Contents
- 1. Transcript
- 1.1. TAPE NUMBER: I, SIDE ONE (JULY 19, 1985)
- 1.2. TAPE NUMBER: I, SIDE TWO (JULY 19, 1985)
- 1.3. TAPE NUMBER: II, SIDE ONE (JULY 19, 1985)
- 1.4. TAPE NUMBER: II, SIDE TWO (JULY 19, 1985)
- 1.5. TAPE NUMBER: III, SIDE ONE (JULY 20, 1985)
- 1.6. TAPE NUMBER: III, SIDE TWO (JULY 20, 1985)
- 1.7. TAPE NUMBER: IV, SIDE ONE (JULY 20, 1985)
- 1.8. TAPE NUMBER: IV, SIDE TWO (JULY 20, 1985)
- 1.9. TAPE NUMBER: V, SIDE ONE (JULY 20, 1985)
- 1.10. TAPE NUMBER: V, SIDE TWO (JULY 21, 1985)
- 1.11. TAPE NUMBER: VI, SIDE ONE (JULY 21, 1985)
- 1.12. TAPE NUMBER: VI, SIDE TWO (JULY 21, 1985)
1. Transcript
1.1. TAPE NUMBER: I, SIDE ONE (JULY 19, 1985)
- LASKEY
- Okay, Mr. Soriano, we'll begin our interview at the very beginning with
some background on your family.
- SORIANO
- Okay. Well, my family was really a very — Oh, what will I say? My mother
was--didn't know how to write or read, number one. And in those days,
you know, she came from a [family of] eleven children. Eight survived,
something like that. There were seven daughters and one son.
- LASKEY
- Where was your mother born?
- SORIANO
- Was in Rhodes. It was part of Turkey then.
- LASKEY
- She was born in Rhodes?
- SORIANO
- Yes.
- LASKEY
- What was her name?
- SORIANO
- Was Rebecca, or we used to call her Bohora. In the Hebraic language,
Bohora means the first born female, the oldest born woman. Bohor is for
men. Any first born is called Bohor, and Bohora--also because of Spanish
Jews, you see, she was a Spanish Jew — and therefore, Bohora, for the
feminine. Mean[ing] first — the oldest daughter.
- LASKEY
- Well, did she get to Rhodes, then, because of the--
- SORIANO
- From the Inquisition.
- LASKEY
- — expulsion of the Jews —
- SORIANO
- Yes, that's right.
- LASKEY
- --from Spain.
- SORIANO
- That's right. Her grandparents came to Rhodes.
- LASKEY
- I see.
- SORIANO
- The way all the parents came, they were all in the Mediterranean basin.
So it happened that I was born because of that. In there.
- LASKEY
- In Rhodes.
- SORIANO
- Yes .
- LASKEY
- Your father [Simon Soriano] was at--?
- SORIANO
- My father was also there. His grandfather came from Bayonne, the
southern part of France, you see, Basque country. Also expelled from
Spain. My father was quite a scholar. [noise outside] I better close
this door because it's a mess with those tourists going to Angel Island.
- LASKEY
- Okay.
- SORIANO
- Okay, we continue. We were talking about my mother, wasn't it?
- LASKEY
- Yes, we were.
- SORIANO
- And then my father, I told you that he was — his grandfather came from
Bayonne, southern part of France. And this is the tragedy of these damn
persecutions, as you know what happened to all the Jews in Germany and
the same thing [in] Spain. This is [the] tragedy of these uncivilized
human beings who think they have to have scapegoats to do their dirty
activities instead of loving humanity and loving people. And as you were
observing my photograph there, of that little girl I told you, that she
came to the door and she wanted to have a photograph with my beret.
She's adorable. Already a woman at the age of nine.
- LASKEY
- With a beautiful smile.
- SORIANO
- Absolutely superb. And intelligent, sensitive. She plays the piano and
cello. I mean, piano and violin. And, just recently I met another girl
by the name of Hillary. She lives in Pomona with her mother, and
father's a pilot, I told you. And I went-- I saw her. I said, "Most
marvelous face." I get fascinated with faces, as I am fascinated with
blossoms or with excellent music or the ballet for that reason, you see.
But not with stories. I love life in complete lucidity, as life is. And
to me that represents something that I relate to. Anything else, fairy
tales, stories, don't appeal to me because they don't mean anything to
me. That's somebody else's concoction, and why should I worry about
that, you see. Now, this little Hillary was so sweet, and I went to her
and I said, "What a beautiful child! Who are you?" And she gave me her
name. Her mother told me she's in one of the schools for talented
children, for gifted kids.
- LASKEY
- Oh, really?
- SORIANO
- Yes. And we became very good friends. And then they came over here, she
wanted me to go to have dinner with them at night. But I said, "No thank
you, dear. I can ' t . " But they were so sweet . And they came over
here and sat down and I said, "Oh, so beautiful." I say, "I wish I could
keep you here." And the mother said, "It won't take one second; she'll
stay." [laughter] And she came and hugged me. I mean, imagine that
lovely child, and is just the opposite of what we're trying to make
nowadays because of all these horrible things that happen. We tell the
kids, "Now, don't go near somebody. Don't talk to anybody, " you know.
- LASKEY
- Well, that's-- Of course, that's a double-edged danger —
- SORIANO
- It is.
- LASKEY
- — because you lose-- The children must be protected. On the other hand,
they are losing that very thing that you're talking about which is of a
spontaneous contact with life.
- SORIANO
- Exactly. And she sent me, just about two or three weeks ago, she sent me
two little snapshots of her. She's nine years old, Hillary.
- LASKEY
- And she lives in Pomona?
- SORIANO
- Yes.
- LASKEY
- You met her in Pomona?
- SORIANO
- They live over there. I met her here. On the dock.
- LASKEY
- I might just mention that we're at your office which is on the wharf at
Tiburon--
- SORIANO
- Yes, in Tiburon.
- LASKEY
- --looking out across the bay to a beautiful view of San Francisco and
Angel Island.
- SORIANO
- But as I told you, I may move from here because my landlord is kicking
me out because he wants to remodel this and make — raise four, five, six
times as much rent. It's all money, money, money; nothing else. There's
nothing — Even though I've been here thirty- three years, you see. But
anyway, that's not the story which I'll resolve. But it's painful still.
It's traumatic due to the fact that after all these years — Thirty-three
years I've been here paying him rent, with this great discourtesy.
However- - Anyway, let's go back to the serious business which is more
important. You were asking me-- I told you that my mother didn't know
how to write or read. My father was very well educated in many — knew
several languages. And he taught my mother how to write and read. And my
mother knew French, Italian and Spanish--and English when I brought them
to the U.S.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- --fluently. And then during the war, fortunately, they escaped from
Rhodes.
- LASKEY
- Now, which war?
- SORIANO
- Second war.
- LASKEY
- Oh, the Second World War.
- SORIANO
- The Second World War —
- LASKEY
- They were still in Rhodes?
- SORIANO
- They were still in Rhodes. Yes, I came from Rhodes .
- LASKEY
- I know you did, but I didn't know that —
- SORIANO
- Well, they were there. They remained there. And then when Germany and
Italy were allies, you see, then Hitler and the Italians at the time,
they were becoming very anti-Semitic. And then when Italy made peace
with the Allies and broke with Germany, then the Germans occupied the
islands and they had submarine and air bases. And they took all the
Italian citizens, all the Greek citizens, all the Jewish population that
was there- -Spanish Jews--which were nothing but Spanish Jews. They all
took them to the camps, and I lost several aunts and so on. Fortunately,
my mother and father and a young brother I have- -I have two other
brothers [Vittorio and Alfredo] --two brothers, you know. One was
already in Israel. Then they migrated to the Belgian Congo. It's the
only place they could go.
- LASKEY
- The Belgian Congo?
- SORIANO
- Yes. Because we had a relative in the Belgian Congo, that was the
easiest way of going. Instead of coming to America and the required
quotas and — You know.
- LASKEY
- What would they do in the Belgian Congo once they got there?
- SORIANO
- Well, they went there just to work. What else could they do?
- LASKEY
- Was there work, I guess, is my question.
- SORIANO
- Well, yes. The Belgian-- Africa was always- - They needed all the
people, so-called whites. Yeah, when they have stores and offices and
professions, naturally. Yeah, they used to, you know-- All the people
have-- Africa was run by the — among the Europeans.
- LASKEY
- Well, that's true. The bureaucracy.
- SORIANO
- The bureaucracy, exactly. They wanted to exploit all the people there,
naturally. Well, business is business.
- LASKEY
- [laughter] Even during the war it's business.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, business even before, you see.
- LASKEY
- Do you still have relatives in the Congo? or whatever it's called now? I
must say, my current geography is bad.
- SORIANO
- I don't know if I have — I don't think I have anybody in the Congo.
- LASKEY
- Well, do you consider your citizenship, your original citizenship, as
Greek, Italian?
- SORIANO
- Italian.
- LASKEY
- Italian?
- SORIANO
- Italian, because, you know, the islands were Italian to begin with. And
after the war, they [the Allies] gave them back to Greece.
- LASKEY
- No, I didn't know that.
- SORIANO
- Yes. That's exactly what happened. As a matter of fact, I have passports
— In my travels, you know, I filled up so many passports. And originally
I was an Italian citizen from Italy, originally. Now I'm an American
citizen of course; I've been since 1930. And then recently it's been
Greek. [laughter]
- LASKEY
- I think of Rhodes as being Greek. That's why I asked this.
- SORIANO
- Now. Now, yes. But Greek — Don't forget, Rhodes was being stolen
constantly by the Venetians, the Greeks, the Turks, the Romans.
Everybody wanted to have Rhodes because it was the crossroads of the
world and the islands are superb. You've never been there?
- LASKEY
- I've never, unfortunately, been there.
- SORIANO
- If you ever go to Greece, go to Rhodes. Because Rhodes is the jewel of
the whole Aegean Mediterranean, as an island, climatically as well.
- LASKEY
- Well, I've seen many, many pictures of it, of course. It is stunning.
- SORIANO
- But it's beautiful. Really, you cannot imagine how beautiful it is.
Climatically and so on. And the fruits — Everything tastes so good
because of the soil apparently-- No doubt, it is volcanic soil which
gives certain flavor. But anyway —
- LASKEY
- What was it like to grow up there?
- SORIANO
- Well, it was a small-- Islands are islands. You know, it's very
constrictive. You couldn't go to college unless you were very rich, you
couldn't have an education. It's very difficult.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Well, nothing — My father was my first tutor. He taught me Greek, my
first language. I used to write it fluently and speak it. And then my
other languages, which we spoke at home-- Spanish, naturally. And I
still, when I lectured in Spain or in the Americas from Argentina down —
all the Americas I've lectured in--in my Spanish all the time of
Cervantes, which we still speak. I have a book given to me by Felix
Candela, you know, the famous Spanish- -
- LASKEY
- The architect, yes.
- SORIANO
- Architect -engineer . And with a lovely inscription after he heard me
lecture. He brought me the book--and I'll show it to you — and he said--
Here, I think we'll find it. Let's see, Candela. You see the Candela
there? You record this? I'll show you. This is very interesting, what he
wrote. See? This lovely inscription he made.
- LASKEY
- Well, you'll have to read it to me. [laughter]
- SORIANO
- Yeah, I'll read it to you. I'll explain it to you.
- LASKEY
- [laughter] That's wonderful.
- SORIANO
- This was at the university in Mexico City I gave this. And that was in
'64, July 1964, the Pan-American Congress.
- LASKEY
- Twenty-one years ago.
- SORIANO
- Yes. I've been lecturing there many, many times. That was at the opening
of the [National Autonomous] University of Mexico. I was a speaker
there, you know.
- LASKEY
- He did some of the buildings for the University of Mexico?
- SORIANO
- Yes, he did. He did the scientific building which is like a little wagon
[hyperbolic paraboloid] . He did a lot of restaurants and so on. And he
brought me this in the morning to the hotel, and I present this —
[translates inscription] "This is for my good friend Raphael" — now, I
never met him before, but I knew of his work, of course — "with an
affection and admiration more sincere and a souvenir of a stupendous
conference- -or lecture — that you gave us in a language delicious that
had the flavor of the romance of the old days"--
- LASKEY
- Oh, that's wonderful. That's delightful.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. — "and of a discussion full of passion, but very cordial and
friendly. Mexico, July 1964, Felix Candela." You see.
- LASKEY
- That's very impressive.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, it was very charming, you see. I have things like that that have
happened in my life, but more appreciated there than I am in my own
country here, really. Even though I know many of my colleagues know me,
but-- Actually, to tell you the truth, I'm wasted. My talents are
wasted. I've contributed [things] in housing that nobody knows what I
have done. We need thousands and thousands of housing units. And I have
a system that I made: I can put four houses in one day made of aluminum
structures. They talk about ecology of using trees. I haven't used a
piece of wood since the year 1936.
- LASKEY
- That's amazing.
- SORIANO
- All my structures have been made of metal now. If I hadn't done these
efforts, nobody would have done-- We wouldn't have had the steel houses
today. When you find all the assistants of mine, former assistants that
have done like — Pierre Koenig, Craig Ellwood, Joe [Joseph Y.]
Fujikuawa, and a few of the others who are doing steel houses now would
have never been. Because I made the effort and nobody wanted to give a
bid even then. And I used to do them myself. I used to undertake-- I
used to tell the clients, "I'll build them for you. It'll be cheaper
anyway." And it was.
- LASKEY
- Well, I don't want to talk too much about that now because we want to
get into this in greater detail later on.
- SORIANO
- Okay.
- LASKEY
- But I think it's interesting that Esther McCoy and Reyner Banham saw you
as a very important link between the European architects and the modern
American architects that were to follow people like [Charles] Eames and
Koenig and Ellwood. And I think that that's something that we're going
to want to talk about a lot.
- SORIANO
- Okay, sure.
- LASKEY
- We still have you on Rhodes, however.
- SORIANO
- Okay. Well, in Rhodes, you know, as I told you, it was very, very- -a
sort of a small little island. You know, islands are very constricted.
And if you don't have any money, you do what you can. Either you can go
to school--the high school type of thing or college type of-- Which is
nothing, really, no-- And I wanted to really do something and I wanted
to have a profession. And then I wanted to get away from Rhodes because
my father was a very interesting man and yet he was very cruel to me.
- LASKEY
- He was cruel?
- SORIANO
- Yes. He used to beat the hell out of me.
- LASKEY
- You're kidding.
- SORIANO
- No, I'm not kidding. I mean, they talk about here: "Well, that's the
home life, you know; therefore, he was a criminal." [laughter] Well,
that's not the whole truth in life, depending on your chromosomes how
your behavior is. It isn't all just because you were abused. Yeah, my
father used to tie my two feet. He meant well, because he thought gold
that isn't pounded never shines. He used to tell me. I used to tell him
— I said, "I'm not gold . " [ laughter ]
- LASKEY
- I'm a person! Was this considered an ordinary pun-- I mean, was this
punishment at the time?
- SORIANO
- The European way.
- LASKEY
- It was.
- SORIANO
- The European way, but he was way in exaggeration. I mean, to tie a
child, the feet, and give it a nice bastonada, the cane stroke [on] the
bottom of the feet. And if I disobeyed him, he used to instruct my
mother not to let me go out and play with anybody.
- LASKEY
- How did your mother feel about that?
- SORIANO
- She hated it. She hated him for that. My mother was a very beautiful,
very intelligent, sensitive human being even though she never went to
school . But she would have an innate intelligence and sensitivity.
Whatever she did was done exquisitely. Whether she did dentelle,
cooking, or pastry. In fact, she was so talented in doing this — Nobody
taught her. But she had this finesse within herself. In fact, when they
had weddings they used to ask my mother to please help them, what to do
and how to do it. And my mother said, "Yes, you can crush the almonds,
but I'll do the rest." Yeah.
- LASKEY
- She sounds wonderful.
- SORIANO
- She was a beautiful human being, really. And my father too was an
exciting man, very interesting.
- LASKEY
- What was his name?
- SORIANO
- Simon. Simon Soriano.
- LASKEY
- How did he get to Rhodes from —
- SORIANO
- Well, from the same. They [his grandparents] migrated there, I suppose,
from the time of the [Spanish] Inquisition. They went all over the
areas.
- LASKEY
- Or went to France and then--
- SORIANO
- And then his father, and then they went to Turkey, from there to Rhodes.
Yeah. And this is the interesting area there. And of course I hated my
father because of his spanking, you know. My mother used to tell me, she
said, "Your father used to kiss you when you were asleep." Well, imagine
a child. I wanted-- That's his whole idea.
- LASKEY
- It did you no good when you were asleep.
- SORIANO
- The result is that I hated him. But then I have compassion. I brought
them here to America. I took care of all their needs. Both my mother and
father are buried in Los Angeles.
- LASKEY
- Are they really?
- SORIANO
- I brought them there and I took care of their needs since the age of
fourteen. My father worked very erratically or neurotically. He hated
business.
- LASKEY
- [laughter] He was in business though?
- SORIANO
- No.
- LASKEY
- Oh, he wasn't. What did he do?
- SORIANO
- He was a very educated man, but he didn't have any profession. And his
father was quite wealthy at one time. And when he got married to my
mother, I understand he [Simon Soriano's father] opened for them a--some
kind of dry goods store or something. And then he [Simon Soriano] sold
it because he felt it was--business is dishonest. That was his thinking.
Oh, he was a very interesting man. He had a very —
- LASKEY
- I should say!
- SORIANO
- — very advanced ideas indeed, but very impractical . But yet he would
work for somebody doing the same thing for wages instead of his own.
Well, maybe he was absolved by not participating in the rules.
- LASKEY
- [laughter] He wasn't making the rules.
- SORIANO
- Yes. So this was the character of the man. And so, he was so-- He was an
extremely honest person. Really.
- LASKEY
- Obviously a trait that he's passed on to you, too.
- SORIANO
- Possibly.
- LASKEY
- In the sense of rightness and —
- SORIANO
- I'm sure I have some of that--both of them--from both parents. And I'm
very proud of it, frankly, in spite of all of that. And yet, afterwards
when I grew up, I understood the whole thing and I had compassion for
him. And, in fact, I took care of all his needs. When it was time to go
to an old-age home in Los Angeles, he was already almost ninety-
something. And I used to fly there every week to take care of him and to
see how he was. And I used to sweep his floor and all that because I
said, "I can't afford to have somebody — " In those days, you know, no
Medicare or anything like that yet. And at the time, I was married and I
had responsibilities here. So it was a difficult life, darling, but
nevertheless I used to do that.
- LASKEY
- Well, you must take a certain amount of pride from that.
- SORIANO
- I do. I don't degrade it because I spent every cent to-- My mother had
cancer and she had two operations. And I spent every little saving I
have to- -for her in Los Angeles because I love her. I love both of
them. And so, the result is that I'm in a condition I'm in now. I never
thought of myself, so-- Because I have nothing, really.
- LASKEY
- Well, you have your work and you have a very good mind. Well, didn't
your father — I think I read that your father taught you about music or
taught you —
- SORIANO
- Yes, he bought a small violin for me because he used to play the violin,
the mandolin, the eukarina. He was a very good musician, a very good —
But he never did anything as a profession. He was very talented and he
wanted me to learn the violin, but his method, again, was very brutal.
If I made a mistake--we used to practice together--if I made a mistake
on one of the notes, with his bow, bang on my little fingers. But, I
mean, I adore music. Music- -my whole life revolves around music and
yet, I hated the violin.
- LASKEY
- Well, I think it's interesting that you love music, having been
introduced to it in that way. It's interesting that you didn't run away
from it.
- SORIANO
- No. But it was inside of my chromosomes — My mother too loved music, and
my brothers — I have a brother here, a younger brother Alfredo, he also
— He just cries when he listens to Beethoven and stuff.
- LASKEY
- Did you have access to music on Rhodes?
- SORIANO
- No. Nothing of the sort, nothing. There was nothing- -well, except the
bands, military bands. They used to play every Thursday, the Italian
band. They used to play all the operas, you know. But I hated them. I
didn't like the operas.
- LASKEY
- You didn't like opera? Do you like opera now?
- SORIANO
- No.
- LASKEY
- Or do you still think of it as a fairy tale? a part of the — ?
- SORIANO
- It is. They are fairy tale-ish, most of them, except some operas that
take an exception: the operas of [Giovanni] Paisiello.
- LASKEY
- I don't know those.
- SORIANO
- Well, I'll have to let you hear Paisiello. You'll see how beautiful that
is. In fact, I use that in my lectures a great deal, Paisiello. He was,
oh well, seventeenth century. The time of Bach and that era. He produced
one, "The Barbiere of Siviglia, " "The Barber of Seville."
- LASKEY
- That early?
- SORIANO
- Before Rossini.
- LASKEY
- [laughter] Before Mozart.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. And then it was one of the most magnificent operas in the world.
But, you see, the opera then was different. The music was first, the
dominant factor. The story was secondary. Yeah. And what I detest of
most of these so-called soap opera is that —
- LASKEY
- Soap operas. [laughter]
- SORIANO
- Well, this is exactly [what] I'm telling you: soap operas — is because
the story's first, music becomes sort of a — like a fumigator. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Oh, dear.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. And this is why I detest most of the so- called pop-rock junk
that's with the kids today, and even jazz. I think it's a lot of
nonsense, in my humble opinion. However, I think I'm right. Because it's
nothing but an artificial, contrived nonsense that has become a cult
instead of culture. And they try to make it into a culture, but it isn't
really. Because if you find anybody doing their own thing [sings]
tra-re-la-ra-la-voom-a-bum-a- an-a-woo-woo-woo-woo following a rhythm;
all right, big deal, so what. [laughter]
- LASKEY
- Is that most jazz or all jazz that —
- SORIANO
- All jazz. All jazz.
- LASKEY
- All jazz you would include.
- SORIANO
- There's nothing, really. Jazz is — I've seen-- I've made these studies
of that and I have tremendous numbers of records that I have. And I've
had a lot of thought about this. I really did. And I'm pretty accurate.
And I spoke with many composers that I know, friends of mine. In fact,
I'll be interviewed for a [radio station] KPFA, I believe, in Berkeley
on a musical thing. Somebody wrote to me and, "We are going to do some
program on music, discussing music."
- LASKEY
- What's your favorite music? I mean, favorite area —
- SORIANO
- Well, Bach —
- LASKEY
- — I guess, would be fair.
- SORIANO
- Bach comes — Well, I have some of the ones that I think they were
serious people. There's Bach; there's [Dietrich] Buxtehude before Bach.
And then you find even the eleventh-century English composers, the
folklorists. I think they're excellent. And folklores of all the
different peoples, folklores. They are mostly in dance form. I say you
never sing a song; you always dance it. That's my theory. That's my own
statement. You dance your songs, you never sing them. And you find the
best folklores are always that. They can tell all the stories of the
world, but they're always danced; never sung. When you start singing
something, it becomes exactly all these platitudes of the kids today:
[sings] "Oh, I love you, I love you, I loooove yoooooouuuuu . You come
into meeee. I looooove yooouuuu, come into meeeeeee." And that's all
there is to it. That's all you're hearing, the same old- -same words
repeated over, because they never understood what it is, really, because
music is something else. Music transcends this so-called trivial
nonsense that you "want expressed." You don't have to express any more
than two lovers expressing — Worth anything. It's just the one look has
more already there. One warmth of a bosom of a woman against your chest
tells you lots of things rather than the words of explaining it. In
fact, in Spanish, my mother used to say something very beautiful. You
see, we kept a lot of the Spanish tradition which is so beautiful. And
in fact, the cousin of my mother wrote several books- -used to be quite
a scholar- -wrote the sayings of the Spanish Jews all over the
Mediterranean, and particularly of Rhodes. He has a book of sayings, the
most marvelous, all in Spanish. [tape recorder turned off]
- LASKEY
- Okay.
- SORIANO
- Let it be. It'll serve because it's mine; it makes it more interesting,
more humane. We have a saying which is applicable to what I will say,
that "Ni escrito ni estampado se puede describir." "Not in wri--even in
writing or in painting or in printing can you describe anything." Now,
look at the depth of that saying. Just reflect on that. Not even in
writing or in painting can you describe anything. Yeah. But look at the
vastness of the universe. Suppose I wanted to-- I've seen many painters
try to do that, which is a lot of nonsense. They can't-- What can they
do? Put a couple of splashes of painting? Nonsense. Or like the writers,
too, with words and words and words — So what? What do they say?
Nothing, really. Just a little tiny, tiny speck of nothing. So the
wisdom of that is so profound, so exquisite. Then if you really
understand the meaning of that, then you become silent. Unless you have
something to say. [Then] you say something. The only ones who really can
say about the universe are the people doing research, investigation.
They give their life's work investigating, don't they? Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- Okay. They validate, they find, and then they state. Yeah. Now, before
that the people who spoke about things, they were mythologists. You
know, they thought. You know, they used to conjure and conjecture. And
this goes in the category of the medicine man. To me this medicine man
postulated all kinds of things without validation. And they're clever,
many of them. They used to-- For example, some of the people used to
make rain, you know, like the shamasses, shamans. And they used to know
by observing-- They were clever. They used to observe when the cloud
formations. And then most of the tribe didn't think much; they didn't
observe much. They [the shamans] said, "Now, let's make a dance. I want
to make rain." And sure enough, rain will occur because he knew already
these clouds will make rain. You see, this is how they become the
chiefs, you see. [phone rings] Excuse me, darling. You're right, Diane,
but not in our style manual. [tape recorder turned off] Go ahead.
- LASKEY
- Let's see. We — I think maybe —
- SORIANO
- Go ahead.
- LASKEY
- What we haven't talked about or gotten into or go back to your
education, how you-- How did you get educated besides your father?
- SORIANO
- My educator [education] was very, very limited. My father was the one
who was my tutor till I was twelve or something like that. Then I spent
two years, three years with the Christian brothers, [College]
Saint-Jean- Baptiste. They were the brothers. Catholic brothers.
Excellent schools. My father had an excellent education. In other words,
he wanted me to be educated, but he wanted me to be the best . He was my
first tutor because he didn't want me to be contaminated with bad words
with children. He didn't want me to play. That's the reason he kept
shielding me. But, you know, I used to know every other bad word.
- LASKEY
- [laughs] Of course.
- SORIANO
- Kids always do that. And my mother would not-- Even though he used to
instruct my mother not to let me out of her sight, not to let me out of
their house. And of course she wouldn't do that. She would let me play
and I used to learn every other bad word. And of course my father hated
that. And so then he sent me to the Saint- Jean-Baptiste French school,
the Christian brothers.
- LASKEY
- Now, was that in Rhodes?
- SORIANO
- In Rhodes, yes. They had wonderful schools. They were excellent
teachers, really. Excuse me, I have to — [tape recorder turned off]
- LASKEY
- We're talking about your school, about--
- SORIANO
- Yeah. Well, the school was the French brothers that were very excellent
teachers, really. It was nice to go there. I was not en pension, as they
say. In other words, I wasn't living in this school. They have also
people who live there; Catholic students, particularly, who had kids
used to go there. But, no. I used to go there during the day at school .
And so that was it .
- LASKEY
- Was it a regular classical education, that is, what we would now call a
liberal arts education?
- SORIANO
- Yes. Liberal arts, yes. They used to teach everything: mathematics,
geography, and all that. And so then I wanted to migrate and secretly,
without telling my father, I asked — I had two — three aunts in Los
Angeles, actually, at the time.
- LASKEY
- How did they happen to be in Los Angeles?
- SORIANO
- They went to America. They came over here-- They were sent, you know,
they were my mother's sisters. They used to try to send the daughters
wherever there was somebody to be married, especially from Rhodes and so
on. And that's what happened. They used to send them here, to Africa, to
Los Angeles. And that's because to have a daughter was a complete
liability. They have to have a trousseau, they have to have dowry. Are
you kidding? They used to prepare the-- The minute the girl was born,
they used to freeze. My grandmother, I understand, after having
daughters after daughters after daughters, you know, she was — When she
had the one, the last one, who's here--my Aunt Matilda in Los Angeles.
She's past ninety-so many years old — and she said her mother sort of se
hielo, [which] in Spanish means, "she froze," [laughter] to have another
daughter. Then after her a boy came. That was the only boy they had.
- LASKEY
- Of eleven children? One boy?
- SORIANO
- Yes. And seven daughters lived, that's all.
- LASKEY
- Well, then they had seven daughters that had to be "disposed of. "
- SORIANO
- They had to be — Absolutely. Let me remove that. Is that yours or mine?
Oh, that ' s okay . Do you have enough room?
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- Put it on top of any place. Let me remove this away. Then you can have
that.
- LASKEY
- Oh, no. This is — Actually, this is just —
- SORIANO
- Here, darling. Let me remove this. This is no problem. [microphone
adjusted] Okay. All right. Okay. Anyway, so that's the way I have enough
— That is how it happened for them to come to America. And I — My father
went to look for work in Egypt because he had a sister there, married at
the time. And so I took the occasion to run away. And--
- LASKEY
- How old were you?
- SORIANO
- I must have been seventeen, eighteen, nineteen, something like that. And
my father was so mad that I disobeyed him after all this severity, all
this training that I will be an obedient [son] and so on. And he would
absolutely not speak to me, wouldn't write to me, for almost three
years.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Four years. I don't know.
- LASKEY
- But you did write to your mother.
- SORIANO
- Yes, of course. And I used to cry. I wanted for my father to write and
not to have that rancor. But then he wrote to me. It was an interesting
one. After three years, "I forgive you, my son. Will you send me four
hundred dollars because I have to go to Africa to look for a job." Yeah.
And then I start crying that my father finally wrote to me. Instead of
saying, you know, "You--!"
- LASKEY
- How dare you!
- SORIANO
- Yeah. But no, I didn't. I had this tenderness in my heart somehow.
Really.
- LASKEY
- Did you send him the four hundred dollars?
- SORIANO
- Yes. And I went to my boss — I was working [at] a fruit stand at the
time, and I went to my boss, I said, "Can you, perhaps, send my father
four hundred — " "Well, I can't give it to you, but I'll take you to the
Morris Plan Company." In other words, the Morris Plan Company [loaned me
the money] . And I remember I thought I will never finish paying. I was
paying and paying interest. You know how this thing- -
- LASKEY
- Oh, yes. Four hundred dollars — This would be —
- SORIANO
- In those days.
- LASKEY
- — in about the 1920s, wouldn't it?
- SORIANO
- Nineteen twenties, yes. In '26, '27, something like that.
- LASKEY
- Now, you were born August 1, 1904, is that right?
- SORIANO
- And so that really was something.
- LASKEY
- Well, I think I read that your trip over here was pretty horrendous,
too, getting from Rhodes to the United States.
- SORIANO
- It was very traumatic because I had the visa-- I mean, I had the permit
to come, I have the affidavits, and I have all the examination, doctor
certificates; I was in excellent health. And here I come to Naples
embarkation point, we go to the American consul to get the visa, and,
"No." It was just the time, in 1924, when they were eliminating the
Orientals from the quotas.
- LASKEY
- Of course. Of course. They were instituting a quota system, period. The
1924 immigration law.
- SORIANO
- That's correct.
- LASKEY
- Right. Of course.
- SORIANO
- And then here I had the brunt of it. All of a sudden, here I thought I
will have free passage right away within the week, and, "No, because
we'll have to wait till the [United States] Senate gives us the quotas
for Italy and everybody else." And I waited, I think, four months, six
months, something. I don't--forget now. I'll have to look it up in my
records. And it was horrible because here I didn't dare spend anything.
I had just enough money for the trip — to pay for the boat, passage-
-which I borrowed from my grandfather and an uncle. And it was very,
very traumatic. And then I used to wash dishes and do a little
interpreting sometimes for foreigners, who used to come and they didn't
know how to speak Italian or French or Spanish, and — Nothing, just--
And wash dishes so I can get a plate of beans once in a while. And I
used to eat cheese and bread, chocolate and bread the next day so I
[don't] get tired of one. That's what I did. And it was really — I lived
in one little room, and I used to take a bath once every two weeks in a
public bathhouse. And I used to take all my laundry with me in a
newspaper, and then while I was taking a bath I used to wash it so
nobody will know, you know. Wash my laundry there and then bring it and
hang it in my room because I couldn't afford anything else. Who could
afford laundry or anything like [that]? It was one of those rooms in
Naples in the slum-- [phone rings] Excuse me. [tape recorder turned off]
Okay.
- LASKEY
- All set.
- SORIANO
- Now, what were we saying? We should have another came to — That is, I
was in Naples and trying to get to America. Well, finally, after several
months, the Senate already had the quotas for every country minus the
Orientals. You see, the Turks and all that, and they were not allowed to
come. But then I was-- We used to check the list. The American consul
used to paste [up] the list of the visas that are given. And I saw the
first ship leave, second ship leave, third ship leave, fourth ship
leave, fifth ship leave. I think I was in the sixth and the last ship,
which was the Giulio Cesare. Julius Caesar was the fastest ship of the
Italian merchant marine. They used to brag, "This is the fastest ship
built — " Stabilizers, and four propellers they had. As a matter of
fact, during the war the British sunk it in the Mediterranean during the
World War II.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yeah, because it was a troop carrier for the Italians. But anyway, so
just this last boat — I looked at the list. There was a fear in my heart
I won't be in the quota. Then two or three from the last- -because my
[name is] Soriano, you know, S — then I saw my name three from the last.
And I was so happy. Finally. And I remember tasting on the ship-- It
took about five, six days to traverse the trans-Atlantic. And I remember
eating the first Jonathan apple on the ship.
- LASKEY
- Really? [laughter]
- SORIANO
- Yeah. It was delicious. Yeah. And then after that, when I came to
America, I used to sell tons of that in the fruit stand. [laughter]
Anyway, so--
- LASKEY
- You came through Ellis Island?
- SORIANO
- Through Ellis Island, yes. And an interesting thing that happened there.
Then we were examined, you know; stripped waist up. And all of a
sudden-- Apparently, I must have — My ribs were showing from not eating
too much. And all of a sudden they gave me a little green piece of
paper, I remember, with the words "send to hospital." "Hospital" I could
decipher.
- LASKEY
- That's right, you didn't speak English.
- SORIANO
- "Send to" — I don't know what it was. But I saw most of them going in
this line; they directed me to this other line. And I went there.
Immediately we were thrown in a room. And some orderly came in and took
me somewhere, and all of a sudden he gave me new clothing, hospital
clothing. And I just about died. I thought they would send me back for--
I didn't understand the reason. And I remember the tenderness of that
orderly. A man puts his hand on my arm and he started to reassure me
with a nice smile. And so all of a sudden here I was in a huge room with
Chinese, Italians, all kinds of people; a huge dormitory with beds,
hospital beds. And so they took my clothes, they gave me hospital type
of thing. Then — I was scared they will send me back. I didn't even know
why.
- LASKEY
- And nobody there spoke- -could tell you what was happening?
- SORIANO
- No. Not yet, until finally a lovely nurse came in and spoke French. And
she was very sweet. Immediately, she took a liking to me. She brought me
glasses of milk, a box of chocolates. She was so sweet, really.
- LASKEY
- Is that why they kept you, though, was--?
- SORIANO
- They kept me to observe me, whether I have TB, because I was
undernourished. My ribs were sticking [out]. They would not admit
anybody with tuberculosis.
- LASKEY
- Oh, of course.
- SORIANO
- If you have any kind of disease, eye disease or tuberculosis, you're not
admitted.
- LASKEY
- So it wasn't just out of the goodness of their heart to fatten you up a
little bit. They wanted to make you —
- SORIANO
- No, no, no, no. They wanted-- They want to be sure. And then I was
examined the next day, right away, with I don ' t know how many doctors
. They were checking me all over. And I said to myself, "My god,
what's--" I didn't even know. I was — I knew I was always healthy. My
genes were okay, but —
- LASKEY
- That must have been — Must have been —
- SORIANO
- Most traumatic.
- LASKEY
- — worried, scary.
- SORIANO
- And I was so scared. I thought If they send me back I will throw myself
in the water, really, because I had these debts incurred. And I didn't
want to go back to my father. He would have killed me to begin with.
Now, this was what happened. But then, [among] some of the inmates that
I talked to, there was one Italian fellow. So I started talking with
him. And he explained to me, "Ah, this is for observation and, you know,
if that chart on your bed" --we had a little chart, everybody--he said,
"when that is removed, that means you're admitted." And one Sunday
morning, sure enough, that wasn't there. I was admitted. But they used
to serve me-- For the first time I saw the most magnificent breakfast.
At home we used to have nothing but [a] piece of bread: toast, bread,
and tea. That's all at breakfast. That's all we ate. French bread and
tea. Nothing else. And over here they had scrambled eggs, jam, cereal,
milk, cream. [laughter] Oh god!
- LASKEY
- The promised land.
- SORIANO
- This — I didn't have — I couldn't eat anything. I was so scared and so
frightened.
- LASKEY
- Really? Of course. I mean, not knowing the language and not knowing what
was going to happen to you.
- SORIANO
- It was absolutely traumatic; but I mean traumatic.
- LASKEY
- Of course.
- SORIANO
- And it really sort of was a very shocking thing to me. However, the
nurses were so superbly beautiful; so charming, so gracious, really.
Everybody was nice. The impression I have of the Americans is really
lovely, kind people. And then when they removed that, all of a sudden
they asked me to dress, and that's it. They gave me two lunch boxes and
they put me on a train that took six days and five nights or five nights
and six days, I don't remember. Went through Chicago and all that. Well,
my destination was California where my aunts were, you see?
- LASKEY
- How did you travel across the country not knowing the language?
- SORIANO
- Well, you don't. It's very difficult. I sat in a seat, naturally — There
was an English boy sitting next to me. And he was so selfish. He used to
be close to the window. I wanted to see what's going on and he didn't
want to; he wanted to get the shade--the sun out. He used to close it.
And I used to say-- I had to do this. [pantomiming] And he used to take,
like that. And so finally one day I just got-- I said-- I used to signal
to him. And he said, "Me, English!" like that. And I said, "Me,
Italian!" [laughter] I said it like that. And then he let me open that.
- LASKEY
- That's wonderful.
- SORIANO
- He really got scared and let me open it so I can look at the--what's
outside.
- LASKEY
- Well, of course. If he didn't want to look out the window, he could have
at least just changed places with you.
- SORIANO
- Well, he was absolutely, I suppose, a very difficult young man, I
suppose, I don't know--
1.2. TAPE NUMBER: I, SIDE TWO (JULY 19, 1985)
- SORIANO
- So, as I said, the train stopped in Chino and a lady got on the train.
She came in then; I told her what happened. She introduced me to another
Italian. So she starts talking to me in Italian. And she knew a little
Italian. Not very much, but still-- I said, "You have a very impolite
nephew." I said, "I wanted to look at the view and he won't let me. He
wanted-- Whenever he wanted he would close this, and this would be
ingracious." And she says, "Oh, he shouldn't have done that. Shouldn't
have." She gave me the address, I should come back and visit them and so
on. I didn't bother. But anyway, what else do we have? So then that was
it. Then my poor aunts were out of their minds because here they know I
left Naples, and here I come to Ellis Island and should be coming
directly, and here I was a whole week detained. They didn't know
whatever happened to me. Then they were trying to look, and they got
through some political people, the-- Somebody, I don't know, who knew
somebody- -they tried. Finally, they checked, and Ellis Island said,
"Yes, Raphael's been admitted. He's on the train . " And so that ' s
what happened . And then I took a taxi, with the last five dollars I
had, to Santa Barbara Avenue [now Martin Luther King, Jr., Boulevard]
where my aunt was and surprised them. So that's the way it was. And then
in the meantime when I was traveling, you know, I didn't know a word of
English. I didn't know how much things cost. I had just a limited
amount; five or six or seven dollars, ten dollars, whatever I had. I
finished the lunch boxes; most of it I hated. I ate the sardines, I ate
the apples and the crackers — They had biscuits [which] were just like
salt crackers. I hated those damn things, [laughter] And then the other
thing was salami, which I never eat; I hate it. And then the cheese- -
- LASKEY
- An Italian who hates salami?
- SORIANO
- Well, yes.
- LASKEY
- Isn't that a contradiction in —
- SORIANO
- We never ate this kind of a things, no. And, as I told you, my mother
was a superb cook. We ate some really good, sensible things. And
cheese-- The cheese looked like soap to me, the American cheese. I'm
used to Parmesan and all these nice tasty cheeses.
- LASKEY
- Gorgonzola.
- SORIANO
- So-- Not so much the Gorgonzola. We used to eat those harder cheeses,
yeah. And this is what happened here. And so here I was. And I tried to
get, with change — The coffee man came in — I used to get a cup of
coffee. Or if they have something sweet, you know, [that they're]
selling, I used to get that. That's all I could know. But go to the
restaurant, where they had a restaurant in with the train, I wouldn't
dare because I didn't know the costs or anything. We used to stop in
Chicago and I used to go to the little coffee shop. I used to point to
pies. That's all I know: apple pie. I ate so many apple — so many pies,
[laughter] I detest it. I didn't want to eat any more, of any sweet,
ever.
- LASKEY
- Ever.
- SORIANO
- That's all I did, survive for a whole week: coffee and sweets. And that
was it. Then I was in California, where California was a little village
then. Especially Los Angeles.
- LASKEY
- Well, Los Angeles must not have been that much different from Rhodes
climate-wise, was it?
- SORIANO
- Climate-wise was very close, but not quite. Rhodes was — Yes, it's very
similar. It's benign climate; very clement. And we have orange blossoms,
it was nice. Flowers and all that, which was lovely. But Rhodes is full
of flowers; beautiful things really. And Los Angeles was very close [to
Rhodes' climate]: oranges and the orange blossoms I love. My mother used
to make the most beautiful pastry with them, with the blossoms of the
oranges. With almonds .
- LASKEY
- In the pastry?
- SORIANO
- She used to make beautiful confiturerie (preserves), you know, pastries,
with orange blossoms, the petals of the orange blossoms in almonds. You
don't really know how delicious that is.
- LASKEY
- Oh, it sounds wonderful.
- SORIANO
- My mother was a superb woman, really. Yeah. She was really a girl. She
could do things with such a finesse. Ooof.
- LASKEY
- Did she teach you how to cook? Did you learn any of those?
- SORIANO
- No, but it came in through osmosis. I cook beautifully.
- LASKEY
- That's what you'd said.
- SORIANO
- I'm sorry I didn't cook for you, but maybe we'll see towards the end of
it; maybe [with] my friend, love of mine-- We'll see what happens; maybe
when we can have the time.
- LASKEY
- Well, you came to Los Angeles in 1924.
- SORIANO
- Yes .
- LASKEY
- It must have been very different from the Los Angeles you see now.
- SORIANO
- Oohfff, yes, yes, yes, yes. Los Angeles was very clement, very lovely,
very few cars actually. And as far as you can-- Santa Barbara Avenue and
Western [Avenue] was about as developed — the only thing. The rest of it
was just small town. And from then on to the beach were just bean fields
cultivated by Japanese. The Red streetcar line used to go from downtown,
Hill Street, to all the beaches. Yeah. Red streetcar lines only. And
there were hardly — There were no buses. There were streetcars all over.
Used to take a bus from Fifth [Street] and Hill or Third [Street] and
Hill Street where I worked in a fruit stand to Santa Barbara Avenue and
Western. Used to take about half an hour with a streetcar. Used to cost
a nickel. I didn't even know how to say [take it]. I said, "Take-it,"
you know. "Take-eet." [laughs]
- LASKEY
- "Take-eet." [laughter]
- SORIANO
- I used to say that. You know, you eventually learn the language. [tape
recorder turned off] Okay.
- LASKEY
- There we go.
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- So you were in Los Angeles in 1924 and you're living with your aunts.
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Had you thought about being an architect at that point?
- SORIANO
- No. I wanted to go to the university though; that was the first thing.
But I wanted to be a composer.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- That was my greatest joy in the world. Or architecture was close, but
composition- -music- -was my greatest joy.
- LASKEY
- Had you done any composing?
- SORIANO
- No. I bought a violin immediately. First money I could make I bought a
violin right from Hill Street--Hill and Third. There was an old violin
maker and so on. I bought an old copy of a French Maggini [violin] . I
still have it. And I remember the first monies that I could save, and I
put it to a violin. And I was taking lessons from a certain Mr. Hunter.
Mr. Hunter-- Hunter, I think it was. His son-in-law or his son, I
believe, was a violinist in the Philharmonic in Los Angeles. But he was
a teacher. Was quite an old gentleman. He used to write his notes on the
little envelope instead of — You throw away all the paper, old
envelopes, he used to keep all the back side of envelopes to write
little notes and little assignments. In other words, nothing was wasted,
even then .
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- Today, you know-- I remember I have assistants, you get a roll, a ream.
If they write three lines like that they [throw it away]. I said, "Look,
I'm paying for that." I say, "You don't have to waste a whole page for
one line." And, you know, that's how spoiled we are, really. Well, maybe
that's part of our society. I don't know. But, so this [is] what I
wanted to do; I wanted music. And then I entered the university, of
course, and the first time — Then I was taking English in the Los
Angeles Coaching School.
- LASKEY
- Where was the Los Angeles Coaching School?
- SORIANO
- It was right on, I believe, on Fifth and Hill streets —
- LASKEY
- Fifth and Hill.
- SORIANO
- — on top of one of the buildings there. Near the Philharmonic
Auditorium, right near there.
- LASKEY
- And it was just to teach —
- SORIANO
- They used to teach —
- LASKEY
- --to teach English--
- SORIANO
- They used to teach English, and they had also students there that--they
couldn't pass their exams. They used to coach some rich people to
prepare for their exams also. And so the teachers took a great liking to
me somehow. I don't know why. But anyway, they, the director of the
school liked [me] , and then I told him that I wanted to go to the
university to study.
- LASKEY
- Now, this is the University of Southern California?
- SORIANO
- Southern California, yes.
- LASKEY
- Why--
- SORIANO
- Well, I didn't know--
- LASKEY
- Oh, oh, oh.
- SORIANO
- — which one, but I wanted to study. I wanted to go to the university and
I said composition, and maybe [in] architecture, I had possibility. Then
I was still sending money home to my parents. Right from the first
moment I came to America. Because I start working at the age of
fourteen. I used to give my mother the whole — everything I earned. And
then I used to ask her, "Can I have a soloo [Italian penny] — like one
cent to buy chocolate?" Remember, I made the money for the whole family
and I had to ask my mother. I mean, this is the way we were brought up.
But that's where my nature, see? I gave it to my mother and I asked my
mother to give me —
- LASKEY
- To give it to you.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. And this is the whole thing. And then I — didn't know. I wanted to
learn something and I knew Rhodes was awful. I came to America and this
[is] what I wanted to do. So, and all the credentials I have is some
certificates from the College Saint- Jean-Baptiste, the Christian
brothers. And that wasn't recognized by the college.
- LASKEY
- By ' SC [University of Southern California]?
- SORIANO
- Yeah. They didn't recognize it. The director of this coaching school,
and there was a professor of chemistry [Mr. Driscoll], just took such a
liking to me. They used to invite me, all the holidays, to their house,
and they really were very gracious, really. And then he took me to USC,
[to] the dean of the school, the coaching school. Mr. Driscoll, I
believe was his name. I forgot his name. I'm not so sure yet. [Arthur
Weatherhead]
- LASKEY
- Okay.
- SORIANO
- And then he took me there and he told them I was conversant in languages
and also how well I was conversant in arithmetic also. And they said
then — I forgot who it was, the admissions then--he said, "Well, can you
pass an exam on this two things?" He said, "Well, sure." I took the
exams. They gave me junior mathematics and I passed it [snaps fingers]
like this. And then they gave me languages also.
- LASKEY
- No problem with languages.
- SORIANO
- So I was admitted, provided I stay in school with a B average, which I
did. And that's how I was admitted.
- LASKEY
- Were you there on a scholarship since ' SC was very expensive, or is
very expensive?
- SORIANO
- No, no, no. I was paying my way.
- LASKEY
- How did you do that?
- SORIANO
- It was difficult. At the end of the month I couldn't hardly save and I
met, in the fruit stand on Fifth and Hill, a Dr. [Rene] Belle. I think
Esther [McCoy] mentions that, but she doesn't- -I don't think she
understood. She's confused a little bit of the statements I made.
Professor Belle was the dean of the school of French- -Department of
French at USC. He came in from a concert from the Philharmonic
Auditorium, around the corner from the fruit stand where I was working,
you know.
- LASKEY
- It's not there anymore.
- SORIANO
- I don't know where it is. It was right there. It was the only concert
auditorium. And in fact, that's where I saw [Richard J.] Neutra and
Frank Lloyd Wright. I met them there, both of them, giving lectures one
after the other, yeah, in that little auditorium--Philharmonic
Auditorium. And so he came to buy some fruits from me and we both had
accents. And we started talking; exchanging some thoughts. And he said,
"What are you doing here?" I said, "I'm a student at USC." "Oh, I'm a
French professor." And so immediately we were exchanging courtesies and
he asked me to come and visit him and I did. And he had a charming wife,
Gertrude. We became very good friends, all of us. We discussed music and
all that for the first time. I said, "Oh my god, I had finally a
friend." Because at school, I brought in my Victrola when I went to USC.
I was playing Bach [on] one of those crank cases.
- LASKEY
- You took it with you onto the campus?
- SORIANO
- Yes. I took it then to listen to Bach while I would draw and all that.
And the students used to say — the boys particularly — "Oh, cut that
stuff, Soriano!" [laughter]
- LASKEY
- Did they really?
- SORIANO
- Yes. And then when we used to take life drawing. I had that playing
while the model was being drawn, you know. They usually were European
models that were either French or German or Italian girls. And they were
very, sort of, sophisticated. They loved the beautiful music.
- LASKEY
- Of course.
- SORIANO
- And of course they loved that. And the American girls, the coeds were
wonderful. They were sensitive. They loved this good music. The boys
hated it: "Oh, Soriano! Cut that music!" And the girls used to say, "Oh,
no! We like that." And the model said, "I'm not going to pose unless Mr.
Soriano plays his music."
- SORIANO
- And that's the way —
- LASKEY
- That's great.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. This is the way-- This is true. And this was in Paul Semple's
office. Paul Semple was the professor of painting which we all had to
take courses in: life drawing and painting.
- LASKEY
- When you were taking-- As part of the architecture curriculum?
- SORIANO
- At USC, yes, yes, yes. It was in the old little building which was the
music building afterwards.
- LASKEY
- Well, why — just to backtrack just a second--how did you happen to
settle upon architecture rather than composing?
- SORIANO
- I'll tell you why. I had to send home money every month. I was
reflecting: composition is hardly any-- You don't make money. I
discussed this with-- I forgot now. Oh, yes. I met a violinist at the
fruit stand, curiously enough; a friend of [Arturo] Toscanini. He was a
violinist from [the] Chicago Symphony Orchestra. And he used to tell me
"Se vuol trovare Parini, cercate Toscanini." "If you like to find
Parini, look for Toscanini." Now, this just came into my mind; I
remember distinctly. We became very good friends. I still have some of
his letters he used to write to me from Chicago. And was a violinist.
Charming person. I made so many, many friends over there.
- LASKEY
- Now, you were working? That's how you earned your money? Working in the
fruit stand —
- SORIANO
- Yes. Working in the fruit stand. Absolutely.
- LASKEY
- --on Fifth and Hill?
- SORIANO
- Yeah. And also, I worked in Grand Central Market. And then I graduated
to Fifth and Hill. And so then discussing that, and he said, "Ah,
compositioning--" I remember him telling me, he says, "You can't. Even
violinist is kind of hard." So then I decided something more practical.
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- And so I was then illustrating also, part-time with the zoology
department, some foraminifera, which were the sediment from the
Galapagos Islands where the [John Allan] Hancock expedition in Los
Angeles — You remember Hancock —
- LASKEY
- Oh, yes, yes. The Hancock Hall.
- SORIANO
- — where they used to bring all the sediment from the Galapagos Islands
from his--with his boat--to USC, to the zoology department for analysis.
And I made all these drawings which are in this Smithsonian Institution.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- I may have several thousand drawings there, or hundreds, I don't know,
which they-- Dr. [Irene] McCulloch, I believe. She was a very lovely,
tall, zoologist. She took a liking to me so I used to do all the
drawings for her through the microscope, from a little sand pinpoint.
- LASKEY
- Oh my goodness.
- SORIANO
- And I still draw the ventral and dorsal in pencil. Yeah. I still have
some drawings so they are-- they'll come in my book. And so then I used
to earn some money doing that. And I told her what I wanted to do and I
was already admitted at USC. Then she took me to the dean of the school
of architecture herself. And so I remember it was Dean Weatherhead, a
very strange man. And he said, "Oh, you have a nice name," and this and
that. [laughter] "But you don't make money in architecture. You have to
have a rich man, or inherit money, to make money." That's the first
thing he told me. Anyway, finally, I settled down. I wanted to study
architecture; I did. And of course, having met my friend Belle, Dr.
Belle, he used to co-sign for me for every semester to--
- LASKEY
- For the fees?
- SORIANO
- For the fees. It was expensive. And I was always behind the eight ball,
always in debt.
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- And I remember when I graduated my diploma was folded in two, three
inches--fold that still shows [on] my diploma — and that's where at the
end behind those things you won't even see — where they kept it in the
vault until I paid. And I paid it after I had an accident, years ago, in
1937. Imagine that. I graduated in '34. And they were trying to fail me
because I wasn't talented. The first year I got--
- LASKEY
- Because you weren't talented?
- SORIANO
- Yeah, that's what the dean told me.
- LASKEY
- Why — How did he come to that?
- SORIANO
- Well, here, let me tell you. The first year I did very well. I had first
mention, first place, first. In other words, I had first mentions, the
best that they can give you because we used to make the [architectural]
orders. In other words, we used to draw Corinthian, the Ionic columns,
and all the orders. And anybody with a little dedication and a little
dexterity could do them, and I did them very well. But the second year
we started getting problems. They gave us the design of a little bank or
a little, whatever, a little small building. And I used to try to design
them in my own concept of what architecture should be rather than copy.
They used to tell us to design it in English or in French [style], and I
refused to do it. I used to say, "What is a style? That doesn't mean
anything . "
- LASKEY
- You started talking a little earlier and I interrupted you on the
curriculum, and as I gather, it was strictly a Beaux Arts —
- SORIANO
- Oh, yes.
- LASKEY
- --curriculum, very classical.
- SORIANO
- They used to give you the thing and a sheet of paper, eight [inches] by
ten. Beaux Arts style, and they used to prescribe the style: do it in
English or do it in Spanish. Do it in whatever. They thought-- And I
used to question that. And I refused to do it. Then, who am I? A punk
student. Now, I used to read a lot of French books also. And talking
with Belle, Rene Belle, he used to clarify and give me more courage of
my beliefs. And he used to give me some very interesting things of
Alain, the French professor at the Sorbonne who was a very, very great
thinker. And then, besides that, I, reading the French books that I had,
I used to correspond with Romain Rolland. You know who Romain Rolland
was?
- LASKEY
- No, I don't.
- SORIANO
- You know Thomas Mann?
- LASKEY
- Yes.
- SORIANO
- Well, you should know Romain Rolland. You see, you Americans don't know.
- LASKEY
- Don't know.
- SORIANO
- Romain Rolland, the stature of that man is one hundred stories or more
higher than Thomas Mann in stature and depth of thinking. He wrote so
many, many books. And I corresponded with him and he answered me. He
sent me two photographs and also some letters that I have which will be
in my book. Now, he wrote the Life of
Beethoven, Beethoven and Goethe,
Beethoven the Creator. He wrote three
lives on Beethoven. He wrote the Life of
Gandhi, one of the most beautiful life you could imagine. He
wrote the Life of Michelangelo.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- He wrote many, many lives — That's how-- This is the tragedy of our
school. Unless it is Germanic or English, you have no idea what are the
literary geniuses that occurred in our society. And Romain Rolland's one
of the greatest things that ever happened in our century. He's known all
over the world. He's been translated in all the languages in the world.
But our schools--they're all ignorant. You know, an interesting thing
happened. I was in London. I spoke to the Royal Institute of British
Architects and I gave another lecture to the architecture consultants or
some such thing. And then I talk of the music of [Edgard] Varese because
I always, in my lecture, I use music and I use other things. And there
was — I mentioned Varese — immediately there was one man in the
audience, one architect, he said, "Oh, Mr. Soriano, that's wonderful!
I'm glad you mentioned Varese." "Well, I'm delighted for you. For the
first time I heard somebody that knows Varese." Most people, they don't
know. They know the pop records, they know junky, but they don't know
Varese, the great master. Really. That's that man over there. Yeah. That
photograph you see next —
- LASKEY
- Oh, really?
- SORIANO
- The one above. See?
- LASKEY
- Yes.
- SORIANO
- That black and white.
- LASKEY
- Varese?
- SORIANO
- That's Edgard Varese. He was the modern composer of our century. Yep.
Yep. Now, he used to live in that same row of houses I told you, on that
street where Tom-- Man Ray, you know, the photographer?
- LASKEY
- Man Ray, yes.
- SORIANO
- Varese, Knud Merrild, [Agnes] Varda, and Charlie Chaplin; all these were
in the same, in the one whole long street around that area in Hollywood.
Yeah. And I was there, you see, right in there. And I was very good
friends with Man Ray. In fact, Man Ray did two portraits of me.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yes. This will be in my book.
- LASKEY
- That's very impressive.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. And we had marvelous evenings, marvelous discussions with these
people.
- LASKEY
- I imagine that the conversation must have been on a rather high plane.
- SORIANO
- It was. It was more international, more exciting. And instead of all
this boorish junk of these people — When I look at, really, the
convention we had in 1958 in June in San Francisco--in 1985, I mean,
instead of '58--for the American Institute of Architects, I tell you, it
' s enough to absolutely disturb anybody who has any sensitivities. The
low quality, the debasing type of nonsense — professional people,
architects, to resort to these banalities! God! Awful! No wonder nobody
respects the profession. Really we bring it upon ourselves, that.
- LASKEY
- Oh, absolutely.
- SORIANO
- But anyway — What was I telling you? I don't know, I forgot.
- LASKEY
- We were talking about 'SC, the Beaux Arts school and the —
- SORIANO
- Oh yeah, the Beaux Arts. And then I--I just finally, I used to question
my teachers. "Oh, Soriano, you make me sick." Because I used to ask,
"But why this? Why that?" "What's the style?" I said, "I don't
understand what an English style is or Spanish style. Is it the tile
roofs or what? What is this? This is purely a mannerism which I don't
think this is architecture--" I used to question that and earn enmity.
"Well, you're a student; you have to learn." I said, "Well, I can think,
too." I used to question them. And, of course, I was in complete
isolation. I used to get nothing but D's, failing.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yes. They wanted for me to quit. The dean said, "We won't let you
graduate. You're not talented. Maybe you'll be better off if you open up
a fruit stand." That's what the dean- -the same dean who told me I had a
beautiful name and this and that, and that I was getting beautiful
awards in the first year, you see: first mention, place first. But the
second year they made my life miserable.
- LASKEY
- And that was because of your ideas?
- SORIANO
- That's right. Because I questioned them. Then, Paul Semple, the painter
whose--where we used to take life drawing, he sort of began to realize
the music-- All he knew is this fellow Tchaikovsky. [laughter] Beyond
that, he didn't know any music. And I used to try to tell him that there
were more. There were some others, Scarlatti, there were other-- There
were all the Couperins, Rameau, the French wonderful composers, and a
few others of the past centuries, and some lovely folklores. And he
wanted- - he was very eager to learn more. He said, "Will you-- You come
over here and just bring your table here. You do the work in here, in my
office, and you can play the music. It's all right." So I did. And I
wasn't taking a single course from any of the professors from sophomore
on.
- LASKEY
- From —
- SORIANO
- The sophomore year on.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- How did —
- SORIANO
- Nothing .
- LASKEY
- How did you do that?
- SORIANO
- Well, I graduated, I said, in French literature — in architecture and
French literature, I tell that. I graduated in architecture and French
literature because I was taking — I used to tell Belle, my friend, I say
what they were doing to me. He says, "Don't worry." He says, "You need
to take electives. Come and take some French classes. You don't even
have to attend class. You know already French. You'll get straight A's.
You got so many grade points to compensate your main subject." The other
subjects I could get C's average at least. But in architecture they were
purposely failing me, giving me D's so I won't graduate. And so I, from
year to year, I fooled them. [laughter] And the dean used to say, "Are
you still here?" [laughter] Like that's what happened. So help me . That
' s what happened .
- LASKEY
- Did they really?
- SORIANO
- This is the true story I'm telling you; not a word romanticized or lied
or fantasized.
- LASKEY
- Well, how did you feel about that? I mean, wasn't it very difficult to
continue to go on?
- SORIANO
- It was difficult, it was difficult. But somehow I have a tenacity and
stubbornness in my knowledge, somehow, even though I'm ignorant. Or
maybe stubbornness in my ignorance , I don ' t know . But somehow I know
what I know and what I feel, and what I know, it was right. And to this
day I can tell you I'm right, by golly, and that's true. I have this
kind of assurance when I see something, and I know when it's not right.
I can tell it to you, too. And if I make an error, I will tell you. I
will be the first one to admit it. I have this kind of assurance. People
who know me know that, so people who do not know me misunderstand me.
They think, "Oh, well, opinionated this and that." That's okay, I don't
care. [tape recorder off]
- LASKEY
- But eventually, then, they did graduate you?
- SORIANO
- Well, I graduated in spite of themselves and contrary to what they
thought I would do. They didn't know that I was getting these extra
grade points. They couldn't say no because I did make--I took electives.
I was within the law. And even though I got a D in my major subject, but
I — in the final analysis I got C average so I could graduate; and I
did. That was in 1934. Now, I'll tell you an interesting story
pertaining to that. A few years ago I was teaching at Pomona State
University [California State Polytechnic University, Pomona]. There was
there a Professor Chilynski, Richard Chilynski. When I lectured, he
asked me to come in, the president of the university- -wanted to see me,
in Pomona. And I went, and then he [Chilynsky] told him. He said, "Well
now, Mr. Soriano doesn't know this," he said to him [the president]. He
said, "I want to tell you something very interesting now. I went to USC
to enroll to the College of Architecture and then I talked to the dean."
It was the same dean, Dean Weatherhead, and he, after interviewing with
him [Chilynsky] , he told him that he was not talented; he would not
make a good architect. He had this kind of attitude. This man, he will
tell you yes or no. He's on judgment without understanding what-- He
said, "No, we discouraged him." So he came out of the door of the dean's
room very distraught. And then in the patio was a professor; his name
was [Clayton M.] Baldwin.
- LASKEY
- Baldwin?
- SORIANO
- Baldwin. We used to call him Baldy. Now, Baldwin was the only professor
that was very charming, very lovely; more humane than the others.
Baldwin would never tell me not — all that. He would never cut me. He
was a very gracious person, really. And he saw this Chilynski at the
door with a face dejected. He said, "What's the matter?" Well, he told
him the story that he wanted to study architecture; the dean said no. He
said, "Come to my office. I'll tell you a story." So he told him. He
said, "There was a young man by the name of Raphael Soriano few years
before you, and he told him the same thing. Look at him now. He's this
very famous architect." And he told that to the president of Pomona
State University. Yeah, and that was maybe four, five years ago,
something like that. I didn't even know that this thing happened to him,
too.
- LASKEY
- That's very interesting.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. And he's an architect. He's one of the best teachers we have in
Pomona there; excellent man. Perfect. You see? How they can destroy you
with some of these complete arbitrary decisions by one man.
- LASKEY
- Oh, absolutely.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. Well, this is what happens in our universities today with all
these teachers who are destroying these lovely mentalities of the kids.
Again, in Pomona, last year I think it was, I gave a criticism to one of
the classes. There was a black girl over there, and I was criticizing
her problem, or somebody else's problem, and I mentioned why [I said]
these things. And I said, "Well, I won't let the professors-- They
shouldn't have let the kids go that far without guiding them properly in
this." She jumped up, "Why doesn't anybody-- Why don't we have teachers
like that to tell us these things? I'm so glad you did this!" She
started shouting and telling me — [laughter] I don't know if the faculty
liked it, not when-- I'm sure the reverberations went through.
- LASKEY
- I'm sure.
- SORIANO
- And then when I used to go into the class criticizing, everybody used to
come there. They used to fill the room. They wanted to hear me talk and
blast. And yet there were other students who were static- -doing all
this postmodern garbage. They thought they really were doing great. And
in fact, they used to be very insolent. And I said, "Well, I don't think
this is the direction of architecture." "Well, that's your opinion!"
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yeah. One girl, second-year girl, told me that last year. And I said,
"Yes, it's a fifty-year-old opinion versus two years of yours, yes?" And
I said, "You're a bit insolent, aren't you?" I just tell her that. And
of course she was a little red in the face. She tried to talk and all
the professors stopped her. And then she tried to bring me a little cup
of juice or something afterwards to make up so that — Well, that's
nothing. Even three, four years before that there was a student- -I
think it was either a senior or a graduate student- -we were discussing
that. Then some of the professors were taking his side. They were
arguing contrary to what I said, which is all right .
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- This was in the class —
- SORIANO
- In the class.
- LASKEY
- — on criticism?
- SORIANO
- Yeah, on criticism. We were criticizing the project of someone — I was
philosophically telling him why I thought this is not. And we were
talking about the arts, you know, and why all this artiness, all this
personal expression is disastrous. And, of course, the teacher's
offended. That was his own teaching, you see, that I hit.
- LASKEY
- Well, if it was dealing with postmodernism, if he's a postmodernist, of
course it would be--
- SORIANO
- It would be —
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- Of course, he would be gored with that and will have to fight. And said,
"Well, Mr. Soriano," this and that and the other. And of course that
student was probably aware I was giving some comments. Again, he said,
"Well, it's your opinion." I said, "Well, yes, that's my opinion. Then
why did you come here for? What do you come to school for? Since you
have an opinion, I have an opinion, there's no point of discussing
anything, is there?" Like that. Of course, he could not answer that one.
And this is the tragedy. You see, we spoil them by just making it,
"Well, do whatever you want." I played a tape in some of my lectures
when they- -public lectures that I give — of Casals, Pablo Casals,
recorded, which I did, when he was giving master classes.
- LASKEY
- You attended them?
- SORIANO
- At USC. And he said — he was telling the students, "No, it's not — it's
not allegretto, no. It's not playful. It's a big thing about Bach," he
said. "Big thing." And then he lowers his voice and he says, "No, you
don't do what you want. No, no, no. You do what's there. You don't do
what I want. No. You don't do what you want, no. Everything must have
order, must have logic." That's in his own words. And I played this many
times in universities when I lectured. I said, "Look, listen to what
other people have to say." Then I have Ravi Shankar, a friend of mine,
too. See the picture there? The corner.
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- Yep. I have some tapes of his where he says almost the same thing. He
says, we, the American public must not think of Indian music as akin to
jazz or romantic or this or all these adjectives. No, it's nothing but
descending and ascending scales, with tensions and whatever, which are
microtones, you see. Those are beautiful things. This [is] why I used to
criticize [Arnold] Schoenberg for. He made a cult of the twelve-tone
scale which is nonsense. Yeah. I had discussions with his star student,
Adolph Weiss, in Los Angeles where I had a big polemics with him. And I
said, "This is nonsense, twelve-tone. My god, the Italians in the early
centuries, they used to play with twenty- five tones. Yeah. Sixteen
tones, all these tones; they never made a cult out of this. This is
microtone. That's what they are; they're microtones. They're vibrations
— da-da- da-da. That's their tones, big tones." I said, "The Indians do
that. These microtones that they use, not twelve tones. It's just
vibrations — dee-dee-dee-dee. And according to whether you tune or no, "
I said, "to make a big to-do about this is silly. The important thing is
what are you structuring, isn't it?" That's the thing; yeah. And most
people don ' t understand that . And so that ' s why I bring music, I
bring ballet, I bring all those things for them to understand; and it
does work. They understand it! I'll tell you an interesting experience
that happened to me. I was lecturing at Technion in Haifa in Israel
about three years ago, four years ago, and they promised they were going
to bring me a video player. And somehow they couldn't get it. Over there
is strange place, you know, where they have to hide and something.
Apparently, the technicians were not paid; therefore, they promised to
bring it- -they wanted to get paid until they brought the things. So
finally, they didn't bring this and therefore, I didn't play. This
Natalia Makarova, I had a pas de deux I was going to show which I take
her all over the world; it's an eight-minute ditty, this very beautiful
thing to show. Yes. I've shown her all over the world. And so the
students were so astute. I said, "Well, unless we find some place where
I can show you this, because it's too bad you don ' t get the experience
to see what I ' m trying to show you in here that will clarify this
more." So finally the American consulate in Tel Aviv had about twenty of
those video players with televisions. This is how we are, you know. We
are marvelous. The USA's a glorious country, really. We have everything.
- LASKEY
- Twenty- five.
- SORIANO
- Yes. And here, so finally, we arranged the — that the consulate will see
that, and I gave them this part of the lecture in the United States
consulate in Tel Aviv.
- LASKEY
- That's great.
- SORIANO
- And the lady, the librarian, even brought me another tape of ballet
which helped also to show what not to do. Yeah. And the students came to
me afterwards and said, "Now we got it; we got it — seeing that." You
see? Because it's kind of hard to talk about architecture in the realms
that I talk because I gore most of the people ' s so- called
pseudo-beliefs, sort of the, you know, nostalgic beliefs that they have.
They don't like to hear that. They get hurt. They think they were — Like
religion, you know. They just are stuck in an area of their thought and
beyond, and if you attack that, you know, you're attacking something
very serious. And instead of being objective, I was talking about
something else and the idea of thought which transcends all kinds of
personal things. And so for that reason I show all these different
devices for them — for the students to understand and my colleagues to
understand. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Do you feel that you're successful in convincing your students--?
- SORIANO
- Yes , very .
- LASKEY
- — in your —
- SORIANO
- Very, very, very. Not all of them, certainly. The ones I convince, I
convinced them very, very beautifully. And there are many of them who
will never be convinced . I had one, another experience, one of the
universities — I was talking about the Beatles, how the Beatles were not
producing anything. "They're just lulling all you kids into all this
fake sex acts. Could you escape [from] that to experience?" I said, "You
get it through this jumping around and, you know, things just like that
instead of going to it. Go to the girl; love her, kiss her, hug her."
And then I said, "The Beatles are not because they have been
plagiarizing Bach and a lot of other composers." I said, "These are not
original composers, contrary to what you people think . " And I showed
them how where they take a piece of Bach, a piece of that, a piece of
the other. I have tapes of that.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yeah. Now, maybe the history should invite me to lecture; they'll hear
something —
1.3. TAPE NUMBER: II, SIDE ONE (JULY 19, 1985)
- SORIANO
- You asked me whether I convince some of the students. Well, I certainly
do. I'll share an interesting story. The reason I brought this thing
here-- You don't know what that is.
- LASKEY
- No, I don't know what it is. It's a large —
- SORIANO
- It's a valve. It's a piston valve of an airplane.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- This is the thing that, with those propeller airplanes, that lifts you
up. This is a piston.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Look how beautiful and precise that is.
- LASKEY
- It is indeed —
- SORIANO
- And this, from here to there —
- LASKEY
- Like a sculpture.
- SORIANO
- Forget it. Don't call it that because I get offended about that. I'm
just joking now but it's true. Many people say a sculpture. I think it's
silly; it's not [a sculpture]. It's a working element of a motor to take
you up with a plane. It's nothing to do with sculpturing. This is
inside--it is hollow. It has sodium in it to keep it cool. So when this
thing goes up and down to lift you up when you go up in the plane, those
piston, the propellers —
- LASKEY
- Yes.
- SORIANO
- This is the thing that works. [makes sound of engine] And actually, this
gets hot, but the sodium inside — But you see the precision to make
this? Look how beautifully done.
- LASKEY
- Absolutely.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. Now, I'll show you why I show you that. I gave a lecture to the
American Institute of Architects, to the practicing architects. These
were all practicing architects, not students. There were one or two
sprinklings, young students yet. But most of us — This lecture I gave in
Los Angeles to the practicing architects. After the lecture, it was--
No, first, during the lecture, there was this Garret Eckbo, you know,
the landscape man.
- LASKEY
- What's the name?
- SORIANO
- Garret Eckbo. Doesn't mean anything. Anyway, he calls me, "You're a
philistine!" and he walks away.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- During the- -yeah- -during the lecture. Stupid. Yeah. I mean, he has an
idea — I'll tell you, I have other reasons for that. But anyway — So
after I lectured, there was very polite applause, that's about all. "Are
there any questions?" None. I said to myself, "God!" I stopped at the
Knickerbocker Hotel, Hollywood Knickerbocker-- Is it still there? I
don't know.
- LASKEY
- I don't think so. I'm not sure.
- SORIANO
- That used to be the hotel of all the movie crowd.
- LASKEY
- The Roosevelt is being remodeled, but I'm not sure — I think the
Knickerbocker is —
- SORIANO
- Yeah, but the Hollywood Knickerbocker used to be the hotel.
- LASKEY
- Yeah, I think it's —
- SORIANO
- Used to be all electric, heaters for the guest rooms .
- LASKEY
- — apartments or something now.
- SORIANO
- Yes. Used to be very first — Beautiful hotel. And I loved to stop there
because they had electric heaters. No gas or anything like the old
furnaces, and it was centrally located. And I was sort of distraught
after that evening, you know. I came to the hotel and I said, "What did
I do? Did I make a mess of my lecture? Didn't I say something--" In my
heart, I knew I did--speak beautifully and I gave a beautiful lecture.
In the morning, around nine o'clock, the telephone rings; a young
architect who was in my lecture. He said, "Mr. Soriano, I was at your
lecture last night. May I come to talk to you, please?" I said, "Well,
of course." And so he brings me this valve.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- And he says, "This is designed by a friend of mine who works for the
aircraft industry, designed these things." And he gave it to me. "But I
want to give it to you in token of my esteem and appreciation. I've
heard you almost nine times and you are more right every time." Now,
that's it. That's why I show you this valve. See? Now, this is a true
story. And at least it encouraged me. I told him what this guy says.
"Oh, well, you — Don't you know they are old fossils." He said that.
[laughter] And at least he gave me a little courage, you know, to see,
well, at least maybe I wasn't all bad.
- LASKEY
- Yeah. Some of your message got through.
- SORIANO
- Yes. At least I had one. [laughs]
- LASKEY
- But I would think that you would get a lot of out- and-out battles- -
- SORIANO
- Oh, yes.
- LASKEY
- — when you talk about, you know, take out the sculptural aspect or the
artistic aspect- -
- SORIANO
- Ooooooh, yes.
- LASKEY
- — of when you dismiss painting and sculpture- -
- SORIANO
- Absolutely.
- LASKEY
- — that you touch a lot of —
- SORIANO
- Guts —
- LASKEY
- --nerves. [laughter]
- SORIANO
- I destroy a lot of guts, yes. As a matter of fact, I'll give you two
instances: One is, I remember distinctly, one girl asking me, "Mr.
Soriano, don't you like anything?" [laughter] And I said, "On the
contrary, I like lots of things." And then a student-- Very recently, a
couple of years ago in one of the colleges, I was talking about the
Beatles. I said, "You shouldn't listen to that because it doesn't mean
anything; I'll show you of all the things, where things were taken out."
And "Why don't you listen to the real thing instead of all this rehash,
junk? Because all you are enamored with all these words which mean
nothing, you think you are part of that culture? Forget that! Be
yourselves. You're part of the universe; it's a greater culture than the
cults of your own peers." I tell them that. And one boy, "No, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no. No, Mr. Soriano, " like that and started jumping —
"No, I wanted-- No, no, no. I want an answer right now!" and he started
telling me-- And I said, "Will you please listen to the end of this-
-beginning of that musical thing what I will do? And then you'll see
what I'm trying to develop; therefore, you to understand. Then we can
talk, yes? There will be a question period, too." He sat down. Again, he
couldn't stand five more minutes. Again, he was sort of --so gored, he
said, "No, I want an answer right now! Right now! Right now!" Just like
that.
- LASKEY
- So upset?
- SORIANO
- Yeah, he was so upset. I said, "Well," I tried to explain to him.
Finally, he kept challenging me. "No, this is a different thing. You
don't understand it." I said, "Oh, shut up and sit down and learn
something!" And then the president of the university was in the audience
and shook my hand and said, "I'm so glad you told him that because none
of the professors tell them anything. They'll let them do what they want
. "
- LASKEY
- Yes.
- SORIANO
- This is the tragedy. Anyway, so this is the way it was. I mean, I have
many, many incidents like that. Many of them call me pristine; they call
me communist; they call me-- You name it, I have been called.
- LASKEY
- Well, that's — It's touching on something very vital with the art. How
did you come to that conclusion? I mean, I think that's rather a unique
perspective.
- SORIANO
- Yes. It is. That's why I'm different than most of my colleagues. That's
why I didn't like for Esther [McCoy] to write a book with the three
others which are totally the opposite of my thinking. I once was going
to be with Konrad Wachsmann and myself, and all of a sudden she changed
it to this, without telling me.
- LASKEY
- I'm going to just mention the book we're talking about .
- SORIANO
- Yes.
- LASKEY
-
The Second Generation.
- SORIANO
-
The Second Generation.
- LASKEY
- And It's interesting because it deals with [J. R.] Davidson, [Gregory]
Ain, [Harwell Hamilton] Harris, and yourself, and Wachsmann isn't even
in it--
- SORIANO
- No, because she was going- -
- LASKEY
- — which is sort of interesting.
- SORIANO
- Yes. She was going to have me and Wachsmann only; two of us. And that's
why I said, "At least tell me," because I didn't want to be with the
other four, the other three, because I don't think they come up to my
thinking, or at least they don't represent what I think my generation, I
mean, they really should be.
- LASKEY
- But you were all--
- SORIANO
- Contemporaries .
- LASKEY
- --colleagues, weren't you?
- SORIANO
- I know. But that still doesn't mean anything. I have a lot of students
were my colleagues from USC [University of Southern California], too.
Many of them have done Spanish haciendas. And what is Harris doing? I
don't understand that what Harris has done. Nothing but imitation of
Frank Lloyd Wright. And if you hear him talk you will see — I don't
think he says much of anything of, in my estimation. And Gregory Ain,
what — ? They talk about nothing, really. What is Gregory Ain? What has
he contributed? Nothing, really, except imitation of [Rudolph M.]
Schindler and [Richard J.] Neutra, badly, badly. He didn't have the
comprehension of any of those. And Davidson, even I call Davidson a sort
of — He lost his virility. In other words, he wasn't fertile.
- LASKEY
- Oh.
- SORIANO
- When you look at his architecture, it's very flat, very meaningless. To
me it doesn't represent anything. It looks, so-called, the type of the
language [it] was in the thirties, but in reality [it] isn't. It's sort
of half-baked or somebody timid. In other words, that was the statement
by a timid man. I call him that--it would be excellent. A timid
statement; perfect. Here, I'll show you. I'll show you why. Because
Davidson begins [the book], doesn't it?
- LASKEY
- Yes.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, so-- [turns pages] Yeah. When you look at all of this-- You see,
that's Davidson, isn't it? Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- So what is this? What has it done here that Neutra hasn't done better
ten times, hundred times? Imitations of Neutra, badly. See? This kind of
a things. And complicated even in plan. I wouldn't do things like that —
all of these angles and all. That's not architecture. That's another
interesting lecture from me.
- LASKEY
- Oh, really? On planning? Laying plans?
- SORIANO
- Yes. I said that they're all —
- LASKEY
- Well, your plans were always models of simplicity.
- SORIANO
- They — I'll show you more you'll see. Like this. So what? All of these
things are nothing, really. They're not real things. They are — They
look like — It's just like somebody imitating Bach, without being Bach.
You know what I mean?
- LASKEY
- I know what you mean.
- SORIANO
- Uh-huh. [turns page] And —
- LASKEY
- But it was very —
- SORIANO
- Well, it's simple —
- LASKEY
- — the International, in what they — very much the International Style —
- SORIANO
- Yeah, which I hate: I hate that name. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- The quintessential — The white, flat surfaces.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, but to me that's not architecture. It is more than just surfaces,
more [than] the styles. It represents a different type of thing. It's
the thinking; it's the structuring of all the totality of the elements
in the unified concept which is not — And here you find little bits of
this, little bits of that, which, here — Maybe on this. You know, they —
Really, look at the plans. This, to me, is not architecture, you see.
Casals said, "I do anything I like, no." [laughter] See? "I do this,
no?" So what? I can do that work and do that way — so what? But to
conceive the thinking — Proper structure is difficult, and beautiful.
This — anybody could do that. You could do it. Sure!
- LASKEY
- Not me.
- SORIANO
- Sure you could. [turns page] This is what happens. You see, we can do
these things, look. I don't know how much of that goes on.
- LASKEY
- That's Harris.
- SORIANO
- That's Harwell Harris, yeah.
- LASKEY
- Well, now, his style —
- SORIANO
- Is very, very much —
- LASKEY
- Harris's style was quite different from yours —
- SORIANO
- Frank Lloyd Wright.
- LASKEY
- — in that it was much wood —
- SORIANO
- Frank Lloyd Wright.
- LASKEY
- — wood surfaces. That's the [John] Entenza House, isn't it?
- SORIANO
- Now, look, all these — Yeah. So are the worst house .
- LASKEY
- But that's unusual for-- That's an unusual house for Harris, too.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, because he wanted to be modern, yeah.
- LASKEY
- Yeah, I think he —
- SORIANO
- But I think Harris is very Frank Lloyd Wrightish, and I heard him
lecture a couple of times. He was pointing all these abstract things-
-pointing that way, the roof, because you can "see the sky" and all this
— all these exaggerated .
- LASKEY
- Well, I see more-- He seems to be somewhat more influenced by the
Japanese, too —
- SORIANO
- Yeah--
- LASKEY
- --use a lot of wood and —
- SORIANO
- Darling, I was in Japan and Tokyo many times. I lectured to them. Not
all Japanese is good. And some of the things they do are lovely, yes.
But I don't think Harris is as Japanesey at all. It's more or less bad
Frank Lloyd Wright. Yeah. Trying to be Frank Lloyd Wright. [turns page]
All this sculptural attitude, you see?
- LASKEY
- That's very Wrightian, yeah.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. All these things. You see, that, to me-- I don't know.
- LASKEY
- Well, of course, that is the — That's the Louis Sullivan Building.
- SORIANO
- And then Gregory Ain. He goes with this, so, all right. Okay. All right.
So? [turns pages] So? He worked for-- This [Rudolph] Schindleresque, you
see? He worked for — See all of that? Cut out into this little--
- LASKEY
- Schindler did that?
- SORIANO
- Yes. You see, this is, again, imitations of that. I imitated Neutra in
the beginning, certainly. And then immediately I realized no, that's not
it. And I went beyond that. And Neutra 's youngest son, Raymond, told me
something very interesting. He came to see me after I gave that lecture
at USC, I believe it was, with his wife. He came, "Raphael, you did what
my father wanted to do and never did it. "
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yes .
- LASKEY
- Well, that must have been quite a compliment for you to get.
- SORIANO
- That's right. And I was terribly touched by this statement. And it's
true. I really went beyond. In fact, I used to criticize Neutra. I
admired Neutra very much because Neutra was really great.
- LASKEY
- When did you know Neutra or work with him?
- SORIANO
- When I was a student.
- LASKEY
- It's while you were still a student?
- SORIANO
- Maybe '28 — something; '28, '29, '30. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- And you worked on the Rush City project?
- SORIANO
- Yes. That's all. For a few months I was there, just-- And then Schindler
called me, as I told you. And then I went to Schindler. Then I couldn't
stand Schindler.
- LASKEY
- You couldn't stand Schindler [his work]?
- SORIANO
- Because —
- LASKEY
- The way he worked, or his —
- SORIANO
- It was charming the way he worked, yes. No, personally I liked him. He
was charming; very nice, gracious man. Always a smile. Yes. But he had
something very strange. He used to leave me with a little-- [ sketches]
Little sketches like that.
- LASKEY
- What is that?
- SORIANO
- I don't know. [laughter] Now, for me to develop-- And then he used to go
to his jobs and never come back. And I used to try to solve the problem
in my own way. "Ah, too functional, too functional," he used to tell me.
- LASKEY
- He thought it was too functional?
- SORIANO
- Yes .
- LASKEY
- I'm surprised.
- SORIANO
- What I did. Because, you see, his was very personal, very sculptural.
- LASKEY
- Well, that's true.
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- That's true.
- SORIANO
- And I was just the opposite. I wanted to structure the thing
objectively, not sculptural. I was one to see the logic of the thing,
how the thing goes together, even though I was ignorant; I didn't know
much of anything. So finally, I told him, I said, "Look, I don't think I
will serve you, not that I could be of use to you, not that I learned
anything from your way." I said, "I don't think it's best," so I quit.
That way we part. I did.
- LASKEY
- So you developed your theories then, really, very early.
- SORIANO
- That's correct. I did my first house in 1934. That was the- -my love's
[Helen Lipetz] house. Yeah. A pianist.
- LASKEY
- The [Manny] Lipetz House?
- SORIANO
- Yes .
- LASKEY
- That's an interesting story.
- SORIANO
- Very few know that.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yeah. She used to play Bach, Scarlatti, Rameau, Couperin. She was a
fantastic pianist. Yeah. She had a Bechstein piano there.
- LASKEY
- What kind?
- SORIANO
- Bechstein, a Geirman piano; beautiful one. Yeah. Yeah. That was it. And
I did that house; I built it myself. We had no contract.
- LASKEY
- How did you come on-- The house was very interesting looking in, again,
in pictures.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, but inside it was — I don't know — the one who owns it after, I
don't know what they did with it. They changed-- They put their own
improvisations, which is sad. But anyway, I have some beautiful shots;
I'll show you. What happened was really this. This is an interesting
story how I happened to know — What do you have there? Is that — ?
- LASKEY
- Just a floor plan of the house.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. That was my original, the floor plan. Yes, I know. It's
interesting. But I wanted to do this one a complete round.
- LASKEY
- The entire house?
- SORIANO
- The entire house in a round or a square; a perfect square or round in
one block, in one unity. Her husband, Manny, he was very- -used to love
[George] Gershwin and was still contaminated with this so-called pseudo
New York culture. And he wanted little round corners here, round corners
there, and all that. And the lot we bought was very, very difficult; was
a hillside.
- LASKEY
- This was in West Hollywood, was it?
- SORIANO
- No, no. It was in the Silver Lake [district] on top of the — overlooking
Neutra's house on the hill, all along the street.
- LASKEY
- Oh, really? It was at Silver Lake?
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Okay. I've got wrong information here.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. And so I finally compromised by doing that round living room for
Helen, the pianist. Yeah. And now, how I get this commission, I'll show
you. It's very interesting in my life. I was just barely nothing. I
wasn't even known, or anything. I was hungry for a European film; I
hated the Hollywood films. And I saw in one of these journals —
newspapers, it said in one place in either Beverly Hills or Hollywood,
in one of the stores, the John Reed Club-- You know who John Reed Club
was--
- LASKEY
- Yes, pretty much. Political —
- SORIANO
- That's right. It was John Reed —
- LASKEY
- --remembrance of John Reed, who--
- SORIANO
- He was the —
- LASKEY
- — the journalist.
- SORIANO
- — newspaperman, journalist who died in the USSR. Buried in the Kremlin.
- LASKEY
-
Ten Days That Shook the World.
- SORIANO
- That's right. And he was — They were intellectuals, artists who
organized, all over the United States, John Reed Clubs to have
friendship with Russia and the United States and other countries. And
this was the way that I met [David] Siqueiros, you know, the Mexican
painter.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yes .
- LASKEY
- That would be impressive.
- SORIANO
- Siqueiros was a member there and his wife Blanca Luz. Yeah. You don't
know that. It's history. Blanca Luz was a poetess. She used to write the
most fantastic, beautiful, tender letters to Siqueiros because he was
always in jail as a commie.
- LASKEY
- Yes. [laughter]
- SORIANO
- Okay.
- LASKEY
- You know, there's a Siqueiros mural downtown.
- SORIANO
- I know that. I know that very well; as a matter of fact, when he did
that. And so I met Siqueiros. I used to know them. In fact, I met
afterwards in Mexico City at the — in Mario Pani's [Pan-American
Congress] buildings he had those murals with the hands like that. Yeah.
In the administration building. Yeah. He did that. And I have tapes on
that collaboration of the artists with architecture, which I blasted
them. I have tapes and tapes of those things which I engaged the people
who did that collaboration. You don't know what I have, really. I have
treasures here . That ' s why I want to get somewhere I can sit down and
really write all these things properly.
- LASKEY
- And catalog and find, you know, make sure that--
- SORIANO
- It requires finances and I don't have anything. And so this is the
story. So what happens is this. I wanted to see a European film. I read
in the newspaper that Le Miracle de
Saint-George in French was showing in the John Reed Club. The Miracle of Saint George. It was a satire
on how the church and the big business [es] get together and make all
these deals, yeah.
- LASKEY
- Ah, I've never heard of that.
- SORIANO
- But done, oh, this was a film, a satire such as you never — is hilarious
and magnificent. Only the French could do a thing like that, you see.
- LASKEY
- Who did it? Do you know- -remember who the filmmaker was?
- SORIANO
- Oh my goodness, it's years ago. I don't even remember. Do you know how
many years ago this is?
- LASKEY
- Mm, about fifty?
- SORIANO
- Fifty years. Yeah, fifty, fifty-three year — more than that; fifty-three
years. Yeah. And so I said, "I want to go." I was hungry to see a
European film. I hated the American films from Hollywood. So I decided
to see that film and I went there. And all titles in French. There was
nothing in — All spoken in French but no titles.
- LASKEY
- No subtitles?
- SORIANO
- No, because most of the people attended were already international
audience from Europe who know, apparently, French. And behind me sat a
Mrs. Orkin. Her husband was an inventor of all kinds of little gadgets.
And her daughter, Ruth Orkin, bicycled from Los Angeles to New York and
wrote a book. I'm talking about this in the early years of the thirties.
She became a very good photographer of people. And the poor baby. She
came to visit me about three years ago; she's suffering from cancer .
- LASKEY
- I know the name. I think I've seen her photographs .
- SORIANO
- Yeah, Ruth Orkin, yes. She does beautiful photography. Well, to make the
story short, she kept poking me. She sat behind me in a nearby row in
the auditorium there, and she said, "What did he say? What did he say?"
[laughter] And I said, "Well, we disturb people. I'll tell you after the
film, okay?" And she took me up on it. She said, "You're an interesting
man. What are you doing?" I said, "Well, I'm a student," and this and
that. And she drove me home in her car to Santa Barbara Avenue with her
little daughter. They were in here and I explained the stuff. She said,
"Oh . . . " We talk about music, and so, "Oh my god, my cousin is a
concert pianist. She's going to be here in six months. I'll invite you.
Will you come?" And she did invite me; and I came. And this was the
beginning.
- LASKEY
- Oh, that's a nice story.
- SORIANO
- And we fell madly in love the first second our eyes hit, you know.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- What happened to the relationship?
- SORIANO
- Well, this is something — Sometime I'll tell you; not now. But anyway,
so I built this house. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- That must have been a very interesting experience--
- SORIANO
- It was.
- LASKEY
- — building a house under — your first house —
- SORIANO
- My first beautiful love.
- LASKEY
- — your first beautiful love —
- SORIANO
- And music in there.
- LASKEY
- — the main thing being a music room which is something that had to mean
as much to you as it did to them.
- SORIANO
- It was, absolutely. And then I know I had many musicians from the [Los
Angeles] Philharmonic [Orchestra], who have retired already. They've
seen my sign outside and they say, "My god, you don't remember? We were
at that house you built — you remember? — with the round — with the
piano. We used to give concerts there, chamber music." And I said,
"Yes."
- LASKEY
- Of course you remember it.
- SORIANO
- How can I not remember it?
- LASKEY
- Well, it must have been a — In the Esther McCoy book there's a picture
of the house with the piano in it.
- SORIANO
- That's not a good one. It's all right, but I have a better one than
that. I have some exquisite ones. I use a lot of very interesting
things.
- LASKEY
- Well, the room has the most beautiful view.
- SORIANO
- That's the Silver Lake right there.
- LASKEY
- Looking down over Silver Lake.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. And then when I was building that Mrs. [Dionne] Neutra came up to
the premises. "For whom are you working?" I said, "For myself. I'm the —
" "Oh, you're doing this?" I said, "Yes." [laughter] "Oh, Mr. Neutra
won't like that." [laughter] She said that to me, I remember distinctly,
and yet she's a very good friend of mine, Mrs. Neutra.
- LASKEY
- Did she know you at the time? Did she know that you had worked in, you
know, her husband 's--
- SORIANO
- Of course. I was working with them when they were living in a little old
house in Echo Park somewheres with the two children, the little Frank
who was a little retarded. He used to go, "Arrr-arrr-arrrr-arrr-arrrr-
arrrr." He used to run around. And the little Dionne was this size and
she used to play the cello and do her--specs [specifications], the
typing for Mr. Neutra. I know all of the — even that era, Mr. Neutra
with that building, that building.
- LASKEY
- The house?
- SORIANO
- Yes. I knew them from that, when I was going to school. That's how I
knew them. Then we became very friendly and I liked them. And as I told
you before that there was a lecture at the [Los Angeles] Philharmonic
Auditorium and through my- -I don't know how I keep meeting people, from
the skies--and there was a lovely lady- -her husband- -and she was a
writer for the movies. Her husband was also a bookkeeper or something in
the movie industry. Somehow I don't know where did I meet them. I forget
now. She was a lovely meticulous woman. She used to always invite me to
her house. And she was a superb cook; fine, clean, meticulous. I
remember that when she used to wash her beans, every bean has to be
studied and cleaned. Really. And meticulous. The spinach, the same way.
And she, in fact, threw me to Frank Lloyd Wright and Neutra. At the time
I didn't even know who they were. Yeah. I was a student then working in
a fruit stand. And then she said, "There'll be two architects
[speaking]." And then I heard them. I heard Frank Lloyd Wright first. It
was filled with people, the auditorium.
- LASKEY
- Well, if Frank Lloyd Wright was talking, then —
- SORIANO
- Yeah. And then Neutra was about half- filled or something like that. And
so Frank Lloyd Wright was a- -had a flair, drama in his speech. Mr.
Neutra was really interesting but a little more difficult to understand
him with his direction. Frank Lloyd Wright [had] more of metaphors and
all this flair which will charm many people with saying nothing even
though saying words. But then afterwards I met both of them because of
that meeting with that lady brought me there to that Philharmonic
Auditorium to tell you. And then when I did my Hallawell Seed Company,
that blue glass nursery, everybody compared it to the [Ludwig] Mies van
der Rohe. I didn't even know who Mies van der Rohe was when I did that.
- LASKEY
- So you actually came to architecture from a philosophical point of view,
and not from an actual having studied — studied architecture —
- SORIANO
- That's correct.
- LASKEY
- — and wanted to —
- SORIANO
- That's correct.
- LASKEY
- — wanted to do that.
- SORIANO
- That ' s correct .
- LASKEY
- That's very interesting.
- SORIANO
- I didn't even know what I was doing when I designed that house.
- LASKEY
- The Lipetz House?
- SORIANO
- Yes.
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- I met architecture at the time just when I graduated, you see. Then
there was WPA [Works Progress Administration], you know, with the
Depression.
- LASKEY
- Oh, sure.
- SORIANO
- And I remember I met Cassatt Griffin which is a very lovely person. Was
an architect, conservative, but very nice, charming person, really. I
worked for the County of Los Angeles in some special projects for
indigent housing which I did-- Really, I have these plans, very simple
ones.
- LASKEY
- Now, that was right when you got out of school, right?
- SORIANO
- Yes, yes.
- LASKEY
- And you went to work for the county.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. And we used to — Out of school there was nothing, you know, with
the Depression.
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- And we used to measure manholes for the City of Los Angeles. They put
sewer systems — They put manholes, but they didn't know where they were.
Yeah. Can't catch, catch-can in case anything goes wrong. And so we had
to mark them. All the engineers and architects were put to work to mark
the manholes in the City of Los Angeles. That's my first job. And then I
graduated to the County of Los Angeles to do special projects for the
Indigent housing and all that which I did very interesting things. I
still have the drawings nicely, which will be in my book.
- LASKEY
- So these were at the time, of course, the Depression was on —
- SORIANO
- That's correct.
- LASKEY
- --and this was the idea for the housing, was to —
- SORIANO
- For the indigent.
- LASKEY
- — help take care of this surplus —
- SORIANO
- Indigents which were coming here, yes.
- LASKEY
- They were coming in. That was — would be part of the Dust Bowl
migration--
- SORIANO
- That's exactly, exactly.
- LASKEY
- — were starting to come in, too, weren't they?
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- It's interesting that at that time that the city was considering- -city
or county- -
- SORIANO
- It's the county, yes.
- LASKEY
- Okay, the county was considering something that massive because
certainly there wasn't much money around —
- SORIANO
- I have dormitories and everything else that I designed. Even schools,
yeah.
- LASKEY
- But they never got built?
- SORIANO
- No. And because — Modifications, politics, and, you know, those things.
At the time I never comprehended anything like that. But I used to ask
Cassatt Griffin, "How do you do that?" I wanted him to — The first time,
[I wanted] to take something underground with wood. Are you kidding? I
didn't know a damn thing about architecture, but I knew my senses were
correct. My senses were beautiful, but the knowledge [of] how to
construct that thing- -
- LASKEY
- Oh, and that's what — that's what —
- SORIANO
- --was lacking.
- LASKEY
- He was an engineer or--?
- SORIANO
- He was an architect actually- -
- LASKEY
- He was an architect —
- SORIANO
- — but he was the architect of the County of Los Angeles. Yeah. And I
used to ask him, I said, "How do you indicate that?" Because I used to
go and it was curiosity to see in the building when they used to build
foundations. And all of a sudden I saw a lump of concrete. And yet, [in
school] we make our foundations [look] like [a] precise T. I said, "How
could that be?" I said, "Why?" I asked him. I said, "You know--" Nobody
could explain. At school nobody even could — We did working drawings.
But the working and drawings were copies of a building of a big office,
one sheet of drawing. We had to trace that. How can you learn on that?
That's why I used to rebel. I said, "I don't understand. What does that
mean? "
- LASKEY
- You didn't actually have to go out to a site or-- Did you do models or —
?
- SORIANO
- No, no, no. Models we could do. I think we did-- Maybe or maybe not; I
don't even remember, really. But anyway, so their teaching was
superficial. Just copy, copy, copy. That's all it was. And I didn't want
to copy; I wanted to hear, to understand, to, "What is it--what?" And so
Cassatt used to give me some clues then-- [I] said, "Oh ..." And I said,
"Well, why is this a lump and then why have indicated steel?" "Well, if
you find enough of that cross section of that stuff, that is all right.
It'll pass." And I said, "Oh, so that's what it — " [laughter] Then with
a little engineering that I had and calculating, then I began to feel my
oats. Then when I built this, I learned a hell of a lot. I took it for
me to build it. Imagine the daringness of this?
- LASKEY
- Well, it ' s a daring design.
- SORIANO
- And I questioned and I investigated and be sure that this thing will do
this, will work that way. And then I did it. So I went in that
direction: learning, observing, questioning, and then digesting in my
brain what it is. "Ah-hah. You can do that. You take these liberties,"
or "It means that," you see. You know. This is interesting.
- LASKEY
- That's very interesting.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. So I didn't learn anything in school except maybe how to work at
nights, hours, or work all night, which I still do sometimes if I have
to do a drawing . Yeah . Yeah .
- LASKEY
- Were you pleased with the house when it was done?
- SORIANO
- Yes, I was very pleased with it; however, there are other things I
wouldn't have done today what I did had I known .
- LASKEY
- Well, this is your first house.
- SORIANO
- Naturally, sure. Still, I was pleased at the fact what I did-- I did
even innovations there which before even they had those lumin-line
troughs in the trains — You remember, indirect lighting?
- LASKEY
- Yes.
- SORIANO
- I installed them — The first thing the lumin- lines came in I installed
them in the house in the round. Going to have to show you that. This is
really very interesting for you to see. That's why they didn't copy the
right pictures.
- LASKEY
- Well, the room with that light at night looks so beautiful. It
illuminated--
- SORIANO
- It is. Exquisite, yeah.
- LASKEY
- How did it work?
- SORIANO
- It worked beautifully.
- LASKEY
- Acoustically.
- SORIANO
- It was perfect.
- LASKEY
- Did it sound as good as it looked?
- SORIANO
- It was excellent acoustics because that trough already took this thing
[sound] instead of reverberating back. It absorbed it. I didn't even
know it. This was just a happenstance, a mystery. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Great. So you did the Lipetz House in 1936.
- SORIANO
- Yes. 'Thirty- four, actually.
- LASKEY
- 'Thirty-four. Really?
- SORIANO
- Yeah. Before even that. Just barely graduated.
- LASKEY
- That's amazing. And by 1938 —
- SORIANO
- 'Thirty- seven, I didn't go, because that's when I was injured. Nineteen
thirty- seven I was injured when I built the [George and Ida Latz
Memorial] Jewish Community Center .
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. And I'll show you the Jewish Community Center .
- LASKEY
- Now, this is in East Los Angeles?
- SORIANO
- Well, I don't know.
- LASKEY
- We're at the [George and Ida] Latz Memorial [Jewish Community Center],
- SORIANO
- I don't know where that is. Yeah, Latz Memorial. I don't know what
happened to it.
- LASKEY
- There's not much left of it right now.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, this is it.
- LASKEY
- Hidden by shrubberies and things.
- SORIANO
- See. This is what it looked like. See. And this.
- LASKEY
- It's —
- SORIANO
- I was injured right in there. I was telling- -
- LASKEY
- How did the injury happen?
- SORIANO
- Well, I was telling the welder to please weld the rivet properly plumbed
because I was going to hang a gate in it, to "please make it plumb." And
a car came down the hill; somebody steered it — And a girl was in the
car. She got scared. She steered it, came right across the street, on
the sidewalk, hit me in the back. And it broke my femur, my knee.
- LASKEY
- Oh.
- SORIANO
- Ai-yi-yi-yi-yi-- You don't know what they did. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- For how long were you —
- SORIANO
- I was six months in the hospital with my leg like that, with weights,
with osteomyelitis of the nose, I lost a piece of jawbone with my lower
front teeth, and this was-- My lip was cut like that, and my clavicle
was broken. My head was broken like that — see those two fingers. And
I'll tell you, to this day I suffer fantastic pains.
- LASKEY
- Oh, of course.
- SORIANO
- My legs and all that. I have to take a pill every now and then to, to —
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- And this is the whole beautiful tragedy of our pathos of life. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Well, that's when — That was the year, too, when a whole--when you were
doing a whole number of things.
- SORIANO
- Oh, yes. I was really — And I designed-- Look at the tenacity of me.
Excuse me if I take a half pill because I've been a little bit under —
- LASKEY
- Would you like to take a —
- SORIANO
- No, that's okay. You like any coffee?
- LASKEY
- Oh, yes. I'd love some.
- SORIANO
- Good. I put some water. [tape recorder off]
- SORIANO
- Now, the accident, which in '37 just about killed me — Well, to show you
my tenacity, I designed two houses there .
- LASKEY
- In the hospital?
- SORIANO
- Yes. Here I was six months in traction — six or four, I've forgotten now
where it was. I have my records here somewhere. [microphone adjusted]
See, we forgot to put this-- But anyway — Could it be that those two are
close together?
- LASKEY
- No, I don't think so. I think it's in the tape.
- SORIANO
- Let me see.
- LASKEY
- We can move it and see.
- SORIANO
- Now, in the hospital, as I told you, they took me there, practically,
with shovels. It was so hideous [an] accident. I've never seen anything
like it. And I had six clients, I believe. They all run to be
relinquished from their contract. They thought I was going to die. And
one, Nixon — the Dixon House, they said, "No. We believe in you. You'll
survive. We'll wait for you." I was deeply touched. And we did. And I
had the house designed almost, but I finished it there. Then I did a
house for a doctor, Dr . Gogol .
- LASKEY
- Oh, yes, yes.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. And his wife was sort of a Trotskyite. They were the real
Trotskyites, but particularly Mrs. Gogol. Oh, how daring she was. Oh,
she detested Stalin-- [ laughter] There was interesting characters
always.
- LASKEY
- Great period for radical women in the United States.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, yeah. And — Forgive me for pulling this up because I have to--
- LASKEY
- Oh, no. Please, just be comfortable.
- SORIANO
- And so I designed that house, and look at the tenacity of me. Now, after
I got out of the hospital, I was with a body cast; full body cast: this
leg completely, this up to here. The only thing free was this, except to
go to the bathroom. But I was solid. With crutches and a cane, for nine
months I had that. Then when I — We started building the Dixon House in
Long Beach, of all the places. Long Beach!
- LASKEY
- Long Beach.
- SORIANO
- Oh, god. I forgot to-- [laughter] I forgot-- And the Red streetcar line
used to go to Long Beach from Hill Street. And I was in a hotel then,
the Huntley Apartments which is near-- My god, it was the hotel of the
movie crowd.
- LASKEY
- The Huntley Apartments?
- SORIANO
- Yes. That was, at the time, way, way, way, way back. And they had the
rooms where [they] had rosewood, little so-called tables for writing
with envelopes. They had silverware in there. And they had [a] billiard
room, a huge ballroom [with] billiard room below. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Where was this? Where was it?
- SORIANO
- In Temple Avenue, near Temple and somewheres around that. I have the
whole story.
- LASKEY
- Sounds wonderful.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. That was the hotel, the hotel I was in, the Huntley. Because
through a friend of mine that I met in the fruit stand, his girl friend
became the manager of that hotel; therefore, I got a room there. And
that's when I got injured. Naturally, after I finished treatment, they
[my friends] all wanted to close my studio in the Huntley, which I had
there, because they thought I would die anyway. I said, "No, I want you
to bring my Bach records and my Victrola and then my drafting table like
the little one like that." And I said, "I want that." And they would
argue with me. I said, "No!" I said, "I want that." And I did. The first
nurse I had--she came through the emergency- -said, "I'm your special
nurse." And I look at her. She had the most beautiful brown eyes. I
said, "You have exquisite eyes." She said to me afterwards, a week later
when I was a little more coherent, she said, "You know, when you told me
that I knew you would live, because they told me I had a curtain case."
And I kept her for all the six to eight months. And even later on she
used to come to see how I was and take care of me. She's so sweet, that
Virginia. Just tender! I couldn't wait in the morning until she came
because I was a mess. My jaws were wired and my back-- Puss oozing from
my nose. And I'll tell you, it was the devil, really. If I think of it
now, I'll go crazy. Felt awful; full of aches and pains and sores--bed
sores. In those days they had calamine lotion which did nothing, you
know. That's the only thing they had.
- LASKEY
- And then they didn't even have a lot of the pain killers that they might
—
- SORIANO
- Nothing.
- LASKEY
- — have given you now--
- SORIANO
- That's right.
- LASKEY
- — and the techniques —
- SORIANO
- That's right.
- LASKEY
- --that would have made it at least less painful.
- SORIANO
- They didn't even have penicillin. That would have cured the
osteomyelitis, would have been cured like that. But they didn't. The
doctor said either you'll kill it or they'll kill you.
- LASKEY
- You must have really wanted to live.
- SORIANO
- Of course I did. And then — So I designed these two houses in the
hospital. And I built-- When I came back to my room, I used to drag
myself to go to the bathroom on my hands because I couldn't walk at all.
And it was not a pleasant one. And then I had a little electric burner
this big so I could make myself some lima beans, soup, and this and
that. And so I managed it.
- LASKEY
- I know how —
- SORIANO
- But you see, life is not so bad in spite of the inconveniences . Because
I was brought up in my mother ' s home-- We never had water, running
water. We never had electricity, heating. We have to bring charcoal,
wood charcoal. We used to buy big sacks of it, store it in a box outside
and bring it in. Make the charcoal burn as — In the tandours metal box
with flaps, you know, these type of things. We used to make hot coals
and bring it in when red hot. Then cook on top of them, and this used to
serve in the winter to warm our hands, and that's all. We used to sit
around in the living room, cook there and warm-- This is the thing. And
the John was an outhouse type of a thing. This is where I used to fetch
the water from the outside, whatever. We never had such things so I was
used to those things, so it didn't matter to me. I wasn't so spoiled. In
America, everything is utensils, utensils. This friend of mine I have, a
charming girl, she has everything — She has a utensil for everything,
even for to make little chopped parsley and all this. She had a table
for this and that and the other thing . And I ' d take them stuff, I'd
clean it thoroughly, and then I'd take with a knife, clip, clip, clip,
clip, clip, [laughter] without anything .
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- Without any mess or anything-- She gets astonished.
- LASKEY
- How do you do that?
- SORIANO
- And garlic, I take and I just dut, dut, dut, dut with my hand, and I
chopped it instead of squashing it with all the — with jllllons of
utensils. So this is what happened. And it was a beautiful thing, the
fact that I was brought up with this kind of a thing: simplicity.
Simplicity of life. And we get used to this, you know. But now I can use
the most exquisite utensils. Why not? It's lovely to have all —
1.4. TAPE NUMBER: II, SIDE TWO (JULY 19, 1985)
- SORIANO
- Okay. Now, where were we?
- LASKEY
- We were talking about simplicity and the recovering — How did you get,
because at this point then you — I think the Latz Memorial, the framing
was in steel.
- SORIANO
- Yes .
- LASKEY
- How had you gotten into steel at such an early time?
- SORIANO
- Well, I was always thinking of new thought-- I was never happy with the
wood. I used to-- The wood is all right, but not flexible. It's static.
So big deal, you copy it. Two-by-four, sixteen inches on center.
Everybody does that, so who cares? So why not? We have industry. I used
to read and find out what there is and I used to say, "Well, why not use
that? We have metallurgy today and our scientific thinking and our
industry. We have new materials. Why not use them properly?" Since I
didn't believe in style — I wasn't interested in copying style. It was
nothing but ornamentation anyway. When they talk about style, they were
talking about ornament. That's what they were talking about. It had
nothing to do with architecture .
- LASKEY
- It's interesting when in the background that you were just talking
about-- That's what made me think to ask you the question about steel,
that you come from a very traditional kind of a background and a very
functional background, to have made this leap into something
nontraditional and, in fact, being interested in eliminating traditions
and dealing only with function, I think, is very interesting.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, but my tradition — I am a universal person. My tradition is the
universe, you see. I'm not a traditional person- -sectarian tradition,
let's say.
- LASKEY
- Well, I was just thinking of the society in Rhodes in a small island in
the middle of the Aegean.
- SORIANO
- Yes.
- LASKEY
- You must have been pretty much steeped in the tradition.
- SORIANO
- Well, they do. But still, I'm a clear thinker. I'm a questioner.
- LASKEY
- Well, that's what is so interesting.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. I'm like the little fermentation, like little yeast that ferments
a great deal and questions a great deal because-- Just because they did
build it, why not? But I look broadly. I always think new ways. Things
stimulate me. If I see something, a gadget, it always gives me an idea.
"Gosh, that could work for something; I can do this." And I'm always
eager to learn, to advance, rather than to remain, to ruminate. It's
more exciting to do that because that doesn't satisfy me at all, as a
human being, to keep ruminating. No, no, no, no, no. So I've kept
questioning, kept wondering. Especially with our industry, all kinds of
materials came in. I used to look at catalogs with new things and I used
to say, "Why not do that?" And so since I already got this daringness
between my friends, this Cassatt Griffin particularly, would used to
tell me, "Well, you can do this and that." So immediately, I realized
this, "Who the hell is to tell me anything?" This is all arbitrary
things anyway. I can make my own arbitrations, as long as they're
working, as long as they will be tenable from the standpoint of
engineering, the stresses and all this analysis which will work well. So
I went to steel right away. And I built the steel floor. As a matter of
fact, in the Lipetz House, you don't even know-- You know, the floor I
used the junior- -what they call junior I-beams of steel. The whole
floor's made of steel, I-beams.
- LASKEY
- No, I didn't know that.
- SORIANO
- No, nobody knows that. They forget because they didn't ask me and I
didn't say, maybe. Now it just occurred to me. Actually, I had the
I-beams of steel.
- LASKEY
- So you were working with steel —
- SORIANO
- Then.
- LASKEY
- --in 1934.
- SORIANO
- Yes, I did. Except the frame was wood. Then I graduated afterwards. I
began to think, "Okay, the floor is beautiful the way it was." It was
made with junior I-beams, the little, small I-beams; they called them
junior I-beams. I used enough for the first time they came. I used the
first time these incandescent lights that were used in the round [room].
Nobody had used them. They just came in as a novelty. And immediately I
said, "Can I get so many of these? Can I use it?" "Oh, sure." And I have
a sheet metal man make me the trough of my own design. Then the trains
begin to use these. Even the train- -the old streamline trains, you
remember? —
- LASKEY
- Oh, yes.
- SORIANO
- All right. If you look at-- The interiors used to have troughs like that
afterwards, not before I did. No.
- LASKEY
- Well, I know you've been asked before and I wanted to ask you for the
sake [of] the interview about the influence of Neutra on your use of
steel.
- SORIANO
- Neutra 's steel was not an influence to me or any other material . The
influence of Neutra was the assurance that Neutra gave me from a
standpoint of planning logically. Yeah. Up to a certain point.
- LASKEY
- Oh, really?
- SORIANO
- Yeah. He was, at the time, I thought it was superb, completely. But then
after I began to get on my own and start thinking more on myself, there
were a lot of things that Neutra did which I will never do, you see. But
yet Neutra was a great master and he had an excellent sensitivity in
materials and taste. And the steel that he used was a different type of
steel. What I use in steel in my housing is different than what Neutra
did, you see.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- In what way?
- SORIANO
- Well, I used an industrially produced steel in modularly planned
housing. Neutra didn't do that.
- LASKEY
- Oh, he didn't? I thought of his houses as being modular. I haven't
looked at them that carefully.
- SORIANO
- No, no. I don't think they are completely modular. They can be called--
He has an order; they're orderly, yes.
- LASKEY
- But they're not modules.
- SORIANO
- Not the way I considered the modules, you see. Because I plan a precise
strict module like a fugue of Bach. I will compare it to that, you see.
But if you look at the plans of Neutra, I can get any plan for you and
I'll show you why. They are totally different than mine. In that
respect, I said I did my own innovations in there, you see. The
influences of Neutra, yes, with the orderly, the planning, was a great
inspiration for me and I admire them very much, in fact. And he has
tremendous sensitivity in colors, textures. And the quality — When he
used to do something, he used to do it beautifully, on grand scale. And
that, yes. That was the influence. But I don't think I copied steel from
Neutra or anything like that. No. And it's an order that I had from
Neutra. I think we'll stop one minute and then I'll see if I can find
the — Okay. [tape recorder off]
- LASKEY
- So we were talking about your —
- SORIANO
- The module.
- LASKEY
- The module and also about your relationship to Neutra or what, you know,
what you had learned from him and also, mainly, I think, it was
discussing steel, how you came to steel and your use of it as opposed to
Neutra ' s or Mies van der Rohe.
- SORIANO
- Well, the steel, you see, as I told you before, I think, I was always
interested in advancement. I was interested in utilization of materials
that belonged into our age because I thought this age we were doing
tremendous strides, particularly metallurgy which, to me, sort of almost
gave me a clue to the direction of richness of materials we can have
with the metallurgy. Can you imagine-- We have today metals that can
take five thousand degrees of heat and it won't buckle or melt? Well,
imagine that, what implications it will have with our skyscrapers- -
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- — with our building industry. Instead of building with steel and then
you have to put cement to fireproof them, all these complications, all
these expensive things. And before you know it you have nothing but a
monster: neither a fish nor a fowl. It's a high breed of junk. Yeah.
Make yourself at home, please. You want a pillow? You can have it.
- LASKEY
- No, I've got it off the edge here. It's just my knee was —
- SORIANO
- But please, make yourself more comfortable. And the result is that I
kept asking, "Why? Why go back to chopping trees?" And then all of a
sudden you find people who, supposedly, for ecology using- -chopping
trees. [laughs] There are the ones — I have an interesting experience
here I must tell you. This is very funny. I had two projects here in
Tiburon: one, seven units; another, twenty-five units. It's here around
the corner. About four, five, six, seven years ago. One of the
architects was sitting on the board of Tiburon City, big, big deal. And
this architect, stupid young punk I would call him, and he was for, you
know, riding the bandwagon of the ecology without understanding what
ecology is. And I submitted for this project what I had: the landscaping
plan, what trees-- There were a lot of trees in there which were rooted,
bad roots, many of them were toppled. And then I had the landscape plan
that I made and I had also a consultation of a Japanese tree surgeon or
tree expert to examine all the things and gave me a letter to that
effect. He said that the plan I have is even more conservative. If he
were here he would remove many of the other trees because eventually
they would be bad, the others--the young ones won't grow as well. I said
they should remove these. But this architect sitting on the planning
board said, "I don't want a single tree removed." Just like that,
arbitrarily.
- LASKEY
- A single —
- SORIANO
- And he kept — Yeah. In other words, he kept making it-- And then we've
been delaying three months like that back and forth. I marked all the
trees to be removed so the board could go over--the planning commission
would go and see. He went through all these delaying tactics. And my
client told me, he said, "Raphael, I know you're very strong and don't--
Just let them talk. Maybe this way they might be able to give us the
permit." He was scared that I would antagonize them. I said, "Don't
worry about it." And so finally he realized the delaying tactics and the
stupidity of them. This poor guy was having loans from Switzerland, from
a friend, and they were hounding him: "When are you going to start
building?" So finally--this is an interesting story — Then he realized
that the thing was a no return. So he says to me, "Go ahead, do whatever
you want. I'm fed up with them." So I went and I faced him. I went right
to this architect. His name is [Charles] Bassett.
- LASKEY
- Bassett.
- SORIANO
- Bassett like a wurst. The dogs I won't even insult them. I said, "Look,
you, how many houses have you built?" He said, "Well, not as many as
you, Mr. Soriano, of course." And I said, "All right. What materials did
you use?" He said, "What [does] this have to do with it?" And I said,
"Plenty. You use nothing but wood, isn't it? And here you sit there
pompously, you don't want to cut trees because you're concerned with the
ecology, with nature, isn't it? I haven't used a stitch of wood since
the year 1936." [laughter] I said, "And you sit pompously doing that to
me, delaying this job and my clients, too." And then I had another
twenty- five units around the corner, too, the same way, he was delaying
it. And then finally the president of the board realized, you know, he
said, "Well, we have another architect." And then he became the mayor,
this other architect. It was Mr. [Bruce] Ross from here [Tiburon] . He
was a charming man. So he got up and bow[ed] at me. He says, "Far be for
me to criticize Mr. Soriano's work." And this punk Bassett had given a
memo, interoffice memo, saying, "Well, I don't see that the plan that
Soriano gave us is any kind of conventional type of planning." Imagine
the jackass? "It isn't any conventional type of a plan that he gave us."
He was giving that-- [It was] confidential, but it was given to me as
confidential and I have it. And that really made me furious. I said,
"This punk sitting there — " So immediately they gave me the permit that
night. But the next morning there was the water moratorium.
- LASKEY
- Oh, no.
- SORIANO
- You couldn't build this. Now, we lost — Two projects I lost, and [they]
could have been sitting beautifully today. Yes. This is the tragedy of
life. By a colleague who is insipid, stupid, mean- -jealous, no doubt--a
little punk sitting there in a planning commission, "Ah-ha. I want to
fix that Soriano, " you know. "Big Soriano." And I'm sure there are many
people like that. They are pompous peanut-brains. Instead of being
gracious and nice and understanding and learn something that he didn't
have in his brains. So that's it, and I lost several jobs like that. And
that's why —
- LASKEY
- That's very sad.
- SORIANO
- — you see my innovations. Again, you see, I use aluminum instead of
using sticks of wood. [laughs] Conserving trees and forest. We have — We
can do today not only that, but you see, I can span — Imagine, I can
span thirty-six feet in this low-cost housing, the smallest ones — I can
span thirty-six feet without any supports in between. Can you imagine?
You know what thirty-six feet is? This is twelve feet, I mean, sixteen--
Let's see, six-- Yeah, this is twelve feet, those two tables.
- LASKEY
- So it's three times —
- SORIANO
- Three times that. I can span with two columns, one on each end. And this
column's this big.
- LASKEY
- Well, the flexibility and low cost and —
- SORIANO
- And also the durability, too. When an earthquake, they will do this, but
they won't fall. The airplane wing does this, it doesn't fall, does it?
Now, this is the way I plan. So, in this case, I said, "Well, why not
use this beautiful material." And they're not expensive at all; they're
cheaper. I can build four houses. We get into it, I'll show you. In one
day I could put the frame of four houses: the columns, the beams, the
finish, ceiling, and the roof including all the connectors to receive
vertical walls. All this installed in one day, four houses, with six
unskilled men. Now, do you mind, do you realize the implications that is
that in housing? I send the brochures to the president of the United
States, to [James E.] Carter at that time, and to Rosalynn [Carter], to
both I addressed it. I get very nice letters, from [Gary] Hart, too:
"When you have some projects we will be able to help give you--" When I
have — But nobody wants this. You go to the jackass builders, to the
bankers, to the developers; they don't want. They want this junk that
you see here in Tiburon. This.
- LASKEY
- Why?
- SORIANO
- Because they're ignorant; they don't know anything. They're so ignorant
they think this sells — This has been sold, has been selling because of
the way they have made the economy. They think that's going to make
money. The other, they think, "Oh, well, this is an untried thing." They
don't know — But it is not untried. Already it's been — It's history
already. Yeah. That's what I have to put up with. And many people ask
me, "Soriano, with all your name, all your fame, why, why?" Even my love
over here, she asked me that same question. Yes. And the reason is
because of the ignorance of other people and because they don't want to
relinquish their nostalgia. They go by nostalgia rather by reason.
- LASKEY
- And they're afraid of something new.
- SORIANO
- That's exactly.
- LASKEY
- Well, now you built the Eichler House. That was an aluminum house. That
was aluminum, wasn't it?
- SORIANO
- Steel. Steel.
- LASKEY
- That was — Oh, that was steel. So the only aluminum houses you've done
are the ones in Hawaii.
- SORIANO
- In Hawaii. And I did one in Los Angeles which I don't even want to
mention because of-- I'll tell you; it's a long story.
- LASKEY
- But even the steel house that you did for Eichler, which, at least in
the photographs, looks —
- SORIANO
- It's a beautiful thing.
- LASKEY
- - -wonderful .
- SORIANO
- It is. They're lovely houses.
- LASKEY
- And he built it. Why didn't he pursue it?
- SORIANO
- I'll tell you why. [Joseph] Eichler was a big funny guy as much as the
rest of them. He used to-- You know what, you know, Eichler, Eichler had
all these big publicity names. If you know the real truth you will
shiver, as I know some of the truth that I have been in contact with
them, including John Entenza, and the Case Study houses. Yeah. Many
people don't know some of the things that I might tell you in the
proceeds of this conversations. Coming to Eichler- - Eichler didn't have
any taste to come to me, but he went to — he made a deal with [A.]
Quincy Jones and [Frederick] Emmons, you see. Quincy Jones used to
imitate my houses. Yeah. Yeah. This is history. As a matter of fact,
Bernardi, you know, with Bernardi — [William W.] Wurster, [Theodore C.]
Bernardi and [Donn] Emmons, you know. Bernardi, one day, at one of the
lectures, somebody asked him, "What do you think of Quincy Jones?" "What
the hell Quincy Jones has done that Soriano hasn't done thousand times
better?" He said that to him, you know. It's true. Quincy Jones was
trying to imitate me because he never did this type of thing before.
- LASKEY
- But he did a lot of large-scale housing, didn't he? Jones?
- SORIANO
- Well, yes.
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- Naturally, because they used to — He used to work for Eichler, used to
give him fifty dollars a house, in repetitions. Yeah. And he will do
anything Eichler wanted. And he used to get the wood houses, the wood
type of systems .
- LASKEY
- Yeah. And so he did more wood. He did--
- SORIANO
- The wood type of the —
- LASKEY
- He worked in more traditional materials, at least, if not in design.
- SORIANO
- That's right. Well, they didn't even in the design, you see. The wood
houses that even Neutra and I did, they were capitalized afterwards by
putting instead of a flat roof, they used to put little things like
that. The rest were our imitation of Neutra and mine, even in the wood.
They were not as original as you think. I mean, most people they don't
know immediately they take this [as original] because he has done so
many, you know. Immediately the publicity brings them up as--
- LASKEY
- Oh, right.
- SORIANO
- — they are the ones. But in reality, they're not. They were just the
imitations of what Neutra did and what I did. Yeah. And what even Harris
did. And they used to capitalize and make this into a big thing. He used
to get along with Eichler giving them fifty dollars a house, every two--
I have a contract here that I even have that Eichler gave me.
- LASKEY
- Well, who was Eichler?
- SORIANO
- He was a butter-and-egg man. [laughter] A shrewd butter-and-egg man that
he saw the potential. Being a clever little Jew, he realized that —
Don't forget, I'm a Jewish man, too —
- LASKEY
- I know, I know.
- SORIANO
- — so I can say that. [laughter]
- LASKEY
- How did they get into building? Is that--
- SORIANO
- Well, because —
- LASKEY
- --Just that really was what happened?
- SORIANO
- — he was a butter-and-egg man, he saw the potential of that. And with
little money saved-- They're pretty clever. The Jews are very
enterprising, you know. They're really wonderfully alert to anything
that is to get money. Why do you suppose all these beatnik and all these
million of records are sold? You investigate that you'll see whose there
behind all of that. They're money-makers; that's all. That's the reason
they are capitalizing and publicizing. This way-- Publicity you can sell
anything.
- LASKEY
- Whatever makes money.
- SORIANO
- Exactly, darling. That's the whole tragedy. I always say that if there
is some sensitive man that will see what we have with concocted
publicity, we can make millions. And this can grow like wildfire. I've
been still fighting on that, and I'm going to do it, by golly. I'm not
finished yet.
- LASKEY
- [laughter] I can tell that.
- SORIANO
- I'm not finished yet. I send hundreds of brochures all over from
Australia to Japan to Iran to Saudi Arabia. Yes.
- LASKEY
- It just fascinates me because it is so sensible. It's inexpensive and,
heaven knows, we need inexpensive housing at this time.
- SORIANO
- And beautiful and logical.
- LASKEY
- It's logical. It's simple. It's simple to put together. It's
inexpensive. In a world that's crying out for housing like that, why
isn't it picked up--why don't governments pick up on it?
- SORIANO
- Well, the governments, of course, are a bunch of people, again, the
nostalgias. Most of them are extremely conservative. And the very few of
them who are of the intelligence, sensitive enough, to really come out
and understand with logic and reality, says, "Yes, that has merit." I
had a project almost in the, with the model cities. I show you letters.
Next time I'll see it. Tomorrow. I'll show you those, the model cities.
They said, "They are the best prefabricated houses they've ever seen by
their research engineers . " That was for Richmond [California]. Yes.
They wanted to have funds and all that. There were very few that will
buy. They said, "Houses like that? Flat roofs?" They always go — They
think unless you have this, it's not a house. I said, "What is the
meretricious about a flat roof?" I said, "Do you-- Your car has a jagged
roof?" [laughter]
- LASKEY
- Pointed roof?
- SORIANO
- And yet they don't question that. I said, "A train has that? Your plane
have that?" But, you see, when it comes to house — Years ago, as a
member for Consolidated Voltee Aircraft [Company]-- You know who they
were? That was during the war. They were making very fancy planes for
the army.
- LASKEY
- Consolidated Aircraft?
- SORIANO
- Voltee. Consolidated Voltee. Voltee.
- LASKEY
- Voltee? No.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. They were very, very big manufacturers of planes. They were
involved with the war effort. At the time I had a-- The vice president
of the corporation was George Tidmarsh, was a friend of mine. I met him.
And we were discussing — I said, "Look, you know, there will be a need
immediately after the war." That was in '39 already, you see. "If
there's a war, or even now, and after the war, there will be a need of
housing." And I said, "How about really stimulating your industry, the
aircraft industry to fabricate these houses of mine since they are made
of metal?" And I designed a beautiful house of metal, like an airplane.
Yeah. I'll show you the drawings. We had a meeting and the chairman of
the board- -who do you suppose it was?--was a certain, a scientist from
Caltech [California Institute of Technology], Los Angeles, Pasadena. I
forgot his name. And he said-- He was the chairman of the board, and the
first criticism I got was from him, a scientist from Caltech, telling —
He said, "Mr. Soriano, can we put some colonial type of an entrance,
porches?" I said, "Why do you want to do that? Do you do that to your
planes?" I said to him. He said, "No, but houses, you know, we have to
have sales. We have to have appeal of the public." I said, "Don't you
set the appeal yourself? All the planes set the appeal. People have
nothing to do with it. The cars set the appeal by the fabricators. The
people never put an input in this. Then it becomes familiar." I said,
"You have to dare. You have to really do it." And this is the question
I'm telling you. It has to do with this incompetent, nostalgic brains
who think this should look like that otherwise it won't sell, instead of
being daring enough and say, "Let's try. Let's put a few — " I always
tell, "Put a half a dozen of them and see what the public says."
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. Well, no — Some of them said, "Well, how about putting one
example." I said, "No. One won't show. Few, yes, because I gave a
varieties. Then we'll suit different people, then you'll see that you
don't scare the public in this case. Then you give them differences:
different textures, different colors, even different planning. And I can
show you the different varieties they could be instead of saying, "Well,
won't they be all monotonous?" And yet they don't talk about that being
monotonous, this thing on Tiburon, you know. They're all the same-
-exactly the same.
- LASKEY
- Exactly.
- SORIANO
- They don't say this is monotonous. And yet they will tell monotonous at
mine because they sit simple, you see. They don't see the nuances within
that I can make, millions of them. That's why I want to show with
different plans, different samples together. Plan and relationship, one
to the other, then they can see what they can do. But no; there's
nobody. You talk to them and you might as well talk to the moon. I think
I can get better response from the moon, I can assure you. It's a sick
thing, really, to me to think that there is this magnificent potential
of making money at the same time of serving the public and giving some
beautiful housing, beautiful planned housing. Instead of all these
sickening things. Or either they talk about how our standards have to
change, FHA [Federal Housing Administration] have to change their
requirements. They make an arbitrary statement that a room has to be
this, so many square feet. And the average person cannot afford that.
They don't have to be rooms-- They don't have to put so many square
feet, especially bedrooms that you sleep at night only. They can be
smaller room and very cozy, but yet FHA requires that. To give you a
loan they have to be that. I used to fight with the FHA, you don't know
how many times.
- LASKEY
- Well, didn't banks used to have--or some banks at least — have a
requirement that it have a hipped roof — ?
- SORIANO
- Oh, yes.
- LASKEY
- — that you couldn't build a house or you couldn't get it past the
planning commission or planning, the board, if it had a — house had a
flat roof?
- SORIANO
- This is exactly — Set by this nostalgic, ignorant people, whether
they're bankers, real estate men, professors of universities, or
whatever, or movie stars. They have misconceptions of what a house will
be. They go by their own comfortable impression of what a house was with
their grandfathers, maybe. Therefore, they want everything to be like
that instead of seeing something as an advancement, like we do on our
cars and every gadget. We want the latest thing. We don't want the
antiquated things. Yet when it comes to a house, nope. I give articles
that I wrote on that.
- LASKEY
- Well, it's a very interesting point that we do modernize in our clothes
—
- SORIANO
- Everything .
- LASKEY
- --in our hair.
- SORIANO
- Everything .
- LASKEY
- Except houses.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. Look at these little instruments. Look at this new cooking--what
do you call it?--the —
- LASKEY
- Microwave?
- SORIANO
- Microwaves, yes. In three minutes, brip, you can cook, you can heat, yet
that's the latest thing. Everyone says, "Oh, you don't have a microwave?
Oh, la, la. Why not?" Well-- But, you see, they are propagated by these
ignorant people who have the power of the money. And the developers,
they are the biggest retarders of progress, are these scavengers which I
call them: the bankers, the real estate people, the lenders who make the
standards-- They set the tone. When they write it, subdivide, sub
development , they're the ones who write that with the attorneys: "You
should conform to the neighborhood quality of housing." I'll tell you
what happened to me once and to Neutra. The same thing happened with
FHA. I'm going back in the early thirties: '34, '36. They used to reject
our plans, Neutra 's and mine, too. And finally we wrote to Washington
[D.C], and then they asked us to resubmit. And we did. And just in spite
they will approve one and reject one just so they can save their face.
That's the way they used to play that game. Or they will give you $500
less. In those days, you know, $500-- If you build a $5,000 house, if
FHA gave you $500 less, that's quite a lot of money. I used to end up
usually giving half —
- LASKEY
- That's 10 percent.
- SORIANO
- — of that. Half of that to — Five hundred. I said, "I'll give you a part
of my fee as a gift. So help me; I did that many times. And I said,
"Could you find the other $250 so you can make it possible?" And this is
what I did, several of them. One time — Let me tell you what happened.
I'll give you two interesting examples that's really part of history. I
did submit a plan, rejected by these fossils, the real estate fossils
who set the FHA appraisal: "He doesn't conform to the neighborhood." And
so finally I just got incensed. So two, three times, "Well, it doesn't
conform to the neighborhood." I said okay. So I went and took
photographs of all the houses in the neighborhood. They were five, six
different type of so-called styles. So I took the photographs and said,
"All right, here, sir." Ten photographs. "Which one of these you want me
to conform to?" [laughter] He said, "Well, you're the architect."
[laughter] I said, "I know, but you're the one that's telling me it
doesn't conform to the neighborhood, so you tell me. What's the
neighborhood to conform to?" And of course I got them there, you see.
And I argued with the point. And finally, after going back to another
person who's above him, "Well, I've nothing to do with it," blah, blah.
They save face. And I say, "This is shameful." I said, "You have a much
more beautifully designed house, more livable," and I get their
approval. But it used to take pains and aggravations. I have another
one: The house I designed for Dr. Gogol. We got the loan already — this
is interesting —
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- — and all of a sudden, after it was under construction, I got a petition
from the neighborhood to stop construction and the lending agency sent
us a notice: "We're going to withdraw the loan because the people in the
neighborhood — they're complaining it doesn't conform to the
neighborhood." After already we had their approval of the FHA and the
lending agency.
- LASKEY
- Oh, my.
- SORIANO
- And here we are under construction, payroll. I'll tell you, I went from
door to door to door to door pleading with everyone. "Well, Mr. Soriano,
you know, we have a good neighborhood here, we have to keep it--" And I
said, "I'm not violating anything, am I?" I said, "I'm giving you very
beautiful--" "Well, there is not a flat roof house here." I said, "Is
that all the problem?" He said, "Well, you know, it has to conform to
this neighborhood." I said, "Well, let me tell you something." I said,
"I have decks, they're all decks from the living areas, from different
areas to go. Don't you think it's good, because a hillside like that and
I converted those beautiful areas of deck so the people could enjoy the
outdoors. Is that a--anything wrong? I think it's the best thing. You
should thank me for it." "No, well, you know, flat roof. Well, they all
look flat, they don't--" So finally, at the very top I had a studio for
the doctor, for Dr. Gogol, an office, a small one, ten by twelve. And it
was flat, also. It was finished already. And I said, "I'll tell you what
I'll do." I said, "You want me to put a hip roof like that on top? Would
that help? " " Now you ' re talking . " I said, "Fine. All right." So
immediately I sent a carpenter and I said, "The roof is finished anyway.
Instead of two-by- threes or two-by- fours, " I said, "put two-by-twos
and tack the shingles — It'll just be one tack. Let the wind blow the
damn things up off after we finish and get the loan." And they moved in
and we did that. That's exactly what happened. Yeah. [laughter] Well,
what else can I do with those jokers? You tell me. They just about blew
my top. I mean, really, if I were not strong, I would have collapsed
underneath of all this and said, "Well, what the hell is the use of all
this trouble." Really. You have no idea what--how they make you
miserable. It's not only the clients you fight with. Them, at least you
can reason with them. They invariably come to-- Sometime they have come
with nostalgic ideas, too. But that doesn't matter. This is for their
own good. I say, "Look, you let me do that and if you don't like it,
I'll change it for you free of charge, okay? Then at least you'll see
it." And then they realize that I was right.
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- In fact, I had a client who said once — I received an award and then I
invited him to the dining--to the table to Los Angeles; they flew in.
And they were talking among themselves, and one of them said I was-- The
Hallawell Seed Company, Mr. McNabb, the president, he said, "Every time
we lost an argument with Soriano, we won. " Was a nice statement, isn't
it?
- LASKEY
- Right. It really is.
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Well, it's difficult enough to deal with a client, but when you have a
whole--an entire neighborhood —
- SORIANO
- You have the neighborhood, then you have the building department. You
know, when I built the Jewish Community Center in Boyle Heights, did you
know what I had to do with it, too?
- LASKEY
- No.
- SORIANO
- I had the three-and-a-half-inch, extra strong pipes occurring every
twelve feet. The ordinance in those days in the county was all Lally
columns had to be six inches thick in diameter. And so I went there, the
engineers said, "Look, these are not Lally columns." "Besides," I said,
"they have enough [strength]." And he said, "Well, you know, the
ordinance says Lally columns have to be — " I said, "These are not Lally
columns, sir." [laughter]
- LASKEY
- They're not even pretending to be Lally columns. [laughter]
- SORIANO
- No. They are steel columns and they are three and a half inches in
diameter and they are sufficient for three stories. The building [has]
only two. And I said, "Here are the calculations. Here are my stresses,
my engineering data here. Just see for yourself." "Well, I'm sorry, but
the ordinance says — " I said, "Well, let me speak to your chief
engineer, please. " "Well, let me see if he's in." Well, he looks in and
he was in. He comes out. "What's the matter?" I said-- Again, same
repetition. Then he opens the book again. "Well, I'm sorry, but the
ordinance says they have to be six-inch [pipes]." And I said, "But sir,
you're an engineer. Look at the calculations I have here. Will you
please look at the stresses? They're more than even the requirement with
the six-inch columns I have in my three-and-a-half-inch extra- strong
columns of steel . " "Sorry, but the ordinance says--" I said, "Anybody
above you I can appeal to?" "Yeah. Appeal to the board. It meets every
other Thursday." I did.
- LASKEY
- Good.
- SORIANO
- I said, "All right." I did. And I went there and I appealed my case. I
said, "Really, I don't understand why should this ordinance be like that
to begin with. Why shouldn't they be flexible?" And I said, "Here are
the calculations." There was an engineer; he looked at it and so on.
They — Finally, they gave me — said, "Well, this time I think we'll let
you go with it." They talked among themselves; they realized how wrong
they were. "This time we'll let you — We'll give you the permit." And I
got the permit. So we were the outspoken ones. The next year they
changed the ordinance. There was not such a clause in there, you see.
- LASKEY
- Well, there are battles that get won.
- SORIANO
- Well, yes, but how many of them do? How many of my colleagues do that?
They take the line of least resistance and therefore, I cannot relate to
them. They don't help me! They don't help themselves either and they
don't help the public. The public loses out. Yeah. This is where it
bothers me, really. And then our education of the students is even
pathetic due to the fact that we're wasting all this youth with all this
misconceptions. And then the result is they come out completely
ignorant, and the result is we have our cities being contaminated with
this mess. And this is pathetic and tragic and insulting to our society,
truly. And yet nobody opens their mouth; they don't say a word. "Don't
rock the boat," like Dean Wurster at University of California, Berkeley,
used to say; therefore, I don't — I'm not invited to lecture at Cal. But
[at] Los Angeles Cal [University of California, Los Angeles] I did
lecture.
- LASKEY
- Good.
- SORIANO
- But because my client paid for it, see. Interesting —
- LASKEY
- There ' s a way around these things .
- SORIANO
- I know. It has to be men of goodwill, you must have. Yeah, isn't it?
Yeah, it must be men of goodwill to-- Look how beautiful these little
things [microphones] are. Aren't they superb? It took several brains to
devise this instead of the old big microphones.
- LASKEY
- They're fantastic.
- SORIANO
- They are exquisite.
- LASKEY
- They really are.
- SORIANO
- This size, already, instead of that size. They used to be heavy. Look at
that crate over here. That weighs seventy-five pounds. That was one of
the Webster tape recorders, the first one that came out. Look how
beautifully designed it was. It has one speed only; seven- and-a-half.
But the speaker, the tone is lousy because in those days, you know, went
back [with little experimentation] .
- LASKEY
- But that was state-of-the-art.
- SORIANO
- That was the one. And then it was beautiful the way it turns out. But
look at it now; they're even smaller ones than that.
- LASKEY
- Much smaller. This is a big one.
- SORIANO
- Of course. And I'll tell you, it makes me think. It makes me think a
lot. And this requires men of goodwill, people who dare. They dare in
this area, but we don't dare in housing, in architecture. Very most
antiquated mess! Yes.
1.5. TAPE NUMBER: III, SIDE ONE (JULY 20, 1985)
- LASKEY
- According to Esther McCoy's bibliography of your work, in 1938 you did
the Austrian House, the Polito House, the Ross House, and the Lee and
Cady Warehouse. Now, those are all important house — projects.
- SORIANO
- The Lee and Cady was before '37. That was a wrong date.
- LASKEY
- Okay.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. That was way, way in '36, I believe.
- LASKEY
- Really? Okay.
- SORIANO
- Lee and Cady was a steel building which I did with Ruppell, the name she
mentions there that Fritz Ruppell was my mentor, which was not right. He
was a friend of mine. I mean, she romanticized all kinds of things which
I never said.
- LASKEY
- What about Fritz Ruppell?
- SORIANO
- Fritz Ruppell was the president of the Lattice Steel Corporation of
California. He used to make prefabricated light steel construction near
the prefabricating plant in Pasadena. And I, in fact, would work with
him. We advised him to make prefabricated lift slabs using lattice
steel, with one-inch plumber's tape. And I was responsible to work with
him. And I said, "Why don't you do that and that way. And then to lift
already precast cement walls on the floor with this lattice steel of
his, putting cement, and then with two hooks lift them up after they
were cured." Yeah, they were the first prefabricated cement walls,
sections of walls.
- LASKEY
- And you worked with him —
- SORIANO
- Yes, on that.
- LASKEY
- — to develop those?
- SORIANO
- Yes .
- LASKEY
- How did you meet him?
- SORIANO
- I met him through, I believe, if my memory doesn't fail me, through an
engineer friend of mine in the county. I think it was a friend of
Cassatt Griffin which I mentioned before. And I can't recollect his
name, but I'll have it. I have it in my records. And he was a lovely
person. They were a friend of his because being an engineer in Pasadena
they knew each other. So he [Griffin's friend] introduced him to me, and
then from there on our friendship flourished. And then immediately I was
consultant for the Lee and Cady, and then I immediately went and we
started doing work in the steel, you see. And I did the [George and Ida
Latz Memorial] Jewish Community Center, was a steel building; Lattice
Steel Corporation of California built it, you see. And then the house,
too, was done at the same time, my first steel house with this type of
system, light steel.
- LASKEY
- Now, I call that, your first steel house, the Katz House, but you prefer
to call it the Gato House.
- SORIANO
- I call it Gato for this reason: He [Milton Katz] was a dishonest man, he
chiseled my fees by pretending that he didn't have any money, that he
spent all the money in the house which was — I helped him even, built it
so it wouldn't cost him too much, because Lattice Steel did it and I
asked him not to charge him too much. And then he said, "My wife's
pregnant — we're going to have a baby. Do you mind waiting for your
fee?" I said, "That's all right." At the time I was busy and it didn't
even matter to me. I waited a couple of years or so. Then all of a
sudden I got very busy and I needed the payroll and I called him. I said
— I forgot — Milton, yes — "Milton, will you please--" "Oh, gee, I
haven't got it." And then I learned afterwards that he was the owner of
several theaters, movie houses in Hollywood. He had the Newsreel Theater
and several other theater houses. And yeah, they used to make money in
those days. Everybody used to go to the movies. And he didn't have it.
And then I said, "Well, can you pay me $100 a month?" It's $500 he owed
me. And, "Oh, I haven't got it." "How about $50?" "No, no, no." I said,
"Twenty- five?" "Well, I'll see. Twenty- five — " I said, "Well, let's
do that and I want to get through because I need this money." I said,
"Milton, I didn't charge you interest or anything." Then he said,
"Okay." He agreed. And then he took two months and he sends me $15. Then
my secretary and I used to call and call and call. And then he used to
delay weeks and he used to send me $5. I mean, this kind of thing —
Finally, my secretary said, "I'm sick and tired. I don't want to do it.
I get so wrapped up with this." And I said, "Well, forget it. We'll drop
it." And so, therefore, this is what happened. I published the house and
I called it the Gato House; Katz —
- LASKEY
- Spanish.
- SORIANO
- — in Spanish, Gato. [laughter] I called it that. So I wouldn't give him
the credit to put his name there and I don't see why — Because he didn't
contribute anything. I did it.
- LASKEY
- Well, I was going to ask you about that because [Paul] Heyer in his book
Architects on Architecture refers to it
as the Gato House.
- SORIANO
- Yes .
- LASKEY
- Esther McCoy refers to it as the Katz House- -
- SORIANO
- Well, she made a —
- LASKEY
- --and I was interested- -
- SORIANO
- Esther doesn't check with me all these things. She should have because
I-- This is exactly why I did it. Now you know the true story. And that
will be in my book that way, too.
- LASKEY
- Well, now, the Katz House, or the Gato House —
- SORIANO
- Yeah .
- LASKEY
- — actually was a little bit later, right? That was in the early forties
and after the houses- -
- SORIANO
- After I built the —
- LASKEY
- — like the Polito House.
- SORIANO
- --after I built the Jewish Community Center in '38.
- LASKEY
- After the —
- SORIANO
- Yeah, about that, about '37, '38. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- But I think in particular there- -the Polito House has always looked
like an extremely interesting structure built on the three levels.
- SORIANO
- Well, yes. It was in a very steep hillside in Hollywood and I built it
that way because that was the most logical thing. And I put a beautiful
little three-story cube and then I have a lovely bridge across to go to
the grounds which is very elegant.
- LASKEY
- Now, most-- Now, on the street side is mostly a blank facade, right?
- SORIANO
- That's right. On the street is a blank facade. The garage is down below
the first floor and then we go up the lovely stairs and there are rooms
with few lights on the-- But everything's facing towards the gardens and
park which was the [garden aviers] in there. Yeah. So, in other words ,
why put on the street things that you don ' t want on the street. Big
glasses, I put small glasses [windows] .
- LASKEY
- Well, and I also read, in one of the magazines it was published in, that
under the stairways, I believe, had a sandblasted —
- SORIANO
- Glass.
- LASKEY
- — glass window to let light —
- SORIANO
- It's huge.
- LASKEY
- — to light up the stairway.
- SORIANO
- That's right.
- LASKEY
- Must have — get beautiful light.
- SORIANO
- It's lovely; it's beautiful. The whole thing is a lovely house. One of
my wood houses? [laughs]
- LASKEY
- But all of these houses would have been wood houses —
- SORIANO
- They were all —
- LASKEY
- --until--
- SORIANO
- Yes.
- LASKEY
- — until you got into steel which came —
- SORIANO
- With the Gato House.
- LASKEY
- — later. It came with the Gato House. But there was the, as I say and
according to these records, you did four or five houses in one year, and
that must have been also at the time when you had your accident.
- SORIANO
- No .
- LASKEY
- But you — No? Was this after?
- SORIANO
- No. Before the accident I had several houses, and after the accident I
did also a few. I have to check in my records exactly what the dates
[are]. Unfortunately, I don't have them in my brains at this point.
- LASKEY
- Another house that was published a lot and that was fascinating and
that, unfortunately, seems to have been really destroyed in the process
was the Lukens House.
- SORIANO
- Oh, yes. The Lukens was a lovely house. It was a beautiful house I did.
That was before my accident. Sure.
- SORIANO
- I have it as 1940. Is that wrong?
- SORIANO
- I believe so. This was done before, I believe, at the time it was taken.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yes, because he [Glen Lukens] bought himself the old garden from an old
estate, wherever it was. I forgot even the address. Do you have it
there?
- LASKEY
- Yes, 3425 West Twenty- seventh Street- -
- SORIANO
- West Twenty- seventh Street.
- LASKEY
- Which is just off Adams [Boulevard] .
- SORIANO
- Yes. That's right. And he had — It was an old, old house- -estate, big
garden. He bought that garden and I built for him — I think it was
before my accident. Yeah, because I was going to USC [University of
Southern California] then and I knew Glen Lukens was a ceramicist; was a
professor of ceramics there. Yeah. And the dates are wrong because I
will look into that when it — You see, sometimes when they are
published, they might be published later than they appear as if they are
like that, you see.
- LASKEY
- Okay.
- SORIANO
- I have to really check my dates myself because the drawings will tell
exactly when.
- LASKEY
- Yeah. Most of the information I have shows it as 1940.
- SORIANO
- Well--
- LASKEY
- But that's--
- SORIANO
- It could have been before my —
- LASKEY
- But as you say, that's just when it was published.
- SORIANO
- Sure , sure .
- LASKEY
- And it was a combination of a studio —
- SORIANO
- It was a studio in one side and I put this beautiful frosted glass,
sandblasted glass to get all the light in there. And then [there] was a
beautiful balcony with veranda to go to the living areas on one side and
the studio on the other side, yeah, with a garage, which was very
beautiful, really. It was an exciting house. And I did everything. I
designed all the interiors; I always do.
- LASKEY
- Oh, you do? I was going to ask you because —
- SORIANO
- Always. I always —
- LASKEY
- — you had done the interior in this one, specifically because there are
pictures of it.
- SORIANO
- I did the interiors of every one of my wood houses. Yeah. Every one. The
Austrian, the Driver, the Gogol House, the Lipetz House, everything
else. I did all the interiors as well. I always do that, including the
landscaping.
- LASKEY
- Oh, you did the landscaping?
- SORIANO
- I always did all the landscaping in all my buildings. Yes, ma'am. Yeah,
because I know — I'm a good gardener and I love, I love blossoms, I love
trees. I used to go and select the most beautiful plants.
- LASKEY
- Did you ever get a lot of static from your clients about, in conflict,
with what they wanted and with what you wanted?
- SORIANO
- No. No, because I discuss that with them. I'm very open. I discuss
before even-- Because they have to pay for it. And I said, "Look--" And
they used to give me discounts-- Evans and Reeves, I remember in Los
Angeles, used to be the big nursery gardens. And they used to give me
discounts on all the plants and I used to turn them [the discounts] over
to the client. I did. I always did that. To me, I wanted to do the thing
beautifully and I didn't care. You know, my fee in architecture was
enough. I didn't even charge them for the interiors, extras, or anything
like that, except the house on 111 Stone Canyon, but that's another
story. But otherwise, I used to do the interiors with the same cost, you
know, with ten percent. Everything as the cost, yeah. Which was not
enough, but then I wanted this to be well and I want the clients to--to
really be--to afford it. And for that reason I used to be gracious
enough, I think, to really be cooperative so that at least to make it
possible, and it helped me and it helped them.
- LASKEY
- Now, with the Lukens House you already had a garden. So what did you —
- SORIANO
- It was a big estate, actually, big, big--a lot of grounds. And we
planted a few little trees here and there and some flowers around the
house. But the rest of it was old, old trees and all that.
- LASKEY
- That's what I wondered, if you sited the house to-- in the garden to
take advantage of it.
- SORIANO
- You brought up a very good point. I did. We studied the grounds and then
there were a lot of big trees and I put the house within this complex of
trees. Yeah. Yeah. It was oriented so to take advantage of the trees and
the beautiful old oak trees. And the photographs that were published, as
you can see, have that lovely quality. Yeah. So I remember one tree
which was a beautiful old one. New, you know, a new lot, usually you
plant a tree by the time they grow — It does not have this lovely
quality of nature. My god, I'm supposed to give you coffee. Remember?
I've been boiling the water.
- LASKEY
- Actually, I turned the water — It — When I went to the—
- SORIANO
- You did? [tape recorder off]
- LASKEY
- Go back to the Lee and Cady Warehouse for a minute because that was--
Would that be considered your first steel building? Do you consider
that--
- SORIANO
- It was considered not my own entire creation, no. It was — I was sort of
a consultant for [Fritz] Ruppell. And he had another architect that he —
friend of his that used to work, but he was not very creative according
to Ruppell. And so I was there trying to make it [a] little more
creative. And still-- And he had already some plans done which I kept
fixing it, cleaning them up with more order, you see.
- LASKEY
- [laughter] Right.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. This is the Lee and Cady.
- LASKEY
- But how-- Lee and Cady was in Michigan and it just seems like —
- SORIANO
- Ferndale, Michigan. It was a Quaker products — Quaker Oats. Yeah,
because of Fritz Ruppell. Um-hm. And I had, a house that I did years
later, my forty- foot spans in Youngstown, Ohio.
- LASKEY
- Oh.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. Very few people know that.
- LASKEY
- Well, did this spark a greater interest in steel or —
- SORIANO
- No, I went-- You see, I right away went into steel because I saw the
potential of metallurgy, the potential of steel. Because with wood, you
know, what do you do? It's just simply try to-- Well, the same old
stuff, and all you do is just put those little sticks all over the
place. And I said this is not the way to build. This is uneconomical,
clumsy, costly, the labor, and then the result is wrong. You have four
walls to hold a little room with these two-by-fours. In mine, I don't
need that. I liberated right away. I went into complete freedom having
just no obstacles. I said why not? Why not have the structure to be
self-tenable than anything else inside to be flexible. A bomb could go
off and yet the structure will still stand, you see. You still have the
shelter. And this is the fact I did the office building of Adolph's in
Burbank that same way. All this stuff came from different parts of the
United States. All prefabricated to be assembled in Burbank. Yeah.
There's no bearing wall there. When you go inside, you'll see there's no
bearing wall in this whole area. There 're only those columns that I
showed you yesterday. There are three columns eight inches in-
-eight-by-eight I-beams of steel, spanning forty- foot modules in one
direction and twenty in the other. That's the whole module. And then two
cantilevers like that; one twenty feet and one ten feet to take care of
the whole lot. That's all.
- LASKEY
- Leaving the interior free —
- SORIANO
- Completely free.
- LASKEY
- — to do anything you want to —
- SORIANO
- And I remember many times when I built houses like that, afterwards
people used to say, "What is that? Is that a house?" And I said, "Yes."
"Well, where are the rooms?" I said, "You wait. They'll be there." We
used to finish the whole thing: finish the ceiling, the roof, and all
the floors were finished, and then we used to install the walls, the
outside enclosure. And then the inside still was a huge cube, empty. And
then the cabinets used to make the rooms, prefabricated cabinets. That's
what I did. I have some details of that. This is the method that I used
and I've been using it ever since. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Were those cabinets, once they got in, they were movable, right?
- SORIANO
- Yes. You can move them.
- LASKEY
- So that if you wanted to rearrange the size —
- SORIANO
- Yeah, but it would be kind of hard for anybody- - one person to do it.
- LASKEY
- But it could be done.
- SORIANO
- Oh, of course. We did-- As a matter of fact, I'll give you an
interesting example that when we built the Adolph's Building their
laboratory was inside of that — the whole lot. Then finally they
extended very big and [so] they were in need of office rooms, so we put
the laboratory in another building someplace else. And then we
remodeled, we readjust[ed] the area of the laboratories for some living
areas. Yeah, for offices. And it was done very simply. And exactly to —
with the same details of the rest of the building, [by] removing the
laboratory and putting some offices without destroying anything. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Well, was that idea ever explored with the idea of single-family
dwellings?
- SORIANO
- I did. This what I told you already, that I'd sent in Hawaii. Eleven
housing units of that and now I'm proposing to the governments, to all
kinds of people, [that] in four days I can build — In one day I can
build four houses with six unskilled persons.
- LASKEY
- But once the house is built with the module, with the module idea, it
sounds like it would be easy to add on or to add on rooms.
- SORIANO
- You could.
- LASKEY
- I'm thinking in terms of a young family that might grow in number, that
the house could expand or contract.
- SORIANO
- Yes. You could do that, but let me tell you something. There's a danger
there. You see, most people think they can do it themselves. That's no
good. In my system, I give them open patios, pergolas, or-- Yeah, but
the open patios with two columns the size of a big room already, with
the roof, partially enclosed [so] that if they want to add this as
another room, it'll be part of the same structure rather than leaving it
to the public to call the carpenter or somebody else, and this is what
they will do. They will put something which is totally different and
will make a mess of the original concept, you see. This type of thing
has happened in Israel, for example, not of mine. An engineer took me
once to show me a project that they were building with blocks, cement
blocks. You know, over there that's all they did, mostly. And then they
said, "Well, we have a place here for the clients to add their own room,
another room if they want to." And he showed me what the clients did.
Everybody's misconception, all the junk, all the nonsense, and the whole
thing was ruined. In my case, no. In my case I really pre-establish
areas like patios, pergolas, and if they want to enclose that room, make
another room or two rooms, they have it — They have already established
— the roof is there, the columns are there. All they put is the vertical
walls to enclose it. I'll show you. I have some plans of that.
- LASKEY
- If you were building-- When you plan today, would you stick with
aluminum or would you move on because you've always been interested in,
you know, exploring. Are there new metals that you would build with?
- SORIANO
- I would move on indeed, but the trouble is the cost. So far, the
aluminum is still cheaper. It's a little more expensive than steel; it
always has been. But in the total workings of it, it's cheaper than
anything because it can have the whole thing anodized and easy to
fabricate, easy to ship because it's lighter than steel, and it doesn't
require upkeep. With steel you have to paint it. Look at our Golden Gate
Bridge. By the time you finish one end of painting, you start the other
one, and it never ends. But with aluminum, you don't have to do that.
You anodize, you're there; already prefinished colors. You remember the
days I showed you how beautiful they were, those greens and blues and
yellows, blacks.
- LASKEY
- And they stay that way.
- SORIANO
- Sure .
- LASKEY
- Well, going back again to the thirties, you did do a couple of houses
that were sheathed in wood, that looked very different: your Strauss
House —
- SORIANO
- Yes .
- LASKEY
- — and the Ebert House.
- SORIANO
- The Strauss House was a whole wood house; completely wood. They are in a
cluster. Yeah. That was the, one of the complete wood houses I tried.
And I used the wood very elegantly, very good. Was a beautiful house, I
thought .
- LASKEY
- It is a beautiful house —
- SORIANO
- It is. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- — looking at the pictures.
- SORIANO
- But that's a lousy picture. Esther [McCoy], really, she just doesn't
realize, doesn't have any sensitivity to at least ask me — They went
with [Julius] Shulman-- She [McCoy] got whatever photographs maybe
Shulman gave her. And this is the worst picture to show what it is. I
could show you — I don't know if I have the Strauss House here in one of
the magazines. Gosh, I have all the publications here, in here. Aah, la,
la, la. [looks through papers]
- LASKEY
- I did see other pictures of it. This was just the one that was
convenient for —
- SORIANO
- Yeah, but it is--
- LASKEY
- --reproducing. But I saw it in the research —
- SORIANO
- Yeah, but she didn't have it; she didn't have the right pictures. I have
some beautiful pictures of that.
- LASKEY
- Well, it was a beautiful house.
- SORIANO
- It is an exquisite one. That was in Cheviot Hills. Did you see it?
Actually?
- LASKEY
- Only in the —
- SORIANO
- — photographs.
- LASKEY
- Again, only so many — I tried to see some of the houses and they're very
hard to see.
- SORIANO
- I don't know in what condition it is now. I don't know. Maybe someday I
should make a [unintelligible] trip there to go and see my old, to visit
every one of them. It's interesting what state they are-- It would be
interesting.
- LASKEY
- Well, if you ever want to do that, let me know--
- SORIANO
- Thank you.
- LASKEY
- --when you're down there and I would be happy to escort — [tape recorder
off] Then came the Hallawell Nursery [and Garden Center] .
- SORIANO
- The Hallawell Nursery was before that. It was actually in '39 when we
start doing the drawings, when we did the drawings.
- LASKEY
- Now, was that your first--
- SORIANO
- It was my first prefabricated —
- LASKEY
- — prefabricated--
- SORIANO
- --that I [dash] from one area to another area, one city to another city.
It was — You know, I'm pretty daring, I think, in many ways.
- LASKEY
- Well, you —
- SORIANO
- Maybe I'm ornery [unintelligible].
- LASKEY
- [laughter] Well, how did you accomplish it? How did you — What is
prefabricated where, and sent where?
- SORIANO
- Okay. I — What I did was this: I made complete drawings, made of steel.
Then we got some contractors in San Francisco to give some bids. And I
told my client [Hallawell Seed Company] that that was going to cost
about $19,000 for the whole thing, the way I estimated it myself. Then
we gave it to the contractors who all of a sudden-- The contractors, you
know, they are very peculiar people. Unless they're familiar with the
old stuff that they did, anything that's different, they immediately
raise the price two, three times, without even studying carefully. And,
as a matter of fact, they came in with a big price, so my client called
me [and] says, "Raphael, you know, we won't be able to afford this price
they've been quoting us. I'm sorry." And I said, "Well, let me see what
it is." So I flew down — those DC-3s at the time, I remember. And — Or
took the train; I don't even remember what I did now. That was
something. It was the —
- LASKEY
- Probably the train. The Lark?
- SORIANO
- --train. Yeah. I used to change even to go to Berkeley with the Santa
Fe, it was. Yes, with the Trailways system to somewheres near San Luis
Obispo, then change to the train to land in Berkeley, then take the
ferry across.
- LASKEY
- Well, what was the original commission? What was it that you were going
to do for Hallawell?
- SORIANO
- Well, Hallawell, they wanted this nursery, a nursery building. They
showed me the plot of land and they were operating there. And it was all
made of wood, stud junk. And I said, "I'll do something very lovely for
you." Then I used also some of the lath houses that they had, some of
the wood lath. You see, the one on top- -they stay on top of the new
steel. I used the old wood lath that they had already in order to save
money. Because they just — it acts like this, like a shape for the
plants. I used that. The main structure's made of steel, very light, on
a module again. And so I came down and I asked the steel contractors- -
or the contractor gave me — "Well, whoever heard of a nursery of steel?
Why not wood? " And I said, "Well, why do you say that?" I said, "Why
not give an actual bid? You have all the drawings." "Well, we don't know
what contingencies." "Now, what contingencies?" I said, "Look, I have
the drawings here. They have complete details. Bid according to that,
okay?" "Well, whoever heard — " Again, they started this. I said, "Will
you please — Is that what you do with the skyscrapers?" I said to them,
"When you do a multiple building, a high-rise building, do you do this?"
And so finally he said, "Well, I don't know. We'll refigure." The figure
still was expensive. They still may want to — So that to protect
themselves, thinking that it will be contingencies because they have
never seen anything like that before. So finally I got so mad. And my
clients, they said, "Raphael, we only have a certain budget as you told
us. Beyond that, we cannot." So I said, "Okay." You know what I did? I
talked to Fritz. "Fritz, this is what I have and they're being-- Can we
fabricate it and we go there with two of your welders and fly over the
weekend and erect that damn thing?" "Oh, sure. Hell." [laughter] And
that's what I did. You see, I always have-- He gave me a quotation, then
I flew in and I got the plasterers, the electrical men, the plumbers to
give us a bid for that separately. Then I added the whole thing; it was
just as cheap what I told them. In fact, it was even less, few hundred
dollars less, from the $19,000 they want. Then we went and built it. And
as a matter of fact, I got a $500 bonus later on because they did so
much business from that. And I did those — On account of that, I did
their new Market Street store. Yes. Which was a beautiful store with the
most innovative things of selling packets of seeds. I have marvelous
color pictures of that . Yeah .
- LASKEY
- Well, what part of the nursery was fabricated down here and how did you
get it — ?
- SORIANO
- Nothing was fabricated down here. Everything was fabricated in Pasadena
and shipped here. The whole —
- LASKEY
- I'm sorry, I'm sorry. That's what I meant. What part was done in
Pasadena?
- SORIANO
- The whole building was done in Pasadena. All the frame, all this that
you see in the nursery, except the plasterwork, was done by the
plasterers in San Francisco. The electricians came in and did that. The
rest, the walls, the framing, everything was done in Pasadena.
- LASKEY
- And you just loaded it on the truck?
- SORIANO
- Yeah. First time. And then I came in with them, with the welders on the
same truck. And we ran the job and helped them build this and that. Then
we have--we got up there, we made a whole frame ready to be plastered
and all that. We called the plasterers, the electricians, the plumber to
do their work. And I did very interesting innovations. Even some new
lath houses of wood we have, that a cabinet man do that. And everything
was done-- [tape recorder off]
- LASKEY
- Well, you also were involved in the design of the interior of the
nursery itself, weren't you?
- SORIANO
- Yes.
- LASKEY
- That is the —
- SORIANO
- All the cabinets —
- LASKEY
- — all the cabinets —
- SORIANO
- --all the storage facilities, display cases. Even the lighting fixtures
I did. Yes. I designed even the lighting fixtures with the- -which I
used even in houses later on. I had one hundred, two hundred, three
hundred, four hundred, five hundred, six hundred watts by doing this
[demonstrates shape], with a switch, by hand. In those days, you know,
they were primitive things. But I had those fixtures done with sheet
metal housing, my own reflector — indirect lighting- -throughout the
store. I mean, these are all things that I always used to do. Very —
With peace and beautiful quality of the display merchandise instead of
glare. They were in all indirect lighting as the sun would do, you see.
Okay. Now, let's see if that's — [tape recorder off] What were you
saying about the — ?
- LASKEY
- Well, in steel at this point, you did — the Hallawell was just prewar.
Just prior to the war--
- SORIANO
- Yes .
- LASKEY
- --and the involvement. What would the effect of the war have on your
steel construction?
- SORIANO
- The war was very difficult, no matter steel or any other material. In
fact, the OPA [Office of Price Administration] at the time--if you
remember or may not remember that OPA —
- LASKEY
- I do.
- SORIANO
- They used to specify and direct how much material. If you had to do a
little remodeling, even then, to fix a little showcase, you had to have
permission what materials you will get and this and that. And therefore,
I did several stores, you know, little clothing stores, jewelry shops
type of thing. In fact, I did a restaurant on Hollywood Boulevard, the
Pep's Restaurant, which they got a permission to do that with the
understanding that it was one to serve to the GIs steaks and, you know,
everything was rationed. And so I devised a very beautiful restaurant
right on Hollywood Boulevard with the chefs cooking steaks right in
front. I put the grid right there with the chefs. And, you know,
every--all the GIs, everybody passing by, their mouths — And then inside
I had a long — it was a long store; we converted it into a
restaurant--some beautiful blue and black booths, blue seats of --vinyl
seats, and black painted stuff. It was a very exciting type of a — very
beautiful restaurant. I have some Kodachromes of these. And it was
published. I published some of these things in some of the magazines.
And we had [a] permit to build that with the understanding that they
were going to charge very low prices for the GIs. And everything was
prescribed: a slice of bread will cost that much, butter was rationed,
even a piece of — square of butter, and then the steaks will cost that
much. And [for] that reason we got the permit to build that restaurant.
- LASKEY
- You had to specify that before you could even get the permit to build?
- SORIANO
- You didn't get that — Yes, you have to apply, and then suggest and tell
that this is what we're going to do. Yeah. And for-- With that
understanding, then you get the permit to get all the materials;
otherwise, you couldn't do it. And I don't know if I did — when I did
the Ciro's Bond Street — the jewelry shops or whatever it is-- No, I did
that afterwards, I believe. But even then, there was a rationed type of
material. I couldn't even get materials. But I did the Bond's — Ciro's,
Bond Street, from England. I did a Beverly Hills shop which is still
standing there on Wilshire Boulevard. The one here, unfortunately, that
was the most beautiful gem, it's nonexistent now. The lease expired and
they didn't [renew] it. So, I could get materials because of my
friendship with some of these contractors, and I used the National
Cornice Works which was a sheet metal maker. Mr. Ness was the — that
doesn't matter; it's just a name of the president of the company- -was
the president of the National Cornice Works. And he was--used to take
his integrity to do the right work. He used to come to the job to
supervise how the craftsmen were doing. That's for roofers, you know.
You put sheet metal all around [in] those days for the wood houses . And
that ' s for the wood houses we ' re talking about, and I used to do —
And I met this man. He was so nice that he used to carry the job with
integrity. And I got very friendly with him. Every time I used to get a
sheet metal work, I used to call the National Cornice['s] Mr. Ness and
he used to give me a price. I wouldn't even get another bid because I
know it will be fair, but I know the work will be superb. And I know it
won't be, sort of, be out of line. So I told him, I said, "I have these
shops and I need some brass. Is there any bronze or brass? They want
some-- that high-class, to look like gold." "Well, for you, Raphael, I
will do it." They were doing submarine work for the navy, they rationed,
put a requisition of all this fancy materials. He said, "We have enough
of this to give you these details for the showcases." And I designed the
most elegant shop. I designed all their showcases, their chairs, their
storage facilities with the drawers with brass pulls. Everything was
done-- It was one of the most elegant stores. I have some beautiful
Kodachrome slides which I'll show you. And, really, it was one of the
most elegant buildings. And because of that friendship, again, with the
president of a corp — sheet metal works, I could get these materials
which is impossible to get. Everybody used to say, "How did you get
that?" Of course, I won't tell them where. [laughter] Then, because of
that lovely, elegant store- -You know the V. C. Morris Company that
Frank Lloyd Wright did on Maiden Lane [San Francisco]?
- LASKEY
- Oh, yes. Off Maiden--on Maiden Lane.
- SORIANO
- That was my store, originally. I had a contract to do that.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yes. I had a contract to do the V. C. Morris because of that. They saw
this lovely gem right on Union Square that was next to Macy's, 257 Geary
[Street]. That's where it was. And then he, the Morrises called me and
said, "Look, Mr. Soriano, we love that store you did. We'd like [you] to
do our store." All right; I did that. And I had a contract. Now, all of
a sudden one day I came in with drawings to have a conference with them,
and who was on the door? Mr. Wright. And Mr. Morris and Mrs. Morris. Mr.
Wright was a friend of Mrs. Morris and he designed a house for them to
be built right beyond the bridge overlooking a cliff on the water, but
they never built it.
- LASKEY
- I was going to say, was it ever built? Because it doesn't sound
familiar.
- SORIANO
- No, it was never built, but the drawings were published, you see. Then,
all of a sudden when I was at- -I met him right at the door, as they
were coming out to go to lunch-- I just came in from the airport with
drawings. And immediately Frank Lloyd Wright said, "What is Soriano
doing for you?" Because he saw that I had drawings. And he [Mr. Morris]
says, "Well, he's doing our shop." "Oh. Why didn't you call me?" And
then he said, "Well, we didn't know that you would be interested in such
a small job." "Oh, sure. I can do the job and Soriano could supervise
it." And I said, "Mr. Wright, you know, our ideas are entirely in
opposite camps. And besides, I don't supervise anybody else's work
except mine." And then they said, "Well, come and have lunch." I said,
"No, no. Go ahead since you were going out to lunch. I'll see you. I
have another client to see anyway." So I saw them afterwards. They were
mortified, the Morrises, because Mr. Wright insisted that he wants to do
the job. And then Mr. Morris said, "Well, maybe he'll forget . " But he
didn't. He kept sending them sketches after sketches. So he was terribly
upset and he said to me, "I know I'll go broke if he does the job, but
my wife is insisting because they're friends." And I said, [knocking on
door] "Look, if you want to find out about this, forget it." I said,
"Look, you can give it to him if he's that hungry for a job," I said,
"but I'm not going to be part of this nonsense."
1.6. TAPE NUMBER: III, SIDE TWO (JULY 20, 1985)
- SORIANO
- I said, "If he [Wright] needs the job so badly — " I said, "This is
unethical, to begin with. Once we have a contract with another
architect, you don't go and take it away. I wouldn't do that to — Even
when I have sometimes plans from other architects, I usually call the
architects and I ask the client to give me a written letter that he is
not engaged by this other architect." I say those things, you see. And
this is only the ethics. And so finally I said, "Give it to him." And
then I got paid for what I did. And so that's why in the end he went
broke, sure enough .
- LASKEY
- Morris did?
- SORIANO
- Sure. Because he [Wright] made a big tour de force, you know, like he
got a-- They couldn't display all these gifts that he [Morris] had. They
were glassware and gifts, very fancy gifts that they used to sell. It
was a real elegant store. And of course from then it [made] it
impossible to exhibit anything and it costs so much, naturally, to do
all these big round circles.
- LASKEY
- The ramp.
- SORIANO
- So anyway, so, this was it. Then I told his son in Beverly Hills, Lloyd
Wright, I said, "Lloyd, do you know what your father did?" And I
explained [it to] him. He said, "Oh, god, Raphael. If that will console
you, he stole three or four churches from me." From his son. Yeah.
That's what Lloyd Wright told me. This is the type of ethics that Frank
Lloyd Wright had and most people don't know that. He was — no scruples
at all, as a human being.
- LASKEY
- Did he need the work that badly?
- SORIANO
- I don't know if he needed it or not. No matter what, even if you were
starving, if I were starving, I would not take anybody's work. This is
not ethical. It's impossible. I mean, where is the human ethics in life?
Above a profession a human being should be ethical, should have
integrity. This is [the] first thing, you're a human being. And that
implies everything with it. Without that, if you don't have that — Who
was it-- Beethoven said that, said something very beautiful. He said,
"There is one great mark of a human being: the kindness of the heart."
He said, "When that is lacking, there is no human being, there's no
great artist." Beethoven said that. Isn't that interesting?
- LASKEY
- It is.
- SORIANO
- And just to show you that in — After all, life is that. God, if you
don't have enough integrity among us, especially professional people,
then what is there? Then we are bandits; just robbers, scavengers,
aren't we? And all this publicity-- You can be the greatest man in the
world and you can be a scavenger like that. It's silly. And I was really
shocked. Yeah. Most people don't know those things, you see, of him. But
I happen to have a nice little archives of experiences that most people
don't know. Yeah. This will be all in my book; I will put all of that.
Sure.
- LASKEY
- Well, how did Mr. Morris justify — or I guess he really couldn't
justify--
- SORIANO
- He couldn't justify anything except that his wife really wanted to give
it because naturally Frank Lloyd Wright is a bigger name, she — And then
he was friend of the family, you see. They were very good friends with
Frank Lloyd Wright and apparently she wanted that. And he designed that
house which they never built. And thinking that, one and the two, even
though they appreciated my lovely store I did which they both admired
very much. And still Frank Lloyd Wright insisted on doing it. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- That's amazing. Really is amazing.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, that's the way life is. I can tell you stories about all the
projects that architects stole from me. It's shameful. Yeah. Anyway, I
had the IBM Building to do right here in the San Francisco area and
what's-his- name stole it. John Bowles did it. My drawings, the drawings
that I did — I have drawings, this is one of them. And I had several of
those. Maybe twenty or something- -that I gave for decision after I had
a contract already. And I gave it to — I sent the drawings to Mr.
[Thomas J.] Watson [Jr.] at the time who became the chairman of the
board. He was the president of the area here in Palo Alto. And they
said, "We'll have to send the drawings to New York for that final
approval . " They wanted me; it's already set. I had a contract with
them. And I didn't have any response for a couple weeks or so. And then
before that, I had an assistant- -I used to have all kinds of assistants
come to me looking for [a] job and one was a fellow by the name of
Cruzen, I believe, from New York. His father was an architect — don't
worry; don't mark that one — and he said, "I want you — my son to have a
little influence [from] you. Can you give him some time?" I said, "Well,
I have no space; however, he can be here for a week . " And he came over
here and worked a little bit. And then I said, "Now, you look for
another job because I need the space . " And he went to find a job in
John Bowles's office in San Francisco. And he called me and said, "Mr.
Soriano, you know, they have the drawings for IBM in Mr. Bowles office."
I said, "What?" [He] said, "Yes." I said, "Will you please go inside and
see again. Be sure they are the drawings . " "Yes, yes. They are your
drawings for IBM." And then I called Watson and I asked — I said, "Mr.
Watson," I said, "what's happening to the drawings that you were
supposed to tell me [about] from New York?" "Well, you know, it takes
time." I said, "Well, tell me one thing. I understand they are in one
architect's office in San Francisco, John Bowles's specifically, John
Bowles's office." "Who told you that?" I said, "Well, an assistant of
mine told me that." "What's his name?" I said, "I'm not going to tell
you his name, but is it or is it not?" And he sent me-- Mr. Crooks was
his--the engineer-- Charming, even though his name sounds funny.
- LASKEY
- [laughter] It sounds appropriate.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, but it was — No.
- LASKEY
- No?
- SORIANO
- This was a marvelous engineer. He liked my drawings. They were elated,
really. At the time I was even — I was married and we went to Lietz
Company for materials, to buy some materials. They said,
"Congratulations, Mr. Soriano." I said, "On what?" "You're doing the IBM
job, aren't you?" I said, "Yes. How did you know?" "Well, the engineers
came in. They were happy that you're going to do their job and they are
thrilled with it." And we were so happy, you know. We had a marvelous
dinner to celebrate that we know we had the job definitely. And then he
came to tell me — he was crying, that engineer. Now, this is a true
story. He says the John Bowles's father-in-law apparently was a
fabricator or manufacturer of company planes, small planes, and he was
playing golf with the chairman of the board of IBM. They concocted
between the two of them that his son-in-law over here should do the job.
Therefore, I got paid and all that, but I didn't-- I could have sued
both of them; I didn't. In those days, I just dropped it. [I was] never
so disgusted. Yeah. I lost [a] beautiful job there, too.
- LASKEY
- When was this?
- SORIANO
- Gosh, I don't even remember. I was — Maybe it must have been twenty
years ago, easily. Yeah. I did the most beautiful plan, most exquisite
concepts, really. I designed all the cabinets for the scientist to study
properly. As you can see, this drawing over there, that's all—
- LASKEY
- It's beautiful.
- SORIANO
- — for the —
- LASKEY
- In color.
- SORIANO
- The concept is so lovely. Now, these are little cells for the creative
scientists — IBM — the thinkers, you know. And then there is several of
them in here. And this is a hallway going to their big building to do
their research, to experiment in what they thought [of] in these
cubicles.
- LASKEY
- Now, these are glass walls —
- SORIANO
- These are all glass walls in a beautiful ambience of parks because there
were acres of land all around there.
- LASKEY
- What is the ceiling?
- SORIANO
- It's all aluminum: this [indicates rhythm] snap, crackle, pop.
- LASKEY
- That's just--it's the corrugated aluminum.
- SORIANO
- This type of thing. Acoustically beautiful, you see, and insulated.
Well, anyway, so that's one of those things. So, what can you do? It's
the tragedy of our civilization and the lack of ethics of humanity.
Really. Yeah. And people keep asking, "Well, why don't you have — ? Why
is it that you're not so active? You don't know business." I say, "I've
been very busy. I did my best. But we're dealing with gangsters. And so
I don't have to be equally as gangstery and be careless and not give a
damn, really."
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Or keep your integrity and then take your chances, as they say. But I'd
rather be the way I am. So what; one job less. But I would've loved to
have done that. Certainly. It would have been a beautiful job. They were
marvelous concepts, what I had, really.
- LASKEY
- Did you ever get a chance to apply them in another building?
- SORIANO
- No, it's kind of hard. No. And even IBM, you know, they could have
called me again after all this. I mean, they ['re] shameless. And then
the same Watson became the chairman of the board afterwards. Well, I
didn't care to deal with those people, you see. Their regular engineers,
their creative people liked my ideas. They were absolutely enthralled
with what I did. They loved them. Yeah. Yeah. Such is life.
- LASKEY
- Very sad. We were talking about the difficulty of getting material --
- SORIANO
- Oh, yes, and during the war.
- LASKEY
- — in the Second World War.
- SORIANO
- I told you already the problem. There was nothing unless you apply for
specific reasons and so on. And then they'll give you all this, give you
so much or such and such of materials, no more, and also limited in
scope. Beyond that, they won't. But now, the tragedy is, darling, that,
you see, in those days in the war, you still could do [a] few little
things. But there wasn't much you can do creatively, really, because you
were restricted completely; war effort and all the materials. And I
wrote articles, even. Designed some housing and so on. Really.
- LASKEY
- Well, even later when you were doing the Shulman House and the Curtis
House when we were- -gotten involved in Korea, you — Wasn't that one of
the reasons that the Shulman House particularly wasn't all steel ,
because there was a shortage of steel?
- SORIANO
- No, that wasn't the reason at all. No. The Shulman House was already a
prototype type of thing. I was using steel and then they wanted finished
ceilings of plaster, you see. They were leery about corrugated ceilings
like that photograph there in color, you see. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- I think we might just mention here that the Shulman House was done for
Julius Shulman —
- SORIANO
- That's correct.
- LASKEY
- — the architectural photographer.
- SORIANO
- That's correct. And, you see, in those days there were people who were
leery about corrugation, corrugated ceilings. Therefore, to use plaster
and to use wood, whatever, then we have to use planks. They were the
simplest things. So I used steel, the whole frame, and then wood in
between so you can either cement with adhesives, with epoxy resins
[from] which I did welded wood. That's — Yes, in those days I never use
nails anymore .
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- I used welded — Yes. You see, I was one of the first who used this
technology in the factories when they used to use planes with wood. They
used to have this plywood, making planes, and they used to weld them
with epoxies. Yes, I did. I never did nails anymore because years and
years ago, when I did the first plaster houses and wood houses in my
period and we used to have little nails, little tiny finish nails to
install the plywood panels of the wood. And then sometimes we have to
even feel those little holes, set them in. That's silly. I said, "What
is all of this nonsense!" Then when I saw this welding, I said, "Well,
now we are in line." And so we have a plywood panel like that,
[demonstrates] you put a few little brush strokes of epoxy like that,
and then you put it against the wall which has a preliminary rough
plywood base underneath the frame. You put it in there already from
floor to ceiling, four-by- eight panels, and all you do--like that, just
as much as I'm telling you now. You press the button with the hand like
that; pssssssss, it's sealed already. It's there. You can't remove it.
Pssss, pssss, psssss, psssss. Already done. And so this is the way it
was built. I did ceilings with that, with wood ceilings. I have several
houses I did wood and the walls of the same and I never used anymore
nails or anything like that. Now, you see, I was constantly tapping new
things.
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- Constantly. Yeah. So the Shulman House- -coming back to the question-
-was done because in those days, you see, I was still — they wanted to,
the clients wanted that kind of a thing. They wanted flat roofs with
plaster and wood and whatever. And so that was the most economical, the
best way. And then even after that I realized the whole thing is
nonsense to do even that. Then I went--I did my Curtis House and which
is the first actually prefabricated house.
- LASKEY
- Oh, really?
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Want to describe that in some detail?
- SORIANO
- Yeah. The first- -the Curtis House was the one because then I did, [for]
the first time, brought in the cabinets when all the frame was there.
That's when everybody used to ask — say, "What is that? A house?" (That
was in Bel Air, you know.)
- LASKEY
- Yes.
- SORIANO
- And I said, "Yes." There are five bathrooms that were completely
finished, enclosed, and the walls we put in — no cabinets in there. Then
we brought in the cabinets.
- LASKEY
- Now, were the walls prefabricated at another site, too?
- SORIANO
- Yes, yes, yes. They were prefabricated and-- Except we applied, at the
finish, cork, insulating cork, on the outside. That was also a first.
Yeah. And I did the same thing in Youngstown, Ohio, for one of the
houses I built there. Cork, even in the snow. And my client was terribly
leery at the time. "Cork? My god," you know, "whoever heard of that?"
And then I called the Armstrong Cork Company at the time [which said],
"No, we don't recommend it." They — That's the cork I'm talking about,
the insulating cork they used to use in the refrigerators. You know that
rough--with holey — cork? Which is dark?
- LASKEY
- Oh, yeah. Right. Right.
- SORIANO
- That's the one I use outside.
- LASKEY
- On the exterior?
- SORIANO
- Yes .
- LASKEY
- In Ohio?
- SORIANO
- In Ohio as well as in Bel Air, the Stone Canyon House. Now, the owner —
That's 1950 already. This is thirty- five years ago. And the owner said,
"My god. This is awful!" I said, "No." "Well, god — " And he calls up.
The cork company says, "We don't recommend It." "Why?" "Because we don't
use it for that." I asked him the same thing. I said, "Well, Just
because you don't use it is not a reason why you don't recommend it."
They don't know, you see. They learn to do something, that's all they
think it's done for.
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- Beyond that, they have no other imagination.
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- And I said, "I want to use it." Not only that, but this came in one
inch, to save money, I have it cut in half an inch because we already
had complete insulation of panel, three-quarters-of-an-inch panel anyway
of plywood. And I put this on the plywood; cement it in, which was —
- LASKEY
- So it was the cork on the plywood?
- SORIANO
- On the plywood, yes, which makes a perfect wall and perfect insulation.
Yeah.
- LASKEY
- And this is the exterior wall?
- SORIANO
- The exterior wall, yeah.
- LASKEY
- And that's filled in between the metal —
- SORIANO
- The metal was —
- LASKEY
- — metal columns.
- SORIANO
- --in ten foot — Ten- foot column modules, yes. And then all this was
anchored completely, top and bottom.
- LASKEY
- I've been curious. You used a lot of steel decking for your roofs and
ceilings. With a flat roof, how did you prevent it from being very hot
in the summer?
- SORIANO
- We have insulation on top. We use fiberglass insulation, an inch and a
half, two inches sometimes, depending on the climate, and that's all.
And then you put roofing on top of that.
- LASKEY
- Roofing on the top of that.
- SORIANO
- Oh, sure.
- LASKEY
- Okay.
- SORIANO
- In the Adolph's Building, you will see, we have a six-inch cell of
metal, perforated metal--not corrugated, but perforated steel mesh —
with cells like that with fiberglass insulation and then the roofing on
top with insulation, too. Yeah. These are all new elements, new
technologies which were used for buildings. They used some of this stuff
— things in big buildings, high rise. And I use some of these things
from the industry, from housing. Yeah. And —
- LASKEY
- Well, just getting back to the Curtis House that we were talking about.
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- How do you convince the client to do something that was really very
experimental?
- SORIANO
- Well, the fact is I, myself, am a very convinced person many times.
Sometimes I may err a little bit, but my errors are not so big, really.
And the fact is, I'm assured, first, when I do something and I use
something, I investigate it a great deal and I check, question,
research, and I take tremendous amount of effort to find out the pros
and cons and the possibilities. And then if I'm convinced that it works,
that there are more positive things than negatives, then I use it. And
especially if it serves well, why not? Like the cork is an example. And
my client was leery. He called the cork company again and he says, "No,
we don't recommend it." Then somebody told him, says, "Oh, god, " you
know, "cork? With the rain? What are you going to do?" And I said to my
client [about] all these things that he's gathering from all the people
and I said, "Look, do you know why cork floats?" He didn't know. And I
said, "It floats because it has no capillary action." That means it
doesn't absorb water. Otherwise it will sink. I said, "That's why it
floats." I said, "Now, will that convince you that it's a wonderful
material for insulation and the water will not penetrate?" Still he
wasn't convinced. Somebody told him to get a waterproofer to give a —
put a waterproofing stuff. I said, "You don't need to." And I said,
"Well, I'll tell you what. Let's get your waterproofer. Let's have
examples of it. We'll give him one sheet of that, " and then I had one
sheet naturally, the way it came, and another one, I said, "we can use,
if you really worry, use carnauba wax, " which is palm tree wax "over
it," which doesn't affect anything. It keeps it nicely. I use carnauba
wax even with plywood panels. It's the only one that doesn't change the
color.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yes. And it protects it, seals it. So here we are, three panels. One,
the waterproofer expert, which the client got. And I had two panels; one
with carnauba wax, one without anything. Okay, the waterproofer came in
— that's a true story, now — and I put them right on the floor. He came
in all happy that he did something, and it looked like the dickens, too,
like varnished, gaudy, you know. And I didn't like the stuff but I
didn't say anything. I said, "All right," and I put the other two there
and I took the hose; put the hose over the whole three panels. The panel
[that's] supposed to be waterproof absorbed the water like that because
he destroyed the capillary action of the material and the resins that
they were impregnated with. He just made it spongy rather than to
preventing —
- LASKEY
- That's interesting.
- SORIANO
- And then mine were just beautifully like the ducks, the goose's back;
the water will fall off. And I said, "All right?" And then the man who's
supposedly the expert waterproofer, his eyes were — "I'll be darned," he
said. And I said, "Well, will that satisfy you?" I said to my client. I
said, "There you are." And finally I did it, see? That was it.
- LASKEY
- You did the whole exterior in cork?
- SORIANO
- Yes .
- LASKEY
- And did it hold up?
- SORIANO
- Sure. It held up. And I don't know what state it is in now, but he needs
really to take off the thing. And I think it was okay. I saw it about —
when was it? — seven, eight years ago. It was all right still. Yeah. And
he changed hands, you know. President [John F.] Kennedy lived in there
with Marilyn Monroe.
- LASKEY
- In the Youngstown house?
- SORIANO
- In the Bel Air — the Bel Air house.
- LASKEY
- Oh, the Bel Air house.
- SORIANO
- That was their little retreat. And they had a-- security things, and
they had a tremendous amount of electrical things in there. Yeah. And
the whole thing was electrified — that house, anyway, because I used
radiant heating with nickel and chrome, nick-chrome wires for
electricity so you can tune your house, the temperature, like a musical
instrument, with different elements, with switches .
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Not in — Yes. That was done because with electricity you can do that,
but [with] hot water you cannot because the hot water runs through the
pipes. And that was just with the elements like that. Wires are not
bigger than that. Nickel and chrome, made of nickel and chrome wire,
insulated with glass. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- And you used that through the whole flooring system?
- SORIANO
- And he gave-- Yeah, it became this thick. Yeah. And then it was all over
fiberglass mats and I put a sandwich of concrete, three inches, [then]
fiberglass with this, plus another three inches. Very resilient floor.
Yeah.
- LASKEY
- You used radiant heating in many of your houses.
- SORIANO
- Most of my houses were done that way. In the later houses, yeah. Yeah,
because I didn't think, first, there was any healthful thing; just
awful. Complicated: sheet metal, ducts and grills all over the place.
Radiant heating is just like you warm as toast. Yeah, because it's a
clean sort of a field of heat rather than circulating hot air. That's
what radiant heating is.
- LASKEY
- It also keeps your spaces clear on the interior.
- SORIANO
- It is beautiful, it's clean, it's lovely. There's nothing — the grills
don't get dark, dirty, and there's no circulation of that dirty air with
registers. Have you ever seen the registers [unintelligible]? They're
always black. And then it's the worst thing that we found out today
even, that air-conditioning in hospitals is the most — where the
bacteria really loves to settle and they circulate the bacteria all over
the hospital, diseases. Yeah. Contrary to all these so-called things
that we claim that they are beautiful. Yeah. Yes, ma'am.
- LASKEY
- But with the Curtis House, too, which as you said was your first house
in which you —
- SORIANO
- The first real prefabricated house, where the cabinets were brought in
made, all beautifully made with walnut woods and so on. I designed all
the furniture- -and everything in there.
- LASKEY
- Did you have a hard time convincing the Curtises that they should buy a
house that didn't have —
- SORIANO
- No.
- LASKEY
- — study rooms, you know, pre-built room rooms? It must have been a —
- SORIANO
- No, I didn't—
- LASKEY
- — strange concept.
- SORIANO
- No, this was — The Curtises were not the original owners .
- LASKEY
- Oh, they weren't?
- SORIANO
- No. I have reasons for it which, I won't say it now, but this will come
in my book. And the Curtises were the ones who bought it afterwards,
which were absolutely beautiful. Madame, Mrs. Curtis, from New York, she
wrote the most beautiful letter. She loved me. The original owners were,
I would say, semi-gangsters.
- LASKEY
- Oh, really?
- SORIANO
- They were in Drew Pearson's column. They were-- called them "Truman's
five-percenters." It was one of the Truman five-percenter. You know what
that was? Five percent was under the table. Yeah. He mentioned several
of them, and he was one of them. Yep. It's a long story which I don't
care to go over.
- LASKEY
- Right. Okay.
- SORIANO
- All right? Then the Case Study house came in at that same time, you see.
- LASKEY
- The guest house was built —
- SORIANO
- The Case Study house- -
- LASKEY
- Oh, yes. I'm sorry, because I know that the Curtis House has the little
guest house —
- SORIANO
- Yes.
- LASKEY
- — attached to it.
- SORIANO
- Which is the same thing as — For guests as — completely as a lovely
unit. It has bathroom, kitchenette, Pullman kitchenette, and everything.
Just a complete little unit that a mother-in-law or anybody could live
there beautifully. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- But, to go back — I'm jumping back a little bit —
- SORIANO
- Okay.
- LASKEY
- — before we get into the Case Study house because they do go together.
When you built the Gato House which was your first steel -structure
house, how had you made the decision to move into housing? Now, you've
done buildings in steel but you hadn't done houses .
- SORIANO
- Well, I — Housing, I did a lot of houses indeed. And I realized why not
in houses? Houses, it will be very easy to industrialize housing. I
said, "This is our era." We make cars with steel, metals. And then I
thought the real advancements had been made in metallurgy. No other
material has made as many advancements we have as in metallurgy. Yeah.
And yet we don't tap that one. And therefore, I said, "Well, I'm going
to go into this," you see. I've been doing — I was the first one [who]
did with the steel houses, really, in this area. And then also the first
one [who] did aluminum houses, the way they should be, intelligently
done, modularly planned, industrially produced; assembled, rather than
all these piddlings with welds and all that. No. No, no, no, no, no. My
system is really [a] beautiful system.
- LASKEY
- It's so simple.
- SORIANO
- It is. Simple and elegant at the same time. And simplicity doesn't bring
monotony. As some people always, without thinking, they say, "Well,
won't they be all monotonous, the same thing?" And I said, "Look at all
the junk you people produce which are all the same thing except they are
[with] a little different shutters. Mine are different, even though
using the same elements. I can do somersaults with my houses and make
every house different, but using the same elements. But you have to
dedicate and apply yourself with intelligence and sensitivity. And I
have it, damn it." [laughs]
- LASKEY
- Well, in the Gato House, you used the lattice steel .
- SORIANO
- Yes. That was the steel with-- Lattice steel at the time was, Fritz
Ruppell had developed, you see. And I said, "We'll use that," which was
okay. It was fine. It worked very beautifully. It was a nice house.
- LASKEY
- Isn't-- Aren't steel houses more difficult to-- what's the word I
want--the tolerances, that they have to be more exact- -the building has
to be more exact than a wood- frame house?
- SORIANO
- Oh, certainly. With wood frame, if you make a mistake or if you — you
can always chop one inch off, cut it, take the saw — If it is cut too
much, you put a molding on it. Yeah. You can do that with wood, but with
steel, metals, once you order these from the factory precisely done,
they have to be exact and your details have to be absolutely exact. And
that's all right. There's nothing wrong with that. We can make them. And
it's a question for you to apply yourself again and check in the shop
drawings before the fabricator makes them, to see to it that he tells
you-- gives you back the shop drawings — if he understands correctly
what your intent is. Then you send them back with corrections and
instructions again until they are absolutely right, they understand
right, then you say, "Okay; proceed." It requires dedication, time and
effort. Without that, nothing happens. The tragedy of our profession and
my colleagues, they don't give a damn. They make a little abstract
drawing, they let the builder make his own details. You look at some
drawings of many architects you will see how [much they] lack in
details. You should see mine. I have tons of details. [tape recorder
off]
- LASKEY
- Do you think that other architects didn't pursue the idea of building
steel houses because of the detail demanded in the —
- SORIANO
- Will you ask that again, please? Ask that again. [tape recorder off]
- LASKEY
- Do you think that other architects didn't pursue the idea of building
steel houses because of the detail and the attention to detail and the
work involved in steel construction?
- SORIANO
- Well, possibly. I don't know. Maybe that's it and maybe that their
imagination was not, then, in the direction of that because the line of
least resistance is to simply build over the same old conventional
two-by- four. It's simple, no headaches. Possibly that's it, and then
easy. And everybody knows the language. You give it to a builder who
builds it for you, you make less details, you see. You let the builder
improvise on the job. But naturally, I have precision, as I told you,
with all the detailing. Maybe they weren't in-- However, some of my
assistants after, when they worked with me, then they did that. Yeah.
Those are the other ones who pursued that. But the tragedy is that most
people are corrupted in their taste because of what they see. They see
all this woodsy, shakey, shacky, tacky with spit and cardboard- -the
same old thing we've been doing now for centuries and centuries . And
this is what people think houses should look like or should be. And
consequently, we get the brunt of it. And now we have another mess,
another disease in this post- modernism, all this garbage, all the
beatniks, so to speak, like [Michael] Graves and Philip [C.] Johnson and
the rest of them. And contaminating the brains of the people and
architecture at the same time.
- LASKEY
- Well, Philip Johnson has sort of run the gamut--
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- — from International Style to postmodernism.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, because he was not really-- You know, he was with [Ludwig] Mies
van der Rohe--was an assistant to Mies van der Rohe. He was not even an
architect. At one time, you know, he was a fascist. Did you know that?
He wanted to be a Nazi? Did you know that?
- LASKEY
- Philip Johnson? No, I didn't know that.
- SORIANO
- My god, this is all written up in Time
magazine.
- LASKEY
- No, I didn't know that.
- SORIANO
- I'll tell you what it was written up in Time magazine. Philip Johnson was an admirer of Hitler. He went
to Germany before he was an architect and he wanted to — came to
America, to New York to organize an SS fascist type of thing like in
Germany. Yes. This was in Time magazine!
- LASKEY
- I didn't— [laughter]
- SORIANO
- Yeah. You search, you'll see.
- LASKEY
- I'm just surprised.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, yeah. Well, everybody — So was I. And then after that, he changed
his mind. He realized it was a dangerous state of affairs —
- LASKEY
- Thank goodness.
- SORIANO
- --and he didn't succeed. And so then he met Mies van der Rohe through
the daughter of — was a student. He was teaching at Yale [University] or
whatever it — When he started architecture then he was teaching — You
know, he speaks quite well, and being a rich boy —
- LASKEY
- Yes.
- SORIANO
- — you know, he got all these plums right away with the Seagram Building
and so on. He knew the student, the daughter of one of the Seagram
people; therefore, that's how he got it and then he got Mies van der
Rohe to do the job. Therefore, he became his assistant. You see, that's
the whole thing. And from there on, you know, the publicity and money,
you can always do anything you want. And I remember Philip Johnson, he
invited me to see his ["glass box"] house that he did in New Canaan
[Connecticut].
- LASKEY
- Oh, the New Canaan house.
- SORIANO
- Yes. And I said, "It's beautiful, Philip." He says, "Hell, you do for
five thousand dollars what I do for three hundred thousand." [laughter]
Yeah. He admired me, actually, and we were very good friends in many
ways. And I thought he was a very nice man. I didn't even know about all
this nonsense and all his weaknesses. And I said, "Wonderful, Philip."
And in fact when he went to have his gold medal, he called me and he
said, "Are you coming to the convention?" I said, "Unfortunately, no,
but congratulations, Philip." He said, "We are two of us left, you know
. " He told me that . And then I wrote to him afterwards and I said,
"Only one of us left —
- LASKEY
- Us is left.
- SORIANO
- — Philip," after he did cabinet pediment on top of a high rise.
- LASKEY
- The —
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- — American Telephone and Telegraph Building.
- SORIANO
- And this is the thing. And this is the big problem we have now,
unfortunately.
- LASKEY
- Well, this is sort of an aside, but I'm curious: How does the New Canaan
house work as a living space?
- SORIANO
- It was very lovely, I think. For him, it was beautiful; nothing wrong
with that. Even anybody could adopt itself beautifully. So much acreage.
- LASKEY
- The house itself --
- SORIANO
- The house is very beautiful. It's lovely. It's nothing wrong with that.
- LASKEY
- It's livable?
- SORIANO
- Sure it is. Why shouldn't it be? To be among a lovely — beautifully
done, among trees and all that? Why shouldn't it be livable?
- LASKEY
- Oh, the siting is beautiful and it looks beautiful. But I just wondered
how it worked to be in it.
- SORIANO
- Well, why not? I mean, in other words, you're talking about nostalgia
again.
- LASKEY
- I'm not— [laughter] Well, it looks like living in a fishbowl. I mean, it
looks like a little jewel box in this setting, but I wondered —
- SORIANO
- This is great.
- LASKEY
- — how it worked for human dimensions, to actually be there to live in
it?
- SORIANO
- Well, for everybody, no, because not everybody has the wealth of Philip
Johnson or the acreage. You don't put one house like that in so many
acres surrounded with trees of your own and pieces of sculpture and all
that.
- LASKEY
- Well--
- SORIANO
- It's just like a park. If you're talking about for individuals, you
could do it beautifully with privacy. Certainly. Why not? I've done it.
And with all the glass even in there, one small lot, depending how you
orientate the whole thing. Sure. And it's all a matter of — Oh, this
[the tape] is already finished; do you want to continue?
- LASKEY
- Well, we don't want to get too sidetracked on Philip Johnson.
- SORIANO
- Well, no, okay. That's okay.
- LASKEY
- But, talking about your own assistants-- You were talking about Johnson
being an assistant to Mies-- Your assistants, Craig Ellwood and Pierre
Koenig, in particular, would go on and do steel houses probably as a
result of having been in your office.
- SORIANO
- That's right.
- LASKEY
- How did they come to be in your office?
- SORIANO
- Well, Pierre Koenig worked for me as an assistant like others — I had a
whole flock of them — and Craig Ellwood was a very strange combination.
He was a salesman of furniture. Most people don't know that.
- LASKEY
- I didn't know that.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. And he came to sell some furniture in the apartment house I did.
See, before that he used to do wood houses like Frank Lloyd Wright type
of things. Then he saw my apartment and then immediately his eyes opened
and then of course-- Most of the things are not done by Craig Ellwood.
He has the name. You see, most of the young people in his office who
were influenced by my stuff were working there and then immediately saw
the quality and all that. From there on it became — And then he was
married to an actress, which boost him up, too, you see? And that's how
it is. But he, as himself — He had good taste to have a good office and
have good publicity, yes. But I'm sure as a man, as a creative person, I
don't know.
- LASKEY
- They always, almost always, in the architecture books refer to him as
having been influenced by Mies in doing Miesian boxes.
- SORIANO
- Nonsense. Nonsense. That's, yeah, because he said that and didn't mean
it. So? Big deal. Mies never did houses like that. I did — his houses
that he was, houses that he was doing with I-beams.
- LASKEY
- Well, in the book The Second Generation,
Cesar Pelli in the introduction talks about the difference between —
what? — between your work or your kind of work and Mies. And he talks —
he calls--he says that the steel work is more relaxed and slender than
yours.
- SORIANO
- Whose?
- LASKEY
- He's talking about Southern California architecture in general. But as
far as the steel is concerned --and I think he mentioned--he's talking
about you and Ellwood and--
- SORIANO
- In other words —
- LASKEY
- --and the Case Study houses.
- SORIANO
- — which is more relaxed? What is--?
- LASKEY
- The Southern California, yours, that it's slender--
- SORIANO
- Much better than what Mies does.
- LASKEY
- — the steel work is slenderer and, whereas, he called the Miesian
[style] heavy and — I can't remember what the other word was, but —
- SORIANO
- Pelli 's ignorant. He doesn't know what he's talking about. Pelli,
again, is another one of those parvenus, as far as I'm concerned. In
fact, you should see the buildings he has done. I criticize them. He is
full of theatrics, Hollywood. He's a Hollywood architect. I know Esther
likes him because she had him do the preface on the book. And all the
things he said were absolutely nonsense. I know some of the things that
he has written. I believe Pelli is not, to me, a serious, serious
thinker. Now, of course he's in Yale, dean of Yale, of course. As a
matter of fact, he did some buildings in San Bernardino; he did the City
Hall there. And they asked me what I thought of it. I said it was a
horrible piece of work. [laughter] Slanting all the things, arbitrarily
chopping corners-- For what? This is not the way of architecture. This
is the postmodernism, and Pelli is one of those, you see. And I know
even Esther wrote a book- -I saw it in England, but I didn't know he had
a book--on Craig Ellwood. Did you know that?
- LASKEY
- No.
- SORIANO
- I saw it in-- One of my admirers, in England, he showed me the book. He
says, "Can you imagine that?" He says, "They didn't write about you;
they wrote about Craig Ellwood, " and Esther did a book. I said, "Who
wrote this?" Esther. Yeah. I didn't know that. I've never seen it,
except there in London. Yeah. Now, that's news you don't know .
- LASKEY
- That's interesting.
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Yeah, that's very interesting.
- SORIANO
- This is history. You're getting it right precisely. I'm sorry, I don't
mean to talk degeneratingly of my colleagues or my friends. I don't care
who they are; to me it doesn't make any difference. But the truth is
truth. And Pelli, to me, doesn't represent anything. He doesn't even
understand what architecture is, as far as I'm concerned. He's playing
with all kinds of fantasies, cubism and decorations. Even some of this
so-called high- rise things they're doing now, all this a la mode like
Johnson, they're playing with all this gimmickry, really. So—?
- LASKEY
- But would you agree with his assessment of the steel work that was done
by you and your colleagues in Southern California?
- SORIANO
- No, no. Totally incorrect. I don't think he understood Mies van der Rohe
to begin with. No. As a matter of fact, one of my assistants, Joe
[Joseph Y.] Fujikawa, during the war-- You don't know him. That's a good
name because he's a lovely person. Joe Fujikawa, yeah. He was the right
hand of Mies van der Rohe.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yes. And now he's getting the offices--he' s now on his own- -when Mies
died. I sent him to Mies. He worked for me. Joe worked for me during the
war. He was Japanese, you know; they had to go inland. And instead of
that I said, "Go to Chicago to Mies."
- LASKEY
- You mean, that's when you sent him? After —
- SORIANO
- That's right.
- LASKEY
- When they were going —
- SORIANO
- During the war.
- LASKEY
- --to incarcerate —
- SORIANO
- Absolutely.
- LASKEY
- — all the Japanese?
- SORIANO
- Absolutely. That's when — And then he worked for Mies. He became the
right-hand man of Mies. He was a very lovely, talented, dedicated young
man.
- LASKEY
- That's a great story.
- SORIANO
- And he called me — yes--he called me his mentor and he admired me. He
sent me some letters. In fact, the Graham Foundation showed me a whole
lot of jobs that Joe was doing.
- LASKEY
- Well, that's wonderful.
- SORIANO
- Yes. Yeah, that's another thing most people don't know. You see, even
Esther doesn't know. Yep.
- LASKEY
- Did you ever meet Mies?
- SORIANO
- Oh sure. He sent me some beautiful letters about me, too, when they were
doing the station KQED [San Francisco] here. And he says, "Get Soriano.
He's the best you can have there." And you know what happened? The
engineers wanted me. Everybody was for me. Then all of a sudden there
was Fleish- -Fleishman or [Mortimer] Fleishhacker was giving $90,000
subsidy, then, at the time, taxwise, you know, to the station. And he
kept saying, "Well, I want to use my architect." And that was-- He had
his own architects. Yeah. And so at the time James Day was the director
of the station, the KQED station, television, educational station. And
then they had a big, big fight with the-- Yeah. They had a big fight
with the membership there, with the engineers which wanted me. And I
already-- Just like the IBM [Building] . They were so pleased that I was
going to do the Jobs. La trag^dle humaine [the human tragedy]. So then
James Day wrote an article and said, "Well, between Soriano and $90,000,
I have to get the $90,000." So that's how they ended up. And then they
got this architect, supposedly, by Fleishhacker, who comes right on the
button with cost, supposedly. And this architect got some Johannson from
the East to collaborate with him, and the prices were three or four
times of what they thought they would cost, and then they didn't build
the building, you see, and they lost Soriano. That's not a nice story.
Isn't it? Nobody knows that.
1.7. TAPE NUMBER: IV, SIDE ONE (JULY 20, 1985)
- SORIANO
- Well, I'll tell you another thing about the museum. You know the
Barnsdall House [Hollyhock House]?
- LASKEY
- Oh, the Frank Lloyd Wright —
- SORIANO
- Yes .
- LASKEY
- The Hollyhock House?
- SORIANO
- Which is already an art center, isn't it? Something there?
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- All right. They wanted me, they wanted Mr. Rigler — [to whom] you spoke
on the phone?
- LASKEY
- From the Adolph's Building?
- SORIANO
- Yes. To give the money to put in a, some kind of a sign in Hollywood so
to identify that there is the art center there. But nobody knows. They
have a little stupid kiosk made of wood- -you know? — in there, but
nobody knows. And there is a car wash with a big sign next door.
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- And so my friend and client, Mr. [Leo G.] Rigler called me, and I went
to see the premises and so on, and I made a very interesting model that
I was going to put-- entirely on metal. [It] was going to be a beautiful
thing, almost like Frank Lloyd Wright. Let's see what I have-- Here,
this one.
- LASKEY
- Oh.
- SORIANO
- And I made a lovely little sketch. I made the mistake of doing that:
Barnsdall Art Center, you see? Was —
- LASKEY
- That's charming.
- SORIANO
- — going to be like that. Very beautiful. Was going to be about sixty or
eighty feet high right on the premises there where the grounds are.
- LASKEY
- At the bottom of the hill?
- SORIANO
- Yes. And possibly I was going to have a ramp to go from here to the
premises nicely for the people to go. And so I met with the [Los Angeles
County] Board of Supervisors with Mr. Rigler, the county board of
supervisors, with two ladies, and [a] Japanese, and [a] Mexican; you
know, this democracy of ours. And an architect was there. And so I did
this myself, without a contractor, because Mr. Rigler was going to
donate the money and I thought there would be a job. So they insulted
both of us with silly remarks. Mr. Rigler was insulted and so was I. So
one of the ladies there, the supervisor, says, "Mr. Soriano, could you
lower this six inches down?" That triangle, do you see there: B-A-C.
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- And I said, "Why do you ask me that? Why will I lower that? What is the
purpose?" "Well I think it'd look better." Now, can you imagine that? A
supervisor, a person like that not to have sensitivity to her concept is
so — To ask me to do this kind of thing. And then another supervisor,
[a] woman, said, "It looks like the Corniforium" — or something that is
right —
- LASKEY
- The Triforium.
- SORIANO
- " — the Triforium there." I said, "What is that?" I never seen-- Through
the window where we were meeting you could see the thing down below. I
said, "Well, how can you compare that mess of concrete with this?" I
said, "This is--" And then I went and saw the thing and said, "How
ridiculous, this is what I'm — " And then the young man who was the head
of the supervisors said, "Well, we have to sort of have a meeting and
then we'll let you know." Mr. Rigler was absolutely mad and wouldn't
give them the money. Still he didn't. Yeah. And now they're coming back
to him for money, but they don't want me, they want to have their
architects. [But Rigler said] "No, if you want my money, you have to
have Soriano." And then they told Mr. Rigler, he says, "Well, Soriano's
not a sculptor." Well, who the hell said I was a sculptor. Is that what
they wanted? A piece of sculpture.
- LASKEY
- They want a sign.
- SORIANO
- Can you imagine the stupidity of those people? I mean, this is what I am
dealing with. This is what we are dealing with: these politicians who
know nothing, ignorants. Miserable heads of individuals to dictate
terms. What is, what shouldn't be. Yeah. This is what we are working
with. That's why people will ask [and] say, "Why aren't you so busy? Why
don't you do this?" This is why. Yeah. I could have easily played with
them so-- "Oh sure," you know. "Oh sure, you want six inches, I'll lower
it six inches down." But what does that prove? Nothing. Really. Anyway,
so that's that. Now what other question [do] you have?
- LASKEY
- Well, we'll go back to 1950, which —
- SORIANO
- The Case Study house.
- LASKEY
- The Case Study. The whole Case Study program.
- SORIANO
- Well, the Case Study house, as far as I'm concerned, was-- It's all
right. It did some good to advertise possibilities. Everybody else does
Case Study houses .
- LASKEY
- Well, you might just want to begin and say even what the Case Study
program was.
- SORIANO
- The Case Study program was-- I don't know actually the real scope of it,
but the way I understood it, was just to make money for [California] Arts and
Architecture.
- LASKEY
- Which was a magazine.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, a magazine, and also to publicize the magazine by using names who
could do this so-called modern things, were a la mode.
- LASKEY
- You don't think it was to promote modern architecture?
- SORIANO
- [laughing] I'm not so convinced that John Entenza was so intelligent
about that. [laughter] I don't think he knew as much as you think. And
he was an opportunist. You know, his father was publisher or whatever, I
forgot. He had money, bought that Arts and
Architecture. It was a very conservative type of magazine.
Have you known that? Used to be an old magazine publishing Spanish
houses and all that.
- LASKEY
- Yeah. I think it was called California Arts and
Architecture.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, whatever it was. Yeah, yeah.
- LASKEY
- It was a regional —
- SORIANO
- This is all right.
- LASKEY
- --magazine of architecture.
- SORIANO
- Then he became a la mode now. Having with all this — What do you call
that? Illuminaries that were already so many in California, Los Angeles.
Was a nice occasion. In that respect, I give credit to John to top this.
That was good. But you know what happened with it, you know? With it, we
have to specify, I have to sell my signature with everything that's been
used in the house: That Soriano specifies cups for the Case Study House
No. 2 or whatever; Soriano specifies this John, this bidet, these light
fixtures; signed. And they charged the company who was selling this,
giving them free.
- LASKEY
- I was going to ask you about that —
- SORIANO
- Yeah. This is what they did.
- LASKEY
- — as we discussed it. Because when I was looking at your — As it was
actually published in California Arts and
Architecture, which I think was December of 1950, it
specified, or it gives always a list of who did the doors--
- SORIANO
- Always. "Soriano specifies that."
- LASKEY
- — who did everything. I was going to ask you how the program actually
worked. Were these things then contributed to build the house on the
stipulation that when it was published they--
- SORIANO
- They would have credit.
- LASKEY
- — would get credit.
- SORIANO
- And they give it for nothing. And that means then they sold [the] house
and they had a promoter who had a piece of property which made money.
You see, they all made money except me. I got the fee. Regular fee. But
then I [was] used. With my signature, they sell, they sold all these
trades: "Soriano specifies that, Soriano specifies that, Soriano
specifies that." At least they could have given me part of that, no? Oh,
no. I forgot the name who was at the head of that promotion department.
I forgot his name. Oh, yes, they wanted [a] lot of things and I refused.
Lot of things they wanted to — for me to specify because anybody who had
a piece of junk they want to put it there. Used to bring it — I said,
"No, Soriano doesn't specify this, I'm sorry." Yeah, I was [a] very
difficult man because I refused to — I said, "I'm not gonna put my name
to something I don't believe. I'm sorry." Yeah. They wanted me to just--
Because they get money and free stuff. And they get advertising and
charge five hundred dollars or whatever for the advertising in their
magazine of their product.
- LASKEY
- Well, John Entenza, who owned the magazine, did this as a — supposedly —
to promote modern architecture —
- SORIANO
- Nonsense; it was for John Entenza.
- LASKEY
- — in Southern California. Now, did Arts and
Architecture buy the land?
- SORIANO
- No.
- LASKEY
- Who — How were the houses built? That's what I'm curious about .
- SORIANO
- This is what they — They found a client who had a lawn, a piece of lot
[1080 Ravoli Drive]. They went around searching and, like in my case,
was Olds, Mr. [Alan] Olds [who] owned that piece of property. In the
[Pacific] Palisades. Alan Olds, I believe it was. He [was] a very
charming man. And then he gave the land so I can build the Case Study
house. When they sold the house, they divide the profits, whatever they
did, I don't know. Yeah. They found a client with land and then they had
people with the material company donate all that free, you see, then
they made a deal out of that and make [it a] money-making proposition.
That's all it was.
- LASKEY
- So the only fee they actually had then, would be the architect's fee?
- SORIANO
- That's it. Yes. Yes. You know, most people don't know-- They think [it]
is altruism, all these beautiful big things. As I told you, even John
Entenza-- how sensitive he was — when he became the [president of the]
Graham Foundation-- Because of that, already--naturally, money and all
this publicity — became the chief of Graham Foundation. When I apply
for, to get a grant to write books, he says, "Oh, Soriano's too old."
And yet in the same year, he gave to Philip [C.] Johnson and, I think,
Peter Blake or something, to do a grant to study the theater in Germany.
If you please, which had nothing to do with it. This is true. This is
facts I'm telling you. And this is how much he was promoting
architecture. It was a big farce, I'll tell you. Sorry, but these are
the realities, darling. You know, I don't spare words and I know,
because I'm right. When I tell you something, I know, I can stand--be
right. You go through history you'll find that I'm right, what I tell
you. Yeah. Most people don't know those things. You see, they all take
it blindly or "John Enten — " Because a group like that was retained and
all that, they play all this "John Entenza did this, John Entenza did
that, Esther McCoy did that," and so on. Well, this is fine. They have
their own contributions, yes, for doing it. But, there are all the other
things behind the stuff which was not exactly that altruism or
knowledge. It was business! Money. Money-maker . As I told you, I
refused to specify things they used to bring me. They want me to do it.
I said, "No. I don't believe in such a utensils. I don't believe in such
fixtures." "Well, we have to--" I said, "No, you have to, but I don't."
Not nothing goes in my name that I--with this. And they took it that
way. Yeah, I used to have real interesting battles with them.
- LASKEY
- Well, how were the architects selected? How were you selected to do what
you did?
- SORIANO
- Well, I had a name already, they could not ignore me.
- LASKEY
- Well, they ignored Harwell Hamilton Harris.
- SORIANO
- Well, because Hamilton Harris, apparently, he maybe didn't qualify
because he was doing a la Frank Lloyd Wright, you see, that wasn't
supposedly the real industrially [inspired] houses of the days. Yeah.
And they used many others which I don't think they were doing- - I mean,
they were all right, but nothing so startling. [Richard J.] Neutra was
the only one that I thought-- And the other assistant —
- LASKEY
- There was the Eames House that —
- SORIANO
- And the other.
- LASKEY
- You don't like that?
- SORIANO
- Well, the Eames — I knew Charlie [Charles Eames] very well as a matter
of fact. Charlie was doing regular house[s] just like Craig Ellwood did
at one time. Yeah. And so all of a sudden he did that. I remember we
used to, I used to go with a girl--the daughter of — God! An actress, a
very beautiful actress, I adore her. Frances was a sculptress, the
daughter of this actress. It [her name] will come to me. And Charlie was
going with her, too. And he designed a house for her entirely of
redwood; you should have seen the plans. She showed it to me. It was
awful. Yeah, the time when [at] the beginning he was learning, I
suppose.
- LASKEY
- Of course.
- SORIANO
- It's okay. But then he did his house, which to me-- It's all right, but
it's not what I call the real prefabricated thing, you know. It's full
of all decorated Mondrianish things, you know. To me that's not the
direction because not everybody will have Mondrian houses and all these
fancy things. And the thing is, Charlie was associated with his wife
[Ray Eames] who loved all these little trinkets, little dolls, and
little playthings. You know, they were that kind of a playful
individuals you see, which is to me not what architecture is.
- LASKEY
- Well, I don't think Eames really — I don't think of him as being an
architect first and foremost.
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- First and foremost he was an industrial designer, and I think in terms
of his furniture and his —
- SORIANO
- Was associated with [Eero] Saarinen, certainly. Yeah. And — But then
they made a big to-do. As a matter of fact, I'll tell you another thing
since we're talking about Entenza, at the time they were absolutely
chummy. Entenza and Charlie were just like that: friends. And there was
not a word that came from Entenza 's mouth that wasn't uttered by
Charlie. Everything was Charlie's decision and sayings. I know that.
Then after, when they got a big fight, when they did that house for
Entenza, you remember?
- LASKEY
- Well, I was going to ask you, I've never seen-- Saarinen and Eames did
the house for Entenza.
- SORIANO
- Which was the worst house on earth.
- LASKEY
- Which apparently is next to or right by the Eames House, but I've never
seen it and I don't know that I've ever seen a picture of it other than
—
- SORIANO
- It's a friend of mine, a friend of mine owns it.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Really. How does it — What's it like?
- SORIANO
- It's awful. It was the worst house I think I've seen.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yeah, nothing really startling. It was in a lovely area, but the
architecture to me was [a] big zero. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Because the Eames House has so much publicity and it's considered one of
the classics in Los Angeles, but you never hear about the Eames-Saarinen
House. And considering it was Saarinen, and I'm, was, sort of surprised
that it just fell away.
- SORIANO
- Because it's not a good house really.
- LASKEY
- That's interesting.
- SORIANO
- And then don't forget he [Entenza] had a fight with Saarinen, with Eam —
Charlie--when they just fall apart completely. They were enemies
afterwards. I don't know--
- LASKEY
- Permanently?
- SORIANO
- Yes. I don't know whatever happened to them. Yeah. Unless they made it
up afterwards and I didn't know. I don't know that. But I knew after
they were chummy - chummy . Everything else that Eames said, Entenza
used to ruminate. Really. This is what I'm telling you that this fact.
And then after that, I don't know what happened. They fall apart and —
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- Those things happen. However, still, Charlie's house is not bad, but the
direction is not that way. You see, because it's full of gimmickry and
decorations and-- Yeah, publicity sometimes can make or break, and
depending who makes the publicity, who writes.
- LASKEY
- Well, were you given any stipulations when — ?
- SORIANO
- The house?
- LASKEY
- When you were assigned a Case Study house, or when you accepted the
commission to do it, I mean, did they say it had to be — ? Were you
given the size, or it had to be three bedrooms, or it had to do
anything?
- SORIANO
- I believe it was a three-bedroom house type of a thing, yeah. Then, from
then on, I was free. But they knew I wouldn't submit to any dictation of
the styles or anything like that, which I don't believe anyway. But I
worked and I helped them really do it beautifully. It was one of the
nicest houses I did. It was beautifully printed. But then I think
somebody bought it now and changed a little bit. They did some changes.
They always do, unfortunately.
- LASKEY
- How do you feel about that?
- SORIANO
- Well, it breaks my heart when they do that. Instead of calling me, you
know? But then-- I don't know. It's just — Instead of having the finesse
to tell me — I don't even know this book.
- LASKEY
- You don't know this book?
- SORIANO
- No.
- LASKEY
- It's The Case Study Houses 1945-1962.
- SORIANO
- May I see that?
- LASKEY
- Yeah, I was just looking for your house here. Let me find it for you.
- SORIANO
- Who wrote the preface? [Cesar] Pelli again?
- LASKEY
- No, Esther.
- SORIANO
- She published that? Esther published the —
- LASKEY
- Yeah, it was originally published in 1962. And then it was just
republished again in 1970.
- SORIANO
- I don't know, I really don't know.
- LASKEY
- Really? You should. You should have this.
- SORIANO
- Well, there are a lot of books that came out with my work; I don't even
know anymore. You don't know how many books I have and magazines I have.
But I kept, fortunately, most of the magazines that I know. Yeah, I
thought so. Yeah, that's a lovely house you see, beautiful.
- LASKEY
- Oh, it is.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, I have some marvelous elevations of this which I don't think they
published. This is wrong, you see. I have a better elevation; this was
done without even finishing it. Silly. This is a photo that [Julius]
Shulman did. But this photograph was published by another. [James H.]
Reed, I believe, photographed a great deal of this which had a
beautiful, beautiful details and — Yeah, yeah, all of this. Yeah; not
this. No, I had a beautiful elevation of that. This is silly. Really,
I'm sad. This is what hurts me. They don't have enough sensitivity. This
is just simply without building it. And I have marvelous construction
details of this rather than just this elevation.
- LASKEY
- Well, I think she was just trying to show the pavilion.
- SORIANO
- I know, but she — These were done by Reed, most of these photographs.
This one wasn't by Shulman. And he did beautiful photography. Yep.
Sorry. Well, anyway, so it doesn't make any difference, really.
- LASKEY
- How long were you associated with Shulman?
- SORIANO
- Well, Shulman — He did many — You know, Shulman started out photography
when I started my first house. He came in with a Brownie one day, said,
"Oh Soriano, look! I'm Julius Shulman, a photographer, and I'm just
starting out, too; can I photograph your house?" I said, "Sure." He had
a Brownie.
- LASKEY
- That's incredible.
- SORIANO
- Yes. That's exactly it.
- LASKEY
- [laughter] That's really amazing.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. And then we became friends and not one time he wanted me to have
the- -to build his house. He said, "Well, I know, most of the architects
do houses, and I like to invite every architect to do one room." I said,
"Julius, that will never be, because nobody will do that. That ' s not
going to work anymore than to have ten chefs do one meal . "
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- And [he] said, "Well, I think I'll — " I said, "Well, try it," I said,
"but I doubt it very much." And do you know? He came to me and says,
"Soriano, I think I'll select you to do the — " And I said, "Fine, thank
you." And I did.
- LASKEY
- And he was obviously very satisfied since- -
- SORIANO
- He was!
- LASKEY
- — he's still living in the house and hasn't changed it.
- SORIANO
- He called me last week to tell me that, "Raphael, why don't I see you?
Why don't I hear from you?" And I said, "Well, I've been pretty busy."
And his new wife, you know — not Emma, but his wife he married very
recently, when his wife died.
- LASKEY
- No, I didn't know.
- SORIANO
- Olga--is suffering from leukemia. He told me that.
- LASKEY
- Shulman is?
- SORIANO
- Not Shulman; his wife.
- LASKEY
- His wife.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, don't say anything because it's not-- Maybe he wants to repeat
himself, but that's what he told me. And he was very dejected, and of
course she was, too. And I felt sad and sorry. And he says, "Well, we're
not going to go anywheres and I've been telling her, where else would
you go with this beautiful house?" And then Mrs. Jones, [A.] Quincy
Jones's wife went there and says, "Look at the beautiful house that
Soriano did. Look at the atmosphere that Soriano did." And so he was
telling me that, Julius [was] .
- LASKEY
- Well, Mrs. Jones used to live in one of your apartments at one time,
didn't she?
- SORIANO
- I know, I know. Yeah. Yep. That's life. Things change. Things occur.
- LASKEY
- Well, did any —
- SORIANO
- Sometimes we know the truth, sometimes we don't.
- LASKEY
- Did your — ? Did the publication of the Case Study house help you any?
Did you directly — ?
- SORIANO
- Possibly. I think—
- LASKEY
- — get a benefit from it?
- SORIANO
- I really don't know. Because I've been published in so many magazines
and books so I don't think the-- Just because Arts
and Architecture published it, because at the time I
published time in the Architectural Forum,
the [Architectural] Record, House and Garden, the
German magazines, the Italian magazines. In fact, the Italian magazines
did a beautiful — Let me see if I can find really an interesting — I
believe I have a nice little color photo [from] the Italian magazine the
way they published it. Yeah, years ago before the Case Study house.
Yeah, I will stop this. [tape recorder off] Well, as I showed you
already, I've been published in so many magazines I don't know. I'm sure
every little publicity helps, yes. Doesn't hurt. But then people forget.
You know, I've had, you see, magazines here like that — All my work has
been published in these. I have tons of these: every one of the
magazines. I kept them fortunately. And many universities, you know, the
people steal the magazines. [Then] they don't have it, they come to me
[and ask], "Do you have this?" And I have them, you see. And, poor
[Richard J.] Neutra, when he had his fire, you know, he lost a lot of
his stuff. Most of the books and magazines he had.
- LASKEY
- Oh, really? I never thought about that, but of course .
- SORIANO
- Oh, yes. Yeah. So what is another question you may have? Forgive me if I
put my leg up, because I have to relax it a little bit because of my
condition. It's too bad I cannot show you that Italian magazine. It was
really beautifully published: the Case Study house in color.
- LASKEY
- Well, I'm noticing that 1950, which seems to have been quite a year for
you —
- SORIANO
- It was a very nice year, yes.
- LASKEY
- — was also the year that you attended the Alcoa Aluminum Conference.
- SORIANO
- Yes , yes .
- LASKEY
- Which was to send you off in another direction.
- SORIANO
- Yes, to promote-- Well, that didn't actually convince me into [using]
aluminum because I already was thinking of aluminum even then before
that.
- LASKEY
- Oh, you were?
- SORIANO
- I'm sure that's why Alcoa invited me, because I was talking to Fritz
Close, I believe, which was the chairman of the board of Alcoa. As a
matter of fact, when he was retired, they invited [a] few of his friends
to make a little film, a little audio-visual statement. I was the only
architect invited to say something. Yeah, with all the big moguls,
supposedly. I have a little [unintelligible], yeah. And I had a very
interesting aluminum dish they presented for the conference. That was in
Boca Raton, Florida. Alcoa created [the] conference and they had a
certain man there by the name of Rowse--Roos, Rowse--who is quite in the
government, you know, is a big builder business. I told him at the time,
I said, "Why don't you promote something." Some of the things that I did
of course-- Now, he has his own concept of ideas which is really
conservative, but then that's what happens, you see. People are scared
to death of something really starkly light and frank. They don't like
that. They like sugar-coated little statements of architecture. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- I think they like it — I guess you're right. I think they're afraid of
something that isn't solid.
- SORIANO
- Well, mine is very solid actually, as-- Can be made more solid than
wood.
- LASKEY
- [laughter] Well, but, you know.
- SORIANO
- Sure. Couldn't be more solid than wood. I mean, than steel, than
aluminum. We fly airplanes with aluminum. Imagine we don't fly them with
wood. They won't last three minutes in all this fantastic stresses that
will take the plane going at such a speed and such altitudes. All the
stuff we're doing for space, [of] what are they made? Aluminum and other
alloyed sophisticated aluminum. Now they have a new material which is an
alloy of graphite and aluminum which is stronger and lighter. Graphite,
the regular lead pencil that you write on. Isn't it marvelous? But all
this come from a scientific thinking, never from the architects.
[laughter] Yeah.
- LASKEY
- And then they don't want to use it.
- SORIANO
- Of course not. Most architects don't even know that thing exists. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- But then you, after-- Before you got into aluminum, you still did the
Colby Apartments which-- And the, your —
- SORIANO
- That was the same year, same year.
- LASKEY
- Probably your shining example of steel, which would be the Adolph's
Building which came later.
- SORIANO
- Well, then the Adolph's was already aluminum and steel; I used same
principles of prefabrication: assembly method, no bearing walls — which
I developed with the Curtis House. I used it in the Adolph's Building.
Yeah. In '54, just four year later, I got the commission to do the
Adolph's Building, and then it was built later. Yeah, I moved here
[Northern California] , barely I moved here, and then I got this
commission. Everybody says, "Oh, Soriano, you just — Why move from Los
Angeles? All your clientele--" I said, "Well, if they want me, they can
reach me."
- LASKEY
- Why did you move from Los Angeles?
- SORIANO
- Well, it was an interesting story. I got married — foolishly--to a girl
with three children, and she was having problems with her husband and so
on. Then I said, "My god, why did I have to marry this?" To get into
this mess when I used to have all these baby starlets, stars from
Hollywood. And to get to this position — and stresses and anxiety. Why?
Well, I did. So, but anyway, so I said to my ex- wife, I said, "I was
planning to move to San Francisco area, particularly in the-- Marin
County's very beautiful." Because I already was familiar doing work in
San Francisco area. And I said, "Come and let's see if you like it."
[She] said, "Oh, yes, " and immediately I bought a house in Tiburon. It
wasn't even developed yet. That was not even a town.
- LASKEY
- This was in 1953.
- SORIANO
- Nineteen fifty-three. And I was in Mill Valley for about a year there.
We had a house until — Then I found this, was not even developed. In
fact, the whole area there was completely-- Black Angus cows were
grazing all over those hills. That's all there were. It was nothing.
None of these buildings, these restaurants-- All these three restaurants
were not here. Nothing. And so then that ' s how I moved here . And then
I bought some property that I was going to develop and do some beautiful
things. I had a lovely parcel for multiple units overlooking this bay
right below the acres of land I have, which my ex-wife took. Yeah, it
was a disaster. Really. Well--
- LASKEY
- But you opted to stay up here.
- SORIANO
- It was lovely and I was — And I moved to the studio. This was used —
This [was] my drafting room. I had eight boys working over here; I have
another room there, full of documents.
- LASKEY
- Even in 1953 when you moved up here from Los Angeles your studio was
still going then at full blast.
- SORIANO
- I had, I still had another —
- LASKEY
- You still had —
- SORIANO
- Yeah, on Leeden Way, I think it was, yeah.
- LASKEY
- You had a staff of eight?
- SORIANO
- Over here. Not over there. Over there I had a secretary I kept —
- LASKEY
- But I mean just — You had an office that had — You had eight people, at
least eight people —
- SORIANO
- Eight people, yes.
- LASKEY
- — working for you.
- SORIANO
- Maximum was eight people. Six to eight people used to work. Because I
didn't want to handle any more than that. It becomes a mess.
- LASKEY
- And you were doing mostly small --or individual houses —
- SORIANO
- Well, yes.
- LASKEY
- — or were you moving into other —
- SORIANO
- Individual houses, I was doing a lot of things and I — And also I
organized Project Architects. You know, you may have heard that: Project
Architects? I was the one who organized that. Yeah, with Maynard Lyndon.
I told Maynard Lyndon at the time- -we were very good friends --and
Arthur [B.] Gallion, dean of USC [University of Southern California] ,
and we were discussing one [partnership] . I said, "Well, let's get
together since we are good friends. We relate in our thinking. And we
can go for big jobs." In fact, we even made a bid for the airport, Los
Angeles Airport.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yes .
- LASKEY
- This was an amalgamation of individual —
- SORIANO
- Of individual.
- LASKEY
- — small, small —
- SORIANO
- Small, yes.
- LASKEY
- — office architects to —
- SORIANO
- Yes, it was Maynard Lyndon, Arthur Gallion, Soriano. And then all of a
sudden Gallion and Maynard Lyndon said, "Well, let's get [Frederick]
Emmons and [A. Quincy] Jones." Jones and Emmons, at the time. And
[Douglas] Honnold and [John] Rex, I believe, also. They wanted to
incorporate it because they were-- They could have this more clout and
all that. And then we had a big brochure we put out and we said-- The
statement we made is that only the principals will participate; not the
draftsman, no — The principals would design this. For the first time we
would give a service designed by top-notch principals of the firm rather
than — In reality, that [design by assistants] was the case, really.
- LASKEY
- [laughter] Fraud, fraud.
- SORIANO
- Then I dissolved it. I, personally. Then I said, "Forget it." Because I
used to come prepared to discuss everything; I knew everything. The
others used to come-- Jones used to come with his assistant; he knew
nothing. And they were playing politics, this dirty little politics.
Jones was a real clever, shrewdy one. Really. So this is the way it was,
and at one time I just got so mad — The whole thing's so silly. And he,
the assistants were doing the work and he was supposed to really do--
The principals [were to] do the work. And Jones, you know, used to drink
a lot. So it was dissolved. But we did a hospital together. You see, San
Pedro Community Hospital [1961].
- LASKEY
- The San Pedro Community Hospital?
- SORIANO
- Yes. And all of this was my own doing. Most people may not know that.
And I designed the graphics, and I have the sheets, the pages I can show
you, the letterheads and all that. I had the office here and the office
in Wilshire Boulevard, Maynard Lyndon's place. Yeah. You see, I was
trying to see whether we can expand to greater things. Then when I
designed the hundred-story office I did it myself. No more associations.
Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Was it too many individual personalities?
- SORIANO
- It is that way, and it never works. Like too many cooks doing one —
- LASKEY
- Right, right.
- SORIANO
- How can that work? They're all prima donnas. Yeah. Especially Jones used
to bug me. He used to come — Whatever I said [Jones would reply] "No."
And then he used to ruminate what I said as his own. Really. And I said
to myself. What is this? Yeah. And I used to come with a prepared
beautiful drawings and then I had them beautifully done, as I do.
- LASKEY
- Yes, yes.
- SORIANO
- Documented like that.
- LASKEY
- Beautiful.
- SORIANO
- And then also after we had a meeting then he used to come later on and
say, "Ha! Now this is what we have to do." Exactly what I did. And I
used to say to myself, "Am I really seeing things?" That's the true
story. And it wasn't his, you see. And his assistants used to work on
this. And he didn't know what was going on and I knew. And so did
Maynard Lyndon. And Gallion. The others didn't. Yeah. I started with
those three, those two, others but not with the rest of them. But, just
after-- We did one job; that was it.
- LASKEY
- Well, you did do the Ciro's jobs with—
- SORIANO
- Ciro's, Bond Street, we did. This was, again, was brought to me by
[Serge] Chermayeff.
- LASKEY
- Yes. And you did collaborate with him on that, didn't you?
- SORIANO
- No !
- LASKEY
- No?
- SORIANO
- I did it all myself.
- LASKEY
- Oh, really.
- SORIANO
- Oh yeah, because he sent me the most stupid drawing and the clients were
also very unhappy about it. Yeah, he used to send me all kinds of sort
of art deco type of things, so finally I said, "No, no, no, no, this
cannot be." And he was, you know. Serge was a prima donna. Used to [put
on] big hot airs. You know, he was a tall fellow and used to look upon--
Well, you know, this kind of thing. Because he was associated with
[Eric] Mendelssohn at one time. Apparently he got pompous.
- LASKEY
- Oh, really?
- SORIANO
- Yeah. Got big. I think it was [Mendelssohn], I'm not so sure now. I
believe it was so. But, then, the clients themselves sort of didn't like
what Serge was doing so then I remained in the project. And I did a most
beautiful job for them. I designed everything. I was happy because I
didn't — I couldn't stand all this art deco type of things he was making
— Which he still does, the same thing I guess; his son does the same
thing.
- LASKEY
- Well, art deco is back in.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, of course. Well, even then they used to have all this painting
type of things and gimmickry, you know. I did something extremely
logical, simple, beautiful. It was a gem of a store, really.
- LASKEY
- You did two stores?
- SORIANO
- I did two. The one in Beverly Hills--still there. But you know, [an]
interesting thing happened at the one in Beverly Hills made me mad
again. Ai-yi-yi-yi- yi. It's really-- It's so, so--what's that?--mind
boggling?
- LASKEY
- Mind boggling.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. For example, I had those beautiful leather walls. You see. Look at
this, how leather-- Those walls, they're like blocks.
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- They're leather stuffed with cotton in it. It gives softness to it and
then is beautiful. Of course, again, the marvelous — That's real
leather, genuine leather .
- LASKEY
- Oh.
- SORIANO
- Look how beautiful they were. Now, I did the same thing in Beverly
Hills. The same thing. You'll find out. All of a sudden, just when the
art deco began, just a few years ago, apparently the company changed
hands already — they sold the whole operations — and all of a sudden
they had some decorator come in and, if you please, they made one
[leather block] black, one white: checkerboard .
- LASKEY
- Oh, no.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. You will see the walls —
- LASKEY
- Did they remove the leather? Or they painted them?
- SORIANO
- No, they painted them I think.
- LASKEY
- Oh.
- SORIANO
- That's what they did. And I said to myself — And then the rest of it--
- LASKEY
- Oh, that's too bad.
- SORIANO
- — remained beautifully. The rest-- You will see the fixtures where the
windows are. They were all done brass, I told you. They were done for
both stores. Yeah. I'll show you in color — They're really beautiful.
Here. [searches through photographs] I'm talking about-- See, this is
the [San Pedro] hospital —
- LASKEY
- Great use of color.
- SORIANO
- — we did together. See that? These are all my own Kodachrome. Look how
lovely they are.
- LASKEY
- They really are.
- SORIANO
- And I want to publish them in color, damn it!
- LASKEY
- Well —
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- They stand a much better chance-- They're doing a lot more color- -
- SORIANO
- Today, yeah.
- LASKEY
- — color publishing.
- SORIANO
- Look, look how beautiful these are. Now look, that's the beautiful
colors-- Look. This is the San Francisco [Ciro's store].
- LASKEY
- Oh, that's San Francisco.
- SORIANO
- And this is the one from the back entrance, if you please, of the
Beverly Hills [store] . You enter there like that, see? Look at the
walls, and look at this beautiful — These are all brass.
- LASKEY
- It's so elegant.
- SORIANO
- And there's the back entrance, yeah. That's the entrance to San
Francisco. But look how lovely this is.
- LASKEY
- Now this is —
- SORIANO
- These are all the tables and showcases I designed.
- LASKEY
- But is this in San Francisco or Beverly Hills?
- SORIANO
- It's San Francisco.
- LASKEY
- That's San Francisco. And this one is--
- SORIANO
- And the same thing like this is in Beverly Hills, also.
- LASKEY
- Yeah, I thought so.
- SORIANO
- Except that the, these things were, one [section] black and white in
Beverly Hills now.
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- But the one in San Francisco doesn't exist because the lease expired and
Macy's has, took it over. And then I don't know what the hell happened
to it.
- LASKEY
- It's beautiful.
- SORIANO
- Isn't that lovely?
- LASKEY
- Yes.
- SORIANO
- Well, that's it.
- LASKEY
- Yeah, the colors are wonderful.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. It breaks my heart, but then what can I do? [looks through
photographs] That's the one in Beverly Hills, you see? Round like that,
with [the] same coloring. Ah, well--
- LASKEY
- The Colby Apartments —
- SORIANO
- Yeah. *[Unfortunately, the owner, a woman from Taiwan, had it demolished
in spite of hundreds of letters and telegrams sent to the mayor.
Ignorant politicians without culture! We missed it by one vote at the
Los Angeles City Council. Two black council members, I understand, were
bribed by this woman from Taiwan! This was in spite of the cultural
heritage.] *[Mr. Soriano added the bracketed material during his review
of the transcript.]
- LASKEY
- Did they--? What kind of color did you use?
- SORIANO
- The Colby Apartments?
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- Well, the outside was, we had black. The steel was all painted jet black
and with some orange color in some — in between the members, identifying
certain members which were less structural than the others. And then I
used the fiberglass, corrugated fiberglass, for the balconies. I used
yellow on the north side because it was very beautiful, and I used blue,
a beautiful aquamarine blue on the southwest side. Because the glare of
the sun with the yellow was a little too intense so the blue was better.
So we study all these things, you see, in that area. A lot of them
arbitrarily say, "Let's put the yellow here and blue here." This we
studied. The same thing with the Hallawell Seed Company. I did-- People
say, "What is that blue glass? How did you decide?" Well, we tried blue,
we tried clear, we tried greenish, we tried grey, and we found the blue
glass that I used was the only one that did not affect the color of the
plants within the nursery.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yeah. It's interesting.
- LASKEY
- That's very interesting, since it was outside.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, the other ones cast a hue and a shade over the plants and made the
plants not real. And the blue sort of let the plants be exactly the way
they were in color. And I said, "We select the blue." And then the red
protective painting of the nursery — "Why red?" "Well," I said, "I paint
it with red lead "--which is a lovely color, Chinese red- -"the columns,
steel, to protect them." And I remain that way. So one was logical; one
also equally as logical. The two were lovely together. And then for the
building itself I used sort of a light grey. Sort of light, just almost
a neutral grey tone or white. Yeah, that's all: the three [colors]. And
I remember Mrs. [Esther] McNabb, the owner's wife, she sat down-- She
was very conservative-- You know, when I did this it was a very
startling thing. People used to go and take photographs and movies and —
Every weekend that was used for that. And she used to say — She wrote to
me a letter which I still have. That's the one that they say to my other
client-- [It] says, "When we lost an argument with Soriano, we'll gain,
we won." And she said, "Dear boy, don't you think it's a bit obvious:
red, white, and blue?" I said, "Come on, Esther." I said, "This is not
red, white, and blue; it's grey, [red] and blue." And I say, "Why don't
you let us finish that and if you don't like any of the colors I'll
change them for you, okay?" That's the way it was. And then when
everybody used to talk about this, they used to come there on weekends
to take movies. And from then on then business [went] way up and they
would send me a letter: "At first we thought we will double our
operation. It has far surpassed our expectations." That was when we got
the $500 bonus. You see, from then on they realize how right I was,
yeah. Well, it takes tenacity and education.
- LASKEY
- Well, it also takes a certain amount of confidence in yourself.
- SORIANO
- Exactly. And that I have. [laughter]
1.8. TAPE NUMBER: IV, SIDE TWO (JULY 20, 1985)
- LASKEY
- The interesting thing — another of the interesting things about the
Colby Apartments besides the use of color- - was their design: the whole
matter of little gardens and balconies and patios. How did you design
it?
- SORIANO
- I always loved gardens, loved patios. And since none have no bearing
walls, this is the way it was designed, too, you see? From then on I
have no bearing walls in any of my concepts. From 1950 on. Yeah. No
bearing walls. So the structure, the structural elements, were
self-tenable and the walls were just simply either cabinets or free.
That's what I did. From then on I've been doing that. And so it works
out beautifully for me, and this is what I designed even with my
aluminum prefabricated houses. I can put in one day four houses with six
unskilled men because they're all prefabricated, pre-studded, precisely
done: all you do is bolt them. Any moron could find the holes; if he
doesn't, he's worse than a moron than I thought.
- LASKEY
- [laughing] Were the Colby Apartments prefabricated then?
- SORIANO
- Yes.
- LASKEY
- And assembled?
- SORIANO
- The same way, no bearing walls. Yeah. And except that we did a lot of
work on the cabinets. Most of it were not done in the factory; they were
done locally. Because it was cheaper that way, at that time. I think it
was [the] Korean War then? Was something we didn't have — Nineteen
fifty- two.
- LASKEY
- Nineteen fifty-two. Could be the Korean War.
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Or the aftermath.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, whatever. Anyway, so, whatever. So we had, I had a marvelous
connection with the U.S. Plywood [Company] . And I knew the president
and he used to let us go to the warehouse all the time to select the
panels as to grain and color. We were receiving lots of plywood ash from
Japan. And I remember I went with my assistant Dan Dworsky, you know, in
Los Angeles?
- LASKEY
- Oh, the architect?
- SORIANO
- He used to work for me. Yes. He was my assistant. In fact, he worked on
my Colby Apartments. We installed all the Plexiglas. He worked locally
there.
- LASKEY
- Daniel Dworsky?
- SORIANO
- Yes. I used to make-- That's right, you didn't know that, did you?
- LASKEY
- No, I didn't know that. [laughter]
- SORIANO
- I gave you so many names. Oh, I can give you so many, many names. Yeah.
Dan Dworsky. I gave you Joe [Joseph Y.] Fujikawa. Dan Dworsky worked in
the apartment-- In fact, I put him to work [on] the divisions of the
patios, the balconies: all this Plexiglas — corrugated? We used to
install it — I devised a way with a little wire, with a little piece of
plywood hanging down. We'd improvise those things on the job. And Dan
worked on them. Dan is a lovely boy, I liked him. Is a good friend of
mine, and his lovely wife, too- -charming. And so this is what we did.
And I — In fact, we went to U.S. Plywood with a couple of assistants and
selected--I don't know how many- -hundreds of panels from several boxes.
Hundreds of boxes they had there of U.S. Plywood that came from Japan,
this thick, with maybe twenty or forty panels in it. And I used to pick
them up. They were four [feet] by eights. Yeah. And I used to go and
pick them up and put them on the wall and select them per color, for
grain, to match them. And so I used to do that. And I matched them as
top one, top two, top three, top four, east wall, living room. Things
like that. I matched every room different woods, and I used to mark them
precisely because I want the cabinetmakers to install them exactly as I
put them up as per grain, as per color. And so as not to make mistake to
leave it to them to do that, I used to do that.
- LASKEY
- To mark them.
- SORIANO
- Yes. And I'll give you an interesting story in a minute. And this wood
also-- This wood was welded wood with infrared light. No nails again,
you see; I used that completely. Yeah. And so [an] interesting thing
happened there. I asked the union there to send me some real
cabinetmakers. And at the time, you know, they were working time and
material. It was a difficulty to get labor. They were very rambunctious,
the laborers, the unions. And they have to take it on time and material.
And I asked the union [for] the cabinetmakers I want. "Yeah, sure we
have the best." Okay. They came in and I said, "Look, I took the trouble
to mark them. Top one, top two, top three, top four, from east to west
on such and such a wall. It's all marked on the wall, too. All you have
to do is just put them together properly and be sure that they're
exactly done. All I want you to-- Installation, you know, with the
plane. Just make that lovely one-eighth-of-an-inch V, you put them
together, they are beautiful, and then put the epoxy resin and then
bang! Done." And that's the way it was done, it's very simple. But I
said, "I want you to be careful. Please." And they said, "Oh, sure,
sure, I understand it very good." You know, right. What happened was
this, a very interesting thing. I come-- I used to go every day or
sometimes twice a day to supervise, to see how it's going on. And so I
looked at the installation of one wall — I said, "There's a mistake
there." I have very sharp eyes; I may not appear so, but I can sense--
"Oh, I did exactly what you said." I said, "Well, it looks like there's
a mistake there, I'm sorry. Do you mind removing it?" He said, "Oh, come
on." I said, "Yes, what's the difference? You're getting paid by the
hour." They were getting paid like that. And I said, "I'll see to it
that the material-- I'll pay or the owner will pay for it, okay? You
have nothing to lose . " The contractor loses nothing since he is on
time and material. You pay him by the hour, that's all. And he said,
"No! That's the [most] foolish thing I've ever heard." I said, "Never
mind with that; I think there's a mistake there, sir." Reluctantly he
removed [it], and sure enough, he had made a mistake. Instead of one-
two, he had one- four. Yeah. And I said, "You see? After I ask you like
a gentleman, like a friend, I explain to you and I really ask you with
great kindness to please be careful in installation, didn't I?" And he
takes the hammer and threw it on the floor. We had already carpets on
the floor already. Said, "I quit this goddamn job." I said, "Okay, fine.
Excellent," I say, "because I don't want a person like that here working
anyway." And so I wrote a letter immediately to the contractor:
noncompliance with the performance of the job, and I have the attorney
write him a letter to follow it up-- termination of contract with this
union builder. And he came begging and pleading, and the union official
came in. And I said, "Nope. I asked for cabinetmakers; I don't want
butchers." I said, "I explained, I took the time. Look what I have on
the panels, they're all marked precisely. And look what he did." "Well,
maybe we can send others." I said, "No, forget it. The owners are very,
very pissed off with this, " I said to them [laughing] like that, which
is true.
- LASKEY
- Of course.
- SORIANO
- And I said, "They don't want to lose time and all that with this kind of
incompetency." And I said, "We're not-- They said they don't want to
finish, they want to move in right now." But all of a sudden I remember
I used to have Italian cabinetmakers that did work for me in shop stores
that I did. Johnny Basso was his name. And I said, "Johnny, do you have
any Italian cabinetmakers, Italian real cabinet — " "Oh, sure enough,
but they no union though." And I said, "That's all right." Now we had —
The whole job was a union job, you see. And we had to have the plumbing
— Everything was done so we didn't care. And I said, "Fine." So we put
some sheets on walls because of complete big glass walls and we worked
at night. And I had those two Italian cabinetmakers from Italy-- They
hardly spoke English. And they were the most beautiful people on earth.
They used to finish the cabinet — they did all the work — and they used
to finish a cabinet and they used to call me, "Signore Soriano, guarda!
Che bello!" Said, "Mr. Soriano, look how beautiful." Their own work!
Putting their hands over it. Can you imagine that kind of craftsmanship?
- LASKEY
- No.
- SORIANO
- And I was touched. I loved these guys. I said to them, I said. Look at
this, and look at the debasing things that have come with these
so-called unions. These stupid jackasses. Just because they're union
they think they — Instead of really having the finesse, the pride of
their work. And we finished the job that way. And they did the most
marvelous work with his Italian nonunion guys.
- LASKEY
- Now, this is all the cabinetwork in the Colby Apartments?
- SORIANO
- All the cabinet and all the paneling in that Colby Apartments. Yes. This
is what you do, you see. Pains, pains, struggles, fights, and then the
union men came in there; they want to picket the job and this and that.
I said, "Go right ahead." Said, "I'm sorry, the owner doesn't want to
pay for it, so what are you going to do?" [laughs] "Go ahead." And so
they couldn't do anything. You see. And, you see, the cabinetry that we
had in there. Let me see if I have a picture here. Oh, yes. You see,
this is the apartment. This is — Now, let me see if I have a cabinet —
Unfortunately, I don't think I have it here. I had some beautiful
pictures of the cabinetwork. Maybe- - Wait a minute, wait a minute,
maybe I have it. No, that's the Adolph's Building; you should see the
inside of it. Yeah, all this is the Adolph's Building. See, I did all
the furniture and everything.
- LASKEY
- That's beautiful.
- SORIANO
- Every, everything. You should see how beautiful that is really.
- LASKEY
- You generally ended up doing your own subcontracting —
- SORIANO
- Every — I did — Most of them.
- LASKEY
- — didn't you, on your buildings?
- SORIANO
- If I hadn't done that, there wouldn't have been an office building. I
mean, there wouldn't have been a single house of steel, ever. Because I
took the trouble — You see, this is the apartment house.
- LASKEY
- That is beautiful.
- SORIANO
- See?
- LASKEY
- Yes.
- SORIANO
- Now, let me see if I have these cabinets.
- LASKEY
- It's a shame they've let it go to waste.
- SORIANO
- Well, this is the tragedy--what happens you know. People have no
finesse. Unfortunately, I have them [the cabinet photos] someplace else,
but not here.
- LASKEY
- I'm sorry.
- SORIANO
- So do I.
- LASKEY
- I'd like to see that.
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Because none of the pictures that I saw were of the interior.
- SORIANO
- No —
- LASKEY
- They were always of the courts and the exterior.
- SORIANO
- I know, I know, I know. I have some cabinetry I may show you after you
finish this. Anyway. So this is what happened. I did the dressers and
everything else. Hundreds of drawers beautifully done with [the] same
beautiful ash by these cabinetmen. And I loved the story-- It's a true
story. They used to rub their hands on their cabinet they'd finished and
say, "Signore Soriano, guarda che bello!" Says, "Look, Mr. Soriano, how
beautiful." They were proud of what they accomplished. Putting their
hands over-- [There would] be such a finesse. As if they did something-
-which is true, they did a beautiful job. Yeah. Because I had beautiful
cabinets for in the dressing room, Mrs. Colby, for her purses and
hundreds of shoes and brassieres, you name it. All that separate,
separate, separate drawers and drawers. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Is craftsmanship just not important to American workmen? Or is it just
not part of our tradition? Or —
- SORIANO
- I don't think it is.
- LASKEY
- Why is it difficult?
- SORIANO
- I don't think it-- Is nothing to do with our tradition. The contrary. I
think America was built because if you make a better mousetrap you
succeed, don't you? So that means that you have to really do some better
work. The trouble is the forces- -the unions and several individuals —
not that I'm against unions, but on the contrary — the unions have been
— Originally, it was all right. But all of a sudden now they became the
worst enemies of themselves. Because all they think is money, money,
money rather than to educate the craftsmen properly . The same thing
with architecture. Why do you suppose we are producing a whole bunch of
"unhatched eggs, " I call them. And I will use that expression which I
think fits to architects who know nothing. Not the A-B-C of architecture
to do buildings, and that's why our cities are so horrible. They're
playing with all these fantasies, gimmickry, painting, sculpture. They
depend on these artificialities to make their architecture viable.
That's all you see. Just gimmickry. Nothing else. Nothing logical
architecturally. No. Because architecture transcends that area of this
gimmickry. Which is like Bach. His music is superb because these
structures, these tonalities [are] so beautiful. The same thing, the
Hindu music, is the same way. These beautiful structuring of tonalities.
[imitates tones] It's like the atmosphere, like the air. Like the
oceans. You don't find gimmickry in the ocean, you don't find gimmickry
in the air. You don't find gimmickry in the flowers, the plants, do you?
No. Never. This is a natural process and it's clear, orderly. That's the
thing. Yeah. Yes, darling, that's the way it is. Unfortunately we are in
a very, state of decadence which to me is very disastrous and it might
be the ruin of America if we don't watch out, really. We find what's
happening to the automobile industry. Yeah. And we ' re complaining that
many cars are sold are the foreign cars rather than the American cars.
Well, we made it. I read an article in 1940 about these gadgets they put
on the automobile industry. All this chrome, facings, for nothing. And I
said, "When are we going to learn that?" In 1940 I wrote this article.
Yeah. It was published in the Philosophical Library
of New York: New Architecture and City Planning. Here, give
me that book, will you please? The one, you see that? The International --red- -International- -
- LASKEY
- Oh, the International Who's Who?
- SORIANO
- Yeah, on top of that there is a, this sort of tan reddish book. The
New Architecture and City Planning.
- LASKEY
- Here you go.
- SORIANO
- Thank you. Yeah. This is the one I wrote, [turns through pages] Yeah.
It's really interesting, isn't it? Let's see what my book-- [Page] 290.
Yeah, [turns pages] Here it is: "Some Problems of the Low-Cost Home,"
1940, by the Philosophical Library of New York, New
Architecture and City Planning, by [Paul] Zucker. Let's see
if I have the place there. I said [in the book], "Unfortunately, it took
a horrible carnage like war to bring to light the stupidity of making
hundreds of variations of the same article simply by adding superfluous
embellishments." Isn't that what we're doing today?
- LASKEY
- Yes.
- SORIANO
- Okay. [continues reading] "With one stroke, our publicity machinery and
our manufacturers, forced by patriotic duty" — that was during the war,
see?-- "began advocating conservation of materials." Yeah. "In
conserving, one must say the most with the least. Is not this one of the
most important laws in any kind of creation?" That's what Bach does,
isn't it? Yeah. "In the design of a chair, the building of a house, in
planning a city, in writing music" --you see?-- "is not this what the
client asks of the architect and what the architect must give to his
client?" I asked these questions, yeah. "We still like to dress our
inventions, if not with complicated dresses of the middle ages, still
with simple streamlined dresses." Yeah. That's what we used to do with
our cars, streamline [with] chrome lines. For what? [continuing]
"Dresses which are nonetheless still dresses. Our inventive achievements
can stand on their own merits. They do not need external embellishments
to show their usefulness. I'm not speaking here of likes and dislikes of
individuals. Everyone has the right to buy or make for himself anything
he wishes, but certainly no one should assume the responsibility of
making for people's consumption, designs that need psychoanalysis."
- LASKEY
- [laughs]
- SORIANO
- Yeah. That was in 1940. [laughs] Actually, to be truthful, it was 1939
when I wrote this; it was published in 1940. I said, "People have been
loud for centuries with false notions," and this is what they're doing
even more now. "They will need re-education to bring back the normal
innate appreciation of intelligent forms. I blame more than anyone else
the designers of this pathetic state." Yes. Yeah. "I blame more "--yeah-
-"the designers of this pathetic state. Their misdeeds have contaminated
everything inside and outside of the houses." True today? Yeah.
Ay-yi-yi-yi-yi-ya. "I have seen too many serious efforts on the part of
some of my colleagues and myself spoiled because of this general
epidemic of confusion." True today?
- LASKEY
- Yes.
- SORIANO
- Well, anyway, I go on. And look what I proposed for prefabricated
houses. In slices, and of wood. Look. I was designing already the two
walls and the ceiling at the same time. Prefinished. And the floors
prefinished. All you do [is] bolt it. And you can stack these things one
on top of the other. See? Bam, bam, bam: like chairs.
- LASKEY
- It really is amazing, or interesting--
- SORIANO
- That's in 1939.
- LASKEY
- Oh. Before the war.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. These are lovely? And I have also the one I did for Consolidated
Voltee Aircraft Company. Give me that thing on top there. I'll show you.
Right down-- The very top. This magazine [Architectural] Forum.
- LASKEY
- This one right here?
- SORIANO
- Yeah. You already know that one. You've seen it.
- LASKEY
- Yes. I saw that.
- SORIANO
- Okay. Did you remember what I did right there?
- LASKEY
- Was that the umbrella — ?
- SORIANO
- Yes.
- LASKEY
- Yes.
- SORIANO
- Yes.
- LASKEY
- Well, as I was starting to say, I think it's so interesting that
Americans, who have this love affair with progress and new things,
haven't adopted it for their houses .
- SORIANO
- No .
- LASKEY
- It just makes-- I mean, they like everything else to be modern, they
like streamlining, they like new materials. They love portable things.
- SORIANO
- That's correct.
- LASKEY
- But they haven't accepted it in house design, which — Especially in Los
Angeles, well, I think any place-
- SORIANO
- All over.
- LASKEY
- — that housing has become so incredibly expensive that only the rich can
have houses. I think they would be delighted.
- SORIANO
- This is exactly it. This is what has happened. This is what I've been
talking for years and years and years until I am about-- I sound like a
broken record, ruminat[ing] the same things. But even here, in 1939 I
wrote this article--article was published in Architectural Forum--"The New House in 194X." Yeah. You
remember that idea that's like an airplane. I said, "Why not use that?"
And you should read what I had in here. I had no wiring for the houses
anymore- -using completely activated lights with paints, you see? And
instead of wiring which was — I was anticipating things that will be
scientifically done in a house which will eventually be.
- LASKEY
- I love the idea of wheeling the house to the lot.
- SORIANO
- Exactly.
- LASKEY
- Just have all the utilities put in in advance and then —
- SORIANO
- And, then, also look at the floor: telescope. Right there. Prefinished
floor, once you prepare the grounds. And also, now look what I did here
and look what other colleagues of mine [did] when they took the "new
house 194x, " like Douglas Meyer and Eric Nicholson. Look at this kind
of a thing: plain, with-- You see little sketches. But they don't-- They
didn't do anything, [turns pages] Look. Look at this. What is that?
Nothing, really. And some designing little bathrooms and little — This
is the same old stuff. "Flexible space." But then, I was thinking of
structures, not just simply little cubicles. Look. This kind of thing--
Like one fellow from California, near Berkeley, Russian-born, said--
what his name is? Michael Goodman-- "Yeah, but using the same old wood,
the same old stuff. Nothing really innovative." But the idea you have to
put all this because there are not many people, well, going ahead.
[turns pages] Look at this, Durham White; I don't know who he was
anyway. Look at this, is that anything new? Nah. No. Even some of the
big names were doing the same old stuff. Yeah. [turns pages] These are
all the real boys-- Yeah, at the time they-- There's Harwell
Harris--betting lounge, he designed. But still he has the same old stuff
that — Yeah. Look at that. [turns pages] Gadgets, gadgets, the same old
junk. Neutra. There's Neutra. At least —
- LASKEY
- Oh, Neutra?
- SORIANO
- Yes, here's Neutra. He was doing at least, look, modularly planned — At
least he had that system of precision.
- LASKEY
- Well, this is nineteen — What, what —
- SORIANO
- This was the 1920-30, he designed this.
- LASKEY
- Oh.
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- But what issue of Architectural Forum is
this?
- SORIANO
- This is September 1942.
- LASKEY
- 'Forty- two. So the war was already well on.
- SORIANO
- Yes, yes, yes. and this is what they thought the new houses will be in
"194X."
- LASKEY
- At some point in —
- SORIANO
- Yeah, yeah. And so-- But, you know, I anticipated these type of things,
new things rather than the same old things like that. Yeah. Foundation
savers, prefabricated parts, same old wood, so —
- LASKEY
- Well, they did a lot of prefabrication during the war, didn't they?
Didn't the army and navy — ?
- SORIANO
- Aaaaaah. Nah.
- LASKEY
- No?
- SORIANO
- That's all because you can take a machine that makes [one] hundred nails
in one shot instead of by hammer and nail, so big deal. What is that?
That doesn't mean anything. That's not prefabrication.
- LASKEY
- Oh.
- SORIANO
- That's using the same old stuff only [with a] little bit of makeup to
make you look prettier quickly.
- LASKEY
- Oh.
- SORIANO
- In other words, when you come out from sleep [such] that you're tired or
maybe your eyes don't feel so good, put a little makeup quickly. That'll
hide a multitude of sins. This is what they're trying to do by having a
machine that can do that. So what? Big deal.
- LASKEY
- But it wasn't really prefabricated parts--
- SORIANO
- No, no.
- LASKEY
- --where they would just truck them out and assemble camps.
- SORIANO
- Exactly. It still will be the same old junk. They look the same way.
(That's okay, don't worry.) Yeah, yeah.
- LASKEY
- Well, something that you said just a few minutes ago reminded me of
something that I wanted to talk to you about, and that was the — that
you tended to use — was it eight-foot ceilings? Wasn't that unusual? And
doors.
- SORIANO
- Yes, my doors, I — See, I-- That's true. I used to say, "My god! Look at
— " Like this door here.
- LASKEY
- Yes.
- SORIANO
- This is seven-foot ceiling here-- This one is not even eight- -which is
not the standard housing authority standard--but seven. And some builder
did it. The father of this jackass did it, you see. And you see, have an
eight-inch piece of stuff in there, on top of the door. And most of the
doors [are] six foot [by] eight [inches] . That is one-foot-four-inch
space on top. And I said, "How ridiculous that is. Why?" And I used to
watch the amount of time spent- - I measured the time of what the
carpenter to make the blocking of the one-foot-four-inches space above
the door. The amount of time it took to block it up. Then the plasterers
have to come, then you put all the plaster moldings and everything else
to hold the plaster around the door header and all that. And I said to
myself, "How awful! How wasteful. The cost of that is so horrible." And
I ask how much a complete door, an eight-foot door? I have this written
up in one of the articles. The average door used to cost about five
dollars or six dollars. They will charge you almost twenty dollars for
the door — for an eight-foot door.
- LASKEY
- For an eight-foot door.
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- So that's —
- SORIANO
- Three times, four times the amount.
- LASKEY
- About three times.
- SORIANO
- And sometimes not. Maybe ten dollars more. And so I used to figure, it's
still cheaper than the labor that — And we had to spend a hundred
dollars to put that piece of stuff on top of the door! And then I said,
"Nonsense. Eliminate that." I said, "Figure eight-foot doors and
eliminate that cost on top." And I used to argue with the builders and
the subcontractors. And they'd say, "Oh, no." I said, "Well, tell me,
how much you spending is painting on top with that header?" "Well, now,
I don't know; we take it all as one." "No," I said, "I want you to tell
me that. Maybe I won't eliminate that." And we used to come — They were
more expensive, yes. They didn't know it themselves. But now they
advertise, you know, you have big ads: "Use eight-foot doors because
they are money savers , they're cheaper." Yeah . Now.
- LASKEY
- That's interesting.
- SORIANO
- After how many years? [laughing] Half -century afterwards. Yeah. Yes
ma'am, that's Mr. Soriano for you . Yeah .
- LASKEY
- Well--
- SORIANO
- Not accepting. Questioning. Yeah. Observing, questioning, questioning,
questioning. And that's the only way innovations come. But then they
used to make my life miserable. They used to go to the owner and say,
"Why the hell do you want to [have] eight-foot doors for?" Yeah, no
kidding. And the clients would —
- LASKEY
- The contractors would go--
- SORIANO
- Yes! They would go to —
- LASKEY
- — to the clients?
- SORIANO
- — the clients, yes. They said, you know, "You want to save money?" You
know, "These eight-foot doors you have — " They used to blame [it] on
the eight-foot doors. And I said, "Don't listen to them. They are
liars." And I used to finally challenge them. And I said, "How dare you
tell me that costs more. How much do you spend on top there? What are
you figuring?" "Well, we take the whole job." (As I mentioned before.) I
said, "No, you don't take the whole-- You figure every inch of it, don't
you?" I want to find out how much it costs you to block this and plaster
that. I want a precise answer to that." And they used to give it to me.
And finally they began to see. "Well now, of course, we take [it] as a
whole thing-- Again, they used to bring that to-- I said, "No, no. I'll
tell you what. Don't put any of that on top. All right? Eliminate that
since it costs you that much; I'll buy the eight-foot doors, okay?" With
a geminold, which have prefabricated doors, fine. And that's what I did.
And that's how I start these things, always. And besides, when I did the
prefabrication with the cabinets made in the factory, I brought them
together with the cabinets and the jambs together so it was all assembly
method; there was no problem- -no plaster. I didn't use plaster anymore
anyway. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- When you went from the wood frame or, you know, from wood to your steel
houses, you also went from ribbon windows--the smaller windows — to the
whole glass walls. But the other walls, were they plywood? When you
stopped using plaster, what did you use for the fill when you went to
your modular housing?
- SORIANO
- Well, there are lots of walls. For example, we use inch-and-an-eighth
plywood.
- LASKEY
- Plywood.
- SORIANO
- Which is very good sound. Is almost as good as plaster walling in
insulation and all that. Inch and an eighth thick.
- LASKEY
- Would the plywood actually be what the surface was? The exterior surface
was plywood?
- SORIANO
- The plywood then we used-- We used good plywoods on the inside, and on
the outside I used to put other- - another layer of plywood. Or I used
to put a marine grade plywood of a different material, or I used to put
in cork . That's what I did .
- LASKEY
- I know, the cork we'd talked about.
- SORIANO
- That's exactly what it was.
- LASKEY
- But, would plywood — ? Would you then just paint it? Or how would you —
?
- SORIANO
- No.
- LASKEY
- Because I think of plywood as being perishable.
- SORIANO
- No.
- LASKEY
- Or would warp, or would stain.
- SORIANO
- Depending [on] what you use, you see. There are many grades of plywood.
There are a hundred grades of plywood. You have to choose the proper
properties of the plywood. The marine grades of plywood which will stand
any kind of salt water and then moisture. Then you finish them properly.
On the inside I used to use beautiful woods laminated to the plywood, if
I ordered it properly from the factory. Or we used to apply another
quarter of an inch on top welded, again, with infrared light and
epoxies. And then the one-and-an-eighth-inch plywood used to be like a
core, which was an excellent insulation. And that's the way I used to do
it. And then the outside I could face-- I can put anything. I could put
— Either leave it alone by ordering marine grade or redwood or whatever
I wanted on the outside, or use any other material applied to it as I
did-- And so become like a sandwich wall which used to be about two
inches, two and a half inches thick. Yeah. And instead of the so-called
six inches thick of the plaster and two-by-fours and all that, which is
silly, you save inches on the inside. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- How did you deal with the problem of Southern California heat with the
glass--with the sliding glass windows or the large glass walls?
- SORIANO
- I didn't think I had any problem there because I don't think it was--
They were all very well insulated. Most of the heat flies [out] from the
top, you see? You know, the average house supposedly that they tell you,
with a hip roof, they say that insulates. That's a lot of nonsense. That
becomes the hot box, especially [when] they put the shingles that are
like that. That space in there becomes so hot, it transmits the heat
downward. Now, I'll tell you, the girl you met, Maureen, she has a house
she had done by one of the so-called conservative architects, John Lloyd
King, in Tiburon at the time; he's dead now. And he did all this woodsy
stuff. And he has the bedroom upstairs. She has a ceiling which is more
than eight feet high. It's almost like fourteen feet high with a
slanting roof going up to the sky, and he has one of those round bulbs
hanging from the top there. You can-- Suppose the bulb burns [out] . You
have to have a ladder to go and change that bulb and remove the fixture.
I mean this is done. And you should see how hot the room gets. Yeah. And
you hear all the rain falling on top of that, the shingles and all
that's on top. Now, this is how cheaply done, even though they used to
permit this kind of construction. And they used to think this, this is
what sells, yeah. Unfortunately, this is the-- Most people never pay
attention to these little details. Yeah. They go into all these abstract
ideas of making it this, this will be cooler, but it isn't. It's worse.
Yeah. And the ribbon glasses, the reason of the ribbon glass-- Do you
know why?
- LASKEY
- No.
- SORIANO
- You study any room when you have a window in a dark space, [then]
another window-- Like in a conservative thing you have windows with a
space — You see in the restaurant there, see? Window and a space, window
and a space — You go inside, you find that window becomes very glarey in
contrast to the dark space. You have not a series — Bup, bup, bup, bup,
glarey, glarey, shots of the window. By making only one ribbon, then you
have one unified concept of soft light all the way through. Yeah. This
is why we did all these ribbon windows: continuity of glass. That was
the reason. Most people think it's just the style. It's nothing —
- LASKEY
- "It looks good."
- SORIANO
- Nothing to do with it. It looks good all right because it was all
unified concept. One reposed, lovely window, instead of just shots of
annoying things. Just like noises: enh! enhl enh! enh! Like that, see?
Yeah. Instead of talking: aaaaaah. Yeah?
- LASKEY
- Okay.
- SORIANO
- That will describe it I think.
- LASKEY
- So when you went-- When you were able to eliminate the bearing walls,
then you could go fully to glass or--
- SORIANO
- You can do anything you want with it.
- LASKEY
- Anything you wanted to.
- SORIANO
- I can put glass, I can put panels, I could put glass and panels, I can
do anything I want in there. Free, freedom. But if you have your walls
to support your ceiling, you can't do that. Mine: just little columns
hold the whole thing. They're so designed to resist seismic stresses in
any direction. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- I can't remember which house it was--I'm sorry; I think it may have been
the Cook House- -that used the decking as part of the ceiling. And [I
was] reading that you actually went in where the decking was laying on
the joint, that you filled in the spaces with —
- SORIANO
- Plexiglas.
- LASKEY
- Plexiglas .
- SORIANO
- Yeah. I do that. Because it gives you a lovely quality to it. You get
extra light, and it has a marvelous feeling. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Well, that's attention to detail you've been talking about.
- SORIANO
- Absolutely. And you should see, not only that, but I can tell you many
other details related to that Plexiglas in relationship to the
corrugation to the building. Yeah. You know, normally, you will see —
Like in the Adolph's [Building] I did these things very beautifully. We
used a lot of Plexiglas, transoms above the areas of the cabinets to the
ceiling. Now, the Plexiglas that I used was very interesting. I used a
joint — which I'll show you, I have a very interesting detail, sample of
it. And then you say, "Well, now, how we going to put the [Plexiglas] to
the surface of the decking? The Plexiglas to adhere that . " (I'm going
to change that [microphone] in a minute.) And then you'll see what I did
there. (Now, I'm going to turn this because those people will make lot
of noise outside, yeah. Let's turn this — Very simple. ) So I used a
very interesting device. See, you assume the Plexiglas was like that,
you see, this size assuming, and then the — This will go to the surface
like that, but, you know, a metallic surface or any other surface, when
you put one next to the other it is always — There is not an even nor —
Might be a little wave, you see? Now, immediately, they — When we did
these details under my supervision, my own details of Plexiglas, then
the men said, "Well, we can always put a putty." I said, "No putties in
my building. No sir." "Well, how are we going to have the seal
completely sealed for sound?" I said, "Well, use your brains. Do you
know how? See what you can do." I challenge them. But I knew already
what we do, you see. Well, they couldn't think of it; putty was the only
thing. I said, "Look, why do you suppose I ordered these to have a
half-round [piece] here. Do I? Half-round? Didn't you do that? Do you
have that in fabrication, that you made a half-round?" "Oh, yeah. Yeah,
yeah, yeah. I thought we were going to fill that with putty." I said,
"No. You put in a tube, a round tube of Plexiglas or Lucite or whatever.
A tube, like a pipe." And I said, "Set it in there; half in there, half
against the ceiling. That makes a perfect adhesion and it takes in all
the different defects of corrugation and makes a perfect fit. And that
seals the noise. Better than putty; then [it] always be there." That's
what we did. Yeah. "Yes. Yes, yes, yes, yes!" And it was beautiful, and
it's still there. When you go there I'll show you in the building,
you'll see. (All right, I'm going to change this. I'm being — ) [tape
recorder off]
- LASKEY
- With the Adolph's Building and the Plexi[glas] that we've been talking
about, you could easily have put panels, you could have put
boards--surfaces that you couldn't see through. Obviously you did it
because you wanted the light. And I wonder — this is a very romantic
kind of a question — but does it have anything to do with your
background on Rhodes? The idea of the importance of light?
- SORIANO
- Nah. Not at all.
- LASKEY
- No?
- SORIANO
- Nothing to do with it. I don't think I identify with any-- At least not
that I'm aware of. Maybe subconsciously I may, but I don't think so. I
don't identify myself with this type of things. I feel I just design
things logically to solve a problem at the time with the principles I'm
working with.
- LASKEY
- But you could have solved that problem in- -by simply closing off the
light, too, which is what-- Well, most architects would have had a wall
there, a floor-to- ceiling wall. But the idea that you chose not to put
a floor-to-ceillng wall, in fact that you didn't have a wall at all —
But the space, when you closed the space off for sound, you didn't close
it off for light. I think that's an interesting choice.
- SORIANO
- Yes. I did, in some areas where we needed no light. I have a room there
— When you'll see it, it was completely black. Dark. And I did it with
devices completely black. Yeah. Now, the things that I did mostly — Most
of these offices were working spaces for secretaries, executives, and so
on. And even the president, as you will see, they are between patios
with beautiful gardens; lovely, exquisite areas where you live. They are
the most beautiful spaces imaginable for offices. And the secretaries
love them. They all have a private garden, each one. And not only that,
but they also have the privilege of shutting the music that is taped
from the central music system — We used to play nothing but classical
music there when Mr. Deutch used to be alive. He loved only the
classical music. But now, unfortunately, the people there play all this
rock junk, sort of pseudo- emasculated type of music. The Muzak.
- LASKEY
- Oh.
- SORIANO
- Which is sad, you know. And I know Mr. Deutch would have jumped from the
grave if he heard that. Because I designed a beautiful music area with
tape recorders and whatnot, record players and all that. Yeah. And It
really hurts me when I see that- -when I go there and they play that
awful junk. But anyway, that's the — They keep telling me something:
"Well, that's the music--" this and that. But if they wanted they could
do it, you see. I think the people who are running the show now don ' t
want it. I know that for a fact. And the fact that I did all this
openness and above the transoms with the lights-- I have indirect
lighting all the way through in the whole building; you don't see a
single light fixture in there. Not one. No register for air-conditioning
either. They're all com[ing] from a trough on top of the cabinets, on
top of the doors. And it continues all over the whole building. It's one
city block. This is an innovation I did, you see? I can't — It's hard to
explain all of that. And then when you go there, you'll see how
beautiful that is. And that gives to the offices for the secretaries
some lovely lightness and openness instead of being constricted with
darkness. Then this way, we have economy also of light. You see. Now.
1.9. TAPE NUMBER: V, SIDE ONE (JULY 20, 1985)
- LASKEY
- The Colby Apartments were your last major commission in Los Angeles
before you moved up here to Tiburon.
- SORIANO
- No, the —
- LASKEY
- I mean, you —
- SORIANO
- The Adolph's.
- LASKEY
- From Tiburon —
- SORIANO
- Oh, I see. I see.
- LASKEY
- --you would do the Adolph's Building —
- SORIANO
- Yeah, yeah.
- LASKEY
- But you're in Los Angeles, and then you moved up here. And--
- SORIANO
- No, we did the [San Pedro Community] Hospital [1961].
- LASKEY
- Oh, the hospital was after that?
- SORIANO
- Yes. Because I was here already when we did the hospital. Yeah. Sure.
Si, Madame, this is true. Because the Colby was in '50; the hospital was
a little later.
- LASKEY
- But did you do it in Los Angeles? Or did you work on it--
- SORIANO
- We worked on the plans here and we had other people working in different
area — Los Angeles, you see. The rest of the project architects were in
Los Angeles. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- But the Colby Apartments were —
- SORIANO
- Were in Los Angeles, exclusively.
- LASKEY
- Were in Los Angeles.
- SORIANO
- That's correct. Correct.
- LASKEY
- Then you, after they were completed you came up here.
- SORIANO
- Yes .
- LASKEY
- And you did your other work from up here.
- SORIANO
- Yes .
- LASKEY
- And of course, the Adolph's Building you did from up here.
- SORIANO
- I did it from up here. Exclusively.
- LASKEY
- And the hospital, which I hadn't realized. But then your other work
mainly was in the [San Francisco] Bay Area?
- SORIANO
- Yes .
- LASKEY
- Were there any major changes in what you did, because the climate and
the terrain and the--
- SORIANO
- Not necessarily, not necessarily, really.
- LASKEY
- — attitudes toward architecture are different.
- SORIANO
- This is — People romanticize the Bay Area region['s] architecture, the
Bay Area — all that nonsense. That's coined by critics and writers who
know nothing. Ignorant. They gave all this aura-- The Bay Area, Bay
region architecture, the Bay Area whatever- -or the International Style.
These are all nonsense words. To me these are gimmick words by critics
of- -writers who know nothing. It's nice to have adjectives, titles-- So
what do they represent? What is the Bay Area architecture? Nothing.
[Richard J.] Neutra has done houses here. They're not different from the
ones he did in Los Angeles. And I've done in design things in Hawaii
which are similar to the ones I designed in other places, so they have
different climate, yes. I have designed things for Guam and even for
Alaska. I have projects which I never built. But then, unfortunately,
due to circumstances- -war and all that stuff — prevented from these
projects from being realized. However, the adjustment to climatic
conditions has to do with what you do with the insulation, with the
glare and so on, orientation. A lot of factors to consider. It's all a
matter of consideration of factors for a performance. A process of
architecture for a particular performance. This is very important. Yeah.
This is the way I worked. I don't romanticize because it is this, it is
that, and therefore I want it that way. And you find many people who
even build in the East, they have houses that look very much like the
ones in San Francisco or Los Angeles. All this colonial housing; they're
not different. Yeah. They are all awful. They are unlivable to begin
with, whether here or there. Only with there they have severe climates,
they have to depend on more heat kind of fixture. Now, I was in London,
as I told you, last November lecturing there. And the chairman of the
Royal Institute of British Architects — He came to see me twenty years
ago. He was in my office here in Tiburon. Was here. And he told me that
he came for look of work for me. And now, he says I was responsible for
that direction in architecture. Yeah. And you should see the modern
house they built. They built a lovely pavilion of aluminum and glass.
Where? Between two renaissance buildings.
- LASKEY
- In London?
- SORIANO
- Yes! In London, London, London! if you please. And you should see what
they did. They even put a glass roof so they can look at the trees.
Because London is always raining and gloomy and it becomes very — You
should see how charming their house is, and my-- I'll tell you their
names: Robin Spence is his name.
- LASKEY
- Robin Webb Spence?
- SORIANO
- No, Robin Spence.
- LASKEY
- Robin Spence.
- SORIANO
- And also, he built that in partnership with the — Also Robin Webster,
but Robin Spence [is] the one who did that pavilion. And his wife Delia
Spence was absolutely charming. They're both very dear friends of mine
and charming. Really. Gracious people. And so they have this pavilion of
glass and aluminum. And you should see the fixtures, you should see the
connections; they use all the industrially produced things that they use
even in trucks to build that house. Now people will say, "My god! In
London, this?" My god, they can tell you that. Maybe tomorrow we'll give
them a ring. Then you talk to them and see. Really, because I haven't
spoken to him — What time is it now? It will be eight hours again. Six,
eight hours. It's exactly midnight there. Yeah. I don't know if I should
wake him up now. And they're absolutely beautiful people. They can tell
you themselves how marvelous the houses are. How this architecture's
beautiful-- And I saw also there are groups of architects. A husband and
wife do, also, the same type of things that I do.
- LASKEY
- How do you insulate a glass house in a climate like London?
- SORIANO
- They can use two glasses, double glaze. Or triple sometimes.
- LASKEY
- Oh.
- SORIANO
- You can do anything you want. We have to use our brains and science,
isn't it? We have it. Yeah. There are all kinds of glasses which are
reflective. Yeah. And you insulate the up. Even you can put two layers
of glass. That will insulate. There's no problem at all. How do you
suppose they insulate a little--the airplanes? Here you [have] again a
skin of aluminum, isn't it?
- LASKEY
- Yes.
- SORIANO
- And yet you ride in comfort- -you go forty thousand feet, which is below
zero. Yeah. Have you flown to Hawaii?
- LASKEY
- No, I never have.
- SORIANO
- Well, you-- Hawaii is, you know, hot, humid, and lovely, balmy. And then
all of a sudden you take the plane, in a few minutes you're about forty
thousand feet up in the air which is minus forty degrees or something;
cold! And yet you're very comfortable there. Sitting on the plane eating
a marvelous dinner or lunch, whatever they serve you. Not marvelous so
much in cuisine. [laughter] But anyway, you eat. So they give you all
the food and then you have music. You can — Even especially if you use
the French airlines — UTA I think it is, yeah — they have a beautiful
Bach or Scarlatti or Vivaldi. Yeah, they have these beautiful choices of
music that you can listen on the earphone. They play it constantly.
Beautiful thing. Absolutely enjoyable. Then you are comfortable even
better than the slum I am in here. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- But that's essentially an artificially created environment on an
airplane. This is--
- SORIANO
- So what?
- LASKEY
- Well, I'm just thinking in terms of a house that--
- SORIANO
- We are creating it — It's not an artificially created environment, too?
A house? Because the environment is outside when there is nothing. When
you enclose something, you build something that's — You're doing it
artificially, isn't it? Call it that if you want to.
- LASKEY
- I don't think I'm saying what I mean to say. I'll try again: that with a
house, unless you want to constantly have an air-conditioning system or
heating system, which is what I think you're--
- SORIANO
- Well, don't you? Don't you?
- LASKEY
- No, not in Southern California.
- SORIANO
- Well, I know; Southern California. But in the East? Ha, ha!
- LASKEY
- No, in the summer we never had an air con-- Where I grew up we never had
an air conditioner.
- SORIANO
- Where? Where?
- LASKEY
- Grand Rapids, Michigan. It got pretty humid, but--
- SORIANO
- But humid — What do you do with the humidity?
- LASKEY
- You sweat a lot.
- SORIANO
- You like to be comfortable. Sweat a lot, yeah. How about in the
winter?
- LASKEY
- Heat.
- SORIANO
- What kind of heat?
- LASKEY
- Well, we had artificial--
- SORIANO
- Stuff is artificial, isn't it?
- LASKEY
- Yeah, right.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, it's not natural any more than will be in Southern California —
- LASKEY
- But that's what I'm saying, that, in particular, would you design houses
differently? Would the climate dictate the design of the house?
- SORIANO
- It does.
- LASKEY
- Or could you take the same design and put it in any climate?
- SORIANO
- You could, as a matter of fact, by adjusting the elements, whatever you
want. In other words, I said before, it's all a matter of adjusting it
to a process of performance. You do something for a particular
performance, meaning if you have to use a name, in a climate which is
very severe, you have to use insulation, naturally. You find
condensation of the atmosphere [on] the glasses. You see, there will be
hot inside and cold outside; there [is] a lot of freezing and
condensation will occur. So you make provisions for that. Scientifically
you can do it. This is what I mentioned, that the satellites and planes
we have. Because they have taken care scientifically to regulate that,
to be comfortable. You do the same thing with the houses, which is,
again, artificial, isn't it? Yeah, it is artificially done.
- LASKEY
- But it's somewhat less artificial.
- SORIANO
- No, it's not--
- LASKEY
- I mean, unless, unless you want it to be-- Unless it's going to be
horrendously expensive to run, I think that—
- SORIANO
- No, it —
- LASKEY
- — you have to have, you know, a —
- SORIANO
- Now, this is true, this is true. However, we are talking about now in
sort of climates which are not too extreme. If you're talking about San
Francisco and Los Angeles, naturally, you have to use not the expensive
air- conditioning system that we use in the East- -even the heating
systems that we use in the East. You will require a tremendous amount
[of] humidifier and heat, otherwise you'll suffocate with the heat in
the winter. I've been — I was in the East. I lived there. Even in Saint
Louis, where it gets absolutely humid and cold-- Well, the climate is
very severe in that area. And I lived in New Haven, Connecticut, when I
was lecturing at Yale [University], and some of the places in New York,
yes. To me that was very stifling. I couldn't bear even to be constantly
there in this below zero outside. And inside, you know, has to be hot
and protective, but it gets very oppressive to the system. Well, you
have to have very fine air-conditioning, or you have the regular hot
systems, just furnaces that blow hot air.
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- Well, that means there [is] plenty of expense again. Money. Money
dictates what kind of a system you want to have. But it's still — It's
all artificial, isn't it, still? Yeah, you heat it artificially.
- LASKEY
- Well, if you heat it or cool it it's already —
- SORIANO
- That's correct. It's all artificial made. It isn't natural. In other
words, in Hawaii--I'll give you an example — when I designed my houses,
they all — because of the tourists, because of all this- -they all want
to have air-conditioning systems. Which is horrible. I'll tell you why:
there's the most mild climate in Hawaii with the winds, the trade winds,
and it's balmy. Yeah. Now, the tragedy is, all of a sudden, you put an
air-conditioning system; it's freezing, it's cold. It's cool all right,
but you go outside [and] it's the biggest shock in the world-- the
difference in temperature, you see? Now, I told my clients-- They want
to have air-conditioning. I said, "Why don't you wait? I'll make this so
you'll have cross ventilation, " because I had transoms with screen--
You know the transoms above?
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- I had screens. So you can have cross ventilation from both areas,
across. And it will remove the heat--the hot air — away, and then the
breeze makes it very comfortable to be in without any air-conditioning.
And I proved to my client that this was so, and he couldn't believe it.
He was going to spend money air-conditioning. "You can always put
units," I said. You can always do that. So he realized that you didn't
need it really. Now, if you are spoiled, you think you have to have air-
conditioning system. That's what all the hotels do, because the clients
coming from the east or other places are used to air-conditioning. You
go to any hotel nowadays — Even in Los Angeles they have
air-conditioning, isn't it?
- LASKEY
- Well, in the —
- SORIANO
- Sure they do.
- LASKEY
- In covered malls.
- SORIANO
- What's that?
- LASKEY
- Shopping malls.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. What's that?
- LASKEY
- Shopping centers —
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- --that are covered.
- SORIANO
- Oh, in covered malls.
- LASKEY
- In a place like Los Angeles.
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Which is SO silly.
- SORIANO
- Well, you know why: because they have the smog, and they have to make —
Well, to you it isn't, but most people, they think it's awful to look at
the smog. It's hideous, really. And then they make it comfortable for
you, for the clients to be there more comfortable and cool so they can
shop. It's all money making. Yeah. Because, you see, Los Angeles —
Because I lived there since 1924, I know the climate of Los Angeles too
well. Used to be marvelous before the war. With the advent of the war,
it became smoggy as that. Otherwise it was blue sky, warm, very clement
weather, beautiful. Orange blossoms, avocado trees. As I told you
before, it is not anymore the same way. Well —
- LASKEY
- We talked, and I don't think we talked on the tape — I think we were
talking at lunch yesterday about what it was like to have been part of
the architectural scene in Los Angeles in the thirties.
- SORIANO
- What it was like?
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- In what respect?
- LASKEY
- For you. Because there was so much going on. The whole —
- SORIANO
- It was an exciting area because they used — There was a group of human
beings there that used to seek-- They wanted this so-called new type of
architecture because they realized they were more livable, they were
more gracious, more open. With patios they've the ability [of having]
privacy — which, before, the houses were never given this consideration.
They were given a sort of a style, a Spanish — Mostly [they] were
designed in Spanish style, with all this silly plaster, devised by a
contractor to make it rough so as not to be careful. Yeah, that's the
reason. All this "jazzed up" plaster they used to call it. Yeah. And the
reason they did that [was] just so as not to be very precise, very
methodically well- structured stuff. "Any old way, just knock it off."
Like that, rough — They call it "jazzed up." Yeah. It's a nice
connotation for the jazz we were talking [about] before, isn't it?
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- "All this jazz"?
- LASKEY
- All that jazz.
- SORIANO
- That gives you a nice clue. Yeah. So — I don't know, I don't know what
to tell you. What were you, what did we discuss. I forgot, sort of.
- LASKEY
- We were talking, just talking about what being an architect in Los
Angeles in — well, from the twenties to the forties. You were there in
the thirties and forties.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. It was very lovely because we have enough clients- -used to come
to a few of us who were really following this marvelous movement of
architecture, which [was] started by Mr. Neutra, really. He should
deserve the first credit.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- I think so.
- LASKEY
- What about [Frank Lloyd] Wright in that sense? It was Wright that Neutra
and [Rudolph M.] Schindler came over to see to, you know. They took his
ideas and then followed him out here.
- SORIANO
- Well, I don't think they took his ideas, but they thought- -
- LASKEY
- Well, they liked his ideas, they were impressed with the —
- SORIANO
- At the time, yeah, at the time they were impressed. In fact, Neutra saw
[Louis] Sullivan- -
- LASKEY
- That's true.
- SORIANO
- --at the time when he was sick and poor. He was shocked to see him, the
great Sullivan, to be absolutely destitute and ill at the same time. And
I was laughing at that myself. [laughs] Yeah, that's really tragic,
isn't it? Pathetic, when you think of it. But--
- LASKEY
- Well, Wright, too--
- SORIANO
- Well, yes —
- LASKEY
- — paid homage to Sullivan in his declining days.
- SORIANO
- Yes, sure. But this is the tragedy, you know, instead of — At least I
have a little comfort that, in their last years, you know, they're
harassed with all these deprivations and struggle of bare necessities of
life.
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. This is what I'm going through right now, huh? Same thing. But
anyway, still I have the good health and good spirits.
- LASKEY
- Yeah. Sullivan had a lot [of] other problems.
- SORIANO
- Sure. Such as-- I don't even know.
- LASKEY
- He was an alcoholic.
- SORIANO
- Oh, he was? Well, I don't have that.
- LASKEY
- He was sick and he —
- SORIANO
- I'm fortunate; I don't have that. Only I've had this broken leg from the
accident, which bothers me. [laughs] This I can bear it. Anyway, I've
been living with it for so many years now. Almost a half -century. Yeah.
But no, Neutra deserves the greatest credit, really, because he was an
admirable man. He did the first-- He awakened the public, I think, to
housing, to the attention, for the first time, to housing. Before that,
you know, most of the architects were involved with big buildings,
cathedrals, and all this stuff. And housing was neglected. Look at the
Acropolis. Look at Rome. The only thing that we talk about Rome or
Acropolis is those big temples, the big cathedrals. The public? All the
slums. That's what they were. They're all one on top of another. And
they romanticize about how marvelous the roof tiles look, and that's
what they tried to imitate here. Yeah. With all this roofing, roofing —
You know, you go to the airport, you'll see those roofs looking you in
the face. Thousands of these — thousands — done by a builder. Roofs,
roofs, roofs, that's all they show you, the roofs. And, well, that's
what you have here right in Tiburon. Look at those outside. Nothing but
roofs. In all kinds of sculptural quality, you see? It is to me
incomprehensible that nonsense. And I was going to tell you some more--
What was it I just—?
- LASKEY
- We were talking about Neutra.
- SORIANO
- Neutra , yes .
- LASKEY
- His contributions.
- SORIANO
- Yes, it was really — He started that, quality of housing, and
unfortunately most architects don't give him credit for that. And it's
sad. Really it is sad. More than anybody, he was the one who tried to
bring real scientific thinking, a little more orderliness, to the
housing; nobody else did that before. I'll tell you an interesting
story. I was at the-- I was in a debate with Skidmore-Owings . I think
Owings, or Merrill-- I forgot now who it was [Skidmore, Owings and
Merrill]; I have it on a newspaper. And Dorothy-- Who was it? She was
the editor of Architectural Record.
Thompson.
- LASKEY
- Oh.
- SORIANO
- Dorothy Thompson. Do you know of her? Well, she was the editor of Architectural Record, [published by] McGraw
Hill.
- LASKEY
- The name is familiar.
- SORIANO
- And I remember-- I was in the debate with them. And there were [William
W.] Wurster, and there were some other architects who were teaching at
Cal [University of California, Berkeley], and so on--They were talking.
Who produced real innovations in housing? They immediately all jumped.
There was this debate was right here in Northern California, San
Francisco. They said, "Well, Wurster, of course; Wurster."
- LASKEY
- William Wurster?
- SORIANO
- Yeah, William Wurster. They kept eulogizing him.
- LASKEY
- What did he do?
- SORIANO
- Nothing! Nothing in housing that meant anything. Zero. You can quote me.
And you are anyway- -
- LASKEY
- I am quoting you. [laughs]
- SORIANO
- Yeah. And for reasons of reality. The only thing is, he got this big
publicity as a real politician. And he'd married that girl who wrote
about housing or slums or whatever it was; I forgot his wife's name. And
so I let them talk — They were talking, talking, talking, talking about
Wurster: how Wurster did that, how Wurster did that. And then there was
silence, that's it. And then I said finally, "Well, aren't we forgetting
somebody? Someone?" Then they looked at me as if something strange had
descended from the sky to question them. And then I said, "Yes." I said,
"What's the matter with Mr. Neutra?" They said, "Oh, yes, yes. Shall we
say — " Then immediately they picked up this stuff-- "Shall we say for
Northern California, Wurster; for Southern California, Neutra?" I said,
"No, no, no." I said, "Neutra did the only really contributions to
housing; not Wurster." And I gave — I give my spiel why, and so on. But,
you see, this is the tragedy of all these romantic sort of playing
politics, personal politics, politicizing statements, you see? And then
they were entirely eliminating. And I said, "Mr. Neutra has done that
more than anybody else. Wurster, what has he done?" Done all the same
old little shacks all over the place. I said, "Is that a contribution to
housing?" And of course they could not answer that one because they knew
damn well that they were just talking not with knowledge. I think I'll
show you something. I think I may have something here-- What they did
build in the USA. You have that one?
- LASKEY
- No, I don't have that one.
- SORIANO
- Well, this was published years ago. They have my nursery there and I'll
show you what Wurster did. Then you will know what I'm talking about.
[looks through book] You see, I have my nurseries here. Look at that.
- LASKEY
- That's beautiful.
- SORIANO
- See, look at all these pictures. Have you seen that?
- LASKEY
- Yes, I've seen several pictures--
- SORIANO
- Okay now, I'll show you. Now, [Pietro] Belluschi. Look what Belluschi
used to do. Look at that wood. Look, this is completely unadmirable.
- LASKEY
- May I see that?
- SORIANO
- Yeah, yeah. Shopping center. But anyway, I just want to get to Wurster.
And this is Mr. Wurster, the type of thing, office building. What is
that, what is admirable about this nonsense? Any builder would do that.
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- Nothing. There is Wurster, [Theodore C.] Bernardi, and [Donn] Emmons,
okay. Now, I'll show you something else about Wurster with another
thing- -but the bicentennial brochure. Have you ever seen that
bicentennial brochure?
- LASKEY
- I don't think so.
- SORIANO
- Okay, well, now I am going to stop here for a minute until I find it.
- LASKEY
- Okay. [tape recorder off]
- SORIANO
- If I told you about the innovations in housing you can see for yourself
any builder could do this kind of junk. So what is good about this? What
is this innovation? Nothing. Yeah. These are all plain, with
gimmickries. In reality, because of wood. There is not really a real
contribution there. And yet you look at this, and you look at the houses
of Neutra — Here, i just opened it; look at how beautiful that is. He
has quality.
- LASKEY
- I've been in that house .
- SORIANO
- Yeah, that's a beautiful house.
- LASKEY
- I think it's the Kaufman House.
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Were you around, let's see, '29 — ?
- SORIANO
- Yeah, I was around —
- LASKEY
- Were you around when they were building the Lovell House?
- SORIANO
- Yes, I just came in —
- LASKEY
- Were you aware of--?
- SORIANO
- I was not aware of that one, no. This was, as a matter of fact-- I
hardly-- At the time, I went afterwards. I went to — That was later that
I saw-- I met Neutra when I heard a lecture with-- You see, that was
five years after I came to America.
- LASKEY
- Yeah, it was awfully soon after you were here. I didn't know if you
would have been aware of it or not--
- SORIANO
- No, I wasn't aware even of who Neutra was, or Frank Lloyd Wright. Yeah.
You see how time marches on. But he made innovations in architecture, in
housing particularly. He had a system of prefabrication of industrially
produced things. And Wurster did nothing of the sort. And contrary to
what they say — And then I'll show you something else. Do you remember
that I talked to you about the KQED station that I lost?
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- Okay. Now, they asked this guy, Johannson, to collaborate with this
fellow. Look at the type of junk Johannson did. That is what he did.
This was —
- LASKEY
- Well, that looks very much like Lewis Kahn--
- SORIANO
- Well, I know, the same as from the East--
- LASKEY
- The prefab — The reinforced concrete, bunker type--
- SORIANO
- Yeah, all these things, all this artificial nonsense .
- LASKEY
- I call it neo- feudalism.
- SORIANO
- Well, this is exactly a good name for it; you can call it that. I'm glad
you did. [laughs] Well, this is the type of individual they required.
They associate themselves to do this, which is silly. And then look at
[Robert] Venturi, all this nonsense. So big deal, they are really
satisfied with their own just junk. So what? Look at this, Leeb House,
with all this artificialities, again. They are playing with gimmickry
again; those are not serious people.
- LASKEY
- Well, it's a game; it's game playing —
- SORIANO
- Of course.
- LASKEY
- It's neoclassical —
- SORIANO
- It's trivia, it's trivia game playing.
- LASKEY
- Taking, taking —
- SORIANO
- Look at Charles Moore. Any builder would do that, better. You should see
what he did. This is C Ranch .
- LASKEY
- C Ranch, ah-hah.
- SORIANO
- And I've seen houses done by Swedish builders, all dollhouses, they did
almost one hundred and some years. They were there in some area close
by, because I developed a big acreage there, in the area of C Ranch, in
that area. And, this is better than this, a thousand times, instead of
this. And so they make a big to-do about this guy, who hasn't understood
that he is playing a game with these trivia games. Yeah. So, big deal.
- LASKEY
- Architectural references.
- SORIANO
- This is the greatest man that I admire, one of the greatest, with
Neutra.
- LASKEY
- Buckminster —
- SORIANO
- [R.] Buckminster Fuller, those are my two-- And [Pierluigi] Nervi, of
course, I admire very much, [Ludwig] Mies van der Rohe. Yeah. Look how
beautiful these are.
- LASKEY
- Oh, those are beautiful.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, of course. And this is the nursery now, which I'll show you, the
Hallawell Seed [Company]. Look how beautiful that is.
- LASKEY
- Ah, there it is.
- SORIANO
- You see. In color, in the real-- Actually, this is so much more
beautiful. This is a beautiful blue, blue, blue, blue, and this is a
Chinese red, and this is a sort of a fuchsia color, the trusses. And
this was painted also fuchsia color. The wood that I used, of the old
wood stuff that they had--
- LASKEY
- That really is beautiful —
- SORIANO
- I am going to close the door because these people are going to make a
lot of noise there. They are coming from the island now and they will
make a lot of noise. Okay, Marlene. Isn't that a nice magazine?
- LASKEY
- It really is--
- SORIANO
- Now, I'll show you something interesting, too. "It is my great pleasure
to thank you for the wisdom, the charm, and the clarity of vision you
have graced us with during your visit. And, your allusions to music were
in a most beautiful and lucid manner of exhibiting the process of
creativity." Isn't that interesting? These are the type of things — some
students--I forgot now-- "Your delightful lectures, your graciousness
and wit, your vivacity and inspiration to me, for these things . . . and
the reference to Romain Rolland" --which I told you--
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- You see, he knew that. "My Sincerest Affection, [inaudible], I believe,
[inaudible]." Is that the name? I don't know.
- LASKEY
- I can't quite read that.
- SORIANO
- No, neither do I. Yeah, a lot of things I had. I want to show you
something very interesting. I've had-- I gave a — here — I gave this at
the school. Remember I told you the new school of architecture in Chula
Vista?
- LASKEY
- Right. That you were not very happy with.
- SORIANO
- No. Just look at the sign the professor did about my lecture, the
advertising. Can you imagine the banality, the lack of any understanding
even of calligraphy? What do you think of that?
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- What, yeah what? Well, say it. Are you ashamed to say it?
- LASKEY
- It's pretty bad.
- SORIANO
- All right, good, I'm glad. And look, a day later, I gave a lecture in
Chula Vista — [knocking on door] Come in, come in, come in! I am being
interviewed — Can you imagine — ? Anyway, I'm glad I recorded this. He
doesn't know I have my attorneys. And this is what they did in the Chula
Vista university. They did this sign. Now, can you imagine, this is a
second-year student; a girl did that. Look at the difference. This is a
professor did that. Can you imagine a thing like that? A second-year
student, a girl? And this is a professor teaching at this Chula Vista
university. This is in Mexico. Now, you just name it. How do you like
that?
- LASKEY
- It's a little depressing.
- SORIANO
- It is. It is depressing to see what we are teaching in our schools. And
this is what annoys me. And then I have to put up with this landlord of
mine, he just came in to interrupt-- These kind of brutes, horrible
human being. Can you imagine that? No finesse even. As if the world is
coming to an end. And look at this letter I received from — I want to
stop this. It doesn't matter, I don't want to —
- LASKEY
- It says, "Greetings, Mr. Soriano, embellisher of life. You came to our
college and in only one week's time augmented my knowledge of art more
than it was in my previous eighteen years of life. I now know to
communicate art is not the way. Your debate with David Lawrence, the
head of the art department, proved this point beyond any doubt. The
artist explained his creation. You proved it insignificant. Your
enthusiastic outlook on life and the sharing of your knowledge will
never be forgotten by me or any of the undersigned." And it's signed,
George Asch, and then a whole list of signs.
- SORIANO
- Isn't that interesting?
- LASKEY
- Now, where was this?
- SORIANO
- This was in San Bernardino, somewheres out there--
- LASKEY
- Oh, really?
- SORIANO
- Yeah, in the Valley college [San Bernardino Valley College of
Law-University of La Verne] . I mean, this is the type of-- These are
only a few of the letters I get from the people. I have hundreds of
these letters like that, and it really touches me because the students
are extremely intelligent. And you see the other thing I read to you —
- LASKEY
- Right —
- SORIANO
- It's really, to me, it's touching, absolutely touching to see what
exists, and how-- The whole thing has been denigrated into all these
banalities of people. Yeah. Anyway — So now you saw already my Hallawell
[Nursery and Garden Center] you saw what Wurster did, you saw a few
documents which very seldom you find any place. Even in a library you
won't find these, because this was given by the U.S. government for
foreign consumption only. This is not for distribution in the United
States; they don't do that. This is to propagandize our modern
architecture in foreign countries. You get that in foreign consuls, but
not in the United States.
- LASKEY
- That's a beautiful publication.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. Isn't that something? Yeah. And here you see what I have. What I
have done, how I am appreciated, even by our own beautiful government.
Our own country. And here I am totally effaced. I haven't done anything
for the last fifteen years. I haven't built one single thing. Maybe I
will do something. Today you have heard Mr. [Leo G.] Rigler. He wants to
build a house. I hope so, because it has been going on for a long time.
Yeah, that ' s the tragedy .
- LASKEY
- Well, what's the possibility of building more of your aluminum houses?
- SORIANO
- I've been trying . You don ' t know how many hundreds of brochures I've
sent all over. I have even sent to the King [Faisal] of Saudi Arabia, we
had correspondence with. [laughs]
- LASKEY
- Let's see if I can — Let's see. I had — Yeah.
- SORIANO
- Correspondence, correspondence, correspondence. Ah-ya-ya-ya. His
Majesty, King Faisal, [inaudible], Saudi Arabia. And this was '74, look
at this. Now, totally describing my aluminum concepts of all these
houses, they want that. I have letters from Iran, from the Shah of Iran
— I was going to do things in there and in a lot of other places. And
also in the Punch Bowl in Hawaii, many places. But it is always they
want money from the United States; they want capital from the U.S. Now,
and if you don't have money from here, they just don't have it enough.
They want always to be subsidized by us-- And I talk to people: I call
here, I call there. Nobody wants to invest in all these- -a turkey. I
could have the whole damn turkey — housing, big buildings. They wanted
funding from the United States. Big corporations, bankers, they don ' t
want to spend anything there . They ' re scared . You see, this is--
I've had all these beautiful contacts, even from Finland; I can show you
tons of correspondence. So what can I do? I've tried my very best, I can
assure you. There's nothing I can do beyond that. Yeah. And it's
really-- Sometimes I wonder — Maybe when I die, then possibly my efforts
will be — will come into fruition, you see. But in the meantime I have
to put up with this thing you just heard, with my landlord. He is
telling me, don't forget the-- As if the world's coming to an end. Well,
anyway — Yeah.
- LASKEY
- What's that? You have been evicted from this place?
- SORIANO
- Yeah, he gave me, he sent me a notice of eviction, a thirty-day notice.
After thirty years of living here. It's insulting. Don't worry, I'll,
I'll-- My attorneys will —
- LASKEY
- But what can they do?
- SORIANO
- The attorneys? Well, I mean, there could be certain tactics to use, to
prevent him-- Because I told him, I said, "I'm looking for a place, and
I'll be--" And I told him already, "I need at least until the end of
August, because I cannot just simply leave--" And he gives me thirty
days' notice. Ridiculous! It takes me that long to pack up. I've been
telling him already that I've been looking for a place. The prices are
so high, I can't afford to. I said, "Please, have a heart." I mean, what
is this? The world is coming to an end? Is he starving to death? And, I
mean, this is really — It hurts, you know, this type of victimization
that I have been put into, from a moron like that. And no finesse, you
know. It's even "Okay, I'll talk to you for five minutes." I mean, even
if you tell him, you know, "I am busy," you know-- No, he wants to, he
thinks that is all there is to it in life, his own big nonsense. Don't
worry, he'll have his just desserts.
- LASKEY
- Oh, yes, ultimate justice.
- SORIANO
- But in the final analysis, I am a victim in this case. Because —
- LASKEY
- You are definitely a victim.
- SORIANO
- I don't know where the hell to go. Because if I had money, there would
be nothing to it. You know what I would do? I would say, "To hell with
you, I'll move. I will hire something, a thousand dollars a month, an
apartment, and move everything there. Okay, no problem." But I haven't
got that kind of money to give. I don't even make it. And between us,
all I get is $317 Social Security. You know what that is?
- LASKEY
- Nothing.
- SORIANO
- It doesn't even pay my rent. I have to borrow money to pay my rent. And
because Leo gives me some, and a few lectures I give here and there
which Leo subsidizes, and sometimes my friend Desmond Muirhead, that I
can make my two ends meet but from month to month. Beyond that, what is
there? Nothing. And it's really tragic and serious, frankly. That's why
I get so damn fed up with all those bums. Piece of garbage-- He has
never done anything in his life — At least I have done something.
- LASKEY
- Was it his father who owned the property when you started, when you
first moved in?
- SORIANO
- No, no, no. He was — He had it already.
- LASKEY
- Oh, he had it. He's had it for thirty- three years?
- SORIANO
- Oh, yes, yes —
- LASKEY
- For thirty- three years that you've lived here —
- SORIANO
- Oh, he was glad to have me as a tenant, $85 a month it started out. He
raised it to $350, in this slum of mine. He has never done anything —
Look at this. It leaks. You should see over there, I have buckets behind
that wall. Back where those panels are, underneath there. And it ruined
many diplomas and books of mine from the beginning. Thirty years he has
never fixed it. He goes there, and he puts a little paint here and
there, and I tell him, look, the seal on top of the door above is where
the leaks go to. Oh, no, he knows better. He has one of those little
cheap guys from school. Gives him a pittance to put a little paint where
he says. And he really is a very ignorant, miserable character. Aaahh —
- LASKEY
- But you will probably have to come back to Southern California then?
- SORIANO
- Oh, yes, I definitely am trying to. I am looking for a place in San
Bernardino. I saw this friend, Professor David Hatfield from San
Bernardino, and he is looking for a place for me. Maybe I can teach
there. And then this David Hatfield is this director of this school of
San Bernardino [Valley] College. He is a good friend of mine, a lovely
person. He says, "Don't worry, I'll come in with four, five students and
we'll pack everything up and take you." And so he is looking for a place
for me.
- LASKEY
- Yes, it's going to be an enormous job.
- SORIANO
- That's right.
- LASKEY
- To pack this all up —
- SORIANO
- But that's all right. That's okay. I have been cleaning things up and
I've been throwing out a lot of junk, yes. And, it, it's just-- It's an
annoying thing because I've been trying to-- He keeps disturbing me like
that, every few months he's been like that. Raising the rent, this and
that, doing everything he can to disturb me. Takes my pots, you know,
throws them in there, which is so awful. But anyway, it doesn't matter.
I'll leave here, so it'll be better off [inaudible]. I can't even want
to see him. I close the door every time he's out there .
- LASKEY
- I can understand that.
- SORIANO
- Because it's an annoying mess.
- LASKEY
- It's very sad.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. What can I do? Nothing. You know, I hope Lloyd — I've been telling
Lloyd long time ago, I said-- He has several lots. He has a whole
hillside in Hollywood where he wanted to build a house. And then he has
several lots, seven, below that, below the hill, belonging to him. I
said, "Why don't you give me one? I'll build a house. It'll be yours
anyway. And I'll bring my stuff--" "Yes, and no — Oh, I don't want to be
bothered to have a dear friend next to me. I'll be worrying; I don't
want to worry." I said, "Okay." I said, "Don't worry about this." Now he
suddenly seems mellowing up a little bit, and then he has been doing the
same thing with the house. His partner died, and then he told me, "I
wish I had let Larry build this house." It was a beautiful thing. It
would have been finished by now, and less expensive, and beautiful. But
now this young guy says, "Well, when I die I'll leave it to Stephen."
Okay. Well, Stephen wants wood, all this-- Tell me, what kind of a thing
— You know, like an old housewife that needs this. She wants to tell
you, "I want a Spanish house." You know, that kind of a thing that I
have to put up with. A young punk. I tried to reason with him. I said,
"Look, I'll give you a beautiful house. You want woods, you don't want
metals, you don't have to." I said, "All I do in the metals is just the
structure. Because it's much more tenable, it's earthquake proof, better
for you. You will stand, and then I will give you all the woods so you
will see wood. And even I can anodize the aluminum-- You wouldn't even
know that it's aluminum." Yeah. Hmm.
- LASKEY
- Has his friend ever seen your work?
- SORIANO
- Oh, sure. Well, Lloyd has a building —
- LASKEY
- That's right, the Adolph's Building —
- SORIANO
- Even Lloyd said, "My god, this is such a beautiful place," I'm working.
"This could be a beautiful house." I said, "Well, yes." I said, "Can't
you reason with him?" I said, "You're the boss anyway; this is yours.
Why don't you step on it and do it?" I don't know. Hmm —
1.10. TAPE NUMBER: V, SIDE TWO (JULY 21, 1985)
- LASKEY
- I think we will start today by discussing, talking about your life after
you left Southern California in 1953 to come to Tiburon.
- SORIANO
- Well, it was a very moving and exciting activity. I was very active,
actually, even though I moved here. And naturally, in this case, I have
already--I was married. Of course I married in Los Angeles-- And I had
already made a family already with three kids, two daughters and a son,
from my ex-wife.
- LASKEY
- How old were they?
- SORIANO
- Oh, they were, I think, little tots. One was about four years and the
other one six, and another one was eight, nine.
- LASKEY
- And your wife was a photographer. Isn't that correct?
- SORIANO
- No, she wasn't. She was a girl from so-called a "good family" from Los
Angeles, a socialite apparently. Her grandfather was a judge, and her
father was an attorney, and so on. And she was very nice, very
sensitive, intelligent girl in many ways. She was a lovely person. But
then money meant a lot to her, apparently. And you discover a lot of
things when you get married, when you don't discover before, you know.
She had a drinking problem afterwards that I discovered, which I didn't
even know it, you see, that sort of thing. So I put up with seven and a
half years of that. Then after that I said, "Halt," and I divorced her.
And then she was vindictive, you see, because I was so sick in marriage.
And then she got married twice again after me.
- LASKEY
- Twice after you?
- SORIANO
- Yes. And divorced. She was a very disturbed girl, apparently, with all
this. And her background was very unmoving, apparently. Well, it doesn't
matter. I don't want to talk to you about her. But the fact is that I
moved here; I was very, very busy. I get the Adolph's job right away,
which I did. And it was a very pleasant area. In those days Tiburon was
nothing, just a little-- The terminus of Northwestern Pacific Railroad,
that is all it was. Just the air — a little village. This was not even a
town, or anything.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yes. Nothing. There were Black Angus cows grazing on the hills.
- LASKEY
- How did you select Tiburon? Why not San Francisco?
- SORIANO
- Well, I love this area, this country was beautiful, and the bay
looking-- In fact I looked at Sausalito-- It was lovely to look at the
bay's very beautiful vista, the grounds. And San Francisco was already a
city, a crowded city, which I don't like. I like to be in a place with —
a beautiful place, with gardens, and this appeals to me. Because I love
gardening, and I love to grow things. And so this was my life. So I
decided-- So immediately I got here to Tiburon-- Because I have seen
this before, Marin County was very lovely. And so I bought a house in
Tiburon with the property, with one of the parcels, where we lived right
away. And then I bought property, the acres of land that I had, which my
ex-wife took everything.
- LASKEY
- Now, this was on the hills?
- SORIANO
- Right —
- LASKEY
- Overlooking —
- SORIANO
- Overlooking the whole bay. The whole bay, overlooking Angel Island, from
— overlooking from Berkeley, Richmond, to the Golden Gate Bridge. I have
all that view in front of me.
- LASKEY
- It must have been beautiful.
- SORIANO
- It was exquisite, yes. It was one of the most choicest pieces of land.
In fact, even the land was not even subdivided, the acres I got. Yeah.
That is how you could have choices then, at the time, you see. I was not
unwise. I was very wise. I knew what I was going to do, which I planned
to develop this. And I could have had — with the parcel where I had the
house — could have been developed into units. Which I would have been
safe today, receiving an income, and have my own studio there,
overlooking this lovely bay. But unfortunately it just didn't work out.
So anyway, then I got very active, and I did- -I was busy planning and
possibilities of a lot of work coming, you see. And then I did the job
in Hawaii while I was here. And I had this proposal for Alcatraz, also
from here, after that.
- LASKEY
- You might want to talk about that proposal for Alcatraz, because it was
extremely interesting.
- SORIANO
- It was very nice. Before that I think I told you that [A.] Cal Rossi — I
think we recorded that in my other tapes .
- LASKEY
- No, we didn't record it so you may want to talk about it.
- SORIANO
- Didn't I? Really?
- LASKEY
- No, we talked about it at lunch, so it's not on the tape itself.
- SORIANO
- Oh, I see. Well, that hundred-story building that I had — all
aluminum--was going to be offices and apartments for executives. Very
elegant. Type of thing for rich executives. And that was going to be
right across from the Fairmont Hotel in a lot, where the Stanford Court
is now. 299
- LASKEY
- Right on Nob Hill.
- SORIANO
- Yes. And I think Allen Temko recommended me for that job. And Allen
Temko is very gracious, very charming friend. And with his wife Becky;
they were both very wonderful friends. They were the ones who convinced
Mr. Rossi, who owned the property, the Stanford Court, to get me to do
something creative, and I did that. And as I told you the story with the
Alcoa. I was going to-- I designed this completely of aluminum.
- LASKEY
- That story about Alcoa is not on the tapes so you might want to tell it
now.
- SORIANO
- Okay. Well, yes. I immediately saw — You know, since I'd been interested
in metals and aluminum. And I called Fritz Close, the chairman of the
board of Alcoa at the time, who I met at the Boca Raton conference,
creative conference of aluminum. Well, Alcoa, you know, had-- I think we
discussed it previously.
- LASKEY
- We did discuss that. We discussed the conference--
- SORIANO
- Yeah, well, okay. Well, because of that I met Fritz Close, and therefore
I decided to call him. He was in Pittsburgh, and I said I have a project
that I think you will be interested in, Alcoa will be interested to
participate. It's a very beautiful, hundred stories, and so on. And he
said, "Oh, wonderful, can you fly up?" And I did fly up with my client.
And we met over there, in Pittsburgh, and I showed — I had, oh, about,
almost twenty, thirty chromostats of the project which I had the
preliminary schemes done. All beautifully presented in color with
details. And then at the executive luncheon we had a big huge table and
a blackboard, and I put all these drawings, the chromostats, there. And
Alcoa, Fritz Close, came in and hugged me and said, "Oh, it's a
beautiful project." And so I even scolded him. I said, "Why didn't you
do an aluminum building of aluminum for Alcoa in San Francisco instead
of that stupid crosses with steel that Skidmore and Merrill made?" He
says, "Well, you know how those damn architects are." And I said, "Well,
it's up to you people to request that." And I said, "It's shameful to
have — Alcoa to have a steel building and then clad it artificially with
real aluminum facing of sheet metal, which is ridiculous, isn't it?" And
so he laughed, and he agreed with me, of course. And so, then Hickman at
the time was--I think in a finances — He's the one who was the
go-between for President [John F.] Kennedy and the steel companies, the
big companies, not to raise the prices, and this and that.
- LASKEY
- Oh, right.
- SORIANO
- Hickman was one of the go-between for the corporations and the
government. He sat on the meeting. And they asked him, "Do you think
that will be a good project? And do you think it will be feasible
economically?" "Oh, yes," after he analyzed what I had. Because I had a
tremendous amount of data with computer analysis and everything, which
we did for the tower for Rossi, which worked beautifully. And so he
thought it was excellent. And so that was agreed upon. Then when we were
flying back, Mr. Rossi just kept hitting me with his elbow. He says,
"You did it, you son-of-a-gun, you did it." He was so happy that Alcoa
was going to participate.
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. And so we started right away pursuing with them. Then
unfortunately he got mixed up with somebody of his friends that did
works before, some kind of cheap housing. I don't know what he did. And
he made a lot of money, and then this other fellow right away wanted to
put in a million dollars in a corporation to participate in that
venture, you see. And that killed the thing. I believe that was the
reason the thing didn't go through, because Alcoa in checking-- They
thought they were dealing only with Rossi, with the property he had at
Stanford Court. But now this other man with another million dollars
comes into the corporation, that was another ball game which Alcoa did
not like.
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- And so I told Rossi that Alcoa did not want to participate with him, and
so on. And as a matter of fact I told him, I said, "Why do you want to
bring this persona non grata? You have already Alcoa behind you?" Rossi
said, "Well, I made a lot of money with him, you know. Having a million
dollars in the corporation, we can do more businesses and stuff." So he
came in later, about a year later, after the thing failed; you know, we
didn't do anything. And apparently this man gave a million dollars to
his corporation, and then he took him for half a million. You see. And
he lost that, and he told me sadly what he did. I said, "Well, there you
are." Unfortunately, you see. We didn't do the beautiful building. And
then when Alcatraz was going to be open and given to the city,
immediately I thought, my god, that will be an excellent thing. And I
devised a world university, an international world university, by
putting that tower, which was very excellent, the same building I
designed. Except instead of having apartments there and offices, I was
going to have a revolving restaurant bar, television broadcasting, and
all kinds of stuff. And also it would have been a light source for the
aircraft to see, which would be above the clouds when it ' s foggy in
San Francisco. That will guide the aircraft, you know, at least to see
it from a distance. You know, instead of having the mediocre tower which
they have now to broadcast television, I was going to have that from
there. Now at the time, there were five submittals. One, I was; the
other one was Mayor [Joseph L.] Alioto at the time with H. L. Hunt. They
were working together to make the Alcatraz Island into a sort of gay
nineties type of honky-tonk San Francisco bit.
- LASKEY
- H. L. Hunt?
- SORIANO
- H. L. Hunt, yes. And they were coming here, and apparently all the
supervisors were already bribed to do that. And they were all for it,
supposedly, the H. L. Hunt-- It was already preset without any
evaluation or judgment whether the proposals were there, even including
mine. I was on television. And some of the others — there was another
proposal from New York — they were going to make apartments or whatever,
I don't know. But there were three or four, I believe. Well, I think, in
my estimation, I think mine was the most logical and intelligent thing.
It would have been the first of its kind, a structure of all aluminum.
The first of its kind. Never before, I think, like that was. There was
no building made of aluminum entirely. And I used two feet in diameter
aluminum pipes, with the wall thickness at the base was six inches,
thick of aluminum. Really. And I had the- -was going to do the recycling
of the waters and so on and so on.
- LASKEY
- How would you have gotten-- What would you have done about
transportation?
- SORIANO
- Transportation didn't matter because you can always get boats if they
want to come there, because there wasn't an occasion when you have to
have students. This was only for thinkers, for research scientists —
- LASKEY
- Oh, I see, okay —
- SORIANO
- Yes. And this was what we were going to do. And I had backers from
different universities. The deans of several universities were backing
me. Even some bankers were supposed to. And there was a woman, real
estate woman, who was working with me at the time who was very astute,
very nice; Ann Smith was her name. And she was doing a lot of running
around with research and all that. And even the finance people. But the
tragedy is that, you know, politicians have a way of muddling things up
and pursuing it to fit their own needs--with any means possible. And of
course there were a lot of — You know, all these things were seen on
television. And I remember KQED, you, know the educational television--
I remember Mel Wax was one of the guys who used to comment on the
television, and he commented on the proposals for the Alcatraz. And all
he had to say about mine — He talked about the other, what the H. L.
Hunt was, all this stuff, and all that at length — And then when he came
to mine: "Well, and this is another one of those hundred-story
buildings." And he dropped it like that. That's as much as he said. I
mean, this is the comprehension of these people, which was sad, really.
Instead of to realize what the project was, to talk about "another one
of those hundreds" — as if this is the whole thing, whether it is a
hundred stories or two stories. And even years later, as a matter of
fact, an appointment was set with Mayor Diane Feinstein. Somebody told
me, says, "Why don't you submit to her? Why don't you talk to her?" They
made an appointment. A friend of mine knew her very well, since she was
a little girl, and said, "Go and see Miss Feinstein." And by golly, I
went there with my assistant, with all the drawings I had. And in the
fifteen minutes I was there she was interrupted constantly with the
telephone calls. It was an impossible experience.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- Yes. You know, I had the finesse of saying, "Will you please hold the
telephones until I'm finished with you?" Then when I explained this and
I came with a hundred stories- -I was telling what it would do, how much
money it would bring to the city, you see — she interrupted, "I don't
want any hundred stories, oh, no, oh, no," just like that, "in San
Francisco." I said, "Madame Feinstein, you come to Tiburon, I'll show
you two-story shacks if you think that makes architecture or makes a
city. It has nothing to do with whether it's a hundred stories or two
stories in a city. You must look at it. And then besides, " I said, "how
could you understand what I was telling you with all these
interruptions?" In fifteen minutes, you know, we were constantly
interrupted. And then finally I said, "Well, thank you very much for
your time," and I took — and I told my students, my assistants, I said,
"Let's take the drawings." We went; that's the end of it. That's the
gross, miserable thing of these politicians, really. And this was very
recently- -
- LASKEY
- This was in 1970?
- SORIANO
- Some two, three, four years ago, five —
- LASKEY
- Pretty recently —
- SORIANO
- Five, six years ago. This was recently. But before that, when we
submitted--that was in '69, I think--
- LASKEY
- 'Sixty-nine--
- SORIANO
- Yeah. And there was a big article in the [San
Francisco] Chronicle. My
friends got together and they wanted my project to go. And they had this
Marget Larsen-- she deserves credit, Marget Larsen--and with Bob
Friedman who was the- -with the publicity agency. And Marget was a
graphics designer, a very beautiful human being. She's dead; she died
last year, unfortunately. She was such a beautiful person. She made the
graphics for the news--one- page newspaper ad- -which some manufacturer
of clothing- -I forget his name- -paid for it. It was for San Francisco,
yeah. And they put coupons at the end. Marget devised that to send to
Secretary [of Interior Walter J.] Hickel at the time, to the general
services. Mayor Alioto, and all the supervisors. And the citizens of San
Francisco flooded them with those coupons. And they put in the ad. They
said, "If you feel like we do, this is the biggest steal since Manhattan
Island from the Indians." And about the project Alioto was concocting
with H. L. Hunt. And immediately the two supervisors who were in the
minority, [Terry] Francois — which was a black man- -and [Robert]
Gonzales- -which was a Mexican, Hispanic — they were appointed by Mayor
Alioto. Now, these two men were accepting H. L. Hunt, the biggest
reactionary. That was a vision, you can imagine. But immediately they
went to television to say, "Well, gee, we didn't know the public felt
like that, so therefore we are rescinding our vote." So they were ready
to conclude the next morning with H. L. Hunt and Mayor Alioto 's
project, this honky-tonk gay nineties San Francisco on Alcatraz. And
that was what stopped them. This page ad of Marget Larsen and — what was
his name — this man, manufacturer of-- I can't remember. And that was
it. Stops them in their track. And that's when the Indians get in it.
Then the federal government withdrew the island when they saw there was
this kind of dissension. And it was a federal property, all the islands.
You see, they gave it to the city free.
- LASKEY
- Ah-hah.
- SORIANO
- Or for a pittance, I don't know what it was. So they withdrew the
island, that's how the Indians got in. Yeah. Then they had all the
problems.
- LASKEY
- That's very interesting.
- SORIANO
- This problem with the Indians. Certainly.
- LASKEY
- So it's still federal property?
- SORIANO
- It's still federal, part of the parks and federal thing. Now they go on
boatloads, they charge admission —
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- To show where Al Capone peed-- This is exactly what they're doing. This
is the kind of a mess that it is now. And I did pursue that nice thing.
And I attended meetings there, but they are in the hands of all these
incompetent humanity. Because of our democratic process, you know,
everybody seems to know everything, they all have something to say. Some
lady said, "Well, we should have gazebos for meditation there, " or we
should do this-- There was another woman, as I came to one of the
meetings, she said, "Well, is the meeting on?" I said, "Yes." And then
she had a book. This is a true story. She had a book, and she said to
me, "What do you think of that?" She didn't know who I was or anything.
I was just coming out in disgust; I was leaving the meeting and she was
going in. And she had a color photo, one of the Egyptian murals-- She
says, "How about this? Wouldn't that be nice in there?" I said, "Good
luck," and I left. This is the kind of mentality. Some other person
wanted to have a piece of sculpture with a diamond, some kind of jewel
--shiny stone, this kind of trivia things. And so — You know what
happened with the Indians when they got to the island. They were
stealing all the copper pipes from the jail. It was quite a violence,
and so finally that was eliminated and taken off the island by force.
And so then-- Now the island, as I told you, is being shown to the
tourists where Al Capone peed or something. Great culture. Yeah. It's
very interesting, isn't it?
- LASKEY
- Is there any talk any further about doing, or just leave it — ?
- SORIANO
- I doubt it. I doubt it. I sent even to President [James E.] Carter and
Rosalynn [Carter] a brochure telling them maybe that will be an
interesting thing. I had a nice answers from the general services of HUD
[United States Department of Housing and Urban Development] offices.
"Oh, Mr. Soriano, we'll give you all the help if there is anything, if
we have anybody to--" Who? I talked to many people but — I went even to
the chairman of the board of Christian Brothers — somebody recommended,
talked to me. He said, "Mr. Soriano, don't waste your time with this
small brains, small officials. This can only be done by huge politician
and going to be a credit to him. And if you think it is going to serve
him, then they can do it. Otherwise, those little politicians, you're
wasting your time." Like Mayor Alioto, Miss Feinstein, and all that.
Yeah. That's the problem. So, then from there on, you know, the chaotic
conditions of the world and — Just up and down. You know, recession, the
— when was it?--the wars we had — what was it? --in Korea, and Vietnam —
All these things affect the building industry, architecture. Topped by
the nostalgia of what a house should be. Therefore, I have all the
strikes against me.
- LASKEY
- Well, isn't it the nostalgia, or what you call the nostalgia, that
probably has hurt you more than any of these things?
- SORIANO
- Absolutely. That certainly is, plus with the economic condition, the
recession up and down, the building costs, this manipulations by all
these individuals, you know. The Arabs with their oil made a chaos of
the whole economy of the world. Not just the Arabs, but the Arabs with
their corporations which work with them, naturally. They can-- They made
the biggest chaos of the whole world. We are still suffering because of
that. And that is why all the real estate is so damn expensive. It's due
to all of that. Everything went up. It doesn't seem to be, but it is
because of it. So it's an insanity that exists all the way through, and
we have to be victims of that — How can you do anything intelligent?
I've just sent so many brochures all over, as I told you. I'll show you
the thing — Even to the king of Saudi Arabia, and other places even
before when things were amicable then. And nothing. And the Shah of
Iran-- You know all this. But circumstances, the timing's wrong.
- LASKEY
- I think we've mentioned before with the high cost of real estate in the
United States today, it's surprising-- at least it's surprising to me —
that your idea of prefabricated aluminum houses — or prior to that the
steel houses — prefabricated housing hasn't caught on, hasn't been more
successful.
- SORIANO
- Well, because of that, because they don't do it. Nobody does it. I did
this eleven units in Hawaii, and this purely because I found the client
through a girlfriend of mine that I met at the airport in Honolulu. And
we were both leaving-- She lived in Hawaii and I was coming back to San
Francisco. She was very charming. She says, "Here's my telephone
[number]; call me when you come back." And so a few months later I
called her; she wasn't there, she was in the States. Well, I was going
there again. And then a Japanese fellow who was a friend of hers was
taking care of her house and her car. And he said, "Oh you're a friend
of Judy--" I forgot her name. And, "Yes." He said, "What do you do?" I
said, "I'm an architect." "Oh, really? Come and have lunch with me." And
then, "I have a piece of property in Maui. Maybe you can advise me." And
this is how I did the job. And so I built the aluminum houses.
- LASKEY
- Really!
- SORIANO
- Yeah. That's just purely circumstances like that . That ' s what happens
. And he was very nice and he said, "Well, I'll help you, and he was
very amiable. I helped him get financing, I helped him even get credit
from the different material people. And it took [me] to do all of this.
I had it fabricated and shipped it-- I'll show you the pictures — Even I
have been there when they were pouring concrete. And so I took this
effort and I-- You should see the meticulous plans that I made. I mean,
the tons of the details. And I knew what I was doing. This is first time
to dare fabricate and ship —
- LASKEY
- They were shipped from the United States —
- SORIANO
- To Hawaii. And erected, assembled there. Yes.
- LASKEY
- And it was still less expensive to do it that way than —
- SORIANO
- Of course. Because I had sugar workers. They came after the work in the
sugar fields and used to come and erect them. They didn't even need any
expert craftsmen, as I told you, because I think it was so well
detailed. All they had to do is just bolt them and just put them
together under my direction. Yeah. We needed very, very few craftsmen
that needed training, except the plumbing and the electric, which they
did. But I ran the whole show, again. Again, I took the bull by the
horn. I ran the thing. Otherwise, that would not even have been. Now,
the interesting pathos of this is again beautiful structures. All of a
sudden my Japanese boy was interested in making money, like everybody
else. Money, money, is always. So he found somebody from Holland that
came in, and he bought that. He asked him to — if he could buy them. He
bought them, and he put tiki roofs over that with neon signs. And he
converted my aluminum housing to a whorehouse and a gambling joint.
- LASKEY
- Your housing development?
- SORIANO
- Yes. It was ruined. That's what happened. And so you can imagine the
disappointment again. And you know, you keep wondering. I said, "What is
all the effort, all this things?" And then my client — listen to this —
he had a large piece of property. We used that. And I said, as he wanted
to sell the other, I said, "Don't sell it; keep it. This is a lovely
thing, maybe someday you can develop this into possibly a hotel, or
possibly something else." And he called me about three, four years ago
from Las Vegas. He went there to gamble, apparently. He said, "Raphael,
how are you? You made me a rich man, you know." [laughter] Yes, exactly
that. And then he told me that story, that he sold that piece of
property to someone who's building hotels there. And he sold the other
one to this Dutchman who ruined the place. I think he kept one house for
himself to live in, whatever-- Not my client, but the man who bought the
whole thing. Yeah, that is the pathos of life, and that is the tragedy.
It really hurts me inside when I see all these efforts, all these
trials-- then what? --and my efforts ruined.
- LASKEY
- And not to be able to continue to do it must be very difficult —
- SORIANO
- It is.
- LASKEY
- Not to be able to build — That was twenty years ago that those were
built.
- SORIANO
- In '63. And I have been pursuing it, and then stop, and then I still am
pursuing it. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- You built a couple of houses here, in Mill Valley, for the builder
[Frank] McCauley. What happened there?
- SORIANO
- Well, McCauley was — It was an interesting story there. I met him in Los
Angeles. And he used to like what I did, and then all of a sudden
something happened to him. Something with his wife, some tragic thing —
And then he came over here, and he wanted to do some business if I could
find a lot. We found two lots right in Mill Valley. He bought them, and
I said, "Okay, I'll help you," and I did the same thing. I helped him
build them. And they were just beautiful homes, exquisite homes.
- LASKEY
- And they are certainly beautiful from the photographs .
- SORIANO
- Yes, but then he sold them, with a builder, you know. He sold them, and
then with the inflation prices, then they keep going — from sell,
somebody else bought them to make profit, sold them again, again.
Everybody else started adding their own little misconceptions. And now
you should see , I'm ashamed even to see the way they are . Some hippies
live there, in one of them. It's incomprehensible what they do, neglect,
because they don't give a damn. You know, they rent them or sell them,
and they're willing to rent them to somebody else.
- LASKEY
- Well, when they were built, were they built with the idea that possibly
they would be developed into a series — ?
- SORIANO
- Oh, yes, everything was, yes. But this poor man had some tragic life,
which I don't want to even tell you what it is —
- LASKEY
- Okay.
- SORIANO
- And apparently this is what happened-- I couldn't — But nevertheless,
this was an idea that I was always thinking and developing and trying to
pursue-- There were a lot of people who were interested in that. And I
had tons of correspondence with Kaiser Aluminum, even to build this,
with several other people. I can show you tons of correspondence.
- LASKEY
- Well, all of your works were published in the important architectural
journals. Your name was known. I'm surprised that builders, other
builders in other parts of the country at some — didn't pick up on these
ideas. You know, it isn't that your works weren't there. That's what is
so surprising.
- SORIANO
- Well, no. As a matter of fact, didn't you see in the write-up of the
bicentennial what they say? Did you read what they —
- LASKEY
- No, because I was just looking at the picture yesterday —
- SORIANO
- Well, I'll tell you, I'll show you. You read it, and you can put it in
there. I think it's in here, and — Please, this is the beautiful copy;
don't put your fingers too much on it. Read in the — in here, just about
towards the last, you see, he says something about the influences I have
had.
- LASKEY
- It talks about influence. What I was talking about was your own--you
being able to build the houses. You contacted —
- SORIANO
- No, wait a minute. You say something else. It's amazing why in other
parts of the world, the country, you mentioned that.
- LASKEY
- Yeah, I said they didn't contact you.
- SORIANO
- Well, yeah, but read there, read that. Read it aloud .
- LASKEY
- Well, "A few of his designs went beyond the prototypical stage. The
logic of his modular structures influenced many similar developments in
other parts of the world."
- SORIANO
- Exactly. You see.
- LASKEY
- But you're still not working, which is my point.
- SORIANO
- Exactly. Well, they don't call me, so they imitate me or they go, you
know — One client I had said this to me one day, he said, "Raphael,
don't be a fool, don't be naive." He said, "It isn't how much you know.
It's who you know." It is a series of circumstances. You see, apparently
the world is very strange. I mean, in medicine, or another, if there is
somebody that is quite a top, they go to him, isn't it? They call him.
But in architecture, it is not the same thing. In architecture they
all-- If somebody they get, somebody-- "Can you make something like
that?" Or imitate, you know, if they have a friend. Instead of calling
me. And many of them are scared-- They think I'm very expensive because
of my reputation. That's another strike I have against me, you see. And
yet, I don't; I charge the same thing as anybody. In fact, less; I give
more services than they do. Now, when I did a house for [Joseph]
Eichler, you see, that first house for him — It's an interesting story.
The house was published, and it was exhibited for the heart-- The
proceeds to go to the heart [American Heart Association] . For a few
months it was open to the public to see it. And you should see the
comments that U.S. Steel put- -wrote there, pro and con on the house.
Many people asked, "Well, why aren't there more houses like that built?
They're so beautiful. They're so clean. There is-- I cannot see that any
spiders will come into these" --this metal beams that I have. With the
wood that Eichler was doing — You see the wood beam cracks? The spiders
love to nest in there. That's the comments of some of these neighbors
who had Eichler houses. They came to see it.
- LASKEY
- Ah-hah.
- SORIANO
- They said, "The ones with wood that we are living in, the spiders all
over the place because of the cracked beams of wood." You see, those big
timbers like that, they have cracks --when they dry--
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- When they dry. And then the spiders collect there. This seems to be easy
to keep clean. I'll give you a little thing like that, and you'll see
what they say. And they keep asking, "Why aren't more projects like that
built?" They kept asking that. Well, the answer is very obvious:
ignorance, and the propagation is done by these imbeciles, by these
ignorant builders and developers and bankers, who are familiar with
whatever they are familiar themselves. Anything else, this to them maybe
does not appeal as homes. The simplicity and clarity scares them, maybe.
Yeah. Nothing to do with me, I can assure you. Or the house is not good.
On the contrary, they are the most livable houses. You ask anybody who
lived in my house. They loved them. I have letters from clients. Yeah.
So. You give me the answer, I don't know. I know the answer exactly what
I told you — It's the ignorance of humanity, and also that of the
builders and the architects themselves. My colleagues don't do that.
They do the other thing. Therefore, they contaminated the taste of
people by example of what they're doing. So the result is people think
houses should look like that, houses are like that. Not like this, like
the ones I do. And people are confused. People are like sheep: you can
take them one way or the other. Most of them don't think. Again, I will
quote Alain. He said, "Most people are like bones and a stomach. There
is nothing else." [laughs]
- LASKEY
- Bones and a stomach.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. So what else could I tell you? I don't know. It's exasperating,
really. Maybe because I'm too severe in my lectures, in my criticism. I
am very frank. And open. But I think I read to you the — what [Felix]
Candela said.
- LASKEY
- Yes. Yes, you did.
- SORIANO
- You see, depending, those who are sincere and serious, they said, "With
a stupendous conference [lecture] which you gave us which was very
controversial and friendly at the same time," you see. In other words,
it wasn't scared-- I wasn't — Some people think, "Oh, well, you don't
like — you've lost everybody. You've lost--" Well, rightly so. I have to
say if I don't say that [Michael] Graves is doing wrong things, what can
I say? How would people know? Or [Philip C.] Johnson is wrong in doing
this armpit junk, on top of the skyscraper, a sixty-story building.
Therefore-- Then how would that-- How do we make sense? How would they
know that the errors that are being committed through my colleagues if
you don't mention their names? Yes?
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- Then they will be confused. They say, "Well, everything is all right."
Yeah. Architects are doing their own thing.
- LASKEY
- You know, we've made reference to your feelings about painting.
- SORIANO
- Yes.
- LASKEY
- I don't think we've discussed it in real depth, and how it applies to
our architecture, and how that makes your architecture different from
the standard architecture of the day.
- SORIANO
- Well, okay.
1.11. TAPE NUMBER: VI, SIDE ONE (JULY 21, 1985)
- LASKEY
- Your attitude about painting and how it relates to your philosophy of
architecture.
- SORIANO
- Well, do you think it relates to architecture?
- LASKEY
- Painting?
- SORIANO
- Yes .
- LASKEY
- I think how you feel about painting relates to how you feel about
architecture.
- SORIANO
- What do you mean by "how you feel"?
- LASKEY
- You're not — You don't like painting as one of the art forms .
- SORIANO
- You mean you ask — You're telling me that, or what?
- LASKEY
- No, I'm asking you that.
- SORIANO
- No, I'm asking you.
- LASKEY
- No, that's what I've understood you to say, is that you feel that
painting is not--I don't want to misquote you, but--that it's a
mythology, it's a retelling of mythologies. And that we don't learn,
really learn from painting; we just accept other people's mythologies.
And that it ' s not a legitimate art form in the sense that music is--or
a universal art form.
- SORIANO
- Do you think so? Do you agree with that?
- LASKEY
- No, I don't.
- SORIANO
- You don't agree with that.
- LASKEY
- No.
- SORIANO
- You think painting should be part of architecture?
- LASKEY
- I think that — No, I think of painting as a legitimate art form. And I
don't see it necessarily just as mythological or myth- telling, and
therefore, I don't see that the same way that you see it.
- SORIANO
- Yes .
- LASKEY
- But that doesn't — You know — But I'm interested in, since you do see it
that way — I don't see architectural styles then as necessarily just
mythological or — I can like other styles, or like traditional styles. I
can like what you do and I can like modern styles. I can also like
traditional styles. I don't necessarily see them as just holding back or
perpetuating antique ideas. Is that fair?
- SORIANO
- Well, I'll tell you what — No, it is not very clear yet, but I will
continue in one second, excuse me.
- LASKEY
- Okay.
- SORIANO
- Well, I asked you that question because I want to know your idea. Then I
will amplify myself, my thinking, on that score. The reason that I said
the words that I said about painting is because I believe there is a
certain amount of confusion that exists in the arts, supposedly,
quotation, "arts." You know? And you mentioned you like or I don't like,
and then you mention style. What do you mean by style? What's your
concept of a style? What does that mean? I'm really-- This is
interesting dialogue. I'm asking you. And I'll tell you afterwards my
thinking on that .
- LASKEY
- I don't recall how I used the word style. What did I say? Mostly I was
asking your ideas on painting and how you related that theory to
architecture. On architectural style, I'm using it in the most common
sense, that if you talk about neo-Spanish colonial revival or
neoclassical, or International modern — which are really just words that
help us all talk about the same thing that are identifying — If I tell
you that a building is Spanish colonial revival, you basically know what
I'm talking about and I don't have to go through a description. It's a
shorthand .
- SORIANO
- Do you think I will know if this is Spanish revival?
- LASKEY
- Yeah, I think you will know. I think you will know.
- SORIANO
- How do you know that? How do you know that?
- LASKEY
- Because you're an architect and you've studied architecture, and you
lived in Southern California and it's a kind of short-hand that I assume
you would know. Now, I have — If I was talking to someone who wasn't
interested in architecture, then no, they wouldn't know. It would depend
on who I was talking to whether I'd use that term. But if I was talking
to someone about architectural styles, that's what I would mean by a
style. It would be a pre-agreed upon determination of a period. If I
talk about renaissance, I assume that the person I ' m talking to will
know what the renaissance style is; it's a period and it looks a certain
way. And that it's a short-hand that we've agreed upon to facilitate
communication in a particular area. The same way with painting styles.
If you talk about abstract expressionism or minimalism or landscape, or
English portraiture as opposed to American portraiture, then we all
assume a general class that we're talking about the same thing . That '
s what I mean by style .
- SORIANO
- I see. Well, does that give you understanding, really?
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- Does that give you understanding?
- LASKEY
- Understanding-- Give me understanding of describing a particular thing.
It describes something. And I know then I can know basically what we're
talking about. It clarifies.
- SORIANO
- What? What will clarify actually? What does clarify — What would it
clarify?
- LASKEY
- What I'm talking about at the time.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. Is that — ? You see. Is It a precise understanding you have, or is
it an abstract understanding?
- LASKEY
- It depends on what you're talking about at the moment. You can talk
about a classification, or you can be talking a specific building. If
you're talking about the Palace Ruccelai in Florence, and you're talking
about a renaissance building, then you're talking about a specific
renaissance building. If you talk about renaissance buildings in
general, then it's an abstraction.
- SORIANO
- But then there are variations — aren't there? --in those buildings? Even
in the renaissance.
- LASKEY
- Oh, of course.
- SORIANO
- Then how do you clarify? Then you call them all together in the
so-called adjective of renaissance. Does that give you any
understanding? Or give you an abstract understanding?
- LASKEY
- It gives you — Well, again, if you're just talking about all buildings,
you know, built from 1420 to 1480--or whatever it is in Italy — then
you'll have an abstraction. And you know they're going to be essentially
this tall, and they're going to have these kinds of windows, basically —
- SORIANO
- Maybe .
- LASKEY
- — and —
- SORIANO
- Maybe.
- LASKEY
- But that's the short-hand that I'm talking about. And there will be
differences, but that's —
- SORIANO
- There are in the renaissance buildings or in any kind of building, let's
say, where they use tremendous amount of sculpture, and ornamentation.
Is that possible to talk about architecture? Or is it a mixed-up affair
between the arts — so-called painting, sculpture, and architecture mixed
together. Now, what rationale can you get from all these three mixtures
and then talk about architecture? Is it possible to do that? That is, to
communicate between us. Can you?
- LASKEY
- You mean — Are you asking if it's possible to separate the sculpture and
the painting from the building?
- SORIANO
- I'm asking —
- LASKEY
- Yeah, I'm not sure what your question is.
- SORIANO
- No, I'm asking actually whether you can really understand architecture
with the admixture of painting, sculpture, and architecture. Or I will
say-- I will put it another way: is painting and sculpture architecture?
And if so, then it's like architecture; and if it isn't, then what is
it? And why do we mix them together?
- LASKEY
- To create an environment would be my-- And I don't know that that would
be your answer, but it — Again, if we're talking renaissance
architecture, there, we're creating a total thing. I mean, they did it,
I assume- -I don't really know — to create a total thing of beauty by
their terms. They constructed a structure which is what you'd call
architecture. They embellished it with what I think would still be
considered — The embellishments aside from the painting, the sculpture,
I think, could be architectural--architectural structures. But they're
embellishments. Painting, I think, is something aside from architecture.
It's something applied on to the architecture. It embellishes it, but
it's not part of the architecture .
- SORIANO
- How about sculpture?
- LASKEY
- I think that sculpture — It depends. Are you talking about--like
what?--the pediments and window frames, or are you talking about
structures — ?
- SORIANO
- I'm talking about —
- LASKEY
- --or statues added on, you know, actual additions to it? Are you talking
— ?
- SORIANO
- No, you bring it down to a specific building or specific-- I'm talking
now in general, since we are talking in big understanding that the human
beings will understand. Generally, as a style, as you mentioned before,
styles are this and that, that we can communicate one with the other,
then you will even listen. You brought in the environment, and I just
kept wondering whether actually — Aren't we using just plain words which
mean absolutely nothing, which will not give us any kind of
understanding, nor even with the word aesthetic or question of beauty?
- LASKEY
- I don't think so. I think if you want to carry it that far you can. But
I think in the matter of getting on with life and simplifying things, if
I'm — If I use a term like a renaissance building, I think that you know
what I'm talking about, that you get an image of what it is —
- SORIANO
- Maybe you know, but I may not know exactly the same thing you're talking
about. Maybe abstractly we may know, yes. But abstraction is knowledge?
Abstraction? Something abstract? I can abstract-- Say that the sun is a
male virile torch. They have done similar things like that in the past.
- LASKEY
- But that ' s not what we ' re talking about when we ' re talking about-
-
- SORIANO
- But yes, symbolism, yes, we're talking. We're talking about that very
same thing.
- LASKEY
- Not really.
- SORIANO
- No?
- LASKEY
- I don't think so. I think you're making it more complicated in that
sense than what we're really trying to say. I mean, we're simply trying
to, to communicate in a simple way.
- SORIANO
- Exactly.
- LASKEY
- And if you're complicating-- You can abstract anything down to a point
of — You can argue that this table doesn't exist, and you could probably
argue It validly. People have. But why bother? You know the table's
there- -
- SORIANO
- No, no.
- LASKEY
- It exists. And the same thing was what we're talking about, or what I
was talking about, was styles. You can argue that there aren't any two
buildings that are the same, or whatever. But I'm simply saying that for
purposes of simple communication, that there is a difference between an
International Style modern building and a renaissance building. And that
for ease of — If I'm talking to someone and we're talking about
architecture, then the person is probably going to know basically what's
being said. That people are communicating with these terms, generally,
they're saying the same things to each other, if you're talking to
people who know about the subject. If you talk about painting styles,
it's the same thing. You can talk about, you know, the Dutch school, or
the baroque, or the renaissance.
- SORIANO
- Excuse me. [tape recorder off] All right, this is good, I'm glad I
caught it in time, by golly; otherwise it would have gone dead and I
would have been in the same boat you were.
- LASKEY
- Good.
- SORIANO
- Damn battery. I believe that's what the whole cause of that, that
defective battery.
- LASKEY
- Well, good.
- SORIANO
- And, well, in answer to all these things we just-- I asked you these
questions purposely to clarify and to elucidate a bit on my thinking
about the subject. First of all, you see, I will ask you another
interesting question. And then we'll come back to the subject of
architecture and the arts. A human being, just a human being, you're
born a person. Now, do you call that a clear statement of nature? You're
born already; you can see beautifully as a human being.
- LASKEY
- Is that a clear statement of nature?
- SORIANO
- That's what I'm saying. Is that a clear statement of nature? In other
words, this was-- This conception and the resultant of the union of two
species, two individuals, they produce-- They procreate another
individual of themselves. Now, would you call that a clear statement? In
other words, it's understandable, intelligible to everybody else who
will see that baby.
- LASKEY
- That the baby exists? Yeah.
- SORIANO
- I mean, naturally they exist because they're crying and moving their
legs; we know it exists. But in other words, everybody understands it's
a baby. That's something that's happened, isn't it? Okay. Now, if you
take painting right away-- You start painting his face, making his
eyelashes with rouge, and blue, whatever you want; the mother's decided
to have a little fanciful thing. Would that clarify the individual? Or
will it complicate the individual?
- LASKEY
- I don't know.
- SORIANO
- What do you mean you don't know?
- LASKEY
- I mean, if it doesn't —
- SORIANO
- Well, no, no, no. We know very well when we see a baby, it's a baby.
- LASKEY
- Yeah. If I see a baby with paint on its face, it's still a baby. It's
just got paint on its face.
- SORIANO
- But then, what else do you ask in your mind when you see all of a sudden
he's been painted with rouge and black eyelashes with mascara and blue,
you know. What would you — come to your mind?
- LASKEY
- I don't know.
- SORIANO
- You mean you wouldn't ask anything? A brand new baby. I'm talking about
a little infant, just first born, beautifully.
- LASKEY
- What are you saying?
- SORIANO
- Well, I'm asking you, what will come to your mind when you see a baby
all of a sudden that ' s been painted with all this makeup?
- LASKEY
- Well, I think what you want me to say is why would- -
- SORIANO
- No, no, no, no, no, no.
- LASKEY
- — they do that, is what you're getting at.
- SORIANO
- No .
- LASKEY
- But the thing is, I don't know why they would do it. There may be a
reason for it.
- SORIANO
- No.
- LASKEY
- It may be, it would depend on what the situation was that I can't know.
- SORIANO
- No. I didn't ask you that at all. I didn't ask you to say anything. I'm
asking your reaction —
- LASKEY
- I have no idea what my reaction would be because it would depend on the
situation that I was in when I saw it.
- SORIANO
- Oh, I see.
- LASKEY
- You see?
- SORIANO
- In other words, suppose you just happen to be there .
- LASKEY
- Be where?
- SORIANO
- Where the child is. All of a sudden you saw this infant, painted with
rouge and the lipstick, big lipstick, and blue paint. What will come to
your mind? Let's put it that way. Nothing?
- LASKEY
- I just can't imagine it, is what it is, because I just, you know —
- SORIANO
- Because they don't do that to the babies, do they?
- LASKEY
- Not babies that I know. There may be societies that do. So —
- SORIANO
- All right, if you haven't seen other ways-- Suppose you have seen one
like that. Something will come to your mind to ask, "Why did they do
that?" And the very fact that you asked the question, "Why did they do
that?"-- It shows very well there is something weird or something
queer--any word that you want to use — you keep asking, "I wonder why
was that done?" Yeah. It had nothing to do with the baby, of course, all
this rouge, lipstick, anymore than the lipstick that you girls put on
the face. Even bring it down to you girls. If you put lipstick, and you
put on the mascara, does that give you any kind of environmental clarity
to you?
- LASKEY
- It makes — It can make you feel good. It--
- SORIANO
- Personally.
- LASKEY
- Personally it can, if it's done right. It improves your opinion of
yourself or how you look. It — Yeah, it does something to you.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, naturally, because you girls have been brainwashed to put on all
that stuff. It's correct?
- LASKEY
- It does something to men, too, I mean--
- SORIANO
- No, to me it doesn't. Actually, now, this is a big generalization we
think. But to me, actually. It repels me. I see you don't have any
lipstick; you don't have anything on your face. That means you have
certain ideas that the fact — What do you need that for? Here I am, an
individual, you have a lovely face, and that's it. Why do you need to
put all this junk on? Some people think they need it, yes? Correct?
- LASKEY
- But it makes them feel better when they do it.
- SORIANO
- That's correct for them. I don't deny anybody to do anything they like
to do themselves, for themselves. Now, as a human being, as a creative
person, if you do something for public consumption, don't you think
that's a very serious thing to consider? If you paint, or if you do
something that doesn't belong there, it will be quite questionable. And
you have to be very careful and see, to ask the question, "What am I
doing with this? Why am I doing this?" The same thing as I brought the
baby. That it will be the question that anybody who will see this paint
will say, "I wonder — " After you leave that, you're not going to insult
the mother or father and say, "I wonder why did they do that to that
poor baby?" That will be a question I would ask. And I'm sure you would,
and many people would. You see, again, this is the danger. We have been
so contaminated with this behavioral pattern of doing anything
laissez-faire, doing anything I like for likes and dislikes, for
aesthetics, for beauty in your concept. That never communicates. This is
my theory, that these artificially applied things never communicate
anything. And it is done by some individuals who thought like Madison
Avenue, Hollywood, to sell you all this fantastic billions of dollars of
cosmetics. They keep advertising all the time to make you look like a
young fifteen-year-old-girl by putting on all this lipstick. And you
find many ladies at the age of seventy putting all this pancake makeup,
and then they don't realize when they go out in the sun you see the
creases in their faces, even much more magnified with the pancake. You
see, they don't see it, but in the mirror, they put that thinking that
that is beautiful. That's fine for them. I don't say. But they have been
brainwashed, you see. And this is what I'm saying. Now, coming back to
architecture, I asked the question, "Is architecture and painting and
sculpture the same thing?" Or are they really part of the same species,
anymore than the paint and the rouge and the lipstick that you put on a
baby? Or is it an artificiality imposed on the baby? And the same thing,
I will ask the question of this painting and sculpture as an
artificiality imposed on architecture. Now, we can elaborate this
farther. Ask the question why people painted. Go back. Let's go back to
Lascaux, Altamira caves. Yeah? Okay. Lascaux and Altamira, they used to,
society used to live in caves and how many — What was society in a cave?
How many people can live in a cave? Five thousand at the most? Ten
thousand people? At least I haven't seen a cave that long, that-- There
are not many. Now, the result would be that society was very tiny, tiny,
tiny. Now, you go to Mexico City, there's seventeen million people in
one city. It's a big cave, isn't it? Seventeen million people. What is
society there? It's a big conglomerate — isn't it?--with a tremendous
amount of complexities. Now, you cannot do today, say, in a city of
Mexico with seventeen million people, what the primitive people of fifty
thousand years ago in the caves — small related cult of the caves — what
they did there. They used to paint the caves, yes; inside, you find all
these bulls, you know —
- LASKEY
- Right, of course.
- SORIANO
- You have seen those drawings, didn't you? Did you ask the question why
did they do that? I ' m sure you have read, maybe.
- LASKEY
- Yeah.
- SORIANO
- Why did they do that? Why did they paint? And what subject was the
painting. What did they paint? I'm asking you.
- LASKEY
- Oh, I'm sorry. Well, they painted ritual, basically.
- SORIANO
- Okay, okay. Now, what did they paint? What's the subject?
- LASKEY
- Bulls. The hunting of bulls, the hunting of horses, animals, and the
importance of animals —
- SORIANO
- That's right, to their society. Could that be applicable today? Suppose
in Mexico City we keep painting bulls and horses in our buildings.
Suppose we did that. What would you think of it? As a mural. Suppose I
want to paint bulls and stuff in a building.
- LASKEY
- In a mural? It wouldn't — I mean —
- SORIANO
- I'm asking you honestly.
- LASKEY
- No, I know, and I — You know, if somebody did a mural, built a new
building and did a mural in the lobby that had bulls and horses in it,
I'd probably think it was fine.
- SORIANO
- Why would you think it was fine? Wouldn't you question it, why do they
paint?
- LASKEY
- I would have to see the mural, of course, but I think —
- SORIANO
- Well, forget this thing about the quality of it. What I'm talking about
—
- LASKEY
- But it wouldn't bother me to see a mural with bulls and horses in it.
- SORIANO
- You wouldn't question it?
- LASKEY
- No. I don't think so. I mean, if it were a bank building and--
- SORIANO
- You would accept that.
- LASKEY
- — and it was in Mexico City. They still have bull fights in Mexico City.
It's still a part of what goes on, it's part of their culture. I, no, I
wouldn't question it particularly. Now, if they went around doing
frescoes on the walls, I would think that was sort of interesting. I
don't think it would bother me, if they put horses and bulls. I don't
know. I'm trying to think of where I might question it. But I don't
think I would think too much about it. I might question the quality of
the mural.
- SORIANO
- How would you judge the quality of the mural?
- LASKEY
- Whether I liked it or not.
- SORIANO
- Oh, well, is that — ?
- LASKEY
- I mean, that's all I'm saying, is whether it's well done, yeah.
- SORIANO
- Is that how you evaluate things, by your likes and dislikes?
- LASKEY
- Some things. Painting, yes.
- SORIANO
- Do you evaluate the workings of this microphone because you like it or
you don't like it?
- LASKEY
- I evaluate the workings of that whether it works or not.
- SORIANO
- But not because you like it.
- LASKEY
- When it works, I like it; and when it doesn't work, I don't like it.
- SORIANO
- That's correct. Okay, in other words, it's a question of performance,
isn't it? Especially this tiny little thing that we're wearing, which is
a little half an inch. Even less maybe.
- LASKEY
- You see, we like these.
- SORIANO
- Well, because they work well, don't they?
- LASKEY
- If they didn't work we wouldn't like them.
- SORIANO
- That's correct.
- LASKEY
- The same way with the mural.
- SORIANO
- Okay. All right. That's good. You bring up a good point. That means it
has to work. What does it mean, that mural that works? What does that
imply?
- LASKEY
- But it goes back again, I think, whether you like it or you don't like
it, because it —
- SORIANO
- Oh, no, no, no, no.
- LASKEY
- Really, it gets back down-- You can use different terms.
- SORIANO
- We said you didn't like this because-- You say if it works, the
performance of it is the thing that makes you like it or not. And I'm
asking the question. When you see this mural of horses in a lobby, this
modern building, a skyscraper with automatic elevators with electronic
computers- -pop, pop, pop, pop — you find a whole bunch of a mural of
horses. Then you will ask, "Is it function--? Is it working? For what?
What is it doing?" Would you ask that question?
- LASKEY
- No. Because it doesn't bother me.
- SORIANO
- Okay.
- LASKEY
- And I think that's where we're different. And that's why we're
interviewing you, because you do have different ideas on this.
- SORIANO
- No question.
- LASKEY
- And I think that that's-- I think that your attitudes on this are
extremely interesting, and that's why I brought it up, why I want you to
talk about it. Because I think that, well, as I said earlier when you
asked me, I like painting, so I really would judge the mural of horses
on whether I liked it or not; whether I thought it was well done —
whatever style it was in--if I thought they were good horses, or they
were abstract horses, or what, because by definition I like murals. Now,
your feelings are much deeper about paintings and your reaction to it
would be very different from mine. And that's why I want you to talk
about your reaction to it.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, I would. That's the reason. The reason I brought this up is
because, to illustrate the further point we've been discussing all this
whole evening and the last two days--three days. That actually I think
the biggest problem in our society is because of this lack of
communication, that because we are taking this as a personal likes and
dislikes. I think this is the tragedy that has occurred in our society
today, as you were complaining, with all this decadence, isn't it? In
music and everything, you were complaining that two, three days, two
days ago with — We went over that. Now, the reason is because everybody
accepts anything, that anything goes. You know, I do my own thing, that
type of thing, okay. Now, therefore, we don't question it. And that's
why I ask you. Wouldn't you question why they have horses in that lobby?
And you said, "No, I like it." But the answer you gave me was, again,
that personal thing that everybody else does. So that means here we have
a very personal anarchism — anything goes then. Well, I like, so what?
Anybody else-- So, I like it, or somebody else says, "I don't like it."
Okay. Well, that doesn't have any significance in the total societal,
really, understanding of the issues today in the twentieth century with
the tremendous amount of knowledge we have. Consequently, you have to
question everything. If you don't question critically with a critical
eye, then you're accepting; you've become the sheep. As we said before,
most human beings are sheep. You can be swayed one way or the other.
They don't think. Therefore, you find the biggest morons that shout
loudly make billions in music, and a serious composer can't even sell
one record. He will starve to death, yes. And this is what's happening.
I think they have to be more critical and question why. I ask the
question, "Why do we do this?" And I think an architect, or any type of
endeavor, the first thing is he should ask--even if you put one line on
the drawing board — he should ask, "What am I doing with this line?"
What this line is doing. Is it a question that I like it? I like to make
a line? It has nothing to do with it. Because society doesn't give a
damn that you make one line or ten lines. What do they care? But society
cares if you are doing this line for society. Then they'll ask you, say,
"What are you doing? I ask you to design me whatever, and you're showing
one line." I said, "Well, what is this?" He'll ask you this question.
And I think this is where the problem really lies. We have to question,
we have to be very serious, and we have to be very, very critical. Yes.
And the question of aesthetics doesn't enter into it at all. As we said
even with the microphone. If it works, I like it; if it doesn't, you
don't.
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- Exactly. If it works, it's beautiful, call it that. If it doesn't work,
it's an ugly thing. Yes.
- LASKEY
- Exactly.
- SORIANO
- So this is the area really where we have the big problem, I believe.
That's why I don't think the sculpture and painting can be mixed with
architecture, because originally it started out as part of the ritual,
and they start — You go back to your renaissance then. From the cave
drawings we jump to the renaissance. All right? What did we find in the
renaissance?
- LASKEY
- The church.
- SORIANO
- All right. That's the dominant thing, isn't it?
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- You find the only buildings that were really meaningful and studied
carefully were the churches, built well. But where the people lived, all
around the churches, it's chaos, isn't it?
- LASKEY
- Well, except for the very rich. The palaces —
- SORIANO
- Forget- -
- LASKEY
- — the palazzos.
- SORIANO
- Yeah, well, palazzi were fortresses to begin with. All the palaces were
fortresses for the gangsters. Remember, the pirates were the biggest
gangsters before, and after they conquered areas, enslaved people, then
became kings and princes and dukes and counts. Therefore, they built
palaces. What were those palaces? They were fortresses, actually. They
built these fortresses, chateaux, they were fortresses. Why? To defend
themselves, their own clan, in huge acres of land. They didn't want
another gangster, another pirate, to come and conquer. Therefore, they
had these as a protective fortress. I had a woman come to me one day,
she wanted a chateau, a French chateau. And I said, "Well, are you
French, madame?" She said, "No." And I said, "Why do you want a French
chateau?" She said, "Because I like it." That's exactly the thing that
she said. You like it.
- LASKEY
- She wanted you to design her a French chateau?
- SORIANO
- A French chateau, yes. And I said, "Well, do you know — " I see you're
laughing at this, but yet you didn't laugh when you were saying to me
that you like the horses.
- LASKEY
- Well, just that it seems incongruous that--
- SORIANO
- Well, naturally.
- LASKEY
- — someone would come to Raphael Soriano for a French chateau.
- SORIANO
- Well, wouldn't that be the same incongruity somebody to say I want you
to paint a mural of horses on a brand new skyscraper with modern
equipment?
- LASKEY
- If they said it to you. They could say it to somebody else.
- SORIANO
- Wait a minute.
- LASKEY
- But now I'm talking about you in particular as doing a chateau.
- SORIANO
- I know, but I'm asking-- I'm bringing this as a philosophical thing;
this is what you're interviewing me, what about my ideas. And I'm
telling you how we are non- thinkers, how we corrupt everything with
muddling. That's what I ' m trying to bring about .
- LASKEY
- I see.
- SORIANO
- Okay. And it's just as preposterous when somebody comes and says, "I
want a mural with horses in there." Or with bulls, with impalas, or
whatever. Okay. But then, the question is the same thing, "Why?" In a
brand new building that millions of people will go up and down on
business or research, or whatever it is; not one person, you see. And
then he imposes that because he likes it. It has this nostalgia, or
whatever his idea, to commission a mural of horses, which were done
originally as ritual. Which were art, supposedly, they call it. But they
were not art; they didn't call it anything. They were ritualistic. Yeah.
This is what I've been trying to clarify, this area. And therefore all
this brings obscurantism. All these complexities. Manipulations as one
person will dictate. I like it; therefore, I want it. It's mine, I'm
paying for it. This is what this lady said. "Well, I want a chateau." I
said, "You know what a chateau is?" "Oh, I know. Don't you have a book
here? I'll show you." I said, "I know what a chateau is; you don't have
to show me." And then I said, "Well, you know, to build a thing like
that today will cost you money." "I have money. No problem with that. I
want it." And I said, "Well, do you know what a chateau is?" Again she
said, "Well, I know I like it." And I said, "Fine, but they were
fortresses, you see." She just looked at me; she didn't even know it was
a fortress — Originally they were fortresses. And then finally I
couldn't convince her, I said, "Why not have something for you, the way
you want it and that suits your needs. You give me all your
requirements, your likes and dislikes--" and to solve the problem. "No,
I like to have a French chateau, because I know what I like." Well, she
was impossible to convince. I said, "I'm sorry, madame, I don't think I
can do that because it'll be a fake, funny imitation." And I said, "I
can bamboozle you if I really wanted to make money. I can give you a
chateau; you won't even know the difference even. I can make all kinds
of sketches to tell you this is a chateau, looks like, but it won't be a
chateau, it will be nonsense, really." "And do you know any architect?"
I said, "No, madame, you open the telephone directory, I'm sure they'll
be many, many architects that will love to do it for you." And that's
it. And the door was open, I said, "Good-bye, madame." That's it. So,
where are we? Questions again. You brought something else up of style.
Do you know what a style is? What ' s a style?
- LASKEY
- Only what I said in the previous conversation.
- SORIANO
- You said a lot of things with it; you mixed very back and forth. The
great total thing of beauty you mentioned. I just might —
- LASKEY
- I didn't say that was a style.
- SORIANO
- No. No, I understand —
- LASKEY
- I was talking about the creation —
- SORIANO
- Yeah. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- — what they saw as — whether architecture included painting and
sculpture, or whether architecture should be sculptural. Which is
something that according to what you wrote, or what I read in the Paul
Heyer book [Architects on Architecture],
that you don't think that even in its structure architecture should be
sculptural.
- SORIANO
- I didn't say that.
- LASKEY
- Didn't I--?
- SORIANO
- No. I didn't say that. Even structure shouldn't be sculptural. I never
said that.
- LASKEY
- Shouldn't be sculptural.
- SORIANO
- Exactly. Now, don't misquote me, you see? Imagine, if you-- No, I'm just
—
- LASKEY
- No, that's what I thought I said.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. No, you thought I said, should be sculptural .
- LASKEY
- Shouldn't be.
- SORIANO
- Shouldn't.
- LASKEY
- Should not be sculptural.
- SORIANO
- Well, good, I hope so.
- LASKEY
- Because particularly —
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- — when you talked about [Eero] Saarinen and it's TWA terminal —
- SORIANO
- That's correct.
- LASKEY
- — and the [Solomon R. ] Guggenheim [Foundation].
- SORIANO
- Which was [sculptural]. That's correct, yeah. This is correct. This is
correct quoting me. Now. For that reason, I feel the same thing. You go
to the renaissance cathedrals, as we talked before. The public, as I
said, where people lived was chaos. Maybe you don't agree with that. I
don't know. Did you — ? You've been to Acropolis? To Athens?
- LASKEY
- No, I haven't.
- SORIANO
- You haven't been to Rome?
- LASKEY
- I've been to Rome, yes, but not to Athens.
- SORIANO
- All right, you've seen the Saint Peter's [Cathedral]? And then what else
is there around Saint Peter's? Nothing but chaos, all kinds of buildings
where people lived.
- LASKEY
- Well, I know the tenements in which the Romans lived were terrible. I
mean, they used to collapse and kill thousands regularly.
- SORIANO
- Sure, sure, sure. And in Athens, the same thing. Here you have a temple
beautifully, logically done with a lot of space on the very top. Just
down below, as you go down below Athens, what's called--just nothing but
a whole bunch of helter-skelter or pell-mell tenements.
- LASKEY
- Tenements. It's exactly what they were.
- SORIANO
- But people lived — Not a single detail or attention to these. These grew
any old way. But the temples, ritualistically, were okay.
- LASKEY
- And the villas.
- SORIANO
- That's right. And then, sculpture and painting was together there. Yeah.
Now, let's get it further down. Where the people lived there was no
sculpture, no painting. They were barely interested in living and having
enough water to run, which they didn't have.
- LASKEY
- Would the tenements in which they were living, would you call that
architecture?
- SORIANO
- Would I?
- LASKEY
- Yes.
- SORIANO
- To me, what is today architecture is not. I wouldn't call it that. They
were simply happenstance due to several variety of things, for people to
live.
- LASKEY
- Do you think that architecture is something that needs to be designed- -
- SORIANO
- Absolutely- -
- LASKEY
- — to be architecture?
- SORIANO
- It should be done, certainly. Today we do it, especially today. We are
past the stage of the- -what do you call that? — the pioneer stage, when
we went through the Wild West, chop any tree and build your own shack
any old way. We have passed that stage already. In fact, I wrote that in
one of that book I read to you from there. You'll see. The stage is
gone. We've finished that. And yet some people are still doing the same
thing: chop trees, building them the way the pioneers did with log
cabins.
- LASKEY
- Log cabins.
- SORIANO
- Okay. Now, many people still love this style. "Oh, I love log cabins. I
love English renaissance or Chippendale — " You name it. All these
names. Adjectives are concocted nonsense; they don't mean anything,
yeah. But they make good sounding words for some artificial people to
discuss in an evening. "Oh, yes, but I, I appreciate this impressionism,
I appreciate the dadaist. Oh no, the dadaist is for that. Oh, no, oh,
no, no, no. 352 no." They keep on-- It's a nice conversation piece to
say nothing. Trivia conversation for an evening. And that's what occurs
all the time. And I remember I lectured once at San Bernardino, to the
museum there. One of the curators to the museum there, a lady, who was
there, and I was taking one of the professors and the classes. And she
was trying to, all of a sudden, to show us certain things, to tell us
certain things about a piece of sculpture that was exhibited — a huge
mess of nonsense that some young man did. And she was trying to give us
as if we were housewives that came in Thursday afternoon to get a little
culture, we're going to the museum. And she was saying-- even trying to
speak French — "Well, I'm passed-- Well, there were the impressionists,
and the Dadaists, and there were the exhibitions of the les refusees." She said refusees. Now, if she
knew French, wanted to be French, she could have said refusees, not refusees — such a thing. And
then finally — she kept on talking, ruminating all these Frenchy words —
and finally some student asked, "Well, I don't understand what you're
telling us." I said, "What does that mean?" "Well . . .," then she kept
on in the renaissance- -puta, puta, puta, puta, puta — Excuse me, I have
to go somewhere, pardon. [tape recorder off] So then I'll go back to the
renaissance, the building in the Saint Peter's, let's say, a good
example. And you find the subject matter of the painting and the
frescoes in the cathedral, isn't it? What's the subject matter there,
inside of the Saint Peter's?
- LASKEY
- In Saint Peter's? Religious.
- SORIANO
- All these murals.
- LASKEY
- Religious.
- SORIANO
- Exactly.
- LASKEY
- Of saints and —
- SORIANO
- That's right. That's the society at the time of the renaissance for the
people who did it, commissioned it. And this was part of the commission
that requested, and therefore, they mix painting. Because in those days
they didn't have newspapers, they didn't have television, they didn't
have any of that propaganda machine. And I call this purely propaganda
poster; that's what they were. I'm not talking about the dexterity of
Michelangelo, whoever, all this, that they knew how to draw. This is
fine, this is lovely. I admire the dexterity. But, the subject matter
interests me. What is it? Religious murals telling me all these fairy
tales, contrived by somebody, a couple of artists. Isn't it? Few
artists, whatever they were. They were painting the things from the
Bible.
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- What's the Bible? A lot of fairy tales. Unfortunately, many people don't
believe that. But they were concocted stories, yes? And you know very
well without industry today, without scientific knowledge, with the
validation we have and going into space, we know very well the world
wasn't created in seven days, or six days-- whatever it is — and the
last day God rested. We know this is a nice little story, yes? If you
want to believe that, go ahead; but we know very well the world is more
complex than that. Don't you think so?
- LASKEY
- Oh, yes, of course.
- SORIANO
- Okay. So therefore, you don't accept. Yet those things are painted in
the murals. They're telling you all of that. Yes. The Michelangelo with
a man floating there in clouds says God creating the universe, or so God
creating the sun and the moon. Now, even when you look at that, when
they tell you that story, a thinking person will say, "What is that?
What is he telling me? Do I have to look at this anymore? Do I have to
read it?" Suppose you read that. You will say, "Oh, bush." Literally has
nothing to do with it. The story is, literally, you throw it away,
anymore than these funnies in the newspaper. Some people write this
stuff in the funnies which are literally "Why is there nonsense--"
They're not good English to begin with. And from a semblance of art or
drawing is also equal to zero. The third one, the philosophy, is equally
as nonsensical platitudes, isn't it? To me they are. Whatever I have
seen. And so, the result is we are here brainwashed with all these
things, and we make them sanctified; you can't even question that. So,
therefore, it comes to us now as the thing to do. The cathedrals or the
buildings must have painting, must have sculpture, because they did in
the past to make these propaganda posters. And I question that. I say
today we don't need that; today we have a tremendous amount of
knowledge. That is our era. This lovely little microphone is your era.
This lovely tape recorder with our voices-- We can do anything we want
with this, and this is the era. Our travels. You came here on a plane,
didn't you? How beautiful, you know? In less than an hour you came here,
from Los Angeles.
- LASKEY
- Right.
- SORIANO
- Yes. Imagine if you had to take a horse and buggy how many--
- LASKEY
- Days .
- SORIANO
- It would have taken two or three days. Yes.
1.12. TAPE NUMBER: VI, SIDE TWO (JULY 21, 1985)
- SORIANO
- And, where was I? Oh, yes, I was telling you about the horse and buggy.
The interesting — One of the students at Miami University once was
lamenting at all this mechanization, all this technology, and all that
and all that and all that. I said to her, "What are you afraid of it?
It's a question of misuse or you use it properly, isn't it?" And she
said, "Well, I still don't like it." And I said, "Well, that's all
right. This is your privilege. I'm not questioning." But I said, "How
did you come here to school?" "What do you mean?" I said, "What did you
do? What transportation do you use?" "Oh, I came, I have my car,
automobile." I said, "Really." And I said, "Why didn't you use a horse
and buggy?" Yeah. That hit home, really. And I said, "Do you cook? Do
you have an apartment?" She said, "Yes." I said, "Do you have the
facilities for cooking? Yes? What kind?" "I have an electric stove." I
said, "Oh, no. It's best to make fire outside and bring it in and cook
it with — " "Oh," she said, "well, I like that, too, when I do barbecues
. " I said, "Well, that's not what I asked you. That's a different
question again, another." I said, "You are complaining about all this
industrialization, all this mechanical things, disastrous, and yet
you're using all of that, which helps you. This is our society. We have
to progress. We cannot regress or stay in the same area. This is why we
have to think, even in architecture, too. We have to check and evaluate.
We discard things that don't serve anymore. Certainly. And that's what
we haven't done in architecture." I said, "Once we are--looks like we
are in a house full of garbage in the backyard, we'll never have emptied
that garbage. It's been accumulating for years and years and years and
years, until it stinks to high heaven, " as they say. Yeah. Now, what
other question you have?
- LASKEY
- What would you do with architecture if you--? If you were putting
together an architectural school today, what would you teach?
- SORIANO
- Oh, that's a very deep question. The fact is, I would simply not teach
any art, number one, or any kind of art will be absolutely taboo. I will
make them think first of all.
- LASKEY
- Now, when you say no art, you're not talking about drawing, that is,
drafting —
- SORIANO
- That's entirely different. That's technological drafting. You say it's
like taking shorthand and using a pen and plume. That's got nothing to
do with architecture.
- LASKEY
- Okay.
- SORIANO
- You have to indicate, you have to present things. Writing a score, like
music, you write a music, you write score. Or you can write some other
ways. This is purely a medium to be able to communicate or translate the
thought to be audible or listenable or visually viable. That's something
else. It's a technique. It's nothing to do with what we're talking
about. The teaching- - Meaning you have to make the students to think,
first of all. They have to use their brains. You have to direct them in
areas. What does that mean? What is thinking? What's knowledge? We have
to clarify all these things. Then we bring it down to architecture
eventually, all of these things properly. And to analyze all these
things whether what we discussed before about thinking of the process of
inventiveness, which is the creative aspects. And find out whether these
were really inventive things, or were they ruminating things, you see.
So therefore, I will eliminate all this. I will not teach any such
things. I will concentrate on scientific thinking a great deal, sciences
that will encourage it, really, because that's what brings us knowledge.
We learn more about us and the universe by teaching sciences. Yes. And
the arts are purely a mythological thing. Unless you want to be a
medicine man, go ahead and study, but don't come to the school of
architecture such as I will make. And then we begin to really work in
the areas of great, great thinking, and advancing of thought, and really
evaluating what are we talking about with all this. When we say
environmental design, or the environment, or a building, what is this?
To really in depth to pursue this, to find out, what are we talking
about? Is it all this silly self-expression of all kinds of little arty
work? Or is it something else? Yes. Same thing as when you are making a
shoe. It cannot be a little pie. Or it cannot be a bracelet. A shoe's a
shoe. That means it has to serve. Doesn't it? Has to fit your foot. You
have to measure it; it has to fit certain, wherever it will go, and we
have these sizes and all that for that reason. As a matter of fact, this
brings me back to the word art- -artisan. You know what the artisan, the
etymology of art? Artisans. Your daughter who studies French, she should
know that. You ask her if she knows what an artisan is. It is the doers.
The bread maker was an artisan, yes. The candle maker was an artisan.
The shoemaker was an artisan. The tailor was an artisan. The peasant who
tilled the soil was an artisan. These were all doers, yes. And in doing,
they have to do something that performs, like this little microphone.
The people who design these microphones — there was one brain, or
because this is very complex now. Now we come to a realm of many
scientists that feel great dedication and application to the scientific
facts; validate knowledge to make this tiny, tiny little microphone-
-which is so beautiful — to work, yeah, yeah. So that's an artisan. And
therefore, after that, some of the people who devise those definitions
of impressionism and da-da-da-da-da, they're babblers, jugglers of words
who know nothing, have degenerated this into art, artist. That's it.
That's the big tragedy of our lives, is this contaminant called art. And
this is what architecture is suffering about. It has nothing to do with
architecture or solving a problem. Whether it's designing a microphone,
building a city, or designing a building, or a design on a matchbox.
It's all the same process- -the process of evaluating, validating, and
doing things for performance, period, that does the thing well. Then,
it's an accomplishment, yeah.
- LASKEY
- Should architecture be permanent?
- SORIANO
- I don't know what permanence is. What is permanent?
- LASKEY
- Do you build monuments for the future, or do you--?
- SORIANO
- What is monument? What do you mean by monument?
- LASKEY
- The Acropolis is a monument. Saint Peter's is a monument .
- SORIANO
- Yeah, but they taught that as monuments. It was nothing but structures
to house certain things; some people later on called it monuments. There
are also monuments in the cemetery, aren't there? Don't they call that
monuments?
- LASKEY
- They're built to last.
- SORIANO
- Well, not in the cemetery.
- LASKEY
- Well, those monuments are built to last, too. They're meant to mark the
graves for a long time.
- SORIANO
- Well, I know. They eventually are all destroyed by the-- Time destroys
everything. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- But I did wonder if you see a constant use of the materials at hand, and
the studying of the technology to incorporate all the newest
technologies into architecture, if you see buildings as temporary. If
you, in other words, do you see a structure as a functional--you're
serving a functional need, you build an office building to house a
certain kind of office. Well, chances are that office, that business is
going to change over a period of years. Would you see--? Do you build
into your buildings an obsolescence? Do you build them for the time, for
the need, with the idea that they will be taken apart, or dismantled, or
something happens to them in the future? Or do you build them with the
idea that they will be there two hundred years from now? Because that's
sort of the feature theory .
- SORIANO
- No, no. This question, the question is a very big question. [tape
recorder off] Now they interrupted my train of thought.
- LASKEY
- We were talking about whether buildings should be built—
- SORIANO
- Permanently —
- LASKEY
- --to last.
- SORIANO
- — yeah, yeah. That I don't know. It doesn't even enter into my mind. But
it does enter into my mind that when I do something, that thing should
perform well. And it should last, naturally. Because a person who
commissions you to design a house or a building, doesn't make any
difference. It requires to be done in the best way possible according to
the budget, use certain materials, naturally. That dictates the type of
materials that you use. And if you want, if you have a lot of money, you
can build them of gold. Gold will not tarnish, will stay there. Now,
platinum, or some space materials which last forever, yes, you can do
that, but depending on all of the budget, depending on the requirements
of the client. Therefore, the materials you use are accordingly. Whether
they last three hundred, two hundred, one hundred, I don't know, this
depending on many, many factors. There is pollution today, in the
atmosphere, with all these acidic and chemical things which destroy and
eat some of the materials. So the idea is to do the best you can with
what you have with your requirements. And according to the monies,
because it always enters into this. The first question a client asks you
is, "How much is it going to cost?" It's the first question you hear.
"How much is it going to be?" How much I can afford. That's how much I
have. Therefore, you do the best you can to devise what materials you
can use. You can eliminate some materials which are extremely expensive,
but there is a very limited budget, naturally. And inexpensive, meaning
that sometimes these materials will last a long, long, long time, will
not require any upkeep. And sometimes you give them materials that they
want to have a house that they will live maybe forty, fifty years in the
house, or more. And most, even those jerry-built houses live for a
couple hundred years. So, that's the scenario.
- LASKEY
- But you don't-- You don't have as part of your theories or thinking on
architecture a real notion that there is a limit, that building should
only function for a limited time.
- SORIANO
- No. No, never. In fact, you do the best you can and hope it will last
for three centuries or more. It will stay there forever. But then, I
don't know, sometimes depending on a lot of elements which destroy it.
Yeah. I never, no, this never enters me as monument--to build monuments
and all that. That's not for me. Monuments are the same thing as
museums. They are places of internment, burial places. This is not the
area of architecture, I don't think so.
- LASKEY
- You've been concerned with low-cost housing for most of your
architectural life. Does that have any relation to your political
philosophy where you've been involved with concerned people?
- SORIANO
- No. No, nothing to do with politics. What's politics? What ' s my
political philosophy? What ' s your political philosophy, since you ask
me that question?
- LASKEY
- Well, you've talked about politics off and on in--
- SORIANO
- Yeah, politicians I talk about them, you know, it's true. But I don't
have any political philosophy as an architect. No, that doesn't enter
into my mind. Even in the housing, because I am interested in the public
to live well. And I'm sure Mr. [Richard J.] Neutra was concerned. All
the really top architects were concerned to do really better things for
the people to live in. And I think for the first time in our history,
because I will say to you Neutra-- I complimented Neutra so much because
he did so many things. Because he was one of the first, actually, who
really gave attention to housing for the public.
- LASKEY
- Well, it is interesting that — Was it in the fifties--the forties or the
fifties--that there was an explosion of architects concerned about
public housing when the public housing program were developed in Los
Angeles — but I think they developed across the country. And that I-- It
was suddenly a consciousness of what I would call a political
consciousness, that doesn't seemed to have happened before or have
happened since.
- SORIANO
- No.
- LASKEY
- And I was curious as to what happened then. Why that sort of upwelling
of public consciousness developed with architecture at that time.
- SORIANO
- I don't think so. I don't think this at that time, 1950, was any public
conscience. Those are the people who jumped in the bandwagon like they
jumped in the bandwagon of all the politicalisms or all these cults.
Yeah, these are the type of people. No, no. You have to go way, way, way
before the — in the twenties and the thirties, what some architects were
thinking about planning properly for the public so they can have better
housing. And not only just in planning, has nothing to do with politics.
Has to do with really the concern of the integrity of the individual,
concern for the well-being of a human being when it does something that
they think will serve them well. And then he went further to say, "Why
not plan in totality so the community could live better?" These things
came forth, I think, in the early thirties, yeah. Even in the twenties
about that. They were people- -
- LASKEY
- Well, the Bauhaus, I think the people —
- SORIANO
- No, Bauhaus, nonsense. Well, that's a talk afterwards. The Bauhaus was
another nonsense. They were another one, contaminated cultists. That's
another story. But actually, architects were concerned. Some of the very
important architects were very much concerned in giving proper planning
and proper housing with proper environment for society. And they were
interested in that. And not only the planning of totality or groups of
communities, but the buildings themselves were equally as intelligently
planned, you see. And not like the Levittowns. Levittown is also another
mess.
- LASKEY
- Planned community.
- SORIANO
- Planned community. Yes. Big words. What does that mean? Nothing. There
were the biggest slums of junkyard by some incompetent, ignorant human
beings. Like [William] Zeckendorf, like [Joseph] Eichler and the rest of
them, thinking they were accomplishing something. All they were
interested in was making money. Nothing to do with planning anything.
They were not interested in that. Because that's why they left all these
messes. Isn't it? Levittown, is that a planned community?
- LASKEY
- I think it was designed as a planned- -one of the first of the major —
- SORIANO
- Well—
- LASKEY
- --sort of middle —
- SORIANO
- --it wasn't really, was just-- To me it was nothing but another big
slum, only it was made with playgrounds. Apparently, to make it more
palatable, sugarcoated with a little bit of planning, yes. Because they
gave them a little shopping center here, or a little facility there.
That's not what I call. Now, Mr. Neutra and his Rush City Reformed,
which he called it. And even Le Corbusier when he made this La Ville
Radieuse. So he had very wonderful concepts, and they were planned
properly. Not just this kind of little communities done by Zackendorf or
by Eichler, all the rest of them. All this is rubbish. These are cults.
Nothing to do with planning. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Well, you were appointed to the state board [California State Board of
Architectural Examiners] , state architectural board by Jerry [Edmund
G.] Brown [Jr.], and you're still on the board.
- SORIANO
- Yes.
- LASKEY
- Right. How do you feel about the state's attitude toward architecture?
- SORIANO
- It was a mess. They made misconceptions. I think Jerry Brown was wrong
in his conceptual affair of what the board should be, because-- I think
he hated professionalism; he thought the professionals will tend to
protect themselves rather than protect the public. Therefore, he
appointed, he denigrated the board-- We have only three member
architects on the board, three architects, and six public members which
are non- architects, who know nothing about architecture.
- LASKEY
- What was the — ? What is the function of the board? What are you
supposed to do?
- SORIANO
- Well, they just simply check on the candidates who come to be licensed
as architects. They check, they give examinations. And then they check
also for violators; those who don't have a license. They bring him to
court, you know. We give them penalties or they revoke his license. I
mean, again, this is a sideline. As far as I'm concerned, they're a
waste of time for that. They should really involve themselves in the
quality of it, bringing forth fine architects. And to see to it that the
qualifications of other universities should work together to develop
better programs, better education to bring really architects. But they
don't do that. The whole thing is just a farce. It has become nothing
but a political manipulation by all these legal entanglements with all
the public members. Since they have no knowledge of architecture,
they're involved with all this political rubbish. Yeah. They make
nothing but fights and fights and fights between the different boards,
and it has become a big comedy, really. A soap opera. Yeah. I think it's
a tragic thing. And I think Jerry Brown made a big miscalculation in his
thinking. And he was trying to do the same for the doctors, and the
doctors didn't let him. But the architects did. The architects were
very, very subservient, apparently thinking that they will get jobs from
the state, you see. Then they didn't want to antagonize the governor,
therefore, they acceded to all these things. And the result is it's a
big mess now. Once they pass the laws they become part of the statutes.
Therefore, to undo that it will take another eight years, ten years with
new membership, with new fights, new resolutions, to get new members,
new thinking; they have been fighting towards that. It's almost like a
hopeless case. You have no idea the waste of time.
- LASKEY
- Have you made any progress? Do you feel like you've made some progress.
- SORIANO
- Yes, I made a little progress. I think I read to you a little letter on
that, didn't I?
- LASKEY
- Yes.
- SORIANO
- Of what the — How they are aggrieved, even nationally, from Washington,
D.C. And I've been hollering about this for the last two and a half
years I've been on the board. Yeah. And, of course, they think I'm too
severe, I'm too critical, and all that; that I don't understand the
legalities. Yeah, of course, I don't understand the legalities that they
fostered in order to protect themselves, their politicization, you see?
They just play ball with each other to protect their lack of knowledge
by hiding behind the agendas in all this verbiage of politics and
meaningless words. It's a pity because the society loses, and it was
supposed to protect the health, welfare, and safety of the public. It's
supposed to be the protectors of that, yeah. And the board is like the
Supreme Court. If there is a grievance between architects and clients,
then eventually they have to come to the board to adjudicate what has
occurred. And, it's a mess, really.
- LASKEY
- Well, if you move down to Southern California again when you have to
leave here, will you stay on the board?
- SORIANO
- Oh, of course, nothing to do-- The appointment has nothing to do with
where I am.
- LASKEY
- I just-- I assumed that you met in Sacramento; that may be wrong.
- SORIANO
- We meet all over.
- LASKEY
- Oh, you meet all over, oh, okay.
- SORIANO
- Sacramento, Los Angeles, we go all over. San Francisco, San Bernardino,
San Diego. We meet in all regions to accommodate everybody, all the
regions. And we give the exams in different areas, too.
- LASKEY
- You actually oversee the exams? Or do you--?
- SORIANO
- Yeah, we have-- No, the board itself does not, is not supposed to be
involved in that. We have proctors, we have examiners, but we oversee
the whole thing, that it is done properly and not to have any problems.
If they do have problems, they come to us. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Do you think the exam is fair?
- SORIANO
- The exam is as fair as the people who write them. And that doesn't say
much because there's a lot of ignorant unhatched eggs — I will repeat
that again — who are graduated from our universities, which is a very
dangerous state of affairs. Hideous. And therefore, they-- It becomes a
serious matter, really. Because they are the ones who — Ignorant people
write those exams, which are ignorant exams, and then these people who
examine are also equally as ignorant. They don't even know what it's all
about. They have become sort of a personal subjective nonsense. And
that's not the way. And especially architecture is a very, very ticklish
thing due to the fact that there's a great deal of this subjectivity
that enters into design, you know. But yet, above that there is a
transcendental, a very good objectivity that should occur, really, in
knowledge and science. But most architects don't practice that way. They
like to make it very subjective, as if they were artists, you see; that
again, I'll bring that. That's the biggest disease they have. Our
universities are contaminated with that.
- LASKEY
- Is that reflected in the exam?
- SORIANO
- Sure. Sure. Yeah, those who even evaluate the candidates' examination,
you should see the words they use. I've been taking issue with all of
it. Yeah. They talk a lot of nonsense.
- LASKEY
- Getting back to the question of if you were to open a school and
formulate a curriculum, would you include architectural history in the
school of architecture?
- SORIANO
- You could. You could, but then possibly as a reference, I would say. Go
to reference school, but don't make a big case. Because history doesn't
teach you anything, really. And then besides, what is history? Who
writes history? Whoever writes has his own input there. It has nothing
to do with the real facts, really. History's something of the past. I
think the future we don't give a damn because we don't know. The future
will have its own requirements, its own qualities, its own advancements,
its own knowledge. It's the present that counts. The future, you can
understand the future, and don't copy it or imitate it or perform with
the future. That doesn't make sense. Today. Today we have tremendous top
men that are questioning today's knowledge; that's the important thing.
And don't be the messiah that you're going to do for the future. You're
going to-- You know, we are to think of the future. Forget it. That's
presumptuous of you-- The future may have so many sophisticated things
that will boggle your mind. Who are you to tell what the future will be?
Even the scientists don't know. All you can do is operate today with
what we know what we have today. Then you're doing very well. And then
keep always advancing and have broad aspects, yes. You can conjecture,
you can abstract, you can postulate about the future, yes. And the past,
well, you can read about the past and you'll be ruminating. You're
taking a lot of junk said by a lot of people that may or may not be.
They may be fairy tales. I have a dear friend of mine, David Daub, used
to be a regents professor at Oxford University. And he used to officiate
at Passover. Sometimes he used to come in from England, used to give a
little stance of sort of a Passover, you know, the Jewish holiday of the
Pesach. And he was a scholar of Roman and Greek law. And he used to tell
exactly the ceremony the way the Jews would practice it. In other words,
they used to use matzohs. And they used to hide a little piece of leg of
lamb, or a little bone, or a piece of little bread, hide it for other
people to come, whatever the rich one was. And a lot of other ceremonial
things within that thing there. And then he used to come and tell you
this whole thing came from the Greek mythology. It has nothing to do
with the Jews.
- LASKEY
- Really?
- SORIANO
- And he used to give a lot of interesting data on the fact that all of
these things go back to the mythology of Greece. And with every new
generation, every rabbi added his own little fairy tale, little story to
it. Therefore, you have what you have today. You see? And this is very
interesting, isn't it? I mean, those who think have thought of that, and
now come up with these ideas. Sure. And even the fact that they have — I
questioned some people writing about Chanukah — You know Chanukah?
- LASKEY
- Yes.
- SORIANO
- The holiday? How do you write Chanukah?
- LASKEY
- I don't know. Sometimes I've seen it spelled with ch—
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- --and sometimes just with an h.
- SORIANO
- That's correct.
- LASKEY
- So I ' m not sure .
- SORIANO
- Now, what do you — What do you think? Well, you would think now
Ha-nu-ka. How do you pronounce that and how do you write it, Chanukah?
Haiku. How do you write haiku? Ch?
- LASKEY
- H-A-I —
- SORIANO
- That's right, h, yeah?
- LASKEY
- --K-U. Well, but the — I think, I don't know Hebrew, but I think the ch
—
- SORIANO
- Yeah?
- LASKEY
- — sound in Hebrew is like a chhh.
- SORIANO
- Well, chhh is "chaih. " It's not "haa, " is it?
- LASKEY
- No, it's a "chhh."
- SORIANO
- Okay, now do you know why the ch is done?
- LASKEY
- No .
- SORIANO
- Who did it? Some young punks. I took issue with a couple of young rabbis
— Christmas. How's Christmas come to be ch, isn't it? Okay. They want it
to be sort of related to the modern Christianity, possibly. Chanukah,
ch, think in relating to that kind of celebration as it is. Yes. I had
this discussion with a couple of young rabbis. And I said, "Are you
crazy?" I said, "This is silly." Well, they thought it was part of the
same ritual; after all, you know, Christ was a Jew, too. Christos, you
know?
- LASKEY
- Oh, I know.
- SORIANO
- And, but the point is that it's Chanukah, which is silly. And I know I
wrote the one rabbi that, and you know, he changed it the next time. He
wrote it with an h. Yeah. And they keep ruminating without thinking.
Some write it, they should know better. Because the ha-nu-ka, it's
"haa." It's not Chanukah. No. Charles, ch, isn't it? Yes.
- LASKEY
- But what is the ch in Italian?
- SORIANO
- Ch —
- LASKEY
- It's a c.
- SORIANO
- No. "Ciao." "Ciao" is c-i.
- LASKEY
- Yeah, it's c-i,--
- SORIANO
- Yeah.
- LASKEY
- But I think ch —
- SORIANO
- "Ca."
- LASKEY
- --is not a "tsh."
- SORIANO
- "Tsh," no.
- LASKEY
- It's a "k."
- SORIANO
- No, but it's different, different. It's not —
- LASKEY
- And so I assume that the--
- SORIANO
- No.
- LASKEY
- Hebrew, it was the same thing- -
- SORIANO
- Never, never, never.
- LASKEY
- --the ch was an h sound.
- SORIANO
- The h sound is "haa." Yeah. And that's the whole thing, that people don't
think. They'll use that, they'll ruminate that again, and it keeps
propagating. All of a sudden you find it becomes an accomplished fact.
And then you'll see, as you say, you saw it written twice-- Two
different types. Sure.
- LASKEY
- And are you saying then that the h is the proper way —
- SORIANO
- The h is the proper way —
- LASKEY
- And the ch is a corruption.
- SORIANO
- — is a corruption with the young so-called non-thinkers. Yeah, it was
some kind of a-- Well, anyway, that's a lot of people who don't think.
Especially since the fifties, we have had a lot of those beatniks with
beards — Let me put a little grease on that chair because it bothers me.
Once, yeah.
- LASKEY
- Do you think from what you were saying about Chanukah, then, that this
is the problem, one of the problems, related to the teaching of history?
That subjective ideas become collective ideas, they get incorporated,
and then get passed along as fact?
- SORIANO
- That's correct. That's exactly it. And then many of them are corrupt
untruths. They become like little stories, little fairy tales. And then
they become an accomplished fact. And most people don't even bother to
check the sources. They keep using them, they read some words and they
think, "Well, yeah, I bet that guy studied that and it validated that, "
you see? And then he takes it and uses it. And they teach that in the
universities by reading a book that somebody wrote about architecture,
yeah. And they write whatever according to what this sort of person
wrote. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- Well, if you taught architectural history and you did it through
pictures, do you think that would be corrupting?
- SORIANO
- No, if you can illustrate. If you can illustrate the pictures and show
why, show the reasons they were there, as we were discussing here-- When
I give lectures I illustrate these very same points very extensively.
And they begin to realize that. Yeah. Yes.
- LASKEY
- We haven't touched at all — and this will be one of the final things
we'll probably discuss--but we haven't touched at all on the subject of
vernacular architectures and--
- SORIANO
- What's that? What's that?
- LASKEY
- Well, native things like igloos, or tree houses. Could a modernist--?
Would you recommend that someone like yourself, a modernist, would study
what people, indigenous people did as a means of simplifying even
further the ideas of architecture, or incorporating these ideas? Or
would you throw them out and deal strictly with technology?
- SORIANO
- No, the question is a very good one actually. I don't think really that
the question of studying igloos, studying tree houses-- Tree houses are,
to me they are playthings of kids, isn't it? And the apes do that, they
build their own. And it's not a house; they just bend some branches to
make a place where they can lie down and sleep. And they don't build
shelters. Tree houses are done with children to play; something else we
don't bother with that. Igloos are differently. Teepees by some of the
primitive Indians, yes. You can study that; some knowledge that comes
from there, yes. I don't deny that one bit. I accept that, all the time.
In fact, it's good to study this, and if there's anything you can learn
from it, you take them; that's perfect. And if there is something that
doesn't give you, there's not enough substance, then you throw them away
in this. Not everything that the primitives did is admirable. There are
some things that are excellent. Same thing, as the Japanese people say,
"Oh, the Japanese house is superb." But it's a lot of nonsense. Not all,
the whole house is not superb, because there are a lot of things in that
house which are just as full of mythology as any place else. Yes.
- LASKEY
- The Japanese house?
- SORIANO
- Yes. Some things are very lovely, yes. Some of these- -the way the
sliding doors and all these things that they made — is a wonderful
thing. And then the tatamis, the modular way of sitting with the little
tatamis, those are wonderful. You can learn from these. But there are a
lot of other things which you cannot take in totality. I've lectured and
taught there — They know me very well over there. And I know them quite
well, too. I discussed some points. Not all of them are good. Some are
intelligent. It depends. The human being is a very interesting species.
I don't care if it's Japanese or Chihuahuan. It doesn't matter. The
brain is a very beautiful thing of a human being. Nature has blessed us
with that particular instrument which is absolutely superb. It's up to
us to evaluate objectively, with great dedication to objectivity. Yes.
If we don't do that, then-- There are people who are incapable of doing
this. They don't have the instrument in their computer; the brain.
Unfortunately, nature has given each one of us a different pattern. And
some with much greater euphony than others, with some that can abstract
with great virility and big broad concepts. Others can't even think
beyond their nose. But we're not sort of denigrating anybody who's not--
doesn't have the fortune of having these faculties. On the contrary. We
accept humanity as it is with compassion. And those who dedicate
themselves with this virility of investigation and employing their
faculties to the utmost, they're admirable. I admire those people. For
that reason, those are the ones who really contribute, who bring
illumination, who bring understanding. Those are beautiful people, and
they devote their whole life to that. Instead of making money — they
don't give a damn about money--their whole beauty is to understand, they
want to know. This is what knowledge is. This is what we don't teach in
our schools. We're going to make everybody a great genius, a great
talented thing, and it's impossible to do that, you see. And this is the
tragedy. We try to equalize everything as if it is equal. But it's
impossible. Yeah.
- LASKEY
- That's an excellent point. And it is true. We don't accept failure. Or
we eliminate it.
- SORIANO
- Yeah. We — Not everybody-- I mean, we are so cold, this pseudo, these
politicians again making this a pseudo-democracy, and that everybody's
equal. But everybody's not really equal. They're all equal as human
beings, yes. They're equal to have the love of each one of us, yes, and
the compassion. In that respect they 're- - we're all equal. But from
their contributions, we're not as equal. And therefore, if you want to
make somebody who's impossible, incapable of grasping something, to make
him on an equal basis with somebody who understands this quickly — will
be a tragic mistake. Because we, first of all, we waste his time that he
could be more useful in another field. And waste the time also of the
other one who has to remain in that same class trying to explain to this
other one. And In the meantime the other one gets bored, gets upset, and
it becomes chaos. And this is exactly what we have in our educational
system. Yeah. Complete chaos. Because, the democratic thing, everybody
has to go to college, everybody has to do this. Well, not everybody is
material for college. Impossible. Yeah. College, college, college. What
is that? Nothing. Maybe it's better off if they plant trees. If they go
and cultivate the earth. It will be better. They will be more useful and
they will be happier. Instead of going to college and they don't
comprehend, they are full of stresses because they fall. What are we
doing? And you try to question that and they say, "Oh, you're an
elitist." They call you that. They call me that, yes. They call me many
other things. But I don't care, doesn't make any difference. Let them
call me. So what? Well, anyway, when are you going to come with this
document? Are you going to have another session? You said possibly two
sessions, or what? What was that? Go ahead. Are you recording?
- LASKEY
- I'm recording now.
- SORIANO
- So these tapes, the paper, the contract form, you see, to me it was
absolutely incomprehensible to present me with that right in the
beginning. They should have sent this to me before. And therefore, I
must tell you that all the statements I made here, they're my own
privileged statements, naturally. Because I'm writing a book, my
autobiography. A great deal of this will be in my book, too, you see. I
don't want the misunderstanding on that, you see. So now I send this
form you sent to me to my attorney to see what he says, and then maybe
we can communicate from there on further on that same subject. But I
want to emphasize that. Because I'm using a great deal of that in my
book, and I don't want this to be afterwards, in case this appears in my
book, "Oh, well, this is our own privilege." You know? Because--
- LASKEY
- Yeah, I--
- SORIANO
- — that's for that reason I didn't sign that document you sent to me.
It's in the hands of my attorney. And that's clear, I hope.
- LASKEY
- I hope so.
- SORIANO
- Okay. Well, very pleased to meet you and hope I will have a chance to
see you again. Give me your telephone number, both at home and so on,
okay?
- LASKEY
- I will. And —
- SORIANO
- Go ahead, say it.
- LASKEY
- It's been very —
- SORIANO
- Say it, say it.
- LASKEY
- — intense.
- SORIANO
- Say it, because I have a couple of words; go ahead. And here, I'm just
about finishing.
- LASKEY
- I just want to thank you for the last three days and for —
- SORIANO
- My pleasure.
- LASKEY
- --your graciousness and--
- SORIANO
- My pleasure.
- LASKEY
- — the interview.
- SORIANO
- You're very charming yourself. Thank you.
- LASKEY
- And I'm exhausted. [laughs] It has been intense.
- SORIANO
- What are your two telephones at home — ?
- LASKEY
- I'll give you a card with the numbers.
- SORIANO
- Okay.
- LASKEY
- Thank you again, Mr. Soriano.
- SORIANO
- Okay, my pleasure, and good wishes to you, okay?
- LASKEY
- Thank you.
- SORIANO
- Thank you.