know we have reconsidered this, we don't
think it's too wise." I says, "Harry, it's too late, the word is out.
You can't stop it now, you might as well go through with it."
Reluctantly, they went through with it and it turned out to be an
exceptional meeting. There were hundreds-
- DONAHOE
- What year was this?
- FIERING
- Just '73.
- DONAHOE
- I thought so for some reason, okay.
- FIERING
- It was a turning point, and we had hundreds of stewards there and, of
course, every one of them was a hero. Elinor is a hell of a fine
speechmaker.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, I'm surprised what you say. I always heard good things about her.
- FIERING
- Well, it's okay. Her intentions were always good.
- DONAHOE
- I don't know her that well.
- FIERING
- Well, see, her experience in a trade union movement, in the organized
trade union movement, was very limited, because she always was in the
public sector where you never had real collective bargaining. So she
never had a chance to build and develop the kind of union or the kind of
experience that goes with building a real union, see. But she is very
well intentioned, you can't question her intentions, and she is a hell
of a good speaker, she is a hell of a public speaker. So she made a big
speech, I made a big speech, and Harry Gluck made a big speech. People
were ready to go and they were ready to march and, when these people got
back into the shops and the offices, everybody is ready to strike in the
county. We set a deadline and then we worked against the deadline. It
was April 29 and everybody is working against that deadline,
particularly the management. I didn't care too much, I wasn't worried
too much, because a strike is just what that county always needed
really.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah.
- FIERING
- As a matter of fact, when you start dealing with associations and the
company-union complex that they have developed, they need a strike to
break them out of that mold, to start developing into a real union.
That's why they never really developed into real unions in the county,
see, nowhere. Either in Elinor's union or 660, never developed into real
unions because they never went through that experience. So everybody is
getting ready to strike and we set up a strike machinery and we
continued our negotiations. I was very flattered they asked me to sit in
with them on their negotiations, too. I sat in on their negotiations and
got out their list of stUff, and I said, "You've got fifty points and
haven't even resolved point one, point one." So the main thing was to
start boiling down the demands on the laundry lists to its essentials,
you know, and Elinor, Harry and I were meeting--and we're different
unions, you know, and the county is ready to accept me sitting there
representing them when normally they'd say, "Hey, get the hell out of
here! What the hell are you doing here, who the hell are you?" So we
resolved all the issues just before the strike deadline. Management came
through with a firm offer that was satisfactory and saleable, and it was
a wild time that year. Next year was much easier.
- DONAHOE
- From then on, yeah.
- FIERING
- And the following year. *[When SEIU and AFSCME were at odds before this
year, my modus operandi was to use their strength, their political
strength, to get things for my members. We would get our members excited
and use that to excite SEIU members. The county would give us more just
to get us off their backs, so they could deal unhampered with the SEIU.
This year we pooled our strength and leadership, worked together, to get
more for everyone.] It was one of those two years anyway. It was much
easier and we got good settlements as a result of that for the next
couple of years, because they knew that people were still on their
muscle, people hadn't forgotten that this is the way they got it. They
were still on their muscle. Some important lessons to be learned, not
from the point of view of how to negotiate, how you use, if you haven't
got all the strength yourself, how you use the other guy's strength in
order to get what you need, see. And our negotiating committees learned
a lot from that, because they are sitting there watching. We had a lot
of good experiences like that in the county. One of the experiences we
had was negotiating wages for the mechanics group, AFSCME Local 119,
which always operated on its muscle. Learned a very good lesson, right
off the bat. From the first meeting they learned that lesson. We were
negotiating for a raise and as we went up the line to the various levels
of management, they were giving us a lot of crap, you know. They were
going to give us a raise, [but] they were checking it, they were making
a survey and indicating hope, you know. Finally, we get to the top guy.
They had finally arranged a meeting with--well, first of all, they
arranged a meeting with the deputy personnel director of the county,
John James. At that time these guys had full authority to make
commitments for the board of supervisors, and this guy started to play
tough cop with us. So here's our committee sitting there and I went to
work on this guy and he's sitting there. He had come in, we were told,
with his chief assistants, and he was going to show them how it should
be done, because I was tough to negotiate with, and he was going to show
them how it should be done, how I should be handled, see. And so he had
these guys all sitting there and he was going to show them how I should
be handled. And he started and I took over the ball and [said], "Here's
my committee." I went to work on the 80and-so and before long he was
saying, "Please, Henry; please, Henry." My committee is repeating this
to me to this day, to this day. I see these guys and they talk about it
to this day. He said, "Please, Henry; please, Henry, you are making me
look bad in front of my people, please, please." Oh, d"id I ream him out
a new asshole. Anyway, he couldn't say yes to a raise, so I says, "Set
us up with a meeting with so-and-so," the personnel director. So we met
with the personnel director and he was going to show his top people how
it should be done. So we walk into the meeting, and these are the top guys in the county,
and this guy, as soon as we walk in and sit down, he says, "I want to
make this brief." He says, "I just wanted to let you know where we were
coming from," he says. "There's not going to be a raise." "Oh," I says, "Gordon, good, I'm glad you told us so we don't waste
time." So I says, "Let's go," to my committee, and we all get up and we
walked out. And we worked out a little strategy on what should happen.
They called up the plant, not me. They called up the people because the
people were all anxious to hear what the hell was going on because they
expected a raise. So the chairman of the committee tells the leading
guys left in the shop what took place. And it's similar to the situation
up in Humboldt County, where the board of supervisors said, "Go to
hell." And in effect that's what this guy said, "Go to hell"; didn't
even talk to us. So went back to my office and these guys went into the
plant and as soon as they hit the plant there's a meeting at a little
shop waiting for them, see. And the guys are steaming, and first guy
gets up, the chairman gets up to make a report, and he says about five
words out of his mouth and somebody says, "Strike!" They pick it up and
the whole goddamn department walks out from allover the county. They
called up to everywhere and everybody comes out allover the county and
they come streaming out and I'm sitting at my desk and the committee
came up to the office. While they're there, just as they walked in, the
telephone rings, and I get a call from the personnel director. He says,
"Henry, Henry do you know what's happened?" I says, "No, Gordon, what's happened?" He says, "They walked out." I says, "Who walked out?" He says, "The whole goddamn department walked out." I says, "The hell you say, they didn't walk out?" He says, "Yes, they did, they did." I says, "Jesus Christ, what are you going to do about it?" He says, "I don't know." He says, "What are you going to do about it?" I says, "I don't know what the hell I can do about it." I says, "Look at
the position you guys took while we were in the meeting." I says, "Jesus
Christ, you want to settle this, you guys better talk it over and give
me something to talk to these guys about." So he says, "I'll call you back." He calls me back and he offers a raise over the telephone. And I says,
"It's a deal now?" He says, "It's a deal. But we can't make the deal while the people are
out." And I says, "All right, now what we'll do is this: I'll convince the guys
to go back, I won't say anything about the raise, and then we'll come in
with the committee after the guys are back to work and you'll make the
offer of the raise and we'll sew it up." He says, "Okay, we'll work it that way." I went to the meeting. We called a big meeting--the guys were out two
days--we called a meeting the second morning. We called a meeting--I
don't know if it was that night or the morning--whatever it was, we
called a meeting and we were out two days. And I make a big pitch and
we're spreading the word around to key people, "Don't worry this thing
is in the bag." Key people. "We got to go back to work. They can't talk
to us while we're out. It's a matter of how they look to the rest of the
community and to the rest of the workers. They have got to feel you guys
are back at work before they sit down and meet with us. They will meet
with us," and so on and so forth. We took a vote and they voted to go
back to work. Went back to work, the committee walks in the next
morning, and in ten minutes we had everything we wanted and everything
was great. * Mr. Fiering added the following bracketed section during his review of
the transcript.
- DONAHOE
- That's fantastic, and was that like '73 by then?
- FIERING
- No, this was '72 or earlier. Man, those guys' wages, their wages were
medium, you know, in the state, and they zoomed up to the top of the
scale in the state. And so did all of our groups, everyone of our groups
got the top scale of anybody in the state in those classifications of
work.
- DONAHOE
- That's great.
1.15. TAPE NUMBER: IX, SIDE ONE OCTOBER 2, 1987
- DONAHOE
- Okay, last time we were talking about AFSCME [American Federation of
State, County, and Municipal Employees] and your involvement with AFSCME
and how important winning collective bargaining was. So you were going
to tell me a little bit more about that.
- FIERING
- Well, the upsurge in organization that followed-All of these incidents
were all interrelated. One does not automatically happen without
something happening before. Coming out of the war, there was not the
depression that had been predicted. Things were pretty good. People in
the public sector made advances in organization and made advances in
their contracts and working conditions, whereas the people in the
private sector stood still because they had not a mechanism with which
to deal with their employers.
- DONAHOE
- Right, that's so important.
- FIERING
- That was one factor there. The other factor was this whole concept that
had grown up in the country, in America, about the philosophy of the
sovereignty of the state and the fact that workers who work for the
government are a special group and have a special loyalty to government
and it would be unpatriotic for them to think in terms of organizing to
confront a public employer as an adversary. But as things improved in
the private sector for those workers and they made huge and rapid gains
in wages and job conditions, that concept gradually diminished in
importance. Public-sector workers began to measure the inadequacies of
their conditions against what their neighbors were experiencing. So the
idea of that kind of sovereignty and loyalty was diminished and the
public employees began to think in terms of union organization. As they
did, President [John F.] Kennedy issued his Executive Order 10988.
- DONAHOE
- What was that?
- FIERING
- Executive Order 10988, which permitted federal workers the right to
present grievances to their employer and to be represented with
representatives of their own choosing, that was the phraseology. But
that meant they could call in anybody--they could call in a union
official--and so that gave the unions a handle in the public sector by
shouting, "See we can represent you. Now, if you join our union, we will
represent you." They couldn't negotiate contracts, but they could
represent them on grievances. *[We were unsuccessful in winning federal
legislation for employees below the federal level. Legislation had to be
won on a state-by-state basis. In California we got the Brown Act, then
the Meyers-MiliasBrown Act. Before we leave this, let me picK up a
thread we talked of previously, the development of self-help
organizations among public workers, the organization of these
associations. The majority of public workers today represented by
AFL-CIO (American Federation of LaborCongress of Industrial
Organizations) unions are members of these associations, now formally
affiliated with one or another AFL-CIO union. I'm pointing up the
evolution of this type of organization which, when formed, never
intended to function as a union, but with changing times and pressures,
gradually moved, first to represent employees on job conditions, to meet
the challenge from the AFL-CIO, then to maintain their existence, under
pressure from their members, took the jump to formal affiliation with
the AFL-CIO. That evolution continues, so they are more and more taking
on the substance of a union as well as its appearance.] Well, in
California that was picked up by George Brown, who was an assemblyman at
the time and who sponsored what came to be known as the Brown Act, whose
terms included those that were embodied in the Kennedy executive order.
But it became the law in the state, so that any public employee on a
level from the state down to any community or special district could
call in a representative to represent him on a grievance or a working
condition. Well, that gave the unions their big handle on public
employment, and of course, it was a big appeal to workers that have some
reason to come into a union, because the union could represent them,
even on a limited scale they could represent them. * Mr. Fiering added the following bracketed section during his review of
the transcript.
- DONAHOE
- It was like a wedge.
- FIERING
- That's right. And so there was an influx of people into the unions and
with that came the inevitability of small work actions, which began to
grow in intensity and in Los Angeles to such an intensity that the
social workers went out on strike in 1966.
- DONAHOE
- Right.
- FIERING
- And stayed out for some ten days. They lost the battle, but you can say
they really won the war. Very, very good group. Fortunately, it was a
very good group of people, highly conscious, socially conscious group of
dedicated idealists. And that's what really made the difference, though
they lost, in not killing off an organizing movement in California. It
was that kind of people, because even though they were forced back to
work they still persisted in organization.
- DONAHOE
- And that was '661
- FIERING
- And that was encouraging to, even though it wasn't said in so many
words, it was a source of encouragement to all public workers. And you
might say, though, that the conditions maintained in the public sector
still couldn't stop organization because conditions were really bad,
wages were really low. The differential between the public sector and
the private sector was so huge.
- DONAHOE
- I remember that.
- FIERING
- It provided a terrible source of agitation. And so the Brown Act led to
many of such stoppages, because workers did come into the unions and
when they came into the unions they were together. When they are
together, they are capable of taking an action. Well, this led, of
course, to the incident I was telling you about up in Humboldt County
with that strike, which was unique, really unique. After I got back home
after that strike, things started to perk in the county here and in the
city. And organization grew. It grew in other places also but not nearly
as rapidly as it grew in Los Angeles.
- DONAHOE
- So there was really the main part was here?
- FIERING
- Yeah.
- DONAHOE
- Weren't there things going on in the Bay Area too?
- FIERING
- Yeah, there were things going on in the Bay Area. Of course, the Bay
Area is an area all by itself. It has a certain uniqueness because of
the ILWU [International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union] history
there and the long trade union history there.
- DONAHOE
- Yes, very different.
- FIERING
- But I don't think--Well, if anything, yes, they moved probably in tandem
with every other part of the state. There's Local 400-
- DONAHOE
- Because I remember social workers up there also.
- FIERING
- Yeah. Well, the social workers started to organize all through the state
as a result of what happened here. And they set up a local, 535 [of the
Service Employees International Union]. [tape recorder off] So I got out of that War on Poverty thing; I just edged my way out of it
because I saw it was a waste of time, and I told the guy I was working
for. By that time, I had a different boss. The guy who hired me on the
reorganization of the union was put in the same category as me, was
downgraded. I didn't know how bitter he was, but he was bitter about it.
A year later when I took over leadership of the union, he became
especially embittered and I didn't realize that until too late. But, in
any event, a call came in from some city--I think it was Arcadia--that
wanted to organize and they are looking around for who wants it and I
jumped in and I says, "I want it." Because the call was that the people
were excited. And I'm dealing with a bunch of people who are afraid of
people who get excited, you know. They don't know how to deal with it,
how to handle it. So I went out then- I think we went over this story.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, we talked about Arcadia. I remember that one.
- FIERING
- And we got that one set up in short order once we pulled the whole city
out. Then one morning I was on my way out there and went out there, had
a meeting with the guys, and came back to the office. As soon as I came
back to the office, I started getting chest pains and I thought it
was-
- DONAHOE
- So this is right during Arcadia?
- FIERING
- Yeah.
- DONAHOE
- So what year is this?
- FIERING
- This is January 10, 1968, and I thought I was having a bellyache or gas.
I was doing push-ups while I was having a heart attack.
- DONAHOE
- Oh no!
- FIERING
- I didn't even know about it.
- DONAHOE
- You mean to relieve the gas?
- FIERING
- Anyway, one of the guys in the office evidently had been through the
experience before and he threw me into his car and we went to the
doctor. The doctor didn't know what was wrong with me.
- DONAHOE
- And you were having chest pains?
- FIERING
- This is a case where you go to a left-wing doctor you know because-
- DONAHOE
- You think he knows something.
- FIERING
- --you think he knows something because he's a left-wing doctor. He
didn't know what the hell it was all about.
- DONAHOE
- He never thought to take an EKG?
- FIERING
- Didn't even take an EKG. I don't know if he had a machine, but he didn't
take an EKG. He was very casual about it, and here I am suffering, and
he says, "Well, if you want to go to the hospital, I will make
arrangements to go." So this guy who was with me urged him to make
provisions at the hospital. So he says, "How do you want to go, do you
want to call a cab?" So this guy volunteered to take me over,
fortunately. So we got to the hospital and they gave me some Demerol,
knocked me out, took the EKG, and told me I had had a heart attack. I
was in the middle of it.
- DONAHOE
- All that running around you were doing, you should have been rushed to
the hospital immediately.
- FIERING
- Yeah, immediately.
- DONAHOE
- It's lucky that you survived.
- FIERING
- I am, I am.
- DONAHOE
- Look at all that time that was wasted.
- FIERING
- Well, I survived it and went back to work.
- DONAHOE
- How long?
- FIERING
- I was out three months.
- DONAHOE
- That's still not bad.
- FIERING
- Well, they wouldn't keep you out that long today, but at that time the
state of the art called for that to be normal.
- DONAHOE
- It's like twenty years ago.
- FIERING
- Oh, not three months--am I saying three months? Three months or three
weeks.
- DONAHOE
- It couldn't be three weeks.
- FIERING
- No, no, three weeks I was in the hospital.
- DONAHOE
- Three weeks is like nothing.
- FIERING
- Three weeks I was in the hospital.
- DONAHOE
- For three weeks you were in the hospital?
- FIERING
- Then I went back to work and we had some of the same and I immediately
picked up with the groups that I had been organizing. By this time,
there was already talk in Sacramento about the possibility of a
collective bargaining law and that was a big thing, which eventually
became the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act.
- DONAHOE
- Right, that we talked about last time.
- FIERING
- The unions and the university got into the act. And industry in
California and the public employers in California, they all recognized
the need for it, because it was the only way they could get a handle on
all this anarchic activity. People popping off anytime they wanted to,
walking out, no controls, no way to reach them, no organized mechanism.
So collective bargaining became the organized mechanism that permitted
people to have a means through which they could air their problems and
get them resolved. That's really what it is. It played a useful role. And so Meyers-Milias-Brown was born.
- DONAHOE
- 'Sixty-nine, yeah.
- FIERING
- 'Sixty-nine, October '69, it was passed in the legislature and became
law. [Ronald W.] Reagan signed it immediately. He was governor at the
time. It's interesting, Reagan as the governor was a lot more loose then
Reagan as the president, not that he worked any harder. He was known as
a guy who used to work from nine to five with his feet up on the desk
most of the time and other guys doing his work. He had a very easy life.
- DONAHOE
- Well, there were a lot of cuts when he was governor, I remember.
- FIERING
- Well, there may have been some cuts, but we got this law. That was
important. Matter of fact I think I mentioned when I was up in Eureka
leading that strike, he had his guy assigned to practically live with
me.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, I remember you told me.
- FIERING
- Became a very good friend of mine and couldn't say enough good about me.
But he was on the phone to Reagan's office seven times a day and vice
versa, reporting on the status of the thing, because they were afraid of
it. You know that was the atmosphere at the time. You never could tell
when something was not going to set up a major explosion among public
employees. The unfortunate thing was that our own people were just as
afraid, see.
- DONAHOE
- Really?
- FIERING
- So they didn't take full advantage of it.
- DONAHOE
- So· that was really a real victory, that was an impetus to--?
- FIERING
- Oh, that was a watershed.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, I can imagine.
- FIERING
- Of course, with that, beginning in 1970 unions could then organize and
ask for legitimate bargaining rights, legal bargaining rights, become
legal bargaining agents. Not exactly on the same conditions as in the
private sector, there was a difference. The most you could get under
Meyers-Milias-Brown was what was called the majority bargaining status
instead of exclusive bargaining status. That's been modified since.
- DONAHOE
- Okay.
- FIERING
- Do you understand the difference?
- DONAHOE
- No, why don't you explain the difference.
- FIERING
- You really need it in here?
- DONAHOE
- Well, why not? Is it really long and complicated? '
- FIERING
- Not really. Majority bargaining status means that the majority
bargaining representative has the sole right to bargain for a contract
and to set the terms and conditions of a contract with the employer, but
any other organization and individual could come in and represent
employees on any terms and conditions of that contract. See, under
exclusive bargaining rights only the exclusive bargaining agent could
represent the employee. Now that makes a big difference.
- DONAHOE
- But how, I thought you had rules against raiding, isn't that kind of
raiding?
- FIERING
- Well, that may be, but when you are talking about the public sector, you
are talking about a predominance of public employees being organized in
independent organizations. So any independent organization could presume
to do that, though the reverse really was what was happening. The unions
were on the attack against the independent organizations, but there were
periods after this where independent organizations were on the offensive
and attacked legitimate AFL-CIO bargaining agents.
- DONAHOE
- Really?
- FIERING
- In some--yes, it's happening today--and won in some cases.
- DONAHOE
- So, in other words, if the majority bargaining agent was AFSCME, just
say, and they were bargaining with the county, but by rights an
independent association could come in?
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- But wouldn't have to prove that they--?
- FIERING
- And take over the-
- DONAHOE
- The negotiating?
- FIERING
- Not the negotiating, but the grievance machinery. They could represent
these employees on grievances under the terms of the contract.
- DONAHOE
- But don't they have to prove that they represent a certain number of the
people? They can just come in?
- FIERING
- Nope, [just] one.
- DONAHOE
- One person?
- FIERING
- That's right. The person with the problem or a group with a problem. In
fact I tried to use that with the SEIU [Service Employees International
Union] when in 1971 or '72, all the bargaining agents had been
established and AFSCME had been pushed out of the major bargaining units
in [Los Angeles] county. A lot of these people were disillusioned with
what [Local] 660 was doing with the SEIU and some of them started coming
to me and I picked up on it. That's why I was talking about Mike and
Annie Hoffman. Their bargaining unit, which was a big bargaining unit in
the county, I seized on that one and we signed up a hell of a lot of
their people and I started going to work taking over the grievance
machinery of the SEIU. I started filing grievances and pursuing
grievances all the way up to arbitration when somebody suddenly tipped
them off that there's an Article 20 in the AFL-CIO constitution. We had
an arbitration demand filed, and the county was hesitant about acting on
it, but they had to act on. But the Employee Relations Commission was
asked to delay action in appointing an arbitrator because they were told
there is going to be a charge filed against us and it is going to be
resolved by the AFL-CIO. They didn't want to get into the middle of that
kind of politics. So they filed a charge and of course they were upheld,
and here we were sitting with a whole lot of cards ready to take them
over and we had to back out.
- DONAHOE
- Because of that. What's Article 201
- FIERING
- Article 20 is a no-raiding article.
- DONAHOE
- So it is no-raiding actually.
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- So even though you said another union can come in or--?
- FIERING
- It cannot be an AFL-[CIO] union.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, I see. So it is mostly the independents.
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- They are not covered by Article 201
- FIERING
- Or [International Brotherhood of] Teamsters. Huh?
- DONAHOE
- They are not covered by Article 20?
- FIERING
- No, how can they be?
- DONAHOE
- Because it's only the AFL-CIO, of course, yeah.
- FIERING
- It's an agreement within the AFL-CIO; it's part of its constitution
dealing with relationships with the AFL-CIO unions.
- DONAHOE
- I see, I see.
- FIERING
- They have all agreed by constitution to abide by the decisions of an
arbitrator on that particular article, but it doesn't affect anybody
else. It doesn't affect the independents, it doesn't affect the
teamsters, doesn't affect anybody else.
- DONAHOE
- Doesn't affect those that aren't in the AFL-CIO.
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- I see. Did that ever change?
- FIERING
- No.
- DONAHOE
- Does that still exist?
- FIERING
- That still exists, of course.
- DONAHOE
- To this day they never got exclusive bargaining, they just have majority
bargaining.
- FIERING
- They have majority bargaining. Now, even though the Meyers-Milias-Brown
Act was amended a year later to permit exclusive bargaining' rights in
the county, they have been unable to win it. In the city they have won
it.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, in L.A. city?
- FIERING
- L.A. city they have it. They not only have that, they now have agency
shop too. But in L.A. County they still have only majority bargaining
status; they still don't have exclusive bargaining.
- DONAHOE
- So it's really a way to allow these independents to come in.
- FIERING
- It always is. It's a threat.
- DONAHOE
- It is a threat, yeah, that's something. Let's see, where were we?
[pause] So, around this whole--I think we were talking about the county.
When the county was being organized you had won a number of the
bargaining units under AFSCME, but then there were different hesitancies
in the leadership of AFSCME. They were kind of hesitating about the
county and the SEIU managed to get in there.
- FIERING
- Yeah, well, what happened, the way in which they approached the
organization, I was asked to play a secondary role in the organizational
campaigns. [Jerry] Wurf had a guy who was a hotshot.
- DONAHOE
- Oh that's right, we talked about that.
- FIERING
- A guy by the name of Tom Fitzpatrick, and I was thinking about his
uncle's name.
- DONAHOE
- Oh yeah, right.
- FIERING
- About his father's name? His uncle's name was Tom from the UE [United
Blectrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of America]. He stemmed out of
the UE and then the IUE [International Union of Blectrical, Radio, and
Machine Workers], see. And I came across his father's name in this book.
- DONAHOE
- Oh really?
- FIERING
- Mike [Fitzgerald]--"Red" Mike they used to call him.
- DONAHOE
- Oh that was "Red" because you had mentioned a Red.
- FIERING
- Yeah, they used to call him Red Mike.
- DONAHOE
- And he was the one from UE?
- FIERING
- Well, he was the one who switched to the IUE. He was a big leader in the
East Pittsburgh shop. He was a founder of UE.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, okay.
- FIERING
- But then during the big split, he went to the IUE, and his son, of
course, went to the IUE. That was Tom who came here as an organizer for
AFSCME. He was a pretty fair organizer; he was a pretty good organizer.
He had done a hell of a job for Wurf in the East and the Middle West and
so Wurf wanted him out here and I wasn't going to make a big deal out of
that. I didn't realize that it would have meant eventually that I was
going to be out. didn't know that till later. I was very naive about
that. But in any event, there was a--It isn't worth telling the
complicated story about the bargaining units.
- DONAHOE
- No, because we had covered a lot of that too.
- FIERING
- Yeah. But in any event, he didn't succeed in winning the first big unit
he went into, the blue collar unit. I had started off with a series of
victories; before he came here I had filed petitions. It was not at my
instigation to file petitions, I filed petitions at the instigation of
the guy who preceded Fitzpatrick. But I did want to file petitions, that
was my thing. But the nature of the petitions was what eventually led to
big differences between me and Fitzpatrick. Not that it was critical,
because he was the guy who could make a final decision anyway. But we
then won--the first certification petitions that were filed were acted
on by the commission--we won them. I started on a snowball effect, see,
and everybody started to feel AFSCME was unbeatable.
- DONAHOE
- Well, you won some major areas.
- FIERING
- Anyway, at the time I felt so bad about it I took part of the blame, but
later I began to look at it objectively to see what my own role was in
it. It isn't like I'm trying to slough off responsibility. I share some
of it, but the major responsibility is shared by Wurf, who missed the
great opportunity of his life. He could have had all of California if he
had done what it was possible for him to do. And Fitzpatrick, who was so
goddamn arrogant, he didn't have his--he thought it was a shaoin. A guy
who never went out to visit the workers on the job and thought he could
mastermind this first big election that he was responsible· for from
behind a desk and assure Wurf that no matter what I did, nO matter where
I was with it, that it was a shoo-in. I remember our national attorney
was passing through here and gave me a call just the day before the
election and he says, "Well, Henry, I guess you are going to have a big
union here with the election." I said, "Don't bet on it, don't bet on
it," because I was out there.
- DONAHOE
- Nothing is guaranteed.
- FIERING
- That's right. I said, "Don't bet on it," and he was surprised to hear
that. But you couldn't tell this guy anything. You couldn't tell
Fitzpatrick-
- DONAHOE
- And without contact with the workers he thinks he's going to win them
over and that's it?
- FIERING
- Well, he had his own style of organizing.
- DONAHOE
- From where? [laughter]
- FIERING
- Well, if he had done what I did he might have been a little more
fearful. I had separated out the mechanics that I had organized, see,
and I had figured that was going to be one of those quick elections we
get. By the time the L.A. County Employee Relations Commission got to
them, they decided, "Hold up, let's get organized here and see where we
are at with bargaining units," and I hesitated about throwing the
mechanics in with the rest of the blue collar workers. And then I did, I
finally did. But after I did, what I didn't realize was that the county
was also counting votes along with the head of the SEIU. This was told
to me by the guy who was the head of the SEIU seven years later, see:
that they paid a visit to the chairman of the county commission, the
employee relations commission, that set up bargaining units and
convinced him to separate out those mechanics, even though I had
withdrawn the petition. And so when he went to the commission, he
suggested to the commission that this is 8 skilled group and deserves
its own identity and keep them separate, and those votes made the
difference on whether we got the majority. I felt very bad about it,
very bad. felt just torn up about it, and I blamed myself to a large
degree, though later I realized what the hell was really happening, when
I took stock of it. I wasn't making the-
- DONAHOE
- You really had the support.
- FIERING
- First of all, I made the decision and I did what this guy wanted, but I
wasn't making the final decisions all along. This guy was and he could
have done what he wanted to do, but his real attitude was to thumb his
nose at me, to say, "Fuck you, buddy," you see. "I didn't need you. I
was going to do this anyway; I was going to win without you, see." And
he had gone and he had rented a boat, he had rented a house--He was
ready to bed down here, and if he had--he and Wurf had worked that
out--that would have been, as far as I was concerned, that would have
been the end of me here. I would have been pushed allover the place, and
I wasn't about to be at that point. It would have meant that I would
have been forced out; I would have to make a decision to get out. So I
survived that in the way I didn't want to survive it.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, by losing the rest of the county.
- FIERING
- But then, a year and a half later--less than that, a year later--the
whole atmosphere changed in the county when these guys were all gone,
and people then took stock again in the county, and they wanted AFSCME.
And they wanted us particularly because of the reputation that AFSCME
had established. That's where this one group and other groups were
coming to me to organize them, and I was organizing. I didn't know much
about Article 20, because I didn't have that kind of a background with
AFL-CIO. Mine was with UE, and they weren't covered by any Article 20,
see. And Christ, we were ready to take over everything that the SEIU had
at that point.
- DONAHOE
- Really. 402
- FIERING
- That 660 particularly had. I don't know about Elinor [Glenn]'s group and
whatever might have happened with that. But anyway it was an unfortunate
set of circumstances. So we established what we had, we solidified it.
We had the best contracts in the county. We had the best wages in the
county. In fact, we had the best wages for our groups in the state, in
all the classifications we had, and our people were very, very up, and
very happy with the union, and everybody else was looking to us too.
- DONAHOE
- But that was it, I mean you never went over--?
- FIERING
- You couldn't take over any--We did succeed in competing with SEIU in one
bargaining unit which was independent--social workers, the psychiatric
social workers, AFSCME Local 2712.
- DONAHOE
- No, that's not [Local] 535.
- FIERING
- No, that's not 535. And we beat them. It was based on our record. They
were an association and they voted a hundred percent to come with us
based on our record as against [Local 660's] record. That was that
incident I told you where we bargained with the county. I says, "Listen,
I got to reward these people for coming to us."
- DONAHOE
- Right.
- FIERING
- Because we did the--I was the only one who was an experienced trade
unionist coming out of the industrial movement and was appreciated by
the SEIU leadership. And once after that Article 20 decision, I decided,
"Look, there's no point. We are not enemies anymore and there's no point
in fighting them. We are only hurting each other." And my MO [modus
operandi] in organizing is that you find out how you can use other
people to improve your own position. It doesn't mean you sell them out,
but how can you use them. And as it turned out we used them before,
because the county was constantly afraid our militancy was going to lead
everybody out. Well, we didn't have anything to do with the other units
at that time. But then when they came to me and asked for my advice,
when they were all in a box--that was 660, Elinor and Dave Crippen--we
started this movement for a strike. That was based on my making a turn,
making the decision, that, well, from now on I'm going to make friends
with these people. have nothing to fight with them about anymore.
- DONAHOE
- And you started working together?
- FIERING
- Worked together. And we worked together and here again, I went out into
the forefront of the whole movement, see, and I was able to tell the
county, "Listen, I control this thing." (I'm giving it to you just the
way it was said. )I said, "I control this thing." And they say, "We know you do." And I says, "You want a settlement, you've got to work through me." And I
say, "Now, I have got to have a reward. First of all, my bargaining unit
has got to come out well, and I said, "As far as this unit is concerned
I go~ to reward them for joining us, I promised them that." So we worked out that little deal, but then I helped the other unions,
once we had taken a strike vote in consumating their own contracts.
Harry Gluck, who was the head of 660, and I became very close, very
close. Matter of fact, the way I became a consultant to 660 after I
retired was that he at that time had an appointment with the--Brown had
given him a big appointment in the state as chairman of the California
Public Employment Relations Board.
- DONAHOE
- Governor Brown.
- FIERING
- Yeah, "Jerry" [Edmund G.] Brown [Jr.]. And so he told his successor,
Steve Cooney, to be sure to come after me, to get my help as a
consultant. I was consultant to him for several years.
- DONAHOE
- Well, what did you think was the difference between AFSCME and SEIU
later when you started working with them? And what would make one better
than the other?
- FIERING
- Neither is better than the other. The difference was the trade union
background versus what's called an association background, or what we
would call a company union background. Not the inability, but the
inexperience in understanding the relationship of a union to an
employer. And my approach was what I had learned all my life. You've got
a boss, and you've got workers. There is only one way to deal with it:
organize to fight. And they were unaccustomed to that. See, the
associations had dealt with the county on, well, you've heard of the
term "collective begging." That's what it was. They used to consider
themselves a part of the county machinery, and they really were. They
were the employee arm of the county machinery, but they didn't get
anything for it, see, and the workers resented it.
- DONAHOE
- So they came out of the independent federations and associations, and
AFSCME was more-
- FIERING
- The popular idea of a union.
- DONAHOE
- --had utilized people from basic industry to organize. It was a
different attitude, a different approach.
- DONAHOE
- So basically you could have worked the same way in either one?
- FIERING
- For anyone, that's right.
- DONAHOE
- They were both the same really. Well, how do you decide on jurisdiction,
because they were both there in the public sector and--?
- FIERING
- Well, jurisdiction is whoever gets there firstest with the mostest is
the one that gets 1n. That's the way it is.
- DONAHOE
- But they really collaborate now more then ever, don't they, AFSCME and
SEIU?
- FIERING
- Then they did, after the fight.
- DONAHOE
- They don't now?
- FIERING
- Right now they are not.
- DONAHOE
- Well, I was just wondering how do they decide, how do they work things
out, how do they collaborate?
- FIERING
- Circumstances either impel them to meet together or circumstances don't
impel them to meet together, or run into conflict with one another on
issues. They have their own interests, but where their circumstances
bring their interest in tandem, they work together. That's the way it
works, everybody works for himself.
- DONAHOE
- I know, but it just seems like it comes into conflict a lot, you know,
to the detriment of the workers.
- FIERING
- It does. It's a bad situation there, has been for several years. The
workers are split apart. We started a coalition, Harry Gluck and I, of
one from each of the unions that was involved then. There was AFSCME,
SEIU, Elinor's group--and the [International Union of] Operating
Engineers, which though it's a small group is an international and a
very key union in the county. The [International Association of] Fire
Fighters was an AFL-CIO union, and one other. It was about six
different-
- DONAHOE
- AFT [American Federation of Teachers]?
- FIERING
- No, the AFT is not in it. And we worked together and we agreed that
Harry would be the chairman because he came from the biggest
group--nobody questioned that--and that maintained for a few years. Then
they elected the rep from the Operating Engineers, Joe Wetzler, as
chairman because he was a neutral, and because there was conflict among
the other unions. But that thing has degenerated over the years now, and
that coalition that we formed at that time is completely different now,
and 660, which represents the majority of the workers, is out of it. Not
even a part of it.
- DONAHOE
- They are not even in it anymore?
- FIERING
- Not even in it.
- DONAHOE
- How long did it last?
- FIERING
- Well, it lasted for all the time I was there until '76, six years. It
lasted for seven years, till Harry left.
- DONAHOE
- Until about '70?
- FIERING
- 'Seventy-seven.
- DONAHOE
- 'Seventy-seven. So from say '77 till now there has been a lot of
conflict.
- FIERING
- Yeah, it's unfortunate.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, it really is. So there's no one in there now trying to build new
coalitions and figure out--?
- FIERING
- Well, they have a coalition, but it excludes the biggest union in the
county.
- DONAHOE
- I mean a real coalition.
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- What about the AFT, did they work at all?
- FIERING
- No, they're not-
- DONAHOE
- They are just a separate.
- FIERING
- They're not involved. They are involved in the AFL-CIO Public Employee
Division, which takes in all the public employee unions. But the county,
which has got its own coalition, they are not involved; there are no
teachers there.
- DONAHOE
- When you became a consultant for the SEIU, then were you still involved
with AFSCME too?
- FIERING
- Yep.
- DONAHOE
- So you have maintained your relationship with both?
- FIERING
- I was negotiating for the probation officers, the mechanics, and for 660
at the same time.
- DONAHOE
- But you couldn't bridge the gaps even though you were there?
- FIERING
- No, that's impossible. No, I couldn't bridge it and I wasn't about to.
It wasn't my role, I was no longer director of the union. If I was the
leader of the union, 409 that would be one thing, but then I couldn't
represent SEIU. But as an independent operator I could be a consultant
to anybody, and I was a consultant to probation officers up until two
years ago. And to the SEIU up until--I was a consultant to Elinor's
union, though she had retired, but I had negotiated a couple of
contracts for them up until two years ago. They wanted me to do it again
this year, but I didn't want it. I don't want to handle that anymore;
it's too heavy, it's too heavy.
- DONAHOE
- Do you think there's a way that could be beneficial to the workers and,
you know, fair to everybody that they could divide jurisdiction amongst
certain groups of the public sector? Do you think both unions are pretty
much the same?
- FIERING
- Yeah, they are--in California only. See, this is the only place where
the SEIU has made real progress in the public sector, and that was
because of L.A. County. That victory in the county opened the doors of
California to the SEIU.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, yeah. But nationwide they are not?
- FIERING
- Nationwide they are not a factor. Here and there they have got some
groups, but California is where they are a factor, and what did that was
L.A. County. A big group of workers has tremendous impact in the public
sector throughout California. AFSCME lost an awful lot that time.
- DONAHOE
- But AFSCME you feel is more powerful nationwide.
- FIERING
- Oh, there's no question about it. AFSCME is the public employee union.
- DONAHOE
- I just didn't know if that is the public employee union.
- FIERING
- That's the public employee union.
- DONAHOE
- So it's really just in California then that SEIU--I hadn't realized that
AFSCME was the major public employee union.
- FIERING
- They are the public employee union in the United States. They've got
over 1,100,000 members, and they are all in the public sector.
- DONAHOE
- A million a half?
- FIERING
- No, 1,100,000 or better, and these are all in the public sector.
- DONAHOE
- And what about SEIU?
- FIERING
- SEIU has got, the SEIU membership is somewhere around 800,000, but of
that 800,000, they may have maybe 300,000 in the public sector, but most
of those in the public sector are in California.
1.16. TAPE NUMBER: IX, SIDE TWO OCTOBER 2, 1987
- DONAHOE
- How do you see the current role of AFSCME in the labor movement?
- FIERING
- You mean nationally?
- DONAHOE
- Nationally and in California, too.
- FIERING
- Well, nationally AFSCME is not only a big force in the labor movement
because of its size and the fact that it is well organized and that it
has money, but it's a credit to the labor movement. It's a damn good
union. It's a real good union, very progressive and dynamic leadership.
- DONAHOE
- Who's the president?
- FIERING
- Jerry [Gerald W.] McEntee. He took over when Wurf died.
- DONAHOE
- That was in the seventies?
- FIERING
- That was in December '81.
- DONAHOE
- So you feel really that it's a good union in terms of being democratic
and responsive to the needs of the members.
- FIERING
- Oh, yeah. Yes. And an unusual president, an unusual president, who is
very responsive to the rank and file. We didn't know too much about the
guy before he became president. The guy who was the district president
here, John Seferian, who is very close to me and who remained district
president after I retired, was instrumental in the vote that elected
McEntee. He was running against Bill Lucy, who was the secretary
treasurer of the union and still is.
- DONAHOE
- All of AFSCME's members are in the public sector, but SEIU, you said
they have 800,000, and 300,000 only are in the public sector.
- FIERING
- My guess is about 300,000, if it's that many.
- DONAHOE
- In the public sector?
- FIERING
- Yeah.
- DONAHOE
- Where are the other 500,000?
- FIERING
- They are--First of all, it used to be called the Building Service
Employees Union. Do you remember the BSEIU? Building Service Employees
International Union, the old AFL union of janitors?
- DONAHOE
- Oh, no, okay.
- FIERING
- Maintenance men. They changed their name, because the influx of people
in the public sector didn't like that name, you know. It was a question
also of being associated with janitors; they didn't like that. So they
took off--and I think that was done at Elinor's instigation--so they
took off the word "building" and they called themselves the SEIU,
instead of BSEIU.
- DONAHOE
- Oh I see, okay.
- FIERING
- As for SEIU, their base ever since their inception was in the private
sector.
- DONAHOE
- Okay.
- FIERING
- And they still have a huge number of people in that area.
- DONAHOE
- Maintenance people.
- FIERING
- Maintenance people, custodial, janitorial, hospitals.
- DONAHOE
- In the private.
- FIERING
- In the private sector, that's right.
- DONAHOE
- And that's where they originated.
- FIERING
- That's where they originated. It wasn't until this experience in
California that they burst onto the public sector scene, and that
enabled them to flaunt it in other places of the country. It also showed
them what a huge reservoir of potential membership there was, and so
they organized some more workers in the public sector in other areas of
the country, but they are scattered: have a few in Massachusetts, a few
in Pittsburgh, a few in New York, Oregon, in some other states, you
know, but they're scattered. They are not significant. As a force, they
are not significant in the public sector, except in California, see.
They've got big chunks of California. They've got the CSEA, the
California State Employees Association, and the 90,000 people they
represent. That's not how many members they've got, but that's what they
represent. They affiliated with the SEIU here just a couple of years
ago. They have many counties that followed suit on L.A. County, like
Santa Clara County, Santa Barbara County, Ventura County, and other
counties like San Francisco County.
- DONAHOE
- They do?
- FIERING
- San Francisco city. They make up a hell of a lot of people, and just as
a guess, my guess would be that they probably represent today in
California--I wouldn't be surprised if the number didn't run close to
200,000 public workers.
- DONAHOE
- Really, oh, okay. But AFSCME has the state employees, aren't they in
the--?
- FIERING
- We have some state employees. We've got the clerical workers, the
service workers in the universities, which makes up something like--the
bargaining units AFSCME has, has about 38,000 people, I think.
- DONAHOE
- In the whole state of California?
- FIERING
- No, no in the University of California system. They are covered by a
separate law, the Higher Education Employment Relations Act.
- DONAHOE
- State workers?
- FIERING
- State workers. That's the rehabilitation workers Unit. State workers are
covered by the State Employees Employment Relations Act.
- DONAHOE
- Oh okay, I was thinking of the-
- FIERING
- In the state, all AFSCME has got among state of California workers is
Lenny Potash's group, rehabilitation workers, Local 2620. Wait a minute.
That's right, Lenny Potash's group. Where are the clerical workers that
they've got? Those are in the universities.
- DONAHOE
- Because they just finished that big campaign a couple of years ago for
the University of California.
- FIERING
- That's right, universities. So all they've got in the state is the rehab
workers.
- DONAHOE
- That's all? I thought they had a lot of other people.
- FIERING
- No, they don't. For the moment, that's it, outside of local public
entities. They have got local unions in local jurisdictions all around
California, like in L.A. County they got five unions. Now, in L.A. city
they represent the clerical workers and about two or three other
bargaining units, or one or two other bargaining units, but the clerical
workers are the big unit. They are four thousand people, and that's
where they broke through on the comparable worth issue, which made
history you know. Well, the first one in comparable worth was also
AFSCME up in San Jose city. That was a historic agreement, but then the
big one on comparable worth was down here in L.A. city.
- DONAHOE
- And that was from AFSCME.
- FIERING
- That was AFSCME, yeah. They broke the ground on comparable; that's their
achievement.
- DONAHOE
- Now, when was that, the L.A. one? I forget the dates.
- FIERING
- Two years ago.
- DONAHOE
- What's the status of SEIU now? Do you think that people have been
relatively satisfied now with SEIU?
- FIERING
- Well, SEIU to this day does not have a majority of the people it
represents as members in the county, to this day. That represents an
awful threat to them, which they just have been unable to overcome. They
never fully matured as a union, they never fully grew out of the
association mentality they were formed with. They never fully matured as
a union. I keep telling them--as a matter of fact I had lunch with one
of them yesterday--that my opinion is they won't until they go through a
full-fledged strike.
- DONAHOE
- SEIU, yeah.
- FIERING
- They have come a good part of the ways but not altogether there.
- DONAHOE
- Some of them have had strikes, like Kaiser, [Local] 399.
- FIERING
- I'm not talking--Kaiser is not a part of the county, that's not public
employment.
- DONAHOE
- Oh okay, because we were on SEIU, but it was a different union.
- FIERING
- Oh, SEIU is a union. It has been through a lot of strikes. I'm not
talking about SEIU as a--I'm talking about the public-sector SEIU. Now,
there are areas of the SEIU in the public sector where they have matured
as unions and they operate as unions, particularly true up north, see,
in Santa Clara County, and up north from there, San Francisco County and
Alameda County, which is another SEIU. Marin County is SEIU when you
start talking about counties. My daughter [Maxine Fiering DeFelice] is a
member of that.
- DONAHOE
- Well, my husband, I told you, he is a member down here, so.
- FIERING
- But in L.A. County that's what I'm talking about, which is a significant
part of California, and that's showing the same kind of development with
the CSEA, difficulty in--See, CSEA joined the SEIUi they were shopping
around for an AFL-CIO label, see. That's all some of their leaders
wanted. They just wanted to get the AFLCIO off their back, and the
AFL-CIO is selling labels: "Take our label and you don't have to worry
about being raided." That's as it was. That's what brought the county
people into the AFL-CIO. Their people were pushing: "Either we get
AFL-CIO or we're going to dump you." So the leadership gave them the
label. Didn't give them the union--that has come from within--they gave
them the label. Same with the CSEA, they gave them a label, so no other
AFL-CIO union can raid them.
- DONAHOE
- That's what happened with my husband. They affiliated with SEIU.
- FIERING
- They took that label, nobody can raid them, see. These people can't
organize into another union; they have to make themselves into a union
wherever they are at. So I suppose it has got its good side to it,
coming from the UE where we were born and bred on raiding.
- DONAHOE
- Well, but you had to resist raiding-
- FIERING
- I'm talking about--First of all, we tore up the AF of L with raiding. We
not only organized the unorganized, we also--the AFL-CIO shops were
practically unorganized; they were dying--and we took them over, many of
them. I went against the [International Association of] Machinists and
the IBEW [International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers] many times.
But then, of course, we became the object of raiding. We were experts in
raiding. Take those two years I was mentioning to you about, '42 to '43,
when we won sixty-six out of sixtyseven, you know. I just mentioned the
numbers; I didn't gave you the flavor of it. That was a whole mixture of
things. Unorganized shops people had never organized and some of them
are IA of M machinists locals, some of them IBEW locals or other unions
in the AF of L. Most of them unorganized but, shoot, we had some hellish
times, great times.
- DONAHOE
- It was entirely different. It seems as though people with industrial
backgrounds like you were sort of drawn into AFSCME because of the
leadership's approach.
- FIERING
- No, I was drawn into AFSCME because they offered me a job.
- DONAHOE
- Right, but they wanted somebody like you.
- FIERING
- They wanted, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- Whereas SEIU didn't have that kind of-
- FIERING
- Well, they really wanted somebody with experience in the trade union
movement to handle grievances. That's how narrow-minded they were with
the concept of a union. This guy who hired me, he hired me as what's
called a grievance handler. What's my job? Just to sit at the telephone
and when the worker calls up and says, "I have a grievance." I'm to
attend to the grievance. I can't exist that way. And when the War on
Poverty thing opened, well, people would come into the union to ask me
about organization, and I'd ask them, "How about it? Here's some people
to organize." They said, "Go ahead and organize."
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, but Wurf had a bigger idea than that.
- FIERING
- But Wurf had a bigger idea, that's right. And didn't know enough about
public sector to know the difference.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, but then you picked it up later, yeah.
- FIERING
- But then I picked it up, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- But SEIU didn't seem to have that kind of outlook, whereas the
leadership of AFSCME did.
- FIERING
- The only one who had it at that time--Well, Elinor was in this Local 434
and there was the city which had Local 347, which had once been both one
local, when it started as United Public Workers. When it split, it
became two locals and Elinor went with the county side, and the guy
named Sidney Moore was the chief guy. When Sidney Moore was pushed out
in the factional fight, another guy took over for the city workers,
which now is a big strong union, about six or seven thousand
people--Local 347. It's pretty well solidified, well organized, and
primarily black.
- DONAHOE
- Los Angeles city workers?
- FIERING
- Yep. It's the blue collar section.
- DONAHOE
- That's the blue collar section.
- FIERING
- That's SEIU.
- DONAHOE
- That's SEIU.
- FIERING
- That came from the United Public Workers of a handful of people, a few
hundred people in the city and county.
- DONAHOE
- Amazing, wow.
- FIERING
- So they grew into--Well, I can't say they really grew into a union,
because they didn't have trade union experience. They were always in the
public sector, and being in the public sector you miss something, you
miss something. They never got that, even Elinor. Elinor was fortunately
a tremendous speaker and a strong personality, and so she could command
attention and demand leadership. But in terms of her experience in union
organization, what it takes for union organization and negotiations,
contracts and stuff like that, she did not have that background or
experience. Even as late as 1970, '71, when I came, I didn't realize it
until I was associated with her in this big crisis you know that we had.
- DONAHOE
- Right, right. So it just seems that from what you are saying the SEIU
people didn't have that kind of background by and large, whereas
AFSCME-
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- --really solicited people with that kind of background. That made it a
very big difference.
- FIERING
- Of course, SEIU learned though.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah.
- FIERING
- They've changed. They've got a hell of a good staff today. Oh, they have
got some great kids, great kids.
- DONAHOE
- I have met a lot of them, yeah, they are. We probably know the same
people.
- FIERING
- Great kids.
- DONAHOE
- But I always thought George Hardy was pretty interesting.
- FIERING
- Yeah, he is 8 very interesting guy, that's right. He offered me a job,
back in 19--Let's see, fifteen years ago. And he offered me a huge chunk
of geography, but at that time I was fifty-nine years old. He didn't
know that because I didn't look it, you know. So I met with his attorney
here and we're discussing it, and the only thing I was most interested
in was did they have a pension plan. It was then that he realized how
old I was and that my main interest was a pension. They didn't have
that, and so we agreed that it was not for me. But he offered me one big
piece of u.s. geography.
- DONAHOE
- Really? Now, did he come out of that old Building--?
- FIERING
- He came out of the old Building Service Employees Union. His father was
one of the organizers of it, and he worked at it, and he became a
business agent in it. He grew up in that union.
- DONAHOE
- Because he seems more of a, you know, kind of the old-time trade
unionist.
- FIERING
- He is an old-time trade unionist, very down-toearth.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, so he seemed to come out of that whole tradition, but I guess some
of the others didn't. I can see the difference.
- FIERING
- Very practical, very practical. Of course, his practicality was best
demonstrated when he made the deal with the public workers. That was
being far-sighted. Gave them no conditions: "Come on in just as you
are."
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, that's exactly what they want.
- FIERING
- But everybody else was looking at him cross-eyed and laying down the
anti-red line.
- DONAHOE
- So he was the one that actually engineered that?
- FIERING
- He is the one who the SEIU can thank.
- DONAHOE
- For that.
- FIERING
- For the position they hold today in the public employment area.
- DONAHOE
- In California, yeah.
- FIERING
- In California, particularly. One of these crises in '73, in fact right
after we finished negotiations, my wife [Clara Wernick Fiering] was
stricken with congestive heart failure.
- DONAHOE
- Nineteen seventy-three?
- FIERING
- Yeah, I was in miserable shape. That went on for seven months; she was
in a coma for seven months.
- DONAHOE
- She was pretty young.
- FIERING
- She was--she was fifty-nine when she died.
- DONAHOE
- You had your coronary pretty young too.
- FIERING
- I had my coronary in '68. I was fifty-five. Fifty-five? Yeah,
fifty-five.
- DONAHOE
- That was pretty young as well. It was almost twenty years ago--nineteen
years ago.
- FIERING
- Yeah, January, it will be twenty years.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, that was pretty young too.
- FIERING
- And then I had open-heart surgery four years ago.
- DONAHOE
- Four years ago?
- FIERING
- Hmm-mm.
- DONAHOE
- Did you have another coronary after that?
- FIERING
- Nope, I was on my way.
- DONAHOE
- You didn't learn your lesson.
- FIERING
- Well, no, I suppose in a way it was inevitable. After all it was, what,
sixteen years after the other one, and I figured eventually I was due
for one of those with all the bypasses that were taking place at that
time. And I was pretty close to my cardiologist. I had a workman's comp
case--workman's comp paid for mine--and I got to a point where he says,
"Well, I think you are about ready," so I did, and I have been in great
shape since that time.
- DONAHOE
- So that was what, '83?
- FIERING
- Yeah, '83, that's right. April '83. I have been in great shape since
that time.
- DONAHOE
- Since the bypass.
- FIERING
- Oh yeah, and I have done a lot of work since that time.
- DONAHOE
- What kind of bypass was it?
- FIERING
- I had four of them.
- DONAHOE
- You had like quadruple?
- FIERING
- Yeah.
- DONAHOE
- At one time?
- FIERING
- I don't know why, yeah, I don't know why people make a big fuss about
that whether it's three or it's four.
- DONAHOE
- Well, because there's more things that could-
- FIERING
- No, once they open you up it doesn't really make a hell of a lot of
difference, you know.
- DONAHOE
- Oh my God, just one cut.
- FIERING
- I haven't had a pain since that time.
- DONAHOE
- Really? That's wonderful.
- FIERING
- My heart is in great shape. My pulse is--I run.
- DONAHOE
- I know, you told me you jog four or day.
- FIERING
- I took up a lot of exercise. Yeah,
- DONAHOE
- When you had the first coronary in after that, did you have a lot of
problems?
- FIERING
- Oh, I had pains, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- Did you take care of yourself? five miles a that's right. '68, then
- FIERING
- Well, they put me on a walking regimen, but, shoot, I was so tied up in
all of this stuff I wasn't- could have been more careful and should have
been more careful.
- DONAHOE
- You didn't watch your diet?
- FIERING
- If I had, I wouldn't have come to this point. If I had done then what I
do now, I wouldn't have come to this point.
- DONAHOE
- So you didn't watch your diet or exercise properly or do anything?
- FIERING
- No, the main thing was organizing, organizing, and the thrill of that
battle, you know, that conflict, that challenge out there.
- DONAHOE
- Even after Clara had her heart attack, it didn't-
- FIERING
- Hmm?
- DONAHOE
- Even after your wife had her attack?
- FIERING
- It was a miserable time. And I had the rest--I was carrying a big load
in AFSCME. Even though we had a staff, I was representing far more than
half the people in contract negotiations outside the county as well as
inside the county. I had everything inside the county. It was one hell
of a load, and with my wife in the hospital, there wasn't much I could
do for her, nor anybody else the rest of that year. But it was a
horrible period in my life, a terrible period.
- DONAHOE
- I can imagine. And she had no warning of this?
- FIERING
- Oh yeah, she had a warning.
- DONAHOE
- She had a lot of warnings?
- FIERING
- In 1963 she had to quit because she had a warning. Well, she had warning
prior to 1963, though she didn't say much about it and didn't take it
too much to heart because you think you are immortal you know, all of
those [kinds of thoughts]. In 1963 she had to quit. See, UE used to move
her around too, up [through] the northern part of the state and down
here, because they had a jerk up there in the northern part of the state
who didn't work.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, yeah, you told me about that.
- FIERING
- And she was very, very responsible, and she used to work at her job. She
didn't just collect pay. The goddamn pay wasn't big enough anyway, it
wasn't. But in '63 she couldn't make it anymore so she went on
disability, and while she was on disability, she in '66 had open-heart
surgery. She had valve problems.
- DONAHOE
- And she was only forty-nine at that point.
- FIERING
- No, not forty-nine. She was--Iet's see, '74, she would have been sixty,
so-
- DONAHOE
- What was it about fifty then?
- FIERING
- So in '64 she was fifty, so she was fifty-two, fifty-three years old.
Fifty-two years old.
- DONAHOE
- Well, that's pretty young.
- FIERING
- Well, she had had rheumatic heart fever when she was a kid.
- DONAHOE
- I was going to say did she have a heart problem, because that's pretty
young, especially for a woman.
- FIERING
- She had rheumatic fever when she was a kid, and they have said that all
of those people had valve damage.
- DONAHOE
- My stepmother died very young of the same thing.
- FIERING
- Yeah, but she never took care of herself.
- DONAHOE
- Neither did my stepmother so, yeah.
- FIERING
- And so she had a-
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, that rheumatic fever really--They didn't know what to do then at
the time.
- FIERING
- Yeah, they didn't know about, that's right.
- DONAHOE
- Those years did tremendous damage to people.
- FIERING
- So she had that surgery and after that surgery she was on disability and
she decided, well, she can't go back to work the way she used to, so she
decided to take a law course and she went to law school.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, God.
- FIERING
- And became a lawyer.
- DONAHOE
- She became a lawyer in '60--when she started--?
- FIERING
- She became a lawyer at the age of fifty-five. Fifty-five or fifty-six.
- DONAHOE
- That's incredible.
- FIERING
- Yeah. And she was with a firm that collaborated with [Ben] Margolis and
[John T.] McTernan. We owe a lot to McTernan for her becoming a lawyer,
because he carried her all the way through on that because she was being
challenged, you know. At that time they had rigid bar interviews and
examinations.
- DONAHOE
- So Margolis and McTernan really helped her out a lot?
- FIERING
- McTernan, McTernan was the one that saw her through. He knew how to
handle the--The bar committee did the interviewing and he primed her on
everything that she had to say about her background and so on. You have
to be absolutely honest about questions, and they go into everything,
you know. They ask you if you are a [Communist] Party member. You've got
to tell them where you lived and when. If you make a mistake on an
address that you formerly lived at, they will hold it against you. So
anyway she went to work for Katz and Rosenfeld out in the valley and
they took her in as a partner. We knew [Robert] Katz pretty well. He had
been a former partner of Margolis and McTernan. And she worked herself
to death.
- DONAHOE
- You mean after all of this she--ooh.
- FIERING
- She worked at that job of a lawyer just as she handles any job she
worked at: she gave it everything. She handled it just the same like she
was doing her union job. She got to represent the ILWU in a couple of
its locals. One out in Boron, matter of fact-
- DONAHOE
- Oh, Boron, yeah.
- FIERING
- They really admired her. They made up a special bible for her when she
died with a cedar box and decorated it and sent it to me, you know, and
all of that. And for Local 26, she represented a couple of cases,
arbitration cases.
- DONAHOE
- What Local 26, that was the--?
- FIERING
- ILWU.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah.
- FIERING
- And so Margolis and McTernan offered her a place in their office and
made her very happy. And they were fixing it up. We had just gone down
there and looked over the way they were fixing up the office, you know,
going to have her name on the door as one of the "counsels," and a week
later she had heart failure. From which she never recovered.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, terrible.
- FIERING
- She was really thrilled about that. Well, anyway that went on for seven
months.
- DONAHOE
- You mean all the--?
- FIERING
- She was in a coma for seven months.
- DONAHOE
- Seven months, that's really hard.
- FIERING
- Yeah, well anyway she died.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, that must have been really terrible.
- FIERING
- Yes, it was terrible.
- DONAHOE
- And, in the middle of this, you were organizing at the county.
- FIERING
- Hmm-mm, I'm trying to hang on to the union. *[And my sanity. I couldn't
work. You know, we spend so much time on these interesting experiences.
A lot to be learned by others. But at such 8 time, it all becomes
irrelevant. Nineteen seventy-three was the most traumatic year of my
life. The county's negotiations were behind me at the time of Clara's
seizure or I would have walked away from them. It was a period during
which I took plenty of time to think about my priorities. That was over
a seven-month stretch. One does a lot of soul-searching, reflection,
introspection, call it what you will. But for the first time in my life,
I tried to think through what had been most important and really was
most important. You wish you could do it over. Yes, it was a little late
to straighten out your priorities. If I could have, my family would have
come first. I missed a lot. My perceptions changed on how to enjoy life,
on what I had missed out on. I really am a different person today. I no
longer seek out challenges and conflict. Within a year after Clara died,
I was married again. My luck held. Ida (Monarch Fiering) is a most
compassionate, loving wife, and for the first time in my life, I feel
relaxed and fully content. After my marriage to Ida, I set my sights on
a possible retirement date. And how I could make up to my kids for some
of the lack of attention, which, of course, you never can.] * Mr. Fiering added the following bracketed section during his review of
the transcript.
- DONAHOE
- Were the children scattered at that time?
- FIERING
- Yeah, my kids were scattered. Yeah, all of them.
- DONAHOE
- There wasn't anyone living nearby huh?
- FIERING
- No, once in a while my son [Frederick Fiering] would be in town, but he
wasn't much help then.
- DONAHOE
- And they were all in school?
- FIERING
- No, they are up north.
- DONAHOE
- They had moved and married and settled by that time.
- FIERING
- They were married; they had families.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, this is a good place to stop this.
- FIERING
- All right.
1.17. TAPE NUMBER: X, SIDE ONE OCTOBER 8, 1987
- FIERING
- I want to correct those dates.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, you can do that.
- FIERING
- That experience when we were all together and took on Los Angeles County
was 1973. And the strike date I talked of was April 29, 1973.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, so that's the one when you built the united front, the coalition
[American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME);
Service Employees International Union (SEIU); International Union of
Operating Engineers].
- FIERING
- Yeah, that's right we built the united front in the county. That's
right.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, so that was after you had realized that they had the majority. But
you were still going to work with them.
- FIERING
- But we were still going to work with them. And that coalition survived.
It's a lot different today than it was, but it survived in the same form
until Harry [Gluck] left in 1977 or '78. I left in 1976. We were in a
certain position, and the best way for us was to work with them, to use
their strength somehow, and, of course, we did. We used their strength
to our advantage, but we got more than they did by knowing how, because
they didn't know how to use their own strength. But we helped them
anyway get more than they would have, and so it benefited everyone. It
changed after that over questions of representation, but that was long
after I retired. I wasn't a part of it after 1976, and I never injected
myself into the issue when it happened. I think it happened in 1981 when
the issue came to a head as to the degree of representation they should
be allowed. It turns out that the union with ninety people got as much
as--had one vote just like a union that represented forty thousand
people. [SEIU Local] 660 was unhappy with that.
- DONAHOE
- That wasn't--?
- FIERING
- Well, what happened was, you see, the coalition originally included one
from each international union, which is fine, except with SEIU where
they had two, Elinor [Glen] and somebody from 660. (Elinor was from
[SEIU Local] 434.) Their status permitted that, and everybody was happy
with it. Nobody argued about that, because we were all together anyway.
Nobody was really fighting each other. We had just been through a very
successful fight and everybody was happy together, you know. So nobody
is making a fuss about that. But in later years one of the unions, CAPE,
which stands for the California Association of Professional Engineers
and which affiliated with MEBA. MEBA is opening its doors to membership
on the basis of a dollar a head. MEBA, Marine Engineers Beneficial
Association. They were selling membership; they were selling the AFL-CIO
[American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations]
label for a dollar a head, that is, a dollar a month per capita.
- DONAHOE
- Now, is this what you were telling me about when you only have majority
bargaining rights and independent groups can come in?
- FIERING
- No, no. But these are not independent groups.
- DONAHOE
- What are they?
- FIERING
- They are AFL-CIO groups. MEBA's an AFL-CIO union.
- DONAHOE
- But aren't they covered by--?
- FIERING
- So what happens, for instance, is that CAPE, which was originally an
independent group and which wanted to be a part of our AFL-CIO coalition
but couldn't because it wasn't in the AFL-CIO, went out and got itself
an AFLCIO label. They got off cheap, see. MEBA was selling the AFL-CIO
label. You affiliate to MEBA, and you, therefore, are CAPE/AFL-CIO and
all you've got to pay is a dollar a member per capita to MEBA to get
that label and nobody can touch you. So you may have all kinds of
dissatisfaction in your membership, but there's no place for them to go;
they've got to stay in that organization, see.
- DONAHOE
- But that has nothing to do with Article 20 [of the AFL-CIO constitution]
or raiding or anything like that?
- FIERING
- Well, it has [raiding] to do with it. Once they affiliate with MEBA and
become a part of the AFL-CIO, nobody can raid them, you see. That's what
they buy with that, which is an unfortunate thing but that's the way it
is. So they represented some diverse groups as time went on, the tax
assessors, engineers, the deputy sheriffs, another was the lifeguards
with ninety members, which later came in and became a part of CAPE also
to escape the raiding thing, see. And so as time went on, they
maneuvered themselves so that each of these constituent parts received
entitlement to one vote on the coalition. So here's CAPE, one
organization, but it has three affiliates. Or MEBA with one
organization, MEBA, they all became a part of MEBA. One organization,
but their constituent parts each had a vote, see. And here's [Local] 660
representing forty thousand people also had just one vote, and
differences arose because there were different interests involved in the
coalition that ran into conflict with each other, and the question of
how many votes anybody had became important. Because they used to
bargain together on overall issues. On fringe benefits for instance,
they .would bargain together, see. And so 660 raised objections to that
and they were pushed out because the rest of the coalition, for whatever
the circumstances were at the time, could not agree to give 660 more
than the one vote. It was a complicated thing, you know, as to how that
whole thing arose, but that's what the bottom line [was]. So 660 took
off on its own because it couldn't allow itself to be voted down on what
it considered some basic things their membership needed when they're
representing the majority of the county, and they are still out.
- DONAHOE
- All this time?
- FIERING
- All this time.
- DONAHOE
- So they are by themselves?
- FIERING
- And there's nothing anybody can do about it. The L.A. [County]
Federation of Labor has rules governing coalitions and they couldn't
modify them for the sake of 660 and run into conflict with all the other
unions, because each of these constituent unions that made up the
coalition was a power force in the AFL-CIO, see.
- DONAHOE
- So they pretty much work by themselves?
- FIERING
- So they work by themselves pretty much, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- That's too bad though in terms of the whole county.
- FIERING
- It is because they should be the leader of the county.
- DONAHOE
- Are the AFSCME groups still in that coalition?
- FIERING
- They are still in the coalition. See now, in the AFSCME group you've got
a dominant group in AFSCME, for instance, the probation officers, whose
interests are closely tied in with one of the groups in the coalition
that's a part of MEBA--the deputy sheriffs. AFSCME would not want to run
into conflict with that group, so when you talk about the power
relationships inside the AFL-CIO, AFSCME's going to run to the support
of its favored group. It's in the power center at the AFL-CIO. So that's
an example of the kinds of complications that arise. So AFSCME is tight
with the coalition, they don't want to leave it. Similarly with--Well,
in SEIU you have factional differences in the union.
- DONAHOE
- Within the whole union itself.
- FIERING
- SEIU has two other representatives in the coalition from two other
locals.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, that still remained in.
- FIERING
- That still remained in. One of the reasons being there were factional
differences with the 660 leadership. Another being [SEIU Local] 535,
which is [comprised of] social workers who are very headstrong and whose
local leadership, for whatever the reasons--the county
leadership--insisted on staying with the coalition; they felt more
secure.
- DONAHOE
- What's the other local?
- FIERING
- Local 434.
- DONAHOE
- Local 434.
- FIERING
- Ophelia McFadden.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, okay.
- FIERING
- See, she is the international vice president of SEIU, and there were
sharp differences between her and the general manager of 660 at that
time.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, I see.
- FIERING
- And she preferred to remain, and she's a member of the executive board
of the L.A. County Federation of Labor, too. She wasn't going to break
with the rules of the federation. There's a whole complicated setup now;
it has just completely changed over a period of time. It's screwed up.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, God. Well, that kind of brings us to the question of your estimate
of the development of the labor movement in Los Angeles.
- FIERING
- Well, I want to get in there some comments about Frank Emspak's book
[The Breakup of the Congress of Industrial Organizations, 1945-1950],
about that inordinate amount of space that he takes explaining the fight
on foreign policy between UE [United Electrical, Radio, and Machine
Workers of America] and the CIO as a very major cause of the rupture.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, okay.
- FIERING
- *[AS I read his thesis, it seemed to me it was James J. Matles building
a record to prove it was UE withdrawing from the CIa instead of being
expelled from the CIO. And then proving that UE was right to withdraw
over issues like the CIO's withdrawal from WFTU (World Federation of
Trade Unions), U.S. relations with the Soviet Union, American
imperialism, foreign policy, the Marshall Plan, and so on. These were
big issues Philip Murray raised because it gave him the opportunity to
use the Cold War as a club to beat us to death. Of course, it made him a
part of the political establishment. It's true, the UE convention took
completely opposite positions from the CIO. And on the non-communist
affidavits, Murray was refusing to sign. On that we were tied to his
kite. A justification for our not signing was, "How can we sign if
Murray hasn't signed." That was supposed to be an argument while his
minions inside and outside UE were red-baiting the hell out of us. This
was 1948 and 1949. Those of us in the trenches were trying to keep the
focus on bread and butter, contracts, autonomy, UE's record.
Unfortunately, the foreign-policy issues were not a part of everyday
union life. Except in isolated cases, they weren't debated by the rank
and file even though the delegates they sent to the UE convention voted
to support; primarily because they supported the leadership and opposed
anything the James B. Carey forces stood for. Emspak is elevating
foreign policy to the major reason for the split. But more than that
he's trying to prove that therefore UE left the CIO instead of vice
versa. It didn't make a hell of a lot of difference to the rank and file
at that time. And I don't know, what is it, more than thirty years
later, what it proves today. He should have tried to prove whether we
were prepared to hold our membership on these issues against Murray and
the CIO. And most everybody else. I don't think we were. History shows
we didn't. And if I had my druthers on two issues to do over they would
be signing the affidavits much earlier, following other CIO unions, and
secondly undercut our opposition on their attack on our foreign-policy
positions by proposing some accomodation with Murray. That would have
given us time to get out of that box. But we were all captives of a
rigid left line that left no room for compromise.] * Mr. Fiering added the following bracketed section during his review of
the transcript.
- DONAHOE
- When workers were mostly interested in trade union questions.
- FIERING
- They were interested in their livelihoods; they didn't think that much
about foreign policy. They weren't really asked to debate it.
- DONAHOE
- Especially at that time.
- FIERING
- Yeah. We take it up in the convention, you get through a resolution--so
what, so what.
- DONAHOE
- But not to make it a fight to the bitter end.
- FIERING
- That's right, but it doesn't touch the rank and file. But you go around
the country hollering, "You see, this is what our rank and file thinks.
We are doing what our membership wants," and the membership doesn't even
know you're saying that.
- DONAHOE
- Well, the raiding attested to that.
- FIERING
- Proves it, that's right.
- DONAHOE
- Because people wouldn't have been susceptible to the raiding if they had
understood and agreed with all of this.
- FIERING
- That's right, and that was the proof.
- DONAHOE
- Seems like they didn't see-
- FIERING
- But the fact of the matter is that foreign policy was never an issue in
the raiding on our part, not out in the field. It may have been an issue
between Murray and our top officers.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, no, of course.
- FIERING
- The opposition made red-baiting the issue, that was their issue. They
used foreign policy in that respect, but we never made foreign policy an
issue, as big an issue as it was between UE and the CIO. We continued to
hold out the olive branch. It was a bad period; it was a very difficult
period.
- DONAHOE
- So when did they finally recognize signing that clause--?
- FIERING
- Oh, that was at the 1949 UE convention.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, so it was up to '50. It was that long.
- FIERING
- Yeah, just before, yeah. The convention was September '49.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, so then after making it such a battle they finally decided to
sign, but by that time it was hardly anything left.
- FIERING
- Well, no, there was a big part of UE left, but we were greatly weakened
because our focus was not on the raiding and saving ourselves. Our focus
was on a lot of programmatic issues that really didn't touch. We were
still doing our job, you know, as reps, handling problems for the
membership, but we weren't really orienting the membership towards the
great danger of the union being ripped apart and the fact that the CIO
wanted to destroy us. As I think back, we never talked in those terms,
that the CIO was going to destroy us. Here they were destroying us, and
we never talked about the fact they were destroying us to our rank and
file. We were fighting against a faction within our union, see. The
UEMDA rUE Members for Democratic Action], yeah.
- DONAHOE
- But what was the basis?
- FIERING
- Then what happened was, the companies, GE [General Electric Company],
and Westinghouse [Electric Corporation] particularly, announced that
they weren't going to recognize us anymore because they didn't know who
to deal with. And that came after the '49 convention and the chartering
of IUE [International Union of Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers]
by the CIO. Up until that time, we were victims of raiding in many other
areas. The FE [United Farm Equipment and Metal Workers of America] had
affiliated with us; the UAW [United Automobile Workers] went after the
FE, see. But we were victims of raiding in other areas, but in GE and
Westinghouse the big break didn't come until after the '49
convention--the big break meaning while we were being chopped apart by
the Carey forces inside, the companies had not taken a position. Now,
the government had taken a position; they were issuing subpoenas left
and right. But then GE and Westinghouse announced that they didn't know
who to deal with, petitioned for elections, and then, of course, that
triggered a new policy by the National Labor Relations Board. The NLRB
would honor the petitions and order elections, even though the contracts
had not yet expired, even though there was no petitioning for
recognition by a competing union. We were on the defensive by that time,
really on the defensive.
- DONAHOE
- Okay. So should we move to Los Angeles again?
- FIERING
- Let's move in there. Okay, what do you want to know?
- FIERING
- I want to know your estimate of the development of the labor movement in
Los Angeles, because you have really seen it I think from-
- FIERING
- Well, but I wasn't involved much in it--well, I was involved in it
from-
- DONAHOE
- Well, from the fifties.
- FIERING
- From the middle sixties, that's right. At least I was a part of it.
- DONAHOE
- Well, actually you came here in the fifties.
- FIERING
- I came here in the fifties. I spent some time here, some little
organizing here, and some little servicing. The servicing in terms of
the whole of my UE work, was not much. Much of it was in Ontario
[California] at the GE plant there. There were, I believe, two UE
10cals--1421, an amalgamated local, and 1012, Ontario GE.
- DONAHOE
- Was that one of the biggest plants, Ontario?
- FIERING
- Ontario, no, it was not. It was one of the big plants here on the coast
for UE.
- DONAHOE
- On the coast, yeah.
- FIERING
- But in terms of UE it was a small plant.
- DONAHOE
- But I meant on the West Coast.
- FIERING
- On the West Coast. On the West Coast, I think it was probably the
biggest plant that the UE had out here, thinking back. By the time I
came here, most of what they had had been lost. I came out here on a
leave of absence and I got tired of sitting around [so] I went to work
in a shop, Domestic Thermostat, which became a part of Minneapolis
Honeywell. And then I asked for a permanent transfer out here, which I
got, and I did this organizing of this plant on the east side, Standard
Coil. I organized a GE shop in Ontario that serviced jet engines.
- DONAHOE
- Standard Coil, I remember you telling me about that one, yeah.
- FIERING
- And then I did some servicing up and down the coast. There was a
Westinghouse strike, up there in Seattle, Washington, and in Sunnyvale,
California. I did some servicing around here in a couple of shops from
rUE Local] 1421 and the Ontario plant of GE. Then, of course, I went
back East a number of times for extended periods and that made up my
tenure here, and by 1956 I had made my decision to quit and then in
January '57 I did it. It wasn't easy, but I did it. I didn't know what
the hell I was going to do. But I have been through all of that with you
on that tape, right? Then I went to work--I told you about the story and
how I got this job in AFSCME, which is flattering and very interesting,
I thought. Well, I went through the first years in AFSCME with you. I
went through organization of the county, and okay we are into '74, and
in '76 I retired. I became vice president of the county federation of
labor, which when I-
- DONAHOE
- When was that?
- FIERING
- In 1969. See, after I became the leader of AFSCME here, we were entitled
to a position on the executive board of the L.A. fed, and I was elected
to it. And I think--I was elected in 1970. I served six years [until]
'76, so maybe it was the middle of '69, up until '76. And I got more of
a flavor of what the labor movement was all about, that it wasn't-
- DONAHOE
- From like that period, yeah.
- FIERING
- From that period really. That it wasn't all I had thought it was about
when I was looking at it from the narrow view of the left and from the
outside. It was a different kind of a labor movement I saw. I began to
understand better the kinds of people who worked for the labor movement,
and what their motivations were, the kind of people they were. They were
people who came out of the ranks of the working class, who came up
through the shops, and who did what they thought had to be done to do a
job for the people who were paying them, for the workers, as best they
knew how. Some of them did a damn good job in that regard.
- DONAHOE
- So in that position on the county federation, you came in contact with
all these different representatives.
- FIERING
- With all of them, a cross section of the labor leadership of the labor
movement here.
- DONAHOE
- So you really were in a good position to estimate and evaluate.
- FIERING
- In a better position than I had been when I was outside the labor
movement.
- DONAHOE
- So what did you think?
- FIERING
- I, as I say, I was pleasantly impressed by the character of the people
that were leading the labor movement. They are good honest soldiers in
the main. They did the job, and they worked hard. My conception of these
guys was what I used to propagandize when I used to agitate against
them: that these people are living off the backs of the workers, taking
it easy, and living a good life and selling the people out. Just wasn't
true, was not true. But, of course, that's to deal with the political
line of the national AFL-CIO, and the political line of these people,
which I may have in some parts agreed with, in some parts disagreed
with. They played the game from the point of view of the unions
representing--They were a reform organization within the system, and
they played the political game the same way, taking advantage of their
political power to get things for the people they represented, and no
better example of that can be offered than the building trades.
Politically, a very narrow group, but they played the political game to
get some goddamn good things for their people--a lot of security, a lot
of benefits, good wages. It's true also for other unions; they played
the game that way. They were not a revolutionary organization; they were
a reform organization that accepted the system, worked within it, and
they wanted a piece of it. That was their philosophy, and I saw them
getting a piece of it. Now, it is true that their political line I don't
think had the kind of depth that ran to a solution of many of the
long-range problems of the country, for which a lot of Los Angeles
people are today paying the price. But I don't know that I would have
had that political line either; I don't know that I had it.
- DONAHOE
- Like what specifically?
- FIERING
- Oh, take what's happening with industry, you know. I mean when you look
around-
- DONAHOE
- You mean plant closures?
- FIERING
- Plant closures. I mean when you look around, plants like the basic
industries, steel and rubber and auto, shut downs, I don't know that the
policies that I would have promoted would have made any difference.
- DONAHOE
- What would you have offered like as a way to forestall the closures that
the other people didn't?
- FIERING
- I didn't have any idea about offering because I couldn't see it. I
didn't envision such things happening in this country. But it didn't
develop overnight. It was a process, and I think the labor movement had
the resources to have seen it coming.
- DONAHOE
- Do you think anybody really did?
- FIERING
- I don't know.
- DONAHOE
- Nobody ever seemed to talk about plant closures.
- FIERING
- None among us dreamed that the steel industry and the auto industry,
which were so far ahead of the rest of the world, could come to the kind
of impasse that they are in today. Whoever did kept it an awful dark
secret.
- DONAHOE
- I just thought that when you said that maybe if policies had been
different that somebody had mentioned something, or you had had some
inkling that this was-
- FIERING
- No, there was never that kind of a struggle, there were never that kind
of differences. I wasn't making too many waves anyway, because I know I
had a difficult time getting back into the labor movement and I just
wanted to seal some friendships--I don't know if you want to call them
friendships--I wanted to secure my position so that whatever I had to
say would not endanger my position at the time. It developed into that,
then I could speak up on issues. People, I found, were very respectful
of me, listened to me, I was well accepted, well accepted. Everybody
knew my past, and I never had to apologize for it and I never would
apologize for it. There are some people who even distrusted me at that
time and still do to this day, but they deal with me, see. They deal
with me.
- DONAHOE
- Well, that was a pretty, you know, important position to be in, in the
county federation like that. You had to have respect to get there.
- FIERING
- Yeah, you had to be accepted to get there. If there was any real
political difference like that--See, the organization of the executive
board was supposed to model the organization on the national AFL-CIO
executive board. But if there was any real political difference of that
nature, they would have found a way to keep you out or they would have
gotten somebody else from your organization; they would have sp~it with
you. They could do that. But I have to say, my thing was not making
waves. My major interest was in organizing, we had a whole field to
organize here.
- DONAHOE
- In terms of the public sector.
- FIERING
- In terms of the public sector, which was just breaking wide open.
- DONAHOE
- At that point, yeah right.
- FIERING
- That's right. That was all I wanted to deal with at that time. Other
than that, nobody prevented me from saying whatever I wanted to. Now, we
in AFSCME have progressive policies--the most progressive policies, or
as progressive as any union in town. Nobody stopped us from doing that,
nobody criticized us for doing that. Now, as far as my relationship with
some individuals, some who used to look under their bed every night to
see if there was a red there, were scared to death of the reds, they
still looked askance at me. They still kept me at arm's length or, you
know, were suspicious. But it didn't make any difference in terms of my
acceptance, my being accepted in the labor movement. And everybody
listened without anything to say, and I have no complaints, no
complaints.
- DONAHOE
- Well, what people say, you hear that Los Angeles has never been as
advanced or something, or as trade union aware as San Francisco or New
York or the East. How did you feel?
- FIERING
- True, it doesn't have the same background. Well, you don't have the same
union consciousness in Los Angeles, but that comes from a long history
of Los Angeles, you know, [which] used to be a retiree town, an old farm
town. The labor movement is much more recent here than it is in San
Francisco. You don't have that degree of consciousness that you have in
San Francisco.
- DONAHOE
- I was going to say, what are the changes that like you see from your
experiences?
- FIERING
- Oh changes, I have seen tremendous changes in the union movement in
terms of the union consciousness of people. Oh tremendous. A much higher
feeling of unionism, especially in the trade union leadership, and you
have that feeling. You feel it also as you get around among the rank and
filers. I get around to a lot of picket lines, especially now being
retired because of what I am doing with the retirees. And well, I'll
tell you about some interesting experiences with the UAW, which was an
archenemy of UE forty years ago. You talk to the UAW people today and
you think you're talking to UE people back in that period.
- DONAHOE
- Like who, you mean the regional [leaders]?
- FIERING
- I'm talking about the former local leaders. I'm dealing with the
retirees-
- DONAHOE
- Oh, the retirees, yeah.
- FIERING
- --who were brought up during that period and who were the international
reps, local presidents, and district officers of that period here. And
you listen to them today. So anyway that's my experience. And when I
wanted help from the leadership of the L.A. federation, no problem. *[You can't call my involvement with UE here in the fifties being a part
of the labor movement. I was part of it from the middle sixties. Though
I ought to back up a bit. My first taste of the labor movement, I
suppose as a member, came when I was sitting in a membership meeting of
Local 108 of the Sheet Metal Workers International Association and
suddenly heard a tirade of red-baiting charges being leveled at a
handful of people. It seemed things hadn't changed much. That was in the
late fifties. By the late sixties, I was in a leadership position and
the atmosphere had changed. I suppose it reflected the changes the
country was going through. Your question is a difficult one. I can't
speak with any real authority on the development of the L.A. labor
movement. My first real contact as a participant came in the late
sixties as a leader of my union. I come from an earlier generation than the current labor leadership. At
that time you equated union health with union growth. The major emphasis
was on organizing. The unions grew, flourished, and the benefits
followed. It seems to me that the present generation turned inward. The
emphasis is on consolidating the position of the unions and the position
of the leadership. Organizing the unorganized faded to a low priority.
I'm talking about the labor movement almost any place it is. L.A. is
reflecting the national AFL-CIO, its policies and philosophy. You have
to understand the structure of the AFL-CIO. It requires rigid adherence
to the policies adopted by its leadership. The top leaders of the AFL-CIO in terms of its political outlook, in
terms of the times in which they lived, have always been conservative,
from Samuel Gompers to William Green to George Meany to Lane Kirkland.
Probably the most progressive of all these was Gompers. The outlook has
been, in my view, narrow, parochial. The trade union leadership saw
themselves as representing an important constituency, but they never
viewed themselves as representatives of an important social institution
giving a measure of leadership to the whole country. Their role,
notwithstanding the lip service they gave to broad social issues, was an
extension legislatively of the job they were doing on the shop floor. Of course, there are changes. I don't imply that there is a monolithic
leadership in the AFL-CIO. The leadership takes in a cross section of
the country. The positions the leader of the AFL-CIO puts forth are the
positions of the majority of the executive board. Other views adopted by
individual unions are also put forward. In fact, each union has autonomy
and can espouse any program it wants in its own behalf. But for the
whole AFLCIO, the majority rules. And then every subordinate body, state
and local federations are bound by those decisions. Subordinate bodies
are not allowed to differ. I'm not making a judgment on whether it's
wrong, right, good or bad. It's got a right to put forward a differing
position at a national convention, but then everyone is bound by it. But let me get back for a moment to about 1965. At that time, the country
was deeply divided over civil rights and Vietnam. On civil rights, the
labor movement was pulled along by events. Some unions were way out
front, AFSCME being one of them. On Vietnam, Meany gave full support to
the administration. I remember Jerry Wurf on a visit to L.A. detailing a
trip he had just come back from, a tour of Europe on behalf of Meany and
the U.S. government, his purpose, to carry the torch on behalf of u.S.
policies in Vietnam. That was 1968. A few months later, Wurf did a
complete flip-flop in his position. He related to me on that occasion he
had come to the conclusion the war must end. Before announcing it, he
had visited Meany to tell him what he intended to do. I mention this for
two reasons. One is that it showed me that there is room for dissent,
and the other is that Wurf is AFSCME, and AFSCME from that time was the
most prominent voice in labor for ending the war. Speaking of the L.A. labor movement. First, just like the national, it
lacks dynamism. But about those things it could do something about, I am
impressed by the degree of integration of the L.A. Federation of Labor
in so many facets of L.A. life, community, political, social. I think
it's done a fine job all of which from time to time is reflected in
community support for its causes, its politics, and so on. I'm hoping
the coming elections will spark some life into the local and national
AFL-CIO. I think the caliber of leader in a number of unions holds out
hope. It had better. The present leadership was not geared to deal with
Reaganism and its consequences, and so a whole host of problems has been
loaded on us.] * Mr. Fiering added the following bracketed section during his review of
the transcript.
- DONAHOE
- Let me ask a technical question. The UAW was not in the AFL-CIO, right?
- FIERING
- That's right, they are now.
- DONAHOE
- Just recently.
- FIERING
- But they are in the L.A. fed.
- DONAHOE
- But they are in the L.A. fed, okay.
- FIERING
- They are not in the [California State Federation of Labor] yet; they
haven't affiliated with the state fed yet.
- DONAHOE
- So they are in the L.A. County fed but not in the state, and they just
recently reaffiliated with the AFLCIO?
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, but the ILWU [International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's
Union] never reaffiliated?
- FIERING
- Never affiliated.
- DONAHOE
- And the [International Brotherhood of Teamsters] are still out.
- FIERING
- The Teamsters are out, that's right.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, I'm just trying to see whoever came back or did not come back.
Now, are they in the county fed?
- FIERING
- No, they are not in the county fed. They are in my setup [FORUM,
Federation of Retired Union Members], but they are not in the county
fed.
- DONAHOE
- The ILWU?
- FIERING
- The ILWU is in FORUM also, but they are not in the county fed. They are
not a part of the AFL-CIO, they're independent. But they are affiliated
with my retiree setup.
- DONAHOE
- Now okay, and what is that called?
- FIERING
- The Federation of Retired Union Members, which is a part of the AFL-CIO.
- DONAHOE
- Had that been going for a long time?
- FIERING
- Well, it has been going, but-
- DONAHOE
- Did you organize it?
- FIERING
- No, I didn't organize it. It has been going--it started up about five
years ago, but it was a dud, nothing happened. I'm credited with making
something out of it, and it's beginning to really be something. It has
tremendous potential.
- DONAHOE
- And this, everyone 1s eligible that was in the labor movement, whether
they were part of the AFL-CIO or whatever? I mean, you know-
- FIERING
- Well, the Teamsters and the ILWU both affiliated with us.
- DONAHOE
- And the UAW.
- FIERING
- We are the only unified labor movement in the area, anywhere.
- DONAHOE
- But you did have dealings with all the different unions whether they
were in the county fed or not, like you had contacts with people from
the UAW.
- FIERING
- Well, no, not when I was working for AFSCME; I didn't have contact with
anybody, except the L.A. Federation of Labor. I was new to them, you
know, and it was a question of learning everything. When you think about
it, I got back in '65 and I left in '76. During that time there was a
huge development in the public sector, so there wasn't a hell of a lot
of time to get acquainted with anybody outside the AFL-CIO. Now that I
have retired I'm getting acquainted with them and the UAW people. I'm
talking about not just the retirees, but the UAW organizations.
- DONAHOE
- When did you see the changes taking place in Los Angeles in terms of
union awareness?
- FIERING
- When? Well, I can't speak with a lot of authority about it in the
fifties because we weren't a part of the AFL-CIO. But then, of course,
the movement was much smaller, the AFL-CIO was much smaller then and the
CIa and the AFL was split, see. And the AF of L was no doubt the
dominant organization here.
- DONAHOE
- Because of the building trades?
- FIERING
- Building trades and it's just longer established, yeah. What the CIa had
going for it essentially here was the UAW, that's what it had.
- DONAHOE
- And the [United] Steelworkers [of America].
- FIERING
- And the Steelworkers, that's right.
- DONAHOE
- And [United] Rubber Workers [of America].
- FIERING
- Steel, rubber, yeah that's right. It had the basic industries it had in
the East, and that didn't come until later, you know. Of course, the UAW
organized in the forties, during the war they organized here, but the
others didn't organize until must have been after the war, as far as I
can think.
- DONAHOE
- No, they were before the war, in the thirties.
- FIERING
- Not before the--In the thirties out here, they were?
- DONAHOE
- Oh, it was a part of that nationwide organizing.
- FIERING
- Oh yeah? Did they have a big operation here, did they have big plants? I
just don't get that feeling that they had.
- DONAHOE
- Well, the plants, none of the plants were as big as back East, but they
were big for the West Coast.
- FIERING
- For here, for the West Coast.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah. And they were only manufacturing steel plants, like Bethlehem.
- FIERING
- Well, I can't claim a hell of a lot of knowledge about that here,
because in UE we were just isolated from everything, we were on our own.
The only ones we had real contact with was the ILWU, and we weren't in
nearly as good a position as the ILWU. They were well grounded. They
were--Well, that's the nature of the industry. And they were well
organized, had excellent leadership, and Local 26 was growing, they were
growing. Local 26 was growing, but UE was not really growing; UE was
going downhill. But, nevertheless, whatever contact we had was with the
ILWU, that was the only solid union we had contact with. There was
nothing else out here. You had the United Public Workers [of America],
but they didn't amount to much; you are talking about a few hundred
people. UE didn't have a hell of a lot at that; we had maybe a couple
thousand people, maybe three thousand, two or three thousand people,
which is nothing.
- DONAHOE
- I was just wondering about the ILWU, just because they were in a similar
position to the UE, in terms of like they were expelled from the CIa and
so they were subject to raiding. Yet, those other unions never seemed to
really make a dent in them that much, do you think?
- FIERING
- They never made a dent.
- DONAHOE
- And why do you think, why would it be different from the UE exactly?
- FIERING
- *[Well, there certainly had to be good reasons. However, I'm just
speculating about them. I never operated close to the ILWU until I came
out here, and even then my contact was limited. That's not to say I
haven't thought about it. In a number of significant ways, their
experience is different from UE. The first thing that comes to mind is
the fact they were born in a bitter strike, many sacrifices but a huge
victory. That permits a claim on the loyalty of workers. Another reason
was the charismatic leadership of Harry Bridges who throughout his
tenure as president personified the most militant and personal qualities
like honesty and courage which workers worship in a leader. The ILWU has
always, in my opinion, been the most democratic in the country. Of
necessity, it was essential to Bridges's survival. His persecution
required open and frank debate and exceptional rapport between him and
his membership. That meant frank discussion of the communist issue and
conviction by the rank and file that Bridges deserved support. With that
there was a strong left-wing tradition and a strong left wing in the
union that played a strong role in its survival. Finally--and this is
not particularly in the order of their importance--the industry was
highly concentrated on the coast and one hundred percent organized.] * Mr. Fiering added the following bracketed section during his review of
the transcript.
1.18. TAPE NUMBER: X, SIDE TWO OCTOBER 8, 1987
- DONAHOE
- What's your estimate of, you know, what you think the needs are in Los
Angeles and key places to be organized, things like that?
- FIERING
- *[I don't think the Los Angeles labor movement is different from any
other big city, nor its problems. The labor leadership is set in a mold
which I believe it must break out of if it is to move forward and
enhance its position in the community and benefit its membership. It has
its priorities confused. The primary and most fundamental task of the
trade union movement is to organize the unorganized. Everything else
flows from that, its economic power, political power, its relationship
to the middle class and the power structure. There is plenty to
organize. There are still large industrial plants, the health industry,
many tens of thousands of department store workers, white-collar
workers, other service workers, myriad smaller industrial shops,
building trades workers, etc., and a couple of hundred thousand union
retired folks. The building trades are a good example of what the
anti-union offensive has brought to that industry which at one time was
solidly organized. Now double-breasting is a huge threat to the unions'
continued existence. Whatever organizing is going on is by individual
unions pecking away at smaller targets. We used to believe that we
either grow or regress. We've lost sight of that axiom, but its proof is
self-evident. You can't stand still. Instead, some characteristics of
the labor movement are its effort to secure its place in the
establishment, accomodating the power structure as it is. That may be
good for short-term gains, but only constantly increasing its numbers
and replacing lost membership will continue to enhance its power. Even
if it means making waves. It lacks dynamism, it is quiescent, its focus
is on narrow day-to-day problems. It needs to pull itself together with
all the strength and resources it has and take aim in a concerted way at
the huge reservoir of workers who need the union and direct a
coordinated effort to bring them in. Its effect would not only be
organizational. It would have tremendous political impact.] Well, I'm not--I work out of the headquarters there and I would say that
it appears now that the labor movement is holding its own today, here.
They have entered some negotiations in which they've experienced
difficulties, they have been through some negotiations in which they
have experienced some successes. On the whole there seems to be a
positive feeling, a pretty good feeling. The autoworkers, I think--well,
you can't say that they are optimistic. But considering the situation
they have today--They just went through some Ford [Motor Company]
negotiations, which turned out pretty good and which is reflected in
your discussions with them. We will see what happens with the GM
[General Motors Corporation] negotiations. But in terms of Los Angeles
more apropos of that kind of thing is what has happened, for instance,
in negotiations with Local 770 [United Food and Commercial Workers
International Union (UFCW)], which just finished its negotiations, which
is a local industry, see. It's not dependent on what happens nationally.
They are in a very upbeat mood over their negotiations. Feel very good
about what they were able to achieve. And it's not that they feel good
because they didn't lose mUCh. They don't feel they lost anything but
they-* Mr. Fiering added the following bracketed section during his review of
the transcript.
- DONAHOE
- Which one is that?
- FIERING
- That's Local 770, the markets, the supermarkets.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, the supermarkets, okay.
- FIERING
- That's the big, big outfit.
- DONAHOE
- The retail clerks, right.
- FIERING
- Well, Local 770 is just one of the locals. They have locals 1442, 905,
and one or two other locals in the area here. All of them are in joint
negotiations; they just finished their contracts. I was just up in their
office--when was it, yesterday?--day before yesterday. Very upbeat mood.
I was talking to one of the people who was in charge of their employee
benefits section, which handles the pensions, welfare funds, and stuff
like that. Very upbeat mood, very good. Generally, what you get out of
the executive board of the L.A. federation is a pretty fair mood. There
is not the defeatism that we experienced up until last year. And, I
think, generally people feel things are getting better, they are
improving, the atmosphere is improving. Negotiations are being conducted
now, and there are some slight wage increases, not like what they like,
but there are wage increases. Concession bargaining is minimal from what
I hear now. That's a sign of the times. And of all the industries, the
ones that face the biggest problems are the garment industries, ILGWU
[International Ladies Garment Workers Union] and Amalgamated [Clothing
Workers of America], I suppose.
- DONAHOE
- Why is that, because of the difficulties?
- FIERING
- Because of the nature of the industry.
- DONAHOE
- You mean all these little shops?
- FIERING
- Little shops, right, and alien workers, foreign born. There isn't that
stability that you have in other industries. Generally, you just feel
the atmosphere is a lot different than it was a year ago, much more
positive. Of course, I don't have to tell you that, you can see it. I don't know what you want from me. What's the future? I always had
confidence in the future of the working class.
- DONAHOE
- Well, where are the places in Los Angeles that you see as key to being
organized? Like, you know, the percentage of the organized working class
seems it has been decreasing steadily, so there's so many places to go.
What do you think would be key places to organize, given your
experience?
- FIERING
- Well, the key sectors to organize are the service industries. The
hospitals, department stores, office workers, banks. When you're talking
about service industries, what are you talking about? What do you talk
about when you talk about service industries? Whatever the service
industries are--Because what pops into my mind right away is McDonald's
you know. That's a big industry now here, that kind of place.
- DONAHOE
- I know I was wondering why have the unions never gone after McDonald's
and Wendy's and Carl's [Jr.]?
- FIERING
- I don't know why. I would venture to say they-Which union would take
them on, which union would they fall into? I don't think anybody has
felt that the effort was worth it yet. Organizing small places like that
is a problem, a real problem.
- DONAHOE
- And then the nature of the workers.
- FIERING
- And the nature of the workers.
- DONAHOE
- Young kids, yeah.
- FIERING
- Young kids, right, but where else is there a big industry that's stable,
that's well situated, that's stabilized in Los Angeles, that has not
been organized? Steel and auto, you've got plants closed down; those
that are working are working. The unions have got their problems in them
internally, but, hell, that's no different than what they have always
had--problems with the boss. They have got problems as a result of
national policy. So there's an election coming up in '88, hopefully the
unions are going to have much more to say about the election, and
they'll playa role in the policies that are determined by whatever the
incoming administration does. Assumedly, if the Republicans are
defeated, then I will say the unions are getting more and more
politically conscious, the workers are getting more and more politically
conscious. More and more understanding of the role that politics plays
in their life. I'm beginning to feel that. No great big deal, maybe
because I'm talking a lot about it [so] that I feel it too, you know,
but I feel they are receptive to it. Also it is much easier than it was
in the past. Of course, the big focus of my movement right now is really
political. Even though it has its other facets, it's really the '88
elections. But I think there's, I feel, a growing understanding of the
importance of the '88 elections. And you can read it when you read in
the newspapers reports about these big unions nationally that are
getting into it. They are going to be dumping tons of money and people
into it. Much more sophisticated I remember when we used to take a role
in politics. Compared to what they do now, there's so much more
sophistication today than before, because they have more money and
experience. They have learned what to do with the money, how to use it
politically, too. My own union particularly. My own union has got a lot
of money and pours a lot of money into politics.
- DONAHOE
- Do you think there's more cooperation among unions in the labor
movement?
- FIERING
- Today?
- DONAHOE
- Well, say in Los Angeles anyway?
- FIERING
- Yes, I would say yes. There is. Yes.
- DONAHOE
- Because of a growing recognition of what has to be done--?
- FIERING
- Yes. Well, an example of that is the response to the new immigration
law. The L.A. federation took the lead in pulling together the unions
behind that. Now, of course, they have a very deep political interest in
that. This is a breakthrough to the Hispanic community. But they are
pouring a lot of money in and a lot of organization into it. And they
have got a whole setup going down at the L.A. Federation of Labor. And
unions who have and are competing for a Hispanic work force are heavily
involved in it.
- DONAHOE
- That would be a big breakthrough for the trade union movement to
organize these people.
- FIERING
- Oh, yes. That's right. Well, it also means an opening politically to the
Hispanic community such as they really have not had before, though
Hispanic workers have not been difficult to organize, by the way.
Hispanic workers and shops are not difficult to organize. But what they
are doing, in a sense, also reflects the growing political importance of
the Hispanic community and recognition of the degree of organization of
Hispanic workers in the labor movement. I know the sheet metal union,
which I was a member of and which was lily-white when I first got into
it, it had, if I remember correctly, out of four thousand members, it
had eighteen blacks. It had--Well, it was just beginning to open up to
Hispanics, just some of them. Today it is very heavily Hispanic, and it
has been Hispanic-dominated in recent years. But that reminds me of a
story. After I became a leader of AFSCME and I would go around to these
doings that the leadership would be involved with in the AFL-CIO, the
guy who was the leader of the sheet metal union spots me and his eyes
flew open. He says, "What the hell are you doing here?" So I says, "I'm the head of AFSCME." He says, "Tell me something." He says, "How the hell did we miss you?" He
referred to the red-baiting binge while I was there.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, I remember you told me that story.
- FIERING
- That's how they got rid of Carl Brant, one of the people who was
railroaded out, and Herb March and others.
- DONAHOE
- They got him.
- FIERING
- Yeah, they got them. They missed me. He says, "How the hell did we miss
you?" I says, "I was just quiet, making a living."
- DONAHOE
- When was that?
- FIERING
- That was in 1959, around there, '58, '59, '60, somewhere around that
period.
- DONAHOE
- So it was as late as that they were still--?
- FIERING
- Yeah. What is it you want? Do you want to know, do I hold a lot of hopes
for the labor movement, do I think they are going anywhere, do I have
criticism of it? Yeah, there's criticism, you can always criticize, you
know.
- DONAHOE
- No, but you said you saw Los Angeles develop more of a union awareness,
and I was wondering like what do you think are the most aggressive
unions, maybe in terms of organizing? I don't know, it seems like I have
seen a downswing in organizing, except in the public sector.
- FIERING
- Yeah.
- DONAHOE
- And is that changing? I mean, are the unions becoming more aggressive in
recognizing the need to?
- FIERING
- Well, what do I know about what's going on inside the unions? Well, how
many unions do I know about on the inside? I'll tell you, the ILGWU has
an aggressive organizing policy. The ACTWU [Amalgamated Clothing and
Textile Workers Union]. These unions have been decimated by loss of
membership. Right now, it's life or death to them. The UAW has an
aggressive organizing policy, always have had. SEIU has. UAW expends a
lot of effort organizing its retirees. If you want to see how a union
should deal with its retired people and the recognition and appreciation
of the power there is in retired people, that's a union to visit, their
retiree headquarters in Bell. They have got the best retirement setup
going. But, of course, their retirees are members of the union.
- DONAHOE
- Right.
- FIERING
- The only thing they can't do is run for office and vote on contracts,
but they can do about everything else.
- DONAHOE
- They can vote for president.
- FIERING
- That's right, they can vote for officers, any officers.
- DONAHOE
- All of the officers, that's right.
- FIERING
- They can't vote on contracts, but they can vote on everything else.
- DONAHOE
- They are full-fledged members.
- FIERING
- They're full-fledged members.
- DONAHOE
- They can't be chairman of the shop, which makes sense.
- FIERING
- Right, and they do that with minimal dues. They don't have to pay the
same dues. There is no outfit like the UAW. They offer the best example
of the political power that resides in retiree organization. But take the leadership of the AFL-CIO here, start with Bill Robertson.
Some people disparage him. I don't know why they disparage him. My own
experiences with Robertson have been excellent. And I remember
when--First of all, I will say this about him. Before I knew the guy
real well, I learned this was a guy who was assigned to the Los Ange1es
Hera1d Examiner strike.
- DONAHOE
- In the sixties?
- FIERING
- In the sixties, right. And he stayed with that strike for five years.
Now, that ain't easy, and he did an excellent job. As you know, they
just about ruined that paper. The paper couldn't wait to organize its
scabs and get the AFL-CIO union label for Christ's sakes. Well, Bill
Robertson was the guy who was the leader of that strike, see, and people
don't think about that. That's where I come from, see, that's the kind
of thing. When I look at a guy, I want to know what the hell did he do
for the workers. And I see here's a guy who really did a tremendous job,
tremendous. My first contact with him was one based on respect of that
kind. Then I had occassion to work with him, because I was not only on
the board, but I was heavily involved in organization and negotiations
with public workers. And when I had a problem, a real serious problem,
then I don't calIon anybody for help, unless I know how I can use them.
That's what my thing is. I am not giving anybody my problem, I want to
know how I can use them. Bill was always available and knew exactly the
right thing to do when I needed a certain kind of help. He was very
helpful to me at a time when I had to either put up and shut up. And I
was playing a game in a certain way, had my ducks lined up in a certain
way and I'd callan him to sew something up and he did the job for me.
That was his chief role. How is he going to help workers? You take any
picket line that's necessary, he's there, no matter what, he's there,
see. On any issue involving the workers, where they are in trouble, he's
there. Now, a lot of things one may not agree with him on, on how he
plays the game politically. Well, the fact of the matter is he has got
the labor movement in a hell of a good position politically today with
the administration downtown. And what he has to do is play it from the
point of view of his constituency, and you may disagree like hell with
what his point of view is on building or overbuilding and things like
that. But his constituency includes the building trades. Whatever he
says has got to reflect what his constituency needs. And they need that
and he does a hell of a job with that.
- DONAHOE
- How long has he been the head?
- FIERING
- He has been the head since 1972, since Sig [Sigmund] Arywitz died.
- DONAHOE
- All right, and where did he come from?
- FIERING
- Well, he came from Minneapolis. Originally, he was a bartender. He came
up from the ranks in the Hotel and Restaurant [Employees and Bartenders
International Union]
- DONAHOE
- The hotel and restaurant workers.
- FIERING
- But he was in Minneapolis. He came out here, and I don't know if he
still was a member of that union here (he may have been a staff member),
but then he became a staff member for Sig Arywitz. His style is
different from most people, it's very low key. [1 don't know] if you
have ever seen him. But here's a g~y who in the past was classified as a
conservative, see.
- DONAHOE
- That's interesting how much he has changed.
- FIERING
- And he has--and you see it.
- DONAHOE
- Well, I told you-
- FIERING
- You see it.
- DONAHOE
- --that he was at that DSA [Democratic Socialist of America] meeting.
- FIERING
- Now, you know, that takes some doing. The guy is intellectually honest
for him to do that and have the courage to do it, because he is
surrounded by right-wing socialists, who are scared of outfits like the
DSA. And scared of people like me.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, and now he is playing a much more forward move.
- FIERING
- I admire the guy. I like him tremendously.
- DONAHOE
- Well, that's interesting that he has gone forward instead of backwards
given the times.
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- He could become more conservative instead of becoming less conservative.
- FIERING
- Well, you know, if the CP [Communist Party] people operate the way they
used to, then he won't hesitate to attack them. And I say they would
deserve it anyway, the goddamn bunch of screwballs they got down there.
And never mentioned to you the fact they went after my ass too.
- DONAHOE
- You just talked about one strike where the young left women were working
against you.
- FIERING
- Now, I only told you about that one.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah.
- FIERING
- But this was after I was the leader of AFSCME. There were two of them
there that went after me.
- DONAHOE
- From AFSCME?
- FIERING
- Yes, from AFSCME.
- DONAHOE
- They were trying to get rid of you.
- FIERING
- You bet. DONAaOE: That's insane.
- FIERING
- Christ, it burns me up to think about it. So I attribute that--I said,
"Where did it come from?" Because I always felt if anybody wanted to say
anything progressive, I would support it. I was progressive myself. I
did what they would consider all the right things, see. I wouldn't let
anybody red-bait me, see, and here all of the sudden, these guys who had
kissed the asses of the red-baiters, kissed their ass, were attacking
me. They were bringing charges against me. Yes, this was formal charges
they brought against me. And I said, "Why does this happen?" The only
thing I can attribute it to is that the CP never forgave me for leaving.
- DONAHOE
- What kind of charges were they bringing against you, for what?
- FIERING
- Oh I forget now, I should have kept copies of them.
- DONAHOE
- And for what, on what grounds?
- FIERING
- The eight charges, oh, that I violated the trust of the workers, I did
something against the workers--a whole list of formal charges with the
international. And so there were hearings held and all that jazz, which
didn't amount to anything.
- DONAHOE
- So you were attacked by the left, not the right.
- FIERING
- Not the right. By the left. Not all the left, just these screwballs. The
screwball left, the CPers.
- DONAHOE
- Would you say they are still a force in Los Angeles at all?
- FIERING
- Who?
- DONAHOE
- The CPers.
- FIERING
- Oh, Christ, no.
- DONAHOE
- I'm just curious.
- FIERING
- Oh, Christ, no.
- DONAHOE
- I mean, I was just wondering where they stand or people that agree with
their position but don't necessarily affiliate [with them].
- FIERING
- I tell them they died, the CP died many years ago, but it hasn't laid
down yet so it could be buried.
- DONAHOE
- But there are a lot of people that still agree with a lot of the things
that broke with them?
- FIERING
- Well, you have a lot of old left-wingers who have a sense of nostalgia,
see, especially old people. You go to some of these affairs, what you
will see is a lot of grey heads, not young people, but a lot of grey
heads. But in terms of an organization that's effective, they have
nothing. They wield no influence whatsoever. And I can't see them coming
back. I can't see them coming back. No matter what the relationship is
with the Soviet Union, I can't see it.
- DONAHOE
- What about other people in the left? Do you ever see them as a force, or
independents, or is it just leftist-type people?
- FIERING
- Well, you know, when you talk left you are talking about a whole range
of people, and there are a lot of--that's the interesting thing--a lot
of young people who . are with left persuasions who are beginning to
come into the labor movement. And many of them working full time, like
the young idealists, you know, socialist-oriented. It's very
encouraging, that part. But they are not CPers.
- DONAHOE
- No, no, I meant other leftists people that you see evidence of in the
labor movement. Not CP.
- FIERING
- Yes, I do. I do. I see them, yes. I see--Of course, my contact mainly
with that kind of people has been in the public sector, and it's
astonishing how many of them are in the public sector working full time.
Now, in the private sector, I'll say this for the private sector:
socialism is no longer a dirty word. I can sit down with anybody. I sat
down with a guy with the Teamsters, for instance, this happened the week
before last, and he's telling me about an old CPer, and he's complaining
about him. He said something which surprised me very much, and I said,
"I'm really surprised to hear that." I says, "I come from that kind of
background myself, but I am still socialist." This is a narrow,
politically naive guy-backward--and he accepts it. And that is standard.
Now, I have said that to a lot of people when we sit down and talk, you
know, and I have had occasion to tell some people look, that's my
background. A guy from the building trades comes in who is assigned by
the building trades to work with me and he's talking to me about some
people in the union he came from who were left-wingers, CPers (now they
are retired) who used to give the leadership in the union a pain in the
ass. He's telling me about them, and I say, "I know they're here, and
some of them pretty active with us." I say, "Listen, you are talking to
me about it, and I come from that background too." And I say, "I feel
differently about things today, but what the hell. Whatever they are,
they are, what they were, they were. But I'm still for socialism." And
this is a guy who himself is not, but they sit there, and they accept
it, and you can talk about it today not like you could before- openly.
- DONAHOE
- Which is interesting, yeah. You know when you mentioned too about the
Hera1d Bzamfner, that made me think like, the late sixties, I mean we
had a number of key strikes. The Hera1d Examiner, the ILWU, Harvey
Aluminum.
- FIERING
- Harvey Aluminum was in the fifties, in the fifties.
- DONAHOE
- I thought there was another later, in the late sixties.
- FIERING
- There may have been another one, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- The oil places--what are they called?--the oil companies, they seemed
like they took a beating in the late sixties. It was like the Hera1d
Examiner, look at what happened. I mean, they lost most of their
workers.
- FIERING
- Their union shop--the guy who was the leader of that strike, I'm going
to be doing some work for him. He's going into some deal and he asked me
if I wanted to work for him, which I will. But he was the head of the
[American] Newspaper Guild, but a leader of the strike, and thought all
the time he knew what the hell my background was. Yesterday he says,
"Hey, you come from that background, too?" I says, "Yeah." He's editing
the county fed paper right now because the one who did got fired. Did
you know Alicia--what's her name?--Alicia Ramirez. Anyway, she got
fired.
- DONAHOE
- From the CIO newspaper?
- FIERING
- The AFL-CIO, she was the editor of the AFL-CIO newspaper [The Citizen].
She was a public information officer for the L.A. fed.
- DONAHOE
- Anyway things changed from those days quite a bit.
- FIERING
- Quite a bit.
- DONAHOE
- For the better-
- FIERING
- For the better, right.
- DONAHOE
- --despite the plant closures and everything. So that's something.
- FIERING
- When I think back how socialist used to be a dirty word, you know, and
how today I can go anywhere and talk about it, that's progress.
- DONAHOE
- Or the thing like with Bill Robertson too, I mean, that's like totally
amazing, that kind of stuff. It is progress.
- FIERING
- How do you measure a guy, how do you measure a guy? I've had people
criticize him to me, and it burns me up. What they know is they sit back
and they read that he wrote a certain article, he wrote the article on
oil. don't know if you read about it in the L.A. Times; he justified
[Thomas] Bradley's position.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, about the offshore drilling.
- FIERING
- The offshore drilling. Well, whatever motivated him to write it, it was
one thing, see. You put that in the context of everything that's
involved around what this· guy is doing as part of his job, it's just
one thing, whether you agree with it or not, and why he wrote it or not.
He may have had to write it for political reasons. Bradley might have
said to hia--I don't know if this was so--but Bradley, he can do
anything with Bradley, but then, on the other hand, Bradley can do
anything with him too. mean, it's a quid pro quo and Bradley might have
felt he needed that kind of support, and Bill is a name in town, you
know. He is a figure, he's a public figure, and he wrote this article on
oil, and I've heard people criticize him for it. So what, that's one
thing. If you don't like it that's too bad. You're entitled to disagree.
How about all of these things that he's doing that are positive? And as
far as the trade union movement is concerned, there is no better trade
unionist than Bill Robertson. A trade union point of view and the needs
of workers--and I'm talking about rank and file--there's no better guy.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, didn't he support the UAW with Van Nuys and the flight attendants.
- FIERING
- Anywhere, wherever there's a problem he would-Sunday morning, you know
the National Football League [NFL] [strike of 1987].
- DONAHOE
- Oh, he was there, yeah, and then he went to the [Robert] Bork thing,
after that.
- FIERING
- Then he went to the Bark thing; I couldn't go to the Bork thing.
- DONAHOE
- That was a lot.
- FIERING
- You know he was out there, [when] I got out there at eleven o'clock in
the morning, he was already there. He didn't leave until about a quarter
to one, I left at one o'clock. He didn't leave till a quarter to one.
- DONAHOE
- And then he had to go speak at the Bork-
- FIERING
- And then he went to speak to the Bork [meeting]. That was the last
announcement he made there; he says, "I hope some of you will come down
to the Bork meeting."
- DONAHOE
- Right, then when he got to the Bark thing he said, "I've just come from
the NFL strike."
- FIERING
- Yeah, he's no youngster, and I'm not either. But two hours in 108 degree
heat was no easy thing.
- DONAHOE
- That's very hard, I know. And he's probably instrumental in supporting
the Theater Workers Project.
- FIERING
- Yes, he is. That's the only way it can get going, is get L.A. fed
backing. That's the only way you can get it is if it goes by him,
because he doesn't just delegate, he makes sure that he knows what the
hell is going on. So how can you not like a guy like that. And even if
he does something that you consider offbeat, you know, how critical can
you be? You can criticize and say, "I don't agree with you, Bill, on
this." Are you going to say he's no good? That's ridiculous. You may be
the one that is wrong. He's a far cry from some of the people I can name
in the past who went red-hunting. They got a lot of heads and made a lot
of people suffer. *[There were a couple of occasions when I called upon him for help. When
the county public employees coalition was readying a strike, we wanted
to mobilize the full resources of the labor movement behind us in case
we went out. Robertson was there with both feet with the fed's PR
apparatus, his own expertise and a~vice, the fed's political muscle.
When I needed his political clout to play a role to tie down an
important concession that would wind up a contract negotiation, he was
there even though it obligated him to return a favor. He has his own
style. He is a low-key individual. No one can say he has the flair of
the extrovert, but he runs a tight ship in the fed. He has control. He
plays the game very close to the rank and file and at all levels of the
labor leadership. But his heart is with the workers. He comes from
there. He came up through the ranks of the culinary union. He was a
bartender, eventually becoming a staffer and then to the fed staff. Tell
him you've got a picket line set up and need him at any time. He'll be
there. He is the local champion of the homeless. He is a Democrat. I don't know what that tells you. He is responsible for
welding a tight relationship with Bradley, making the fed a big factor
in his administration. It has paid off with policies that advantage
unions. I think he is left of center, but not going so far as to lose
touch with his constituency. I remember in years past he was
characterized as a conservative. But that was by some in the far left
who called anyone to the right of them a conservative. I can add he
supported a function sponsored by the Southern California Library for
Social Studies and Research. This was after I had given him background
detail on its leadership. I leveled with him. I was on their board at
that time. And let's not forget the Workers Theater Project would not
have gotten off the ground without his support. I would say his
instincts are progressive and his experience has moved him more and more
in that direction. I don't want to imply he is a paragon of virtue, but
on balance I would vote for and support him.] * Mr. Fiering added the following bracketed section during his review of
the transcript.
- DONAHOE
- But that is very strange how the mood of the country and even Los
Angeles has been somewhat conservative and yet there are all of these
people in the labor movement who are becoming more aware at the same
time.
- FIERING
- Well, that's the way I see them today. Of course, people change, and I
hope that he keeps going in that direction. In terms of his relationship
with me, I have never had a complaint. When I needed him, he was there.
In fact even when I had my retirement dinner, he postponed--he had
reservations for a trip to Denmark-postponed it so he could speak at my
dinner.
- DONAHOE
- Really? Now that was in?
- FIERING
- 'Seventy-six.
- DONAHOE
- 'Seventy-six. Okay, well, what are you doing now exactly? You are
building this retirees~ organization?
- FIERING
- That, yeah, and I'm the chairman of it.
- DONAHOE
- And that is all of labor you said, not just AFSCME.
- FIERING
- Everybody. That's a united labor movement, right.
- DONAHOE
- And you became involved in that after you retired.
- FIERING
- Just last year. I have been in it [since] only October, really the first
of the year, but technically I got the appointment last September.
- DONAHOE
- Now are you the president of this club?
- FIERING
- I'm the chairman, not the president, chairman. See our positions are
appointed by--We are a department of the federation, so I am appointed
by Bill Robertson, see, with the approval of the federal executive board
and the federation delegate body.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, so you are a department of the federation, okay.
- FIERING
- Yeah. Now, we are the only ones in the country who have got anything
going like what we have here, but I understand it is being talked about
a lot and being looked at. In California, they are starting to imitate
it in other parts of the state. And it is going to be the way the labor
movement goes in the future with the retirees. The major emphasis being
the organization of retiree divisions in each local union, retiree
clubs, with the development of a certain relationship to the working
section of the union, see, and detail of the responsibilities of each to
the other, and each one to its membership, that is a retiree club to its
own membership. Without going--I don't want to give you the whole--If I
get started on this I go for two hours. And then, of course, our group
is a coordinating group. The county fed's FORUM is a coordinating group.
It is a delgate body.
- DONAHOE
- Right, I see that.
- FIERING
- And while the major focus at the moment is the '88 elections, what we
are essentially doing is our basic job, [which] is the organization of
clubs, retiree clubs, and the development of a political action
apparatus and, in the organization of clubs, developing what we call
club life--how should a retiree club function or operate, see? And that,
of course, runs to a whole range of activities dealing with the quality
of life of retirees. Including things like, on the one hand, the one
extreme, recreation activities and social activities; on the other
extreme, looking to the problems that arise with older people as they
get older: sickness, illness, health, and the help they need for all
kinds of things. And it's catching on. It encompasses a--Well, when you
think about it, the estimates are something like 35 percent of all
retirees are union members. Well, they call them ex-union members. We
are getting across the notion they are still union members; that's how
we are cementing a tie. Which means in a county like Los Angeles--or in
Los Angeles alone--Los Angeles County, you are talking about somewhere
between four and five hundred thousand people out there. Many thousands
of whom are drawing pensions out of unions, see, or as a result of union
contracts, but who don't have an organizational tie to the union
anymore. And our job is to bring them back, create that tie, and
organize them for their benefit and for the benefit of the labor
movement. So it's a huge job, and it is nice to see it operating. It's
making progress.
- DONAHOE
- Well, in that regard, Los Angeles seems to be in the forefront.
- FIERING
- It is in the forefront.
- DONAHOE
- Because it's not really going on anywhere else.
- FIERING
- As we get people from here who go East--and we have a lot of people go
East from here--they mingle with other people, and they are telling them
about our operation here. And it is creating interest elsewhere, I
understand, just like it is in California. In California it really is
creating a lot of interest. We just came off a conference in--what do
you call it?--Alameda County, Oakland, just a month ago. Less than a
month ago--three weeks ago? What's today? Yeah, about three weeks ago, a
senior citizen's convention. And we had a caucus of trade unionists the
whole first half of the day, and we had almost two hundred trade
unionists there. And most of them came to it because they heard about
our FORUM.
- DONAHOE
- Wow.
- FIERING
- And they expected--Well, the room seats a hundred fifty, and we didn't
expect that. We thought we would have maybe fifty people. They just
jammed that room. It was terrific, pretty terrific.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, that's wonderful.
1.19. TAPE NUMBER: XI, SIDE ONE NOVEMBER 20, 1987
- FIERING
- I was down in Palm Springs at an AFSCME [American Federation of State,
County and Municipal Employees] district council convention this past
weekend (it was just a routine convention) and I was invited to speak
and I spoke on the retired members, that was my subject.
- DONAHOE
- Okay, today we are going to talk about the Southern California Library
[for Social Studies and Research]. What is the history of your
involvement, and what is your role in this library? I know you are on
the board.
- FIERING
- Well, at first I saw the library, and that's going back quite a few
years when Emil [Freed] was gathering up all the books he could lay his
hands on, asking everybody to make contributions of books instead of
throwing them out. And we kept the few that we thought were specially
important to us, but a large part of our library we turned over to him,
and that was like satchels full of stuff.
- DONAHOE
- What year was this? Was this in the late fifties?
- FIERING
- This was in the late fifties, yeah, early sixties, because I saw the
library as important as a repository for that literature, and I saw his
perspective as something that was worthwhile. Accumulating all that
literature and holding it, for posterity, I thought it was worthy. It
was a worthy cause and so we supported that, you know, but then that
didn't change my conception of who Emil Freed was in terms of his
relationship to the CP [Communist Party]. He was always close to it, and
that's okay. He's entitled to his opinion. I thought what was important
was what he was doing, and what he was doing was an important part of
history and that I supported. Well, when I retired, he came onto me
about getting on the board of the library, and I shied away from it for
years. I didn't want to have anything to do with it because my estimate
of the library was that it was an adjunct of the CP and I didn't want to
have anything to do with that. But it didn't discourage him; I would get
a call at least once a year or sometimes twice a year or when he would
run into me. And he was very persistent, very persistent. And so
finally, in 1982 I decided, well, I'll talk to him. I said, "Give me the
time to think it over, I want to ask you a few questions about it." And
I did ask him these questions, you know, and so he assured me that there
was no link, it was an independent library, which satisfied me. I told
him what my view of a library ought to be: it ought to be a center for
intellectual discussion of socialism, all kinds, running from CP all the
way over to include every kind of group. It should be that kind of a
center for the discussion of socialism, see. And he didn't disagree with
me so he asked me if I would come on. I says, "I'll come on, but I want
to do something." He says, "What would you like to do about that?" I said, "What I would like to do is get together a bunch of trade union
organizers or trade union people who are socialists and let's start a
core with them, see, and see how we can develop that idea." And he was
very much for it so I got a hold of a number of people that I knew and
we had some meetings, several meetings, but the thing petered out, see.
Because the library had nothing really to offer us. At that time he was
just beginning to get an idea about expanding that building at 6120
[South Vermont Avenue], building it up.
- DONAHOE
- But he was down there by that time?
- FIERING
- He was down there by that time, and he had big ideas about developing
that building, and what I had in mind fitted right in with that. He was
going to build a room for us so we would have classes of trade unionists
and we would have discussions. That was that first purpose of that one
room when you come in on the left--now it's stacked with books--but the
purpose of that room was for just that, to have classes and meetings and
a place where we could have union meetings, too. We would get the word
around to local unions that here was an available meeting place. It's
set in the black area. There are a lot of black union members, a lot of
unions with heavy black membership who live in that area, who would find
it much more convenient, see. They would find it much more convenient
coming to a meeting in 8 place like that than they would having to
travel to other places to a meeting. And I thought we could get local
unions to agree for minimal rent--even sometimes for free if they
couldn't afford it--to use that place for their local meetings or for
classes for local unions. That was what we wanted to build up there,
see.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, that would be so good.
- FIERING
- And that idea just fell flat, because it took so long to build that
room. With all the difficulties that went into it, the group petered out
that I had, and it was too bad. But that was my idea; it would be that
kind of a center. It has never developed into that kind of center.
Hopefully, with what they have going now with these people whose names I
have given them as contacts they are making around the trade union
movement they can start something like that. These are people who are
key people in the trade union movement; they are not, you know, just
lowlevel officials. The names I gave them are people who are top
officials in the labor movement locally. And hopefully, if they can
involve them, we can begin to have this kind of a thing. But also not to
hide the fact that we are a socialist-oriented library, primarily
interested in discussions on socialism and labor problems, and to build
that kind of a center. Well, that was my hope. And so I agreed to join
the board.
- DONAHOE
- In '82.
- FIERING
- 'Eighty-two. And from '82 on that board to me has really meant nothing;
it has been one boring session. I'll sit through a whole goddamn
meeting, and I am turned on only to myself, and whatever problems I got
going someplace else, or if I am paying attention to the meeting, I'm
wondering what the hell am I doing here? What am I doing here? Finally,
I articulated that here a few months ago that it just had no relevance
at all to what my concerns, my interests were. And that's not negating
the fact they need money. Sure, they need money, but it was not my
thing; I'm not a fund-raiser. I don't know how to do it, it's not my
interest. But this was the main concern, that was the main agenda for
the library. Well, it meant survival so I'm not knocking it, but it
didn't leave any room for what I wanted, that was the thing. So I
thought very seriously about just dropping out of it, and more than
once. I don't know why I hung on.
- DONAHOE
- But there were two labor programs though, weren't there?
- FIERING
- They had the Harry Bridges dinner. ["A Salute to Harry Bridges,"
February 9, 1986]
- DONAHOE
- Before that there was like an all-day conference.
- FIERING
- Oh yeah, they had that and see, I participated very heavily in that, and
I felt very good. I made a real contribution to that thing.
- DONAHOE
- That was really important.
- FIERING
- Organizing it, getting people to it, and all of that.
- DONAHOE
- All the workshops.
- FIERING
- Yeah, I felt very good about it.
- DONAHOE
- That was '84?
- FIERING
- This was '84, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- 'Eighty-four, yeah. I forget, it was just called the labor conference.
- FIERING
- Mm-hmm. "Labor's Response Crisis."
- DONAHOE
- Then the Harry Bridges dinner.
- FIERING
- Then the Harry Bridges thing, in which I played somewhat of a role.
- DONAHOE
- And then this last, the ILGWU [International Ladies Garment Workers
Union].
- FIERING
- The ILG[WU] thing where I gave them key people to contact. They were
nibbling around the edges, looking how they could sneak in.
- DONAHOE
- So they have had like three major labor oriented-
- FIERING
- That's right, yeah, and they could have a whole lot more, see. See,
there's something the left doesn't appreciate. They say they do. At
least they voice it, but I don't know if they fully appreciate it. And I
didn't even myself until relatively recently how wide open everybody is
for discussion in the labor movement. I still carry that baggage about
the fear of red-baiting, and yet, I can see now how in the present
ambience that's not a real problem. Not that it doesn't lay there
dormant, but it is not a real problem. And most people are open to all
kinds of discussions, see, and the library is just the perfect place for
that kind of thing, so you can talk about the library and you can talk
about what the library is to anybody, including the fact that it is a
socialist-oriented thing. Many people today articulate a sympathy for
socialism without really knowing what it is, but it is just the idea
that it is anticapitalist, see, and they have so many grievances against
the system today. So the library offers a lot of opportunities if they
would zero in on what's possible, and what's possible with the labor
movement first. True, they can expand it to the whole community too,
there's that too, but I'm thinking about the labor movement. So once you
are grounded with that and you've got a base in that, then you are
secured, and you don't have to worry about vicissitudes and all that,
calamities hitting you. Anyway, so I was on the board and I talked to
Ida [Monarch Fiering] once about, "What the hell am I doing there? I'm
not saying anything, I'm not doing anything. Why am I wasting my time?"
But anyway I was drawn to that, I had some allegiance to Freed. I felt
for the guy, had feelings for the guy and what he had done, and I
suppose I had some hope that maybe some good might come out of it. I
know the people I was dealing with were well-intentioned people.
- DONAHOE
- And that was their aim, what you wanted.
- FIERING
- Yes, I know, I know. And if I was the ulcer type I would get ulcers just
sitting there through meetings listening to these people. So anyway, but
I am loosened up on the thing by now, you know, much less fear about it.
I don't go to many board meetings, and I am now being drawn more and
more into what I proposed with these suggestions on the labor movement,
so anyway that's--So if you want my view on the library, I think it's a
good thing. I think up until recently it has been outside of these
events that it has had, it's really been a kind of a dead outfit. It's
supposed to be a source for research you know, but how many people use
it for research? Very few, very few, if any. Once in a while they get
somebody.
- DONAHOE
- They do have a lot of materials that you can't get anywhere else.
- FIERING
- I know that, I know that.
- DONAHOE
- Because I have sent people there.
- FIERING
- But you've got to create a desire to use it. don't think they have hit
on that key yet, see. Maybe when they effect these contacts with the
unions, they'll maybe develop the key, but they haven't yet hit on a
key. If that thing was at UCLA, which wanted it at one time--I don't
know whether you know that, but UCLA wanted to take it over.
- DONAHOE
- I think a number of universities wanted it.
- FIERING
- USC [University of Southern California] wanted to take it over. But, of
course, they wanted to control it.
- DONAHOE
- Cal State L.A. [California State University, Los Angeles].
- FIERING
- They wanted to control it, yeah, they wanted to control it. And the
leadership of the library wanted it to remain independent, and I'm for
that, I'm for that. But if it was there at either one of those
universities, I'm sure more people would find their way to the material
than where it is on Vermont Avenue. But it's worth holding out as long
as they can support themselves. Hopefully, a turn will be made and it
will be the kind of institution that becomes highly prized in the
community, you know, sought after, and I think it should be. Like you
say, i~ has got stuff in there that you find no place in the world. And
it's valuable; it's important to researchers.
- DONAHOE
- Right, right, on all issues, not just labor, because I had a friend that
went there and did all kinds of investigation about the school system.
Found all kinds of things about the whole integration struggles and
everything in the forties and fifties.
- FIERING
- Well, you saw the Hollywood Ten [television program] on PBS [Public
Broadcasting Service], and among the credits they listed the library.
- DONAHOE
- Right, so they have an enormous amount of information on that. But why
do you think it's so slow, like what's happened? Why hasn't it turned
around?
- FIERING
- The reason it's slow is because nobody has been able to make the proper
kind of noise about it.
- DONAHOE
- But even Emil, I mean he couldn't.
- FIERING
- No, he couldn't; he wasn't that kind. You are getting a bunch of people
in there now who can, people like Bill [William] Doyle and Dorothy
[Doyle]. I am impressed with [John H. M.] Laslett, but more so the
Doyles who really are gung ho, out and around, really aggressive, you
know.
- DONAHOE
- They have been working in it for years.
- FIERING
- A number of years, yeah, and I have hopes that now we'll see what these
contacts bring forth. Maybe that will help open it up. But there's
nobody who does a real PR job. Outside of the publicity we get around
affairs, like the vets' affair [niNo Pasar&n! A Tribute to the
Veterans of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, 1937-1987," March 1, 1987] and
the Bridges affair you know, it's not constantly brought to the
attention of the community. Nobody does that for them. If somebody did,
people would start beating a path to it I think, because there are
enough scholars in town who would want that kind of stuff and don't know
it's there.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, it seems like, but maybe it's these problems, these impressions,
that it has been affiliated with, like the Communist Party.
- FIERING
- Yeah, you mean Freed's past affiliation. Well, think-
- DONAHOE
- Not so much the affiliation, but maybe just people just connected in
their minds or something. Do you think so?
- FIERING
- I don't know that that's a -
- DONAHOE
- You don't think that's a factor?
- FIERING
- No, and that's the point I want to make, that with the current
atmosphere that's less and less.
- DONAHOE
- It doesn't matter.
- FIERING
- Now, it may have been true many years ago whenever they mention Freed
and the library, they mentioned that he was a CPer, and this is sort of
an off-shoot of the CP. But it doesn't make any difference today, and
besides, of course, it's not so true today. And it's much more
acceptable today. In fact, if you took all the stuff, the crap that was
hurled against Freed years ago and you did it today, it might even be an
inducement for some people to find a way to the library in today's
atmosphere, but that's not the case. That's not even an impediment of
any kind, see, and if they could somehow get some PR done on it-well,
you got to do things too for PR I suppose. So anyway, that's off the top
of my head.
- DONAHOE
- Well, now they want to I guess set up some, like these trade union
classes.
- FIERING
- Yeah. Now, if they establish good contact with trade union leadership
and this thing they have got ,going with some of them--this idea about
developing the history of the unions--that's what it's all about.
- DONAHOE
- In Los Angeles?
- FIERING
- In Los Angeles, right. But all these various unions, they'll establish
contact, and develop contact, and they will be able to have a class, the
kind of classes which involve these very people we're seeing. And also
involve more programs with a lot more content and with socialist ideas
in discussion, because they never hide the fact that they are a
socialist-oriented group.
- DONAHOE
- Right. Yeah, and it would be very different than any programs that exist
anywhere else, I think.
- FIERING
- There is no place else here for that thing. Nobody else is doing it; not
even the unions themselves are doing it.
- DONAHOE
- No, not at all. And Trade-Tech [Los Angeles Trade-Technical College]
just does technical things, you know like stewards training and labor
law, things like that, but they don't do the history of the unions here,
per see
- FIERING
- Yeah, and your department doesn't go into that kind of thing. Those are
individual oral histories.
- DONAHOE
- No, we are trying to develop that. It hasn't been done in Los Angeles
too much. I had just heard that Emil had really taken this on himself,
the whole library, that he didn't really get the support of the party,
that they were opposed to it.
- FIERING
- No, I don't know about being--No, I never heard they were opposed to it.
- DONAHOE
- I heard it from other people, I don't know.
- FIERING
- No, what the realities were, the party was under attack, they had all
they could handle without worrying about creating a library. But Emil
decided this was going to be his bag, and he went about and he did it.
So as he did it, people just didn't stop him, they didn't criticize him.
They didn't say don't do it.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah, but he didn't really get support, financial support.
- FIERING
- He didn't get support, but nobody stood in his way either, nobody
stopped him from doing what he wanted to do. So he wanted to collect
books, they said, "Go out, be my guest. Just don't bother me, I got
plenty, I got trouble of my own. I can't do anything for you."
- DONAHOE
- That certainly was a good vision.
- FIERING
- Yes, it was.
- DONAHOE
- And we are glad he did it. We wouldn't have all this material if it
wasn't for him.
- FIERING
- Yeah, I think time will prove that. I give him a lot of credit for it;
it is no easy job. But it's interesting how it became known throughout
the left movement that "Emil is collecting books, don't throw your books
away, give them to Emil."
- DONAHOE
- To this day people say the same thing. If you have books, bring them to
the library once they start getting more than you can handle.
- FIERING
- But nobody was antagonistic. If you heard the story about the party
being antagonistic to him, I don't think that was so.
- DONAHOE
- But yeah, [it was] just that they didn't support him.
- FIERING
- They didn't support him because they couldn't, they couldn't. They could
barely keep their heads above water; they were drowning for Christ's
sakes.
- DONAHOE
- I don't know how he did it on his own. It's incredible.
- FIERING
- They still haven't come up out of the water, but that's another story.
What else can I tell you about the library?
- DONAHOE
- I guess that's about it, just in terms of you know how they were going
to try to turn this around.
- FIERING
- I admire the people who are in it, got their hearts in it. They're
really putting out for it.
- DONAHOE
- Well, I think that your role has been important because they've wanted a
person with a labor perspective all time.
- FIERING
- Yeah, well, it was important because they had a specific thing under way
and I could play a role and I played a role. But you think in terms of
what kind of a steady kind of contribution could I make, they never
thought in such terms until just now, see, when I came up with all the
lists of names for them and that suggestion. That came about when I
exploded one time and I said, "I don't know what I am doing here?"
- DONAHOE
- Well, it was good you exploded.
- DONAHOE
- So, you know, I think it definitely has a good future with these
possibilities.
- FIERING
- I do, I do. Yeah, I love the people who are in it, what they are putting
out for it, and if they keep going, I think it will go somewhere. It has
already established a reputation for itself with the ILGWU, you know.
Good job. That's a permanent relationship Laslett's got an ongoing thing
now with Steve Nutter, who is the director of the ILGWU, a fine young
guy.
- DONAHOE
- And some materials have come out of that conference.
- FIERING
- Yes, they are writing up a report.
- DONAHOE
- A report and some kinds of publications.
- FIERING
- That's right, which the ILGWU can prize and put out to its members, and
it comes from the library. Now they are hoping to do the same thing with
[United Steelworkers of America].
- DONAHOE
- And then hopefully [United] Auto[mobile Workers], hopefully UE [United
Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of America] so that would really
be great. And they can really build up some archival material too. Okay.
Did you have some other ideas about the labor movement?
- FIERING
- Well, I forget where the hell we were at on that thing. I think you were
asking me what do I think about what direction it was taking and all of
that.
- DONAHOE
- Well, we were talking about-
- FIERING
- About its leadership.
- DONAHOE
- --that you know everyone is saying that labor is taking such a beating
today, that there has been such losses in terms of conditions and the
contracts and benefits. The percentage of organized workers to the total
labor force has decreased. And I was asking how do you view this? Plant
closures, there's just so much negativism.
- FIERING
- Yes and what about the leadership of the labor movement, what kind of
leadership was it giving in view of these conditions.
- DONAHOE
- Right.
- FIERING
- *[Well, we covered my view a little bit ago concerning the confusion on
labor's priorities. The labor movement was completely unprepared for
Reaganism when it burst on the scene with the discharge of over 11,000
a~r controllers and the destruction of PATCO (Professional Air Traffic
Controllers Organization). Nor were they prepared for the profound
changes in the American economy. We have been on the defensive since.
It's only recently that you sense a change in the mood of working
people. They're sick and tired of taking a beating and, in my opinion,
are ready for leadership to fight back. Is the American Federation of
Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations leadership up to the task? I
think the kinds of differences we've seen recently in the national
AFL-CIO reflects a struggle for a new policy, taking the offensive
against Reaganism. Something has to give there, changes in that power
structure to reflect a new, young, aggressive leadership or further
deterioration in labor's position. I think the American worker is ready
for his union to take a really independent, a fighting approach against
capitalism.] And, of course, some things of great significance have happened since
that time, you know. The convention of the AFL-CIO has taken on a marked
turn in a more progressive direction. That was significant in many ways,
not the least of which is that it was probably the sharpest turn it has
taken since, Christ, since the fight with the CIO when you think about
it, because, historically, even though CIO merged with the AF of L in
1955, or '57, whenever it was-* Mr. Fiering added the following bracketed section during his review of
the transcript.
- DONAHOE
- 'Fifty-five, yeah.
- FIERING
- 'Fifty-five. There was no basic change in the program of the CIO at that
point, except for, not its political organization, but its attitude on
participation in politics. But as far as its programmatic orientation,
there was not any significant change. It was business unionism, it
remained business unionism, it supported capitalism without reservation.
And it stayed that way. But the one significant change was that the CIO
brought with it its political participation, its participation in the
political process, much more so than the AFL had ever allowed itself to.
But the character of the leadership from [Samuel] Gompers to [William]
Green to [George] Meany to [Lane] Kirkland, in terms of it being a
right-wing leadership, really never changed. Probably the most
progressive of all of those four people was Gompers.
- DONAHOE
- I think you are right. [laughter]
- FIERING
- But they always went hand in hand with the policies of the government,
in terms of foreign policy, no matter how reactionary the administration
was.
- DONAHOE
- Especially even recently with Central America when they came out with
the union's involvement in the demonstrations.
- FIERING
- Whatever it was. Which in large part accounts for the position that the
American worker finds himself in today. There was never any really
independent approach or a fighting approach against capitalism.
- DONAHOE
- No alternatives presented.
- FIERING
- That's right. That paved the way for plant closings, the deterioration
of the American industrial structure, the multinational corporations and
the exported jobs and everything else because people like Kirkland were
there backing up a foreign policy which was detrimental to the interest
of the American worker. But for the first time in the history of the
AFL-CIO, there was division on fundamental foreign policy issues.
- DONAHOE
- Oh yes.
- FIERING
- You can see what is happening inside the labor movement. It offers a lot
of hope, and it was bound to happen, which is why I was not ever really
negative about it. These things come in curves, ups and downs, and now
you've got a new young element coming in that's ready to come to grips
with some of the problems and is carrying the fight, and a part of that
I am happy to say is my own union.
- DONAHOE
- They are affiliated--Oh, they have been part of this, of course, yeah.
- FIERING
- They are taking among the most progressive positions in the AFL-CIO.
- DONAHOE
- Did they just have a convention recently?
- FIERING
- AFSCME [American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees]?
- DONAHOE
- No.
- FIERING
- Oh, the AFL-CIO, of course. That's when the [International Brotherhood
of] Teamsters affiliated.
- DONAHOE
- I know, but I missed all of this.
- FIERING
- You weren't here then?
- DONAHOE
- No.
- FIERING
- That was the other thing that happened, the Teamsters reaffiliated.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, that's what I was trying to figure out what happened here.
- FIERING
- Oh sure. But the problem, for instance-
- DONAHOE
- So they just had their convention and the Teamsters reaffiliated.
- FIERING
- That was one of the very significant things that happened. And, of
course, there's a lot of concern about the full significance of that
politically because the balance is going to shift rightward, everybody's
concerned, see.
- DONAHOE
- With the Teamsters.
- FIERING
- And that was one of the reasons why the people fenagled the thing. The
thinking is, help make it possible, because they saw how the winds were
blowing and they know that Kirkland is not going to be for long, and
when the contest comes up for leadership to succeed Kirkland, the
balance of forces may lean towards the left of center. And so in order
to obviate that possibility, negotiations with the Teamsters was
encouraged, and with the Teamsters coming in, it shifts the balance
again to the right, you see. People who are looking ahead to possibly
running for the leadership of the AFL-CIO are at the core of that. It is
hard to say exactly which one it is, but it is one of two or three
people, either the building trades guy, [Bob] Georgine, or [Tom]
Donahue, who is the secretary to Kirkland, or [John J.] Sweeney who's
the-
- DONAHOE
- Sweeney you think?
- FIERING
- --who is the SEIU [Service Employees International Union] president.
- DONAHOE
- He's pretty good.
- FIERING
- Pretty good and pretty sharp. Yeah, he's good, but you see, on an issue
like this, well, actually he is the better of the three.
- DONAHOE
- He has a very interesting approach, much more historical.
- FIERING
- Well, you want to remember that his base is really the old-line worker,
the old craft worker. It's only in the last, in recent years, in the
last, well-
- DONAHOE
- But he comes out same as [George] Hardy?
- FIERING
- That's right.
- DONAHOE
- But he takes a much more historical, education-type approach I thought,
Sweeney.
- FIERING
- Yeah, well, he is more an intellectual than George Hardy, but don't
underrate Hardy.
- DONAHOE
- Oh no.
- FIERING
- I know him very well, and I like him. I like him and I think he is a
shrewd article.
- DONAHOE
- The library should contact him.
- FIERING
- He is one guy who would outsmart a dwarf. But the library should contact
him.
- DONAHOE
- He's an excellent person to contact.
- FIERING
- Absolutely. As a matter of fact, I gave them his name.
- DONAHOE
- Did you?
- FIERING
- Yeah, I gave them his name. DONAHOE; Because he would really be
terrific.
- FIERING
- The guy, what's on his mind is on his tongue, no bullshit.
- DONAHOE
- I know.
- FIERING
- No bullshit. He talks just like a worker, but it's true that, you know,
he's more conservative. He has somewhat of a business view of a union
perhaps, but he has done the job. He is the guy opened up his union to
elements outside the janitors and made a better union out of it, and
Sweeney came along and followed him, see. Sweeney is more the
intellectual, very bright. So anyway, there is that part of it, but most
significant is that fact that the program the AFL-CIO adopted, probably
shows the sharpest turn politically of any program that they have
adopted ever since CIO days.
- DONAHOE
- Like what specifically, since I missed everything.
- FIERING
- The simplest example is Nicaragua.
- DONAHOE
- They took a position?
- FIERING
- Good position. Can you picture that in the AFLCIO?
- DONAHOE
- No, I can't believe it, after all that criticism about Central America
and criticizing the unions.
- FIERING
- That's right, and you know that was not Kirkland's position, but he was
forced to it.
- DONAHOE
- So they took a position against aid to the Contras.
- FIERING
- No, no, not against aid to Contras. Took a position in favor of the
Arias plan for peace. But on the larger issues of foreign policy, they
had been to the right of [Ronald W.] Reagan on that particular issue,
Kirkland was.
- DONAHOE
- Yeah I know, so that's amazing.
- FIERING
- But they took a very forthright position on that and a lot of other
issues, international issues. I'm waiting to get ahold of the results of
the convention.
- DONAHOE
- When was it?
- FIERING
- This was just in October.
- DONAHOE
- It's usually in the middle of October?
- FIERING
- It was in OCtober, about a month ago, that's right.
- DONAHOE
- Well, I must have just missed it.
- FIERING
- You just missed it, that's right.
- DONAHOE
- It's usually in Miami or--?
- FIERING
- It was Miami this time.
- DONAHOE
- But Kirkland,· he wasn't up for reelection.
- FIERING
- No, he's up every four years--the next convention. Oh, he won't be
defeated, but he's pretty sick and everybody knows that. One of the
leaders in that movement was my union.
- DONAHOE
- In this whole move to-
- FIERING
- Yeah, my union, the UAW, the machinists union [International Association
of Machinists]--and CWA [Communications Workers of America]--they are a
core of the progressives, and they represent four of the largest unions
in the AFL-CIO. My union was the largest, and now the Teamsters coming
in makes them second largest.
- DONAHOE
- Oh my gosh, you mean the Teamsters are the biggest?
- FIERING
- They are now the biggest union, yeah. But, of course, when you boil it
all down, you take out the Canadian membership, they aren't any larger
than my union, see, as far as their American membership is concerned.
And there's a lot of misgivings about their coming in, but my own view
is, misgivings and all, in the long run it's probably better. [Jackie]
Presser probably is not going to be there for long.
- DONAHOE
- Oh, that's who you are saying, Kirkland was ill, yeah. '
- FIERING
- Yeah, he is probably going to go, and Presser may not survive in another
few months. Perhaps, it opens the door to changes in the teamsters
union.
- DONAHOE
- Did they take any other kinds of positions like about plant closings or
anything like that?
- FIERING
- Oh, yeah. Their whole program contains all the positions reflecting the
needs of the unions, foreign trade and plant closings, etc. Of course,
the issue of foreign trade is kind of a debatable thing, I don't know
exactly, without being an expert on it, exactly what's involved in the
thing, but that something has to be done is obvious. And they took
positions on that, but their positions were contrary to Reagan and the
administration, strong positions.
- DONAHOE
- , It's so unusual. It's just like it happened in a matter of months,
because when was that union participation against involvement in Central
America, the big demonstration we had? It was this year.
- FIERING
- It was this year.
- DONAHOE
- June or something or May?
- FIERING
- April.
- DONAHOE
- April. And they came out so strongly against it. Kirkland was just
terrible.
- FIERING
- Now it's kosher.
- DONAHOE
- [laughter] That's amazing that they changed so drastically. So you
should be getting a report, a full report.
- FIERING
- Yeah, well, I should be. In fact they wrote up a short synopsis of each
one. And these are synopses of what is going on in AFSCME and the labor
movement. We had one here, just little pieces of stuff, a few weeks ago;
I should have kept it.
- DONAHOE
- About the conference?
- FIERING
- About the convention, convention decisions, yeah.
- DONAHOE
- So this you see as a really positive development in terms of the labor
movement.
- FIERING
- Oh yeah, in terms of the labor movement. Of course, I hope it is going
to be translated into good election results. It had better be because my
own feeling is that we are going to be heading for a depression, and
with that, with a Democratic administration, we probably can do a lot of
things. With a Republican administration it may not be so possible, but
it will help the general atmosphere. *[When I retired as executive director of AFSCME in July 1976, I had
intended it to be a retirement from the labor movement, but that was not
to be. I really had my mind set on developing new interests that I had
fantasized about for a long time. Ida and I had made great plans.
Immediately on my retirement, I was under great pressure to retain ties
with my own union with the specific promise I would assist a couple of
key locals in their contract negotiations the following year. They
offered to put me on a consultant status. The conditions were good, so I
accepted. When Ida and I got back from some traveling to Europe and
other places, Bill Robertson asked me to serve as the Los Angeles County
Federation of Labor rep on the HSA (Health Services Agency). This was
set up by Congress under a public law with the aim of bringing the
consumer and provider elements of the health community together in a
cooperative effort to reduce health costs. I spent time for a couple of
years with that. To make a long story short, it provided a lot of money
to make-believe and a few good-paying jobs for a handful of bureaucrats. I left in disgust, in disagreement with its policies, with the L.A.
Federation of Labor. But I made enough noise to contribute to its
demise. In 1977, I did, as I committed, again become involved in AFSCME
negotiations. The new director, Ron Coleman, whom I had brought in to
replace me, I felt, however, was uneasy with my presence, because I was
told he felt he was constantly being compared to me. I appreciate it was
difficult for him. Yet he was pressured to accept my presence there. The
relationship with the AFSCME probation officers maintained through 1985.
I began to like the arrangement free-lancing as a consultant, avoiding
the stresses and strains of elected union leadership, but contributing
my expertise to help solve problems. It meant no direct responsibility. The director of the UCLA Institute of Industrial Relations division, Jack
C. Blackburn, asked me to teach an eight-week class, which went off very
well. So that was repeated once more. As that was coming to a close in
1978, Marty Morgenstern, who was "Jerry" [Edmund G.] Brown [Jr.]'s chief
personnel officer, offered me work teaching the state's management staff
the whys and wherefores of AB 838, the new collective bargaining law for
state employees. All this still allowed Ida and myself to enjoy
traveling and other activities. The work with the state went on for
about a year. During 1978, the new general manager of SEIU Local 660, Steve Cooney,
approached me and offered me a consultantship to 660, a huge station,
but with a host of problems. He had been pressured by Harry Gluck, his
predecessor, to come after me. This was the union that had sought
shelter nine years earlier behind an AFL-CIO label. Though I had given
up challenges when I retired, I could not resist this offer under these
circumstances. So I plunged into a round of teaching and training of
union leadership and staff as well as significant negotiations. It was
all very ego-satisfying. I still maintained my connection with AFSCME
and was the only person who was acceptable to both unions, who were
strong competitors. It was a special status. I handled key negotiations
for 660 with Los Angeles County management, clerical workers,
eligibility workers, nurses, all key bargaining units, and helped pull
them closer to the union, and I helped keep the union together. This
went on through 1983. In 1985 I did some work for SEIU Local 434, the Los Angeles County
hospital union, as well. At the end of 1978, Ida decided she wasn't
going to sit home waiting for me. In 1976 when I retired, I had insisted
she quit her job at the Westside Jewish Community Center so we could
enjoy retirement together. So in 1979, after some courses updating her
teaching credential, she went to work for the L.A. Unified School
District as an adult ed teacher in a minimum assignment. We enjoyed life
like we couldn't on full-time jobs. But by 1985 I had had it. That year
negotiations had become burdensome, and I wasn't taking any chances at
that age, seventy-two, suffering stresses and strains, so I notified all
and sundry, no more contacts for me. In 1987, Ophelia McFadden, general manager of Local 434, asked me again
to take such an assignment, and I refused. It was difficult to say no,
but only because I would have liked to do this for her. Instead, I
finally conceded in 1986 to being a senior citizen and accepted an
invitation from Bill Robertson to act as chairman of the Federation of
Retired Union Members [FORUM]. This was a volunteer job. That's where I
am at the moment, except that I have just been offered a paying job as
administrator of a medical information and referral service for retired
union members. I don't know much more about it than that it sounds
interesting, while Ida does her thing until she gets tired. She does
what she does and is as much appreciated as I am in the FORUM. Other
than the· usual illnesses we're prone to at this age, we are enjoying
ourselves. Of course, we both fantasize that we'd love to pick up at a
moment's notice and take off to some strange and faraway places any time
we wish. But given we're not that well situated financially, never
having thought until very late about the financial implications of
retirement, we are enjoying ourselves. So I am still in the labor
movement at this stage of my life, but in ways I hadn't foreseen ten or
twenty years ago. On occasion I remind myself when I think about my
life, "Hey, don't forget your priorities." My priority, of course, is my
life with Ida first, then my kids and grand-kids, then any service I can
give.] * Mr. Fiering added the following bracketed section during his review of
the transcript.